FORM N-CSRS
CERTIFIED
SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-06728
Name of Fund: BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: Anne F. Ackerley, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 04/30/2010
Date of reporting period: 10/31/2009
Item 1 Report to Stockholders
EQUITIES FIXED INCOME REAL ESTATE LIQUIDITY ALTERNATIVES BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS
|
|
Semi-Annual Report |
|
|
|
OCTOBER 31, 2009 | (UNAUDITED) |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
NOT FDIC INSURED
MAY LOSE VALUE
NO BANK GUARANTEE
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Semi-Annual Report: |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements |
|
39 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Over the past 12 months, we have witnessed a seismic shift in market sentiment from fear and pessimism during the worst economic decline and crisis of confidence in financial markets since The Great Depression to increasing optimism amid emerging signs of recovery. The period began in the midst of an intense deterioration in global economic activity and financial markets in the final months of 2008 and the early months of 2009. The collapse of confidence resulted in massive government policy intervention on a global scale in the financial system and the economy. The tide turned dramatically in March 2009, however, on the back of new US government initiatives, as well as better-than-expected economic data and upside surprises in corporate earnings.
Not surprisingly, global equity markets endured extreme volatility over the past 12 months, starting with steep declines and heightened risk aversion in the early part of the reporting period, which eventually gave way to an impressive rally that began in March. Although there have been fits and starts along the way and a few modest corrections, the new bull market has pushed all major US indices well into positive territory for 2009. The experience in international markets was similar to that in the United States. In particular, emerging markets (which were less affected by the global credit crunch and are experiencing faster economic growth rates when compared to the developed world) have posted impressive gains since the rally began.
In fixed income markets, the flight-to-safety premium in Treasury securities prevailed during the equity market downturn, which drove yields sharply lower, but concerns about deficit spending, debt issuance, inflation and dollar weakness have kept Treasury yields range bound in recent months. As economic and market conditions began to improve in early 2009, near-zero interest rates on risk-free assets prompted many investors to reallocate money from cash investments into higher-yielding and riskier non-Treasury assets. The high yield sector was the greatest beneficiary of this move, having decisively outpaced all other taxable asset classes since the start of 2009. Similarly, the municipal bond market is on pace for its best performance year ever in 2009, following one of its worst years in 2008. Investor demand remains strong for munis, helping to create a highly favorable technical backdrop. Municipal bond mutual funds are seeing record inflows, reflecting the renewed investor interest in the asset class.
As a result of the rebound in sentiment and global market conditions, most major benchmark indexes are now in positive territory for both the 6- and 12-month periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Returns as of October 31, 2009 |
|
6-month |
|
12-month |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
US equities (S&P 500 Index) |
|
20.04 |
% |
|
9.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small cap US equities (Russell 2000 Index) |
|
16.21 |
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International equities (MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index) |
|
31.18 |
|
|
27.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities (BofA Merrill Lynch 10-Year US Treasury Index*) |
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
8.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable fixed income (Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index) |
|
5.61 |
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt fixed income (Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index) |
|
4.99 |
|
|
13.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High yield bonds (Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index) |
|
27.72 |
|
|
48.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Formerly a Merrill Lynch index. |
|
|
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
The market environment has visibly improved since the beginning of the year, but a great deal of uncertainty and risk remain. Through periods of market turbulence, as ever, BlackRocks full resources are dedicated to the management of our clients assets. For additional market perspective and investment insight, visit the most recent issue of our award-winning Shareholder® magazine at www.blackrock.com/shareholdermagazine. As always, we thank you for entrusting BlackRock with your investments, and we look forward to continuing to serve you in the months and years ahead.
Sincerely,
Rob Kapito
President, BlackRock Advisors,
LLC
|
|
Announcement to Shareholders |
|
On December 1, 2009, BlackRock, Inc. and Barclays Global Investors, N.A. combined to form one of the worlds preeminent investment management firms. The new company, operating under the BlackRock name, manages $3.19 trillion in assets** and offers clients worldwide a full complement of active management, enhanced and index investment strategies and products, including individual and institutional separate accounts, mutual funds and other pooled investment vehicles, and the industry-leading iShares platform of exchange traded funds.
|
|
** |
Data is as of September 30, 2009, is subject to change, and is based on a pro forma estimate of assets under management and other data at BlackRock, Inc. and Barclays Global Investors. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
|
|
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
|
For the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Fund returned 12.77% based on market price and 17.73% based on net asset value (NAV). For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 16.28% on a market price basis and 14.93% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Positive performance factors included concentrations in education, health and corporate-related debt. Renewed risk appetite was also beneficial, given the Funds focus on lower-rated credits. In addition, the Funds long duration stance and emphasis on longer-dated bonds were significant positive contributors as yields on the long end of the curve fell substantially. Negative factors included less exposure to the tax-backed, essential services and tobacco sectors.
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) |
|
MYD |
Initial Offering Date |
|
November 29, 1991 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of October 31, 2009 ($12.49)1 |
|
6.63% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
10.20% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.069 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.828 |
Leverage as of October 31, 20094 |
|
38% |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Auction Market Preferred Shares (Preferred Shares) and tender option bond trusts (TOBs) as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 7. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.49 |
|
$ |
11.45 |
|
|
9.08 |
% |
$ |
13.58 |
|
$ |
11.09 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.13 |
|
$ |
11.53 |
|
|
13.88 |
% |
$ |
13.84 |
|
$ |
11.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
23 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
Corporate |
|
15 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
State |
|
15 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
10 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
9 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Education |
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Housing |
|
7 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
22 |
% |
|
28 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
29 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
A/A |
|
24 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
B/B |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
CCC/Caa |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
10 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of Standard and Poors (S&Ps) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities as investment grade quality. As of October 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, the market value of these securities was $22,209,791 representing 2% and $18,072,535 representing 2%, respectively, of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
||
4 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of October 31, 2009 |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, high-grade municipal obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes.
|
|
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
|
For the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Fund returned 10.72% based on market price and 10.79% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 11.62% on a market price basis and 9.56% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Among the factors that contributed to Fund performance during the reporting period were: exposure to the long end of the curve during a period of yield-curve flattening and a general tightening of credit spreads, which drove performance in the Funds holdings of insured bonds with weaker underlying credits; and, the Funds concentration in the transportation and escrowed sectors, which outperformed during the period. Conversely, low exposure to the utilities and education sectors detracted from Fund performance as both segments performed well.
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
MQY |
Initial Offering Date |
|
June 26, 1992 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of October 31, 2009 ($13.24)1 |
|
6.30% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
9.69% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.0695 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.8340 |
Leverage as of October 31, 20094 |
|
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 7. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market Price |
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
$ |
12.32 |
|
|
7.47 |
% |
$ |
14.44 |
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
|
7.54 |
% |
$ |
15.03 |
|
$ |
13.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
25 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
23 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
State |
|
16 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Health |
|
8 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Housing |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Education |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
38 |
% |
|
39 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
29 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
A/A |
|
26 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Not Rated |
|
2 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these securities as investment grade quality. As of October 31, 2009, the market value of these securities was $7,684,952 representing 1% of the Funds long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of October 31, 2009 |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Investment Objective |
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) (the Fund) seeks to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term, high-grade municipal obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund invests primarily in insured municipal bonds.
|
|
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
|
For the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Fund returned 17.55% based on market price and 10.90% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of 11.62% on a market price basis and 9.56% on a NAV basis. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. Among the factors that contributed to Fund performance during the reporting period were: exposure to the long end of the curve during a period of yield-curve flattening and a general tightening of credit spreads, which drove performance in the Funds holdings of insured bonds with weaker underlying credits; and the Funds concentration in the transportation and housing sectors, which outperformed during the period. Conversely, low exposure to the utilities and education sectors detracted from Fund performance as both segments performed well.
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
|
MQT |
Initial Offering Date |
|
August 28, 1992 |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of October 31, 2009 ($11.58)1 |
|
6.42% |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
|
9.88% |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.062 |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
|
$0.744 |
Leverage as of October 31, 20094 |
|
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Preferred Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to Preferred Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 7. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Funds market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
11.58 |
|
$ |
10.16 |
|
|
13.98 |
% |
$ |
12.28 |
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
12.42 |
|
$ |
11.55 |
|
|
7.53 |
% |
$ |
13.06 |
|
$ |
11.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Funds long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Transportation |
|
29 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
County/City/Special District/ School District |
|
26 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
State |
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
11 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Housing |
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Health |
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Education |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
10/31/09 |
|
4/30/09 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
47 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
25 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
A/A |
|
22 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Not Rated |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&Ps or Moodys ratings. |
|
|
|
|
||
6 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
The Funds may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and NAV of their Common Shares. However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.
To leverage, the Funds issue Preferred Shares, which pay dividends at prevailing short-term interest rates, and invests the proceeds in long-term municipal bonds. In general, the concept of leveraging is based on the premise that the cost of assets to be obtained from leverage will be based on short-term interest rates, which normally will be lower than the income earned by each Fund on its longer-term portfolio investments. To the extent that the total assets of the Fund (including the assets obtained from leverage) are invested in higher-yielding portfolio investments, the Funds Common Shareholders will benefit from the incremental net income.
To illustrate these concepts, assume a Funds Common Shares capitalization is $100 million and it issues Preferred Shares for an additional $50 million, creating a total value of $150 million available for investment in long-term municipal bonds. If prevailing short-term interest rates are 3% and long-term interest rates are 6%, the yield curve has a strongly positive slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the $50 million of Preferred Shares based on the lower short-term interest rates. At the same time, the securities purchased by the Fund with assets received from the Preferred Shares issuance earn the income based on long-term interest rates. In this case, the dividends paid to Preferred Shareholders are significantly lower than the income earned on the Funds long-term investments, and therefore the Common Shareholders are the beneficiaries of the incremental net income.
If short-term interest rates rise, narrowing the differential between short-term and long-term interest rate, the incremental net income pickup on the Common Shares will be reduced or eliminated completely. Furthermore, if prevailing short-term interest rates rise above long-term interest rates of 6%, the yield curve has a negative slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the higher short-term interest rates whereas the Funds total portfolio earns income based on lower long-term interest rates.
Furthermore, the value of the Funds portfolio investments generally varies inversely with the direction of long-term interest rates, although other factors can influence the value of portfolio investments. In contrast, the redemption value of the Funds Preferred Shares does not fluctuate in relation to interest rates. As a result, changes in interest rates can influence the Funds NAV positively or negatively in addition to the impact on Fund performance from leverage from Preferred Shares discussed above.
The Funds may also leverage their assets through the use of tender option bond (TOB) programs, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. TOB investments generally will provide the Funds with economic benefits in periods of declining short-term interest rates, but expose the Funds to risks during periods of rising short-term interest rates similar to those associated with Preferred Shares issued by the Funds, as described above. Additionally, fluctuations in the market value of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB trust may adversely affect each Funds NAV per share.
The use of leverage may enhance opportunities for increased income to the Funds and Common Shareholders, but as described above, it also creates risks as short- or long-term interest rates fluctuate. Leverage also will generally cause greater changes in the Funds NAV, market price and dividend rate than a comparable portfolio without leverage. If the income derived from securities purchased with assets received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Funds net income will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the securities purchased is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, each Funds net income will be less than if leverage had not been used, and therefore the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be reduced. The Funds may be required to sell portfolio securities at inopportune times or distressed values in order to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to the use of leverage or as required by the terms of leverage instruments, which may cause a Fund to incur losses. The use of leverage may limit each Funds ability to invest in certain types of securities or use certain types of hedging strategies, such as in the case of certain restrictions imposed by ratings agencies that rate preferred shares issued by the Funds. Each Fund will incur expenses in connection with the use of leverage, all of which are borne by Common Shareholders and may reduce income to the Common Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
38 |
% |
|
MQY |
|
39 |
% |
|
MQT |
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Funds may invest in various derivative instruments, including financial futures contracts as specified in Note 2 of the Notes to Financials Statements, which constitute forms of economic leverage. Such instruments are used to obtain exposure to a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities or to hedge market and/or interest rate risks. Such derivative instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of a derivative instrument and the underlying asset and illiquidity of the derivative instrument. The Funds ability to successfully use a derivative instrument depends on the investment advisors ability to accurately predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. The use of derivative instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require the Funds to sell or purchase portfolio securities at inopportune times or for distressed values, may limit the amount of appreciation the Funds can realize on an investment or may cause the Funds to hold a security that it might otherwise sell. The Funds investments in these instruments are discussed in detail in the Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Jefferson, Alabama, RB, Series A, |
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
$ |
4,371,150 |
|
Tuscaloosa Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.63%, 8/01/25 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
880,000 |
|
5.88%, 8/01/36 |
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
2,570,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,821,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 11.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona State Transportation Board, RB, Sub-Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/21 |
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
6,290,184 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/22 |
|
|
7,030 |
|
|
7,689,414 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/23 |
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
5,632,738 |
|
Maricopa County IDA, Arizona, RB, Arizona Charter |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
2,249,907 |
|
Maricopa County IDA, Arizona, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 10/20/31 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,249,200 |
|
6.05%, 10/20/36 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,093,650 |
|
Phoenix IDA, Arizona, RB, America West Airlines Inc. |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,113,140 |
|
Phoenix IDA, Arizona, Refunding RB, America West |
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
3,363,065 |
|
Pima County IDA, RB, Charter Schools, Project II, |
|
|
765 |
|
|
676,818 |
|
Pima County IDA, RB, Industrial Development, Tucson |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,048,630 |
|
Pima County IDA, RB, Prerefunded, Charters Schools, |
|
|
565 |
|
|
620,432 |
|
Pima County IDA, Refunding RB, Tucson Electric |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
3,442,351 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
10,020 |
|
|
8,959,884 |
|
5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
6,719,740 |
|
Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/15/20 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,926,320 |
|
5.75%, 7/15/24 |
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
2,065,266 |
|
Yavapai County IDA, Arizona, RB, Yavapai Regional |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
3,870,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,011,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 13.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series A, |
|
$ |
3,155 |
|
$ |
3,315,274 |
|
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 5.00%, 8/15/39 |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
3,468,229 |
|
Saint Joseph Health System, Series A, |
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
4,587,353 |
|
California State Public Works Board, RB, Department |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
4,267,980 |
|
California Statewide Communities Development |
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
4,203,981 |
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Backed, Senior, Series A-1, |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
1,381,594 |
|
Series A-4, 7.80%, 6/01/42 (c) |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
9,026,250 |
|
San Francisco City & County Public Utilities |
|
|
19,075 |
|
|
19,360,171 |
|
State of California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/01/31 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
9,508 |
|
Various Purpose, 5.25%, 11/01/25 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,086,900 |
|
Various Purpose, 5.00%, 6/01/32 |
|
|
9,335 |
|
|
8,792,637 |
|
Various Purpose, 6.50%, 4/01/33 |
|
|
14,075 |
|
|
15,555,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,055,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 7.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City & County of Denver, Colorado, RB, AMT (AMBAC), |
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
6,806,942 |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Series C |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
3,739,537 |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
4,375,274 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
4,771,326 |
|
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, Colorado, RB, |
|
|
195 |
|
|
208,763 |
|
Elk Valley Public Improvement, RB, Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10%, 9/01/14 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
714,686 |
|
7.35%, 9/01/31 |
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
4,572,783 |
|
|
|
Portfolio Abbreviations |
|
To simplify the listings of portfolio holdings in the Schedules of Investments, the names of many of the securities have been abbreviated according to the following list:
|
|
AGC |
Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AMBAC |
American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
AMT |
Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to) |
CAB |
Capital Appreciation Bonds |
CIFG |
CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty |
COP |
Certificate of Participation |
EDA |
Economic Development Authority |
FGIC |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHA |
Federal Housing Administration |
FSA |
Financial Security Assurance Inc. |
GAN |
Grant Anticipation Notes |
GNMA |
Government National Mortgage Association |
GO |
General Obligation Bonds |
HDA |
Housing Development Authority |
HFA |
Housing Finance Agency |
IDA |
Industrial Development Authority |
IDRB |
Industrial Development Revenue Bond |
ISD |
Independent School District |
MBIA |
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance |
|
(National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.) |
PSF-GTD |
Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
RB |
Revenue Bonds |
S/F |
Single-Family |
SO |
Special Obligation |
TAN |
Tax Anticipation Notes |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platte River Power Authority, Colorado, RB, Series HH: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/26 |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
$ |
2,689,100 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/27 |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
1,209,902 |
|
Plaza Metropolitan District No. 1, Colorado, TAN, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Improvement Fee, 8.00%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
6,686,285 |
|
Subordinate Public Improvement Fee, 8.13%, |
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
1,750,468 |
|
University of Colorado, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 6/01/30 |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
2,394,563 |
|
5.38%, 6/01/32 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,330,350 |
|
5.38%, 6/01/38 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
873,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,123,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut State Development Authority, RB, AFCO |
|
|
125 |
|
|
124,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airports Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series 2nd Senior Lien, 7.00%, 10/01/31 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
2,600,500 |
|
Series 2nd Senior Lien-B, 7.03%, 10/01/32 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
3,660,150 |
|
Series 2nd Senior Lien-B, 7.05%, 10/01/33 |
|
|
13,410 |
|
|
3,006,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,267,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 6.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Clearwater, Florida, RB, Series A, |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
3,510,673 |
|
County of Broward, Florida, RB, Series A, |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
2,224,606 |
|
County of Lee, Florida, RB (AMBAC), |
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
4,811,756 |
|
County of Miami-Dade, Florida, RB, Miami |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Airport, Series A, AMT (AGC), |
|
|
5,150 |
|
|
5,022,640 |
|
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, Florida, RB, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,022,350 |
|
Hillsborough County IDA, RB, National Gypsum, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
7,930,055 |
|
7.13%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
3,447,850 |
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, |
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
4,435,999 |
|
Santa Rosa Bay Bridge Authority, RB, |
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
2,494,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,899,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, RB, |
|
|
6,945 |
|
|
7,094,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Territory of Guam, GO, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 11/15/19 |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
1,322,438 |
|
6.75%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
2,380,617 |
|
7.00%, 11/15/39 |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,485,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,188,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho Housing & Finance Association, RB, |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
25,042 |
|
Power County Industrial Development Corp., RB, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,018,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,043,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friendship Village Schaumburg, 5.63%, 2/15/37 |
|
|
875 |
|
|
692,195 |
|
Monarch Landing Inc. Facilities, 7.00%, |
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
722,500 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Illinois, RB, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,288,520 |
|
Village of Bolingbrook, Illinois, Special Tax, Forest City |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
761,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,464,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Saint Joseph, RB, Notre Dame Du Lac |
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
4,742,980 |
|
Indiana Finance Authority Hospital Revenue, |
|
|
6,645 |
|
|
6,766,670 |
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Duke Energy, |
|
|
5,945 |
|
|
5,668,201 |
|
Indiana Finance Authority, RB, Sisters of St. Francis |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
1,637,914 |
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Indiana, RB, Indiana |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
2,392,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,207,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Lenexa, Kansas, RB, Lakeview Village Inc., |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,437,800 |
|
Kansas Development Finance Authority, RB, Adventist |
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
7,296,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,733,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, |
|
|
800 |
|
|
847,808 |
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, |
|
|
650 |
|
|
664,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,512,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
8,625,780 |
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, RB, Franciscan |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
1,661,795 |
|
Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana, RB, Series A, |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
1,652,472 |
|
Port Lake Charles, Louisiana, Refunding RB, |
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
18,637,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,577,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Maryland 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Prince Georges, Maryland, SO, National |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
$ |
1,211,370 |
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, |
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
2,395,685 |
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,994,020 |
|
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
437,720 |
|
Maryland State Energy Financing Administration, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,000,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,039,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, RB, |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,140,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit, Michigan, RB, Senior Lien, Series B |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
2,265,858 |
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, |
|
|
6,085 |
|
|
5,833,385 |
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00%, 9/01/29 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,324,680 |
|
8.25%, 9/01/39 |
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
7,392,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,816,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, RB, Rolling Hills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 8/20/21 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
450,908 |
|
6.20%, 2/20/43 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,128,980 |
|
City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, RB, Housing, Gaar |
|
|
895 |
|
|
906,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,486,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
University of Southern Mississippi, RB, Campus |
|
|
280 |
|
|
295,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri State Highways & Transit Commission, |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
16,444,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Lincoln, Nebraska, RB, 4.25%, 6/15/24 |
|
|
790 |
|
|
803,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities |
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
3,329,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 10.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Cigarette Tax, 5.50%, 6/15/24 |
|
|
11,435 |
|
|
10,914,707 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB,
Continental Airlines Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 9/15/19 |
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
3,520,436 |
|
6.25%, 9/15/29 |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
11,962,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New Jersey (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, First Mortgage, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lions Gate Project, 5.75%, 1/01/25 |
|
$ |
710 |
|
$ |
611,722 |
|
Lions Gate Project, 5.88%, 1/01/37 |
|
|
230 |
|
|
179,563 |
|
Presbyterian, 6.38%, 11/01/31 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,565,960 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Motor Vehicle Surcharge, |
|
|
19,350 |
|
|
19,500,930 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/01/13 |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
134 |
|
6.63%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
184 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series C (AMBAC), 5.05%, 12/15/35 (e) |
|
|
13,110 |
|
|
2,558,023 |
|
Series A, 5.50%, 12/15/21 |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
4,483,244 |
|
Series A, 5.50%, 12/15/22 |
|
|
6,600 |
|
|
7,425,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,722,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 6.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of New York, New York, GO, Series O, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,548,175 |
|
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency, |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,138,576 |
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series B, |
|
|
4,910 |
|
|
5,038,593 |
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,168,600 |
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education, Series F, 5.00%, 3/15/35 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,084,500 |
|
Mount Sinai Health, Series A, 6.75%, 7/01/20 |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
1,901,190 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., New York, RB, |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
7,251,969 |
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, New York, RB, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,322,600 |
|
Westchester County Industrial Development Agency, |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
3,161,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,615,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina 3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B, 5.00%, 1/01/26 |
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
4,546,888 |
|
Series D, 6.75%, 1/01/10 (c) |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
4,848,895 |
|
North Carolina HFA, North Carolina, RB, Home |
|
|
145 |
|
|
145,331 |
|
North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, North |
|
|
525 |
|
|
525,950 |
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arbor Acres Community Project, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,123,360 |
|
Presbyterian Homes, 5.40%, 10/01/27 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,560,500 |
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/39 |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
1,256,398 |
|
5.00%, 6/01/42 |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
2,751,789 |
|
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency, RB, Number 1 |
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
2,163,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,922,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
10 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ohio 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, RB, |
|
$ |
7,460 |
|
$ |
6,009,627 |
|
County of Hamilton, Ohio, RB, Improvement, |
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
5,263,903 |
|
County of Lucas, Ohio, RB, Refunding & Improvement, |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
2,193,487 |
|
County of Montgomery, Ohio, Refunding RB, Catholic |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
4,793,837 |
|
Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, RB, Saint Mary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 5/15/24 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
641,325 |
|
6.00%, 5/15/34 |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
1,755,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,657,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portland Housing Authority, RB, Housing, Pine |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
1,404,532 |
|
State of Oregon, GO, Veterans Welfare, Series 80A, |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
1,935,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,339,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montgomery County Higher Education & Health |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
2,309,541 |
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aqua Pennsylvania Inc. Project, 5.00%, |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
3,778,784 |
|
National Gypsum Co., Series A, AMT, |
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
3,336,964 |
|
Pennsylvania HFA, RB, Series 97A, AMT, |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
2,297,806 |
|
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
11,990 |
|
|
10,612,949 |
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB, Sub-Series B, |
|
|
13,905 |
|
|
13,833,945 |
|
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, RB, |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
1,175,096 |
|
Sayre Health Care Facilities Authority, RB, Guthrie |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
6,013,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,358,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
10,120 |
|
|
10,944,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Falls Detention Facility Corp., Rhode Island, |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
3,598,022 |
|
City of Woonsocket, Rhode Island, GO (MBIA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 10/01/17 |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
1,262,546 |
|
6.00%, 10/01/18 |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
1,229,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,090,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Dakota 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Dakota Health & Educational Facilities |
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
4,980,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tennessee 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corp., |
|
$ |
3,505 |
|
$ |
3,271,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 14.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance Airport Authority, Texas, Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
2,230,235 |
|
Austin Texas Convention Enterprises Inc., RB, First Tier, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,350,550 |
|
Bexar County Housing Finance Corp., RB, Waters at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.80%, 8/01/21 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
953,927 |
|
6.00%, 8/01/31 |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
1,604,215 |
|
6.05%, 8/01/36 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
635,120 |
|
Brazos River Authority, Refunding RB, TXU Electric Co. |
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
6,844,940 |
|
City of Houston, Texas, RB, Special Facilities, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.38%, 7/01/22 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,411,205 |
|
7.00%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,791,380 |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Facilities |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
7,438,500 |
|
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, RB, E.I. du Pont de |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,002,750 |
|
Gulf Coast IDA, RB, Citgo Petroleum Corp. Project, |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
3,956,511 |
|
Houston Industrial Development Corp., RB, Senior, |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
1,326,171 |
|
Houston Texas Airport Systems Revenue, Refunding |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
3,215,444 |
|
La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp., RB, |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
2,338,524 |
|
Lower Colorado River Authority, RB, Samsung Austin |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
3,339,224 |
|
Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1, Texas, |
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
4,624,733 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Refunding RB, Second |
|
|
12,140 |
|
|
12,608,361 |
|
San Antonio Energy Acquisition Public Facility Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 8/01/23 |
|
|
6,955 |
|
|
7,089,023 |
|
5.50%, 8/01/25 |
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
6,364,427 |
|
Texas State Turnpike Authority, RB, First Tier, Series A |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
6,400,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,525,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Virgin Islands 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, RB, Senior |
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
6,349,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Riverton, Utah, RB, IHC Health Services Inc., |
|
|
5,595 |
|
|
5,421,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James City County EDA, RB, First Mortgage, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.35%, 9/01/26 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,262,010 |
|
5.50%, 9/01/34 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,587,820 |
|
Winchester IDA, Virginia, RB, Westminster, Canterbury, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
896,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,745,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|||
|
|||
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Washington 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vancouver Housing Authority, Washington, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 9/01/22 |
|
$ |
945 |
|
$ |
830,050 |
|
6.20%, 9/01/32 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,047,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,877,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, RB, Senior, Air Cargo, |
|
|
660 |
|
|
549,028 |
|
State of Wisconsin, RB, Series A, 6.00%, 5/01/36 |
|
|
14,300 |
|
|
15,700,113 |
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
6,651,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,900,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Sweetwater, Wyoming, Refunding RB, |
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
6,411,205 |
|
Wyoming Community Development Authority, |
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
4,839,626 |
|
Wyoming Municipal Power Agency, Wyoming, RB, |
|
|
595 |
|
|
571,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,821,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 125.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
747,026,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Special Care Facilities Financing |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
4,546,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, Refunding RB, San Francisco |
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
7,087,568 |
|
California Educational Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
5,310 |
|
|
5,595,731 |
|
Los Angeles Community College District, |
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
4,772,853 |
|
San Diego Community College District, California, |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
2,261,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,717,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C3, 5.10%, 10/01/41 |
|
|
7,490 |
|
|
7,567,147 |
|
Series C7, 5.00%, 9/01/36 |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
4,839,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,406,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series T1, 4.70%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
9,130 |
|
|
9,622,107 |
|
Series X3, 4.85%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
9,270 |
|
|
9,648,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,270,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Georgia 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Colleges & Universities Authority, Refunding |
|
$ |
6,398 |
|
$ |
6,652,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities |
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
4,331,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
3,462,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duke University Project, Series A, 5.00%, |
|
|
18,897 |
|
|
19,442,005 |
|
Wake Forest University, 5.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
3,247,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,689,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Ohio, Refunding RB, Cleveland Clinic Health, |
|
|
27,900 |
|
|
28,789,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charleston Educational Excellence Finance Corp., RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 12/01/28 |
|
|
7,795 |
|
|
8,069,384 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/29 |
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
7,133,897 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
2,572,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,776,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelby County Health Educational & Housing |
|
|
11,240 |
|
|
11,411,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 9.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfax County IDA, Virginia, Refunding RB, Health |
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
6,578,679 |
|
University of Virginia, Refunding RB, 5.00%, 6/01/40 |
|
|
10,620 |
|
|
11,203,250 |
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (MBIA), |
|
|
30,930 |
|
|
31,180,224 |
|
Virginia Housing Development Authority, RB, |
|
|
6,720 |
|
|
6,789,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,752,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Puget Sound Regional Transportation |
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
5,555,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
11,459 |
|
|
11,255,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
223,617,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
970,643,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
|
12 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.23% (g)(h) |
|
|
17,401,862 |
|
$ |
17,401,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
17,401,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $1,006,588,266*) 165.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
988,045,711 |
|
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets (4.5)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(26,705,437 |
) |
Liability for Trust Certificates, Including Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
(113,225,720 |
) |
Preferred Shares, at Redemption Value (42.1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(251,489,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
596,625,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of October 31, 2009, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
|
|
|
$ |
891,713,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,598,876 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
(46,388,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16,789,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default of interest payments. |
|
|
(b) |
Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(c) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
(d) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued security transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Citigroup Inc. |
|
$ |
9,841,572 |
|
$ |
(66,111 |
) |
Goldman Sachs Bank USA |
|
$ |
2,309,541 |
|
$ |
(9,365 |
) |
Jeffries and Co. |
|
$ |
3,778,784 |
|
$ |
(63,467 |
) |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA |
|
$ |
5,421,443 |
|
$ |
(85,548 |
) |
Merrill Lynch and Co. |
|
$ |
1,637,914 |
|
$ |
(2,417 |
) |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
13,940,437 |
|
$ |
(228,418 |
) |
RBC Capital |
|
$ |
2,338,524 |
|
$ |
(12,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(f) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a tender option bond trust in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
(g) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Affiliate |
|
Net |
|
Income |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
$ |
15,296,830 |
|
$ |
15,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments, which are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments) |
|
|
|
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the inputs used as of October 31, 2009 in determining the fair valuation of the Funds investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Valuation Inputs |
|
|
|
Investments
in |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,401,862 |
|
Level 2 Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
|
|
|
970,643,849 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
988,045,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments October 31, 2009 (Unaudited) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
(000) |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Public School & College Authority, Refunding |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
$ |
1,231,032 |
|
County of Jefferson, Alabama, RB, Series A, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,250,390 |
|
University of Alabama, Alabama, RB, Series A (MBIA), |
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
7,294,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,775,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borough of Matanuska-Susitna, Alaska, RB, Goose |
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
4,395,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., RB, Senior, 5.00%, |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
2,655,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 18.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Refunding |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
3,141,425 |
|
Arcadia Unified School District, California, GO, CAB, |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
338,294 |
|
Cabrillo Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.18%, 8/01/37 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
560,397 |
|
4.87%, 8/01/38 |
|
|
7,405 |
|
|
1,202,794 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
775 |
|
|
803,435 |
|
California State University, RB, Systemwide, Series A |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,302,272 |
|
Carlsbad Unified School District, GO, Election, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
3,005,150 |
|
Chino Valley Unified School District COP, GO, Election |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,211,160 |
|
City of San Jose, California, RB, Series A, AMT (AMBAC), |
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
5,080,110 |
|
Coast Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
2,312,016 |
|
El Monte Union High School District, California, GO, |
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
6,331,793 |
|
Fresno Unified School District, California, GO, Election |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
1,243,960 |
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., California, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
11,260,600 |
|
Hartnell Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
1,938,379 |
|
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp., RB, |
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
2,907,136 |
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/29 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,111,480 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
2,307,214 |
|
Mount Diablo Unified School District, California, GO, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,009,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
(000) |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBIA), 5.00%, 2/01/33 |
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
$ |
2,784,485 |
|
Series B (FSA), 5.00%, 2/01/30 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,624,565 |
|
Series B (FSA), 5.00%, 2/01/31 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,236,696 |
|
Port of Oakland, RB, Series K, AMT (MBIA), |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
2,407,237 |
|
Poway Redevelopment Agency, California, TAN, Paguay |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,741,720 |
|
Sacramento City Unified School District, California, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,510,850 |
|
San Bernardino Community College District, California, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5,779,000 |
|
San Jose Unified School District, Santa Clara County |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
2,905,795 |
|
San Mateo County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
2,828,332 |
|
State of California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 6/01/27 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
29,981 |
|
5.50%, 4/01/28 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5,090 |
|
Ventura County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
3,233,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,154,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Covenant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/27 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,469,360 |
|
5.50%, 12/01/33 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
790,155 |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
1,247,895 |
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, RB, CAB, |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
2,375,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,882,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 6.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Miami, Florida, RB, Miami Revenues (MBIA), |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
1,071,224 |
|
County of Duval, Florida, COP, Master Lease Program |
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
4,049,717 |
|
County of Miami-Dade, Florida, GO, Building Better |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
3,718,407 |
|
County of Miami-Dade, Florida, RB, Miami International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A (CIFG), 5.00%, 10/01/38 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
2,595,007 |
|
(Syncora), 5.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
7,669,542 |
|
County of Orange, Florida, RB, Series B (MBIA), |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,214,212 |
|
Florida State Department of Environmental Protection, |
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
2,624,302 |
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, |
|
|
375 |
|
|
380,415 |
|
South Florida Water Management District, COP (AGC), |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
2,850,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,173,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
14 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
(000) |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Georgia 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Augusta, Georgia, RB (FSA), 5.25%, 10/01/39 |
|
$ |
2,820 |
|
$ |
2,908,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawaii 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Hawaii, GO, Series CX (FSA), 5.50%, 2/01/21 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,146,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 21.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, GO, Chicago |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,188,880 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, GO, CAB, City Colleges (FGIC), |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
4,021,420 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series A (FSA), |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,565,370 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, RB, General, Airport Third Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(FSA), 5.75%, 1/01/23 |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
3,492,072 |
|
(FSA), 5.75%, 1/01/24 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,094,720 |
|
(Syncora), 6.00%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
3,378,936 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, RB, Project, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,077,640 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, Refunding RB, General Airport |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, (MBIA), 5.75%, 1/01/21 |
|
|
13,665 |
|
|
13,855,353 |
|
Series A, (MBIA), 5.50%, 1/01/22 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,030,000 |
|
Series A, (MBIA), 5.38%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
11,766,625 |
|
Series A-2, (FSA), 5.75%, 1/01/21 |
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
2,747,269 |
|
County of Cook, Illinois, GO, Capital Improvement, |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
5,732,120 |
|
Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, RB, State Tax |
|
|
28,525 |
|
|
27,856,659 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Illinois, RB, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,073,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,880,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Indiana, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A (MBIA), 5.00%, 1/01/37 |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
2,729,595 |
|
Series B, 5.75%, 1/01/34 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
564,685 |
|
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
2,320,941 |
|
5.25%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
4,913,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,528,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, RB, Series A (AGC), 5.63%, |
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
4,965,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,997,892 |
|
Louisiana State Transportation Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
1,284,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rapides Finance Authority, Louisiana, RB, Cleco Power |
|
|
800 |
|
|
673,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,954,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
1,690,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
(000) |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Massachusetts 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts HFA, Massachusetts, RB, Rental, |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
$ |
4,016,360 |
|
Massachusetts HFA, Massachusetts, RB, S/F, |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,125,068 |
|
Massachusetts Port Authority, RB, Delta Air Lines Inc. |
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
3,087,999 |
|
Massachusetts State Water Resource Authority, |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,851,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,080,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit, Michigan, RB, Second Lien, Series E |
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
8,920,259 |
|
City of Detroit, Michigan, RB, System, Second Lien, |
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
4,212,017 |
|
Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
2,140,407 |
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Refunding RB, AMT (Syncora): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detroit Edison Co. Project, Series A, 5.50%, |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,592,560 |
|
Detroit Edison Co. Project, Series C, 5.45%, |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
5,369,292 |
|
Detroit Edison Co., Pollution, Series C, |
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
1,891,966 |
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, RB, |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
4,076,479 |
|
State of Michigan, RB, GAN (FSA), 5.25%, 9/15/26 |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
3,503,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,706,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, RB, Fairview Health |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
3,039,741 |
|
Dakota County Community Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
167 |
|
|
168,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,208,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Washington, Nebraska, RB, Cargill Inc. |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,325,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 8.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Carson City, Nevada, RB, Carson, Tahoe |
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
3,697,667 |
|
City of Las Vegas, Nevada, GO, Limited Tax, Performing |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,254,443 |
|
County of Clark, Nevada, RB, Southwest Gas Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, (FGIC), 4.75%, 9/01/36 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
37,074 |
|
Series D, (MBIA), 5.25%, 3/01/38 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
10,646,160 |
|
County of Clark, Nevada, RB, Subordinate Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/30 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,011,440 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
19,100 |
|
|
18,712,843 |
|
Las Vegas Valley Water District, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
2,120,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,480,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New Jersey 8.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Cigarette Tax (Radian): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 6/15/29 |
|
$ |
710 |
|
$ |
685,668 |
|
5.50%, 6/15/31 |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
1,191,516 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Motor Vehicle Surcharge, |
|
|
20,065 |
|
|
20,311,800 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, School Facilities Construction, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%, 3/01/28 |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
2,746,849 |
|
5.13%, 3/01/30 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
7,701,825 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,524,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,162,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of New York, New York, GO, Series B (MBIA), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,517,000 |
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, New York, RB, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,585,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,102,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Montgomery, Ohio, Refunding RB, Catholic |
|
|
750 |
|
|
709,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania HFA, RB, S/F, Series 73A, AMT, |
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
2,128,310 |
|
Pennsylvania HFA, RB, Series 99-A, AMT, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,002,200 |
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB, CAB, |
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
2,550,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,680,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,636,512 |
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series A (MBIA), 5.75%, 8/01/41 (b) |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
4,289,880 |
|
First Sub-Series A, 6.38%, 8/01/39 |
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
5,069,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,995,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berkeley County School District, RB, Securing Assets |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
3,808,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 15.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bell County Health Facility Development Corp., Texas, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,233,320 |
|
City of Houston, Texas, Refunding RB, Combined, |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
3,239,766 |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.88%, 11/01/17 |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
1,903,280 |
|
5.88%, 11/01/18 |
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
2,217,201 |
|
5.88%, 11/01/19 |
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
2,460,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Texas (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregg County Health Facilities Development Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.38%, 10/01/10 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
$ |
2,753,062 |
|
6.88%, 10/01/10 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,190,170 |
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, RB, Senior |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
3,955,185 |
|
Lewisville ISD, Texas, GO, CAB, Refunding, School |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
2,939,700 |
|
Lone Star College System, GO, 5.00%, 8/15/33 |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
4,923,264 |
|
Mansfield ISD, Texas, GO, School Building, 5.00%, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,388,044 |
|
North Harris County Regional Water Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
1,829,783 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Refunding RB, First Tier: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, System (AGC), 5.72%, 1/01/31 (b) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
2,860,800 |
|
Series A, 6.00%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
3,557,315 |
|
System (MBIA), 5.75%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
12,410,577 |
|
Texas State Turnpike Authority, RB, First Tier, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 8/15/38 |
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
7,226,856 |
|
5.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
9,061,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,150,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Salt Lake City, Utah, RB, IHC Hospitals Inc. |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
17,326,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont HFA, Vermont, RB, Multiple Purpose, Series C, |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
1,835,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Tacoma, Washington, RB (MBIA), 5.00%, |
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
5,156,406 |
|
County of King, Washington, GO, Sewer (MBIA), |
|
|
100 |
|
|
102,370 |
|
Port of Tacoma, Washington, RB, Series A (AMBAC), |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,790,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,049,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Refunding RB, Series C, |
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
1,736,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 116.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
506,470,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
California 8.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, California, RB, |
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
$ |
1,256,751 |
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., |
|
|
14,160 |
|
|
16,006,181 |
|
Los Angeles Community College District, California, |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
2,981,818 |
|
San Diego Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
509 |
|
|
533,868 |
|
San Diego County Water Authority, COP, Refunding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series 2008-A (FSA), 5.00%, 5/01/33 |
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
5,180,650 |
|
Series A (MBIA), 5.00%, 5/01/32 |
|
|
9,003 |
|
|
9,092,336 |
|
Tamalpais Union High School District, California, GO, |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
1,998,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,050,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
1,453,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Tallahassee, Florida, RB (MBIA), 5.00%, |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
6,046,560 |
|
County of Seminole, Florida, Refunding RB, Series B |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
6,743,772 |
|
Florida State Board of Education, GO, Series D, |
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
2,457,732 |
|
Jacksonville Electric Authority, RB, Sub-Series A, |
|
|
4,310 |
|
|
4,529,336 |
|
Miami Dade County School Board, Florida, COP, |
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
11,728,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,505,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta, Georgia, RB, General, Subordinate |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,102,900 |
|
City of Augusta, Georgia, RB (FSA), 5.25%, 10/01/34 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,174,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,277,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, Refunding RB, Second Lien |
|
|
14,429 |
|
|
15,102,910 |
|
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, RB, Series B, |
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
2,137,793 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Illinois, |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
3,779,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,020,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts School Building Authority, RB, Series A |
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
17,042,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Las Vegas, Nevada, GO, Limited Tax Performing |
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
5,425,610 |
|
Clark County Water Reclamation District, GO, Series B, |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
2,641,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,066,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New Hampshire 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
$ |
10,182,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Cigarette Tax (AGC), |
|
|
5,150 |
|
|
5,337,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erie County Industrial Development Agency, RB, City |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
2,139,627 |
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
3,870,086 |
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, Education, |
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
1,706,236 |
|
New York State Thruway Authority, RB, Series G (FSA), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,162,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,878,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Ohio, RB, Cleveland Clinic Health, Series B, |
|
|
780 |
|
|
808,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina State Public Service Authority, RB, |
|
|
4,695 |
|
|
5,015,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Creek ISD, Texas, GO, Refunding School Building |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
6,238,778 |
|
Cypress Fairbanks, ISD, GO, Refunding Schoolhouse |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
4,940,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,179,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfax County IDA, Virginia, Refunding RB, Health Care, |
|
|
450 |
|
|
472,154 |
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (MBIA), |
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
3,228,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,700,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Puget Sound Regional Transportation Authority, |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
2,584,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
188,103,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
694,573,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.23% (g)(h) |
|
|
7,201,538 |
|
|
7,201,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
7,201,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $696,467,372*) 161.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
701,774,913 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
5,142,035 |
|
Liability
for Trust Certificates, Including Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
(96,194,865 |
) |
Preferred Shares, at Redemption Value (40.7)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(176,650,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
434,071,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of October 31, 2009, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
600,850,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
21,702,701 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(16,835,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
4,866,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents a step-up bond that pays an initial coupon rate for the first period and then a higher coupon rate for the following periods. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(c) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
(d) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued security transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,957,043 |
|
$ |
(22,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Security is collateralized by Municipal or US Treasury Obligations. |
|
|
(f) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a tender option bond trust in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
(g) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Affiliate |
|
Net |
|
Income |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
$ |
(3,707,616 |
) |
$ |
19,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments, which are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments) |
|
|
|
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the inputs used as of October 31, 2009 in determining the fair valuation of the Funds investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Investments
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
7,201,538 |
|
Level 2 Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
694,573,375 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
701,774,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments October 31, 2009 (Unaudited) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Public School & College Authority, |
|
$ |
800 |
|
$ |
820,688 |
|
Birmingham Alabama Special Care Facilities |
|
|
650 |
|
|
689,637 |
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A, 4.75%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,500,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 19.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Refunding |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
5,412,336 |
|
Antelope Valley Community College District, GO, |
|
|
550 |
|
|
567,259 |
|
Arcadia Unified School District, California, GO, CAB, |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
215,278 |
|
Cabrillo Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.18%, 8/01/37 |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
362,103 |
|
4.87%, 8/01/38 |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
779,664 |
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaiser Permanente, Series A (FSA), 5.50%, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,040,950 |
|
Saint Joseph Health System, Series A, 5.75%, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
518,345 |
|
Coast Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,486,296 |
|
East Side Union High School District-Santa Clara |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
4,511,250 |
|
El Monte Union High School District, California, GO, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,145,200 |
|
Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District, California, GO, |
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
2,930,106 |
|
Fresno Unified School District, California, GO, Election |
|
|
800 |
|
|
809,080 |
|
John Swett Unified School District, GO, Series A (FSA), |
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
2,932,329 |
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/29 |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
2,672,462 |
|
5.00%, 10/01/36 |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
1,495,886 |
|
Monterey Peninsula Community College District, |
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
3,913,310 |
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP (MBIA), |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,328,842 |
|
Palm Springs Financing Authority, RB, Convention |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
2,977,894 |
|
Port of Oakland, RB, Series K, AMT (MBIA), 5.75%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,001,860 |
|
Poway Redevelopment Agency, California, TAN, Paguay |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,088,575 |
|
Sacramento City Unified School District, California, GO, |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,606,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, RB, Series N |
|
$ |
4,400 |
|
$ |
4,404,884 |
|
State of California, GO, 5.13%, 6/01/27 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
19,988 |
|
Ventura County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
2,078,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,299,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Covenant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/27 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,102,020 |
|
5.50%, 12/01/33 |
|
|
675 |
|
|
592,616 |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
780 |
|
|
794,578 |
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, RB, CAB, |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
1,572,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,061,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 10.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward County School Board, Florida, COP, Series A |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,430,212 |
|
City of Miami, Florida, RB, Miami Revenues (MBIA), |
|
|
480 |
|
|
467,443 |
|
County of Duval, Florida, COP, Master Lease Program |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
2,599,818 |
|
County of Miami-Dade, Florida, RB, Jackson Health |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,071,060 |
|
County of Miami-Dade, Florida, RB, Miami International |
|
|
12,550 |
|
|
11,738,141 |
|
County of Orange, Florida, RB, Series B (MBIA), |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
1,585,175 |
|
Hillsborough County Aviation Authority, Florida, RB, |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
3,260,107 |
|
Miami-Dade County School Board, Florida, COP, |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
1,668,713 |
|
Orange County School Board, COP, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
2,966,964 |
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, |
|
|
250 |
|
|
253,610 |
|
South Florida Water Management District, COP (AGC), |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,900,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,941,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta, Georgia, Refunding RB, General, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,068,050 |
|
City of Augusta, Georgia, RB (FSA), 5.25%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
1,939,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,007,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 19.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, GO, Chicago |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,736,100 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, GO, CAB, City Colleges (FGIC), |
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
2,589,176 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series A (FSA), |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,217,900 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc (MQT) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, RB, General, Airport Third Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(FSA), 5.75%, 1/01/23 |
|
$ |
5,200 |
|
$ |
5,340,816 |
|
(Syncora), 6.00%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,252,624 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, RB, Project, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,077,640 |
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, Refunding RB, General Airport |
|
|
9,150 |
|
|
9,204,900 |
|
County of Cook, Illinois, GO, Capital Improvement, |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
2,775,790 |
|
Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, RB, State Tax |
|
|
21,675 |
|
|
21,167,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,362,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Indiana, RB, |
|
|
350 |
|
|
359,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, RB, Series A (AGC), 5.63%, |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
1,209,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,146,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferson Parish Home Mortgage Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
1,349,299 |
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,276,431 |
|
Rapides Finance Authority, Louisiana, RB, Cleco Power |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,472,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,097,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
1,119,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 10.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts HFA, Massachusetts, RB, Rental |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
19,308,200 |
|
Massachusetts HFA, Massachusetts, RB, S/F, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,448,910 |
|
Massachusetts Port Authority, RB, Delta Air Lines Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/16 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
2,495,305 |
|
5.50%, 1/01/19 |
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
2,074,812 |
|
Massachusetts State Water Resource Authority, |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
2,776,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,103,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan 5.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit, Michigan, RB, Second Lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B (FSA), 6.25%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
376,519 |
|
Series B (FSA), 7.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
234,718 |
|
Series E (FGIC), 5.75%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,364,406 |
|
City of Detroit, Michigan, RB, System, Second Lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A (FGIC), 5.50%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
4,672,440 |
|
Series B (MBIA), 5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,717,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
1,000,190 |
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Refunding RB, Detroit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.50%, 6/01/30 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
936,800 |
|
Series C, 5.45%, 12/15/32 |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
3,610,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,912,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, RB, Fairview Health |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
2,026,494 |
|
Dakota County Community Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
108 |
|
|
108,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,134,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Saint Louis, Missouri, GO, Missouri Direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 3/01/10 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,113,320 |
|
6.00%, 3/01/10 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,543,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,657,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Carson City, Nevada, RB, Carson, Tahoe |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
2,525,236 |
|
County of Clark, Nevada, RB, Southwest Gas Corp. |
|
|
40 |
|
|
32,955 |
|
County of Clark, Nevada, RB, Subordinate Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/30 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,508,580 |
|
5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
2,645,271 |
|
County of Clark, Nevada, RB, System Subordinate Lien, |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
1,304,363 |
|
Las Vegas Valley Water District, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
1,396,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,412,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 6.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Cigarette Tax (Radian): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 6/15/29 |
|
|
870 |
|
|
840,185 |
|
5.50%, 6/15/31 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
370,900 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Motor Vehicle Surcharge, |
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
8,273,636 |
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, School Facilities Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series O, 5.13%, 3/01/28 |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
3,490,357 |
|
Series P, 5.13%, 9/01/28 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,141,360 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,606,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,723,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico State Transportation Commission, RB, |
|
|
6,295 |
|
|
6,513,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, State University |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
$ |
5,197,000 |
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, New York, RB, |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,268,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,465,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Montgomery, Ohio, Refunding RB, Catholic |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,363,825 |
|
Plain, Ohio, Local School District, GO (FGIC), 6.00%, |
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
5,551,770 |
|
Plain, Ohio, Local School District, Refunding |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
1,243,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,159,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware River Port Authority, Pennsylvania & |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5,043 |
|
Pennsylvania HFA, RB, Series 99A, AMT, 5.25%, |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
1,341,474 |
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB, CAB, |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
1,617,174 |
|
Philadelphia School District, GO, Series E, 6.00%, |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,404,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,368,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
1,094,417 |
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series A (MBIA), 5.76%, 8/01/41 (b) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
1,532,100 |
|
First Sub-Series A, 6.38%, 8/01/39 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,235,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,862,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berkeley County School District, RB, Securing Assets |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
2,488,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Tennessee, RB, |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
2,315,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 12.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Refunding RB, Series A |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,080,280 |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Facilities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,986,800 |
|
Lewisville ISD, Texas, GO, CAB, Refunding, School |
|
|
3,915 |
|
|
1,871,370 |
|
Lone Star College System, GO, 5.00%, 8/15/33 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,077,040 |
|
Mansfield ISD, Texas, GO, School Building, 5.00%, |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
1,105,768 |
|
Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1, Texas, |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,691,982 |
|
North Harris County Regional Water Authority, RB, |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
2,067,352 |
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Refunding RB, First Tier: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBIA), 5.75%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
3,632,364 |
|
Series A, 6.00%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
2,541,691 |
|
System, Series K-1 (AGC), 5.75%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
3,600,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas State Turnpike Authority, RB, First Tier, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 8/15/38 |
|
$ |
4,800 |
|
$ |
4,817,904 |
|
5.50%, 8/15/39 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,446,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,919,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont HFA, Vermont, RB, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Purpose, Series C (FSA), 5.50%, |
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
2,496,161 |
|
Series 27 (FSA), 4.85%, 11/01/32 |
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
2,535,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,031,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington 3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port of Seattle, Washington, RB, Series B, AMT |
|
|
7,470 |
|
|
7,569,650 |
|
Port of Tacoma, Washington, GO, Series B, AMT (AGC), |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
1,310,293 |
|
Port of Tacoma, Washington, RB, Series A (AMBAC), |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,860,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,740,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds 118.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
330,423,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp., Arizona, RB, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,030,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, California, RB, |
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
3,845,960 |
|
Los Angeles Community College District, California, |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
1,920,110 |
|
San Diego Community College District, California, GO, |
|
|
359 |
|
|
376,848 |
|
San Diego County Water Authority, Refunding, |
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
3,036,242 |
|
Tamalpais Union High School District, California, GO, |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
1,353,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,532,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
855 |
|
|
941,158 |
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
1,766,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,707,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Tallahassee, Florida, RB (MBIA), 5.00%, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,031,040 |
|
County of Seminole, Florida, Refunding RB, Series B |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
4,495,848 |
|
Florida State Board of Education, GO, Series D, 5.00%, |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
1,218,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,745,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta, Georgia, RB, General (FSA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B, 5.25%, 1/01/33 |
|
$ |
4,999 |
|
$ |
5,093,730 |
|
Subordinate Lien, Series C, 5.00%, 1/01/33 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,154,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,248,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois 10.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago, Illinois, Refunding RB, Second Lien |
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
2,668,319 |
|
Illinois Regional Transportation Authority, RB (MBIA), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
12,461,728 |
|
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, RB, Series B, |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
3,741,138 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Illinois, RB, |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,570,665 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Illinois, |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
7,831,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,273,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Louisiana, RB, Series A (FSA), 5.00%, |
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
4,643,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts School Building Authority, RB, Series A |
|
|
7,195 |
|
|
7,431,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Las Vegas, Nevada, GO, Limited Tax Performing |
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
3,573,755 |
|
Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada, GO, |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
1,711,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,285,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Cigarette Tax (AGC), |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,072,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
1,157,718 |
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, Education, |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
1,109,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Ohio, RB, Cleveland Clinic Health, Series B, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
518,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charleston Educational Excellence Finance Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 12/01/28 |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
2,820,920 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/29 |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
2,499,957 |
|
5.25%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
880 |
|
|
902,044 |
|
South Carolina State Public Service Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
1,201,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,424,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Creek ISD, Texas, GO, Refunding School Building |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
$ |
2,009,098 |
|
Cypress Fairbanks, Texas, ISD, GO, Refunding |
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
5,460,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,470,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfax County IDA, Virginia, Refunding RB, Health Care, |
|
|
300 |
|
|
314,769 |
|
Virginia HDA, RB, Sub-Series H-1 (MBIA), |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
2,015,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,330,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,227,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
115,209,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
445,633,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.23% (g)(h) |
|
|
6,001,616 |
|
|
6,001,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
6,001,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $451,394,268*) 162.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
451,634,753 |
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,941,986 |
|
Liability for Trust Certificates, Including Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
(59,166,801 |
) |
Preferred Shares, at Redemption Value (42.0)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(116,596,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
277,813,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of October 31, 2009, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
393,455,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
16,475,324 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(17,376,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
$ |
(901,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents a step-up bond that pays an initial coupon rate for the first period and then a higher coupon rate for the following periods. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
(c) |
Security is collateralized by Municipal or US Treasury Obligations. |
|
|
(d) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued security transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Citigroup Inc. |
|
$ |
1,891,060 |
|
$ |
(8,068 |
) |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,267,343 |
|
$ |
(7,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
(f) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a tender option bond trust in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
(g) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Net |
|
Income |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
$ |
5,100,753 |
|
$ |
11,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments, which are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Funds own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments) |
|
|
|
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For information about the Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the inputs used as of October 31, 2009 in determining the fair valuation of the Funds investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
|
Investments
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
6,001,616 |
|
Level 2 Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
445,633,137 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
451,634,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 (Unaudited) |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at value unaffiliated1 |
|
$ |
970,643,849 |
|
$ |
694,573,375 |
|
$ |
445,633,137 |
|
Investments at value affiliated2 |
|
|
17,401,862 |
|
|
7,201,538 |
|
|
6,001,616 |
|
Cash |
|
|
524,241 |
|
|
37,849 |
|
|
99,228 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
15,613,619 |
|
|
10,007,694 |
|
|
6,432,968 |
|
Investments sold receivable |
|
|
490,362 |
|
|
3,385,611 |
|
|
1,275,750 |
|
Income receivable affiliated |
|
|
334 |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
66,258 |
|
|
48,422 |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
61,770 |
|
|
45,581 |
|
|
31,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,004,802,295 |
|
|
715,300,274 |
|
|
459,474,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments purchased payable |
|
|
39,736,521 |
|
|
5,838,216 |
|
|
4,242,064 |
|
Income dividends payable Common Shares |
|
|
3,134,829 |
|
|
2,114,555 |
|
|
1,386,750 |
|
Investment advisory fees payable |
|
|
424,904 |
|
|
314,196 |
|
|
200,565 |
|
Interest expense and fees payable |
|
|
104,756 |
|
|
137,521 |
|
|
86,930 |
|
Officers and Directors fees payable |
|
|
67,908 |
|
|
49,917 |
|
|
907 |
|
Other affiliates payable |
|
|
5,996 |
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
2,972 |
|
Other accrued expenses payable |
|
|
91,863 |
|
|
62,553 |
|
|
64,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities |
|
|
43,566,777 |
|
|
8,520,847 |
|
|
5,984,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust certificates3 |
|
|
113,120,964 |
|
|
96,057,344 |
|
|
59,079,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
156,687,741 |
|
|
104,578,191 |
|
|
65,064,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares at Redemption Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25,000 per share liquidation preference, plus unpaid dividends4,5 |
|
|
251,489,000 |
|
|
176,650,423 |
|
|
116,596,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
$ |
596,625,554 |
|
$ |
434,071,660 |
|
$ |
277,813,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Consist of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital6 |
|
$ |
623,369,252 |
|
$ |
426,282,532 |
|
$ |
287,766,740 |
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
|
8,339,529 |
|
|
5,788,583 |
|
|
4,382,613 |
|
Accumulated net realized loss |
|
|
(16,540,672 |
) |
|
(3,306,996 |
) |
|
(14,576,692 |
) |
Net unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
(18,542,555 |
) |
|
5,307,541 |
|
|
240,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
$ |
596,625,554 |
|
$ |
434,071,660 |
|
$ |
277,813,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per Common Share |
|
$ |
13.13 |
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
$ |
12.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Investments at cost unaffiliated |
|
$ |
989,186,404 |
|
$ |
689,265,834 |
|
$ |
445,392,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Investments at cost affiliated |
|
$ |
17,401,862 |
|
$ |
7,201,538 |
|
$ |
6,001,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Represents short-term floating rate certificates issued by tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Preferred Shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value $0.05 per share |
|
|
10,058 |
|
|
7,065 |
|
|
4,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value $0.10 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Preferred Shares authorized |
|
|
13,720 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 Common Shares outstanding, 200 million shares authorized, $0.10 par value |
|
|
45,432,304 |
|
|
30,425,258 |
|
|
22,366,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
|
24 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended October 31, 2009 (Unaudited) |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
26,336,102 |
|
$ |
17,253,014 |
|
$ |
11,367,846 |
|
Income affiliated |
|
|
18,152 |
|
|
21,853 |
|
|
11,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
26,354,254 |
|
|
17,274,867 |
|
|
11,379,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory |
|
|
2,308,386 |
|
|
1,753,072 |
|
|
1,123,490 |
|
Commissions for Preferred Shares |
|
|
186,033 |
|
|
135,001 |
|
|
87,985 |
|
Accounting services |
|
|
135,466 |
|
|
93,194 |
|
|
67,819 |
|
Professional |
|
|
49,757 |
|
|
43,437 |
|
|
37,651 |
|
Transfer agent |
|
|
47,319 |
|
|
25,535 |
|
|
24,845 |
|
Officer and Directors |
|
|
42,085 |
|
|
28,282 |
|
|
16,633 |
|
Printing |
|
|
25,360 |
|
|
19,666 |
|
|
14,912 |
|
Custodian |
|
|
20,876 |
|
|
15,963 |
|
|
11,414 |
|
Registration |
|
|
7,896 |
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
4,480 |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
60,218 |
|
|
50,060 |
|
|
42,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses excluding interest expense and fees |
|
|
2,883,396 |
|
|
2,169,347 |
|
|
1,432,115 |
|
Interest expense and fees1 |
|
|
298,803 |
|
|
347,946 |
|
|
220,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
3,182,199 |
|
|
2,517,293 |
|
|
1,652,576 |
|
Less fees waived by advisor |
|
|
(8,005 |
) |
|
(10,179 |
) |
|
(5,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived |
|
|
3,174,194 |
|
|
2,507,114 |
|
|
1,646,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
23,180,060 |
|
|
14,767,753 |
|
|
9,732,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
(513,581 |
) |
|
(478,453 |
) |
|
(1,860,486 |
) |
Financial futures contracts |
|
|
(265,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779,037 |
) |
|
(478,453 |
) |
|
(1,860,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments |
|
|
69,633,026 |
|
|
28,736,349 |
|
|
19,784,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gain |
|
|
68,853,989 |
|
|
28,257,896 |
|
|
17,924,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(888,801 |
) |
|
(671,235 |
) |
|
(356,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations |
|
$ |
91,145,248 |
|
$ |
42,354,414 |
|
$ |
27,300,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Related to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
Six
Months |
|
Period |
|
Year
Ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
23,180,060 |
|
$ |
22,185,193 |
|
$ |
46,456,245 |
|
Net realized loss |
|
|
(779,037 |
) |
|
(3,920,385 |
) |
|
(6,301,395 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
69,633,026 |
|
|
38,914,225 |
|
|
(157,567,039 |
) |
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(888,801 |
) |
|
(1,788,996 |
) |
|
(12,071,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
|
|
91,145,248 |
|
|
55,390,037 |
|
|
(129,484,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(18,580,717 |
) |
|
(17,560,799 |
) |
|
(36,001,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of common dividends |
|
|
471,303 |
|
|
815,938 |
|
|
2,855,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
73,035,834 |
|
|
38,645,176 |
|
|
(162,629,759 |
) |
Beginning of period |
|
|
523,589,720 |
|
|
484,944,544 |
|
|
647,574,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
596,625,554 |
|
$ |
523,589,720 |
|
$ |
484,944,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
8,339,529 |
|
$ |
4,628,987 |
|
$ |
1,916,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
Six
Months |
|
Period |
|
Year
Ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
14,767,753 |
|
$ |
13,886,963 |
|
$ |
29,446,444 |
|
Net realized loss |
|
|
(478,453 |
) |
|
(794,982 |
) |
|
(1,309,516 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
28,736,349 |
|
|
46,913,056 |
|
|
(93,093,592 |
) |
Dividends and distributions to Preferred Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(671,235 |
) |
|
(1,262,709 |
) |
|
(8,220,460 |
) |
Net realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(984,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
|
|
42,354,414 |
|
|
58,742,328 |
|
|
(74,161,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(12,078,827 |
) |
|
(10,405,438 |
) |
|
(20,810,877 |
) |
Net realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,225,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net assets resulting from dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(12,078,827 |
) |
|
(10,405,438 |
) |
|
(23,036,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
30,275,587 |
|
|
48,336,890 |
|
|
(97,198,103 |
) |
Beginning of period |
|
|
403,796,073 |
|
|
355,459,183 |
|
|
452,657,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
434,071,660 |
|
$ |
403,796,073 |
|
$ |
355,459,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
5,788,583 |
|
$ |
3,770,892 |
|
$ |
1,484,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
|
26 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
Six
Months |
|
Period |
|
Year
Ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
9,732,542 |
|
$ |
9,157,790 |
|
$ |
19,297,921 |
|
Net realized loss |
|
|
(1,860,486 |
) |
|
(4,247,291 |
) |
|
(1,157,479 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
19,784,984 |
|
|
33,306,545 |
|
|
(66,060,322 |
) |
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(356,301 |
) |
|
(795,547 |
) |
|
(5,769,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
|
|
27,300,739 |
|
|
37,421,497 |
|
|
(53,689,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(7,750,141 |
) |
|
(6,710,079 |
) |
|
(13,420,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
19,550,598 |
|
|
30,711,418 |
|
|
(67,109,830 |
) |
Beginning of period |
|
|
258,262,548 |
|
|
227,551,130 |
|
|
294,660,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
277,813,146 |
|
$ |
258,262,548 |
|
$ |
227,551,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
4,382,613 |
|
$ |
2,756,513 |
|
$ |
1,161,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended October 31, 2009 (Unaudited) |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash (Used for) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations excluding dividends to Preferred Shareholders |
|
$ |
92,034,049 |
|
$ |
43,025,649 |
|
$ |
27,657,040 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable |
|
|
(229,023 |
) |
|
95,716 |
|
|
144,721 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(27,010 |
) |
|
(19,846 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in income receivable affiliated |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase in investment advisory fees payable |
|
|
76,741 |
|
|
43,340 |
|
|
25,201 |
|
Decrease in interest expense and fees payable |
|
|
(71,283 |
) |
|
(138,326 |
) |
|
(108,024 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other affiliates payable |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
628 |
|
Decrease in other accrued expenses payable |
|
|
(56,697 |
) |
|
(71,104 |
) |
|
(26,913 |
) |
Increase in Officers and Directors fees payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
20,100 |
|
|
255 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain |
|
|
(69,119,445 |
) |
|
(28,257,896 |
) |
|
(17,924,498 |
) |
Amortization of premium and discount on investments |
|
|
595,933 |
|
|
(371,661 |
) |
|
(793,460 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
|
|
187,754,141 |
|
|
81,423,056 |
|
|
56,739,081 |
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(204,160,758 |
) |
|
(91,462,752 |
) |
|
(63,362,573 |
) |
Net (purchases) proceeds of short-term securities |
|
|
(15,296,831 |
) |
|
3,707,616 |
|
|
2,699,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used for) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(8,472,102 |
) |
|
7,993,697 |
|
|
5,050,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on redemption of Preferred Shares |
|
|
(20,050,000 |
) |
|
(15,375,000 |
) |
|
(11,675,000 |
) |
Cash receipts from trust certificates |
|
|
42,983,888 |
|
|
21,925,758 |
|
|
16,623,821 |
|
Cash payments from trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,200,000 |
) |
|
(2,100,000 |
) |
Cash dividends paid to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(17,879,668 |
) |
|
(11,698,512 |
) |
|
(7,481,738 |
) |
Cash dividends paid to Preferred Shareholders |
|
|
(897,062 |
) |
|
(680,441 |
) |
|
(362,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
4,157,158 |
|
|
(8,028,195 |
) |
|
(4,995,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(4,314,944 |
) |
|
(34,498 |
) |
|
55,621 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
4,839,185 |
|
|
72,347 |
|
|
43,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
524,241 |
|
$ |
37,849 |
|
$ |
99,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
370,086 |
|
$ |
486,272 |
|
$ |
328,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital shares issued in reinvestment of dividends paid to shareholders |
|
$ |
471,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Statement of Cash Flows is presented when a Fund had a significant amount of borrowing during the year, based on the average borrowing outstanding in relation to total assets. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
|
28 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
Period |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Year Ended October 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
11.53 |
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
$ |
14.36 |
|
$ |
14.98 |
|
$ |
14.48 |
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
$ |
13.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
1.09 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
(3.62 |
) |
|
(0.57 |
) |
|
0.61 |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
0.41 |
|
Dividends and distributions to Preferred Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
Net realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase from investment operations |
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
(2.86 |
) |
|
0.20 |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
(0.94 |
) |
|
(0.99 |
) |
|
(0.96 |
) |
Net realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
(0.94 |
) |
|
(0.99 |
) |
|
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital charges with respect to issuance of Preferred Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
3 |
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
13.13 |
|
$ |
11.53 |
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
$ |
14.36 |
|
$ |
14.98 |
|
$ |
14.48 |
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
12.49 |
|
$ |
11.45 |
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
$ |
15.76 |
|
$ |
14.20 |
|
$ |
13.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
17.73 |
%5 |
|
11.76 |
%5 |
|
(20.69 |
)% |
|
1.40 |
% |
|
10.30 |
% |
|
8.38 |
% |
|
11.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on market price |
|
|
12.77 |
%5 |
|
22.93 |
%5 |
|
(25.06 |
)% |
|
(7.91 |
)% |
|
18.33 |
% |
|
10.69 |
% |
|
11.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses6 |
|
|
1.12 |
%7 |
|
1.25 |
%7 |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.23 |
% |
|
1.29 |
% |
|
1.26 |
% |
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived6 |
|
|
1.12 |
%7 |
|
1.25 |
%7 |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
1.29 |
% |
|
1.26 |
% |
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived and excluding interest expense and fees6,8 |
|
|
1.01 |
%7 |
|
1.09 |
%7 |
|
1.06 |
% |
|
1.01 |
% |
|
1.01 |
% |
|
1.02 |
% |
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income6 |
|
|
8.15 |
%7 |
|
9.20 |
%7 |
|
7.65 |
% |
|
7.14 |
% |
|
7.35 |
% |
|
7.55 |
% |
|
7.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders |
|
|
0.31 |
%7 |
|
0.74 |
%7 |
|
1.99 |
% |
|
1.88 |
% |
|
1.71 |
% |
|
1.10 |
% |
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
7.84 |
%7 |
|
8.46 |
%7 |
|
5.66 |
% |
|
5.26 |
% |
|
5.64 |
% |
|
6.45 |
% |
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
596,626 |
|
$ |
523,590 |
|
$ |
484,945 |
|
$ |
647,574 |
|
$ |
672,367 |
|
$ |
644,825 |
|
$ |
636,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
251,450 |
|
$ |
271,500 |
|
$ |
271,500 |
|
$ |
343,000 |
|
$ |
343,000 |
|
$ |
343,000 |
|
$ |
343,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
32 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset coverage per Preferred Share at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
$ |
84,322 |
|
$ |
73,217 |
|
$ |
69,695 |
|
$ |
72,218 |
|
$ |
74,034 |
|
$ |
72,008 |
|
$ |
71,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Amount is less than $(0.01) per share. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Amount is less than $0.01 per share. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to Preferred Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
7 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
8 |
Interest expense and fees relate to tender option bond trusts. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
Period |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Year Ended October 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
$ |
11.68 |
|
$ |
14.88 |
|
$ |
15.32 |
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
$ |
15.54 |
|
$ |
15.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
1.03 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
(3.12 |
) |
|
(0.42 |
) |
|
0.37 |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
0.19 |
|
Dividends and distributions to Preferred Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
Net realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
(2.45 |
) |
|
0.25 |
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
(0.34 |
) |
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
(0.69 |
) |
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
(0.96 |
) |
|
(0.97 |
) |
Net realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
(0.34 |
) |
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
(0.69 |
) |
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
(0.96 |
) |
|
(0.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital charges with respect to issuance of Preferred Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
$ |
11.68 |
|
$ |
14.88 |
|
$ |
15.32 |
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
$ |
15.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
$ |
12.32 |
|
$ |
10.90 |
|
$ |
13.20 |
|
$ |
14.48 |
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
$ |
14.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
10.79 |
%4 |
|
17.07 |
%4 |
|
(16.79 |
)% |
|
2.00 |
% |
|
7.78 |
% |
|
3.10 |
% |
|
8.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on market price |
|
|
10.72 |
%4 |
|
16.47 |
%4 |
|
(12.47 |
)% |
|
(4.26 |
)% |
|
7.22 |
% |
|
2.64 |
% |
|
10.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses5 |
|
|
1.19 |
%6 |
|
1.43 |
%6 |
|
1.76 |
% |
|
1.71 |
% |
|
1.76 |
% |
|
1.45 |
% |
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived5 |
|
|
1.18 |
%6 |
|
1.42 |
%6 |
|
1.75 |
% |
|
1.71 |
% |
|
1.75 |
% |
|
1.44 |
% |
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived and excluding interest expense and fees5,7 |
|
|
1.02 |
%6 |
|
1.13 |
%6 |
|
1.10 |
% |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
0.96 |
% |
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income5 |
|
|
6.96 |
%6 |
|
7.58 |
%6 |
|
6.89 |
% |
|
6.46 |
% |
|
6.61 |
% |
|
6.46 |
% |
|
6.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders |
|
|
0.32 |
%6 |
|
0.69 |
%6 |
|
1.92 |
% |
|
2.01 |
% |
|
1.80 |
% |
|
0.93 |
% |
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.64 |
%6 |
|
6.89 |
%6 |
|
4.97 |
% |
|
4.45 |
% |
|
4.81 |
% |
|
5.53 |
% |
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
434,072 |
|
$ |
403,796 |
|
$ |
355,459 |
|
$ |
452,657 |
|
$ |
466,002 |
|
$ |
456,886 |
|
$ |
472,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
176,625 |
|
$ |
192,000 |
|
$ |
192,000 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
24 |
% |
|
33 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset coverage per Preferred Share at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
$ |
86,443 |
|
$ |
77,582 |
|
$ |
71,318 |
|
$ |
70,282 |
|
$ |
71,614 |
|
$ |
70,701 |
|
$ |
84,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Amount is less than $(0.01) per share. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to Preferred Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
7 |
Interest expense and fees relate to tender option bond trusts. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
30 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
Period |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Year Ended October 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
11.55 |
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
$ |
13.17 |
|
$ |
13.64 |
|
$ |
13.36 |
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
$ |
13.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
0.94 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
(3.00 |
) |
|
(0.46 |
) |
|
0.37 |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
0.27 |
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
(2.40 |
) |
|
0.14 |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
(0.60 |
) |
|
(0.61 |
) |
|
(0.71 |
) |
|
(0.85 |
) |
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital charges with respect to issuance of Preferred Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
2 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of the period |
|
$ |
12.42 |
|
$ |
11.55 |
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
$ |
13.17 |
|
$ |
13.64 |
|
$ |
13.36 |
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price, end of the period |
|
$ |
11.58 |
|
$ |
10.16 |
|
$ |
8.75 |
|
$ |
11.60 |
|
$ |
12.93 |
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
$ |
12.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
10.90 |
%4 |
|
17.27 |
%4 |
|
(18.42 |
)% |
|
1.39 |
% |
|
7.98 |
% |
|
3.98 |
% |
|
9.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on market price |
|
|
17.55 |
%4 |
|
19.90 |
%4 |
|
(20.31 |
)% |
|
(5.79 |
)% |
|
6.34 |
% |
|
8.21 |
% |
|
11.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses5 |
|
|
1.22 |
%6 |
|
1.52 |
%6 |
|
1.80 |
% |
|
1.73 |
% |
|
1.66 |
% |
|
1.49 |
% |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived5 |
|
|
1.22 |
%6 |
|
1.52 |
%6 |
|
1.79 |
% |
|
1.72 |
% |
|
1.66 |
% |
|
1.49 |
% |
|
1.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses after fees waived and excluding interest expense and fees5,7 |
|
|
1.05 |
%6 |
|
1.18 |
%6 |
|
1.12 |
% |
|
1.06 |
% |
|
1.05 |
% |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income5 |
|
|
7.19 |
%6 |
|
7.86 |
%6 |
|
6.96 |
% |
|
6.39 |
% |
|
6.44 |
% |
|
6.51 |
% |
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders |
|
|
0.26 |
%6 |
|
0.68 |
%6 |
|
2.08 |
% |
|
1.97 |
% |
|
1.78 |
% |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.93 |
%6 |
|
7.18 |
%6 |
|
4.88 |
% |
|
4.42 |
% |
|
4.66 |
% |
|
5.48 |
% |
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
277,813 |
|
$ |
258,263 |
|
$ |
227,551 |
|
$ |
294,661 |
|
$ |
305,111 |
|
$ |
298,722 |
|
$ |
306,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
116,575 |
|
$ |
128,250 |
|
$ |
128,250 |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
|
17 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
37 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset coverage per Preferred Share at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
$ |
84,583 |
|
$ |
75,349 |
|
$ |
69,420 |
|
$ |
71,065 |
|
$ |
72,693 |
|
$ |
71,676 |
|
$ |
76,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Amount is less than $0.01 per share. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to Preferred Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
7 |
Interest expense and fees relate to tender option bond trusts. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to tender option bond trusts. |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
31 |
|
|
|
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies:
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD), BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT) (collectively the Funds) are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies. The Funds are organized as Maryland corporations. The Funds financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require the use of management accruals and estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The Funds determine and make available for publication the net asset value of their Common Shares on a daily basis.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds:
Valuation: Municipal investments (including commitments to purchase such investments on a when-issued basis) are valued on the basis of prices provided by dealers or pricing services selected under the supervision of each Funds Board of Directors (the Board). In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrixes, market transactions in comparable investments and information with respect to various relationships between investments. Financial futures contracts traded on exchanges are valued at their last sale price. Short-term securities with maturities less than 60 days may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Investments in open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value each business day.
In the event that application of these methods of valuation results in a price for an investment which is deemed not to be representative of the market value of such investment or are not available, the investment will be valued by a method approved by each Funds Board as reflecting fair value (Fair Value Assets). When determining the price for Fair Value Assets, the investment advisor and/or the sub-advisor seeks to determine the price that each Fund might reasonably expect to receive from the current sale of that asset in an arms length transaction. Fair value determinations shall be based upon all available factors that the investment advisor and/or sub-advisor deems relevant. The pricing of all Fair Value Assets is subsequently reported to the Board or a committee thereof.
Forward Commitments and When-Issued Delayed Delivery Securities:
The Funds may purchase securities on a when-issued basis and may purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment basis. Settlement of such transactions normally occurs within a month or more after the purchase or sale commitment is made. The Funds may purchase securities under such conditions with the intention of actually acquiring them, but may enter into a separate agreement to sell the securities before the settlement date. Since the value of securities purchased may fluctuate prior to settlement, the Funds may be required to pay more at settlement than the security is worth. In addition, the purchaser is not entitled to any of the interest earned prior to settlement. When purchasing a security on a delayed delivery basis, the Funds assume the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations. In the event of default by the counterparty, the Funds maximum amount of loss is the unrealized gain of the commitment, which is shown on the Schedules of Investments, if any.
Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts: The Funds leverage their assets through the use of tender option bond trusts (TOBs). A TOB is established by a third party sponsor forming a special purpose entity, into which one or more funds, or an agent on behalf of the funds, transfers municipal bonds. Other funds managed by the investment advisor may also contribute municipal bonds to a TOB into which a Fund has contributed bonds. A TOB typically issues two classes of beneficial interests: short-term floating rate certificates, which are sold to third party investors, and residual certificates (TOB Residuals), which are generally issued to the participating funds that made the transfer. The TOB Residuals held by a Fund include the right of the Fund (1) to cause the holders of a proportional share of the floating rate certificates to tender their certificates at par, and (2) to transfer, within seven days, a corresponding share of the municipal bonds from the TOB to the Funds. The TOB may also be terminated without the consent of the Fund upon the occurrence of certain events as defined in the TOB agreements. Such termination events may include the bankruptcy or default of the municipal bond, a substantial downgrade in credit quality of the municipal bond, the inability of the TOB to obtain quarterly or annual renewal of the liquidity support agreement, a substantial decline in market value of the municipal bond or the inability to remarket the short-term floating rate certificates to third party investors.
The cash received by the TOB from the sale of the short-term floating rate certificates, less transaction expenses, is paid to the Fund, which typically invests the cash in additional municipal bonds. Each Funds transfer of the municipal bonds to a TOB is accounted for as a secured borrowing, therefore the municipal bonds deposited into a TOB are presented in the Funds Schedules of Investments and the proceeds from the issuance of the short-term floating rate certificates are shown as trust certificates in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Interest income from the underlying security is recorded by the Funds on an accrual basis. Interest expense incurred on the secured borrowing and other expenses related to remarketing, administration and trustee services to a TOB are reported as expenses of the Funds. The floating rate certificates have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender certificates to the TOB for redemption at par at each reset date. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of the underlying municipal bonds transferred to TOBs, the related liability for
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
trust certificates and the range of interest rates on the liability for trust certificates were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Liability |
|
Range
of |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
MYD |
|
$ |
223,617,381 |
|
$ |
113,120,964 |
|
|
0.20% 0.49 |
% |
MQY |
|
$ |
188,103,305 |
|
$ |
96,057,344 |
|
|
0.24% 0.85 |
% |
MQT |
|
$ |
115,209,702 |
|
$ |
59,079,871 |
|
|
0.21% 0.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Funds average trust certificates outstanding and the daily weighted average interest rate, including fees, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Trust |
|
Daily
Weighted |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
$ |
90,042,524 |
|
|
0.33% |
|
MQY |
|
$ |
90,045,669 |
|
|
0.39% |
|
MQT |
|
$ |
54,704,402 |
|
|
0.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should short-term interest rates rise, the Funds investments in TOBs may adversely affect the Funds investment income and distributions to Common Shareholders. Also, fluctuations in the market value of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB may adversely affect the Funds net asset value per share.
Zero-Coupon Bonds: Each Fund may invest in zero-coupon bonds, which are normally issued at a significant discount from face value and do not provide periodic interest payments. Zero-coupon bonds may experience greater volatility in market value than similar maturity debt obligations which provide regular interest payments.
Segregation and Collateralization: In cases in which the 1940 Act and the interpretive positions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) require that the Funds either deliver collateral or segregate assets in connection with certain investments (e.g., financial futures contracts) each Fund will, consistent with SEC rules and/or certain interpretive letters issued by the SEC, segregate collateral or designate on its books and records cash or other liquid securities having a market value at least equal to the amount that would otherwise be required to be physically segregated. Furthermore, based on requirements and agreements with certain exchanges and third party broker-dealers, each party has requirements to deliver/deposit securities as collateral for certain investments.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income: For financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are recorded on the dates the transactions are entered into (the trade dates). Realized gains and losses on investment transactions are determined on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend dates. Interest income is recognized on the accrual method. Each Fund amortizes all premiums and discounts on debt securities.
Dividends and Distributions: Dividends from net investment income are declared and paid monthly. Distributions of capital gains are recorded on the ex-dividend dates. Dividends and distributions to Preferred Shareholders are accrued and determined as described in Note 6.
Income Taxes: It is each Funds policy to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
Each Fund files US federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The statutes of limitations on the Funds US federal tax returns remain open for each of the three years ended October 31, 2008 and the period ended April 30, 2009. The statutes of limitations on each of the Funds state and local tax returns may remain open for an additional year depending upon the jurisdiction.
Recent Accounting Standards: In June 2009, amended guidance was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board for transfers of financial assets. This guidance is intended to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The amended guidance is effective for financial statements for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. Earlier application is prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of this guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. Additionally, the enhanced disclosure provisions of the amended guidance should be applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of this guidance. The impact of this guidance on the Funds financial statements and disclosures, if any, is currently being assessed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
33 |
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
Deferred Compensation and BlackRock Closed-End Share Equivalent Investment Plan: Under the deferred compensation plan approved by each Funds Board, non-interested Directors (Independent Directors) may defer a portion of their annual complex-wide compensation. Deferred amounts earn an approximate return as though equivalent dollar amounts had been invested in common shares of other certain BlackRock Closed-End Funds selected by the Independent Directors. This has approximately the same economic effect for the Independent Directors as if the Independent Directors had invested the deferred amounts directly in other certain BlackRock Closed-End Funds.
The deferred compensation plan is not funded and obligations there under represent general unsecured claims against the general assets of each Fund. Each Fund may, however, elect to invest in common shares of other certain BlackRock Closed-End Funds selected by the Independent Directors in order to match its deferred compensation obligations. Investments to cover each Funds deferred compensation liability, if any, are included in other assets in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends and distributions from the BlackRock Closed-End Fund investments under the plan are included in income affiliated in the Statements of Operations.
Other: Expenses directly related to a Fund are charged to that Fund. Other operating expenses shared by several funds are pro rated among those funds on the basis of relative net assets or other appropriate methods.
2. Derivative Financial Instruments:
The Funds may engage in various portfolio investment strategies both to increase the returns of the Funds and to economically hedge, or protect, their exposure to interest rate risk. Losses may arise if the value of the contract decreases due to an unfavorable change in the value of the underlying security, or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract. To the extent amounts due to the Funds from their counterparties are not fully collateralized, contractually or otherwise, the Funds bear the risk of loss from counterparty non-performance. See Note 1 Segregation and Collateralization for information with respect to collateral practices. Counterparty risk related to exchange-traded financial futures contracts is minimal because of the protection against defaults provided by the exchange on which they trade.
Financial Futures Contracts: The Funds may purchase or sell financial futures contracts and options on financial futures contracts to gain exposure to, or economically hedge against, changes in interest rates (interest rate risk). Financial futures contracts are contracts for delayed delivery of securities at a specific future date and at a specific price or yield. Pursuant to the contract, the Funds agree to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in value of the contract. Such receipts or payments are known as margin variation and are recognized by the Funds as unrealized gains or losses. When the contract is closed, the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. The use of financial futures transactions involves the risk of an imperfect correlation in the movements in the price of financial futures contracts, interest rates and the underlying assets.
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Categorized by Risk Exposure: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of
Operations |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Loss From |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Futures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(265,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
As of October 31, 2009, there were no financial futures contracts outstanding. During the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Fund had limited activity in these transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
3. Investment Advisory Agreement and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC) are the largest stockholders of BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). Due to the ownership structure, PNC is an affiliate for 1940 Act purposes, but BAC is not.
Each Fund entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the Manager), the Funds investment advisor, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BlackRock, to provide investment advisory and administration services.
The Manager is responsible for the management of each Funds portfolio and provides the necessary personnel, facilities, equipment and certain other services necessary to the operations of each Fund. For such services, each Fund pays a monthly fee at an annual rate of 0.50% of the respective Funds average daily net assets. Average daily net assets is the average daily value of the Funds total assets minus the sum of its accrued liabilities.
The Manager has voluntarily agreed to waive its advisory fee by the amount of investment advisory fees the Funds pay to the Manager indirectly through its investment in affiliated money market funds. This amount is included in fees waived by advisor in the Statements of Operations.
The Manager has entered into a separate sub-advisory agreement with BlackRock Investment Management, LLC (BIM), an affiliate of the Manager, under which the Manager pays BIM, for services it provides, a monthly fee that is a percentage of the investment advisory fee paid by the Funds to the Manager.
For the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Funds reimbursed the Manager for certain accounting services, which are included in accounting services in the Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
|
$9,252 |
|
MQY |
|
|
$6,180 |
|
MQT |
|
|
$4,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain officers and/or directors of the Funds are officers and/or directors of BlackRock or its affiliates. The Funds reimburse the Manager for compensation paid to the Funds Chief Compliance Officer.
4. Investments:
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short term securities, for the six months ended October 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
Sales |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
$ |
235,299,753 |
|
$ |
182,911,998 |
|
MQY |
|
$ |
91,892,295 |
|
$ |
81,866,758 |
|
MQT |
|
$ |
65,525,018 |
|
$ |
54,168,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Market and Credit Risk:
Many municipalities insure repayment of their bonds, which reduces the risk of loss due to issuer default. The market value of these bonds may fluctuate for other reasons, including market perception of the value of such insurance, and there is no guarantee that the insurer will meet its obligation.
In the normal course of business, the Funds invest in securities and enter into transactions where risks exist due to fluctuations in the market (market risk) or failure of the issuer of a security to meet all its obligations (credit risk). The value of securities held by the Funds may decline in response to certain events, including those directly involving the issuers whose securities are owned by the Funds; conditions affecting the general economy; overall market changes; local, regional or global political, social or economic instability; and currency and interest rate and price fluctuations. Similar to credit risk, the Funds may be exposed to counterparty risk, or the risk that an entity with which the Funds have unsettled or open transactions may default. Financial assets, which potentially expose the Funds to credit and counterparty risks, consist principally of investments and cash due from counterparties. The extent of the Funds exposure to credit and counterparty risks with respect to these financial assets is approximated by their value recorded in the Funds Statements of Assets and Liabilities, less any collateral held by the Funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
35 |
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
6. Capital Share Transactions:
Each Fund is authorized to issue 200 million shares, all of which were initially classified as Common Shares. The par value for each Funds Common Shares is $0.10. The par value for each Funds Preferred Shares is $0.05 except MQT Series D, which is $0.10. Each Board is authorized, however, to reclassify any unissued shares of Common Shares without approval of Common Shareholders. In this regard, the Boards have reclassified 13,720 shares of MYD, 10,000 shares of MQY and 6,400 shares of MQT of unissued Common Shares as Preferred Shares.
Common Shares
Shares issued and outstanding for MYD during the six months ended October 31, 2009, the period ended April 30, 2009 and the year ended October 31, 2008 increased by the following amounts as a result of dividend reinvestment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months |
|
Period |
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
40,375 |
|
73,715 |
|
210,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued and outstanding remained constant for MQY and MQT during the six months ended October 31, 2009, the period ended April 30, 2009 and the year ended October 31, 2008.
Preferred Shares
The Preferred Shares are redeemable at the option of each Fund, in whole or in part, on any dividend payment date at their liquidation preference per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends whether or not declared. The Preferred Shares are also subject to mandatory redemption at their liquidation preference plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, if certain requirements relating to the composition of the assets and liabilities of a Fund, as set forth in each Funds Articles Supplementary (the Governing Instrument), are not satisfied.
From time to time in the future, each Fund may effect repurchases of its Preferred Shares at prices below their liquidation preference as agreed upon by the Fund and seller. Each Fund also may redeem its Preferred Shares from time to time as provided in the Funds Governing Instrument. Each Fund intends to effect such redemptions and/or repurchases to the extent necessary to maintain applicable asset coverage requirements or for such other reasons as the Board may determine.
The holders of Preferred Shares have voting rights equal to the holders of Common Shares (one vote per share) and will vote together with holders of Common Shares (one vote per share) as a single class. However, the holders of Preferred Shares, voting as a separate class, are also entitled to elect two Directors for each Fund. In addition, the 1940 Act requires that along with approval by shareholders that might otherwise be required, the approval of the holders of a majority of any outstanding Preferred Shares, voting separately as a class would be required to (a) adopt any plan of reorganization that would adversely affect the Preferred Shares, (b) change a Funds sub-classification as a closed-end investment company or change its fundamental investment restrictions or (c) change its business so as to cease to be an investment company.
The Funds had the following series of Preferred Shares outstanding, effective yields and reset frequency as of October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Series |
|
Preferred |
|
Effective |
|
Reset |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
MYD |
|
A |
|
1,320 |
|
|
0.46% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
1,320 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
1,320 |
|
|
0.40% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
1,320 |
|
|
0.44% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
2,052 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
1,260 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
G |
|
1,466 |
|
|
1.49% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQY |
|
A |
|
1,413 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
1,413 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
1,413 |
|
|
0.40% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
1,413 |
|
|
0.41% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
1,413 |
|
|
1.49% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQT |
|
A |
|
1,457 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
1,457 |
|
|
0.50% |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
1,457 |
|
|
0.43% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
292 |
|
|
1.49% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on seven-day and 28-day Preferred Shares are cumulative at a rate which is reset every seven or 28 days, respectively, based on the results of an auction. If the Preferred Shares fail to clear the auction on an auction date, each Fund is required to pay the maximum applicable rate on the Preferred Shares to holders of such shares for successive dividend periods until such time as the shares are successfully auctioned. The maximum applicable rate on all series of Preferred Shares (except MYD Series G, MQY Series E and MQT Series D) is the higher of 110% of the AA commercial paper rate or 110% of 90% of the Kenny S&P 30-day High Grade Index rate divided by 1.00 minus the marginal tax rate. The maximum applicable rate on the Preferred Shares of MYD Series G, MQY Series E and MQT Series D is the higher of 110% of the Telerate/BBA LIBOR or
|
|
|
|
||
36 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
110% of 90% of the Kenney S&P 30-day High Grade Index rate divided by 1.00 minus the marginal tax rate. The low, high and average dividend rates on the Preferred Shares for each Fund for the six months ended October 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
A |
|
0.44% |
|
0.72% |
|
0.53% |
|
|
|
B |
|
0.40% |
|
0.75% |
|
0.51% |
|
|
|
C |
|
0.40% |
|
0.79% |
|
0.55% |
|
|
|
D |
|
0.44% |
|
0.79% |
|
0.53% |
|
|
|
E |
|
0.40% |
|
0.79% |
|
0.51% |
|
|
|
F |
|
0.38% |
|
0.79% |
|
0.51% |
|
|
|
G |
|
1.42% |
|
1.79% |
|
1.54% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQY |
|
A |
|
0.43% |
|
0.72% |
|
0.53% |
|
|
|
B |
|
0.40% |
|
0.79% |
|
0.50% |
|
|
|
C |
|
0.40% |
|
0.79% |
|
0.52% |
|
|
|
D |
|
0.35% |
|
0.76% |
|
0.48% |
|
|
|
E |
|
1.42% |
|
1.79% |
|
1.55% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQT |
|
A |
|
0.43% |
|
0.72% |
|
0.50% |
|
|
|
B |
|
0.35% |
|
0.73% |
|
0.49% |
|
|
|
C |
|
0.35% |
|
0.76% |
|
0.50% |
|
|
|
D |
|
1.46% |
|
1.82% |
|
1.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since February 13, 2008, the Preferred Shares of the Funds failed to clear any of their auctions. As a result, the Preferred Shares dividend rates were reset to the maximum applicable rate, which ranged from 0.35% to 1.82% for the six months ended October 31, 2009. A failed auction is not an event of default for the Funds but it has a negative impact on the liquidity of Preferred Shares. A failed auction occurs when there are more sellers of a funds auction rate preferred shares than buyers. It is impossible to predict how long this imbalance will last. A successful auction for the Funds Preferred Shares may not occur for some time, if ever, and even if liquidity does resume, Preferred Shareholders may not have the ability to sell the Preferred Shares at their liquidation preference.
The Funds may not declare dividends or make other distributions on Common Shares or purchase any such shares if, at the time of the declaration, distribution or purchase, asset coverage with respect to the outstanding Preferred Shares is less than 200%.
The Funds pay commissions of 0.25% on the aggregate principal amount of all shares that successfully clear their auctions and 0.15% on the aggregate principal amount of all shares that fail to clear their auctions. Certain broker-dealers have individually agreed to reduce commissions for failed auctions.
During the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Funds announced the following redemptions of Preferred Shares at a price of $25,000 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Series |
|
Redemption |
|
Shares |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MYD |
|
A |
|
7/29/09 |
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
2,625,000 |
|
|
|
B |
|
7/08/09 |
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
2,625,000 |
|
|
|
C |
|
7/22/09 |
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
2,625,000 |
|
|
|
D |
|
7/15/09 |
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
2,625,000 |
|
|
|
E |
|
7/08/09 |
|
164 |
|
|
$ |
4,100,000 |
|
|
|
F |
|
7/09/09 |
|
101 |
|
|
$ |
2,525,000 |
|
|
|
G |
|
7/06/09 |
|
117 |
|
|
$ |
2,925,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQY |
|
A |
|
8/04/09 |
|
123 |
|
|
$ |
3,075,000 |
|
|
|
B |
|
7/14/09 |
|
123 |
|
|
$ |
3,075,000 |
|
|
|
C |
|
7/17/09 |
|
123 |
|
|
$ |
3,075,000 |
|
|
|
D |
|
7/10/09 |
|
123 |
|
|
$ |
3,075,000 |
|
|
|
E |
|
7/06/09 |
|
123 |
|
|
$ |
3,075,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQT |
|
A |
|
8/03/09 |
|
146 |
|
|
$ |
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
B |
|
7/13/09 |
|
146 |
|
|
$ |
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
C |
|
7/13/09 |
|
146 |
|
|
$ |
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
D |
|
7/07/09 |
|
29 |
|
|
$ |
725,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended October 31, 2008, the Funds announced the following redemptions of Preferred Shares at a price of $25,000 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Series |
|
Redemption |
|
Shares |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MYD |
|
A |
|
7/02/2008 |
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
9,375,000 |
|
|
|
B |
|
7/09/2008 |
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
9,375,000 |
|
|
|
C |
|
6/25/2008 |
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
9,375,000 |
|
|
|
D |
|
6/18/2008 |
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
9,375,000 |
|
|
|
E |
|
6/18/2008 |
|
584 |
|
|
$ |
14,600,000 |
|
|
|
F |
|
6/26/2008 |
|
359 |
|
|
$ |
8,975,000 |
|
|
|
G |
|
6/23/2008 |
|
417 |
|
|
$ |
10,425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQY |
|
A |
|
7/08/2008 |
|
464 |
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
|
B |
|
6/24/2008 |
|
464 |
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
|
C |
|
7/18/2008 |
|
464 |
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
|
D |
|
6/27/2008 |
|
464 |
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
|
E |
|
6/23/2008 |
|
464 |
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQT |
|
A |
|
7/07/2008 |
|
397 |
|
|
$ |
9,925,000 |
|
|
|
B |
|
7/14/2008 |
|
397 |
|
|
$ |
9,925,000 |
|
|
|
C |
|
6/30/2008 |
|
397 |
|
|
$ |
9,925,000 |
|
|
|
D |
|
6/24/2008 |
|
79 |
|
|
$ |
1,975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Funds financed the Preferred Share redemptions with cash received from TOB transactions.
Preferred Shares issued and outstanding for the period November 1, 2008 to April 30, 2009 remained constant.
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
37 |
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (concluded)
7. Capital Loss Carryforwards:
As of April 30, 2009, the Funds had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized capital gains through the indicated expiration dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Expires April 30, |
|
MYD |
|
MQY |
|
MQT |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2010 |
|
$ |
189,274 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,105,212 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,561,802 |
|
2016 |
|
|
11,743,926 |
|
$ |
2,229,309 |
|
|
493,401 |
|
2017 |
|
|
4,065,755 |
|
|
704,337 |
|
|
3,726,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,998,955 |
|
$ |
2,933,646 |
|
$ |
10,886,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Subsequent Events:
Managements evaluation of the impact of all subsequent events on the Funds financial statements was completed through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued and the following items were noted:
Each Fund paid a net investment income dividend on December 1, 2009 to Common Shareholders of record on November 13, 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
$0.0690 |
|
MQY |
|
$0.0695 |
|
MQT |
|
$0.0620 |
|
|
|
|
|
The dividends declared on Preferred Shares for the period November 1, 2009 to November 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
A |
|
$ |
104,555 |
|
|
|
B |
|
$ |
100,552 |
|
|
|
C |
|
$ |
106,104 |
|
|
|
D |
|
$ |
101,855 |
|
|
|
E |
|
$ |
154,876 |
|
|
|
F |
|
$ |
94,456 |
|
|
|
G |
|
$ |
341,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQY |
|
A |
|
$ |
12,167 |
|
|
|
B |
|
$ |
11,446 |
|
|
|
C |
|
$ |
9,995 |
|
|
|
D |
|
$ |
11,550 |
|
|
|
E |
|
$ |
41,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQT |
|
A |
|
$ |
101,707 |
|
|
|
B |
|
$ |
121,816 |
|
|
|
C |
|
$ |
109,164 |
|
|
|
D |
|
$ |
68,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
38 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements |
The Board of Directors (each, a Board and, collectively, the Boards, and the members of which are referred to as Board Members) of each of BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (MYD), BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (MQY) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (MQT, and together with MYD and MQY, each a Fund, and, collectively, the Funds) met on April 14, 2009 and May 28 29, 2009 to consider the approval of its respective Funds investment advisory agreement (each, an Advisory Agreement) with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the Manager), each Funds investment advisor. Each Board also considered the approval of the sub-advisory agreement (each, a Sub-Advisory Agreement) between its respective Fund, the Manager and BlackRock Investment Management, LLC (the Sub-Advisor).The Manager and the Sub-Advisor are referred to herein as BlackRock. The Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements are referred to herein as the Agreements. Unless otherwise indicated, references to actions taken by the Board or the Boards shall mean each Board acting independently with respect to its respective Fund.
Activities and Composition of the Boards
Each Board consists of twelve individuals, ten of whom are not interested persons of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act) (the Independent Board Members). The Board Members of each Fund are responsible for the oversight of the operations of such Fund and perform the various duties imposed on the directors of investment companies by the 1940 Act. The Independent Board Members have retained independent legal counsel to assist them in connection with their duties. The Chairman of each Board is an Independent Board Member. Each Board has established five standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Governance and Nominating Committee, a Compliance Committee, a Performance Oversight Committee and an Executive Committee, each of which is composed of Independent Board Members (except for the Executive Committee, which has one interested Board Member) and is chaired by an Independent Board Member. In addition, each Board has established an Ad Hoc Committee on Auction Market Preferred Shares.
The Agreements
Pursuant to the 1940 Act, each Board is required to consider the continuation of the Agreements on an annual basis. In connection with this process, each Board assessed, among other things, the nature, scope and quality of the services provided to its respective Fund by the personnel of BlackRock and its affiliates, including investment management, administrative and shareholder services, oversight of fund accounting and custody, marketing services and assistance in meeting applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Throughout the year, the Boards, acting directly and through their committees, consider at each of their meetings factors that are relevant to their annual consideration of the renewal of the Agreements, including the services and support provided by BlackRock to the Funds and their shareholders. Among the matters the Boards considered were: (a) investment performance for one-, three- and five-year periods, as applicable, against peer funds, and applicable benchmarks, if any, as well as senior management and portfolio managers analysis of the reasons for any out performance or underperformance against each Funds peers; (b) fees, including advisory and other amounts paid to BlackRock and its affiliates by the Funds for services such as call center and fund accounting; (c) the Funds operating expenses; (d) the resources devoted to, and compliance reports relating to, the Funds investment objectives, policies and restrictions; (e) the Funds compliance with their Code of Ethics and compliance policies and procedures; (f) the nature, cost and character of non-investment management services provided by BlackRock and its affiliates; (g) BlackRocks and other service providers internal controls; (h) BlackRocks implementation of the proxy voting policies approved by the Boards; (i) execution quality of portfolio transactions; (j) BlackRocks implementation of the Funds valuation and liquidity procedures; and (k) periodic updates on BlackRocks business.
Board Considerations in Approving the Agreements
The Approval Process: Prior to the April 14, 2009 meeting, each Board requested and received materials specifically relating to the Agreements. Each Board is engaged in an ongoing process with BlackRock to continuously review the nature and scope of the information provided to better assist their deliberations. The materials provided in connection with the April meeting included (a) information independently compiled and prepared by Lipper, Inc. (Lipper) on Fund fees and expenses, and the investment performance of each Fund as compared with a peer group of funds as determined by Lipper and a customized peer group selected by BlackRock (collectively, Peers); (b) information on the profitability of the Agreements to BlackRock and a discussion of fall-out benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholders; (c) a general analysis provided by BlackRock concerning investment advisory fees charged to other clients, such as institutional clients and open-end funds, under similar investment mandates, as well as the performance of such other clients; (d) the impact of economies of scale; (e) a summary of aggregate amounts paid by each Fund to BlackRock; and (f) an internal comparison of management fees classified by Lipper, if applicable.
At an in-person meeting held on April 14, 2009, each Board reviewed materials relating to its consideration of the Agreements. As a result of the discussions that occurred during the April 14, 2009 meeting, the Boards presented BlackRock with questions and requests for additional
|
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
39 |
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements (continued) |
information and BlackRock responded to these requests with additional written information in advance of the May 28 29, 2009 Board meeting.
At an in-person meeting held on May 28 29, 2009, each Funds Board, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement between the Manager and such Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreement between such Fund, the Manager and the Sub-Advisor, each for a one-year term ending June 30, 2010. The Boards considered all factors they believed relevant with respect to the Funds, including, among other factors: (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BlackRock; (b) the investment performance of the Funds and BlackRock portfolio management; (c) the advisory fee and the cost of the services and profits to be realized by BlackRock and certain affiliates from their relationship with the Funds; (d) economies of scale; and (e) other factors.
Each Board also considered other matters it deemed important to the approval process, such as services related to the valuation and pricing of its respective Funds portfolio holdings, direct and indirect benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholders from their relationship with such Fund and advice from independent legal counsel with respect to the review process and materials submitted for the Boards review. The Boards noted the willingness of BlackRock personnel to engage in open, candid discussions with the Boards. The Boards did not identify any particular information as controlling, and each Board Member may have attributed different weights to the various items considered.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services: Each Board, including its Independent Board Members, reviewed the nature, extent and quality of services provided by BlackRock, including the investment advisory services and the resulting performance of its respective Fund. Throughout the year, each Board compared its respective Funds performance to the performance of a comparable group of closed-end funds, and the performance of a relevant benchmark, if any. The Boards met with BlackRocks senior management personnel responsible for investment operations, including the senior investment officers. Each Board also reviewed the materials provided by its respective Funds portfolio management team discussing such Funds performance and such Funds investment objective, strategies and outlook.
Each Board considered, among other factors, the number, education and experience of BlackRocks investment personnel generally and its respective Funds portfolio management team, investments by portfolio managers in the funds they manage, BlackRocks portfolio trading capabilities, BlackRocks use of technology, BlackRocks commitment to compliance and BlackRocks approach to training and retaining portfolio managers and other research, advisory and management personnel. Each Board also reviewed a general description of BlackRocks compensation structure with respect to its respective Funds portfolio management team and BlackRocks ability to attract and retain high-quality talent.
In addition to advisory services, each Board considered the quality of the administrative and non-investment advisory services provided to its respective Fund. BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholders provide the Funds with certain administrative and other services (in addition to any such services provided to the Funds by third parties) and officers and other personnel as are necessary for the operations of the Funds. In addition to investment advisory services, BlackRock and its affiliates provide the Funds with other services, including: (i) preparing disclosure documents, such as the prospectus and the statement of additional information in connection with the initial public offering and periodic shareholder reports; (ii) preparing communications with analysts to support secondary market trading of the Funds; (iii) assisting with daily accounting and pricing; (iv) preparing periodic filings with regulators and stock exchanges; (v) overseeing and coordinating the activities of other service providers; (vi) organizing Board meetings and preparing the materials for such Board meetings; (vii) providing legal and compliance support; and (viii) performing other administrative functions necessary for the operation of the Funds, such as tax reporting, fulfilling regulatory filing requirements, and call center services. The Boards reviewed the structure and duties of BlackRocks fund administration, accounting, legal and compliance departments and considered BlackRocks policies and procedures for assuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and BlackRock: Each Board, including its Independent Board Members, also reviewed and considered the performance history of its respective Fund. In preparation for the April 14, 2009 meeting, the Boards were provided with reports, independently prepared by Lipper, which included a comprehensive analysis of each Funds performance. The Boards also reviewed a narrative and statistical analysis of the Lipper data that was prepared by BlackRock, which analyzed various factors that affect Lippers rankings. In connection with its review, each Board received and reviewed information regarding the investment performance of its respective Fund as compared to a representative group of similar funds as determined by Lipper and to all funds in such Funds applicable Lipper category and customized peer group selected by BlackRock. Each Board was provided with a description of the methodology used by Lipper to select peer funds. Each Board regularly reviews the performance of its respective Fund throughout the year.
The Board of MYD noted that, in general, MYD performed better than its Peers in that MYDs performance was at or above the median of its customized Lipper peer group composite in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported.
|
|
|
|
||
40 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements (continued) |
The Board of each of MQY and MQT noted that MQY and MQT performed below the median of their respective customized Lipper peer group composite in the one- and three-year periods reported, and MQY and MQT performed above the median of their respective customized Lipper peer group composite in the five-year period reported. The Board of each of MQY and MQT, and BlackRock reviewed the reasons for MQYs and MQTs respective underperformance during these periods compared with their respective Peers. The Board of each of MQY and MQT was informed that, among other things, over-exposure to the long-end of the municipal curve, an overweight on insured bonds with weaker underlying credits and the underperformance of municipal cash relative to MQYs and MQTs respective Bond Market Association hedges all negatively impacted MQYs and MQTs respective performance.
For MQY and MQT, the Board of each respective Fund and BlackRock discussed BlackRocks commitment to providing the resources necessary to assist the portfolio managers and to improve each such Funds performance.
C. Consideration of the Advisory Fees and the Cost of the Services and Profits to be Realized by BlackRock and its Affiliates from their Relationship with the Funds: Each Board, including its Independent Board Members, reviewed its respective Funds contractual advisory fee rates compared with the other funds in its respective Lipper category. Each Board also compared its respective Funds total expenses, as well as actual management fees, to those of other comparable funds. Each Board considered the services provided and the fees charged by BlackRock to other types of clients with similar investment mandates, including separately managed institutional accounts.
The Boards received and reviewed statements relating to BlackRocks financial condition and profitability with respect to the services it provided the Funds. The Boards were also provided with a profitability analysis that detailed the revenues earned and the expenses incurred by BlackRock for services provided to the Funds. The Boards reviewed BlackRocks profitability with respect to the Funds and other funds the Boards currently oversee for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to available aggregate profitability data provided for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Boards reviewed BlackRocks profitability with respect to other fund complexes managed by the Manager and/or its affiliates. The Boards reviewed BlackRocks assumptions and methodology of allocating expenses in the profitability analysis, noting the inherent limitations in allocating costs among various advisory products. The Boards recognized that profitability may be affected by numerous factors including, among other things, fee waivers by the Manager, the types of funds managed, expense allocations and business mix, and therefore comparability of profitability is somewhat limited.
The Boards noted that, in general, individual fund or product line profitability of other advisors is not publicly available. Nevertheless, to the extent such information is available, the Boards considered BlackRocks overall operating margin, in general, compared to the operating margin for leading investment management firms whose operations include advising closed-end funds, among other product types. The comparison indicated that operating margins for BlackRock with respect to its registered funds are generally consistent with margins earned by similarly situated publicly traded competitors. In addition, the Boards considered, among other things, certain third-party data comparing BlackRocks operating margin with that of other publicly-traded asset management firms, which concluded that larger asset bases do not, in themselves, translate to higher profit margins.
In addition, the Boards considered the cost of the services provided to the Funds by BlackRock, and BlackRocks and its affiliates profits relating to the management and distribution of the Funds and the other funds advised by BlackRock and its affiliates. As part of their analysis, the Boards reviewed BlackRocks methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Funds. The Boards also considered whether BlackRock has the financial resources necessary to attract and retain high-quality investment management personnel to perform its obligations under the Agreements and to continue to provide the high quality of services that is expected by the Boards.
Each Board noted that its respective Fund paid contractual management fees, which do not take into account any expense reimbursement or fee waivers, lower than or equal to the median contractual management fees paid by such Funds Peers.
D. Economies of Scale: Each Board, including its Independent Board Members, considered the extent to which economies of scale might be realized as the assets of its respective Fund increase and whether there should be changes in the advisory fee rate or structure in order to enable such Fund to participate in these economies of scale, for example through the use of breakpoints in the advisory fee based upon the assets of such Fund. The Boards considered that the funds in the BlackRock fund complex share some common resources and, as a result, an increase in the overall size of the complex could permit each fund to incur lower expenses than it would otherwise as a stand-alone entity. The Boards also considered BlackRocks overall operations and its efforts to expand the scale of, and improve the quality of, its operations.
The Boards noted that most closed-end fund complexes do not have fund level breakpoints because closed-end funds generally do not experience substantial growth after the initial public offering and each fund is managed independently, consistent with its own investment objectives. The Boards noted that only one closed-end fund in the Fund Complex has
|
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
41 |
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements (concluded) |
breakpoints in its fee structure. Information provided by Lipper also revealed that only one closed-end fund complex used a complex-level breakpoint structure.
E. Other Factors: The Boards also took into account other ancillary or fallout benefits that BlackRock or its affiliates and significant shareholders may derive from their relationship with the Funds, both tangible and intangible, such as BlackRocks ability to leverage its investment professionals who manage other portfolios, an increase in BlackRocks profile in the investment advisory community, and the engagement of BlackRocks affiliates and significant shareholders as service providers to the Funds, including for administrative and distribution services. The Boards also noted that BlackRock may use third-party research obtained by soft dollars generated by certain mutual fund transactions to assist itself in managing all or a number of its other client accounts.
In connection with their consideration of the Agreements, the Boards also received information regarding BlackRocks brokerage and soft dollar practices. The Boards received reports from BlackRock, which included information on brokerage commissions and trade execution practices throughout the year.
Conclusion
Each Board, including its Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement between its respective Fund and the Manager for a one-year term ending June 30, 2010 and the Sub-Advisory Agreement between such Fund, the Manager and the Sub-Advisor for a one-year term ending June 30, 2010. Based upon its evaluation of all these factors in their totality, each Board, including its Independent Board Members, was satisfied that the terms of the Agreements were fair and reasonable and in the best interest of its respective Fund and its shareholders. In arriving at a decision to approve the Agreements, each Board did not identify any single factor or group of factors as all-important or controlling, but considered all factors together, and different Board Members may have attributed different weights to the various factors considered. The Independent Board Members were also assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel in making this determination. The contractual fee arrangements for each Fund reflect the results of several years of review by such Funds Board Members and predecessor Board Members, and discussions between such Board Members (and predecessor Board Members) and BlackRock. Certain aspects of the arrangements may be the subject of more attention in some years than in others, and the Board Members conclusions may be based in part on their consideration of these arrangements in prior years.
|
|
|
|
||
42 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Cavanagh, Chairman of the Board and Director |
Karen P. Robards, Vice Chair of the Board, Chair of the Audit Committee and Director |
G. Nicholas Beckwith, III, Director |
Richard S. Davis, Director |
Kent Dixon, Director and Member of the Audit Committee |
Frank J. Fabozzi, Director and Member of the Audit Committee |
Kathleen F. Feldstein, Director |
James T. Flynn, Director and Member of the Audit Committee |
Henry Gabbay, Director |
Jerold B. Harris, Director |
R. Glenn Hubbard, Director |
W. Carl Kester, Director and Member of the Audit Committee |
Anne F. Ackerley, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Brendan Kyne, Vice President |
Neal J. Andrews, Chief Financial Officer |
Jay M. Fife, Treasurer |
Brian P. Kindelan, Chief Compliance Officer |
Howard B. Surloff, Secretary |
|
Investment Advisor |
BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
Wilmington, DE 19809 |
|
Sub-Advisor |
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC |
Plainsboro, NJ 08536 |
|
Custodians |
The Bank of New York Mellon1 |
New York, NY 10286 |
State Street Bank and Trust Company2 |
Boston, MA 02101 |
|
Transfer Agent |
Common Shares: |
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services1 |
Jersey City, NJ 07310 |
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.2 |
Providence, RI 02940 |
|
Auction Agent |
Preferred Shares: |
The Bank of New York Mellon |
New York, NY 10286 |
|
Accounting Agent |
State Street Bank and Trust Company |
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
Legal Counsel |
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP |
New York, NY 10036 |
|
Address of the Funds |
100 Bellevue Parkway |
Wilmington, DE 19809 |
|
1 For MYD and MQT. |
2 For MQY. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective July 31, 2009,
Donald C. Burke, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Funds retired.
The Funds Board wishes Mr. Burke well in his retirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Results |
|
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on August 26, 2009 for shareholders of record on June 29, 2009 to elect director nominees of each Fund:
Approved the Directors as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Nicholas Beckwith, III |
|
Richard E. Cavanagh |
|
Richard S. Davis |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
40,884,444 |
|
1,697,703 |
|
40,840,393 |
|
1,741,754 |
|
40,927,283 |
|
1,654,864 |
|
MQY |
|
27,197,093 |
|
1,341,425 |
|
27,241,381 |
|
1,297,137 |
|
27,058,284 |
|
1,480,234 |
|
MQT |
|
19,188,366 |
|
928,274 |
|
19,266,647 |
|
849,993 |
|
18,939,615 |
|
1,177,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Kent Dixon |
|
Frank J. Fabozzi |
|
Kathleen F. Feldstein |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
40,811,518 |
|
1,770,629 |
|
6,225 |
1 |
42 |
1 |
40,802,610 |
|
1,779,537 |
|
MQY |
|
27,170,870 |
|
1,367,648 |
|
5,621 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
27,215,777 |
|
1,322,741 |
|
MQT |
|
19,165,957 |
|
950,683 |
|
2,910 |
1 |
52 |
1 |
19,238,979 |
|
877,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
James T. Flynn |
|
Henry Gabbay |
|
Jerrold B. Harris |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
40,897,638 |
|
1,684,509 |
|
40,851,314 |
|
1,730,833 |
|
40,917,445 |
|
1,664,702 |
|
MQY |
|
27,250,773 |
|
1,287,745 |
|
27,014,800 |
|
1,523,718 |
|
27,260,081 |
|
1,278,437 |
|
MQT |
|
19,189,997 |
|
926,643 |
|
18,942,079 |
|
1,174,561 |
|
19,232,337 |
|
884,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
R. Glenn Hubbard |
|
W. Carl Kester |
|
Karen P. Robards |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYD |
|
40,844,994 |
|
1,737,153 |
|
6,225 |
1 |
42 |
1 |
40,746,563 |
|
1,835,584 |
|
MQY |
|
27,174,266 |
|
1,364,252 |
|
5,621 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
27,188,247 |
|
1,350,271 |
|
MQT |
|
19,305,391 |
|
811,249 |
|
2,910 |
1 |
52 |
1 |
19,221,492 |
|
895,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Voted on by holders of Preferred Shares only.
|
|
Dividend Policy |
|
The Funds dividend policy is to distribute all or a portion of their net investment income to their shareholders on a monthly basis. In order to provide shareholders with a more stable level of dividend distributions, the Funds may at times pay out less than the entire amount of net investment income earned in any particular month and may at times in any particular month pay out such accumulated but undistributed income in addition to net investment income earned in that month. As a result, the dividends paid by the Funds for any particular month may be more or less than the amount of net investment income earned by the Funds during such month. The Funds current accumulated but undistributed net investment income, if any, is disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, which comprises part of the financial information included in this report.
|
|
|
|
||
44 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Additional Information (continued) |
|
|
General Information |
|
The Funds do not make available copies of their Statements of Additional Information because the Funds shares are not continuously offered, which means that the Statement of Additional Information of each Fund has not been updated after completion of the respective Funds offerings and the information contained in each Funds Statement of Additional Information may have become outdated.
During the period, there were no material changes in the Funds investment objectives or policies or to the Funds charters or by-laws that were not approved by the shareholders or in the principal risk factors associated with investment in the Funds. There have been no changes in the persons who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds portfolio.
Quarterly performance, semi-annual and annual reports and other information regarding the Funds may be found on BlackRocks website, which can be accessed at http://www.blackrock.com. This reference to BlackRocks website is intended to allow investors public access to information regarding the Funds and does not, and is not intended to, incorporate BlackRocks website into this report.
Electronic Delivery
Electronic copies of most financial reports are available on the Funds websites or shareholders can sign up for e-mail notifications of quarterly statements, annual and semi-annual reports by enrolling in the Funds electronic delivery program.
Shareholders Who Hold Accounts with Investment Advisors, Banks or Brokerages:
Please contact your financial advisor to enroll. Please note that not all investment advisors, banks or brokerages may offer this service.
Householding
The Funds will mail only one copy of shareholder documents, including annual and semi-annual reports and proxy statements, to shareholders with multiple accounts at the same address. This practice is commonly called householding and it is intended to reduce expenses and eliminate duplicate mailings of shareholder documents. Mailings of your shareholder documents may be householded indefinitely unless you instruct us otherwise. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, please contact the Funds at (800) 441-7762.
Availability of Quarterly Schedule of Investments
Each Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds Forms N-Q are available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and may also be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (202) 551-8090. Each Funds Form N-Q may also be obtained upon request and without charge by calling (800) 441-7762.
Availability of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling toll-free (800) 441-7762; (2) at www.blackrock.com; and (3) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Availability of Proxy Voting Record
Information about how the Funds voted proxies relating to securities held in the Funds portfolios during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available upon request and without charge (1) at www.blackrock.com or by calling (800) 441-7762 and (2) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
|
|
|
||
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
45 |
|
|
|
Additional Information (concluded) |
|
|
BlackRock Privacy Principles |
|
BlackRock is committed to maintaining the privacy of its current and former fund investors and individual clients (collectively, Clients) and to safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information BlackRock collects, how we protect that information and why in certain cases we share such information with select parties.
If you are located in a jurisdiction where specific laws, rules or regulations require BlackRock to provide you with additional or different privacy-related rights beyond what is set forth below, then BlackRock will comply with those specific laws, rules or regulations.
BlackRock obtains or verifies personal non-public information from and about you from different sources, including the following: (i) information we receive from you or, if applicable, your financial intermediary, on applications, forms or other documents; (ii) information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others; (iii) information we receive from a consumer reporting agency; and (iv) from visits to our websites.
BlackRock does not sell or disclose to non-affiliated third parties any non-public personal information about its Clients, except as permitted by law or as is necessary to respond to regulatory requests or to service Client accounts. These non-affiliated third parties are required to protect the confidentiality and security of this information and to use it only for its intended purpose.
We may share information with our affiliates to service your account or to provide you with information about other BlackRock products or services that may be of interest to you. In addition, BlackRock restricts access to non-public personal information about its Clients to those BlackRock employees with a legitimate business need for the information. BlackRock maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that are designed to protect the non-public personal information of its Clients, including procedures relating to the proper storage and disposal of such information.
|
|
|
|
||
46 |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
OCTOBER 31, 2009 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not a prospectus. Past performance results shown in this report should not be considered a representation of future performance. The Funds have leveraged their Common Shares. Leverage creates risks for Common Shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of the Common Shares, and the risk that fluctuations in the short-term dividend rates of the Preferred Shares, currently set at the maximum reset rate as a result of failed auctions, may affect the yield to Common Shareholders. Statements and other information herein are as dated and are subject to change.
#MYQII-10/09
|
|
Item 2 |
Code of Ethics Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
Item 3 |
Audit Committee Financial Expert Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
Item 4 |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
Item 5 |
Audit Committee of Listed Registrants Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
Item 6 |
Investments |
|
(a) The registrants Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of this form. |
|
(b) Not Applicable due to no such divestments during the semi-annual period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing. |
|
|
Item 7 |
Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
Item 8 |
Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
Item 9 |
Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers Not Applicable |
|
|
Item 10 |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders The registrants Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees to the board of directors recommended by shareholders when a vacancy becomes available. Shareholders who wish to recommend a nominee should send nominations that include biographical information and set forth the qualifications of the proposed nominee to the registrants Secretary. There have been no material changes to these procedures. |
|
|
Item 11 |
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
11(a) |
The registrants principal executive and principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13(a)-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
11(b) |
There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
Item 12 |
Exhibits attached hereto |
|
|
12(a)(1) |
Code of Ethics Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
|
|
12(a)(2) |
Certifications Attached hereto |
|
|
12(a)(3) |
Not Applicable |
|
|
12(b) |
Certifications Attached hereto |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. |
||
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Anne F. Ackerley |
|
|
|
|
|
Anne F. Ackerley |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer of |
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Date: December 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
||
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Anne F. Ackerley |
|
|
|
|
|
Anne F. Ackerley |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of |
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Date: December 21, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Neal J. Andrews |
|
|
|
|
|
Neal J. Andrews |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of |
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Date: December 21, 2009 |
|