Enclosure:
|
Materials for the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
(1)
|
to approve a registration rights agreement between the Company and S.B. Israel Telecom Ltd.; and
|
|
(2)
|
to approve a compensation policy for the Company's office holders; and
|
|
(3)
|
to approve and ratify the grant of indemnification letters to the following directors: (i) Mr. Shlomo Rodav, (ii) Mr. Ilan Ben-Dov, (iii) Mr. Adam Chesnoff, (iv) Mr. Fred Gluckman, (v) Mr. Sumeet Jaisinghani, (vi) Mr. Yoav Rubinstein, (vii) Mr. Arieh Saban, (viii) Mr. Yahel Shachar, and (ix) Mr. Elon Shalev.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
ROLY KLINGER, ADV.
Company Secretary
|
|
(1)
|
to approve a registration rights agreement between the Company and S.B. Israel Telecom Ltd.; and
|
|
(2)
|
to approve a compensation policy for the Company's office holders; and
|
|
(3)
|
to approve and ratify the grant of indemnification letters to the following directors: (i) Mr. Shlomo Rodav, (ii) Mr. Ilan Ben-Dov, (iii) Mr. Adam Chesnoff, (iv) Mr. Fred Gluckman, (v) Mr. Sumeet Jaisinghani, (vi) Mr. Yoav Rubinstein, (vii) Mr. Arieh Saban, (viii) Mr. Yahel Shachar, and (ix) Mr. Elon Shalev.
|
|
(i)
|
Clause 3.01(a) has been amended to provide that each Holder shall have the right to require the Company to file, if the Company qualifies, a shelf registration statement relating to the offer and sale of all Registerable Shares by the Holder from time to time in accordance with the methods of distribution elected by such Holder.
|
|
(ii)
|
Clause 3.01(a) would also be amended to provide that the Company shall be deemed to have effected a Demand Registration (1) if the demand registration statement is declared effective by the SEC and remains effective for not less than one hundred eighty (180) days (or such shorter period as shall terminate when all Registerable Shares covered by such demand registration statement have been sold or withdrawn), or (2) if such registration statement relates to an underwritten offering, such longer period as, in the opinion of counsel for the underwriter or underwriters, a prospectus is required by law to be delivered in connection with sales of Registerable Shares by an underwriter or dealer (the applicable period, the “Demand Period”) or (3) if in connection with a shelf registration statement, the shelf registration statement is continuously effective under the U.S. Securities Act in order to permit the prospectus forming a part thereof to be usable by Holders until the date as of which all Registerable Shares have been sold pursuant to the shelf registration statement or another registration statement filed under the U.S. Securities Act or the date as of which the Holders are permitted to sell their Registerable Shares without registration under the U.S. Securities Act pursuant to Rule 144 under the U.S. Securities Act without volume limitation or other restrictions on transfer thereunder.
|
|
(iii)
|
Clause 3.01(b) would be amended to provide that the Company has the right to postpone or delay the filing of any Demand Registration upon giving prompt notice of such action to the Holders, and that the postponement or delay will be for a period not exceeding 45 days.
|
|
(iv)
|
Clause 3.02(a) would be amended to provide that in case of a Piggy Back Registration, if the offering pursuant to a registration statement is to be underwritten, then each Holder making a request for a Piggy Back Registration must, and the Company shall make such arrangements with the managing underwriter or underwriters so that each such Holder may, participate in such underwritten offering. If the offering pursuant to a registration statement is to be on any other basis, then each Holder making a request for a Piggy Back Registration must, and the Company shall make such arrangements so that each such Holder may, participate in such offering on such basis. Each Holder shall be permitted to withdraw all or part of its Registerable Shares from a Piggy Back Registration at any time prior to the effectiveness of such registration statement.
|
|
The purpose of the proposed amendment is to clarify and provide a detailed explanation of the rights and obligations of a Holder who is filing a Demand Registration to participate in an underwritten or other public offering of the Company’s securities. The Company believes that the proposed amendment is beneficial to both parties to the registration rights agreement, as well as to the Company’s shareholders generally, since the amendment helps organize the process by which a Holder may join a public offering of securities planned by the Company and thus helps ensure the orderly marketing of the Company’s shares. The Company also has the possibility of asking the Holder to withdraw his Demand Registration if, as a result of the Holder’s Demand Registration being piggy backed to the Company’s registration to offer its shares, the underwriters warn the Company that the combined size of the offering may be more than the market can absorb or that it may cause the market value of the Company’s listed securities to diminish materially.
|
|
(v)
|
Clause 3.02(e) would be amended to provide that in the event of a Piggy Back Registration, or if the Company decides not to proceed with the public offering which included a Piggy Back Registration, the Holder’s right to request a Demand Registration under Section 3.01 shall not be prejudiced.
|
|
The proposed amendment was added solely for purposes of clarification, since the Holder is entitled, in any case, to submit a Demand Registration to the Company, without any connection to his right to Piggy Back Registration when the Company initiates a public offering. Therefore, in the event that the Company decides to withdraw its public offering, the Holder’s right to request that the Company file a Demand Registration pursuant to clause 3.01 of the registration rights agreement will not be prejudiced. In the opinion of the Company, this is the logical and accepted interpretation of the wording of the Existing RRA, and therefore, the amendment serves simply as a clarification without effect on the parties’ rights or obligations.
|
|
(vi)
|
A clarifying amendment to Clause 3.04, the Registration Expenses clause.
|
|
The purpose of the proposed amendment is solely to clarify that the underwriting fees and discounts are relevant only if the registered offering is being carried out as an underwritten offer. The terms of the agreement relative to expenses is the same as had existed in the Original RRA and the Existing RRA.
|
|
(vii)
|
Other technical amendments annotated in Annex “A”.
|
1
|
As this term is defined in the Israeli Companies Law from time to time. As of the adoption date of this Policy - the terms of office or employment of an Office Holder, including the granting of an exemption, insurance, an undertaking to indemnify, or an indemnification under an undertaking to indemnify, Severance Bonus, and any benefit, other payment or undertaking of a payment as stated, which are given because of service or employment as stated. Capitalized terms referring to the Policy that are not defined herein, shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Policy.
|
2
|
Insofar as the Office Holder is holding office through a company under his/her control, the provisions of the Compensation Policy shall apply mutatis mutandis: the Compensation to an Office Holder shall be paid against an invoice and not as a wage, and the components of the Compensation will be normalized so that, in economic terms, they will conform to that stated in this Policy.
|
3
|
“Compensation Plan” - is defined in the Policy as a plan relating to the Terms of Office or Employment of an Office Holder or a number of Office Holders of the Company, regarding a particular matter or a variety of matters.
|
4
|
However, to the extent permitted by law, if the General Meeting shall oppose approving the Policy, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors shall be able to approve the Policy, after having held another discussion of the Policy and after having determined, on the basis of detailed reasoning, that, notwithstanding the opposition of the General Meeting, the adoption of the Policy is for the benefit of the Company. This provision is not currently applicable to us.
|
(i)
|
Clause 5.1.3 has been amended to conform with an amendment to the Israeli Companies Law and with the disclosure requirements set in the Israel Securities Authority position dated September 9, 2013 (the “ISA Position”).
|
(ii)
|
Clause 5.2.2 has been amended to provide that the granting of an Equity Compensation to the Company's External Directors shall be made through the use of equity instruments, but not by way of granting options.
|
(iii)
|
Clause 5.3 has been amended to conform with the disclosure requirements set in the ISA Position and to reduce the ratios that were set between the Variable Components (non-equity and equity) and the Fixed Components.
|
(iv)
|
Clause 5.4.1 was amended in order to detail more broadly the comparative analysis (benchmark) that the Company uses in the process of determining the Compensation Plan for Office Holders.
|
(v)
|
Clause 5.5.1 was amended to include a minimum criterion for receiving the annual Bonus. It should be noted that the criterion was set in light of the high volatility in the Israeli telecommunications market and the sharp decrease in the Company's EBITDA over the past three years. The cap that was set for the aggregate annual bonuses for all senior officers was omitted, due to the fact that the maximum ratio between the non-equity Variable Components and the Fixed Components is already set in Clause 5.3, as required according to the ISA Position.
|
|
(vi)
|
Clause 5.5.1.3 (c) was amended to provide that the weight to be assigned to the “personal evaluation” category shall not exceed 20%.
|
|
(vii)
|
Clause 5.5.2 was amended to clarify that the Company will be allowed to commit to grant a Severance Bonus to an Office Holder only under exceptional circumstances and based on reasons of great importance to be detailed in the resolutions of the Company’s organs.
|
|
(viii)
|
Clause 5.6.3 was amended to include a mechanism according to which the exercise price of the options to be granted shall be determined.
|
|
(ix)
|
Clause 5.6.6 was amended to reduce the maximum cumulative dilution rate.
|
|
(x)
|
Clause 5.6.11 regarding repricing of an equity compensation was deleted.
|
|
(xi)
|
Clause 5.7 regarding comparative analysis relative to the market was added.
|
|
(xii)
|
Clause 6 was amended to include the new Maximum Indemnity Amount in the Company's indemnification letters (to be granted as of the date of approval of the Compensation Policy) and to clarify that approval of the Policy does not purport to constitute approval of the granting of a release to Office Holders.
|
|
(i)
|
financial liability incurred or imposed in accordance with a judgment, including a judgment given in a settlement or a judgment of an arbitrator approved by a court; provided, that such liability pertains to one or more of the events set forth in the indemnification letter, which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors of the company, are anticipated in light of the company’s activities at the time of the grant of indemnification and is limited to the sum or measurement of indemnification determined by the Board of Directors to be reasonable under the circumstances and set forth in the indemnification letter;
|
|
(ii)
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees, incurred or ordered by a court in the context of proceedings filed by or on behalf of the company or by a third party, or in a criminal proceeding in which the director or office holder is acquitted or if convicted, for an offense which does not require criminal intent;
|
|
(iii)
|
reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees incurred due to an investigation or proceeding conducted by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding and which has ended without the filing of an indictment against the director or office holder and no financial liability was imposed on the director or office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings, or has ended without the filing of an indictment against the director or office holder, but financial liability was imposed on the director or office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings in an alleged criminal offense that does not require proof of criminal intent, within the meaning of the relevant terms in the law or in connection with a financial fine (Itzum Caspi);
|
|
(iv)
|
Payment to the injured party as a result of a violation set forth in Section 52.54(a)(1)(a) of the Israeli Securities Law, including by indemnification in advance; and
|
|
(v)
|
Expenses incurred in connection with a proceeding (a “Proceeding” - halich) under Chapters H3, H4 or I1 of the Israeli Securities Law, or under Chapter 4 of Part 9 of the Israeli Companies Law, in connection with any affairs including reasonable legal expenses (e.g., attorney fees), including by indemnification in advance.
|
|
(i)
|
“RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Shlomo Rodav and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(ii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Ilan Ben-Dov and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(iii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Adam Chesnoff and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(iv)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Fred Gluckman and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(v)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Sumeet Jaisinghani and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(vi)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Yoav Rubinstein and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(vii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Arieh Saban and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(viii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Yahel Shachar and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter; and
|
|
(ix)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Elon Shalev and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
ROLY KLINGER, ADV.
Company Secretary
|
PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD.
|
|||
|
By:
|
||
Name: | |||
Title: | |||
SCAILEX CORPORATION
S.B. ISRAEL TELECOM LTD.
|
|||
|
By:
|
||
Name: | |||
Title: |
|
1.1
|
Pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Law (Amendment number 20), 5773 - 2012 (“Amendment 20”), a compensation policy for Office Holders of the Company is hereby being adopted (“the Compensation Policy” or “the Policy”), as this term is defined in the Companies Law, 5759 - 1999, as amended (“the Companies Law”), including section 267.A of the Companies Law. Terms defined in the Companies Law and not defined in this document shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Companies Law, unless the context dictates otherwise.
|
|
1.2
|
The Terms of Office and Employment of the Office Holders of the Company shall be determined on the basis of the Compensation Policy as defined hereunder (“the Compensation” or “Compensation Plan”) and shall be submitted for approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Partner Communications Company Ltd. (“the Company”), the Company’s Board of Directors or the shareholders (as relevant), as required pursuant to the Companies Law.1
|
|
1.3
|
At least once every three years, and after receiving the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Company’s Board of Directors shall discuss and decide whether to approve a Compensation Policy for the Company's Office Holders that will advance the Company’s targets. The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors shall also review the Company’s Compensation Policy and the need to amend it to conform to the provisions of law from time to time, in the event that a material change in circumstances occurs from those that had existed when the Policy was last approved or for other reasons. The Compensation Policy shall be submitted for the approval of the shareholders as required pursuant to the Companies Law. However, to the extent permitted by law, if the shareholders shall oppose approving the Policy, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors shall be able to approve the Policy, after having held another discussion of the Policy and after having determined, on the basis of detailed reasoning, that, notwithstanding the opposition of the shareholders, the adoption of the Policy is for the benefit of the Company.
|
1
|
Insofar as the Office Holder is holding office through a company under his ownership, the provisions of the Compensation Policy shall apply mutatis mutandis: the Compensation to an Office Holder shall be paid against an invoice and not as a salary, and the components of the Compensation will be normalized so that, in economic terms, they will conform to that stated in this Policy.
|
|
1.4
|
The Policy shall remain in effect in its current format until amended or terminated by the Company’s relevant organs, subject to all statutory provisions.
|
|
1.5
|
The Compensation Policy, as specified hereunder, was formulated during an orderly internal process conducted at the Company in conformity with the provisions of Amendment 20, and is based on principles that enable a proper balance between the desire to reward Office Holders for their achievements and the need to ensure that the structure of the Compensation is in line with the Company's benefit and overall strategy over time. The purpose of the Policy is to set guidelines for the mode of compensation of the Company’s Office Holders. The Company’s Management and the Company’s Board of Directors deem all of the Office Holders of the Company as partners in the Company's success and the holistic approach to Office Holders’ Compensation derives from this view. This document presents the indices that derived from the principles of the formulated Compensation Policy, as specified hereunder in clause 5.
|
|
1.6
|
It is hereby clarified that no statement in this document purports to vest any right to the Office Holders to whom the principles of the Compensation Policy apply, or to any other third party, and not necessarily will use be made of all of the components and ranges presented in this Policy.
|
|
1.7
|
The purpose of the Policy is to set guidelines for the mode of compensation of Office Holders of the Company. Therefore, the indices presented are intended to prescribe an adequately broad framework that shall enable the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of the Company to formulate a personal Compensation Plan for each Office Holder or a particular compensation component according to individual circumstances (including unique circumstances) and according to the Company’s needs, in a manner that is congruent with the Company's benefit and the Company’s overall strategy over time.
|
|
3.1
|
The Board of Directors is responsible for managing and implementing the Compensation Policy and for all operations required for this purpose, and has the authority to interpret the provisions of the Compensation Policy in any instance of doubt as how to implement it. Without derogating from that stated and subject to the requirements of the Companies Law, subsequent to its approval by the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors shall formulate and approve a Compensation Plan for Office Holders, while referring to the Compensation Policy and while referring to data to be submitted for this purpose by the Company’s CEO or any delegate on his behalf for each Office Holder at the relevant time of review.
|
2
|
Partner Communications Company Ltd. 2004 Share Options Plan.
|
|
3.2
|
Notwithstanding all that stated in this Policy, prior to adopting a resolution regarding the grant of compensation pursuant to this Policy, the Board of Directors may decide (upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) to reduce or cancel amounts of the Bonuses (or a portion thereof) that shall be calculated by virtue of the approved Compensation Plans, for the reasons specified in this document and particularly, due to the Company’s results, as well as other considerations, the reasons for which shall be specified.
|
|
3.3
|
As is required and pursuant to the provisions of Amendment 20, the Company’s Board of Directors has appointed a board committee to address compensation issues (hereinabove and hereinafter: “the Compensation Committee”), inter alia, for the purpose of performing its functions as required pursuant to the provisions of section 118.B. of the Companies Law:
|
|
(1)
|
to recommend the Compensation Policy for Office Holders to the Board of Directors;3
|
|
(2)
|
to recommend that the Compensation Policy be updated from time to time, and to review its implementation;
|
|
(3)
|
to decide whether to approve transactions involving Terms of Office and Employment of an Office Holder, director and controlling shareholder or a relative thereof; and
|
|
(4)
|
to decide whether to exempt the Terms of Office of a candidate for the office of CEO from the need for approval by the shareholders.
|
|
3.4
|
Correct to the adoption date of this Policy, three members have been appointed to the Compensation Committee, comprised of all of the incumbent external directors of the Company and one independent director. Correct to the adoption date of this Policy, the following directors have been appointed to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
|
|
Ÿ
|
Mr. Barry Ben-Zeev (committee chairman; external director)
|
|
Ÿ
|
Dr. Michael Anghel (external director)
|
|
Ÿ
|
Mr. Arik Steinberg (independent director).
|
3
|
As stated above, the Compensation Policy shall be reviewed and approved at least once every three years.
|
|
3.5
|
The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee may receive the assistance of external consultants for the purpose of formulating or updating the Compensation Policy and for supervising and controlling the approved Policy, to the extent that shall be deemed appropriate.
|
|
3.6
|
The Company’s Board of Directors shall discuss and determine the procedure for supervising the proper implementation of the Compensation Policy, in order to ensure that it is being implemented and, with the assistance of the Compensation Committee, the Board shall periodically review the implementation of the Policy (at least once a year) and shall prescribe rules for control, reporting and rectification of Policy deviations, all as specified hereunder in clause 10.
|
|
3.7
|
Without derogating from the general purport of that stated, the Board of Directors (upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) shall at all times be authorized to instruct that calculations of Bonuses shall be performed in a manner that differs from that specified in a particular Compensation Plan, or to resolve that any particular Bonus by virtue of a particular Compensation Plan shall not be paid at all, and shall be authorized to instruct the revision, cancellation or suspension of any particular Compensation Plan, for reasons that the Board shall deem fit, in light of considerations of the Company's benefit and subject to any law, provided that any payment to any of the relevant Office Holders deriving from the implementation of revisions as stated, shall not exceed the payment amount that would originally have been paid by virtue of that particular Compensation Plan were it not for the implemented revisions. This authority of the Board of Directors shall also be exercisable in relation to a Compensation Plan for which the targets for a particular year have already been approved by the Board of Directors and brought to the attention of those Office Holders who are benefitting from it, as long as the payment pursuant thereto has not yet been paid. That stated in this clause shall be deemed a clause included in every Compensation Plan to be granted to any employee.
|
|
3.8
|
Furthermore, any payment that is not an Ongoing Remuneration that shall be paid to an Office Holder pursuant to his/her particular Compensation Plan, insofar as it shall be paid, and which constitutes a Variable Component or a Fixed Component, is not and shall not be deemed part of the Office Holder’s base salary, for all intents and purposes.
|
4.
|
Principles of the Compensation Policy for Office Holders
|
5.
|
Outline for defining a personal Compensation Plan for Office Holders of the Company
|
|
5.1
|
The following considerations shall be taken into account when approving a personal Compensation Plan:
|
|
5.1.1
|
The Office Holder’s education, qualifications, expertise and professional experience and achievements in his/her current position and, to the extent relevant, in his/her previous position;
|
|
5.1.2
|
The Office Holder’s position, spheres of responsibility and previous compensation agreements signed with the Office Holder;
|
|
5.1.3
|
The ratio between the cost of Office Holder’s Terms of Office and Employment and the cost of the remuneration of the rest of the employees of the Company and the employees of contractors who are working for the Company, and particularly, relative to the average and median remuneration of employees as stated5; whether this ratio is appropriate and why, and the impact of the gaps between them on the labor relations in the Company, if there is any impact;
|
4
|
In any event, pursuant to the law, the Plan must be approved once every three years.
|
|
5.1.4
|
Insofar as the Compensation Plan shall include Variable Components, the considerations should include, inter alia: the Office Holder’s contribution to the achievement of the Company’s targets and to the maximizing of its profits, all from a long-term perspective and depending upon the Office Holder’s position. The Board of Directors shall have discretion with regard to reducing the Variable Components, inter alia, as stated above in clauses 3.2 and 3.7.
|
|
5.2
|
Directors’ Compensation
|
|
5.2.1
|
The securities of the Company are listed for trading in Israel and in the United States. As a result, the burden imposed on the Company’s directors, as well as their responsibility, derive from the requirements of both legal systems. In order to retain high-quality directors who possess expertise and contribute significantly to the Company, the Company believes that they should be compensated commensurately.
|
5
|
In 2012, the ratio between the cost of the CEO's remuneration and the cost of the average remuneration of the rest of the Company employees (that are not Office Holders) is 17, and compared to the cost of the median remuneration of the employees is 24; the ratio between the cost of the average remuneration of an Office Holder that is not the CEO and the cost of the average remuneration of the rest of the Company employees (that are not Office Holders) is 11; and compared to the cost of the median remuneration of the employees is 16.
|
|
5.2.2
|
By virtue of their capacity as directors, the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and members of Board committees shall be entitled to compensation, which includes an annual financial compensation and compensation for participation in meetings, in conformity with the provisions of the Companies Regulations (Rules regarding Remuneration and Reimbursement of Expenses to External Directors), 5760 – 2000. As long as it holds true that each of the members of the Board of Directors is an expert in his/her field, considering his/her education, qualifications, expertise and professional experience (not necessarily financial and accounting expertise or professional qualification), the financial compensation to each director shall be the same, apart from the Chairman. Additionally, the directors shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses and shall benefit from the Company’s Office Holders’ insurance policy and from indemnification letters that have been or shall be granted during this period (as stated hereunder in clause 6). The Company shall be able to grant directors an Equity Compensation, provided that the granting of an Equity Compensation to the External Directors shall be made through an allotment of Restricted Shares or through the use of any other equity instrument, but not by way of granting options. Beyond that stated above, no additional compensation shall be given to Office Holders in their capacities as directors.
For this purpose, the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors shall consider the director’s education, qualifications, expertise and professional experience and achievements, the creation of uniformity in the Compensation to the directors (subject to special circumstances) (or in the method of calculating it), the advancement of the Company’s objectives, its policy from a long-term perspective, the creation of suitable incentives for directors of the Company (considering, inter alia, the Company’s risk-management policy), the size of the Company and the nature of its operations, but without it being required to take into account the other considerations specified in section 267.B.(a) of the Companies Law, or the matters and parameters specified in the First Addendum A to the Companies Law, since they are irrelevant, intrinsically, under the specific circumstances at the Company.
|
|
5.2.3
|
Notwithstanding that stated above in clause 5.2.2, the Company has the discretion to grant the Chairman of the Board a higher compensation, that shall take into account the additional work imposed on him, the additional time that the Chairman of the Board is required to devote to the performance of his role, and, insofar as the Chairman of the Board is an active chairman, also the appointment percentage at which he shall be employed.
|
|
5.3
|
The ratio between the Fixed Components and the Variable Components (equity and non-equity)
|
|
5.4
|
Ongoing Remuneration
(That stated in this clause is the maximum level and does not confer a right to any employee to demand these terms)
|
|
5.4.1
|
Monthly salary
When determining the monthly salary for Office Holders of the Company, the Company uses benchmark salaries in order to compare the reasonability and outward fairness of its compensation system, the aim being to recruit and retain key Office Holders at competitive market conditions. The comparative survey is conducted by the Company’s professional compensation advisor and focuses on companies operating in the same business environment as that of the Company, while considering the sizes and characteristics of the surveyed companies (including the volume of revenues, the profitability rate, the number of employees, the operating arena, etc.). In order to ensure that the sampling is representative, the comparison is performed relative to 15 – 25 companies, each of which has an operating turnover of at least NIS 1 billion, and an employee workforce in excess of 1,000 employees. The compensation levels of the Company’s Office Holders shall be within the customary range for Office Holders at the surveyed companies according to the findings of the comparative survey, and according to the judgment of the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors. The Company is striving to provide a level of compensation for its Office Holders at a range of between 20% and 80% of all companies in the survey.
The monthly salary is linked to the consumer price index (CPI), as published by the Central Bureau of Statistics and, as a rule, is updated on a monthly or quarterly basis according to the CPI of the month preceding the month for which the salary is being paid. If the CPI is negative, the monthly salary is not reduced accordingly; however, a negative CPI is offset from the next positive CPI. Any cost-of-living increase to be paid, if any, is deducted from each salary update.
|
|
5.4.2
|
Annual vacation, sick days and Office Holders’ routine annual medical examination
The Office Holders are entitled to vacation (the maximum vacation time shall not exceed 30 days per annum and the accumulation of vacation days may be restricted), sick days (the maximum number of sick days shall not exceed 30 days per annum and the accumulation of sick days may be restricted) and a routine annual medical examination according to the Company’s procedures.
|
|
5.4.3
|
Allocations to a pension plan and to a continuing education fund
The Company executes allocations and deductions from the Office Holders’ salary to a pension fund (14.33%), to an office Holders’ insurance plan (13.33%) or to a combined plan (13.33%) and to loss-of-work-capacity insurance (2.5%), according to the Office Holder’s choice.
The Company executes allocations and deductions from the Office Holders’ salary to a continuing education fund (7.5%), according to the Office Holder’s choice.
|
|
5.4.4
|
Advance notice
As a rule, the advance-notice period prescribed in Office Holders’ employment agreements shall not exceed three months during the first year of employment, and six months as of the second year of employment. As a rule, the Office Holder is required to be at the service of the Company during the advance-notice period.
|
|
5.4.5
|
Adjustment period
The adjustment period prescribed in Office Holders’ employment agreements shall not exceed three months during the first year of employment, and six months as of the second year of employment.
|
|
5.4.6
|
Car and phone
The Company may make available a company car of manager class for the Office Holder’s work-related purposes, and assumes the related expenses and, as a rule, also assumes the grossing up of the relevant tax, according to the instructions of the Income Tax Authority. The Company has the option of choosing to pay vehicle maintenance according to the Company's policy, as it may be from time to time.
The Company provides a mobile phone to the Office Holder and covers the cost of the use thereof, as a rule, only in Israel (however, for certain Office Holders, also international calls from Israel and from abroad). The Office Holders assume the value in use of the cell phone, according to the instructions of the Income Tax Authority. The Office Holders will be entitled to purchase from the Company cellular phones at prices that will be determined by the Company, so long as the price shall not be less than 80% of the cost price of the phone and will be entitled to benefit from tariff plans that are offered to Company employees from time to time.
The Office Holders are entitled to reimbursement of per diem expenses, hospitality and lodging in Israel and abroad, according to the Company’s procedures.
|
|
5.5
|
Bonuses
|
|
5.5.1
|
Annual Bonus
The minimum criterion for receiving the annual Bonus is that the total EBITDA6 shall not have decreased by more than 40% of the EBITDA for the year preceding the year in respect whereof the bonus is payable7.
When calculating achievement of the EBITDA target and those targets constituting the basis for the annual Bonus, as specified hereunder, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors shall neutralize those non-recurrent and exceptional events which, if taken into account, would lead to an outcome that does not serve the objectives underlying the granting of the annual compensation and that undercompensates or overcompensates the Office Holders other than according to their performance.
Determination of the annual Bonus to Office Holders8
|
|
5.5.1.1
|
The annual Bonus is based on targets at the level of the Company, the division and at a personal level, which is usually defined in advance shortly after the Company’s budget is approved for the following year and before the start of the year for which the annual Bonus is to be paid.
|
|
5.5.1.2
|
The sum of the annual Bonus that may be granted to any Office Holder shall be set in advance, as specified in this Policy, in a manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the Bonus and the Fixed Components in the Office Holder’s Compensation Plan.
|
6
|
It should be noted, that for the purpose of determining whether the minimum criterion for receiving the annual Bonus is met, the Company will calculate the EBITDA in a consistent manner identical to the manner in which it calculated this data until now and according to which it reported the EBITDA data in its annual financial reports.
|
7
|
The minimum criterion for receiving the annual Bonus was set in light of the high volatility that is characteristic of the Israeli telecommunications market and in light of the sharp decrease in the Company's EBITDA over the past three years. For example, the EBITDA for the first half of 2013 totaled NIS 548 million, compared to the EBITDA for the first half of 2012 which totaled NIS 861 million (a decrease of approximately 36%).
|
8
|
With respect to the annual Bonus for the CEO that is in office at the time of approval of the Compensation Policy-see section 5.5.1.6 to this Policy.
|
|
5.5.1.3
|
The sum of the annual Bonus that shall actually be paid to an Office Holder, shall be calculated in a manner that ensures that a structured ratio is maintained between the percentage at which targets are achieved and the height of the Bonus being paid, using a formula that usually takes into account the following three components: achievement of the Company’s targets, achievement of the division’s targets and a personal evaluation of the relevant Office Holder, as specified in the annual Bonus plan (“the Formula” and “the Annual Bonus Plan”, as relevant) and as specified hereunder:
|
|
(a)
|
The Company’s targets
Key targets shall be selected from all Company targets included in the annual budget, which shall constitute a foundation for calculating the ratio at which the Company’s targets were achieved, and which are defined while considering, inter alia, the Company’s risk management policy, and the long-term perspective (“the Company’s Key Targets”). Such targets and indices may be the Company’s net profit; an EBITDA target; market share; churn rate; cash flow, etc., and shall include, inter alia, targets that serve long-term objectives. Each of the Company’s Key Targets will be assigned benchmarks having numerical values that are deemed achievable targets, so that achievement of the exact numerical target prescribed in the Annual Bonus Plan shall constitute achievement of 100% of the target. Numerical values shall also be defined that shall constitute the threshold target, which, if not achieved, will disqualify the employee for a Bonus in respect of that specific target, and numerical values shall be defined that shall constitute the upper limit for calculating the percentage at which a specific target has been achieved. The actual percentage at which targets are achieved shall be calculated according to the aforesaid benchmarks and can reach the maximum level to be defined for each target specifically in the Annual Bonus Plan. The preparation of the Annual Bonus Plan, including the determination of the Company’s Key Targets, their numerical values according to the Company’s budget and the minimum and maximum benchmarks, shall be done annually and is subject to the approval of the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors. The weight to be assigned to this category (“Company targets”) in the Formula for any given Office Holder shall range between 30% and 90%.
|
|
(b)
|
The Division’s targets
Key targets shall be selected from all of the division targets under the purview of the relevant Office Holder that included in or derive from the annual budget. These selected targets shall constitute the basis for calculating the percentage at which the division’s targets have been achieved, and shall be defined while taking into account, inter alia, the Company’s risk-management policy and the long-term perspective (“the Division’s Key Targets”). Such targets and indices may be: profitability index; market share; growth index; operating and service indices; an index of compliance with internal procedures; contribution to the formulating of targets and to the leading of processes relating to corporate governance and compliance with provisions of law; compliance with regulations; contribution to the performance and advancement of strategic content and targets; an index of reaching milestones in major projects, etc., and shall include, inter alia, targets serving long-term objectives. Each of the Division’s Key Targets shall be assigned benchmarks having numerical values that are deemed achievable targets so that achievement of the exact numerical target prescribed in the Annual Bonus Plan shall constitute achievement of 100% of the target. Numerical values shall also be defined that shall constitute the threshold target, which, if not achieved, will disqualify the employee for a Bonus in respect of that specific target, and numerical values shall be defined that shall constitute the upper limit for calculating the percentage at which a specific target has been achieved. The actual percentage at which targets are achieved shall be calculated according to the aforesaid benchmarks and can reach the maximum level to be defined for each target specifically in the Annual Bonus Plan. The Division’s Key Targets, their numerical values and the minimum and maximum benchmarks shall be submitted by the Company’s CEO for the approval of the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors. The weight to be assigned to the “Division targets” category in the Formula for any given Office Holder shall range between 10% and 70%.
|
|
(c)
|
Personal evaluation
The Company’s CEO shall present his personal evaluation of Office Holders reporting to the CEO to the Company’s Compensation Committee and to the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors shall present his personal evaluation of the Company’s CEO to the Company’s Compensation Committee and to the Board of Directors. These evaluations shall relate, inter alia, to nonfinancial indices, including the Office Holder’s long-term contribution and his/her long-term performance. The weight to be assigned to the “personal evaluation” category in the Formula for any given Office Holder shall not exceed 20%.
|
|
(d)
|
It is hereby clarified that the aggregate weight to be assigned to all three of the aforesaid categories in the Formula shall be 100%.
The breakdown of the targets in each measurable category and the relative weight of each of the measurable categories shall be tailored to each Office Holder individually, depending on the seniority of the Office Holder and the organizational division to which the Office Holder is assigned or that is under his/her purview.
|
|
5.5.1.4
|
Upon the approval of the Company’s annual results (in the first quarter of the year following the relevant budget year), the annual Bonus to be paid to each Office Holder shall be calculated according to the relevant Formula in the Annual Bonus Plan, based on the relevant group of targets from among the Company’s Key Targets, the Division’s Key Targets and the personal evaluation of each Office Holder. Eligibility for the annual Bonus and the sum thereof shall be determined according to the following rules: if the total achievement of targets is at a ratio that is lower than the defined minimum threshold of 60%, the Office Holder shall not be eligible for any Bonus whatsoever. If the total achievement of targets is at the ratio of at least 60%, the annual Bonus will be calculated according to an index – that determines with respect to each achievement target ratio the sum of the Bonus in terms of multiples of the Base Salary, all as set forth in the Annual Bonus Plan.
|
|
5.5.1.5
|
Multi-year Bonus
|
|
(a)
|
The sum exceeding 50% of the total Calculated Bonus shall be paid shortly after the calculation date of the said Bonus (“the Base Payment”), no later than 30 days after the approval of the Company’s annual results for the year of the Bonus;
|
|
(b)
|
The balance of the Calculated Bonus (CPI-linked) (“the Payment of the Balance”) shall be paid on the payment date of the annual Bonus to be paid in the year after the payment of the Base Payment (no later than 30 days after the approval of the Company’s annual results for that subsequent year); however, an Office Holder’s eligibility for the Payment of the Balance during any given subsequent year shall be contingent upon his/her overall achievement of the predefined multi-year targets, together with the defined annual targets for the base year.
|
|
5.5.1.6
|
Existing arrangements
|
|
(a)
|
Insofar as the achievement of targets, as specified hereunder in sub clause (d) shall be between 90% and 100% (inclusively) - the CEO shall be eligible for an annual Bonus at the sum reflecting approximately 80% of his Ongoing Remuneration10 (“the Basic Annual Bonus”) up to the sum reflecting approximately 120% of his Ongoing Remuneration 11 (“the Annual Goal Bonus”), linearly relative to the percentage of the targets achieved.12
|
|
(b)
|
Insofar as the achievement of targets shall be by more than 100% - the Board of Directors has the discretion to either grant the CEO an annual Bonus at the sum equivalent to the Annual Goal Bonus, or to grant him an additional sum, the outcome of which is an annual Bonus that is higher than the Annual Goal Bonus (“the Additional Sum”). According to this Compensation Policy, insofar as the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of the Company shall decide to pay the Additional Sum as stated, the discretionary Additional Sum as stated shall constitute an immaterial portion.
|
9
|
The CEO serving at the time of the approval of the Compensation Policy, with whom the engagement is through a management company.
|
10
|
This percentage is calculated according to the compensation set forth in the CEO's management agreement, which as a rule is equivalent to the Ongoing Remuneration as of the date of the engagement with the management company; NIS 2 million.
|
11
|
See footnote 10 above; NIS 3 million. In addition, if the Company's annual net profit for 2012, 2013 or 2014 (the examination shall be conducted separately for each of these years) will be equal to or greater than the Company's annual net profit for the previous year, the Company shall grant 150,000 options for the relevant year (according to the terms of the option plan that was in effect at the time the management agreement was entered into with the CEO).
|
12
|
The relative calculation shall be performed at intervals of 1%, so that the achievement of targets at 1% above 90% shall entitle the CEO to his Basic Annual Bonus plus NIS 100,000 (one hundred thousand). Fractional percentages shall be rounded up or down to the nearest whole percentage point. For example: if, in a particular year, the CEO achieved 93.6% of the targets, his achievement of targets in that year shall be deemed achievement of 94% of the targets and therefore, the CEO shall be entitled to an annual bonus at the sum of NIS 2.4 million.
|
|
(c)
|
Insofar as the achievement of targets shall be by less than 90% – the Board of Directors has the discretion to decide whether to pay the CEO an annual Bonus. According to this Compensation Policy, insofar as the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of the Company shall decide to pay an annual Bonus as stated, when the CEO achieved less than 90% of the targets, the sum to be paid as stated shall be calculated proportionately to the percentage of the targets that were achieved, similarly to that stated above in sub clause (a).
|
|
(d)
|
“The targets” – in this clause, means: the Company’s annual targets, as defined by the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, at their sole discretion, within the framework of the Company’s Annual Bonus Plan.
|
|
5.5.1.7
|
Eligibility for a Bonus in respect of a partial period of employment
|
5.5.2
|
Severance Bonus
|
|
5.5.2.1
|
As of the adoption date of this Policy, the Company shall not engage in an agreement that commits to a Severance Bonus in advance, but it shall be able to commit to grant a Severance Bonus to an Office Holder, ad hoc, only under exceptional circumstances and based on reasons of great importance which shall be detailed in the resolutions of the Company's relevant organs. That stated in no way prejudices stipulations in existing agreements regarding Severance Bonuses.
|
|
5.5.2.2
|
The Severance Bonus, if granted, shall be granted commensurate to the Office Holder’s Terms of Office or Employment. The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of the Company can grant Severance Bonuses to Office Holders of the Company by virtue of this Compensation Policy, which shall be calculated on the basis of their Ongoing Remuneration and shall not exceed 25% of the Ongoing Remuneration for each year of employment at the Company, or, in exceptional instances, when a predefined period of employment is approved, which shall not exceed three years, the Severance Bonus shall reflect the consideration that the Office Holder would have been entitled to receive had he/she worked throughout the entire said period. As a rule, an Office Holder’s minimum period of office or employment that shall qualify for a Severance Bonus shall be at least twelve (12) months of employment at the Company.
|
|
5.5.2.3
|
The decision-making with regard to a Severance Bonus shall consider the Office Holder’s contribution to the achievement of the Company’s targets and to the maximizing of its profits, and shall be calculated while considering the Company’s performance during the Office Holder’s incumbency, as shall be decided by the Board of Directors.
|
|
5.5.2.4
|
The decision-making with regard to a Severance Bonus shall take into account the circumstances of the Office Holder’s severance and how they affect the Office Holder’s right to the Severance Bonus. Naturally, a Severance Bonus shall not be given under circumstances of the commission of fraud against the Company.
|
|
5.5.2.5
|
It is hereby clarified that the adoption of this Compensation Policy shall in no way prejudice the existing rights of any Office Holder relative to Severance Bonuses that were approved prior to the adoption of this Policy, on which the Office Holders relied during their employment.
|
|
5.5.3
|
Special Bonuses
In addition to the annual Bonuses and any other compensation described in this Policy, the Board of Directors of the Company (upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) shall have the authority, in accordance with its discretion, to award special Bonuses, whether equity or non-equity - ad hoc - under special circumstances, such as Office Holder retention relating to the sale of the Company or the transfer of the control over the Company. This special Bonus shall be calculated separately and in addition to any other type of compensation described in this Policy. The special Bonus as stated shall be according to the criteria to be prescribed by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of the Company, and shall be within the range that is customary in the market for Office Holders holding similar positions, provided that such compensation shall not exceed twice (2) the Fixed Components of the Office Holder in the relevant calendar year13, without this requiring an additional approval by the shareholders. In addition, under circumstances as stated, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of the Company shall also be able to extend an Office Holder’s adjustment period for a period not longer than nine months and/or to determine that the Company shall pay the Office Holder his/her compensation terms in their entirety during an additional period, which shall not exceed 12 months beyond that prescribed in this Compensation Policy.
|
|
5.6
|
Equity Compensation – options, Phantom Options, Restricted Stock Units, Restricted Shares
|
|
5.6.1
|
The use of an equity-based compensation enables alignment between the Office Holders’ targets and the objectives of the shareholders, creates a retention component in the Compensation Plan that takes a long-term perspective on the Company’s results, and motivates the Office Holders to work for the benefit of the Company under long-term policy considerations and with controlled risk-taking. Equity Compensation can be offered in a track either with or without a trustee, including a capital-gains track or an employment-income track, as the Company’s institutions shall decide.
|
|
5.6.2
|
The terms of a Compensation Plan that include an Equity Compensation should provide adequate incentives to maximize the Company’s long-term value. Among the relevant parameters for ensuring the creation of such incentives are: the expected volume of dilution, the plan's economic value, the exercise prices and the vesting period.
|
13
|
The relevant calendar year - the calendar year preceding the date of the decision to grant the bonus or the calendar year during which the decision was adopted, as to be decided by the Compensation Committee and the Company's Board of Directors in accordance with the specific circumstances.
|
|
5.6.3
|
With respect to variable equity components not cleared in cash, such as options or Restricted Shares, the maximum value shall be calculated on the grant date by way of determining their exercise prices according to a variety of considerations that the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors have determined, including, inter alia, the average market price of the share during a defined trading period. The exercise price shall be determined according to one of the following options: (1) the exercise price shall not be less than the average closing price of the Company’s share during the thirty trading days on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange preceding the grant date, with the addition of a 5.0% premium; or (2) the exercise price shall not be less than the average closing price of the Company’s share during the thirty trading days on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange preceding the grant date, while the vesting of the options will be subject to achieving targets set by the Company's Compensation Committee and Board of Directors. For the avoidance of doubt, the resolution with respect to the option to be implemented will be adopted only at the time of the grant.
|
|
5.6.4
|
As a rule, the minimum holding or vesting period of variable equity components shall be three years (divided into tranches that shall vest throughout the period, with the minimum vesting period relative to each tranche being one year). This minimum vesting period serves to constitute adequate incentive from a long-term perspective. However, the Board of Directors (upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) shall have the discretion to assign a shorter vesting period or to calculate the vesting period from an earlier point at which the Office Holder was employed by or provided services to the Company, under circumstances that shall be explained and specified.
|
|
5.6.5
|
The exercise period shall commence as of the end of the vesting period and shall end after two to seven years have elapsed; however, the Board of Directors shall have the discretion to define a shorter or longer exercise period, provided that the duration shall in no instance exceed the period of the Equity Compensation plan and shall not be less than one year after each vesting date, apart from an instance of termination of employment, for which a shorter exercise period may be defined, but not less than three months.
|
|
5.6.6
|
The maximum cumulative dilution within the scope of Equity Compensation in respect of all grants executed in the Company shall be limited, so that it shall not exceed 10% of the Company’s shares to all Office Holders of the Company for the duration of the Period of the Compensation Policy. The dilution ratio between senior Office Holders and the rest of the employees shall be examined using a test of reasonability.
|
|
5.6.7
|
The dilution ratio shall be calculated while considering the gap between theoretical and actual dilution. Therefore, an Equity Compensation (insofar as relevant, such as options) that carries an exercise price that exceeds 150% of the highest share price during the period of one year prior to the calculation date, shall be exempted from such calculation of the actual dilution. The examination shall be carried out at the time of the allotment of each such Equity Compensation, and no change shall be made in an allotment already granted due to a subsequent change in the market price of the share.
|
|
5.6.8
|
In order to maintain the effectiveness of the Equity Compensation being granted to an Office Holder and in order to equate the Office Holder’s position to that of the Company’s shareholders, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of the Company may reduce the exercise price (or make some other comparable adjustment to the relevant Equity Compensation) fully or partially, when a dividend is distributed to the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s Existing Options Plan includes a dividend-reduction mechanism (full or partial, as the case may be) when a dividend is distributed to the Company’s shareholders.
|
|
5.6.9
|
An Equity Compensation may be exercised using a cashless mechanism, whereby the offeree is entitled to receive from the Company only that quantity of shares that reflects the economic gain that the offeree would have received had he/she exercised the Equity Compensation (insofar as relevant, such as options) for shares at the market price of those shares, net of the exercise price in respect thereof. This mechanism may be adopted by the Board of Directors from time to time.
|
|
5.6.10
|
The Board of Directors has discretion to operate a mechanism for exchanging the Equity Compensation for another Equity Compensation (such as an exchange of options), for immediate acceleration of the Equity Compensation or for exchange it for Phantom Options in the event of a change in control over the Company (as defined in the relevant Equity Compensation Plan), as well as to operate a mechanism for immediate acceleration of the Equity Compensation or for exchanging it for Phantom Options in the event of liquidation of the Company or if the Company becomes a private company. The Existing Options Plan also includes an options-acceleration mechanism in the event of the termination of the employment of an offeree by the Company within six months of the date of a transfer of control.
|
|
5.7
|
Comparative analysis relative to the market
|
|
5.8
|
Management agreements between public companies, or between private companies controlled by the controlling shareholder and a public company controlled by the controlling shareholder
|
|
5.8.1
|
Section 270(4) of the Companies Law prescribes that the special decision-making principles prescribed in the Companies Law regarding the approval of a public company’s engagement with its controlling shareholder in relation to Terms of Office and Employment, shall also apply to a transaction of the public company with a company controlled by the controlling shareholder, which provides management or consulting services to the Company. Insofar as a consideration shall not be paid to the controlling shareholder or to another company under his control in relation to a management or consulting agreement, such agreement shall not constitute “Terms of Office and Employment” and, accordingly, the Compensation/Audit Committee or the Board of Directors shall not be required to take into account the considerations specified in section 267.B(a) of the Companies Law or the matters and parameters prescribed in the First Addendum A to the Companies Law.
|
|
5.8.2
|
Management agreements as stated shall be limited to a period of up to three years.
|
6.
|
Indemnification, insurance, release
|
7.
|
Procedure for approving the Terms of Office of the Office Holders of the Company
|
|
7.1
|
Relative to an Office Holder (other than a director, CEO, controlling shareholder or relative of a controlling shareholder)
|
|
7.1.1
|
The Compensation Committee and subsequently, the Board of Directors, shall approve a Compensation Plan for an Office Holder as stated, in conformity with the Compensation Policy.
|
|
7.1.2
|
Approval of a Compensation Plan that does not conform to the Compensation Policy shall be possible in “special cases,”14 (as defined in Amendment 20), with the discussion of the Compensation Plan by the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors following the same procedure as for approving a compensation policy; i.e., taking into account the considerations specified in section 267.B(a) of the Companies Law, and while referring to the matters specified in Part A of the First Addendum A, and while prescribing provisions, inter alia, as specified in Part B of the said Addendum with the subsequent approval of a Compensation Plan by the shareholders, provided that one of the following conditions is fulfilled: (1) the majority of votes in favor of the matter shall include at least a majority of the votes of shareholders not constituting controlling shareholders in the Company, or those having a personal interest in the approval of the Compensation Plan participating in the vote; which votes shall not include abstaining votes;15 (2) the total number of objecting votes of the shareholders mentioned in subclause (1) does not exceed 2% of the total voting rights in the Company (“Compensation Special Majority”).
|
|
7.1.3
|
Nevertheless, insofar as the law permits this, if the shareholders opposed the approval of the Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors shall be able to approve the plan, in “special cases,” notwithstanding shareholders' opposition, after having held another discussion of the terms of the Compensation Plan, and on the basis of detailed reasoning that considered the rationale behind the shareholders' opposition.
|
|
7.1.4
|
An amendment to Terms of Office that is immaterial relative to an existing engagement may be approved solely by the Compensation Committee. Insofar as such amendment relates to a quantitative value, an amendment at a threshold of up to 5% shall be deemed, for the purposes of this clause 7.1.4, an immaterial amendment; insofar as the amendment does not relate to a quantitative value, the materiality of the amendment shall be examined on its merits and its intrinsic nature.
|
14
|
For example, when the relevant Office Holder has extraordinary qualifications.
|
15
|
Shareholders participating in the voting must notify the Company in advance whether or not they have a personal interest in approving the compensation plan; if a shareholder fails to so notify, the shareholder shall not vote and its vote shall not be counted.
|
|
7.2
|
Relative to the Terms of Office of a CEO (other than a director, controlling shareholder or a relative of a controlling shareholder)
|
|
7.2.1
|
A Compensation Plan for a CEO shall be approved by the Compensation Committee, by the Board of Directors and by the shareholders by the Compensation Special Majority (in that order).
|
|
7.2.2
|
Nevertheless, insofar as the law permits this, if the shareholders opposed the approval of the Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors shall be able to approve the plan, in “special cases,” notwithstanding the shareholders’ opposition, after having held another discussion of the terms of the Compensation Plan, and on the basis of detailed reasoning that considered the rationale behind the shareholders' opposition.
|
|
7.2.3
|
In “special cases,” a CEO’s Compensation Plan may be approved even if it does not conform to the Compensation Policy, with the discussion of the Compensation Plan by the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors following the same procedure as for approving a compensation policy; i.e., taking into account the considerations specified in section 267.B(a) of the Companies Law, and while referring to the matters specified in Part A of the First Addendum A, and while prescribing provisions, inter alia, as specified in Part B of the said Addendum, and with the Compensation Plan being subsequently approved by the shareholders by the Compensation Special Majority.
|
|
7.2.4
|
An amendment to Terms of Office that is immaterial relative to an existing engagement may be approved solely by the Compensation Committee. Insofar as such amendment relates to a quantitative value, an amendment at a threshold of up to 5% shall be deemed, for the purposes of this clause 7.2.4, an immaterial amendment; insofar as the amendment does not relate to a quantitative value, the materiality of the amendment shall be examined on its merits and intrinsic nature.
|
|
7.2.5
|
The Compensation Committee shall be able to exempt the Compensation Plan of any candidate for the office of CEO from having to obtain the approval of the shareholders, when the Compensation conforms to the Compensation Policy, when the candidate has no “linkage” to the Company or its controlling shareholder,16 and it has come to the conclusion, on the basis of reasons to be specified, that the submission of the Compensation Plan for approval by the shareholders shall thwart the engagement with that candidate for office.
|
|
7.3
|
Relative to the Terms of Office of a director (other than a controlling shareholder or a relative of a controlling shareholder)
|
|
7.3.1
|
The terms of compensation conforming to the Compensation Policy shall be approved by the Compensation Committee, by the Board of Directors and by the shareholders by a simple majority.
|
|
7.3.2
|
In “special cases,” a director’s Compensation Plan may be approved even if it does not conform to the Compensation Policy, with the discussion of the approval of the Compensation Plan by the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors following the same procedure as for approving a compensation policy; i.e., taking into account the considerations specified in section 267.B(a) of the Companies Law, and while referring to the matters specified in Part A of the First Addendum A, and while prescribing provisions, inter alia, as specified in Part B of the said Addendum, and with the Compensation Plan being subsequently approved by the shareholders by the Compensation Special Majority.
|
|
7.4
|
Relative to the Terms of Office of a controlling shareholder or a relative thereof
|
|
7.4.1
|
The terms of compensation conforming to the Compensation Policy shall be approved by the Compensation Committee, by the Board of Directors and by the shareholders by a special majority17 of the Company’s shareholders.18
|
16
|
The requirement is that the candidate must fulfill the conditions of an “absence of linkage,” which a candidate is required to fulfill in order to hold office as an external director, and which is prescribed in section 240(b) of the Companies Law. In other words, in relation to a company with a controlling shareholder, the candidate cannot be a relative of the controlling shareholder, and neither the candidate, his relative, partner, employer, anyone who is directly or indirectly subordinate to the candidate, nor a corporation of which the candidate is its controlling shareholder, on the date of appointment or during the two years that preceded the date of appointment, have any linkage to the Company, to the Company’s controlling shareholder or to a relative of the controlling shareholder, on the date of the appointment, or to a corporation controlled by the controlling shareholder.
|
|
7.4.2
|
In “special cases,” a Compensation Plan may be approved for a controlling shareholder or a relative thereof even if it does not conform to the Compensation Policy, with the discussion of the approval of the Compensation Plan by the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors following the same procedure as for approving a compensation policy; i.e., taking into account the considerations specified in section 267.B(a) of the Companies Law, and while referring to the matters specified in Part A of the First Addendum A, and while prescribing provisions, inter alia, as specified in Part B of the said addendum, and with the Compensation Plan being subsequently approved by the shareholders by a special majority.
|
|
7.4.3
|
A Compensation Plan to a controlling shareholder or to a relative thereof for a period exceeding three years must be re-approved every three years.
|
8.
|
Compensation pursuant to previously approved compensation agreements
|
17
|
In this document, “special majority” means that upon the approval by the shareholders, one of the following conditions is fulfilled: (1) the majority of votes in favor of the matter shall include at least a majority of the votes of shareholders not constituting controlling shareholders in the Company, or those having a personal interest in the approval of the transaction participating in the vote; which votes shall not include abstaining votes; shareholders participating in the voting must notify the Company in advance whether or not they have a personal interest in approving the transaction; if a shareholder fails to so notify, the shareholder shall not vote and his vote shall not be counted; (2) the total number of objecting votes of the shareholders mentioned in subclause (1) does not exceed 2% of all the total voting rights in the Company (pursuant to that prescribed in section 275(a)(3)).
|
18
|
The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors must check whether the Compensation Plan includes a “distribution” and, if it does, it must verify compliance with the provisions of the law in this regard (whether or not the Compensation Plan conforms to the Compensation Policy), including verification that there is no reasonable concern that the said Plan might prevent the Company from being able to meet its existing and expected liabilities on their payment due dates (pursuant to section 275(d) of the Companies Law).
|
9.
|
Return of a Bonus
|
10.
