UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

o		REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ING GROEP N.V.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
The Netherlands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

ING Groep N.V.
Amstelveenseweg 500
1081 KL Amsterdam
P.O. Box 810, 1000 AV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices)

Hans van Barneveld
Telephone: +31 20 541 8510
E-mail: Hans.van.Barneveld@ing.com
Amstelveenseweg 500
1081KL Amsterdam
The Netherlands
(Name; Telephone, Email and Address of Company Contact Person)

		Name of each exchange on
Title of each class		which registered
American Depositary Shares, each representing one Ordinary share		New York Stock Exchange
Ordinary shares, nominal value EUR 0.24 per Ordinary share and Bearer Depositary receipts in respect of Ordinary shares*		New York Stock Exchange
7.05% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
7.20% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
6.20% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
6.125% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
5.775% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
6.375% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
7.375% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange
8.50% ING Perpetual Debt Securities		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

Ordinary shares, nominal value EUR 0.24 per Ordinary share			2,063,147,969
Bearer Depositary receipts in respect of Ordinary shares			2,062,180,263

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes þ     o No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes o     þ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ     o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAPo 
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board þ 
Other o 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

o Item 17      Item 18 o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yeso     þ No

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

						PAGE
PART I
Item
1.				IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS			5
2.				OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE			5
3.				KEY INFORMATION			5
4.				INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY			17
5.				OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS			43
6.				DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES			83
7.				MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS			102
8.				FINANCIAL INFORMATION			106
9.				THE OFFER AND LISTING			108
10.				ADDITIONAL INFORMATION			109
11.				QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE OF MARKET RISK			116
12.				DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES			116
PART II
13.				DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES			117
14.				MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS			117
15.				CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			117
16.				AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE			119
				CODE OF ETHICS DISCLOSURE			119
				PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES			119
				PURCHASES OF REGISTERED EQUITY SERVICES OF THE ISSUER BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS			121
				CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			121
PART III
18.				FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			122
19.				EXHIBITS			122
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
				SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION ON BANKING OPERATIONS			125
EX-1.1
EX-1.2
EX-2.10
EX-7
EX-8
EX-12.1
EX-12.2
EX-13.1
EX-13.2
EX-15.1
EX-15.2
EX-15.3

PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION

In this Annual Report, and unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise dictates, references to “ING Groep N.V.”, “ING Groep” and “ING Group” refer to ING Groep N.V. and references to “ING”, the “Company”, the “Group”, “we” and “us” refer to ING Groep N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries. ING Groep N.V.’s primary insurance and banking subsidiaries are ING Verzekeringen N.V. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “ING Insurance”)  and ING Bank N.V. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “ING Bank”), respectively. References to “Executive Board” or “Supervisory Board” refer to the Executive Board or Supervisory Board of ING Groep N.V.

ING presents its consolidated financial statements in euros, the currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union. Unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, references to “US$” and “Dollars” are to the United States dollars and references to “EUR” are to euros.

Solely for the convenience of the reader, this Annual Report contains translations of certain euro amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates. These translations should not be construed as representations that the translated amounts actually represent such dollar or euro amounts, as the case may be, or could be converted into U.S. dollars or euros, as the case may be, at the rates indicated or at any other rate. Therefore, unless otherwise stated, the translations of euros into U.S. dollars have been made at the rate of euro 1.00 = $ 1.2674, the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in euros as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Noon Buying Rate”) on March 6, 2009.

Except as otherwise noted, financial statement amounts set forth in this Annual Report are presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (“EU”). In this document the term “IFRS-EU” is used to refer to International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU including the decisions ING Group made with regard to the options available under International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU. See Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the basis of presentation.

IFRS-EU differs from International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS-IASB”) in respect of certain paragraphs in IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’.

ING Group applies fair value hedge accounting for portfolio hedges of interest rate risk (fair value macro hedges) in accordance with the EU ‘carve out’ version of IAS 39. Under the EU ‘IAS 39 carve-out’, hedge accounting may be applied, in respect of fair value macro hedges, to core deposits and hedge ineffectiveness is only recognised when the revised estimate of the amount of cash flows in scheduled time buckets falls below the original designated amount of that bucket and is not recognized when the revised amount of cash flows in scheduled time buckets is more than the original designated amount. Under IFRS-IASB, hedge accounting for fair value macro hedges can not be applied to core deposits and ineffectiveness arises whenever the revised estimate of the amount of cash flows in scheduled time buckets is either more or less than the original designated amount of that bucket.

Effective March 4, 2008, amendments to Form 20-F permit Foreign Private Issuers to include financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS-IASB without reconciliation to US GAAP. The amendments also include a two-year transition provision to accommodate Issuers, such as ING Group that apply the EU IAS 39 hedge accounting carve-out and provide a reconciliation of result and equity under IFRS-EU to IFRS-IASB for the years ended 2008 and 2007. This reconciliation is included in Note 2.4 to the consolidated financial statements. A reconciliation of result under IFRS-EU to US GAAP for the year ending December 31, 2006, is provided in Note 2.5 to the consolidated financial statements.

Unless otherwise indicated, gross premiums, gross premiums written and gross written premiums as referred to in this Annual Report include premiums (whether or not earned) for insurance policies written during a specified period, without deduction for premiums ceded, and net premiums, net premiums written and net written premiums include premiums (whether or not earned) for insurance policies written during a specified period, after deduction for premiums ceded. Certain amounts set forth herein may not sum due to rounding.

Although certain references are made to information available on ING’s website, no materials from ING’s website or any other source are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, except as specifically stated herein.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-
LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained in this Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, certain statements made in the sections hereof entitled “Information on the Company,” “Dividends,” “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Selected Statistical Information on Banking Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risk” are statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements due to, without limitation,

•		changes in general economic conditions, in particular economic conditions in ING’s core markets,
•		changes in performance of financial markets, including developing markets,
•		changes in the availability of, and costs associated with, sources of liquidity such as interbank funding, as well as conditions in the credit markets generally, including changes in borrower and counterparty creditworthiness,
•		the frequency and severity of insured loss events,
•		changes affecting mortality and morbidity levels and trends,
•		changes affecting persistency levels,
•		changes affecting interest rate levels,
•		changes affecting currency exchange rates,
•		changes in general competitive factors,
•		changes in laws and regulations,
•		changes in the policies of governments and/or regulatory authorities,

ING is under no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or for any other reason. See “Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Factors Affecting Results of Operations.”

PART I

Item 1. Identity Of Directors, Senior Management And Advisors

Not Applicable.

Item 2. Offer Statistics And Expected Timetable

Not Applicable.

Item 3. Key Information

The selected consolidated financial information data set forth below is derived from the consolidated financial statements of ING Group. ING Group adopted IFRS as adopted by the EU as of 2005.

IFRS-EU differs in certain respects from IFRS-IASB and U.S. GAAP. See Note 2.4 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the differences between IFRS-EU and IFRS-IASB and a reconciliation of certain income statement and balance sheet items to IFRS-IASB. See Note 2.5. to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the differences between IFRS-EU and U.S. GAAP and a reconciliation of certain income statement and balance sheet items to U.S. GAAP.

The following information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to the Group’s consolidated financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere herein.

		Year ended December 31,
		2008				2008				2007(2)				2006(2)				2005(2)				2004(2)
		USD(1)				EUR				EUR				EUR				EUR				EUR
		(in millions, except amounts per share and ratios)
IFRS-EU Consolidated Income Statement Data
Income from insurance operations:
Gross premiums written:
Life			49,261				38,868				40,732				40,501				39,144				36,975
Non-life			6,266				4,944				6,086				6,333				6,614				6,642
Total			55,527				43,812				46,818				46,834				45,758				43,617
Commission income			2,624				2,070				1,901				1,636				1,346				1,198
Investment and Other income			11,369				8,970				13,488				11,172				10,299				10,787
Total income from insurance operations			69,519				54,851				62,208				59,642				57,403				55,602
Income from banking operations:
Interest income			124,460				98,201				76,859				59,262				48,342				25,471
Interest expense			110,410				87,115				67,823				49,927				39,180				16,772
Net interest result			14,050				11,085				9,036				9,335				9,162				8,699
Investment income			(3,117	)			(2,459	)			947				483				937				363
Commission income			3,669				2,895				2,926				2,681				2,401				2,581
Other income			265				209				1,693				1,696				1,348				1,035
Total income from banking operations			14,868				11,731				14,602				14,195				13,848				12,678
Total income (3)			84,017				66,291				76,586				73,621				71,120				68,159
Expenditure from insurance operations:
Life			65,426				51,622				49,526				49,106				47,156				44,988
Non-life			6,165				4,864				6,149				5,601				6,269				6,292
Total expenditure from insurance operations			71,590				56,486				55,675				54,707				53,425				51,280
Total expenditure from banking operations			14,680				11,583				10,092				9,190				8,932				9,260
Total expenditure(3)(4)			85,902				67,778				65,543				63,681				62,226				60,419
Result before tax from insurance operations:
Life			(2,720	)			(2,146	)			5,314				3,436				2,666				2,647
Non-life			648				511				1,219				1,499				1,312				1,675
Total			(2,072	)			(1,635	)			6,533				4,935				3,978				4,322
Result before tax from banking operations			188				148				4,510				5,005				4,916				3,418
Result before tax			(1,885	)			(1,487	)			11,043				9,940				8,894				7,440
Taxation			(914	)			(721	)			1,535				1,907				1,379				1,709
Minority interests			(47	)			(37	)			267				341				305				276
Net result			(924	)			(729	)			9,241				7,692				7,210				5,755
Dividend on Ordinary shares			1,901				1,500				3,180				2,865				2,588				2,359
Addition to shareholders’ equity			(3,364	)			(2,654	)			6,061				4,827				4,622				3,396
Payable on non-voting equity securities (7)																			(539	)			(425	)
Net result attributable to equity holders of the Company			(924	)			(729	)			9,241				7,692				7,210				5,755
Basic earnings per share(5)			(0.46	)			(0.36	)			4.32				3.57				3.32				2.71
Diluted earnings per share(5)			(0.46	)			(0.36	)			4.28				3.54				3.32				2.71
Dividend per Ordinary share (5)			0.94				0.74				1.48				1.32				1.18				1.07
Interim Dividend			0.94				0.74				0.66				0.59				0.54				0.49
Final Dividend			—				—				0.82				0.73				0.64				0.58
Number of Ordinary shares outstanding (in millions)			2,063.1				2,063.1				2,226.4				2,205.1				2,204.9				2,204.7
Dividend pay-out ratio (6)			n.a.				n.a.				34.3	%			37.0	%			35.5	%			39.5	%

		2006				2005				2004
		(EUR millions, except amounts per share)
U.S. GAAP Consolidated Income Statement Data
Total income			47,588				47,960				49,733
Net result U.S. GAAP, excluding cumulative effects			6,827				6,976				6,688
Cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles											(91	)
Net result U.S. GAAP, including cumulative effects (8)			6,827				6,976				6,597
Net result per Ordinary share and Ordinary share equivalent(5)			3.17				3.21				3.10

		Year ended December 31,
		2008				2008				20072)				2006(2)				2005(2)				2004(2)
		USD(2)				EUR				EUR				EUR				EUR				EUR
						(in billions, except amounts per share and ratios)
IFRS-EU Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Total assets			1,687.8				1,331.7				1,312.5				1,226.3				1,158.6				876.4
Investments:
Insurance			138.8				109.5				132.3				140.5				144.5				112.1
Banking			188.6				148.8				160.4				171.1				180.1				164.2
Total			327.4				258.3				292.6				311.6				324.6				276.3
Loans and advances to customers			785.5				619.8				553.0				474.4				439.2				330.5
Insurance and investment contracts:
Life			270.0				213.0				232.4				237.9				232.1				205.5
Non-life			8.6				6.8				9.6				10.1				12.8				11.4
Investment contracts			26.7				21.1				23.7				20.7				18.6
Total			305.3				240.8				265.7				268.7				263.5				216.9
Customer deposits and other funds on deposit:
Savings accounts of the banking operations			347.6				274.3				275.1				283.1				269.4				219.4
Other deposits and bank funds			314.9				248.5				250.1				213.6				196.3				129.8
Total			662.6				522.8				525.2				496.7				465.7				349.2
Amounts due to banks			193.0				152.3				167.0				120.8				122.2				95.9
Share capital (in millions)							2,063.1				2,242.4				2,268.1				2,292.0				2,291.8
Shareholders’ equity			21.9				17.3				37.2				38.3				36.7				24.1
Non-voting equity securities			12.8				10.0
Shareholders’ equity per Ordinary share 5)			10.84				8.55				17.73				17.78				16.96				12.95

		2006				2005				2004
		(EUR billions, except amounts per share)
U.S. GAAP Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Total assets			1,228.4				1,159.3				920.4
Shareholders’ equity			40.6				41.6				35.1
Shareholders’ equity per Ordinary share and Ordinary share equivalent(5)			18.88				19.21				16.00

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by owners of shares or ADSs on conversion of dividends, if any, paid in euros on the shares and will affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange.

The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rate for U.S. dollars into euros based on the Noon Buying Rate.

		U.S. dollars per euro
		Period				Average
Calendar Period		End(1)				Rate(2)				High				Low
2004			1.3538				1.2478				1.3625				1.1801
2005			1.1842				1.2397				1.3476				1.1670
2006			1.3197				1.2661				1.3327				1.1860
2007			1.4603				1.3794				1.4862				1.2904
2008			1.3919				1.4695				1.6010				1.2446
2009 (through March 6, 2009) (2)			1.2674				1.2710				1.3718				1.2549

The table below shows the high and low exchange rate of the U.S. dollar per euro for the last six months.

		High				Low
September 2008			1.4737				1.3939
October 2008			1.4058				1.2446
November 2008			1.3039				1.2525
December 2008			1.4358				1.2634
January 2009			1.3718				1.2804
February 2009			1.3064				1.2547
March 2009 (through March 6, 2009)			1.2674				1.2549

The Noon Buying Rate for euros on December 31, 2008 was EUR 1.00 = $ 1.3919 and the Noon Buying Rate for euros on March 6, 2009 was EUR 1.00 = $ 1.2674.

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to the Financial Services Industry

Because we are an integrated financial services company conducting business on a global basis, our revenues and earnings are affected by the volatility and strength of the economic, business and capital markets environments specific to the geographic regions in which we conduct business. The ongoing turbulence and volatility of such factors have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect the profitability of our insurance, banking and asset management business.

Factors such as interest rates, securities prices, credit (including liquidity) spreads, exchange rates, consumer spending, business investment, real estate and private equity valuations, government spending, inflation, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, and terrorism all impact the business and economic environment and, ultimately, the amount and profitability of business we conduct in a specific geographic region. For example, in an economic downturn, such as the one currently taking place, characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, higher corporate and private debt defaults, lower business investment and consumer spending, the demand for banking and insurance products is adversely affected and our reserves and provisions are likely to increase, resulting in lower earnings. Securities prices, real estate valuations and private equity valuations may be adversely impacted, and any such losses would be realized through profit and loss and shareholders equity. Some insurance products contain minimum return or accumulation guarantees. If returns do no meet or exceed the guarantee levels we may need to set up additional reserves to fund these future guaranteed benefits. In addition, we may experience an elevated incidence of claims and lapses or surrenders of policies. Our policyholders may choose to defer paying insurance premiums or stop paying insurance premiums altogether. Similarly, a downturn in the equity markets, such as the one currently taking place, causes a reduction in commission income we earn from managing portfolios for third parties, income generated from our own proprietary portfolios, asset-based fee income on certain insurance products, and our capital base. We also offer a number of insurance and financial products that expose us to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates, securities prices, corporate and private default rates, the value of real estate assets, exchange rates and credit spreads. For more details on the impact of interest rates and exchange rate fluctuations on our operations, see “Item 5. Operating and financial review and prospects – Factors affecting results of operations”.

In case one or more of the factors mentioned above adversely affects the profitability of our business this might also result, among others, in the following:

-		the unlocking of deferred acquisition costs impacting earnings; and/or
-		reserve inadequacies which could ultimately be realized through profit and loss and shareholders equity; and/or
-		the write down of tax assets impacting net results; and or
-		impairment expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, impacting net results. Management believes that if ongoing market volatility adversely impacts the performance of the reporting units Retail Banking — Central Europe and Insurance Americas — United States, compared with what was assumed in the year-end 2008 goodwill impairment test, the book value (including goodwill) of these reporting units may exceed the related fair values, which would result in impairments. See Note 9 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements.

Shareholders’ equity and net result of ING in 2008 were significantly impacted by the turmoil and the extreme volatility in the worldwide financial markets. The financial markets and worldwide economies have deteriorated further in the first months of 2009 in several areas, especially the equity markets. Current levels continuing or a further negative development in financial markets and/or economies in 2009 may have a material adverse impact on shareholders’ equity and net result in future periods, including as a result of the potential consequences listed above. See “Subsequent Events” of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may impact our ability to access liquidity and capital, as well as the cost of credit and capital.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption for more than eighteen months. In the second half of 2008, the volatility and disruption reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, market developments have resulted in restrictions on the availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers.

We need liquidity in our day-to-day business activities to pay our operating expenses, interest on our debt and dividends on our capital stock; maintain our securities lending activities; and replace certain maturing liabilities. The principal sources of our liquidity are deposit funds, insurance premiums, annuity considerations, cash flow from our investment portfolio and assets, consisting mainly of cash or assets that are readily convertible into cash. Sources of liquidity in normal markets also include a variety of short- and long-term instruments, including repurchase agreements, commercial paper, medium- and long-term debt, junior subordinated debt securities, capital securities and stockholders’ equity.

In the event current resources do not satisfy our needs, we may have to seek additional financing. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the volume of trading activities, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity, as well as the possibility that customers or lenders could develop a negative perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be limited if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If our internal sources of liquidity prove to be insufficient, there is a risk that external funding sources might not be available, or available at unfavorable terms.

Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may also limit our access to capital required to operate our business. Such market conditions may limit our ability to raise additional capital to support business growth, or to counter-balance the consequences of losses or increased regulatory capital requirements. This could force us to delay raising capital, reduce or postpone payment of dividends on our shares or interest payments on other securities, issue capital of different types or under different terms than we would otherwise, or incur a higher cost of capital than in a more stable market environment. This would have the potential to decrease both our profitability and our financial flexibility. Our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and regulatory capital position could be materially adversely affected by disruptions in the financial markets.

In the course of 2008, governments around the world, including the Dutch government, have implemented measures providing assistance to financial institutions, in certain cases requiring (indirect) influence on or changes to governance and remuneration practices. In certain cases governments have even nationalised companies or parts thereof. The measures adopted in the Netherlands consist in both liquidity provision and capital reinforcement, and a Dutch Capital Guarantee Scheme. The liquidity and capital reinforcement measures apply for a period of one year as of October 10, 2008, while the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the Netherlands is scheduled to run through December 31, 2009 (see Item 4. “Recent Developments”). So far we have been able to benefit from these measures. Going forward, the Dutch authorities will look at each application individually. Potential future transactions with the Dutch government or any other government or actions by such government regarding ING could adversely impact the position or rights of shareholders, bondholders, customers, creditors, our results, operations, solvency, liquidity and governance.

Because our life and non-life insurance and reinsurance businesses are subject to losses from unforeseeable and/or catastrophic events, which are inherently unpredictable, our actual claims amount may exceed our established reserves or we may experience an abrupt interruption of activities, each of which could result in lower net results and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

In our life and non-life insurance and reinsurance businesses, we are subject to losses from natural and man-made catastrophic events. Such events include, without limitation, weather and other natural catastrophes such as hurricanes, floods, earthquakes and epidemics, as well as events such as terrorist attacks. The frequency and severity of such events, and the losses associated with them, are inherently unpredictable and can not always be adequately reserved for. Furthermore, we are subject to actuarial and underwriting risks such as, for instance, mortality, morbidity, and adverse home claims development which result from the pricing and acceptance of insurance contracts. In accordance with industry practices, modelling of natural catastrophes is performed and risk mitigation measures are made. In case claims occur, reserves are established based on estimates using actuarial projection techniques. The process of estimating is based on information available at the time the reserves are originally established and includes updates when more information becomes available. Although we continually review the adequacy of the established claim reserves, and based on current information, we believe our claim reserves are sufficient, there can be no assurances that our actual claims experience will not exceed our estimated claim reserves. If actual claim amounts exceed the estimated claim reserves, our earnings may be reduced and our net results may be adversely affected. In addition, because unforeseeable and/or catastrophic events can lead to an abrupt interruption of activities, our banking and insurance operations may be subject to losses resulting from such disruptions. Losses can relate to property, financial assets, trading positions, insurance and pension benefits to employees and also to key personnel. If our business continuity plans are not able to be put into action or do not take such events into account, losses may further increase.

Because we operate in highly regulated industries, laws, regulations and regulatory policies or the enforcement thereof that govern activities in our various business lines could have an effect on our reputation, operations and net results.

We are subject to detailed banking, insurance, asset management and other financial services laws and government regulation in each of the jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Regulatory agencies have broad administrative power over many aspects of the financial services business, which may include liquidity, capital adequacy and permitted investments, ethical issues, money laundering, privacy, record keeping, and marketing and selling practices. Banking, insurance and other financial services laws, regulations and policies currently governing us and our subsidiaries may also change at any time in ways which have an adverse effect on our business, and it is difficult to predict the timing or form of any future regulatory or enforcement initiatives in respect thereof. Also, bank regulators and other supervisory authorities in the EU, the US and elsewhere continue to scrutinize payment processing and other transactions under regulations governing such matters as money-laundering, prohibited transactions with countries subject to sanctions, and bribery or other anti-corruption measures. Regulation is becoming increasingly more extensive and complex and regulators are focusing increased scrutiny on the industries in which we operate, often requiring additional Company resources. These regulations can serve to limit our activities, including through our net capital, customer protection and market conduct requirements, and restrictions on businesses in which we can operate or invest. If we fail to address, or appear to fail to address, appropriately any of these matters, our reputation could be harmed and we could be subject to additional legal risk, which could, in turn, increase the size and number of claims and damages asserted against us or subject us to enforcement actions, fines and penalties.

In light of current conditions in the global financial markets and the global economy, regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry. Most of the principal markets where we conduct our business have adopted, or are currently considering, major legislative and/or regulatory initiatives in response to the financial crisis. In particular, governmental and regulatory authorities in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States and elsewhere are implementing measures to increase regulatory control in their respective financial markets and financial services sectors, including in the areas of prudential rules, capital requirements, executive compensation and financial reporting, among others. Most recently, governments in the Netherlands and abroad have intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to stresses experienced in the global financial markets. Some of the measures adopted subject us and other institutions for which they were designed to additional restrictions, oversight or costs. For restrictions related to the agreements of ING with the Dutch State, see “Risks related to the Company — Our agreements with the Dutch State impose certain restrictions regarding the issuance or repurchase of our shares and the compensation of certain senior management positions.” We cannot predict whether or when future legislative or regulatory actions may be taken, or what impact, if any, actions taken to date or in the future could have on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Despite our efforts to maintain effective compliance procedures and to comply with applicable laws and regulations, there are a number of risks in areas where applicable regulations may be unclear, subject to multiple interpretation or conflict with one another, where regulators revise their previous guidance or courts overturn previous rulings, or we fail to meet applicable standards. Regulators and other authorities have the power to bring administrative or judicial proceedings against us, which could result, amongst other things, in suspension or revocation of our licenses, cease and desist orders, fines, civil penalties, criminal penalties or other disciplinary action which could materially harm our results of operations and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANY

Ongoing turbulence and volatility in the financial markets have adversely affected us, and may continue to do so. We currently do not expect these conditions to improve in the short term.

Our results of operations are materially impacted by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally. The stress experienced in the global capital markets that started in the second half of 2007 continued and substantially increased throughout 2008 and continues in 2009. The crisis in the mortgage market in the United States, triggered by a serious deterioration of credit quality, led to a revaluation of credit risks. These conditions have resulted in greater volatility, widening of credit spreads and overall shortage of liquidity and tightening of financial markets throughout the world. In addition, prices for many types of asset-backed securities (ABS) and other structured products have significantly deteriorated. These concerns have since expanded to include a broad range of fixed income securities, including those rated investment grade, the international credit and interbank money markets generally, and a wide range of financial institutions and markets, asset classes, such as public and private equity, and real estate sectors. As a result, the market for fixed income instruments has experienced decreased liquidity, increased price volatility, credit downgrade events, and increased probability of default. Securities that are less liquid are more difficult to value and may be hard to dispose of. International equity markets have also been experiencing heightened volatility and turmoil,

with issuers, including ourselves, that have exposure to the real estate, mortgage, private equity and credit markets particularly affected. These events and the continuing market upheavals, including extreme levels of volatility, have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, in part because we have a large investment portfolio and extensive real estate activities around the world. In addition, the confidence of customers in financial institutions is being tested. Reduced confidence could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, including through an increase of lapses or surrenders of policies and withdrawal of deposits.

As a result of the ongoing and unprecedented volatility in the global financial markets in 2007 and 2008, we have incurred negative revaluations on our investment portfolio, which have impacted our earnings and shareholders’ equity. Furthermore, we have incurred impairments and other losses, which have impacted our profit and loss accounts. Reserves for insurance liabilities are overall adequate at the Group and Business Line level. Inadequacies in certain product areas have developed. Reference is made to Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements “Risk Management — Reserve Aquadecy”.

Such impacts have arisen primarily as a result of valuation issues arising in connection with our investments in real estate and private equity, exposures to US mortgage-related structured investment products, including sub-prime and Alt-A Residential and Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS and RMBS), Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) and Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs), monoline insurer guarantees, Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) and other investments. In many cases, the markets for such investments and instruments have become highly illiquid, and issues relating to counterparty credit ratings and other factors have exacerbated pricing and valuation uncertainties. Valuation of such investments and instruments is a complex process involving the consideration of market transactions, pricing models, management judgment and other factors, and is also impacted by external factors such as underlying mortgage default rates, interest rates, rating agency actions and property valuations. While we continue to monitor our exposures in this area, in light of the ongoing market environment and the resulting uncertainties concerning valuations, there can be no assurances that we will not experience further negative impacts to our shareholders’ equity or profit and loss accounts from such assets in future periods.

Because we operate in highly competitive markets, including our home market, we may not be able to increase or maintain our market share, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

There is substantial competition in the Netherlands and the other countries in which we do business for the types of insurance, commercial banking, investment banking, asset management and other products and services we provide. Customer loyalty and retention can be influenced by a number of factors, including relative service levels, the prices and attributes of products and services, and actions taken by competitors. If we are not able to match or compete with the products and services offered by our competitors, it could adversely impact our ability to maintain or further increase our market share, which would adversely affect our results of operations. Such competition is most pronounced in our more mature markets of the Netherlands, Belgium, the Rest of Europe, the United States, Canada and Australia. In recent years, however, competition in emerging markets, such as Latin America, Asia and Central and Eastern Europe, has also increased as large insurance and banking industry participants from more developed countries have sought to establish themselves in markets which are perceived to offer higher growth potential, and as local institutions have become more sophisticated and competitive and have sought alliances, mergers or strategic relationships with our competitors. The Netherlands and the United States are our largest markets for both our banking and insurance operations. Our main competitors in the banking sector in the Netherlands are ABN AMRO Bank/Fortis and Rabobank. Our main competitors in the insurance sector in the Netherlands are Achmea, Fortis and Aegon. Our main competitors in the United States are insurance companies such as Lincoln National, Hartford, Aegon Americas, AXA, Met Life, Prudential, Nationwide and Principal Financial. Increasing competition in these or any of our other markets may significantly impact our results if we are unable to match the products and services offered by our competitors. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated, as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms or have declared bankruptcy. In 2008, this trend accelerated considerably, as several major financial institutions consolidated, were forced to merge or received substantial government assistance. These developments could result in our competitors gaining greater access to capital and liquidity, expanding their ranges of products and services, or gaining geographic diversity. We may experience pricing pressures as a result of these factors in the event that some of our competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Because we do business with many counterparties, the inability of these counterparties to meet their financial obligations could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Third-parties that owe us money, securities or other assets may not pay or perform under their obligations. These parties include the issuers whose securities we hold, borrowers under loans originated, customers, trading counterparties, counterparties under swaps, credit default and other derivative contracts, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing house and other financial intermediaries. Defaults by one or more of these parties on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, downturns in the economy or real estate values, operational failure, etc., or even rumors about potential defaults by one or more of these parties or regarding the financial services industry generally, could lead to losses for us, and defaults by other institutions. In addition, with respect to secured transactions, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized, or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due us. We also have exposure to a number of financial institutions in the form of unsecured debt instruments, derivative transactions and equity investments. There is no assurance that losses on, or impairments to the carrying value of these assets would not materially and adversely affect our business or results of operations.

Reinsurers

Our insurance operations have bought protection for risks that exceed certain risk tolerance levels set for both our life and non-life businesses. This protection is bought through reinsurance arrangements in order to reduce possible losses. Because in most cases we must pay the policyholders first, and then collect from the reinsurer, we are subject to credit risk with respect to each reinsurer for all such amounts. As a percentage of our (potential) reinsurance receivables as of December 31, 2008, the greatest exposure after collateral to an individual reinsurer was approximately 32%, approximately 68% related to four other reinsurers and the remainder of the reinsurance receivables balance related to various other reinsurers. The inability or unwillingness of any one of these reinsurers to meet its financial obligations to us, or the insolvency of our reinsurers, could have a material adverse effect on our net results and our financial results.

Because we use assumptions about factors to determine the insurance provisions, deferred acquisition costs (DAC) and value of business added (VOBA), the use of different assumptions about these factors may have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

The establishment of insurance provisions, including the impact of minimum guarantees which are contained within certain variable annuity products, the adequacy test performed on the provisions for life policies and the establishment of DAC and VOBA are inherently uncertain processes involving assumptions about factors such as court decisions, changes in laws, social, economic and demographic trends, inflation, investment returns, policyholder behaviour (e.g. lapses, persistency, etc.) and other factors, and, in the life insurance business, assumptions concerning mortality and morbidity trends.

The use of different assumptions about these factors could have a material effect on insurance provisions and underwriting expense. Changes in assumptions may lead to changes in the insurance provisions over time. Furthermore, some of these assumptions can be volatile.

Because we use assumptions to model client behavior for the purpose of our market risk calculations, the difference between the realization and the assumptions may have an adverse impact on the risk figures and future results.

We use assumptions in order to model client behavior for the risk calculations in our banking and insurance books. Assumptions are used to determine insurance liabilities, the price sensitivity of savings and current accounts and to estimate the embedded optional risk in the mortgage and investment portfolios. The realization or use of different assumptions to determine the client behavior could have material adverse effect on the calculated risk figures and ultimately future results.

Because we also operate in markets with less developed judiciary and dispute resolution systems, in the event of disputes in these markets, the quality and the effectiveness of such systems could have an adverse effect on our operations and net results.

In the less developed markets in which we operate, judiciary and dispute resolution systems may be less developed. As a result in case of a breach of contract we may have difficulties in making and enforcing claims against contractual counterparties and, if claims are made against us, we might encounter difficulties in mounting a defence against such allegations. If we become party to legal proceedings in a market with an insufficiently developed judiciary system, it could have an adverse effect on our operations and net result.

When new financial products are brought to the market, communication and marketing aims to present a balanced view of the product (however there is a focus on potential advantages for the customers). Whilst we engage in a due diligence process when we develop products, if the products do not generate the expected profit, or result in a loss, or otherwise do not meet expectations, customers may file claims against us. Such claims could have an adverse effect on our operations and net result.

We obtain credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch. While we aim to maintain a senior unsecured rating of AA, each of the rating agencies reviews its ratings and rating methodologies on a recurring basis and may decide on a downgrade at any time. In the event of a downgrade the cost of issuing debt will increase, having an adverse effect on net results.

Claims paying ability, at the Group or subsidiary level, and financial strength ratings are factors in establishing the competitive position of insurers. A rating downgrade could elevate lapses or surrenders of policies requiring cash payments, which might force us to sell assets at a price that may result in realized investment losses. Among others, total invested assets decreases and deferred acquisition costs might need to be accelerated, adversely impacting earnings. A downgrade may adversely impact relationships with distributors of our products and services and customers, which may affect new sales and our competitive position.

Our Bank assets are risk weighted. Downgrades of these assets could result in a higher risk weighting which may result in higher capital requirements and thus a need to deleverage. This may impact net earnings and the return on capital, and may have an adverse impact on our competitive position.

A sustained increase in the inflation rate in our principal markets would have multiple impacts on ING and may negatively affect our business, solvency position and results of operations. For example, a sustained increase in the inflation rate may result in an increase in market interest rates which may (i) decrease the value of certain fixed income securities we hold in our investment portfolios resulting in reduced levels of unrealized capital gains available to us which could negatively impact our solvency position and net income, (ii) result in increased surrenders of certain life & savings products, particularly, those with fixed rates below market rates, and (iii) require us, as an issuer of securities, to pay higher interest rates on debt securities we issue in the financial markets from time to time to finance our operations which would increase our interest expenses and reduce our results of operations. A significant and sustained increase in inflation has historically also been associated with decreased prices for equity securities and sluggish performance of equity markets generally. A sustained decline in equity markets may (i) result in impairment charges to equity securities that we hold in our investment portfolios and reduced levels of unrealized capital gains available to us which would reduce our net income and negatively impact our solvency position, (ii) negatively impact performance, future sales and surrenders of our unit-linked products where underlying investments are often allocated to equity funds, and (iii) negatively impact the ability of our asset management subsidiaries to retain and attract assets under management, as well as the value of assets they do manage, which may negatively impact their results of operations. In addition, in the context of certain property & casualty risks underwritten by our insurance subsidiaries (particularly “long-tail” risks), a sustained increase in inflation with a resulting increase in market interest rates may result in (i) claims inflation (i.e., an increase in the amount ultimately paid to settle claims several years after the policy coverage period or event giving rise to the claim), coupled with (ii) an underestimation of corresponding claims reserves at the time of establishment due to a failure to fully anticipate increased inflation and its effect on the amounts ultimately payable to policyholders, and, consequently, (iii) actual claims payments significantly exceeding associated insurance reserves which would negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, a failure to accurately anticipate higher inflation and factor it into our product pricing assumptions may result in a systemic mis-pricing of our products resulting in underwriting losses which would negatively impact our results of operations.

Operational risks are inherent in our business.

Our businesses depend on the ability to process a large number of transactions efficiently and accurately. Losses can result from inadequate personnel, inadequate or failed internal control processes and systems, or from external events that interrupt normal business operations. We also face the risk that the design of our

controls and procedures prove to be inadequate or are circumvented. We have suffered losses from operational risk in the past and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer material losses from operational risk in the future.

Adverse publicity and damage to ING’s reputation arising from its failure or perceived failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, financial reporting irregularities involving other large and well known companies, increasing regulatory and law enforcement scrutiny of “know your customer” anti-money laundering, prohibited transactions with countries subject to sanctions, and bribery or other anti-corruption measures and anti-terrorist-financing procedures and their effectiveness, regulatory investigations of the mutual fund, banking and insurance industries, and litigation that arises from the failure or perceived failure by ING to comply with legal, regulatory and compliance requirements, could result in adverse publicity and reputation harm, lead to increased regulatory supervision, affect our ability to attract and retain customers, maintain access to the capital markets, result in cease and desist orders, suits, enforcement actions, fines and civil and criminal penalties, other disciplinary action or have other material adverse effects on us in ways that are not predictable.

While holders of our bearer receipts are entitled to attend and speak at the General Meeting, voting rights are not attached to the bearer depositary receipts. Stichting ING Aandelen (“the Trust”) holds more than 99% of our Ordinary shares, and exercises the voting rights attached to the Ordinary shares (for which bearer receipts have been issued). Holders of bearer receipts who attend – in person or by proxy — the General Meeting must obtain voting rights by proxy from the Trust. Holders of bearer receipts and holders of the ADSs (American Depositary Shares) representing the bearer receipts, who do not attend the General Meeting, may give binding voting instructions to the Trust. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions – Voting Instructions of holders of bearer receipts of Ordinary shares to the Trust”. The Trust is entitled to vote on any Ordinary shares underlying the bearer depositary receipts for which the Trust has not granted voting proxies, or voting instructions have not been given to the Trust. In exercising its voting discretion, the Trust is required to make use of the voting rights attached to the Ordinary shares in the interest of the holders of bearer receipts, while taking into account:

	§		our interests,
	§		the interests of our affiliates, and
	§		the interests of our other stakeholders

in such a way that all interests are balanced and safeguarded as effectively as possible. The Trust may, but has no obligation to, consult with the holders of bearer receipts or ADSs in exercising its voting rights in respect of any Ordinary shares for which it is entitled to vote. These arrangements differ from practices in other jurisdictions, and accordingly may affect the rights of the holders of bearer receipts or ADSs and their power to affect the Company’s business and operations.

The share price of our bearer receipts and our ADSs has been volatile in the past, in particular over the past year. The share price and trading volume of our bearer receipts and our ADSs may continue to be subject to significant fluctuations due, in part, to the high volatility in the securities markets generally and more particular in shares of financial institutions. Other factors, besides our financial results, that may impact our share price include, but are not limited to:

	§		market expectations of the performance and capital adequacy of financial institutions in general;
	§		investor perception of the success and impact of our strategies;
	§		a downgrade or review of our credit ratings;

	§		potential litigation or regulatory action involving ING Group or sectors we have exposure to through our insurance and banking activities;
	§		announcements concerning financial problems or any investigations into the accounting practices of other financial institutions; and
	§		general market circumstances.

Our agreements with the Dutch State impose certain restrictions regarding the issuance or repurchase of our shares and the compensation of certain senior management positions.

For so long as the Dutch State holds at least 25% of the Core Tier-I Securities issued by us on November 12, 2008, for so long as the Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility between ourselves and the Dutch State agreed upon in the term sheet of January 26, 2009 is in place, or for so long as any of the government guaranteed senior unsecured bonds issued by ING Bank N.V. successively on January 30, 2009, February 20, 2009 and March 12, 2009 under the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the Netherlands (the “Government Guaranteed Bonds”) are outstanding, whichever expires last, we are prohibited from issuing or repurchasing any of our own shares (other than as part of regular hedging operations and the issuance of shares according to employment schemes) without the consent of the Dutch State’s nominees on the Supervisory Board (see below). In addition, under the terms of these agreements with the Dutch State, we have agreed to institute certain restrictions on the compensation of the members of the Executive Board and Senior Management, including incentives or performance-based compensation. These restrictions could hinder or prevent us from attracting or retaining the most qualified management with the talent and experience to manage our business effectively. In connection with these transactions, the Dutch State was granted the right to nominate two candidates for appointment to the Supervisory Board. The Dutch State’s nominees have veto rights over certain material transactions, as set forth in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Supervisory Board”.

The issuance of the Core Tier-I Securities to the Dutch State has increased the cumulative change of ownership for United States tax purposes to approximately 42% as per November 12, 2008. Future increases of capital or other ownership changes may bring ING over the 50% threshold, in which case limitations to the future use of tax loss carry forwards as well as certain so-called built-in-losses may adversely affect net result and equity.

Section 382 of the United States Internal Revenue Code contains a so-called loss limitation rule, the general purpose of which is to prevent trafficking in tax losses (i.e. it is an anti-abuse rule). The rule is triggered when the ownership of a company changes by more than 50% (measured by value) on a cumulative basis in any three year period. If triggered, restrictions may be imposed on the future use of realised tax losses as well as certain losses that are built into the assets of the company at the time of the ownership change and that are realised within the next five years. The issuance of EUR 10 billion of securities by ING to the Dutch State on November 12, 2008 brought ING’s (cumulative) change of ownership as per that date to approximately 42%. As a result, future increases in capital or other changes of ownership may adversely affect the net result or equity of ING, unless relief from the loss limitation rules is obtained, which may or may not be possible.

Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands and most of the members of our Supervisory and Executive Board and many of our officers reside outside of the United States, it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments against us or the members of our Supervisory and Executive Boards or our officers.

Most of our Supervisory and Executive Board members, and some of the experts named in this Annual Report, as well as many of our officers are persons who are not residents of the United States, and most of our and their assets, are located outside the United States. As a result, you may not be able to serve process on those persons within the United States or to enforce in the United States judgments obtained in U.S. courts against us or those persons based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws. You also may not be able to enforce judgments of U.S. courts under the U.S. federal securities laws in courts outside the United States, including the Netherlands. The United States and the Netherlands do not currently have a treaty providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, you will not be able to enforce in the Netherlands a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any U.S. federal or state court based on civil liability, even if the judgment is not based only on the U.S. federal securities laws, unless a competent court in the Netherlands gives binding effect to the judgment.

Item 4. Information on the Company

GENERAL

ING was established as a Naamloze Vennootschap (public limited liability company) on March 4, 1991, through the merger of Nationale-Nederlanden, which was the largest insurer in the Netherlands, and NMB Postbank Group, which was one of the largest banks in the Netherlands. ING Groep N.V. is incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands.

		The official address of ING Group is:		The name and address of ING Groep N.V.’s agent in the United States is:
		ING Groep N.V.		ING Financial Holdings Corporation
		Amstelveenseweg 500		1325 Avenue of the Americas
		1081 KL Amsterdam		New York, NY 10019
		P.O. Box 810, 1000 AV Amsterdam		United States of America
		The Netherlands		Telephone +1 646 424 6000
		Telephone +31 20 541 5411

Our mission

ING aims to deliver its financial products and services in the way its customers want them delivered: with exemplary service, convenience and at competitive prices. This is reflected in our mission statement: to set the standard in helping our customers manage their financial future.

Our profile

ING is a global financial institution of Dutch origin offering banking, investments, life insurance and retirement services. We serve more than 85 million private, corporate and institutional customers in Europe, North and Latin America, Asia and Australia. We draw on our experience and expertise, our commitment to excellent service and our global scale to meet the needs of a broad customer base, comprising individuals, families, small businesses, large corporations, institutions and governments.

Our strategy

ING’s overall ambition is to help customers manage their financial future. Capitalising on changing customer preferences and building on our solid business capabilities, ING’s strategic focus is on banking, investments, life insurance and retirement services. We want to provide retail customers with the products they need during their lives to grow savings, manage investments and prepare for retirement with confidence. With our wide range of products, innovative distribution models and strong footprints in both mature and developing markets, we have the long-run economic, technological and demographic trends on our side. We align our business strategy around a universal customer ideal: saving and investing for the future should be easier. While steering the business through turbulent times, we will execute efforts across all our business lines to strengthen customer confidence and meet their needs, preserve a strong capital position, further mitigate risks and bring our costs in line with revenue expectations.

Our stakeholders

ING conducts business on the basis of clearly defined business principles. In all our activities, we carefully weigh the interests of our various stakeholders: customers, employees, communities and shareholders. ING strives to be a good corporate citizen.

Our corporate responsibility

ING wants to pursue profit on the basis of sound business ethics and respect for its stakeholders. Corporate responsibility is therefore a fundamental part of ING’s strategy: ethical, social and environmental factors play an integral role in our business decisions.

CHANGES IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE GROUP

Acquisitions effective in 2008

In December 2008, ING acquired 100% of the voluntary pension fund Oyak Emeklilik for a total consideration of EUR 110 million. Goodwill of EUR 69 million was recognised on the acquisition and is mainly attributable to the operational synergies and the future business potential resulting from the acquisition.

In July 2008, ING acquired approximately 97% of Interhyp AG, Germany’s largest independent residential mortgage distributor for a total consideration of EUR 418 million. Goodwill of EUR 371 million was recognised on the acquisition and is mainly attributable to the future potential for enhancing ING’s distribution platforms in Europe resulting from the acquisition.

In July 2008, ING acquired 100% of CitiStreet, a leading retirement plan and benefit service and administration organisation in the US defined contribution marketplace for a total consideration of EUR 578 million. Goodwill of EUR 462 million was recognised on the acquisition and is mainly attributable to the operational synergies and the future business potential resulting from the acquisition, making ING one of the largest defined contribution businesses in the United States.

In January 2008, ING closed the final transaction to acquire 100% of Banco Santander’s Latin American pension and annuity businesses through the acquisition of the pension business in Chile. See Note 29 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements “Acquisitions effective in 2007” for full details of the entire deal.

Disposals effective in 2008

In December 2007, ING reached an agreement with Berkshire Hathaway Group to sell its reinsurance unit NRG N.V. for EUR 272 million The sale resulted in a net loss of EUR 144 million. As disclosed in Note 21 ‘Other liabilities’ of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements a loss on disposal of EUR 129 million was reported in 2007. In 2008, EUR 15 million additional losses, predominantly relating to currency exchange rate changes were recognised.

In July 2008, ING announced it had completed the sale of part of its Mexican business, Seguros ING SA de CV and subsidiaries, to AXA as announced in February 2008, for a total consideration of EUR 950 million (USD 1.5 billion). The sale resulted in a gain of EUR 182 million.

In January 2008 ING completed the sale of its health business in Chile, ING Salud, to Said Group and Linzor Capital Partners, resulting in a gain on disposal of EUR 55 million.

Disposals announced and occurring or expected to occur in 2009

In October 2008 ING announced that it had reached agreement to sell its entire Taiwanese life insurance business, ING Life Taiwan, to Fubon Financial Holding Co. Ltd. for approximately EUR 447 million. At December 31, 2008 ING Life Taiwan qualified as a disposal group held for sale. The sale was completed on February 13, 2009. Consequently ING Life Taiwan will be deconsolidated in the first quarter 2009. ING will be paid in a fixed number of shares with the difference between the fair value of those shares at the closing date and sale prices being paid in subordinated debt securities of the acquirer. ING Life Taiwan is included in the segment Insurance Asia/Pacific. This transaction is expected to result in a loss of EUR 292 million . A provision has been recognised for this loss in Other liabilities. The loss has been recognised in 2008 in ‘Net gains/losses on disposal of group companies’ in the profit and loss account.

As mentioned in “Acquisitions effective in 2007” in Note 29 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements, ING acquired the AFJP Pension (Origenes AFJP S.A.) company in Argentina as part of the Santander transaction. In November 2008 the Government of Argentina passed legislation to nationalise the private pension system (AFJPs). Under the law, all client balances held by the private pension system would be transferred to the Argentina Government and AFJP’s pension business would be terminated. The law became effective in December 2008 when the Argentine Social Security Administration (ANSES) took ownership over the affiliate accounts. The nationalisation impacted the pension assets only, thus leaving ING responsible for the ongoing operating costs and liabilities including severance obligations. This resulted in a loss of EUR 188 million being recognised in 2008.

In February 2009, ING announced that it had agreed to sell its 70% stake in ING Canada for net proceeds of approximately EUR 1,265 million (CAD 2,163 million). The transaction was closed on February 19, 2009 and will be booked in 2009. This transaction will result in a decrease in Total assets of approximately EUR 5,471 million and a decrease of Total liabilities of approximately EUR 3,983 million.

For the years 2007 and 2006 as well as a description of on-going capital expenditures, see Note 29 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements.

In October 2008, the Dutch State announced measures to protect the financial sector. The Dutch State has stated it is committed to make capital available to each financial enterprise in the Netherlands that is fundamentally sound and viable. The objective is  to maintain these institutions’ own funds at the levels deemed necessary by the supervisor. The contribution of the government can take various forms, such as a participation via preferential shares, or otherwise if so required on account of the legal form, group structure or other considerations. Any financial enterprise meeting the above description is entitled to apply for this measure. If necessary, financial enterprises may consult with the authorities on specific balance-sheet problems. In any event, all these measures will be subject to conditions in order to limit market distortions and the financial risks for the government and to prevent misuse. The conditions will relate, among other things, to guarantees on returns, the financing of operational costs by the financial enterprises concerned, executive pay and representation in the executive bodies. The above applies for a period of one year as of October 10, 2008.  

In addition the State of the Netherlands implemented a EUR 200 billion guarantee scheme for the issuance of medium term bank debt (the “Credit Guarantee Scheme”). The program is scheduled to run through December 31, 2009. The guarantee scheme targets non-complex senior unsecured loans ‘plain vanilla’ commercial paper, certificates of deposit, and medium term notes, with maturities ranging from 3 to 36 months. Fees will depend on creditworthiness of the banks involved and will be based on historical credit default swap spreads (or an approximation if necessary), with an addition of 50 basis points. Maturities of less than a year will have a fixed fee of 50 basis points. The scheme will include loans denominated in euros, US Dollars and British Pounds. Both principal and interest will be covered. The Dutch State Treasury Agency will execute the scheme.

The ING Group benefited from the capital support facilities set up by the Dutch Sate as part of the measures adopted in response to the financial and economic crisis. In November 2008, ING Group issued EUR 10 billion of non-voting Core Tier-1 securities (the “Core Tier-1 Securities”) to the Dutch State. In January 2009, ING Group negotiated an Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility term sheet with the Dutch State (the “Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility); this transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2009, subject to final documentation and regulatory approval. For more information see “Item 4. Corporate Governance – Transactions with the Dutch State”. In January, February and March 2009 ING placed 3 government guaranteed senior unsecured bond issues (see list below).

On January 26, 2009, ING announced measures to reduce risks and expenses in order to adapt the Group to the current environment. In January 2009, ING entered into an Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility term sheet with the Dutch State covering ING’s Alt-A RMBS portfolio. Through this transaction, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2009, subject to final documentation and regulatory approval, risks are expected to be reduced with respect to 80% of ING’s Alt-A RMBS portfolio. In addition, expenses are targeted to be cut by EUR 1 billion in 2009, including by means of a headcount reduction of 7,000 positions. Furthermore, selective divestments will be made outside the focus of the core franchise. For more information see “Item 4. Corporate Governance – Transactions with the Dutch State”.

On January 26, 2009, ING announced that Michel Tilmant had stepped down from the Executive Board and that Jan Hommen will be nominated for appointment to the Executive Board at the 2009 annual General Meeting. Following his appointment he will act as chairman of the Executive Board. For recent changes in the Executive Board and Supervisory Board reference is made to “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.

On January 30, 2009, ING Bank announced that it has successfully placed 3 year USD denominated government guaranteed senior unsecured bonds. The issue of USD 6 billion was done under the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the Netherlands and is part of ING Group’s regular medium-term funding operations.

On November 18, 2008, ING announced the voluntary delisting from the Frankfurt, Paris and Swiss stock exchanges. The delisting was completed in the first quarter of 2009. The listings of (depositary receipts for) shares on Euronext Amsterdam and Euronext Brussels and of ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange are not affected by the delisting.

On February 11, 2009, ING announced that it closed the sale of its Taiwanese life insurance business to Fubon Financial Holding Co. Ltd. See “Disposals announced and occurring or expected to occur in 2009”.

On February 16, 2009, in light of the recently announced cost reduction programme, ING confirmed not to renew the three year sponsorship (2007-2009) contract with Renault F1 and to end its presence in F1 beyond the 2009 season.

On February 19, 2009, ING Group announced that it has completed the sale of its 70% stake in ING Canada via a private placement and a concurrent “bought deal” public offering. ING no longer owns an interest in ING Canada, the largest provider of property & casualty insurance products and services in Canada. See: “Disposals announced and occurring or expected to occur in 2009”.

On February 20, 2009, ING Bank announced that it has placed a 5 year EUR 4 billion government guaranteed senior unsecured bond issue. The issue of EUR 4 billion was done under the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the State of the Netherlands and is part of ING Bank’s regular medium-term funding operations.

On February 23, 2009, ING announced that the Supervisory Board intends to nominate Patrick Flynn (1960, Irish) for appointment to the Executive Board at the annual General Meeting of Shareholders of April 27, 2009. Upon appointment Patrick Flynn will become the new Chief Financial Officer of ING.

On March 12, 2009, ING Bank announced that it has placed a 5 year USD denominated government guaranteed senior unsecured bond issue. The issue of USD 2 billion was done under the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the State of the Netherlands and is part of ING Bank’s regular medium-term funding operations.

Adjusting to a new reality

Key points:

	§		Confronting the crisis head on
	§		Prioritizing customers, capital, risk and costs
	§		Delivering an easier customer experience
	§		Focus on banking, investments, life insurance and retirement services

The global financial crisis has strongly impacted the financial services sector. ING has not been immune and has seen a corresponding deterioration in earnings. As maintaining the confidence of our stakeholders is essential to remain successful, we will confront the crisis head on by putting customers first, preserving our capital base, further mitigating risks and lowering costs. We will continue to align our long term business strategy around a universal customer ideal: saving and investing for the future should be easier. This is even more valid going forward, as the crisis proves that financial institutions need to reduce the complexity of their product and services offering and go back to the basics of finance.

In the course of 2008 the financial crisis intensified significantly. It has become evident that the long-lasting period of low interest rates and ample liquidity has triggered the emergence of incongruities in the financial sector. A combination of factors has severely undermined the proper functioning of the financial system: the mispricing of risk and excessive leverage by a number of financial institutions, the rapid emergence of toxic assets, the industry’s over-reliance on mathematical modeling as well as the detrimental effects of certain incentive structures and the pro-cyclical working of accounting rules. As a result of the crisis, customer confidence in the sector has decreased significantly.

The consequences have been far-reaching. The market expectations of capital requirements for international financial institutions have increased substantially, forcing governments around the world to support banks with large capital injections. Unfortunately, ING was no exception. Although our commercial performance kept up reasonably well, the sharp market decline in 2008 led to significant impairments and negative revaluations across almost all asset classes, also affecting our earnings and capital position. Looking forward, all indicators suggest that market conditions will remain difficult throughout 2009.

The challenges we are facing in these exceptional times clearly require thoughtful solutions. Therefore, we are taking a fresh look at our business to seek new ways of doing business. In the Netherlands, the new bank created by combining ING Bank and Postbank began operating under the ING brand from 2009. In Belgium, we continued with the implementation of a new retail branch service concept, transforming traditional branches into outlets with automated self-service cash functions and online banking access. We invested in our retail banking network with a particular focus on Poland, Romania, Turkey and India. Building on our banking business, ING

Direct aims to offer a more complete range of products in all countries, instead of offering single savings products. In Germany, ING Direct’s mortgage activities have been strengthened by the acquisition of Interhyp.

At Wholesale Banking, we reviewed and even selectively decreased our client coverage model in non-core markets. We reduced and exited certain volatile products and activities, especially in equities markets and within Financial Markets Strategic Trading. We will increasingly focus our full-service wholesale banking activities on the Benelux, where we aim to become the leading wholesale bank. ING also has ambitions to be a market leader in Poland and Romania, as well as in a number of key products globally, like Structured Finance.

In December 2008, we completed the acquisition of the Turkish voluntary pension company Oyak Emeklilik, which has been integrated in Insurance Europe. Oyak Emeklilik will be re-branded under the ING brand in 2009.

In the Americas, we are focused on the long-term growth opportunities presented by the ageing of the US population and the increasing wealth in Latin America. The acquisition of CitiStreet, one of the major retirement plan service and administration organizations in the US defined contribution market, provides us with an expanded geographic footprint and broader service offerings to customers. In Peru, we increased our stake in AFP Integra to 80%, the number one pension fund company by market share.

In Asia/Pacific, bank distribution was further reinforced through an exclusive agreement with the Royal Bank of Scotland in Hong Kong, and by sales expansion through TMB Bank from the Bangkok region to the entire branch network in Thailand. Furthermore, ING became one of the multi-region preferred strategic partners of HSBC Insurance.

Strategy: adjusting to a new reality

Financial institutions like ING have an important role to play in creating the conditions for social and economic progress, by taking and spreading the financial risks of individuals and companies. Yet, the credit crisis underscores that we can only do this if we are trusted by our customers. Earning and maintaining customer trust therefore an absolute prerequisite for any financial institution to operate. As the increased complexity of the financial services industry has been a major cause of the crisis and the loss of customer confidence, going back to the basics of finance is inevitable.

ING has a clear eye for what lies at the heart of our business: collecting customer balances and redeploying these in the economy, by means of a self originated loan book consisting of mortgages and corporate, private and other types of loans. We are well aware of our responsibilities and will continue to do our utmost to maintain the confidence of all our stakeholders and to contribute to a proper functioning of markets. We will align our long term business strategy around a universal customer ideal: saving and investing for the future should be easier.

Going forward we will take steps to strengthen our financial position and adjust to the reality of the global recession while keeping focus on our long-term priorities. In the short to medium term, we will step up efforts to steer the business through these turbulent times, to stabilize our company and reinforce our credibility. Our efforts will be focused on disciplined execution of these plans in 2009, specifically by:

	§		putting customers first
	§		preserving a strong capital position, including divestments that free up capital
	§		further mitigating risks
	§		bringing our costs in line with the operating environment

Putting customers first

The credit crisis has had a clear impact on customer needs, both in terms of product offering, as well as servicing models. These turbulent times prove once more that delivering an easier customer experience and going back to basics should be an essential part of our strategy. Hence, we will continue along the path chosen in 2007, when we launched our Easier programme, which emphasizes the attributes that build customer trust and competitive advantage over the long term: customers expect us to be available when they need us, to provide them with a clear overview of their financial situation, to respond to their queries in a fast and efficient manner, to be open and transparent about our products and services and to provide them with objective and professional advice. Apart from the need to reinforce our efforts to deliver an easier customer experience, the crisis has created a shift in customer demand towards products that offer wealth-protection and risk reduction. Therefore, we will reposition our product portfolio to accommodate changing customer needs.

Preserving a strong capital position

The economic environment has not only put pressure on the profitability of our business, but has also led to an internationally recognized belief that going forward, capital requirements for financial institutions should be higher. Although our capital position was above or in line with previously targeted levels and regulatory requirements, in October 2008 we decided to further strengthen our capital base in the form of the issuance of EUR 10 billion of CoreTier-1 Securities to the Dutch State, which brought our ING Bank Core Tier-1 ratio to 9.32% as per December 31, 2008.

The current environment also forces us to reassess in what businesses and geographies ING has a strong market position that is sustainable for the long term. We aim to avoid asset-growth in pressurized sectors and continue our efforts to deleverage our balance sheet and to reduce the volatility and complexity of our portfolio. We will make a number of selective divestments outside the core of our franchise to free up capital and simplify the organization. We will do so in a disciplined manner. In February 2009, we sold our interest our in ING Canada, the largest provider of property & casualty insurance products and services in Canada.

Mitigating risk

ING has been reducing risk across the balance sheet over the course of 2008. We aim to further reduce our risk exposure in the coming period. In 2008, we have started to reduce our real estate, private equity, corporate bond and interest rate exposure. We sold several equity stakes and implemented hedges. Moreover, we have begun to cap balance sheet growth for the bank and reduced market value risk for insurance operations. In Taiwan, ING sold its life insurance business to Fubon Financial Holding, which resulted in a reduction of interest rate risk exposure.

In January 2009, ING and the Dutch State reached an agreement on an Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility term sheet covering ING’s Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities. Market prices for these securities had become depressed as liquidity dried up, which affected our results and equity far in excess of reasonably expected credit losses. This transaction with the Dutch State as described in the term sheet would significantly reduce the uncertainty regarding the impact on ING of any potential future losses on 80% of the portfolio. In 2009, we will continue to reduce our risk profile. We believe in a strong risk management function that is fully integrated into the daily management and strategic planning of all our business units. ING aims to close this transaction in the first quarter of 2009, but the closing is dependent on the completion of final documentation and approval of various regulators.

Bringing costs in line with the operating environment

With pressure on margins and investment returns, it is vital to contain costs. In January 2009 we announced the plan to cut operating expenses by EUR 1 billion in 2009. The structural expense reduction is expected to lead to annual savings of approximately EUR 1.1 billion from 2010 onwards. Of the cutback, 35% will come from a reduction of the workforce by approximately 7,000 full-time positions in 2009. The remainder of the expense reduction comes from decreasing costs for our head office, marketing, the Formula 1 programme, consultancy, third-party staff and the renegotiating of certain contracts with IT-vendors.

By taking these measures we are bringing expenses in line with the operating environment. This will make ING leaner and more flexible as we position ourselves for an eventual recovery.

Long term priorities

We are convinced that it is in the long-term interest of all our stakeholders (customers, employees, communities, and shareholders) to do whatever is necessary to maximize business opportunities whilst maintaining the financial health and growth prospects of our company. Our focus on banking, investments, life insurance, and retirement services, enables us to provide retail customers with the products they need during their lives to grow savings, manage investments and prepare for retirement with confidence. With our wide range of products, innovative distribution models and strong footprints in both mature and developing markets, we have the economic, technological and demographic trends on our side.

We will continue to invest in our bank distribution platforms. We are able to serve our 85 million customers through different distribution channels – our direct banking channels and branches and also through tied agents, and via distribution agreements with other parties. Banks can fill many customer needs across a wide range of products from liquidity to lending and investing. Banking is also structurally well-positioned with many chances for customer interaction and long customer retention.

But even with the right mindset and structure in place, shielding customers from market risks while managing earnings volatility remains a daunting challenge, especially in the uncertain market environment of today.

Therefore, we also want to make sure that we continue to be able to generate a good portion of our own assets as well. Our wholesale banking activities will thus continue to play a fundamentally important role, as our expertise in this field helps us generate the high-quality assets in which we can invest our retail deposits. Our wholesale banking business also provides us with relevant skills in risk management, and gives us access to financial markets around the world. Lastly, our asset management will also remain key to our strategy. In order to optimize our asset management skills, we will further strengthen our capabilities and investment expertise to deliver first-class investment performance for our clients.

High grow markets continue to play an important role for ING. Yet, given the new economic and regulatory realities and the necessity to preserve ING’s capital position, new investments will be tempered.

While drawing lessons from the crisis and the debate on the function of financial institutions in society, we will review the portfolio of the company in terms of markets, distribution models as well as product offering, in order to ensure our long-term competitiveness. We will focus on fewer, coherent and strong businesses Also, we will simplify the organization, improve the fundamentals of our business and invest in improving commercial processes.

Moreover, further strengthening of our brand around a universal ideal of delivering an easier customer experience remains a main objective, as awareness and appreciation of the ING brand is essential in building trust, a key driver for long-term business growth.

Last, but certainly not least, continued investment in our people is essential. ING is proud to have highly skilled and motivated staff. Hence, we will continue to promote people-oriented leadership, and to drive for excellence.

Conclusions and ambitions

The global financial crisis made 2008 an extremely challenging year for all financial institutions and ING was no exception. The sharp market decline in 2008 has confronted us with significant impairments and negative revaluations across almost all asset classes. ING is confronting the crisis head on by putting customers first, preserving a strong capital position, further mitigating risks and lowering costs.

While the global economy will be confronted with a recession in 2009, our first priority is to improve the financial fundamentals of the company, without losing perspective on the long term. We will assess our strategic focus and review our portfolio in the best interests of our customers: the markets we want to be in, our distribution models and our product offering. ING will pursue a universal customer ideal: saving and investing for the future should be easier.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Legislative and regulatory developments

In December 2008, the Monitoring Committee of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Frijns Committee’) published an updated version of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (‘Tabaksblat Code’ or ‘Code’), the draft of which was distributed for consultation in June 2008. The revised Code became effective on January 1, 2009.

ING Group is now considering the revised Code and to what extent it can be implemented. As recommended by the Frijns Committee, the implementation of the revised Code will be discussed at the 2010 General Meeting as a separate agenda item.

In 2008, several changes of EU origin relating to listed company disclosure and transparency were proposed to be implemented in Dutch law. These especially affect annual and interim financial reporting, a mandatory corporate governance statement in the annual report and – for public interest entities – the introduction of a mandatory audit committee. Subsidiaries of a public interest entity which complies with the mandatory audit committee requirement are exempt. ING Group, ING Bank N.V, and ING Verzekeringen N.V. have an audit committee, whereas the other ING Group subsidiaries in the Netherlands make use of this exemption.

Furthermore, also as a result of EU legislation, the rules on the maintenance and alteration of capital of public limited liability companies were amended. The amended rules, among others things, facilitate the issue of shares against contribution in kind, the repurchase of shares, and the provision of financial support for the acquisition of a company’s own stock by third parties.

A legislative proposal to implement the EU Shareholder Rights Directive was submitted to the Dutch Parliament in November 2008. It primarily addresses matters of logistics in the build-up to a general meeting, such as the disclosure and distribution of the meeting materials, the record date, shareholders’ proposals and the asking of questions.

Following a consultation procedure, a legislative proposal was submitted to Dutch Parliament in November 2008 to facilitate the introduction of the one-tier board into Dutch company law. The proposal will clarify the rules on the division of tasks in a board of directors. This proposal also includes a revised version of the conflict of interest rules and will abolish the required second candidate within the context of a binding nomination, recommended by the Tabaksblat Committee in 2003.

Finally, as a result of a change in Dutch law, the term ‘general meeting of shareholders’ in the Dutch Civil Code was changed to ‘general meeting’. For the time being ING Group is not planning to change its Articles of Association to incorporate the new term, though the term is used in this Annual Report.

Transactions with the Dutch State

On November 12, 2008, ING Group issued 1 billion Core Tier-1 Securities (‘Securities’) to the Dutch State against payment of EUR 10 per Security resulting in an increase of ING Group’s Core Tier-1 capital of EUR 10 billion. The Securities do not form part of ING Group’s share capital; accordingly they do not carry voting rights in the General Meeting. The financial entitlements of the Securities are described in Note 12 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2009, ING entered into an Illiquid Assets Back-up Facility term sheet with the Dutch State covering ING’s Alt-A Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) portfolio. Through this transaction, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2009, subject to the completion of final documentation and regulatory approval, the Dutch State will become the economic owner of 80% of the Alt-A RMBS portfolio. This transaction is expected to be concluded at a price of 90% of par value with respect to the 80% proportion of the portfolio of which the Dutch State will become the economic owner. Par value of the portfolio is approximately EUR 30 billion. Following the deteriorated economic outlook in the third and fourth quarter, market prices for these securities had become depressed as liquidity dried up, which had an impact on ING’s results and equity far in excess of estimated credit losses. Under the terms of the facility, ING will sell an undivided 80% interest in each security in the Alt-A RMBS portfolios to the Dutch State. The Dutch State will absorb 80% of the risks and returns on the Alt-A RMBS portfolio. ING will remain exposed to 20% of the risk of the Alt-A RMBS portfolios and will remain the legal owner of 100% of the securities. In the portfolio as such the transaction will significantly reduce the uncertainty regarding the impact on ING of any future losses in the portfolio. In addition, as a result of the facility, 80% of the Alt-A RMBS portfolios will be derecognized from ING’s balance sheet under IFRS. Therefore, 80% of the negative revaluation reserve on the securities will be reversed, resulting in an increase of approximately EUR 5 billion in shareholders’ equity. Another benefit of the facility is that it will reduce the amount of ING’s risk weighted assets by approximately EUR 13 billion. As condition to the Facility ING will commit to support the growth of the Dutch lending business for an amount of EUR 25 billion on market conforming conditions. The Dutch State will also acquire certain consent rights with respect to the sale or transfer of the 20% proportion of the Alt-A RMBS portfolio that is retained by ING.

On January 30, 2009, its subsidiary ING Bank N.V. announced that it had issued under the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the Netherlands USD 6 billion three-year government guaranteed senior unsecured bonds, in February 2009 a 5 year EUR 4 billion fixed rate government guaranteed senior unsecured bond and in March 2009 a 5 year USD 2 billion government guaranteed senior unsecured bond (the “Government Guaranteed Bonds or the “Bonds’).

In the framework of these transactions, certain arrangements with respect to corporate governance and executive remuneration were agreed with the Dutch State which will remain in place as long as the Dutch State owns at least 250 million Securities, as long as the Back-up Facility is in place (provided that the final documentation is concluded and the closing occurs pursuant to the term sheet of January 26, 2009) or any of the Bonds is outstanding (whichever expired last). These arrangements entail that:

•		the Dutch State may recommend two candidates (‘State Nominees’) for appointment to the Supervisory Board. Certain decisions of the Supervisory Board require approval of the State Nominees (see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Supervisory Board”);
•		ING Group will develop a sustainable remuneration policy for the Executive Board and Senior Management that is aligned to new international standards and submit this to its General Meeting for adoption. This remuneration policy shall include incentive schemes which are linked to long-term value creation, thereby taking account of risk and restricting the potential for ‘rewards for failure’. The new remuneration policy will amongst others include objectives relating to corporate and social responsibility;
•		members of the ING Executive Board will not receive any performance-related payment – either in cash, options, shares or depositary receipts – for 2008, 2009 and subsequent years until the adoption of the new remuneration policy mentioned above;
•		severance payments to Executive Board member will be limited to a maximum of one year’s fixed salary, in line with the Tabaksblat Code;
•		ING undertakes to support the growth of the Dutch lending to corporates and consumers (including mortgages) for an amount of EUR 25 billion, on market conforming terms;

•		ING will pro-actively use EUR 10 billion of the Dutch Guarantee Scheme over 2009;
•		ING commits itself to maintaining the Dutch payment system PIN on its payment debit cards as long as other market participants, representing a substantial market share, are still making use of this payment system;
•		Appointment of the Chief Executive Officer of the Executive Board requires approval of the State’s nominees.

For more information on the State Nominees and for more information on the other arrangements, reference is made to Item 6. “ Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.

Shareholder participation and position of the Trust Office

As announced earlier, the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board intend to reconsider the position of the Stichting ING Aandelen (the “‘Trust Office”) and depositary receipts once the number of votes on ordinary shares and depositary receipts of ordinary shares, including proxies and excluding the votes which are at the discretion of the Trust Office at a General Meeting is at least 35% of the total votes that may be cast for three consecutive years.

In 2006, the percentage of votes thus cast amounted to 28% of total votes, which increased to 37.6% in 2007 and to well over 38% in 2008. The Executive Board is committed to encouraging depositary receipt holders, particularly institutional investors, to participate in voting at the General Meeting.

Elimination of preference A shares and preference B shares

In 2008 all remaining preference A shares were eliminated. Such shares were cancelled either following the repurchase of the depositary receipts of the A shares, or through redemption. Subsequently, the preference A shares and the preference B shares were removed from ING Group’s Articles of Association. As a result, all outstanding ING Group shares have voting rights proportional to their economic value as recommended under section IV.1.2 of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code.

Separate Remuneration Committee and Nomination Committee

On January 1, 2009, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee of the Supervisory Board was split into a separate Remuneration Committee and a Nomination Committee. As recommended under section III.5.11. of the Tabaksblat Code, the Remuneration Committee will not be chaired by the chairman of the Supervisory Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODES

In compliance with the Dutch Corporate Governance Code

In its corporate governance structure and practices, ING Group uses the Tabaksblat Code of 2003 as reference. The Code can be downloaded on the website of the Frijns Committee. The ING Group corporate governance structure described in the document ‘The Dutch Corporate Governance Code — ING’s implementation of the Tabaksblat Code for good corporate governance’ was approved by the General Meeting on April 26, 2005. As a result, ING Group is considered to be in full compliance with the Tabaksblat Code, although it does not apply all best-practice provisions of the Code in full. The document is available on the website of ING Group (www.ing.com).

The following deviations from the Tabaksblat Code are to be reported for 2008:

•		best-practice provision II.1.1.: Michel Tilmant, being appointed as an Executive Board member before January 1, 2004, was appointed for an indefinite period of time. He stepped down from the Executive Board effective January 26, 2009;
•		best-practice provision II.2.3: Executive Board members may sell shares awarded to them without financial consideration within the five-year retention period in order to cover the wage tax which is to be withheld over the vested award, so as to avoid the total wage tax being withheld in the month of vesting exceeding the gross salary payment of that month;
•		best-practice provisions II.2.3, II.2.10 and II.2.11: although ING Group’s policy is to disclose the performance criteria for variable remuneration only to the extent that this information is not share price sensitive or competition-sensitive, this is not relevant for 2008 as no variable remuneration will be paid to Executive Board members with respect to performance in 2008;
•		best-practice provisions II.2.8, II.3.2. and II.3.3: Executive Board members may obtain banking and insurance services from ING Group subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their business and on terms that apply to all employees. These may include services in which the granting of credit is of a subordinate nature, e.g. credit cards and overdrafts in current accounts. These exceptions are based on a lack of materiality;
•		best-practice provision III.2.2: if a Supervisory Board member does not meet the independence criteria of the Code, the Supervisory Board may still decide to consider such member to be independent in order to take into account specific circumstances, such as family and employment relations, so as to allow for situations of non-independence that are not material;

•		best-practice provisions III.2.2. and II.3.1: the legally required second candidate on a binding nomination for appointment to the Supervisory Board does not need to meet the independence criteria of the Tabaksblat Code nor the requirements of the Supervisory Board profile, in view of the contemplated abolition of this legal requirement;
•		best-practice provision III.3.4: Jan Hommen, who was appointed in the 2005 annual General Meeting as a Supervisory Board member, has more than five positions as a supervisory board member with other Dutch-listed companies. This was approved by the Supervisory Board in view of the fact that Jan Hommen’s intention to give up his chairmanship of the Supervisory Board of TNT N.V. With a view to his proposed appointment to the Executive Board at the 2009 General Meeting, Jan Hommen will step down from his positions as a Supervisory Board member of Reed Elsevier N.V. and TNT N.V. by April 2009. He will also step down from his position as a Supervisory Board member of Koninklijke FrieslandCampina N.V. (non-listed);
•		best-practice provision III.3.5: under special circumstances the Supervisory Board may deviate from the general rule that a member of the Supervisory Board may not be reappointed for more than two subsequent four-year terms;
•		best-practice provision III.5.1: instead of a separate remuneration committee and a nomination committee, ING Group established a combined Remuneration and Nomination Committee; this committee however, was separated into a Nomination Committee and a Remuneration Committee on January 1, 2009;
•		best-practice provision III.5.11: the Remuneration and Nomination Committee was chaired by the chairman of the Supervisory Board (best-practice provision III.5.11); as of January 1, 2009, the new separate Remuneration Committee will no longer be chaired by the chairman of the Supervisory Board;
•		best-practice provision III.6.1: in the case of a transaction with a family member that entails a conflict of interests according to the Code, the Supervisory Board may decide that no conflict of interests exists if the relationship is based on a marriage that is now over, to allow for situations where the family relationship no longer exists;
•		best-practice provision III.6.3 and III.6.4: transactions with Supervisory Board members or persons holding at least 10% of the shares of ING Group in which there are significant conflicting interests will be published in the Annual Report, unless (i) this conflicts with the law, (ii) the confidential, share-price sensitive or competition-sensitive character of the transaction prevents this and/or (iii) the information is so competition-sensitive that the publication could damage the competitive position of ING Group;
•		best-practice provisions III.7.4: Supervisory Board members may obtain banking and insurance services from ING Group subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their business and on terms that are customary in the sector. These may include services in which the granting of credit is of a subordinate nature, e.g. credit cards and overdrafts in current accounts. These exceptions are based on a lack of materiality;
•		best-practice provision IV.3.8: if a notarial report is drawn up of the General Meeting, shareholders will not have the opportunity to react to the minutes of the meeting, as this would be in conflict with the laws applicable to such notarial report.

NYSE Requirements

For an overview of what we believe to be the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and NYSE corporate governance rules applicable to US companies, see Item 16G. Corporate Governance. The summary of such significant differences is also available on the website of ING Group (www.ing.com).

CORPORATE ORGANIZATION

ING Groep N.V. has a Supervisory Board and an Executive Board. The Executive Board is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Group and its business lines (Insurance Europe, Insurance Americas, Insurance Asia/Pacific, Wholesale Banking, Retail Banking and ING Direct). For more information about the Supervisory and Executive Boards, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.

Business Lines

Each business line formulates the strategic, commercial and financial policies in conformity with the group strategy and performance targets set by the Executive Board. Each business line is also responsible for the preparation of its annual budget, which is then approved and monitored by the Executive Board. In addition, each business line approves the strategy, commercial policy and the annual budgets of the business units in its business line and monitors the realization of the policies and budgets of that business line and its business units.

The following chart shows the breakdown by business line of ING’s total income for the year 2008. Please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, Segment Reporting” for the total income and result before tax by business line for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006.

INSURANCE EUROPE

ING Insurance Europe operates in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, Spain, Greece, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and Russia. The operating companies in these countries have tailored their insurance products, investment and pension fund services for certain target markets and distribution channels. In the wake of the credit crisis, Insurance Europe will focus on retaining its customers, managing capital efficiently and reducing its cost base .

ING Insurance Europe has three key strategic priorities. First, in the mature markets of the Benelux, ING focuses on improving efficiency and optimising the balance sheet. Second, in the growing markets of Central Europe, the focus is on accelerating growth in key geographies. Third, across all regions, ING leverages on the opportunities created by the ageing of the European population by reinforcing its position as a specialist provider of banking, life insurance, investments and retirement services for retail customers.

In the Netherlands, ING offers basic retail insurance products via direct marketing (Postbank, which has been rebranded ING in early 2009), while independent intermediaries (Nationale-Nederlanden) and tied agents (RVS) are more suitable for selling complex products requiring personal service and specialized advice. In Central Europe, tied agents are the main distribution channel. In this region too, ING continues to strive towards a multi-distribution approach with banks, brokers and direct marketing as additional channels. ING considers the client’s need for personal service and specialized advice as an important factor in determining how to distribute its products and services within Europe.

ING Investment Management Europe (“ING IM Europe”) is the principal proprietary asset manager for ING Insurance Europe. ING IM Europe also manages equity, fixed income and structured investments for institutional investors and the private label investment funds sold by various ING companies, including ING Bank Netherlands, ING Bank Belgium, Nationale-Nederlanden and third party distributors. In addition, ING IM Europe is responsible for managing the treasury activities of ING Insurance.

ING’s life insurance products in Europe consist of a broad range of traditional, unit-linked and variable annuity policies written for both individual and group customers. In some countries, Group policies are designed to fund private pension benefits offered by a wide range of businesses and institutions as a supplement to government provided benefits. ING is also a prominent provider of mandatory and voluntary pension funds in several countries in Central Europe. ING also has a dedicated team to develop and grow its variable annuity business across Europe. Thus far the variable annuity product has been rolled out in Spain, Poland, Hungary and the Netherlands and in 2009, it will be rolled out in Belgium.

ING’s non-life products, mainly in the Netherlands, include coverage for both individual and commercial/group clients for fire, automobile, disability, transport and aviation insurance, third party liability insurance and indirect premiums (incoming reinsurance premiums). Nationale-Nederlanden has also developed a central product manufacturing service for property & casualty insurance, which has developed products for ING Bank in Belgium and ING in the Netherlands. ING offers a broad range of disability insurance products and complementary services for employers and self-employed professionals (such as dentists, general practitioners and lawyers).

INSURANCE AMERICAS

ING Insurance Americas (“ING Americas”) operates in three main geographic areas: Canada, the United States, and Latin America. ING Americas offers life and non-life insurance, retirement services (primarily defined contribution plans), annuities, mutual funds, broker-dealer services and institutional products, including group reinsurance and institutional asset management products and services.

In 2008, ING Americas in the United States operated through three divisions: Wealth Management (retirement services, annuities and broker-dealer services), Insurance (individual life, group life and reinsurance) and Asset Management. Through these divisions, ING provides a wide variety of financial products and services to individual and institutional customers. Distribution channels for Wealth Management and Insurance include career agents, independent producers, brokers-dealers and financial institutions as well as financial planners and affiliated distribution channels. Career agents, affiliated and independent broker-dealers and an institutional sales force support the Asset Management division’s product distribution. In 2009 a new structure will simplify the US Wealth Management business model by separating the management of the annuities product line from that of retirement services, and provide more focus on ING’s diverse collection of customers and distribution partners.

ING is a major player in retirement services, providing defined contribution plans to small and medium-sized corporations, educational institutions, hospitals and governments. The integration of the CitiStreet business acquired in May of 2008 into Retirement Services has proceeded well and key business and operation policies and strategies have been developed which leverage the strengths and talents of both organizations. CitiStreet, one of the premier retirement plan service and administration organizations in the US defined contribution marketplace, provides ING with unique market opportunities. These include an expanded geographic footprint, further entry into specific market segments and broader service offerings to customers. ING plans to fully leverage CitiStreet’s excellent scalable technology platform to allow smooth business expansion.

ING continued to invest in expanding its distribution capacity, particularly in variable annuities, seeking out partnerships with major distributors. Several major distribution partnerships were announced during the year. ING continued to target pre-and post retirees in sales strategies as part of the “EASIER” brand campaign. Sales began to slow in the third quarter as equity markets became more volatile and dipped further in the fourth quarter. Several product changes were made over the course of the year and additional changes will be made in 2009 in response to deteriorating market conditions.

The Asset Management organization includes ING Investment Management Americas (“ING IM Americas”), Mutual Funds and Financial Products. ING IM Americas manages proprietary assets for ING Americas’ insurance entities, investing in a diverse mix of public fixed income, private placements, commercial mortgages and alternative assets. ING IM Americas third party business units (mainly in the U.S.) include mutual fund sub-advisory, institutional assets, alternative assets and managed accounts; their products are distributed through internal, affiliated and outside distribution channels. Third party assets are managed in a wide range of investment styles and portfolios including: domestic and international equity portfolios of various value, blend and growth styles and of small, mid- and large capitalization, domestic and international fixed income portfolios across the major bond and loan market sectors, balanced portfolios, hedge funds, funds of funds and private equity. The Financial Products unit of Asset Management provides principal protection products such as guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements to institutional customers.

The U.S. Insurance businesses focus on both individual and institutional clients and provide a wide range of insurance products, including variable universal life, universal life, and term insurance. Individual retail markets include the high net worth and mass affluent markets. Institutional customers are served by the Retail Life unit (which sells bank-owned and corporate-owned life insurance), the Employee Benefits unit (which provides both group and voluntary insurance products), and by ING Reinsurance (which provides group reinsurance coverage). It is this diversified model and Individual Life’s continued focus on effective distribution, efficient operations and competitive manufacturing that allowed the business to generate an important increase in sales and market share in 2008.

ING Canada remains the number one property & casualty insurer in the country, and its scale and disciplined pricing has enabled the company to be at the forefront of the industry. The conservatively managed property & casualty business has been relatively unaffected by the financial crisis. Focus continues to be on making it easier for individuals and brokers to do business with ING Canada whether through agents, affiliation groups or direct over the internet. In early February 2009, ING sold its 70% stake in ING Canada.

In Latin America, ING is the second largest pension provider based on Assets under Management. In Peru, ING is the largest pension provider by market share; in Mexico and Chile, the third largest; and in Uruguay and Colombia, ING ranks among the top-five providers. The sale of the Mexican insurance business in July 2008 allowed ING in Mexico to concentrate on its growing Afore pension, annuities and investment management businesses. In Peru, ING increased its stake in AFP Integra, the number one pension fund company in Peru, to 80%, and also increased its shareholding in ING Fondos, a Peruvian mutual fund provider. In November, the Argentine government nationalized the country’s private pension system, which included ING’s pension fund business. The region continues to serve as a critical component in ING’s global growth strategy.

INSURANCE ASIA/PACIFIC

ING Insurance Asia/Pacific (“IAP”) is a leading provider of life insurance and wealth management products and services. It is the number two international life insurer in Asia/Pacific based on new sales, with twelve life operations in ten markets. In 2008 IAP announced the sale of its life insurance business in Taiwan; the transaction was closed on February 11, 2009. Following the completion of this transaction, IAP’s life insurance footprint in Asia/Pacific is reduced to 11 operations in 9 countries. IAP is also the region’s fourth largest investment manager, based on assets under management, with asset management operations in thirteen markets. ING has flagship operations in the mature and larger markets of Australia and New Zealand, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (asset management only, upon completion of the Taiwan life insurance sale), and is

well positioned to secure an increasing share of future growth in the large and emerging markets of Malaysia, China, India and Thailand, which are also among the fastest growing in Asia.

An IAP regional office in Hong Kong leads, controls and supports all IAP business units in the region, ensures implementation of strategy and standards and facilitates regional and global synergies.

The business units in Asia/Pacific offer select types of life insurance, wealth management, and retail and institutional asset management products and services. These include annuities, endowment, disability/morbidity insurance, unit linked/ universal life, whole life, participating life, group life, accident and health, term life and employee benefits. In Hong Kong non-life insurance products (including medical, motor, fire, marine, personal accident and general liability) are also offered.

The core Asia/Pacific traditional distribution network of tied agents, career agents and financial advisors is increasingly complemented by alternative distribution channels including bancassurance, brokers, worksite and direct marketing as well as online distribution.

IAP estimates that its combined insurance operations rank second among regional foreign life insurers by annualized premium equivalent (annualized premium equivalent represents the aggregate of new regular premium sales and 10% of new single premium sales of life insurance products) and its combined investment management operations in Asia, excluding Australia and Japan, rank second in terms of total assets under management. IAP’s market ranking is based on an analysis of public disclosures by regulators and competitors as well as data provided by independent publications.

WHOLESALE BANKING

Wholesale Banking’s primary focus is on the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland and Romania, where it offers a full range of products, from cash management to corporate finance. Elsewhere, it takes a more selective approach to clients and products. Wholesale Banking has six business units: General Lending & Payments and Cash Management (PCM), Structured Finance, Leasing & Factoring, Financial Markets, Other Wholesale Products, and ING Real Estate.

After years of improved capital efficiency, solid profit growth and expense reduction, Wholesale Banking launched a new ‘Fitter, Focused, Further’ strategy for 2008-2010, the aim being to become a leader in several key markets and products.

The strategy includes becoming the market leader in the Benelux, a top 5 wholesale bank in Central and Eastern Europe (selected markets), and a global or regional leader in a number of key product areas, including Structured Finance, Financial Markets, Payments and Cash Management (PCM) and Leasing.

During 2008, the organisation introduced several cost containment initiatives to reduce operating expenses and stimulate growth. We reduced and exited certain volatile products and activities, especially in equities markets and within Financial Markets Strategic Trading. Core products were prioritised and optimised.

Volumes increased in General Lending over the course of 2008 as the turbulent market circumstances offered the possibility to pursue selective asset growth, at higher margins and fee levels.

ING’s Payments & Cash Management business experienced volume growth due to new and renewed mandates from institutional clients. Opportunities also arose from the creation of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) on January 28, 2008, which removed the distinction between national and intra-European cross-border payments. ING also expanded its PCM activity into new markets, including Russia, Romania and Ukraine.

Structured Finance held up well due to strong demand from customers in a market where credit had been reduced significantly. ING continued to support clients’ funding needs during 2008. The scarcity of available financing further increased margins, especially benefiting Structured Finance in the US, but also in Western Europe and Asia. Deal flow was particularly robust in Natural Resources.

In spite of the difficult market circumstances, Leasing & Factoring saw strong increases in portfolio size and income levels throughout 2008. ING also continued to seek out opportunities to cross-sell services to corporate clients. Leasing growth was driven by higher volumes in Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Hungary and Russia.

Financial Markets had an exceptionally strong first half and continued to show robust operational performance during the rest of the year. Nevertheless, credit related markdowns and impairments in the second half negatively impacted 2008’s overall performance.

As a result of the financial market crisis, real estate markets deteriorated during 2008 resulting in a tough year for ING Real Estate.

Wholesale Banking completed a number of high profile transactions in 2008. ING was the book runner and mandated lead arranger (MLA) to InBev for the underwriting and credit facilities for the USD 45 billion acquisition of Anheuser-Busch in the US. Furthermore, the Financial Markets team also provided USD 8.6 billion in IRS / FX swaps for the acquisition.

ING also won a mandate to help Leaseplan Corporation, the car leasing affiliate of Volkswagen AG, raise up to EUR 1.5 billion with a two-year bond. In December, ING also participated in the successful completion of a EUR 7.2 billion rights issue by Santander.

2008 was an unusually difficult year for the financial sector. Wholesale Banking kept its focus on its customers, and despite the financial crisis managed to record solid commercial performance across most of its businesses. The business continues to secure important mandates and transactions. It is watching expenses carefully, in part to compensate for higher risk costs and impairments, and has adjusted its strategic focus to key geographies and product areas where it already has a competitive advantage.

Wholesale Banking remains one of the largest contributors of profit to ING Group, and has a clearly defined focus and ambition to be a full-service Benelux bank and a specialist products provider globally.

RETAIL BANKING

The retail banking business focuses on retail banking services to individuals, and to small- and medium-sized businesses and on private banking. These businesses are supported by a multi-product, multi-channel distribution approach. We serve two types of retail markets, each reflecting our different market positions and therefore each requiring a slightly different approach with regard to the retail strategy. In the mature markets of the Netherlands and Belgium, our strategy is to assist our clients in areas such as wealth accumulation, savings and mortgages. We seek to distribute these different products through an efficient mix of channels appropriate to the client segments and products. In a number of selected developing markets (India, Poland, Romania, Turkey) with the right demographics, economic growth potential and stable institutional environment, our strategy is to become a prominent player in the local retail banking markets, providing our clients with simple but quality products. In the mature markets, achieving operational excellence and cost leadership, combined with the right level of customer satisfaction, will be important for continuing profit growth. ING considers developing economies as opportunities for structural growth due to their strong demographics, rapid income growth, emerging middle classes and relatively low penetration of the financial services sector.

The Netherlands

Postbank is ING’s direct bank in the Netherlands. Postbank reaches its individual customers through home banking, telephone, call centers, internet banking, mailings and post offices. Using direct marketing methods, Postbank leverages its position as a leading provider of current account services and payments systems to provide other financial services such as savings accounts, mortgage loans, consumer loans, credit card services, investment and insurance products. Mortgages are offered through a tied agents sale force and direct and intermediary channels.

ING Bank Netherlands operates through a branch network of 250 branches. It offers a full range of commercial banking activities and also life and non-life insurance products. It also sells mortgages through the intermediary channel.

In May 2007, ING announced it will be combining the forces of ING Bank and Postbank. The integration of the two banks is well on track: the new bank is operating under the ING brand as of Q1 2009. It will have over 8 million retail clients with a market share of 40% in terms of salary accounts and 600,000 SME (Small Medium Enterprises) clients. The new bank will improve customer service by combining the direct banking model of Postbank with the professional advice capabilities of ING Bank.

Belgium

ING Belgium provides banking, insurance (life, non-life) and asset management products and services to meet the needs of individuals, families, companies and institutions through a network of local head offices, 800

branches and direct banking channels (fully automated branches, home banking services and call centers). ING Belgium also operates a second network, Record Bank, which provides a full range of banking products through independent banking agents and credit products through a multitude of channels (agents, brokers, vendors).

Central Europe

In Poland, ING Bank Slaski provides a full range of banking services to business and individual customers through a network of 430 branches, supported by ATMs and telephone, internet and electronic banking. Since 2004 we have opened 200 fully automated outlets in Romania that provide selected banking products to individual clients. On December 24, 2007 the acquisition of Oyak Bank was completed and in July 2008 Oyak Bank was successfully rebranded into ING Bank Turkey. ING Bank Turkey is a leading bank in the Turkish market with 5,900 employees, offering a full range of banking services with a focus on retail banking. In June 2008 the rollout of retail banking operations in Ukraine started capitalizing on the successful self-banking model that had previously been introduced in Romania.

Asia

In India, ING Vysya Bank has a network of 460 branches supported by a sales force of tied agents, who provide a full range of banking services to business and individual clients. In China, ING acquired a 19.9% participation in Bank of Beijing in 2005, reduced by the IPO to 16.1%. In Thailand ING has a 30% stake (on a fully diluted basis) in TMB Bank.

Private Banking

Private Banking provides wealth management services to high net worth individuals throughout the world. We have continued to raise the visibility of the Private Banking activities in the Benelux to penetrate ING’s existing client base in these markets. In new international markets (Asia, Central Europe, Latin America), we continue to seek to attract new assets to the group, serving them in part out of our branch in Switzerland.

ING DIRECT

ING Direct is a direct banking business, which is an important part of ING Group’s international retail strategy. The strategy of ING Direct is to be a low-cost provider of financial services in large, mature markets by offering clients simple and transparent products and excellent service via call-centers, direct mail and the internet. The main products offered by ING Direct are saving accounts and mortgages. ING Direct also sells a focused range of financial products such as mutual funds, e-brokerage, payment accounts and pensions.

ING Direct’s direct banking business is active in nine countries, which are Canada, Spain, Australia, France, the United States, Italy, Germany, Austria and United Kingdom, and as of the end of 2008, provides services to 22.2 million customers. Each country forms a separate business unit.

In 2008, ING Direct continued to invest in growth by expanding into new geographies, increasing the residential mortgage portfolio, and further expanding the product range through the launch of investment products and payment accounts.

ING Direct showed in 2008 resilient commercial growth bringing the total client retail balance (includes funds entrusted, off balance sheet funds and retail lending) to EUR 323 billion at the end of December. ING Direct is focusing on maintaining an attractive customer offering in savings and term deposits while continuing to balance the mortgage portfolio. At year-end 2008 total funds entrusted to ING Direct worldwide amounted to EUR 191 billion and total residential mortgages were EUR 114 billion.

PRINCIPAL GROUP COMPANIES

Reference is made to Exhibit 8 “ List of subsidiaries of ING Groep N.V.”

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

The insurance, banking, asset management and broker-dealer businesses of ING are subject to detailed comprehensive supervision in all the jurisdictions in which ING conducts business. This supervision is based in large part on European Union (“EU”) directives, discussed more fully below.

The Dutch regulatory system for financial supervision consists of prudential supervision — monitoring the soundness of financial institutions and the financial sector, and conduct-of-business supervision — regulating institutions’ conduct in the markets. Prudential supervision is exercised by De Nederlandsche Bank (“DNB”), while conduct-of-business supervision is performed by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets, Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”).

The events in the financial markets have resulted in a large number of national, regional and global bodies presenting in 2008 views of possible legislative and regulatory changes for the banking, insurance and investment industry. Important reports on the future of financial markets, supervision and regulation were presented amongst others by the Financial Stability Forum, the International Institute of Finance, Basel Committee, the US Treasury, European Commission and European Parliament. In February of 2009 the High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU chaired by Mr Jacques de Larosière submitted, in line with its October 2008 mandate, a report with recommendations to the European Commission on the need for stronger coordinated supervision and effective crisis management procedures in the EU. Many of these proposals are still in the process of being developed in actual policy action. In the course of 2008 we have however also seen immediate action to steer the financial sector through the crisis. Governments have for example provided capital, taken over illiquid assets, guaranteed certain obligations or provided other types of assistance to financial institutions, in certain cases requiring (indirect) influence on or changes to governance and remuneration practices. ING Groep N.V. entered into such transactions in 2008 and 2009 with the Dutch State, as further set out in Item 4 ‘Corporate Governance — Transactions with the Dutch State’. Another development consisted in raising the level of deposit insurance in many jurisdictions. In order to ease depositor anxiety and avoid possible bank runs many European countries decided in the course of 2008 to raise the coverage level for depositor protection to a minimum of EUR 50,000. The Netherlands have increased the level of protection to EUR 100,000. To further increase the effectiveness of depositor protection the European Union has proposed to require earlier payouts and eliminate co-insurance. Another action taken was the introduction by several countries of restrictions in short selling, in particular regarding shares in financial companies. In some countries restrictions only applied to ‘naked short selling’ while other countries introduced stringent requirements or further reporting obligations to supervisory authorities on short selling. The restrictions on short selling were also applicable to the (depositary receipts for) ordinary shares of ING Group.

As a result of our frequent evaluation of all businesses from economic, strategic and risk perspectives ING continues to believe that for business reasons doing business involving certain specified countries should be discontinued, which includes that ING has a policy not to enter into new relationships with clients from these countries and processes remain in place to discontinue existing relationships involving these countries. At present these countries include Myanmar, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, Iran and Cuba. ING Bank N.V. is now in the final stages of liquidating the Netherlands Caribbean Bank, which has been a 100% owned subsidiary since 2007.

ING Bank N.V. has continued discussions with its Dutch bank regulator De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) related to transactions involving persons in countries subject to sanctions by the EU, the US and other authorities and its earlier review of transactions involving sanctioned parties. In connection with that review and related discussions ING Bank has undertaken to complete the global implementation of enhanced compliance and risk management procedures, and to monitor the implementation of such procedures on an ongoing basis, as instructed by DNB. ING Bank also remains in discussions with authorities in the US and in other jurisdictions concerning these matters, including with respect to ongoing information requests and it is not possible to predict at this time the outcome thereof. Financial institutions continue to experience close scrutiny by regulatory authorities, governmental bodies, shareholders, rating agencies, customers and others to ensure they comply with the relevant laws, regulations, standards and expectations. Bank and insurance regulators and other supervisory authorities in Europe, the US and elsewhere continue to oversee the activities of financial institutions to ensure that they operate with integrity and conduct business in an efficient, orderly and transparent manner. ING seeks to meet the standards and expectations of regulatory authorities and other interested parties through a number of initiatives and activities, including scrutinizing account holder information, payment processing and other transactions to support compliance with regulations governing money-laundering, economic and trade sanctions, bribery and other corrupt practices. The failure or perceived failure by ING to meet applicable standards in these areas could result in, among other things, suspension or revocation of ING’s licenses, cease and desist orders, fines, civil or criminal penalties and other disciplinary

action which could materially damage ING’s reputation and financial condition, and accordingly ING’s primary focus is to support good business practice through its Business Principles and group policies.

As discussed under “Item 3. Key Information — Risk Factors”, as a large multinational financial institution we are subject to reputational and other risks in connection with regulatory and compliance matters involving such countries.

INSURANCE

Europe

Insurance companies in the EU are subject to supervision by insurance supervisory authorities in their home country. This principle of “home country control” was established in a series of directives adopted by the EU, which we refer to as the “1992 Insurance Directives”. In the Netherlands, DNB monitors compliance with applicable regulations, the capital base of the insurer and its actuarial reserves, as well as the assets of the insurer, which support such reserves. Pursuant to the 1992 EU Directives, ING may also conduct business directly, or through foreign branches, in all the other jurisdictions of the EU, without being subject to licensing requirements under the laws of the other EU member-states, though it has to deal with local legislation and regulation in all the European countries where it is active.

ING Insurance’s life and non-life subsidiaries in the EU are required to file detailed audited annual reports with their home country insurance supervisory authority. These reports are audited by ING Insurance’s independent auditors and include balance sheets, profit and loss statements, actuarial statements and other financial information. The authorizations granted by the insurance supervisory authorities stipulate the classes of business that an insurer may write an insurance policy for, and is required for every proposed new class of business. In addition, the home country insurance supervisory authority may require an insurer to submit any other information it requests and may conduct an audit at any time.

On the basis of the EU directives, European life insurance companies are required to maintain at least a shareholders’ equity level of generally 4% of insurance reserves (1% of separate account reserves), plus 0.3% of the amount at risk under insurance policies. The required shareholders’ equity level for Dutch non-life insurers is the greater of two calculations: one based on premiums and the other on claims.

The European Commission, jointly with Member States, is carrying out a fundamental review of the regulatory capital regime of the insurance industry (the Solvency 2 project). Its objective is to establish a solvency system that is better matched to the true risks of insurers enabling supervisors to protect policyholders’ interests as effectively as possible and in accordance with common principles across the EU. The Commission has produced a ‘Framework for Consultation’ setting out the policy principles and guidelines that will act as a framework for the development of the Solvency 2 regime. Work on the Solvency 2 Framework Directive is still in progress, and as the member states have different opinions, adoption is not expected in short term.

Americas

United States

ING Group’s United States insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation of their activities under U.S. state and federal laws. Supervisory agencies in various states have broad powers to grant or revoke licenses to conduct business, regulate trade practices, license agents, approve policy forms and certain premium rates, set standards for capital and reserve requirements, determine the form and content of required financial reports, examine insurance companies, require investment portfolio diversification and prescribe the type and amount of permitted investments. Insurance companies are subject to a mandatory annual audit of their statutory basis financial statements by an independent certified public accountant, and in addition, are subject to an insurance department financial condition examination by their state of domicile approximately every three to five years.

ING Insurance’s U.S. operations are subject to Risk Based Capital (“RBC”) guidelines which provide a method to measure the adjusted capital (statutory capital and surplus plus other adjustments) that insurance companies should maintain, taking into account the risk characteristics of the company’s investments and products. The RBC guidelines are used by state insurance regulators as an early warning regulatory tool to identify possibly inadequately capitalized insurers which may need additional regulatory oversight. Each of the companies comprising ING Insurance’s U.S. operations was above its target and statutory minimum RBC ratios at year-end 2008.

Insurance holding company statutes and regulations of each insurer’s state of domicile require periodic disclosure concerning the ultimate controlling person (i.e. the corporation or individual that controls the insurer). Such statutes also impose various limitations on investments in, or transactions with, affiliates and may require prior approval of the payment of certain dividends by the domestic insurer to its immediate parent company. ING is subject, by virtue of its ownership of U.S. insurance companies, to certain of these statutes and regulations.

Although the U.S. federal government generally does not directly regulate the insurance business, many federal laws affect the insurance business in a variety of ways, including federal privacy legislation which requires safeguarding and confidentiality of customer information, federal tax laws relating to insurance and annuity product taxation, and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 requiring, among other things, the establishment of anti-money laundering monitoring programs. In addition, a number of the products issued by ING Group’s U.S. insurance companies are regulated as securities under state and federal law. Finally, a variety of U.S. retirement savings products and services may be subject to Department of Labor regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”).

Canada

In February 2009, ING sold its 70% stake in ING Canada through a private placement and concurrent public offering and thus no longer owns any interest in ING Canada, the largest provider of property and casualty insurance products and services in Canada. Our U.S. insurance businesses that are licensed in Canada are subject to regulation by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI”).

Mexico

The insurance annuities and pension businesses in Mexico are subject to general rules and detailed regulation of their operations under federal law. ING’s annuities and pension subsidiaries in Mexico are supervised by the Ministry of Finance, in the case of annuities through the Ministry’s National Insurance and Bonding Commission (“CNSF”), and in the case of pensions through the Ministry’s National Retirement Savings System Commission (“CONSAR”). The main legal framework applicable to insurance companies in Mexico includes the Insurance Companies Law, the Insurance Contract Law, and regulations issued by the CNSF. In the case of pension companies, the main legal framework includes the Retirement Savings Systems Law and regulations issued by the CONSAR. The Commerce Code, the Mercantile Companies Law, the Foreign Investment Law, Income Tax Laws and regulations issued by the Ministry of Finance are also applicable to both insurance and pension companies.

The Ministry of Finance has authority to grant or revoke licenses to conduct insurance and pension businesses in Mexico, and to prescribe rules on anti-money laundering. The CNSF and the CONSAR, respectively regulate insurance and pension companies’ activities through inspection and ongoing supervision, and have issued regulations that provide specific rules for its operations, including capital requirements and reserves, financial information standards and reporting, corporate governance guidelines, investment rules, risk management and related party transactions. In addition, the CNSF has issued rules concerning issuance of new insurance products and reinsurance. Insurance and pension companies are also subject to a mandatory annual audit of their financial statements and tax reports by independent auditors.

Argentina

ING’s insurance companies in Argentina are subject to supervision at the federal level by the Superintendent of Retirement, the rules and directives of the Superintendent and the Insurance Law (No. 17.418) and Law 20.091 which regulates insurance activity. The Superintendent has issued directives regarding the conduct of insurance operations, approval of policy forms, premium rates, insurance claims, risk management and investment rules. The Superintendent also has the power to examine insurance companies and require financial and operational information. In 2007, the Superintendent issued a new directive (No. 32.275) regarding annuities that establishes surplus requirements and fixed expense rates for annuities in order to provide annuity policyholders with greater transparency with respect to product pricing.

ING Group’s pension business is subject to regulation by the Superintendent of Pension Fund Managers, which as of December 9, 2008, pursuant to law 26.425, ordered all Private Pension Fund Managers (“AFJP”) to transfer the pension funds they then held to the ANSES (“Administración Nacional de la Seguridad Social”), the Argentine State social security system. As a result of the nationalization of the Argentine pension fund system, ANSES has taken over control of the private pension funds and ING’s Argentine AFJP will ultimately be liquidated. In a related matter, ING has entered into a contract to sell its Argentine annuities company, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

Peru

ING’s pension business in Peru is subject to supervision at the federal level by the Superintendent of Banking, Insurance and Private Pension Fund Administrators and various laws and regulations including those related to capital maintenance, disclosure to clients with respect to client funds under administration, minimum investment yield, marketing activities and investment trading, safeguarding of confidential information, proper complaint handling, risk management, supervision of sales force activities, and anti-money laundering standards and procedures.

Chile

ING’s insurance business in Chile is subject to supervision by the Chilean Securities and Insurance Commission (“SVS”), the rules and directives issued by the SVS and the Insurance Law (“Decree Law No. 251”). The SVS is the authority that licenses and regulates insurers in Chile. Only Chilean corporations may operate an insurance business in Chile. The Insurance Law establishes requirements and regulations regarding the conduct of operations by insurance businesses, including rules regarding technical reserves, permitted investments and legal solvency requirements such as minimum solvency margins and limits on indebtedness.

ING’s pension business in Chile is subject to supervision by the Chilean Superintendent of Pension (“SP”) (“SP”), regulations issued by the SP, Decree Law No. 3.500 of 1980 (“DL 3.500”) and by its regulation (“Supreme Decree No. 57”). The SP is the authority that licenses and regulates pension funds in Chile. According to DL 3.500, pension funds must be managed by corporations that are pension funds administrators (“AFPs”). The DL 3.500 regulates the structure of funds, investment limits, transactions with related parties, the transfer of pension members’ participations between AFPs, and other pension fund administrator rights and obligations. AFPs are incorporated as stock corporations and are also subject to supervision by the SVS.

Colombia

ING’s pension business in Colombia is subject to Law 100 of 1993, Decree 656 of 1994, Law 797 of 2003, Law 860 of 2003 and Decree 3995 of 2008 which regulate the general regime of social security, including corporate requirements for incorporating a Pension and Severance Funds Administrator (“PFA”); Financial System Statute Decree 663 of 1993, which regulates the authorized activities, liabilities, obligations and minimum profitability of funds administered by PFAs; and External Circular No. 007 of 1996 of the Finance Superintendency. The Finance Superintendency is the authority that licenses and regulates PFAs. The Superintendency has the power to examine PFAs and request financial and operational information and to apply sanctions for failure to comply with applicable regulations.

PFAs are required to have specialized personnel and technical capacity to properly manage pension funds. The requirements vary based on the nature and size of the pension funds managed. PFAs are also required to invest pension funds in accordance with rules established by the Finance Superintendency. PFAs must guarantee pension fund minimum returns, based on a methodology adopted by the Finance Superintendency. All institutions under Finance Superintendency supervision must also adopt anti-money laundering mechanisms.

Uruguay

ING Group’s pension business in Uruguay is subject to the regulation of the Uruguay Central Bank (“Banco Central del Uruguay”) pursuant to Law 16.713, a Federal law which sets forth the creation of the private pension system (sistema previsional), requirements for incorporation of Administradora de Fondos de Ahorro Provisional (“AFAP”), capital, investment and tax requirements. Specific regulations such as decrees and official letters pursuant to Law 16.713 deal with bank secrecy, anti-money laundering, sales and marketing training and supervision.

Asia/Pacific

Japan

ING Group’s life insurance subsidiary in Japan is subject to the supervision of the Financial Services Agency (“FSA”), the chief regulator in Japan, the rules and regulations as stipulated by the Commercial Code, Insurance

Business Law and ordinances of the Cabinet Office. The affairs handled by the FSA include, among others, planning and policymaking concerning financial systems and the inspection and supervision of private sector financial institutions including banks, securities companies, insurance companies and market participants including securities exchanges.

New products, revision of existing products, etc. require approval by the FSA. The Cabinet Office ordinances stipulate the types and proportions of assets in which an insurance company can invest. The Insurance Business Law further requires that an insurance company set aside a liability reserve to provide for the fulfillment of the level of expected mortality and other assumptions that are applied in calculating liability reserves for long-term contracts. In addition to the required audit by external auditors, insurance companies are required to appoint a corporate actuary and have such corporate actuary be involved in the method of calculating premiums and other actuarial, accounting and compliance matters.

South Korea

ING Group’s South Korean insurance subsidiaries are subject to supervision by the Financial Supervisory Commission (“FSC”) and its executive arm, the Financial Supervisory Service (“FSS”). A second body, the Korean Insurance Development Institute (“KIDI”) advises the FSC, FSS and the Ministry of Finance and Economy on policies and systems related to life insurance and may calculate net insurance premium rates that insurance companies can apply and report such premium rates to the FSC. The KIDI must approve all new products and revisions of existing. Since 2006 the FSS has sharpened its supervisory policies based on the Risk Assessment and Application System (“RAAS”) from 2006 onwards. 

Australia

The financial services activities of life insurance, investments, superannuation, general insurance and banking are currently governed by separate legislation under Australian law. The two main financial services regulators are the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (“APRA”) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”). APRA is responsible for the prudential regulation of banks and other deposit taking institutions, life and general insurance companies, superannuation funds and Retirement Savings Account Providers. APRA’s responsibilities include regulating capital and liquidity requirements and monitoring the management functions of product providers. APRA also requires superannuation trustees to be licensed under the Registrable Superannuation Entity Licensing regime. All relevant entities obtained their licenses in January 2006. ASIC is responsible for consumer protection and market integrity across the financial systems, including the areas of insurance, banking and superannuation.

Taiwan

The Financial Supervisory Commission (“FSC”) was established on July 1, 2004 and supervises insurance companies, banks and securities houses in Taiwan. New solvency requirements were issued, stipulating that the paid-in capital held by Taiwanese life insurance companies must be at least 200% of their risk based capital (“RBC”). This applies to both local and foreign insurance companies in Taiwan; should the paid-in capital to risk capital ratio fall below 200%, the life insurance company is required to raise new funds to achieve the target. In accordance with the Regulations Governing Pre-sale Procedures for Insurance Products, last amended on August 30, 2006 of the FSC, all insurance products must be filed with the Insurance Bureau of the FSC before they are marketed. On October 20, 2008, ING reached an agreement with Fubon Financial Holding Co. Ltd. to sell ING Life Taiwan for a consideration of USD 600 million (EUR 447 million). The transaction closed on February 11, 2009, and thus ING no longer owns any interest in ING Life Taiwan.

BANKING

Wholesale Banking, Retail Banking and ING Direct

Basel II and European Union Standards as currently applied by ING Bank

DNB, the Dutch Central Bank and consolidating supervisor, has given ING permission to use the most sophisticated approaches for solvency reporting under the Financial Supervision Act, the Dutch legislation reflecting the Basel II Accord. DNB has shared information with host regulators of relevant jurisdictions to come to a joint decision. In all jurisdictions where the bank operates, ING must meet local Basel requirements as well.

ING uses the Advanced IRB Approach for credit risk and the Advanced Measurement Approach for operational risk. During 2008 and 2009 a Basel I regulatory floor of 90% and 80%, respectively, still applies. A small number of portfolios are still reported under the Standardised Approach. These portfolios will migrate to a large extent to the Advanced IRB approach in the coming years

ING Bank files consolidated quarterly and annual reports of its financial position and results with DNB in the Netherlands. ING Bank’s independent auditors audit these reports on an annual basis.

Payment Services Directive

In 2008, European Banks started implementing the requirements of the Payment Services Directive (“PSD”). The PSD is a harmonized legal framework for the market for payment services in the European Union, and a direct result of the so-called Lisbon Agenda to make the EU the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010. The Directive has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union on December 5, 2007 and must be implemented in the national laws of all EU Member States at the latest by November 1, 2009. The PSD pursues a threefold objective, being the enhancement of competition by removing payment market entry barriers, the enlargement of market transparency for all payment service users and the standardization of rights and obligations of both providers and users of payment services in the European Union.

The PSD will affect current as well as future payment products, including SEPA products. As a consequence, ING Retail, ING Wholesale and ING Direct business lines offering payment services in no less than 17 Member States of the European Union will be impacted. To make sure all business lines are PSD-compliant as from November 1, 2009 an extensive Programme covering all these countries has been set up. Not only client agreements including general and product-specific terms and conditions will need to be adapted to meet the PSD requirements, but also payment processing facilities, channels and systems, resulting in impact on sales, products, legal, operations and IT. After starting in 2007, the ING PSD Programme is on course for a timely delivery, enabling ING to face the challenges of the new post-PSD market for payment services and strengthen its position as a major European player in the payments arena.

Americas

United States

ING Bank has a limited direct presence in the United States through the facility of the ING Bank Representative Office in New York. Although the office’s activities are strictly limited to essentially that of a marketing agent of bank products and services and a facilitator (i.e. the office may not take deposits or execute any transactions), the office is subject to the regulation of the State of New York Banking Department and the Federal Reserve. ING Bank also has a subsidiary in the United States, ING Financial Holdings Corp, which through several operating subsidiaries offers various financial products, including lending, and financial markets products. These entities do not accept deposits in the United States on their own behalf or on behalf of ING Bank NV.

A major part of our banking activities in the United States, ING Direct USA, is regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), a division of the United States Department of the Treasury and, to a lesser extent, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, an independent agency of the Federal government that operates under the auspices of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, a US federal law. Because ING Direct USA is a federally chartered savings bank, ING Group is a savings and loan holding company and consequently its U.S. activities are subject to the consolidated supervision of the OTS under the Home Owners’ Loan Act.

A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) substantially broadened the scope of U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The U.S. Treasury Department has issued a number of implementing regulations which apply various requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act to financial institutions such as our bank, insurance, broker-dealer and investment adviser subsidiaries and mutual funds advised or sponsored by our subsidiaries. Those regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers. In addition, the bank regulatory agencies are imposing heightened standards, and law enforcement authorities have been taking a more active role. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could have serious legal and reputation consequences for the institution.

As a result of our frequent evaluation of all businesses from economic, strategic and risk perspectives ING continues to believe that for business reasons doing business involving certain specified countries should be discontinued, which includes that ING has a policy not to enter into new relationships with clients from these

countries and processes remain in place to discontinue existing relationships involving these countries. At present these countries include Myanmar, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, Iran and Cuba. ING Bank N.V. is now in the final stages of liquidating the Netherlands Caribbean Bank, which has been a 100% owned subsidiary since 2007.

ING Bank N.V. has continued discussions with its Dutch bank regulator De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) related to transactions involving persons in countries subject to sanctions by the EU, the US and other authorities and its earlier review of transactions involving sanctioned parties. In connection with that review and related discussions ING Bank has undertaken to complete the global implementation of enhanced compliance and risk management procedures, and to monitor the implementation of such procedures on an ongoing basis, as instructed by DNB. ING Bank also remains in discussions with authorities in the US and in other jurisdictions concerning these matters, including with respect to ongoing information requests, and it is not possible to predict at this time the outcome thereof. Financial institutions continue to experience close scrutiny by regulatory authorities, governmental bodies, shareholders, rating agencies, customers and others to ensure they comply with the relevant laws, regulations, standards and expectations. Bank and insurance regulators and other supervisory authorities in Europe, the US and elsewhere continue to oversee the activities of financial institutions to ensure that they operate with integrity and conduct business in an efficient, orderly and transparent manner. ING seeks to meet the standards and expectations of regulatory authorities and other interested parties through a number of initiatives and activities, including scrutinizing account holder information, payment processing and other transactions to support compliance with regulations governing money-laundering, economic and trade sanctions, bribery and other corrupt practices. The failure or perceived failure by ING to meet applicable standards in these areas could result in, among other things, suspension or revocation of ING’s licenses, cease and desist orders, fines, civil or criminal penalties and other disciplinary action which could materially damage ING’s reputation and financial condition, and accordingly ING’s primary focus is to support good business practice through its Business Principles and group policies.

Canada

ING Bank of Canada (“ING Direct Canada”) is a federally regulated financial institution that is subject to the supervision of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI”), which is the primary supervisor of federally chartered financial institutions (including banks and insurance companies) and federally administered pension plans.

ING Direct Canada operates a wholly-owned mutual fund dealer subsidiary, ING Direct Mutual Funds Limited that is subject to provincial regulation in the provinces in which it operates. ING Direct Mutual Funds Limited’s home province supervisor is the Ontario Securities Commission, which regulates the sale of mutual funds and equities in Ontario. ING Direct Mutual Funds Limited is also a member of the Mutual Funds Dealer’s Association, a mandatory self-regulatory body, which governs and oversees the conduct of mutual fund dealers in Canada.

Asia/Pacific

Australia

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority is responsible for the prudential regulation of banks and other deposit taking institutions, life and general insurance companies, superannuation funds and Retirement Savings Account Providers.

BROKER-DEALER AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

Americas

United States

ING’s broker-dealer entities in the United States are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the states in which they operate, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the self-regulatory organization which succeeded to the regulatory functions of the National Association of Securities Dealers and the New York Stock Exchange. The primary governing statutes for such entities are the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and state statutes and regulations, as applicable. These and other laws, and the regulations promulgated there under, impose requirements (among others) regarding minimum net capital, safeguarding of customer assets, protection and use of material, non-public (inside) information, record-keeping requirements, supervision of employee activities, credit to customers, suitability determinations in the context of recommending transactions to customers, clearance and settlement procedures and anti-money laundering standards and procedures. The rules of FINRA, the self-regulatory organization, in some respects duplicate the above-mentioned legal requirements, but also impose requirements specific to the marketplaces that FINRA oversees. For example, FINRA imposes requirements relating to activities by market-makers in the over-the-counter market in equity securities and requirements regarding transactions effected in its listed securities market.

Certain ING entities in the United States (including certain of its broker-dealers) also act in the capacity of a federally registered investment advisor (i.e., providing transactional advice to customers for a fee), and are governed in such activities by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Moreover, certain ING entities manage registered investment funds (such as mutual funds) and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, regulates the governance and activities of those funds. These laws impose record-keeping and disclosure requirements on ING in the context of such activities. Moreover, the laws impose restrictions on transactions or require disclosure of transactions involving advisory clients and the advisor or the advisors’ affiliates, as well as transactions between advisory clients. In addition, ERISA imposes certain obligations on investment advisors managing employee plan assets as defined in this act.

The failure of ING to comply with these various requirements could result in civil and criminal sanctions and administrative penalties imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the states, or FINRA on those entities of ING which have committed the violations. Moreover, employees who are found to have participated in the violations, and the managers of these employees, also may be subject to penalties by governmental and self-regulatory agencies.

Canada

ING Investment Management, Inc. (“ING IM”), a federally incorporated, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Canada Inc., is registered in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec as an adviser with specific investment authorities. While substantially all of ING IM’s current business consists of providing investment management services to ING Canada Inc. and its insurance subsidiaries, ING IM is seeking to expand its business by providing asset management services to third party institutional investors across Canada.

ING IM is subject to regulation by securities regulatory authorities of the provinces in which it is registered and conducts business. Regulation issued by provincial securities regulatory authorities imposes requirements (among others) regarding registration of investment management entities and their employees, governance, ongoing disclosure to clients and regulatory authorities, marketing activities, transactions with affiliates and derivatives transactions. Additionally, ING IM is subject to applicable federal laws, including those related to privacy and anti-money laundering.

COMPETITION

ING is involved in insurance, retail and wholesale banking, and other products and services across 50 countries. The mature markets of the Netherlands, Belgium, the Rest of Europe, North America and Australia are characterised by a high degree of competition. As financial institutions from mature markets have increasingly established themselves in developing markets, competition in these markets has increased too. In some cases ING and its competitors have sought to form alliances, mergers or strategic relationships with local institutions, which are rapidly becoming more sophisticated and competitive.

With the financial markets in crisis, governments around the globe have undertaken exceptional measures to reinvigorate financial institutions. ING’s management feels that these measures are important and necessary steps to restore confidence and bring stability and certainty to the financial system. The exact impact of the interventions remains to be seen. However, most governments have been very clear that the measures are of temporary nature and only aimed at servicing financial services companies’ urgent needs in weathering the crisis, ING is entirely committed to prevent unfair competition or the appearance thereof. In order to achieve this, the following principles have been formulated for the banking, insurance, pension and investment activities that ING Groep N.V. and its subsidiaries are engaged in:

•		In the media and in contacts with third parties, ING Groep N.V. and its subsidiaries will not promote the financial involvement of the Dutch State as provider of Tier-1 core capital, neither implicitly nor explicitly.
•		The policy of ING Groep N.V. and its subsidiaries will not be aimed at using the involvement of the Dutch State as provider of Tier-1 core capital to increase their market share in financial products in any way.
•		ING Groep N.V. and its subsidiaries will continue to try and distinguish themselves from competitors through the quality of services and financial products offered to their customers.

In the long run, competition in the financial services industry in both mature and developing markets will continue to be based on factors like brand recognition, scope of distribution systems, customer service, products offered, financial strength, price and, in the case of investment-linked insurance products and asset management services, investment performance. Management believes its major competitors are the leading global European, American and Asian commercial banks, insurance companies, asset management and other financial-services companies.

RATINGS

ING Groep N.V.’s long-term senior debt is rated “AA-” (with a negative outlook) by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service (“Standard & Poor’s”), a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. ING Groep N.V.’s long-term senior debt is rated “A1” (with a stable outlook) by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”). ING Groep N.V.’s long term senior debt is rated “A+” (with a negative outlook) by Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”).

ING Verzekeringen N.V.’s long-term senior debt is rated “AA-” (with a negative outlook) by Standard & Poor’s and “A2” (with a stable outlook) by Moody’s. Fitch rated ING Verzekeringen N.V.’s long-term senior debt “A+” (with a negative outlook).

ING Bank N.V.’s long-term senior debt held a “AA” (with a negative outlook) rating by Standard & Poor’s. Moody’s rated ING Bank N.V.’s long-term senior debt at “Aa3” (with a stable outlook). Finally, ING Bank N.V.’s long-term senior debt was rated “AA-” (with a stable outlook) by Fitch Ratings, Ltd.

ING Verzekeringen N.V.’s short-term senior debt is rated “A-1+” by Standard & Poor’s and Prime-1 (P-1) by Moody’s. ING Verzekeringen held a “F1” rating by Fitch.

ING Bank N.V.’s short-term senior debt held a rating of “A-1+” by Standard & Poor’s and Prime-1 (P-1) by Moody’s. Fitch rated ING Bank N.V.’s short-term senior debt “F1+”.

All ratings are provided as of January 29, 2009, and are still current at date of filing.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

In the Netherlands, ING sold, during the years, a significant part of the land and buildings used in the normal course of its business. Outside the Netherlands, ING predominantly leases all of the land and buildings used in the normal course of its business. In addition, ING has part of its investment portfolio invested in land and buildings. Management believes that ING’s facilities are adequate for its present needs in all material respects.

Item 5. Operating and financial review and prospects

The following review and prospects should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related Notes thereto included elsewhere herein. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS-EU. IFRS-EU differs in certain respects from IFRS-IASB and U.S. GAAP. See Note 2.4. to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the differences between IFRS-EU and IFRS-IASB and see Note 2.5. of the consolidated financial statements for a description of the relevant differences between IFRS-EU and U.S.GAAP. Unless otherwise indicated, financial information for ING Group included herein is presented on a consolidated basis under IFRS-EU.

FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ING Group’s results of operations are affected by demographics (particularly with respect to life insurance) and by a variety of market conditions, including economic cycles, insurance industry cycles (particularly with respect to non-life insurance), banking industry cycles and fluctuations in stock markets, interest and foreign exchange rates. See Item 3. “Risk Factors” for more factors that can impact ING Group’s results of operations.

General market conditions

Demographic studies suggest that over the next decade there will be growth in the number of individuals who enter the age group that management believes is most likely to purchase retirement-oriented life insurance products in ING’s principal life insurance markets in the Netherlands, the Rest of Europe, the United States, Asia and Australia. In addition, in a number of its European markets, including the Netherlands, retirement, medical and other social benefits previously provided by the government have been, or in the coming years are expected to be, curtailed. Management believes this will increase opportunities for private sector providers of life insurance, health, pension and other social benefits-related insurance products. Management believes that ING Insurance’s distribution networks, the quality and diversity of its products and its investment management expertise in each of these markets, positions ING Insurance to benefit from these developments. In addition, the emerging markets in Central and Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America, in which ING Insurance has insurance operations, generally have lower gross domestic products per capita and gross insurance premiums per capita than the countries in Western Europe and North America in which ING Insurance has insurance operations. Management believes that insurance operations in these emerging markets provide ING Insurance with the market presence which will allow it to take advantage of anticipated growth in these regions. In addition, conditions in the non-life insurance markets in which ING Insurance operates are cyclical, and characterized by periods of price competition, fluctuations in underwriting results, and the occurrence of unpredictable weather-related and other losses.

Fluctuations in equity markets

Our insurance and asset management operations are exposed to fluctuations in equity markets. Our overall investment return and fee income from equity-linked products are influenced by equity markets. The fees we charge for managing portfolios are often based on performance and value of the portfolio. In addition, fluctuations in equity markets may affect sales of life and pension products, unit-linked products, including variable business and may increase the amount of withdrawals which will reduce related management fees. In addition, our direct shareholdings that are classified as investments are exposed to fluctuations in equity markets. The securities we hold may become impaired in the case of a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost. Our banking operations are also exposed to fluctuations in equity markets. ING Bank maintains an internationally diversified and mainly client-related trading portfolio. Accordingly, market downturns are likely to lead to declines in securities trading and brokerage activities which we execute for customers and therefore to a decline in related commissions and trading results. In addition to this, ING Bank also maintains equity investments in its own non-trading books. Fluctuations in equity markets may affect the value of these investments.

Fluctuations in interest rates

Our insurance operations are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates through impacts on sales and surrenders of life insurance and annuity products. Declining interest rates may increase sales, but may impact profitability as a result of a reduced spread between the guaranteed interest rates to policyholders and the investment returns on fixed interest investments. Declining interest rates may also affect the results of our reserve adequacy testing which may in turn result in reserve strengthening. Rising interest rates may increase the surrender of policies which may require liquidation of fixed interest investments at unfavorable market prices. This could result in realized investment losses. Our banking operations are exposed to fluctuations in interest

rates. Our management of interest rate sensitivity affects the results of our banking operations. Interest rate sensitivity refers to the relationship between changes in market interest rates on the one hand and on the other hand to changes in both net interest income and the results of our trading activities for our own account. Both the composition of our banking assets and liabilities and the fact that interest rate changes may affect client behavior in a different way than assumed in our internal models result in a mismatch which causes the banking operations’ net interest income and trading results to be affected by changes in interest rates

Market developments in 2008

Like other financial institutions, ING has not been immune to the financial crisis. The financial crisis started in the US subprime mortgage market in early 2007 and intensified over 2008 as prices fell across most major asset classes throughout the world. Equity markets lost significant ground and real estate prices were generally under pressure. Credit spreads widened significantly, both in the US and Europe. As liquidity became tight, central banks around the world were quick to provide funding to prevent the interbank market from drying up. There were also a number of significant financial institutions that failed during the year. As the financial crisis spread beyond the financial sector it also affected consumer confidence, other sectors and economic growth. All of these factors placed major strains on risk management departments in financial services companies, including ING, and emphasized the importance of having a robust risk management organisation in place that can take forceful measures to reduce risk. For details regarding the impact of the credit and liquidity crisis on ING’s assets and results, see Note 2.1 “Risk Management” to the consolidated financial statements.

Impact of financial crisis

Impact on pressurised asset classes

As a result of the deteriorating market conditions throughout 2008 ING Group incurred negative revaluations on its investment portfolio, which impacted shareholders’ equity. Furthermore, ING Group incurred impairments, fair value changes and trading losses, which impacted its profit and loss account (P&L).

The table below shows the exposures and negative revaluations and losses taken on US sub-prime and US Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS), Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) and Collateralised Loan Obligations (CLOs) during 2008.

US Subprime RMBS, US Alt-A RMBS and CDOs/CLOs exposures, revaluations and losses

		December 31, 2008																December 31, 2007
						Revaluations				Change in 2008												Revaluations
						through Equity				Write-downs through												through Equity
(EUR millions)		Market value				(pre-tax)				P&L (pre-tax)				Other changes				Market value				(pre-tax)
US Subprime RMBS			1,778				(839	)			(120	)			(52	)			2,789				(307	)
US Alt-A RMBS			18,847				(6,538	)			(2,064	)			(33	)			27,482				(936	)
CDOs/CLOs			3,469				(218	)			(394	)			2,186				1,895				(134	)
Total			24,094				(7,595	)			(2,578	)			2,101				32,166				(1,377	)

-		ING Group’s total EUR 1.8 billion exposure to US sub-prime assets relates to non originated loans acquired as investments in RMBS and represents 0.1% of total assets. At December 31, 2008 approximately 77% of ING’s US sub-prime portfolio was rated AA or higher. ING Group does not originate sub-prime mortgages. The vast majority of the total mortgage backed securitisations (MBS) are (residential) mortgages that are not classified as sub-prime.
-		ING Group’s total US Alt-A RMBS exposure at December 31, 2008 was EUR 18.8 billion. About 65% of this portfolio was AAA rated. The majority of the exposure (EUR 16.3 billion) was held by ING Direct. ING’s Available-for-Sale Alt-A investments are measured at fair value in the balance sheet. The substantial amount of negative pre-tax revaluation and impairments on this portfolio are mainly caused by the illiquid market.
-		Net investments in CDOs/CLOs at December 31, 2008 were 0.3% of total assets. The vast majority of the CDOs/CLOs has investment grade corporate credit as underlying assets, only EUR 1 million has US subprime mortgages underlying.

EUR 23.7 billion of the EUR 24.1 billion exposure on US Subprime RMBS, US Alt-A RMBS and CDOs/CLOs is booked at fair value. An analysis of the method applied in determining the fair values of financial assets and

liabilities is provided in Note 33 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2008 the fair value of US Subprime RMBS, US Alt-A RMBS and CDOs/CLOs was as follows:

Fair value of US Subprime RMBS, US Alt-A RMBS and CDOs/CLOs

		Reference to
		published price				Valuation technique				Valuation technique
		quotations in				supported by market				not supported by
(EUR millions)		active markets				inputs				market inputs				Total
2008
US Subprime RMBS			20				26				1,732				1,778
US Alt-A RMBS							244				18,244				18,488
CDOs/CLOs			3,273				162				34				3,469
Total			3,293				432				20,010				23,735
2007
US Subprime RMBS			2,636				153								2,789
US Alt-A RMBS			23,312				4,170								27,482
CDOs/CLOs			281				1,597				17				1,895
Total			26,229				5,920				17				32,168

Assets classified in Valuation technique not supported by market inputs consist mainly (approximately 87 %) of investments in asset backed securities in the United States. These assets are valued using external price sources that are obtained from third party pricing services and brokers. As at December 31, 2007, these assets were classified in Reference to published price quotations in active markets as valuation is based on independent quotes and trading in the relevant markets was active at that time. During 2008, the trading volumes in the relevant markets reduced significantly and these have now become inactive. The dispersion between prices for the same security from different price sources increased significantly. As a result, an amount of EUR 25 billion of mortgage backed securities in the United States was reclassified from Reference to published price quotations in active markets to Valuation technique not supported by market inputs in the third quarter of 2008.

Impact on Real Estate

By the end of 2008 ING Group’s total exposure to real estate was EUR 15.5 billion of which EUR 9.8 billion was subject to revaluation through the profit and loss account. In 2008, ING recorded EUR 1,184 million pre-tax negative revaluations and impairments. ING’s real estate portfolio has high occupancy rates and is diversified over sectors and regions, but is clearly affected by the negative real estate markets throughout the world.

Impact on Equity securities – available-for-sale

Direct equity exposure at December 31, 2008 in this caption was EUR 5.8 billion (public) and EUR 0,4 billion (private). During 2008 ING booked EUR 1,707 million of pre-tax impairments on this direct public equity exposure. ING generally decides to impair a listed equity security based on two broad guidelines: when the fair value of the security is below 75% of the cost price or when the market price of the security is below the cost price for longer than six months.

Impact on other asset classes

Negative impact on results 2008 (pre-tax) from private equity and alternative assets amounted to EUR 399 million. Negative impact on results 2008 (pre-tax) from debt securities other than mentioned above amounted to EUR 292 million.

Impact on counterparty risk

In the third quarter a number of financial institutions were no longer expected to fulfil their obligations. ING incurred EUR 483 million pre-tax losses (excluding loan losses) on Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual and the Icelandic banks. The loss included impairments of debt securities, trading losses and derivative positions, including the costs to replace derivatives on which the banks were counterparty.

Impact on Liquidity profile

Due to the financial crisis liquidity became scarce and central banks around the world provided funding to prevent the interbank market drying up. ING’s liquidity position remained sound. ING Bank has a favourable funding profile as the majority of the funding stems from client deposits.

Fluctuations in exchange rates

ING Group is exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates. Our management of exchange rate sensitivity affects the results of our operations both through the trading activities for our own account and because of the fact that we publish our consolidated financial statements in euros. Because a substantial portion of our income and expenses are denominated in currencies other than euros, fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate foreign currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar, the Turkish lira, the Japanese yen, the Korean won, the Pound sterling and the Polish zloty into euros will impact our reported results of operations and cash flows from year to year. This exposure is mitigated by the fact that realized results in non-Euro currencies are translated into euro by monthly hedging. See Note 23 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of our hedging activities with respect to foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates will also impact the value (denominated in euro) of our investments in our non-Euro reporting subsidiaries. The impact of these fluctuations in exchange rates is mitigated to some extent by the fact that income and related expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, of each of our non-euro reporting subsidiaries are generally denominated in the same currencies. For the main foreign currencies, in which ING’s income and expenses are denominated namely the U.S. dollar, Pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Turkish lira and Polish zloty, the translation risk is managed taking into account the effect of translation results on the Tier-1 ratio. For all other currencies the translation risk is managed within a Value-at-Risk limit.

The weakening of most currencies against the euro during 2008 had a negative impact of EUR 163 million on (underlying) net result. In 2007 and 2006 exchange rates influenced net result, respectively, by EUR 159 million negatively and EUR 20 million positively.

For the years 2008, 2007 and 2006, the year-end exchange rates (which are the rates ING uses in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for balance sheet items not denominated in euros) and the average quarterly exchange rates (which are the rates ING uses in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for income statement items and cash flows not denominated in euros) were as follows for the currencies specified below:

										Average1)
		4Q 2008				3Q 2008				2Q 2008				1Q 2008				2007				2006
U.S. dollar			1.345				1.511				1.566				1.514				1.375				1.257
Australian dollar			1.922				1.694				1.664				1.674				1.639				1.664
Canadian dollar			1.590				1.559				1.579				1.509				1.470				1.422
Pound sterling			0.844				0.796				0.792				0.761				0.686				0.682
Japanese yen			130.787				161.518				162.530				159.662				161.685				146.188
South Korean won			1,748.405				1,640.581				1,589.017				1,438.373				1,275.559				1,199.328
Turkish lira			1.995				1.825				1.973				1.838				1.786				1.798
Polish zloty			3.741				3.327				3.425				3.566				3.781				3.897

		Year-end
		2008				2007				2006
U.S. dollar			1.396				1.472				1.318
Australian dollar			2.026				1.676				1.669
Canadian dollar			1.710				1.444				1.528
Pound sterling			0.956				0.734				0.671
Japanese yen			126.354				164.819				156.768
South Korean won			1758.273				1,378.094				1,225.971
Turkish lira			2.143				1.718				1.865
Polish zloty			4.175				3.586				3.832

Critical Accounting Policies

See Note 2.1. to the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to the Group’s consolidated financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere herein. ING Group evaluates the results of its insurance operations and banking operations, including Insurance Europe, Insurance Americas, Insurance Asia/Pacific, Wholesale Banking, Retail Banking and ING Direct, using the financial performance measure of underlying result before tax. Underlying result before tax is defined as result before tax and, excluding, as applicable for each respective segment, either all or some of the following items: gains/losses from divested units, realized gains/losses on divestitures and special items such as certain restructuring charges and other non-operating income/expense.

While these excluded items are significant components in understanding and assessing the Group’s consolidated financial performance, ING Group believes that the presentation of underlying result before tax enhances the understanding and comparability of its segment performance by highlighting result before tax attributable to ongoing operations and the underlying profitability of the segment businesses. For example, we believe that trends in the underlying profitability of our segments can be more clearly identified without the effects of the realized gains/losses on divestitures as the timing is largely subject to the Company’s discretion, influenced by market opportunities and ING Group does not believe that they are indicative of future results. Underlying result before tax is not a substitute for result before tax as determined in accordance with IFRS-EU. ING Group’s definition of underlying result before tax may differ from those used by other companies and may change over time. For further information on underlying result before tax as well as the reconciliation of our segment underlying result before tax to our result before taxation see “ Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Segment Reporting” and Note 49 of Note 2.1 to the consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the consolidated results of the operations of ING Group and its insurance and banking operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

		Insurance								Banking								Eliminations								Total
		2008				2007				2008				2007				2008				2007				2008				2007
		(EUR millions)
Premium income			43,812				46,818																				43,812				46,818
Interest result banking operations											11,085				9,036				43				60				11,042				8,976
Commission income			2,070				1,901				2,895				2,926												4,965				4,827
Investment and Other income			8,970				13,488				(2,250	)			2,640				248				163				6,472				15,965
Total income			54,851				62,208				11,731				14,602				291				223				66,291				76,586
Underwriting expenditure			49,485				48,833																				49,485				48,833
Other interest expenses			1,269				1,326												291				223				978				1,103
Operating expenses			5,422				5,515				10,303				9,967												15,725				15,481
Impairments/additions to the provision for loan losses			310				1				1,280				125												1,590				126
Total expenditure			56,486				55,675				11,583				10,092				291				223				67,778				65,544
Result before tax			(1,635	)			6,533				148				4,510												(1,487	)			11,043
Taxation			(483	)			775				(238	)			759												(721	)			1,534
Result before minority interests			(1,152	)			5,758				386				3,751												(766	)			9,509
Minority interests			31				155				(69	)			112												(38	)			267
Net result			(1,183	)			5,603				454				3,638												(729	)			9,241
Result before tax			(1,635	)			6,533				148				4,510												(1,487	)			11,043
Gains/losses on divestments(1)			(8	)			(382	)							(32	)											(8	)			(414	)
Result/loss divested units			88				(39	)																			88				(39	)
Special items (2)			321								301				489												622				489
Underlying result before tax			(1,235	)			6,113				449				4,967												(786	)			11,080

The following table sets forth the consolidated results of the operations of ING Group and its insurance and banking operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

		Insurance								Banking								Eliminations								Total
		2007			2006						2007				2006			2007				2006				2007				2006
		(EUR millions)
Premium income			46,818				46,834																				46,818				46,834
Interest result banking operations											9,036				9,335				60				143				8,976				9,192
Commission income			1,901				1,636				2,926				2,681												4,827				4,317
Investment and Other income			13,488				11,172				2,640				2,179				163				73				15,965				13,278
Total income			62,208				59,642				14,602				14,195				223				216				76,586				73,621
Underwriting expenditure			48,833				48,188																				48,833				48,188
Other interest expenses			1,326				1,233												223				216				1,103				1,017
Operating expenses			5,515				5,275				9,967				9,087												15,481				14,362
Impairments/additions to the provision for loan losses			1				11				125				103												126				114
Total expenditure			55,675				54,707				10,092				9,190				223				216				65,544				63,681
Result before tax			6,533				4,935				4,510				5,005												11,043				9,940
Taxation			775				702				759				1,205												1,534				1,907
Result before minority interests			5,758				4,233				3,751				3,800												9,509				8,033
Minority interests			155				281				112				60												267				341
Net result			5,603				3,952				3,638				3,740												9,241				7,692
Result before tax			6,533				4,935				4,510				5,005												11,043				9,940
Gains/losses on divestments(1)			(382	)			(49	)			(32	)			112												(414	)			63
Result divested units			(39	)			(79	)							(65	)											(39	)			(144	)
Special items											489																489
Underlying result before tax			6,113				4,807				4,967				5,052												11,080				9,859