SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC  20549

Commission file number     1-12692

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý or No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o or No ý.

As of August 15, 2005, the registrant had 1,000 shares of its Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

2

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1.  Financial Statements

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(amounts in thousands)

3

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets, Continued

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(amounts in thousands)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

MORTON’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

July 3, 2005 and July 4, 2004

1)            Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported during the period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company uses a 52/53 week fiscal year which ends on the Sunday closest to January 1. Approximately every six or seven years, a 53rd week will be added.

Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (“MRG”) was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on October 3, 1988 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morton’s Holding Company, Inc. (“MHCI”), which was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on March 10, 2004 and became the direct parent of MRG on June 4, 2004. MHCI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Morton’s Holdings, LLC (“MHLLC”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on April 4, 2002.

2)            Recent Events

During 2005, the Company received proceeds of approximately $674,000 from the sale of stock in Charlie Brown’s Acquisition Corp., an affiliate of Castle Harlan, Inc., and recorded a gain on the sale of its investment of approximately $664,000 in the consolidated statement of operations for the six month period ended July 3, 2005.

3)            Statements of Cash Flows

For the purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company paid cash interest of approximately $4,315,000 (which includes capitalized interest of approximately $108,000) and $4,811,000, and income taxes, net of refunds, of approximately $525,000 and $318,000, for the six month periods ended July 3, 2005 and July 4, 2004, respectively.

7

4)            Restricted Cash

Restricted cash of $417,000 and $548,000 as of July 3, 2005 and January 2, 2005, respectively, represents cash collateral relating to an interest rate swap agreement with Bank of America, formerly Fleet National Bank (“B of A”). See Note 6.

5)            Intangible Asset and Goodwill

The identifiable intangible asset acquired represents the Company’s trade name “Morton’s,” which has an indefinite life and accordingly is not subject to amortization, but is subject to impairment testing. The trade name is used in the advertising and marketing of the restaurants and is widely recognized and accepted by consumers in its respective market as an indication of and recognition of service, value and quality. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of the business acquired. During fiscal 2005, goodwill was reduced by $261,000 which represents an adjustment in purchase accounting as a result of a revision to a deferred tax asset valuation allowance assumed at the time of purchase.

6)            Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for its derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138.  SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities.  It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measures those instruments at fair value.  As of July 3, 2005, the Company’s derivative financial instrument consists of one interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $20,000,000. Additionally, one interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $20,000,000 expired in October 2004. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as speculative instruments and resulting changes in fair market value have been charged or credited to interest expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations.  As of July 3, 2005, in accordance with SFAS No. 133 the receivable was approximately $26,000. As of January 2, 2005, in accordance with SFAS No. 133, the liability was approximately $77,000.

7)            Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income for the six month periods ended July 3, 2005 and July 4, 2004 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

8)            Dividend

On June 4, 2004, MHCI completed a $40,000,000 14% senior secured notes offering. The notes are secured by the assets of MHCI, which include the stock of MRG.  The notes are not secured by the assets of, nor are they guaranteed by, MRG or any of its subsidiaries.

Pursuant to the MHCI notes, if at the end of a fiscal quarter the Company has cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities in excess of $5,000,000, excluding up to $750,000 of cash and cash equivalents held by one or more of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, and is permitted to pay a dividend under the Restricted Payments covenant of the 7.5% senior secured notes (defined therein), the Company is required to pay a dividend, to the extent permitted, to MHCI to repay outstanding PIK notes.  The dividend will be in the amount of the lesser of the excess cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities over the

8

$5,000,000 threshold or the aggregate outstanding PIK notes. On May 12, 2005, the Company paid such a dividend of approximately $995,000 to MHCI.

9

9)            Employee Subscription Agreements

Certain of our executives and other employees have been granted common units of MHLLC, which represent an ownership interest in MHLLC, pursuant to employee subscription agreements.  MHLLC’s Board approved 1,711,344 common units available for grant of which 1,497,585, 28,600, 20,800 and 1,600 were granted in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004, on January 25, 2005 and on May 24, 2005, respectively.  The fair value of each common unit granted during fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004, on January 25, 2005 and on May 24, 2005 was $0.01.  Common units granted to an employee pursuant to employee subscription agreements are granted at no cost to the employee. These common units are subject to vesting.  Fifty percent of the granted common units vest upon certain dates if the employee is employed as of such date.  However, if the employee has been continuously employed by the Company from the date of grant to the date of a change of control, any unvested time vesting units will immediately vest simultaneously with the consummation of the change of control. In addition, fifty percent of the common units will vest upon certain change of control or liquidation events if, upon the occurrence of such an event, Castle Harlan Partners III, L.P. achieves an internal rate of return of at least 30% and the employee is employed as of such date.  Upon termination of employment, unvested common units will be forfeited and vested common units will be subject to repurchase pursuant to the terms of MHLLC’s operating agreement.  Stock-based employee compensation expense related to this plan is charged to the Company based on the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations.  Accordingly, the Company recognized compensation expense relating to the vesting of common units granted in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended July 3, 2005 and July 4, 2004.  The compensation expense recorded during the three and six month periods ended July 3, 2005 and July 4, 2004, represents the straight-line amortization of the difference between the fair value at the date of grant of $0.01 per common unit and the exercise price (which is zero) of the common units of the outstanding time-vesting common units for the respective period.  The remaining compensation expense that was measured at the date of grant will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period.  Compensation expense relating to the other 50% of common units granted, which vest upon certain change of control or liquidation events if, upon the occurrence of such an event, Castle Harlan Partners III, L.P. achieves an internal rate of return of at least 30%, will be measured and recognized if and when these events occur.

Activity relating to the common units granted pursuant to employee subscription agreements is as follows:

As of July 3, 2005, there were 368,293 common units available for grant.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation as originally provided by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” Additionally, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure in both the annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the effect of the

10

method used on reported results. The transitional requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for all financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Due to the fact that the compensation expense on the unvested common units is based on the fair value of the common units of MHLLC at the date of grant, there is no difference between reported net income and the pro forma net income that would be recognized under SFAS No. 123.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires all stock-based employee compensation to be recorded as an expense in the consolidated statement of operations and that such cost be measured according to the fair value of stock options. SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.  As the Company already charges stock-based employee compensation expense related to units issued pursuant to employee subscription agreements based on the fair value of such units, the adoption of this statement will not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

10)          Financial Information about Geographic Areas

Income (loss) before income taxes for the Company’s domestic and foreign operations are as follows (amounts in thousands):

11)          Restaurant Activity

During July 2004, a new Morton’s steakhouse was opened in White Plains, New York. During the first quarter of 2005, new Morton’s steakhouses were opened in Bethesda, Maryland; Charlotte, North Carolina and Chicago, Illinois. During August 2005, a new Morton’s steakhouse opened in Atlantic City, New Jersey. No restaurants were closed during the six month periods ended July 3, 2005 and July 4, 2004. The Company has signed leases to open new Morton’s steakhouses in Troy, Michigan, Coral Gables, Florida and Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

The Company records rental expense on a straight-line basis from the date that the Company takes control of the premises over the lease term. Any difference between the calculated expense and the amounts actually paid are reflected as a deferred rent liability included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company also includes landlord allowances for leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment in the deferred rent liability. These amounts are amortized as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis from the date that the Company takes control of the premises over the lease term. The Company has a policy of capitalizing the portion of deferred rent during the construction period in leasehold improvements.

12)          Legal Matters and Contingencies

Since August 2002, a number of the Company’s current and former employees in New York, Boston and Florida have initiated arbitrations with the American Arbitration Association in their respective states alleging that the Company has violated state (Boston arbitration), state and federal (New York arbitrations) and federal (Florida arbitrations) wage and hour laws regarding the sharing of tips with other employees and

11

failure to pay for all hours worked. There are two group arbitrations pending in Florida. One is proceeding in West Palm Beach as a collective action (hereafter referred to as “West Palm Beach arbitration”) with approximately thirty claimants. The second is proceeding in Miami as a consolidated action (hereafter “Miami arbitration”) with approximately six claimants.  Potential class members in the West Palm Beach arbitration were sent notices notifying them of the arbitration and advising them if they wish to participate in the arbitration they must sign and return a consent form.  In addition, there are two individual demands for arbitration pending in Florida which may ultimately be joined to the Miami arbitration.

In general, the complainants are seeking restitution of tips, the difference between the tip credit wage and the minimum wage, payment for hours worked off the clock (in the Miami arbitration and in the individual Florida arbitrations only), liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. The arbitrator in the New York arbitrations has permitted the complainants to consolidate their arbitrations into one action and proceed as a collective action. The Miami claimants are also seeking to consolidate their arbitrations. The arbitrator has ruled that the claims cannot be consolidated but is allowing the case to proceed as a collective action. The Boston arbitrator has ruled that the claimants may proceed as a class, but to date there are only three people in the class and no class has been certified. The Company intends to and is contesting these matters vigorously. Management believes an adverse opinion in any one of these cases would not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition.

In November 2004, current and former employees of the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse commenced a federal lawsuit asserting individual, representative and class claims against the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse and several other Morton’s steakhouses.  The plaintiffs asserted claims based on the Company’s alleged failure to provide them with meal and rest periods, and for unlawful tip sharing and unfair competition.  The plaintiffs seek restitution of tips, meal and break period compensation and attorneys’ fees. Dismissals with prejudice for all defendants, except the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse, were granted.  The claims against the Sacramento Morton’s steakhouse have been moved to arbitration.

In May 2005, a former employee of the Boston restaurant filed a nationwide class action complaint in federal court in Massachusetts alleging that the tip out violates the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint and compel arbitration.  While the motion was pending, the plaintiff filed a nationwide collective action demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association.  The demand for arbitration alleges the same facts as the lawsuit filed in federal court.  The motion to dismiss is still pending in federal court.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources.

13)          Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

The obligations of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Issuer”) related to the 7.5% senior secured notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis and on a senior basis by certain of the Company’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”). These guarantees are senior secured obligations of the Guarantors, subject to liens permitted under the indenture governing the 7.5% senior secured notes, rank senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of the Guarantors and rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Guarantors. There are no restrictions on the Company’s ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the Guarantors, except those imposed by applicable law and certain contractual restrictions, which do not exceed 25% of consolidated net assets of any Guarantor, that are permitted under the indenture governing the 7.5% senior secured notes. The following supplemental financial information sets forth, on a condensed consolidating basis, balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows for the Issuer, domestic subsidiaries of the Company that are Guarantors and foreign subsidiaries and domestic subsidiaries of the Company that are not Guarantors (collectively, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The Company has not presented separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Guarantor Subsidiaries because management has determined that such information is not material to investors.

12

Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheet

July 3, 2005

(unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)

13

Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheet

July 3, 2005

(unaudited)

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

14

Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheet

January 2, 2005

(Amounts in thousands)

15

Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheet

January 2, 2005

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

16

Supplemental Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three month period ended July 3, 2005

(unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)