|
Control principles, reporting and correction of deviations
|
|
10.1
|
The Company shall comply with every existing and future provision of law pertaining to the Compensation Policy of the Company’s Office Holders.
|
|
10.2
|
Any deviation or variance from the Compensation Policy specified in this document or from the principles therein shall be approved by the Compensation Committee and subsequently, by the Company’s Board of Directors, or in some other manner that conforms to the requirements of the Companies Law.
|
|
10.3
|
At least once a year, when the annual Compensation is about to be given to the Office Holders, the Company’s CEO or any delegate on his behalf shall submit a report to the Compensation Committee and to the Company’s Board of Directors about the Compensation given to each of the Office Holders, and refer to the Compensation guidelines defined for each Office Holder, the percentage at which targets were achieved and the calculation of the sums.
|
|
10.4
|
The Company’s V.P., Human Resources and the CFO shall verify that the payment in respect of each Office Holder’s compensation complies with the guidelines specified in this document.
|
|
10.5
|
At least once every three years, the Company’s Internal Auditor shall prepare a special report on the Company’s compliance with the Compensation Policy as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Internal Auditor shall submit his report on the implementation of the Compensation Policy as required pursuant to the Companies Law (to the Chairman of the Board of Directors, to the CEO and to the Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee). Insofar as the report shows that the Company deviated from the Compensation Policy approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, the Internal Auditor’s report shall also be submitted for immediate discussion by the Compensation Committee and by the Board of Directors of the Company.
|
1.
|
According to your letter, we have been asked to evaluate the reasonability of the components of the compensation being proposed for executives of the Company, within the scope of formulating a compensation policy for the Company.
|
2.
|
As a general background, Prof. Moshe Zviran Ltd. engages in the provision of advisory services and comparative information on the subject of executive compensation in Israel. The comparative data used as a foundation for our work rely on a designated database, the only one of its kind in Israel, which was developed, built and is updated by us, and is comprised of real data taken from compensation surveys in the various fields, additional data received from the companies themselves within the scope of a large number of advisory assignments performed recently for senior managements at a variety of companies, as well as real data from other sources. Our database, which constitutes the largest and most up-to-date benchmark in Israel, in conjunction with our unique expertise, which relies on academic knowledge, decades of experience and hundreds of projects, enable us to offer organizations solutions that are based on research and knowledge based on local, sectoral or global data.
|
Analysis of the compensation package
|
3.
|
The structure of the compensation package for senior management positions is usually based on the following components:
|
|
Ÿ
|
fixed base salary;
|
|
Ÿ
|
vehicle and the grossing up of items – including the economic value of a personal company car, and grossing up of the value in use of the vehicle, if any, as well as fixed payments and grossing up of items, if any;
|
|
Ÿ
|
annual bonuses that link the manager’s earnings to the achievement of the company’s short-range targets and other annual additions (such as: a 13th – 14th salary), if any;
|
|
Ÿ
|
equity compensation (options and shares) that link the manager’s earnings to the achievement of the company’s long-range targets and enhancement of the company’s value;
|
4.
|
The following analysis was performed for two echelons:
|
|
Ÿ
|
comparative analysis for the office of the C.E.O.
|
|
Ÿ
|
comparative analysis for the group of V.P.s, who report to the C.E.O.
|
C.E.O.
|
5.
|
For the purpose of creating a correct comparative group for the office of the C.E.O., we extracted data on the customary levels of compensation for the office of C.E.O. among major and mega corporations, each of which has an operating turnover exceeding USD 500 million, and an employee force in excess of 1,000 employees. The sampling of companies includes data from 15 public and private companies, including: Osem, El Al, Electra, Bezeq, Hot, Migdal, Makhteshim, Menorah, Nice, Cellcom, Paz, Pelephone, Strauss, Shikun & Binui and Tnuva. Some of the companies are listed only in Tel-Aviv, while others (such as: Nice, Cellcom) are dual listed. Some of the companies in the sampling are private companies. The average operating turnover (in 2012) of the companies in the sampling was NIS 7.5 billion (median: NIS 6.06 billion). It should be noted that the data on executives of companies in the banking sector, holding companies and mega corporations such as Teva, Israel Chemicals, Azrielli and the like, were not included in the sampling, due to a concern of causing bias in the results.
|
6.
|
The table below presents the customary salary levels for the office of C.E.O. at the sampling of companies, and the relative position of Partner’s C.E.O. at each of the salary levels relative to what is customary in the sampling:
|
Data from the sampling
|
Partner’s data
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Salary level
|
Low
|
25% |
Average
|
75% |
High
|
Relative position
|
||||||||||||||||||
Base salary
|
110,000 | 122,810 | 143,190 | 166,890 | 208,600 |
~ 60th percentile
|
||||||||||||||||||
Monthly additions
|
6,000 | 11,610 | 15,000 | 17,420 | 19,070 |
~ 25th percentile
|
||||||||||||||||||
Full monthly salary
|
128,090 | 138,230 | 158,840 | 185,190 | 220,750 |
~ 60th percentile
|
||||||||||||||||||
Annual additions
|
– | 1,327,500 | 2,219,830 | 2,293,600 | 6,832,000 | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive salary
|
138,420 | 247,380 | 343,830 | 392,130 | 707,000 |
~ 15th percentile
|
||||||||||||||||||
Equity compensation (annual)
|
– | – | 1,672,410 | 2,117,770 | 7,539,380 |
~ 85th percentile
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total compensation
|
138,420 | 308,150 | 479,300 | 696,460 | 879,280 |
~ 50th percentile
|
V.P.s – reporting to the C.E.O.
|
7.
|
For the purpose of creating a correct comparative group for the functional offices of the V.P.s, we extracted data on the customary levels of compensation for the offices of vice general managers and executive V.P.s among 25 major and mega corporations, each of which has an operating turnover exceeding USD 500 million.
|
8.
|
The table below presents the customary salary levels for the offices of vice general managers and executive V.P.s in the sampling of companies (after excluding extreme values), and the relative positions of Partner’s V.P.s (the average salary and a range – from the lowest to the highest) at each of the salary levels relative to what is customary in the sampling:
|
Data from the sampling
|
V.P data at Partner
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low
|
25% |
Average
|
75% |
High
|
Relative position
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Range
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary
|
40,120 | 52,890 | 64,270 | 75,000 | 133,400 |
~ 55th percentile
|
~ 25th-85th percentile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly additions
|
– | 5,750 | 9,090 | 12,420 | 17,800 |
~ 80th percentile
|
~ 25th-90th percentile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Full monthly salary
|
42,740 | 59,340 | 73,370 | 87,500 | 142,300 |
~ 60th percentile
|
~ 20th-80th percentile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Annual additions
|
– | 213,240 | 400,290 | 519,930 | 1,800,100 | – | – | |||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive salary
|
50,110 | 80,480 | 106,730 | 121,810 | 248,650 |
~ 25th percentile
|
~ 15th-50th percentile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Equity compensation (annual)
|
– | 19,290 | 322,090 | 548,650 | 1,523,610 |
~ 80th percentile
|
~ 60th-85th percentile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total compensation
|
53,680 | 92,050 | 133,570 | 169,680 | 327,820 |
~ 55th percentile
|
~ 25th-80th percentile
|
9.
|
Our analysis of the components of the officers’ compensation at Partner, relative to the data in the sampling, shows that the levels of compensation in the Company are within the range that is customary at similar companies.
|
Confidentiality and limit of liability
|
10.
|
As has been agreed, the scope of our role is solely the provision of advice and information, while the responsibility for reaching decisions that relate to this engagement and the results to be obtained following the use of any of the services or products being provided by us is that of the Company and its institutions. We have no liability, contractual or otherwise, deriving from the services or from any of the results or from the advice provided – towards the Company or others.
|
11.
|
Should any questions arise, we would be delighted to be at your service and assistance.
|
Sincerely,
Prof. Moshe Zviran
|
1.
|
Partner Communications Company Ltd. (“Partner”) hereby undertakes to indemnify you for any liability or expense that you incur or that is imposed on you in consequence of an action or an inaction by you (including prior to the date of this letter), in your capacity of an officer or director in Partner or as an officer or director on behalf of Partner in a company controlled by Partner or in which Partner has a direct or indirect interest (such companies being referred to herein as “Subsidiaries”), as follows:
|
|
1.1.
|
Financial liability that you incur or is imposed on you in accordance with a judgment, including a judgment given in a settlement or a judgment of an arbitrator approved by the court; provided, that such liability pertains to one or more of the events set out in Schedule I hereto, which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors of Partner, are anticipated in light of Partner's activities at the time of granting this undertaking and are at the sum or measurement of indemnification determined by the Board of Directors to be reasonable given the circumstances set forth herein;
|
|
1.2.
|
Reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees, that you may incur or for which you will be ordered to pay by a court in the context of proceedings filed against you by or on behalf of Partner or by a third party, or in a criminal proceeding in which you are acquitted or if you are convicted, for an offense which does not require criminal intent; and
|
|
1.3.
|
Reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees that you may incur due to an investigation or proceeding conducted against you by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding and which has ended without the filing of an indictment against you and either (i) no financial liability was imposed on you in lieu of criminal proceedings, or (ii) financial liability was imposed on you in lieu of criminal proceedings but the alleged criminal offense does not require proof of criminal intent, within the meaning of the relevant terms in or in the law referred to in the Israeli Companies Law of 1999 (the “Israeli Companies Law”), or in relation to a financial sanction ("itzum caspi").
|
1.4.
|
Payment to the harmed party as a result of a violation set forth in Section 52.54(a)(1)(a) of the Israeli Securities Law of 1968 (the "Israeli Securities Law"), including by indemnification in advance.
|
1.5.
|
Expenses incurred in connection with a Procedure ("halich"), as defined in Section 56.8(a)(1) of the Israeli Securities Law (a "Procedure"), in connection with any of your affairs including, without limitation, reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees, including by indemnification in advance.
|
1.6.
|
Any other liability or expense indemnifiable under any applicable law.
|
2.
|
Partner may not indemnify you for your liability for: (i) a breach of duty of loyalty towards Partner unless you have acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not harm Partner's best interest; (ii) a breach of duty of care done intentionally or recklessly ("pzizut") except for negligence; (iii) an act intended to unlawfully yield a personal profit; (iv) a fine, a civil fine ("knass ezrahi"), a financial sanction ("itzum caspi") or a penalty ("kofer") imposed upon you; and (v) a Procedure ("halich").
|
3.
|
Indemnification pursuant to this letter will be subject to applicable law and to the following terms and conditions:
|
|
3.1.
|
That you notify Partner within a reasonable time of your learning of any legal proceedings instigated against you in connection with any event that may give rise to indemnification and that you provide Partner, or anyone specified by Partner, with any documents connected to the proceeding in question.
|
3.2.
|
That Partner reserves the right to represent you in the proceedings or to appoint legal counsel of its choice for this purpose (unless its choice of legal counsel is unacceptable to you on reasonable grounds). Partner or such legal counsel will take all necessary steps to bring the matter to a close and will keep you informed of key steps in the process. The appointed counsel will be bound by a fiduciary duty to you and to Partner. If a conflict of interests should arise between the appointed counsel and yourself, counsel will inform Partner and you will be entitled to appoint a different counsel reasonably acceptable to Partner and the terms of this indemnification agreement shall apply to the new appointment. If Partner should decide to settle by arbitration or by mediation or by settlement, it shall be allowed to do so; provided, that you do not incur any additional expense or liability due to such arbitration, mediation or settlement or that you have otherwise agreed to such arbitration, mediation or settlement. If Partner so requests, you will sign any document that will empower it or any appointed counsel to represent you and defend you in any proceeding as stated above. You will cooperate as reasonably demanded of you with Partner and any appointed legal counsel. Partner shall cover all related expenses so that you will not have to make any payments or incur any expenses yourself.
|
|
3.3.
|
That whether or not Partner shall operate in accordance with section 3.2 above, indemnification shall still cover all and every kind of expense incurred by you that is included in section 1 of this letter so that you will not have to pay or finance them yourself. You will not be indemnified for any expenses arising from a settlement, mediation or arbitration unless Partner has agreed to the settlement, mediation or arbitration.
|
|
3.4.
|
That upon your request for payment in connection with any event according to this indemnification letter, Partner shall complete all the necessary arrangements required by the law for payment and shall act to receive all necessary authorizations, if demanded. If any authorization should be required for payment, and the payment is not authorized for any reason, this payment or part of it will be subject to the approval of the court (if relevant) and Partner shall act in order to receive authorization.
|
|
3.5.
|
That in the event that you are paid for any sums in accordance with this letter of indemnification in connection with a legal proceeding, and later it becomes clear that you were not entitled to such payments, the sums will be considered as a loan given to you by Partner subject to the lowest interest rate for purposes of Section 3(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance (or any other legislation replacing it) which does not cause a taxable benefit. You shall be required to repay such amounts in accordance with the payment arrangements fixed by Partner, and at such time as Partner shall request in writing.
|
|
3.6
|
That you shall remain entitled to indemnification by Partner as provided in this letter of indemnification even when you are no longer an officer or director in Partner or in a Subsidiary on Partner’s behalf, as long as the events that led to the payments, costs and expenses for which indemnification is being sought are a result of an action or an inaction taken by you as such officer or director.
|
|
3.7
|
The terms contained in this letter will be construed in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and in the absence of any definition in the Israeli Companies Law, pursuant to the Israeli Securities Law. Schedule I hereto constitutes an integral part hereof.
|
|
3.8
|
The obligations of Partner under this letter shall be interpreted broadly and in a manner that shall facilitate its implementation, to the fullest extent permitted by law, including, ipso facto, as further expanded in the future, and for the purposes for which it was intended. Without derogating from the generality of the foregoing, it is clarified that with respect to any expansion of indemnification that is currently, or will in the future be, permitted by law following incorporation of specific provisions in Partner’s Articles of Association, such expansion be in effect ipso facto even prior to such incorporation, based on Article 34.1 of the Articles of Association, which allows indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law. In the event of a conflict between any provision of this letter and any provision of the law that cannot be superseded, changed or amended, said provision of the law shall supersede the specific provision in this letter, but shall not limit or diminish the validity of the remaining provisions of this letter.
|
|
3.9
|
The indemnification under this letter will enter into effect upon your signing a copy of the same in the appropriate place, and the delivery of such signed copy to Partner. It is hereby agreed that your agreement to accept this letter constitutes your irrevocable agreement that any previous undertaking of Partner for indemnification towards you, to the extent granted, shall become void automatically upon your signing this letter. Notwithstanding the above, if this letter shall be declared or found void for any reason whatsoever, then any previous undertaking of Partner for indemnification towards you, which this letter is intended to replace, shall remain in full force and effect.
|
|
3.10
|
Partner may, in its sole discretion and at any time, revoke its undertaking to indemnify hereunder, or reduce the Maximum Indemnity Amount (as defined in section 3.13 below) thereunder, or limit the events to which it applies, either in regard to all the officers or to some of them, to the extent such change or revocation relates solely to events that occur after the date of such change; provided, that prior notice has been given to you of its intention to do so, in writing, at least 60 days before the date on which its decision will enter into effect. No such decision will have a retroactive effect of any kind whatsoever, and the letter of indemnification prior to such change or revocation, as the case may be, will continue to apply and be in full force and effect for all purposes in relation to any event that occurred prior to such change or revocation, even if the proceeding in respect thereof is filed against you after the change or revocation of the letter of indemnification. In all other cases, this letter may not be changed unless Partner and you have agreed in writing.
|
|
3.11
|
This undertaking to indemnify is not a contract for the benefit of any third party, including any insurer, and is not assignable nor will any insurer have the right to demand participation of Partner in any payment for which an insurer is made liable under any insurance agreement that has been made with it, with the exception of the deductible specified in such agreement. For the avoidance of any doubt in the event of death this letter will apply to you and your estate.
|
|
3.12
|
No waiver, delay, forbearance to act or extension granted by Partner or by you will be construed in any circumstance as a waiver of the rights hereunder or by law, and will not prevent any such party from taking all legal and other steps as will be required in order to enforce such rights.
|
|
3.13
|
The aggregate indemnification amount payable by Partner to all directors, officers and other indemnified persons (including, inter alia, officers and directors nominated on behalf of Partner in Subsidiaries) pursuant to all letters of indemnification issued or that may be issued to them by Partner on or after 2013in the future (including, inter alia, to officers and directors nominated on behalf of Partner in Subsidiaries), which indemnification letters include a maximum indemnity amount substantially similar to the Maximum Indemnity Amount under this Section 3.13 (the “Maximum Indemnity Amount”), for any occurrence of an event set out in Schedule I hereto (each, an “Event”), will not exceed the higher of (i) 25% of shareholders equity (according to the latest reviewed or audited financial statements approved by Partner's Board of Directors prior to approval of the indemnification payment)and (ii) 25% of market capitalization, each as measured at the time of indemnification (the “Maximum Indemnity Amount”).; provided, however, that under the circumstances where indemnification for the same Event is to be made in parallel to you under this letter and to one or more indemnified persons under indemnification letters issued (or to be issued) by Partner containing a maximum indemnity amount which is the higher of 25% of shareholders equity and 25% of market capitalization (the "Combined Maximum Indemnity Amount"), the Maximum Indemnity Amount for you hereby shall be adjusted so it does not exceed the Combined Maximum Indemnity Amount to which any other indemnified person is entitled under any other indemnification letter containing the Combined Maximum Indemnity Amount.
|
|
3.14
|
The Maximum Indemnity Amount shall not be affected in any way by the existence of, or payment under, insurance policies. Payment of the indemnification shall not affect your right to receive insurance payments, if you receive the same (either personally or through Partner or on your behalf) and Partner will not be required to indemnity you for any sums that were, in fact, already paid to you or for you in respect of insurance or any other indemnification obligations made to you by any third party. In the event there is any payment made under this letter and such payment is covered by an insurance policy, Partner shall be entitled to collect such amount of payment from the insurance proceeds. You will return to Partner any amount that you may receive pursuant to this letter, which is based on data or financial results that will later on be found to be erroneous and will be restated in Partner's financial statements, as will be implemented by Partner's Board of Directors.
|
|
3.15
|
In the event If the indemnification amount Partner is required to pay to its directors and other indemnified persons, as mentioned in section 1 above, exceeds at any time the Maximum Indemnity Amount or the balance of the Maximum Indemnity Amount in accordance with section 3.13 above after deducting any indemnification amounts paid or payable by Partner to any of its directors or other indemnified persons at such time (all, as determined and clarified in Section 3.13 above or in the other applicable indemnification letters), such Maximum Indemnification Amount or such remaining balance will be allocated among the directors and the other indemnified persons entitled to indemnification, in the same ratio as with respect to any eEvent the amount for which each individual directors or other indemnified persons may be indemnified is to the aggregate amount that all of the relevant directors and other indemnified persons involved in the eEvent may be indemnified.
|
|
3.16
|
The foregoing does not derogate from Partner's right to indemnify you retroactively in accordance with that permitted by the Articles of Association of Partner and applicable law.
|
1.
|
Any offering of Partner’s securities to private investors and/or to the public and listing of such securities, and/or the offer by Partner to purchase securities from the public and/or from private investors or other holders, and any undertakings, representations, warranties and other obligations related to any such offering and Partner’s status as a public company or as an issuer of securities.
|
2.
|
All matters relating to Partner’s status, obligations and/or actions as a public company, and/or the fact that Partner’s securities were issued to the public or to private investors and/or are or were traded on a stock exchange (including, without limitation, Nasdaq stock market, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange), whether in Israel or abroad.
|
3.
|
The erection, construction and operation of Partner’s mobile telephone network, including the erection and operation of antennas and other equipment and environmental issues, including undertakings, activities and communications with authorities regarding the foregoing and including the work performed by Partner’s subcontractors in connection therewith.
|
4.
|
The purchase, distribution, marketing and sale of handsets, other terminal equipment and any other of Partner’s products and/or any marketing plans and/or publications.
|
5.
|
A Transaction, Extraordinary Transaction, or an Activity within the meaning of Section 1 of the Israeli Companies Law, including negotiations for entering into a Transaction or an Activity, the transfer, sale, acquisition or charge of assets or liabilities (including securities) or the grant or acceptance of a right in any one of them, receiving credit and the grant of collateral, as well as any act directly or indirectly involving such a Transaction or Activity.
|
6.
|
Investments which Partner and/or its Subsidiaries and/or its affiliates make in other entities whether before and/or after the investment is made, entering into the transaction, the execution, development and monitoring thereof, including actions taken or alleged omissions by you in the name of Partner and/or any subsidiary thereof and/or any affiliates thereof as a director, officer, employee and/or a board observer of the entity which is the subject of the transaction and the like.
|
7.
|
The merger acquisition or other business combination or restructuring, or any such proposed transaction and any decision related to it (by Partner or another person) of Partner, any subsidiary thereof and/or any affiliate thereof with, of or into another entity and/or the sale or proposed sale of the operations and/or business, or part thereof, or any dissolution, receivership, creditors' arrangement, stay of proceeding or any similar proceeding, of Partner, any of its Subsidiaries and/or any of its affiliates.
|
8.
|
Tender offers for Partner's securities, including in connection with Partner's Board of Directors' opinion regarding a Special Tender Offer as defined in the Israeli Companies Law or refraining from such opinion.
|
9.
|
Labor relations and/or employment matters in Partner, its Subsidiaries and/or its affiliates and trade relations of Partner, its Subsidiaries and/or its affiliates, including with independent contractors, customers, suppliers and service providers.
|
10.
|
The testing of products developed and/or marketed by Partner, its Subsidiaries and/or its affiliates and/or in connection with the distribution, sale, license or use of such products.
|
11.
|
The intellectual property of Partner, its Subsidiaries and/or its affiliates, and its protection, including the registration or assertion of rights to intellectual property and the defense of claims relating to intellectual property infringement.
|
12.
|
Actions taken (or alleged omissions) pursuant to or in accordance with the policies and procedures of Partner, its Subsidiaries and/or its affiliates, whether such policies and procedures are published or not.
|
13.
|
The borrowing or other receipt of funds and any other financing transaction or arrangement, or any such proposed transaction or arrangement, whether or not requiring the imposition of any pledge or lien.
|
14.
|
Any Distribution (“haluka” - as defined in the Israeli Companies Law).
|
|
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any share repurchase and distribution of dividends, including, without limitation, in 2005 and distribution of dividends during the calendar years of 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 (including the special dividend distribution as of March 2010, approved by the District Court), 2011 and 2012.
|
15.
|
Taking part in or performing tenders.
|
16.
|
The making of any statement, including a representation or opinion made by an officer or director of Partner in such capacity whether in public or private, including during meetings of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof.
|
17.
|
An act in contradiction to the Articles of Association or Memorandum of Partner.
|
18.
|
Any action or omission in connection with voting rights in Partner.
|
19.
|
Any action or decision in relation to work safety and/or working conditions.
|
20.
|
Actions taken pursuant to any of Partner’s licenses, or any breach thereof.
|
21.
|
Decisions and/or actions pertaining to the environment and/or the safety of handsets, including radiation or dangerous substances.
|
22.
|
A payment to the harmed party as a result of a violation set forth in Section 52.54(a)(1)(a) of the Israeli Securities Law.
|
23.
|
Negotiation for, signing and performance or non-performance of insurance policies.
|
24.
|
Events associated with the drawing up and/or approval of financial statements, including the acts or omissions relating to the adoption of financial reports (including International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS), preparation and signing Partner's financial statements, consolidated or on a sole basis, as applicable, as well as the editing or approval of the Directors' report or business plans and forecasts, providing an estimate of the effectiveness of Partner's internal controls and other matters in connection with the financial statements and Directors' report and provision of statements relating to the financial statements.
|
25.
|
Events associated with business plans, including pricing, marketing, distribution, directives to employees, customers and suppliers and collaborations with other parties.
|
26.
|
Reporting and/or filing of applications or reports, under any applicable law (including immediate reports, periodic or other), disclosure, messaging, providing (or failure to provide) information, statements, declarations, evaluations, presentations, opinions, reviews, requests for approval, or otherwise to any governmental or quasi-governmental authority, stock exchange or regulatory body whether in Israel or abroad.
|
27.
|
Actions and any legal process, whether in Israel or abroad, relating, directly or indirectly, to any governmental or quasi-governmental authority, including with respect to trade restrictions, restrictive arrangements, mergers and monopolies.
|
28.
|
Investigations conducted against you by any governmental or quasi-governmental authority.
|
29.
|
Class actions, including class actions in respect of the environment, consumer protection or complaints, roaming, content services, the Communications Law of 1982, any of Partner’s licenses, Partner’s contracts, and anti-trust, derivative actions or any other legal proceedings against you and/or Partner and/or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with your role and/or activities in Partner or on its behalf.
|
30.
|
All matters relating to the change of control transaction, entered into on August 12, 2009, between Advent Investments Pte. Ltd. and Scailex Corporation Ltd. (“Scailex”), under which Scailex agreed to acquire 78,940,104 Ordinary Shares of Partner.
|
31.
|
All matters relating to a potential sale of Partner’s securities by Scailex Corporation Ltd., any affiliates thereof or any other Material Shareholder (“ba’al menaya mahuti”) of Partner.
|
32.
|
Transactions or agreements entered into between Partner and any of its shareholders or between shareholders of Partner.
|
33.
|
Transfer of information to shareholders or potential shareholders of Partner, including Interested Parties.
|
34.
|
All matters relating to breach of Partner contracts.
|
35.
|
Activities Partner may pursue in new areas such as transmission services, access to high-speed Internet services, fixed line and long-distance telephony services, cable television and other communication services to subscribers.
|
36.
|
Establishment, registration, administration, or making use of registries and information databases, including as required by the provisions of the Protection of Privacy Law of 1981 (including regulations, orders, directives, rules or provisions and instructions) issued by any competent authority or by virtue of those authorities and any decision or other action relating to said law.
|
37.
|
A suspicion as to perpetration of an offence and/or breach of a statutory obligation under any law because of an action taken by Partner and that, according to any law, can also be attributed to you and/or because of an action taken by you by virtue of your function as officer or director in Partner and/or that was taken for the sake of Partner and/or on its behalf.
|
38.
|
A payment or non-payment to any governmental authority under any applicable law, including the payment of income tax, sales tax, betterment tax on real estate, transfer taxes, excise, value added tax, stamp tax, customs, National Insurance payments, municipal levies, royalty fees or any other fees, levies, financial sanction ("itzum caspi") in connection with any of Partner’s licenses, and including any kind of fines, interest and linkage increments.
|
39.
|
Any other actions which can be anticipated for companies of the type of Partner, and which the Board of Directors may deem appropriate.
|
40.
|
Any of the foregoing events, relating to your service as an officer or director in any of Partner's Subsidiaries on Partner's behalf.
|
41.
|
Any of the foregoing events, as it may relate to 012 Smile Telecom Ltd. or to any company in which it has a direct or indirect interest.
|
Annex “E”
|
Translation of Sections 21-24 of the License
|
Transfer of Means of Control
|
21.1
|
A holding of ten percent (10%) or more of any of the Means of Control in the Licensee will not be transferred, either directly or indirectly, either all at once or in parts, unless given the Minister’s prior written consent.
|
21.2
|
None of the said Means of Control, or a part of them, in the Licensee, may be transferred in any way, if as a result of the transfer, control in the Licensee will be transferred from one person to another, unless given the Minister’s prior written consent.
|
21.3
|
No control shall be acquired, either direct or indirect, in the Licensee, and no person, whether on his/her own or together with his/her relative or with those acting with him/her on a regular basis, shall acquire in it ten percent (10%) or more of any of the Means of Control in the Licensee, whether all at once or in parts, unless given the Minister’s prior written consent.
|
21.4
|
1Cancelled
|
21.5
|
2Despite the provisions of sub-clauses 21.1 and 21.3 above, should there occur a transfer or purchase of a percentage of Tradable Means of Control in the Licensee requiring consent under clauses 21.1 and 21.3 (other than a transfer of purchase that results in a transfer of control), without the Minister’s consent having been sought, the Licensee shall report this to the Minister in writing, and shall make an application to the Minister to approve the said transfer or purchase of the Means of Control in the Licensee, within 21 days of the date on which the Licensee became aware of such.
|
|
In this Clause 21, “Tradable Means of Control” – Means of Control, including Global or American Depository Shares (GDR’s or ADR’s), or similar certificates, registered for trading on the securities exchange in Israel or overseas, and offered to the public by prospectus, or held by the public in Israel or overseas.
|
21.6
|
Neither the entry into an underwriting agreement relating to the issue or sale of securities to the public, the registration for trading on the securities exchange in Israel or overseas, nor the deposit or registration of securities with a registration company or with a depository agent or a custodian for the purpose of registration of GDRs or ADRs or similar certificates relating to the issue or sale of securities to the public shall in and of themselves be considered as a transfer of Means of Control in the Licensee3.
|
21.7
|
(a)
|
Irregular Holdings shall be noted in the Licensee’s members register (the list of shareholders) stating the fact that they are irregular, immediately upon the Licensee’s becoming aware of this, and a notice of the registration shall be given by the Licensee to the holder of such Irregular Holding and to the Minister.
|
|
(b)
|
Irregular Holdings, noted as aforesaid in clause 21.7(a), shall not provide the holder with any rights, and shall be “dormant shares” as defined in Section 308 of the Companies Law 5759-1999, expect in the case of the receipt of a dividend or any other distribution to shareholders (especially the right to participate in an allotment of rights calculated on the basis of holdings of Means of Control in the Licensee, although holdings accumulated as aforesaid shall also be considered as Irregular Holdings), and therefore no action or claim of the activation of a right by virtue of the Irregular Holdings shall have any force, except in the case of the receipt of a dividend or any other distribution as aforesaid.
|
|
Without derogating form the generality of the above:
|
|
(1)
|
A shareholder who takes part in a vote during a meeting of shareholders shall advise the Licensee prior to the vote, or in the case of documentary voting on the voting document, whether his holdings in the Licensee or his voting require consent under clauses 21 and 23 of the License or not; where a shareholder does not so advise, he may not vote and his vote shall not count.
|
|
(2)
|
No director of the Licensee shall be appointed, elected or transferred from office by virtue of an Irregular Holding; should a director be appointed, elected or transferred from office as aforesaid, the said appointment, election or transfer, as the case may be, shall be of no effect.
|
|
(3)
|
Irregular Holdings shall not provide voting rights in the general meeting;
|
|
(c)
|
The provisions of clause 21.7 shall be included in the Articles of Association of the Licensee, including the provisions of clause 21.9, mutatis mutandis.
|
21.8
|
For so long as the Articles of Association of the Licensee provide as set out in clause 21.7, and the Licensee acts in accordance with the provisions of clauses 21.5 and 21.7, and for so long as none of the holdings of Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes4 reduces to less than 26% 5 6 7 of all Means of Control in the Licensee immediately prior to the listing of the shares for trade, and for so long as the Articles of Association of the Licensee provide that a majority of the voting power in the general meeting of the Licensee may appoint all members of the Board of Directors of the Licensee, other than external directors required by any law and/or the relevant Exchange Rules, the Irregular Holdings shall not, in and of themselves, give rise to a cause for the cancellation of the Licensee.
|
|
For the purpose of this article: "Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes"- Matbit Telecommunications Systems Ltd., Advent Investment Pte Limited, Matav Investments Ltd and Tapuz Cellular Systems limited Partnership as well as any other entity that one of them has transferred the Means of Control in the Licensee to, with the Minister's consent, before 4.7.2004 (each of the above entities shall be termed "Founding Shareholder"), as well as any other entity that a Founding Shareholder will transfer Means of Control in the Licensee to after 4.7.2004, provided that the Minister gave his written consent that the transferree be considered for this matter as the Founding Shareholder's substitute from the date to be determined by the Minister, including anyone that is an Israel Entity as defined in Article 22A.2, that purchased Means of Control from the Licensee and received the Minister's approval to be considered a founding shareholder or their substitute from the date set by the Minister8. Such consent under this article does not exempt the Licensee from the obligation to receive the Minister's consent for every transfer of the Means of Control in the Licensee that requires the Minister's consent in accordance with any other article in the License.9
|
21.9
|
The provisions of clauses 21.5 through 21.8 shall not apply to the founding shareholders or their substitutes.10
|
7Amendment No. 31
|
22.
|
Placing a Charge on Means of Control
|
|
Any shareholder in the company that holds the License, or a shareholder in an Interested Party in the same company, is not allowed to encumber his/her shares, in a way that the realization of the charge would cause a change in the ownership in ten percent (10%) or more of any of the Means of Control in the Licensee, unless the charge agreement includes a constraint, according to which the charge cannot be realized without prior consent, in writing, by the Minister.
|
22A.
|
Israeli Requirement and Holdings of Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes11
|
22A.1.
|
The total cumulative holdings of the "Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes", as defined in Article 21.8, (including anyone that is an “Israeli Entity” as defined in Article 22.2A below, that purchased Means of Control from the Licensee and received the Minister’s approval to be considered a founding shareholder or their substitute from the date set by the Minister), and are bound by an agreement for the fulfillment of the provisions of Article 22A of the License (in this Article they will all be considered “Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes”) shall not be reduced to less than 26% of each of the Means of Control in the Licensee.
|
22A.2
|
The total cumulative holdings of "Israeli Entities", one or more, that are considered as one of the Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes, from the total holdings of Founding Shareholders or their Substitutes as set forth in Article 22A.1 above, shall not be reduced at all times to less than 5% of the total issued share capital and from each of the Means of Control in the Licensee. For this matter, the issued share capital of the Licensee shall be calculated by deducting the number of “Dormant Shares” held by the Licensee.
|
|
In this Article-
|
|
"Israeli Entity"- for an individual-an Israeli citizen or resident of Israel, For a corporation- a corporation that was incorporated in Israel and an individual that is a citizen and a resident of Israel, controls the corporation either directly or indirectly, as long as the indirect control shall be only through a corporation that was incorporated in Israel, one or more. However, for the matter of indirect holdings, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Communications may approve holdings through a corporation that has not been incorporated in Israel, as long as the corporation does not directly hold shares in the Licensee, and only if they are convinced that this will not derogate from the provisions of this article. For this matter, “Israeli citizen”- as defined in the Nationality Law, 5712-1952; “resident”-as defined in the Inhabitants Registry Law, 5725-1965.
|
11 |
Amendment No. 31-Amendment No. 31 will come into effect upon completion of all of the obligations set forth in article 22A and no later than 30 June 2005, in accordance with the Ministry of Communications document 62/05-4031 dated 13 March 2005
|
|
For this matter, "Dormant Shares"- as defined in Article 308 of the Companies Law, 5759-1999.
|
22A.3
|
At least one tenth (10%) of the members of the Board of Directors of the Licensee shall be appointed by the Israeli Entities as set forth in Article 22A.2. Notwithstanding the above-mentioned, for this matter- if the Board of Directors of the Licensee shall consist of up to 14 members – at least one director shall be appointed by the Israeli entities as set forth in Article 22.2A above, if the Board of Directors of the Licensee shall consist of between 15 and 24 members-at least 2 directors shall be appointed by the Israeli entities as set forth in Article 22.2A above and so on and so forth.
|
22A.4
|
The Licensee's Board of Directors shall appoint from among its members that have security clearance and security compatibility to be determined by the General Security Service (hereinafter: “ Directors with Clearance”) a committee to be designated "the Committee for Security Matters", or CSM.
|
|
The CSM shall consist of at least 4 Directors with Clearance including at least one External Director. Security matters shall be discussed, subject to Article 22A.5, solely by the CSM. A resolution that was adopted or an action that was taken by the CSM, shall have the same effect as a resolution that was adopted or an action that was taken by the Board of Directors and shall be discussed by the Board of Directors only if necessary in accordance with Article 22A.5 and subject to Article 22A.5.
|
|
In this article-“security matters”-as defined in the Bezeq Order (Determination of Essential Service Provided by “Bezeq”, the Israeli Telecommunications Company Ltd), 5757-1997, as of March 9, 2005.
|
22A.5
|
Security matters that the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee of the Licensee shall be required to consider in accordance with the mandatory provisions of the Companies Law, 5759-1999, or in accordance with the mandatory provisions of any other law that applies to the Licensee shall be discussed, if they need to be discussed by the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee, only in the presence of Directors with Clearance. Directors that do not have security clearance shall not be allowed to participate in this Board of Directors or Audit Committee meeting and shall not be entitled to receive information or to review documents that relate to this matter. The legal quorum for such meetings shall include only Directors with Clearance.
|
|
The Licensee may set out in its Articles of Association that an Office Holder, who in the capacity of his position or based on the provisions of the law or the Articles of Association, should have received information or participate in security matter meetings and this was denied him due to Article 22A.5, will be released from any liability for any claim of breach of duty of care towards the Licensee, if the breach of duty of care was a result of his or her inability to participate in the meetings or receive information.
|
22A.6
|
The shareholders at a general meeting shall not be entitled to assume, delegate, transfer or exercise any of the authorities granted to another organ in the company, regarding security matters
|
22A.7
|
(a) The Minister shall appoint an observer for the Board of Directors and committee meetings, who has security clearance and security compatibility that will be determined by the General Security Services.
|
|
(b) The observer shall be a government employee, qualified to serve as a director, in accordance with Chapter C of the Government Companies Law, 5735-1975.
|
|
(c) In addition, and without derogating from any duty imposed on him by any law, the observer shall be bound by confidentiality towards the Licensee, except as the matter may be required to fulfill his responsibilities as an observer. The observer shall not act as an observer or in any other capacity for any entity that deals with the provision of telecommunication services and directly competes with the Licensee, and shall refrain from any conflict of interest between his position as an observer and between the Licensee, excluding conflicts of interest that result from his being a government employee that is fulfilling his responsibilities as an observer with the Licensee. The observer shall undertake towards the Licensee not to serve as an observer or an office holder, and not to fulfill a position or be employed, directly or indirectly by any entity that directly competes with the Licensee or has a conflict of interest with the Licensee, excluding a conflict of interest that results from his being a government employee that is fulfilling his responsibilities as an observer with the Licensee throughout the duration of his position as an observer with the Licensee and for eighteen months after he completes this term.
|
|
In any case of a dispute regarding a conflict of interest of the observer, the matter shall be decided by the State Attorney General or a person on his behalf.
|
|
(d) Notices to Board of Director and committee meetings, including the CSM, shall be sent to the observer and he shall be entitled to participate as an observer in each such meeting.
|
|
(e) The observer's entitlement to receive information from the Licensee, shall be the same as a director. If the Licensee believes that certain information that is sensitive business information is not required by the observer in order to fulfill his duties, the Licensee may delay delivery of such information to the observer and shall inform him accordingly. If the observer believes that he should receive such information, the matter shall be decided by the head of the General Security Services.
|
|
(f) If the observer believes that the Licensee adopted or is about to adopt a resolution regarding security matters, contrary to the provisions of the License, contrary to Article 13 of the Law or contrary to the provisions of Article 11 of the General Security Services Law, 5762-2002, he shall immediately notify the Licensee in writing. Such a notice shall be sent to the chairman of the Board of Directors and to the chairman of the CSM and adequate time shall be given, under the circumstances of the case, to remedy the breach or to change the resolution, if possible.
|
22A.8
|
The provisions of Article 22A of the License shall be adopted in the Articles of Association of the Licensee.
|
Section C: Cross-Ownership and Conflict of Interests
|
23.
|
Prohibition of Cross-Ownership
|
23.1
|
The Licensee, an Office Holder or an Interested Party in the Licensee, as well as an Office Holder in an Interested Party in the Licensee, shall not hold, either directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of any Means of Control in a Competing MRT Operator, and shall not serve as an Office Holder in a Competing MRT Operator or in an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator; for this matter, “Holding” includes holding as an agent.
|
23.2
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 23.1, the Minister may, based upon written request, permit an Office Holder in the Licensee to serve as an Office Holder in an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator, or permit an Office Holder in an Interested Party in the Licensee to serve as an Office Holder in a Competing MRT Operator or in an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator, if he is satisfied, that this will not harm the competition in MRT Services; the Minister may condition the granting of such permit on conditions that the Office Holder must fulfill for prevention of harm to the competition as aforesaid.
