Edgar Filing: MFS INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST

MFS INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF

REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-05785

MFS INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Christopher R. Bohane

Massachusetts Financial Services Company

111 Huntington Avenue

Boston, Massachusetts 02199

(Name and address of agents for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000

Date of fiscal year end: November 30

Date of reporting period: November 30, 2016

ITEM 1.

REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.

ANNUAL REPORT

November 30, 2016

LOGO

MFS® INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST

LOGO

CXH-ANN

MFS® INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: CXH


Letter from the Chairman			1
Portfolio composition			2
Management review			4
Performance summary			7
Portfolio managers’ profiles			9
Dividend reinvestment and cash purchase plan			10
Portfolio of investments			11
Statement of assets and liabilities			43
Statement of operations			44
Statements of changes in net assets			45
Statement of cash flows			46
Financial highlights			47
Notes to financial statements			49
Report of independent registered public accounting firm			61
Results of shareholder meeting			62
Trustees and officers			63
Board review of investment advisory agreement			68
Proxy voting policies and information			72
Quarterly portfolio disclosure			72
Further information			72
Information about fund contracts and legal claims			73
Federal tax information			73
MFS^® privacy notice			74
Contact information back cover

NOT FDIC INSURED • MAY LOSE VALUE • NO BANK GUARANTEE

LOGO

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN

Dear Shareholders:

Despite June’s unexpected vote by the United Kingdom to leave the European Union and the surprising result in November’s U.S. presidential election, most markets have

proved resilient. U.S. share prices quickly reversed post-Brexit declines, and indices reached new highs following the November elections. U.S. bond yields rose after Trump’s victory on hopes that his proposed policy mix of lower taxes, increased spending on infrastructure and a lower regulatory burden on businesses will lift both U.S. economic growth and inflation. However, even after a recent rise in bond yields, interest rates in most developed markets remain very low, with major central banks maintaining extremely accommodative monetary policies.

Globally, economic growth has shown signs of recovery of late, led by the United States and the eurozone. Despite better growth,

there are few immediate signs of worrisome inflation. Emerging market economies are recovering at a somewhat slower pace amid fears that restrictive U.S. trade policies could further hamper the already slow pace of global trade growth.

At MFS®, we believe in a patient, long-term approach to investing. Viewing investments with a long lens makes it possible to filter out short-term market noise and focus on achieving solid risk-adjusted returns over a full market cycle.

In our view, such an approach, along with the professional guidance of a financial advisor, will help you reach your investment objectives.

Respectfully,

LOGO

Robert J. Manning

Executive Chairman

MFS Investment Management

January 13, 2017

The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change and may not be relied upon for investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed.

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Portfolio structure (i)

LOGO


Top ten industries (i)
Healthcare Revenue – Hospitals			20.8%
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue			14.4%
Student Loan Revenue			12.4%
Universities – Colleges			12.0%
Transportation – Special Tax			7.8%
General Obligations – General Purpose			7.5%
Miscellaneous Revenue – Other			6.2%
Utilities – Municipal Owned			6.1%
Airport Revenue			5.9%
General Obligations – Schools			5.4%


Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i)
AAA			7.9%
AA			44.1%
A			49.9%
BBB			22.8%
BB			6.5%
B			4.4%
CCC			0.6%
CC			1.2%
C			0.3%
D			0.6%
Not Rated			9.3%
Cash & Cash Equivalents			(41.1)%
Other			(6.5)%

Portfolio facts (i)
Average Duration (d)			11.3
Average Effective Maturity (m)			16.9 yrs.

(a)

For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. The fund may or may not have held all of these instruments on this date. The fund is not rated by these agencies.

Portfolio Composition – continued

(d)

Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. This calculation is based on net assets applicable to common shares as of 11/30/16.

(i)

For purposes of this presentation, the components include the value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts.

(m)

In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. This calculation is based on gross assets, which consists of net assets applicable to common shares plus the value of preferred shares, as of 11/30/16.

From time to time Cash & Cash Equivalents may be negative due to the aggregate liquidation value of variable rate municipal term preferred shares and/or timing of cash receipts.

Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.

Cash & Cash Equivalents includes any cash, investments in money market funds, short-term securities, and other assets less liabilities. Please see the Statement of Assets and Liabilities for additional information related to the fund’s cash position and other assets and liabilities.

Other includes equivalent exposure from currency derivatives and/or any offsets to derivative positions and/or the leverage created through the issuance of self-deposited inverse floaters and may be negative.

Percentages are based on net assets applicable to common shares as of 11/30/16.

The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Summary of Results

MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (“fund”) is a closed-end fund. The fund’s investment objective is to seek high current income exempt from federal income tax, but may also consider capital appreciation. The fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets, including assets attributable to preferred shares and borrowing for investment purposes, in tax-exempt bonds and tax-exempt notes.

For the twelve months ended November 30, 2016, common shares of the fund provided a total return of 0.46%, at net asset value and a total return of 1.34%, at market value. This compares with a return of –0.22% for the fund’s benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index (formerly Barclays Municipal Bond Index).

The performance commentary below is based on the net asset value performance of the fund which reflects the performance of the underlying pool of assets held by the fund. The total return at market value represents the return earned by owners of the shares of the fund which are traded publicly on the exchange.

Market Environment

Sluggish global growth weighed on both developed and emerging market (“EM”) economies during the reporting period. The US Federal Reserve (“Fed”) began its long-anticipated monetary tightening cycle toward the end of the period, but the tightening cycle has proved to be more gradual than initially anticipated. Globally, central bank policy remained highly accommodative, which forced many government, and even some corporate, bond yields into negative territory. During the second half of the period, the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union (“EU”), beginning a multi-year process of negotiation in order to achieve “Brexit.” While markets initially reacted to the vote with alarm, the spillover to European and EM economies was relatively short-lived, although risks of further hits to EU cohesiveness could re-emerge. Late in the period, the surprising US presidential election outcome prompted a significant rally in equities and a rise in bond yields in anticipation of a reflationary policy mix from the incoming Trump administration.

During much of the reporting period, US earnings headwinds expanded beyond the energy, materials and industrial sectors, to include most sectors of the market. Headwinds eased somewhat at the end of the period as stabilizing oil prices pushed energy earnings higher relative to expectations. The sharp rise in the US dollar also weighed on earnings. US consumer spending held up well during the second half of the period amid a modest increase in real wages and low gasoline prices. Demand for autos reached near-record territory before plateauing late in the period, while the housing market continued its recovery. Slow global trade continued to mirror slow global growth, particularly for many EM countries. That said, EM countries began to show signs of a modest upturn in activity along with adjustment in their external accounts. These improved conditions appeared to have reassured investors and contributed to record inflows into the asset class during July and August as negative yields for an increasing share of developed market bonds drove yield-hungry investors further out on the risk spectrum. Similar investor inflows were experienced in the

Management Review – continued

investment grade and high yield corporate markets. Late in the reporting period, however, new challenges emerged for emerging markets debt (“EMD”) as a result of the US presidential election, which raised concerns about the potential for a protectionist turn in US trade policy which could negatively impact EM economies. These concerns, along with rising expectations for US growth, inflation and rates, have turned the tables on flows into EMD. Since the election, flows have reversed. As of the end of the period, the markets seemed to be in “wait-and-see” mode, looking for evidence to either confirm or refute the repricing of risk that has occurred since Election Day.

While US Treasury yields finished slightly higher relative to where they started the reporting period, Treasuries experienced significant volatility during that time. According to data from the Fed, 10-year US Treasury yields started the reporting period at 2.21%, fell to as low as 1.37% in the wake of Brexit and finished the reporting period at 2.37%.

A significant portion of the increase in yields occurred in the wake of the results of the US presidential election, as President-elect Donald Trump and Republicans, who remained in control of both houses of Congress, discussed the prospects for greater-than-expected fiscal stimulus. The prospects for fiscal stimulus raised the possibility of stronger growth and higher inflation in the near-to-medium-term, which pushed Treasury yields higher.

The municipal bond market also saw an increase in yields post-election, with the market underperforming Treasuries for a while before recovering due to increased demand for higher-quality municipal securities from non-traditional municipal investors, also called crossover buyers. Amid the volatile yield environment, the broader US investment grade municipal bond market provided slightly negative total returns during the period, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, however mid-quality investment grade and below-investment grade municipal bonds performed slightly better than the highest-quality portion of the market. Investment grade municipal bonds generally lagged taxable bonds amid a strong recovery in credit spreads in areas such as investment grade and high yield corporate debt during the first-half of the reporting period and resilient spreads in the second-half of the period.

Municipal market performance was generally the result of higher yields and increased issuance, especially later in the reporting period, with declining demand. Against this backdrop, generally fundamentals remained stable for the majority of municipal issuers, and as a result, tax-equivalent yields appeared attractive relative to overall credit quality. However, markets remain concerned about underfunded public employee pension systems and other benefits promised to public employees and the political difficulties in enacting reform.

Factors Affecting Performance

Relative to the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, positive bond selection in “A” & “BB” rated^(r) securities was a key contributor to relative performance. Additionally, bond selection within the credit enhanced, housing, industrial and tobacco sectors further benefited relative results.

The fund employs leverage which has been created through the issuance of variable rate municipal term preferred shares and inverse floaters. To the extent that

Management Review – continued

investments are purchased through the use of leverage, the fund’s net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund. During the reporting period, the fund’s leverage positively impacted performance.

The fund’s shorter duration^(d) stance relative to the benchmark detracted from relative performance. Selection within “AA” rated issues further weighed on relative returns.

Respectfully,


Michael Dawson		Geoffrey Schechter
Portfolio Manager		Portfolio Manager

(d)	Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value.

(r)

Bonds rated “BBB”, “Baa”, or higher are considered investment grade; bonds rated “BB”, “Ba”, or below are considered non-investment grade. The source for bond quality ratings is Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, Inc. and are applied using the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). For securities which are not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated.

The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover and do not necessarily reflect the views of MFS or any other person in the MFS organization. These views are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions, and MFS disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice or an indication of trading intent on behalf of any MFS portfolio. References to specific securities are not recommendations of such securities, and may not be representative of any MFS portfolio’s current or future investments.

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY THROUGH 11/30/16

The following chart presents the fund’s historical performance in comparison to its benchmark(s). Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost; current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. The performance shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the sale of fund shares. Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results.

Price Summary for MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust

Date

Price

Year Ended 11/30/16

Net Asset Value

11/30/16

$10.15

11/30/15

$10.60

New York Stock Exchange Price

11/30/16

$9.37

9/06/16

(high) (t)

$10.74

11/17/16

(low) (t)

$9.35

11/30/15

$9.70

Total Returns vs Benchmark



Year Ended 11/30/16	MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust at
	New York Stock Exchange Price (r)	1.34%
	Net Asset Value (r)	0.46%
	Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index (f)	(0.22)%

(f)	Source: FactSet Research Systems Inc.

(r)	Includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions.

(t)	For the period December 1, 2015 through November 30, 2016.

Benchmark Definition

Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index (formerly Barclays Municipal Bond Index) – a market capitalization-weighted index that measures the performance of the tax-exempt bond market.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Notes to Performance Summary

The fund’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to net asset value. When fund shares trade at a premium, buyers pay more than the net asset value underlying fund shares, and shares purchased at a premium would receive less than the amount paid for them in the event of the fund’s concurrent liquidation.

Performance Summary – continued

The fund’s monthly distributions may include a return of capital to shareholders to the extent that distributions are in excess of the fund’s net investment income and net capital gains, determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations. Distributions that are treated for federal income tax purposes as a return of capital will reduce each shareholder’s basis in his or her shares and, to the extent the return of capital exceeds such basis, will be treated as gain to the shareholder from a sale of shares. Returns of shareholder capital have the effect of reducing the fund’s assets and increasing the fund’s expense ratio.

Net asset values and performance results based on net asset value do not include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and may differ from amounts reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities or the Financial Highlights.

From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.

In accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the fund hereby gives notice that it may from time to time repurchase common and/or preferred shares of the fund in the open market at the option of the Board of Trustees and on such terms as the Trustees shall determine.

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS’ PROFILES


Portfolio Manager	Primary Role	Since	Title and Five Year History
Michael Dawson	Portfolio Manager	2007	Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1998.

Geoffrey Schechter	Portfolio Manager	2007	Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1993.

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND CASH PURCHASE PLAN

The fund offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) that allows common shareholders to reinvest either all of the distributions paid by the fund or only the long-term capital gains. Generally, purchases are made at the market price unless that price exceeds the net asset value (the shares are trading at a premium). If the shares are trading at a premium, purchases will be made at a price of either the net asset value or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater. You can also buy shares on a quarterly basis in any amount $100 and over. The Plan Agent will purchase shares under the Cash Purchase Plan on the 15th of January, April, July, and October or shortly thereafter.

If shares are registered in your own name, new shareholders will automatically participate in the Plan, unless you have indicated that you do not wish to participate. If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you may wish to request that your shares be re-registered in your own name so that you can participate. There is no service charge to reinvest distributions, nor are there brokerage charges for shares issued directly by the fund. However, when shares are bought on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market, each participant pays a pro rata share of the transaction expenses, including commissions. Dividends and capital gains distributions are taxable whether received in cash or reinvested in additional shares – the automatic reinvestment of distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on the distributions.

If your shares are held directly with the Plan Agent, you may withdraw from the Plan at any time by going to the Plan Agent’s website at www.computershare.com/investor, by calling 1-800-637-2304 any business day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078. Please have available the name of the fund and your account number. For certain types of registrations, such as corporate accounts, instructions must be submitted in writing. Please call for additional details. When you withdraw from the Plan, you can receive the value of the reinvested shares in one of three ways: your full shares will be held in your account, the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send the proceeds to you, or you may transfer your full shares to your investment professional who can hold or sell them. Additionally, the Plan Agent will sell your fractional shares and send the proceeds to you.

If you have any questions or for further information or a copy of the Plan, contact the Plan Agent Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Transfer Agent for the fund) at 1-800-637-2304, at the Plan Agent’s website at www.computershare.com/investor, or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078.

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

11/30/16

The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by jurisdiction.


Municipal Bonds - 145.2%
Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Alabama - 1.2%
Alabama Incentives Financing Authority Special Obligation, “A”, 5%, 9/01/2037	$	55,000	$	59,660
Birmingham, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Methodist Home for the Aging), 5.25%, 6/01/2025		70,000		71,007
Cullman County, AL, Health Care Authority (Cullman Regional Medical Center), “A”, 6.75%, 2/01/2029		355,000		370,581
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Capital Appreciation, Senior Lien, “B”, AGM, 0%, 10/01/2025		5,000		3,556
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Capital Appreciation, Senior Lien, “B”, AGM, 0%, 10/01/2026		95,000		64,192
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Capital Appreciation, Senior Lien, “B”, AGM, 0%, 10/01/2029		135,000		74,417
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Capital Appreciation, Senior Lien, “B”, AGM, 0%, 10/01/2034		190,000		73,091
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Capital Appreciation, Senior Lien, “B”, AGM, 0%, 10/01/2035		365,000		131,112
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Subordinate Lien, “D”, 5%, 10/01/2017		25,000		25,592
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Subordinate Lien, “D”, 5%, 10/01/2018		30,000		31,213
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Subordinate Lien, “D”, 5%, 10/01/2021		35,000		37,436
Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Rev. Warrants, Subordinate Lien, “D”, 5%, 10/01/2023		45,000		48,152
Pell City, AL, Special Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (Noland Health Services, Inc.), 5%, 12/01/2039		140,000		147,980
Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board Rev., Gulf Opportunity Zone (International Paper Co.), “A”, 5.8%, 5/01/2034		275,000		305,514

			$	1,443,503
Arizona - 1.1%
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Basis Schools Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2035	$	35,000	$	35,071
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Basis Schools Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2045		50,000		49,029
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Basis Schools Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2046		35,000		34,310
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Great Hearts Academies Project), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2036		60,000		62,549

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Arizona - continued
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Great Hearts Academies Project), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2041	$	45,000	$	46,457
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Great Hearts Academies Project), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2046		80,000		82,302
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Legacy Traditional Schools Project), 5%, 7/01/2035		70,000		68,097
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Education Facility Rev. (Legacy Traditional Schools Project), 5%, 7/01/2045		80,000		75,362
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 12/01/2032		795,000		890,305

			$	1,343,482
Arkansas - 0.8%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority Hospital Rev. (Washington Regional Medical Center), “A”, 5%, 2/01/2035	$	30,000	$	32,463
Arkansas Development Finance Authority Hospital Rev. (Washington Regional Medical Center), “C”, 5%, 2/01/2033		50,000		54,324
Pulaski County, AR, Public Facilities Board Healthcare Rev. (Baptist Health), 5%, 12/01/2039		730,000		772,909
Pulaski County, AR, Public Facilities Board Healthcare Rev. (Baptist Health), 5%, 12/01/2042		120,000		126,468

			$	986,164
California - 16.2%
Alameda, CA, Corridor Transportation Authority Second Subordinate Lien Rev., “B”, 5%, 10/01/2037	$	60,000	$	64,131
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 8/01/2031		130,000		75,706
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 8/01/2032		235,000		131,090
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District (Election of 2008), Capital Appreciation, 0%, 8/01/2033		470,000		250,947
California Department of Water Resources, Center Valley Project Rev., “AJ”, 5%, 12/01/2035 (Prerefunded 12/01/2021)		1,000,000		1,149,160
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (California Lutheran University), 5.75%, 10/01/2038		350,000		370,990
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Chapman University), 5%, 4/01/2031		135,000		147,679
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of San Francisco), 6.125%, 10/01/2036		75,000		87,458
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Southern California), “A”, 5.25%, 10/01/2038 (Prerefunded 10/01/2018)		535,000		574,681
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), “A”, 5.75%, 7/01/2039		195,000		211,639

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
California - continued
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Sutter Health), “B”, 5.875%, 8/15/2031	$	535,000	$	604,218
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “G”, 4.95%, 8/01/2023		1,050,000		1,055,450
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “G”, 5.5%, 8/01/2042		10,000		10,072
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (Biola University), 5.8%, 10/01/2028		100,000		105,183
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (University of La Verne), “A”, 6.25%, 6/01/2040		70,000		78,562
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), “B”, 5.25%, 6/01/2023 (Put Date 12/01/2017)		135,000		139,259
California Public Works Board Lease Rev. (Various Capital Projects), “I”, 5%, 11/01/2038		1,220,000		1,351,321
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Various Correctional Facilities), “A”, 5%, 9/01/2033		1,135,000		1,272,585
California School Finance Authority, School Facility Rev. (Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2030		40,000		42,672
California School Finance Authority, School Facility Rev. (Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2045		100,000		103,525
California State University Rev., “A”, 5%, 11/01/2037		805,000		876,363
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Environmental Facilities Rev. (Microgy Holdings Project), 9%, 12/01/2038 (a)(d)		25,246		126
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Educational Student Housing Project), 5.625%, 6/01/2033		500,000		521,690
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Loma Linda University Medical Center), “A”, 5.25%, 12/01/2034		85,000		87,403
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Loma Linda University Medical Center), “A”, 5.25%, 12/01/2044		245,000		247,550
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Student Housing, SUCI East Campus), 6%, 5/15/2040 (Prerefunded 5/15/2018)		220,000		235,539
Chula Vista, CA, Industrial Development Rev. (San Diego Gas & Electric Co.), “E”, 5.875%, 1/01/2034		195,000		212,400
District of Southern CA, Water Replenishment Financing Authority Assessment Rev., 5%, 8/01/2036		100,000		112,481
District of Southern CA, Water Replenishment Financing Authority Assessment Rev., 5%, 8/01/2037		105,000		117,853
District of Southern CA, Water Replenishment Financing Authority Assessment Rev., 5%, 8/01/2041		230,000		256,689

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
California - continued
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, 5%, 6/01/2030	$	85,000	$	94,604
La Verne, CA, COP (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), 5%, 5/15/2036		50,000		51,786
Los Angeles County, CA, Redevelopment Refunding Authority Tax Allocation Rev. “D”, AGM, 5%, 9/01/2022		210,000		239,774
Los Angeles County, CA, Redevelopment Refunding Authority Tax Allocation Rev. “D”, AGM, 5%, 9/01/2023		210,000		241,861
Los Angeles County, CA, Regional Financing Authority Rev. (Montecedro Inc. Project), “A”, CALHF, 5%, 11/15/2034		35,000		38,732
Los Angeles County, CA, Regional Financing Authority Rev. (Montecedro Inc. Project), “A”, CALHF, 5%, 11/15/2044		65,000		71,375
Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, “D”, 5%, 1/01/2034		95,000		102,421
Mount San Antonio, CA, Community College District Rev. (Election of 2008), Convertible Capital Appreciation, 0% to 8/01/2028, 6.25% to 8/01/2043		355,000		253,356
Mount San Antonio, CA, Community College District, Convertible Capital Appreciation, 0% to 8/01/2023, 5.875% to 8/01/2028		140,000		122,101
Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, CA, COP, 6.75%, 11/01/2039 (Prerefunded 11/01/2019)		245,000		280,263
Port of Oakland, CA, Rev., “P”, 5%, 5/01/2033		970,000		1,049,695
Riverside County, CA, Public Financing Authority Tax Allocation Rev. (Project Area No. 1 Desert Communities & Interstate 215 Corridor Projects), BAM, 4%, 10/01/2037		60,000		60,308
Riverside County, CA, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev. (Jurupa Valley Redevelopment Project Area), “B”, BAM, 4%, 10/01/2036		60,000		60,353
Riverside County, CA, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev. (Mid-County Redevelopment Project Area), “C”, BAM, 4%, 10/01/2036		20,000		20,118
Riverside County, CA, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Rev. (Mid-County Redevelopment Project Area), “C”, BAM, 4%, 10/01/2037		10,000		10,051
Riverside County, CA, Transportation Commission Sales Tax Rev. (Limited Tax), “A”, 5.25%, 6/01/2039		345,000		388,163
San Diego County, CA, Regional Airport Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 7/01/2040		835,000		905,115
San Francisco, CA, City & County Airports Commission, International Airport Rev., “D”, 5%, 5/01/2025 (Prerefunded 5/03/2021)		285,000		323,703
San Francisco, CA, City & County Airports Commission, International Airport Rev., “D”, 5%, 5/01/2025		715,000		805,405
San Francisco, CA, City & County Redevelopment Successor Agency, Tax Allocation (Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project), “A”, 5%, 8/01/2043		25,000		26,875

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
California - continued
San Jose, CA, Airport Rev., “A-2”, 5.25%, 3/01/2034	$	710,000	$	780,553
State of California, 4%, 9/01/2026		725,000		786,560
State of California, 5.25%, 10/01/2028		270,000		308,910
State of California, 5.25%, 9/01/2030		645,000		733,604
State of California, 5%, 5/01/2044		230,000		253,630
Upland, CA, COP (San Antonio Community Hospital), 6.5%, 1/01/2041		85,000		94,285
West Contra Costa, CA, Unified School District, “B”, NATL, 6%, 8/01/2024		250,000		285,685
Whittier, CA, Health Facility Rev. (PIH Health), 5%, 6/01/2044		125,000		130,154

			$	19,013,862
Colorado - 2.9%
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Academy of Charter Schools Project), 5.625%, 5/01/2040	$	230,000	$	240,782
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Montessori Charter School Project), 5%, 7/15/2037		40,000		41,364
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (The Classical Academy Project), “A”, 5%, 12/01/2038		75,000		78,420
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Twin Peaks Charter Academy Project), 5%, 11/15/2031		145,000		154,187
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc. Project), “A”, 5%, 12/01/2035		150,000		157,958
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society), 5.625%, 6/01/2043		90,000		97,498
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (SCL Health System), “A”, 5%, 1/01/2044		380,000		409,553
Colorado Regional Transportation District, Private Activity Rev. (Denver Transportation Partners), 6.5%, 1/15/2030		560,000		633,410
Colorado Regional Transportation District, Private Activity Rev. (Denver Transportation Partners), 6%, 1/15/2034		480,000		533,630
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.25%, 10/01/2032		245,000		246,936
Denver, CO, Convention Center Hotel Authority Rev., 5%, 12/01/2035		70,000		73,543
Denver, CO, Convention Center Hotel Authority Rev., 5%, 12/01/2036		45,000		47,166
Denver, CO, Convention Center Hotel Authority Rev., 5%, 12/01/2040		120,000		125,281
Denver, CO, Health & Hospital Authority Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 12/01/2045		95,000		99,997
Park Creek Metropolitan District, CO, Senior Limited Property Tax Supported Rev., NATL, 5%, 12/01/2045		405,000		430,641

			$	3,370,366

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Connecticut - 1.3%
Mohegan Tribal Finance Authority, CT, Economic Development Bonds, 7%, 2/01/2045 (n)	$	180,000	$	183,442
State of Connecticut, Special Tax Obligation Rev., “A”, 5%, 12/01/2028		405,000		454,750
State of Connecticut, Special Tax Obligation Rev., “A”, 5%, 12/01/2029		405,000		454,750
State of Connecticut, Special Tax Obligation Rev., “A”, 5%, 12/01/2030		385,000		427,573

			$	1,520,515
District of Columbia - 1.8%
District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency (Henson Ridge), “E”, FHA, 5.1%, 6/01/2037	$	485,000	$	486,571
District of Columbia Rev. (Georgetown University), Convertible Capital Appreciation, BHAC, 0% to 4/01/2018, 5% to 4/01/2040		1,430,000		1,425,467
District of Columbia Rev. (Kipp, D.C. Charter School), “A”, 6%, 7/01/2033		40,000		46,191
District of Columbia Rev. (Kipp, D.C. Charter School), “A”, 6%, 7/01/2043		105,000		119,987
District of Columbia Rev. (Methodist Home of the District of Columbia Issue), 4.5%, 1/01/2025		20,000		19,601
District of Columbia Rev. (Methodist Home of the District of Columbia Issue), “A”, 5.125%, 1/01/2035		20,000		19,131
District of Columbia Rev. (Methodist Home of the District of Columbia Issue), “A”, 5.25%, 1/01/2039		10,000		9,552

			$	2,126,500
Florida - 4.6%
Bellalago, FL, Educational Facilities Benefit District (Osceola County) Capital Improvement Refunding Rev., 4.375%, 5/01/2030	$	80,000	$	81,650
Bellalago, FL, Educational Facilities Benefit District (Osceola County) Capital Improvement Refunding Rev., 4.5%, 5/01/2033		35,000		35,595
Bellalago, FL, Educational Facilities Benefit District (Osceola County) Capital Improvement Refunding Rev., 4.6%, 5/01/2034		60,000		61,208
Capital Trust Agency, FL, Housing Rev. (Atlantic Housing Foundation), “B”, 7%, 7/15/2032 (d)(q)		340,000		169,946
Collier County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Ave Maria University, Inc. Project), “A”, 6.125%, 6/01/2043		440,000		487,762
Daytona Beach, FL, Halifax Hospital Medical Center Rev., 5%, 6/01/2026		115,000		131,377
Daytona Beach, FL, Halifax Hospital Medical Center Rev., 5%, 6/01/2029		105,000		117,886
Daytona Beach, FL, Halifax Hospital Medical Center Rev., 5%, 6/01/2030		105,000		116,578

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Florida - continued
Heritage Harbour North Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 6.375%, 5/01/2038	$	125,000	$	126,100
Lakeland, FL, Hospital Rev. (Lakeland Regional Health Systems), 5%, 11/15/2033		175,000		189,803
Lakeland, FL, Hospital Rev. (Lakeland Regional Health Systems), 5%, 11/15/2034		150,000		161,832
Lakeland, FL, Hospital Rev. (Lakeland Regional Health Systems), 5%, 11/15/2035		215,000		231,196
Miami-Dade County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Miami Children’s Hospital), “A”, 6.125%, 8/01/2042		195,000		216,661
Miami-Dade County, FL, Special Obligation, “B”, 5%, 10/01/2035		180,000		195,617
Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, FL, Springing Lien Rev., “A”, 7.25%, 10/01/2040 (Prerefunded 10/01/2021)		175,000		217,417
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Orlando Health Obligated Group), “A”, 5%, 10/01/2037		160,000		173,574
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Rev., “A”, 5.75%, 10/01/2022 (n)		250,000		256,903
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), “A”, 6%, 4/01/2029		105,000		113,577
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), “A”, 6.25%, 4/01/2039		155,000		167,699
St. John’s County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Presbyterian Retirement), “A”, 6%, 8/01/2045 (Prerefunded 8/01/2020)		400,000		460,692
Sumter County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Central Florida Health Alliance Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2026		20,000		22,347
Sumter County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Central Florida Health Alliance Projects), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2029		20,000		21,953
Sumter County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Central Florida Health Alliance Projects), “A”, 5.125%, 7/01/2034		40,000		43,110
Sumter County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Central Florida Health Alliance Projects), “A”, 5.25%, 7/01/2044		120,000		128,713
Tampa Bay, FL, Sports Authority Rev. (Tampa Bay Arena), NATL, 5.75%, 10/01/2025		1,000,000		1,149,180
Tampa, FL (University of Tampa Project), 5%, 4/01/2040		85,000		91,219
Westridge, FL, Community Development District, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.8%, 5/01/2037 (a)(d)		480,000		287,976

			$	5,457,571
Georgia - 3.5%
Americus and Sumter County, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Magnolia Manor Obligated Group), “A”, 6.25%, 5/15/2033	$	75,000	$	81,932
Americus and Sumter County, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Magnolia Manor Obligated Group), “A”, 6.375%, 5/15/2043		75,000		81,905

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Georgia - continued
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., “A”, 6%, 11/01/2022 (Prerefunded 11/01/2019)	$	290,000	$	327,164
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), “A”, 8.75%, 6/01/2029		125,000		149,056
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 10/01/2028		125,000		143,308
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 10/01/2029		120,000		137,338
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 10/01/2030		75,000		84,666
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 10/01/2031		15,000		16,897
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 10/01/2041		340,000		381,014
Fulton County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., 5%, 1/01/2026		320,000		355,885
Fulton County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., 5%, 1/01/2027		215,000		238,932
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 3/15/2022		525,000		572,780
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 9/15/2026		120,000		136,123
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 9/15/2028		250,000		283,705
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority Power Rev., “GG”, 5%, 1/01/2026		225,000		253,994
Glynn-Brunswick, GA, Memorial Hospital Authority Rev., Unrefunded Balance, 5.625%, 8/01/2034		15,000		15,726
Hall County and Gainesville, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc.), “A”, 5.5%, 8/15/2054		320,000		363,568
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 6/15/2030		100,000		103,379
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 6/15/2039		100,000		103,034
Rockdale County, GA, Development Authority Project Rev. (Visy Paper Project), “A”, 6.125%, 1/01/2034		320,000		320,608

			$	4,151,014
Guam - 0.0%
Guam Government Business Privilege Tax Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 1/01/2036	$	40,000	$	42,016

Hawaii - 1.1%
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (15 Craigside Project), “A”, 9%, 11/15/2044	$	115,000	$	134,466
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (Hawaiian Electric Co. & Subsidiary), 6.5%, 7/01/2039		410,000		441,652
State of Hawaii, “DZ”, 5%, 12/01/2031 (Prerefunded 12/01/2021)		110,000		126,408
State of Hawaii, “DZ”, 5%, 12/01/2031		70,000		77,776
State of Hawaii, Highway Rev., “A”, 5%, 1/01/2030 (Prerefunded 1/01/2022)		305,000		349,991

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Hawaii - continued
State of Hawaii, Highway Rev., “A”, 5%, 1/01/2031	$	120,000	$	132,911
State of Hawaii, Highway Rev., “A”, 5%, 1/01/2032		80,000		88,407

			$	1,351,611
Illinois - 13.1%
Bolingbrook, IL, Sales Tax Rev., 6.25%, 1/01/2024	$	230,000	$	220,400
Chicago, IL (Modern Schools Program), “G”, AMBAC, 5%, 12/01/2023		50,000		50,144
Chicago, IL (Modern Schools Program), “H”, AMBAC, 5%, 12/01/2021		85,000		85,241
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2017		5,000		5,016
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2022		40,000		40,314
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2023		25,000		25,196
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2025		5,000		5,039
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2028		360,000		378,781
Chicago, IL, “A”, 5.25%, 1/01/2028		25,000		24,897
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 4.75%, 1/01/2030		45,000		45,110
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2034		155,000		155,411
Chicago, IL, “A”, 5%, 1/01/2036		85,000		79,631
Chicago, IL, “A”, AGM, 5%, 1/01/2037		260,000		260,629
Chicago, IL, “C”, NATL, 5%, 1/01/2023		35,000		36,065
Chicago, IL, “C”, NATL, 5%, 1/01/2029		285,000		293,638
Chicago, IL, “D”, AMBAC, 5%, 12/01/2022		230,000		230,665
Chicago, IL, “D”, 5.5%, 1/01/2033		70,000		69,194
Chicago, IL, Board of Education, “B”, AMBAC, 5%, 12/01/2021		110,000		110,063
Chicago, IL, Board of Education, “B”, AGM, 5%, 12/01/2035		305,000		311,737
Chicago, IL, Board of Education, “C”, AGM, 5%, 12/01/2032		685,000		709,139
Chicago, IL, Board of Education, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Refunding Dedicated Rev., “B”, AMBAC, 5%, 12/01/2021		345,000		347,615
Chicago, IL, Board of Education, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Refunding Dedicated Rev., “B”, AMBAC, 5%, 12/01/2023		80,000		80,442
Chicago, IL, Greater Chicago Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, “C”, 5%, 12/01/2029		855,000		943,886
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., Customer Facility Charge, AGM, 5.25%, 1/01/2032		70,000		77,876
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., Customer Facility Charge, AGM, 5.25%, 1/01/2033		35,000		38,898
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., Customer Facility Charge, AGM, 5.5%, 1/01/2043		145,000		160,434
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., Senior Lien, “B”, 5%, 1/01/2030		230,000		254,962
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., Third Lien, “A”, 5.625%, 1/01/2035		650,000		723,073

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Illinois - continued
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Rev., 5.25%, 12/01/2029	$	155,000	$	162,505
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Rev., 5.25%, 12/01/2030		310,000		334,859
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Rev., 5.25%, 12/01/2031		60,000		64,666
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales Tax Receipts Rev., 5.25%, 12/01/2040		410,000		437,048
Chicago, IL, Wastewater Transmission Rev., “C”, 5%, 1/01/2035		30,000		31,358
Chicago, IL, Wastewater Transmission Rev., “C”, 5%, 1/01/2039		50,000		52,021
Illinois Finance Authority Rev., 7.75%, 8/15/2034 (Prerefunded 8/15/2019)		5,000		5,799
Illinois Finance Authority Rev., 6.125%, 5/15/2025 (Prerefunded 5/15/2019)		15,000		16,675
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 4.75%, 5/15/2033		160,000		159,635
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), “A”, 5.125%, 5/15/2043		125,000		124,638
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (KishHealth Systems Obligated Group), 5.75%, 10/01/2028 (Prerefunded 10/01/2018)		380,000		411,118
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group), “B”, FRN, 1.723%, 5/01/2036 (Put Date 5/01/2021)		70,000		70,106
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Presence Health Network), “A”, 7.75%, 8/15/2034 (Prerefunded 8/15/2019)		395,000		460,155
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Presence Health Network), “C”, 5%, 2/15/2036		85,000		86,905
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Presence Health Network), “C”, 4%, 2/15/2041		245,000		206,552
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Presence Health Network), “C”, 5%, 2/15/2041		120,000		121,717
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Presence Health Obligated Group), 6.125%, 5/15/2025 (Prerefunded 5/15/2019)		15,000		16,675
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), “A”, 6%, 7/01/2043		565,000		638,207
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Resurrection Health Care Corp.), 6.125%, 5/15/2025 (Prerefunded 5/15/2019)		430,000		478,022
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 6.25%, 4/01/2029		545,000		555,976
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 6.875%, 8/15/2038 (Prerefunded 8/15/2019)		395,000		451,588
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), “C”, 5%, 8/15/2035		315,000		333,909
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (University of Chicago), “A”, 5%, 10/01/2035		1,000,000		1,105,590

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Illinois - continued
Illinois Finance Authority Student Housing Rev. (Northern Illinois University Project), 6.625%, 10/01/2031	$	390,000	$	414,827
Illinois Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, 5.5%, 6/01/2023		150,000		168,374
Illinois Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, 6%, 6/01/2028		1,145,000		1,302,151
Illinois Toll Highway Authority Rev., “B”, 5%, 1/01/2032		1,000,000		1,096,670
Lincolnshire, IL, Special Service Area No. 1 (Sedgebrook Project), 6.25%, 3/01/2034		171,000		166,238
Romeoville, IL, Rev. (Lewis University Project), “A”, 5%, 10/01/2042		130,000		135,571
State of Illinois, NATL, 5%, 1/01/2019		85,000		85,018

			$	15,458,069
Indiana - 3.0%
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 10/15/2018	$	190,000	$	201,738
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Marquette Project), “A”, 5%, 3/01/2030		40,000		42,124
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Marquette Project), “A”, 5%, 3/01/2039		100,000		102,369
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2040		350,000		357,865
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing Project), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2044		365,000		377,392
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (State Revolving Fund Program), “A”, 5%, 2/01/2029		1,000,000		1,121,260
Indiana Health & Educational Facility Authority Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation), 5.5%, 3/01/2037		340,000		343,985
Richmond, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Reid Hospital & Health Center Services), “A”, 6.625%, 1/01/2039 (Prerefunded 1/01/2019)		525,000		579,705
University of Southern Indiana Rev. (Student Fee), “J”, ASSD GTY, 5.75%, 10/01/2028		210,000		232,506
Valparaiso, IN, Exempt Facilities Rev. (Pratt Paper LLC Project), 7%, 1/01/2044		110,000		131,231

			$	3,490,175
Iowa - 0.5%
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-1”, 4.625%, 12/01/2019	$	125,000	$	129,820
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-1”, 4.875%, 12/01/2020		25,000		25,962
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-2”, 5.5%, 12/01/2025		100,000		107,115
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-2”, 5.6%, 12/01/2026		105,000		112,501
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-2”, 5.7%, 12/01/2027		15,000		15,988
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-2”, 5.75%, 12/01/2028		190,000		202,417

			$	593,803

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Kansas - 0.5%
Coffeyville, KS, Electric Utility System Rev., “B”, NATL, 5%, 6/01/2038	$	300,000	$	305,826
Coffeyville, KS, Electric Utility System Rev., “B”, NATL, 5%, 6/01/2042		100,000		101,633
Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS, Unified Government Utility System Improvement Rev., “A”, 5%, 9/01/2044		195,000		211,255

			$	618,714
Kentucky - 1.7%
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), “A”, 5.375%, 8/15/2024	$	255,000	$	269,576
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), “A”, 5.625%, 8/15/2027		85,000		89,495
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), “A”, 6.375%, 6/01/2040		440,000		482,275
Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Economic Development Rev., “A”, 5%, 7/01/2030		1,000,000		1,098,570
University of Kentucky, General Receipts, “A”, 5%, 4/01/2036		110,000		121,865

			$	2,061,781
Louisiana - 2.4%
Jefferson Parish, LA, Hospital Service District No. 2 (East Jefferson General Hospital), 6.25%, 7/01/2031	$	470,000	$	501,913
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (St. James Place of Baton Rouge Project), “A”, 6.25%, 11/15/2045		240,000		247,454
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Lake Charles Memorial Hospital), 6.375%, 12/01/2034		290,000		306,884
New Orleans, LA, Aviation Board General Airport Rev. (North Terminal Project), “B”, 5%, 1/01/2040		240,000		253,546
New Orleans, LA, Aviation Board General Airport Rev. (North Terminal Project), “B”, 5%, 1/01/2045		100,000		105,293
New Orleans, LA, Aviation Board Gulf Opportunity Zone CFC Rev. (Consolidated Rental Car), “A”, 6.25%, 1/01/2030		185,000		198,346
New Orleans, LA, Sewerage Service Rev., 5%, 6/01/2040		50,000		53,203
New Orleans, LA, Sewerage Service Rev., 5%, 12/01/2040		65,000		70,077
New Orleans, LA, Sewerage Service Rev., 5%, 6/01/2045		185,000		196,305
New Orleans, LA, Sewerage Service Rev., 5%, 12/01/2045		85,000		91,174
Shreveport, LA, Water and Sewer Rev., AGM, 5%, 12/01/2030		230,000		255,696
Shreveport, LA, Water and Sewer Rev., AGM, 5%, 12/01/2034		70,000		76,410
St. Charles Parish, LA, Gulf Zone Opportunity Zone Rev. (Valero Energy Corp.), 4%, 12/01/2040 (Put Date 6/01/2022)		480,000		501,701

			$	2,858,002

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Maryland - 0.4%
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Anne Arundel Health System, Inc.), “A”, 6.75%, 7/01/2039 (Prerefunded 7/01/2019)	$	175,000	$	198,504
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Charlestown Community), 6.25%, 1/01/2041 (Prerefunded 1/01/2021)		190,000		222,997

			$	421,501
Massachusetts - 17.0%
Boston, MA, Metropolitan Transit Parking Corp., Systemwide Parking Rev., 5.25%, 7/01/2036	$	285,000	$	317,578
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Transportation Fund Rev. (Accelerated Bridge Program), “A”, 5%, 6/01/2038		1,000,000		1,106,890
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Rev., “A-1”, 5.25%, 7/01/2029		350,000		429,772
Massachusetts College Building Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 5/01/2031		190,000		213,214
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Evergreen Center, Inc.), 5%, 1/01/2024		250,000		250,200
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Milford Regional Medical Center), “F”, 5.75%, 7/15/2043		40,000		43,599
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (North Hill Communities), “A”, 6.5%, 11/15/2043		100,000		104,493
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (UMass Memorial Health Care Obligated Group), “I”, 5%, 7/01/2036		120,000		127,897
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Williams College), “P”, 5%, 7/01/2043		1,000,000		1,111,120
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Covanta Energy Project), “A”, 4.875%, 11/01/2027		205,000		205,394
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 12/01/2042 (Prerefunded 5/01/2019)		70,000		77,101
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev, “A”, 4.25%, 1/01/2030		165,000		166,345
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev, “A”, 4.25%, 1/01/2031		110,000		110,072
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “H”, ASSD GTY, 6.35%, 1/01/2030		170,000		177,558
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “J”, 3.5%, 7/01/2033 (u)		15,000,000		13,039,350
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., “K”, 5.25%, 7/01/2029		265,000		286,240
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Suffolk University), “A”, 6.25%, 7/01/2030		415,000		455,919

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Massachusetts - continued
Massachusetts Port Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 7/01/2037	$	35,000	$	37,697
Massachusetts Port Authority Special Facilities Rev. (ConRAC Project), “A”, 5.125%, 7/01/2041		40,000		42,871
Massachusetts Port Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Air Lines Project, Inc.), “A”, AMBAC, 5%, 1/01/2027		145,000		145,518
Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax Rev., “B”, 5%, 10/15/2032		720,000		802,404
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, “B”, AGM, 5.25%, 8/01/2029		600,000		737,592

			$	19,988,824
Michigan - 4.2%
Detroit, MI, Water & Sewerage Department, Senior Lien Sewage Disposal System Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 7/01/2039	$	460,000	$	494,707
Detroit, MI, Water Supply System Rev., Senior Lien, “A”, 5%, 7/01/2036		25,000		26,294
Detroit, MI, Water Supply System Rev., Senior Lien, “C”, 5%, 7/01/2041		30,000		31,604
Genesee County, MI, Water Supply System Rev., “B”, BAM, 5%, 2/01/2046		60,000		64,900
Michigan Finance Authority (City of Detroit Financial Recovery Income Tax Rev.), “F”, 3.875%, 10/01/2023		50,000		51,544
Michigan Finance Authority (City of Detroit Financial Recovery Income Tax Rev.), “F”, 4%, 10/01/2024		65,000		67,096
Michigan Finance Authority Hospital Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 5%, 11/15/2041		120,000		127,243
Michigan Finance Authority Hospital Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 4%, 11/15/2046		905,000		835,134
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Sewage Disposal System Rev. Refunding Second Lien Local Project), “C”, 5%, 7/01/2033		65,000		69,780
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Sewage Disposal System Rev. Refunding Second Lien Local Project), “C”, 5%, 7/01/2034		150,000		160,355
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Sewage Disposal System Rev. Refunding Second Lien Local Project), “C”, 5%, 7/01/2035		100,000		106,679
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Sewage Disposal System Rev. Refunding Second Lien Local Project), “D-2”, 5%, 7/01/2034		65,000		69,487
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department), “C-1”, 5%, 7/01/2044		175,000		185,204
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department), “C-2”, 5%, 7/01/2044		135,000		139,983

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Michigan - continued
Michigan Finance Authority Local Government Loan Program Rev. (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department), “C-6”, 5%, 7/01/2033	$	220,000	$	237,402
Michigan Finance Authority Rev. (Trinity Health Corp.), 5%, 12/01/2035		750,000		837,660
Royal Oak, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (William Beaumont Hospital), 5%, 9/01/2039		545,000		584,660
Royal Oak, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (William Beaumont Hospital), 8.25%, 9/01/2039 (Prerefunded 9/01/2018)		230,000		258,134
Wayne County, MI, Airport Authority Rev. (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), “D”, AGM, 5%, 12/01/2040		570,000		616,769

			$	4,964,635
Minnesota - 0.0%
Minneapolis & St. Paul, MN, Housing Authority Rev. (City Living), “A-2”, GNMA, 5%, 12/01/2038	$	12,099	$	12,102

Mississippi - 1.3%
Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Pollution Control Rev. (Systems Energy Resources Project), 5.875%, 4/01/2022	$	625,000	$	646,581
Mississippi Development Bank Special Obligation (City of Jackson Water and Sewer System Rev. Bond Project), AGM, 6.875%, 12/01/2040		90,000		113,054
Mississippi Hospital Equipment & Facilities Authority Rev. (Baptist Memorial Healthcare), “A”, 5%, 9/01/2022		110,000		122,647
Mississippi Hospital Equipment & Facilities Authority Rev. (Baptist Memorial Healthcare), “A”, 5%, 9/01/2023		295,000		330,999
University of Southern Mississippi Educational Building Corp. Rev. (Campus Facilities Project), 5.25%, 9/01/2032 (Prerefunded 9/01/2019)		190,000		209,336
University of Southern Mississippi Educational Building Corp. Rev. (Campus Facilities Project), 5.375%, 9/01/2036 (Prerefunded 9/01/2019)		65,000		71,833

			$	1,494,450
Missouri - 0.4%
Missouri Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (A.T. Still University Health Services), 5%, 10/01/2039	$	55,000	$	59,419
Missouri Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (SSM Health Care), “A”, 5%, 6/01/2031		205,000		228,282
Missouri Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Senior Living Facilities Rev. (Lutheran Senior Services Project), “A”, 5%, 2/01/2036		35,000		36,381
Missouri Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Senior Living Facilities Rev. (Lutheran Senior Services Project), “A”, 5%, 2/01/2046		85,000		87,067

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Missouri - continued
St. Louis County, MO, Industrial Development Authority Health Facilities Rev. (Nazareth Living Center), “A”, 5.125%, 8/15/2045	$	35,000	$	33,626

			$	444,775
National - 0.7%
Centerline Capital Group, Inc., FHLMC, 6.3%, 10/31/2052 (n)	$	500,000	$	545,615
Resolution Trust Corp., Pass-Through Certificates, “1993”, 9.75%, 12/01/2017 (z)		227,741		227,741

			$	773,356
Nebraska - 0.6%
Douglas County, NE, Educational Facilities Rev. (Creighton University), “A”, 5.875%, 7/01/2040	$	645,000	$	718,388

Nevada - 0.7%
Las Vegas Valley, NV, Water District, “C”, 5%, 6/01/2029	$	755,000	$	840,844

New Hampshire - 0.4%
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Rev. (Elliot Hospital Obligated Group), “A”, 6%, 10/01/2027 (Prerefunded 10/01/2019)	$	445,000	$	500,256

New Jersey - 5.7%
New Jersey Building Authority Rev., “A”, BAM, 5%, 6/15/2027	$	15,000	$	16,617
New Jersey Building Authority Rev., “A”, BAM, 5%, 6/15/2028		40,000		43,908
New Jersey Building Authority Rev., “A”, BAM, 5%, 6/15/2029		50,000		54,521
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project), 5.5%, 1/01/2027		40,000		45,008
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project), 5%, 1/01/2028		40,000		43,683
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project), AGM, 5%, 1/01/2031		115,000		125,815
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project), AGM, 5.125%, 1/01/2039		70,000		76,211
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project), AGM, 5.125%, 7/01/2042		35,000		37,992
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project), 5.375%, 1/01/2043		225,000		245,804
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 4.875%, 9/15/2019		65,000		67,328
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 5.25%, 9/15/2029		260,000		275,098
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), “A”, 5.625%, 11/15/2030		40,000		44,030

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
New Jersey - continued
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), “B”, 5.625%, 11/15/2030	$	35,000	$	38,501
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Stockton University), “A”, AGM, 4%, 7/01/2036		60,000		58,958
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 7.5%, 12/01/2032 (Prerefunded 6/01/2019)		460,000		527,321
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (University Hospital), “A”, AGM, 5%, 7/01/2046		360,000		384,314
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.5%, 6/01/2023		1,320,000		1,331,035
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 4.75%, 6/01/2034		1,850,000		1,567,172
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1-A”, 5%, 6/01/2041		1,835,000		1,556,942
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Capital Appreciation, “1-C”, 0%, 6/01/2041		30,000		7,728
Newark, NJ, Housing Authority, Secured Police Facility Rev. (South Ward Police Facility), AGM, 5%, 12/01/2038		105,000		112,958

			$	6,660,944
New Mexico - 0.4%
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), “D”, 5.9%, 6/01/2040	$	400,000	$	441,240

New York - 11.0%
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6%, 7/15/2030 (Prerefunded 1/15/2020)	$	200,000	$	226,434
Build NYC Resource Corp. Rev. (Albert Einstein School of Medicine, Inc.), 5.5%, 9/01/2045		310,000		325,336
Build NYC Resource Corp. Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Pratt Paper, Inc. Project), 5%, 1/01/2035		140,000		150,487
Glen Cove, NY, Local Economic Assistance Corp. (Garvies Point Public Improvement Project), Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 1/01/2045		120,000		20,072
Hempstead, NY, Local Development Corp. Rev. (Hofstra University Project), 5%, 7/01/2025		130,000		143,612
Hempstead, NY, Local Development Corp. Rev. (Hofstra University Project), 5%, 7/01/2026		95,000		104,818
Hempstead, NY, Local Development Corp. Rev. (Hofstra University Project), 5%, 7/01/2028		20,000		21,994
Hudson Yards, NY, Infrastructure Corp. Rev., “A”, 5.75%, 2/15/2047		350,000		394,485
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.5%, 8/15/2030		165,000		179,421

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
New York - continued
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.25%, 2/15/2035	$	100,000	$	107,936
New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Municipal Water Finance Authority Project, 5%, 6/15/2025		200,000		226,110
New York Environmental Facilities, “C”, 5%, 5/15/2041		255,000		282,588
New York Liberty Development Corp. Rev. (Goldman Sachs Headquarters), 5.25%, 10/01/2035		1,725,000		2,013,334
New York Liberty Development Corp., Liberty Rev. (3 World Trade Center Project), “2”, 5.375%, 11/15/2040		215,000		222,058
New York Liberty Development Corp., Liberty Rev. (4 World Trade Center Project), 5%, 11/15/2031		200,000		221,506
New York Liberty Development Corp., Liberty Rev. (One Bryant Park LLC), 6.375%, 7/15/2049		435,000		475,877
New York Liberty Development Corp., Liberty Rev. (World Trade Center Project), 5%, 11/15/2044		500,000		549,615
New York Power Authority Rev., “ A”, 5%, 11/15/2038		1,000,000		1,112,440
New York Transportation Development Corp., Special Facility Rev. (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project), 5%, 8/01/2026		115,000		120,482
New York Transportation Development Corp., Special Facility Rev. (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project), 5%, 8/01/2031		60,000		60,851
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer System Rev., “AA”, 5%, 6/15/2034		1,610,000		1,780,451
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer Systems Rev., “CC”, 5%, 6/15/2047		1,000,000		1,102,990
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer Systems Rev., “CC”, 5%, 6/15/2047		85,000		93,682
Niagara County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Covanta Energy Project), “A”, 5.25%, 11/01/2042		175,000		176,468
Port Authority of NY & NJ, Special Obligation Rev. (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), 6%, 12/01/2036		195,000		220,748
Port Authority of NY & NJ, Special Obligation Rev. (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), 6%, 12/01/2042		225,000		254,041
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Rev., NY, Capital Appreciation, “A”, 0%, 11/15/2029		1,125,000		701,910
Utility Debt Securitization Authority Restructuring Rev., NY, “E”, 5%, 12/15/2041		1,500,000		1,689,135

			$	12,978,881
North Carolina - 2.3%
Durham, NC, Durham Housing Authority Rev. (Magnolia Pointe Apartments), 5.65%, 2/01/2038	$	349,549	$	349,549

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
North Carolina - continued
North Carolina Medical Care Commission Retirement Facilities First Mortgage Rev. (United Church Homes and Services), “A”, 5%, 9/01/2037	$	5,000	$	5,106
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Pennybyrn at Maryfield), 5%, 10/01/2025		15,000		16,351
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Pennybyrn at Maryfield), 5%, 10/01/2030		20,000		21,167
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Pennybyrn at Maryfield), 5%, 10/01/2035		25,000		26,136
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, Monroe Connector System State Appropriation Rev., 5%, 7/01/2036		2,000,000		2,195,320
University of North Carolina, Greensboro, Rev., 5%, 4/01/2039		105,000		114,966

			$	2,728,595
Ohio - 2.6%
Bowling Green, OH, Student Housing Rev. (State University Project), 6%, 6/01/2045	$	285,000	$	300,883
Butler County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (UC Health), 5.75%, 11/01/2040 (Prerefunded 11/01/2020)		105,000		121,056
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Flats East Development Project), 7%, 5/15/2040		95,000		104,253
Lake County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev., 6%, 8/15/2043		40,000		42,374
Ohio Tax Exempt Private Activity (Portsmouth Bypass Project), AGM, 5%, 12/31/2035		395,000		421,670
Scioto County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Southern Ohio Medical Center), 5.75%, 2/15/2038 (Prerefunded 2/15/2018)		555,000		585,847
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Hospital Facilities Improvement Rev. (Memorial Health System Obligated Group Project), 5.5%, 12/01/2029		10,000		10,624
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Hospital Facilities Improvement Rev. (Memorial Health System Obligated Group Project), 5%, 12/01/2035		60,000		60,949
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Hospital Facilities Improvement Rev. (Memorial Health System Obligated Group Project), 5%, 12/01/2043		75,000		75,640
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Hospital Facilities Improvement Rev. (Memorial Health System Obligated Group Project), 5.5%, 12/01/2043		90,000		96,054
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Flats East Development Recovery Zone Facility Bonds), 6.875%, 5/15/2040		35,000		37,930
Toledo Lucas County, OH, Authority Port Rev., Facilities (CSX, Inc. Project), 6.45%, 12/15/2021		1,000,000		1,187,700

			$	3,044,980

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Oklahoma - 1.4%
Oklahoma Industries Authority Rev. (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation Project), 5.5%, 7/01/2029 (Prerefunded 7/01/2018)	$	600,000	$	640,410
Tulsa, OK, Airport Improvement Trust Rev., “A”, 5%, 6/01/2045		55,000		57,879
Tulsa, OK, Industrial Authority Rev. (University of Tulsa), 6%, 10/01/2027		535,000		595,701
Tulsa, OK, Municipal Airport Trust Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), “B”, 5.5%, 6/01/2035		140,000		147,245
Tulsa, OK, Municipal Airport Trust Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), “B”, 5.5%, 12/01/2035		170,000		180,229

			$	1,621,464
Oregon - 0.4%
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, OR, “C”, 5.625%, 10/01/2026 (n)	$	350,000	$	350,466
Forest Grove, OR, Campus Improvement Rev. (Pacific University Project), “A”, 5%, 5/01/2030		20,000		21,163
Forest Grove, OR, Campus Improvement Rev. (Pacific University Project), “A”, 5%, 5/01/2036		95,000		98,093

			$	469,722
Pennsylvania - 6.2%
Clarion County, PA, Industrial Development Authority, Student Housing Rev. (Clarion University Foundation, Inc.), 5%, 7/01/2034	$	35,000	$	36,068
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Public School Building Authority Lease Rev. (School District of Philadelphia Project), 5%, 4/01/2028		140,000		147,192
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Asbury Atlantic, Inc.), 6%, 1/01/2040		105,000		109,487
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries Project), 6.125%, 1/01/2029 (Prerefunded 1/01/2019)		515,000		564,625
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries Project), 6.125%, 1/01/2029		55,000		59,694
Dallas, PA, Area Municipal Authority Rev. (Misericordia University Project), 5%, 5/01/2029		80,000		83,885
East Hempfield, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Millersville University Student Services), 5%, 7/01/2039		35,000		35,864
East Hempfield, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Millersville University Student Services), 5%, 7/01/2046		20,000		20,391
East Hempfield, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Student Services, Inc., Student Housing Project at Millersville University of Pennsylvania), 5%, 7/01/2030		25,000		26,263

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Pennsylvania - continued
East Hempfield, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Student Services, Inc., Student Housing Project at Millersville University of Pennsylvania), 5%, 7/01/2035	$	35,000	$	36,083
Erie, PA, Water Authority Rev., AGM, 5%, 12/01/2049		200,000		217,582
Lehigh County, PA, Water and Sewer Authority Rev. (Allentown Concession), “A”, 5%, 12/01/2043		900,000		969,876
Lehigh County, PA, Water and Sewer Authority Rev. (Allentown Concession), Capital Appreciation, “B”, 0%, 12/01/2036		940,000		402,151
Luzerne County, PA, “A”, AGM, 5%, 11/15/2029		145,000		156,462
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Issue), “A”, 5.25%, 1/15/2036		655,000		689,001
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community Project), 5.375%, 1/01/2050		90,000		87,026
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev. (The Pennsylvania Rapid Bridge Replacement Project), 5%, 6/30/2026		35,000		38,435
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev. (The Pennsylvania Rapid Bridge Replacement Project), 5%, 12/31/2030		85,000		90,179
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev. (The Pennsylvania Rapid Bridge Replacement Project), 5%, 12/31/2034		775,000		801,815
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Sewer Sludge Disposal Rev. (Philadelphia Biosolids Facility), 6.25%, 1/01/2032		260,000		277,555
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (East Stroudsburg University), 5%, 7/01/2042		200,000		203,800
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5.8%, 7/01/2030 (Prerefunded 7/01/2020)		65,000		74,281
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School Project), 6.5%, 6/15/2033		180,000		186,358
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School Project), 6.75%, 6/15/2043		140,000		145,376
Philadelphia, PA, Authority for Industrial Development Rev. (Tacony Academy Charter School Project), “A-1”, 7%, 6/15/2043		100,000		110,863
Philadelphia, PA, Municipal Authority Rev., 6.5%, 4/01/2034		105,000		114,008
Philadelphia, PA, Water & Wastewater Rev., “A”, 5%, 1/01/2036		1,000,000		1,086,380
Pittsburgh, PA, Urban Redevelopment Authority Rev., “C”, GNMA, 4.8%, 4/01/2028		440,000		442,407
West Shore, PA, Area Authority Rev. (Messiah Village Project) “A”, 5%, 7/01/2030		30,000		31,937
West Shore, PA, Area Authority Rev. (Messiah Village Project) “A”, 5%, 7/01/2035		60,000		62,418

			$	7,307,462

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Puerto Rico - 6.7%
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 7/01/2028	$	35,000	$	35,813
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “BB”, AMBAC, 5.25%, 7/01/2018		65,000		67,699
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “CC”, AGM, 5.5%, 7/01/2029		5,000		5,741
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “CC”, AGM, 5.25%, 7/01/2032		45,000		50,804
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “CC”, AGM, 5.25%, 7/01/2033		135,000		152,847
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “CC”, AGM, 5.25%, 7/01/2036		135,000		153,598
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “D”, AGM, 5%, 7/01/2032		300,000		303,021
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “J”, NATL, 5%, 7/01/2029		20,000		20,014
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “L”, NATL, 5.25%, 7/01/2035		150,000		161,970
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “L”, AMBAC, 5.25%, 7/01/2038		800,000		844,040
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “N”, AMBAC, 5.25%, 7/01/2030		60,000		62,939
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “N”, AMBAC, 5.25%, 7/01/2031		115,000		120,674
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “N”, NATL, 5.25%, 7/01/2033		145,000		157,679
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “N”, ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 7/01/2034		145,000		164,375
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority Rev., “N”, ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 7/01/2036		360,000		409,594
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, “A”, NATL, 5.5%, 7/01/2020		440,000		479,314
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, “A”, NATL, 5.5%, 7/01/2021		45,000		49,644
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, “A”, AGM, 5%, 7/01/2035		305,000		317,642
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, “A-4”, AGM, 5.25%, 7/01/2030		65,000		67,852
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, “C”, AGM, 5.25%, 7/01/2027		25,000		25,047
Puerto Rico Convention Center District Authority, Hotel Occupancy Tax Rev., “A”, AMBAC, 5%, 7/01/2031		300,000		295,713
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “LL”, NATL, 5.5%, 7/01/2017		10,000		10,211
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “NN”, NATL, 5.25%, 7/01/2022		115,000		126,629

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Puerto Rico - continued
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “NN”, NATL, 4.75%, 7/01/2033	$	20,000	$	20,008
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “SS”, NATL, 5%, 7/01/2019		530,000		536,185
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “UU”, NATL, 4.5%, 7/01/2018		10,000		10,343
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “UU”, NATL, 5%, 7/01/2019		50,000		52,827
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “UU”, AGM, 5%, 7/01/2022		30,000		30,381
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “VV”, NATL, 5.25%, 7/01/2025		25,000		26,699
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “VV”, 5.25%, 7/01/2029		120,000		129,845
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “VV”, NATL, 5.25%, 7/01/2030		180,000		195,246
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Rev., “VV”, NATL, 5.25%, 7/01/2032		20,000		21,775
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority (Cogeneration Facilities - AES Puerto Rico Project), 6.625%, 6/01/2026		320,000		291,514
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Educational Facilities Rev. (University Plaza Project), NATL, 5%, 7/01/2033		230,000		230,699
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5%, 4/01/2017		35,000		34,993
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5%, 4/01/2018		25,000		24,928
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 4%, 4/01/2020		10,000		9,513
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5%, 4/01/2021		40,000		38,800
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5.375%, 12/01/2021		30,000		29,530
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5%, 4/01/2022		50,000		47,918
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5%, 4/01/2027		95,000		84,782

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Puerto Rico - continued
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5.5%, 12/01/2031	$	55,000	$	49,149
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5.125%, 4/01/2032		55,000		46,819
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5%, 3/01/2036		55,000		46,006
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 5.375%, 4/01/2042		45,000		37,251
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., “C”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 7/01/2018		25,000		26,139
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., “C”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 7/01/2023		160,000		168,653
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., “C”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 7/01/2027		400,000		422,500
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority Special Tax Rev., “C”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 7/01/2028		60,000		63,560
Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, “A”, AGM, 5%, 8/01/2027		15,000		15,534
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Government Facilities Rev., “M-3”, NATL, 6%, 7/01/2027		125,000		129,600
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Government Facilities Rev., “M-3”, NATL, 6%, 7/01/2028		25,000		25,869
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Rev., “M-2”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 7/01/2035 (Put Date 7/01/2017)		315,000		319,753
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority Rev., Guaranteed (Government Facilities), “I”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 7/01/2036		35,000		35,036
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, NATL, 0%, 8/01/2042		350,000		82,086
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, NATL, 0%, 8/01/2045		95,000		18,806
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, NATL, 0%, 8/01/2046		1,940,000		364,526
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, AMBAC, 0%, 8/01/2054		555,000		55,644
University of Puerto Rico Rev., “P”, NATL, 5%, 6/01/2025		30,000		30,031

			$	7,835,808
Rhode Island - 0.9%
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp. Rev., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), “A”, ASSD GTY, 7%, 5/15/2039 (Prerefunded 5/15/2019)	$	855,000	$	967,809

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Rhode Island - continued
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), 5%, 5/15/2039	$	35,000	$	37,026

			$	1,004,835
South Carolina - 1.9%
Columbia, SC, Waterworks and Sewer System Rev., 5%, 2/01/2038	$	1,000,000	$	1,093,560
South Carolina Public Service Authority Rev., “A”, 5.125%, 12/01/2043		215,000		236,016
South Carolina Public Service Authority Rev., “B”, 5.125%, 12/01/2043		515,000		567,015
South Carolina Public Service Authority Rev., “C”, 5%, 12/01/2036		260,000		282,981

			$	2,179,572
South Dakota - 0.2%
South Dakota Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Sanford Obligated Group), “B”, 5%, 11/01/2034	$	230,000	$	248,715

Tennessee - 5.2%
Chattanooga, TN, Health Educational & Housing Facility Board Rev. (Catholic Health Initiatives), “A”, 5.25%, 1/01/2045	$	820,000	$	874,399
Clarksville, TN, Water, Sewer & Gas Rev., 5%, 2/01/2038		1,000,000		1,087,160
Knox County, TN, Educational & Housing Facility Board, Hospital Rev. (Covenant Health), “A”, 5%, 1/01/2042		685,000		731,402
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facility Board, Hospital Rev. (Covenant Health), “A”, 5%, 1/01/2047		300,000		319,302
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Electric Rev., “A”, 5%, 5/15/2036		1,000,000		1,099,310
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Rev. (Vanderbilt University Medical Center), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2035		225,000		244,256
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Rev. (Vanderbilt University Medical Center), “A”, 5%, 7/01/2040		120,000		128,485
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 9/01/2017		180,000		184,795
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 9/01/2022		205,000		231,738
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 9/01/2023		300,000		338,817
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 9/01/2026		610,000		685,719
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “C”, 5%, 2/01/2025		185,000		202,087

			$	6,127,470

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Texas - 15.0%
Austin, TX, (Travis, Williamson and Hays Counties) Water and Wastewater System Rev., 5%, 11/15/2045	$	125,000	$	139,646
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 1/01/2017		95,000		95,243
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 1/01/2019		190,000		190,272
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 1/01/2020		155,000		155,277
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 1/01/2024		90,000		90,103
Brazos River, TX, Brazoria County Environmental Rev. (Dow Chemical, Co.), “A-3”, 5.125%, 5/15/2033		165,000		170,004
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District (Dow Chemical Co.), “B-2”, 4.95%, 5/15/2033		590,000		607,535
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Senior Lien Rev., “A”, 5%, 1/01/2045		100,000		106,679
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Idea Public Schools), 5%, 8/15/2042		330,000		339,375
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 6.125%, 12/01/2040		100,000		110,000
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 6.25%, 12/01/2045		70,000		77,160
Conroe, TX, Independent School District, Unlimited Tax School Building and Refunding, PSF, 5%, 2/15/2039		155,000		171,774
Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Rev., “A”, 5%, 11/01/2038		335,000		346,316
Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Rev., “C”, 5%, 11/01/2045		750,000		796,440
Dallas, TX, Civic Center Convention Complex Rev., ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 8/15/2034		465,000		499,126
Fort Worth, TX, Independent School District, Unlimited Tax School Building, PSF, 5%, 2/15/2039		315,000		348,875
Frenship, TX, Independent School District, AGM, 5%, 2/15/2033 (Prerefunded 2/15/2017)		500,000		504,250
Frenship, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2/15/2044		1,000,000		1,106,190
Frisco, TX, Independent School District, Unlimited Tax School Building, PSF, 5%, 8/15/2023		1,170,000		1,366,010
Gregg County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Hospital Rev., (Good Shepherd Obligated Group), “A”, FRN, 4.273%, 10/01/2029 (Put Date 3/01/2017)		180,000		179,023
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (CITGO Petroleum Corp.), 8%, 4/01/2028		250,000		250,378

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Texas - continued
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Medical Facilities Rev. (Baylor College of Medicine), “D”, 5.625%, 11/15/2032 (Prerefunded 11/15/2018)	$	490,000	$	531,469
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., “C”, 5%, 11/15/2031		90,000		98,325
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., “C”, 5%, 11/15/2032		20,000		21,749
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., “C”, 5%, 11/15/2033		40,000		43,355
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, AGM, 0%, 11/15/2041		70,000		22,404
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, “A”, AGM, 0%, 11/15/2046		175,000		43,383
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., “B”, 5%, 7/01/2026		160,000		178,738
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., Special Facilities Rev. (United Airlines, Inc. Terminal Improvement Projects), “B-1”, 5%, 7/15/2030		100,000		105,128
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., Special Facilities Rev. (United Airlines, Inc. Terminal Improvement Projects), “B-2”, 5%, 7/15/2020		110,000		117,324
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., Subordinate Lien, “A”, 5%, 7/01/2031		140,000		149,395
Houston, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (United Parcel Service, Inc.), 6%, 3/01/2023		245,000		245,135
La Vernia, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (KIPP, Inc.), “A”, 6.25%, 8/15/2039 (Prerefunded 8/15/2019)		150,000		168,668
La Vernia, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Lifeschool of Dallas), “A”, 7.5%, 8/15/2041 (Prerefunded 8/15/2019)		385,000		444,848
Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District 1 (Houston Lighting), AMBAC, 5.125%, 11/01/2028		2,000,000		2,305,640
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “A-1”, 5%, 7/01/2031		15,000		16,147
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “A-1”, 4%, 7/01/2036		80,000		75,524
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “A-1”, 5%, 7/01/2046		160,000		167,182
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “A-1”, 5%, 7/01/2051		160,000		166,262
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “B”, 4%, 7/01/2031		25,000		23,802

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Texas - continued
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “B”, 4.25%, 7/01/2036	$	35,000	$	33,040
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “B”, 5%, 7/01/2046		100,000		103,697
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Senior Living Rev. (Cardinal Bay, Inc. - Village on the Park/Carriage Inn Project), “B”, 4.75%, 7/01/2051		90,000		87,430
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Student Housing Rev. (CHF - Collegiate Housing Stephenville III, L.L.C. - Tarleton State University Project), 5%, 4/01/2030		25,000		26,054
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Student Housing Rev. (CHF - Collegiate Housing Stephenville III, L.L.C. - Tarleton State University Project), 5%, 4/01/2035		30,000		30,696
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Student Housing Rev. (CHF - Collegiate Housing Stephenville III, L.L.C. - Tarleton State University Project), 5%, 4/01/2047		65,000		65,702
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Student Housing Rev. (Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi II LLC - Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Project), 5%, 4/01/2031		20,000		20,847
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Student Housing Rev. (Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi II LLC - Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Project), 5%, 4/01/2036		20,000		20,463
New Hope, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Student Housing Rev. (Collegiate Housing Corpus Christi II LLC - Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Project), 5%, 4/01/2048		35,000		35,388
North Texas Education Finance Corp., Education Rev. (Uplift Education), “A”, 5.125%, 12/01/2042		150,000		153,570
North Texas Tollway Authority Rev., 6%, 1/01/2038		620,000		705,585
North Texas Tollway Authority Rev. (Special Projects System), “D”, 5%, 9/01/2031		1,000,000		1,107,240
Red River, TX, Education Finance Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University Project), 5%, 6/01/2046		55,000		56,721
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5.125%, 6/01/2036 (Prerefunded 6/01/2017)		115,000		117,406
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Air Force Village Obligated Group Project), 6.125%, 11/15/2029 (Prerefunded 11/15/2019)		40,000		45,085
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Air Force Village Obligated Group Project), 6.375%, 11/15/2044 (Prerefunded 11/15/2019)		315,000		357,311

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Texas - continued
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Barton Creek Senior Living Center, Inc., Querencia Project), 5%, 11/15/2035	$	60,000	$	62,686
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Barton Creek Senior Living Center, Inc., Querencia Project), 5%, 11/15/2040		70,000		72,870
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Buckingham Senior Living Community, Inc. Project), 3.875%, 11/15/2020		55,000		55,170
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Stayton at Museum Way), 8.25%, 11/15/2044		500,000		527,710
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility Rev. (Trinity Terrace Project), “A-1”, 5%, 10/01/2044		60,000		60,694
Texas Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp III., Gas Supply Rev., 5%, 12/15/2031		135,000		140,635
Texas Private Activity Surface Transportation Corp. Senior Lien Rev. (NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC Segments 3A & 3B Facility), 7%, 12/31/2038		115,000		130,669
Texas Private Activity Surface Transportation Corp. Senior Lien Rev. (NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC Segments 3A & 3B Facility), 6.75%, 6/30/2043		95,000		111,671
Texas Tech University Rev., Refunding & Improvement, “A”, 5%, 8/15/2030		175,000		194,026
Waco Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Baylor University), 5%, 3/01/2043		675,000		724,505

			$	17,621,025
Vermont - 0.2%
Burlington, VT, Airport Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 7/01/2024	$	10,000	$	11,300
Burlington, VT, Airport Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 7/01/2030		15,000		16,357
Vermont Economic Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), 4.75%, 4/01/2036 (Put Date 4/02/2018)		195,000		193,385

			$	221,042
Virginia - 0.4%
Embrey Mill Community Development Authority, VA, Special Assessment Rev., 7.25%, 3/01/2043	$	165,000	$	172,742
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority Rev. (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco LLC Project), 5.5%, 1/01/2042		275,000		293,939

			$	466,681

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Washington - 2.3%
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.75%, 12/01/2032 (Prerefunded 12/01/2017)	$	535,000	$	560,717
Snohomish County, WA, Public Hospital District No.3, 5%, 12/01/2031 (Prerefunded 12/01/2017)		505,000		525,675
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Highline Medical Center), FHA, 6.25%, 8/01/2036 (Prerefunded 8/01/2018)		695,000		752,720
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Virginia Mason Medical Center), “A”, 6.25%, 8/15/2042		570,000		585,253
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5.875%, 10/01/2034		225,000		242,357
Washington Housing Finance Community Nonprofit Housing Rev. (Heron’s Key Senior Living), “B-3”, 4.375%, 1/01/2021		100,000		100,252

			$	2,766,974
West Virginia - 0.4%
Monongalia County, WV, Building Commission Improvement Rev. (Monongalia Health System Obligated Group), 5%, 7/01/2029	$	30,000	$	33,465
Monongalia County, WV, Building Commission Improvement Rev. (Monongalia Health System Obligated Group), 5%, 7/01/2030		85,000		94,117
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority Hospital Rev. (Thomas Health System), 6.5%, 10/01/2038		285,000		294,510

			$	422,092
Wisconsin - 0.6%
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 7/15/2026	$	185,000	$	203,269
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 7/15/2028		55,000		59,970
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (St. John’s Community, Inc.), “B”, 5%, 9/15/2037		20,000		20,679
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (St. John’s Community, Inc.), “B”, 5%, 9/15/2045		35,000		35,989
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority Education Rev. (Pine Lake Preparatory), 5.5%, 3/01/2045		45,000		45,802
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority Healthcare Facility (Church Home of Hartford, Inc. Project), “A”, 5%, 9/01/2030		25,000		25,776
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority Healthcare Facility (Church Home of Hartford, Inc. Project), “A”, 5%, 9/01/2038		30,000		30,344
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, Airport Facilities Rev. (Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC), “B”, 5%, 7/01/2022		90,000		96,017
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, Airport Facilities Rev. (Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC), “B”, 5.25%, 7/01/2028		95,000		101,649

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Issuer	Shares/Par		Value ($)
Municipal Bonds - continued
Wisconsin - continued
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, Airport Facilities Rev. (Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC), “B”, 5%, 7/01/2042	$	60,000	$	60,826

			$	680,321
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $164,501,685)			$	170,874,102

Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (3.9)%				(4,534,243	)
VMTPS, at liquidation value of $48,750,000 net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $52,078 (issued by the fund) - (41.4)%				(48,697,922	)
Net assets applicable to common shares - 100.0%			$	117,641,937

(a)	Non-income producing security.

(d)	In default.

(n)

Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $1,336,426 representing 1.1% of net assets applicable to common shares.

(q)	Interest received was less than stated coupon rate.

(u)	Underlying security deposited into special purpose trust (“the trust”) upon creation of self-deposited inverse floaters.

(z)

Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities:


Restricted Securities	Acquisition Date	Cost		Value
Resolution Trust Corp., Pass-Through Certificates, “1993”, 9.75%, 12/01/2017	8/27/93		$227,741		$227,741
% of Net assets applicable to common shares					0.2%

The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:

ARPS

Auction Rate Preferred Shares

COP

Certificate of Participation

FRN

Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and the current rate may not be the rate reported at period end.

LOC

Letter of Credit

VMTPS

Variable Rate Municipal Term Preferred Shares

Portfolio of Investments – continued


Insurers
AGM		Assured Guaranty Municipal
AMBAC		AMBAC Indemnity Corp.
ASSD GTY		Assured Guaranty Insurance Co.
BAM		Build America Mutual
BHAC		Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CALHF		California Health Facility Construction Loan Insurance Program
FHA		Federal Housing Administration
FHLMC		Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
GNMA		Government National Mortgage Assn.
NATL		National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.
PSF		Permanent School Fund
SYNCORA		Syncora Guarantee Inc.

See Notes to Financial Statements

Financial Statements

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

At 11/30/16

This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.


Assets
Investments, at value (identified cost, $164,501,685)	$170,874,102
Cash	354,616
Receivables for
Investments sold	106,074
Interest	2,731,282
Other assets	7,917
Total assets	$174,073,991
Liabilities
Payables for
Distributions on common shares	$17,356
Interest expense and fees	119,503
Payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets	7,499,925
Payable to affiliates
Investment adviser	5,949
Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs	342
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation	15
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	91,042
VMTPS, at liquidation value of $48,750,000 net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $52,078	48,697,922
Total liabilities	$56,432,054
Net assets applicable to common shares	$117,641,937
Net assets consist of
Paid-in capital - common shares	$117,648,434
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	6,372,417
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments	(6,845,239	)
Undistributed net investment income	466,325
Net assets applicable to common shares	$117,641,937
VMTPS, at liquidation value of $48,750,000 net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $52,078 (1,950 shares of Series 2019/3 issued and outstanding at $25,000 per share)	48,697,922
Net assets including preferred shares	$166,339,859
Common shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding	11,586,957
Net asset value per common share (net assets of $117,641,937 / 11,586,957 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)	$10.15

See Notes to Financial Statements

Financial Statements

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year ended 11/30/16

This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.


Net investment income
Income
Interest	$8,459,122
Other	43
Total investment income	$8,459,165
Expenses
Management fee	$1,139,371
Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs	14,182
Administrative services fee	36,947
Independent Trustees’ compensation	17,794
Stock exchange fee	23,761
ARPS service fee	391
Custodian fee	12,132
Reimbursement of custodian expenses	(5,983	)
Shareholder communications	26,868
Audit and tax fees	78,694
Legal fees	10,874
ARPS redemption costs	7,204
Interest expense and fees and amortization of VMTPS debt issuance costs	866,991
Miscellaneous	75,101
Total expenses	$2,304,327
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser	(35,058	)
Net expenses	$2,269,269
Net investment income	$6,189,896
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis)
Investments:
Non-affiliated issuers	$1,391,441
Futures contracts	11,257
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	$1,402,698
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Investments	$(7,110,392	)
Futures contracts	3,055
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments	$(7,107,337	)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments	$(5,704,639	)
Distributions declared to shareholders of ARPS	$(1,405	)
Change in net assets from operations	$483,852

See Notes to Financial Statements

Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.


	Years ended 11/30
	2016			2015
Change in net assets
From operations
Net investment income		$6,189,896			$6,322,396
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		1,402,698			402,455
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments		(7,107,337	)		(505,428	)
Distributions declared to shareholders of ARPS		(1,405	)		(1,123	)
Change in net assets from operations		$483,852			$6,218,300
Distributions declared to common shareholders
From net investment income		$(5,671,815	)		$(5,920,935	)
Total change in net assets		$(5,187,963	)		$297,365
Net assets applicable to common shares
At beginning of period		122,829,900			122,532,535
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $466,325 and $395,840, respectively)		$117,641,937			$122,829,900

See Notes to Financial Statements

Financial Statements

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year ended 11/30/16

This statement provides a summary of cash flows from investment activity for the fund.


Cash flows from operating activities:
Change in net assets from operations	$483,852
Distributions to shareholders of ARPS	1,405
Change in net assets from operations excluding distributions declared to shareholders of ARPS	$485,257
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Purchase of investment securities	(60,998,160	)
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities	59,394,269
Proceeds from disposition of short-term investments, net	200,000
Realized gain/loss on investments	(1,391,441	)
Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments	7,110,392
Net amortization/accretion of income	(205,002	)
Amortization of VMTPS debt issuance costs	38,785
Increase in interest receivable	(20,709	)
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities	(5,867	)
Decrease in payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts	(1,406	)
Decrease in deposits with brokers	30,600
Increase in other assets	(5,915	)
Increase in payable for interest expense and fees	52,888
Net cash provided by operating activities	$4,683,691
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of VMTPS debt issuance costs	(67,499	)
Cash receipts from issuance of Series 2019 VMTPS, at liquidation value	48,785,000
Cash payments to repurchase Series 2016 VMTPS	(47,960,000	)
Cash payments to redeem ARPS	(825,000	)
Cash distributions paid on common shares	(5,675,132	)
Cash distributions paid on ARPS	(1,429	)
Net cash used by financing activities	$(5,744,060	)
Net decrease in cash	$(1,060,369	)
Cash:
Beginning of period	$1,414,985
End of period	$354,616

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the year ended November 30, 2016 for interest was $775,318.

See Notes to Financial Statements

Financial Statements

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the past 5 years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.


Common Shares	Years ended 11/30
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
Net asset value, beginning of period		$10.60			$10.58			$9.61			$10.96			$9.48
Income (loss) from investment operations
Net investment income (d)		$0.53	(c)		$0.55			$0.55			$0.57			$0.61
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments		(0.49	)		(0.02	)		0.95			(1.37	)		1.30
Distributions declared to shareholders of ARPS		(0.00	)(w)		(0.00	)(w)		(0.00	)(w)		(0.00	)(w)		(0.01	)
Total from investment operations		$0.04			$0.53			$1.50			$(0.80	)		$1.90
Less distributions declared to common shareholders
From net investment income		$(0.49	)		$(0.51	)		$(0.53	)		$(0.55	)		$(0.63	)
Net increase resulting from tender and repurchase of ARPS		$—			$—			$—			$—			$0.21
Net asset value, end of period (x)		$10.15			$10.60			$10.58			$9.61			$10.96
Market value, end of period		$9.37			$9.70			$9.27			$8.30			$11.03
Total return at market value (%) (p)		1.34			10.39			18.34			(20.20	)		24.28
Total return at net asset value (%) (j)(r)(s)(x)		0.46	(c)		5.69			16.65			(7.02	)		22.84	(y)
Ratios (%) (to average net assets applicable to common shares) and Supplemental data:
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(p)		1.82	(c)		1.72			1.77			1.79			1.46
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(p)		1.79	(c)		1.69			1.74			1.76			1.43
Net investment income (p)		4.89	(c)		5.16			5.42			5.53			5.94
Portfolio turnover		18			11			15			19			14
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted)		$117,642			$122,830			$122,533			$111,399			$126,973
Supplemental Ratios (%):
Ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shares after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l)(p)		1.10	(c)		1.15			1.18			1.17			1.16
Ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shares, ARPS, and VMTPS after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l)(p)		0.80	(c)		0.82			0.83			0.83			0.82
Net investment income available to common shares		4.89	(c)		5.16			5.42			5.53			5.86

Financial Highlights – continued


	Years ended 11/30
	2016		2015		2014		2013		2012
Senior Securities:
ARPS		—		33		33		33		33
VMTPS		1,950		1,917		1,917		1,917		1,917
Total preferred shares outstanding		1,950		1,950		1,950		1,950		1,950
Asset coverage per preferred share (k)		$85,302		$87,990		$87,837		$82,128		$90,114
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share (m)		$25,000		$25,000		$25,000		$25,000		$25,000
Average market value per preferred share (m)(u)		$25,000		$25,000		$25,000		$25,000		$25,000

(c)	Amount reflects a one-time reimbursement of expenses by the custodian (or former custodian) without which net investment income and performance would be lower and expenses would be higher. See Note 2 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.

(d)	Per share data is based on average shares outstanding.

(f)	Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable.

(j)	Total return at net asset value is calculated using the net asset value of the fund, not the publicly traded price and therefore may be different than the total return at market value.

(k)	Calculated by subtracting the fund’s total liabilities (not including liquidation preference of ARPS and VMTPS) from the fund’s total assets and dividing this number by the total number of preferred shares outstanding.

(l)

Interest expense and fees relate to payments made to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets and interest expense paid to shareholders of VMTPS. For the year ended November 30, 2012, the expense ratio also excludes fees and expenses related to the tender and repurchase of a portion of the fund’s ARPS. For the year ended November 30, 2016, the expense ratio also excludes fees and expenses related to redemption of the fund’s ARPS and amortization of VMTPS debt issuance costs.

(m)	Amount excludes accrued unpaid distributions on ARPS and accrued interest on VMTPS.

(p)	Ratio excludes dividend payments on ARPS.

(r)	Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower.

(s)	From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.

(u)	Average market value represents the approximate fair value of each of the fund’s ARPS and VMTPS.

(w)	Per share amount was less than $0.01.

(x)	The net asset values and total returns at net asset value have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes.

(y)

Included in the total return at net asset value for the year ended November 30, 2012 is the impact of the tender and repurchase by the fund of a portion of its ARPS at 95% of the ARPS’ per share liquidation preference. Had this transaction not occurred, the total return at net asset value for the year ended November 30, 2012 would have been lower by 1.87%.

See Notes to Financial Statements

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Business and Organization

MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the fund) is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified closed-end management investment company.

The fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies.

(2) Significant Accounting Policies

General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests primarily in municipal instruments. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuer’s future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable, the security could decline in value, and distributions made by the fund could be taxable to shareholders.

On March 24, 2016, the fund adopted the accounting provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-03 (“ASU 2015-03”), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Topic 835-30) – Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs which resulted in a change in accounting principle. Under ASU 2015-03, debt issuance costs are required to be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. Prior to the fund’s adoption of ASU 2015-03, debt issuance costs were deferred and presented as an asset.

In October 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released its Final Rule on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rule”). The Rule, which introduces two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies – Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN – also contains amendments to Regulation S-X which

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

impact financial statement presentation, particularly the presentation of derivative investments. Although still evaluating the impacts of the Rule, management believes that many of the Regulation S-X amendments are consistent with the fund’s current financial statement presentation and expects that the fund will be able to comply with the Rule’s Regulation S-X amendments by the August 1, 2017 compliance date.

In November 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). For entities that have restricted cash and are required to present a statement of cash flows, ASU 2016-18 changes the cash flow presentation for restricted cash. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2016-18, management expects that the effects of the fund’s adoption will be limited to the reclassification of restricted cash on the fund’s Statement of Cash Flows and the addition of disclosures regarding the nature of the restrictions on restricted cash. ASU 2016-18 would first be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods.

Balance Sheet Offsetting – The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty. The fund’s right to setoff may be restricted or prohibited by the bankruptcy or insolvency laws of the particular jurisdiction to which a specific master netting agreement counterparty is subject. Balance sheet offsetting disclosures, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.

Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans, including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price on their primary exchange as provided by a third-party pricing service. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation on their primary exchange as provided by a third-party pricing service. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.

The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of November 30, 2016 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:


Investments at Value	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Municipal Bonds		$—		$170,874,102		$—		$170,874,102

For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.

Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts. At November 30, 2016, the fund did not have any outstanding derivative instruments.

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended November 30, 2016 as reported in the Statement of Operations:


Risk	Futures Contracts
Interest Rate		$11,257

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended November 30, 2016 as reported in the Statement of Operations:


Risk	Futures Contracts
Interest Rate		$3,055

Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, uncleared derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an ISDA Master Agreement on a bilateral basis. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each agreement to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.

Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the clearing broker and the clearing house for cleared derivatives (e.g., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for uncleared derivatives (e.g., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and uncleared options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, which contains a collateral support annex, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as “Restricted cash” or “Deposits with brokers.” Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, are noted in the Portfolio of Investments. The fund may be required to make payments of interest on uncovered collateral or margin obligations with the broker. Any such payments are included in interest expense in the Statement of Operations.

Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.

The fund bears the risk of interest rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.

Inverse Floaters – The fund invests in municipal inverse floating rate securities which are structured by the issuer (known as primary market inverse floating rate securities) or by the fund utilizing the fund’s municipal bonds which have already been issued (known as self-deposited secondary market inverse floating rate securities) to have variable rates of interest which typically move in the opposite direction of short-term interest rates. A self-deposited secondary market inverse floating rate security is created when the fund transfers a fixed rate municipal bond to a special purpose trust, and causes the trust to (a) issue floating rate certificates to third parties, in an amount equal to a fraction of the par amount of the deposited bonds (these certificates usually pay tax-exempt interest at short-term interest rates that typically reset weekly; and the certificate holders typically, on seven days notice, have the option to tender their certificates to the trust or another party for redemption at par plus accrued interest), and (b) issue inverse floating rate certificates (sometimes referred to as “inverse floaters”) which are held by the fund. Such self-deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are accounted for as secured borrowings, with the municipal bonds reflected in the investments of the fund and amounts owed to the holders of the floating rate certificates under the provisions of the trust, which amounts are paid solely from the assets of the trust, reflected as liabilities of the fund in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the caption, “Payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets”. The carrying value of the fund’s payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets as reported in the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. The value of the payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets as of the reporting date is considered level 2 under the fair value hierarchy disclosure. At November 30, 2016, the fund’s payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets was $7,499,925 and the weighted average interest rate on the floating rate certificates issued by the trust was 0.80%. For the year ended November 30, 2016, the average payable to the holders of the floating rate certificates from trust assets was $7,524,564 at a weighted average interest rate of 0.49%. Interest expense and fees relate to interest payments made to the holders of certain floating rate certificates and associated fees, both of which are made from trust assets. Interest expense and fees are recorded as incurred. For the year

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

ended November 30, 2016, interest expense and fees related to self-deposited inverse floaters amounted to $78,349 and are included in interest expense in the Statement of Operations. Primary market inverse floaters held by the fund are not accounted for as secured borrowings.

Statement of Cash Flows – Information on financial transactions which have been settled through the receipt or disbursement of cash is presented in the Statement of Cash Flows. The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is the amount included within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and includes cash on hand at its custodian bank and does not include any short-term investments.

Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.

Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.

The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.

Legal fees and other related expenses incurred to preserve and protect the value of a security owned are added to the cost of the security; other legal fees are expensed. Capital infusions made directly to the security issuer, which are generally non-recurring, incurred to protect or enhance the value of high-yield debt securities, are reported as additions to the cost basis of the security. Costs that are incurred to negotiate the terms or conditions of capital infusions or that are expected to result in a plan of reorganization are reported as realized losses. Ongoing costs incurred to protect or enhance an investment, or costs incurred to pursue other claims or legal actions, are expensed.

Reimbursement of Expenses by Custodian – In December 2015, the fund’s custodian (or former custodian), State Street Bank and Trust Company, announced that it intended to reimburse its asset servicing clients for expense amounts that it billed in

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

error during the period 1998 through 2015. The amount of this one-time reimbursement attributable to the fund is reflected as “Reimbursement of custodian expenses” in the Statement of Operations.

Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken on federal and state tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.

Book/tax differences primarily relate to defaulted bonds, expiration of capital loss carryforwards, amortization and accretion of debt securities, and non-deductible expenses that result from the treatment of VMTPS as equity for tax purposes.

The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last two fiscal years is as follows:


	11/30/16		11/30/15
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains)		$36,408		$27,946
Tax-exempt income		6,386,660		6,512,000
Total distributions		$6,423,068		$6,539,946

The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:


As of 11/30/16
Cost of investments	$155,564,383
Gross appreciation	10,853,851
Gross depreciation	(3,044,057	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	$7,809,794
Undistributed ordinary income	37,690
Undistributed tax-exempt income	772,413
Capital loss carryforwards	(8,247,511	)
Post-October capital loss deferral	(35,105	)
Other temporary differences	(343,778	)

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized for fund fiscal years beginning after November 30, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses (“post-enactment losses”). Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses (“pre-enactment losses”). As a transition rule, the Act requires that all post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.

As of November 30, 2016, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such pre-enactment losses expire as follows:


11/30/17	$(5,772,221	)
11/30/18	(2,208,465	)
11/30/19	(266,825	)
Total	$(8,247,511	)

(3) Transactions with Affiliates

Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.65% of the fund’s average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares).

The investment adviser has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee to 0.63% of the fund’s average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares). This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until November 30, 2017. For the year ended November 30, 2016, this management fee reduction amounted to $35,058, which is included in the reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the year ended November 30, 2016 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.63% of the fund’s average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares).

The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s total annual operating expenses, excluding interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs, and investment-related expenses (including interest expenses and fees associated with investments in inverse floating rate instruments), such that total fund operating expenses do not exceed 0.89% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares). This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until November 30, 2017. For the year ended November 30, 2016, the fund’s actual operating expenses did not exceed the limit and therefore, the investment adviser did not pay any portion of the fund’s expenses related to this agreement.

Transfer Agent – The fund engages Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”) as the sole transfer agent for the fund’s common shares. MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC) monitors and supervises the activities of Computershare for an agreed upon fee approved by the Board of Trustees. For the year ended November 30, 2016, these fees paid to MFSC amounted to $4,083.

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares). The administrative services fee incurred for the year ended November 30, 2016 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0211% of the fund’s average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares).

Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS and MFSC.

Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into a service agreement (the ISO Agreement) which provides for payment of fees solely by the funds to Tarantino LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Senior Officer (ISO) for the funds. Frank L. Tarantino serves as the ISO and is an officer of the funds and the sole member of Tarantino LLC. The funds can terminate the ISO Agreement with Tarantino LLC at any time under the terms of the ISO Agreement. For the year ended November 30, 2016, the fee paid by the fund under this agreement was $257 and is included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ISO.

(4) Portfolio Securities

For the year ended November 30, 2016, purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $34,405,160 and $31,731,416, respectively.

(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest

The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. The fund reserves the right to repurchase shares of beneficial interest of the fund subject to Trustee approval. During the years ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, there were no transactions in fund shares.

(6) Line of Credit

The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.25 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Overnight Federal Reserve funds rate or daily one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Overnight Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the year ended November 30, 2016, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $682 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.

(7) Preferred Shares

As of March 23, 2016, the fund had 1,917 shares issued and outstanding of Variable Rate Municipal Term Preferred Shares, series 2016/9 (Series 2016 VMTPS) and 33 shares issued and outstanding of Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS), series M, each with a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. Subsequent to March 23, 2016, all shares of the Series 2016 VMTPS and the ARPS were redeemed using proceeds from the issuance of a new series of Variable Rate Municipal Term Preferred Shares as further described below.

The Series 2016 VMTPS were a variable rate form of preferred shares with a term redemption date of September 30, 2016 unless extended through negotiation with the private holders of the Series 2016 VMTPS. Dividends were set weekly to a fixed spread against the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index. During the period December 1, 2015 through March 23, 2016, the Series 2016 VMTPS dividend rates ranged from 1.26% to 1.38%. For the period December 1, 2015 through March 23, 2016, the average dividend rate was 1.27%. Dividends paid to the Series 2016 VMTPS were treated as interest expense and recorded as incurred. For the period December 1, 2015 through March 23, 2016, interest expense related to the Series 2016 VMTPS amounted to $192,467 and is included in interest expense in the Statement of Operations.

The ARPS were preferred shares whose dividends were reset every seven days through an auction process. During the time the ARPS were outstanding, if the ARPS were unable to be remarketed on a remarketing date as part of the auction process, the fund was required to pay the maximum applicable rate on the ARPS to holders of such shares for successive dividend periods until such time as the shares were successfully remarketed. The maximum rate on the ARPS rated aa3/AA- or better was equal to 110% of the higher of (i) the Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Bond Rate or (ii) the “AA” Composite Commercial Paper Rate. Since February 2008, regularly scheduled auctions for the ARPS have failed. During the period the ARPS were outstanding, the ARPS dividend rates ranged from 0.19% to 0.66% for series M. For the period the ARPS were outstanding, the average ARPS dividend rate was 0.43% for series M.

The fund paid an annual service fee to broker-dealers with customers who were beneficial owners of the ARPS. The service fee was equivalent to 0.25% of the applicable ARPS liquidation value while the ARPS auctions were successful or to 0.15% or less, varying by broker-dealer, while the auctions were failing.

On March 24, 2016, the fund issued 1,950 shares of a new series of Variable Rate Municipal Term Preferred Shares (Series 2019 VMTPS) in a private offering with an aggregate liquidation preference of $48,750,000. The fund used a portion of the proceeds from the sale of its Series 2019 VMTPS to fund the redemption on March 24, 2016 of all of its outstanding Series 2016 VMTPS and used the remaining portion of its

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

Series 2019 VMTPS offering proceeds to fund the redemption of all of its outstanding ARPS. The redemption date for the fund’s series M ARPS was April 29, 2016. The ARPS were redeemed at their respective liquidation preferences of $25,000 per share plus dividends owed through, but excluding, the applicable redemption dates. Taking into account its Series 2019 VMTPS issuance and the redemption of the outstanding Series 2016 VMTPS and the ARPS, the amount of the fund’s assets attributable to preferred shares and related leverage remains unchanged.

The Series 2019 VMTPS are redeemable at the option of the fund in whole or in part at the liquidation preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, but generally solely for the purpose of decreasing the leverage of the fund. The Series 2019 VMTPS are subject to a mandatory term redemption date of March 31, 2019 unless extended through negotiation with the private holders of the Series 2019 VMTPS. There is no assurance that the term of the Series 2019 VMTPS will be extended or that the Series 2019 VMTPS will be replaced with any other preferred shares or other form of leverage upon the redemption of the Series 2019 VMTPS. Six months prior to the term redemption date of the Series 2019 VMTPS, the fund is required to begin to segregate liquid assets with the fund’s custodian to fund the redemption. Dividends on the Series 2019 VMTPS are cumulative and are set weekly to a fixed spread against the SIFMA Municipal Swap Index. During the period from issuance on March 24, 2016 through November 30, 2016, the Series 2019 VMTPS dividend rates ranged from 1.44% to 2.02%. For the period March 24, 2016 through November 30, 2016, the average dividend rate was 1.66%.

In the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, the Series 2019 VMTPS aggregate liquidation preference is shown as a liability since they have a stated mandatory redemption date. Dividends paid to the Series 2019 VMTPS are treated as interest expense and recorded as incurred. For the period March 24, 2016 through November 30, 2016, interest expense related to the Series 2019 VMTPS amounted to $557,381 and is included in interest expense in the Statement of Operations. Costs directly related to the issuance of the Series 2019 VMTPS are considered debt issuance costs. Debt issuance costs are presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability and are being amortized into interest expense over the life of the Series 2019 VMTPS. The period-end carrying value for the Series 2019 VMTPS in the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities is its liquidation value less any unamortized debt issuance costs, which approximates its fair value. Its fair value would be considered level 2 under the fair value hierarchy.

Under the terms of a purchase agreement between the fund and the investor in the Series 2019 VMTPS, the fund is subject to various investment restrictions that are substantially similar to those that were in place with respect to the Series 2016 VMTPS. These investment-related requirements are in various respects more restrictive than those to which the fund is otherwise subject in accordance with its investment objectives and policies. In addition, the fund is subject to certain restrictions on its investments imposed by guidelines of the rating agencies that rate the Series 2019 VMTPS, which guidelines may be changed by the applicable rating agency, in its sole discretion, from time to time. These guidelines may impose asset coverage or portfolio composition requirements that are more stringent than those imposed on the fund by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”).

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

The fund is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the Series 2019 VMTPS as defined in the fund’s governing documents and the 1940 Act. One of a number of asset coverage-related requirements is that the fund is not permitted to declare or pay common share dividends unless immediately thereafter the fund has a minimum asset coverage ratio of 200% with respect to the Series 2019 VMTPS after deducting the amount of such common share dividends.

The 1940 Act requires that the preferred shareholders of the fund, voting as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two trustees at all times, and elect a majority of the trustees at any time when dividends on the preferred shares are unpaid for two full years. Unless otherwise required by law or under the terms of the preferred shares, each preferred shareholder is entitled to one vote and preferred shareholders will vote together with common shareholders as a single class.

Leverage involves risks and special considerations for the fund’s common shareholders. To the extent that investments are purchased by the fund with proceeds from the issuance of preferred shares, the fund’s net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund. Changes in the value of the fund’s portfolio will be borne entirely by the common shareholders. It is possible that the fund will be required to sell assets at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so in order to redeem preferred shares to comply with asset coverage or other restrictions including those imposed by the 1940 Act and the rating agencies that rate the preferred shares. There is no assurance that the fund’s leveraging strategy will be successful.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the Fund) as of November 30, 2016, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and others. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust at November 30, 2016, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

LOGO

Boston, Massachusetts January 13, 2017

RESULTS OF SHAREHOLDER MEETING

(unaudited)

At the special meeting of shareholders of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust, which was held on October 6, 2016, the following actions were taken:

Item 1: To elect the following individuals as Trustees, elected by the holders of common and preferred shares together:


	Number of Shares
Nominee	For		Withheld Authority
Maureen R. Goldfarb		7,153,654.652		3,263,272.891
Robert J. Manning		7,146,129.123		3,270,798.420
Maryanne L. Roepke		7,208,129.652		3,208,797.891

Item 2: To elect the following individuals as Trustees, elected by the holders of preferred shares only:


	Number of Shares
Nominee	For		Withheld Authority
John P. Kavanaugh		1,950		0
Laurie J. Thomsen		1,950		0

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS — IDENTIFICATION AND BACKGROUND

The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, as of January 1, 2017, are listed below, together with their principal occupations during the past five years. (Their titles may have varied during that period.) The address of each Trustee and Officer is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.


Name, Age	Position(s) Held with Fund	Trustee/Officer Since^(h)	Term Expiring^(l)	Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years	Other Directorships^(j)
INTERESTED TRUSTEES
Robert J. Manning^(k) (age 53)	Trustee	February 2004	2019	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Chairman	N/A
Robin A. Stelmach^(k) (age 55)	Trustee	January 2014	2018	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice Chair	N/A
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES
David H. Gunning (age 74)	Trustee and Chair of Trustees	January 2004	2018	Private investor	Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., Director; Development Alternatives, Inc., Director/Non-Executive Chairman
Steven E. Buller (age 65)	Trustee	February 2014	2017	Chairman, Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (until 2015); Standing Advisory Group, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Member (until 2014); BlackRock, Inc. (investment management), Managing Director (until 2014), BlackRock Finco UK (investment management), Director (until 2014)	N/A
Maureen R. Goldfarb (age 61)	Trustee	January 2009	2019	Private investor	N/A

Trustees and Officers – continued


Name, Age	Position(s) Held with Fund	Trustee/Officer Since^(h)	Term Expiring^(l)	Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years	Other Directorships^(j)
Michael Hegarty (age 72)	Trustee	December 2004	2017	Private investor	Rouse Properties Inc., Director; Capmark Financial Group Inc., Director (until 2015)
John P. Kavanaugh (age 62)	Trustee and Vice Chair of Trustees	January 2009	2017	Private investor	N/A
Maryanne L. Roepke (age 60)	Trustee	May 2014	2019	American Century Investments (investment management), Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (until 2014)	N/A
Laurie J. Thomsen (age 59)	Trustee	March 2005	2017	Private investor	The Travelers Companies, Director; Dycom Industries, Inc., Director
OFFICERS
Christopher R. Bohane^(k) (age 42)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	July 2005	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel	N/A
Kino Clark^(k) (age 48)	Assistant Treasurer	January 2012	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President	N/A
Thomas H. Connors^(k) (age 57)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	September 2012	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel; Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (financial service provider), Director and Senior Counsel (until 2012)	N/A
Ethan D. Corey^(k) (age 53)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	July 2005	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel	N/A

Trustees and Officers – continued


Name, Age	Position(s) Held with Fund	Trustee/Officer Since^(h)	Term Expiring^(l)	Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years	Other Directorships^(j)
David L. DiLorenzo^(k) (age 48)	President	July 2005	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President	N/A
Brian E. Langenfeld^(k) (age 43)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	June 2006	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel	N/A
Susan A. Pereira^(k) (age 46)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	July 2005	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel	N/A
Kasey L. Phillips^(k) (age 46)	Assistant Treasurer	September 2012	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President; Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, Senior Vice President, Fund Treasurer (until 2012)	N/A
Mark N. Polebaum^(k) (age 64)	Secretary and Clerk	January 2006	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	N/A
Matthew A. Stowe^(k) (age 42)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	October 2014	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel	N/A
Frank L. Tarantino (age 72)	Independent Senior Officer	June 2004	N/A	Tarantino LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal	N/A
Richard S. Weitzel^(k) (age 46)	Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk	October 2007	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel	N/A

Trustees and Officers – continued


Name, Age	Position(s) Held with Fund	Trustee/Officer Since^(h)	Term Expiring^(l)	Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years	Other Directorships^(j)
Martin J. Wolin^(k) (age 49)	Chief Compliance Officer	July 2015	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (since July 2015); Mercer (financial service provider), Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, North America and Latin America (until June 2015)	N/A
James O. Yost^(k) (age 56)	Treasurer	September 1990	N/A	Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President	N/A

(h)

Date first appointed to serve as Trustee/officer of an MFS Fund. Each Trustee has served continuously since appointment unless indicated otherwise. For the period from December 15, 2004 until February 22, 2005, Mr. Manning served as Advisory Trustee. Prior to January 2012, Messrs. DiLorenzo and Yost served as Assistant Treasurers of the Funds. From January 2012 through December 2016, Messrs. DiLorenzo and Yost served as Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer of the Funds, respectively.

(j)	Directorships or trusteeships of companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (i.e., “public companies”).

(k)

“Interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (referred to as the 1940 Act), which is the principal federal law governing investment companies like the fund, as a result of a position with MFS. The address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.

(l)

Under the terms of the Boards’ retirement policy, an Independent Trustee shall retire at the end of the calendar year in which he or she reaches the earlier of 75 years of age or 15 years of service on the Board (or, in the case of any Independent Trustee who joined the Board prior to 2015, 20 years of service on the Board).

The Trust holds annual shareholder meetings for the purpose of electing Trustees, and Trustees are elected for fixed terms. Two Trustees, each holding a term of one year, are elected annually by holders of the Trust’s preferred shares. The remaining Trustees are currently divided into three classes, each having a term of three years which term expires on the date of the third annual meeting following the election to office of the Trustee’s class. Each year the term of one class expires. Each Trustee and officer will serve until next elected or his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal.

Messrs. Buller and Kavanaugh and Ms. Roepke are members of the Fund’s Audit Committee.

Trustees and Officers – continued

Each of the Fund’s Trustees and officers holds comparable positions with certain other funds of which MFS or a subsidiary is the investment adviser or distributor, and, in the case of the officers, with certain affiliates of MFS. As of January 1, 2017, the Trustees served as board members of 138 funds within the MFS Family of Funds.


Investment Adviser		Custodian
Massachusetts Financial Services Company		State Street Bank and Trust Company
111 Huntington Avenue		1 Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02199-7618		Boston, MA 02111-2900
Portfolio Managers		Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Michael Dawson		Ernst & Young LLP
Geoffrey Schechter		200 Clarendon Street
		Boston, MA 02116

BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2016 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Senior Officer, a senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.

In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.

In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent third party, on the investment performance (based on net asset value) of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2015 and the investment performance (based on net asset value) of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/ objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Broadridge on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Broadridge (the “Broadridge expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Broadridge was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.

The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.

Based on information provided by Broadridge and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s common shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s common shares ranked 21st out of a total of 73 funds in the Lipper performance universe for this three-year period (a ranking of first place out of the total number of funds in the performance universe indicating the best performer and a ranking of last place out of the total number of funds in the performance universe indicating the worst performer). The total return performance of the Fund’s common shares ranked 20th out of a total of 75 funds for the one-year period and 45th out of a total of 70 funds for the five-year period ended December 31, 2015. Given the size of the Lipper performance universe and information previously provided by MFS regarding differences between the Fund and other funds in its Lipper performance universe, the Trustees also reviewed the Fund’s performance in comparison to the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index (formerly Barclays Municipal Bond Index). The Fund outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index for each of the one-, three-, and five-year periods ended December 31, 2015 (one-year: 5.8% total return for the Fund versus 3.3% total return for the benchmark; three-year: 5.7% total return for the Fund versus 3.2% total return for the benchmark; five-year: 9.6% total return for the Fund versus 5.3% total return for the benchmark). Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.

In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.

In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s common shares as a percentage of average daily net assets (including the value of preferred shares) and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Broadridge. The Trustees considered that MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its advisory fee, and that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, each of which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the data provided by Broadridge (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each higher than the Broadridge expense group median.

The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any institutional separate accounts advised by MFS (“separate accounts”) and unaffiliated investment companies for which MFS serves as subadviser (“subadvised funds”) that have comparable investment strategies to the Fund. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund, as well as the more extensive regulatory burdens imposed on MFS in managing the Fund, in comparison to separate accounts and subadvised funds.

The Trustees considered that, as a closed-end fund, the Fund is unlikely to experience meaningful asset growth. As a result, the Trustees did not view the potential for realization of economies of scale as the Fund’s assets grow to be a material factor in their deliberations. The Trustees noted that they would consider economies of scale in the future in the event the Fund experiences significant asset growth, such as through a material increase in the market value of the Fund’s portfolio securities.

The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.

After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.

In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent,

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.

The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative services provided to the Fund by MFS under agreements other than the investment advisory agreement. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.

The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.

Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2016.

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION

MFS votes proxies on behalf of the fund pursuant to proxy voting policies and procedures that are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting mfs.com (once you have selected “Individual Investor” as your role, click on “Individual Investor Home” in the top navigation and then select “Learn More About Proxy Voting” under the “I want to…” header on the left hand column of the page), or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available by August 31 of each year without charge by visiting mfs.com (once you have selected “Individual Investor” as your role, click on “Individual Investor Home” in the top navigation and then select “Learn More About Proxy Voting” under the “I want to…” header on the left hand column of the page), or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE

The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:

Public Reference Room

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE, Room 1580

Washington, D.C. 20549

Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the Fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.

FURTHER INFORMATION

From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “Market Commentary” and “Announcements” sub sections in the “Market Outlooks” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Closed-End Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.

Additional information about the fund (e.g. performance, dividends and the fund’s price history) is also available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Closed-End Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.

INFORMATION ABOUT FUND CONTRACTS AND LEGAL CLAIMS

The fund has entered into contractual arrangements with an investment adviser, administrator, transfer agent, and custodian who each provide services to the fund. Unless expressly stated otherwise, shareholders are not parties to, or intended beneficiaries of these contractual arrangements, and these contractual arrangements are not intended to create any shareholder right to enforce them against the service providers or to seek any remedy under them against the service providers, either directly or on behalf of the fund.

Under the Trust’s By-Laws, any claims asserted against or on behalf of the MFS Funds, including claims against Trustees and Officers, must be brought in state and federal courts located within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (unaudited)

The fund will notify shareholders of amounts for use in preparing 2016 income tax forms in January 2017. The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Of the dividends paid from net investment income during the fiscal year, 99.43% is designated as exempt interest dividends for federal income tax purposes. If the fund has earned income on private activity bonds, a portion of the dividends paid may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of computing a shareholder’s alternative minimum tax.

rev. 3/16

FACTS

WHAT DOES MFS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?


Why?		Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.

What?

The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:

• Social Security number and account balances

• Account transactions and transaction history

• Checking account information and wire transfer instructions

When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice.


How?		All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons MFS chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.


Reasons we can share your personal information	Does MFS share?	Can you limit this sharing?
For our everyday business purposes – such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus	Yes	No
For our marketing purposes – to offer our products and services to you	No	We don’t share
For joint marketing with other financial companies	No	We don’t share
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your transactions and experiences	No	We don’t share
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness	No	We don’t share
For nonaffiliates to market to you	No	We don’t share


Questions?		Call 800-225-2606 or go to mfs.com.


Page 2


Who we are
Who is providing this notice?		MFS Funds, MFS Investment Management, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., and MFS Heritage Trust Company.


What we do
How does MFS protect my personal information?		To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include procedural, electronic, and physical safeguards for the protection of the personal information we collect about you.
How does MFS collect my personal information?		We collect your personal information, for example, when you • open an account or provide account information • direct us to buy securities or direct us to sell your securities • make a wire transfer We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates, or other companies.
Why can’t I limit all sharing?		Federal law gives you the right to limit only • sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness • affiliates from using your information to market to you • sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.


Definitions
Affiliates		Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. • MFS does not share personal information with affiliates, except for everyday business purposes as described on page one of this notice.
Nonaffiliates		Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. • MFS does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you.
Joint marketing		A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. • MFS doesn’t jointly market.


Other important information
If you own an MFS product or receive an MFS service in the name of a third party such as a bank or broker-dealer, their privacy policy may apply to you instead of ours.

LOGO

CONTACT US

TRANSFER AGENT, REGISTRAR, AND

DIVIDEND DISBURSING AGENT

CALL

1-800-637-2304

9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time

WRITE

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

P.O. Box 43078

Providence, RI 02940-3078

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: CXH

ITEM 2.

CODE OF ETHICS.

The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and as defined in Form N-CSR that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to an element of the Code’s definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. However, effective January 1, 2017, the Code was amended to (i) clarify that the term “for profit” company as used in Section II.B of the Code excludes the investment adviser and its subsidiaries and pooled investment vehicles sponsored by the investment adviser or its subsidiaries, (ii) align the Code’s provisions regarding receipt of gifts and entertainment in Section II.B of the Code with the gifts and entertainment policy of the Funds’ investment adviser, and (iii) make other administrative changes. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.

A copy of the Code of Ethics amended effective as of January 1, 2017 is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.

ITEM 3.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

Messrs. Steven E. Buller and John P. Kavanaugh and Ms. Maryanne L. Roepke, members of the Audit Committee, have been determined by the Board of Trustees in their reasonable business judgment to meet the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Form N-CSR. In addition, Messrs. Buller and Kavanaugh and Ms. Roepke are “independent” members of the Audit Committee (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). The Securities and Exchange Commission has stated that the designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 on the Form N-CSR does not impose on such a person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.

ITEM 4.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Items 4(a) through 4(d) and 4(g):

The Board of Trustees has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) to serve as independent accountants to the Registrant (hereinafter the “Registrant” or the “Fund”). The tables below set forth the audit fees billed to the Fund as well as fees for non-audit services provided to the Fund and/or to the Fund’s investment adviser, Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”), and to various entities either controlling, controlled by, or under common control with MFS that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“MFS Related Entities”).

For the fiscal years ended November 30, 2016 and 2015, audit fees billed to the Fund by E&Y were as follows:


	Audit Fees
	2016		2015
Fees billed by E&Y:
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust		56,664		56,664

For the fiscal years ended November 30, 2016 and 2015, fees billed by E&Y for audit-related, tax and other services provided to the Fund and for audit-related, tax and other services provided to MFS and MFS Related Entities were as follows:

Audit-Related Fees¹

Tax Fees²

All Other Fees³

2016

2015

2016

2015

2016

2015

Fees billed by E&Y:

To MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust

11,027

9,953

1,048

1,006

Audit-Related Fees¹

Tax Fees²

All Other Fees³

2016

2015

2016

2015

2016

2015

Fees billed by E&Y:

To MFS and MFS Related Entities of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust^*

1,412,499

1,120,675

116,023

99,446


	Aggregate Fees for Non-audit Services
	2016		2015
Fees Billed by E&Y:
To MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust, MFS and MFS Related Entities^#		1,676,150		1,493,107

^*	This amount reflects the fees billed to MFS and MFS Related Entities for non-audit services relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund (portions of which services also related to the operations and financial reporting of other funds within the MFS Funds complex).

#	This amount reflects the aggregate fees billed by E&Y for non-audit services rendered to the Fund and for non-audit services rendered to MFS and the MFS Related Entities.

The fees included under “Audit-Related Fees” are fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements, but not reported under ‘‘Audit Fees,’’ including accounting consultations, agreed-upon procedure reports, attestation reports, comfort letters and internal control reviews.

²	The fees included under “Tax Fees” are fees associated with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including services relating to the filing or amendment of federal, state or local income tax returns, regulated investment company qualification reviews and tax distribution and analysis.

³	The fees included under “All Other Fees” are fees for products and services provided by E&Y other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees,” including fees for services related to review of internal controls and review of Rule 38a-1 compliance program.

Item 4(e)(1):

Set forth below are the policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees relating to the pre-approval of audit and non-audit related services:

To the extent required by applicable law, pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the Board is needed for all audit and permissible non-audit services rendered to the Fund and all permissible non-audit services rendered to MFS or MFS Related Entities if the services relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. Pre-approval is currently on an engagement-by-engagement basis. In the event pre-approval of such services is necessary between regular meetings of the Audit Committee and it is not practical to wait to seek pre-approval at the next regular meeting of the Audit Committee, pre-approval of such services may be referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee for approval; provided that the Chair may not pre-approve any individual engagement for such services exceeding $50,000 or multiple engagements for such services in the aggregate exceeding $100,000 between such regular meetings of the Audit Committee. Any engagement pre-approved by the Chair between regular meetings of the Audit Committee shall be presented for ratification by the entire Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Item 4(e)(2):

None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Fund and MFS and MFS Related Entities relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant disclosed above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit, review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).

Item 4(f): Not applicable.

Item 4(h): The Registrant’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by a Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm of non-audit services to MFS and MFS Related Entities that were not pre-approved by the Committee (because such services were provided prior to the effectiveness of SEC rules requiring pre-approval or because such services did not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant) was compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm as the Registrant’s principal auditors.

ITEM 5.

AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

The Registrant has an Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Steven E. Buller and John P. Kavanaugh and Ms. Maryanne L. Roepke.

ITEM 6.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

A schedule of investments of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of the Registrant under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

ITEM 7.

DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

February 1, 2016

Massachusetts Financial Services Company, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS International (UK) Limited, MFS Heritage Trust Company, MFS Investment Management (Canada) Limited, MFS Investment Management Company (Lux) S.à r.l., MFS International Singapore Pte. Ltd., MFS Investment Management K.K., and MFS’ other subsidiaries that perform discretionary investment management activities (collectively, “MFS”) have adopted proxy voting policies and procedures, as set forth below (“MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures”), with respect to securities owned by the clients for which MFS serves as investment adviser and has the power to vote proxies, including the pooled investment vehicles sponsored by MFS (the “MFS Funds”). References to “clients” in these policies and procedures include the MFS Funds and other clients of MFS, such as funds organized offshore, sub-advised funds and separate account clients, to the extent these clients have delegated to MFS the responsibility to vote proxies on their behalf under the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

The MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures include:

Voting Guidelines;

Administrative Procedures;

Records Retention; and

Reports.

A.	*VOTING GUIDELINES*

General Policy; Potential Conflicts of Interest

MFS’ policy is that proxy voting decisions are made in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in the interests of any other party or in MFS’ corporate interests, including interests such as the distribution of MFS Fund shares and institutional client relationships.

MFS reviews corporate governance issues and proxy voting matters that are presented for shareholder vote by either management or shareholders of public companies. Based on the overall principle that all votes cast by MFS on behalf of its clients must be in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of such clients, MFS has adopted proxy voting guidelines, set forth below, that govern how MFS generally will vote on specific matters presented for shareholder vote.

As a general matter, MFS votes consistently on similar proxy proposals across all shareholder meetings. However, some proxy proposals, such as certain excessive executive compensation, environmental, social and governance matters, are analyzed on a case-by-case basis in light of all the relevant facts and circumstances of the proposal. Therefore, MFS may vote similar proposals differently at different shareholder meetings based on the specific facts and circumstances of the issuer or the terms of the proposal. In addition, MFS also reserves the right to override the guidelines with respect to a particular proxy proposal when such an override is, in MFS’ best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients.

MFS also generally votes consistently on the same matter when securities of an issuer are held by multiple client accounts, unless MFS has received explicit voting instructions to vote differently from a client for its own account. From time to time, MFS may also receive comments on the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures from its clients. These comments are carefully considered by MFS when it reviews these guidelines and revises them as appropriate.

These policies and procedures are intended to address any potential material conflicts of interest on the part of MFS or its subsidiaries that are likely to arise in connection with the voting of proxies on behalf of MFS’ clients. If such potential material conflicts of interest do arise, MFS will analyze, document and report on such potential material conflicts of interest (see Sections B.2 and D below), and shall ultimately vote the relevant proxies in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of its clients. The MFS Proxy Voting Committee is responsible for monitoring and reporting with respect to such potential material conflicts of interest.

MFS is also a signatory to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. In developing these guidelines, MFS considered environmental, social and corporate governance issues in light of MFS’ fiduciary obligation to vote proxies in the best long-term economic interest of its clients.

2.	MFS’ Policy on Specific Issues

Election of Directors

MFS believes that good governance should be based on a board with at least a simple majority of directors who are “independent” of management, and whose key committees (e.g., compensation, nominating, and audit committees) consist entirely of “independent” directors. While MFS generally supports the board’s nominees in uncontested or non-contentious elections, we will not support a nominee to a board of a U.S. issuer (or issuer listed on a U.S. exchange) if, as a result of such nominee being elected to the board, the board would consist of a simple majority of members who are not “independent” or, alternatively, the compensation, nominating (including instances in which the full board serves as the compensation or nominating committee) or audit committees would include members who are not “independent.”

MFS will also not support a nominee to a board if we can determine that he or she attended less than 75% of the board and/or relevant committee meetings in the previous year without a valid reason stated in the proxy materials or other company communications. In addition, MFS may not support some or all nominees standing for re-election to a board if we can determine: (1) the board or its compensation committee has re-priced or exchanged underwater stock options since the last annual meeting of shareholders and without shareholder approval; (2) the board or relevant committee has not taken adequately responsive action to an issue that received majority support or opposition from shareholders; (3) the board has implemented a poison pill without shareholder approval since the last annual meeting and such poison pill is not on the subsequent shareholder meeting’s agenda, (including those related to net-operating loss carry-forwards); (4) the board or relevant committee has failed to adequately oversee risk by allowing the hedging and/or significant pledging of company shares by executives; or (5) there are governance concerns with a director or issuer.

MFS may not support certain board nominees of U.S. issuers under certain circumstances where MFS deems compensation to be egregious due to pay-for-performance issues and/or poor pay practices. Please see the section below titled “MFS’ Policy on Specific Issues - Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation” for further details.

MFS evaluates a contested or contentious election of directors on a case-by-case basis considering the long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry, management’s track record, the qualifications of all nominees, and an evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders.

Majority Voting and Director Elections

MFS votes for reasonably crafted proposals calling for directors to be elected with an affirmative majority of votes cast and/or the elimination of the plurality standard for electing directors (including binding resolutions requesting that the board amend the company’s bylaws), provided the proposal includes a carve-out for a plurality voting standard when there are more director nominees than board seats (e.g., contested elections) (“Majority Vote Proposals”).

Classified Boards

MFS generally supports proposals to declassify a board (i.e.; a board in which only one-third of board members is elected each year) for all issuers other than for certain closed-end investment companies. MFS generally opposes proposals to classify a board for issuers other than for certain closed-end investment companies.

Proxy Access

MFS believes that the ability of qualifying shareholders to nominate a certain number of directors on the company’s proxy statement (“Proxy Access”) may have corporate governance benefits. However, such potential benefits must be balanced by its potential misuse by shareholders. Therefore, we support Proxy Access proposals at U.S. issuers that establish an ownership criteria of 3% of the company held continuously for a period of 3 years. In our view, such qualifying shareholders should have the ability to nominate at least 2 directors. Companies should be mindful of imposing any undue impediments within its bylaws that may render Proxy Access impractical.

MFS analyzes all other proposals seeking Proxy Access on a case-by-case basis. In its analysis, MFS will consider the proposed ownership criteria for qualifying shareholders (such as ownership threshold and holding period) as well as the proponent’s rationale for seeking Proxy Access.

Stock Plans

MFS opposes stock option programs and restricted stock plans that provide unduly generous compensation for officers, directors or employees, or that could result in excessive dilution to other shareholders. As a general guideline, MFS votes against restricted stock, stock option, non-employee director, omnibus stock plans and any other stock plan if all such plans for a particular company involve potential dilution, in the aggregate, of more than 15%. However, MFS will also vote against stock plans that involve potential dilution, in aggregate, of more than 10% at U.S. issuers that are listed in the Standard and Poor’s 100 index as of December 31 of the previous year. In the cases where a stock plan amendment is seeking qualitative changes and not additional shares, MFS will vote its shares on a case-by-case basis.

MFS also opposes stock option programs that allow the board or the compensation committee to re-price underwater options or to automatically replenish shares without shareholder approval. MFS also votes against stock option programs for officers, employees or non-employee directors that do not require an investment by the optionee, that give “free rides” on the stock price, or that permit grants of stock options with an exercise price below fair market value on the date the options are granted. MFS will consider proposals to exchange existing options for newly issued options, restricted stock or cash on a case-by-case basis, taking into account certain factors, including, but not limited to, whether there is a reasonable value-for-value exchange and whether senior executives are excluded from participating in the exchange.

MFS supports the use of a broad-based employee stock purchase plans to increase company stock ownership by employees, provided that shares purchased under the plan are acquired for no less than 85% of their market value and do not result in excessive dilution.

Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation

MFS believes that competitive compensation packages are necessary to attract, motivate and retain executives. However, MFS also recognizes that certain executive compensation practices can be “excessive” and not in the best, long-term economic interest of a company’s shareholders. We believe that the election of an issuer’s board of directors (as outlined above), votes on stock plans (as outlined above) and advisory votes on pay (as outlined below) are typically the most effective mechanisms to express our view on a company’s compensation practices.

MFS generally opposes shareholder proposals that seek to set rigid restrictions on executive compensation as MFS believes that compensation committees should retain some flexibility to determine the appropriate pay package for executives. Although we support linking executive stock option grants to a company’s performance, MFS also opposes shareholder proposals that mandate a link of performance-based pay to a specific metric. MFS generally supports reasonably crafted shareholder proposals that (i) require the issuer to adopt a policy to recover the portion of performance-based bonuses and awards paid to senior executives that were not earned based upon a significant negative restatement of earnings unless the company already has adopted a satisfactory policy on the matter, (ii) expressly prohibit the backdating of stock options, and (iii) prohibit the acceleration of vesting of equity awards upon a broad definition of a “change-in-control” (e.g.; single or modified single-trigger).

Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

MFS will analyze advisory votes on executive compensation on a case-by-case basis. MFS will vote against an advisory vote on executive compensation if MFS determines that the issuer has adopted excessive executive compensation practices and will vote in favor of an advisory vote on executive compensation if MFS has not determined that the issuer has adopted excessive executive compensation practices. Examples of excessive executive compensation practices may include, but are not limited to, a pay-for-performance disconnect, employment contract terms such as guaranteed bonus provisions, unwarranted pension payouts, backdated stock options, overly generous hiring bonuses for chief executive officers, unnecessary perquisites, or the potential reimbursement of excise taxes to an executive in regards to a severance package. In cases where MFS (i) votes against consecutive advisory pay votes, or (ii) determines that a particularly egregious excessive executive compensation practice has occurred, then MFS may also vote against certain or all board nominees. MFS may also vote against certain or all board nominees if an advisory pay vote for a U.S. issuer is not on the agenda, or the company has not implemented the advisory vote frequency supported by a plurality/ majority of shareholders.

MFS generally supports proposals to include an advisory shareholder vote on an issuer’s executive compensation practices on an annual basis.

“Golden Parachutes”

From time to time, MFS may evaluate a separate, advisory vote on severance packages or “golden parachutes” to certain executives at the same time as a vote on a proposed merger or acquisition. MFS will support an advisory vote on a severance package on a on a case-by-case basis, and MFS may vote against the severance package regardless of whether MFS supports the proposed merger or acquisition.

Shareholders of companies may also submit proxy proposals that would require shareholder approval of severance packages for executive officers that exceed certain predetermined thresholds. MFS votes in favor of such shareholder proposals when they would require shareholder approval of any severance package for an executive officer that exceeds a certain multiple of such officer’s annual compensation that is not determined in MFS’ judgment to be excessive.

Anti-Takeover Measures

In general, MFS votes against any measure that inhibits capital appreciation in a stock, including proposals that protect management from action by shareholders. These types of proposals take many forms, ranging from “poison pills” and “shark repellents” to super-majority requirements.

MFS generally votes for proposals to rescind existing “poison pills” and proposals that would require shareholder approval to adopt prospective “poison pills,” unless the company already has adopted a clearly satisfactory policy on the matter. MFS may consider the adoption of a prospective “poison pill” or the continuation of an existing “poison pill” if we can determine that the following two conditions are met: (1) the “poison pill” allows MFS clients to hold an aggregate position of up to 15% of a company’s total voting securities (and of any class of voting securities); and (2) either (a) the “poison pill” has a term of not longer than five years, provided that MFS will consider voting in favor of the “poison pill” if the term does not exceed seven years and the “poison pill” is linked to a business strategy or purpose that MFS believes is likely to result in greater value for shareholders; or (b) the terms of the “poison pill” allow MFS clients the opportunity to accept a fairly structured and attractively priced tender offer (e.g. a “chewable poison pill” that automatically dissolves in the event of an all cash, all shares tender offer at a premium price). MFS will also consider on a case-by-case basis proposals designed to prevent tenders which are disadvantageous to shareholders such as tenders at below market prices and tenders for substantially less than all shares of an issuer.

MFS will consider any poison pills designed to protect a company’s net-operating loss carryforwards on a case-by-case basis, weighing the accounting and tax benefits of such a pill against the risk of deterring future acquisition candidates.

Proxy Contests

From time to time, a shareholder may express alternative points of view in terms of a company’s strategy, capital allocation, or other issues. Such shareholder may also propose a slate of director nominees different than the slate of director nominees proposed by the company (a “Proxy Contest”). MFS will analyze Proxy Contests on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the track record and current recommended initiatives of both company management and the dissident shareholder(s). Like all of our proxy votes, MFS will support the slate of director nominees that we believe is in the best, long-term economic interest of our clients.

Reincorporation and Reorganization Proposals

When presented with a proposal to reincorporate a company under the laws of a different state, or to effect some other type of corporate reorganization, MFS considers the underlying purpose and ultimate effect of such a proposal in determining whether or not to support such a measure. MFS generally votes with management in regards to these types of proposals, however, if MFS believes the proposal is in the best long-term economic interests of its clients, then MFS may vote against management (e.g. the intent or effect would be to create additional inappropriate impediments to possible acquisitions or takeovers).

Issuance of Stock

There are many legitimate reasons for the issuance of stock. Nevertheless, as noted above under “Stock Plans,” when a stock option plan (either individually or when aggregated with other plans of the same company) would substantially dilute the existing equity (e.g. by approximately 10-15% as described above), MFS generally votes against the plan. In addition, MFS typically votes against proposals where management is asking for authorization to issue common or preferred stock with no reason stated (a “blank check”) because the unexplained authorization could work as a potential anti-takeover device. MFS may also vote against the authorization or issuance of common or preferred stock if MFS determines that the requested authorization is excessive or not warranted.

Repurchase Programs

MFS supports proposals to institute share repurchase plans in which all shareholders have the opportunity to participate on an equal basis. Such plans may include a company acquiring its own shares on the open market, or a company making a tender offer to its own shareholders.

Cumulative Voting

MFS opposes proposals that seek to introduce cumulative voting and for proposals that seek to eliminate cumulative voting. In either case, MFS will consider whether cumulative voting is likely to enhance the interests of MFS’ clients as minority shareholders.

Written Consent and Special Meetings

The right to call a special meeting or act by written consent can be a powerful tool for shareholders. As such, MFS supports proposals requesting the right for shareholders who hold at least 10% of the issuer’s outstanding stock to call a special meeting. MFS also supports proposals requesting the right for shareholders to act by written consent.

Independent Auditors

MFS believes that the appointment of auditors for U.S. issuers is best left to the board of directors of the company and therefore supports the ratification of the board’s selection of an auditor for the company. Some shareholder groups have submitted proposals to limit the non-audit activities of a company’s audit firm or prohibit any non-audit services by a company’s auditors to that company. MFS opposes proposals recommending the prohibition or limitation of the performance of non-audit services by an auditor, and proposals recommending the removal of a company’s auditor due to the performance of non-audit work for the company by its auditor. MFS believes that the board, or its audit committee, should have the discretion to hire the company’s auditor for specific pieces of non-audit work in the limited situations permitted under current law.

Other Business

MFS generally votes against “other business” proposals as the content of any such matter is not known at the time of our vote.

Adjourn Shareholder Meeting

MFS generally supports proposals to adjourn a shareholder meeting if we support the other ballot items on the meeting’s agenda. MFS generally votes against proposals to adjourn a meeting if we do not support the other ballot items on the meeting’s agenda.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Issues

MFS believes that a company’s ESG practices may have an impact on the company’s long-term economic financial performance and will generally support proposals relating to ESG issues that MFS believes are in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders. For those ESG proposals for which a specific policy has not been adopted, MFS considers such ESG proposals on a case-by-case basis. As a result, it may vote similar proposals differently at various shareholder meetings based on the specific facts and circumstances of such proposal.

MFS generally supports proposals that seek to remove governance structures that insulate management from shareholders (i.e., anti-takeover measures) or that seek to enhance shareholder rights. Many of these governance-related issues, including compensation issues, are outlined within the context of the above guidelines. In addition, MFS typically supports proposals that require an issuer to reimburse successful dissident shareholders (who are not seeking control of the company) for reasonable expenses that such dissident incurred in soliciting an alternative slate of director candidates. MFS also generally supports reasonably crafted shareholder proposals requesting increased disclosure around the company’s use of collateral in derivatives trading. MFS typically supports proposals for an independent board chairperson. However, we may not support such proposals if we determine there to be an appropriate and effective counter-balancing leadership structure in place (e.g.; a strong, independent lead director with an appropriate level of powers and duties). For any governance-related proposal for which an explicit guideline is not provided above, MFS will consider such proposals on a case-by-case basis and will support such proposals if MFS believes that it is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders.

MFS generally supports proposals that request disclosure on the impact of environmental issues on the company’s operations, sales, and capital investments. However, MFS may not support such proposals based on the facts and circumstances surrounding a specific proposal, including, but not limited to, whether (i) the proposal is unduly costly, restrictive, or burdensome, (ii) the company already provides publicly-available information that is sufficient to enable shareholders to evaluate the potential opportunities and risks that environmental matters pose to the company’s operations, sales and capital investments, or (iii) the proposal seeks a level of disclosure that exceeds that provided by the company’s industry peers. MFS will analyze all other environmental proposals on a case-by-case basis and will support such proposals if MFS believes such proposal is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders.

MFS will analyze social proposals on a case-by-case basis. MFS will support such proposals if MFS believes that such proposal is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders. Generally, MFS will support shareholder proposals that (i) seek to amend a company’s equal employment opportunity policy to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; and (ii) request additional disclosure regarding a company’s political contributions (including trade organizations and lobbying activity) (unless the company already provides publicly-available information that is sufficient to enable shareholders to evaluate the potential opportunities and risks that such contributions pose to the company’s operations, sales and capital investments).

The laws of various states or countries may regulate how the interests of certain clients subject to those laws (e.g. state pension plans) are voted with respect to social issues. Thus, it may be necessary to cast ballots differently for certain clients than MFS might normally do for other clients.

Foreign Issuers

MFS generally supports the election of a director nominee standing for re-election in uncontested or non-contentious elections unless it can be determined that (1) he or she failed to attend at least 75% of the board and/or relevant committee meetings in the previous year without a valid reason given in the proxy materials; (2) since the last annual meeting of shareholders and without shareholder approval, the board or its compensation committee has re-priced underwater stock options; or (3) since the last annual meeting, the board has either implemented a poison pill without shareholder approval or has not taken responsive action to a majority shareholder approved resolution recommending that the “poison pill” be rescinded. In such circumstances, we will vote against director nominee(s). Also, certain markets outside of the U.S. have adopted best practice guidelines relating to corporate governance matters (e.g. the United Kingdom’s and Japan Corporate Governance Codes). Many of these guidelines operate on a “comply or explain” basis. As such, MFS will evaluate any explanations by companies relating to their compliance with a particular corporate governance guideline on a case-by-case basis and may vote against the board nominees or other relevant ballot item if such explanation is not satisfactory. In some circumstances, MFS may submit a vote to abstain from certain director nominees or the relevant ballot items if we have concerns with the nominee or ballot item, but do not believe these concerns rise to the level where a vote against is warranted.

MFS generally supports the election of auditors, but may determine to vote against the election of a statutory auditor in certain markets if MFS reasonably believes that the statutory auditor is not truly independent.

Some international markets have also adopted mandatory requirements for all companies to hold shareholder votes on executive compensation. MFS will vote against such proposals if MFS determines that a company’s executive compensation practices are excessive, considering such factors as the specific market’s best practices that seek to maintain appropriate pay-for-performance alignment and to create long-term shareholder value. We may alternatively submit an abstention vote on such proposals in circumstances where our executive compensation concerns are not as severe.

Many other items on foreign proxies involve repetitive, non-controversial matters that are mandated by local law. Accordingly, the items that are generally deemed routine and which do not require the exercise of judgment under these guidelines (and therefore voted with management) for foreign issuers include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) receiving financial statements or other reports from the board; (ii) approval of declarations of dividends; (iii) appointment of shareholders to sign board meeting minutes; (iv) discharge of management and supervisory boards; and (v) approval of share repurchase programs (absent any anti-takeover or other concerns). MFS will evaluate all other items on proxies for foreign companies in the context of the guidelines described above, but will generally vote against an item if there is not sufficient information disclosed in order to make an informed voting decision. For any ballot item where MFS wishes to express a more moderate level of concern than a vote of against, we will cast a vote to abstain.

In accordance with local law or business practices, some foreign companies or custodians prevent the sale of shares that have been voted for a certain period beginning prior to the shareholder meeting and ending on the day following the meeting (“share blocking”). Depending on the country in which a company is domiciled, the blocking period may begin a stated number of days prior or subsequent to the meeting (e.g. one, three or five days) or on a date established by the company. While practices vary, in many countries the block period can be continued for a longer period if the shareholder meeting is adjourned and postponed to a later date. Similarly, practices vary widely as to the ability of a shareholder to have the “block” restriction lifted early (e.g. in some countries shares generally can be “unblocked” up to two days prior to the meeting whereas in other countries the removal of the block appears to be discretionary with the issuer’s transfer agent). Due to these restrictions, MFS must balance the benefits to its clients of voting proxies against the potentially serious portfolio management

consequences of a reduced flexibility to sell the underlying shares at the most advantageous time. For companies in countries with share blocking periods or in markets where some custodians may block shares, the disadvantage of being unable to sell the stock regardless of changing conditions generally outweighs the advantages of voting at the shareholder meeting for routine items. Accordingly, MFS will not vote those proxies in the absence of an unusual, significant vote that outweighs the disadvantage of being unable to sell the stock.

From time to time, governments may impose economic sanctions which may prohibit us from transacting business with certain companies or individuals. These sanctions may also prohibit the voting of proxies at certain companies or on certain individuals. In such instances, MFS will not vote at certain companies or on certain individuals if it determines that doing so is in violation of the sanctions.

In limited circumstances, other market specific impediments to voting shares may limit our ability to cast votes, including, but not limited to, late delivery of proxy materials, untimely vote cut-off dates, power of attorney and share re-registration requirements, or any other unusual voting requirements. In these limited instances, MFS votes securities on a best efforts basis in the context of the guidelines described above.

B.	*ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES*

MFS Proxy Voting Committee

The administration of these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures is overseen by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, which includes senior personnel from the MFS Legal and Global Investment Support Departments. The Proxy Voting Committee does not include individuals whose primary duties relate to client relationship management, marketing, or sales. The MFS Proxy Voting Committee:

Reviews these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures at least annually and recommends any amendments considered to be necessary or advisable;

Determines whether any potential material conflict of interest exists with respect to instances in which MFS (i) seeks to override these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; (ii) votes on ballot items not governed by these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; (iii) evaluates an excessive executive compensation issue in relation to the election of directors; or (iv) requests a vote recommendation from an MFS portfolio manager or investment analyst (e.g. mergers and acquisitions); and

Considers special proxy issues as they may arise from time to time.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The MFS Proxy Voting Committee is responsible for monitoring potential material conflicts of interest on the part of MFS or its subsidiaries that could arise in connection with the voting of proxies on behalf of MFS’ clients. Due to the client focus of our investment management business, we believe that the potential for actual material conflict of interest issues is small. Nonetheless, we have developed precautions to assure that all proxy votes are cast in the best long-term economic interest of shareholders.¹ Other MFS internal policies require all MFS employees to avoid actual and potential conflicts of interests between personal activities and MFS’ client activities. If an employee (including investment professionals) identifies an actual or potential conflict of interest with respect to any voting decision (including the ownership of securities in their individual portfolio), then that employee must recuse himself/herself from participating in the voting process. Any significant attempt by an employee of MFS or its subsidiaries to unduly influence MFS’ voting on a particular proxy matter should also be reported to the MFS Proxy Voting Committee.

In cases where proxies are voted in accordance with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, no material conflict of interest will be deemed to exist. In cases where (i) MFS is considering overriding these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, (ii) matters presented for vote are not governed by these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, (iii) MFS evaluates a potentially excessive executive compensation issue in relation to the election of directors or advisory pay or severance package vote, or (iv) a vote recommendation is requested from an MFS portfolio manager or investment analyst (e.g. mergers and acquisitions); (collectively, “Non-Standard Votes”); the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will follow these procedures:

Compare the name of the issuer of such proxy against a list of significant current (i) distributors of MFS Fund shares, and (ii) MFS institutional clients (the “MFS Significant Distributor and Client List”);

If the name of the issuer does not appear on the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, then no material conflict of interest will be deemed to exist, and the proxy will be voted as otherwise determined by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee;

If the name of the issuer appears on the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, then the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will be apprised of that fact and each member of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will carefully evaluate the proposed vote in order to ensure that the proxy ultimately is voted in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in MFS’ corporate interests; and

¹	For clarification purposes, note that MFS votes in what we believe to be the best, long-term economic interest of our clients entitled to vote at the shareholder meeting, regardless of whether other MFS clients hold “short” positions in the same issuer.

For all potential material conflicts of interest identified under clause (c) above, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will document: the name of the issuer, the issuer’s relationship to MFS, the analysis of the matters submitted for proxy vote, the votes as to be cast and the reasons why the MFS Proxy Voting Committee determined that the votes were cast in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in MFS’ corporate interests. A copy of the foregoing documentation will be provided to MFS’ Conflicts Officer.

The members of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee are responsible for creating and maintaining the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, in consultation with MFS’ distribution and institutional business units. The MFS Significant Distributor and Client List will be reviewed and updated periodically, as appropriate.

For instances where MFS is evaluating a director nominee who also serves as a director of the MFS Funds, then the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will adhere to the procedures described in section (d) above regardless of whether the portfolio company appears on our Significant Distributor and Client List.

If an MFS client has the right to vote on a matter submitted to shareholders by Sun Life Financial, Inc. or any of its affiliates (collectively “Sun Life”), MFS will cast a vote on behalf of such MFS client pursuant to the recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.‘s (“ISS”) benchmark policy, or as required by law.

Except as described in the MFS Fund’s prospectus, from time to time, certain MFS Funds (the “top tier fund”) may own shares of other MFS Funds (the “underlying fund”). If an underlying fund submits a matter to a shareholder vote, the top tier fund will generally vote its shares in the same proportion as the other shareholders of the underlying fund. If there are no other shareholders in the underlying fund, the top tier fund will vote in what MFS believes to be in the top tier fund’s best long-term economic interest. If an MFS client has the right to vote on a matter submitted to shareholders by a pooled investment vehicle advised by MFS, MFS will cast a vote on behalf of such MFS client in the same proportion as the other shareholders of the pooled investment vehicle.

Gathering Proxies

Most proxies received by MFS and its clients originate at Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). Broadridge and other service providers, on behalf of custodians, send proxy related material to the record holders of the shares beneficially owned by MFS’ clients, usually to the client’s proxy voting administrator or, less commonly, to the client itself. This material will include proxy ballots reflecting the shareholdings of Funds and of clients on the record dates for such shareholder meetings, as well as proxy materials with the issuer’s explanation of the items to be voted upon.

MFS, on behalf of itself and certain of its clients (including the MFS Funds) has entered into an agreement with an independent proxy administration firm pursuant to which the proxy administration firm performs various proxy vote related administrative services such as vote processing and recordkeeping functions. Except as noted below, the proxy administration firm for MFS and its clients, including the MFS Funds, is ISS. The proxy administration firm for MFS Development Funds, LLC is Glass, Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”; Glass Lewis and ISS are each hereinafter referred to as the “Proxy Administrator”).

The Proxy Administrator receives proxy statements and proxy ballots directly or indirectly from various custodians, logs these materials into its database and matches upcoming meetings with MFS Fund and client portfolio holdings, which are input into the Proxy Administrator’s system by an MFS holdings data-feed. Through the use of the Proxy Administrator system, ballots and proxy material summaries for all upcoming shareholders’ meetings are available on-line to certain MFS employees and members of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee.

It is the responsibility of the Proxy Administrator and MFS to monitor the receipt of ballots. When proxy ballots and materials for clients are received by the Proxy Administrator, they are input into the Proxy Administrator’s on-line system. The Proxy Administrator then reconciles a list of all MFS accounts that hold shares of a company’s stock and the number of shares held on the record date by these accounts with the Proxy Administrator’s list of any upcoming shareholder’s meeting of that company. If a proxy ballot has not been received, the Proxy Administrator contacts the custodian requesting the reason as to why a ballot has not been received.

Analyzing Proxies

Proxies are voted in accordance with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures. The Proxy Administrator, at the prior direction of MFS, automatically votes all proxy matters that do not require the particular exercise of discretion or judgment with respect to these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures as determined by MFS. With respect to proxy matters that require the particular exercise of discretion or judgment, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee considers and votes on those proxy matters. MFS also receives research and recommendations from the Proxy Administrator which it may take into account in deciding how to vote. MFS uses the research of ISS to identify (i) circumstances in which a board may have approved excessive executive compensation, (ii) environmental and social proposals that warrant further consideration or (iii)

circumstances in which a non-U.S. company is not in compliance with local governance or compensation best practices. In those situations where the only MFS fund that is eligible to vote at a shareholder meeting has Glass Lewis as its Proxy Administrator, then we will utilize research from Glass Lewis to identify such issues. MFS analyzes such issues independently and does not necessarily vote with the ISS or Glass Lewis recommendations on these issues. MFS may also use other research tools in order to identify the circumstances described above. Representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee review, as appropriate, votes cast to ensure conformity with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

As a general matter, portfolio managers and investment analysts have little involvement in most votes taken by MFS. This is designed to promote consistency in the application of MFS’ voting guidelines, to promote consistency in voting on the same or similar issues (for the same or for multiple issuers) across all client accounts, and to minimize the potential that proxy solicitors, issuers, or third parties might attempt to exert inappropriate influence on the vote. In certain types of votes (e.g. mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests, capitalization matters, potentially excessive executive compensation issues, or certain shareholder proposals)a representative of MFS Proxy Voting Committee may consult with or seek recommendations from MFS investment analysts and/or portfolio managers.² However, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will ultimately determine the manner in which all proxies are voted.

As noted above, MFS reserves the right to override the guidelines when such an override is, in MFS’ best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients. Any such override of the guidelines shall be analyzed, documented and reported in accordance with the procedures set forth in these policies.

Voting Proxies

In accordance with its contract with MFS, the Proxy Administrator also generates a variety of reports for the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, and makes available on-line various other types of information so that the MFS Proxy Voting Committee or proxy team may review and monitor the votes cast by the Proxy Administrator on behalf of MFS’ clients.

For those markets that utilize a “record date” to determine which shareholders are eligible to vote, MFS generally will vote all eligible shares pursuant to these guidelines regardless of whether all (or a portion of) the shares held by our clients have been sold prior to the meeting date.

From time to time, due to travel schedules and other commitments, an appropriate portfolio manager or research analyst may not be available to provide a vote recommendation. If such a recommendation cannot be obtained within a reasonable time prior to the cut-off date of the shareholder meeting, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee may determine to abstain from voting.

Securities Lending

From time to time, the MFS Funds or other pooled investment vehicles sponsored by MFS may participate in a securities lending program. In the event MFS or its agent receives timely notice of a shareholder meeting for a U.S. security, MFS and its agent will attempt to recall any securities on loan before the meeting’s record date so that MFS will be entitled to vote these shares. However, there may be instances in which MFS is unable to timely recall securities on loan for a U.S. security, in which cases MFS will not be able to vote these shares. MFS will report to the appropriate board of the MFS Funds those instances in which MFS is not able to timely recall the loaned securities. MFS generally does not recall non-U.S. securities on loan because there may be insufficient advance notice of proxy materials, record dates, or vote cut-off dates to allow MFS to timely recall the shares in certain markets on an automated basis. As a result, non-U.S. securities that are on loan will not generally be voted. If MFS receives timely notice of what MFS determines to be an unusual, significant vote for a non-U.S. security whereas MFS shares are on loan, and determines that voting is in the best long-term economic interest of shareholders, then MFS will attempt to timely recall the loaned shares.

Engagement

The MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures are available on www.mfs.com and may be accessed by both MFS’ clients and the companies in which MFS’ clients invest. From time to time, MFS may determine that it is appropriate and beneficial for representatives from the MFS Proxy Voting Committee to engage in a dialogue or written communication with a company or other shareholders regarding certain matters on the company’s proxy statement that are of concern to shareholders, including environmental, social and governance matters. A company or shareholder may also seek to engage with representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee in advance of the company’s formal proxy solicitation to review issues more generally or gauge support for certain contemplated proposals.

C.	*RECORDS RETENTION*

MFS will retain copies of these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time and will retain all proxy voting reports submitted to the Board of Trustees of the MFS Funds for the period required by applicable law. Proxy solicitation materials, including electronic versions of the proxy ballots completed by representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, together with their respective notes and comments, are maintained in an electronic format by the Proxy Administrator and are accessible on-line by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee. All proxy voting materials and supporting documentation, including records generated by the Proxy Administrator’s system as to proxies processed, including the dates when proxy ballots were received and submitted, and the votes on each company’s proxy issues, are retained as required by applicable law.

D.	*REPORTS*

U.S. Registered MFS Funds

MFS publicly discloses the proxy voting records of the U.S. registered MFS Funds on a quarterly basis. MFS will also report the results of its voting to the Board of Trustees of the U.S. registered MFS Funds. These reports will include: (i) a summary of how votes were cast (including advisory votes on pay and “golden parachutes”) ; (ii) a summary of votes against management’s recommendation; (iii) a review of situations where MFS did not vote in accordance with the guidelines and the rationale therefore; (iv) a review of the procedures used by MFS to identify material conflicts of interest and any matters identified as a material conflict of interest; (v) a review of these policies and the guidelines; (vi) a review of our proxy engagement activity; (vii) a report and impact assessment of instances in which the recall of loaned securities of a U.S. issuer was unsuccessful; and (viii) as necessary or appropriate, any proposed modifications thereto to reflect new developments in corporate governance and other issues. Based on these reviews, the Trustees of the U.S. registered MFS Funds will consider possible modifications to these policies to the extent necessary or advisable.

Other MFS Clients

MFS may publicly disclose the proxy voting records of certain other clients (including certain MFS Funds) or the votes it casts with respect to certain matters as required by law. A report can also be printed by MFS for each client who has requested that MFS furnish a record of votes cast. The report specifies the proxy issues which have been voted for the client during the year and the position taken with respect to each issue and, upon request, may identify situations where MFS did not vote in accordance with the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

Except as described above, MFS generally will not divulge actual voting practices to any party other than the client or its representatives because we consider that information to be confidential and proprietary to the client. However, as noted above, MFS may determine that it is appropriate and beneficial to engage in a dialogue with a company regarding certain matters. During such dialogue with the company, MFS may disclose the vote it intends to cast in order to potentially effect positive change at a company in regards to environmental, social or governance issues.

ITEM 8.

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Portfolio Manager(s)

Information regarding the portfolio manager(s) of the MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the “Fund”) is set forth below. Each portfolio manager is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund.


Portfolio Manager	Primary Role	Since	Title and Five Year History
Michael Dawson	Portfolio Manager	2007	Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 1998.
Geoffrey Schechter	Portfolio Manager	2007	Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1993.

Compensation

Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed annually. As of December 31, 2015, portfolio manager total cash compensation is a combination of base salary and performance bonus:

Base Salary – Base salary represents a smaller percentage of portfolio manager total cash compensation than performance bonus.

Performance Bonus – Generally, the performance bonus represents more than a majority of portfolio manager total cash compensation.

The performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, generally with more weight given to the former and less weight given to the latter.

The quantitative portion is based on the pre-tax performance of assets managed by the portfolio manager over one-, three-, and five-year periods relative to peer group universes and/or indices (“benchmarks”). As of December 31, 2015, the following benchmarks were used to measure the following portfolio manager’s performance for the Fund:


Fund	Portfolio Manager	Benchmark(s)
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust	Michael Dawson	Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
	Geoffrey Schechter	Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index

Additional or different benchmarks, including versions and components of indices, custom indices, and linked indices that combine performance of different indices for different portions of the time period, may also be used. Consideration is given to portfolio performance over one, three, and five years with emphasis placed on the longer periods. For portfolio managers who have served for more than five years, additional longer-term performance periods are also considered. For portfolio managers who have served for less than five years, performance periods are adjusted as appropriate.

The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal peer review process (conducted by other portfolio managers, analysts, and traders) and management’s assessment of overall portfolio manager contributions to investor relations and the investment process (distinct from fund and other account performance). This performance bonus may be in the form of cash and/or a deferred cash award, at the discretion of management. A deferred cash award is issued for a cash value and becomes payable over a three-year vesting period if the portfolio manager remains in the continuous employ of MFS or its affiliates. During the vesting period, the value of the unfunded deferred cash award will fluctuate as though the portfolio manager had invested the cash value of the award in an MFS Fund(s) selected by the portfolio manager. A selected fund may be, but is not required to be, a fund that is managed by the portfolio manager.

Portfolio managers also typically benefit from the opportunity to participate in the MFS Equity Plan. Equity interests are awarded by management, on a discretionary basis, taking into account tenure at MFS, contribution to the investment process, and other factors.

Finally, portfolio managers also participate in benefit plans (including a defined contribution plan and health and other insurance plans) and programs available generally to other employees of MFS. The percentage such benefits represent of any portfolio manager’s compensation depends upon the length of the individual’s tenure at MFS and salary level, as well as other factors.

Ownership of Fund Shares

The following table shows the dollar range of equity securities of the Fund beneficially owned by the Fund’s portfolio manager(s) as of the Fund’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2016. The following dollar ranges apply:

N. None

A. $1 – $10,000

B. $10,001 – $50,000

C. $50,001 – $100,000

D. $100,001 – $500,000

E. $500,001 – $1,000,000

F. Over $1,000,000


Name of Portfolio Manager		Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Fund
Michael Dawson		N
Geoffrey Schechter		N

Other Accounts

In addition to the Fund, each portfolio manager of the Fund is named as a portfolio manager of certain other accounts managed or subadvised by MFS or an affiliate. The number and assets of these accounts were as follows as of November 30, 2016:

Registered Investment
Companies*

Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles

Other Accounts

Name

Number of
Accounts

Total Assets

Number of
Accounts

Total Assets

Number of
Accounts

Total Assets

Michael Dawson

$2.6 billion

N/A

Geoffrey Schechter

$15.3 billion

$562.8 million

N/A

*	Includes the Fund.

Advisory fees are not based upon performance of any of the accounts identified in the table above.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

MFS seeks to identify potential conflicts of interest resulting from a portfolio manager’s management of both the Fund and other accounts, and has adopted policies and procedures designed to address such potential conflicts.

The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) gives rise to conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives and strategies, benchmarks, time horizons and fees as a portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In certain instances there are securities which are suitable for the Fund’s portfolio as well as for accounts of MFS or its subsidiaries with similar investment objectives. The Fund’s trade allocation policies may give rise to conflicts of interest if the Fund’s orders do not get fully executed or are delayed in getting executed due to being aggregated with those of other accounts of MFS or its subsidiaries. A portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely affect the value of the Fund’s investments. Investments selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform investments selected for the Fund.

When two or more clients are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, the securities are allocated among clients in a manner believed by MFS to be fair and equitable to each. Allocations may be based on many factors and may not always be pro rata based on assets managed. The allocation methodology could have a detrimental effect on the price or volume of the security as far as the Fund is concerned.

MFS and/or a portfolio manager may have a financial incentive to allocate favorable or limited opportunity investments or structure the timing of investments to favor accounts other than the Fund, for instance, those that pay a higher advisory fee and/or have a performance adjustment and/or include an investment by the portfolio manager.

ITEM 9.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust


Period	(a) Total number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
12/01/15-12/31/15		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
1/01/16-1/31/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
2/01/16-2/28/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
3/01/16-3/31/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
4/01/16-4/30/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
5/01/16-5/31/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
6/01/16-6/30/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
7/01/16-7/31/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
8/01/16-8/31/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
9/1/16-9/30/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
10/1/16-10/31/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695
11/1/16-11/30/16		0		N/A		0		1,158,695

*Total*		0				0

Note: The Board approved procedures to repurchase shares and reviews the results periodically. The notification to shareholders of the program is part of the semi-annual and annual reports sent to shareholders. These annual programs begin on October 1st of each year. The programs conform to the conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and limit the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased in each annual period (October 1 through the following September 30) to 10% of the Registrant’s outstanding shares as of the first day of the plan year (October 1). The aggregate number of shares available for purchase for the October 1, 2016 plan year is 1,158,695.

ITEM 10.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.

ITEM 11.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)

Based upon their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

(b)

There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12.

EXHIBITS.

(a)	File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.

(1)

Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Code of Ethics attached hereto.

(2)

A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto.

(3)

Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the Registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.

(c)

If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto.

Notice

A copy of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant: MFS INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST


By (Signature and Title)*		DAVID L. DILORENZO
		David L. DiLorenzo, President

Date: January 13, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


By (Signature and Title)*		DAVID L. DILORENZO
		David L. DiLorenzo, President (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: January 13, 2017


By (Signature and Title)*		JAMES O. YOST
		James O. Yost, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)

Date: January 13, 2017

*	Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.