UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-Q
QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY
Investment Company Act file number 811-22591
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
9 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
Joseph Moroney, President
9 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (212) 515-3200
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: March 31, 2013
Item 1. Schedule of Investments.
The Schedule(s) of Investments is attached herewith.
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments
March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
See accompanying Notes to Schedule of Investments. | 1
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (continued)
March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
2 | See accompanying Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Schedule of Investments (continued)
March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
(a) | Senior Loans are senior, secured loans made to companies whose debt is rated below investment grade and investments with similar characteristics. Senior Loans typically hold a first lien interest and pay interest at rates that are periodically determined on the basis of a floating base lending rate plus a spread. Unless otherwise identified, all Senior Loans carry a variable rate of interest. These base lending rates are generally (i) the lending rate offered by one or more European banks such as the London Interbank Offered Rate, (ii) the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks and/or (iii) the certificate of deposit rate used by commercial lenders. The rate shown represents the weighted average rate at March 31, 2013. Senior Loans are generally not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the 1933 Act) and often contain certain restrictions on resale and cannot be sold publicly. Senior Loans often require prepayments from excess cash flow or permit the borrower to repay at its election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturity shown. |
(b) | All or a portion of this position has not settled. Full contract rates do not take effect until settlement date. |
(c) | Foreign issuer traded in U.S. dollars. |
(d) | Fair Value Level 3 security. All remaining securities are categorized as Level 2. |
(e) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A under the 1933 Act. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration to qualified institutional buyers. At March 31, 2013, these securities amounted to $76,052,209 or 28.3% of net assets. |
(f) | When-issued security with settlement to occur at a later date. The value of this security is subject to market flucuations from the date purchased. |
(g) | Asset backed securities include collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). A CLO typically takes the form of a financing company (generally called a Special Purpose Vehicle or SPV), created to reapportion the risk and return characteristics of a pool of assets. While the assets underlying CLOs are often Senior Loans or corporate notes and bonds, the assets may also include (i) subordinated loans; (ii) debt tranches of other CLOs; and (iii) equity securities incidental to investments in Senior Loans. The Fund may invest in lower tranches of CLOs, which typically experience a lower recovery, greater risk of loss or deferral or non-payment of interest than more senior tranches of the CLO. A key feature of the CLO structure is the prioritization of the cash flows from a pool of debt securities among the several classes of the CLO. The SPV is a company founded for the purpose of securitizing payment claims arising out of this asset pool. On this basis, marketable securities are issued by the SPV which, due to the diversification of the underlying risk, generally represent a lower level of risk than the original assets. The redemption of the securities issued by the SPV typically takes place at maturity out of the cash flow generated by the collected claims. |
(h) | Floating rate asset. The interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at March 31, 2013. |
(i) | Cost for U.S. federal income tax purposes is identical to book basis. Unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments are as follows: |
Gross unrealized appreciation |
$ | 2,117,234 | ||||
Gross unrealized depreciation |
(83,075 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||
Net unrealized appreciation |
$ | 2,034,159 | ||||
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Schedule of Investments. | 3
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Notes to Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
Security Valuation
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc. (the Fund) values its investments primarily using the mean price based on valuations provided by approved independent third party pricing services. Securities and assets for which market quotations are not readily available or for which the valuations provided by the primary pricing sources are believed to be unreliable are valued at fair value pursuant to procedures adopted by the Funds board of directors (the Board). In general, the fair value of a security is the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive upon the sale of an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the reporting date. Market quotations may be deemed not to represent fair value in certain circumstances where Apollo Credit Management, LLC, the investment adviser, reasonably believes that facts and circumstances applicable to an issuer, a seller or purchaser or the market for a particular security causes current market quotes not to reflect the fair value of the security. Examples of these events could include situations in which material events are announced after the close of the market on which a security is primarily traded, when a security trades infrequently causing a quoted purchase or sale price to become stale, or in the event of a fire sale by a distressed seller.
Senior loans, corporate notes and bonds and collateralized loan obligations are priced based on valuations provided by approved independent, third-party pricing services or brokers, if available. If a price is not available from an independent, third-party pricing service or broker, or if the price provided by the independent third-party pricing service or broker is believed to be unreliable, the security will be fair valued pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. These procedures can, but are not obligated to, take into account any factors deemed relevant, which may include, among others, (i) the nature and pricing history of the security, (ii) the liquidity or illiquidity of the market for the particular security, (iii) recent purchases or sales transactions for the particular security or similar securities, (iv) whether any dealer quotations for the security are available and considered reliable and (v) press releases and other information published about the issuer. In these cases, the Funds net asset value (NAV) will reflect the affected portfolio securities fair value as determined in the judgment of the Board or its designee instead of being determined by the market. Using a fair value pricing methodology to value securities may result in a value that is different from a securitys most recent sale price and from the prices used by other investment companies to calculate their NAV. Determination of fair value is uncertain because it involves subjective judgments and estimates.
There can be no assurance that the Funds valuation of a security will not differ from the amount that it realizes upon the sale of such security.
Fair Value Measurements:
The Fund has performed an analysis of all existing investments to determine the significance and character of all inputs to their fair value determination. The levels of fair value inputs used to measure the Funds investments are characterized into a fair value hierarchy. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which the Fund has access at the date of measurement;
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, but are valued based on executed trades, broker quotations that constitute an executable price, and alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs which, in each case, are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset in connection with market data at the measurement date; and
Level 3 Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. In certain cases, investments classified within Level 3 may include securities for which the Fund has obtained indicative quotes from broker-dealers that do not necessarily represent prices the broker may be willing to trade on, as such quotes can be subject to material management judgment. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect the Funds own assumptions that market participants would use to price the asset or liability based on the best available information.
At the end of each reporting period, management evaluates the Level 2 and Level 3 assets, if any, for changes in liquidity, including but not limited to: whether a broker is willing to execute at the quoted price, the depth and consistency of prices from third party services, and the existence of contemporaneous, observable trades in the market.
4 |
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Notes to Schedule of Investments (continued)
As of March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
The valuation techniques used by the Fund to measure fair value at March 31, 2013 maximized the use of observable inputs and minimized the use of unobservable inputs. All investments at March 31, 2013 were valued using prices provided by an approved third party pricing service and/or broker quotes. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Transfers in and out of the levels are recognized at the value at the end of the period. A summary of the levels of the Funds investment securities as of March 31, 2013 are as follows:
Investments in Securities: | Total Value at March 31, 2013 |
Level 1 Quoted Price |
Level 2 Significant Observable Inputs |
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Senior Loans |
$ | 125,528,222 | $ | | $ | 116,547,008 | $ | 8,981,214 | ||||||||
Corporate Notes and Bonds |
75,675,209 | | 75,675,209 | | ||||||||||||
Asset Backed Securities |
987,500 | | | 987,500 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Investments |
$ | 202,190,931 | $ | | $ | 192,222,217 | $ | 9,968,714 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund did not have any liabilities that were measured at fair value at March 31, 2013. The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 holdings for which significant unobservable inputs were used in determining fair value as of March 31, 2013.
Total Fair Value |
Senior Loans | Asset Backed Securities |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Fair Value, beginning of period |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Purchases |
9,846,904 | 8,859,404 | 987,500 | |||||||||
Sales |
| | | |||||||||
Accrued discounts/premiums |
90 | | 90 | |||||||||
Total net realized gains/ losses |
| | | |||||||||
Total net unrealized gains/ losses |
121,720 | 121,810 | (90 | ) | ||||||||
Transfers into Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Transfers out of Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fair Value, end of period |
$ | 9,968,714 | $ | 8,981,214 | $ | 987,500 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no transfers out of and into Level 3 and into/from Level 2. Net change in unrealized gains (losses) attributable to Level 3 investments still held at March 31, 2013 was $121,720.
For more information with regard to significant accounting policies, see the Funds prospectus dated February 25, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
| 5
Item 2. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The Funds principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that the Funds disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act)), are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
(b) | There were no changes in the Funds internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the Funds last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Funds internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 3. Exhibits.
Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act are attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) |
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc. |
By (Signature and Title) |
/s/ Joseph Moroney | |
Joseph Moroney, President | ||
(principal executive officer) |
Date |
May 17, 2013 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) |
/s/ Joseph Moroney | |
Joseph Moroney, President | ||
(principal executive officer) |
Date |
May 17, 2013 |
By (Signature and Title) |
/s/ Jodi Sarsfield | |
Jodi Sarsfield, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer | ||
(principal financial officer) |
Date |
May 17, 2013 |