|
23.3
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 23.1, an Interested Party in the Licensee, which is a trust fund, an insurance company, an investment company or a pension fund, may hold up to ten percent (10%) of the Means of Control in a Competing MRT Operator, and an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator, which is a trust fund, an insurance company, an investment company or a pension fund, may hold up to ten percent (10%) of the Means of Control in the Licensee, provided it does not have a representative or an appointee on its behalf among the Office Holders of a Competing MRT Operator or of the Licensee, as the case may be, unless it is required to do so by law.
|
23.4
|
The Licensee, an Office Holder or an Interested Party in the Licensee, as well as an Office Holder in an Interested Party in the Licensee, will not control a Competing MRT Operator, and will not cause it, by any act or omission, to be controlled by a Competing MRT Operator or by an Office Holder or an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator, or by an Office Holder in an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator, or by a person or corporation that controls a Competing MRT Operator.
|
23.5
|
The rate of indirect holding in a corporation will be a product of the percentage of holdings in each stage of the chain of ownership, subject to what is set out in Paragraph 23.6; for example:
|
|
(A)
|
‘A’ holds 40% in Company ‘B’;
|
|
(B)
|
Company ‘B’ holds 40% in Company ‘C’;
|
|
(C)
|
Company ‘C’ holds 25% in Company ‘D’;
|
|
(D)
|
Therefore, Company ‘A’ holds, indirectly, 4% of Company ‘D’.
|
23.6
|
For the matter of this Paragraph and Paragraphs 14.1 (G) (6), (7), (8), (8a), (9) and 21.4, if a certain body (hereinafter: “the Controlling Body”) controls another body that has holdings, directly or indirectly, in the Licensee (hereinafter: “the Controlled Body”), the Controlling Body, and also any other body controlled by the Controlling Body, will be attributed with the rate of holdings in the Licensee that the Controlled Body has, directly or indirectly; according to the following examples:
|
|
A.
|
Direct holdings:
|
|
(1)
|
‘A’ holds 50% in Company ‘B’, and controls it;
|
|
(2)
|
Company ‘B’ holds 50% in Company ‘C’, and controls it;
|
|
(3)
|
Company ‘C’ holds 10% in the Licensee and does not control it;
|
|
(4)
|
Therefore, notwithstanding that ‘A’s’ holdings in the Licensee in accordance with the instructions of Paragraph 5.6 are 2.5%, ‘A’ and also any body controlled by ‘A’ will be deemed as an Interested Party holding 10% in the Licensee.
|
|
B.
|
Indirect holdings:
|
|
(1)
|
‘A’ holds 50% of Company ‘B’ and controls it;
|
|
(2)
|
Company ‘B’ holds 40% of Company ‘C’ and controls it;
|
|
(3)
|
Company ‘C’ holds 40% of Company ‘D’ and does not control it;
|
|
(4)
|
Company ‘D’ holds 40% of the Licensee and does not control it;
|
|
(5)
|
Therefore, ‘A’ and any body controlled by ‘A’ will be regarded as having a holding in the Licensee at the rate of holdings of Company ‘C’ in the Licensee, which is holdings of 16% (according to the method set out in Paragraph 23.5 for the calculation of the rate of indirect holdings in the absence of control), and in this manner, ‘A’ and any body controlled by ‘A’ is an Interested Party in the Licensee.
|
23.7
|
If a certain body has indirect holding in the Licensee, through two or more Interested Parties, then for the purpose of its definition as an Interested Party, and for the purpose of determining the rate of holding with regard to this Paragraph, the greatest indirect rate of holding will be taken into account, and also any rate of holding that derives from the chain of holdings through which the said holding body is attributed with the holdings of corporations controlled by it in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 23.6; the rates of holdings that derive from two or more chains that will be taken into account as stated above, will be cumulative for the purpose of calculating the rate of holdings.
|
23.8
|
The Minister may, in response to a written request, permit an Interested Party in the Licensee to hold, either directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more in any of the Means of Control of a Competing MRT Operator, if the Minister is satisfied that this will not harm competition in the MRT field; 12the Minister may condition the granting of the said permit on a condition that the Interested Party in the Licensee or competing MRT Operator is an Interested Party merely by virtue of the provisions of Article 23.6 .
|
24.
|
Prohibition of Conflict of Interests
|
|
The Licensee, any body in which the Licensee is an Interested Party, an Office Holder in the Licensee or an Interested Party in the company holding the License or an Office Holder in an Interested Party therein, will not be party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with a Competing MRT Operator, or an Interested Party or an Office Holder in it, or an Office Holder in an Interested Party in a Competing MRT Operator, or any other body in which a Competing MRT Operator is an Interested Party, which are intended to or might reduce or harm competition in anything that pertains to MRT Services, MRT Terminal Equipment or any other Telecommunications Services.
|
1.
|
Approval of a Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and S.B. Israel Telecom Ltd.
|
2.
|
Approval of a compensation policy for the Company's office holders.
|
3.
|
Approval and ratification of the grant of Indemnification Letters to the following directors: (i) Mr. Shlomo Rodav, (ii) Mr. Ilan Ben-Dov, (iii) Mr. Adam Chesnoff, (iv) Mr. Fred Gluckman, (v) Mr. Sumeet Jaisinghani, (vi) Mr. Yoav Rubinstein, (vii) Mr. Arieh Saban, (viii) Mr. Yahel Shachar and (ix) Mr. Elon Shalev ("Indemnified Persons").
|
|
(i)
|
“RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Shlomo Rodav and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(ii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Ilan Ben-Dov and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(iii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Adam Chesnoff and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(iv)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Fred Gluckman and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(v)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Sumeet Jaisinghani and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(vi)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Yoav Rubinstein and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(vii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Arieh Saban and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter;
|
|
(viii)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Yahel Shachar and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter; and
|
|
(ix)
|
RESOLVED: to approve and ratify the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Elon Shalev and to provide him with the Revised Indemnification Letter.
|
Item No.
|
Subject of the Resolution
|
Votea
|
In respect of transaction’s approval pursuant to sections 255, 267A and 275 - do you have a “Personal Interest” in the resolution or constitute a “Controlling Party”b?
|
||||
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
Yesc
|
No
|
|||
1)
|
Approval of a registration rights agreement between the Company and S.B. Israel Telecom Ltd.
|
||||||
2)
|
Approval of a compensation policy for the Company's Office Holders.
|
||||||
3)
|
Approval and ratification of the grant of Indemnification Letters to the following directors:
|
||||||
(i)
|
Shlomo Rodav
|
||||||
(ii)
|
Ilan Ben-Dov
|
||||||
(iii)
|
Adam Chesnoff
|
||||||
(iv)
|
Fred Gluckman
|
||||||
(v)
|
Sumeet Jaisinghani
|
||||||
(vi)
|
Yoav Rubinstein
|
||||||
(vii)
|
Arieh Saban
|
||||||
(viii)
|
Yahel Shachar
|
||||||
(ix)
|
Elon Shalev
|
o
|
Yes. I approve the declaration below.
|
o
|
No. I do not approve the declaration below. I hold, together with others, ________ Ordinary Shares of Partner.
|
|
I declare that my holdings and my vote DO NOT require the consent of the Israeli Minister of Communications pursuant to (i) Sections 21 (Transfer of Means of Control) or 23 (Prohibition of Cross-Ownership) of the Company’s General License for the Provision of Mobile Radio Telephone Services using the Cellular Method in Israel dated April 7, 1998, as amended (the “License”); or (ii) any other license granted, directly or indirectly, to Partnere.
|
Signature | |
Name (Print): ___________ | |
Title: __________________
Date: __________________
|
a
|
If an X is not marked in either column, or if an X is marked in more than one column, the vote shall be considered as an abstention on the relevant item.
|
b
|
Kindly provide details regarding the nature of your Personal Interest in the resolution, or why you constitute a Controlling Party in the Company, at the designated space after the table. “Personal Interest” is defined in Section 1 of the Israeli Companies Law as a person’s personal interest in an act or a transaction of a company, including, without limitation, the personal interest of a person's relative and the personal interest of an entity in which the person or the person's relative is an interested party. Holding shares in a company does not give rise to a “Personal Interest.” “Personal Interest” includes, without limitation, a personal interest of a person voting by proxy which was given by another person, even if the other person does not have a personal interest, and a person voting on behalf of a person having a personal interest will be deemed as having a personal interest, whether the voting discretion is in the voter’s hands or not. The Israeli Companies Law refers to the definition of “Control” in Section 1 of the Israeli Securities Law (1968), defining "Control" as the ability to direct the activity of a company, except for ability stemming only from being a director or holding another position in that company, and it is presumed that a person is controlling a company if said person holds half or more of a of certain type of means of control in a company (the right to vote in the shareholders general meeting or in a similar organ in another corporation or the right to appoint directors of the company or its general manager).
|
c
|
If an X is not marked in either column, or if an X is marked in the “Yes” column and the shareholder does not provide details regarding the nature of the Personal Interest or the Controlling Party Interest, or an X is marked in both columns, the vote shall be disqualified.
|
d
|
In the event that the shareholder is an “Interested Party”, as defined in the License, voting in a different manner with respect to each part of the shareholder's Ordinary Shares, a separate Deed of Vote should be filed for each quantity of Ordinary Shares in respect of which the shareholder intends to vote differently.
|
e
|
Under certain licenses granted, directly or indirectly, to Partner, approval of, or notice to, the Minister of Communications of the State of Israel may be required for holding of 5% or more of Partner's means of control.
|
To:
|
Partner Communications Company Ltd. (the “Company”)
|
Attn:
|
Roly Klinger, Adv., Company Secretary
|
1
|
Name of shareholder.
|
2
|
A shareholder is entitled to give several Deeds of Authorization, each of which refers to a different quantity of Ordinary Shares of the Company held by the shareholder, so long as the shareholder shall not give Deeds of Authorization with respect to an aggregate number of Ordinary Shares exceeding the total number of shares held by him.
|
3
|
In the event that the proxy does not hold an Israeli Identification number, indicate a passport number, if any, and the name of the country in which the passport was issued.
|
4
|
Kindly provide details regarding the nature of your Personal Interest in the resolution, or why you constitute a Controlling Party in the Company, at the designated space after the table (on page 3). “Personal Interest” is defined in Section 1 of the Israeli Companies Law (1999) (the “Israeli Companies Law”) as a person’s personal interest in an act or a transaction of a company, including, without limitation, the personal interest of a person's relative and the personal interest of an entity in which the person or the person's relative is an interested party. Holding shares in a company itself does not give rise to a “Personal Interest”. “Personal Interest” includes, without limitation, a personal interest of a person voting by proxy which was given by another person, even if the other person does not have a personal interest, and a person voting on behalf of a person having a personal interest will be deemed as having a personal interest, whether the voting discretion is in the voter’s hands or not. The Israeli Companies Law refers to the definition of “Control” in Section 1 of the Israeli Securities Law (1968), defining "Control" as the ability to direct the activity of a company, except for ability stemming only from being a director or holding another position in that company, and it is presumed that a person is controlling a company if said person holds half or more of a of certain type of means of control in a company (the right to vote in the shareholders general meeting or in a similar organ in another corporation or the right to appoint directors of the company or its general manager).
|
Item No.
|
Subject of the Resolution
|
Vote5
|
In respect of transaction’s approval pursuant to sections 255, 267A and 275 - do you have a “Personal Interest” in the resolution or constitute a “Controlling Party”4?
|
||||
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
Yes6
|
No
|
|||
1)
|
Approval of a registration rights agreement between the Company and S.B. Israel Telecom Ltd.
|
||||||
2)
|
Approval of a compensation policy for the Company's office holders.
|
||||||
3)
|
Approval and ratification of the grant of Indemnification Letters to the following directors:
|
||||||
(i)
|
Shlomo Rodav
|
||||||
(ii)
|
Ilan Ben-Dov
|
||||||
(iii)
|
Adam Chesnoff
|
||||||
(iv)
|
Fred Gluckman
|
||||||
(v)
|
Sumeet Jaisinghani
|
||||||
(vi)
|
Yoav Rubinstein
|
||||||
(vii)
|
Arieh Saban
|
||||||
(viii)
|
Yahel Shachar
|
||||||
(ix)
|
Elon Shalev
|
•
|
Yes. I approve the declaration below.
|
•
|
No. I do not approve the declaration below. I hold, together with others, ________ Ordinary Shares of Partner.
|
|
I declare that my holdings and my vote DO NOT require the consent of the Israeli Minister of Communications pursuant to (i) Sections 21 (Transfer of Means of Control) or 23 (Prohibition of Cross-Ownership) of the Company’s General License for the Provision of Mobile Radio Telephone Services using the Cellular Method in Israel dated April 7, 1998, as amended (the “License”)8; or (ii) any other license granted, directly or indirectly, to Partner9.
|
Date: _____________
|
__________________________
Signature
Name (print):_______________
Title: _____________________
|
7
|
In the event that the shareholder is an “Interested Party,” as defined in the License, voting in a different manner with respect to each part of the shareholder's Ordinary Shares, a separate Deed of Authorization should be filed for each quantity of Ordinary Shares in respect of which the shareholder intends to vote differently.
|
8
|
A translation of sections 21-24 of the License is attached as Annex “E” to the Proxy Statement distributed with this Deed of Authorization.
|
9
|
Under certain licenses granted, directly or indirectly, to Partner, approval of, or notice to, the Minister of Communications of the State of Israel may be required for holding of 5% or more of Partner's means of control.
|
Partner Communications Company Ltd.
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ Ziv Leitman | |
Name: | Ziv Leitman | ||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer | ||