Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-19271
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
01-0393723
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
ONE IDEXX DRIVE, WESTBROOK, MAINE
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
04092
(ZIP Code) |
207-556-0300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date. The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock,
$0.10 par value, was 59,559,969 on October 20, 2008.
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
84,586 |
|
|
$ |
60,360 |
|
Accounts receivable, less reserves of $2,949 in 2008 and $1,742 in 2007 |
|
|
112,053 |
|
|
|
108,384 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
112,907 |
|
|
|
98,804 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
24,207 |
|
|
|
23,606 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
19,624 |
|
|
|
14,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
353,377 |
|
|
|
305,663 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
178,655 |
|
|
|
141,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
|
|
231,379 |
|
|
|
236,414 |
|
Other long-term assets, net |
|
|
15,282 |
|
|
|
18,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,661 |
|
|
|
254,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
778,693 |
|
|
$ |
702,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
28,937 |
|
|
$ |
32,510 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
31,660 |
|
|
|
29,182 |
|
Accrued employee compensation and related expenses |
|
|
41,754 |
|
|
|
44,753 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
|
18,206 |
|
Accrued customer programs |
|
|
17,813 |
|
|
|
15,107 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
163,942 |
|
|
|
72,236 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
10,458 |
|
|
|
10,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
307,750 |
|
|
|
223,392 |
|
Long-term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
11,265 |
|
|
|
14,697 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
5,157 |
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
6,210 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
11,527 |
|
|
|
13,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
33,616 |
|
|
|
40,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 3 and 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value: Authorized: 120,000 shares; Issued: 95,314 and
94,504 shares in 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
9,531 |
|
|
|
9,450 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
544,077 |
|
|
|
514,773 |
|
Deferred stock units: Outstanding: 100 and 82 units in 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
2,201 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
678,476 |
|
|
|
585,862 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
23,097 |
|
|
|
22,705 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost: 35,867 and 33,500 shares in 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
(820,468 |
) |
|
|
(696,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
437,327 |
|
|
|
438,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
778,693 |
|
|
$ |
702,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
167,144 |
|
|
$ |
155,552 |
|
|
$ |
526,622 |
|
|
$ |
460,902 |
|
Service revenue |
|
|
83,949 |
|
|
|
73,833 |
|
|
|
254,115 |
|
|
|
216,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,093 |
|
|
|
229,385 |
|
|
|
780,737 |
|
|
|
677,586 |
|
Cost of Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
65,435 |
|
|
|
60,121 |
|
|
|
200,714 |
|
|
|
190,730 |
|
Cost of service revenue |
|
|
57,509 |
|
|
|
50,786 |
|
|
|
170,778 |
|
|
|
145,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,944 |
|
|
|
110,907 |
|
|
|
371,492 |
|
|
|
336,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
128,149 |
|
|
|
118,478 |
|
|
|
409,245 |
|
|
|
341,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
41,527 |
|
|
|
37,757 |
|
|
|
129,742 |
|
|
|
110,086 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
29,705 |
|
|
|
27,343 |
|
|
|
89,407 |
|
|
|
81,182 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
17,920 |
|
|
|
17,281 |
|
|
|
53,489 |
|
|
|
50,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
38,997 |
|
|
|
36,097 |
|
|
|
136,607 |
|
|
|
99,441 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
(3,486 |
) |
|
|
(3,290 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
38,437 |
|
|
|
35,582 |
|
|
|
134,919 |
|
|
|
98,120 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
12,738 |
|
|
|
9,787 |
|
|
|
42,305 |
|
|
|
29,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,699 |
|
|
$ |
25,795 |
|
|
$ |
92,614 |
|
|
$ |
68,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
59,473 |
|
|
|
61,094 |
|
|
|
60,121 |
|
|
|
61,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
61,865 |
|
|
|
63,916 |
|
|
|
62,603 |
|
|
|
64,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
92,614 |
|
|
$ |
68,486 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
36,170 |
|
|
|
29,538 |
|
Reduction (increase) in deferred compensation expense |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
Navigator® inventory write-down and royalty license impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,138 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
Benefit of deferred income taxes |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
(8,210 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
8,083 |
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
Tax benefit from exercises of stock options |
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
|
|
(7,544 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(14,278 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(14,137 |
) |
|
|
(2,722 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,751 |
) |
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,632 |
) |
|
|
(4,748 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
17,629 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
109,814 |
|
|
|
94,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(64,982 |
) |
|
|
(41,723 |
) |
Acquisitions of equipment leased to customers |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
Acquisitions of intangible assets and businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(8,649 |
) |
|
|
(87,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(74,191 |
) |
|
|
(95,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities, net |
|
|
92,099 |
|
|
|
71,031 |
|
Payment of other notes payable |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(122,429 |
) |
|
|
(99,241 |
) |
Proceeds from exercises of stock options |
|
|
14,856 |
|
|
|
17,655 |
|
Tax benefit from exercises of stock options |
|
|
5,906 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(10,110 |
) |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
Net effect of exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24,226 |
|
|
|
(3,159 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
60,360 |
|
|
|
61,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
84,586 |
|
|
$ |
58,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
$ |
2,710 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
43,234 |
|
|
$ |
30,846 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements of IDEXX Laboratories,
Inc. (IDEXX, the Company, we or our) have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the requirements of Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01 for financial statements
required to be filed as a part of Form 10-Q.
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, and all other
entities in which we have a variable interest and are determined to be the primary beneficiary. All
material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the
opinion of our management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of our financial position
and results of operations. The condensed balance sheet data at December 31, 2007 was derived from
audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The
results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the full year or any future period. These unaudited, condensed
financial statements should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On October 25, 2007, our board of directors approved a two-for-one split of the outstanding
shares of our common stock, to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Each holder of
common stock of record at November 5, 2007 received one additional share of common stock for each
share of common stock then held. The additional shares of common stock were distributed on November
26, 2007. As a result of the stock split, the number of outstanding common shares doubled to
approximately 61 million shares.
All share and per share data (except par value) have been adjusted to reflect the effect of
the stock split for all periods presented. In addition, the exercise of outstanding stock options
and the vesting of other stock awards, as well as the number of shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under our various employee benefit plans, were proportionately increased in accordance
with the terms of those respective agreements and plans.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year condensed consolidated financial
statements to conform to the current year presentation. Reclassifications had no material impact on
previously reported results of operations or financial position.
NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies used in preparation of these condensed consolidated
financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are consistent with those
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007, except as discussed below.
Share-Based Compensation
To develop the expected term assumption for option awards, we previously elected to use the
simplified method described in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
107, which is based on vesting and contractual terms. Beginning in January 2008, we derive the
expected term assumption for options based on historical experience and other relevant factors
concerning expected employee behavior with regard to option exercise. See Note 4 for additional
information.
6
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) on
January 1, 2008. As permitted by FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. SFAS 157-2, Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP No. SFAS 157-2), we elected to defer the adoption of SFAS No. 157
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands financial statement
disclosures about fair value measurements. There was no cumulative effect of adoption related to
SFAS No. 157 and the adoption did not have an impact on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows. We are studying SFAS No. 157 with respect to nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities falling under the scope of FSP No. SFAS 157-2 and have not yet determined
the expected impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. See Note 16
for a discussion of our adoption of SFAS No. 157.
We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159) on
January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure
eligible items at fair value (the fair value option). Under this pronouncement, a business entity
must report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
in earnings at each subsequent reporting period. We have not elected the fair value option for any
items on our balance sheet.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of SFAS No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 changes the
disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. This standard requires
enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how instruments are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
and how derivatives and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008. We are evaluating the expected impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 amends FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142) to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141) and other U.S. GAAP. This FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset is to be
applied prospectively, therefore, the impact of the implementation of this pronouncement cannot be
determined until the transactions occur.
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS OF BUSINESSES AND OTHER ASSETS
We paid $6.8 million in cash to acquire a business and, under separate transactions, to acquire
certain intangible assets that did not comprise businesses during the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and recognized liabilities, including contingent liabilities associated with purchase
accounting, of $0.3 million, of which $0.1 million was paid in the third quarter of 2008. In
addition, we have agreed to pay up to $7.5 million in cash in the future upon achievement of
certain revenue and other milestones. These payments will be accrued and recorded as additional
intangible assets if and when we determine that it is probable that the milestones will be
achieved.
More specifically, in January 2008, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of VetLab Laboratorio Veterinario de Referencia, S.L. (VetLab S.L.). With
operations in Barcelona, Spain, VetLab S.L. is a provider of reference laboratory testing services
to veterinarians. We also acquired certain intellectual property and distribution rights associated
with a diagnostic test product during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. In connection with
these acquisitions, we recognized goodwill of $0.4 million and amortizable intangible assets of
$6.4 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we made purchase price payments of $1.7
million related to the achievement of milestones realized by certain businesses acquired in prior
years, of which $1.5 million was previously accrued.
7
We believe that the acquired businesses enhance our existing businesses by either expanding
the geographic range of our existing businesses or expanding our existing product lines. We
determined the purchase price of each acquired business based on our assessment of estimated future
cash flows attributable to the business enterprise taken as a whole, the strength of the business
in the marketplace, the strategic importance of the acquisition to IDEXX, and the sellers desire
to be acquired by IDEXX versus perceived alternatives. We recognized goodwill based on the excess
of the purchase price for each business over the fair values of the individual tangible and
separately identified intangible assets acquired, which were valued in accordance with SFAS No.
141.
We have commitments outstanding at September 30, 2008 for additional purchase price payments
of up to $7.8 million, of which $0.3 million has been accrued, in connection with acquisitions of
businesses and intangible assets prior to September 30, 2008, all of which are contingent upon the
achievement by certain acquired businesses of specified milestones.
The results of operations of the acquired businesses have been included since their respective
acquisition dates. Pro forma information has not been presented because such information is not
material to the financial statements taken as a whole.
NOTE 4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, share-based compensation expense included $7.5
million for options, restricted stock units and deferred stock units with vesting conditions and
$0.4 million for employee stock purchase rights. Expense for deferred stock units without vesting
conditions of $0.2 million has been excluded from share-based compensation in the table below for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, as it relates to deferred stock
units granted to directors in lieu of cash compensation. Share-based compensation expense has been
included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
|
$ |
495 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
3,848 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
|
$ |
7,881 |
|
|
$ |
6,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options, restricted stock units, deferred stock units with vesting
conditions, and employee stock purchase rights awarded during the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 totaled $18.0 and $18.1 million, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation
cost for unvested share-based compensation awards outstanding at September 30, 2008, before
consideration of estimated forfeitures, was $33.3 million. We estimate that this cost will be
reduced by approximately $2.2 million related to forfeitures. The weighted average remaining
expense recognition period at September 30, 2008 was approximately 2.0 years.
Options
The weighted average valuation assumptions used to determine the fair value of each option
grant on the date of grant were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Expected term, in years |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
The total fair value of options that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 was $11.2 million and $12.6 million, respectively.
8
Restricted and Other Deferred Stock Units With Vesting Conditions
The combined weighted average fair value per unit of restricted stock units and deferred stock
units with vesting conditions granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$56.78 and $42.62, respectively.
NOTE 5. INVENTORIES
Inventories include material, labor and overhead, and are stated at the lower of cost
(first-in, first-out) or market. The components of inventories were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
32,837 |
|
|
$ |
26,182 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
17,964 |
|
|
|
16,425 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
62,106 |
|
|
|
56,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
112,907 |
|
|
$ |
98,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
7,602 |
|
|
$ |
7,754 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
53,867 |
|
|
|
54,072 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
16,737 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
105,937 |
|
|
|
92,139 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
|
72,885 |
|
|
|
61,472 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
53,612 |
|
|
|
23,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,804 |
|
|
|
255,176 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
133,149 |
|
|
|
113,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment |
|
$ |
178,655 |
|
|
$ |
141,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $9.1 million and $26.5 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. Depreciation expense was $7.3 million and $21.0 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
In 2007, we began the renovation and expansion of our primary facility in Westbrook, Maine. We
have capitalized $29.0 million related to this project as construction in progress during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and $41.4 million since the projects inception.
Instruments placed with customers under certain minimum volume commitment programs are
capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the instrument or the minimum
volume commitment period.
9
NOTE 7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets other than goodwill consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
10,575 |
|
|
$ |
4,579 |
|
|
$ |
10,895 |
|
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
Product rights (1) |
|
|
32,989 |
|
|
|
13,146 |
|
|
|
27,838 |
|
|
|
10,428 |
|
Customer-related intangible assets (2) |
|
|
57,718 |
|
|
|
11,517 |
|
|
|
57,907 |
|
|
|
8,011 |
|
Other, primarily noncompete agreements |
|
|
6,592 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,874 |
|
|
$ |
32,386 |
|
|
$ |
103,056 |
|
|
$ |
24,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Product rights comprise certain technologies, licenses, trade names and contractual rights
acquired from third parties. |
|
(2) |
|
Customer-related intangible assets comprise customer lists and customer relationships
acquired from third parties. |
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $2.7 million and $7.9 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. Amortization expense of intangible assets was
$2.4 million and $6.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we acquired customer-related intangible
assets of $1.4 million, product rights of $4.8 million, and other intangible assets of $0.2
million, all of which were assigned to the Companion Animal Group (CAG) segment, with weighted
amortization periods of 15 years, 10 years and 3 years, respectively. See Note 3 for additional
information. The remaining changes in the cost of intangible assets other than goodwill during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 resulted from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Goodwill by segment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG segment |
|
$ |
129,803 |
|
|
$ |
131,004 |
|
Water segment |
|
|
16,222 |
|
|
|
17,566 |
|
Production animal segment |
|
|
9,866 |
|
|
|
9,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,891 |
|
|
$ |
158,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized goodwill of $0.6 million (all
of which is expected to be tax deductible) related to business acquisitions prior to September 30,
2008, which was assigned to the CAG segment. Of this amount, $0.2 million related to business
acquisitions prior to 2008. See Note 3 for additional information. The remaining changes in
goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 resulted from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
NOTE 8. WARRANTY RESERVES
We provide for the estimated cost of instrument warranties in cost of product revenue at the
time revenue is recognized based on the estimated cost to repair the instrument over its warranty
period. Cost of revenue reflects not only estimated warranty expense for the systems sold in the
current period, but also any changes in estimated warranty expense for the installed base that
results from our quarterly evaluation of service experience. Our actual warranty obligation is
affected by instrument performance in the customers environment and associated costs incurred in
servicing instruments. Should actual service rates or costs differ from our estimates, which are
based on historical data and projections of future costs, revisions to the estimated warranty
liability would be required.
10
Following is a summary of changes in accrued warranty reserves during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,579 |
|
|
$ |
1,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
Provision for warranty expense |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
Liability assumed in connection with business acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
Change in estimate, balance beginning of period |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
299 |
|
Settlement of warranty liability |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
|
|
(2,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9. DEBT
In February 2008, we increased the aggregate principal amount available under our unsecured
short-term revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) to $200.0 million from $125.0 million. At
September 30, 2008 we had $163.9 million outstanding under the Credit Facility with a weighted
average interest rate of 3.5%. Of the total amount outstanding at September 30, 2008, $3.9 million
was borrowed by our Canadian subsidiary and denominated in Canadian dollars.
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were
33.1% and 31.4%, respectively, compared with 27.5% and 30.2% for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively.
The increase in our effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2008
compared to September 30, 2007 was due primarily to a federal research and experimentation tax
credit that was not available for the three months ended September 30, 2008; the reduction of
international deferred tax liabilities during the three months ended September 30, 2007, resulting
from a decrease in statutory tax rates; and the recognition of certain state tax benefits,
resulting from the completion of an audit during the three months ended September 30, 2007.
The increase in our effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to September 30, 2007 was due primarily to a federal research and experimentation tax
credit that was not available for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The tax benefits
discussed above that were realized during the three months ended September 30, 2007 were offset by
a reduction in international deferred tax liabilities due to a change in the statutory tax rates
for a jurisdiction in which we operate in the three months ended March 31, 2008. This reduction of
statutory rates was a non-recurring benefit of approximately $1.5 million, which reduced our
effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by 1.1%.
NOTE 11. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following is a summary of comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,699 |
|
|
$ |
25,795 |
|
|
$ |
92,614 |
|
|
$ |
68,486 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(13,921 |
) |
|
|
6,305 |
|
|
|
(5,015 |
) |
|
|
9,344 |
|
Change in fair value of foreign currency contracts
classified as hedges, net of tax |
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
|
|
5,599 |
|
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
Change in fair market value of investments, net of tax |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
17,785 |
|
|
$ |
30,850 |
|
|
$ |
93,006 |
|
|
$ |
76,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NOTE 12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and vested deferred stock
units outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net
income available to common shareholders by shares used for basic earnings per share increased by
the dilutive impact using the treasury stock method of options, restricted stock units and unvested
deferred stock units.
The following is a reconciliation of shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per
share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding for Basic Earnings per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
59,374 |
|
|
|
61,013 |
|
|
|
60,025 |
|
|
|
61,607 |
|
Weighted average vested deferred stock units outstanding |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,473 |
|
|
|
61,094 |
|
|
|
60,121 |
|
|
|
61,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding for Diluted Earnings per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding for basic earnings per share |
|
|
59,473 |
|
|
|
61,094 |
|
|
|
60,121 |
|
|
|
61,685 |
|
Dilutive effect of options issued to employees and
directors |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock units issued to
employees |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Dilutive effect of unvested deferred stock units issued
to directors |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,865 |
|
|
|
63,916 |
|
|
|
62,603 |
|
|
|
64,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested deferred stock units outstanding are included in shares outstanding for basic and
diluted earnings per share because the associated shares of our common stock are issuable for no
cash consideration, the number of shares of our common stock to be issued is fixed, and issuance is
not contingent.
Certain options to acquire shares and restricted stock units have been excluded from the
calculation of shares outstanding for dilutive earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.
The following table presents information concerning those anti-dilutive options and restricted
stock units (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of shares
underlying
anti-dilutive
options |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise price per
underlying share of
anti-dilutive
options |
|
$ |
53.67 |
|
|
$ |
45.15 |
|
|
$ |
52.98 |
|
|
$ |
43.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of shares
underlying
anti-dilutive
restricted stock
units |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
The following table presents additional information concerning the exercise prices of vested
and unvested options outstanding at the end of the period (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing price per share of our common stock |
|
$ |
54.80 |
|
|
$ |
54.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares underlying options with exercise prices below the closing price |
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
5,680 |
|
Number of shares underlying options with exercise prices equal to or above the closing price |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares underlying outstanding options |
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES
Significant commitments, contingencies and guarantees at September 30, 2008 are consistent
with those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 in Note
13 to the consolidated financial statements, except as described in Note 3.
NOTE 14. TREASURY STOCK
Our board of directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 40,000,000 shares of our common
stock in the open market or in negotiated transactions. We believe that the repurchase of our
common stock is a favorable investment and we also repurchase to offset the dilutive effect of our
employee share-based compensation programs. Repurchases of our common stock may vary depending upon
the level of other investing activities and the share price.
From the inception of the program in August 1999 to September 30, 2008, we repurchased
35,491,000 shares for $812.6 million. From the inception of the program to September 30, 2008, we
also received 376,000 shares of stock with a market value of $7.9 million that were surrendered by
employees in payment for the minimum required withholding taxes due on the exercise of stock
options, the vesting of restricted stock units and the settlement of deferred stock units, and in
payment for the exercise price of stock options.
Information about our treasury stock purchases and other receipts is presented in the table
below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares acquired |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
Total cost of shares acquired |
|
$ |
20,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,150 |
|
|
$ |
123,800 |
|
|
$ |
99,683 |
|
Average cost per share |
|
$ |
51.44 |
|
|
$ |
50.93 |
|
|
$ |
52.30 |
|
|
$ |
43.93 |
|
NOTE 15. SEGMENT REPORTING
We are organized into business units by market and customer group. Our reportable segments
include: products and services for the veterinary market, which we refer to as our Companion Animal
Group (CAG), water quality products (Water), and products for production animal health, which
we refer to as the Production Animal Segment (PAS). We also operate two smaller segments that
comprise products for dairy quality, which we refer to as Dairy, and products for the human medical
diagnostic market, which we refer to as OPTI Medical. Financial information about the Dairy and
OPTI Medical operating segments are combined and presented in an Other category because they do
not meet the quantitative or qualitative thresholds for reportable segments. CAG develops, designs,
manufactures, and distributes products and performs services for veterinarians. Water develops,
designs, manufactures, and distributes products to detect contaminants in water. PAS develops,
designs, manufactures, and distributes products to detect disease in production animals. Dairy
develops, designs, manufactures, and distributes products to detect contaminants in dairy products.
OPTI Medical develops, designs, manufactures, and distributes point-of-care electrolyte and blood
gas analyzers and related consumable products for the human medical diagnostics market.
Items that are not allocated to our operating segments comprise primarily corporate research
and development expenses, a portion of share-based compensation expense, interest income and
expense, and income taxes. We allocate most of our share-based compensation expense to the
operating segments. This allocation differs from the actual expense and consequently yields a
difference between the total allocated share-based compensation expense and the actual expense for
the total company.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 in Notes 2 and 17.
13
The following is the segment information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
CAG |
|
|
Water |
|
|
PAS |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Total |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
205,050 |
|
|
$ |
20,321 |
|
|
$ |
17,801 |
|
|
$ |
7,921 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
28,938 |
|
|
$ |
8,865 |
|
|
$ |
3,482 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
|
$ |
38,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,437 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
187,481 |
|
|
$ |
17,431 |
|
|
$ |
17,377 |
|
|
$ |
7,096 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
229,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
28,529 |
|
|
$ |
7,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,561 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(2,232 |
) |
|
$ |
36,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,582 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
CAG |
|
|
Water |
|
|
PAS |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Total |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
639,411 |
|
|
$ |
57,287 |
|
|
$ |
60,452 |
|
|
$ |
23,587 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
780,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
106,300 |
|
|
$ |
23,437 |
|
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,700 |
) |
|
$ |
136,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,919 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
554,939 |
|
|
$ |
48,941 |
|
|
$ |
52,871 |
|
|
$ |
20,835 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
677,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
75,293 |
|
|
$ |
20,010 |
|
|
$ |
10,286 |
|
|
$ |
(487 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,661 |
) |
|
$ |
99,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,120 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Revenue by product and service category was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG segment revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments and consumables |
|
$ |
80,587 |
|
|
$ |
71,443 |
|
|
$ |
236,974 |
|
|
$ |
209,889 |
|
Rapid assay products |
|
|
36,212 |
|
|
|
33,639 |
|
|
|
115,699 |
|
|
|
101,464 |
|
Laboratory and consulting services |
|
|
73,536 |
|
|
|
64,914 |
|
|
|
222,984 |
|
|
|
191,350 |
|
Practice information systems and digital radiography |
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
12,197 |
|
|
|
42,373 |
|
|
|
36,419 |
|
Pharmaceutical products |
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
5,288 |
|
|
|
21,381 |
|
|
|
15,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG segment revenue |
|
|
205,050 |
|
|
|
187,481 |
|
|
|
639,411 |
|
|
|
554,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water segment revenue |
|
|
20,321 |
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
57,287 |
|
|
|
48,941 |
|
PAS segment revenue |
|
|
17,801 |
|
|
|
17,377 |
|
|
|
60,452 |
|
|
|
52,871 |
|
Other segment revenue |
|
|
7,921 |
|
|
|
7,096 |
|
|
|
23,587 |
|
|
|
20,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
251,093 |
|
|
$ |
229,385 |
|
|
$ |
780,737 |
|
|
$ |
677,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
On January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for our financial assets and
liabilities. As permitted by FSP No. SFAS 157-2, we elected to defer the adoption of SFAS No. 157
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and requires expanded
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange
price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the
principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy
which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize
the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
SFAS No. 157 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Our Level 1 assets and liabilities include
investments in money market funds and marketable securities
related to a deferred compensation plan assumed in a business
combination. The liabilities associated with this plan relate to
deferred compensation, which is indexed to the performance of the
underlying investments. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities. Our Level 2 assets include
unrealized gains on hedge contracts. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities. At September 30, 2008, we had no Level 3 assets or
liabilities. |
15
The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair
value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2008 by level within the fair value hierarchy. We did
not have any nonfinancial assets or liabilities that were measured or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis at September 30, 2008. As required by SFAS No. 157, assets and liabilities measured
at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input
to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to
the asset or liability (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities (1) |
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
Money market funds (2) |
|
|
6,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,807 |
|
Derivatives (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,229 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation (4) |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to investments in marketable securities for a deferred compensation plan, which is
included in other long-term assets. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to short-term investment in registered funds and included in cash and cash
equivalents. |
|
(3) |
|
Relates to unrealized gains on hedge contracts, included in other assets. The notional value
of these contracts is $121.1 million. |
|
(4) |
|
Relates to deferred compensation liability associated with the above-mentioned marketable
securities, included in other long-term liabilities. |
NOTE 17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 17, 2008, we entered into an agreement to sell our ACAREXX and SURPASS
pharmaceutical products and a product currently under development, which are a part of our CAG
segment. We expect that this transaction will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2008, at which
time we also intend to restructure the remaining pharmaceutical business. The impact of the sale
and restructuring is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations for the
fourth quarter of 2008. Proceeds received from the sale of these assets are projected to be
approximately $8 million. In addition, we may receive future consideration that is contingent upon
the acquirer receiving approval to market and sell the product currently under development, in the
U.S., and the subsequent achievement of specific product sales milestones. The impact of receiving
this consideration will be recorded in our results of operations in the period that the milestones
are achieved.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes or incorporates
forward-looking statements about
our business and expectations within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements relating to future revenue growth rates,
demand for our products, realizability of assets, warranty expense, share-based compensation
expense, and competition. You can generally identify
forward-looking statements by the fact that
they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Words such as expects, may,
anticipates, intends, would, will, plans, believes, estimates, should, and similar
words and expressions are intended to help you identify forward-looking statements. These
statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events; are based on current
estimates, projections, beliefs, and assumptions; and are not guarantees of future performance.
Actual events or results may differ materially from those described
in the forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties as more
fully described under the heading Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. The risks and uncertainties discussed herein do not reflect the potential impact of future
mergers, acquisitions or dispositions. In addition, any
forward-looking statements represent our
estimates only as of the day this Quarterly Report was first filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates as of any subsequent date.
While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we
specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our estimates or expectations change.
Business Overview
We operate primarily through three business segments: products and services for the veterinary
market, which we refer to as our Companion Animal Group (CAG), water quality products (Water)
and products for production animal health, which we refer to as the Production Animal Segment
(PAS). We also operate two smaller segments that comprise products for dairy quality, which we
refer to as Dairy, and products for the human medical diagnostic market, which we refer to as OPTI
Medical. Financial information about the Dairy and OPTI Medical operating segments are combined and
presented in an Other category because they do not meet the quantitative or qualitative
thresholds for reportable segments.
CAG develops, designs, manufactures, and distributes products and performs services for
veterinarians. Water develops, designs, manufactures, and distributes products to detect
contaminants in water. PAS develops, designs, manufactures, and distributes products to detect
diseases in production animals. Dairy develops, designs, manufactures, and distributes products to
detect contaminants in dairy products. OPTI Medical develops, designs, manufactures, and
distributes point-of-care electrolyte and blood gas analyzers and related consumable products for
the human medical diagnostics market.
Items that are not allocated to our operating segments comprise primarily corporate research
and development expenses, a portion of
share-based compensation expense, interest income and
expense, and income taxes. We allocate most of our
share-based compensation expense to the
operating segments. This allocation differs from the actual expense and consequently yields a
difference between the total allocated share-based compensation expense and the actual expense for
the total company.
Because our instrument consumables, rapid assay products, and pharmaceutical products are sold
in the U.S. and certain other geographies by distributors, distributor purchasing dynamics have an
impact on our reported sales of these products. Distributors purchase products from us and sell
them to veterinary practices, who are the end users. Distributor purchasing dynamics may be
affected by many factors and may be unrelated to underlying
end-user demand for our products. As a
result, fluctuations in distributors inventories may cause reported results in a period not to be
representative of underlying
end-user demand. Therefore, we believe it is important to track
distributor sales to end users and to distinguish between the impact of
end-user demand and the
impact of distributor purchasing dynamics on reported revenue growth.
Where growth rates are affected by changes in end-user demand, we refer to the impact of
practice-level sales on growth. Where growth rates are affected by distributor purchasing dynamics,
we refer to the impact of changes in distributors inventories. If during the comparable period of
the prior year, distributors inventories grew by more than those inventories grew in the current
year, then changes in distributors inventories have a negative impact on our reported sales growth
in the current period. Conversely, if during the comparable period of the prior year, distributors
inventories grew by less than those inventories grew in the current year, then changes in
distributors inventories have a positive impact on our reported sales growth in the current
period.
We operate in 17 countries and, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, 41% of our
revenue was derived from sales outside of the U.S. Since August, 2008 the U.S. dollar has
strengthened substantially in relation to other currencies in which our sales are denominated. Strengthening of the
U.S. dollar relative to other currencies has a negative impact on our international revenues and on margins of products manufactured in the U.S. and sold internationally. In addition, to the extent
that the U.S. dollar is stronger in future periods relative to the exchange rates in effect in the
corresponding prior periods, our growth rate will be negatively affected. The related impact on
foreign currency denominated operating expenses and the impact of foreign currency hedge contracts
in place partially offset this exposure. See also the section captioned Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.
On October 17, 2008, we entered into an agreement to sell our ACAREXX and SURPASS
pharmaceutical products and a product currently under development, which are a part of our CAG
segment. We expect that this transaction will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2008, at which
time we also intend to restructure the remaining pharmaceutical business. The impact of the sale
and restructuring is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations for the
fourth quarter of 2008.
17
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The
significant accounting policies used in preparation of these condensed consolidated financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are consistent with those discussed in Note
2 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007, except as discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The critical accounting policies and the
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are consistent with those discussed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 in the section captioned
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCritical
Accounting Policies and Estimates, except as discussed below.
Share-Based Compensation
We grant share-based compensation to certain classes of employees annually in the first
quarter of each year, including stock options. We have used subjective assumptions to value stock
options, particularly for the expected stock price volatility and the expected term of the options
that we believe are reasonable.
To develop the expected term assumption for option awards, we previously elected to use the
simplified method described in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
107, which is based on vesting and contractual terms. Beginning in January 2008, we derive the
expected term assumption for options based on historical experience and other relevant factors
concerning expected employee behavior with regard to option exercise. Expected term for future
awards will be determined using a consistent method. Longer expected term assumptions increase the
fair value of option awards and therefore increase the expense recognized per award.
Share-based compensation expense is based on the number of awards ultimately expected to vest
and is, therefore, reduced for an estimate of the number of awards that are expected to be
forfeited. The forfeiture estimates are based on historical data and other factors, and
compensation expense is adjusted for actual results. Net share-based compensation costs for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $7.9 million, which is net of a reduction of $1.1 million
for estimated forfeitures. Changes in estimated forfeiture rates and differences between estimated
forfeiture rates and actual experience may result in unanticipated increases or decreases in
share-based compensation expense from period to period.
18
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
Revenue
Total Company. Revenue increased $21.7 million, or 9%, to $251.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 from $229.4 million for the same period of the prior year. The favorable
impact of currency exchange rates contributed 2% to revenue growth. The following table presents
revenue by operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
and Currency |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Currency (1) |
|
|
Acquisitions (2) |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
205,050 |
|
|
$ |
187,481 |
|
|
$ |
17,569 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Water |
|
|
20,321 |
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
17,801 |
|
|
|
17,377 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
7,921 |
|
|
|
7,096 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
251,093 |
|
|
$ |
229,385 |
|
|
$ |
21,708 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to the effect of changes in currency
rates from the three months ended September 30, 2007 to the three months ended September 30,
2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to incremental revenues during the
three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007
from businesses acquired subsequent to July 1, 2007. |
Companion Animal Group. Revenue for CAG increased $17.6 million, or 9%, to $205.1 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $187.5 million for the same period of the prior
year. The favorable impact of currency exchange rates contributed 1% to the increase in CAG
revenue. Incremental sales from veterinary reference laboratory businesses acquired subsequent to
July 1, 2007 contributed less than one-half of a percent to CAG revenue growth. The following table
presents revenue by product and service category for CAG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
and Currency |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Currency (1) |
|
|
Acquisitions (2) |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments and
consumables |
|
$ |
80,587 |
|
|
$ |
71,443 |
|
|
$ |
9,144 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Rapid assay products |
|
|
36,212 |
|
|
|
33,639 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Laboratory and
consulting Services |
|
|
73,536 |
|
|
|
64,914 |
|
|
|
8,622 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Practice information
management systems and
digital radiography |
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
12,197 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Pharmaceutical products |
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
5,288 |
|
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
(73.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net CAG revenue |
|
$ |
205,050 |
|
|
$ |
187,481 |
|
|
$ |
17,569 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to the effect of changes in currency
rates from the three months ended September 30, 2007 to the three months ended September 30,
2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to incremental revenues during the
three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007
from businesses acquired subsequent to July 1, 2007. |
19
The following revenue analysis reflects the results of operations net of the impact of
currency exchange rates on sales outside the U.S. and net of incremental sales from veterinary
reference laboratory businesses acquired subsequent to July 1, 2007.
The increase in sales of instruments and consumables was due primarily to higher unit sales
volume across most instrument and consumables product categories. Higher instrument sales volumes
were due primarily to sales of Catalyst Dx chemistry analyzers and SNAPshot Dx analyzers, both of
which we began shipping to customers in the first quarter of 2008, and increased sales of Coag Dx analyzers, which we
began shipping to customers in the fourth quarter of 2007. These favorable impacts were partly
offset by a decrease in sales of LaserCyte® hematology analyzers. Higher consumables
sales volumes were due primarily to higher worldwide
practice-level sales of tubes used with our
hematology analyzers, slides used with our chemistry analyzers and cassettes used with our
VetStat® Analyzer. Higher instrument service revenue was due to the higher number of
instruments covered under service contracts resulting from an increase in the installed base of
instruments. Instruments and consumables sales were also favorably impacted by higher average unit
sales prices for slides that are sold for use in our chemistry analyzers, although this impact was
largely offset by lower average unit prices on sales of our LaserCyte® hematology and
VetTest® chemistry analyzers due primarily to increased promotional discounting. Changes
in distributors inventory levels decreased reported instruments and consumables revenue growth by
1%.
The increase in sales of rapid assay products was due to higher average unit sales prices and,
to a lesser extent, higher sales volumes. Higher average unit sales prices were due, in part, to
higher relative sales of canine combination test products versus single assay test products, as
well as price increases of certain canine and feline combination test products. We expect that the
rate of end users conversion from canine heartworm-only tests to combination test products will
slow in future periods, which will decelerate the rate of increase in average unit sales prices.
Increased volume was due primarily to increased U.S.
practice-level sales of canine combination
test products, such as SNAP® 4Dx®, partly offset by unfavorable changes in
U.S. distributor inventory levels of canine and feline combination test products. The impact from
changes in distributors inventory levels decreased reported rapid assay revenue growth by 7%.
The increase in sales of laboratory and consulting services resulted from higher testing
volume and the impact of price increases. Higher testing volume was attributable primarily to sales
to new customers. Acquisitions of veterinary reference laboratories in the United States and Europe
contributed 1% to reported laboratory and consulting services revenue growth.
The increase in sales of practice information management systems and digital radiography
resulted primarily from higher sales volumes of companion animal radiography systems and, to a
lesser extent, increased sales of hardware and peripheral equipment used with practice information
management systems. These favorable impacts were partly offset by lower average unit prices for
companion animal digital radiography systems and increased discounting of Cornerstone®
practice information management systems.
The decrease in sales of pharmaceutical products resulted primarily from the discontinuation
of sales of PZI VET®, our insulin product for the treatment of diabetic cats, at the end
of the second quarter of 2008. As discussed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second
quarter of 2008, we sold our remaining inventory of PZI VET® in the second quarter
following our announcement that we would be discontinuing this product since the raw material used
in the product is no longer commercially available. Sales of PZI VET® were $3.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Water. Revenue for Water increased $2.9 million, or 17%, to $20.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 from $17.4 million for the same period of the prior year. The increase
resulted primarily from higher sales volume and, to a lesser extent, higher average unit sales
prices due to higher relative sales in geographies where products are sold at higher average unit
sales prices. Higher sales volumes were attributable to the commencement in September 2007 of
distribution of certain water testing kits manufactured by Invitrogen Corporation (Invitrogen),
which increased reported Water revenue growth by 6%, as well as higher sales of our
Colilert® products, used to detect total coliforms and E. coli in water, and
Filta-Max® products, used to detect Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water. The favorable
impact of currency exchange rates contributed 1% to the increase in Water revenue.
Production Animal Segment. Revenue for PAS increased $0.4 million, or 2%, to $17.8 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $17.4 million for the same period of the prior year.
The increase resulted primarily from higher livestock diagnostics sales volume and the favorable
impact from currency exchange rates, which contributed 6% to PAS revenue growth, partly offset by
lower average unit sales prices for our post-mortem test for bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE) and for our test for mycobacterium paratuberculosis (M. pt).
20
Other. Revenue for Other operating units increased $0.8 million, or 12%, to $7.9 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $7.1 million for the same period of the prior year
due primarily to higher sales volume of Dairy SNAP® antibiotic residue tests and of OPTI
Medical products.
Gross Profit
Total Company. The following table presents gross profit and gross profit percentages by
operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
99,945 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
$ |
93,949 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
$ |
5,996 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Water |
|
|
12,825 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
10,919 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
12,035 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
|
10,412 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
% |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
3,324 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
% |
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Unallocated amounts |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(82.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
128,149 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
$ |
118,478 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
% |
|
$ |
9,671 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal Group. Gross profit for CAG increased $6.0 million, or 6%, to $99.9 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $93.9 million for the same period of the prior
year due to increased sales volume across all CAG product and service lines, with the exception of
the pharmaceuticals business, partly offset by a decrease in gross profit percentage to 49% from
50%. The decrease in the gross profit percentage was due primarily to higher relative sales of
lower margin laboratory and consulting services and IDEXX VetLab® instruments, and
higher manufacturing costs of our instruments, including our Catalyst Dx chemistry analyzer where
we have not yet achieved economies of scale. These unfavorable items were partly offset by the
favorable impact of foreign currency rates on sales denominated in those currencies, inclusive of
foreign exchange hedge contract gains and foreign currency denominated expenses.
Water. Gross profit for Water increased $1.9 million, or 17%, to $12.8 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 from $10.9 million for the same period of the prior year due to
increased sales volume and an increase in the gross profit percentage of approximately one-half of
a percentage point. The increase in the gross profit percentage was due primarily to the impact of
foreign currency rates on sales denominated in those currencies, inclusive of foreign exchange
hedge contract gains and foreign currency denominated expenses; lower overall costs of
manufacturing; and, to a lesser extent, higher relative sales in geographies where products are
sold at higher unit prices. These favorable impacts were partly offset by greater relative sales of
lower margin products, consisting primarily of water testing kits manufactured by Invitrogen.
Production Animal Segment. Gross profit for PAS increased $1.6 million, or 16%, to $12.0
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $10.4 million for the same period of the
prior year due to increased sales volume and an increase in the gross profit percentage to 68% from
60%. The increase in gross profit percentage was due primarily to the impact of foreign currency
rates on sales denominated in those currencies, inclusive of foreign exchange hedge contract gains
and foreign currency denominated expenses; net lower production costs; the gross profit impact of
revenue recognized on shipments prior to July 1, 2008 to a customer that is on the cash basis of
accounting due to uncertain collectibility; and the favorable settlement of a royalty liability.
These favorable impacts were partly offset by lower average unit sales prices.
Other. Gross profit for Other operating units increased $0.2 million, or 8%, to $3.3 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $3.1 million for the same period of the prior
year due primarily to increased sales volume, partly offset by a decrease in the gross profit
percentage to 42% from 43%. The decrease in gross profit percentage was due primarily to
comparatively higher costs of production and relatively higher sales of Dairy SNAP®
antibiotic residue tests in geographies where the products are sold at lower unit prices. These
unfavorable impacts were partly offset by the favorable impact of foreign currency rates on sales
denominated in those currencies, inclusive of foreign exchange hedge contract gains and foreign
currency denominated expenses, and proportionally higher sales of higher margin OPTI Medical
consumable products.
21
Operating Expenses and Operating Income
Total Company. The following tables present operating expenses and operating income by
operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
71,007 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
$ |
65,420 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
$ |
5,587 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Water |
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
|
7,851 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
% |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Unallocated amounts |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
89,152 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
$ |
82,381 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
$ |
6,771 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
28,938 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
$ |
28,529 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Water |
|
|
8,865 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(140.7 |
%) |
Unallocated amounts |
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
38,997 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
$ |
36,097 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal Group. The following table presents CAG operating expenses by functional
area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
35,272 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
$ |
31,836 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,436 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
23,878 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
21,975 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
11,857 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
11,609 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
71,007 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
$ |
65,420 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
$ |
5,587 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense resulted primarily from higher personnel and
personnel-related costs due, in part, to expanded worldwide sales and marketing, the addition of
customer service headcount, and higher overall customer support function expenses. To a lesser
extent, the impact of exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses also contributed to
the increase in sales and marketing expense. These increases were partly offset by a decrease in
direct selling expense related to distributor incentives and a decrease in direct marketing expense
due to specific product launches and other 2007 initiatives that did not recur in 2008.
The increase in general and administrative expense resulted primarily from higher spending on
executive, finance, information technology and legal support and the unfavorable impact of exchange
rates on foreign currency denominated expenses.
The increase in research and development expense resulted primarily from higher personnel
costs, partly offset by a net decrease in product development spending. The net decrease in product
development spending resulted from the completion of development of our next-generation chemistry
analyzer, Catalyst Dx, and our new quantitative immunoassay platform, SNAPshot Dx, both of which
we began shipping to customers in the first quarter of 2008, as well as lower external consulting
costs related to our digital radiography business.
22
Water. The following table presents Water expenses by functional area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
3,960 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense resulted primarily from higher personnel and
personnel-related costs due primarily to expanded worldwide headcount. The increase in general and
administrative expense was the result of slightly higher personnel-related expenses, partly offset
by lower overall spending on corporate support function expenses. The increase in research and
development expense was due primarily to higher patent registration and related fees, partly offset
by the absence in 2008 of certain costs incurred during the second quarter of 2007 associated with
support of new product development initiatives.
Production Animal Segment. The following table presents PAS operating expenses by functional
area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
3,491 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
8,553 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,851 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
% |
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The slight increase in sales and marketing expense resulted primarily from the impact of
exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses and higher personnel and personnel-related
costs, partly offset by decreased spending on direct marketing activities. The increase in general
and administrative expense resulted primarily from increased personnel costs and the impact of
exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses, partly offset by lower overall spending on
corporate support function expenses and the absence in 2008 of distributor termination costs
incurred in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in research and development expense resulted
primarily from higher personnel costs and the impact of exchange rates on foreign currency
denominated expenses.
Other. Operating expenses for Other operating units increased $0.3 million to $3.3 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to higher spending on corporate support
function expenses and increased personnel costs.
Unallocated Amounts. Operating expenses that are not allocated to our operating segments
decreased $0.1 million to $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease
in unallocated amounts resulted primarily from lower expense related to share-based compensation,
partly offset by higher corporate research and development expense due to the addition of personnel
dedicated to information management software development.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Interest income was $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Higher average invested cash balances during the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared
to 2007 were offset by lower effective interest rates.
Interest expense was $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Incremental borrowings under our revolving credit facility during the three months ended September
30, 2008 as compared to 2007 were offset by lower effective interest rates on outstanding debt
balances.
23
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates were 33.1% and 27.5% for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in our effective income tax rate for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to September 30, 2007 was due primarily to a federal research and
experimentation tax credit that was not available for the three months ended September 30, 2008;
the reduction of international deferred tax liabilities during the three months ended September 30,
2007, resulting from a decrease in statutory tax rates; and the recognition of certain state tax
benefits, resulting from the completion of an audit during the three months ended September 30,
2007.
The federal research and experimentation tax credit expired effective December 31, 2007,
however, legislation was enacted on October 3, 2008 to retroactively extend the benefit until
December 31, 2009. The full year effect of this benefit will be recorded in our tax rate during the
three months ended December 31, 2008. It is anticipated that
this benefit will reduce our
full-year
effective tax rate by 1.3%.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Revenue
Total Company. Revenue increased $103.2 million, or 15%, to $780.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. Incremental sales from businesses acquired subsequent to January 1, 2007
contributed 1% to revenue growth. These acquisitions consisted primarily of veterinary reference
laboratories and customer lists in Canada, the United States and Europe; a production animal
diagnostic products business in France; and the Critical Care Division of Osmetech plc, which we
refer to as OPTI Medical. The favorable impact of currency exchange rates contributed 4% to revenue
growth. The following table presents revenue by operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
and Currency |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Currency (1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
639,411 |
|
|
$ |
554,939 |
|
|
$ |
84,472 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Water |
|
|
57,287 |
|
|
|
48,941 |
|
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
60,452 |
|
|
|
52,871 |
|
|
|
7,581 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Other |
|
|
23,587 |
|
|
|
20,835 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
780,737 |
|
|
$ |
677,586 |
|
|
$ |
103,151 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to the effect of changes in currency
rates from the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to the nine months ended September 30,
2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to incremental revenues during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from
businesses acquired subsequent to January 1, 2007. |
Companion Animal Group. Revenue for CAG increased $84.5 million, or 15%, to $639.4 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The favorable impact of currency exchange rates
contributed 3% to the increase in CAG revenue. Incremental sales from veterinary reference
laboratory businesses acquired subsequent to January 1, 2007 contributed 1% to CAG revenue growth.
24
The following table presents revenue by product and service category for CAG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change from |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
and Currency |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Currency (1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments and
consumables |
|
$ |
236,974 |
|
|
$ |
209,889 |
|
|
$ |
27,085 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Rapid assay products |
|
|
115,699 |
|
|
|
101,464 |
|
|
|
14,235 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Laboratory and
consulting services |
|
|
222,984 |
|
|
|
191,350 |
|
|
|
31,634 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Practice information
management systems and
digital radiography |
|
|
42,373 |
|
|
|
36,419 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Pharmaceutical products |
|
|
21,381 |
|
|
|
15,817 |
|
|
|
5,564 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net CAG revenue |
|
$ |
639,411 |
|
|
$ |
554,939 |
|
|
$ |
84,472 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to the effect of changes in currency
rates from the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to the nine months ended September 30,
2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the percentage change in revenue attributed to incremental revenues during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from
businesses acquired subsequent to January 1, 2007. |
The following revenue analysis reflects the results of operations net of the impact of
currency exchange rates on sales outside the U.S. and net of incremental sales from veterinary
reference laboratory businesses acquired subsequent to January 1, 2007.
The increase in sales of instruments and consumables was due to higher unit sales volume
across all instrument and consumables product categories, partly offset by net lower average unit
sales prices. Higher consumables sales volumes were due primarily to higher worldwide
practice-level sales of chemistry slides; tubes used with our hematology analyzers; consumables
used with our Coag Dx analyzer, which we began shipping to customers in the fourth quarter of
2007; and cassettes used with our VetStat® analyzer. Higher instrument sales volumes
were due primarily to increased sales of Catalyst Dx chemistry analyzers, which we began shipping
to customers in the first quarter of 2008, Coag Dx blood coagulation analyzers, which we began
shipping to customers in the fourth quarter of 2007, SNAPshot Dx analyzers, which we began
shipping to customers in the first quarter of 2008; and IDEXX VetLab® Stations, our
in-clinic laboratory information management systems. Higher instrument service revenue was due to
the increase in number of instruments covered under service contracts resulting from an increase in
the installed base of instruments. Lower average unit sales prices were due primarily to increased
promotional discounting on LaserCyte® and VetTest® analyzers, partly offset
by higher average unit sales prices on slides that are sold for use in our chemistry analyzers.
Sales volumes of consumables in the U.S. and Canada in the first half of 2007 benefited from
temporary additional diagnostic testing volume related to the recall of certain pet foods in March
2007. We believe that the recall resulted in a higher than usual number of pet visits to veterinary
clinics in North America in the first and second quarters of 2007. We estimate that this event
negatively impacted year-over-year growth in sales of consumables used in our IDEXX
VetLab® suite of analyzers for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by approximately
2%, and negatively impacted growth in sales of total instruments and consumables by approximately
1%. Changes in distributors inventory levels did not have a significant impact on reported
instruments and consumables revenue growth.
The increase in sales of rapid assay products was due to both higher sales volumes and higher
average unit sales prices. Increased volume was due primarily to increased U.S. practice-level
sales of our canine combination test products, such as the SNAP® 4Dx®, and
the July 2007 launch of SNAP® cPL, our test for pancreatitis in dogs. In May 2006, we
acquired intellectual property and distribution rights related to certain canine and feline rapid
assay products from Agen Biomedical Limited (Agen), and subsequently began to transition
customers utilizing the Agen rapid assay products to IDEXX rapid assay products. The favorable
impacts on rapid assay sales noted above were partly offset by a decrease in the volume of sales of
Agen products as we transitioned customers from these products to our SNAP® tests.
Higher average unit sales prices were due, in part, to higher relative sales of canine combination
test products versus single assay test products; less promotional discounting in connection with
our SNAP® up the Savings and other customer programs; and, to a lesser extent, the
impact of price increases of certain canine and feline combination tests. We expect that the rate
of end users conversion from canine heartworm-only tests to combination test products will slow in
future periods, which will decelerate the rate of
increase in average unit sales prices. The impact from changes in distributors inventory levels
did not have a significant impact on reported rapid assay revenue growth.
25
The increase in sales of laboratory and consulting services resulted from higher testing
volume and the impact of price increases. Higher testing volume was attributable primarily to sales
to new customers and the impact of new test offerings. As discussed above, the first half of 2007
benefited from temporary additional diagnostic testing volume resulting from the March 2007 pet
food recall. We estimate that this event negatively impacted year-over-year growth in laboratory
and consulting services revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by approximately 1%.
The increase in sales of practice information management systems and digital radiography
resulted primarily from higher sales volumes of companion animal radiography systems and, to a
lesser extent, the favorable impact of changes to the customer support pricing structure for our
Cornerstone® practice information management systems. These favorable impacts were
partly offset by lower sales of practice information management systems; lower sales of equine
radiography systems; and lower average unit prices for companion animal digital radiography
systems.
The increase in sales of pharmaceutical products resulted primarily from higher sales volume
and average unit sales price of PZI VET®, our insulin product for the treatment of
diabetic cats. As discussed above, in the second quarter of 2008 we informed customers that we
would be discontinuing this product and thereafter we sold our remaining inventory during the
second quarter. The acceleration of PZI VET® sales into the second quarter as a result
of our announcement had an incremental impact of approximately $5 million on sales for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Sales of PZI VET® were $10.5 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007.
Water. Revenue for Water increased $8.3 million, or 17%, to $57.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from $48.9 million for the same period of the prior year. The increase
resulted primarily from higher sales volume, partly offset by lower average unit sales prices due
to higher relative sales in geographies where products are sold at lower average unit sales prices.
Higher sales volumes were attributable to the commencement in September 2007 of distribution of
certain water testing kits manufactured by Invitrogen, which increased reported Water revenue
growth by 6%; higher sales of our Colilert® products, used to detect total coliforms and
E. coli in water; and higher sales of Filta-Max® products, used to detect
Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water. The favorable impact of currency exchange rates contributed
3% to the increase in Water revenue.
Production Animal Segment. Revenue for PAS increased $7.6 million, or 14%, to $60.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $52.9 million for the same period of the prior
year. The increase in revenue resulted from increased sales volume and the favorable impact from
currency exchange rates, which contributed 10% to PAS revenue growth, partly offset by lower
average unit sales prices. The increase in volume resulted primarily from higher livestock
diagnostics sales, including sales attributable to Institut Pourquier, a France-based manufacturer
of production animal diagnostic products that we acquired in March 2007. The year-over-year growth
in sales of Pourquier products contributed 4% to PAS revenue growth. The decrease in average unit
sales prices was due primarily to a reduction in average price for our post-mortem test for BSE,
and for our test for mycobacterium paratuberculosis (M. pt).
Other. Revenue for Other operating units increased $2.8 million, or 13%, to $23.6 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $20.8 million for the same period of the prior year
due primarily to higher sales volume of our OPTI Medical products, which we acquired in the first
quarter of 2007 and, to a lesser extent, higher sales volume of Dairy SNAP® antibiotic
residue tests. The favorable impact of currency exchange rates contributed 4% to the increase in
Other operating units revenue.
26
Gross Profit
Total Company. The following table presents gross profit and gross profit percentages by
operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
322,730 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
% |
|
$ |
269,328 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
% |
|
$ |
53,402 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Water |
|
|
35,573 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
30,960 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
40,698 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
% |
|
|
32,677 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
% |
|
|
8,021 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
Other |
|
|
9,952 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
7,926 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
Unallocated amounts |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(24.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
409,245 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
% |
|
$ |
341,278 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
$ |
67,967 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal Group. Gross profit for CAG increased $53.4 million, or 20%, to $322.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $269.3 million for the same period of the
prior year due to increased sales volume across the CAG product and service lines and to an
increase in the gross margin percentage to 50% from 49%. The gross profit percentage in 2007 was
depressed by 2% due to the write-offs of inventory and a prepaid royalty related to our
Navigator® product, as discussed below. To a lesser extent, the 2008 gross profit
percentage was favorably impacted by lower cost of slides that are sold for use in
VetTest® chemistry analyzers; higher average unit sales prices on canine combination
test products; and the favorable impact of foreign currency rates on sales denominated in those
currencies, net of foreign exchange hedge contract losses and foreign currency denominated
expenses. These favorable items were partly offset by higher manufacturing costs of our
instruments, including our Catalyst Dx chemistry analyzer for which we have not yet achieved
economies of scale and higher relative sales of lower margin laboratory and consulting services and
IDEXX VetLab® instruments.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 we recognized a write-down of nitazoxanide raw
materials inventory of $9.1 million and a write-off of a prepaid royalty license of $1.0 million
associated with Navigator® paste. We wrote down these assets because the third-party
contract manufacturer of finished goods notified us that it would discontinue manufacturing the
product in 2009. Additionally, product sales were lower than projected. We believed that we would
not be able to enter into a replacement manufacturing arrangement on economically feasible terms
and that we would not be able to obtain the product after termination of the existing manufacturing
arrangement because the estimated production volume was low. Accordingly, we evaluated our
associated inventory for obsolescence based on our changed estimates of product availability and
estimated future demand and market conditions. Additionally, because of lower sales volume
estimates and the reduced product life, we determined that we would not realize our related
investment in prepaid royalties and, therefore, fully expensed this asset.
Water. Gross profit for Water increased $4.6 million, or 15%, to $35.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 from $31.0 million for the same period of the prior year due to
increased sales volume, partly offset by a decrease in the gross profit percentage to 62% from 63%.
The decrease in the gross profit percentage was due primarily to greater relative sales of lower
margin products, consisting primarily of water testing kits manufactured by Invitrogen that we
began distributing in September 2007; discrete costs incurred as a result of discontinuing a
project to qualify a second source supplier for certain products; and higher relative sales in
geographies where products are sold at lower unit prices. These unfavorable impacts were partly
offset by lower overall costs of manufacturing and the impact of foreign currency rates on sales
denominated in those currencies, inclusive of foreign exchange hedge contract gains and foreign
currency denominated expense.
Production Animal Segment. Gross profit for PAS increased $8.0 million, or 25%, to $40.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $32.7 million for the same period of the
prior year due to increased sales volume and to an increase in the gross profit percentage to 67%
from 62%. The gross profit percentage in 2007 was negatively affected by 1% as a result of purchase
accounting for inventory acquired with the Pourquier business. The gross profit percentage for 2008
also improved due to the impact of foreign currency rates on sales denominated in those currencies,
net of foreign exchange hedge contract losses and foreign currency denominated expenses; the gross
profit impact of revenue recognized on shipments prior to July 1, 2008 to a customer that is on the
cash basis of accounting due to uncertain collectibility; and the favorable settlement of a royalty
liability. These favorable impacts were partly offset by the impact of lower average unit sales
prices.
27
Other. Gross profit for Other operating units increased $2.0 million, or 26%, to $10.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $7.9 million for the same period of the prior
year due primarily to increased sales volume and to an increase in the gross profit percentage to
42% from 38%. The gross profit percentage in 2007 was negatively affected as a result of purchase
accounting for inventory acquired in connection with the OPTI Medical business. The gross profit
percentage in 2008 also improved due to the impact of foreign currency rates on sales denominated
in those currencies, net of foreign exchange hedge contract losses and foreign currency denominated
expenses, partly offset by the impact of lower average unit sales prices and higher overall costs
of manufacturing.
Operating Expenses and Operating Income
Total Company. The following tables present operating expenses and operating income by
operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
216,430 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
$ |
194,035 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
22,395 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Water |
|
|
12,136 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
10,950 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
25,874 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
22,391 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
|
3,483 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
10,206 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
|
8,413 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
Unallocated amounts |
|
|
7,992 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
272,638 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
$ |
241,837 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
$ |
30,801 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAG |
|
$ |
106,300 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
$ |
75,293 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
$ |
31,007 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
% |
Water |
|
|
23,437 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
20,010 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
PAS |
|
|
14,824 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
10,286 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
% |
Unallocated amounts |
|
|
(7,700 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(36.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
136,607 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
$ |
99,441 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
$ |
37,166 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal Group. The following table presents CAG operating expenses by functional
area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
109,759 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
$ |
93,874 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
$ |
15,885 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
71,466 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
65,310 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
6,156 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
35,205 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
34,851 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
216,430 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
$ |
194,035 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
22,395 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense resulted primarily from higher personnel and
personnel-related costs due, in part, to expanded worldwide sales and marketing and the addition of
customer service headcount. To a lesser extent, the impact of exchange rates on foreign currency
denominated expenses also contributed to the increase in sales and marketing expense.
The increase in general and administrative expense resulted primarily from higher spending on
corporate support functions, including information technology, finance, human resources and legal;
the unfavorable impact of exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses; incremental
expenses associated with businesses acquired subsequent to January 1, 2007, comprised mainly of
administrative expenses of a recurring nature to support the acquired businesses and amortization
expense for intangible assets acquired; and, to a lesser extent higher personnel costs due, in
part, to increased headcount. These increases were partly offset by the absence of non-recurring
costs incurred in 2007 related to acquisitions and decreased spending on general facilities-related
expenses.
28
The increase in research and development expense resulted primarily from higher personnel
costs to support incremental new product and technology development initiatives and product
enhancement efforts related primarily to rapid assay, IDEXX VetLab® instrumentation, and
digital radiography products. These increases were largely offset by a decrease in product
development spending resulting from the completion of the development of our next-generation
chemistry analyzer, Catalyst Dx, and our new quantitative immunoassay platform, SNAPshot Dx, both
of which we began shipping to customers in the first quarter of 2008, and by lower external
consulting costs related to our pharmaceuticals product line.
Water. The following table presents Water expenses by functional area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
5,805 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
$ |
4,986 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
819 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
4,097 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
12,136 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
$ |
10,950 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,186 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense resulted primarily from higher personnel and
personnel-related costs due, in part, to expanded headcount and incremental costs incurred for
travel and, to a lesser extent, the impact of exchange rates on foreign currency denominated
expenses. The increase in general and administrative expense resulted primarily from costs incurred
in connection with the termination of a supply agreement. The decrease in research and development
expense resulted primarily from the absence in 2008 of costs incurred in 2007 associated with
support of new product development initiatives, partly offset by higher patent registration and
related fees.
Production Animal Segment. The following table presents PAS operating expenses by functional
area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
10,198 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
$ |
8,218 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,980 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
9,758 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
5,918 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
5,651 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
25,874 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
$ |
22,391 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
$ |
3,483 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense resulted primarily from higher personnel and
personnel-related costs, the impact of exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses and,
to a lesser extent, incremental activities associated with the Pourquier business, which was
acquired in March 2007. The increase in general and administrative expense was due primarily to the
impact of exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses, increased personnel costs and
incremental costs associated with the acquisition of the Pourquier business, which are comprised
mainly of administrative expenses of a recurring nature to support the acquired business and
amortization expense for intangible assets. These increases were partly offset by lower overall
spending on corporate support function expenses, including legal and facilities-related expenses.
The increase in research and development expense resulted primarily from higher personnel costs and
the impact of exchange rates on foreign currency denominated expenses, partly offset by a decrease
in spending for professional fees and research and development supplies.
Other. Operating expenses for Other operating units increased $1.8 million to $10.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to incremental expenses incurred related
to OPTI Medical and higher spending on corporate support function expenses.
Unallocated Amounts. Operating expenses that are not allocated to our operating segments
increased $1.9 million to $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily
to increased corporate research and development expense due to the addition of personnel dedicated
to software for information management.
29
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Interest income was $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $2.0
million for the same period of the prior year. The decrease in interest income was due to lower
effective interest rates, partly offset by higher average invested cash balances.
Interest expense was $3.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
$3.3 million for the same period of the prior year. The increase in interest expense was due
primarily to higher borrowings under our revolving credit facility, partly offset by lower
effective interest rates on outstanding debt balances.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates were 31.4% and 30.2% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in our effective income tax rate for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to September 30, 2007 was due primarily to a federal research and
experimentation tax credit that was not available during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
This tax benefit had expired effective December 31, 2007, however, on October 3, 2008 legislation
was enacted to retroactively extend the benefit until December 31, 2009. This effect will be
recorded in our tax rate as of the year ending December 31, 2008. It is anticipated that this
benefit will reduce our full-year effective tax rate by 1.3%.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
A discussion of recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2(r) to the consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 and in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
We fund the capital needs of our business through cash on hand, funds generated from
operations, and amounts available under our credit facilities. At September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, we had $84.6 million and $60.4 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents, and
working capital of $45.6 million and $82.3 million, respectively. Additionally, at September 30,
2008, we had remaining borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility of $36.1 million.
We believe that current cash and cash equivalents, funds generated from operations, and amounts
available under our credit facilities will be sufficient to fund our operations, capital purchase
requirements, and strategic growth needs. We further believe that we could obtain additional
borrowings at market interest rates to fund our growth objectives, however, based on the current
credit market, the interest rates obtained may be less favorable than historical interest rates and the interest rates available to us under our current credit facilities. The extent and timing of
acquisition-related spending and repurchases of our common stock could cause variations in our
liquidity and leverage levels.
We consider the operating earnings of certain non-United States subsidiaries to be
indefinitely invested outside the U.S. Changes to this policy could have adverse tax consequences.
Subject to this policy, we manage our worldwide cash requirements considering available funds among
all of our subsidiaries. Foreign cash balances are generally available without legal restrictions
to fund ordinary business operations outside the U.S.
The following table presents additional key information concerning working capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days sales outstanding |
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
Inventory turns |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
30
Sources and Uses of Cash
Cash provided by operating activities was $109.8 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008, compared to $94.8 million for the same period in 2007. The total of net income and net
non-cash charges was $131.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $99.4
million for the same period in 2007.
We historically have experienced proportionally lower or net negative cash flows from
operating activities during the first quarter and proportionally higher or net positive cash flows
from operating activities for the remainder of the year and for the annual period. Several factors
contribute to the seasonal fluctuations in cash flows generated by operating activities, including
the following:
|
|
|
In the U.S., we have historically paid our final income tax payments for each fiscal
year on March 15th of the following year, in addition to paying our first
quarter payment for the current fiscal year. In the current year we made our first
quarter payment for the current fiscal year on April 15th. Prior to 2008 our
method of depositing estimated taxes typically delayed a portion of the payment
relating to the preceding year until this final payment date and, as a result, tax
payments were higher in the first quarter of each year. Due to changes in federal tax
law, we believe this will be less significant in future periods. |
|
|
|
|
We have management and non-management employee incentive programs that provide for
the payment of annual bonuses in the first quarter following the year in which the
bonuses were earned. |
|
|
|
|
We have agreements with certain suppliers that require us to make minimum annual
inventory purchases, in some cases in order to retain exclusive distribution rights,
and we have other agreements with suppliers that provide for lower pricing based on
annual purchase volumes. We may place a higher volume of purchase orders for inventory
during the fourth quarter in order to meet our minimum commitments or realize volume
pricing discounts and we receive that inventory in the fourth or first quarters and pay
in the first quarter. The specific facts and circumstances that we consider in
determining the timing and level of inventory purchases throughout the year related to
these agreements may yield inconsistent cash flows from operations, most typically in
the first and fourth quarters. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash decreased by $21.6 million due to
changes in operating assets and liabilities, compared to a decrease in the same period of 2007 of
$4.6 million, resulting in a year-to-year change of $17.0 million. The increase in cash used by
changes in operating assets and liabilities, compared to 2007, was primarily attributable to $14.2
million incremental cash used by accrued expenses and $11.4 million incremental cash used by
changes in inventory, partly offset by a decrease of $9.3 million of cash used by decreases in
accounts receivable. The incremental cash used to reduce accrued expenses was due to greater
relative reductions in employee-related liabilities including management incentive bonuses and the
timing of estimated tax payments caused by changes in federal estimated payment rules that became
effective in the current year. The incremental cash used by changes in inventory was due primarily
to increases in certain instrument inventory, including our Catalyst Dx chemistry analyzer,
resulting from the launch of the instrument in the first quarter of 2008. This increase was partly
offset by decreases in inventory due to the receipt of a lower volume of VetTest® slides
from our supplier in 2008 as compared to 2007. The incremental cash provided by decreases in
accounts receivable was due to slower sales growth in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the
same period of the prior year.
Cash used by investing activities was $74.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, compared to cash used of $95.2 million for the same period of 2007. The decrease in cash used
by investing activities for 2008, compared to 2007, was due to $79.1 million less cash used for
business acquisitions and purchases of other assets not comprising businesses, partly offset by a
decrease in cash provided by the sale of investments of $35.0 million and incremental purchases of
property and equipment of $23.3 million, described below.
31
We paid $6.8 million to acquire a business and, under separate transactions, to acquire certain
intangible assets that did not comprise businesses during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and recognized liabilities, including contingent liabilities associated with purchase accounting,
of $0.3 million, of which $0.1 million was paid in the third quarter of 2008. In January 2008, we
acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain
liabilities of VetLab Laboratorio Veterinario de Referencia, S.L. (VetLab S.L.). With
operations in Barcelona, Spain, VetLab S.L. is a provider of reference laboratory testing services
to veterinarians. We also acquired certain intellectual property and distribution rights associated
with a diagnostic test product during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Additionally,
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 we made purchase price payments of $1.7 million
related to the achievement of milestones realized by certain businesses acquired in prior years.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 we paid $86.1 million and assumed liabilities of
$18.0 million, including $8.1 million of deferred tax liabilities associated with purchase
accounting to acquire businesses and certain intangible assets that did not comprise businesses. We
also made $1.6 million in purchase payments associated with business acquisitions that closed in
prior periods during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
We paid $65.0 million to purchase fixed assets and $0.6 million to acquire rental instruments
sold with recourse during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Our total capital expenditure
plan for 2008 is approximately $100 million, which includes approximately $40 million for the
renovation and expansion of our headquarters facility in Westbrook, Maine. Our 2008 capital
expenditure plan has decreased by approximately $30 million from the level anticipated in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to delayed spending on our
headquarters facility.
On March 30, 2007, we entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of
multinational banks in the principal amount of $125.0 million that matures on March 30, 2012 (the
Credit Facility). In February 2008, we increased the aggregate principal amount available under
this facility to $200.0 million. The Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes,
including business acquisitions and repurchases of our common stock. The applicable interest rates
generally range from 0.375% to 0.875% above the London interbank rate or the Canadian
Dollar-denominated bankers acceptance rate, dependent on our leverage ratio. Under the Credit
Facility, we pay quarterly commitment fees of 0.08% to 0.20%, dependent on our leverage ratio, on
any unused commitment. The Credit Facility contains financial and other affirmative and negative
covenants, as well as customary events of default, that would allow any amounts outstanding under
the Credit Facility to be accelerated, or restrict our ability to borrow thereunder, in the event
of noncompliance. The financial covenant requires our ratio of debt to earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined by the agreement, not to exceed 3-to-1. At
September 30, 2008 we were in compliance with the covenants of the Credit Facility. At September
30, 2008 we had $163.9 million outstanding under the Credit Facility, of which $3.9 million was
borrowed by our Canadian subsidiary and denominated in Canadian dollars. Compared to September 30,
2007, the total amount outstanding under our Credit Facility had increased $86.7 million. Cash
received from borrowings was primarily used to repurchase shares of our common stock and to fund
acquisitions.
The board of directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 40,000,000 shares of our common
stock in the open market or in negotiated transactions. From the inception of the program in August
1999 to September 30, 2008, we repurchased 35,491,000 shares. Cash used to repurchase shares in the
first nine months of 2008 and 2007 was $122.4 million and $99.2 million, respectively. We believe
that the repurchase of our common stock is a favorable investment and we also repurchase to offset
the dilutive effect of our employee share-based compensation programs. Repurchases of our common
stock may vary depending upon the level of other investing activities and the share price. See Note
14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for additional information about our share repurchases.
Other Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Significant commitments, contingencies and guarantees at September 30, 2008 are consistent
with those discussed in the section captioned Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources, and in Note 13 to the
consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, except as described below and in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We have amounts committed under open purchase orders of $61.8 million at October 9, 2008.
These purchase orders relate to goods or services to be received over the next twelve months.
We have commitments outstanding at September 30, 2008 for additional purchase price payments
of up to $7.8 million, of which $0.3 million has been accrued, in connection with acquisitions of
businesses and intangible assets prior to September 30, 2008, all of which is contingent on the
achievement by certain acquired businesses of specified milestones.
32
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our financial market risk consists primarily of foreign currency exchange rate risk. Our
functional currency is the U.S. dollar and our primary manufacturing operations are in the U.S.,
but we distribute our products worldwide both through direct export and through our subsidiaries.
Our primary foreign currency transaction risk consists of intercompany sales of product and we
attempt to mitigate this risk through our hedging program described below. Our subsidiaries in 17
foreign countries use the local currency as their functional currency. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, 41% of our revenue was attributable to sales of products and services to
customers outside the U.S.
We identify foreign currency exchange risk by regularly monitoring our transactions
denominated in foreign currencies. We attempt to mitigate currency risk by hedging the majority of
our cash flow on intercompany sales to minimize foreign currency exposure. Currency exposure on
large purchases of foreign currency denominated products are evaluated in our hedging program and
used as natural hedges to offset hedge requirements.
Our hedging strategy is consistent with prior periods and there were no material changes in
our market risk exposure during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We enter into forward
currency exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges for amounts that are less than the full
value of forecasted intercompany sales and for amounts that are equivalent to, or less than, other
specific, significant transactions, thus no significant ineffectiveness has resulted or been
recorded through the statements of operations. Our hedging strategy related to intercompany
inventory purchases provides that we employ the full amount of our hedges for the succeeding year
at the conclusion of our budgeting process for that year, which is complete by the end of the
preceding year. Quarterly, we enter into contracts to hedge incremental portions of anticipated
foreign currency transactions for the following year. Accordingly, our risk with respect to foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations may vary throughout each annual cycle.
We enter into hedge agreements where we believe we have meaningful exposure to foreign
currency exchange risk. At September 30, 2008, we had $4.3 million in net unrealized gains on
foreign exchange contracts designated as hedges recorded in other comprehensive income, which is
net of $1.9 million in taxes.
Our foreign currency exchange risk at September 30, 2008 consisted of local currency revenues
and expenses, the impact of hedge contracts and balances denominated in a currency other than the
Companys or our subsidiaries functional currencies. Based on our overall foreign currency
exchange risk at September 30, 2008, a 1% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign
currencies at September 30, 2008 would decrease revenue by approximately $1.0 million in the fourth
quarter of 2008. At September 30, 2008, a 1% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign
currencies, excluding the impact of hedge contracts currently in place, would reduce operating
income by approximately $0.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008. A 1% strengthening of the U.S.
dollar relative to foreign currencies, including the impact of hedge contracts currently in place,
would reduce operating income by approximately $0.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2008. A 1%
weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies would have the exact opposite impact of
a 1% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies.
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting IDEXX, see Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. As of the date of this report, there have been no material
changes to the market risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined by the SEC in its Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act). The term disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and
other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal
executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and
management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures at
September 30, 2008, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as
of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to achieve their stated purpose.
33
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2008
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 30, 2006, Cyntegra, Inc. filed suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the
Central District of California alleging that we had violated U.S. federal antitrust laws and
California state unfair trade practices laws. The complaint alleged, among other things, that we
were monopolizing the U.S. market for companion animal diagnostic products. On October 26, 2007,
the trial court granted summary judgment in our favor on all of Cyntegras claims and dismissed the
suit. Cyntegra appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Cyntegra
filed its opening brief on appeal on May 30, 2008; we filed our opposition brief on July 2, 2008;
and Cyntegra filed its reply brief on July 16, 2008. We expect the Court of Appeals to schedule a
hearing in mid-2009. Until then, the trial court judgment in our favor remains in place. We will
continue to defend ourselves vigorously, as we believe Cyntegras claims are without merit.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our future operating results involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual events or
results may differ materially from those discussed in this report. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed below, as
well as those discussed elsewhere in this report.
Our Failure to Successfully Execute Certain Strategies Could Have a Negative Impact on Our
Growth and Profitability
The companion animal health care industry is very competitive and we anticipate increased
competition from both existing competitors and new market entrants. Our ability to maintain or
enhance our historical growth rates and our profitability depends on our successful execution of
many elements of our strategy, which include:
|
|
|
Developing, manufacturing and marketing innovative new in-house laboratory analyzers
such as Catalyst Dx and SNAPshot Dx that drive sales of IDEXX VetLab®
instruments, grow our installed base of instruments, and create a recurring revenue
stream from consumable products; |
|
|
|
Developing and introducing new proprietary rapid assay and other diagnostic tests
and services that effectively differentiate our products and services from those of our
competitors; |
|
|
|
Achieving the benefits of economies of scale in our worldwide reference laboratory
business; |
|
|
|
Increasing the value to our customers of our companion animal products and services
by enhancing the integration of these products; |
|
|
|
Growing our market share by strengthening our sales and marketing activities both
within the U.S. and in geographies outside of the U.S.; and |
|
|
|
Developing and implementing new technology and licensing strategies; and
identifying, completing and integrating acquisitions that enhance our existing
businesses or create new business or geographic areas for us. |
We may not be able to successfully implement some or all of these strategies and increase or
sustain our rate of growth or profitability.
34
A Weak Economy Could Result in Reduced Demand for Our Products and Services
A substantial percentage of our sales are made to the companion animal veterinary market
worldwide. Demand for our companion animal diagnostic products and services is driven in part by
the number of pet visits to veterinary hospitals. Economic weakness in our significant markets
could cause pet owners to skip or defer visits to veterinary hospitals or could affect their
willingness to treat certain pet health conditions or approve certain diagnostic tests. A decline
in pet visits to the hospital or in the willingness of pet owners to treat certain health
conditions or approve certain tests could result in a decrease in diagnostic testing, and therefore
in our sales of diagnostic products and services.
Disruption in Financial and Currency Markets Could Have a Negative Effect on Our Business
As widely reported, financial markets in the U.S., Europe and Asia have been experiencing
extreme disruption in recent months, including, among other things, extreme volatility in security
prices, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades of certain
investments and declining valuations of others. Governments have taken unprecedented actions
intended to address extreme market conditions that include severely restricted credit and declines
in real estate values. While currently these conditions have not impaired our ability to access
credit markets and finance our operations, there can be no assurance that there will not be a
further deterioration in financial markets and confidence in major economies. These economic
developments affect businesses such as ours in a number of ways. The current tightening of credit
in financial markets adversely affects the ability of customers and suppliers to obtain financing
for significant purchases and operations and could result in a decrease in orders for our products
and services. Strengthening of the rate of exchange for the U.S. Dollar against certain major
currencies also adversely affects our results. We are unable to predict the likely duration and
severity of the current disruption in financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the U.S.
and other countries.
Our Dependence on a Limited Number of Suppliers Could Limit Our Ability to Sell Certain
Products or Reduce Our Profitability
We currently purchase many products and materials from single sources or a limited number of
sources. Some of the products that we purchase from these sources are proprietary, and, therefore,
cannot be readily or easily replaced by alternative sources. These products include our
VetAutoread hematology, VetLyte® electrolyte, IDEXX VetLab® UA urinalysis,
VetTest® chemistry, and Coag Dx blood coagulation analyzers and related consumables and
accessories; image capture plates used in our digital radiography systems; active ingredients for
pharmaceutical products; and certain components and raw materials used in our SNAP®
rapid assay devices, water testing products and LaserCyte® hematology analyzers. If we
are unable to obtain adequate quantities of these products in the future, we could face cost
increases or reductions, or delays or discontinuations in product shipments, which could result in
our inability to supply the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Our Biologic Products Are Complex and Difficult to Manufacture, Which Could Negatively
Affect Our Ability to Supply the Market
Many of our rapid assay and production animal diagnostic products are biologics, which are
products that are comprised of materials from living organisms, such as antibodies, cells and sera.
Manufacturing biologic products is highly complex. Unlike products that rely on chemicals for
efficacy (such as most pharmaceuticals), biologics are difficult to characterize due to the
inherent variability of biological input materials. Difficulty in characterizing biological
materials or their interactions creates greater risk in the manufacturing process. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to maintain adequate sources of biological materials or that
biological materials that we maintain in inventory will yield finished products that satisfy
applicable product release criteria. Our inability to produce or obtain necessary biological
materials or to successfully manufacture biologic products that incorporate such materials could
result in our inability to supply the market with these products, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations.
35
Various Government Regulations Could Limit or Delay Our Ability to Market and Sell Our
Products
In the U.S., the manufacture and sale of our products are regulated by agencies such as the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Most diagnostic tests for animal health
applications, including our canine, feline, poultry and livestock tests, must be approved by the
USDA prior to sale in the U.S. Our water testing products must be approved by the EPA before they
can be used by customers in the U.S. as a part of a water quality monitoring program required by
the EPA. Our pharmaceutical and dairy testing products require approval by the FDA. The manufacture
and sale of our OPTI® line of human point-of-care electrolytes and blood gas analyzers
are regulated by the FDA and require approval by the FDA before they may be sold commercially in
the U.S. The manufacture and sale of our products are subject to similar laws in many foreign
countries. Any failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements relating to the manufacture
and sale of our products in the U.S. or in other countries could result in fines and sanctions
against us or removals of our products from the market, which could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations. In addition, delays in obtaining regulatory approvals for new
products or product upgrades could have a negative impact on our growth and profitability.
Our Success Is Heavily Dependent Upon Our Proprietary Technologies
We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright laws to protect our
proprietary rights. If we do not have adequate protection of our proprietary rights, our business
may be affected by competitors who utilize substantially equivalent technologies that compete with
us.
We cannot ensure that we will obtain issued patents, that any patents issued or licensed to us
will remain valid, or that any patents owned or licensed by us will provide protection against
competitors with similar technologies. Even if our patents cover products sold by our competitors,
the time and expense of litigating to enforce our patent rights could be substantial, and could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, expiration of patent
rights could result in substantial new competition in the markets for products previously covered
by those patent rights. In this regard, we expect that revenues and profit margins associated with
sales of our SNAP® FIV/FeLV tests are likely to decline following the expiration in June
2009 of a U.S. patent that we exclusively license that broadly covers products that diagnose feline
immunodeficiency virus.
In the past, we have received notices claiming that our products infringe third-party patents
and we may receive such notices in the future. Patent litigation is complex and expensive, and the
outcome of patent litigation can be difficult to predict. We cannot ensure that we will win a
patent litigation case or negotiate an acceptable resolution of such a case. If we lose, we may be
stopped from selling certain products and/or we may be required to pay damages and/or ongoing
royalties as a result of the lawsuit. Any such adverse result could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations.
Distributor Purchasing Patterns Could Negatively Affect Our Operating Results
We sell many of our products, including substantially all of the rapid assays and instrument
consumables sold in the U.S., through distributors. Distributor purchasing patterns can be
unpredictable and may be influenced by factors unrelated to the end-user demand for our products.
In addition, our agreements with distributors may generally be terminated by the distributors for
any reason on 60 days notice. Because significant product sales are made to a limited number of
distributors, the loss of a distributor or unanticipated changes in the frequency, timing or size
of distributor purchases, could have a negative effect on our results of operations. Our financial
performance, therefore, is subject to an unexpected downturn in product demand and may be
unpredictable.
Distributors of veterinary products have entered into business combinations resulting in fewer
distribution companies. Consolidation within distribution channels would increase our customer
concentration level, which could increase the risks described in the preceding paragraph.
36
Increased Competition and Technological Advances by Our Competitors Could Negatively Affect
Our Operating Results
We face intense competition within the markets in which we sell our products and services. We
expect that future competition will become even more intense, and that we will have to compete with
changing and improving technologies. Competitors may develop products that are superior to our
products, and as a result, we may lose
existing customers and market share. Some of our competitors and potential competitors,
including large human pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies, have substantially greater financial
resources than us, and greater experience in manufacturing, marketing, research and development,
obtaining regulatory approvals and conducting clinical trials than we do.
Changes in Testing Could Negatively Affect Our Operating Results
The market for our companion and production animal diagnostic tests and our dairy and water
testing products could be negatively impacted by a number of factors. The introduction or broad
market acceptance of vaccines or preventatives for the diseases and conditions for which we sell
diagnostic tests and services could result in a decline in testing. Changes in accepted medical
protocols regarding the diagnosis of certain diseases and conditions could have a similar effect.
Eradication or substantial declines in the prevalence of certain diseases also could lead to a
decline in diagnostic testing for such diseases. Our production animal products business in
particular is subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in disease prevalence. In addition,
changes in government regulations could negatively affect sales of our products that are driven by
compliance testing, such as our dairy and water products. Declines in testing for any of the
reasons described could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
On December 29, 2006, the Drinking Water Inspectorate in the U.K. published a proposal to
discontinue the regulation that requires testing water supplies for Cryptosporidium. Subsequently,
regulatory changes were approved and will become effective January 1, 2009. Our customers in the
U.K. may voluntarily continue to test for Cryptosporidium after that date. However, we expect that
beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 we will lose sales of our Filta-Max® products in
England and Wales to customers who test solely based on regulatory requirements. Our sales of
Filta-Max® products in England and Wales were $2.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2007.
The European Commission recently approved a proposal to revise the current monitoring regime
for BSE in cattle. The monitoring regime is required within the member states of the European
Union. The revised regime increases the age at which healthy slaughtered cattle are required to be
tested for BSE from 30 months to 48 months, which has been estimated to reduce the population of
cattle tested by approximately 30%. The revisions become effective January 1, 2009 and we believe that we are likely to lose a portion of our sales of our
post-mortem test for BSE, which were $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Consolidation of Veterinary Hospitals Could Negatively Affect Our Business
An increasing percentage of veterinary hospitals in the U.S. is owned by corporations that are
in the business of acquiring veterinary hospitals and/or opening new veterinary hospitals
nationally or regionally. Major corporate hospital owners in the U.S. include VCA Antech, Inc.,
National Veterinary Associates, and Banfield, The Pet Hospital, each of which is currently a
customer of IDEXX. A similar trend exists in the U.K. and may in the future also develop in other
countries. Corporate owners of veterinary hospitals could attempt to improve profitability by
leveraging the buying power they derive from their scale to obtain favorable pricing from
suppliers, which could have a negative impact on our results. In addition, certain corporate
owners, most notably VCA Antech, our primary competitor in the U.S. market for reference laboratory
services, also operate reference laboratories that serve both their hospitals and unaffiliated
hospitals. Any hospitals acquired by these companies are likely to use their laboratory services
almost exclusively. In addition, because these companies compete with us in the laboratory services
business, hospitals acquired by these companies may cease to be customers or potential customers of
our other companion animal products and services, which would cause our sales of these products and
services to decline.
Increasing Energy Costs Could Have a Negative Impact on Our Profitability
Our operating costs include the direct costs of energy needed to operate our business,
including the cost of electricity to power our facilities and manufacturing processes, oil and
natural gas to operate the heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems in our facilities, and
gasoline to power our courier and other company-owned vehicles. In addition, our operating costs
include the prices we pay to third parties for various goods and services, including shipping
services, that are affected by the energy costs incurred by these providers. We may not be able to
pass along increases in direct or indirect energy costs to our customers due to competitive or
economic factors and therefore, our profitability could be adversely impacted by such increases.
37
Our Inexperience in the Human Point-of-Care Market Could Inhibit Our Success in this Market
Upon acquiring the Critical Care Division of Osmetech plc in January 2007, we entered the
human point-of-care medical diagnostics market for the first time with the sale of the
OPTI® line of electrolyte and blood gas analyzers. The human point-of-care medical
diagnostics market differs in many respects from the veterinary medical market. Significant
differences include the impact of third party reimbursement on diagnostic testing, more extensive
regulation, greater product liability risks, larger competitors, a more segmented customer base,
and more rapid technological innovation. Our inexperience in the human point-of-care medical
diagnostics market could negatively affect our ability to successfully manage the risks and
features of this market that differ from the veterinary medical market. There can be no assurance
that we will be successful in achieving growth and profitability in the human point-of-care medical
diagnostics market comparable to the results we have achieved in the veterinary medical market.
Risks Associated with Doing Business Internationally Could Negatively Affect Our Operating
Results
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, 41% of our revenue was attributable to sales of
products and services to customers outside the U.S. Various risks associated with foreign
operations may impact our international sales. Possible risks include fluctuations in the value of
foreign currencies, disruptions in transportation of our products, the differing product and
service needs of foreign customers, difficulties in building and managing foreign operations,
import/export duties and quotas, and unexpected regulatory, economic or political changes in
foreign markets. Prices that we charge to foreign customers may be different than the prices we
charge for the same products in the U.S. due to competitive, market or other factors. As a result,
the mix of domestic and international sales in a particular period could have a material impact on
our results for that period. In addition, many of the products for which our selling price may be
denominated in foreign currencies are manufactured, sourced, or both, in the U.S. and our costs are
incurred in U.S. dollars. We utilize non-speculative forward currency exchange contracts and
natural hedges to mitigate foreign currency exposure. However, an appreciation of the U.S. dollar
relative to the foreign currencies in which we sell these products would reduce our operating
margins. Additionally, a strengthening U.S. dollar could negatively impact the ability of customers
outside the U.S. to pay for purchases denominated in U.S. dollars.
The Loss of Our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Could Adversely Affect Our
Business
We rely on the management and leadership of Jonathan W. Ayers, our President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman. We do not maintain key man life insurance coverage for Mr. Ayers. The loss of
Mr. Ayers could have a material adverse impact on our business.
We Could Be Subject to Class Action Litigation Due to Stock Price Volatility, which, if it
Occurs, Could Result in Substantial Costs or Large Judgments Against Us
The market for our common stock may experience extreme price and volume fluctuations, which
may be unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance or prospects. In the past,
securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies following periods of
volatility in the market prices of their securities. We may be the target of similar litigation in
the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our managements
attention and resources, which could have a negative effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
If Our Quarterly Results of Operations Fluctuate, This Fluctuation May Cause Our Stock Price
to Decline, Resulting in Losses to You
Our prior operating results have fluctuated due to a number of factors, including seasonality
of certain product lines; changes in our accounting estimates; the impact of acquisitions; timing
of distributor purchases, product launches, operating expenditures, litigation and claim-related
expenditures; changes in competitors product offerings; and other matters. Similarly, our future
operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to these and other factors,
many of which are beyond our control. If our operating results or projections of future operating
results do not meet the expectations of market analysts or investors in future periods, our stock
price may fall.
38
Future Operating Results Could Be Negatively Affected By the Resolution of Various Uncertain
Tax Positions and by Potential Changes to Tax Incentives
In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the
ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Significant judgment is required in determining our
worldwide provision for income taxes. We periodically assess our exposures related to our worldwide
provision for income taxes and believe that we have appropriately accrued taxes for contingencies.
Any reduction of these contingent liabilities or additional assessment would increase or decrease
income, respectively, in the period such determination was made. Our income tax filings are
regularly under audit by tax authorities and the final determination of tax audits could be
materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and accruals.
Additionally, we benefit from certain tax incentives offered by various jurisdictions. If we are
unable to meet the requirements of such incentives, our inability to use these benefits could have
a material negative effect on future earnings.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased common shares as described
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Period |
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1 to July 31, 2008 |
|
|
292,955 |
|
|
$ |
50.31 |
|
|
|
292,955 |
|
|
|
4,607,170 |
|
August 1 to August 31, 2008 |
|
|
65,600 |
|
|
|
54.23 |
|
|
|
65,600 |
|
|
|
4,541,570 |
|
September 1 to September 30, 2008 |
|
|
32,998 |
|
|
|
55.98 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
|
4,509,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
391,553 |
|
|
$ |
51.44 |
|
|
|
390,755 |
|
|
|
4,509,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our board of directors has approved the repurchase of up to 40,000,000 shares of our common
stock in the open market or in negotiated transactions. The plan was approved and announced on
August 13, 1999, and subsequently amended on October 4, 1999, November 16, 1999, July 21, 2000,
October 20, 2003, October 12, 2004, October 12, 2005, February 14, 2007, and February 13, 2008 and
does not have a specified expiration date. There were no other repurchase plans outstanding during
the three months ended September 30, 2008, and no repurchase plans expired during the period.
Repurchases of 390,755 shares were made during the three months ended September 30, 2008 in open
market transactions.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we received 798 shares of our common stock
that were surrendered by employees in payment for the minimum required withholding taxes due on the
vesting of restricted stock units. In the above table, these shares are included in columns (a) and
(b), but excluded from columns (c) and (d). These shares do not reduce the number of shares that
may yet be purchased under the repurchase plan.
39
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification by Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Merilee Raines
|
|
Date: October 24, 2008 |
Merilee Raines |
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
41
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification by Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification by Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |