e20vf
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
or |
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 1-15240
James Hardie Industries N.V.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
N/A
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
The Netherlands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Atrium, 8th floor
Strawinskylaan 3077
1077 ZX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class: |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: |
|
|
|
Common stock, represented by CHESS Units of
Foreign Securities
|
|
New York Stock Exchange* |
CHESS Units of Foreign Securities
|
|
New York Stock Exchange* |
American Depositary Shares, each representing five units of
CHESS Units of Foreign Securities
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
* |
Listed, not for trading, but only in connection with the
registered American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act.
None.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act.
None.
Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers
classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report: 459,373,176 shares of common
stock at March 31, 2005.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to
follow. Item 17 o Item 18 þ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
|
|
Item 1. |
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and
Advisers |
Not Required.
|
|
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
Not Applicable.
In this annual report, unless the context otherwise
indicates, James Hardie Industries N.V., a naamloze
vennootschap, or a Dutch public limited liability company
incorporated and existing under the laws of The Netherlands, is
referred to as JHI NV. JHI NV and together with its
direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries as of the time
relevant to the applicable reference, the James Hardie
Group, and JHI NV and its current direct and indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries are collectively referred to as
we, us, our, JHI NV
and its wholly owned subsidiaries, or the
Company.
The term fiscal year refers to our fiscal year
ended March 31 of such year; the term dollars
or $ refers to U.S. dollars; the term
A$ refers to Australian dollars; the term
NZ$ refers to New Zealand dollars; the term
PHP refers to Philippine pesos; and the term
CLP refers to Chilean pesos. The term
msf or thousand square feet refers to
thousands of square feet, where a square foot is defined as a
standard square foot of 5/16 thickness and the term
mmsf or million square feet refers to
millions of square feet, where a square foot is defined as a
standard square foot of 5/16 thickness.
As a company incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands,
JHI NV has listed its securities for trading on the Australian
Stock Exchange (ASX) through the use of the Clearing
House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) Units of
Foreign Securities (CUFS). CUFS are a form of
depositary security that represents a beneficial ownership
interest in the securities of a non-Australian corporation. Each
of our CUFS represents the beneficial ownership of one share of
common stock of JHI NV, the legal ownership of which is held by
CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Ltd. The CUFS are listed and
traded on the ASX under the symbol JHX.
The Company has also listed its securities for trading on the
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Company sponsors
a program, whereby beneficial ownership of five CUFS is
represented by one American Depositary Share (ADS),
which is issued by The Bank of New York. These ADSs trade on the
NYSE in the form of American Depositary Receipts
(ADRs) under the symbol JHX. Unless the
context indicates otherwise, when we refer to ADRs, we are
referring to ADRs or ADSs and when we refer to our common
stock we are referring to the shares of our common stock
that are represented by CUFS.
Selected Financial Data
We have included in Item 18 of this annual report the
audited consolidated financial statements of JHI NV,
consisting of our consolidated balance sheets as of
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, our consolidated
statements of changes in shareholders equity as of
March 31, 2005, March 31, 2004 and March 31,
2003, and our consolidated statements of income and cash flows
for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, together
with the related notes thereto. For periods prior to
October 19, 2001, the effective date of our corporate
restructuring (see Item 4, Information on the
Company History and Development of the
Company Corporate Restructuring), the
consolidated financial statements represent the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of ABN 60 000 009
263 Pty Ltd (ABN 60), which was formerly known as
James Hardie Industries Limited (JHIL) and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. For periods after October 19,
2001, our consolidated financial statements represent the
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of JHI
NV and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
The consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, or
U.S. GAAP.
2
The selected consolidated financial information summarized below
has been derived in part from JHI NVs financial
statements. You should read the selected consolidated financial
information in conjunction with JHI NVs financial
statements and related notes contained in Item 18 and with
the information provided in the section of this report entitled
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
contained in Item 5. Historic financial data is not
necessarily indicative of our future results and you should not
unduly rely on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except sales price per unit and per share data) | |
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
939.2 |
|
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
$ |
599.7 |
|
|
$ |
444.8 |
|
|
$ |
373.0 |
|
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement(1)
|
|
|
236.1 |
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
152.0 |
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$ |
1,210.4 |
|
|
$ |
981.9 |
|
|
$ |
783.6 |
|
|
$ |
591.7 |
|
|
$ |
526.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income(3)
|
|
$ |
196.2 |
|
|
$ |
172.2 |
|
|
$ |
128.8 |
|
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.5 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Other (expense) income(4)
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
189.8 |
|
|
|
165.7 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(61.9 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
127.9 |
|
|
$ |
125.3 |
|
|
$ |
83.5 |
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
126.9 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
170.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share
basic
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Net income per common share basic
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
Income from continuing operations per common share
diluted
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Net income per common share diluted
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Return of capital per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
458.9 |
|
|
|
458.1 |
|
|
|
456.7 |
|
|
|
438.4 |
|
|
|
409.6 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
461.0 |
|
|
|
461.4 |
|
|
|
459.4 |
|
|
|
440.4 |
|
|
|
409.6 |
|
Consolidated Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
219.8 |
|
|
$ |
162.6 |
|
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
|
$ |
76.6 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(149.2 |
) |
|
|
(58.0 |
) |
|
|
237.9 |
|
|
|
(77.2 |
) |
|
|
(162.9 |
) |
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
$ |
(28.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(87.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(279.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(40.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(5)
|
|
$ |
36.3 |
|
|
$ |
36.4 |
|
|
$ |
27.4 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA(6)
|
|
|
232.5 |
|
|
|
208.6 |
|
|
|
156.2 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
Capital expenditures(7)
|
|
$ |
153.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
90.2 |
|
|
$ |
50.8 |
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except sales price per unit and per share data) | |
Volume (million square feet)(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
|
1,855.1 |
|
|
|
1,519.9 |
|
|
|
1,273.6 |
|
|
|
988.5 |
|
|
|
852.3 |
|
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement(1)
|
|
|
376.9 |
|
|
|
362.1 |
|
|
|
349.9 |
|
|
|
320.7 |
|
|
|
318.9 |
|
Average sales price per unit (per thousand square feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement(1)
|
|
A$ |
846 |
|
|
A$ |
862 |
|
|
A$ |
887 |
|
|
A$ |
861 |
|
|
A$ |
857 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current assets(9)
|
|
$ |
180.2 |
|
|
$ |
195.9 |
|
|
$ |
159.4 |
|
|
$ |
115.1 |
|
|
$ |
84.9 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,088.9 |
|
|
|
971.2 |
|
|
|
851.8 |
|
|
|
968.0 |
|
|
|
969.0 |
|
Long-term debt(10)
|
|
|
147.4 |
|
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
357.3 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
624.7 |
|
|
|
504.7 |
|
|
|
434.7 |
|
|
|
370.7 |
|
|
|
281.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement includes all fiber cement manufactured
in Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines and sold in
Australia, New Zealand and Asia. See Item 5, Notes to
Results of Operations, on page 61 for additional
details on sales volume and average sales price per unit in
fiscal years 2004 and 2003. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes fiber cement manufactured and sold in Chile, fiber
reinforced concrete pipes manufactured and sold in the United
States, fiber cement operations in Europe and roofing operations
in the United States. Also includes general corporate income in
fiscal years 2002 and 2001 comprised primarily of rental income
from subleasing office space in Sydney, Australia. |
|
|
(3) |
For fiscal year 2005, operating income includes Special
Commission of Inquiry and other related expenses of
$28.1 million. In addition, operating income includes
restructuring and other operating income/expenses as follows:
(i) for fiscal year 2005, $6.0 million consisting of a
settlement loss of $5.3 million related to an employee
retirement plan and a $0.7 million loss on the sale of land
in Sacramento, California; (ii) for fiscal year 2004,
$2.1 million expense primarily related to an increase in
cost provisions for our Australian and New Zealand business;
(iii) for fiscal year 2003, $1.0 million income
related to the settlement of a terminated derivative contract;
(iv) for fiscal year 2002, $12.6 million expense
related to the roofing Class Action Settlement Agreement in
the United States, $7.4 million expense associated with the
corporate reorganization and $8.1 million expense related
to the decrease in fair value of derivative contracts; and
(v) for fiscal year 2001, asset write-downs, lease
termination charges and employee termination costs of
$15.5 million primarily associated with the restructuring
of our fiber cement business in Australia and the creation of
the new Asia Pacific regional structure. |
|
|
(4) |
Consists primarily of the following: (i) for fiscal year
2005, the $1.3 million expense consisted of a
$2.1 million impairment charge that we recorded on an
investment in a company that filed a voluntary petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy
code, partly offset by a $0.8 million gain on a separate
investment; (ii) for fiscal year 2004, the net gain
achieved after accounting for income items, including a
$4.5 million profit on the sale of our New Zealand
property, was partially offset by expense items, including
$3.2 million primarily due to a capital duty fee paid in
conjunction with our Dutch corporate structure; (iii) for
fiscal year 2003, investment income of $0.7 million;
(iv) for fiscal year 2002, investment expenses of
$0.4 million; and (v) for fiscal year 2001, investment
income of $1.6 million. |
|
|
(5) |
Information for depreciation and amortization is for continuing
businesses only. |
4
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Represents income from continuing operations before interest
income, interest expense, income taxes, other nonoperating
expenses, described in footnote four above, net, depreciation
and amortization charges, and certain other property, goodwill
and equipment impairment charges as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(Adjusted EBITDA) |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
219.8 |
|
|
$ |
162.6 |
|
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
|
$ |
76.6 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities, net
|
|
|
(61.2 |
) |
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
(44.8 |
) |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
126.9 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
170.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
|
Loss (income) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(87.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
232.5 |
|
|
$ |
208.6 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
|
$ |
68.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under
U.S. GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to,
or more meaningful than, income from operations, net income or
cash flows as defined by U.S. GAAP or as a measure of our
profitability or liquidity. Not all companies calculate Adjusted
EBITDA in the same manner as we have and, accordingly, Adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable with other companies. We have
included information concerning Adjusted EBITDA because we
believe that this data is commonly used by investors to evaluate
the ability of a companys earnings from its core business
operations to satisfy its debt, capital expenditure and working
capital requirements. To permit evaluation of this data on a
consistent basis from period to period, Adjusted EBITDA has been
adjusted for noncash charges such as goodwill and asset
impairment charges, as well as nonoperating income and expense
items. See our consolidated financial statements and our
discussion under Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects for further information to assist in identifying
and evaluating trends in Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
(7) |
Information for capital expenditures includes both cash and
credit purchases, and is for continuing businesses only. |
|
|
(8) |
Fiber cement volume is measured in 5/16 thick square feet,
which are referred to as standard feet. |
|
|
(9) |
Total current assets less total current liabilities. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes current portion of long-term debt. |
5
Risk Factors
|
|
|
We may be subject to potential liability because certain
current and former James Hardie Group subsidiaries previously
manufactured products that contained asbestos. |
Prior to 1987, a New Zealand subsidiary in the James Hardie
Group manufactured products in New Zealand that contained
asbestos. Statutory provisions in New Zealand currently bar
claims for compensatory damages arising from work-related
asbestos exposure.
Prior to 1987, two former subsidiaries of ABN 60, Amaca Pty
Limited (Amaca) and Amaba Pty Limited
(Amaba), which are now owned and controlled by the
Medical Research and Compensation Foundation (the
Foundation), manufactured products in Australia that
contained asbestos. In addition, prior to 1937, ABN 60,
which is now owned by the ABN 60 Foundation Pty Ltd
(ABN 60 Foundation), manufactured products in
Australia that contained asbestos. For reasons provided below
under Item 4, Information on the Company
Legal Proceedings, we do not believe that we will have any
liability under current Australian law if future liabilities of
ABN 60 or the ABN 60 Foundation exceed the funds
available to those entities. However, we cannot predict with any
certainty any future claims or allegations that may be made, how
the laws of various jurisdictions may be applied to the facts or
how the laws may change in the future. If a court of competent
jurisdiction relying on applicable law at the time were to find
JHI NV, our New Zealand subsidiary or another James Hardie Group
subsidiary liable for damages connected with existing or former
subsidiaries or their past manufacture of asbestos-containing
products, we may incur significant liabilities in connection
with any damages that may be awarded in the legal proceedings,
in addition to the costs associated with defending against such
claims. See Item 4, Information on the
Company Legal Proceedings.
|
|
|
As a result of the Special Commission of Inquiry that was
established in Australia to consider matters related to the
Foundation, we may be subject to claims and allegations
regarding asbestos-related liability and our corporate
restructurings, including the corporate restructurings that
resulted in the creation of the Foundation and the ABN 60
Foundation and associated intercompany transactions. |
In February 2004, the Government of the State of New South Wales
(the NSW Government), Australia established a
Special Commission of Inquiry (SCI) to investigate,
among other matters, the circumstances in which the Foundation
was established. The SCI heard evidence and received submissions
from April 5, 2004 to August 13, 2004.
On July 14, 2004, the Company announced that it would
recommend that its shareholders approve a form of statutory
scheme to be developed in relation to the compensation of proven
asbestos-related personal injury and death claims
(Claims) against Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60 (the
Liable Entities).
The SCI issued its report on September 21, 2004. The SCI
indicated that the establishment of the Foundation and the
establishment of the ABN 60 Foundation were legally
effective, that any liabilities in relation to the asbestos
claims for claimants remained with Amaca, Amaba or ABN 60
(as the case may be), and that no significant liabilities for
those claims could likely be assessed directly against the
Company. In relation to the question of the funding of the
Foundation, the SCI found that there was a significant funding
shortfall. In part, this was based on actuarial work
commissioned by the Company indicating that the discounted value
of the central estimate of the asbestos liabilities of Amaca and
Amaba was approximately A$1.573 billion as of June 30,
2003. The central estimate was calculated in accordance with
Australian Actuarial Standards, which differ from generally
accepted practices in the United States. As of June 30,
2003, the undiscounted value of the central estimate of the
asbestos liabilities of Amaca and Amaba, as determined by KPMG
Actuaries Pty Ltd (KPMG Actuaries), was
approximately A$3.403 billion ($2.272 billion). The
SCI found that the net assets of the Foundation and the
ABN 60 Foundation were not sufficient to meet these
prospective liabilities and were likely to be exhausted in the
first half of 2007. The SCIs findings are not binding and
if the issues were presented to a court, it might come to
different conclusions on one or more of the issues.
6
Accordingly, shortly after the release of the SCI report on
September 21, 2004, the Company commenced negotiations with
the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), the
UnionsNSW (formerly known as the Labor Council of New South
Wales) and a representative of the asbestos claimants (together,
the Representatives) and subsequently also with the
NSW Government, in relation to the anticipated future funding
shortfall of the Liable Entities in relation to their ability to
meet expected future Claims. The statutory scheme that the
Company proposed on July 14, 2004 was not accepted by the
Representatives.
On October 28, 2004, the NSW Government announced its
preparedness to pass legislation that would alter the
Companys current liability position. See Item 4,
Information on the Company Legal
Proceedings, and the risk factor below entitled The
Government of the State of New South Wales has announced that it
is prepared to pass legislation that would impose retroactive
liability on the Company if current negotiations between the
Company, the NSW Government, the ACTU and asbestos claimants do
not reach an acceptable conclusion.
On November 5, 2004, the Australian Attorney-General and
the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer (the two relevant
ministers of the Australian Federal Government) issued a news
release stating that the Ministerial Council for Corporations
(the relevant body of Federal, State and Territory Ministers,
MINCO) had unanimously agreed to support a
negotiated settlement that will ensure that victims of
asbestos-related diseases receive full and timely compensation
from James Hardie and if current negotiations
between James Hardie, the ACTU and asbestos victims do not reach
an acceptable conclusion, MINCO also agreed in principle to
consider options for legislative reform. The news release
of November 5, 2004 indicated that treaties to enforce
Australian judgments in Dutch and U.S. courts are not
required, but that the Australian Government has been involved
in communications with Dutch and U.S. authorities regarding
arrangements to ensure that Australian judgments are able to be
enforced where necessary. If current negotiations do not lead to
an acceptable conclusion, the Company is aware of suggestions of
legislative intervention, but has no detailed information as to
the content of any such legislation. The NSW Government has
stated that it would not consider assisting the implementation
of any proposal advanced by the Company unless it was the result
of an agreement reached with the unions acting through the
Representatives.
On December 21, 2004, the Company announced that it had
entered into a non-binding Heads of Agreement with the NSW
Government and the Representatives which is expected to form the
basis of a proposed binding agreement (the Principal
Agreement) under which a subsidiary of JHI NV will
agree to provide, and JHI NV will guarantee, funding
payments to a special purpose fund (the SPF)
established to provide funding on a long-term basis to be
applied towards meeting Claims against the Liable Entities. Once
executed, the Principal Agreement will be a legally binding
agreement. The implementation of the Principal Agreement will be
subject to a number of conditions precedent, including the
delivery of an independent experts report and approval of
the Companys board of directors, shareholders and lenders.
The Heads of Agreement contained two additional conditions
precedent to the Principal Agreement. The first was the conduct
of a review of legal and administrative costs associated with
dust diseases compensation in New South Wales and the
implementation of the results of that review by legislation of
the NSW Government. The purpose of this review was primarily to
determine ways to reduce legal and administrative costs, and to
consider the current processes for handling and resolving dust
diseases compensation claims in New South Wales. The NSW
Government announced its findings on March 8, 2005.
Legislation was passed in the NSW Lower House (Legislative
Assembly) on May 24, 2005 and the Upper House (Legislative
Council) on May 25, 2005. The bill became an act on
May 26, 2005. The commencement date was July 1, 2005.
Based upon the passage of the act and its terms, the Company
believes that this condition has been satisfied.
The second additional condition precedent contained in the Heads
of Agreement pertains to the certainty of the tax deductibility
of potential asbestos compensation payments. The tax
deductibility of such payments is one of the determinants of
affordability which is important because it preserves the
Companys ability to fund its expansion and growth
initiatives. It is also important to Claimants because it
improves the Companys capacity to fund Claims. The Company
continues to be in discussions with the Australian Taxation
Office and
7
the Treasury of the Australian Government to ensure the tax
deductibility of all proposed asbestos compensation payments.
Without certainty regarding the tax deductibility of the
potential asbestos compensation payments, the Company may not
enter into the Principal Agreement. As noted above, this could
result in legislative action being taken.
On April 15, 2005, the Company announced that it had
extended the coverage of the funding arrangements agreed under
the Heads of Agreement to enable the SPF to settle or meet
proven Claims by members of the Baryugil community in Australia
against Asbestos Mines Pty Ltd (Asbestos Mines), a
former ABN 60 subsidiary, which conducted asbestos-related
mining activities in or around Baryugil. The Company has no
current right to access any Claim information in relation to
Claims against Asbestos Mines, and has no current involvement in
the management or settlement of such Claims. The Companys
proposal to provide additional funding to the SPF will be based
on actuarial assessments of the estimated Claims against
Asbestos Mines. The Companys proposal is not limited as to
the time period to which the Claims arose.
The Companys offer to extend the funding arrangements of
the SPF to permit the SPF to meet proven asbestos-related Claims
from members of the Baryulgil community is proposed to be
implemented subject to the same or similar conditions applicable
to funding provided to the SPF for use in meeting proven claims
from Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60, including that information in
relation to the proven claims is provided to the Company.
Asbestos Mines has not been part of the James Hardie Group since
1976, when it was sold to Woodsreef Mines Ltd, which was
subsequently renamed Mineral Commodities Ltd. From 1954 until
1976, Asbestos Mines was a wholly owned subsidiary of James
Hardie Industries Limited (now ABN 60). Except as described
below, the Company has not had access to any information
regarding claims or the decisions taken by the Foundation in
relation to them.
The parties have announced a timetable for negotiations which
envisages the signing of the Principal Agreement, depending on
the timing of the resolution of certain matters, in late
July/early August 2005 and the shareholder meeting to consider
the voluntary funding proposal being held in late
September/early October 2005.
If negotiations of the Principal Agreement are completed and the
Principal Agreement is subsequently executed and becomes
effective, the Company may be required to make a substantial
provision in its financial statements and it is possible that
the Company may need to seek additional borrowing facilities. If
the terms of the Principal Agreement involve the Company making
payments, either on an annual or other basis, the Companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected and its ability to pay
dividends could be impaired. See Item 4, Information
on the Company Legal Proceedings.
If no resolution is reached and implemented, it is not possible
to predict what action the Foundation, the ABN 60 Foundation,
the NSW Government, other state and territory governments, the
Australian federal government, the Representatives or others may
take or what the outcome of any such actions may be, although
certain government officials and others have stated their
anticipated actions in such circumstances. See Item 4,
Information on the Company Legal
Proceedings and risk factor below entitled The
Government of the State of New South Wales has announced that it
is prepared to pass legislation that would impose retroactive
liability on the Company if current negotiations between the
Company, the NSW Government, the ACTU and asbestos claimants do
not reach an acceptable conclusion for more information.
The impact of any such actions could be materially adverse to
the Company.
We have continued to incur costs associated with the SCI and
other related matters including: preparation and negotiation of
a Principal Agreement with the NSW Government to provide
long-term funding of proven asbestos-related claims for
Australian personal injury claimants against certain former
James Hardie Group Australian subsidiaries; finalization of the
NSW Governments review of legal and administrative costs;
and in cooperating with the Australian Securities and
Investments Commissions (the ASIC)
investigation into the circumstances surrounding the
establishment of the Foundation. SCI and other related expenses
are again likely to be material over the short-term.
8
|
|
|
In the future, we may have difficulty maintaining existing
financial accommodation on their current terms, obtaining
financial accommodation (debt or equity) on usual terms for
other entities in the same businesses or with the same credit
ratings, or obtaining certain types of financial accommodation
at all. In addition, we may not be able to maintain our
historical level of liquidity because we may have to make
significant payments under an agreement to resolve outstanding
asbestos matters. |
Historically, we have sought to renew our lines of credit, term
revolving loan and 364-day stand-by loan facilities each year on
substantially the same terms and conditions. We have recently
entered into new credit facilities with several banks. Subject
to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, these new
facilities will provide us with an increased amount of liquidity
compared to what was available under our previous financing
arrangements. These facilities are initially for a 364-day term,
but we anticipate that two-thirds of them will be extended to a
five-year term if negotiation of the Principal Agreement is
completed and the Principal Agreement is subsequently executed
and becomes effective. The extension of a facility will only
occur if the relevant bank is satisfied with the terms of the
Principal Agreement. If the final position reached in the
Principal Agreement is materially different from the position in
the Heads of Agreement, the extension may not occur and we may
have to arrange a further refinancing.
In the future, we may not be able to renew credit facilities on
substantially similar terms, or at all; we may have to pay
additional fees and expenses that we might not have to pay under
normal circumstances; and we may have to agree to terms that
could increase the cost of our debt structure. If we are unable
to renew our debt on terms which are not materially less
favorable than the terms currently available to us, we may have
to scale back our levels of planned capital expenditure and/or
take other measures to conserve cash in order to meet our future
cash flow requirements.
In addition, if the terms of the Principal Agreement involve us
making payments, either on an annual or other basis, our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected and our ability to pay
dividends could be impaired. See also Liquidity and Capital
Resources under Item 5, Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
|
|
|
The Government of the State of New South Wales has
announced that it is prepared to pass legislation that would
impose retroactive liability on the Company if current
negotiations between the Company, the NSW Government, the ACTU
and asbestos claimants do not reach an acceptable
conclusion. |
If current negotiations concerning the Principal Agreement
between the Company and the NSW Government do not reach an
acceptable conclusion, the NSW Government has indicated that it
may attempt to pass legislation that would seek to impose
liability on the Company for asbestos claims on the Company.
Negotiations with the NSW Government continues and no draft
legislation which, if implemented, would impose retroactive
liability, has been published, nor is any such legislation
expected to be published while negotiations continue to
progress. See Item 4, Information on the
Company Legal Proceedings.
|
|
|
We have experienced product bans and boycotts and negative
publicity and have been subject to other measures taken by the
Representatives and others to influence the resolution of
matters relating to the SCI investigation and to encourage
governmental action if there is no resolution. |
The Representatives and others may continue to encourage
consumers and union members in Australia and elsewhere to ban or
boycott the Companys products and to demonstrate or
otherwise create negative publicity toward the Company in order
to influence the Companys approach to discussions with the
Representatives and to encourage governmental action if the
discussions are unsuccessful. The Representatives and others
might also take such actions in an effort to influence the
Companys shareholders, a significant number of which are
located in Australia, to approve any proposed arrangement. Any
such measures, and the influences resulting from them, could
have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
9
|
|
|
Continued scrutiny resulting from ongoing investigations
may have an adverse effect on our business. |
We are currently subject to an investigation by ASIC into the
circumstances surrounding the establishment of the Foundation
and associated matters. We cannot predict when this
investigation will be completed or what the results of this
investigation will be. It is possible that we or our current or
former directors and officers will be required to pay material
fines, suffer other penalties or become liable to provide
indemnification payments, each of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business. The results of these or other
investigations could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity.
|
|
|
Our board of directors and senior management continue to
devote significant attention to matters arising from and related
to the Special Commission of Inquiry, including the negotiation
of the Principal Agreement. |
Since the establishment of the SCI, our board of directors, our
senior management and others within our organization have
devoted a significant amount of time and resources to
investigating the allegations raised in the report of the SCI,
to producing documents to and complying with requests from
governmental and regulatory authorities and others, to seeking
resolution of issues arising out of the SCI, to preparing and
negotiating the Principal Agreement and to finalizing the NSW
Governments review of legal and administrative costs. The
board of directors and managements focus on issues
related to the SCI and the Principal Agreement may distract them
from conducting the business of the Company, and this could
adversely affect our results of operations.
|
|
|
Continuing negative publicity may continue to adversely
affect our business. |
As a result of the events that were considered by the SCI, we
have been the subject of negative publicity, both in Australia
and elsewhere in the world. We believe that this negative
publicity has contributed to declines in the price of our
publicly traded securities in 2004 and 2005, and that this
publicity has resulted in increased regulatory scrutiny on us.
We also believe that many of our employees are operating under
stressful conditions, which may reduce morale and could lead to
increased employee turnover. Continuing negative publicity could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
liquidity and the market price of our publicly traded securities
and create difficulties in attracting or retaining high caliber
staff.
|
|
|
We may be liable for costs, penalties, fees or expenses
incurred by current or former directors, officers or employees
of the James Hardie Group to the extent that those costs are
covered by indemnity arrangements granted by the James Hardie
Group to those persons. |
We may be liable for costs, penalties, fees or expenses incurred
by current or former directors, officers or employees of James
Hardie Group to the extent that those costs are covered by
indemnity arrangements granted by the James Hardie Group to
those persons. To date, with respect to the application of our
indemnity obligations to proceedings of the SCI and other
regulatory bodies, we have paid all legal fees and costs
incurred on behalf of any current or past employee, officer or
director who has been involved in any such proceeding. In
addition, our indemnification obligations would generally cover
costs incurred by a director or officer in responding to an ASIC
investigation or any other investigation conducted by a
governmental agency or a liquidator. We or a relevant subsidiary
may be reimbursed under directors and officers
insurance policies taken out by us or a relevant subsidiary.
However, there is no guarantee that such insurance will cover
the nature of such claims or will completely cover any claims
that are covered. If such costs are not insured or substantially
exceed the amount of the insurance that we maintain, our
business, financial condition, results of operations and
liquidity could be adversely affected.
10
|
|
|
Under the U.S.-Netherlands income tax treaty and Dutch tax
law, we derive substantial tax benefits from the group finance
operations of our Netherlands-based finance subsidiary, and
changes in either the treaty or laws applicable to the finance
subsidiary, including the recent changes to the tax treaty,
could increase our effective tax rate and, as a result, reduce
our future profits and cash flows. |
On December 28, 2004, the United States and The Netherlands
amended the U.S.-Netherlands Income Tax Treaty (prior to
amendment, the Original U.S.-NL Treaty; post amendment,
the New U.S.-NL Treaty). We believe that, based on
the transitional rules set forth in the New U.S.-NL Treaty, the
Original U.S.-NL Treaty will apply to us and to our Dutch and
U.S. subsidiaries until February 1, 2006. Under the
Original U.S.-NL Treaty, a reduced 5% U.S. withholding tax
applied to dividends, and no U.S. withholding tax applied
to interest or royalties that our U.S. subsidiaries paid to
JHI NV or our Dutch finance subsidiary. The Original U.S.-NL
Treaty had various conditions of eligibility for reduced
U.S. withholding tax rates (and other treaty benefits), all
of which we satisfied. If, however, we do not qualify for the
benefits under the New U.S.-NL Treaty, such dividend, interest
and royalty payments would be subject to a 30%
U.S. withholding tax.
Companies eligible for benefits under the New U.S.-NL Treaty
qualify for a zero percent U.S. withholding tax rate on
dividends. However, the New U.S.-NL Treaty has a number of new,
more restrictive eligibility requirements for reduced
U.S. withholding tax rates and other treaty benefits. We
are in the process of changing our organizational and
operational structure to satisfy the requirements of the New
U.S.-NL Treaty. Accordingly, we are planning to take a number of
reorganization actions to satisfy those requirements and thus
remain eligible for benefits under the New U.S.-NL Treaty.
However, we cannot guarantee that we can remain eligible for
benefits under the New U.S.-NL Treaty, or obtain an equally
favorable result. If we elect to request a formal ruling from
the U.S. tax authorities regarding whether our proposed
plan meets the requirements of the New U.S.-NL Treaty
provisions, we cannot assure you that we will receive a
favorable ruling from them. Furthermore, we may not receive a
formal ruling at all. As a result, we cannot guarantee that we
will continue to receive the treaty benefits. The loss of treaty
benefits could significantly increase our effective tax rate in
the future, which could have a material adverse impact on our
financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We have previously concentrated our finance and treasury
activities in our Dutch finance subsidiary located in The
Netherlands. In addition to providing financing to our various
subsidiaries, the finance subsidiary owns and develops
intellectual property that it licenses to our operating
subsidiaries. Under the Netherlands International Group Finance
Company rules, we have obtained a ruling from the Dutch Revenue
authority that allows the finance subsidiary to set aside, in a
Financial Risk Reserve (FRR), a portion of its
taxable profits from financing and from licensing its
intellectual property. The amounts set aside in the FRR are free
of current Dutch income tax. Consequently, the finance
subsidiary will generally incur a tax rate of approximately 15%
to 18% on its qualifying financing and licensing income and a
34.5% statutory rate on all other income (34.5% is the Dutch
corporate income tax rate through December 31, 2004. For
calendar year 2005, the Dutch corporate income tax rate is
31.5%), including any amounts involuntarily released from the
FRR to cover any risks (including currency, bad debt and foreign
branch losses) for which the FRR was established. The tax rate
on qualifying income may be reduced to as low as approximately
7% to 10% depending on the extent to which amounts from the FRR
pay for capital expenditures of our operating companies. The
Dutch revenue ruling became effective on July 1, 2001 and,
when issued, was to apply for 10 years so long as we
satisfied the requirements of the International Group Finance
Company provisions under Dutch tax law. As discussed below, the
Dutch revenue ruling is set to expire on December 31, 2010.
Under the European Union Code of Conduct on Direct Business
Taxation, member states of the European Union have agreed to
eliminate harmful tax competition within the European Union.
Accordingly, the EU Council of Economic and Finance Ministers, a
working group of EU member countries, reviewed the tax regimes
of all its member countries and identified certain tax
concessions the Council considered as harmfully competitive and
therefore in violation of the Code of Conduct. Among the
identified tax concessions is the Netherlands International
Group Finance Company regime. In December 2002, The Netherlands
agreed to end its International Group Finance Company regime for
new entrants.
11
In a separate but related development, the European Commission,
the executive arm of the European Union, also reviewed the tax
regimes of its member countries to identify tax concessions that
the European Commission considered to be a form of
prohibited state aid and, therefore, contrary to the
provisions of the European Community Treaty. In February 2003,
the Commission concluded that the existence of special tax
concessions in certain countries, including the Netherlands
International Group Finance Company regime, cannot be reconciled
with EU rules regarding state aid. Accordingly, the European
Commission banned certain concessionary tax regimes, including
the Netherlands International Group Finance Company regime, but
allowed companies then operating under that regime, including
our Dutch finance subsidiary, to continue to operate under the
regime until December 31, 2010. Some uncertainty exists
whether, during this extended period of the International Group
Finance Company regime, qualifying companies can continue to set
aside profits in their FRR and defer any taxable recovery of
profits from their FRR until the expiration date. Until
December 31, 2010, and absent further legal developments,
we intend to maintain and continue to add to the FRR of our
Dutch finance subsidiary all allowable profits the subsidiary
earns, and to fund capital expenditures of our operating
companies with amounts from the FRR.
Although our Dutch finance subsidiary can continue to derive
benefits under the Netherlands International Group Finance
Company rules until December 31, 2010, we cannot guarantee
that either the EU, or another relevant authority or legislative
body, would not attempt to repeal the law earlier or that a
court of competent jurisdiction would not invalidate it,
possibly with retrospective effect.
|
|
|
Substantial and increasing competition in the building
products industry could adversely affect our business. |
Competition in the building products industry is based largely
on price and, to a lesser extent, quality, performance and
service. Our fiber cement products compete with products
manufactured from natural and engineered wood, vinyl, stucco,
masonry, gypsum and other materials as well as fiber cement
products offered by other manufacturers. Some of our competitors
may have greater financial and other resources than we do and,
among other factors, may be less affected by reductions in
margins resulting from price competition.
Some of our competitors have lowered prices of their products to
compete for sales. In addition, we expect our competitors to
continue to expand their manufacturing capacities, to improve
the design and performance of their products and to introduce
new products with competitive price and performance
characteristics. Increased competition by existing or future
competitors could adversely impact fiber cement prices and could
require us to increase our investment in product development,
productivity improvements and customer service and support to
compete in our markets.
Fiber cement product prices in the United States, Australia and
New Zealand have fluctuated for a number of years due to the
entry into the market of new producers and competition from
alternative products, among other reasons, and these prices
could continue to fluctuate in the future. Because of the
maturity of the Australian and New Zealand markets, we believe
that prices in those markets may decline and that sales volumes
may not increase significantly or may decline in the future.
Historically, increased sales volumes of our U.S. fiber
cement products, the addition of proprietary products to our
product mix and improved operating efficiencies have more than
offset the decrease in pricing for such products in the United
States. However, there may be future price decreases and we may
not be able to offset such decreases with increased volume, new
products or improved operating efficiencies. For instance,
unanticipated technical problems could impair our efforts to
commission new equipment aimed at improving operating
efficiencies. Any of these factors could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
|
|
|
If damages resulting from product defects exceed our
insurance coverage, paying these damages could result in a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. |
The actual or alleged existence of defects in any of our
products could subject us to significant product liability
claims. Although we do not have replacement insurance coverage
for damages to, or defects in, our products, we do have product
liability insurance coverage for consequential damages that may
arise from the use of our products. Although we believe this
coverage is adequate and currently intend to maintain this
12
coverage in the future, we cannot assure you that this coverage
will be sufficient to cover all future product liability claims
or that this coverage will be available at reasonable rates in
the future. The successful assertion of one or more claims
against us that exceed our insurance coverage could require us
to incur significant expenses to pay these damages. These
additional expenses could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
If one or more of our fiber cement products fail to
perform as expected or contain a design defect, such failure or
defect, and any resulting negative publicity, could result in
lower sales and may subject us to claims from purchasers or
users of our fiber cement products. |
Because our fiber cement products have been used only since the
early 1980s, we cannot assure you that these products will
perform in accordance with our expectations over an extended
period of time or that there are no serious design defects in
such products. If our fiber cement technology fails to perform
as expected or a product is discovered to have design defects,
such failure or defects, and any resulting negative publicity,
could result in lower sales of our products and may subject us
to claims from purchasers or users of defective products, either
of which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
Warranty claims resulting from unforeseen defects in our
products and exceeding our warranty reserves could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. |
We have offered, and continue to offer, various warranties on
our products, including a 50-year limited warranty on certain of
our fiber cement siding products in the United States. Although
we maintain reserves for warranty-related claims and legal
proceedings that we believe are adequate, we cannot assure you
that warranty expense levels or the results of any
warranty-related legal proceedings will not exceed our reserves.
If our warranty reserves are significantly exceeded, the costs
associated with such warranties could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operation and financial
condition.
|
|
|
We may incur significant costs in the future in complying
with applicable environmental and health and safety laws and
regulations. A failure to comply with or a change in these laws
and regulations could subject us to significant liabilities,
including, but not limited to, damages and penalties. |
We are subject to U.S. federal, state and local and foreign
environmental and health and safety laws and regulations
governing, among other matters, our operations and the use,
handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances
currently or formerly used by us or any of our affiliates. Under
these laws and regulations, we may be held jointly and severally
responsible for the remediation of any hazardous substance
contamination at our or our predecessors past or present
facilities and at third-party waste disposal sites. We may also
be held liable for any claims arising out of human exposure to
hazardous substances or other environmental damage. We will
continue to be liable for any environmental problems that
occurred while we owned or operated any of the three gypsum
facilities that we sold in April 2002. See Item 4,
Information on the Company Capital
Expenditures and Divestitures Divestitures.
In addition, many of our products contain crystalline silica,
which can be released in a respirable form in connection with
manufacturing practices and handling or use. The inhalation of
respirable crystalline silica at certain exposure levels is
known or suspected to be associated with silicosis, potentially
causing lung cancer and other adverse human health effects. We
may face future costs of engineering and compliance to meet new
standards relating to crystalline silica if standards are made
more stringent. In addition, there is a risk that claims for
silica-related disease could be made against us. We cannot
assure you that we will have adequate resources, including
adequate insurance coverage, to satisfy any future
silica-related disease claims or that there will not be adverse
business consequences in the distribution, end user or other
markets. Any such claims may have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition. See also Risk Factor above captioned
If damages resulting from product defects exceed our
insurance coverage, paying these damages could result in a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
13
The costs of complying with environmental and health and safety
laws relating to our operations or the liabilities arising from
past or future releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances
or product liability matters may result in us making future
expenditures that could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition. In
addition, we cannot make any assurances that the laws currently
in place will not change. Also, if applicable laws or judicial
interpretations related to successor liability or piercing
the corporate veil were to change, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. See Item 4, Information on
the Company Legal Proceedings.
|
|
|
Our business is dependent on the residential and
commercial construction markets. |
Demand for our products depends in large part on residential
construction markets and, to a lesser extent, on commercial
construction markets. The level of activity in residential
construction markets depends on new housing starts and
residential remodeling projects, which are a function of many
factors not within our control, including general economic
conditions, mortgage and other interest rates, inflation,
unemployment, demographic trends, gross domestic product growth
and consumer confidence in each of the countries and regions in
which we operate. In addition, the level of activity in
construction markets also depends on our ability to grow primary
demand for fiber cement and convert sales of alternative
materials to sales of fiber cement. Historically, in periods of
economic decline, both new housing starts and residential
remodeling also decline. The level of activity in the commercial
construction market depends largely on vacancy rates and general
economic conditions. Because residential and commercial
construction markets are sensitive to cyclical changes in the
economy, downturns in the economy or a lack of substantial
improvement in the economy of any of our geographic markets
could negatively affect operating results. Because of these and
other factors, our operating results may be subject to
substantial fluctuations and the results for any prior period
may not be indicative of results for any future period.
|
|
|
Because demand for our products in our major markets is
seasonal, our quarterly results of operations may vary
throughout the year. |
In the United States, a large proportion of our fiber cement
products are sold in three regions: the Southeast, the
Southcentral and the Pacific Northwest. Demand for building
products in these regions is seasonal because construction
activity diminishes during the winter season. In Australia, New
Zealand and the Philippines, demand for building products is
also seasonal because, in Australia and New Zealand,
construction activity diminishes during the summer period of
December to February, and in the Philippines, construction
activity diminishes during the wet season from June to September
and the last half of December due to the slowdown in business
activity over the holiday period. We commenced production of
fiber cement products in Chile in early 2001, where markets also
experience decreased seasonal construction activity from May
through September.
|
|
|
We may experience adverse fluctuations in the supply and
cost of raw materials necessary to our business. A significant
reduction or cessation of shipments from an important supplier
could adversely affect our business if we are unable to secure
alternative supplies within a short time or on reasonable
terms. |
Our fiber cement business periodically experiences fluctuations
in the supply and costs of raw materials, and some of our supply
markets are concentrated. Cellulose fiber, silica, cement and
water are the principal raw materials used in the production of
fiber cement. Cellulose fiber has been subject to significant
price fluctuations. Although we have not recently experienced
any shortages of raw materials that have materially affected our
operations, price fluctuations or material delays may occur in
the future due to lack of raw materials or suppliers. The loss
or deterioration of our relationship with a major supplier, an
increase in demand by third parties for a particular
suppliers products or materials or delays in obtaining
materials could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
14
|
|
|
If our research and development efforts fail to generate
new, innovative products or processes, our overall profit
margins may decrease and demand for our products may fall, which
would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition. |
We invest significantly in research and development because we
believe that such efforts are key to sustaining and growing our
existing market leadership position in fiber cement. Because
profit margins for fiber cement products and building products
generally erode the longer a product has been on the market,
innovation is particularly important. We rely on our research
and development efforts to generate new products and processes
to increase demand and to protect profit margins. If our
research and development efforts fail to generate new,
innovative products or processes, our overall profit margins may
decrease and demand for our products may fall, which would have
an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
|
|
|
Demand for our products is subject to changes in consumer
preference. |
The continued development of builder and consumer preference for
our fiber cement products over competitive products is critical
to sustaining and expanding demand for our products. Therefore,
the failure to maintain and increase builder and consumer
acceptance of our fiber cement products could have a material
adverse effect on our growth strategy as well as our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
We rely on only a few distributors to distribute our fiber
cement products and the loss of any distributor could adversely
affect our business. |
Our top two distributors in the United States represented
approximately 45% of our total U.S. fiber cement net sales
in fiscal year 2005. In addition, a large home center retailer
accounted for approximately 15% of our total U.S. fiber
cement net sales in fiscal year 2005. Our top two distributors
in Australia and our top four distributors in New Zealand
accounted for approximately 20% and 95% of our total net sales
of fiber cement in Australia and New Zealand, respectively, in
fiscal year 2005. We generally do not have long-term contracts
with our large distributors. Accordingly, if we were to lose one
or more of these distributors because our competitors were able
to offer distributors more favorable pricing terms or for any
other reasons, we may not be able to replace distributors in a
timely manner or on reasonable terms. The loss of one or more
distributors could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
Changes in, or failure to comply with, the laws,
regulations, policies or conditions of any jurisdiction in which
we conduct our business could result in, among other
consequences, the loss of our assets in such jurisdiction, the
elimination of certain rights that are critical to the operation
of our business in such jurisdiction, a decrease in revenues or
the imposition of additional taxes or other costs. |
Because we own assets, manufacture and sell our products
internationally, our activities are subject to political,
economic, legal and other uncertainties, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changing political and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
changing laws and policies; |
|
|
|
the general hazards associated with the assertion of sovereign
rights over certain areas in which we conduct our
business; and |
|
|
|
laws limiting or conditioning the right and ability of
subsidiaries and joint ventures to pay dividends or remit
earnings to affiliated companies. |
Although we seek to take applicable laws, regulations and
conditions into account in structuring our business on a global
basis, changes in, or our failure to comply with, the laws,
regulations, policies or conditions of any jurisdiction in which
we conduct our business could result in, among other
consequences, the loss of our assets in such jurisdiction, the
elimination of certain rights that are critical to the operation
of our business in such jurisdiction, a decrease in revenues or
the imposition of additional taxes. Therefore, any
15
change in laws, regulations, policies or conditions of a
jurisdiction could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
Our reliance on intellectual property and other
proprietary information subjects us to the risk that competitors
could copy our products or processes. |
Our success depends, in part, on the proprietary nature of our
technology, including non-patentable intellectual property such
as our process technology. To the extent that a competitor is
able to reproduce or otherwise capitalize on our technology, it
may be difficult, expensive or impossible for us to obtain
necessary legal protection. Also, the laws of some foreign
countries may not protect our intellectual property to the same
extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition to
patent protection of intellectual property rights, we consider
elements of our product designs and processes to be proprietary
and confidential. We rely on employee, consultant and vendor
non-disclosure agreements and contractual provisions and a
system of internal safeguards to protect our proprietary
information. However, any of our registered or unregistered
intellectual property rights may be challenged or exploited by
others in the industry, which could harm our operating results
and competitive position.
|
|
|
We rely on a continuous power supply and availability of
utilities to conduct our operations, and any shortages or
interruptions could disrupt our operations and increase our
expenses. |
In the manufacture of our products, we rely on a continuous and
uninterrupted supply of electric power, water and natural gas as
well as the availability of water, waste and emissions discharge
facilities. Any future shortages or discharge curtailments could
significantly disrupt our operations and increase our expenses.
We currently do not have backup generators to maintain power and
do not have alternate sources of power in the event of a
blackout. In addition, our current insurance does not provide
coverage for any damages that we or our customers may suffer as
a result of any interruption in our power supply. If blackouts
interrupt our power supply, we would be temporarily unable to
continue operations at the affected facilities. Any future
interruption in our ability to continue operations at our
facilities could damage our reputation, harm our ability to
retain existing customers or obtain new customers and could
result in lost revenue, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
|
Because we have significant operations outside of the
United States and report our earnings in U.S. dollars,
unfavorable fluctuations in currency values and exchange rates
could have a significant negative impact on our earnings. |
Because our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, our
non-U.S. operations face the additional risk of fluctuating
currency values and exchange rates. Such operations may also
face hard currency shortages and controls on currency exchange.
Approximately 21% and 24% of our net sales in fiscal years 2005
and 2004, respectively, were derived from sales outside the
United States. Consequently, changes in the value of foreign
currencies (principally Australian dollars, New Zealand dollars,
Philippine pesos, Chilean pesos, Euros, U.K. pounds and Canadian
dollars) could significantly affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition. We generally attempt to
mitigate foreign exchange risk by entering, where possible, into
contracts that require payment in U.S. dollars instead of
the local currency, hedging transactional risk, where
appropriate, and having non-U.S. operations borrow in local
currencies, particularly the Philippines and Chile. Although we
did not have any material interest rate swaps or forward
exchange contracts outstanding as of March 31, 2005, we may
enter into such financial instruments from time to time to
manage our market risks. There can be no assurance that we will
be successful in these mitigation strategies, or that
fluctuations in foreign currencies and other foreign exchange
risks will not have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
Information technology systems integration issues could
disrupt our internal operations, which could have significant
adverse effects on our profitability. |
Beginning in fiscal year 2006, we expect to commence
implementation of a new enterprise resource planning
(ERP) software system. Our ongoing systems
integration work could cause portions of our
16
information technology infrastructure to experience
interruptions, delays or cessations of service and produce
system errors. We may not be successful in timely implementing
these new systems, and transitioning data and other aspects of
the process could be expensive, time consuming and disruptive.
Any disruptions that may occur in the implementation of this new
system could adversely affect our ability to accurately and
timely report the financial results of our operations and
otherwise efficiently operate our business, which could have a
significant adverse effect on our profitability.
|
|
|
Our Articles of Association and Dutch law contain
provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control that
may otherwise be beneficial to you. |
Our Articles of Association contain several provisions that
could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of
control of our ownership. Our Articles of Association generally
prohibit the holding of shares of our common stock if, because
of an acquisition of a relevant interest (including interests
held in the form of shares of our common stock, CUFS or ADRs) in
such shares, a partys relevant interest in our common
stock or voting rights increases from 20% or below to over 20%
or from a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.
However, this prohibition is subject to exceptions, including
acquisitions that result from acceptance under a takeover bid as
described in our Articles of Association. Although these
provisions in our Articles of Association may help to ensure
that no person acquires voting control of us without making an
offer to all shareholders, these provisions may also have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change of control that may
otherwise be beneficial to you. See Item 10,
Additional Information Key Provisions of our
Articles of Association Limitations on Right to Hold
Common Stock.
|
|
|
Because we are incorporated under Dutch laws, you may not
be able to effectively seek legal recourse against us or our
management and you may have difficulty enforcing any
U.S. judgments or rulings in a foreign jurisdiction. |
We are incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands. In
addition, many of our directors and executive officers are
residents of jurisdictions outside the United States and a
substantial portion of our assets are located outside the United
States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of
process within the United States upon such persons, or to
enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against
such persons in U.S. courts, or to enforce in
U.S. courts any judgments obtained against such persons in
courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States,
including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions
of the U.S. securities laws. In addition, it may be
difficult for you to enforce, in original actions brought in
courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States,
rights predicated upon the U.S. securities laws.
The rights of shareholders and the responsibilities of directors
under the laws of The Netherlands may not be as clearly
established as under statutes or judicial precedent in existence
in certain U.S. jurisdictions, and such rights under the
laws of The Netherlands may differ substantially from what those
rights would be under the laws of various jurisdictions in the
United States.. Therefore, our shareholders may have more
difficulty in challenging the actions by our directors than they
would otherwise as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in
the United States.
|
|
|
The issuance of shares of common stock or the grant of
options to acquire shares of common stock could dilute the value
of your shares and adversely affect the price of our common
stock. |
Because the authority to issue shares, and to grant rights to
subscribe for shares, such as options, up to the amount of our
authorized share capital, has been delegated to our Supervisory
Board, the issuance of such shares or rights could dilute the
value of your shares and adversely affect the price of our
common stock.
In addition, if we issue a large number of our equity
securities, the trading price of our equity securities could
decrease. We may pursue acquisitions of businesses and may issue
equity securities in connection with these acquisitions,
although we do not currently have specific acquisitions planned.
We may also issue equity securities to satisfy other liabilities
of the Company. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that
future sales or issuances of our equity securities or the
availability of such securities for future sale will have on our
securities market price from time to time.
17
|
|
|
If we experience labor disputes or interruptions, as we
have from time to time in the past, our operations may be
disrupted and our business, financial condition and results of
operations may be adversely affected. |
Approximately 52% of our employees in Australia and 64% of our
employees in New Zealand are currently represented by labor
unions. Our unionized employees are covered by a range of
federal and state-based agreements in Australia and New Zealand.
Our Australian and New Zealand agreements expire at various
times beginning September 2005. We cannot assure you that the
agreements will be renewed on reasonable terms, or at all.
During the past three years, we experienced occasional strikes
and work interruptions lasting up to two days in Australia. In
the event we experience a prolonged labor dispute at any of our
facilities, any strikes or work interruptions associated with
such dispute could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our effective income tax rate could increase and adversely
affect our operating results. |
We operate in multiple jurisdictions and pay tax on our income
according to the tax laws of these jurisdictions. Various
factors, some of which are beyond our control, determine our
effective tax rate, including changes in or interpretations of
tax laws in any given jurisdiction, our ability to use net
operating losses and tax credit carry forwards and other tax
attributes, changes in geographical allocation of income and
expense, and our judgment about the realizability of deferred
tax assets.
|
|
|
If we are classified as a controlled foreign
corporation or a passive foreign investment
company, our shareholders could be subject to increased
tax liability as a consequence of their investment in our
securities. |
Our U.S. citizen and resident shareholders could incur
adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences if, for
federal income tax purposes, we are classified as a
controlled foreign corporation or a passive
foreign investment company. For information regarding
these consequences, see Item 10, Additional
Information Taxation United States
Taxation. In addition, shareholders could be adversely
affected by changes in the current tax laws, regulations and
interpretations thereof in the United States and The
Netherlands, including changes that could have retroactive
effect.
|
|
|
We may acquire or divest businesses from time to time, and
this may adversely affect our operating results and financial
condition and may significantly change the nature of the company
in which you have invested. |
In the past, we have divested business segments. In the future,
we may acquire other businesses or sell some or all of our
assets or business segments. Any significant acquisition or sale
may adversely affect our operating results and financial
condition and could change the overall profile of our business.
As a result, the value of our shares may decrease in response to
any such acquisition or sale and, upon any such acquisition or
sale, our shares may represent an investment in a company with
significantly different assets and prospects from the Company
when you made your initial investment in us.
|
|
|
Our current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer were appointed in October 2004 after the resignations of
our former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. |
Although our current Chief Executive Officer has been employed
by us for 14 years, he has been serving as our CEO for less
than one year. Our Chief Financial Officer has also been with us
for less than one year. Because of the unscheduled nature of the
departure of our former CEO and CFO, and the essentially
concurrent appointment of our current CEO and CFO, there was
little time available to smoothly transition over to the current
CEO and CFO. Accordingly, it may take time for our new CEO and
CFO to effectively transition into their new roles and to
develop effective working relationships with our board of
directors, employees, shareholders and others. We cannot assure
you that this restructuring of our senior management will not
adversely affect our results of operations or otherwise
adversely affect us.
18
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements. We may
from time to time make forward-looking statements in our
periodic reports filed with or furnished to the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 20-F and 6-K,
in our annual reports to shareholders, in offering circulars and
prospectuses, in media releases and other written materials and
in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees
to analysts, institutional investors, representatives of the
media and others. Examples of forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
|
|
projections of our operating results or financial condition; |
|
|
|
statements regarding our plans, objectives or goals, including
those relating to competition, acquisitions, dispositions and
our products; |
|
|
|
statements about our future performance; |
|
|
|
statements about product or environmental liabilities; and |
|
|
|
expectations about payments to a special purpose fund for the
compensation of proven asbestos-related personal injury and
death claims. |
Words such as believe, anticipate,
plan, expect, intend,
target, estimate, project,
predict, forecast,
guideline, should, aim and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such
statements.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. We caution you that a number of important factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from the plans,
objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in
such forward-looking statements. These factors, some of which
are discussed under Risk Factors beginning on
page 6, include but are not limited to: all matters
relating to or arising out of the prior manufacture of products
that contained asbestos by current and former James Hardie Group
subsidiaries; compliance with and changes in tax laws and
treatments; competition and product pricing in the markets in
which we operate; the consequences of product failures or
defects; exposure to environmental, asbestos or other legal
proceedings; general economic and market conditions; the supply
and cost of raw materials; the success of our research and
development efforts; our reliance on a small number of product
distributors; compliance with and changes in environmental and
health and safety laws; risks of conducting business
internationally; compliance with and changes in laws and
regulations; foreign exchange risks; the successful
implementation of new software systems; and the successful
transition of our new senior management. We caution you that the
foregoing list of factors is not exclusive and that other risks
and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially
from those in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date they are made.
|
|
Item 4. |
Information on the Company |
History and Development of the Company
Our legal name was changed to James Hardie Industries N.V. from
RCI Netherlands Holdings B.V. in July 2001 when our legal form
was converted from a besloten vennootschap met beperkte
aansprakelijkheid (a B.V.), or private
limited liability company, to a naamloze
vennootschap (a N.V.), or a public limited
liability company whose stock, unlike a private limited
liability company, may be transferred without executing a
notarial deed if such company is listed on a recognized stock
exchange. We operate under Dutch law. Our corporate seat is
located in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The address of our
registered office in The Netherlands is Atrium, 8th floor,
Strawinskylaan 3077, 1077 ZX Amsterdam. The telephone number
there is 011 31 20 301 2980. Our Company Secretary is
Mr. Benjamin Butterfield who is based in The Netherlands.
On July 2, 1998, James Hardie Industries Limited
(JHIL), now called ABN 60, which was then a public
company organized under the laws of Australia and listed on the
Australian Stock Exchange, announced a plan of reorganization
and capital restructuring (the 1998 Reorganization).
19
James Hardie N.V. (JHNV) was incorporated in August
1998 as an intermediary holding company, with all of its common
stock owned by indirect subsidiaries of ABN 60. On
October 16, 1998, the shareholders of ABN 60 approved
the 1998 Reorganization. We began our restructuring in November
1998, primarily to address the structural imbalance and
resulting operational, financial and commercial issues
associated with the increasing significance and growth
opportunities of our U.S. operations and the location of
corporate management and our shareholder base in Australia. At
that time, we successfully completed:
|
|
|
|
|
the formation of JHNV; |
|
|
|
the transfer to subsidiaries of JHNV of all of our fiber cement
businesses, our U.S. gypsum wallboard business, our
Australian and New Zealand building systems business and our
Australian windows business, all of which, except for fiber
cement, were subsequently sold; |
|
|
|
a debt financing, consisting of an issuance of notes to
U.S. purchasers, and the arrangement of an Australian
credit facility; and |
|
|
|
the relocation of most of our senior executives and managers to
our operational headquarters in the United States. |
On July 24, 2001, ABN 60 announced a further plan of
reorganization and capital restructuring (the 2001
Reorganization). On October 19, 2001, we completed
our 2001 Reorganization. This restructuring was done to provide
us with a more efficient financial structure in light of
potential global expansion, to allow us to use our stock for
acquisitions if necessary and to increase overall returns to our
shareholders. The 2001 Reorganization consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of shares of JHI NV common stock represented by
CUFS to substantially all ABN 60 shareholders in exchange
for their shares of ABN 60 common stock pursuant to an
approved Australian scheme of arrangement; |
|
|
|
the transfer by ABN 60 of all of the outstanding shares of JHNV
(which directly or indirectly held substantially all of the
assets of the James Hardie Group at that time) to JHI NV; |
|
|
|
a capital reduction and payment of a dividend by ABN 60 to its
then sole shareholder, JHI NV; |
|
|
|
the issuance by ABN 60 of 100,000 partly-paid ordinary
shares to JHI NV for a total issue price approximately equal to
the market value of the James Hardie Group immediately prior to
the schemes implementation (which equaled approximately
A$1.9 billion). There was an initial subscription price
paid of A$50 per partly-paid ordinary share (that is, for a
total subscription price for such shares of A$5 million),
and the remainder was left uncalled. A partly-paid share is a
share that is issued with only part of its value paid by the
owner of the share. The partly-paid shares were issued by
ABN 60 to enable it to call on JHI NV for funds in the
future if ABN 60 needed such funds to maintain its solvency; |
|
|
|
The Deed of Covenant and Indemnity provided that, apart from
ABN 60s limited financial obligations to Amaba and
Amaca under the deed (for which ABN 60, at the time of the
establishment of the ABN 60 Foundation, had been provided
with funds to invest so as to be able to meet those
obligations), ABN 60 had no further obligations to Amaca or
Amaba in connection with their asbestos-related liabilities, and
that ABN 60 was indemnified by those entities in the event
that ABN 60 incurred or suffered any such liabilities; |
|
|
|
the listing of the shares of JHI NV represented by CUFS on
the Australian Stock Exchange and the listing of ADRs,
representing CUFS, which in turn represent shares of
JHI NV, on the New York Stock Exchange; and |
|
|
|
the establishment of a Dutch financing subsidiary, James Hardie
International Finance B.V. (JHIF BV). |
As a result of the share exchange, ABN 60 shareholders
ceased to hold any direct interest in ABN 60 and instead became
the holders of interests in JHI NV common shares, receiving
substantially their same proportional ownership interests in the
Company as they had in ABN 60 before exchanging their
shares.
In addition, as a result of the exchange, ABN 60 and JHNV
became direct subsidiaries of JHI NV.
20
The 2001 Reorganization is generally depicted in the following
simplified diagrams:
Following the 2001 Reorganization, JHI NV controlled the same
assets and liabilities as ABN 60 controlled immediately
prior to the 2001 Reorganization.
During fiscal year 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
JHI NV and ABN 60 cancelled the partly-paid shares.
The decision to cancel the partly-paid shares was taken by the
directors of ABN 60 who did so based on a determination
that the reduction in capital would not materially prejudice
ABN 60s ability to pay its creditors, including Amaba
and Amaca, which, under the terms of the Deed of Covenant and
Indemnity, were creditors of ABN 60 only to the extent of
the limited financial obligations under that Deed. The directors
determined that the funds in ABN 60 at that time would be
sufficient for any such creditors; |
|
|
|
ABN 60 transferred control of all of its non-operating
subsidiaries to RCI Holdings Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary
of JHI NV, to distinguish between the operating group of
companies and non-operating subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
Following the consolidation of the operating assets of the James
Hardie Group under JHI NV and JHNV in fiscal year 2003, the
principal activity of ABN 60 was paying amounts in
accordance with the Deed of Covenant and Indemnity. As described
above, ABN 60 was regarded as having more than sufficient
funds invested to enable it to meet its liabilities in full as
they became due and payable. Also, at that time, the cash
position of the Company had improved significantly as a result
of the sale of the Companys Gypsum business in the United
States and the impending sale of a gypsum mine in Nevada.
Despite such cash position and the ability of ABN 60 to
meet its obligations under the Deed of Covenant and Indemnity,
the presence of the Companys obligation to ABN 60 was
constraining the Companys borrowing capacity because
U.S. GAAP required the amount of the liability under the
Deed of Covenant and Indemnity to be recorded on an undiscounted
basis. On March 31, 2003, following a review of all
available options to address this issue and after a thorough
review had been conducted to determine that the funds available
to ABN 60 would be sufficient to meet the claims of all
creditors, the shares in ABN 60 were transferred to a newly
established company named the |
21
|
|
|
|
|
ABN 60 Foundation. ABN 60 Foundation was established
to be the sole shareholder of ABN 60. ABN 60 is
managed by independent directors and operates entirely
independently of the Company. |
The following is a simplified diagram of our current corporate
structure:
Recent Developments
|
|
|
Special Commission of Inquiry and Related
Developments |
In February 2004, the NSW Government established a SCI to
investigate, among other matters, the circumstances in which the
Foundation was established. Shortly after the release of the SCI
report, on September 21, 2004, the Company commenced
negotiations with the Representatives, and subsequently with the
NSW Government, in relation to the anticipated future funding
shortfall of the Liable Entities and their ability to meet
expected future claims. On December 21, 2004, the Company
announced that it had entered into a non-binding Heads of
Agreement with the NSW Government and the Representatives in
relation to the principles on which a subsidiary of JHI NV
would agree to provide, and JHI NV would guarantee, funding
payments to a special purpose fund, which would be established
to provide funding on a long-term basis for Claims against the
Liable Entities.
Since December 2004, the Company has been involved in
negotiations with the NSW Government on a binding agreement,
which is referred to as the Principal Agreement. Additional
information about the SCI and related matters can be found below
under the heading Legal Proceedings and above under
Item 3, Risk Factors.
Costs incurred during fiscal year 2005 associated with the SCI
and other related matters totaled $28.1 million and
included: $6.8 million related to the SCI;
$4.9 million related to the internal investigation
conducted by independent legal advisers, consistent with
U.S. securities regulations, of the impact on our financial
statements of allegations of illegal conduct raised during the
SCI and any potential impacts on the financial statements (the
investigation found there was no impact on our 2004 financial
statements); $1.2 million related to the ASIC investigation
into the circumstances surrounding the creation of the
Foundation; $6.4 million for resolution advisory services;
$6.0 million in severance and consulting payments to former
executives; and $2.8 million for other matters.
|
|
|
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Investigation |
On September 22, 2004, the ASIC announced that it was
conducting an investigation into potential contraventions of
certain Australian laws arising from the transactions considered
by the SCI. To date, ASIC has announced that it is investigating
various matters, but it has not specified the particulars of
alleged contraventions under investigation, nor has it announced
that it has reached any conclusion that any person or entity has
contravened any relevant law. See also Legal
Proceedings below.
22
|
|
|
Board and Management Changes |
On August 11, 2004, Mr. Alan McGregor resigned as
Chairman of the Supervisory Board due to his continuing ill
health and Ms. Meredith Hellicar was appointed Chairman of
the Supervisory Board. On August 25, 2004,
Mr. McGregor resigned from the Joint and Supervisory Boards
and from all board committees on which he served.
On September 28, 2004, the Company announced that
Mr. Peter Macdonald and Mr. Peter Shafron were
standing aside as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively.
On October 20, 2004, Mr. Shafron resigned from his
position as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Russell Chenu was
appointed as Executive Vice President Australia and
interim Chief Financial Officer on October 21, 2004. On
February 14, 2005, Mr. Chenu was appointed as our
Chief Financial Officer.
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Macdonald resigned from his
position on the Managing Board and as Chief Executive Officer.
On the same day, Mr. Louis Gries was appointed as an
interim member of the Managing Board (in accordance with
Article 15.4 of the Companys Articles of Association)
and was named interim Chief Executive Officer. On
February 14, 2005, Mr. Gries was appointed as our
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gries appointment as a
member of the Managing Board will be considered by the
Companys shareholders at the next General Meeting.
Also on October 21, 2004, Mr. Folkert Zwinkels
resigned from the Managing Board and Mr. W. (Pim)
Vlot, the Companys Secretary at the time, was appointed as
an interim member of the Managing Board (in accordance with
Article 15.4 of the Companys Articles of Association)
on the same day. On April 30, 2005, Mr. Zwinkels
resigned from the Company.
On June 30, 2005, Mr. Vlots temporary employment
agreement expired by its terms. On July 1, 2005,
Mr. Butterfield, the Companys General Counsel, was
appointed as an interim member of the Managing Board and Company
Secretary. Mr. Butterfields appointment as a member
of the Managing Board will be considered by our shareholders at
the next General Meeting.
In June 2005, we entered into new unsecured debt facilities
totaling $355 million. The new debt facilities are
revolving U.S. dollar cash advance facilities involving
agreements with six banks, and replaced our previous revolving
and stand-by loan facilities. See Material Contracts
section under Item 10, Additional Information.
General Overview of Our Business
Based on net sales, we believe we are the largest manufacturer
of fiber cement products and systems for internal and external
building construction applications in the United States,
Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines, and the second
largest manufacturer of flat sheet fiber cement products in
Chile. Fiber cement is currently one of the fastest growing
segments of the U.S. residential exteriors industry. Based
on our knowledge, experience and third-party data regarding our
industry, we estimate that total U.S. industry shipments of
fiber cement siding, trim, soffit and fascia were approximately
1.7 billion square feet during fiscal year 2005, an
increase of approximately 19% from fiscal year 2004. Based on
our knowledge, experience and third-party data, we estimate that
we have 25% to 35% of the USA Interior Cement Board Market. We
market our fiber cement products and systems under various Hardi
brand names and other brand names such as Cemplank® siding,
Sentry® siding and
Artisantm
roofing. We believe that, in certain applications, our fiber
cement products and systems provide a combination of distinctive
performance, design and cost advantages when compared to other
fiber cement products and alternative products and systems that
use solid wood, engineered wood, vinyl, brick, stucco or gypsum
wallboard.
The sale of fiber cement products in the United States accounted
for 78%, 75% and 77% of our total net sales from continuing
operations in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
23
Our fiber cement products are used in a number of markets,
including new residential construction (single and multi-family
housing), manufactured housing (mobile and pre-fabricated
homes), repair and remodeling and a variety of commercial and
industrial applications (stores, warehouses, offices, hotels,
motels, schools, libraries, museums, dormitories, hospitals,
detention facilities, religious buildings and gymnasiums). We
manufacture numerous types of fiber cement products with a
variety of patterned profiles and surface finishes for a range
of applications, including external siding and soffit lining,
roofing, internal linings, facades, fencing, pipes and floor and
tile underlayments. In contrast to some other building
materials, fiber cement provides durability attributes, such as
strong resistance to moisture, fire, impact and termites,
requires relatively little maintenance and can be used as a
substrate to create a wide variety of architectural effects with
textured and colored finishes. During fiscal year 2005,
management believes, based on its analysis of competitors
sales that we sold approximately 90% of all fiber cement
products sold in the United States, approximately 65% of all
fiber cement products sold in Australia and approximately 90% of
all fiber cement products sold in New Zealand. Based on our
knowledge, experience and third-party data regarding our
industry, we estimate that we sold approximately 12% of the
estimated
121/2 billion
square foot U.S. exteriors market total (siding, fascia,
trim and soffit) in fiscal year 2005.
The breakdown of our net sales by product category and
geographic area for each of our last three fiscal years is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Cement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
939.2 |
|
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
$ |
599.7 |
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
236.1 |
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
1,210.4 |
|
|
$ |
981.9 |
|
|
$ |
783.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum (United States)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
Building Systems (New Zealand)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Discontinued Operations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (Continuing and Discontinued Operations)
|
|
$ |
1,210.4 |
|
|
$ |
984.8 |
|
|
$ |
822.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Overview
|
|
|
U.S. Housing Industry and Fiber Cement
Industry |
In the United States, fiber cement is principally used in the
residential building industry, which fluctuates based on the
level of new home construction and the repair and remodeling of
existing homes. The level of activity is generally a function of
interest rates, inflation, unemployment levels, demographic
trends, gross domestic product growth and consumer confidence.
Demand for building products is also affected by residential
housing starts and existing home sales, the age and size of the
housing stock and overall home improvement expenditures.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, annual domestic
housing starts increased from approximately 1.61 million in
calendar year 2002 to approximately 1.96 million in
calendar year 2004 and residential remodeling expenditures
increased from approximately $173.3 billion in calendar
year 2002 to approximately $198.6 billion in calendar year
2004.
Based on our knowledge, experience and third-party data
regarding our industry, we estimate that total
U.S. industry shipments of fiber cement siding, trim,
soffit and fascia were approximately 1.7 billion square
feet during fiscal year 2005, up approximately 19% from fiscal
year 2004. The future growth of fiber cement
24
products will depend on overall demand for building products and
on the rate of penetration of fiber cement products against
competing materials such as wood, engineered wood (hardboard and
oriented strand board), vinyl, masonry and stucco.
In the United States, the largest application for fiber cement
products is in the external siding industry. Fiber cement is one
of the fastest growing segments of the siding industry.
Continued strength in residential construction combined with
gains in the repair and remodel market have resulted in strong
demand for external siding products. Based on our knowledge,
experience and third-party data regarding our industry, we
estimate that we sold approximately 12% of the estimated
121/2 billion
square foot U.S. exteriors market total (siding, fascia,
trim and soffit) in fiscal year 2005. Siding is a component of
every building and it usually occupies more square footage than
any other building component, such as windows and doors.
Selection of siding material is based on installed cost,
durability, aesthetic appeal, strength, weather resistance,
maintenance requirements and cost, insulating properties and
other features. Different regions of the United States show a
decided preference among siding materials according to economic
conditions, weather, materials availability and local taste. The
principal siding materials are solid wood, engineered wood,
fiber cement, vinyl, masonry and stucco. Vinyl has the largest
share of the siding market. In recent years, fiber cement has
been gaining market share against vinyl and wood and engineered
wood products. In wood and engineered wood products, share
growth is believed to be due to durability concerns and higher
maintenance requirements of those products.
In the U.S. civil construction market, large diameter pipes
are used for major public infrastructure projects such as storm
water, sewer, water distribution and other non-pressurized
drainage applications. According to the most recent Freedonia
Report on Large Diameter Pipes, approximately 184 million
linear feet of large diameter pipes is manufactured annually in
the United States. Of this amount, approximately 46% is used for
storm water and sewer applications, approximately 19% is used in
drainage and irrigation applications and approximately 35% is
used for a variety of other applications. According to the
report, the amount of large diameter pipes that is expected to
be manufactured is currently expected to grow at a rate of
approximately 2.4% annually.
|
|
|
International Fiber Cement Industry |
In Australia and New Zealand, fiber cement building products are
used in both the residential and commercial building industries
with applications in external siding, internal walls, ceilings,
floors, soffits and fences. The residential building industry
represents the principal market for fiber cement products. We
believe the level of activity in this industry is generally a
function of interest rates, inflation, unemployment levels,
demographic trends, gross domestic product growth and consumer
confidence. Demand for fiber cement building products is also
affected by the level of new housing starts and renovation
activity. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, new
housing starts in Australia grew from approximately 139,898 in
calendar year 2001 to approximately 165,094 in calendar year
2004. Renovation activity, as measured in local currency
expenditures by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, has
increased steadily each year from calendar year ended
December 31, 2001 to calendar year ended December 31,
2004 for a total increase over this period of approximately 46%.
According to Statistics New Zealand, new dwellings authorized in
New Zealand grew from approximately 21,262 in fiscal year 2002
to 30,255 in fiscal year 2005. Residential renovation activity
in New Zealand has steadily increased each year from fiscal year
2002 to fiscal year 2005 for a total increase over this period
of approximately 56%.
Fiber cement products have gained broader acceptance across a
range of product applications in Australia and New Zealand than
in the United States primarily due to their earlier
introduction. Former subsidiaries of ABN 60 developed fiber
cement in Australia as a replacement for asbestos cement in the
early 1980s. Asbestos sheet production ceased in the early 1980s
and asbestos pipe-based production ceased in early 1987.
Competition has intensified over the past nine years in
Australia. In addition to competition from solid wood,
engineered wood, wallboard, masonry and brick, two Australian
competitors have established fiber cement manufacturing
facilities in Australia and fiber cement imports are also
available. Competition has also intensified in New Zealand as
fiber cement imports have increased, resulting in increasingly
competitive market pricing.
25
Management believes that fiber cement has good long-term growth
potential in some Asian markets because of the benefits of
framed construction over traditional masonry construction. In
addition, we believe the opportunity to replace wood-based
products, such as plywood, with more durable fiber cement will
be attractive to consumers in these markets.
Products
We manufacture fiber cement products in the United States,
Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines and Chile. In fiscal
year 2004, we also commenced our Europe Fiber Cement business by
distributing our fiber cement products in the U.K. and France.
Our total product offering is aimed at the building and
construction markets, including new residential construction,
manufactured housing, repair and remodeling and a variety of
commercial and industrial building applications.
We offer a wide range of fiber cement products for both exterior
and interior applications, some of which have not yet been
introduced into the United States. In the United States and
elsewhere, our products are typically sold as planks or flat
sheets with a variety of patterned profiles and finishes. Planks
are used for external siding while flat sheets are used for
internal and external wall linings and floor underlay. At our
Plant City, Florida facility, we manufacture fiber reinforced
concrete pipes for use as large diameter storm water and
non-pressurized drainage applications. Outside the United
States, we also manufacture fiber cement products for use in
other applications such as building facades, lattice, fencing,
decorative columns and ceiling applications.
We have developed a proprietary technology platform that enables
us to produce thicker yet lighter-weight fiber cement products
that are generally lighter and easier to handle than traditional
building products. The first application of this technology has
been our Harditrim plank. Harditrim® plank is a fiber
cement trim product that is used on the exterior of residential
and commercial construction to replace traditional wood and
engineered wood trim. Harditrim plank was launched in fiscal
year 1999, with the introduction of Harditrim® HLD®
plank, from our Cleburne, Texas plant and demand has been strong
since that time. A new production process for manufacturing
Harditrim plank was completed at the Cleburne plant and
production commenced in fiscal year 2002. Additional trim
capacity was added in the Peru plant in fiscal years 2004 and
2005.
We believe that our products provide certain performance, design
and cost advantages. The principal fiber cement attribute in
exterior applications is durability, particularly when compared
to competing wood and wood-based products, while offering
comparable aesthetics. Our fiber cement products exhibit
superior resistance to the damaging effects of moisture, fire,
impact and termites compared to wood and wood-based products,
which has enabled us to gain a competitive advantage over
competing products. Vinyl siding products generally have better
durability characteristics than wood-based products, but
typically cannot duplicate the superior aesthetics of fiber
cement and lack the characteristics necessary for effectively
accepting paint applications.
Our fiber cement products provide strength and the ability to
imprint simulated patterns that closely resemble patterns and
profiles of traditional materials such as wood and stucco. The
surface properties provide a superior paint-holding finish to
wood and engineered wood products such that the periods between
necessary maintenance and repainting are longer. Compared to
masonry construction, fiber cement is lightweight, physically
flexible and can be cut using readily available tools. This
makes fiber cement suitable for lightweight construction across
a range of architectural styles. Fiber cement is well suited to
both timber and steel framed construction.
In our interior product range, our ceramic tile underlayment
products provide superior handling and installation
characteristics compared to fiberglass mesh cement boards.
Compared to wood and wood-based products, our products provide
the same general advantages that apply to external applications.
In addition, our fiber cement products exhibit less movement in
response to exposure to moisture than many alternative competing
products, providing a more consistent and durable substrate on
which to install tiles. In internal lining applications where
exposure to moisture and impact damage are significant concerns,
our products provide superior moisture resistance and impact
resistance to traditional gypsum wet area wallboard and other
competing products.
26
Our strategy in our USA Hardie Pipe business is to establish
Hardie® Pipe as the preferred solution for stormwater
applications that use pipes with diameters ranging from 12
to 36. We believe that Hardie® Pipe continues to
offer advantages to the mid-size drainage pipe market because
our product features span both traditional concrete pipes and
newer flexible pipes. We offer the initial crush strength of
rigid pipes, combined with the lighter-weight, longer lengths
and ease of installation of flexible pipes. The result is
productivity gains over rigid pipes and less installation and
service risk than with flexible pipes.
We seek to emphasize the performance attributes of our products
and continue to develop new products that, due to the materials
used and the process technology employed in their manufacture,
may be difficult for competitors to emulate. While no assurances
can be given, we believe that the proprietary nature of these
products, our ability to competitively source raw materials for
these products and the economies of scale that are derived from
their manufacture should assist our efforts to maintain our
leadership and low cost competitive position. See Research
and Development.
In fiscal year 2000, we launched Hardibacker 500® tile
underlayment, a new
1/2
inch thick tile backer board in the United States. This enabled
us to increase sales of products to home center retailers which
access the building trade and home repair markets. We also
continued to expand sales of our Harditrim® HLD®
plank, a new generation of low density fiber cement trim
products, which was first introduced in 1999, for residential
construction that further extended our product range and
enhanced our reputation as a leader in fiber cement product
innovation. The addition of Harditrim® HLD® plank
enabled us to offer a fiber cement system for residential
construction that gave builders the option to completely replace
wood and engineered wood products with fiber cement in most
exterior applications. We introduced the
ColorPlustm
collection, a new finished product available in specific lap
siding, shingles, trim, fascia and soffit products, during
fiscal year 2002. In fiscal year 2003, we expanded our new line
of pre-finished exterior products, the
ColorPlustm
collection, with the addition of several new colors, and
successfully launched a new all-weather low density trim product
utilizing our new proprietary XLD® trim low density fiber
cement technology. We also launched our new improved proprietary
grid
1/4
backer product EzGrid® underlayment. In fiscal year 2004,
we introduced pre-finished trim accessories to further expand
our
ColorPlustm
collection line. And the first commercial sales of our
Artisantm
Roofing product were made in the second half of fiscal year
2004. In fiscal year 2005, we expanded our
ColorPlustm
collection manufacturing capacity and capabilities to meet
increasing demand for the
ColorPlustm
collection. Additional colors were added to the
ColorPlustm
collection of plank, soffit and trim to expand the
ColorPlustm
collection line. Additionally, in the past five years, we
launched many new textures, styles and coatings in fiber cement
siding products in the United States to capitalize on demand for
a variety of styles among homebuilders and homeowners. In
Australia and New Zealand, new products released over the past
three years include EziGrid® Tile Underlay,
Eclipsatm
Eaves Lining, Linea® weatherboards, ExoTec®
Façade Panel and Hardirock® board (Australia only). In
fiscal year 2005, in the Philippines, we continued with our
Hardiflex® board penetration against plywood applications
in ceilings, walls and eaves, as well as focused on growing our
share against timber fascia board applications with our
Hardiflex Senepa product line.
Seasonality
Our earnings are seasonal and typically follow activity levels
in the building and construction industry. In the United States,
the calendar quarters ending in December and March generally
reflect reduced levels of building activity depending on weather
conditions. In Australia and New Zealand, the calendar quarter
ending in March is usually affected by a slowdown due to summer
holidays. In the Philippines, construction activity diminishes
during the wet season from June through September and during the
last half of December due to the slowdown in business activity
over the holiday period. In Chile, we also experience decreased
construction activity from May through September due to weather
conditions. Also, general industry patterns can be affected by
weather, economic conditions, industrial disputes and other
factors.
Raw Materials
All of the raw materials required in the manufacture of our
fiber cement products are available from a number of sources and
we have not experienced any shortages that have materially
affected our operations.
27
The principal raw materials used in the manufacture of fiber
cement are cellulose fiber (wood-based pulp), silica (sand),
portland cement and water.
Cellulose Fiber. Reliable access to specialized,
consistent quality, low cost pulp is critical to the production
of fiber cement building materials. Cellulose fiber is sourced
from New Zealand, the United States, Canada and Chile, and is
processed to our specifications. It is further processed using
our proprietary technology to provide the reinforcing material
in the cement matrix of fiber cement. We have developed a high
level of internal expertise in the production and use of
wood-based pulps. This expertise is shared with pulp producers,
which have access to appropriate raw wood stocks, in order to
formulate superior reinforcing pulps. The resulting pulp
formulas are typically proprietary and are the subject of
confidentiality agreements between the pulp producers and us.
Although we have entered into contracts to hedge pulp prices in
the past, we currently have none in effect. However, we continue
to evaluate options on agreements with suppliers for the
purchase of pulp that could fix our pulp prices over the
longer-term.
Silica. High purity silica is sourced locally by the
various production plants. In the majority of locations, we use
silica sand as a silica source. In certain other locations,
however, we process quartz rock and beneficiate silica sand to
ensure the quality and consistency of this key raw material.
Cement. Cement is acquired in bulk from local suppliers
and is supplied on a just-in-time basis to our manufacturing
facilities. The silos at each fiber cement plant hold between
one and three days of our cement requirements.
Water. We use local water supplies and seek to process
all wastewater to comply with environmental requirements.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
The principal markets for our fiber cement products are the
United States, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Chile,
the U.K. and France. In addition, we sell fiber cement products
in Canada, South Korea, China, Hong Kong, Macau, Japan, Taiwan,
Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Guam, the Middle East,
Argentina, Spain, The Netherlands, Denmark and the Republic of
Ireland. Our
Harditm
brand name, customer education in comparative product
advantages, differentiated product range and customer service,
including technical advice and assistance, provide the basis for
our marketing strategy. We offer our customers support through a
specialized fiber cement sales force and customer service
infrastructure in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the
Philippines, Europe, Canada and Chile. The customer service
infrastructure includes inbound customer service support
coordinated nationally in each country, and is complemented by
outbound telemarketing capability. Within each regional market,
we provide sales and marketing support to building products
dealers and lumber yards and also provide support directly to
the customers of these distribution channels, principally
homebuilders and building contractors.
In the United States, we sell fiber cement products for new
residential construction predominantly to distributors, which
then sell these products to dealers or lumber yards. This
two-step distribution process is increasingly being supplemented
with direct sales to customers as a means of accelerating
product penetration and sales. Our top two
U.S. distributors accounted for approximately 45% of our
total U.S. fiber cement net sales in fiscal year 2005. In
addition, a large home center retailer accounted for
approximately 15% of our total U.S. fiber cement net sales
in fiscal year 2005. Repair and remodel products in the United
States are typically sold through the large home center
retailers and specialist distributors. In Australia and New
Zealand, both new construction and repair and remodel products
are generally sold directly to hardware stores and lumber yards
rather than through the two-step distribution process used in
the United States. In the Philippines, a network of thousands of
small to medium size dealer outlets sells our fiber cement
products to consumers, builders and real estate developers. In
Chile, we sell directly to builders and contractors, as well as
to hardware stores and distributors. Physical distribution of
product in each country is primarily by road or sea transport
and, in the United States, some use of rail.
We maintain dedicated regional sales management teams in the
major sales territories. The sales teams (including
telemarketing staff) consist of approximately 300 people in the
United States and Canada,
28
72 people in Australia, 23 people in New Zealand, 35 people
in the Philippines, 31 people in Chile, 27 people in Europe and
one person in Taiwan. Our national sales managers and national
account managers, together with the regional sales managers and
sales representatives, maintain relationships with national and
other major accounts. Our sales force includes skilled trades
people who provide on-site technical advice and assistance. In
some cases, sales forces manage specific product categories. For
example, in the United States, there are separate sales forces
for siding products, interior products, pipes and roofing. The
interior products sales force provides in-store merchandising
support for home center retailers.
We also use trade and consumer advertising and public relations
campaigns to generate demand for our products. These campaigns
usually explain the differentiating attributes of our fiber
cement products and the suitability of our fiber cement products
and systems for specific applications.
Despite the fact that distributors are generally our direct
customers, we also aim to increase primary demand for our
products by marketing our products directly to homeowners,
architects and builders. We encourage them to specify and
install our products because of the quality and craftsmanship of
our products. This pull through strategy, in turn,
assists us in expanding sales for our distribution network as
distributors benefit from the increasing demand for our products.
Geographic expansion of our fiber cement business has occurred
in markets where framed construction is prevalent for
residential applications or where there are opportunities to
change building practices from masonry to framed construction,
such as in parts of Asia and South America. Expansion is also
possible where there are direct substitution opportunities
irrespective of the methods of construction. Our entry into the
Philippines is an example of the ability to substitute fiber
cement for an alternative product (in this case plywood). With
the exception of our current major markets, as well as Japan and
certain rural areas in Asia and Eastern Europe, most markets in
the world principally utilize masonry construction for external
walls in residential construction. Accordingly, further
geographic expansion depends on our ability to provide
alternative construction solutions and for those solutions to be
accepted by the markets.
Because fiber cement products were relatively new to the
Philippines, the launch of our fiber cement products in the
Philippines in fiscal year 1999 was accompanied by strategies to
address the particular needs of local customers and the building
trade. For example, we established a carpenter training and
accreditation program whereby Filipino carpenters who are
unfamiliar with our products are taught installation techniques.
We have also put greater emphasis on building our relationships
with new home developers and builders in order to educate the
market on the benefits of our products in this particular sector.
Fiber cement products manufactured in Australia, New Zealand and
the Philippines are exported to a number of markets in Asia and
the Middle East by sea transport. A regional sales management
team based in the Philippines is responsible for coordinating
export sales into Asia and the Middle East.
Research and Development
We pioneered the successful development of cellulose reinforced
fiber cement and, during the 1980s, progressively introduced
products resulting from our proprietary product formulation and
process technology. We have capitalized on our strong market
positions to maintain leadership in product research and
development and process technology enhancements. Our product
differentiation strategy, and our quest to maintain our position
as one of the low cost manufacturers of fiber cement, is
supported by our significant investment in research and
development activities. In fiscal year 2005, we spent
$27.1 million, or approximately 2.2% of total net sales, in
research and development activities. This amount included
$5.5 million of amounts classified as selling, general and
administrative expenses for U.S. GAAP purposes. In fiscal
year 2004, we spent $26.1 million, or approximately 2.7% of
total net sales, in research and development activities. This
amount included $3.5 million of amounts classified as
selling, general and administrative expenses for U.S. GAAP
purposes. In fiscal year 2003, we spent $20.8 million, or
approximately 2.7% of total net sales, in research and
development activities. This amount included $2.7 million
of amounts classified as selling, general and administrative
expenses for U.S. GAAP purposes. We believe that we
continue to have one of the largest and most advanced fiber
cement research and development capabilities in the world.
29
Globally, we employ over 130 scientists, engineers and
technicians in Core Research and in Product & Process
Development. Over 50% of our scientists have advanced degrees,
and 45% have worked for the Company for over five years.
We have Research & Development Centers in Sydney,
Australia and Fontana, California, where we conduct core
research, develop new manufacturing technology platforms and
develop products for specific markets and applications. Through
our investment in process technology, we aim to keep reducing
our capital and operating costs, and find new ways to make
existing products and new products.
Over the past ten years, advances in process technology have
allowed us to reduce the incremental cost of additional capacity
at existing sites. At the same time, we have reduced our raw
materials costs through yield improvements in the plants, by
providing technological support to drive process improvements in
our suppliers operations, and from our increased business
scale.
We believe that we also benefit from superior economies of scale
because we operate plants that have two to three times larger
capacity than our fiber cement competitors.
In addition, our goals are to:
|
|
|
|
|
continue to lower the capital cost of each unit of production at
new plants by learning from past projects and through continuing
innovation in engineering; and |
|
|
|
reduce operating costs at each plant by improving manufacturing
processes, raw materials yields and machine productivity. |
Dependence on Trade Secrets and Research and Development
Our current patent portfolio is based mainly on fiber cement
compositions, associated manufacturing processes and the
resulting products. Our non-patent technical intellectual
property consists primarily of our operating and manufacturing
know-how, which is maintained as trade secret information. We
have increased our abilities to effectively create, manage and
utilize our intellectual property and have implemented a
strategy that increasingly uses patenting, licensing, trade
secret protection and joint development to protect and increase
our market share. If our research and development efforts fail
to generate new, innovative products or processes, our overall
profit margins may decrease and demand for our products may fall.
Governmental Regulation
Our operations and properties are subject to extensive federal,
state and local and foreign environmental protection and health
and safety laws, regulations and ordinances. These environmental
laws, among other matters, govern activities and operations that
may have adverse environmental effects, such as discharges to
air, soil and water, and establish standards for the handling of
hazardous and toxic substances and the handling and disposal of
solid and hazardous wastes. In the United States, these
environmental laws include:
|
|
|
|
|
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; |
|
|
|
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act; |
|
|
|
the Clean Air Act; |
|
|
|
the Occupational Safety and Health Act; |
|
|
|
the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act; |
|
|
|
the Clean Water Act; |
|
|
|
the Safe Drinking Water Act; |
|
|
|
the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act; |
|
|
|
the Toxic Substances Control Act; |
30
|
|
|
|
|
the National Environmental Policy Act; and |
|
|
|
the Endangered Species Act, |
as well as analogous state statutes and regulations. Other
countries also have statutory schemes relating to the protection
of the environment. Some environmental laws provide that a
current or previous owner or operator of real property may be
liable for the costs of removal or remediation of environmental
contamination on, under, or in that property. In addition,
persons who arrange, or are deemed to have arranged, for the
disposal or treatment of hazardous substances may also be liable
for the costs of removal or remediation of environmental
contamination at the disposal or treatment site, regardless of
whether the affected site is owned or operated by such person.
Environmental laws often impose liability whether or not the
owner, operator or arranger knew of, or was responsible for, the
presence of such environmental contamination. Also, third
parties may make claims against owners or operators of
properties for personal injuries and property damage associated
with releases of hazardous or toxic substances pursuant to
applicable environmental laws as well as common law tort
theories, including strict liability. Environmental compliance
costs in the future will depend, in part, on regulatory
developments and future requirements that cannot be predicted.
Also see Legal Proceedings below.
Organizational Structure
JHI NV is incorporated in The Netherlands, with its corporate
seat in Amsterdam.
The table below sets forth our significant subsidiaries, all of
which are 100% owned by JHI NV, either directly or indirectly,
as of May 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of | |
Name of Company |
|
Establishment | |
|
|
| |
James Hardie Aust Holdings Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie Aust Investco Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie Aust Investments No. 1 Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie Austgroup Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie Australia Management Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie Australia Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie Building Products Inc.
|
|
|
United States |
|
James Hardie Europe B.V.
|
|
France and United Kingdom |
James Hardie Fibre Cement Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie International Finance B.V.
|
|
|
Netherlands |
|
James Hardie International Holdings B.V.
|
|
|
Netherlands |
|
James Hardie N.V.
|
|
|
Netherlands |
|
James Hardie New Zealand Limited
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
James Hardie NZ Holdings Trust
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
James Hardie Philippines Inc.
|
|
|
Philippines |
|
James Hardie Research (Holdings) Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
James Hardie U.S. Investments Sierra Inc.
|
|
|
United States |
|
N.V. Technology Holdings A Limited Partnership
|
|
|
Australia |
|
RCI Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
Australia |
|
31
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
The following table sets forth our capital expenditures,
calculated on an accrual basis, for each year in the three-year
period ended March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Cement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
144.8 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
81.0 |
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
Chile, U.S. Pipes, U.S. Roofing and Europe
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiber Cement
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
153.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
90.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant capital expenditure projects over the past three
fiscal years in our USA Fiber Cement business include:
|
|
|
|
|
the commencement of construction of a new fiber cement
manufacturing plant in Pulaski, Virginia at a total estimated
cost of $98.0 million. Construction of the plant began in
March 2005 and will include two manufacturing lines, each with a
design capacity of 300 million square feet. The first line
is expected to be to be completed for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2007. The plant will produce external siding and
interior backerboard products for new residential construction,
repair and remodel and manufactured housing markets. Funding of
the new plant is expected to be provided by the Companys
cash flow and current or future debt facilities. As of
March 31, 2005, we have incurred $7.7 million related
to the construction of the Virginia plant; |
|
|
|
the commencement in fiscal year 2005 of additional
ColorPlus® coating capacity inside our existing plants,
which includes a building expansion at our Peru, Illinois plant
and the new ColorPlus coating lines at our Peru, Illinois and
Blandon, Pennsylvania plants; |
|
|
|
the addition of a new fiber cement plant in Reno, Nevada at a
cost of $52.5 million, which occurred during fiscal years
2005 and 2004; |
|
|
|
the construction of a new trim line at our Peru, Illinois plant.
As of March 31, 2005, we were in pre-production and had
incurred $56.2 million, which occurred during fiscal years
2005 and 2004; |
|
|
|
upgrades to our Blandon, Pennsylvania plant at a cost of
$17.1 million, which occurred during fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003; |
|
|
|
the addition of a panel production line at our Waxahachie, Texas
plant at a cost of $26.5 million, which occurred during
fiscal years 2004 and 2003; |
|
|
|
the addition of a pre-finishing line and expansion of the
building at our Peru, Illinois plant at a total cost of
$7.9 million, which primarily occurred during fiscal years
2004 and 2003; |
|
|
|
the purchase of land and buildings in Summerville, South
Carolina and Blandon, Pennsylvania at a cost of
$10.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively, in
fiscal year 2003; and |
|
|
|
the addition of a second flat sheet production line at our Peru,
Illinois plant at a total cost of $24.7 million, consisting
of capital expenditures of $9.0 million, which occurred
during fiscal year 2003, and $15.7 million, which occurred
during fiscal years 2002 and 2001. |
32
The significant capital expenditure project in our USA Hardie
Pipe business in the past five fiscal years was the construction
of our pipe plant in Plant City, Florida. The project cost
$33.7 million, which was primarily incurred during fiscal
year 2001.
In our roofing operations, we spent $11.7 million in fiscal
years 2004 and 2003 on our new pilot plant in Fontana,
California. This pilot plant was built to test our proprietary
manufacturing technology and to provide product market testing
in Southern California for a new generation of fiber cement
roofing product.
In addition, in fiscal year 2004, $2.2 million was spent to
upgrade the fiber cement manufacturing plant at Rosehill in
Sydney and $1.8 million was spent at our Brisbane plant to
install a coating facility.
We currently expect to spend up to approximately
$175.0 million for capital expenditures in fiscal year
2006. Amounts expended will be principally focused on our
efforts to create additional low-cost, high-volume manufacturing
capacity to meet increased demand for our current fiber cement
products and to create new manufacturing capacity for new fiber
cement products. The expected amount of spending in fiscal year
2006 includes additional capital expenditures expected to be
made on projects that were in progress during fiscal year 2005,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the construction of a new fiber cement manufacturing plant in
Pulaski, Virginia, discussed above, at an estimated cost of
approximately $75.0 million; |
|
|
|
the building expansion and addition of ColorPlus® coating
lines at our Peru, Illinois and Blandon, Pennsylvania plants,
discussed above; and |
|
|
|
the remaining cost of the Peru trim line at an estimate of
approximately $4.8 million. |
In addition, the expected capital expenditure amount for fiscal
year 2006 above includes approximately $6.3 million related
to the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning
software system.
All of the above planned capital expenditures are in our USA
Fiber Cement segment.
We currently expect the level of our capital expenditures to
continue to be substantial. Competitive pressures and market
developments could require increased capital expenditures. Our
financing for these capital expenditures is expected to come
from our cash from our future operations and from external debt
to the extent that cash from operations does not cover our
capital expenditures.
On May 30, 2003, we sold our New Zealand Building Systems
business to a third party. We recorded a gain of
$1.9 million representing the excess of net proceeds from
the sale of $6.7 million over the net book value of assets
sold of $4.8 million. The proceeds from the sale comprised
cash of $5.0 million and a note receivable in the amount of
$1.7 million. As of March 2005, the $1.7 million note
receivable had been collected in full.
On March 12, 2002, we signed an agreement to sell our
Gypsum operations to BPB U.S. Holdings, Inc. (BPB
U.S.) for cash proceeds of $345.0 million less
selling costs of $10.6 million. The sale was completed on
April 25, 2002. We recorded a pre-tax gain of
$81.4 million representing the excess of net proceeds from
the sale of $334.4 million over the net book value of
assets sold of $253.0 million. The sale resulted in income
tax expense of $26.1 million. The net assets of our Gypsum
business prior to the sale primarily consisted of trade
receivables, inventory, accounts payable, mineral reserves,
property, plant and equipment, goodwill and deferred taxes.
Prior to the sale of our Gypsum operations in April 2002, we
owned and operated three gypsum wallboard-manufacturing
facilities in the United States.
33
Part of our former Gypsum business included three gypsum rock
mines. One mine was located in an area covering parts of
Northwest Arizona, Utah and Nevada. The other two mines were
located in Las Vegas, Nevada and Nashville, Arkansas. In June
2001, we entered into an agreement to sell our Las Vegas mine to
a developer for $50.0 million. On March 21, 2003, we
completed the sale of our gypsum mine in Las Vegas and recorded
a pre-tax gain of $49.2 million representing the excess of
net proceeds from the sale of $48.4 million less the cost
of assets sold of $0.7 million and the assumption of
$1.5 million in liabilities by the buyer. The sale resulted
in an income tax expense of $19.2 million. The proceeds
from the sale comprised cash of $50.6 million less selling
costs of $2.2 million. The other two gypsum rock mines were
included with the sale of our Gypsum operations to BPB U.S.
Under the terms of the sale agreement with BPB U.S., we agreed
to customary indemnification obligations related to our
representations and warranties in the agreement. Our
indemnification obligation generally extends for two years from
the closing date of April 25, 2002 and arises only if
claims exceed $5 million in the aggregate and is limited to
$100 million in the aggregate. This obligation expired
April 25, 2004. In addition, we agreed to indemnify BPB
U.S. for any future liabilities arising from asbestos-related
injuries to persons or property arising from our former Gypsum
business. Although we are not aware of any asbestos-related
claims arising from the Gypsum business nor circumstances that
would give rise to such claims, under the sale agreement, our
obligation to indemnify the purchaser for liabilities arising
from asbestos-related injuries arises only if such claims exceed
$5 million in the aggregate, is limited to
$250 million in the aggregate and will continue for
30 years after the closing date of our Gypsum business.
Pursuant to the terms of our agreement to sell our Gypsum
business, we also retained responsibility for any losses
incurred by BPB U.S. resulting from environmental conditions at
the Duwamish River in the State of Washington so long as notice
of a claim is given within 10 years of closing. Our
indemnification obligations in this regard are subject to a
$34.5 million limitation. The Seattle gypsum facility had
previously been included on the Confirmed and Suspected
Contaminate Sites Report released in 1987 due to the
presence of metals in the groundwater. Because we believe the
metals found emanated from an offsite source, we do not believe
we are liable for, and have not been requested to conduct, any
investigation or remediation relating to the metals in the
groundwater.
During the year ended March 31, 2003, we recorded a loss of
$1.3 million relating to our Building Services business,
which was disposed of in November 1996. The loss consisted of
expenses of $0.8 million and a $0.5 million write-down
of an outstanding receivable that was retained as part of the
sale.
On March 31, 2003, we transferred control of ABN 60 to
a newly established company named ABN 60 Foundation.
ABN 60 Foundation was established to be the sole
shareholder of ABN 60 and to ensure ABN 60 meets its
payment obligations to the Foundation. Following the
establishment of the ABN 60 Foundation, JHI NV no
longer owns any shares of ABN 60. ABN 60 Foundation is
managed by independent directors and operates entirely
independently of us. We do not control the activities of
ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation in any way. Other than as
described in Legal Proceedings, we have no economic
interest in ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation and have no
right to dividends or capital distributions from those entities.
Apart from the express indemnity for non-asbestos matters
provided to ABN 60 and a possible arrangement to fund some
or all future claimants for asbestos-related injuries caused by
former James Hardie Group subsidiary companies and to the
potential liabilities more fully described in Legal
Proceedings, we do not believe we will have any liability
under current Australian law should future liabilities of
ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation exceed the funds available
to those entities. As a result of the change in ownership of
ABN 60 on March 31, 2003, we recorded a loss on
disposal of $0.4 million, representing the liabilities of
ABN 60 (to the Foundation) of A$94.6 million
($57.2 million), the A$94.5 million
($57.1 million) in cash held on the balance sheet, and
costs associated with the establishment and funding of the
ABN 60 Foundation. Also see Legal Proceedings
and Notes 13 and 15 to our consolidated financial
statements included in Item 18.
34
JHI NV has agreed to indemnify ABN 60 Foundation for any
non asbestos-related legal claims made against ABN 60.
There is no maximum amount of the indemnity and the term of the
indemnity is in perpetuity. The Company believes that the
likelihood of any material non asbestos-related claims occurring
against ABN 60 is remote. As such, the Company has not
recorded a liability for the indemnity. The Company has not
pledged any assets as collateral for such indemnity.
In connection with the separation of Amaca, Amaba and
ABN 60 from the James Hardie Group, those entities agreed
to indemnify JHI NV and its related corporate entities for past
and future asbestos-related liabilities. Amaca, Amaba and
ABN 60s obligation to indemnify JHI NV and its
related entities includes claims that may arise associated with
the manufacturing activities of those companies.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Over the past several years, we have built significant
production capacity in the United States in an effort to ensure
that we will be able to meet expected increases in demand for
our products and improve our operating efficiencies. As part of
our facilities investment strategy, we have constructed a plant
for flat sheet and trim products in Illinois and upgraded and
expanded our existing plants in Illinois, Texas, California and
Pennsylvania. In addition, we entered into a long-term lease
arrangement in fiscal year 2001 for our Waxahachie, Texas plant
and upgraded the existing first line, replaced the existing
second line and completed construction on a new panel production
line at this fiber cement plant in fiscal years 2001, 2002 and
2004, respectively. In fiscal year 2002, we also acquired the
operating assets of Cemplank, Inc., which included a fiber
cement plant at Blandon, Pennsylvania and a fiber cement plant
at Summerville, South Carolina, and, in fiscal year 2003, we
purchased the property on which these plants are located. In
fiscal year 2004, we completed upgrades to our Blandon,
Pennsylvania plant. In addition, we started construction on our
new green-field plant in Reno, Nevada and our new trim line at
our Peru, Illinois plant, and completed our pilot roofing plant
in Fontana, California. In fiscal year 2005, we completed our
ninth plant in Reno, Nevada and began pre-production at our new
trim line in Peru, Illinois. In addition, in March 2005 we began
building our tenth USA Fiber Cement manufacturing plant in
Pulaski, Virginia.
Over the last five years we have spent an aggregate of
approximately $219.5 million on construction and upgrades
of our plants in the United States. Our management estimates
that our nine manufacturing plants are among the largest and
lowest cost fiber cement manufacturing plants in the United
States. In addition, our tenth manufacturing plant in Pulaski,
Virginia will be our largest fiber cement manufacturing plant in
the world once completed. Our management also believes that the
location of our plants in California, Texas, Florida, Illinois,
Washington, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Nevada and Virginia
positions us near high growth markets in the United States while
minimizing our transportation costs for product distribution and
raw material sourcing.
In fiscal year 2002, we closed our fiber cement plant in Western
Australia and have been meeting demand from our remaining
facilities. The remaining plants in Australia have also been
upgraded over recent years to improve output and productivity.
In fiscal year 2004, A$3.2 million ($2.2 million) was
spent to upgrade the fiber cement manufacturing plant at
Rosehill in Sydney. In addition, we spent A$2.6
($1.8 million) in fiscal year 2004 at our Brisbane plant to
install a coating facility. We believe that the facility has
added value to our basic product range. In New Zealand, our
fiber cement production line was upgraded in fiscal year 2001 at
a cost of NZ$1 million ($1 million). The upgrades have
enabled this plant to produce new siding and internal lining
fiber cement products. In the Philippines, we have one fiber
cement manufacturing plant, which began producing marketable
product in fiscal year 1999.
In March 2001, our fiber reinforced concrete pipe plant at Plant
City, Florida commenced operations. Built at a total cost of
$33.7 million, the plant produces drainage pipes and has an
annual production capacity of 100,000 tons.
In December 2000, we purchased and significantly upgraded a
plant in Santiago, Chile and the production of our products
there commenced in March 2001.
35
Our manufacturing plants use significant amounts of water which,
after internal recycling and reuse, are eventually discharged to
publicly owned treatment works (with the exception of our
Blandon, Pennsylvania facility which maintains a closed loop
system). The discharge of process water is monitored by us, as
well as regulators. In the past, from time to time, we have
received reports of discharges in excess of our permit limits.
In each case, we have addressed the concerns raised in those
notices. During fiscal year 2005, we did not incur any material
costs with respect to reports of discharges in excess of our
permit limits.
We manufacture fiber cement products in the United States,
Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines and Chile. The location
of each of our fiber cement plants and the annual design
capacity for such plants are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing | |
|
Committed | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Annual | |
|
Additional | |
|
Planned | |
|
|
Design | |
|
Design | |
|
Design | |
Location |
|
Capacity(1) | |
|
Capacity(1) | |
|
Capacity(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiber Cement Flat Sheet (in million square feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fontana, California
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
Plant City, Florida
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
Cleburne, Texas
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
Tacoma, Washington
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
Peru, Illinois
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
Waxahachie, Texas
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
Blandon, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
Summerville, South Carolina
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
Reno, Nevada
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
Pulaski, Virginia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United States
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sydney, New South Wales(2)
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
Brisbane, Queensland (Carole Park)(2)(3)
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Australia
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auckland(2)
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
The Philippines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manila
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santiago
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiber Cement Flat Sheet
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pipes (in tons)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant City, Florida (pipes)
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
Brisbane, Queensland (Meeandah)(2)(3)
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pipes
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Annual design capacity is based on managements historical
experience with our production process and is calculated
assuming continuous operation, 24 hours per day, seven days
per week, producing 5/16 thickness siding at a target
operating speed. Plants outside the United States produce a
range of thicker |
36
|
|
|
products, which negatively affect their outputs. Actual
production is affected by factors such as product mix, batch
size, plant availability and production speeds and is usually
less than annual design capacity. |
|
(2) |
Prior to March 2004, the land and buildings on which these
facilities are located was leased on a long-term basis from
Amaca Pty Limited. In March 2004, various subsidiaries of
Multiplex Property Trust (together, Multiplex), an
unrelated third party, acquired the land and buildings related
to these four fiber cement manufacturing facilities from Amaca. |
|
(3) |
There are two manufacturing plants in Brisbane. Carole Park
produces only flat sheets and Meeandah produces only pipes and
columns. |
|
(4) |
Pipe and column capacity is measured in tons rather than million
square feet. |
While the same basic process is used to manufacture fiber cement
products at each facility, plants are designed to produce the
appropriate mix of products to meet each markets specific,
projected needs. All of our manufacturing facilities have been
either newly constructed or substantially modernized and
upgraded in the past five years. The facilities were constructed
so production can be efficiently adjusted in response to
increased consumer demand by increasing production capacity
utilization, enhancing the economies of scale or adding
additional lines to existing facilities, or making corresponding
reductions in production capacity in response to weaker demand.
Except for the Waxahachie, Texas plant, we own all of our fiber
cement sites and plants located in the United States. The lease
for the Waxahachie, Texas site and plant expires on
March 31, 2020, at which time we have an option to purchase
the plant. Pursuant to the lease, we make quarterly base rental
payments of $850,000. In 1998, we entered into lease agreements
with a former subsidiary now owned by the Foundation for all of
our fiber cement sites located in Australia. In March 2004,
Multiplex acquired the land and buildings related to the four
fiber cement manufacturing facilities from the Foundation. Prior
to that acquisition, we renegotiated the four leases with
Multiplex. Upon completion of the acquisition and subsequent
transfer of title to Multiplex, Multiplex assumed the
responsibility of landlord under each of the amended leases. In
addition, in March 2004, Multiplex also acquired our New Zealand
land and buildings and we now make lease payments to Multiplex
related to this site. We own our fiber cement plant located in
Chile and our Pipe plant in the United States. In addition, we
own 40% of our fiber cement plant located in the Philippines.
For fiscal year 2005, average capacity utilization for our fiber
cement plants by country was approximately as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
Country |
|
Utilization(1) | |
|
|
| |
United States
|
|
|
91% |
|
Australia
|
|
|
54% |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
54% |
|
Philippines
|
|
|
83% |
|
Chile
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Capacity utilization is based on design capacity. Design
capacity is based on managements estimates, as described
above. No accepted industry standard exists for the calculation
of fiber cement manufacturing facility capacities. |
The capital cost per unit of production for new plants has
significantly declined since we opened our first U.S. plant
in Fontana, California in 1989. This improvement is largely
attributable to our utilization of proprietary technology.
Management believes that our capital cost per unit of capacity
is substantially lower than that of many of our
competitors plants. In addition, we can now build and
commission new manufacturing plants significantly faster than
when we built our first production line in the United States.
Management believes that the speed and cost at which we can
construct new plants relative to our competitors enable us to
respond rapidly to emerging regional demand for fiber cement
products and to gain the advantage accorded to the first local
producer in a market.
37
We own a quartz mine in Fontana, California and lease a quartz
mine in Tacoma, Washington. Our five-year lease for the mine in
Tacoma, Washington expires on February 28, 2006, at which
time we have the option to renew our lease for an additional
four years. We pay production royalties to the owner based on
silica tonnage removed from the mine. Because other cost
effective sources of sand are not available at these locations,
we operate these quartz mines and process the rock to obtain
silica for our fiber cement products.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved from time to time in various legal
proceedings and administrative actions incidental or related to
the normal conduct of business. Although it is impossible to
predict the outcome of any pending legal proceeding, our
management believes that such proceedings and actions in the
normal conduct of business should not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a material adverse effect on either our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
See section below entitled Claims Against Former and
Current Subsidiaries for information regarding
asbestos-related matters.
|
|
|
Claims Against Former and Current Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Amaca Pty Ltd, Amaba Pty Ltd and ABN 60 |
In February 2001, ABN 60, formerly known as JHIL,
established the Foundation by gifting A$3.0 million
($1.7 million) in cash and transferring ownership of Amaca
and Amaba to the Foundation. The Foundation is a special purpose
charitable foundation established to fund medical and scientific
research into asbestos-related diseases. Amaca and Amaba were
Australian companies which had manufactured and marketed
asbestos-related products prior to 1987.
The Foundation is managed by independent trustees and operates
entirely independently of the Company and its current
subsidiaries. The Company does not control (directly or
indirectly) the activities of the Foundation in any way and,
effective from February 16, 2001, has not owned or
controlled (directly or indirectly) the activities of Amaca or
Amaba. In particular, the trustees of the Foundation are
responsible for the effective management of claims against Amaca
and Amaba, and for the investment of Amacas and
Amabas assets. Other than the offers to provide interim
funding to the Foundation and the indemnity to the directors of
ABN 60 as described below, the Company has no legally
binding commitment to or interest in the Foundation, Amaca or
Amaba, and it has no right to dividends or capital distributions
made by the Foundation.
On March 31, 2003, the Company transferred control of
ABN 60 to a newly established company named ABN 60
Foundation. ABN 60 Foundation was established to be the
sole shareholder of ABN 60 and to ensure that ABN 60
meets payment obligations to the Foundation owed under the terms
of a deed of covenant and indemnity described below. Following
the establishment of the ABN 60 Foundation, the Company no
longer owned any shares in ABN 60. ABN 60 Foundation
is managed by independent directors and operates entirely
independently of the Company. The Company does not control the
activities of ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation in any way,
it has no economic interest in ABN 60 or ABN 60
Foundation, and it has no right to dividends or capital
distributions made by the ABN 60 Foundation.
Up to the date of the establishment of the Foundation, Amaca and
Amaba incurred costs of asbestos-related litigation and
settlements. From time to time, ABN 60 was joined as a
party to asbestos suits which were primarily directed at Amaca
and Amaba. Because Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60 are no longer a
part of the Company, and all relevant claims against ABN 60
had been successfully defended, no provision for
asbestos-related claims was established in the Companys
consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2005 and
2004.
It is possible that the Company could become subject to suits
for damages for personal injury or death in connection with the
former manufacture or sale of asbestos products that are or may
be filed against Amaca,
38
Amaba or ABN 60. However, as described further below, the
ability of any claimants to initiate or pursue such suits may be
restricted or removed by legislation contemplated under the
Heads of Agreement, also described further below. Although it is
difficult to predict the incidence or outcome of future
litigation and thus no assurances can be given, the Company
believes that, in the absence of governmental action introducing
legislation or a change in jurisprudence as previously adopted
in prior case law before the NSW Supreme Court and Federal High
Court, as more fully described below, the risk that such suits
could be successfully asserted against the Company is not
probable and estimable at this time. This belief is based in
part on the following factors given the transfers of Amaca and
Amaba to the Foundation and of ABN 60 to the ABN 60
Foundation: none of those companies are part of the Company; the
separateness of corporate entities under Australian law; the
limited circumstances where piercing the corporate
veil might occur under Australian and Dutch law; there is
no equivalent under Australian common law of the U.S. legal
doctrine of successor liability; and JHI NV has been
advised that the principle applicable under Dutch law, to the
effect that transferees of assets may be held liable for the
transferors liabilities when they acquire assets at a
price that leaves the transferor with insufficient assets to
meet claims, is not triggered by those transfers of Amaca, Amaba
and ABN 60 or the restructure of the Company in 2001 or
previous group transactions. The courts in Australia have
generally refused to hold parent entities responsible for the
liabilities of their subsidiaries absent any finding of fraud,
agency, direct operational responsibility or the like. However,
if suits are made possible and/or successfully brought, they
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, results of operations or financial condition.
In New Zealand, where RCI Holdings Pty Ltd holds a subsidiary
that formerly manufactured asbestos-containing products, there
is current legislation entitled the Accident Insurance Act
1998 which bars claims for compensatory damages arising
from work-related asbestos exposure. Although claims in New
Zealand for non work-related injury might still be alleged, and
although it is possible that a claimant for work-related
asbestos exposure could still seek non-compensatory damages, we
believe that any such claims would not have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company was not a
party to any material asbestos litigation and did not make any
settlement payments in relation to such litigation.
Under U.S. laws, the doctrine of successor
liability provides that an acquiror of the assets of a
business carried on by a corporation can, in certain states and
under certain circumstances, be held responsible for liabilities
arising from the conduct of that business prior to the
acquisition, notwithstanding the absence of any contractual
arrangement between the acquiror and the selling corporation
pursuant to which the acquiror agreed to assume such liabilities.
The general principle under Australian law is that, in the
absence of a contractual agreement to transfer specified
liabilities of a business, and where there is no fraudulent
conduct, the liabilities remain with the corporation that
previously carried on the business and are not passed on to the
acquiror of assets. Prior to March 2004, we leased manufacturing
sites from Amaca, a former subsidiary that is now owned and
controlled by the Foundation. In addition, we purchased certain
plant and equipment and inventory from Amaca in connection with
the first phase of our restructuring at fair value. Each of
these transactions involved only Australian companies and,
accordingly, we believe the transactions are governed by
Australian laws and not the laws of any other jurisdiction. We
do not believe these transactions should give rise to the
assumption by the Company of any asbestos-related liabilities
(tortious or otherwise) under Australian law that may have been
incurred during the period prior to the transfer of the assets.
Under Dutch law, a Dutch transferee of assets may be held
responsible for the liabilities of the transferor following a
transfer of such assets if the transfer results in the
transferor having insufficient assets to meet the claims of its
creditors or if the transfer will otherwise jeopardize the
position of the creditors of the transferor. We believe the
transfer by ABN 60 of all of the shares of JHNV to JHI NV
in the 2001 Restructuring will not result in the Company being
held responsible as transferee under this rule because, upon the
transfer and the implementation of the other aspects of the 2001
Restructuring, ABN 60 had the same financial resources to
meet the claims of its creditors as it had prior to the transfer.
39
|
|
|
Special Commission of Inquiry |
On October 29, 2003, the Foundation issued a press release
stating that its most recent actuarial analysis estimates
that the compensation bill for the organization could reach one
billion Australian dollars in addition to those funds already
paid out to claimants since the Foundation was formed and that
existing funding could be exhausted within five years. In
February 2004, the NSW Government established the SCI to
investigate, among other matters described below, the
circumstances in which the Foundation was established. The SCI
was instructed to determine the current financial position of
the Foundation and whether it is likely to meet its future
asbestos-related claims in the medium to long-term. It was also
instructed to report on the circumstances in which the
Foundation was separated from ABN 60 and whether this may
have resulted in or contributed to a possible insufficiency of
assets to meet future asbestos-related liabilities, and the
circumstances in which any corporate restructure or asset
transfers occurred within or in relation to the James Hardie
Group prior to the funding of the Foundation to the extent that
this may have affected the Foundations ability to meet its
current and future liabilities. The SCI was also instructed to
report on the adequacy of current arrangements available to the
Foundation under the Corporations Act of Australia to assist the
Foundation in managing its liabilities and whether reform is
desirable in order to assist the Foundation in managing its
obligations to current and future claimants.
On July 14, 2004, following the receipt of a new actuarial
estimate of asbestos liabilities of the Foundation by KPMG
Actuaries, the Company lodged a submission with the SCI stating
that the Company would recommend to its shareholders that they
approve the provision of an unspecified amount of additional
funding to enable an effective statute-based scheme to
compensate all future claimants for asbestos-related injuries
for which Amaca and Amaba are liable. The Company proposed that
the statutory scheme include the following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
speedy, fair and equitable compensation for all existing and
future claimants, including objective criteria to reduce
superimposed (judicial) inflation. Superimposed inflation
is inflation in claim awards above the underlying rate of
inflation and is sometimes called judicial inflation; |
|
|
|
contributions to be made in a manner which provide certainty to
claimants as to their entitlement, the scheme administrator as
to the amount available for distribution, and the proposed
contributors (including the Company) as to the ultimate amount
of their contributions; |
|
|
|
significant reductions in legal costs through reduced and more
abbreviated litigation; and |
|
|
|
limitation of legal avenues outside of the scheme. |
The submission stated that the proposal was made without any
admission of liability or prejudice to the Companys rights
or defenses.
The SCI finished taking evidence on August 13, 2004 and
issued its report on September 21, 2004. The SCI indicated
that the establishment of the Foundation and the establishment
of the ABN 60 Foundation were legally effective, that any
liabilities in relation to the asbestos claims for claimants
remained with Amaca, Amaba or ABN 60 (as the case may be), and
that no significant liabilities for those claims could likely be
assessed directly against the Company.
The following is a summary of the principal findings of the SCI
based on the SCIs report and other information available
to us. This summary does not contain all of the findings
contained or observations made in the SCI report. Please see our
website for a link to the SCIs report. It should be noted
that the SCI is not a court and, therefore, its findings have no
legal force.
Principal Findings in Favor of the Company
The principal findings in favor of the Company were that:
|
|
|
|
|
the establishment of the Foundation was legally effective and
causes of action which the Foundation, Amaba or Amaca might have
against the James Hardie Group, its officers and advisers would
be unlikely to result in any significant increase in the funds
of Amaba, Amaca or the Foundation (putting |
40
|
|
|
|
|
this finding conversely, the Company is unlikely to face any
significant liability to the Foundation, Amaba or Amaba as a
result of the then current causes of action of such entities
against the current members of the James Hardie Group); |
|
|
|
there was no finding that JHI NV had committed any material
breach of any law as a result of the separation and
reorganization transactions which took place in 2001; |
|
|
|
many of the allegations and causes of action put forward by
lawyers for the Foundation, Amaba and Amaca were described as
speculative; and |
|
|
|
the SCI rejected the suggestion that JHI NV had breached
any law or was part of a conspiracy in relation to the fact that
the reorganization scheme documents prepared in 2001 did not
refer to the possibility of the partly-paid shares being
cancelled (whereas they in fact were cancelled in 2003). |
Other Principal Findings Relevant to the Company
The other principal findings relevant to the Company were that:
|
|
|
|
|
as a practical (but not legal) matter, if the right
amount (and not merely the minimum amount) of funding was not
provided to the Foundation, the Company would face potential
legislative, customer, union and public action to apply
legislative and boycott measures and public pressure to ensure
that the Company met any significant funding shortfall; and |
|
|
|
the directors of ABN 60 at the time of the cancellation of the
partly-paid shares (Messrs. Morley and Salter) effectively
followed the instructions of JHI NV in relation to the
cancellation. As a result, it might be concluded that
JHI NV was a shadow director of ABN 60 at that time.
However, while expressing some reservations about what occurred,
the SCI did not find that the ABN 60 directors (including
JHI NV as a shadow director) breached their duty in
undertaking the cancellation. |
Principal Findings Against ABN 60 (formerly called JHIL)
A number of further findings (positive and adverse) were also
made in relation to ABN 60, which is not a current member of the
James Hardie Group. Such findings were not directed against the
Company. For the reasons provided above in this section
Legal Proceedings, we do not believe that the
Company will have any liability under current Australian law if
future liabilities of ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation
exceed the funds available to those entities. This includes
liabilities that may attach to ABN 60 or ABN 60
Foundation as a result of claims made, if successful, in
connection with the transactions involved in the establishment
of the ABN 60 Foundation and the separation of ABN 60
from the Company.
The SCI found that, given ABN 60s limited financial
resources, ABN 60 would need to be able to succeed in
making a claim of some kind against JHI NV in respect of
the cancellation of the partly-paid shares before claims by
Amaba or Amaca against ABN 60 had any practical value.
Although expressing reservations about what occurred, the SCI
did not find that the directors of ABN 60 had breached
their duty in canceling the partly-paid shares.
The SCI did not make any finding that any cause of action by
ABN 60 with respect to the partly-paid shares was likely to
succeed.
Principal Findings Against Mr. Macdonald and
Mr. Shafron
The principal (but non-determinative) findings against
Messrs. Macdonald and Shafron pertained to their conduct
while officers of ABN 60 in relation to:
|
|
|
|
|
alleged false and misleading conduct associated with a
February 16, 2001 press release, particularly regarding a
statement that the Foundation was fully funded in
contravention of New South Wales and Commonwealth legislation
prohibiting false or misleading conduct; |
41
|
|
|
|
|
allegedly breaching their duties as officers of ABN 60 by
encouraging the board of directors of ABN 60 to act on the
Trowbridge report, dated February 13, 2001 (the
Trowbridge Report), in forming a view that the
Foundation would be fully funded; and |
|
|
|
criticisms, falling short of findings of contraventions of law,
based on their respective roles in the separation and
reorganization transactions. These included criticisms relating
to their development, control over, reliance on and use of the
Trowbridge Report, despite (in the SCIs view) their
knowledge of its limitations. |
The Commissioner noted that he had not carried out an exhaustive
investigation and concluded that it was a matter for
Commonwealth authorities (notably ASIC) to determine whether any
further action should be taken in relation to matters which the
Commissioner considered, comprised or might be likely to have
comprised contraventions of Australian corporations law. The
Commissioner acknowledged that in relation to various of his
findings, there was an issue as to whether Amaba or Amaca
suffered any loss or damage from the actions reviewed by him but
in this regard he did not find it necessary to reach any
definitive conclusion.
In relation to the question of the funding of the Foundation,
the SCI found that there was a significant funding shortfall. In
part, this was based on actuarial work commissioned by the
Company indicating that the discounted value of the central
estimate of the asbestos liabilities of Amaca and Amaba was
approximately A$1.573 billion as of June 30, 2003. The
central estimate was calculated in accordance with Australian
Actuarial Standards, which differ from generally accepted
accounting practices in the United States. As of June 30,
2003, the undiscounted value of the central estimate of the
asbestos liabilities of Amaca and Amaba, as determined by KPMG
Actuaries, was approximately A$3.403 billion
($2.272 billion). The SCI found that the net assets of the
Foundation and the ABN 60 Foundation were not sufficient to meet
these prospective liabilities and were likely to be exhausted in
the first half of 2007.
In relation to the Companys statutory scheme proposal, the
SCI reported that there were several issues that needed to be
refined quite significantly but that it would be an appropriate
starting point for devising a compensation scheme.
The SCIs findings are not binding and if the issues were
presented to a court, it might come to different conclusions on
one or more of the issues.
The NSW Government stated that it would not consider assisting
the implementation of any proposal advanced by the Company
unless it was the result of an agreement reached with the unions
acting through the Representatives. The statutory scheme that
the Company proposed on July 14, 2004 was not accepted by
the Representatives.
The Company believes that, except to the extent that it agrees
otherwise as a result of these discussions with the NSW
Government, as discussed below under the subheading
Interim Funding and ABN 60 Indemnity, under
current Australian law, it is not legally liable for any
shortfall in the assets of Amaca, Amaba, the Foundation, the
ABN 60 Foundation or ABN 60.
It is also possible that the Representatives and others may
encourage or continue to encourage consumers and union members
in Australia and elsewhere to ban or boycott the Companys
products, to demonstrate or otherwise create negative publicity
toward the Company in order to influence the Companys
approach to the discussions with the NSW Government or to
encourage governmental action if the discussions are
unsuccessful. The Representatives and others might also take
such actions in an effort to influence the Companys
shareholders, a significant number of which are located in
Australia, to approve any proposed arrangement. Any such
measures, and the influences resulting from them, could have a
material adverse impact on the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
On October 28, 2004, the NSW Premier announced that the NSW
Government would seek the agreement of the Ministerial Council,
comprising Ministers of the Commonwealth and the Australian
States and Territories, to allow the NSW Government to pass
legislation which he announced would wind back James
Hardies corporate restructure and rescind the cancellation
of A$1.9 billion in partly paid shares. The
announcement said that the laws will effectively enforce
the liability [for asbestos-related claims] against the
42
Dutch parent company. On November 5, 2004, the
Australian Attorney-General and the Parliamentary Secretary to
the Treasurer (the two relevant ministers of the Australian
Federal Government) issued a news release stating that the
Ministerial Council for Corporations (the relevant body of
Federal, State and Territory Ministers, MINCO) had
unanimously agreed to support a negotiated settlement that
will ensure that victims of asbestos-related diseases receive
full and timely compensation from James Hardie and if
the current negotiations between James Hardie, the ACTU
and asbestos victims do not reach an acceptable conclusion,
MINCO also agreed in principle to consider options for
legislative reform. The news release of November 5,
2004 indicated that treaties to enforce Australian judgments in
Dutch and U.S. courts are not required, but that the
Australian Government has been involved in communications with
Dutch and U.S. authorities regarding arrangements to ensure
that Australian judgments are able to be enforced where
necessary. If negotiations do not lead to an acceptable
conclusion, the Company is aware of suggestions of legislative
intervention, but has no detailed information as to the content
of any such legislation.
On December 21, 2004, the Company announced that it had
entered into a non-binding Heads of Agreement with the NSW
Government and the Representatives which is expected to form the
basis of the Principal Agreement to establish and fund the SPF
to provide funding on Claims against the Liable Entities.
The principles set out in the Heads of Agreement include:
|
|
|
|
|
the establishment of the SPF to compensate asbestos claimants; |
|
|
|
initial funding of the SPF by the Company on the basis of a
November 2004 KPMG report (which provided a net present value
central estimate of A$1.536 billion ($1.03 billion)
for all present and future claims at June 30, 2004). The
undiscounted value of the central estimate of the asbestos
liabilities of Amaca and Amaba as determined by KPMG was
approximately A$3.586 billion ($2.471 billion). At
December 21, 2004, the initial funding for the first three
years was expected to be A$239 million (based on
KPMGs estimate of liabilities as of June 30, 2004)
less the assets to be contributed by the Foundation which were
expected to be approximately A$125 million. The actuarial
assessment is to be updated annually; |
|
|
|
a two-year rolling cash buffer in the SPF and an annual
contribution in advance based on actuarial assessments of
expected claims for the next three years, to be revised annually; |
|
|
|
a cap on the annual payments made by the Company to the SPF,
initially set at 35% of annual net operating cash flow (defined
as cash from operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP) for
the immediately preceding year, with provisions for the
percentage to decline over time depending upon the
Companys financial performance and claims outlook; and |
|
|
|
no cap on individual payments to asbestos claimants. |
The Heads of Agreement contains an agreement from the NSW
Government to provide releases to the James Hardie Group and to
its present and past directors, officers, employees and advisers
from all civil liabilities (if any) incurred prior to the date
of the Principal Agreement in relation to the events and
transactions examined by the SCI. These releases will take the
form of legislation to be passed by the NSW Parliament and other
state and territory parliaments in Australia (and the
Commonwealth Parliament) will be approached by the Company and
the NSW Government to pass similar legislation.
The NSW Government conducted a review of legal and
administrative costs in dust diseases compensation in New South
Wales. The purpose of this review was primarily to determine
ways to reduce legal and administrative costs, and to consider
the current processes for handling and resolving dust diseases
compensation claims in New South Wales. The NSW Government
announced its findings on March 8, 2005. Legislation was
passed in the NSW Lower House (Legislative Assembly) on
May 24, 2005 and the Upper House (Legislative Council) on
May 25, 2005. The bill became an act on May 26, 2005.
The commencement date of the legislation will be July 1,
2005.
43
As part of the discussions surrounding the Principal Agreement,
the Company has been progressing with the NSW Government
relevant options in relation to the establishment of the SPF
referenced above.
Once executed, the Principal Agreement will be a legally binding
agreement. The implementation of the Principal Agreement will be
subject to a number of conditions precedent, including the
delivery of an independent experts report, the Company
being satisfied as to the certainty of the tax deductibility of
proposed asbestos compensation payments, and the approval by the
Companys board of directors, shareholders and lenders.
The parties have announced a timetable for negotiations which
envisages the signing of the Principal Agreement, depending on
the timing of the resolution of certain matters, in late
July/early August 2005 and the shareholder meeting to consider
the voluntary funding proposal being held in late
September/early October 2005.
If negotiation of the Principal Agreement are completed and the
Principal Agreement is subsequently executed and becomes
effective, the Company may be required to make a substantial
provision in its financial statements and it is possible that
the Company may need to seek additional borrowing facilities. If
the terms of the Principal Agreement involve the Company making
payments, either on an annual or other basis, the Companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected and its ability to pay
dividends could be impaired. See Item 4, Information
on the Company Legal Proceedings.
|
|
|
Updated Actuarial Study; Claims Estimate |
The Company commissioned updated actuarial studies of potential
asbestos-related liabilities as of June 30, 2004 and
March 31, 2005. Based on the results of these studies, it
is estimated that the discounted value of the central estimate
for claims against the Liable Entities was approximately
A$1.536 billion ($1.059 billion) and
A$1.685 billion ($1.302 billion) as of June 30,
2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively. The undiscounted
value of the central estimate of the asbestos liabilities of
Amaca and Amaba as determined by KPMG Actuaries was
approximately A$3.586 billion ($2.471 billion) and
A$3.604 billion ($2.784 billion) as of June 30,
2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively. Actual liabilities
of those companies for such claims could vary, perhaps
materially, from the central estimate described above. This
central estimate is calculated in accordance with Australian
Actuarial Standards, which differ from generally accepted
accounting practices in the United States.
In estimating the potential financial exposure, the actuaries
made assumptions related to the total number of claims which
were reasonably estimated to be asserted through 2071, the
typical cost of settlement (which is sensitive to, among other
factors, the industry in which the plaintiff claims exposure,
the alleged disease type and the jurisdiction in which the
action is being brought), the legal costs incurred in the
litigation of such claims, the rate of receipt of claims, the
settlement strategy in dealing with outstanding claims and the
timing of settlements.
Further, the actuaries have relied on the data and information
provided by the Foundation and Amaca Claim Services and assumed
that it is accurate and complete in all material respects. The
actuaries have not verified that information independently nor
established the accuracy or completeness of the data and
information provided or used for the preparation of the report.
Due to inherent uncertainties in the legal and medical
environment, the number and timing of future claim notifications
and settlements, the recoverability of claims against insurance
contracts; and in estimating the future trends in average claim
awards as well as the extent to which the above-named entities
will contribute to the overall settlements, the actual liability
amount could differ materially from that currently projected.
A sensitivity analysis has been performed to determine how the
actuarial estimates would change if certain assumptions (i.e.,
the rate of inflation and superimposed inflation, the average
costs of claims and legal fees, and the projected numbers of
claims) were different than the assumptions used to determine
the central
44
estimates. This analysis shows that the discounted central
estimates could fall in a range of A$1.0 billion to
A$2.3 billion (undiscounted estimates of A$2.0 billion
to A$5.7 billion) and A$1.1 billion to
A$2.6 billion (undiscounted estimates of A$2.0 billion
to A$5.9 billion) as of June 30, 2004 and
March 31, 2005, respectively. It should be noted that the
actual cost of the liabilities could fall outside of that range
depending on the out-turn of actual experience relative to the
assumptions made.
The potential range of costs as estimated by KPMG Actuaries is
affected by a number of variables such as nil settlement rates
(where no settlement is payable by the Liable Entities as the
claim settlement is borne by other (non-Liable Entities)
asbestos defendants who are held liable), peak year of claims,
past history of claims numbers, average settlement rates, past
history of Australian asbestos-related medical injuries, current
number of claims, average defense and plaintiff legal costs,
base wage inflation and superimposed inflation. The potential
range of losses disclosed includes both asserted and unasserted
claims. While no assurances can be provided, if the Company
signs the Principal Agreement and it is approved by all of the
necessary parties, including the board of directors,
shareholders and lenders, the Company expects to be able to
partially recover losses from various insurance carriers. As of
March 31, 2005, KPMG Actuaries undiscounted central
estimate of asbestos-related liabilities was
A$3.604 billion. This undiscounted central estimate is net
of expected insurance recoveries of A$453.0 million after
making a general credit risk allowance for bad debt insurance
carriers and an allowance for A$49.8 million of by
claim or subrogation recoveries from other third parties.
Currently, the timing of any potential payments is uncertain
because the Company has not yet reached agreement with the NSW
Government and the conditions precedent to any agreement that
may be reached have not been satisfied. In addition, the Company
has not yet incurred any settlement costs because the Foundation
continues to meet all claims of the Liable Entities. The Company
is currently unable to estimate the expected cost of
administering and litigating the claims under the potential
agreement with the NSW Government because this is highly
contingent upon the final outcome of the NSW Governments
review of legal and administrative costs.
Accordingly, the Company has not established a provision for
asbestos-related liabilities as of March 31, 2005 because
at this time it is not probable and estimable in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
The following table, provided by KPMG Actuaries, shows the
number of claims pending as of March 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Australia
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown-Court Not Identified(1)
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
USA
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The Unknown Court Not Identified
designation reflects that the information for such claims had
not been, as of the date of publication, entered into the
database which the Foundation maintains. Over time, as the
details of unknown claims are provided to the
Foundation, the Company believes the database is updated to
reflect where such claims originate. Accordingly, the Company
understands the number of unknown claims pending fluctuates due
to the resolution of claims as well as the reclassification of
such claims. |
45
For the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the
following tables, provided by KPMG Actuaries, show the claims
filed, the number of claims dismissed, settled or otherwise
resolved for each period, and the average settlement amount per
claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
A$ |
157,594 |
|
|
A$ |
167,450 |
|
|
A$ |
204,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown Court Not Identified | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
A$ |
47,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$ |
37,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
A$ |
228,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table, provided by KPMG Actuaries, shows the
activity related to the numbers of open claims, new claims, and
closed claims during each of the past five years and the average
settlement per settled claim and case closed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of open claims at beginning of year
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Number of new claims
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Number of closed claims
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Number of open claims at year-end
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
Average settlement amount per settled claim
|
|
A$ |
157,223 |
|
|
A$ |
167,450 |
|
|
A$ |
201,200 |
|
|
A$ |
197,941 |
|
|
A$ |
179,629 |
|
Average settlement amount per case closed
|
|
A$ |
129,949 |
|
|
A$ |
117,327 |
|
|
A$ |
177,752 |
|
|
A$ |
125,435 |
|
|
A$ |
128,653 |
|
46
The Company has not had any responsibility or involvement in the
management of claims against ABN 60 since the time it left
the James Hardie Group in 2003. Since February 2001, when Amaca
and Amaba were separated from the James Hardie Group neither
JHI NV nor any current subsidiary of JHI NV has had
any responsibility or involvement in the management of claims
against those entities. Prior to that date, the principal entity
potentially involved in relation to such claims was ABN 60,
which has not been a member of the James Hardie Group since
March 2003.
On April 15, 2005, the Company announced that it had
extended the coverage of the funding arrangements agreed under
the Heads of Agreement to enable the SPF to settle or meet
proven Claims by members of the Baryugil community in Australia
against Asbestos Mines, a former ABN 60 subsidiary which
conducted asbestos-related mining activities in or around
Baryugil. The Company has no current right to access any Claims
information in relation to Claims against Asbestos Mines, and
has no current involvement in the management or settlement of
such Claims. The Companys proposal to provide additional
funding to the SPF will be based on actuarial assessments of the
estimated Claims against Asbestos Mines. The Companys
proposal is not limited as to the time period to which the
Claims arose.
The Companys offer to extend the funding arrangements of
the SPF to permit the SPF to meet proven asbestos-related Claims
from members of the Baryulgil community is proposed to be
implemented subject to the same or similar conditions applicable
to funding provided to the SPF for use in meeting proven claims
from Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60, including that information in
relation to the proven claims is provided to the Company.
Asbestos Mines has not been part of the James Hardie Group since
1976, when it was sold to Woodsreef Mines Ltd, which was
subsequently renamed Mineral Commodities Ltd. From 1954 until
1976, Asbestos Mines was a wholly owned subsidiary of James
Hardie Industries Limited (now ABN 60). Except as described
below, the Company has not had access to any information
regarding claims or the decisions taken by the Foundation in
relation to them.
On October 26, 2004, the Company, the Foundation and KPMG
Actuaries entered into an agreement under which the Company
would be entitled to obtain a copy of the actuarial report
prepared by KPMG Actuaries in relation to the claims liabilities
of the Foundation and Amaba and Amaca, and would be entitled to
publicly release the final version of such reports. The Company
is seeking to obtain similar rights of access to actuarial
information produced for the SPF by the actuary to be appointed
by the SPF (the Approved Actuary). The terms of such
access are not yet settled. The Companys future
disclosures with respect to claims statistics is subject to it
obtaining such information from the Approved Actuary. The
Company has had no general right (and will not obtain any right
under the Principal Agreement) to audit or otherwise itself
independently verify such information or the methodologies to be
adopted by the Approved Actuary. As a result of the above, the
Company cannot make any representations or warranties as to the
accuracy or completeness of the actuarial information disclosed
herein or disclosed in the future.
47
|
|
|
SCI and Other Related Expenses |
The Company has incurred substantial costs associated with the
SCI and may incur material costs in the future related to the
SCI or subsequent legal proceedings. The following are the
components of SCI and other related expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
SCI
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Internal investigation
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
ASIC investigation
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Severance and consulting
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Resolution advisory fees
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Funding advice and other
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SCI and other related expenses
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Internal investigation costs relate to an internal investigation
conducted by independent legal advisors to investigate the
impact on the financial statements of allegations raised during
the SCI and in order to assist in completion of the preparation
and filing of the Companys Form 20-F in the United
States for the year ended March 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Investigation |
ASIC has announced that it is conducting an investigation into
the events examined by the SCI, without limiting itself to the
evidence compiled by the SCI. ASIC has served notices to produce
relevant documents upon the Company, various directors and
officers of the Company and on certain of its advisers and
auditors at the time of the separation and restructure
transactions described above. ASIC has also served notices
requiring the production by the Company and ABN 60 of
certain computerized information and requiring certain current
and former directors of ABN 60 or the Company to present
themselves for examination by ASIC delegates. To date, ASIC has
announced that it is investigating various matters, but it has
not specified the particulars of alleged contraventions under
investigation, nor has it announced that it has reached any
conclusion that any person or entity has contravened any
relevant law.
To assist ASICs investigation, the Australian Federal
Government enacted legislation to abrogate the legal
professional privilege which would otherwise have attached to
certain documents relevant to matters under investigation or to
any future proceedings to be taken. The legislation is set out
in the James Hardie (Investigations and Proceedings) Act 2004.
The Company may incur liability to meet the costs of current or
former directors, officers or employees of the James Hardie
Group to the extent that those costs are covered by indemnity
arrangements granted by the Company to those persons. To date,
no claims have been received from any current or former officers
in relation to the ASIC investigation, except in relation to the
examination by a former director of ABN 60 by ASIC
delegates, the amount of which cannot be assessed at present. In
relation to this claim and any others that may arise, the
Company may be reimbursed in whole or in part under
directors and officers insurance policies maintained
by the Company.
On October 20, 2004, Mr. Peter Shafron resigned from
the Company and on October 21, 2004, Mr. Peter
Macdonald resigned from the Company. In connection with these
resignations, the Company incurred severance costs of
$8.9 million in the period ended March 31, 2005. These
costs comprised $6.0 million of additional expense and
$2.9 million of previously existing accruals.
48
|
|
|
Interim Funding and ABN 60 Indemnity |
The Company has undertaken a number of initiatives to seek to
ensure that payment of asbestos-related Claims by the Foundation
is not interrupted due to insolvency of Amaba or Amaca prior to
the expected timing of the Companys entry into the
Principal Agreement. The initiatives are described further
below. The Company believes that the Foundation is unlikely to
need to avail itself of the financial assistance which has been
offered by the Company, on the basis that on December 3,
2004 and in part as a result of the initiatives undertaken by
the Company, the Foundation received a payment of approximately
A$88.5 million from ABN 60 for use in processing and
meeting asbestos-related claims pursuant to the terms of a deed
of covenant and indemnity which ABN 60, Amaca and Amaba had
entered into in February 2001.
The Company facilitated the payment of such funds by granting an
indemnity (under a separate deed on indemnity) to the directors
of ABN 60, which it announced on November 16, 2004.
Under the terms of that indemnity, the Company agreed to meet
any liability incurred by the ABN 60 directors resulting
from the release of the A$88.5 million by ABN 60 to
the Foundation. The Company believes that the release of funding
by ABN 60 is in accordance with law and contracts in place
and therefore the Company should not incur liability under this
indemnity. The Company did not make any payments in relation to
this indemnity during the year ended March 31, 2005.
Additionally, on November 16, 2004, the Company offered to
provide funding to the Foundation on an interim basis for a
period of up to six months from that date. Such funding would
only be provided once existing Foundation funds have been
exhausted. The Company believes, based on actuarial and legal
advice, that claims against the Foundation should not exceed the
funds which are available to the Foundation (particularly in the
light of its receipt of the A$88.5 million described above)
or which are expected to become available to the Foundation
during the period of the interim funding proposal.
On March 31, 2005, the Company renewed its commitment to
assist the Foundation to provide interim funding, if necessary,
prior to the Principal Agreement being finalized in accordance
with the updated timetable announced at that date and described
above.
The Company has not recorded a provision for either the proposed
indemnity or the potential payments under the interim funding
proposal. The Company has not made any payments in relation to
this offer.
With regard to the ABN 60 indemnity, there is no maximum
value or limit on the amount of payments that may be required.
As such, the Company is unable to disclose a maximum amount that
could be required to be paid. The Company believes, however,
that the expected value of any potential future payments
resulting from the ABN 60 indemnity is zero and that the
likelihood of any payment being required under this indemnity is
remote.
|
|
|
Financial Position of the Foundation |
On the basis of the current cash and financial position of the
Foundations subsidiaries (Amaca and Amaba) and following
the Companys entry into the Heads of Agreement, the
applications previously made to the Supreme Court of NSW for the
appointment of a provisional liquidator to the Foundations
subsidiaries, were dismissed with their consent.
|
|
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |
For the periods prior to October 19, 2001, the effective
date of the 2001 Reorganization, the consolidated financial
statements represent the financial position and results of
operations of JHIL and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The
following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and the related notes thereto, included
under Item 18.
Overview
We intend this discussion to provide information that will
assist in understanding our March 31, 2005 consolidated
financial statements, the changes in significant items in those
consolidated financial statements
49
from year to year, and the primary reasons for those changes.
This discussion includes information about our critical
accounting policies and how these policies affect our
consolidated financial statements and information about the
consolidated financial results of each business segment to
provide a better understanding of how each segment and its
results affect our financial condition and operating results as
a whole. Our March 31, 2005 consolidated financial
statements and the notes accompanying those consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with this
discussion. In addition, during fiscal year 2005, we incurred
significant costs associated with the SCI and other related
matters. We have continued to incur material costs associated
with the SCI and other related matters and expect to incur such
costs in the short-term. Information regarding the SCI and other
related matters can be found in this discussion, Item 3,
Risk Factors, Item 4, Information on the
Company Legal Proceedings and Note 13 to
our consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
|
|
|
The Company and the Building Product Markets |
Based on net sales, we believe we are the largest manufacturer
of fiber cement products and systems for internal and external
building construction applications in the United States,
Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines and the second
largest manufacturer of flat sheet products in Chile. Our
current primary geographic markets include the United States,
Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Chile and Europe.
Through significant research and development expenditure, we
develop key product and production process technologies that we
patent or hold as trade secrets. We believe that these
technologies give us a competitive advantage in the markets in
which we sell our products.
We manufacture numerous types of fiber cement products with a
variety of patterned profiles and surface finishes for a range
of applications including external siding and soffit lining,
trim, roofing, internal linings, facades, floor and tile
underlayments, drainage pipes and decorative columns. Our
products are used in various market segments, including new
residential construction, manufactured housing, repair and
remodel and a variety of commercial and industrial construction
applications. We believe that in certain construction
applications, our fiber cement products and systems provide a
combination of distinctive performance, design and cost
advantages over competing building products and systems.
Our products are primarily sold to the residential housing
markets. Residential construction fluctuates based on the levels
of new home construction activity and the repair and remodeling
of existing homes. These levels of activity are affected by many
factors including home mortgage interest rates, inflation rates,
unemployment levels, existing home sales, the average age and
the size of housing inventory, consumer home repair and remodel
spending, gross domestic product growth and consumer confidence
levels. These factors were generally favorable during fiscal
year 2005, resulting in healthy levels of residential
construction and home repair and remodel activity.
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005 Key Results |
Total net sales increased 23% to $1,210.4 million in fiscal
year 2005, operating income increased 14% to
$196.2 million, and income from continuing operations
increased 2% to US$127.9 million.
Our largest market is North America, where fiber cement is one
of the fastest growing segments of the external siding market.
During fiscal year 2005, USA Fiber Cement net sales contributed
approximately 78% of total net sales, and its operating income
was the primary contributor of total Company operating income.
Net sales increased due to increased sales volume and a higher
average net sales price. Operating income increased from fiscal
year 2004 primarily due to growth in net sales, partly offset by
an increase in unit cost of sales, unit freight cost, general
liability insurance and selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Asia Pacific net sales contributed approximately 20% of total
net sales, and its operating income was the second largest
contributor of total Company operating income. Net sales
increased in fiscal year 2005 in both our Australia and New
Zealand and our Philippines Fiber Cement businesses. In our
Australia and New Zealand business, this increase was primarily
due to favorable foreign currency exchange rates. Operating
income increased primarily due to cost savings and the impact of
a cost provision recorded in the fiscal year
50
2004 that did not recur in fiscal year 2005 related to our
Australia and New Zealand business and favorable foreign
currency exchange rate differences.
In our emerging businesses of Chile Fiber Cement, Europe Fiber
Cement and USA Hardie Pipe, we continued to make good progress.
Our Chilean business recorded a small positive operating income
in each quarter of fiscal year 2005. Our USA Hardie Pipe
business significantly reduced its operating loss compared to
fiscal year 2004. Our Europe Fiber Cement business incurred an
operating loss for fiscal year 2005 as expected as we continued
to build awareness of our products among distributors, builders
and contractors, and added further distribution outlets in both
the U.K. and French markets. In addition, our
Artisantm
Roofing business is continuing to prove its business model and
remains focused on market testing, refining the manufacturing
operation and improving productivity.
For further information regarding our business and operations,
please see Item 4, Information on the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting policies affecting our financial condition and
results of operations are more fully described in Note 2 to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18.
Certain of our accounting policies require the application of
judgment by management in selecting appropriate assumptions for
calculating financial estimates, which inherently contain some
degree of uncertainty. Management bases its estimates on
historical experience and other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the reported carrying value
of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses that may not be readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. We consider the following
policies to be the most critical in understanding the judgments
that are involved in preparing our consolidated financial
statements and the uncertainties that could impact our results
of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
|
|
|
Accounting for Contingencies |
We account for loss contingencies in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies,
under which we accrue amounts for losses arising from contingent
obligations when the obligations are probable and the amounts
are reasonably estimable. As facts concerning contingencies
become known, we reassess our situation and make appropriate
adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. For
additional information regarding asbestos-related matters, see
Item 3, Risk Factors, Item 4,
Information on the Company Legal
Proceedings and Note 13 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18.
We record estimated reductions to sales for customer rebates and
discounts including volume, promotional, cash and other rebates
and discounts. Rebates and discounts are recorded based on
managements best estimate when products are sold. The
estimates are based on historical experience for similar
programs and products. Management reviews these rebates and
discounts on an ongoing basis and the related accruals are
adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes
available.
We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable on an
ongoing basis based on historical bad debts, customer
credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our
customer payment activity. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
provided for known and estimated bad debts. Although credit
losses have historically been within our expectations, we cannot
guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit
loss rates that we have in the past. Because our accounts
receivable are concentrated in a relatively small number of
customers, a significant change in the liquidity or financial
position of any of these customers could impact their ability to
make payments and result in the need for additional allowances
which would
51
decrease our net sales. For additional information regarding our
customer concentration, see Item 3, Risk
Factors.
Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market. In
order to determine market, management regularly reviews
inventory quantities on hand and evaluates significant items to
determine whether they are excess, slow-moving or obsolete. The
estimated value of excess, slow-moving and obsolete inventory is
recorded as a reduction to inventory and an expense in cost of
sales in the period it is identified. This estimate requires
management to make judgments about the future demand for
inventory, and is therefore at risk to change from period to
period. If our estimate for the future demand for inventory is
greater than actual demand and we fail to reduce manufacturing
output accordingly, we could be required to record additional
inventory reserves, which would have a negative impact on our
gross profit.
We offer various warranties on our products, including a 50-year
limited warranty on certain of our fiber cement siding products
in the United States. Because our fiber cement products have
only been used since the early 1980s, there is a risk that these
products will not perform in accordance with our expectations
over an extended period of time. A typical warranty program
requires that we replace defective products within a specified
time period from the date of sale. We record an estimate for
future warranty related costs based on an analysis of actual
historical warranty costs as they relate to sales. Based on this
analysis and other factors, we adjust the amount of our warranty
provisions as necessary. Although our warranty costs have
historically been within calculated estimates, if our experience
is significantly different from our estimates, it could result
in the need for additional reserves. For additional information
regarding warranties, see Item 3, Risk Factors.
|
|
|
Accounting for Income Tax |
We account for income taxes according to SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, under which we compute
our deferred tax assets and liabilities, which arise from
differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense
for tax and financial statement purposes. We must assess
whether, and to what extent, we can recover our deferred tax
assets. If full or partial recovery is unlikely, we must
increase our income tax expense by recording a valuation
allowance against the portion of deferred tax assets that we
cannot recover. We believe that we will recover all of the
deferred tax assets recorded (net of valuation allowance) on our
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2005. However, if
facts later indicate that we will be unable to recover all or a
portion of our net deferred tax assets, our income tax expense
would increase in the period in which we determine that recovery
is unlikely.
Due to our size and the nature of our business, we are subject
to ongoing reviews by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) and other taxing jurisdictions on various tax
matters, including challenges to various positions we assert. We
accrue for tax contingencies based upon our best estimate of the
taxes ultimately expected to be paid, which we update over time
as more information becomes available. Such amounts are included
in taxes payable or other non-current liabilities, as
appropriate. If we ultimately determine that payment of these
amounts is unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a
tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the
liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional charge
in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax
liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.
Tax authorities from various jurisdictions in which we operate
are in the process of auditing our respective jurisdictional
income tax returns for various ranges of years. None of the
audits have progressed sufficiently to predict their ultimate
outcome. We have accrued income tax liabilities for these audits
based upon knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances,
taking into account existing tax laws, our experience with
previous audits and settlements, the status of current tax
examinations, and how the tax authorities view certain issues.
52
Results of Operations
In fiscal years 2003 through 2005, there was a significant
increase in net sales generated from our USA Fiber Cement
operations primarily as a result of demand for our fiber cement
products and $282.0 million in capital investments during
fiscal years 2003 to 2005 in this segment.
The following table shows our selected financial and operating
data for continuing operations, expressed in millions of
U.S. dollars and as a percentage of total net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
939.2 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
% |
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
% |
|
$ |
599.7 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement
|
|
|
236.1 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
|
1,210.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
981.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
783.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(784.0 |
) |
|
|
(64.8 |
) |
|
|
(623.0 |
) |
|
|
(63.4 |
) |
|
|
(492.8 |
) |
|
|
(62.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
426.4 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
358.9 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
290.8 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(174.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(162.0 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(144.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
SCI and other related expenses
|
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating (expense) income
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
196.2 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
172.2 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
189.8 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
165.7 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(61.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
127.9 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
$ |
125.3 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
$ |
83.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes sales of fiber cement in Chile and fiber reinforced
concrete pipes in the United States, our roofing operations in
the United States and fiber cement operations in Europe. |
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
March 31, 2004 |
Total Net Sales. Total net sales increased 23% compared
to fiscal year 2004, from $981.9 million in fiscal year
2004 to $1,210.4 million in fiscal year 2005. Net sales
from USA Fiber Cement increased 27% from $738.6 million in
fiscal year 2004 to $939.2 million in fiscal year 2005 due
to continued strong growth in sales volumes and a higher average
net sales price. Net sales from Asia Pacific Fiber Cement
increased 7% from $219.8 million in fiscal year 2004 to
$236.1 million in fiscal year 2005 due to increased sales
volumes and favorable foreign currency movements. Net sales from
Other Fiber Cement increased 49% from $23.5 million in
fiscal year 2004 to $35.1 million in fiscal year 2005 as
the Chilean flat sheet business, the USA Hardie Pipe business
and Europe Fiber Cement business continued to grow.
USA Fiber Cement Net Sales. Net sales increased 27% from
$738.6 million in fiscal year 2004 to $939.2 million
in fiscal year 2005 due to increased sales volumes and a higher
average net sales price. Sales volume increased 22% from
1,519.9 million square feet in fiscal year 2004 to
1,855.1 million square feet in fiscal year 2005, primarily
due to continued strong growth in primary demand for fiber
cement and a favorable housing construction market. New
residential housing construction remained buoyant during the
year due to
53
strong consumer demand and low inventories of houses for sale,
fueled by low interest rates, solid housing prices and a
strengthening domestic economy.
We continued to grow sales in both our emerging and established
geographic markets and in our exterior and interior product
markets. Further market share was gained in our emerging
geographic markets as our exterior products continued to
penetrate against alternative materials, primarily wood-based
and vinyl siding. There continued to be growth in sales of
higher-priced, differentiated products such as vented soffits,
Heritage® panels, the
ColorPlustm
Collection of pre-painted siding and Harditrim® XLD®
Planks. There were further market share gains in the interior
products market, with sales of Hardibacker 500® half-inch
backerboard up strongly compared to fiscal year 2004.
The average net sales price increased 4% from $486 per
thousand square feet in fiscal year 2004 to $506 per
thousand square feet in fiscal year 2005. The increase was due
to proportionally stronger growth of differentiated, higher
priced products, including Harditrim®, vented soffit and
the
ColorPlustm
Collection, and price increases for some products that became
effective on July 1, 2004 and January 1, 2005.
Our West Coast manufacturing capacity increased during fiscal
year 2005 with the addition of our new fiber cement plant in
Reno, Nevada. The plant began producing product in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2005 and its ramp-up is progressing well.
At fiscal year end 2005, we were in pre-production with our new
160 million square foot trim line in Peru, Illinois. Also,
during fiscal year 2005, we added pre-finishing capacity in
Peru, Illinois and began construction of our tenth plant in
Pulaski, Virginia.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement Net Sales. (See Notes to
Results of Operations on page 61). Net sales
increased 7% from $219.8 million in fiscal year 2004 to
$236.1 million in fiscal year 2005. Net sales increased 1%
in Australian dollars. Sales volume increased 4% from
362.1 million square feet in fiscal year 2004 to
376.9 million square feet in fiscal year 2005.
In our Australian and New Zealand Fiber Cement business, net
sales increased 8% from $195.5 million in fiscal year 2004
to $210.1 million in fiscal year 2005 due to a higher
average net sales price and favorable foreign currency
movements. In Australian dollars, net sales increased 1%. Sales
volumes decreased from 284.2 million square feet in fiscal
year 2004 to 283.3 million square feet in fiscal year 2005
primarily due to weaker market conditions in Australia and the
impact of product bans and boycotts in Australia connected with
the SCI and release of the SCI report. In Australia, new
residential housing activity improved early in fiscal year 2005
led by buoyant activity in Queensland, and the renovation and
commercial segments also remained strong early in fiscal year
2005. However, both new residential housing and renovations
activity softened over fiscal year 2005. In New Zealand, new
residential housing activity was robust in the first half of
fiscal year 2005 but softened slightly during the second half of
fiscal year 2005. Sales of our Linea® weatherboards
continued to grow strongly. The average net sales price
increased 1% in Australian dollars. During fiscal year 2005, we
launched
Eclipsatm
Eaves Lining, a new pre-painted eave product, across Australia.
Eclipsatm
offers cost benefits and construction advantages over
non-painted eave products and we expect that it will be received
favorably by builders.
In the Philippines, net sales increased 25% from
$20.8 million in fiscal year 2004 to $26.0 million in
fiscal year 2005. In local currency, net sales increased 27%.
This increase was due to a 20% increase in sales volume and a 5%
increase in the average net sales price. The increase in the
average net sales price was due to a change in sales mix between
domestic and export sales and higher domestic prices in the
second half of fiscal year 2005. Increased market penetration
and regional exports resulted in significantly stronger demand
during fiscal year 2005.
Other Sales. Other sales include sales of our fiber
cement products manufactured in Chile, sales of Hardie®
Pipe in the United States, our roofing operations in the United
States and fiber cement operations in Europe.
Our Chilean business continued to increase its penetration of
the domestic flat sheet market and increased sales of
higher-priced, differentiated products, and increased regional
exports. Net sales increased compared to fiscal year 2004, due
to growth in sales volume and a higher average net sales price.
In local
54
currency, the average net sales price decreased primarily due to
the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar on export prices, partly
offset by higher domestic prices and a change in the sales mix.
Construction activity in Chile continued to show signs of
improvement during fiscal year 2005.
Our USA Hardie Pipe business continued to penetrate the Florida
market of the United States and to improve its manufacturing
efficiency. Net sales for fiscal year 2005 increased strongly
due to increased sales volumes and higher prices despite severe
weather in Florida that adversely affected sales in the first
half of fiscal year 2005. The increase in sales volume was due
to market share gains and buoyant construction activity in
Florida. The average net sales price improved strongly during
fiscal year 2005, reflecting favorable market conditions and
improved customer focus by the business. The manufacturing
performance of our plant also improved significantly during
fiscal year 2005, but operating costs remain above our targets.
Our European business continued to grow demand during fiscal
year 2005 by building awareness of our products among
distributors, builders and contractors, and by adding further
distribution outlets in both the U.K. and French markets. Sales
have continued to build steadily since commencement of
operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. Progress on
creating primary demand in Europe for fiber cement siding
products and converting tile applications from drywall and wood
to fiber cement products, remains in line with management
expectations.
In June 2003, we completed construction and began production
trials at our pilot roofing plant in Fontana, California. The
pilot plant, which has a design capacity of 25 million
square feet, was built to test our proprietary manufacturing
technology and to provide product for market testing in Southern
California. Our roofing business is continuing to prove its
business model and remains focused on market testing, refining
the manufacturing operation and improving productivity. Our
Artisantm
Roofing product, made from a new lightweight concrete roofing
technology, has now been launched in all our targeted markets in
California.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 19% from
$358.9 million in fiscal year 2004 to $426.4 million
in fiscal year 2005 due to improvements in our major businesses.
The gross profit margin decreased 1.4 percentage points to
35.2% in fiscal year 2005.
USA Fiber Cement gross profit increased 19% due to higher net
sales, partly offset by an increase in unit cost of sales and
increased freight costs. The higher unit cost of sales resulted
primarily from increased sales of higher-priced, differentiated
products, higher pulp and cement costs, maintenance expenses and
a temporary reduction in manufacturing efficiency at some plants
that occurred during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005.
Higher freight costs were primarily related to an increase in
length of haul of some products due to supply issues associated
with a temporary reduction in plant manufacturing efficiency in
the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, and higher fuel costs
and general liability insurance. The gross profit margin
decreased 2.6 percentage points.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement gross profit increased 11% following
improvements from Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement and
Philippines Fiber Cement, which increased 8% and 53%,
respectively. The improved result was due to manufacturing
efficiency gains in both Australia and New Zealand and increased
net sales in New Zealand, partly offset by reduced net sales in
Australia attributable to weaker market conditions and product
bans and boycotts in Australia connected with the SCI and
release of its report. In the Philippines, increased sales
accounted for the stronger gross profit performance. The Asia
Pacific Fiber Cement gross profit margin increased
1.2 percentage points.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A)
Expenses. SG&A expenses increased 8% compared to fiscal
year 2004, from $162.0 million to $174.5 million. The
increase in SG&A expenses was due mainly to increased sales
and marketing, information technology and other expenses
associated with growth initiatives in the United States. As a
percentage of sales, SG&A expenses for the year were
2.1 percentage points lower at 14.4%.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and
development expenses include costs associated with
core research projects that are designed to benefit
all fiber cement business units. These costs are recorded in the
Research and Development segment rather than being attributed to
individual business units. These costs decreased 15% for fiscal
year 2005, to $12.0 million. Other research and development
costs
55
associated with commercialization projects in business units are
included in the business related unit segment results. In total,
these costs increased 13% to $9.6 million for fiscal year
2005.
SCI and Other Related Expenses. In February 2004, the NSW
Government, Australia, established a SCI to investigate, among
other matters, the circumstances in which the Foundation was
established. Shortly after release of the SCI report on
September 21, 2004, we commenced negotiations with the NSW
Government, the ACTU, UnionsNSW and a representative of asbestos
claimants in relation to our offer made to the SCI on
July 14, 2004 to provide funds voluntarily for proven
Australian-based asbestos-related injury and death claims
against certain former James Hardie Group Australian
subsidiaries. On December 21, 2004, we entered into a Heads
of Agreement with the above parties to establish and fund a SPF
to provide funding for these claims on a long-term basis. We
have subsequently entered into negotiations with the NSW
Government on an agreement that, when completed, we expect to be
put to shareholders for approval.
Costs incurred during fiscal year 2005 associated with the SCI
and other related matters totaled $28.1 million and
included: $6.8 million related to the SCI;
$4.9 million related to the internal investigation
conducted by independent legal advisers, consistent with
U.S. securities regulations, of the impact on our financial
statements of allegations of illegal conduct raised during the
SCI and any potential impacts on the financial statements (the
investigation found there was no adverse impact on our 2004
financial statements); $1.2 million related to the ASIC
investigation into the circumstances surrounding the creation of
the Foundation; $6.4 million for resolution advisory
services; $6.0 million in severance and consulting payments
to former executives; and $2.8 million for other matters.
Further information on the SCI and other related matters can be
found in Item 3, Risk Factors and Item 4,
Information on the Company Legal Proceedings
and Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18.
Other Operating Expense. Other operating expense of
$6.0 million in fiscal year 2005 relates to a settlement
loss of $5.3 million for an employee retirement plan and
loss on the sale of land in Sacramento, California. The
retirement of a significant number of participants in the
employee retirement plan resulted in a requirement under
SFAS No. 88 to recognize and accelerate the amortizing
of an actuarial loss for the plan. The other operating expense
amount in fiscal year 2004 of $2.1 million mainly reflects
an increase in cost provisions for our Australia and New Zealand
business.
Operating Income. Operating income increased 14% from
$172.2 million in fiscal year 2004 to $196.2 million
in fiscal year 2005. The operating income margin decreased
1.3 percentage points to 16.2% in fiscal year 2005.
Operating income includes SCI and other related expenses of
$28.1 million.
USA Fiber Cement operating income increased 24% from
$195.6 million in fiscal year 2004 to $241.5 million
in fiscal year 2005. The increase was due to growth in net
sales, partly offset by an increase in unit cost of sales, unit
freight cost, general liability insurance and SG&A expenses.
The increase in unit cost of sales was due to increased sales of
higher cost differentiated products, higher pulp and cement
costs, increased maintenance expenses and a temporary reduction
in manufacturing efficiency at some plants that occurred during
the second quarter of fiscal year 2005. Higher freight costs
were primarily related to an increase in length of haul of some
products due to supply issues associated with the temporary
reduction in plant manufacturing efficiency and higher fuel
costs. The operating income margin decreased 0.8 of a percentage
point to 25.7%.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement operating income increased 25% from
$37.6 million in fiscal year 2004 to $46.8 million in
fiscal year 2005. The operating income margin increased
2.7 percentage points to 19.8% in fiscal year 2005.
Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement operating income
increased 20% from $35.4 million in fiscal year 2004 to
$42.4 million in fiscal year 2005. In Australian dollars,
Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement operating income
increased 12%. The increase in operating income in Australian
dollars was mainly due to cost savings and the impact of a cost
provision recorded in fiscal year 2004 that did not recur in
fiscal year 2005. The operating income margin increased
2.1 percentage points to 20.2% in fiscal year 2005.
Philippines Fiber Cement business more than doubled its positive
operating income performance compared to fiscal year 2004 due to
increased net sales.
56
The Chile Fiber Cement business recorded a small positive
operating income in each quarter of fiscal year 2005.
Our USA Hardie Pipe business significantly reduced its operating
loss compared to fiscal year 2004 due to increased sales
volumes, higher selling prices and manufacturing cost savings.
Our Europe Fiber Cement business incurred an operating loss for
fiscal year 2005 as expected.
General corporate costs increased $35.3 million from
$27.5 million in fiscal year 2004 to $62.8 million in
fiscal year 2005. This increase was primarily due to
$28.1 million of SCI and other related expenses, a
settlement loss of $5.3 million related to an employee
retirement plan, a $0.7 million loss on sale of land owned
in Sacramento, California and a net increase in other general
corporate costs. Additionally, in the fiscal year 2004, we
booked a reversal of an excess provision of $1.6 million
related to a vendor dispute that we settled favorably that did
not recur in fiscal year 2005. These increases were partially
offset by a $2.5 million decrease in employee bonus plan
expense and a $3.0 million decrease in employee share based
compensation expense from stock appreciation rights primarily
caused by a decrease in our share price.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense decreased by
$4.9 million from $10.0 million in fiscal year 2004 to
$5.1 million in fiscal year 2005, primarily due to a higher
amount of interest expense capitalized on construction projects
in fiscal year 2005 compared to fiscal year 2004, higher
interest income in fiscal year 2005 due to higher average cash
balances and lower interest expense in fiscal year 2005 due to
lower average debt balances.
Other (Expense) Income. During fiscal year 2005, other
expense consisted primarily of a $2.1 million impairment
charge that we recorded on an investment in a company that filed
a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. bankruptcy code, partially offset by a
$0.8 million gain on a separate investment. In fiscal year
2004, we realized a gain before income tax of $4.5 million
on the sale of property formerly owned by one of our New Zealand
subsidiaries. Additionally, a previously recorded liability
related to potential contingent legal claims was reversed,
resulting in income of $4.3 million. We also realized
$0.1 million in net investment income. These income items
were partially offset by an impairment charge of
$2.2 million that we recorded on an investment in a company
that filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy code. Additionally,
we incurred an expense of $3.2 million primarily due to a
capital duty fee paid in conjunction with our Dutch legal
structure. We incurred this to extend the scope of our
international finance subsidiary to lend to global operations.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by
$21.5 million from $40.4 million in fiscal year 2004
to $61.9 million in fiscal year 2005 due to the increase in
profit, the geographic mix of earnings, estimated income tax
contingencies recorded during fiscal year 2005 and
non-deductible SCI and other related expenses.
Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing
operations increased from $125.3 million in fiscal year
2004 to $127.9 million in fiscal year 2005. Income from
continuing operations includes SCI and other related expenses of
$28.1 million and a related tax benefit of
$5.8 million.
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
March 31, 2003 |
Total Net Sales. Total net sales increased 25% from
$783.6 million in fiscal year 2003 to $981.9 million
in fiscal year 2004. Net sales from USA Fiber Cement increased
23% from $599.7 million in fiscal year 2003 to
$738.6 million in fiscal year 2004 due to continued strong
growth in sales volumes and higher average net selling prices.
Net sales from Asia Pacific Fiber Cement increased 26% from
$174.3 million in fiscal year 2003 to $219.8 million
in fiscal year 2004 due to increased sales volumes and favorable
currency exchange rate differences. Net sales from Other Fiber
Cement increased 145% from $9.6 million in fiscal year 2003
to $23.5 million in fiscal year 2004 due to continued
growth in the Chilean flat sheet business, the USA Hardie Pipe
business and the Europe Fiber Cement business.
USA Fiber Cement Net Sales. Net sales increased 23% from
$599.7 million in fiscal year 2003 to $738.6 million
in fiscal year 2004. Sales volume increased 19% from
1,273.6 million square feet in fiscal year
57
2003 to 1,519.9 million square feet in fiscal year 2004 due
to strong growth in primary demand for fiber cement and a
favorable housing construction market. Residential housing
activity remained healthy during fiscal year 2004 buoyed by low
mortgage rates, strong housing prices, low inventory levels of
new homes for sale and a recovering domestic economy. Strong
growth continued in both the interior and exterior product
markets and in our emerging and established markets as our
products continued to take share from alternative materials,
mainly wood-based and vinyl siding.
The average net selling price increased 3% from $471 per
thousand square feet in fiscal year 2003 to $486 per
thousand square feet in fiscal year 2004. This was due to an
increased proportion of sales of higher-priced, differentiated
products and a price increase in some regions implemented in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2004.
In the exterior products market, there was continued strong
growth in sales of higher-priced, differentiated products such
as vented soffits, Heritage® panels, the
ColorPlustm
Collection of pre-painted siding and Harditrim® XLD®
planks. In the interior products market, sales of our
Hardibacker 500® half-inch backerboard grew strongly as it
further penetrated its target market, helping to lift our share
of the interior cement board market.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004, we began
construction of our new 300 million square foot green-field
fiber cement plant in Reno, Nevada. The plant will service the
rapidly growing demand in the West Coast region of the United
States and is expected to begin production by the end of
calendar year 2004.
During fiscal year 2004, we completed the upgrade of and began
ramping-up our Blandon, Pennsylvania plant, which we acquired
from Cemplank in December 2001. The upgrade increased design
capacity of the plant from 120 million square feet to
200 million square feet. We also completed the upgrade of
and began ramping-up our 160 million square foot panel
production line at our Waxahachie, Texas plant. In addition, in
fiscal year 2004, we commissioned and began ramping-up our new
proprietary pre-finishing line at our Peru, Illinois plant. This
is expected to significantly reduce painting costs for our
ColorPlustm
Collection of exterior siding, and help to accelerate our market
penetration in the northern region of the United States. Also,
at our Peru, Illinois plant, we commenced construction of a new
160 million square foot trim line, which we expect to begin
production by the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement Net Sales (See Notes to
Results of Operations on page 61). Net sales
increased 26% from $174.3 million in fiscal year 2003 to
$219.8 million in fiscal year 2004. Net sales increased 2%
in Australian dollars. Sales volume increased 3% from
349.9 million square feet in fiscal year 2003 to
362.1 million square feet in fiscal year 2004. Net selling
price decreased by 3% primarily due to the increase in the
Philippines product mix in overall Asia Pacific net sales.
In Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement, net sales increased
25% from $156.3 million in fiscal year 2003 to
$195.5 million in fiscal year 2004, primarily due to
favorable foreign exchange rate differences. In Australian
dollars, net sales increased 1%. The increase in net sales in
local currency was due to a 1% increase in sales volume from
280.2 million square feet in fiscal year 2003 to
284.2 million square feet in fiscal year 2004. The average
net selling price was flat compared to fiscal year 2003. In
Australia, new residential housing activity slowed during the
year, but was better than industry forecasts. The impact of this
was partly offset by strong residential renovation and
commercial activity. Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC)
Pipes continued to penetrate the targeted market and increased
sales volumes compared to fiscal year 2003. During fiscal year
2004, FRC® pipes was successful in tendering to supply
storm drainage pipes for the Sydney Orbital road project. The
project involves the supply of a significant volume of FRC pipes
over the next year. A new pipe standard was released by
Standards Australia during fiscal year 2004. This will enable
our fiber cement pipes to compete more effectively against steel
reinforced concrete pipes. During fiscal year 2004, we launched
ExoTec® Facade Panel, our new premium facade panel
incorporating the next generation of fiber cement composites.
The new product is designed for commercial applications. In New
Zealand, new residential housing activity remained at healthy
levels and demand was strong for soffits and weatherboards,
including our Linea® product range of weatherboards, which
uses proprietary low-density technology.
58
In the Philippines, net sales increased 16% from
$18.0 million in fiscal year 2003 to $20.8 million in
fiscal year 2004. In local currency, net sales increased 22%.
Sales volume increased 12% from 69.7 million square feet in
fiscal year 2003 to 77.9 million square feet in fiscal year
2004. The average net selling price increased 10% compared to
fiscal year 2003 due to a combination of increased regional
export business and expansion of product range into higher
priced products in the domestic market.
Other Sales. Other sales include sales of our fiber
cement products manufactured in Chile, sales of Hardie®
Pipe in the United States, our roofing operations in the United
States and fiber cement operations in Europe.
Our Chilean operation continued to increase its penetration of
the local market in line with its targets. Net sales increased
167% compared to fiscal year 2003 due to a 103% increase in
sales volume and a higher average net selling price. The level
of construction activity in Chile improved during fiscal year
2004 after being stagnant since the end of 2001. The average net
selling price increased due to strong export sales and growth in
sales of higher-priced, differentiated products.
Our USA Hardie Pipe business continued to penetrate the
southeast market of the United States and improve its
manufacturing efficiency. Net sales increased 95% compared to
fiscal year 2003 due to a 95% increase in sales volume. The
average net selling price was flat compared to fiscal year 2003.
Market acceptance of our fiber cement pipes continued to grow
strongly and we further increased our share of the market for
our targeted diameter range of drainage pipes in Florida. The
manufacturing performance of the plant continued to improve
during the period, reducing costs and increasing output,
particularly of the larger diameter pipes. Despite the improved
costs and output, manufacturing costs remain higher than our
targets. The competitive response to our entry into the
south-east market remains intense.
Our Europe Fiber Cement business commenced operations during
fiscal year 2004 with the launch in the United Kingdom and
France markets of our Hardibacker® backerboard range of
interior products and our proprietary pre-painted siding
products. Awareness of our product range among distributors,
builders and contractors is growing and sales of
Hardibacker® tile backer and our pre-painted siding
products are in line with our expectations. In June 2003, we
commissioned a new coating line near Southampton in England. The
line is used to apply the finishing coat to siding products
imported from our United States business.
In June 2003, we completed construction and began production
trials at our pilot roofing plant at Fontana, California. The
pilot plant, which has a design capacity of 25 million
square feet, was built to test our proprietary manufacturing
technology and to provide product for market testing in Southern
California. Plant testing and manufacturing trials commenced
during fiscal year 2004 and the first on-site installations of
the new roofing product were completed. The first commercial
sales of our
Artisantm
roofing product were made in the second half of fiscal year
2004. There were no commercial sales in the first half of fiscal
year 2005, but sales began in October 2004 and expected to ramp
up through the end of fiscal year 2005. Interest in our roofing
product within our targeted market is strong.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 23% from
$290.8 million in fiscal year 2003 to $358.9 million
in fiscal year 2004 due to improvements in all our major
businesses. The gross profit margin decreased 0.5 of a
percentage point to 36.6% in fiscal year 2004.
USA Fiber Cement gross profit increased 24% due to higher sales
volumes and a higher average net selling price, partly offset by
an increase in unit cost of sales and higher freight costs. The
higher unit cost of sales resulted primarily from higher pulp
costs, increased sales of higher-priced differentiated products
and the ramp-up of the new manufacturing lines at the Blandon,
Pennsylvania; Waxahachie, Texas; and Peru, Illinois plants. The
gross profit margin increased 0.2 of a percentage point.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement gross profit increased 19% following
improvements from Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement, and
Philippines Fiber Cement, which increased 16% and 70%,
respectively. The improved result for Australia and New Zealand
was due to a favorable foreign exchange difference. In the
Philippines, increased sales and reduced manufacturing costs
resulted in the stronger gross profit performance. The Asia
Pacific Fiber Cement gross profit margin decreased
2.1 percentage points.
59
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses.
SG&A expenses increased 12% compared to the prior year, from
$144.9 million in fiscal year 2003 to $162.0 million
in fiscal year 2004. The increase in SG&A expenses was due
mainly to sales and marketing expenses associated with growth
initiatives in the USA. However, as a percentage of sales,
SG&A expenses were 2.0 percentage points lower, at
16.5% in fiscal year 2004.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and
development includes costs associated with core
research projects that are aimed at benefiting all fiber cement
business units. These costs are recorded in the Research and
Development segment rather than being attributed to individual
business units. These costs increased 36% during fiscal year
2004 to $14.1 million. Our Research and Development segment
includes these costs and $3.5 million of Research and
Development administrative expenses classified as SG&A
expense. Other research and development costs associated with
commercialization projects in business units are included in the
business unit segment results. In total, these costs increased
10% to $8.5 million in fiscal year 2004.
Other Operating (Expenses)/ Income. Other operating
expenses of $2.1 million in fiscal year 2004 mainly reflect
an increase in cost provisions for our Australia and New Zealand
business. In fiscal year 2003, we realized a $1.0 million
gain from the settlement of a pulp hedge contract.
Operating Income. Operating income increased 34% from
$128.8 million in fiscal year 2003 to $172.2 million
in fiscal year 2004. The operating income margin increased
1.1 percentage points to 17.5% in fiscal year 2004.
USA Fiber Cement operating income increased 26% from
$155.1 million in fiscal year 2003 to $195.6 million
in fiscal year 2004. The increase was due to strong growth in
net sales, partly offset by an increase in unit cost of sales,
freight and SG&A expenses. The operating income margin
increased 0.6 percentage points to 26.5% in fiscal year
2004.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement operating income increased 38% from
$27.3 million in fiscal year 2003 to $37.6 million in
fiscal year 2004. The operating income margin increased
1.4 percentage points to 17.1% in fiscal year 2004.
Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement operating income
increased 30% from $27.2 million in fiscal year 2003 to
$35.4 million in fiscal year 2004, primarily due to
favorable foreign exchange rate differences. In Australian
dollars, Australia and New Zealand Fiber Cement operating income
increased 5% mainly due to lower SG&A expenses, partly
offset by a temporary decrease in manufacturing performance at
the Rosehill, NSW plant during fiscal year 2004 and increased
freight costs. The operating income margin for Australia and New
Zealand Fiber Cement was 0.7 of a percentage point higher, at
18.1%. Our Philippines business recorded operating income of
$2.2 million for fiscal year 2004 compared to a
$0.1 million operating income in fiscal year 2003.
The Chile Fiber Cement business recorded its first full year
positive operating income since commencing commercial production
in 2001.
Despite continued strong volume growth and improved
manufacturing performance, our USA Hardie Pipe business incurred
an operating loss for the year due to low prices and higher than
targeted unit costs.
Our Europe Fiber Cement business became operational during
fiscal year 2004 and incurred an operating loss, as expected.
General corporate costs decreased by $2.4 million from
$29.9 million in fiscal year 2003 to $27.5 million in
fiscal year 2004. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction
in employee bonus plan expense and a $1.6 million gain from
the positive resolution of a vendor dispute, partly offset by
changes in a number of other corporate expenses.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense decreased by
$9.9 million from $19.9 million in fiscal year 2003 to
$10.0 million in fiscal year 2004. In fiscal year 2003, we
incurred a $9.9 million make-whole payment from the early
retirement of $60.0 million of long-term debt. Interest
expense decreased further by $2.7 million due to lower
average borrowings. These decreases in net interest expense were
partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in interest
income due to lower average cash balances compared to fiscal
year 2003.
60
Other Income. We realized a gain before income tax of
$4.5 million on the sale of property formerly owned by one
of our New Zealand subsidiaries. Additionally, a previously
recorded liability related to potential contingent legal claims
was reversed, resulting in income of $4.3 million. We also
realized $0.1 million in net investment income. These
income items were partially offset by an impairment charge that
we recorded of $2.2 million on an investment in a company
that filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy code. Additionally,
we incurred an expense of $3.2 million primarily due to a
capital duty fee paid in conjunction with our Dutch legal
structure. We incurred this to extend the scope of our
international finance subsidiary to lend to global operations.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by
$14.3 million from $26.1 million in fiscal year 2003
to $40.4 million in fiscal year 2004 due to the increase in
profit.
Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing
operations increased by 50% or $41.8 million, from
$83.5 million in fiscal year 2003 to $125.3 million in
fiscal year 2004.
Notes to Results of Operations
|
|
|
Volume and Average Net Selling Price Asia
Pacific Fiber Cement Adjusted: |
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, we disclosed in a
Form 6-K that in fiscal years 2004 and 2003, our Asia
Pacific Fiber Cement segment reported incorrect volume figures
due to errors when converting to our standard square feet
measurement and due to our Philippines Fiber Cement business
including intercompany volume during fiscal year 2004. The
following table presents adjusted volume and average net sales
price for our Asia Pacific Fiber Cement business segment. We
have adjusted this Form 20-F for the revised volume and
average net sales price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As Previously | |
|
Adjusted | |
|
As Previously | |
|
Adjusted | |
|
|
Published | |
|
Figure | |
|
Published | |
|
Figure | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Volume (million square feet)
|
|
|
402.1 |
|
|
|
362.1 |
|
|
|
368.3 |
|
|
|
349.9 |
|
Average sales price per unit (per thousand square feet)
|
|
A$ |
788 |
|
|
A$ |
862 |
|
|
A$ |
843 |
|
|
A$ |
887 |
|
|
|
|
Net Sales Philippines Fiber Cement
Adjusted: |
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, we disclosed in a
Form 6-K that in fiscal year 2004, our Philippines business
incorrectly reported intercompany transfers as external net
sales and cost of sales. Adjustment to the Philippines Fiber
Cement discussion is necessary to provide an accurate
year-to-year discussion of Philippines Fiber Cement net sales.
Therefore, for discussion purposes only, for the Philippines
Fiber Cement business, we adjusted fiscal year 2004 Philippines
Fiber Cement net sales. We have not restated the Asia Pacific
Fiber Cement business segment results or the consolidated
financial statements since these adjustments are not material to
our Asia Pacific Fiber Cement segment or to the consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole. The following table
presents adjusted Philippines Fiber Cement net sales for
discussion purposes only:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Previously Reported
|
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Net Sales
|
|
$ |
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
61
Discontinued Operations
In total, we recorded a loss of $1.0 million from
discontinued operations in fiscal year 2005 and income of
$4.3 million and $87.0 million in fiscal years 2004
and 2003, respectively. The amount in fiscal year 2005 relates
primarily to additional costs associated with the sale of New
Zealand land in March 2004 and the settlement of a dispute
associated with a former business. The amount for fiscal year
2004 primarily includes a favorable outcome from matters related
to our former Gypsum business and a gain on the sale of our New
Zealand Building Systems business, net of other wind-up costs of
Gypsum and other discontinued businesses. See Note 15 to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18
for additional information about the results of our discontinued
operations.
On May 30, 2003, we sold our New Zealand Building Systems
business to a third party. We recorded a gain of
$1.9 million representing the excess of net proceeds from
the sale of $6.7 million over the net book value of assets
sold of $4.8 million. The proceeds from the sale comprised
cash of $5.0 million and a note receivable in the amount of
$1.7 million. As of March 2005, the $1.7 million note
receivable had been collected in full.
In fiscal year 2002, we successfully completed the
transformation of our company into a purely fiber cement
business when we signed a definitive agreement to sell our
Gypsum business. We completed the sale on April 25, 2002
and recorded a pre-tax gain of $81.4 million in fiscal year
2003, with income tax expense of $26.1 million. See
Item 4, Information on the Company
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
Divestitures.
On June 28, 2001, we entered into an agreement to sell our
gypsum mine property in Las Vegas, Nevada to a developer. We
completed the transaction on March 21, 2003 and realized a
$49.2 million pre-tax gain on the sale with
$19.2 million of income tax expense.
During the year ended March 31, 2003, we recorded a loss of
$1.3 million related to our Building Services business,
which was disposed of in November 1996. The loss consisted of
expenses of $0.8 million and a $0.5 million write down
of an outstanding receivable that was retained as part of the
sale.
On March 31, 2003, we transferred control of ABN 60 to
a newly established company named ABN 60 Foundation. The
ABN 60 Foundation was established to be the sole
shareholder of ABN 60 and to ensure that ABN 60 meets
its payment obligations to the Foundation. Following the
establishment of the ABN 60 Foundation, JHI NV no longer
owns any shares of ABN 60. The ABN 60 Foundation is
managed by independent directors and operates entirely
independently of us. We do not control the activities of
ABN 60 or the ABN 60 Foundation in any way. Other than
described in Item 4, Information on the
Company Legal Proceedings, we have no economic
interest in ABN 60 or the ABN 60 Foundation and have
no right to dividends or capital distributions from those
entities. Apart from the express indemnity for non-asbestos
matters provided to ABN 60 and a possible arrangement to
fund some or all future claimants for asbestos-related injuries
caused by former James Hardie Group subsidiary companies and to
the potential liabilities more fully described under the heading
Information on the Company Legal
Proceedings in Item 4, we do not believe we will have
any liability under current Australian law should future
liabilities of ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation exceed the
funds available to those entities. As a result of the change in
ownership of ABN 60, on March 31, 2003, we recorded a
loss on disposal of $0.4 million, representing the
liabilities of ABN 60 (to the Foundation) of
A$94.6 million ($57.2 million), the
A$94.5 million ($57.1 million) in cash held on the
balance sheet, and costs associated with the establishment and
funding of the ABN 60
62
Foundation. See also Item 4, Information on the
Company Legal Proceedings and Notes 13
and 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in
Item 18.
JHI NV has agreed to indemnify ABN 60 Foundation for
any non asbestos-related legal claims made against ABN 60.
There is no maximum amount of the indemnity and the term of the
indemnity is in perpetuity. The Company believes that the
likelihood of any material non asbestos-related claims occurring
against ABN 60 is remote. As such, the Company has not
recorded a liability for the indemnity. The Company has not
pledged any assets as collateral for such indemnity.
In connection with the separation of Amaca, Amaba and
ABN 60 from the James Hardie Group, those entities agreed
to indemnify JHI NV and its related corporate entities for
past and future asbestos-related liabilities. Amaca, Amaba and
ABN 60s obligation to indemnify JHI NV and its
related entities includes claims that may arise associated with
the manufacturing activities of those companies.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
|
|
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits |
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003)
(SFAS No. 132R), Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an
amendment of FASB Statement 87, Employers Accounting
for Pensions, No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlement and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and
for Termination Benefits, and No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than
Pensions. SFAS No. 132R requires additional
disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net
periodic benefit/cost of defined benefit pension plans and other
defined benefit postretirement plans. SFAS No. 132R is
effective for foreign plans for the fiscal years ending after
June 15, 2004. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities |
In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No.
(FIN) 46 (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46R), which addresses how a business
should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest
in an entity through means other than voting rights, and
accordingly, should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R
replaced FIN 46, which was issued in January 2003.
FIN 46 or FIN 46R applies immediately to entities
created after January 31, 2003 and no later than the end of
the first reporting that ended after December 15, 2003 to
entities considered to be special-purpose entities
(SPEs). FIN 46R is effective for all other
entities no later than the end of the first interim or annual
reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption
of the provisions of FIN 46 or FIN 46R relative to
SPEs and for entities created after January 31, 2003 did
not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements. The
adoption of the other provisions of FIN 46R did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its
Application to Certain Investments |
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
ratified the provisions of Issue 03-01, The Meaning
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to
Certain Investments, which clarifies the definition of
other-than-temporary impairment for certain investments
accounted for under the cost method. The recognition and
measurement guidance in Issue 03-01 should be applied to
other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods
beginning after June 15, 2004. For all other investments
within the scope of this issue, the disclosure requirements are
effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The
adoption of this issue did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
63
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of Accounting
Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43,
Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires abnormal
amounts of inventory costs related to idle facility, freight
handling and wasted material expenses to be recognized as
current period charges. Additionally, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not
expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
American Jobs Creations Act |
In October 2004, the President of the United States signed into
law the American Jobs Creation Act (the Act). The
Act allows for a U.S. federal income tax deduction for a
percentage of income earned from certain U.S. production
activities. Based on the effective date of the Act, we will be
eligible for this deduction in the first quarter of fiscal year
2006. Additionally, in December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP) 109-1, Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS
No. 109), to the Tax Deduction on Qualified
Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act
of 2004. FSP 109-1, which is effective upon issuance,
states the deduction under this provision of the Act should be
accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with
SFAS No. 109. We are in the process of quantifying the
impact this provision of the Act will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
The Act also allows for an 85% dividends received deduction on
the repatriation of certain earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In
December 2004, the FASB issued FSP 109-2, Accounting
and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation
Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
FSP 109-2, which was effective upon issuance, allows
companies time beyond the financial reporting period of
enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for
reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of
applying SFAS No. 109. Additionally, FSP 109-2
provides guidance regarding the required disclosures surrounding
a companys reinvestment or repatriation of foreign
earnings. We are continuing to evaluate this provision of the
Act and as such, have not yet quantified the impact this
provision will have on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets |
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchange of Non-Monetary Assets An Amendment
of ARB Opinion No. 29, which requires non-monetary
asset exchanges to be accounted for at fair value. The Company
is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 153
for non-monetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of this
standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R
replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Generally, SFAS No. 123R is similar
in approach to SFAS No. 123 and requires that
compensation cost relating to share-based payments be recognized
in the financial statements based on the fair value of the
equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123R
is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual
reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. In April
2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission delayed
the effective date of SFAS No. 123R until fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We adopted
SFAS No. 123 in fiscal year 2003 and do not expect the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R to have a material effect on
our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations |
In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN 47
clarifies the term conditional asset retirement
obligation used in SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for
64
Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN 47 is effective no
later than the end of the fiscal year ending after
December 15, 2005. We are in the process of evaluating
whether FIN 47 will result in the recognition of additional
asset retirement obligations for us.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our treasury policy regarding our liquidity management, foreign
exchange risks management, interest rate risk management and
cash management is administered by our treasury department and
is centralized in The Netherlands. This policy is reviewed
annually and is designed to ensure that we have sufficient
liquidity to support our business activities and meet future
business requirements in the countries in which we operate.
Counterparty limits are managed by our treasury department and
based upon the counterparty credit rating; total exposure to any
one counterparty is limited to specified amounts and signed off
annually by the CFO.
We have historically met our working capital needs and capital
expenditure requirements through a combination of cash flow from
operations, proceeds from the divestiture of businesses, credit
facilities and other borrowings, proceeds from the sale of
property, plant and equipment and proceeds from the redemption
of investments. Seasonal fluctuations in working capital
generally have not had a significant impact on our short-term or
long-term liquidity. We believe that we can meet our present
working capital requirements for at least the next
12 months based on our current capital resources.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $113.5 million as of
March 31, 2005. At that date, we also had credit facilities
totaling $449.4 million of which $159.3 million was
outstanding. At March 31, 2005, our credit facilities were
all uncollateralized and consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Total | |
|
Principal | |
|
|
Rate at | |
|
Facility at | |
|
Outstanding at | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
Description |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
US$ notes, fixed interest, repayable annually in varying
tranches from November 2005 through November 2013
|
|
|
7.12 |
% |
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
A$ revolving loan, can be drawn down in either US$ or A$,
variable interest based on US$ LIBOR or A$ bank bill rate plus
margin, can be repaid and redrawn until maturity in November 2006
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
154.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ stand-by loan, can be drawn down in either US$ or A$,
variable interest based on US$ LIBOR or A$ bank bill rate plus
margin until maturity of $117.5 million in April and
$15.0 million in October 2005
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ line of credit, can be drawn down in Chilean Pesos, variable
interest based on Chilean Tasa Activa Bancaria rate plus margin
until maturity in April and December 2005(1)
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
449.4 |
|
|
$ |
159.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Renewed and extended until March 2006. |
Net debt, short and long-term debt less cash and cash
equivalents, at March 31, 2005 was $45.8 million, a
decrease of $57.7 million, from $103.5 million as at
March 31, 2004.
In June 2005, we entered into new unsecured debt facilities
totaling $355 million. These new facilities will replace
the A$ revolving loan and the US$ stand-by-loan facilities that
were in place at March 31, 2005. Subject to the
satisfaction of customary closing conditions, these new
facilities will provide us with an increased amount of
liquidity, compared to what was available under our previous
financing arrangements. These facilities are initially for a
364-day term, but we anticipate that two-thirds of them will be
extended to a five-year term if negotiation of the Principal
Agreement is completed and the Principal Agreement is
65
subsequently executed and becomes effective. The extension of a
facility will only occur if the relevant bank is satisfied with
the terms of the Principal Agreement. If the final position
reached in the Principal Agreement is materially different from
the position in the Heads of Agreement, the extension may not
occur and we may have to arrange a further refinancing. In the
future, we may not be able to renew credit facilities on
substantially similar terms, or at all; we may have to pay
additional fees and expenses that we might not have to pay under
normal circumstances; and we may have to agree to terms that
could increase the cost of our debt structure. If we are unable
to renew our debt on terms which are not materially less
favorable than the terms currently available to us, we may have
to scale back our levels of planned capital expenditure and/or
take other measures to conserve cash in order to meet our future
cash flow requirements. See Item 10, Additional
Information Material Contracts.
As a consequence of the completion of the sale of our Gypsum
business on April 25, 2002, we were technically not in
compliance as of that date with certain pre-approval covenants
of our US$ uncollateralized note agreements totaling
$225.0 million. Effective December 23, 2002, the note
purchase agreement was amended to, among other matters, modify
these covenants to remove the technical non-compliance caused by
the sale of our Gypsum business. In connection with such
amendment, we prepaid $60.0 million in principal amount of
the notes. As a result of the early retirement, we incurred a
$9.9 million make-whole payment charge, which was charged
to interest expense during fiscal year 2003.
At March 31, 2005, we believe that we were in compliance
with all restrictive covenants contained in the uncollateralized
notes, revolving loan facility and the stand-by credit facility
agreements. Under the most restrictive of these covenants, we
are required to maintain certain ratios of debt to equity and
net worth and levels of earnings before interest and taxes and
have limits on how much we can spend on an annual basis in
relation to asbestos payments to Amaca, Amaba or ABN 60.
|
|
|
Cash Flow Year Ended March 31, 2005
compared to Year Ended March 31, 2004 |
Net operating cash inflows increased by $57.2 million or
35% from $162.6 million to $219.8 million for the year
ended March 31, 2005 compared to the year ended
March 31, 2004, primarily due to changes in our operating
assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $149.2 million
for the year ended March 31, 2005 compared to
$58.0 million in fiscal year 2004. The increase in the cash
used was primarily due to additional capital expenditures of
$78.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2005,
$10.9 million cash received in fiscal year 2004 from the
sale of land and buildings of our Australia and New Zealand
business in March 2004, and $5.0 million cash received in
the fiscal year 2004 from the sale of our New Zealand Building
Systems business in May 2003 that did not recur in fiscal year
2005, partly offset by proceeds of $3.4 million from the
sale of land in Sacramento, California in fiscal year 2005.
Net cash used in financing activities was $28.2 million for
the year ended March 31, 2005 compared to
$87.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2004. The decrease in cash used was primarily due to a
$68.7 million repayment of capital in fiscal year 2004 that
did not recur in fiscal year 2005 and a $9.2 million
decrease in dividends paid, partly offset by a
$17.6 million scheduled debt repayment in fiscal year 2005.
|
|
|
Cash Flow Year Ended March 31, 2004
compared to Year Ended March 31, 2003 |
Net operating cash inflows increased by $97.8 million from
$64.8 million to $162.6 million for the year ended
March 31, 2004 compared to the year ended March 31,
2003, primarily due to changes in our operating assets and
liabilities and gain on disposal of subsidiaries and businesses.
In fiscal year 2003, we recorded a gain of $84.8 million
compared to a gain of $4.1 million related to disposal of
subsidiaries and businesses. Other working capital changes
caused a net increase in cash of $25.5 million.
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities was
($58.0) million for the year ended March 31, 2004
compared to $237.9 million for the year ended
March 31, 2003. The decrease in cash flows from investing
activities from fiscal year 2003 to fiscal year 2004 was
primarily due to proceeds from the sale of our Gypsum business
and from the Las Vegas land sale in fiscal year 2003, which was
partially offset by a
66
$57.1 million payment related to the transfer of control of
ABN 60 in fiscal year 2003 that did not recur in fiscal
year 2004. In addition, we spent $15.4 million less on
capital expenditures during fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal
year 2003. The $5.0 million from the sale of businesses
resulted from the sale of our New Zealand Building Systems
business in May 2003. The $10.9 million from property sold
resulted primarily from land and buildings of our Australia and
New Zealand business that we sold for cash in March 2004. The
$74.8 million capital expenditures in fiscal year 2004
resulted primarily from continued operating plant expansions and
construction and new property purchases.
Net cash used in financing activities was $87.9 million for
the year ended March 31, 2004 compared to
$279.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2003. Net
cash outflow in fiscal year 2004 resulted primarily from a
$68.7 million return of capital and $22.9 million of
dividends paid. In fiscal year 2003, the return of capital was
higher by $26.1 million. In addition, in fiscal year 2003
we repaid $160.0 million of bank debt, which did not recur
in fiscal year 2004. Net proceeds from borrowings decreased from
fiscal year 2003 by $5.0 million to $0.5 million in
fiscal year 2004. The proceeds of $3.2 million represent
stock option exercises during fiscal year 2004.
|
|
|
Capital Requirements and Resources |
Our capital requirements consist of expansion, renovation and
maintenance of our production facilities and construction of new
facilities. Our working capital requirements, consisting
primarily of inventory and accounts receivable and payables,
fluctuate seasonally and increase prior to and during months of
the year when overall construction and renovation activity
volumes increase. We have historically funded cash flow
shortfalls with cash generated from divestiture of non-fiber
cement business operations and other business assets and from
available cash under bank debt facilities.
During fiscal year 2005, our continuing businesses generated
cash in excess of our capital requirements. As we continue
expanding our fiber cement businesses, we expect to use cash
primarily generated from our operations to fund capital
expenditures and working capital. We expect to spend
significantly during fiscal year 2006 on capital expenditures
that include facility upgrades and new facility construction.
Upgrades generally include expenditures for implementing new
fiber cement technologies.
We may enter into an agreement with the NSW Government to
provide long-term funding of proven asbestos-related claims for
Australian personal injury claimants against former Australian
James Hardie Group subsidiary companies. Currently, the timing
of any potential payments is uncertain because we have not yet
reached an agreement with the NSW Government and the conditions
precedent to any agreement that may be reached have not been
satisfied.
We are currently unable to estimate the cost of administering
and litigating the claims under the potential agreement with the
NSW Government because this is highly contingent upon the final
outcome of the NSW Governments review of legal and
administrative costs. However, if we enter into the Principal
Agreement, we may have to make an initial payment in fiscal 2006
equal to estimated asbestos claims to be paid over the next
three years less existing cash of the Foundation. We believe
that the cash and cash equivalents that we currently have on
hand and funds from debt facilities that we anticipate will be
available, will be sufficient to fund the initial payment.
Additionally, we anticipate that the Principal Agreement will
require us to make annual payments to fund asbestos claims.
We are currently negotiating the Principal Agreement with the
NSW Government. Costs we incur negotiating this agreement may be
significant and will negatively impact our cash generated from
operations over the short-term. We anticipate that our cash
flows from operations, net of estimated payments that may be
made under the Principal Agreement, will be sufficient to fund
our planned capital expenditure and working capital requirements
in the short-term. If we do not generate sufficient cash from
operations to fund our planned capital expenditures and working
capital requirements, we believe the cash and cash equivalents
of $113.5 million, and the cash that we anticipate will be
available to us under credit facilities, will be sufficient to
meet any cash shortfalls during the next two to three years.
67
Beyond three years, we intend to rely primarily on increased
market penetration of our products and increased profitability
from a more favorable product mix to generate cash to fund our
growth. Historically, our products have been well accepted by
the market and our product mix has changed towards higher
priced, differentiated products that generate higher margins. We
are relying on increased market demand for all of our products
to achieve sufficient market penetration and a product-mix
sufficiently profitable to fund our growth plans. We also intend
to maintain sufficient levels of available cash under bank debt
facilities to offset any cash shortfall.
We believe that we will be able to continue increasing our
market share by further market penetration against competing
products. Generally, over the past three years, a large part of
our growth resulted from market share increases, especially in
our major market of North America. We have historically acquired
market share from vinyl and wood-based products and believe that
our success is based primarily on our superior and proprietary
product and production technologies that give us competitive
product advantages. We expect to continue our research and
development activities over the short and long-term to maintain,
improve and increase our technology advantages. Based on our
market penetration history, technology benefits from our
research and development activities, and other factors, we
expect that our market penetration trend will continue over the
short and longer-term.
We believe our business is affected by general economic
conditions and interest rates in the United States and in other
countries because these factors affect the number of new housing
starts, the level of housing prices and household income levels.
We believe that housing prices, which may affect available owner
equity and household income levels, are contributors to the
currently robust renovation and remodel markets for our
products. We believe that continued improvements in general
economic conditions and continued low mortgage interest rates
will maintain new housing starts and the renovation and remodel
markets at historically high levels, which we expect will result
in our operations generating cash flow sufficient to fund the
majority of our planned capital expenditures. It is possible
that a decline in residential housing starts in the United
States or in other countries in which we manufacture and sell
our products would negatively impact our growth and current
levels of revenue and profitability and therefore decrease our
liquidity and our ability to generate sufficient cash from
operations to meet our capital requirements. During calendar
year 2004, rising United States interest rates did not have a
significant effect on United States home mortgage interest rates
and new housing starts increased. However, continued interest
rate increases anticipated in calendar year 2005 may slow down
new housing starts in the United States and cause a decrease in
housing prices, which may reduce demand for our products.
Pulp is a primary ingredient in our fiber cement formulation and
affects our working capital requirements. Pulp prices increased
during fiscal year 2005 and it is possible that prices will
continue to fluctuate. To minimize additional working capital
requirements caused by rising pulp prices, we may seek to enter
into contracts with suppliers for the purchase of pulp that
could fix our pulp prices over the longer-term. However, if pulp
prices do not continue to rise, cash generated from our
operations may be negatively impacted if pulp pricing is fixed
over the longer-term.
Freight costs have increased due to continued higher fuel prices
and an increase in the average length of haul of our products
from our facilities to our customers facilities. We expect
fuel costs to remain higher, which will increase our working
capital requirements as compared to fiscal year 2005.
The collective impact of the foregoing factors, and other
factors, may affect our ability to generate sufficient cash
flows from operations to meet our short and longer-term capital
requirements. We believe that we will be able to fund any cash
shortfalls with cash that we anticipate will be available under
our credit facilities and that we will be able to maintain
sufficient cash available under those facilities. Additionally,
we could determine it necessary to scale back or postpone our
expansion plans to maintain sufficient capital resources over
the short and longer-term.
Our total capital expenditures, including amounts accrued, for
continuing operations for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 were
$153.0 million, $74.1 million and $90.2 million,
respectively. The capital expenditures
68
were primarily used to create additional low cost, high volume
manufacturing capacity to meet increased demand for our fiber
cement products and to create new manufacturing capacity for new
fiber cement products.
Significant capital expenditures in fiscal year 2005 included
the completion of our new Reno, Nevada plant and the
construction of a new trim line at our Peru, Illinois plant.
Significant capital expenditures in fiscal year 2004 included
the completion of: (i) an upgrade to our Blandon,
Pennsylvania plant; (ii) a panel production line at our
Waxahachie, Texas plant; (iii) a new pre-finishing line at
our Peru, Illinois plant; and (iv) a pilot roofing plant in
Fontana, California. In addition, we began construction on a new
green-field fiber cement plant in Reno, Nevada and on a new trim
line at our Peru, Illinois plant. Significant capital
expenditures in fiscal year 2003 included the completion of a
second flat sheet production line at our plant in Peru,
Illinois. In addition, we commenced construction on a panel
production line at our Waxahachie, Texas plant and a pilot
roofing products plant in Fontana, California and began an
upgrade to our Blandon, Pennsylvania plant. See Item 4,
Information on the Company Capital
Expenditures and Divestitures.
The following table summarizes our significant contractual
obligations at March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
During Fiscal Year Ending March 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 to 2008 | |
|
2009 to 2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Long-Term Debt
|
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
Interest on Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
133.8 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
Purchase Obligations(1)
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
407.7 |
|
|
$ |
110.0 |
|
|
$ |
89.9 |
|
|
$ |
77.2 |
|
|
$ |
130.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Purchase Obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods
or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and
that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum
quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price
provisions; and the approximate timing of the transactions.
Purchase obligations listed above primarily represent
commitments for capital expenditures, the majority of which
relate to the construction of our new Pulaski, Virginia plant.
In addition, the total purchase obligations includes agreements
related to software maintenance contracts and approximately
$20 million that will be incurred beginning fiscal year
2006, related to the implementation and maintenance of a new ERP
system. Contracts related to our new ERP system were executed
after the end of fiscal year 2005. We did not have any
significant agreements with variable price provisions. |
The table above does not include amounts related to our future
funding obligations for our Australian defined benefit plan. We
estimate that our pension plan funding will be approximately
$1.8 million for fiscal year 2006. Projected payments
beyond fiscal year 2006 are not currently determinable. See also
Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18.
In addition, the table above does not include any amounts
related to funding obligations that might arise from
asbestos related matters discussed under
Item 3, Risk Factors, Item 4,
Information on the Company Legal
Proceedings and Note 13 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18. We have not established a provision
for any of these liabilities because at this time such
liabilities are not probable and estimable. Depending on future
developments, the impact of future cash funding obligations
could be significant and our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected
and our ability to pay dividends could be impaired.
See Notes 10 and 13 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18 in this Form 20-F for further
information regarding long-term debt and operating leases,
respectively.
69
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, we did not have any material
off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on
our results of operations for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2005, 2004 or 2003.
Seasonality and Quarterly Variability
Our earnings are seasonal and typically follow activity levels
in the building and construction industry. In the United States,
the calendar quarters ending December and March reflect reduced
levels of building activity depending on weather conditions. In
Australia and New Zealand, the calendar quarter ending March is
usually affected by a slowdown due to summer holidays. In the
Philippines, construction activity diminishes during the wet
season from June to September and during the last half of
December due to the slowdown in business activity over the
holiday period. In Chile, we experience decreased construction
activity from May through September due to weather. Also,
general industry patterns can be affected by weather, economic
conditions, industrial disputes and other factors.
Research and Development
For fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, our expenses for research
and development were $21.6 million, $22.6 million and
$18.1 million, respectively.
We have invested heavily in research and development, with a
focus primarily on fiber cement. We view research and
development as key to sustaining our existing market leadership
position and expect to continue to allocate significant funding
to this endeavor. Through our investment in process technology,
we aim to keep reducing our capital and operating costs, and
find new ways to make existing and new products.
Over the past ten years, advances in process technology have
allowed us to reduce the incremental cost of additional capacity
at existing sites. At the same time, we have reduced our raw
materials costs through yield improvements in the plants; by
providing technological support to drive process improvements in
our suppliers operations; and from our increased business
scale.
We believe that we also benefit from superior economies of scale
because we operate plants that have two to three times larger
capacity than our competitors.
In addition, our goals are to:
|
|
|
|
|
continue to lower the capital cost of each unit of production at
new plants by learning from past projects and through continuing
innovation in engineering; and |
|
|
|
reduce operating costs at each plant by improving manufacturing
processes, raw materials yields and machine productivity. |
Outlook
The short-term outlook for housing construction in North America
remains positive, despite the prospect of modest interest rate
rises later calendar year 2005.
Building permit numbers remain strong and the U.S.-based
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) reports
that there is a backlog of houses that have been permitted but
not yet started. These factors suggest the upside potential for
housing starts to be good for the immediate future. In addition,
the NAHB reported that builders remain positive about industry
prospects in the months ahead, and it also refined its expected
decline in housing starts for the 2005 calendar year from 3%-5%
to 1.4%.
In North America, strong sales growth is expected, but the rate
of growth for the year ahead is forecast to be less than the
very high level of fiscal year 2005. In fiscal year 2006, we
expect to continue to grow primary
70
demand for fiber cement and to penetrate our targeted markets.
Margins are expected to remain attractive over the short-term
despite the impact of higher raw material and freight costs.
In our Australia and New Zealand business, no improvement to the
current soft levels of new housing and renovations activity is
expected over the short-term. The progressive lifting of product
bans and boycotts in
Australia is expected to continue throughout the year. In
New Zealand, housing construction activity is expected to
continue at previously solid levels. Further manufacturing
efficiency gains and other cost savings are also expected.
In the Philippines, building and construction activity is
forecast to be softer but another solid quarterly operating
income performance is expected.
In our emerging Europe Fibre Cement and USA Hardie Pipe
businesses, further sales growth and market share are expected
as awareness of our products increases among builders,
contractors and distributors.
We have continued to incur costs associated with the SCI and
other related matters including: preparation and negotiation of
a Principal Agreement with the NSW Government to provide
long-term funding of proven asbestos-related claims for
Australian personal injury claimants against certain former
James Hardie Group Australian subsidiaries; finalization of the
NSW Governments review of legal and administrative
costs; and in cooperating with the ASIC investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the establishment of the Foundation.
SCI and other related expenses are again likely to be material
over the short-term.
|
|
Item 6. |
Directors, Senior Management and Employees |
Board Practices and Senior Management
We have a multi-tiered board structure, which is consistent with
Dutch corporate law. This structure consists of a Managing
Board, a Supervisory Board and a Joint Board.
In the Netherlands, a two-tier board structure with a Managing
Board and a Supervisory Board is common. In Australia, the vast
majority of companies listed on the ASX have a one-tier board
comprising both executive directors and non-executive directors.
Therefore, in addition to our Managing Board and Supervisory
Board, our board structure includes a Joint Board (the
Joint Board or the Board), comprising
all non-executive directors and our CEO. The Joint Board is the
equivalent of a full board of directors of a U.S. or an
Australian company.
Although the responsibilities of our Managing Board, Supervisory
Board and Joint Board are currently not formalized in charters,
we have developed charters, which will become effective on the
date of amendment of our Articles of Association and will be put
on the Investor Relations area of our website at
www.jameshardie.com. The proposed amendments to our current
Articles of Association will require shareholder approval at our
2005 Annual General Meeting.
The Managing Board includes only executive directors and
consists of at least two members, or more as determined by the
Supervisory Board. The members of the Managing Board are
appointed by our shareholders at a General Meeting. The Joint
Board and any of our shareholders have the right to make
nominations for the Managing Board.
The Supervisory Board appoints one member of the Managing Board
as Chairman and one member as the Chief Executive Officer. The
title of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer may be granted to
the same person. The Managing Board is currently chaired by our
Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gries.
71
If one, more or all members of the Managing Board are prevented
from acting, or are failing to act, the Joint Board is
authorized to designate a person temporarily in charge of
management.
Members of the Managing Board may be suspended and dismissed by
shareholders at the General Meeting. Furthermore, members of the
Managing Board may be suspended by the Supervisory Board.
No member of the Managing Board (other than our CEO) shall hold
office for a continuous period in excess of three years or past
the end of the third General Meeting following his or her
appointment, whichever is longer, without submitting for
re-election.
The Managing Board manages our company. It is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
the general affairs, operations and finance; and |
|
|
|
achieving our goals, strategy and policies, and results. |
The Managing Board is also responsible for complying with all
relevant legislation and regulations and for managing the risks
associated with our activities.
It reports related developments to, and discusses the internal
risk management and control systems with, the Supervisory Board
and the Audit Committee. The Managing Board is accountable for
the performance of its duties to the Supervisory Board and to
shareholders.
The Managing Board provides the Supervisory Board, in a timely
manner, with all the information it needs to exercise the duties
of the Supervisory Board. In discharging its duties, the
Managing Board takes into account our interests, our enterprise
(including the interests of our employees) shareholders, other
stakeholders and all parties involved in or with us.
The Supervisory Board includes only non-executive directors and
consists of at least two members, or more as determined by the
Joint Board. The members of the Supervisory Board are appointed
by shareholders at the General Meeting. The Joint Board and any
of our shareholders have the right to make nominations for the
Supervisory Board.
If there is a vacancy on the Supervisory Board at any time after
the end of an annual General Meeting and prior to the subsequent
annual General Meeting, the Joint Board may appoint member(s) of
the Supervisory Board to fill any vacancy, provided:
|
|
|
|
|
that these member(s) retire(s) no later than at the end of the
first Annual General Meeting following their
appointment; and |
|
|
|
the number of the members of the Supervisory Board appointed by
the Joint Board at any given time does not exceed one-third of
the aggregate number of members of the Supervisory Board as
fixed by the Joint Board. |
The Supervisory Board appoints one of its members as Chairman.
In our case, this person also chairs the Joint Board. The
Supervisory Board is currently chaired by Ms. Hellicar.
No member of the Supervisory Board shall hold office for a
continuous period in excess of three years or past the end of
the third General Meeting of Shareholders following such
members appointment, whichever is longer, without
submitting for re-election.
72
The Supervisory Board is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
supervising the policy and actions pursued by the Managing
Board; and |
|
|
|
the general course of our affairs and the business enterprise we
operate. |
The Supervisory Board assists the Managing Board with advice
relating to the general policy aspects connected with its
activities. In discharging its duties, the Supervisory Board
takes into account our interests, our enterprise (including the
interests of our employees), shareholders, other stakeholders
and all parties involved in or with us.
Members of the Supervisory Board may be suspended and dismissed
by the shareholders.
The Joint Board consists of between three and twelve members as
determined by the boards Chairman or a greater number as
determined by our shareholders at a General Meeting.
The Joint Board consists of all members of the Supervisory
Board, the Chief Executive Officer and, if the Chairman of the
Supervisory Board decides, one or more other members of the
Managing Board, to be designated by the Chairman of the
Supervisory Board, provided that the number of members of the
Managing Board on the Joint Board is never greater than the
number of members of the Supervisory Board.
The Joint Board currently includes all of the members of the
Supervisory Board as well as the Chairman of the Managing Board,
i.e. the CEO.
The Joint Board appoints one of its members as the Chairman. The
Chairman must be an independent, non-executive director. In our
case, this person also chairs the Supervisory Board. The Joint
Board is currently chaired by Ms. Hellicar.
The Joint Board is responsible for overseeing the general course
of our affairs, approving the strategy set by the Managing
Board, and monitoring our performance. To this end, we adopt a
three-year business plan and a 12-month operating plan. Our
financial results and performance are closely monitored against
these plans.
Our Joint Board also seeks to ensure that we have in place
effective external disclosure policies and procedures so that
our shareholders and the financial markets are fully-informed on
all material matters that might influence the share price.
The core responsibility of members of the Joint Board is to
exercise their business judgment in our and our shareholders
best interests. Members of the Joint Board must fulfill their
fiduciary duties to shareholders in compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations. Directors also take into
consideration the interests of other stakeholders in the
Company, including employees, customers, creditors and others
with a legitimate interest in the Companys affairs.
In discharging their duties, directors are provided with direct
access to our senior executives and outside advisors and
auditors. Joint Board Committees and individual directors may
seek independent professional advice at the Companys
expense for the purposes of the proper performance of their
duties.
The Joint Board generally holds at least four meetings per year
and whenever the Chairman of the Joint Board or two or more of
its members have requested a meeting. Joint Board meetings are
generally held at the Companys offices in the Netherlands,
but may in exceptional circumstances be held elsewhere. In
addition,
73
meetings may also be held by telephone or video-conference
provided that all participants can hear each other
simultaneously. The vast majority of the Joint Board meetings
shall physically be held in the Netherlands.
Each Joint Board meeting includes an executive session without
any members of our management present.
The Joint Board has an annual program of visiting our facilities
and spending time with line management, customers and suppliers
to assist directors to better understand our businesses and the
markets in which we operate.
Directors
Our directors possess qualifications, experience and expertise
which will assist the board in fulfilling its responsibilities,
and assist the Company to achieve future growth.
Directors are required to be able to devote a sufficient amount
of time to prepare for, and effectively participate in, board
and committee meetings. The responsibilities of directors and
our expectations of them are set out in a letter at the time the
director is appointed.
All directors are expected to bring their independent views and
judgment to the Joint Board and must declare any potential or
actual conflicts of interest.
In determining the independence of directors in accordance with
applicable listing standards, and whether a director has a
material relationship with us or another party that might impair
his or her independence, the Joint Board considers all relevant
facts and circumstances.
The Joint Board may determine that a director is independent
even if there is a material relationship. This may occur if that
relationship is not considered by the Joint Board to influence,
or be perceived to influence, the directors decisions in
relation to us.
The Joint Board has not set materiality thresholds and considers
all relationships on a case-by-case basis, having regard to the
accounting standards approach to materiality.
The Joint Board has a policy that a majority of its members and
the Chairman must be independent unless a greater number is
required to be independent under the rules and regulations of
ASX, the NYSE or any other applicable regulatory body. For the
purposes of complying with any applicable independence
requirements for directors who serve on the Nominating and
Governance Committee, the Remuneration Committee and the Audit
Committee, a directors independence is determined by the
board in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
applicable exchange or regulatory body.
In addition, the office of Chairman of the Joint Board and Chief
Executive Officer cannot be held by the same person
simultaneously, other than in special circumstances and/or for a
short period of time.
The Board does not believe that arbitrary limits on the tenure
of directors are appropriate or in the best interests of us and
our shareholders. Limits on tenure may cause the loss of
experience and expertise that are important contributors to our
long-term growth and prosperity. Conversely, the Board does not
believe that directors should expect to be automatically
nominated for re-election at the end of their three-year term,
but that their nomination for re-election should be based on
their individual performance and our needs.
The Joint Board has considered the issue of the independence of
our directors and determined that each of the members of the
Joint Board is independent, other than Mr. Gries.
Mr. Gries is our Chief Executive Officer and as such is not
independent.
Under the NYSE listing standards applicable to
U.S. companies, Mr. James Loudon would not be
considered to be independent because his son is an employee of
our independent registered public accounting firm. However, his
son does not work, and has never worked, on our audit or
otherwise performed services for
74
us. Accordingly, despite the fact that Mr. Loudon is not
independent under the NYSE rules, the board of directors has
resolved to have him continue to serve on the Audit Committee
and the Remuneration Committee.
Two additional ways in which our corporate governance practices
significantly differ from those followed by U.S. domestic
companies under NYSE listing standards should be noted. First,
in the United States, it is the audit committee of a board of
directors that is required to be solely responsible for, among
other matters, appointing a companys independent auditor.
However, in accordance with Dutch law, our shareholders are
required to appoint our independent auditor. In addition, the
NYSE rules require each issuer to have an audit committee, a
compensation committee (the equivalent to a remuneration
committee), and a nominating committee composed entirely of
independent directors. In our case, the charters of the
committees of our board of directors only require that we have a
majority of independent directors on such committees, unless a
higher number is mandatory.
Directors shareholdings disclosed under Share
Ownership below are not considered to detract from their
independence.
All of the independent directors have:
|
|
|
|
|
undertaken to advise the Joint Board of any change in their
circumstances that could affect their independence; and |
|
|
|
completed a comprehensive questionnaire that confirms their
independence. |
We have an orientation procedure for new directors. Our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and
Executive Vice Presidents are responsible for providing
information for the orientation for new directors and for
periodically providing materials or briefing papers to the Joint
Board on matters as requested or appropriate for the fulfillment
of the directors duties.
Typically, a new director will undergo an extensive orientation
that includes:
|
|
|
|
|
visits to our facilities, meetings with management and customers; |
|
|
|
reviews of financial position, strategy, operating performance
and risk management; |
|
|
|
a review of his or her rights, duties and
responsibilities; and |
|
|
|
a discussion of the role of Joint Board Committees. |
We also have induction and orientation programs for executives
and employees that are tailored according to seniority and
position.
We encourage our directors to participate in continuing
education programs to assist them in performing their
responsibilities.
Under our Articles of Association, the salary, the bonus (if
any) and the other terms and conditions of employment of the
members of the Managing Board are determined by the Joint Board.
Under an amendment to the Dutch Civil Code which came into force
on October 1, 2004, the salary and bonus of members of the
Managing Board must be determined within the scope and the
limits of a Remuneration Policy.
A Remuneration Policy for the members of the Managing Board has
been developed by the Supervisory and Joint Boards and will be
submitted to our shareholders for adoption at the next General
Meeting. Furthermore, arrangements for the remuneration of the
members of the Managing Board in the form of shares or CUFS, or
rights to acquire shares or CUFS, in our share capital will be
subject to the approval of shareholders at the 2005 General
Meeting.
Under our Articles of Association, the Joint Board determines
the remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board,
provided that the total amount does not exceed a maximum sum
approved by shareholders
75
at the General Meeting. Under the amendment to the Dutch Civil
Code, the total remuneration of the members of the Supervisory
Board will always be determined by shareholders.
Our Articles of Association generally provide that we will
indemnify any person who is or was a member of our Managing,
Supervisory or Joint Boards or one of our employees, officers or
agents, who suffers any loss as a result of any action in
connection with their service to us, provided they acted in good
faith in carrying out their duties and in a manner they
reasonably believed to be in our interest. This indemnification
generally will not be available if the person seeking
indemnification acted with gross negligence or willful
misconduct in the performance of such persons duties to
us. A court in which an action is brought may, however,
determine that indemnification is appropriate nonetheless.
The Joint Board, together with the Nominating and Governance
Committee, has developed, and periodically revises, management
succession plans, policies and procedures for our Chief
Executive Officer and other senior officers, whether such
succession occurs as a result of a promotion, termination,
resignation, retirement or an emergency.
Board Committees
Our Joint Board has three committees: the Audit Committee, the
Nominating and Governance Committee and the Remuneration
Committee. In addition, a fourth committee, known as the Special
Committee, operated between July 19, 2004 and
March 31, 2005.
Following the Corporate Governance review and changes proposed
to the Articles of Association, the board committee structure is
being revised and it is anticipated that the Supervisory Board
instead of the Joint Board will have three committees: the Audit
Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the
Remuneration Committee.
Following our recent corporate governance review, changes were
made to update and expand our Audit Committee Charter. The key
aspects of the charter, as amended, are set out below.
The Audit Committee contains at least three members of the
Board, appointed by the Board. The majority of the members of
the Audit Committee must be independent. If the rules and
regulations of the ASX, the NYSE or any other applicable
regulatory body mandatorily require more members of the Audit
Committee to be independent, then the number of members of the
Audit Committee required by the rules to be independent must be
independent. For purposes of complying with any applicable
independence requirements, a directors independence is
determined by the Board in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the applicable exchange or regulatory body.
All members must be financially literate and must have
sufficient business, industry and financial expertise to act
effectively as members of the Audit Committee, as determined by
the Board. At least one member must have accounting or related
financial management expertise, as determined by the Board. In
addition, at least one member of the Audit Committee shall be an
audit committee financial expert as determined by
the Board in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission rules.
The Board appoints one member of the Audit Committee as its
Chairman. The Chairman must be independent and is primarily
responsible for the proper functioning of the Audit Committee.
The Chairman acts as spokesman of the Audit Committee and is the
main contact for the Board. The Chairman of the Audit Committee
must not be the current Chairman of the Board or a former member
of the Managing Board.
76
Currently, the members of the Audit Committee are
Mr. Michael Brown (Chairman), Mr. Michael Gillfillan,
Mr. Loudon, Mr. Gregory Clark and Ms. Hellicar.
Under the NYSE listing standards applicable to
U.S. companies, Mr. Loudon would not be considered to
be independent because his son is an employee of our independent
registered public accounting firm. However, his son does not
work, and has never worked, on our audit or otherwise performed
services for us. Accordingly, despite the fact that Mr. Loudon
is not independent under the NYSE rules, the Board has resolved
to have him continue to serve on the Audit Committee.
|
|
|
Purpose, Duties and Responsibilities |
The Audit Committee provides advice and assistance to the
Supervisory Board in fulfilling the Boards
responsibilities relating to: the integrity of the
Companys financial statements; the Companys
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the external
auditors qualifications and independence; the
Companys internal controls; oversight of risk assessment
and management; the performance of the Companys internal
audit function and the external auditor; and such other matters
as the Board may request from time to time.
Standards and Quality: The Audit Committee oversees the
adequacy and effectiveness of the Companys accounting and
financial policies and controls, including periodic discussions
with management, internal auditors and the external auditor, and
seeks assurance of compliance with relevant regulatory and
statutory requirements.
Financial Reports: The Audit Committee oversees the
Companys financial reporting process and reports on the
results of its activities to the Board. Specifically, the Audit
Committee reviews with management and the external auditor the
Companys annual and quarterly financial statements and
reports to shareholders, seeking assurance that the external
auditor is satisfied with the disclosures and content of the
financial statements, and recommends their adoption to the
Board. The Chairman of the Audit Committee may represent the
entire Audit Committee for the purposes of quarterly reviews. In
overseeing the financial reporting process, the Audit Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Oversees the submission of financial information by the Company
(including information relating to the Companys choice of
accounting policies, the application and assessment of the
effects of new relevant legislation, and information on the
treatment of estimated entries in the annual accounts). |
|
|
|
Meets to review and discuss with management and the external
auditor the annual audited and quarterly financial statements of
the Company, including: (i) an analysis of the external
auditors judgment as to the quality of the Companys
accounting principles, including significant financial reporting
issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of
the financial statements; (ii) the Companys specific
disclosures under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
including accounting policies that may be regarded as critical;
and (iii) major issues regarding the Companys
accounting principles and financial statement presentations,
including any significant changes in the Companys
selection or application of accounting principles and financial
statement presentations. |
|
|
|
Assesses whether the external reporting is consistent with the
members of the Audit Committees information and knowledge
and is adequate for shareholder needs. |
|
|
|
Reviews and discusses corporate policies with respect to
earnings press releases, as well as financial information and
earnings guidance, if any, provided to analysts and ratings
agencies. |
Risk Assessment and Management: The Audit Committee
reviews, monitors and discusses the Companys policies and
procedures with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the identification of strategic, operational and financial risks; |
|
|
|
the establishment of effective systems to monitor, assess,
prioritize, mitigate and manage risk; and |
|
|
|
reporting systems for monitoring compliance with risk policies. |
77
External Audit: The Audit Committee has general oversight
of the appointment and provision of all external audit services
to the Company. Specifically, the Audit Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Is responsible, in its capacity as a committee of the Board, for
the selection, retention, compensation, and general oversight of
the work of the external auditor. Accordingly, it recommends the
appointment and, as appropriate, the termination of the external
auditor to the General Meeting of shareholders. The external
auditor reports directly to the Audit Committee. At least every
four years, the Audit Committee shall, together with the
Managing Board, thoroughly assess the functioning of the
external auditor in the various entities and capacities in which
the external auditor operates. The main conclusions of the
assessment are notified to the General Meeting, accompanied by,
if appropriate, a proposal for the replacement of the external
auditor and appointment of a new external auditor. |
|
|
|
Reviews all audit reports provided to the Company by the
external auditor. |
|
|
|
Obtains and reviews, at least annually, a report by the external
auditor describing: (i) the external auditors
internal quality-control procedures; (ii) any material
issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control
review, peer review, or by any inquiry or investigation by
governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding
five years relating to one or more independent audits carried
out by the external auditors, as well as any steps taken by the
external auditor to deal with any such issues; and
(iii) all relationships between the external auditor and
the Company. |
|
|
|
Approves in advance all audit services to be provided by the
external auditor. |
|
|
|
Establishes policies and procedures for the engagement of the
external auditor to provide permissible non-audit services,
which shall include pre-approval of all permissible non-audit
services to be provided by the external auditor, and determines
the involvement of the external auditor in respect of the
contents and publication of financial reporting by the Company
other than the annual accounts. |
|
|
|
Considers, at least annually, the independence of the external
auditor, including whether the external auditors
performance of permissible non-audit services is compatible with
the auditors independence, and obtains and reviews a
report by the external auditor describing any relationships
between the external auditor and the Company or any other
relationships that may adversely affect the independence of the
external auditor. At least once a year, the Audit Committee
shall, together with the Managing Board, report to the Board on
the developments concerning the relationship with the external
auditor, in particular its independence. The report shall
address issues including the adequacy of the rotation of the
partners within the external auditor firm, and the
appropriateness of any non-audit services provided by the
external auditor. Ongoing retention of the external auditor will
take into account the outcome of this report. |
|
|
|
Oversees the compliance with recommendations and observations of
the external auditor. |
|
|
|
Reviews and discusses with the external auditor: (i) the
scope of the audit, the results of the audit, any irregularities
in respect of the content of the financial reporting, and any
difficulties the external auditor encountered in the course of
its audit work, including managements response, any
restrictions on the scope of the external auditors
activities or on access to requested information, and any
significant disagreements with management; and (ii) any
reports of the external auditor with respect to interim periods. |
|
|
|
Establishes policies for the hiring of employees and former
employees of the external auditor. |
Internal Audit: The Audit Committee oversees the
Companys internal audit function, and approves the
appointment and termination of all providers of internal audit
services, both internal and external (including the
Companys internal audit director from time to time). The
Audit Committee approves, and can direct, the plan of action for
internal audit services, takes note of internal audit findings
and recommendations, supervises compliance with the plan and
recommendations, and assesses the performance of the internal
audit function. Specifically, the Audit Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Discusses with the internal auditors the overall scope and plans
for its audit activities. |
78
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews and approves the annual internal audit plan and the
related budget and work program. |
|
|
|
Reviews all internal audit reports. |
|
|
|
Oversees the implementation of corrective actions by management
personnel. |
In addition, the Audit Committee meets separately and
periodically with all providers of internal audit services, at
either the committees or the internal auditors
request, and reviews and discusses the scope and results of the
internal audit program. At least annually, the Audit Committee
assesses the performance and objectivity of the internal audit
function, including review of the internal audit program and
co-ordination between internal and external auditors, and the
need for any changes.
Internal Controls: The Audit Committee reviews and
discusses the adequacy and effectiveness of the Companys
internal compliance and control systems as well as and the
effectiveness of their implementation, including any significant
deficiencies in internal controls and significant changes in
such controls.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Audit Committee
reviews and discusses the adequacy and effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and management
reports thereon.
Complaints: The Audit Committee establishes procedures
for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters,
including procedures for confidential, anonymous submission of
concerns by employees regarding questionable accounting and
auditing matters.
The Audit Committee meets as often as it deems necessary or
appropriate, either in person or telephonically, and at such
times and places, and with such invitees, as the Audit Committee
determines. A quorum for a meeting of the Audit Committee is a
majority of its members. Resolutions of the Audit Committee are
adopted by a majority of votes cast. The Audit Committee keeps
minutes of meetings and records of resolutions passed, and these
are included in the papers for the next Board meeting after each
meeting of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reports
regularly to the Board about its meetings and activities.
The Audit Committee maintains free and open communications with
the external auditor, the internal auditors and management. The
committee periodically meets with the external auditor without
representatives of management to discuss the adequacy of the
Companys disclosures and policies and to satisfy itself
regarding the external auditors independence from
management. The external auditor may communicate with the Audit
Committee or its Chairman at any time.
In exercising its oversight role, the Audit Committee may
investigate any matter brought to its attention, and for this
purpose has full access to the Companys records, personnel
and any required external support. The Audit Committee has the
authority to retain, at the Companys expense, the external
auditor and such other outside counsel, accountants, experts and
advisors as it determines appropriate to assist the Audit
Committee in the performance of its functions. The Company will
also provide funding for the payment of ordinary administrative
expenses of the Audit Committee that are necessary or
appropriate in carrying out its duties.
The Audit Committee reviews, and may take any necessary action
to uphold, the overall quality of the Companys financial
reporting and practices.
79
The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its
charter at least annually, and recommends any changes it
considers appropriate to the Board.
The Audit Committee conducts an annual performance review of the
Audit Committee and reports its findings to the Board.
The Audit Committee oversees the Companys compliance
programs with respect to legal and regulatory requirements and
the Companys code of ethics policies, including reviewing
related party transactions and other conflict of interest issues
as they arise.
In addition to providing the Board with a report and minutes of
each of its meetings, the Audit Committee will inform the Board
of any general issues that arise with respect to the quality or
integrity of the Companys financial statements, the
Companys compliance with legal or regulatory requirements,
the performance and independence of the external auditor, or the
performance of the internal audit function.
The Audit Committee may undertake other special duties as
requested by the Board.
|
|
|
Annual Information Meeting |
Our external auditor attends the Annual Information Meeting.
Our Audit Committee Charter, as amended, is available from the
Corporate Governance area of our Investor Relations website at
www.jameshardie.com.
|
|
|
Nominating and Governance Committee |
Our Nominating and Governance Committee was formed in 2002.
Following our recent corporate governance review, changes were
made to update and expand our Nominating and Governance
Committee Charter. The key aspects of the charter, as amended,
are set out below.
The Nominating and Governance Committee consists of at least
three members of the Supervisory Board, who are appointed by the
Board.
The majority of the members of the committee must be independent
unless a greater number is required to be independent under the
rules and regulations of the ASX, the NYSE or any other
applicable regulatory body. For the purposes of complying with
any applicable independence requirements for directors who serve
on the Nominating and Governance Committee, a directors
independence is determined by the Board in accordance with the
rules and regulations of the applicable exchange or regulatory
body.
The Joint Board appoints one member of the committee as its
Chairman. The Chairman must be independent, is primarily
responsible for the committees proper functioning, acts as
the committees spokesman and is the main contact for the
Board.
Currently, Mr. Donald McGauchie (Chairman), Mr. Peter
Cameron, Mr. Clark and Ms. Hellicar serve on the
Nominating and Governance Committee.
80
|
|
|
Purpose, Duties and Responsibilities |
The purpose of the committee is to identify individuals
qualified to become members of the Managing Board or Board;
recommend to the Board candidates for the Managing Board or
Board (to be appointed by shareholders); recommend to the Board
a set of corporate governance principles; and perform a
leadership role in shaping the Companys corporate
governance policies. The duties and responsibilities of the
committee are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Develop criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates for
the Managing Board and the Board. These criteria include a
candidates business experience and skills, independence,
judgment, integrity, ability to commit sufficient time and
attention to the activities of the Managing Board and Board, as
well as the absence of any potential conflicts with the
Companys interests. In applying these criteria, the
committee considers the needs of the Managing Board and the
Board as a whole and seeks to achieve a diversity of
occupational and personal backgrounds on the Board. |
|
|
|
Identify and review the qualifications of, and recruit
candidates for, the Managing Board and the Board. |
|
|
|
Assess the contributions and independence of incumbent directors
in determining whether to recommend them for re-election to the
Board. |
|
|
|
Establish a procedure for the consideration of candidates for
the Managing Board and the Board recommended by the
Companys stockholders. |
|
|
|
Recommend to the Board candidates for election or re-election to
the Managing Board and the Board, all to be elected by
shareholders at a General Meeting. |
|
|
|
Recommend to the Board candidates to be appointed by the Board
as necessary to fill vacancies and newly created directorships
and make recommendations for the removal of directors. |
|
|
|
Develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance
principles and review and recommend changes to these principles,
as necessary. |
|
|
|
Make recommendations to the Board concerning the structure,
composition and functioning of the Board and its committees. |
|
|
|
Recommend to the Board candidates for appointment to board
committees and consider periodically rotating directors among
the committees. |
|
|
|
Review and recommend to the Board retirement and other tenure
policies for directors. |
|
|
|
Review directorships in other public companies held by or
offered to directors and senior officers of the Company. |
|
|
|
Review and assess the channels through which the Board receives
information, and the quality and timeliness of information
received. |
|
|
|
Review the Companys succession plans relating to the CEO
and other senior officers. |
|
|
|
Periodically evaluate the functioning of the individual members
of the Managing Board and the Board and report the results of
the evaluation to the Board. |
|
|
|
Periodically evaluate the scope and composition of the Managing
Board and the Board, and propose the profile of the Board. |
81
|
|
|
|
|
Supervise the policy of the Managing Board in relation to the
selection and appointment criteria for senior management. |
|
|
|
Annually evaluate the performance of the committee and the
adequacy of the committees charter. |
|
|
|
Perform such other duties and responsibilities as are consistent
with the purpose of the committee and as the Board or the
committee deems appropriate. |
The committee has the authority to retain such outside counsel,
experts, and other advisors as it determines appropriate to
assist it in the full performance of its functions, including
sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm used to
identify director candidates, and to approve the search
firms fees and other retention terms.
The committee meets as often as it deems necessary or
appropriate, either in person or telephonically, and at such
times and places as the committee determines. A quorum for a
meeting of the committee is a majority of its members.
Resolutions of the committee are adopted by a majority of votes
cast. The committee reports regularly to the full Board with
respect to its meetings.
The committee prepares a report of its deliberations and
findings and provides the Board with the report at the first
meeting of the Board directly following the meeting of the
committee and in any event no less frequently than annually.
Our Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, as amended, is
available from the Corporate Governance area of our Investor
Relations website at www.jameshardie.com.
Following our recent corporate governance review, changes were
made to update and expand our Remuneration Committee Charter.
The key aspects of the charter, as amended, are set out below.
The Remuneration Committee consists of at least three members of
the Supervisory Board who are appointed by the Board.
The majority of the members of the Remuneration Committee must
be independent unless a greater number is required to be
independent under the rules and regulations of ASX, the NYSE or
any other applicable regulatory body. For the purposes of
complying with any applicable independence requirements for
directors to serve on our Remuneration Committee, a
directors independence shall be determined by the Board in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the applicable
exchange or regulatory body.
Additionally, members of the Remuneration Committee must qualify
as non-employee directors for purposes of
Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and as outside directors for purposes of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Board appoints one member of the Remuneration Committee as
its Chairman. The Chairman must be independent, is primarily
responsible for the committees proper functioning, acts as
the committees spokesman and is the main contact for the
Board. The Chair of the Remuneration Committee may not be the
current Chairman of the Board or a former member of the Managing
Board.
Currently, the members of the Remuneration Committee are
Mr. John Barr (Chairman), Mr. Loudon and
Ms. Hellicar.
82
Under the NYSE listing standards applicable to
U.S. companies, Mr. Loudon would not be considered to
be independent because his son is an employee of our independent
registered public accounting firm. However, his son does not
work, and has never worked, on our audit or otherwise performed
services for us. Accordingly, despite the fact that
Mr. Loudon is not independent under the NYSE rules, the
board of directors has resolved to have him continue to serve on
the Remuneration Committee.
|
|
|
Purpose, Duties, and Responsibilities |
The purpose of the Remuneration Committee is to discharge the
responsibilities of the Board relating to remuneration of the
Companys senior executives and non-executive directors and
to further advise the Board on the Companys remuneration
policies and practices. The duties and responsibilities of the
Remuneration Committee are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Oversee the Companys overall remuneration structure,
policies and programs, assess whether the Companys
remuneration structure establishes appropriate incentives for
management and employees, and approve any significant changes in
the Companys remuneration structure, policies and programs. |
|
|
|
Administer and make recommendations to the Board with respect to
the Companys incentive-compensation and equity-based
remuneration plans, including the JHI NV 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan (the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan). |
|
|
|
Review the remuneration of directors, for service on the Board
and the Board committees and recommend changes in remuneration
to the Board. |
|
|
|
Prepare a proposal for the Board concerning the remuneration
policy for the members of the Managing Board to be put to a
General Meeting. |
|
|
|
Review and make recommendations to the Board on the
Companys recruitment, retention and termination policies
and procedures for senior management. |
|
|
|
Prepare a proposal concerning the individual remuneration of the
members of the Managing Board to be put to the Board, including:
(i) the remuneration structure; and (ii) the amount of
fixed remuneration, shares and/or options and/or other variable
remuneration components, pension rights, severance pay and other
forms of remuneration to be awarded, as well as the related
performance criteria. |
|
|
|
Review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to
the remuneration of the members of the Managing Board, evaluate
the performance of the members of the Managing Board in light of
those goals and objectives, and recommend to the Board the
remuneration of the members of the Managing Board. |
|
|
|
Prepare the remuneration report on the remuneration policies for
the Managing Board to be put to the Board for adoption. The
remuneration report comprises a report on the way in which the
remuneration policy was implemented in the most recent financial
year as well as an outline of the remuneration policy that will
be implemented in the following years. At a minimum, the outline
must contain the information as referred to in best practice
provision II.2.10 of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code. The
remuneration report shall be posted on the Companys
website. |
|
|
|
Make recommendations regarding the remuneration of the
Companys other senior executives. |
|
|
|
Approve stock option and other stock incentive awards for senior
executives. |
|
|
|
Review and approve the design of incentive schemes and other
benefit plans pertaining to senior executives. |
|
|
|
Review and recommend employment agreements and severance
arrangements for senior executives, including change-in-control
provisions, plans or agreements. |
|
|
|
Approve, amend or modify the terms of any remuneration or
benefit plan that does not require shareholder approval. |
83
|
|
|
|
|
Annually evaluate the performance of the Remuneration Committee
and the adequacy of this charter. |
|
|
|
Perform such other duties and responsibilities as are consistent
with the purpose of the Remuneration Committee and as the Board
or the Remuneration Committee deems appropriate. |
The Remuneration Committee may delegate any of the foregoing
duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the
Remuneration Committee consisting of not less than two members
of the committee.
The Remuneration Committee will have the sole authority to
retain, at the expense of the Company, such outside counsel,
experts, remuneration consultants and other advisors as it
determines appropriate to assist it in the full performance of
its functions.
The Remuneration Committee will meet as often as it deems
necessary or appropriate, either in person or telephonically,
and at such times and places as the Remuneration Committee
determines. A quorum for a meeting of the Remuneration Committee
is a majority of its members. Resolutions of the Remuneration
Committee are adopted by a majority of votes cast. The
Remuneration Committee will report regularly to the Board with
respect to its meetings and activities.
The Remuneration Committee prepares a report of its
deliberations and findings and provides the Board with the
report at its first meeting directly following the meeting of
the Remuneration Committee and, in any event, no less frequently
than annually.
Our Remuneration Committee Charter, as amended, is available
from the Corporate Governance area of our Investor Relations
website at www.jameshardie.com.
In July 2004, the Board established a committee of the Board to
oversee our participation in the SCIs investigation into
the Foundation. The Special Committee was wound-up on
March 31, 2005.
Ms. Hellicar (Chairman), Mr. McGauchie and
Mr. Gillfillan served on the Special Committee. Its
responsibilities included:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing the SCIs report, which was delivered to the NSW
Government on September 21, 2004, and recommending to the
Joint Board appropriate actions in response to its
findings; and |
|
|
|
overseeing any developments with respect to or discussion of
arrangements as to the SCIs findings and taking any
recommendations to the Joint Board and, ultimately, to our
shareholders for approval. |
Policies and Programs
We have a number of policies and programs that address key
aspects of our corporate governance. Our key policies and
programs cover:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Management |
|
|
|
Business Conduct and Ethics |
|
|
|
Ethics Hotline (Whistleblower) |
|
|
|
Continuous Disclosure and Market Communication |
|
|
|
Insider Trading |
84
The Joint Board, together with the Audit Committee, is
responsible for satisfying itself that our risk management
systems are effective and, in particular, for ensuring that:
|
|
|
|
|
the principal strategic, operational and financial risks are
identified; |
|
|
|
effective systems are in place to monitor and manage
risks; and |
|
|
|
reporting systems, internal controls and arrangements for
monitoring compliance with laws and regulations are adequate. |
In addition to maintaining appropriate insurance and other risk
management measures, the Company has taken the following steps
to address identified risks. It has:
|
|
|
|
|
established policies and procedures in relation to treasury
operations, including the use of financial derivatives; |
|
|
|
issued and revised standards and procedures in relation to
environmental and health and safety matters; |
|
|
|
implemented and maintained training programs in relation to
legal issues such as trade practices/antitrust, trade secrecy,
and Intellectual Property protection; and |
|
|
|
issued procedures requiring that significant capital and
recurring expenditure is approved at an appropriate level of
management or by the Joint Board. |
The internal and external audit functions are involved in risk
assessment and the management and measurement of the
effectiveness of the Companys risk management systems. The
internal and external audit functions are separate from and
independent of each other.
The above risks are also addressed in our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics which applies to all employees and directors,
and monitored through regular reports to the Joint Board. Where
appropriate, members of the management team and independent
advisers also make presentations to the Joint Board and to the
Audit Committee during the year.
We regularly review the need for additional disclosure of our
risk management systems including those related to our internal
compliance and control system.
|
|
|
Business Conduct and Ethics |
See Item 16B, Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as amended, is
available from the Corporate Governance area of our Investor
Relations website at www.jameshardie.com.
|
|
|
Ethics Hotline (Whistleblower) |
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also provides employees
with instructions about whom they should contact if they have
information or questions regarding violations of the policy. The
Ethics Hotline will be introduced progressively in our
operations in The Netherlands, the United States and Australia
before July 31, 2005. See Item 16B, Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics.
|
|
|
Continuous Disclosure and Market Communication
Policy |
We have a Continuous Disclosure and Market Communication Policy
which is designed to ensure that investors can easily understand
our strategies and assess the quality of our management and
examine our financial position and the strength of our growth
prospects.
The policy is also designed to ensure that we satisfy our legal
obligations on disclosure to the ASX and under the Australian
Corporations Act (2001) as well as our obligations in the
United States where we are traded on the NYSE, and in The
Netherlands.
85
We are committed to communicating effectively with our
investors. Our investor relations program includes:
|
|
|
|
|
management briefings and presentations to accompany quarterly
results, which are accessible on a live webcast and
teleconference; |
|
|
|
audio webcasts of other management briefings and view webcasts
of the shareholder information meeting; |
|
|
|
a comprehensive Investor Relations website that displays all
Company announcements and notices as soon as they have been
cleared by the ASX, as well as all major management and roadshow
presentations; |
|
|
|
Australian and United States site visits and briefings on
strategy for investment analysts; |
|
|
|
a quarterly newsletter available to shareholders and other
interested parties; |
|
|
|
an e-mail alert service to advise investors and other interested
parties of announcements and other events; and |
|
|
|
equality of access for shareholders, investment analysts and the
media to briefings, presentations and meetings. |
Our Continuous Disclosure and Market Communication Policy is
available from the Corporate Governance area of our Investor
Relations website at www.jameshardie.com.
Directors and senior executives are subject to our Insider
Trading Policy and rules.
Directors and senior executives, among others, must notify the
designated compliance officer, currently our General Counsel,
before buying or selling our shares. Our shares may only be
bought or sold by employees, including senior executives, and
directors, within four weeks beginning two days after the
announcement of quarterly or full year results.
The Joint Board recognizes that it is the individual
responsibility of each of our directors and employees to ensure
that he or she complies with the spirit and the letter of
insider trading laws and that notification to the Joint Board in
no way implies Joint Board approval of any transaction.
Our Insider Trading Policy is available from the Corporate
Governance area of our Investor Relations website at
www.jameshardie.com.
|
|
|
Current and Former Directors and Executive Officers |
On August 11, 2004, Mr. Alan McGregor resigned as
Chairman of the Supervisory Board due to his continuing ill
health and Ms. Meredith Hellicar was appointed Chairman of
the Supervisory Board. On August 25, 2004,
Mr. McGregor resigned from the Joint and Supervisory Boards
and from all board committees on which he served.
Mr. McGregor passed away on February 19, 2005.
On September 28, 2004, we announced that Mr. Peter
Macdonald and Mr. Peter Shafron were standing aside as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively.
On October 20, 2004, Mr. Shafron resigned from his
position as Chief Financial Officer. On October 21, 2004,
Mr. Russell Chenu was named Executive Vice President,
Australia and interim Chief Financial Officer. On
February 14, 2005, Mr. Chenu was appointed as our
Chief Financial Officer.
86
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Macdonald resigned from his
position on the Managing Board and as Chief Executive Officer.
On the same day, Mr. Louis Gries was appointed as an
interim member of the Managing Board (in accordance with
Article 15.4 of our Articles of Association) and was named
interim Chief Executive Officer. On February 14, 2005, he
was appointed Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gries
appointment, as a member of the Managing Board, will require
shareholders approval at the next General Meeting.
Mr. Macdonalds resignation letter did not explain his
reasons for resigning. Prior to the date of
Mr. Macdonalds resignation, we had, with
Mr. Macdonalds knowledge, engaged external legal
advisers to conduct a review of our affairs in the light of the
findings of the SCI. That review did not result in any finding
that Mr. Macdonald had breached the terms of his employment
agreement in relation to the activities and transactions under
review. Mr. Macdonalds resignation followed the
announcement on September 28, 2004 (shortly after the
release of the SCI Report) that Mr. Macdonald was standing
down from his role as Chief Executive Officer.
After his resignation as our Chief Executive Officer, we engaged
Mr. Macdonald in a consulting role for a minimum period of
27 months in order to efficiently transition his duties as
Chief Executive Officer to his successor. From October 22,
2004 through January 21, 2005, Mr. Macdonald was paid
a monthly consulting fee of $60,000 in return for committing to
up to 80% of a full-time role during that period. From
January 22, 2005 through March 31, 2005,
Mr. Macdonald was paid a monthly fee of $10,000. We paid
Mr. Macdonald a total of $201,289 from October 22,
2004 to March 31, 2005. After March 31, 2005, we have
paid and expect to continue to pay Mr. Macdonald a monthly
fee of $10,000 for the remainder of the agreement.
Mr. Shafrons resignation letter did not explain his
reasons for resigning. He had previously stood down from his
position as Chief Financial Officer.
We also engaged Mr. Shafron in a consulting role for a
period of 24 months in order to efficiently transition his
duties as Chief Financial Officer to his successor. From
October 22, 2004 through March 31, 2005, we paid
Mr. Shafron a monthly fee of $7,020 for a total of $37,417.
In addition, during this period we also paid for his monthly car
lease payment of $750 for a total of $3,968. After
March 31, 2005, we will continue to pay Mr. Shafron a
monthly fee of $7,020 and pay for his car lease. Beginning in
June 2005, we will be paying Mr. Shafron a monthly fee of
$7,770, which includes a $750 car allowance, for the remainder
of the agreement.
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Folkert Zwinkels resigned
from the Managing Board and Mr. W. (Pim) Vlot, the
Companys Secretary at the time, was appointed as an
interim member of the Managing Board (in accordance with
Article 15.4 of our Articles of Association) on the same
day. Mr. Zwinkels resigned from his position as a managing
director in order to focus his attention on his role as our
Treasurer. On April 30, 2005, Mr. Zwinkels resigned
from the Company. On June 30, 2005, Mr. Vlots
employment agreement expired by its terms and on July 1,
2005 Mr. Benjamin Butterfield was appointed as an interim
member of the Managing Board and Company Secretary.
87
The current members of our Supervisory Board, Managing Board and
Joint Board and our executive officers, along with certain of
our former directors and executive officers, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
Term Expires | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Supervisory Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meredith Hellicar
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Chairman of the Joint Board and Chairman of the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
John Barr
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Deputy Chairman of the Joint Board and Deputy Chairman of the
Supervisory Board |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Michael Brown
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Member of the Joint Board and the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Peter Cameron
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Member of the Joint Board and the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Gregory Clark
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Member of the Joint Board and the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Michael Gillfillan
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Member of the Joint Board and the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
James Loudon
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Member of the Joint Board and the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Donald McGauchie
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Member of the Joint Board and the Supervisory Board |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Managing Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Gries
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Interim Member of the Joint Board and
Interim Chairman of the Managing Board |
|
Benjamin Butterfield
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
General Counsel, Interim Member of the Managing Board and
Company Secretary |
|
Other Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Chenu
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Donald Merkley
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Executive Vice President Research and Development |
|
David Merkley
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Executive Vice President Engineering and Process
Development |
|
James Chilcoff
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Vice President International(1) |
|
Mark Fisher
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Vice President Specialty Products(2) |
|
Nigel Rigby
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Vice President Emerging Markets(2) |
|
Robert Russell
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Vice President Established Markets(2) |
|
Former Directors and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan McGregor
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Former Chairman of the Joint Board and Former Chairman of the
Supervisory Board(3) |
|
Peter Macdonald
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Former Chief Executive Officer, Former Member of the Joint Board
and Former Chairman of the Managing Board(4) |
|
Peter Shafron
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Former Senior Vice President Legal and Chief Financial Officer(5) |
|
Phillip Morley
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer(5) |
|
Folkert Zwinkels
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Former Treasurer and Former Member of the Managing Board(6) |
|
W. (Pim) Vlot
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Former Interim Member of the Managing Board and Former Company
Secretary(7) |
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Chilcoff became a Vice President in August 2004. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Fisher, Mr. Rigby and Mr. Russell became Vice
Presidents in November 2004. |
88
|
|
(3) |
On August 11, 2004, Mr. McGregor resigned as Chairman.
On August 25, 2004, he resigned his Board and committee
memberships due to continuing ill health. Mr. McGregor
passed away on February 19, 2005. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Macdonald resigned on October 21, 2004. |
|
(5) |
At the end of May 2004, Mr. Shafron replaced
Mr. Morley as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Shafron
resigned on October 20, 2004. |
|
(6) |
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Zwinkels resigned from the
Managing Board and Mr. Vlot, Company Secretary, was
appointed as an interim member of the Managing Board on the same
day. Mr. Zwinkels resigned as our Treasurer on
April 30, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Mr. Vlots temporary employment agreement, as amended,
provided that unless an indefinite contract was negotiated, the
contract would automatically terminate on June 30, 2005.
The agreement expired by its terms on June 30, 2005. |
Directors
Meredith Hellicar is the Chairman of our Joint Board and
the Chairman of our Supervisory Board. From July 19, 2004
until its dissolution on March 31, 2005, Ms. Hellicar
was also the Chairman of the Special Committee overseeing
matters relating to the SCI. Ms. Hellicar is also a member
of our Remuneration Committee, Nominating and Governance
Committee and Audit Committee. Ms. Hellicar joined James
Hardie Industries Limited (now named ABN 60) as an
independent, non-executive director in May 1992. She resigned as
director of JHIL in October 2001 and was appointed as a member
of our Supervisory Board and Joint Board. She was last elected
by our shareholders at our 2003 Annual General Meeting.
Ms. Hellicar was appointed Chairman of our Joint and
Supervisory Board after Mr. McGregors resignation in
August 2004. She is experienced as a company director and has
held chief executive positions in resources, transport and
logistics, law and financial services. She is a director of AMP
Limited (since March 2003), Southern Cross Airports Group,
Amalgamated Holdings Limited (since October 2003), HLA
Envirosciences Pty Limited and HCS Limited; and Chairman of The
Sydney Institute. Ms. Hellicar is also a member of the
Australian Takeovers Panel and the Garvan Institute Foundation.
Her previous experience includes directorships with the NSW
Environment Protection Authority from 1992 to 1996, AurionGold
and the NSW Treasury Corporation from 2003 and 2004.
Ms. Hellicar was Chief Executive Officer of the law firm
Corrs Chambers Westgarth and Managing Director of TNT Logistics
Asia Pte Ltd and InTech Pty Ltd. Ms. Hellicar was awarded a
Centenary Medal for her contribution to society in business
leadership. Ms. Hellicar received a Bachelor of Arts and
Master of Laws, specializing in international business law, from
University of Sydney.
John Barr joined James Hardie Industries N.V. as an
independent, non-executive director as a member of our Joint
Board and Supervisory Board in September 2003 and was appointed
Deputy Chairman of the Joint and Supervisory Boards in October
2004. He was last elected by our shareholders at our 2004 Annual
General Meeting. Mr. Barr is also Chairman of our
Remuneration Committee. Mr. Barr is Chairman of Performance
Logistics Group, Inc., the second largest provider of new
vehicle transportation services in North America, and in May
2005, he assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer of Papa
Murphys International Inc., a take-and-bake pizza chain,
following its June 2004 acquisition by a partnership consisting
of himself, Charlesbank Capital Partners, LLC and company
management. He has more than 30 years of management
experience in the North American industrial sector, including
25 years at The Valvoline Company, a leading marketer,
distributor and producer of quality branded automotive and
industrial products and services, eight years as President and
Chief Executive Officer. Between 1995 and 1999, Mr. Barr
served as President and Chief Operating Officer and a member of
the board of directors of the Quaker State Corporation, a
leading automotive aftermarket products and consumer car care
company, now part of Royal Dutch Shell. Since December 2002,
Mr. Barr has served as director of United Auto Group, the
second largest publicly held automotive retailer in the United
States, and, in August 2003, he was appointed to the board of
directors of Clean Harbors Inc., the leading provider of
hazardous waste and environmental management services throughout
North America. In December 2003, he was appointed as director to
UST Inc.
89
Michael Brown is a member of our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board and Chairman of our Audit Committee.
Mr. Brown joined James Hardie Industries Limited as an
independent, non-executive director in September 1992 and was
appointed to our Supervisory Board and Joint Board in October
2001. He was last elected by our shareholders at our 2002 Annual
General Meeting. Mr. Brown has broad executive experience
in finance, accounting and general management in Australia, Asia
and the United States. He is Chairman and Director of Repco
Corporation Ltd and Energy Developments Ltd. He is a
non-executive director of Wattyl Ltd and Innamincka Petroleum
Ltd. He was Group Finance Director of Brambles Industries
Limited from 1995 to 2000; prior to that, he was Finance
Director of Goodman Fielder Ltd, Renison Goldfields Consolidated
Ltd, and Esso Australia Ltd.
Peter Cameron joined James Hardie Industries N.V. as an
independent, non-executive director as a member of our Joint
Board and Supervisory Board in August 2003. He was last elected
by our shareholders at our 2003 Annual General Meeting. He is
also a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee.
Mr. Cameron has been involved in some of Australias
largest corporate takeovers, mergers and corporate
reconstructions, and has a wealth of commercial and corporate
advisory experience. He is Chairman of Investment Banking in
Australia and a Managing Director of Credit Suisse First Boston.
In addition, he is a member of the Australian Takeovers Panel
and Chairman of the Advisory Board of the University of Sydney
Law School. Mr. Cameron was formerly a partner and Head of
Mergers and Acquisitions with the Australian law firm, Allens
Arthur Robinson. Mr. Cameron has a Bachelor of Arts and
Bachelor of Laws from the University of Sydney.
Gregory Clark is a member of our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board. He is also a member of our Nominating and
Governance Committee and Audit Committee. He was elected as an
independent, non-executive director in July 2002. Dr. Clark
first joined the Company as a consultant to the Board in
December 2001. He has a distinguished background in science and
business, specializing in the development and commercialization
of new technology. He is the recipient of a number of
international awards for science and technology, including the
Australian Academy of Science Pawsey Medal as the most
outstanding Australian scientist. Dr. Clark is currently
Principal of Clark Capital Partners, a technology advisor to a
number of financial institutions and a Director of Australia and
New Zealand Banking Group Limited. He served as President and
Chief Operating Officer of U.S.-based Loral Space and
Communications LLC from 1998 to 2000. Prior to that, he was
President of News Corporations News Technology Group and a
member of News Corporations Executive Committee.
Dr. Clark received a Ph.D. in Physics from the Australian
National University.
Michael Gillfillan is a member of our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board and Audit Committee. In addition,
Mr. Gillfillan was a member of the Special Committee
overseeing matters relating to the SCI from July 19, 2004
until its dissolution on March 31, 2005.
Mr. Gillfillan joined James Hardie Industries Limited as an
independent, non-executive director in August 1999 and was
appointed to our Supervisory Board and Joint Board in September
2001. He was last elected by our shareholders at our 2003 Annual
General Meeting. He provides us with considerable knowledge of
U.S. capital markets and a depth of experience in
commercial and corporate banking. He has held a number of senior
executive positions, including Vice Chairman of Wells Fargo
Bank. He was elected as a director of UnionBanCal Corporation
and its primary subsidiary, Union Bank of California, NA in
January 2003 and is a partner at Meriturn Partners, LLC.
Mr. Gillfillan received a B.A. in History from the
University of California, Berkeley and an MBA from the
University of California, Los Angeles.
James Loudon is a member of our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board, Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee.
Mr. Loudon was elected as an independent, non-executive
director in July 2002 after joining James Hardie Industries N.V.
as a consultant to the Board in March 2002. He has held
management positions in finance and investment banking and
senior roles in the transport and construction industries. He is
currently Deputy Chairman of Caledonia Investments Plc and has
been a director of this company since 1995. He is Governor of
the University of Greenwich and of several charitable
organizations. He was a non-executive director of Lafarge
Malayan Cement Berhad from 1989 to 2004. In addition, he served
as Group Finance Director of Blue Circle Industries Plc, one of
the worlds largest cement producers, from 1987 until 2001
and, prior to that, he was the first Vice-President of Finance
for Blue Circles companies
90
in the United States. Mr. Loudon received a Bachelor of
Arts from Cambridge University and an MBA from the Stanford
Graduate School of Business.
Donald McGauchie is a member of our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board and the Chairman of our Nominating and
Governance Committee. In addition, Mr. McGauchie was a
member of the Special Committee overseeing matters relating to
the SCI from July 19, 2004 until its dissolution on
March 31, 2005. Mr. McGauchie joined James Hardie
Industries N.V. as an independent, non-executive director in
August 2003. Mr. McGauchie has wide commercial experience
within the food processing, commodity trading, finance and
telecommunication sectors. He also has extensive public policy
experience, having previously held several high-level advisory
positions to the Australian Government including the Prime
Ministers Supermarket to Asia Council, the Foreign Affairs
Council and the Trade Policy Advisory Council.
Mr. McGauchie is Chairman of Telstra Corporation Limited
and a director of The Reserve Bank of Australia and Nufarm
Limited. Mr. McGauchie was a director of National Foods
Limited from 2000 to 2005, director of Graincorp Limited from
1999 to 2002, Chairman of Woolstock Australia Limited from 1999
to 2002, Deputy Chairman of Ridley Corporation Limited from 1998
to 2004, President of the National Farmers Federation from 1994
to 1998 and Chairman of Rural Finance Corporation from 2003 to
2004. In 2003, he was awarded the Centenary Medal for service to
Australian society through agriculture and business.
Louis Gries is our Chief Executive Officer, an interim
member of the Joint Board and our interim Chairman of the
Managing Board. His election as a permanent member of the
Managing Board will be required at the next General Meeting of
shareholders. Mr. Gries joined us as Manager of the Fontana
fiber cement plant in California in February 1991 and was
appointed President of James Hardie Building Products (USA) in
December 1993 and Executive Vice President
Operations in January 2003. In October 2004, Mr. Gries was
appointed interim CEO and in February 2005, he was appointed
CEO. He previously held management positions with United States
Gypsum (USG) Corporation. He has a Bachelor of
Science in Mathematics from the University of Illinois and an
MBA from California State University, Long Beach.
Benjamin Butterfield is our General Counsel, Company
Secretary, and an interim member of our Managing Board.
Mr. Butterfield joined us in January 2005 as our General
Counsel. On July 1, 2005, he was appointed as an interim
member of the Managing Board and our Company Secretary. From
2003 to 2004, Mr. Butterfield served as General Counsel of
Lennar Corporation. Prior to that, from 1996 to 2003 he served
as General Counsel of Hughes Supply, Inc. Prior to this, he was
a partner at Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, PA (now part of
Holland & Knight LLP). Mr. Butterfield was
Chairman of the Business Law Section of the Orange County (FL)
Bar Association from 1994 to 1995. He has a Bachelor of Arts
from Covenant College in Lookout Mountain, Tennessee and a Juris
Doctor from Stetson University College of Law in
St. Petersberg, Florida.
Executive Officers
Russell Chenu is our Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Chenu joined us in October 2004 as Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Australia. In
February 2005, he was appointed Chief Financial Officer. From
February 2001 to July 2004, Mr. Chenu served as Chief
Financial Officer of Tab Limited, then a publicly traded
entertainment and gambling company. Prior to that, from November
1999 to February 2001, he served as Chief Financial Officer of
Delta Gold Limited, then a publicly traded gold mining company.
Mr. Chenu previously worked for us for 13 years in a
variety of capacities, ultimately as Group Banking Manager from
1982 to 1984. He has a Bachelor of Commerce from the University
of Melbourne and an MBA from Macquarie Graduate School of
Management in Australia.
Donald Merkley is our Executive Vice
President Research and Development. Mr. Merkley
joined us in 1993 as Manager of our Plant City fiber cement
plant in Florida and was appointed U.S. Product Development
Manager in 1997. In 2002, he was made Executive Vice
President Research and Development and in January
2003, his role was expanded to give him responsibility for our
emerging roofing business in the United States. Mr. Merkley
is also involved in reviewing business development
opportunities. Before joining us, Mr. Merkley held
positions with USG Corporation in various engineering-related
roles. He has a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Arizona
State University.
91
David Merkley is our Executive Vice President
Engineering and Process Development. Mr. Merkley joined us
in 1994 as Plant Manager of our Fontana fiber cement operation
in California. Other roles Mr. Merkley has held with us
include: Manager, Research and Development from 1994 to 1996;
Plant Manager, Plant City from 1996 to 1998; Process Development
Manager from 1998 to 2000; and Operations Manager for James
Hardie Building Products USA from 2000 to 2002. In 2002,
Mr. Merkley was made Executive Vice President
Manufacturing and Engineering, with global responsibility. In
August 2004, Mr. Merkley became Executive Vice
President Engineering and Process Development with
responsibility for further development of new flat sheets, pipes
and trim technologies, new product engineering and plant design
and construction. Prior to joining us, Mr. Merkley held
various engineering positions in the civil construction
industry. Mr. Merkley has a Bachelor of Science in
Construction from Arizona State University.
James Chilcoff is our Vice President
International. Mr. Chilcoff joined us in 1997 as a Senior
Product Manager for Siding. Other roles Mr. Chilcoff has
held with us include: Siding Product Development
Manager Marketing from 1998 to 1999; Siding Product
Manager from 1999 to 2000; Exterior Marketing Manager from 2000
to 2001; Southern Division Sales/ Marketing Manager from 2001 to
2002; Vice President Sales/ Marketing from 2002 to 2003; and
General Manager of our Australian and New Zealand business from
2003 to 2004. In August 2004, Mr. Chilcoff became Vice
President International. Before joining us,
Mr. Chilcoff held various positions with CertainTeed
Corporation, S. C. Johnson Wax, Formica Corporation
and Armstrong World Industries. Mr. Chilcoff has a Bachelor
of Business Administration from Eastern Michigan University and
an MBA from Xavier University in Ohio.
Mark Fisher is our Vice President Specialty
Products. Mr. Fisher joined us in 1993 as a Production
Engineer. Other roles Mr. Fisher has held with us include:
Finishing Manager, Production Manager and Product Manager at
various locations from 1993 to 1999; Sales and Marketing Manager
from 2000 to 2002; and General Manager of our Europe Fiber
Cement business from 2002 to 2004. In November 2004,
Mr. Fisher became Vice President Specialty
Products. Before joining us, Mr. Fisher worked in
Engineering for Chevron Corporation. Mr. Fisher has a
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and an MBA from
University of Southern California.
Nigel Rigby is our Vice President Emerging
Markets. Mr. Rigby joined us in 1998 as a Planning Manager
for our New Zealand business. Other roles Mr. Rigby held
with us include: Sales and Marketing Manager and Product
Development Manager for our New Zealand business from 1999 to
2002; Strategic Marketing Manager for our Australian business
from 2002 to 2003; Business Development Manager for our
U.S. business in 2003; and Vice President Exterior
Sales Emerging Markets from 2003 to 2004. In
November 2004, Mr. Rigby became Vice President
Emerging Markets. Before joining us, Mr. Rigby held various
management positions at Fletcher Challenge, a New Zealand based
company involved in energy, pulp and paper, forestry and
building materials.
Robert Russell is our Vice President
Established Markets. Mr. Russell joined us in 1996 as a
Production Engineer. Other roles Mr. Russell held with us
include: Production Manager from 1997 to 1998; Plant Manager
from 1998 to 1999; Interior Products & Retail Sales
Manager from 1999 to 2000; Vice President Marketing and Sales
(James Hardie Gypsum) from 2000 to 2001; Business Development
Manager from 2001 to 2002 and Vice President Exterior Sales and
Marketing Established Markets from 2002 to 2004. In
November 2004, Mr. Russell became Vice
President Established Markets. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Russell held various engineering positions with USG
Corporation. Mr. Russell has a Bachelor of Science Degree
in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arizona and his
MBA at the University of California Los Angeles.
Donald Merkley and David Merkley are brothers. None of the other
persons above have any familial relationship with each other. In
addition, none of the individuals listed above is party to any
arrangement or understanding with a major shareholder, customer,
supplier or other entity, pursuant to which any of the above was
selected as a director or member of senior management.
92
Former Directors and Executive Officers
Alan McGregor, AO was Chairman of our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board until August 11, 2004 and resigned as a
director on August 25, 2004 due to continuing ill health.
He passed away on February 19, 2005. Mr. McGregor was
also a member of our Audit Committee, Nominating and Governance
Committee (Chairman) and Remuneration Committee (Chairman).
Mr. McGregor joined us in 1989 as an independent,
non-executive director and became Chairman in 1995, and was
appointed to our Joint and Supervisory Board in September 2001.
Mr. McGregor had a distinguished career in the law and as a
director and chairman of a number of large Australian public
companies. He was a former Chairman of Burns Philp &
Co. Ltd, the Australian Wool Testing Authority Ltd and FH
Faulding & Co. Ltd. Mr. McGregor had been a board
or committee member of a number of charitable and community
organizations and private companies. Mr. McGregor received
an M.A. in Economics and Law from the University of Cambridge in
the United Kingdom and a Bachelor of Laws from the University of
Adelaide in Australia.
Peter Macdonald was our Chief Executive Officer, Member
of the Joint Board and Chairman of the Managing Board.
Mr. Macdonald resigned on October 21, 2004 but is
expected to remain with us in a consulting capacity for an
interim period. Mr. Macdonald joined us in 1993 as General
Manager of our Australian fiber cement business and was
appointed President of our U.S. operations in 1994. He was
appointed Chief Operating Officer in September 1998 and Managing
Director and Chief Executive Officer in November 1999. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Macdonald held senior roles at CSR Ltd and
Metal Manufactures Ltd. Mr. Macdonald received a Bachelor
of Commerce and Administration from Victoria University, New
Zealand and an MBA from Pepperdine University.
Folkert Zwinkels was our Treasurer and a member of our
Managing Board. Mr. Zwinkels resigned from the Managing
Board on October 21, 2004. On April 30, 2005, he
resigned as our Treasurer. Mr. Zwinkels joined us in
October 2001 as Treasury Manager and was appointed Treasurer in
January 2003. Before joining us, he was Treasury Manager for
Reichhold Chemicals and prior to that he held a number of
financial positions at ING Barings and ABN AMRO. In addition, he
is a member of the Dutch Association of Corporate Treasurers.
Mr. Zwinkels has a Bachelor of Business Administration from
Erasmus University in Rotterdam and an MBA from University of
Bradford.
W. (Pim) Vlot was our Legal Counsel Europe &
Global Intellectual Property Manager, Company Secretary and an
interim member of our Managing Board. Mr. Vlot joined us in
January 2004 as Legal Counsel Europe & Global Manager
Intellectual Property. In February 2004, Mr. Vlot was also
appointed Company Secretary and in October 2004, he was
appointed as an interim member of the Managing Board. Before
joining us, from January 2003 to December 2003, he worked at the
Amsterdam office of the Amicorp Group, a privately owned
international provider of multinational company management,
trust and fiduciary and financial services. From October 2001 to
December 2002, he worked at Ernst & Young in The
Netherlands as Senior Manager, tax and legal. From 2000 to 2001,
Mr. Vlot worked at EQT Scandinavia B.V., the Dutch branch
of a Swedish Private Equity firm in Amsterdam, as its in-house
counsel tax and legal. Mr. Vlot is also currently a
part-time teacher in corporate tax law at the Inholland
University for Economic and Legal studies in Rotterdam and has
taught Dutch and international corporate tax law at the Dutch
Federal Tax Consultants Association in Amsterdam. Mr. Vlot
holds a masters degree in Dutch and International Tax Law from
the University of Amsterdam.
|
|
|
Former Executive Officers |
Peter Shafron was our Senior Vice President Legal and
Chief Financial Officer until he resigned on October 20,
2004. Mr. Shafron joined us in August 1993 and served as
our Senior Company Solicitor from June 1995 until he was
appointed General Counsel in March 1997. He was appointed Senior
Vice President Finance and Legal in November 2002
and in February 2004 was named Chief Financial Officer, taking
over after Mr. Morleys retirement from the position
at the end of May 2004. Before joining us, Mr. Shafron was
an associate with the Australian law firm Allen Allen &
Hemsley. He has a Bachelor of Arts
93
from the Australian National University, a Bachelor and Master
of Laws from the University of Sydney and an MBA from Pepperdine
University. Mr. Shafron is admitted to practice law in
Australia and California.
Phillip Morley was our Chief Financial Officer until he
retired from the position at the end of May 2004.
Mr. Morley remained an employee until January 31,
2005. Mr. Morley joined us as Chief Accountant in October
1984 and served as our Financial Controller from 1988 to 1995
and Executive General Manager Building Services from 1995 to
1997. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 1997. Before
joining us, Mr. Morley held senior positions in finance and
management at Swift & Co Ltd and Pfizer Corporation. He
is a Chartered Accountant and has a Bachelor of Economics and an
MBA from the University of Sydney.
Employees
As of the end of each of the last three fiscal years, we
employed the following number of people:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Cement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States (includes Canada)
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
Pipes (United States and Australia)
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
Roofing (United States)
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiber Cement
|
|
|
2,953 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
Research & Development, including Technology
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Discontinued Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Systems (New Zealand)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employees
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the end of March 31, 2005, of the 3,122 people
employed, 369 were members of labor unions: (275 in Australia
and 94 in New Zealand). Management believes that we have a
satisfactory relationship with these unions and it members and
there are currently no ongoing labor disputes.
Compensation
The aggregate amount of compensation that we paid to, or accrued
with respect to, members of our Supervisory Board, our Managing
Board and our Joint Board and to our executive officers
(22 persons in aggregate) for services in all their
capacities to us in fiscal year 2005 was approximately
$18.1 million. This figure consists of base salaries,
bonuses paid, accrued compensation relating to awards of shadow
stock, superannuation and retirement benefits, stock options and
severance.
As of March 31, 2005, the total amount accrued to provide
pension, retirement or similar benefits was approximately
$0.5 million and was related to certain members of our
Supervisory Board.
94
The tables below set forth the compensation for those
non-executive and executive directors who served on the Board
during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004; and
for our five most highly compensated current executive officers
and for our former executive officers during the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (if the current and former
non-executive directors and executive officers were in this
group for that period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary | |
|
Equity | |
|
Post-employment | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Directors | |
|
JHI NV | |
|
|
|
Retirement | |
|
|
|
|
Fees | |
|
Stock(1) | |
|
Superannuation(2) | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Name |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Non-Executive Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hellicar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
$ |
128,750 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,388 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,138 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
43,333 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,033 |
|
M. R. Brown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,300 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
53,333 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,033 |
|
D. G. McGauchie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,850 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
31,667 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,867 |
|
J. D. Barr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
33,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,519 |
|
P. Cameron
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,400 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,333 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,033 |
|
M.J. Gillfillan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
53,333 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,333 |
|
G. J. Clark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,333 |
|
J. R. H. Loudon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
47,333 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,333 |
|
Former Non-Executive Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. McGregor(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
38,750 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
640,976 |
|
|
|
685,939 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
15,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,300 |
|
Total Compensation for
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
527,500 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
34,651 |
|
|
|
640,976 |
|
|
|
1,315,627 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
422,518 |
|
|
|
207,666 |
|
|
|
36,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666,784 |
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary | |
|
employment | |
|
Equity | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Superannuation | |
|
Shadow | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash | |
|
and 401(K) | |
|
Share and | |
|
Severance | |
|
|
|
|
Base Pay | |
|
Bonuses | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Options(4) | |
|
Pay | |
|
|
Name |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Gries(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
$ |
576,654 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,452 |
|
|
$ |
136,012 |
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
233,155 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,119,273 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
439,427 |
|
|
|
753,720 |
|
|
|
114,725 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
228,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548,407 |
|
P. Vlot(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
136,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,055 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Former Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. D. Macdonald(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
471,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
138,430 |
|
|
|
6,513,284 |
|
|
|
7,153,630 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
822,500 |
|
|
|
1,745,390 |
|
|
|
15,693 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
593,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,189,141 |
|
F. H. Zwinkels(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
188,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,326 |
|
|
|
3,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,082 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
121,756 |
|
|
|
27,921 |
|
|
|
10,715 |
|
|
|
13,526 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,263 |
|
Total Compensation for Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
1,372,686 |
|
|
|
1,160,452 |
|
|
|
153,709 |
|
|
|
60,945 |
|
|
|
374,964 |
|
|
|
6,513,284 |
|
|
|
9,636,040 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
1,383,683 |
|
|
|
2,527,031 |
|
|
|
141,133 |
|
|
|
37,526 |
|
|
|
825,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,914,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary | |
|
employment | |
|
Equity | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relocation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow | |
|
Severance | |
|
Allowances | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash | |
|
401(K) | |
|
Share & | |
|
and Retirement | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
|
|
Base Pay | |
|
Bonuses | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Options(4) | |
|
Pay | |
|
Non- | |
|
|
Name |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
recurring | |
|
US$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Merkley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
$ |
334,000 |
|
|
$ |
521,656 |
|
|
$ |
65,245 |
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
195,177 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,129,078 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
315,577 |
|
|
|
437,401 |
|
|
|
68,503 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
173,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,657 |
|
David Merkley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
303,769 |
|
|
|
475,573 |
|
|
|
87,978 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
192,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072,589 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
285,577 |
|
|
|
394,064 |
|
|
|
68,481 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
135,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895,559 |
|
J. Chilcoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
234,231 |
|
|
|
259,688 |
|
|
|
31,956 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
27,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,971 |
|
|
|
670,018 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
M. T. Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
215,770 |
|
|
|
262,062 |
|
|
|
50,301 |
|
|
|
12,946 |
|
|
|
107,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
|
665,601 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
R. P. Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
233,751 |
|
|
|
234,542 |
|
|
|
32,366 |
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
|
|
111,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,224 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary | |
|
employment | |
|
Equity | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relocation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow | |
|
Severance | |
|
Allowances | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash | |
|
401(K) | |
|
Share & | |
|
and Retirement | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
|
|
Base Pay | |
|
Bonuses | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Options(4) | |
|
Pay | |
|
Non- | |
|
|
Name |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
US$ | |
|
recurring | |
|
US$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Former Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.J. Shafron(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
211,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,924 |
|
|
|
12,855 |
|
|
|
21,674 |
|
|
|
863,162 |
|
|
|
8,686 |
|
|
|
1,156,728 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
307,500 |
|
|
|
375,951 |
|
|
|
34,625 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
360,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
1,106,654 |
|
P.G. Morley(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
275,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,872 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
137,082 |
|
|
|
1,028,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548,496 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
327,630 |
|
|
|
445,742 |
|
|
|
78,802 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
580,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,445,100 |
|
Total Compensation for Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2005
|
|
|
1,808,781 |
|
|
|
1,753,521 |
|
|
|
400,642 |
|
|
|
89,634 |
|
|
|
792,191 |
|
|
|
1,891,870 |
|
|
|
131,095 |
|
|
|
6,867,734 |
|
|
Fiscal year 2004
|
|
|
1,236,284 |
|
|
|
1,653,158 |
|
|
|
250,411 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
1,249,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
4,453,970 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The annual allocation to non-executive directors of JHI NV stock
to the value of $10,000 was approved by shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting held on July 19, 2002. The
non-executive directors can elect to take additional stock in
lieu of fees. |
|
(2) |
The superannuation benefits include Australian mandated 9%
superannuation guarantee contributions on the Australian
directors total fees. |
|
(3) |
On August 11, 2004, Mr. McGregor resigned as Chairman
of the Supervisory Board due to ill health. On August 25,
2004, he resigned from the Joint and Supervisory Boards and from
all Board committees. |
|
(4) |
Options are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
and the fair value of options granted are included in
compensation during the period in which the options vest. The
weighted average assumptions and weighted average fair valued
used for grants in fiscal year 2005 were as follows: 1.1%
dividend yield; 29.1% expected volatility; 3.2% risk free
interest rate; 3.3 years of expected life; and A$1.35
weighted average fair value used at grant date. Shadow share
expense included in compensation is calculated based on the
movement in our share price during the year and the increase in
vesting of the shadow shares; A$/US$ foreign exchange movements
also affect the result. Actual benefit received depends on our
share price and foreign exchange rates at the time of exercise.
Our U.S. Shadow Stock Plan and Non-U.S. Based
Employees Stock Plan were terminated at the end of February 2005
and the value on that day of all the outstanding shares of these
plans were paid to the participants. |
|
(5) |
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Gries was appointed as an
interim member of the Managing Board and named interim Chief
Executive Officer. On February 14, 2005, he was appointed
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gries appointment, as a
member of the Managing Board, will require shareholders
approval at the next General Meeting of shareholders. |
|
(6) |
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Vlot, the Companys
secretary at the time, was appointed as an interim member of the
Managing Board. On June 30, 2005, Mr. Vlots
temporary employment agreement expired by its terms and
Mr. Butterfield was appointed as an interim member of the
Managing Board on July 1, 2005. In connection with the
expiration of his agreement, we expect to make a lump sum
payment to Mr. Vlot of approximately 50,000 Euros. |
|
(7) |
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Macdonald resigned from the
Company. |
|
(8) |
On October 21, 2004, Mr. Zwinkels resigned from his
position on the Managing Board. On April 30, 2005,
Mr. Zwinkels resigned as Treasurer. In connection with his
resignation, in May 2005 (after the end of fiscal year 2005), we
made a lump sum payment to Mr. Zwinkels of approximately
$65,000 in connection with his final settlement agreement. |
97
|
|
(9) |
On October 20, 2004, Mr. Shafron resigned from the
Company. |
|
|
(10) |
Consistent with prior years, gross up of tax on the
increase/decrease in investment value of superannuation is
included for Mr. Morley. This benefit is provided to
Mr. Morley to offset U.S. taxes he would not have had
to pay on his superannuation if he were still in Australia. At
the end of May 2004, Mr. Morley retired from his position
of Chief Financial Officer, but remained an employee until
January 31, 2005. In connection with his retirement, we
made a lump sum payment to Mr. Morley equal to
18 months of salary based on his salary at the time of his
departure. We also paid additional salary amounts owned to him
related to expatriate pay. On February 1, 2005,
Mr. Morley entered into a consulting agreement with the
Company. |
We sponsor a U.S. defined contribution plan, the James
Hardie Retirement and Profit Sharing Plan, for our employees in
the United States and a defined benefit pension plan, the
Hardiplan Superannuation Plan, for our employees in Australia.
The U.S. defined contribution plan is a tax-qualified
retirement and savings plan (the 401(k) Plan)
covering all U.S. employees, subject to certain eligibility
requirements. Participating employees may elect to reduce their
current annual compensation by up to $14,000 in calendar year
2005 and have the amount of such reduction contributed to the
401(k) Plan, with a maximum compensation limit of $210,000. In
addition, we match employee contributions dollar for dollar up
to a maximum of the first 6% of an employees base salary.
The Hardiplan Superannuation Plan is funded based on statutory
requirements in Australia and is based primarily on the
contributions and income derived thereon held by the plan on
behalf of the member, and to a lesser degree, on the
participants eligible compensation and years of credited
service.
On February 22, 2005, December 14, 2004,
December 5, 2003, December 3, 2002 and
December 17, 2001, we granted options to
purchase 273,000 shares, 5,391,100 shares,
6,179,583 shares, 4,037,000 shares and
4,248,417 shares of our common stock, respectively, at fair
market value to management and other employees under the 2001
Equity Incentive Plan. The JHIL Key Management Equity Incentive
Plan (KMEIP) was terminated as of October 19,
2001 and was replaced with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. See
the section below entitled Option Ownership.
On October 19, 2001, the effective date of the 2001
Reorganization, we confirmed the Economic Profit Incentive Plan.
The Economic Profit Incentive Plan provides incentive
compensation, in the form of year-end bonus payments, to certain
of our officers and key employees based on the
participants achievement of mutually agreed upon
individual performance objectives and our achievement of certain
target economic profit levels.
In addition, as part of the 2001 Reorganization, we amended the
JHIL 1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan, the JHIL 2000
Executive Stock Incentive Plan and the James Hardie Inc. Shadow
Stock Plan so that our, rather than JHILs common stock
served as the benchmark for determining cash payments at
maturity. All shadow shares issued under these plans were fully
vested and the cash payments were made in February 2005.
At our 2002 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders approved a
Supervisory Board Share Plan (SBSP), which requires
that all non-executive directors on our Joint Board and
Supervisory Board receive shares of our common stock as payment
for a portion of their director fees. The SBSP requires our
directors to take at least $10,000 of their fees in shares and
allows directors to receive additional shares in lieu of fees in
their discretion. Shares issued under the $10,000 compulsory
component of the SBSP are subject to a two-year escrow that
requires members of the Supervisory Board to retain shares for
at least two years following issue. The issue price for the
shares is the market value at the time of issue. No loans will
be entered into by us in relation to the grant of shares
pursuant to the SBSP.
Service Contracts and Severance Agreements
|
|
|
Service Contracts with Current Directors |
Mr. Gries and Mr. Butterfield, each treated as a
member of our Managing Board, have employment agreements with us
pursuant to which they are compensated for their services as
executive officers. The terms of the agreement are described
below. None of our Supervisory Board members has a service
contract with us.
98
Mr. Gries is our Chief Executive Officer, the interim
Chairman of the Managing Board and an interim Member of the
Joint Board. Mr. Gries was appointed interim Chief
Executive Officer and interim member of the Managing Board on
October 21, 2004. On February 14, 2005, he was
appointed Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gries
appointment as a member of the Managing Board will be considered
by our shareholders at the next General Meeting.
His employment agreement is for a period of three years and the
term will be automatically extended for one year on each
February during the term unless either party notifies the other
that it does not want the term to extend. If
Mr. Gries employment as Chief Executive Officer is
terminated without cause or by Mr. Gries for good reason,
then he will receive severance pay equal to 1.5 times his annual
salary at the time of departure plus an annual bonus equal to
1.5 times the average annual bonus he was paid over the
immediately preceding three fiscal years. Additionally, Mr.
Gries will consult with us for two years after his termination.
Subject to compliance with the consulting agreement, he will
receive his annual salary and annual target bonus during this
time, as well as certain additional benefits.
Mr. Butterfield is our General Counsel, Company Secretary
and an interim member of the Managing Board.
Mr. Butterfield was appointed interim member of the
Managing Board on July 1, 2005. His appointment on the
Managing Board will be considered by our shareholders at the
next General Meeting.
Mr. Butterfield currently has an International Assignment
Agreement to be located in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. His
agreement is for a period of three years and the term may be
extended by mutual agreement. Either we or Mr. Butterfield
can terminate the employment relationship at any time and for
any reason. In the event that the assignment is terminated by
us, we will pay reasonable repatriation costs for
Mr. Butterfield and his belongings back to the United
States unless the employment is terminated by us for breach of
conditions applying to his employment. In the event that we
terminate Mr. Butterfield for breach of conditions, or if
he voluntarily terminates his assignment before the end of its
terms, Mr. Butterfield will be required to pay back all
relocation costs (pro-rated), which we paid to him related to
his relocation from the United States to Amsterdam.
|
|
|
Service Contracts with Former Directors |
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 and part of
fiscal year 2005, Mr. Macdonald and Mr. Zwinkels were
members of our Managing Board. In addition, from October 2004
through June 2005, Mr. Vlot was an interim member of our
Managing Board. Each had employment agreements with us pursuant
to which they were compensated. The terms of the agreement, are
described below.
Until October 21, 2004, Mr. Macdonald served as our
Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Managing Board and
member of the Joint Board. In accordance with his employment
agreement, he served as one of the members of our Managing Board
and as our Chief Executive Officer and as Chief Executive
Officer of several of our subsidiaries.
Mr. Macdonalds last agreement took effect on
November 1, 2002 and was to expire on October 31, 2005.
After his resignation as our Chief Executive Officer, we engaged
Mr. Macdonald in a consulting role for a minimum period of
27 months in order to efficiently transition his duties as
Chief Executive Officer to his successor. From October 22,
2004 through January 21, 2005, Mr. Macdonald was paid
a monthly consulting fee of $60,000 in return for committing to
up to 80% of a full-time role during that period. From
January 22, 2005 through March 31, 2005,
Mr. Macdonald was paid a monthly fee of $10,000. We paid
Mr. Macdonald a total of $201,289 from October 22,
2004 to March 31, 2005. After March 31, 2005, we have
paid and expect to continue to pay Mr. Macdonald a monthly
fee of $10,000 for the remainder of the agreement.
99
During fiscal year 2004 and until October 21, 2004,
Mr. Zwinkels was a member of the Managing Board. On
October 1, 2001, James Hardie Industries Finance B.V.
entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Zwinkels, and
the agreement was amended on August 6, 2004. On
April 30, 2005, Mr. Zwinkels resigned from his
position as Company Treasurer.
Mr. Vlot served as our Company Secretary and an interim
member of the Managing Board from October 2004 through
June 30, 2005. We entered into a temporary employment
agreement with Mr. Vlot on January 1, 2004 and it was
amended on June 15, 2004 and December 30, 2004. The
temporary agreement, as amended, provided that unless an
indefinite contract was negotiated, the contract would
automatically terminate on June 30, 2005. The agreement
expired by its terms on June 30, 2005.
In connection with the resignation of Mr. Macdonald and
Mr. Shafron, we entered into agreements with each
individual.
The severance agreement with Mr. Macdonald was consistent
with the terms of his employment agreement. We made a lump sum
payment to Mr. Macdonald equal to two times his current
annual salary at the time of his departure plus twice the annual
bonus paid in the year immediately preceding the year of
termination plus fiscal year ending 2004s notional balance
under our Economic Profit Incentive Plan.
The severance agreement with Mr. Shafron was consistent
with his employment agreement. We made a lump sum payment to
Mr. Shafron equal to the sum of his current annual salary
at the time of his departure plus his annual target bonus plus
fiscal year ending 2004s notional balance under our
Economic Profit Incentive Plan.
100
Share Ownership
As of May 31, 2005, the number of shares of our common
stock beneficially owned by each person listed in the table
under the heading Compensation
Remuneration, is set forth below. This table below
excludes the late Mr. McGregor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
of | |
Name |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
Class(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meredith Hellicar
|
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John Barr(3)
|
|
|
22,068 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael Brown
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Peter Cameron
|
|
|
13,719 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gregory Clark
|
|
|
13,358 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael Gillfillan(4)
|
|
|
53,969 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James Loudon
|
|
|
5,597 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald McGauchie(5)
|
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Louis Gries
|
|
|
823,462 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Pim Vlot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald Merkley
|
|
|
473,532 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David Merkley
|
|
|
368,402 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James Chilcoff
|
|
|
237,648 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark Fisher
|
|
|
211,974 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert Russell
|
|
|
88,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Former Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Macdonald (former CEO)(6)
|
|
|
884,587 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Peter Shafron (former CFO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Phillip Morley (former CFO)
|
|
|
622,634 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Folkert Zwinkels (former Treasurer and former member of our
Managing Board)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
Indicates that the individual beneficially owns less than 1% of
our shares of common stock. |
101
|
|
(1) |
Since the SBSP was approved at the 2002 Annual General Meeting,
three general allotments have been made to non-executive
directors. The number of beneficial shares includes the
following SBSP allotments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Allotted Under SBSP | |
|
|
December 3, | |
|
August 22, | |
|
August 27, | |
Name |
|
2004(a) | |
|
2003(b) | |
|
2002(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Meredith Hellicar
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
John Barr
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Brown
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
Peter Cameron
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Clark
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
6,688 |
|
Michael Gillfillan
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
James Loudon
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
Donald McGauchie
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Each participants December 3, 2004 mandatory
participation of 1,068 shares is subject to a two-year
escrow period ending on December 4, 2006. |
|
|
(b) |
Each participants August 22, 2003 mandatory
participation of 1,260 shares is subject to a two-year
escrow period ending on August 22, 2005. |
|
|
(c) |
Each participants August 27, 2002 mandatory
participation of 1,641 shares were subject to a two-year
escrow period until they were released on August 27, 2004. |
|
|
(2) |
Based on 460,967,944 shares of common stock outstanding at
May 31, 2005 (all of which are subject to CUFS). |
|
(3) |
As of May 31, 2005, 21,000 shares were held in a
trust, of which Mr. Barr and his wife are trustees. |
|
(4) |
As of May 31, 2005, 50,000 shares were held in a
trust, of which Mr. Gillfillan and his wife are trustees. |
|
(5) |
Includes 3,000 shares held in the McGauchie Superfund, of
which Mr. McGauchie is a trustee. |
|
(6) |
As of May 31, 2005, 403,600 shares were held jointly
by Mr. Macdonald and his wife and 380 shares were held
by Mr. Macdonalds wife in trust for their children. |
None of the shares held by any of the directors or executive
officers has any special voting rights. Beneficial ownership of
shares includes shares issuable upon exercise of options which
are exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2005. In
addition, Mr. Macdonald has 1,950,000 shares
outstanding as of May 31, 2005. If on July 12, 2005,
the performance hurdle is satisfied, some or all his options
will become exercisable. See Equity
Plans JHI NV Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option
Plan 2002 below.
Option Ownership
The number of shares of our common stock that each person listed
in the table under the heading Compensation
Remuneration, have an option to purchase as of
May 31, 2005 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Options Owned | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Gries
|
|
|
40,174 |
(1)(2) |
|
|
A$3.1321/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2009 |
|
|
|
|
175,023 |
(1)(6) |
|
|
A$3.0921/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
324,347 |
(7) |
|
|
A$5.0586/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
325,000 |
(8) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
325,000 |
(9) |
|
|
A$7.05/share |
|
|
|
December 2013 |
|
|
Pim Vlot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Options Owned | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Donald Merkley
|
|
|
48,209 |
(1)(2) |
|
|
A$3.1321/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2009 |
|
|
|
|
138,170 |
(1)(10) |
|
|
A$3.0921/share |
(3)4)(5) |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
170,709 |
(7) |
|
|
A$5.0586/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
(8) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
(9) |
|
|
A$7.05/share |
|
|
|
December 2013 |
|
|
|
|
230,000 |
(11) |
|
|
A$5.99/share |
|
|
|
December 2014 |
|
|
David Merkley
|
|
|
48,209 |
(1)(2) |
|
|
A$3.1321/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2009 |
|
|
|
|
82,902 |
(1)(10) |
|
|
A$3.0921/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
102,425 |
(7) |
|
|
A$5.0586/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
(8) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
(9) |
|
|
A$7.05/share |
|
|
|
December 2013 |
|
|
|
|
230,000 |
(11) |
|
|
A$5.99/share |
|
|
|
December 2014 |
|
|
James Chilcoff
|
|
|
40,174 |
(1)(2) |
|
|
A$3.1321/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2009 |
|
|
|
|
92,113 |
(1)(12) |
|
|
A$3.0921/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
68,283 |
(7) |
|
|
A$5.0586/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
111,000 |
(8) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
(11) |
|
|
A$5.99/share |
|
|
|
December 2014 |
|
|
Mark Fisher
|
|
|
92,113 |
(1)(12) |
|
|
A$3.0921/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
68,283 |
(7) |
|
|
A$5.0586/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
74,000 |
(8) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
132,000 |
(9) |
|
|
A$7.05/share |
|
|
|
December 2013 |
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
(11) |
|
|
A$5.99/share |
|
|
|
December 2014 |
|
|
Robert Russell
|
|
|
27,634 |
(1)(13) |
|
|
A$3.0921/share |
(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
111,000 |
(8) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
132,000 |
(9) |
|
|
A$7.05/share |
|
|
|
December 2013 |
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
(11) |
|
|
A$5.99/share |
|
|
|
December 2014 |
|
|
Former Directors and
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Macdonald (former CEO)
|
|
|
1,950,000 |
(14) |
|
|
A$5.7086/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
July 2012 |
|
|
Phillip Morley (former CFO)
|
|
|
273,134 |
(7)(15) |
|
|
A$5.0586/share |
(4)(5) |
|
|
February 2007 |
|
|
|
|
134,300 |
(8)(15) |
|
|
A$6.4490/share |
(5) |
|
|
February 2007 |
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
(9)(15) |
|
|
A$7.05/share |
|
|
|
February 2007 |
|
|
Peter Shafron (former CFO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Folkert Zwinkels (former Treasurer and former member of our
Managing Board)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This nonqualified stock option to purchase shares of our common
stock was granted on October 19, 2001 under our 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan in exchange for the termination of an award of
shadow stock covering an equal number of shares of JHIL common
stock. See Equity Plans 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan under Item 6. |
|
|
(2) |
All options vested and became exercisable in November 2004. |
103
|
|
|
|
(3) |
The exercise price reflects an A$0.0965 per share price
reduction due to a capital return paid to shareholders in
December 2001. |
|
|
(4) |
The exercise price reflects an A$0.3804 per share price
reduction due to a capital return paid to shareholders in
November 2002. |
|
|
(5) |
The exercise price reflects an A$0.2110 per share price
reduction due to a capital return paid to shareholders in
November 2003. |
|
|
(6) |
Options vest and become exercisable in two equal installments in
November 2004 and 2005. |
|
|
(7) |
Granted under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. All options vested
and became exercisable in December 2004. |
|
|
(8) |
Granted under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. Options vest and
become exercisable in three installments: 25% on
December 3, 2003; 25% on December 3, 2004; and 50% on
December 3, 2005. |
|
|
(9) |
Granted under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. Options vest and
become exercisable in three installments: 25% on
December 5, 2004; 25% on December 5, 2005; and 50% on
December 5, 2006. |
|
|
(10) |
Options vest and become exercisable in three equal installments
in November 2003, 2004 and 2005. |
|
(11) |
Granted under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. Options vest and
become exercisable in three installments: 25% on
December 14, 2005; 25% on December 14, 2006; and 50%
on December 14, 2007. |
|
(12) |
The options are 80% vested. The remaining options vest and
become exercisable in November 2005. |
|
(13) |
Options vest and become exercisable in November 2005. |
|
(14) |
This option was granted to Mr. Macdonald on July 19,
2002 under the 2002 Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan.
These options will become exercisable for 1,462,500 shares
on the first business day on or after July 19, 2005 if our
TSR from July 19, 2002 to July 19, 2005 is at least
equal to the median TSR for the companies comprising our peer
group. In addition, for each one-percent improvement in our TSR
ranking above the median TSR for our peer group,
19,500 shares become exercisable (up to a total of 487,500
additional shares). The vested options will remain exercisable
until July 19, 2012. As of March 31, 2005, all
1,950,000 options were outstanding. If the performance hurdle is
not met by October 31, 2005, the options will lapse and be
cancelled. See Equity Plans JHI NV
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2002 below. |
|
(15) |
All options vested and became exercisable at retirement at
February 2005. |
Stock-Based Compensation
At March 31, 2005, the Company had the following
stock-based compensation plans: three Peter Donald Macdonald
Share Option Plans; the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan; the Key
Management Shadow Stock Incentive Plan; the Stock Appreciation
Rights Plan; and the Supervisory Board Share Plan.
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plans |
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan |
As a replacement for options previously granted by JHIL on
November 17, 1999, we granted Mr. Macdonald an option
to purchase 1,200,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of A$3.87 per share under the JHI NV Peter
Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan. The exercise price and the
number of shares available on exercise may be adjusted on the
occurrence of certain events, including new issues, share
splits, rights issues and capital reconstructions, as set out in
the plan rules. As a result, the exercise price was reduced by
A$0.21, A$0.38 and A$0.10 for the November 2003, November 2002
and December 2001 returns of capital, respectively. As with the
original JHIL option grant, this stock option became fully
vested and exercisable on November 17, 2004. All 1,200,000
options were outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2005.
Mr. Macdonald exercised all of these options in April 2005,
prior to its expiration date of April 20, 2005.
104
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2001 |
As a replacement for options previously granted by JHIL on
July 12, 2001, we granted Mr. Macdonald an option to
purchase 624,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price per share equal to A$5.45 under the JHI NV Peter
Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2001. As set out in the plan
rules, the exercise price and the number of shares available on
exercise may be adjusted on the occurrence of certain events,
including new issues, share splits, rights issues and capital
reconstructions. Consequently, the exercise price was reduced by
A$0.21, A$0.38 and A$0.10 for the November 2003, November 2002
and December 2001 returns of capital, respectively. The
replacement options were to become exercisable for
468,000 shares on the first business day on or after
July 12, 2004, if our TSR (essentially its dividend yield
and common stock performance) from July 12, 2001 to that
date was at least equal to the median TSR for the companies
comprising our peer group, as set out in the plan (the
Initial Performance Milestone). In addition, the
replacement options were to become exercisable on that same day
for an additional 6,240 shares for each one-percent
improvement in our TSR ranking above the median total
shareholder returns for our peer group (up to a total of 156,000
additional shares). On the first business day of each month from
November 2004 until the options expired on April 20, 2005,
six months after the date of Mr. Macdonalds
resignation, our TSR was compared with that of our peer group to
determine if any previously unvested options vest according to
the applicable test described above. All 624,000 options were
outstanding at March 31, 2005. Because the TSR requirement
had not been met six months after Mr. Macdonald ceased to
be employed by us, all of these options expired in April 2005.
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2002 |
On July 19, 2002, under the JHI NV Peter Donald Macdonald
2002 Share Option Plan, we granted Mr. Macdonald an
option to purchase 1,950,000 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of A$6.30 per share. As set out
in the plan rules, the exercise price and the number of shares
available on exercise may be adjusted on the occurrence of
certain events, including new issues, share splits, rights
issues and capital reconstructions. Consequently, the exercise
price was reduced by A$0.21 and A$0.38 for the November 2003 and
November 2002 returns of capital, respectively. These options
will become exercisable for 1,462,500 shares of our common
stock on the first business day on or after July 19, 2005,
if our TSR from July 19, 2002 to July 19, 2005 is at
least equal to the median total shareholder returns for the
companies comprising our peer group, which comprises those
companies included in the S&P/ ASX 200 index excluding the
companies listed in the 200 Financials and
200 Property Trust indices. Additionally, for each
one-percent improvement in our TSR ranking above the median TSR
for its peer group 19,500 shares become exercisable (up to
a total of 487,500 additional shares). If any options remain
unexercisable on July 19, 2005 because the applicable test
for TSR is not satisfied, then on the first business day of each
subsequent month until October 31, 2005, our TSR will again
be compared with that of its peer group to determine if any
previously unvested options vest according to the applicable
test described above. The vested options will remain exercisable
until the tenth anniversary of the issue date, July 19,
2012. All 1,950,000 options were outstanding at March 31,
2005.
|
|
|
2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
Under our 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, our employees, including
employees of our subsidiaries and officers who are employees,
but not including any member of our Managing Board or
Supervisory Board, are eligible to receive awards in the form of
nonqualified stock options, performance awards, restricted stock
grants, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights,
phantom stock or other stock-based benefits. The 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan is intended to promote our long-term financial
interests by encouraging our management and other persons to
acquire an ownership position in us, to align their interests
with those of our shareholders and to encourage and reward their
performance. The 2001 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by our
shareholders and Joint Board subject to implementation of the
consummation of our 2001 Reorganization.
An aggregate of 45,077,100 shares of common stock have been
made available for issuance under the 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan, provided that such number (and any awards granted) is
subject to adjustment in
105
the event of a stock split, stock dividend or other changes in
our common stock or capital structure or our restructuring. Our
ADSs evidenced by ADRs and our common stock in the form of CUFS
will be equivalent to and interchangeable with our common stock
for all purposes of the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, provided
that ADRs will be proportionately adjusted to account for the
ratio of CUFS in relation to ADRs.
The following number of options to purchase shares of our common
stock issued under this plan in each of the past three years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Options | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Outstanding as of | |
Share Grant Date |
|
Granted | |
|
May 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
October 2001(1)
|
|
|
5,468,829 |
|
|
|
1,323,066 |
|
December 2001
|
|
|
4,248,417 |
|
|
|
1,992,746 |
|
December 2002
|
|
|
4,037,000 |
|
|
|
2,622,300 |
|
December 2003
|
|
|
6,179,583 |
|
|
|
4,503,355 |
|
December 2004
|
|
|
5,391,100 |
|
|
|
5,079,100 |
|
February 2005
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,793,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Awarded to our employees on October 19, 2001 in exchange
for the cancellation of JHIL shadow stock awards under the JHIL
Key Management Equity Incentive Plan. |
Our Remuneration Committee administers the 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan, our Joint Board or Remuneration Committee is authorized to
determine who may participate in the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan,
the number and types of awards made to each participant and the
terms, conditions and limitations applicable to each award. In
addition, our Joint Board or Remuneration Committee will have
the exclusive power to interpret the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
and to adopt such rules and regulations as it deems necessary or
appropriate for purposes of administering the 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan. Subject to certain limitations, our Joint Board
or Remuneration Committee will be authorized to amend, modify or
terminate the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan to meet any changes in
legal requirements or for any other purpose permitted by law.
The purchase or exercise price of any award granted under the
2001 Equity Incentive Plan may be paid in cash or other
consideration at the discretion of our Joint Board or
Remuneration Committee. Our Joint Board or Remuneration
Committee, in its discretion, may allow cashless exercises of
awards or may permit us to assist in the exercise of options.
Stock Options. Under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, our
Joint Board or Remuneration Committee is authorized to award
nonqualified options to purchase shares of common stock as
additional employment compensation. The 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan does not allow us to grant options qualified as
incentive stock options under Section 422 of
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Options
are exercisable over such periods as may be determined by our
Joint Board or Remuneration Committee, but no stock option may
be exercised after 10 years from the date of grant. Options
may be exercisable in installments and upon such other terms as
determined by our Joint Board or Remuneration Committee. Options
are evidenced by notices of option grants authorized by our
Joint Board or Remuneration Committee. No option is transferable
other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or
pursuant to certain domestic relations orders.
Performance Awards. Our Joint Board or Remuneration
Committee, in its discretion, may award performance awards to an
eligible person contingent on the attainment of criteria
specified by our Joint Board or Remuneration Committee.
Performance awards are paid in the form of cash, shares of
common stock or a combination of both. Our Joint Board or
Remuneration Committee determines the total number of
performance shares subject to an award, and the terms and the
time at which the performance shares will be issued.
106
Restricted Stock Awards. Our Joint Board or Remuneration
Committee may award restricted shares of common stock, which are
subject to forfeiture under such conditions and for such periods
of time as our Joint Board or Remuneration Committee may
determine. Shares of restricted stock may not be sold,
transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered so long
as such shares remain restricted. Our Joint Board or
Remuneration Committee determines the conditions or restrictions
of any restricted stock awards, which may include restrictions
on requirements of continued employment, individual performance
or our financial performance or other criteria.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Our Joint Board or
Remuneration Committee also may award stock appreciation rights
either in tandem with an option or alone. Stock appreciation
rights granted in tandem with a stock option may be granted at
the same time as the stock option or at a later time. A stock
appreciation right entitles the participant to receive from us
an amount payable in cash, in shares of common stock or in a
combination of cash and common stock, equal to the positive
difference between the fair market value of a share of common
stock on the date of exercise and the grant price, or such
lesser amount as our Joint Board or Remuneration Committee may
determine.
Dividend Equivalent Rights. Dividend equivalent rights,
defined as a right to receive payment with respect to all or
some portion of the cash dividends that are or would be payable
with respect to shares of common stock, may be awarded in tandem
with stock options, stock appreciation rights or other awards
under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. Our Joint Board or
Remuneration Committee determines the terms and conditions of
these rights. The rights may be paid in cash, shares of common
stock or other awards.
Other Stock-Based Benefits. Our Joint Board or
Remuneration Committee may award other benefits that, by their
terms, might involve the issuance or sale of our common stock or
other securities, or involve a benefit that is measured by the
value, appreciation, dividend yield or other features
attributable to a specified number of shares of our common stock
or other securities, including but not limited to stock
payments, stock bonuses and stock sales.
Effect of Change in Control. The 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan provides for the automatic acceleration of certain benefits
and the termination of the plan under certain circumstances in
the event of a change in control. A change in
control will be deemed to have occurred if either (1) any
person or group acquires beneficial ownership equivalent to 30%
of our voting securities, (2) individuals who are members
of our Joint Board as of the effective date of the 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan, or individuals who became members of our Joint
Board after the effective date of the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
whose election or nomination for election was approved by a
majority of such individuals (or, in the case of directors
nominated by a person, entity or group with 20% of our voting
securities, by two-thirds of such individuals) cease to
constitute at least a majority of the members of our Joint
Board, or (3) there occurs the consummation of certain
mergers, the sale of substantially all of our assets or our
complete liquidation or dissolution.
|
|
|
Shadow Stock and Stock Appreciation Rights Plans |
The U.S. Shadow Stock Plan provides an incentive to certain
key employees in the United States based on growth in our share
price over time as if such employees were the owners of that
number of our common stock equal to the number of shares of
shadow stock issued to employees. The vesting period of awards
under the shadow stock plan is five years. The last grant date
under the U.S. Shadow Stock Plan was December 17,
2001. In December 1998, a shadow stock plan for
non-U.S. based employees was instituted under similar terms
to the U.S. Shadow Stock Plan with a vesting period of
three years. The last grant date under the non-U.S. plan
was August 15, 2001. Both shadow stock plans were
terminated on February 28, 2005. The value on that day of
all the outstanding shares of those plans was paid to the
participants.
On December 5, 2003, 12,600 shadow stock shares were
granted under the terms and conditions of the Key Management
Shadow Stock Incentive Plan. All of these shares remained
outstanding as of March 31, 2005 but were subsequently
cancelled in April 2005.
On December 14, 2004, 527,000 stock appreciation rights
were granted under the terms and conditions of the JHI NV Stock
Appreciation Rights Incentive Plan. This plan provides similar
incentives as the 2001
107
Equity Incentive Plan. All of these stock appreciation rights
were outstanding at March 31, 2005 and will vest over three
years from the date of grant. At June 30, 2005, 27,000
stock appreciation rights were cancelled.
|
|
|
Supervisory Board Share Plan |
At our 2002 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders approved a
SBSP, which requires that all non-executive directors on our
Joint Board and Supervisory Board receive shares of our common
stock as payment for a portion of their director fees. The SBSP
requires that our directors to take at least $10,000 of their
fees in shares and allows directors to receive additional shares
in lieu of fees in their discretion. Shares issued under the
$10,000 compulsory component of the SBSP are subject to a
two-year escrow that requires members of the Supervisory Board
to retain those shares for at least two years following issue.
The issue price for the shares is the market value at the time
of issue. No loans will be entered into by us relation to the
grant of shares pursuant to the SBSP.
Other Compensation: Economic Profit Incentive Plan
We maintain an Economic Profit Incentive Plan, which provides
incentive compensation to certain of our directors, officers and
key executives. This plan is a variable pay plan, which links
the Companys economic profit to bonus payments to certain
key individuals. These designated executives are entitled to
receive bonus payments upon the accomplishment of certain
economic profit target levels of the Company and certain other
mutually agreed upon personal objectives. The target bonus is
paid to the participant at the end of the year if the economic
profit target is met. If the economic profit target is exceeded,
the participant realizes a bonus greater than his or her target
bonus, but only one-third of the excess bonus is paid to the
participant at the end of the fiscal year. The remaining
two-thirds is then deposited with a notional bank and is paid to
the executive over the following two years if the economic
profit target is met in these years, or is reduced if the
economic profit target is not met. This arrangement
distinguishes between sustained performance and one-time
performance and encourages participants to maintain a long-term
view.
Employment Agreements
We enter into employment agreements with certain of our senior
executives. The amounts paid under these agreements are listed
under the heading Compensation, on page 94
above. The terms of these agreements provide for an annual
base salary, potential annual bonus payments pursuant to our
Economic Profit Incentive Plan, and various benefits and expense
reimbursements. These agreements also include restrictive
covenants to protect our trade secrets, as well as agreements
regarding non-competition and non-solicitation of our employees
for a specified period in the event the executive is no longer
employed by us.
|
|
Item 7. |
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |
Major Shareholders
At May 31, 2005, all issued and outstanding shares of our
common stock were listed on the Australian Stock Exchange in the
form of CHESS Units of Foreign Securities (CUFS).
CUFS represent beneficial ownership of our shares. CHESS
Depository Nominees Pty Ltd is the registered owner of the
shares represented by CUFS. Each of our CUFS represents one
share of our common stock.
108
To our knowledge, based on shareholder notices filed with the
Australian Stock Exchange (unless indicated otherwise below), as
of May 31, 2005, the following table identifies those
shareholders which beneficially owned 5% or more of our common
stock and their holdings as of the date of their last respective
notices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Shares | |
Shareholder |
|
Owned | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (and subsidiaries)
|
|
|
75,268,867 |
|
|
|
16.40% |
|
Lazard Asset Management Pacific Co.
|
|
|
40,876,189 |
|
|
|
8.90% |
|
Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited
|
|
|
39,835,741 |
|
|
|
8.69% |
|
National Australia Bank Limited Group
|
|
|
28,198,184 |
|
|
|
6.15% |
|
The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
28,039,211 |
|
|
|
6.11% |
|
Commonwealth Bank merged with Colonial First State Investments
in June 2000, and their combined holdings as of March 22,
2001 exceeded 5% of JHILs outstanding stock. Commonwealth
Bank increased its percentage ownership of JHIL to approximately
13% in May 2001. Through subsequent periodic purchases,
Commonwealth Bank gradually increased its interest in JHI NV to
17.03% in July 2003, but based on information provided by
Commonwealth Bank in its Form 13G filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on
February 28, 2005, it had reduced its interest in JHI NV to
16.40%.
Lazard Asset Management Pacific Co became a substantial
shareholder on April 1, 2004, with a 5.34% interest in our
outstanding stock and increased its holding in JHI NV on
April 11, 2005 to 8.90% in the last notice received.
Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited became a
substantial shareholder on January 28, 2004, with a 5.55%
interest in JHI NV outstanding shares and increased its holding
in JHI NV on April 6, 2004 to 8.69% in the last notice
received.
National Australia Bank Limited Group became a substantial
shareholder on May 25, 2004, with 5.03% of our outstanding
stock and increased its holding in JHI NV on June 16, 2004
to 6.15% in the last notice received.
The Capital Group Companies, Inc became a substantial
shareholder on August 3, 2004, with a 5.09% interest in JHI
NV outstanding shares and increased its holding in JHI NV on
September 6, 2004 to 6.11% in the last notice received.
Concord Capital Ltd became a substantial shareholder on
June 18, 2004, with 5.34% of our outstanding stock before
reducing its holding in JHI NV below 5% on August 6, 2004.
However, through subsequent periodic purchases, Concord Capital
Ltd gradually increased its interest in JHI NV to above 5%,
before reducing its holdings in JHI NV below 5% on April 8,
2005.
Each of the above shareholders has the same voting rights as all
other holders of our common stock. To our knowledge, except for
the major shareholders described above, we are not directly or
indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by a
foreign government or by any other natural or legal persons
severally or jointly.
Other Security Ownership Information
At May 31, 2005, 0.66% of the outstanding shares of our
common stock were held by 56 CUFS holders with registered
addresses in the United States. In addition, at May 31,
2005, 0.38% of our outstanding shares were represented by ADRs
held by 14 holders, all of whom have registered addresses in the
United States. A total of 1.04% of our outstanding capital stock
was registered to 70 United States holders as of May 31,
2005.
109
Related Party Transactions
In accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing
standards, our Audit Committee reviews and approves all related
party transactions. In discharging the duties set forth in their
charter, the Audit Committee reviews all conflicts and/or
related party transactions at least every year in the fourth
quarter. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews any proposed
related party transaction from time to time as they arise.
Furthermore, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by
the Company requires directors and employees to avoid conflicts
of interest, which include related party transactions.
|
|
|
Transactions and Existing Loans to our Directors and
Directors of our Subsidiaries |
Loans receivable totaling $32,508 were outstanding from our
directors and directors of our subsidiaries under the terms and
conditions of the Executive Share Purchase Plan (the
Plan) at May 31, 2005. Loans under the Plan are
interest free and repayable from dividend income earned by, or
capital returns from, securities acquired under the Plan. The
loans are collateralized by shares issued under the Plan. No new
loans to our directors or executive officers, under the Plan or
otherwise, and no modifications to the existing loans have been
made since December 1997. Repayments totaling $18,632 were
received in fiscal year 2005 in respect of the Plan from such
directors. No repayments were made in April and May 2005.
During fiscal year 2005, directors resigned with loans
outstanding totaling $117,688 at the date of their resignation.
These amounts are repayable to us within two years under the
terms of the Plan.
The following table sets forth the names of our and our
subsidiaries directors and their respective loan amounts
as of May 31, 2005. All figures are in U.S. dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, | |
Director |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
A. Kneeshaw
|
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
D. Salter
|
|
|
20,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
32,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Made to Directors and Director Related Entities
of our Subsidiaries |
In August 2004, Chairman Hellicar was appointed as Chairman of
the Special Committee of the Board. The Special Committee of the
Board was established to oversee our participation in the SCI.
In this role, she received a fee of $45,000 for the year ended
March 31, 2005.
Mr. Clark is a non-executive director of ANZ Banking Group
Limited with whom we transact banking business.
Mr. McGauchie is also a non-executive director of Telstra
Corporation Limited from which we purchase communications
services. All transactions were in accordance with normal
commercial terms and conditions. It is not considered that these
directors had significant influence over these transactions.
In February 2004, one of our subsidiaries entered into a
consulting agreement in usual commercial terms and conditions
with The Gries Group in respect to professional services. The
principal of The Gries Group, James P. Gries, is Mr. Louis
Gries brother. Under the agreement, approximately $12,000
is paid each month to The Gries Group. The agreement expired in
June 2005 and payments of $157,080 were made for the year ended
March 31, 2005. Mr. Louis Gries has no economic
interest in The Gries Group.
Payments of $6,817 for the year ended March 31, 2005 were
made to Grech, Vella, Tortell & Hyzler Advocates.
Dr. Vella was a director of a number of our subsidiaries
during fiscal year 2005. The payments were made in respect of
professional services and were negotiated in accordance with
usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments of $86,822 for the year ended March 31, 2005 were
made to Pether and Associates Pty Ltd, technical contractors.
The late J. Pether was a director of one of our
subsidiaries and was a director of Pether and Associates Pty
Ltd. The payments were in respect of technical services provided
to us and were negotiated in accordance with usual commercial
terms and conditions.
110
Payments totaling $27,634 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to R. Chistensen and T. Norman who are directors
of one of our subsidiaries. The payments were made in respect of
professional services and were negotiated in accordance with
usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments totaling $71,849 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to M. Helyar, R. Le Tocq and N. Wild
who are directors of one of our subsidiaries. The payments were
made in respect of professional services and were negotiated in
accordance with usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments totaling $15,488 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to Marlee (UK) Ltd. Marlee (UK) Ltd is a
director of one of our subsidiaries. The payments were made in
respect of professional services and were negotiated in
accordance with usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments totaling $4,730 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to Bernaldo, Mirador and Directo Law Offices. R.
Bernaldo is a director of one of our subsidiaries. The payments
were made in respect of professional services and were
negotiated in accordance with usual commercial terms and
conditions.
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Information |
See Item 4, Information on the Company
Legal Proceedings, Item 18, Financial
Statements, and pages F-1 through F-56. There has been no
significant change to the financial statements included in this
annual report since the date of such financial statements.
See Item 10, Additional Information Key
Provisions of our Articles of Association of JHI NV
Dividends.
Price History
Prior to the restructuring that we completed in October 2001,
there was no public market for shares of JHI NV common stock,
nor was there a market for JHI NV ADRs. Shares in JHIL, which
represented substantially the same operations, assets and
liabilities as those of JHI NV prior to our 2001 Reorganization,
were traded on the Australian Stock Exchange and
over-the-counter as ADRs. One JHIL ADR represented two JHIL
shares. After October 19, 2001, our shares were listed on
the New York Stock Exchange and one JHI NV ADR represents five
JHI NV shares.
JHIL shares were exchanged for JHI NV shares represented by CUFS
shares on October 19, 2001. See Item 4,
Information on the Company History and
Development of the Company.
The high and low trading prices of JHI NV CUFS on the Australian
Stock Exchange are as follows (Note: Prices listed after
October 19, 2001 represent JHI NV CUFS and prices listed
prior to October 19, 2001 represent JHIL shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Period |
|
(A$) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
(A$) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal year ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
March 31, 2004
|
|
|
8.04 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
March 31, 2003
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
|
March 31, 2002
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
|
March 31, 2001
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Period |
|
(A$) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
(A$) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal quarter ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
6.88 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
March 31, 2004
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
8.04 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
September 30, 2003
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
June 30, 2003
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
Month ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2005
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
|
|
April 30, 2005
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
February 28, 2005
|
|
|
6.96 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
January 31, 2005
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
The U.S. dollar prices set forth above were calculated
using the weighted average exchange rate for the relevant period.
The high and low trading prices of JHI NV ADRs on the New York
Stock Exchange after October 19, 2001, the effective date
of the 2001 Reorganization, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
Period |
|
(US$) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal year ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
27.21 |
|
|
|
18.10 |
|
|
March 31, 2004
|
|
|
28.50 |
|
|
|
18.25 |
|
|
March 31, 2003
|
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
|
15.29 |
|
|
March 31, 2002(1)
|
|
|
17.95 |
|
|
|
11.10 |
|
Fiscal quarter ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
27.21 |
|
|
|
22.60 |
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
26.52 |
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
22.26 |
|
|
|
18.10 |
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
25.05 |
|
|
|
18.82 |
|
|
March 31, 2004
|
|
|
27.60 |
|
|
|
23.60 |
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
28.50 |
|
|
|
24.40 |
|
|
September 30, 2003
|
|
|
25.85 |
|
|
|
22.50 |
|
|
June 30, 2003
|
|
|
23.95 |
|
|
|
18.25 |
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
Period |
|
(US$) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Month ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2005
|
|
|
25.55 |
|
|
|
21.54 |
|
|
April 30, 2005
|
|
|
23.50 |
|
|
|
21.66 |
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
25.15 |
|
|
|
22.60 |
|
|
February 28, 2005
|
|
|
26.76 |
|
|
|
23.30 |
|
|
January 31, 2005
|
|
|
27.21 |
|
|
|
24.92 |
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
26.07 |
|
|
|
21.87 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Prior to the 2001 Reorganization, JHIL ADRs traded
over-the-counter. Because historically the JHIL ADRs have not
been actively traded, complete trading price information is not
readily available. However, we believe that the trading price of
the JHIL ADRs generally reflect the price of the underlying JHIL
shares represented thereby, as well as any transaction costs
associated with the ADRs. |
During the 12 months ended May 31, 2005, an average of
2,144,107 JHI NV CUFS were traded daily on the Australian Stock
Exchange.
During the 12 months ended May 31, 2005, an average of
1,661 JHI NV ADRs were traded daily on the New York Stock
Exchange.
Trading Markets
Prior to the restructuring, JHIL shares traded on the Australian
Stock Exchange. After the 2001 restructuring, our securities
became listed and quoted on the following stock exchanges:
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (in the form of CUFS)
|
|
|
Australian Stock Exchange |
|
ADRs
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
We cannot predict the prices at which our shares and ADRs will
trade or the volume of trading for such securities, nor can we
assure you that these securities will continue to meet the
applicable listing requirements of these exchanges.
Trading on the Australian Stock Exchange
The Australian Stock Exchange is headquartered in Sydney,
Australia, with branches located in each Australian state
capital. Our CUFS trade on the Australian Stock Exchange under
the symbol JHX. The Australian Stock Exchange is a
publicly listed company with trading being undertaken by brokers
registered under the Australian Corporations Act 2001. Trading
principally takes place between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. on each weekday (excluding Australian public
holidays). Settlement of trades in uncertificated securities
listed on the Australian Stock Exchange is generally effected
electronically on the third business day following the trade.
This is undertaken through CHESS (Clearing House Electronic
Sub-register System), which is the clearing and settlement
system operated by the Australian Stock Exchange.
Trading on the New York Stock Exchange
In the United States, five JHI NV CUFS equal one JHI NV ADR. Our
ADRs trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
JHX. Trading principally takes place between the
hours of 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on each weekday
(excluding U.S. public holidays). All inquiries and
correspondence regarding ADRs should be directed to The Bank of
New York, depository for our ADRs, at The Bank of New York, ADR
Department, 101 Barclay Street #22W, New York, New York
10286 or at its website located at www.adrbny.com or contact:
Bank of New York, Investor Relations, P.O. Box 11258,
Church Street Station, New York, NY 10286-1258, toll free
telephone number for USA domestic callers: 1-888-BNY-ADRs,
non-U.S. callers can call: 610-382-7836 or email:
shareowners@bankofny.com.
113
|
|
Item 10. |
Additional Information |
General
We were originally incorporated in 1998 as a private company
with limited liability, or besloten vennootschap met
beperkte aansprakelijkheid (a B.V.). By
notarial deed dated July 24, 2001, we changed our name to
James Hardie Industries N.V. and by the same deed we changed our
legal form into that of a naamloze vennootschap
(an N.V.), a public limited liability company
under Dutch law. Our Articles of Association were most recently
amended on November 5, 2003.
Our corporate seat is in Amsterdam, The Netherlands and we have
offices at The Atrium, 8th floor, Strawinskylaan 3077, 1077 ZX
Amsterdam, The Netherlands. We are registered at the trade
register of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry for Amsterdam,
The Netherlands under number 34106455.
Key Provisions of our Articles of Association of JHI NV
Our purposes are:
|
|
|
|
|
to participate in, to take an interest in any other way in and
to conduct the management of business enterprises of whatever
nature; |
|
|
|
to raise funds through the issuance of debt or equity or in any
other way and to finance third parties; |
|
|
|
to provide guarantees, including guarantees for the debts of
third parties; and |
|
|
|
to perform all activities which are incidental to or which may
be conducive to, or connected with, any of the foregoing. |
|
|
|
Provisions of our Articles of Association or Charter
Related to Directors |
Power to vote when director is materially interested.
Pursuant to the Companys Articles of Association, and
subject to limited exceptions, a member of the Managing Board
who has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to
the affairs of the Company must give all other members of the
Managing Board notice of his or her interest. Furthermore,
subject to limited exceptions, a member of the Managing Board
who has a material personal interest in a matter that is being
considered at a meeting of the Managing Board may neither be
present while the matter is being considered at such meeting nor
vote on the matter.
Subject to limited exceptions, a member of the Supervisory Board
who has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to
the affairs of the Company must give all other members of the
Supervisory Board notice of his or her interest. Furthermore,
subject to limited exceptions, a member of the Supervisory Board
who has a material personal interest in a matter that is being
considered at a meeting of the Supervisory Board may neither be
present while the matter is being considered at such meeting nor
vote on the matter.
If a member of the Managing Board has a conflict of interest
with the Company (whether acting in his personal capacity by
entering into an agreement with the Company, conducting any
litigation against the Company or acting in any other capacity),
he or she, will still have the power to represent the Company
towards third parties when entering into transactions, unless a
person is designated at the General Meeting of Shareholders for
that purpose or the law provides the designation in a different
manner.
Power to vote compensation. Despite the provisions of our
Articles of Association to the contrary, which provisions were
adopted prior to more recent superseding legislation, the
compensation of the members of the Supervisory Board is
determined at the General Meeting of Shareholders.
The remuneration of the members of the Managing Board is
determined by the Joint Board within the limits of the
remuneration policy adopted at the General Meeting of
Shareholders. The Joint Board will submit for approval by the
General Meeting of Shareholders a proposal regarding the
arrangements for the remuneration of the members of the Managing
Board in the form of shares or rights to acquire shares. This
proposal includes at least how many shares or rights to acquire
shares may be awarded to the Managing Board
114
and which criteria apply to an award or a modification. The
Joint Board consists of all members of the Supervisory Board,
the Chief Executive Officer and, if the chairman of the
Supervisory Board decides so, one or more other members of the
Managing Board, provided that the number of members of the
Managing Board being on the Joint Board can never be greater
than the number of members of the Supervisory Board. Our
Articles of Association do not include any provisions regarding
the power of the members of the Managing Board, in the absence
of an independent quorum, to vote compensation to themselves or
any other members of the Managing Board.
Borrowing Powers. Our Articles of Association do not
include any provisions regarding the borrowing powers of members
of the Managing Board or the Supervisory Board. However, the
provisions regarding conflict of interest generally govern this
issue.
Age Limit Requirement for Retirement or
Non-Retirement. Our Articles of Association do not include
any provisions regarding the mandatory retirement age of a
member of the Managing Board or the Supervisory Board.
Number of shares for directors qualification. Our
Articles of Association do not impose any obligation on the
members of the Managing Board or the Supervisory Board to hold
shares in the Company.
|
|
|
Issuance of Shares; Preemptive Rights |
Pursuant to Dutch law and our Articles of Association, the
authority to issue shares and to grant rights to subscribe for
shares, such as options, and to limit or exclude preemptive
rights is vested in our shareholders as a group, unless our
shareholders have delegated this authority to another corporate
body. Such delegation is valid for a maximum period of five
years, but may be renewed at any time prior to its expiration.
Our Supervisory Board has been delegated the authority to issue
shares and to grant rights to subscribe for shares, such as
options, and to limit or exclude preemptive rights for a period
expiring on August 15, 2006. After August 15, 2006,
shares and rights to subscribe for shares may be issued, and
preemptive rights may be limited or excluded by our shareholders
or by our Supervisory Board, provided it has again been
delegated this authority by our shareholders (such delegation
shall be for a maximum period of five years). We plan to ask our
shareholders to delegate this authority to our Supervisory Board
again prior to the expiration of the period ending on
August 15, 2006. It is anticipated that our Supervisory
Board will eliminate preemptive rights with respect to any and
all issuances of shares of common stock during such period.
Shares of common stock must be issued for a subscription price
at least equal to their nominal value and at least 25% of the
nominal value must have been paid up at the time of issuance.
As a Dutch company that has listed securities in Australia and
the United States, we are subject to applicable legislation
regarding insider trading. Generally, Dutch law prohibits
anyone, whether or not a director or employee of the issuer,
from trading in or bringing about transactions in the securities
of the issuer while in possession of inside, non-public
information and from passing on inside information or
recommending a transaction while in possession of inside
information. Under Australian law, persons are prohibited from
trading on the basis of undisclosed, price-sensitive information
regarding a companys securities. Similarly, in the United
States, persons are prohibited from trading on the basis of
material, non-public information. We have adopted an internal
code on insider trading consistent with Dutch, Australian and
U.S. laws and regulations.
At the proposal of our Joint Board, we may acquire shares in our
own capital, subject to certain provisions of Dutch law and of
our Articles of Association, if and insofar as
(1) shareholders equity, less the amount to be paid
for the shares acquired, is not less than the sum of the paid
and called up part of our issued share capital, plus any
reserves required to be maintained by Dutch law or our Articles
of Association, (2) the aggregate par value of the shares
of our capital which we or our subsidiaries acquire, already
hold or on which we or they hold a right of pledge, amounts to
no more than one-tenth of the aggregate par value of the issued
115
share capital and (3) our shareholders, as a group, have
authorized our Managing Board to acquire such shares. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries may vote shares that are held by
them or us.
At the September 17, 2004 Annual General Meeting, our
Managing Board was authorized to cause JHI NV to acquire
shares in JHI NVs capital for a period expiring on
March 17, 2006. After March 17, 2006, shares in JHI
NVs capital may be acquired if our Managing Board has
again been authorized to do so by our shareholders (such
authorization may be for a maximum period of 18 months). We
intend to ask our shareholders in our 2005 Annual General
Meeting to renew the authorization of the Managing Board to
cause JHI NV to acquire shares in JHI NVs capital, such on
terms substantially identical as the September 17, 2004
authorization.
|
|
|
Reduction of Share Capital |
Upon the proposal of our Joint Board, our shareholders as a
group have the power to effect a reduction of share capital by
deciding to (i) cancel shares, or depositary receipts
related to shares, acquired by us in our own share capital, or
(ii) to reduce the nominal value of our shares, subject to
applicable statutory provisions, with or without a partial
repayment or release. In case of a partial repayment or release,
these must be made pro rata to all shares. The pro
rata requirements may be waived by agreement of all
shareholders concerned.
|
|
|
Shareholders Meetings and Voting Rights |
Each shareholder, person entitled to vote and CUFS holder (but
not an ADR holder) has the right to attend general meetings of
shareholders, either in person or by proxy, to address
shareholder meetings and, in the case of shareholders and other
persons entitled to vote (for instance, certain pledge holders),
to exercise voting rights, subject to the provisions of our
Articles of Association. Meetings of shareholders are held in
The Netherlands at least annually, within six months after the
close of each of our fiscal years. These meetings take place in
either Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam or Haarlemmermeer.
Additional meetings of shareholders may be held as often as our
Joint Board, our Managing Board or our Supervisory Board deems
necessary or upon the call of (1) holders of shares of
common stock jointly representing at least 5% of our issued
share capital, (2) at least 100 holders of shares of common
stock or one shareholder representing at least 100 CUFS holders
or any relevant combination thereof so that the request of at
least 100 persons is taken into account or (3) any one
member of either the Managing, Joint or Supervisory Boards. Our
Articles of Association also provide that an information meeting
of shareholders must be undertaken prior to each general
meeting, which must be held in Australia.
We give notice of each meeting of shareholders by mail and by
way of an announcement in a nationally distributed newspaper in
The Netherlands. Such notice is given no later than the 28th day
prior to the day of the meeting and includes or is accompanied
by an agenda identifying the business to be considered at the
meeting. We currently are exempt from the proxy rules under the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Holders of shares of common stock represented by
CUFS are provided notice of general meetings of shareholders and
other communications with shareholders by us, and the ADR
depositary, The Bank of New York, provides our ADR holders with
such notices and communications. CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty
Ltd (CDN), or we on behalf of CDN, may deliver to
CUFS holders instruction forms allowing the CUFS holders to
instruct CDN how to vote at a meeting. Similarly, the ADR
depositary may deliver to ADR holders instruction forms allowing
the ADR holders to direct the ADR depositary on how to instruct
CDN to vote at a meeting. In order for CUFS holders to attend
general meetings of shareholders in person, such holders need
not withdraw the shares of common stock represented by the CUFS,
but must follow such rules and procedures as may be established
by the CUFS Subregistrar and our share registry. CUFS holders
may request CDN to appoint them as proxy for the purposes of
voting the shares underlying their holding of CUFS on behalf of
CDN. In order for ADR holders to attend general meetings of
shareholders in person, such holders will have to convert their
ADRs into CUFS and, in doing so, must follow the procedures set
forth in the deposit agreement and such rules and procedures as
may be established by the ADR depositary.
116
Each share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one
vote on each matter to be voted upon by the shareholders.
Holders of CUFS will be entitled to attend and to speak, but not
vote, at our shareholders meetings. A CUFS holder may follow
instructions set out in a relevant Notice of Meeting to have the
registered shareholder, CDN, appoint the CUFS holder as a proxy
of CDN to vote their CUFS holding at the relevant meeting of
shareholders. Holders of ADRs are not entitled to attend or
speak, nor vote, at our general meetings of shareholders.
Unless otherwise required by our Articles of Association or
Dutch law, resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders
will be validly adopted by an absolute majority of the votes
cast at a meeting at which at least 5% of our issued share
capital is present or represented. Except where expressly stated
otherwise in this Form 20-F, all references here and
elsewhere herein to actions by the shareholders, or shareholders
as a group, are references to actions taken by way of such a
resolution at a meeting of shareholders.
Dutch law and our Articles of Association currently do not
impose any limitations on the rights of persons who are not
resident of The Netherlands to hold or vote shares of common
stock, solely as a result of such non-resident status.
Our fiscal year runs from April 1 through March 31.
Dutch law requires that within five months after the end of our
fiscal year, unless the general meeting of shareholders has
extended this period for a maximum of six months, our Managing
Board must make available to our shareholders a report with
respect to that fiscal year. This report must include the
financial statements and a report of an independent accountant.
The annual report must be submitted to the shareholders for
adoption. The annual report, including the management report, is
prepared in English and, in the case of the consolidated
accounts of JHI NV and its wholly owned subsidiaries, according
to U.S. GAAP, and in the case of JHI NVs accounts,
according to accounting principles generally accepted in The
Netherlands (Dutch GAAP).
Our Articles of Association provide that we shall generally
indemnify any person who is or was a member of our Managing,
Supervisory or Joint Boards or one of our employees, officers or
agents, and who suffers any loss as a result of any action in
connection with their service to us, provided they acted in good
faith in carrying out their duties and in a manner they
reasonably believed to be in our interest. This indemnification
generally will not be available if the person seeking
indemnification acted with gross negligence or willful
misconduct in the performance of such persons duties to
us. A court in which an action is brought may, however,
determine that indemnification is appropriate nonetheless.
All calculations to determine the amounts available for
dividends or other distributions are based on our statutory
accounts, which are, as a holding company, different from our
consolidated accounts and which are prepared in accordance with
Dutch GAAP because we are a Dutch company. Because we are a
holding company and have limited operations of our own, we are
largely dependent on dividends or other distributions from our
subsidiaries to fund any cash dividends.
The profits of JHI NV in any financial year, if any, shall first
be retained by way of a reserve in such amount as determined by
our Supervisory Board. The remaining portion of the profits
shall be at the disposal of our Joint Board for further
allocation to our reserves or, if permitted by Dutch law and our
Articles of Association, be made available for distribution as a
dividend to the holders of shares of common stock, or a
combination thereof. Our Joint Board may also declare interim
dividends as permitted by Dutch law and our Articles of
Association.
We may not make any distribution, whether out of our profits as
an interim dividend, out of our general share premium reserve or
out of any other reserves that are available for shareholder
distributions under Dutch law, if the distribution would reduce
shareholders equity to an amount less than the sum of the
paid and called
117
up part of our issued share capital, plus certain reserves that
are required to be maintained by Dutch law and our Articles of
Association. Distributions may, at the discretion of our Joint
Board, be made in cash or in shares or other securities, such as
a stock dividend, provided that our shareholders as a group are
authorized to make distributions in shares or other securities,
if and so long as our Supervisory Board has not been delegated
the authority to issue shares and rights to subscribe for
shares. See Issuance of Shares; Preemptive Rights.
Cash dividends and other distributions that have not been
collected within five years and two days after the date on which
they became due and payable will revert to us.
JHIL historically paid dividends to its shareholders. JHI
NVs Joint Board determines whether to declare a dividend
and the amount of any such dividend. The Joint Board also
determines the record dates at which time registered holders of
our shares, including the CHESS Depositary Nominee issuing CUFS
to the ADR depositary, will be entitled to dividends and sets
the payment dates. Dividends are declared payable to our
shareholders in U.S. dollars. The ADR Depositary (Bank of
New York) receives dividends in U.S. dollars directly from
JHI NV on each CUFS dividend payment date and will distribute
any dividend to holders of ADRs in U.S. dollars pursuant to
the terms of the deposit agreement. Other CUFS holders
registered at a dividend record date are paid their dividend on
each CUFS dividend payment date in the equivalent amount of
Australian dollars, as determined by the prevailing exchange
rate shortly after the CUFS dividend record date.
|
|
|
Amendment of Articles of Association |
Our Articles of Association may be amended by our shareholders
by resolution approved by 75% of the votes cast at a general
meeting of shareholders at which at least 5% of our issued share
capital is present or represented.
In the event of our dissolution and liquidation, and after we
have paid all debts and liquidation expenses, all assets
available for distribution shall be distributed to our holders
of shares of common stock pro rata based on the nominal
amount paid upon the shares of common stock held by such
holders. As a holding company, our sole material assets are the
capital stock of our subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of a
dissolution or liquidation, we will either distribute the
capital stock of our subsidiaries or sell such stock and
distribute the net proceeds thereof, or liquidate such
subsidiaries and distribute the net proceeds thereof, after
satisfying our liabilities.
|
|
|
Limitations on Right to Hold Common Stock |
Subject to certain exceptions, our Articles of Association
prohibit the holding of shares of our common stock if, because
of an acquisition of a relevant interest (including in the form
of shares of our common stock, CUFS or ADRs) in such shares:
(1) the number of shares of our common stock in which any
person, directly or indirectly, acquires or holds a relevant
interest increases from 20% or below to over 20% or from a
starting point that is above 20% and below 90% of the issued and
outstanding share capital of JHI NV or (2) the voting
rights which any person, directly or indirectly, is entitled to
exercise at a general meeting of shareholders increase from 20%
or below to over 20% or from a starting point that is above 20%
and below 90% of the total number of such voting rights which
may be exercised by any person at a general meeting of
shareholders. The purpose of this prohibition is to ensure that
the principles which underpin the Australian Corporations Act
2001 takeover regime are complied with in a change of control,
namely that: (1) the acquisition of control over the
Company takes place in an efficient, competitive and informed
market; (2) the holders of the shares of our common stock
or CUFS and our Managing Board, Joint Board and Supervisory
Board know the identity of any person who proposes to acquire a
substantial interest in the Company, have a reasonable time to
consider the proposal, and are given enough information to
enable them to assess the merits of the proposal and (3) as
far as practicable, the holders of the shares of our common
stock or CUFS inter alia all have a reasonable and equal
opportunity to participate in any benefits accruing to the
holders through any
118
proposal under which a person would acquire a substantial
interest in the Company. The exceptions to this prohibition set
forth in our Articles of Association generally include:
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions that result from acceptances under a takeover bid,
which complies with the Articles of Association, including the
principles set forth above; |
|
|
|
acquisitions which result in a persons voting power
increasing by not more than 3% in a six-month period; |
|
|
|
acquisitions which are consistent with the principles set forth
above, conform to the other takeover principles set out in the
Articles of Association (adjusting those principles as
appropriate to meet the particular circumstances of the
acquisitions) and have received the prior approval of the
Supervisory Board; and |
|
|
|
acquisitions approved at a general meeting of shareholders,
subject to certain requirements being satisfied in relation to
voting and the provision of information. |
The prohibition does not apply to holdings by the CUFS
depositary, CDN, of our shares as custodian for the CUFS holders
but will apply to CDN where another person holds a relevant
interest thereby constituting a breach of the provisions. If a
person has a relevant interest that constitutes a breach of the
prohibition, JHI NV has several powers available to it under our
Articles of Association. These include powers to require the
disposal of our common stock, disregard the exercise of votes
and suspend dividend rights. These powers will only extend to
that number of shares of common stock which result in the
prohibition being breached.
The Supervisory Board may cause JHI NV to exercise these powers
if JHI NV has first obtained a judgment from a court of
competent jurisdiction that a breach of the prohibition has
occurred and is continuing. Alternatively, these powers may also
be exercised without having recourse to the courts if certain
procedures in relation to obtaining legal advice are followed.
Our right to exercise these powers by complying with these
procedures must be renewed by shareholder approval every five
years or such powers will lapse. If renewed, confirmation of
this renewal must be made by lodgement of a declaration by the
Joint Board with the relevant authority in accordance with Dutch
law.
Furthermore, if JHI NV becomes subject to the law of any
jurisdiction, which applies so as to regulate the acquisition of
control and the conduct of any takeover of the Company, JHI NV
shall consult promptly with the ASX to determine whether, in the
light of the application of such law:
|
|
|
(i) ASX requires an amendment to the takeover provisions in
our Articles of Association to comply with the ASX Listing Rules
as then in force; or |
|
|
(ii) any waiver of the ASX Listing Rules permitting the
inclusion of the takeovers provisions has ceased to have effect. |
In either case, the Managing Board shall put to a general
meeting of shareholders a proposal to amend our Articles of
Association so as to make them, to the fullest extent permitted
by law, consistent with the ASX Listing Rules.
Although these provisions of our Articles of Association may
help to ensure that no person may acquire voting control of us
without making an offer to all shareholders, these provisions
may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in
control of the Company.
Holders of shares of our common stock, including those shares
represented by CUFS or ADRs, may become subject to notification
obligations under the Dutch 1995 Act on the Supervision of the
Securities Trade (Wet toezicht effectenverkeer 1995, the
Dutch Securities Act). Those obligations are
summarized below. You are advised to consult your own legal
advisers to determine whether the obligations apply to you.
Under the Dutch Securities Act, certain persons must notify the
Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (the
AFM) or Stichting Autoriteit Financiele
Markten of any transaction in our shares of our
119
common stock, CUFS, ADRs or ADSs or related securities.
Notification must be made within 10 days of the end of the
calendar month in which the transaction was made, using a form
that can be obtained from the AFM (P.O. Box 11723, 1001 GS
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, telephone +31 (20) 553 52 00).
The AFM keeps a public register of all notifications received.
Persons who must notify the AFM of transactions in our shares,
ADRs or related securities include:
|
|
|
|
|
persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 25% of JHI
NVs outstanding share capital; |
|
|
|
managing and supervisory directors of such greater than 25%
shareholders; and |
|
|
|
the spouses of the persons referred to above, relations by blood
or affinity to the first degree and other persons who share a
household with these persons, and relations by blood or affinity
to the first degree who do not share a household with these
persons but hold at least 5% of our shares or will obtain this
percentage through the transaction. |
In case of non-observance of the notification obligations of the
Dutch Securities Act, criminal (including fines and
imprisonment) or administrative sanctions (including fines) may
be imposed.
Further pursuant to our Articles of Association, shareholders
are required to notify us of acquisitions of 5% or more of our
outstanding securities and of any further change of 1% or more
of our outstanding securities. In addition, pursuant to our
Articles of Association, we have the power to require our
shareholders and CUFS holders to provide to us information about
the identity of persons who have relevant interests in our
securities and the details of that interest. These provisions
are intended to mirror the tracing of beneficial ownership
provisions of the Australian Corporations Act 2001, which would
not have applied statutorily to us as a Dutch company absent a
specific provision in our Articles of Association.
Finally, shareholders are subject to beneficial ownership
reporting disclosure requirements under U.S. securities
laws, including the filing of beneficial ownership reports on
Schedules 13D and 13G with the SEC. The SECs rules require
all persons who beneficially own more than 5% of a class of
securities registered with the SEC to file either a
Schedule 13D or 13G. This filing requirement applies to all
holders of our shares of common stock, ADRs or CUFS because our
securities have been registered with the SEC. The number of
shares of common stock underlying ADRs and CUFS is used to
determine whether a person beneficially owns more than 5% of the
class of securities. This beneficial ownership-reporting
requirement applies whether or not the holders are
U.S. residents. The decision of whether to file a
Schedule 13D or a Schedule 13G will depend primarily
on the nature of the beneficial owner and the circumstances
surrounding the persons beneficial ownership. A copy of
the rules and regulations relating to the reporting of
beneficial ownership with the SEC, as well as Schedules 13D and
13G, are available on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
Material Contracts
Notes. In November 1998, we issued $225.0 million of
noncollateralized notes as part of a seven-tranche private
placement facility. Principal repayments are due in seven
installments on specified dates that commenced on
November 5, 2004 and end on November 5, 2013. The
tranches bear fixed interest rates of 6.86%, 6.92%, 6.99%,
7.05%, 7.12%, 7.24% and 7.42%, respectively. Interest is payable
on May 5, and November 5, each year. The first tranche
of $17.6 million was repaid in November 2004. The notes are
issued by James Hardie International Finance B.V.
(JHIF BV) and JHI NV guarantees the
principal and interest of the notes. Effective December 23,
2002, the note purchase agreement was amended to, among other
matters, modify certain covenants in connection with the sale of
our Gypsum business in April 2002, and, in connection with this
amendment, we prepaid $60.0 million in principal amount of
the notes. As a result of the early retirement, we incurred a
$9.9 million make-whole payment charge which was charged to
interest expense during the year ended March 31, 2003.
Revolving Loan Facility. Under the Revolving Loan
Agreements among JHIF BV as borrower, JHI NV as
guarantor, and James Hardie N.V. and James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc., as retiring guarantors, and certain
lenders thereto, we have an Australian dollar-denominated
noncollateralized revolving loan facility
120
providing for borrowings up to A$200.0 million
($154.5 million) that can be repaid and redrawn until
maturity in November 2006. Interest is recalculated at the
commencement of each drawdown period based on the US$ LIBOR or
the average Australian bank bill rate plus the margins of
individual lenders. During the year ended March 31, 2005,
we paid $0.5 million in commitment fees. As of
March 31, 2005, there was $154.5 million
(A$200.0 million) available under this revolving loan
facility. This loan facility was novated to the current parties
on December 16, 2002. We anticipate that this facility will
be terminated and replaced with our new revolving
U.S. dollar cash advance facilities in July 2005.
Stand-by Loan Facility. Under the 364 Day
Standby Loan Agreements among JHIF BV, as borrower,
JHI NV as guarantor, and James Hardie Australia Investco
Pty Limited, James Hardie N.V. and James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc., as retiring guarantors, and certain
lenders thereto, we have short-term noncollateralized stand-by
loan facilities that allow us to borrow up to
$132.5 million. At March 31, 2005, five out of six
loan facilities or $117.5 million had a maturity date of
April 30, 2005 and the sixth facility or $15.0 million
had a maturity date of October 30, 2005. At March 31,
2005, we had not drawn down any of these facilities. Interest is
recalculated at the commencement of each draw-down period based
on either the US$ LIBOR or the average A$ bank bill bid rate
plus the margins of the individual lenders and is payable at the
end of each draw-down period. During the year ended
March 31, 2005, we paid $0.3 million in commitment
fees. JHI NV guarantees the principal and interest under
the standby loans. This loan facility was novated to the current
parties on December 16, 2002. We anticipate that this
facility will be terminated and replaced with our new revolving
U.S. dollar cash advance facilities in July 2005.
U.S. Dollar Cash Advance Facilities. In June 2005,
we entered into new unsecured debt facilities totaling
$355 million. The new debt facilities are revolving
U.S. dollar cash advance facilities involving agreements
with six banks. Subject to the satisfaction of customary closing
conditions, these new facilities will replace our previous
revolving and stand-by loan facilities. Each of the new
facilities is for an initial term of 364 days. Upon
satisfaction of certain conditions, including shareholder
approval of our proposed voluntary long-term funding arrangement
for proven asbestos claims against certain former Australian
subsidiary companies, two-thirds of the aggregate facilities
will convert to a term of five years from signing date and
one-third will remain as extendable 364-day facilities. The
interest rate for each facility is US$ LIBOR plus a margin.
Exchange Controls
There are no legislative or other legal provisions currently in
force in The Netherlands or arising under our Articles of
Association restricting the import of export of capital,
including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use
by JHI NV and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, or remittances
to our security holders not resident in The Netherlands. Cash
dividends payable in U.S. dollars on our common stock may
be officially transferred from The Netherlands and converted
into any other convertible currency.
There are no limitations, either by Dutch law or in our Articles
of Association, on the right of non-residents of The Netherlands
to hold or vote our common stock.
Taxation
The following summarizes the material Dutch and U.S. tax
consequences of an investment in shares of our common stock.
This summary does not address every aspect of taxation relevant
to a particular investor subject to special treatment under any
applicable law, and is not intended to apply in all respects to
all categories of investors. In addition, except for the matters
discussed under Netherlands Taxation, this summary
does not consider the effect of other foreign tax laws or any
state, local or other tax laws that may apply to an investment
in shares of our common stock. This summary assumes that we will
conduct our business in the manner described in this annual
report. Changes in our organizational structure or the manner in
which we conduct our business may invalidate all or parts of
this summary. The laws on which this summary is based could
change, perhaps with retroactive effect, and any law changes
could invalidate all or parts of this summary. We will not
update this summary for any law changes after the date of this
annual report.
121
This discussion does not bind either the U.S. or Dutch tax
authorities, or the courts of those jurisdictions. Except as
previously noted, we have not sought a ruling nor will we seek a
ruling of the U.S. or Dutch tax agencies about matters in
this summary. We cannot assure you that such tax agencies will
concur with the views in this summary concerning the tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our
common stock, or that any reviewing judicial body in the United
States or The Netherlands would likewise concur.
PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS
REGARDING THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACQUIRING,
OWNING AND DISPOSING OF OUR COMMON SHARES, INCLUDING THE EFFECT
OF ANY FOREIGN, STATE OR LOCAL TAXES.
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences generally applicable to
U.S. Shareholders (as defined below) who invest
in shares of our common stock and hold the shares as capital
assets. For purposes of this summary,
U.S. Shareholders means: (1) citizens or
residents of the United States (as defined for U.S. federal
income tax purposes); (2) corporations created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States or any of its
political subdivisions; (3) estates whose income is subject
to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source
and (4) trusts if (i) a court in the United States can
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and (ii) one or more U.S. persons can control
all of the substantial decisions of the trust.
This summary does not comprehensively describe all possible tax
issues that could influence a current or prospective
U.S. Shareholders decision to buy or sell shares of
our common stock. In particular, this summary does not discuss:
(1) the tax treatment of special classes of
U.S. Shareholders, such as financial institutions, life
insurance companies, tax exempt organizations, tax-qualified
employer plans and other tax-qualified or qualified accounts,
investors liable for the alternative minimum tax, dealers in
securities, shareholders who hold shares of our common stock as
part of a hedge, straddle, or other risk reduction arrangement,
or shareholders whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar; (2) the tax treatment of
U.S. Shareholders who own (directly or indirectly by
attribution through certain related parties) 10% or more of our
voting stock and (3) the application of other
U.S. federal taxes, such as the U.S. federal estate
tax. The summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), applicable Treasury
regulations, judicial decisions and administrative rulings and
practice, all as of the date of this annual report.
Treatment of ADRs. For U.S. federal income tax
purposes, a holder of an ADR is considered the owner of the
shares of stock represented by the ADR. Accordingly, except as
otherwise noted, references in this summary to ownership of
shares of our common stock includes ownership of the shares of
our common stock underlying the corresponding ADRs.
Taxation of Distributions. The tax treatment of a
distribution on shares of our common stock held by a
U.S. Shareholder depends on whether such distribution is
from our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as
determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). To
the extent a distribution is from our current or accumulated
earnings and profits, a U.S. Shareholder will include such
amount in gross income as a dividend. To the extent a
distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and
profits, a U.S. Shareholder will treat such amount first as
a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the
U.S. Shareholders tax basis in such shares, and any
excess amount will be treated and taxed as a capital gain. See
the discussion of Capital Gains Rates below.
Notwithstanding the foregoing described treatment, we do not
intend to maintain calculations of our current and accumulated
earnings and profits. Dividends received on shares of our common
stock will not qualify for the inter-corporate dividends
received deduction.
Distributions to U.S. Shareholders that are treated as
dividends may be subject to a reduced rate of tax under recently
enacted U.S. tax laws. For tax years beginning after
December 31, 2002 and before January 1, 2009,
qualified dividend income is subject to a maximum
tax rate of 15%. Qualified dividend income includes
dividends received from a qualified foreign
corporation. A qualified foreign corporation
includes (1) a foreign corporation that is eligible for the
benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the
122
U.S. that contains an exchange of information program and
(2) a foreign corporation that pays dividends with respect
to shares of its stock that are readily tradable on an
established securities market in the U.S. We believe that
we are, and will continue to be, a qualified foreign
corporation and that dividends we pay with respect to our
shares will qualify as qualified dividend income. To
be eligible for the 15% tax rate, a U.S. Shareholder must
hold our shares un-hedged for a minimum holding period
(generally, 61 days during the 121-day period beginning on
the date that is 60 days before the ex-dividend date of the
distribution). Although we believe we presently are, and will
continue to be, a qualified foreign corporation, we
cannot guarantee that we will so qualify. For example, we will
not constitute a qualified foreign corporation if we
are classified as a (1) a passive foreign investment
company (discussed below) in either the taxable year of
the distribution or the preceding tax year or (2) a
foreign investment company or a foreign
personal holding company (each discussed below) in either
the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding tax year,
but only for our tax years beginning before January 1, 2005.
Distributions to U.S. Shareholders that are treated as
dividends are generally considered income from sources outside
the United States and foreign source passive income
for foreign tax credit purposes. However, if U.S. persons
own, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of our shares of common
stock, then a portion of the dividends (based on the proportion
of our income that is from U.S. sources) may be treated as
sourced within the U.S. This 50% ownership rule could
potentially limit a U.S shareholders ability to use
foreign tax credits against the shareholders U.S. tax
liability. In addition, special rules will apply to determine a
U.S. Shareholders foreign tax credit limitation if a
dividend distributed with respect to our shares constitutes
qualified dividend income (as described above). See
the discussion of Credit of Foreign Taxes Withheld
below.
Any amounts of foreign currency we distribute on shares of our
common stock generally will equal the fair market value in
U.S. dollars of such foreign currency on the date of
receipt. A U.S. Shareholder will have a tax basis in the
foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date
of receipt, and will recognize gain or loss when it sells or
exchanges the foreign currency. Such gain or loss is taxable as
ordinary income or loss from U.S. sources.
U.S. Shareholders who are individuals will not recognize
gain upon selling or exchanging foreign currency if the gain
does not exceed $200 and the sale or exchange constitutes a
personal transaction under the Internal Revenue
Code. The amount of any property other than money that we
distribute with respect to shares of our common stock will equal
its fair market value on the date of distribution.
Credit of Foreign Taxes Withheld. Under certain
conditions, including a requirement to hold shares of our common
stock un-hedged for a certain period, and subject to limitation,
a U.S. Shareholder may claim a credit against the
U.S. shareholders federal income tax liability for
the foreign tax owed and withheld or paid with respect to
taxable dividends on its shares. Alternatively, a
U.S. Shareholder may deduct the amount of withheld foreign
taxes, but only for a year for which the U.S. Shareholder
elects to deduct all foreign income taxes. Complex rules
determine how and when the foreign tax credit applies, and
U.S. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to
determine whether and to what extent they may claim foreign tax
credits.
Under certain conditions, we may retain a portion of Netherlands
taxes we withhold from dividends paid to our shareholders,
rather than pay that portion of the withheld taxes to The
Netherlands Tax Administration. Uncertainty exists whether a
U.S. Shareholder can properly claim as a foreign tax credit
any Netherlands withholding taxes we retain. As a result,
U.S. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors
regarding their ability to do so. If unable to claim a foreign
tax credit for those tax amounts, a U.S. shareholder still
may deduct them for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but
only for a year for which the U.S. Shareholder elects to
deduct all foreign income taxes. The conditions under which we
could retain Netherlands withholding taxes are unlikely to
occur, but upon request, we will inform U.S. Shareholders
whether we retained any Dutch tax withheld from distributions on
shares of our common stock.
Sale or Other Disposition of Shares. A
U.S. Shareholder will recognize capital gain or loss on the
sale or other taxable disposition of shares of our common stock,
equal to the difference between the U.S. Shareholders
adjusted tax basis in the shares sold or disposed of and the
amount realized on the sale or disposition. Individual
U.S. Shareholders may benefit from lower marginal tax rates
on capital gains recognized on shares sold, depending on the
U.S. Shareholders holding period of the shares. See
the
123
discussion of Capital Gains Rates below. Capital
losses not offset by capital gains are subject to limitations on
deductibility. The gain or loss from the sale or other
disposition of shares of our common stock generally will be
treated as income from sources within the United States for
foreign tax credit purposes, unless the U.S. Shareholder is
a U.S. citizen residing outside the United States and
certain other conditions are met.
Capital Gains Rates. For individual
U.S. Shareholders, the tax rates applicable to capital gain
and ordinary income may vary substantially. For calendar year
2004, the highest marginal income tax rate that could apply to
the ordinary income of an individual U.S. Shareholder
(disregarding the effect of limitations on deductions) is 35%.
In contrast, a maximum rate of 15% applies to any net capital
gain of an individual U.S. Shareholder if such gain is
attributable to the sale or exchange of capital assets held more
than one year. Gain attributable to the sale or exchange of
capital assets held one year or less is short-term capital gain,
taxable at the same rates as ordinary income. In addition, a
maximum rate of 15% applies to qualified dividend
income (as described above).
Controlled Foreign Corporation Status. If more than 50%
of the voting power of all classes of our stock or the total
value of our stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by citizens
or residents of the United States, United States domestic
partnerships and corporations or estates or trusts other than
foreign estates or trusts, each of whom owns 10% or more of the
total combined voting power of all classes of our stock entitled
to vote or the total value of our stock (10-Percent
Shareholder), we could be treated as a controlled
foreign corporation (CFC) under Subpart F
of the Code. This classification would, among other
consequences, require 10-Percent Shareholders to include in
their gross income, their pro rata share of our
Subpart F income (as specifically defined by
the Code) and our earnings invested in U.S. property (as
specifically defined by the Code).
In addition, gain from the sale or exchange of our common shares
by a U.S. person who is or was a United States shareholder
(as defined in the Code) at any time during the five-year period
ending with the sale or exchange is treated as dividend income
to the extent of earnings and profits of the company
attributable to the stock sold or exchanged. Under certain
circumstances, a corporate shareholder that directly owns 10% or
more of our voting shares may be entitled to an indirect foreign
tax credit for amounts characterized as dividends under the Code.
If we were classified as both a Passive Foreign Investment
Company, as described below, and a CFC, generally we would not
be treated as a Passive Foreign Investment Company
(PFIC) with respect to 10-Percent Shareholders. We
believe that we are not, nor will we become, a CFC.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status. Special
U.S. federal income tax rules apply to
U.S. Shareholders owning capital stock of a PFIC. A foreign
corporation will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which 75% or
more of its gross income is passive income or in which 50% or
more of the average value of its assets are considered
passive assets (generally assets that generate
passive income or assets held for the production of passive
income). For these purposes, passive income generally excludes
interest, dividends or royalties from related parties.
If we were a PFIC, each U.S. Shareholder would likely face
increased tax liabilities (possibly including an interest
charge) upon the sale or other disposition of shares of our
common stock or upon receipt of excess
distributions, unless the U.S. Shareholder elects
(1) to be taxed currently on its pro rata portion of
our income, regardless of whether such income was distributed in
the form of dividends or otherwise, or (2) to mark its
shares to market by accounting for any difference between such
shares fair market value and adjusted basis at the end of
the taxable year by either an inclusion in income or a deduction
from income. Because of the manner in which we operate our
business, we are not, nor do we expect to become, a PFIC.
Foreign Personal Holding Company Status. For our tax
years beginning before January 1, 2005, special
U.S. federal income tax rules apply to
U.S. Shareholders owning shares of a foreign personal
holding company (a FPHC). A foreign
corporation will be a FPHC if (1) at any time during its
taxable year, five or fewer individuals who are
U.S. citizens or residents own (directly or indirectly by
attribution through certain related parties) more than 50% of
the corporations capital stock (by either voting power or
value) (the Shareholder Test) and (2) the
corporation derives at least 60% of its gross income (reduced to
at least
124
50% after the initial year of qualification under certain
circumstances), as adjusted, for the taxable year from certain
passive sources (the Income Test). We and certain of
our subsidiaries meet and will likely continue to meet the
Income Test, because most of our income derives from interest or
dividends. However, we will fail the Shareholder Test, because
U.S. citizens or residents do not own more than 50% of the
shares of our common stock. Therefore, neither we nor any of our
subsidiaries are a FPHC for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
If we or any of our subsidiaries were a FPHC,
U.S. Shareholders (including certain indirect holders)
would be required to include in gross income, as a dividend,
their pro rata share of the undistributed taxable income
(as specifically adjusted) of the FPHC, if they were holders on
the last day of our taxable year (or, if earlier, the last day
on which the FPHC satisfies the Shareholder Test), but such
pro rata share would increase their basis in their shares
by a corresponding amount. In addition, if we or any of our
subsidiaries were to become a FPHC, U.S. persons who
acquire shares of our common stock from decedents would not
receive a stepped-up basis in such shares. Instead,
such holders would have a tax basis in such shares equal to the
lesser of the decedents basis or fair market value. These
special rules regarding foreign personal holding companies were
recently repealed by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the
Act) and these rules do not apply to our tax years
beginning after December 31, 2004.
Foreign Investment Company Status. As described above,
dividends we pay on our stock after December 31, 2002 are
subject to a tax rate of no more than 15%, provided we are a
qualified foreign corporation and the required
un-hedged holding period is satisfied. We will not qualify for
that status if, among other reasons, we are a foreign
investment company in either the taxable year of the
distribution or the preceding tax year. A foreign investment
company is a foreign corporation that is (i) registered
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a management company
or as a unit investment trust or (ii) engaged primarily in
the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in
securities, commodities, or derivative positions in securities
or commodities, at a time when U.S. persons directly,
indirectly, or constructively own more than 50% of either its
total voting power or total stock value. Because of the manner
in which we operate our business, we are not, nor do we expect
to become, a foreign investment company. These special rules
regarding foreign investment companies were recently repealed by
the Act, and these rules do not apply to our tax years beginning
after December 31, 2004.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Provisions Applicable to
Non-United States Holders. Holders of shares of our common
stock who are not U.S. Shareholders
(Non-U.S. Shareholders) generally will not be
subject to U.S. federal income taxes, including
U.S. withholding taxes, on any gain realized on a sale,
exchange or other disposition of the shares unless (1) such
gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the
Non-U.S. Shareholder of a trade or business in the United
States or (2) in the case of gain realized by a
Non-U.S. Shareholder who is an individual, the
Non-U.S. Shareholder is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year in which the sale or
other disposition occurs and certain other conditions are met. A
Non-U.S. Shareholder generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends
received with respect to shares of our common stock, unless such
income is effectively connected with the conduct by the
Non-U.S. Shareholder of a trade or business in the United
States.
U.S. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding.
Dividend payments on shares of our common stock and proceeds
from the sale, exchange, or redemption of shares of our common
stock may be subject to information reporting to the Internal
Revenue Service and possible U.S. backup withholding at a
current rate of 30%. Backup withholding will not apply to a
shareholder who furnishes a correct taxpayer identification
number or certificate of foreign status and makes any other
required certification or who is otherwise exempt from backup
withholding. U.S. persons who are required to establish
their exempt status generally must provide such certification on
a properly completed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9
(Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification).
Non-U.S. shareholders generally will not be subject to
U.S. information reporting or backup withholding. However,
such shareholders may be required to provide certification of
non-U.S. status in connection with payments received in the
United States or through certain U.S.-related financial
intermediaries.
125
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as
backup withholding may be credited against a shareholders
U.S. federal income tax liability, and a shareholder may
obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund
with the Internal Revenue Service and furnishing any required
information.
The following is a summary of the material Dutch tax
consequences generally applicable to an investment in shares of
our common stock by a beneficial owner who is neither a citizen,
resident nor deemed resident of The Netherlands. This summary
does not comprehensively describe all possible tax issues that
could influence a prospective shareholders decision to
acquire shares of our common stock. For example, this summary
omits from discussion Netherlands gift, estate and
inheritance taxes. The summary is based on the Dutch tax
legislation, published case law and other applicable regulations
as at the date of this annual report, any of which may change
possibly with retroactive effect.
Treatment of ADRs. In general, for Netherlands tax
purposes, an owner of depositary receipts is considered the
owner of the shares of stock represented by depositary receipts.
Accordingly, except as otherwise noted, references in this
section of the annual report to ownership of shares of our
common stock includes ownership of the shares underlying the
corresponding ADRs.
Dutch Dividend Withholding Tax. The Netherlands imposes a
25% withholding tax on amounts we distribute as dividends. The
term dividends for this purpose includes, but is not
limited to:
|
|
|
(1) direct or indirect distributions in cash or in kind,
deemed or constructive distributions, and repayments of
additional paid-in capital not recognized as such for
Netherlands dividend withholding tax purposes; |
|
|
(2) liquidation proceeds, proceeds of redemption of shares
of common stock or, generally, except if a certain specific
exemption applies, consideration paid by us for the repurchase
of shares of common stock in excess of the average paid-in
capital recognized for Netherlands dividend withholding tax
purposes; |
|
|
(3) the par value of shares of common stock issued to a
holder of shares of common stock or an increase of the par value
of shares of common stock, as the case may be, to the extent
that no contribution to capital, recognized for Netherlands
dividend withholding tax purposes, was made or will be made; and |
|
|
(4) the partial repayment of paid-in capital, recognized
for Netherlands dividend withholding tax purposes, if and to the
extent that there are net profits (zuivere
winst) for dividend withholding tax purposes, unless
the general meeting of our shareholders has previously resolved
to make such repayment and provided that the par value of the
shares of common stock concerned has been reduced by a
corresponding amount by changing our Articles of Association. As
a result of contributions in kind (i.e., in shares) to our
paid-in capital made prior to the listing of our common shares,
a portion of such paid-in capital may not be recognized for
Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes. |
If a double taxation convention is in effect between The
Netherlands and the country of residence of a non-resident
shareholder and depending on the terms of that double taxation
convention, such non-resident shareholder may be eligible for a
full or partial exemption from, or refund of, Dutch dividend
withholding tax.
Under the U.S.-NL Treaty, dividends that we pay to citizens and
residents of the United States who are the beneficial owners of
shares of our common stock (other than an exempt organization or
exempt pension organization) are generally eligible for a
reduction of the 25% Netherlands withholding tax to 15%, or in
the case of certain U.S. corporate shareholders owning
directly at least 10% of our voting power, 5%, unless the shares
of common stock held by such residents form part of the business
property of a business carried on through a permanent
establishment in The Netherlands. The same exception applies if
the beneficial owner of the shares, being a citizen or resident
of the United States, performs independent personal services
from a fixed base situated in The Netherlands and the holding of
the shares of common stock in respect of which the dividends are
paid pertains to such fixed base in The Netherlands. The U.S.-NL
Treaty also exempts from tax
126
dividends we pay to exempt pension organizations and exempt
organizations, as defined under the treaty. A shareholder of our
common stock, other than an individual, will be ineligible for
the benefits of the U.S.-NL Treaty unless the shareholder
satisfies certain tests under the limitation on benefits
provisions of Article 26 of the U.S.-NL Treaty. To prevent
so-called dividend stripping, Netherlands law generally denies
the treaty benefit of a reduced dividend withholding tax rate
for any dividend paid to a recipient who is not the
beneficial owner of the dividend.
To claim the reduced withholding tax rate on portfolio dividends
under the U.S.-NL Treaty, a shareholder of our common stock
(other than an exempt organization or exempt pension
organization) must give us in duplicate a signed Form IB
92 USA before payment of the dividend. The form has a
qualifying bankers affidavit, requiring a bank member of
the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange, or a
member bank of the Federal Reserve System, to attest that the
bank has custody of the shares of common stock, or that the bank
has been shown that the common shares are property of the
applicant. If the Form IB 92 USA is submitted before
the dividend payment date and all relevant conditions are
fulfilled, we will withhold tax from the dividend at the reduced
treaty rate of 15%. If a shareholder of our common stock is
unable to claim withholding tax relief in this manner, the
shareholder can get a refund of excess tax withheld by filing a
Form IB 92 USA, describing the circumstances that
prevented the holders claiming withholding tax relief. The
holder must file the form within three years after the end of
calendar year in which the tax had been levied.
A qualified exempt pension organization may obtain a full
exemption from the dividend withholding tax if, before the
payment of the dividend, the organization gives us in duplicate
a signed Form IB 96 USA, along with the requisite
bankers affidavit as described above, and includes IRS
Form 6166 for the relevant year or a valid qualification
certification issued by the competent Dutch tax office and
complies with certain other requirements. Other qualifying
exempt organizations are ineligible for relief from withholding
at source but may claim a refund of the tax withheld by filing a
Form IB 95 USA and complying with certain other
formalities.
Holders of shares of our common stock through a depository will
initially receive dividends subject to a withholding tax rate of
25%. Upon timely receipt of required documents concerning a
holders eligibility for the reduced rate under the U.S.-NL
Treaty, dependent on the status of the holder, the
dividend-disbursing agent (via any nominee) will pay an amount
equal to 10% or 25% of the dividend to the holder.
Taxes on Income and Capital Gains. A shareholder of
shares of our common stock will not be subject to any
Netherlands taxes on income or capital gains in respect of
dividends distributed by the Company or in respect of capital
gains realized on the disposition of shares of our common stock
(other than the dividend withholding tax described above),
provided that:
|
|
|
(1) such shareholder is neither resident nor deemed to be
resident in The Netherlands, nor has elected to be subject to
the rules of the Dutch Income Tax Act 2001 that apply to
residents of The Netherlands; |
|
|
(2) such shareholder does not have a business or an
interest in a business that is, in whole or in part, carried on
through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative
in The Netherlands and to which business or part of a business,
as the case may be, the shares of common stock are attributable; |
|
|
(3) such shareholder does not perform independent personal
services in The Netherlands giving rise to a fixed base in The
Netherlands to which the shares of common stock are
attributable; and |
|
|
(4) the shares of common stock owned by such shareholder do
not form part of a substantial interest or a deemed substantial
interest, as defined below, in the share capital of the Company
or, if such shares of common stock do form part of such an
interest, they form part of the assets of a business other than
a Netherlands business. |
Generally, a shareholder of our common stock will have a
substantial interest in our shares only if the shareholder, the
spouse of the shareholder, certain other relatives (including
foster children), or certain persons in the household of the
shareholder, alone or together, whether directly or indirectly,
own or possess
127
certain rights (e.g., the right of usufruct) in, shares of our
stock representing 5% or more of the total issued and
outstanding capital (or the issued and outstanding capital of
any class of shares), or rights to acquire the shares, whether
or not already issued, that represent at any time 5% or more of
the total issued and outstanding capital (or the issued and
outstanding capital of any class of shares) or the ownership of
certain profit participating certificates that relate to 5% or
more of the annual profit and/or to 5% or more of the
liquidation proceeds. Shareholders of our common stock who do
not hold a substantial interest themselves will also be subject
to the substantial interest regime if their spouse
and/or certain other relatives hold a substantial interest. A
deemed substantial interest is present if a substantial interest
or part of a substantial interest has been disposed of, or is
deemed to have been disposed of, without recognition of a gain.
If a shareholder has a substantial interest in the shares of our
common stock and is resident of a country with which The
Netherlands has concluded a convention to avoid double taxation,
such shareholder may, depending on the terms of such double
taxation convention, be eligible for an exemption from
Netherlands income tax on capital gains realized upon the
disposition or deemed disposition of shares of our common stock,
or to a full or partial exemption from Netherlands income tax on
dividends we pay.
Under the U.S.-NL Treaty, capital gains realized by a
shareholder that has a substantial interest in the shares of our
common stock and is a resident of the United States (as defined
in the U.S.-NL Treaty) upon the disposition of shares of our
common stock, are, with certain exceptions, generally exempt
from Netherlands tax.
As indicated above, a shareholder of shares of our common stock,
other than an individual, will be ineligible for the benefits of
the U.S.-NL Treaty if such shareholder does not satisfy the
limitation on benefits provisions under Article 26 of the
U.S.-NL Treaty.
Other Taxes and Duties. No other Netherlands registration
tax, transfer tax, stamp duty or any similar documentary tax or
duty will be payable by our investors in respect of or in
connection with the subscription, issue, placement, allotment or
transfer of shares of our common stock.
Documents Available for Review
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act
applicable to foreign private issuers and in
accordance therewith file reports, including annual reports, and
other information with the SEC. Such reports and other
information have been filed electronically with the SEC
beginning November 4, 2002. The SEC maintains a site on the
Internet, at www.sec.gov, which contains reports and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC. In addition, such reports may be obtained, upon
written request, from our Company Secretary at Atrium,
8th floor, Strawinskylaan 3077, 1077 ZX
Amsterdam, The Netherlands or our Assistant Company Secretary
Level 3, 22 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2000. Such
reports and other information filed with the SEC prior to
November 2002 may be inspected and copied at prescribed rates at
the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at
100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549,
inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.,
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005 or obtained by
written request to our Company Secretary. Although, as a foreign
private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange
Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements
and annual reports to shareholders and the short-swing profit
recovery provisions set forth in Section 16 of the Exchange
Act, we:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish our shareholders with annual reports containing
consolidated financial statements examined by an independent
registered public accounting firm; and |
|
|
|
furnish quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each
fiscal year containing unaudited consolidated financial
information in filings with the SEC under Form 6-K. |
|
|
Item 11. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Cash and cash equivalents include amounts on deposit in banks
and cash invested temporarily in various highly liquid financial
instruments with original maturities of three month or less when
acquired.
128
We have operations in foreign countries and, as a result, are
exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in
purchases, sales, assets and liabilities denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We also are exposed
to interest rate risk associated with our long-term debt and to
changes in prices of commodities we use in production.
Periodically, interest rate swaps, commodity swaps and forward
exchange contracts are used to manage market risks and reduce
exposure resulting from fluctuations in interest rates,
commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. Our policy
is to enter into derivative instruments solely to mitigate risks
in our business and not for trading or speculative purposes.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have significant operations outside of the United States and,
as a result, are exposed to changes in exchange rates which
affect our financial position, results of operations and cash
flow.
For our fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the following
currencies comprised the following percentages of our net sales,
cost of goods sold, expenses and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
A$ | |
|
NZ$ | |
|
Other(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
|
79.0% |
|
|
|
13.3% |
|
|
|
4.1% |
|
|
|
3.6% |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
81.5% |
|
|
|
12.0% |
|
|
|
3.1% |
|
|
|
3.4% |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
60.3% |
|
|
|
31.5% |
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
|
|
5.7% |
|
Liabilities (excluding borrowings)
|
|
|
73.9% |
|
|
|
17.6% |
|
|
|
5.1% |
|
|
|
3.4% |
|
For our fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, the following
currencies comprised the following percentages of our net sales,
cost of goods sold, expenses and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
A$ | |
|
NZ$ | |
|
Other(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
|
76.3% |
|
|
|
15.8% |
|
|
|
4.1% |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
77.3% |
|
|
|
15.0% |
|
|
|
3.6% |
|
|
|
4.1% |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
68.6% |
|
|
|
18.9% |
|
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
|
6.2% |
|
Liabilities (excluding borrowings)
|
|
|
83.2% |
|
|
|
9.4% |
|
|
|
4.2% |
|
|
|
3.2% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Comprised of Philippine Pesos, Euros and Chilean Pesos. |
We purchase raw materials and fixed assets and sell some
finished product for amounts denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency of the business in which the
related transaction is generated. In order to protect against
foreign exchange rate movements, we may enter into forward
exchange contracts timed to mature when settlement of the
underlying transaction is due to occur. At March 31, 2005,
there were no such material contracts outstanding.
Interest Rate Risk
We have market risk from changes in interest rates, primarily
related to our borrowings. At March 31, 2005, 93% of our
borrowings were fixed-rate and 7% variable-rate, as compared to
94% of our borrowings at a fixed rate and 6% at a variable rate
at March 31, 2004. The large percentage of fixed-rate debt
reduces the earnings volatility that would result from changes
in interest rates. From time to time, we may enter into interest
rate swap contracts in an effort to mitigate interest rate risk.
At March 31, 2005, no interest rate swap contracts were
outstanding.
The table below presents our long-term borrowings at
March 31, 2005, the expected maturity date of future
principal repayments and related weighted average interest
rates. For obligations with variable interest rates, we have
used current interest rates and have not attempted to project
future interest rates. The fair value of our outstanding debt is
what we likely would have to pay over the term of the loan if we
were to enter into debt on substantially the same terms today.
At March 31, 2005, all of our outstanding fixed-rate and
variable-rate borrowings were denominated in U.S. dollars.
129
Future Principal Repayments by Expected Maturity Date
(In millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed rate debt
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
$ |
173.6 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
|
6.92 |
% |
|
|
6.99 |
% |
|
|
7.05 |
% |
|
|
7.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
7.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
In addition, we have assessed the market risk for our
variable-rate debt and believe that a 1% change in interest
rates will increase or decrease interest expense by
approximately $0.1 million annually based on
$11.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding at
March 31, 2005.
Commodity Price Risk
Pulp is a raw material we use to produce fiber cement, and it
has historically demonstrated more price sensitivity than other
raw materials that we use in our manufacturing process. In
August 2000, we entered into a contract with a third party to
hedge the price of 5,000 metric tons of pulp per month,
representing approximately 50% of our production requirements at
that time. The original contract term was effective from
September 1, 2000 to August 31, 2005, with settlement
payments due each month. On December 2, 2001, the other
party filed for bankruptcy. This had the effect of terminating
all outstanding swap transactions immediately prior to the
bankruptcy filing. The estimated fair value at the date of
termination of the pulp contract was a $6.2 million
liability and was recorded in other non-current liabilities in
fiscal year 2002. Also, a current payable of $0.6 million
was recorded at March 31, 2002. In November 2002, we
settled our obligation under this contract for a cash payment of
$5.8 million. Accordingly, we recorded a gain on settlement
of the contract in the amount of $1.0 million in other
operating income during fiscal year 2003. Pulp prices increased
during fiscal years 2005 and 2004, and we expect them to
continue to fluctuate. To minimize the additional working
capital requirements caused by rising pulp prices, we may seek
to enter into contracts with suppliers for the purchase of pulp
that could fix our pulp prices over the longer-term. However, if
pulp prices do not continue to rise, our cost of sales may be
negatively impacted due to fixed pulp pricing over the
longer-term. We have assessed the market risk for pulp and
believe that, based on our most recent estimates, a $65 per
metric ton price movement in pulp prices, which represents
approximately 10% of the average market pulp price in fiscal
year 2005, would have had approximately a 1.5% change in cost of
sales in fiscal year 2005.
|
|
Item 12. |
Description of Securities Other Than Equity
Securities |
Not Required.
130
PART II
|
|
Item 13. |
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
None.
|
|
Item 14. |
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders
and Use of Proceeds |
None.
|
|
Item 15. |
Controls and Procedures |
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective.
There have been no significant changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during fiscal year 2005 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 16A. |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Our Joint Board has determined that Michael Brown, Michael
Gillfillan and James Loudon are audit committee financial
experts, as such term is defined by applicable SEC rules.
Mr. Brown and Mr. Gillfillan are considered to be
independent. However, under the NYSE listing standards
applicable to U.S. companies, Mr. Loudon would not be
considered to be independent because his son is an employee of
our independent registered public accounting firm. However, his
son does not work, and has never worked, on our audit or
otherwise performed services for us. Accordingly, the Board has
resolved to have Mr. Loudon to continue to serve on the
Audit Committee.
|
|
Item 16B. |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics |
We seek to maintain high standards of integrity and are
committed to ensuring that we conduct our business in accordance
with high standards of ethical behavior.
In 2003, we revised our code of ethics primarily:
|
|
|
|
|
to prohibit, directly or indirectly, extending or maintaining
credit, arranging for the extension of credit or renewing an
extension of credit, in the form of a personal loan to or for
any of our directors or executive officers; |
|
|
|
to add a mechanism to enable employees to submit any concerns or
complaints regarding questionable accounting or auditing
matters. Such submissions may be made on an anonymous,
confidential basis and may be directed to an employees
supervisor(s), corporate controller or the secretary of Audit
Committee. In addition, we added a section that prohibits
retaliation of any kind against individuals who have made good
faith reports or complaints of violations of our code of ethics
or other known or suspected illegal or unethical
conduct; and |
|
|
|
to add a section that provides that our code of ethics may be
amended or modified by our Supervisory Board. In addition,
waivers of this code may only be granted by our Supervisory
Board or a committee of our Supervisory Board with specific
delegated authority, and any such waiver, will be disclosed to
our shareholders. |
131
In June 2005, we updated our code of ethics primarily:
|
|
|
|
|
to change its name to the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics, to reflect the fact that it sets forth our
standards of business conduct as well as ethical behavior, and
in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations of the New
York Stock Exchange; and |
|
|
|
to make our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to
our directors, in addition to all of our employees, in
compliance with the relevant rules and regulations of the New
York Stock Exchange. |
In addition, we are in the process of introducing a new
toll-free, 24-hour ethics hotline, through which employees may
confidentially report concerns or complaints regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters and other suspected
violations of law or our code of business conduct and ethics.
This new hotline will be progressively introduced in our
operations in The Netherlands, the United States and Australia.
We have not granted any waivers from the provisions of our Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics during fiscal year 2005.
Our complete Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is publicly
available on the Corporate Governance area of our Investor
Relations website at www.jameshardie.com.
|
|
Item 16C. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Fees Paid to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Fees paid to our independent registered public accounting firm
for services provided for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Audit Fees include the aggregate fees for professional services
rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm.
Professional services include the audit of our annual financial
statements and services that are normally provided in connection
with statutory and regulatory filings. During the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2005, total audit fees also included
internal investigation fees of $1.9 million. |
|
(2) |
Audit-Related Fees include the aggregate fees billed for
assurance and related services rendered by our independent
registered public accounting firm. Our independent registered
public accounting firm did not engage any temporary employees to
conduct any portion of the audit of our financial statements for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. |
|
(3) |
Tax Fees include the aggregate fees billed for tax compliance,
tax advice and tax planning services rendered by our independent
registered public accounting firm. |
In addition to the fees described above, during the fiscal year
ended March 31 2003, we incurred minor fees from our
independent registered public accounting firm related to the
purchase and use of software.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
In accordance with our Audit Committees policy and the
requirements of the law, all services provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are pre-approved annually by the
Audit Committee. Pre-approval includes a list of specific audit
and non-audit services in the following categories: audit
services, audit-related services, tax services and other
services. Any additional services that we may ask our
independent registered public accounting firm to perform will be
set forth in a separate document requesting Audit Committee
approval in advance of the service being performed.
132
All of the services pre-approved by the Audit Committee are
permissible under the SECs auditor independence rules. To
avoid potential conflicts of interest, the law prohibits a
publicly traded company from obtaining certain non-audit
services from its independent registered public accounting firm.
We obtain these services from other service providers as needed.
|
|
Item 16D. |
Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit
Committees |
Not Applicable.
|
|
Item 16E. |
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and
Affiliated Purchasers |
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 18. |
Financial Statements |
See pages F-1 through F-56, which are incorporated into this
annual report by reference.
Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
Articles of Association, as amended on November 5, 2003 of
James Hardie Industries N.V. (English Translation)(4) |
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Letter Agreement of September 6, 2001 by and between James
Hardie Industries N.V. and CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty
Limited, as the depositary for CHESS Units of Foreign
Securities(1) |
|
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Deposit Agreement dated as of September 24, 2001 between
The Bank of New York, as depositary, and James Hardie Industries
N.V.(1) |
|
|
2 |
.3 |
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 5, 1998,
among James Hardie Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V. and certain
purchasers thereto re: $225,000,000 Guaranteed Senior Notes(1) |
|
|
2 |
.4 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement and First Amendment to Note
Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2000, by and
among James Hardie Finance B.V., James Hardie U.S. Funding,
Inc., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie Aust Investco Pty Limited
and certain noteholders thereto(1) |
|
|
2 |
.5 |
|
Second Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of
October 22, 2001, by and among, James Hardie
U.S. Funding, Inc., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie Aust
Investco Pty Limited, James Hardie Australia Finance Pty
Limited, James Hardie International Finance B. V. and certain
noteholders thereto(1) |
|
|
2 |
.6 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Limited(2) |
|
|
2 |
.7 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Bank One, NA(2) |
|
|
2 |
.8 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and BNP Paribas(2) |
|
|
2 |
.9 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Australia and Westdeutsche Landesbank
Girozentrale, Sydney Branch(2) |
|
|
2 |
.10 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Limited(2) |
133
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.11 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Bank One, NA(2) |
|
|
2 |
.12 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and BBL Australia Limited(2) |
|
|
2 |
.13 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and BNP Paribas(2) |
|
|
2 |
.14 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated 364 Day Standby Loan Agreement among James
Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James
Hardie U.S. Funding Inc. and Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank,
National Association(2) |
|
|
2 |
.15 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated 364 Day Standby Loan Agreement among James
Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James
Hardie U.S. Funding Inc. and Westdeutsche Landesbank
Girozentrale, Sydney Branch(2) |
|
|
2 |
.16 |
|
Form of Novation Agreement, dated December 16, 2002,
relating to Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among
James Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V.,
James Hardie U.S. Funding Inc., James Hardie Industries
N.V., and each of the following banks: Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited; Bank One, NA; BNP Paribas; and WestLB AG,
Sydney Branch(3) |
|
|
2 |
.17 |
|
Form of Novation Agreement, dated December 16, 2002,
relating to Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among
James Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V.,
James Hardie U.S. Funding Inc., James Hardie Industries
N.V. and each of the following banks: Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited; Bank One, NA; ING Bank N.V., Sydney
Branch; BNP Paribas; Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, National
Association; and WestLB AG, Sydney Branch(3) |
|
|
2 |
.18 |
|
Amendment Agreement to Amended and Restated Standby Loan
Agreement, effective April 30, 2004, among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie Industries N.V. and
Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, National Association(4) |
|
|
2 |
.19 |
|
Form of Extension Letter, relating to 364 Day Standby Loan
Agreement among James Hardie International Finance B.V., James
Hardie Industries N.V. and each of the following banks:
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited; Bank One, NA;
ING Bank NV, Sydney Branch; BNP Paribas; and WestLB AG, Sydney
Branch(4) |
|
|
2 |
.20 |
|
Extension Letter relating to 364 Day Standby Loan Agreement
among James Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie
Industries N.V. and Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank N.A.(4) |
|
|
2 |
.21 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Third Amendment to Note
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2002, among
James Hardie U.S. Funding Inc, James Hardie International
Finance B.V., James Hardie Industries N.V., James Hardie N.V.
and certain noteholders thereto(3) |
|
|
2 |
.22 |
|
Common Terms Deed Poll dated June 15, 2005 between James
Hardie International Finance B.V. and James Hardie Industries
N.V. |
|
|
2 |
.23 |
|
Form of Term Facility Agreement between James Hardie
International Finance B.V. and Financier |
|
|
2 |
.24 |
|
Form of 364-day Facility Agreement between James Hardie
International Finance B.V. and Financier |
|
|
2 |
.25 |
|
Form of Guarantee Deed between James Hardie Industries N.V. and
Financier |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
James Hardie Industries N.V. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
4 |
.2 |
|
James Hardie Industries N.V. Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option
Plan 2002(1) |
|
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Economic Profit and Individual Performance Incentive Plans |
|
|
4 |
.4 |
|
JHI NV Stock Appreciation Rights Incentive Plan |
|
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Supervisory Board Share Plan, dated July 19, 2002(1) |
134
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Letter of Resignation, dated October 21, 2004, between
James Hardie Industries N.V. and Peter Donald Macdonald(4) |
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Consulting agreement, dated November 15, 2004, between
James Hardie Industries N.V. and Peter Shafron(4) |
|
|
4 |
.8 |
|
Employment Agreement effective as of February 10, 2005,
among James Hardie Building Products, Inc., James Hardie
Industries N.V. and Louis Gries |
|
|
4 |
.9 |
|
Summary of Employment Terms between James Hardie Industries N.V.
and Russell Chenu |
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
International Assignment Agreement dated May 10, 2005,
between James Hardie Industries N.V. and Benjamin Butterfield |
|
|
4 |
.11 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective September 1, 2004, between
James Hardie Buildings Products, Inc. and David Merkley |
|
|
4 |
.12 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective September 1, 2004, between
James Hardie Building Products and Donald Merkley |
|
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Amended Secondment dated October 8, 2004 between James
Hardie Building Products Inc. and James Chilcoff(4) |
|
|
4 |
.14 |
|
Final Settlement Agreement between James Hardie International
Finance B.V. and Folkert Zwinkels dated March 24, 2005 |
|
|
4 |
.15 |
|
Form of Joint and Several Indemnity Agreement among James Hardie
N.V., James Hardie (USA) Inc. and certain indemnitees thereto(1) |
|
|
4 |
.16 |
|
Form of Joint and Several Indemnity Agreement among James Hardie
Industries N.V., James Hardie Inc. and certain indemnitees
thereto(1) |
|
|
4 |
.17 |
|
Form of Deed of Access to Documents, Indemnity and Insurance
among James Hardie Industries N.V. and certain indemnitees
thereto(1) |
|
|
4 |
.18 |
|
Form of Joint and Several Indemnity Agreement among James Hardie
Industries N.V., James Hardie Building Products Inc. and certain
indemnities thereto |
|
|
4 |
.19 |
|
Lease Amendment, dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at the corner of Cobalt & Silica Street,
Carole Park, Queensland, Australia(4) |
|
|
4 |
.20 |
|
Variation of Lease dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at the corner of Colquhoun & Devon Streets,
Rosehill, New South Wales, Australia(4) |
|
|
4 |
.21 |
|
Extension of Lease dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at Rutland, Avenue, Welshpool, Western Australia,
Australia(4) |
|
|
4 |
.22 |
|
Lease Amendment dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at 46 Randle Road, Meeandah, Queensland, Australia (4) |
|
|
4 |
.23 |
|
Lease Agreement dated March 23, 2004 among Studorp Limited,
James Hardie New Zealand Limited and James Hardie Industries
N.V. re premises at the corner of ORorke and Station
Roads, Penrose, Auckland, New Zealand(4) |
|
|
4 |
.24 |
|
Lease Agreement dated March 23, 2004 among Studorp Limited,
James Hardie New Zealand Limited and James Hardie Industries
N.V. re premises at 44-74 ORorke Road, Penrose, Auckland,
New Zealand(4) |
|
|
4 |
.25 |
|
Industrial Building Lease Agreement, effective October 6,
2000, between James Hardie Building Products, Inc. and Fortra
Fiber-Cement L.L.C., re premises at Waxahachie, Ellis County,
Texas(1) |
|
|
4 |
.26 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between James Hardie Building
Products, Inc. and Cemplank, Inc. dated as of December 12,
2001(1) |
|
|
4 |
.27 |
|
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement dated
March 12, 2002, between BPB U.S. Holdings, Inc. and
James Hardie Inc.(1) |
135
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
|
8 |
.1 |
|
List of significant subsidiaries of James Hardie Industries N.V. |
|
|
12 |
.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
12 |
.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
13 |
.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
15 |
.1 |
|
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm |
|
|
15 |
.2 |
|
Consent of KPMG Actuaries Pty Ltd |
|
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Excerpts of the ASX Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Ltd
as of May 2005 |
|
|
99 |
.2 |
|
Excerpts of the Financial Services Reform Act 2001, as of
March 11, 2002 |
|
|
99 |
.3 |
|
ASIC Class Order 02/311, dated November 3, 2002 |
|
|
99 |
.4 |
|
ASIC Modification, dated March 7, 2002(1) |
|
|
(1) |
This document was previously filed on paper as an exhibit to a
prior Form 20-F. It is being re-filed herewith
electronically. |
|
(2) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on
Form 20-F dated September 7, 2001 and incorporate
herein by reference. |
|
(3) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F dated July 2, 2003 and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
(4) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F dated November 22, 2004 and incorporated
herein by reference. |
136
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly
caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report
on its behalf.
|
|
|
James Hardie Industries
N.V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Gries |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: July 1, 2005
137
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
|
|
|
F-56 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
James Hardie Industries N.V. and Subsidiaries
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and
changes in shareholders equity present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of James Hardie
Industries N.V. and Subsidiaries at March 31, 2005 and
2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended March 31,
2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company is subject to certain significant
contingencies, including asbestos-related claims against former
subsidiaries; a Special Commission of Inquiry established by the
government of New South Wales, Australia; a Heads of Agreement;
an investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission; and an indemnity to ABN 60 together with a related
commitment to provide interim funding to the Medical Research
and Compensation Foundation.
|
|
|
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
|
|
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
Los Angeles, California
May 13, 2005
F-2
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
|
|
US dollars) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
72.3 |
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1.5 million and $1.2 million as of
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
127.2 |
|
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
Refundable income taxes
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378.6 |
|
|
|
365.2 |
|
Long-term receivables and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
685.7 |
|
|
|
567.1 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,088.9 |
|
|
$ |
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
Accrued product warranties
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.4 |
|
|
|
169.3 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
121.7 |
|
|
|
147.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
Accrued product warranties
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
11,14 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464.2 |
|
|
|
466.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, Euro 0.59 par value, 2.0 billion shares
authorized; 459,373,176 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2005 and 458,558,436 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2004
|
|
|
16,20 |
|
|
|
245.8 |
|
|
|
245.2 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
16,20 |
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264.3 |
|
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
Employee loans
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624.7 |
|
|
|
504.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,088.9 |
|
|
$ |
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Notes | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Millions of US dollars, | |
|
|
|
|
except per share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
1,210.4 |
|
|
$ |
981.9 |
|
|
$ |
783.6 |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(784.0 |
) |
|
|
(623.0 |
) |
|
|
(492.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426.4 |
|
|
|
358.9 |
|
|
|
290.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174.5 |
) |
|
|
(162.0 |
) |
|
|
(144.9 |
) |
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
SCI and other related expenses
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating (expense) income
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196.2 |
|
|
|
172.2 |
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
189.8 |
|
|
|
165.7 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61.9 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
125.3 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income tax
benefit (expense) of $0.2 million, ($0.1) million
and ($1.6) million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
(Loss) gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of
income tax benefit (expense) of nil, $4.8 million and
($45.3) million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126.9 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
170.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (Millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
458.9 |
|
|
|
458.1 |
|
|
|
456.7 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
461.0 |
|
|
|
461.4 |
|
|
|
459.4 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
126.9 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
170.5 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries and businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(84.8 |
) |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of land and buildings
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of investments and negotiable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
Impairment loss on investment
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(24.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
|
|
162.6 |
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(153.2 |
) |
|
|
(74.8 |
) |
|
|
(90.2 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiaries and businesses, net of
cash invested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
334.4 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale and maturity of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
Collections on loans receivable
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Cash transferred on establishment of ABN 60 Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(149.2 |
) |
|
|
(58.0 |
) |
|
|
237.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from line of credit
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Repayments of borrowings
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160.0 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Repayments of capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.7 |
) |
|
|
(94.8 |
) |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
(87.9 |
) |
|
|
(279.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at bank and on hand
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
Short-term deposits
|
|
|
84.9 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents continuing operations
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
Cash at bank and on hand discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
72.3 |
|
|
$ |
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts
capitalised
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for income taxes, net
|
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
$ |
(6.5 |
) |
|
$ |
77.3 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Earnings | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
(Accumulated | |
|
Employee | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit) | |
|
Loans | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Balances as of March 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
205.4 |
|
|
$ |
323.5 |
|
|
$ |
(91.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(64.3 |
) |
|
$ |
370.7 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170.5 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrealized transition loss on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185.8 |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
Conversion of common stock from Euro 0.50 par value to Euro
0.85 par value
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
|
|
(157.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of common stock from Euro 0.85 par value to Euro
0.64 par value and subsequent return of capital
|
|
|
(94.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94.8 |
) |
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Employee loans repaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
269.7 |
|
|
$ |
171.3 |
|
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(49.0 |
) |
|
$ |
434.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129.6 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrealized transition loss on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154.3 |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
Conversion of common stock from Euro 0.64 par value to Euro
0.73 par value
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of common stock from Euro 0.73 par value to Euro
0.5995 par value and subsequent return of capital
|
|
|
(68.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.7 |
) |
Conversion of common stock from Euro 0.5995 par value to
Euro 0.59 par value
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Employee loans repaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
245.2 |
|
|
$ |
134.0 |
|
|
$ |
151.1 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(24.3 |
) |
|
$ |
504.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrealized transition loss on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.1 |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Employee loans repaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
245.8 |
|
|
$ |
139.4 |
|
|
$ |
264.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(24.1 |
) |
|
$ |
624.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Background and Basis of Presentation |
The Company manufactures and sells fiber cement building
products for interior and exterior building construction
applications primarily in the United States, Australia, New
Zealand, Philippines, Chile and Europe. Prior to April 25,
2002, the Company manufactured gypsum wallboard for interior
construction applications in the United States.
On July 2, 1998, ABN 60 000 009 263 Pty
Ltd, formerly James Hardie Industries Limited
(JHIL), then a public company organized under the
laws of Australia and listed on the Australian Stock Exchange,
announced a plan of reorganization and capital restructuring
(the 1998 Reorganization). James Hardie N.V.
(JHNV) was incorporated in August 1998, as an
intermediary holding company, with all of its common stock owned
by indirect subsidiaries of JHIL. On October 16, 1998,
JHILs shareholders approved the 1998 Reorganization.
Effective as of November 1, 1998, JHIL contributed its
fiber cement businesses, its U.S. gypsum wallboard
business, its Australian and New Zealand building systems
businesses and its Australian windows business (collectively,
the Transferred Businesses) to JHNV and its
subsidiaries. In connection with the 1998 Reorganization, JHIL
and its non-transferring subsidiaries retained certain unrelated
assets and liabilities.
On July 24, 2001, JHIL announced a further plan of
reorganization and capital restructuring (the 2001
Reorganization). Completion of the 2001 Reorganization
occurred on October 19, 2001. In connection with the 2001
Reorganization, James Hardie Industries N.V. (JHI
NV), formerly RCI Netherlands Holdings B.V., issued common
shares represented by CHESS Units of Foreign Securities
(CUFS) on a one for one basis to existing JHIL
shareholders in exchange for their shares in JHIL such that JHI
NV became the new ultimate holding company for JHIL and JHNV.
Following the 2001 Reorganization, JHI NV controls the same
assets and liabilities as JHIL controlled immediately prior to
the 2001 Reorganization.
The consolidated financial statements represent the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of JHI NV and its
current wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as
either the Company or James Hardie and
JHI NV together with its subsidiaries as of the time relevant to
the applicable reference, the James Hardie Group,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, the transfers to JHI NV have been
accounted for on a historical cost basis using the
as-if pooling method on the basis that the transfers
are between companies under common control.
|
|
2. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP). The
U.S. dollar is used as the reporting currency. All
subsidiaries are consolidated and all significant intercompany
transactions and balances are eliminated.
F-7
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
these estimates.
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform
with the current year presentation.
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation |
All assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars
at current exchange rates while revenues and expenses are
translated at average exchange rates in effect for the period.
The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are
included directly in other comprehensive income in
shareholders equity. Gains and losses arising from foreign
currency transactions are recognized in income currently.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include amounts on deposit in banks
and cash invested temporarily in various highly liquid financial
instruments with original maturities of three months or less
when acquired.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
generally determined under the first-in, first-out method,
except that the cost of raw materials and supplies is determined
using actual or average costs. Cost includes the costs of
materials, labor and applied factory overhead.
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Property,
plant and equipment of businesses acquired are recorded at their
estimated cost based on fair value at the date of acquisition.
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed using
the straight-line method over the following estimated useful
lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
40 |
|
Building improvements
|
|
|
5 to 10 |
|
Manufacturing machinery
|
|
|
20 |
|
General equipment
|
|
|
5 to 10 |
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
3 to 4 |
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 10 |
|
The costs of additions and improvements are capitalized, while
maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Interest
is capitalized in connection with the construction of major
facilities. Capitalized interest is recorded as part of the
asset to which it relates and is amortized over the assets
estimated useful life. Retirements, sales and disposals of
assets are recorded by removing the cost and accumulated
depreciation amounts with any resulting gain or loss reflected
in the consolidated statements of income.
F-8
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill, which
represents cost in excess of the fair value of the identifiable
net assets of businesses acquired. Effective April 1, 2002,
the Company no longer amortizes goodwill in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Accordingly, the Company reviews goodwill for impairment
annually, or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances warrant. If carrying values were to exceed their
estimated fair values, the Company would record an impairment
loss to write the assets down to their estimated fair values.
There were no impairment charges recorded against goodwill for
the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and
purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated
future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the
amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
fair value of the assets.
Environmental remediation expenditures that relate to current
operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.
Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past
operations, and which do not contribute to current or future
revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when
environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable
and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Estimated liabilities
are not discounted to present value. Generally, the timing of
these accruals coincides with completion of a feasibility study
or the Companys commitment to a formal plan of action.
|
|
|
Mineral Acquisition Costs |
The Company records acquired proven and probable silica mineral
ore reserves at their fair value at the date of acquisition.
Depletion expense is recorded based on the estimated rate per
ton multiplied by the number of tons extracted during the
period. The rate per ton may be periodically revised by
management based on changes in the estimated tons available to
be extracted which, in turn, is based on third party studies of
proven and probable reserves.
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, requires the recording of a liability for an
asset retirement obligation in the period in which the liability
is incurred. The initial measurement is based upon the present
value of estimated third party costs and a related long-lived
asset retirement cost capitalized as part of the assets
carrying value and allocated to expense over the assets
useful life. Accordingly, the Company accrues for reclamation
costs associated with mining activities, which are accrued
during production and are included in determining the cost of
production.
The Company recognizes revenue when the risks and obligations of
ownership have been transferred to the customer, which generally
occurs at the time of delivery to the customer. The Company
records estimated reductions to sales for customer rebates and
discounts including volume, promotional, cash and other
discounts. Rebates and discounts are recorded based on
managements best estimate when products are sold. The
estimates are based on historical experience for similar
programs and products. Management reviews
F-9
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
these rebates and discounts on an ongoing basis and the related
accruals are adjusted, if necessary, as additional information
becomes available.
Cost of goods sold is primarily comprised of cost of materials,
labor and manufacturing. Cost of goods sold also includes the
cost of inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs,
inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs and
shipping and handling costs.
Shipping and handling costs are charged to costs of goods sold
as incurred. Recovery of these costs is incorporated in the
Companys sales price per unit and is therefore classified
as part of net sales.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include
costs related to advertising, marketing, selling, information
technology and other general corporate functions. Selling,
general and administrative expenses also include certain
transportation and logistics expenses associated with the
Companys distribution network. Transportation and logistic
costs were $1.2 million, $1.3 million and
$1.0 million for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
The Company expenses the production costs of advertising the
first time the advertising takes place. Advertising expense was
$15.7 million, $15.2 million and $10.5 million
during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
|
|
|
Accrued Product Warranties |
An accrual for estimated future warranty costs is recorded based
on an analysis by the Company, including the historical
relationship of warranty costs to sales.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability
method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized
by applying enacted statutory rates applicable to future years
to differences between the tax bases and financial reporting
amounts of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on
deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that all
or some portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
To meet the reporting requirements of SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, the Company calculates the fair value of
financial instruments and includes this additional information
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements when the
fair value is different than the carrying value of those
financial instruments. When the fair value reasonably
approximates the carrying value, no additional disclosure is
made. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by
the Company using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is
required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of
fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could
realize in a current
F-10
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
Periodically, interest rate swaps, commodity swaps and forward
exchange contracts are used to manage market risks and reduce
exposure resulting from fluctuations in interest rates,
commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. Where such
contracts are designated as, and are effective as, a hedge,
gains and losses arising on such contracts are accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended.
Specifically, changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges are deferred and
recorded in other comprehensive income. These deferred gains or
losses are recognized in income when the transactions being
hedged are completed. The ineffective portion of these hedges is
recognized in income currently. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges are
recognized in income, as are changes in the fair value of the
hedged item. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
that are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes are
recognized in income. The Company does not use derivatives for
trading purposes.
In fiscal year 2003, the Company adopted the fair value
provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, which requires the Company to
value stock options issued based upon an option pricing model
and recognize this value as compensation expense over the
periods in which the options vest. In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure,
an amendment of SFAS No. 123, the Company has
elected to recognize stock-based compensation using the
retroactive restatement method. Under this change in accounting
method, the Company has restated its consolidated financial
statements for all years presented herein to reflect stock-based
compensation expense under a fair value based accounting method
for all options granted, modified or settled in fiscal years
beginning after March 31, 1995. See Note 16 for full
disclosures required under SFAS No. 123 and
SFAS No. 148.
The Company sponsors both defined benefit and defined
contribution retirement plans for its employees. Employer
contributions to the defined contribution plans are recognized
as periodic pension expense in the period that the
employees salaries or wages are earned. The defined
benefit plan covers all eligible employees and takes into
consideration the following components to calculate net periodic
pension expense: (a) service cost; (b) interest cost;
(c) expected return on plan assets; (d) amortization
of unrecognized prior service cost; (e) recognition of net
actuarial gains or losses; and (f) amortization of any
unrecognized net transition asset. If the amount of the
Companys total contribution to its pension plan for the
period is not equal to the amount of net periodic pension cost,
the Company recognizes the difference either as a prepaid or
accrued pension cost.
Dividends are recorded as a liability on the date that the Board
of Directors formally declares the dividend.
The Company is required to disclose basic and diluted earnings
per share (EPS). Basic EPS is calculated using
income divided by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic
EPS except that the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding is increased to include the number of additional
common shares calculated using the treasury method that would
have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares,
such as options, had been
F-11
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
issued. Accordingly, basic and dilutive common shares
outstanding used in determining net income per share are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of shares) | |
Basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
458.9 |
|
|
|
458.1 |
|
|
|
456.7 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
461.0 |
|
|
|
461.4 |
|
|
|
459.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Continuing operations | |
|
|
US dollar) | |
Net income per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Net income per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Potential common shares of 8.2 million, 2.0 million
and 1.3 million for the years ended March 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively, have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted common shares outstanding because the
effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign
currency translation and derivative instruments and is presented
as a separate component of shareholders equity.
In May 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 145,
Rescission of SFAS Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment
of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections. Among
other things, SFAS No. 145 rescinds various
pronouncements regarding early extinguishment of debt and allows
extraordinary accounting treatment for early extinguishment only
when the provisions of Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 30, Reporting the
Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of
Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual
and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, are
met. SFAS No. 145 provisions regarding early
extinguishment of debt are generally effective for fiscal years
beginning after May 15, 2002. As permitted under
SFAS No. 145, the Company early adopted the provisions
of this standard effective April 1, 2002. As a result of
the early retirement of $60.0 million of the Companys
long-term debt, the Company incurred charges of
$9.9 million related to a make-whole payment paid to
certain noteholders on December 23, 2002. Accordingly, this
amount was included in interest expense in the year ended
March 31, 2003 rather than as an extraordinary item.
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits |
In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132
(revised 2003) (SFAS No. 132R),
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of FASB Statement 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, No. 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlement and Curtailments of
Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and
No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits Other than Pensions. SFAS No. 132R
requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations,
cash flows and net periodic benefit/ cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans.
SFAS No. 132R is effective for foreign plans for
fiscal years ending after
F-12
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
June 15, 2004. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities |
In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No.
(FIN) 46 (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46R), which addresses how a business
should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest
in an entity through means other than voting rights and
accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaced
FIN 46, which was issued in January 2003. FIN 46 or
FIN 46R applies immediately to entities created after
January 31, 2003 and no later than the end of the first
reporting period that ended after December 15, 2003 to
entities considered to be special-purpose entities
(SPEs). FIN 46R is effective for all other
entities no later than the end of the first interim or annual
reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption
of the provisions of FIN 46 or FIN 46R relative to
SPEs and for entities created after January 31, 2003 did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The adoption of the other provisions of
FIN 46R did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its
Application to Certain Investments |
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
ratified the provisions of Issue 03-01, The Meaning
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to
Certain Investments, which clarifies the definition of
other-than-temporary impairment for certain investments
accounted for under the cost method. The recognition and
measurement guidance in Issue 03-01 should be applied to
other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods
beginning after June 15, 2004. For all other investments
within the scope of this issue, the disclosure requirements are
effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The
adoption of this issue did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of Accounting
Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43,
Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires abnormal
amounts of inventory costs related to idle facility, freight
handling and wasted material expenses to be recognized as
current period charges. Additionally, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company
does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
American Jobs Creation Act |
In October 2004, the President of the United States signed into
law the American Jobs Creation Act (the Act). The
Act allows for a U.S. federal income tax deduction for a
percentage of income earned from certain U.S. production
activities. Based on the effective date of the Act, the Company
will be eligible for this deduction in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006. Additionally, in December 2004, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 109-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP 109-1, which
was effective upon issuance, states the deduction under this
provision of the Act should be accounted for as a special
deduction in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The Company
is in the process of quantifying the impact this provision of
the Act will have on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
F-13
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Act also allows for an 85% dividends received deduction on
the repatriation of certain earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In
December 2004, the FASB issued FSP 109-2, Accounting
and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation
Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
FSP 109-2, which was effective upon issuance, allows
companies time beyond the financial reporting period of
enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for
reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of
applying SFAS No. 109. Additionally, FSP 109-2
provides guidance regarding the required disclosures surrounding
a companys reinvestment or repatriation of foreign
earnings. The Company continues to evaluate this provision of
the Act and as such, has not yet quantified the impact this
provision will have on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets |
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchange of Non-Monetary Assets An Amendment
of ARB Opinion No. 29, which requires non-monetary
asset exchanges to be accounted for at fair value. The Company
is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 153
for non-monetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the
adoption of this standard to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R
replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Generally, SFAS No. 123R is similar
in approach to SFAS No. 123 and requires that
compensation cost relating to share-based payments be recognized
in the financial statements based on the fair value of the
equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123R
is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual
reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. In April
2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123R until
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 123 in fiscal year 2003 and does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 123R to have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations |
In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN 47
clarifies the term conditional asset retirement
obligation used in SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.
FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of the fiscal
year ending after December 15, 2005. The Company is in the
process of evaluating whether FIN 47 will result in the
recognition of additional asset retirement obligations for the
Company.
|
|
3. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Cash at bank and on hand
|
|
$ |
28.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.6 |
|
Short-term deposits
|
|
|
84.9 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
72.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Short-term deposits are placed at floating interest rates
varying between 2.70% to 2.76% and 0.90% to 1.02% as of
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
4. |
Accounts and Notes Receivable |
Accounts and notes receivable consist of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Trade receivables
|
|
$ |
121.6 |
|
|
$ |
109.9 |
|
Other receivables and advances
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts and notes receivable
|
|
$ |
127.2 |
|
|
$ |
118.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The collectibility of accounts receivable, consisting mainly of
trade receivables, is reviewed on an ongoing basis and an
allowance for doubtful accounts is provided for known and
estimated bad debts. The following are changes in the allowance
for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Balance at April 1
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Charged to expense
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Costs and deductions
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Foreign currency movements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Finished goods
|
|
$ |
71.1 |
|
|
$ |
76.7 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
Provision for obsolete finished goods and raw materials
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$ |
99.9 |
|
|
$ |
103.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Construction | |
|
|
|
|
Land | |
|
Buildings | |
|
Equipment | |
|
in Progress | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Balance at April 1, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
119.8 |
|
|
$ |
444.4 |
|
|
$ |
107.0 |
|
|
$ |
679.8 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
(138.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
305.5 |
|
|
|
107.0 |
|
|
|
520.0 |
|
Changes in net book value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
74.1 |
|
Retirements and sales
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
Other movement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
47.1 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
135.0 |
|
|
|
562.8 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
772.1 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
(184.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
114.0 |
|
|
$ |
378.8 |
|
|
$ |
63.0 |
|
|
$ |
567.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Construction | |
|
|
|
|
Land | |
|
Buildings | |
|
Equipment | |
|
in Progress | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Balance at 1 April 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
135.0 |
|
|
$ |
562.8 |
|
|
$ |
63.0 |
|
|
$ |
772.1 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
(184.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
114.0 |
|
|
|
378.8 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
567.1 |
|
Changes in net book value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
117.1 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
Retirements and sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.3 |
) |
Other movement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
118.6 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
|
|
606.6 |
|
|
|
176.6 |
|
|
|
925.8 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
(215.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
106.7 |
|
|
$ |
390.9 |
|
|
$ |
176.6 |
|
|
$ |
685.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress consists of plant expansions and
upgrades.
F-16
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interest related to the construction of major facilities is
capitalized and included in the cost of the asset to which it
relates. Interest capitalized was $5.9 million,
$1.6 million and $1.7 million for the years ended
March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Depreciation
expense for continuing operations was $36.3 million,
$35.9 million and $27.2 million for the years ended
March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Intangible assets consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Balance at April 1, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Changes in net book value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded amortization expense of nil,
$0.5 million and $0.2 million for the years ended
March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to
other intangibles.
The Company sponsors a U.S. retirement plan, the James
Hardie Retirement and Profit Sharing Plan, for its employees in
the United States and a retirement plan, the James Hardie
Australia Superannuation Plan, for its employees in Australia.
The U.S. plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution
retirement and savings plan covering all U.S. employees
subject to certain eligibility requirements and matches employee
contributions (subject to limitations) dollar for dollar up to
6% of their salary or base compensation. The James Hardie
Australia Superannuation Plan has two types of participants.
Participants who joined the plan prior to July 1, 2003 have
rights and benefits that are accounted for as a defined benefit
plan in the Companys financial statements while
participants who joined the plan subsequent to July 1, 2003
have rights and benefits that are accounted for as a defined
contribution plan in the Companys financial statements.
Both of these participant plans are funded based on statutory
requirements in Australia. The Companys expense for its
defined contribution plans totaled $5.2 million,
$3.8 million and $2.9 million for the years ended
March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Details of the
defined benefit participant plan of the James Hardie Australia
Superannuation Plan (Defined Benefit Plan) are as
follows.
The investment strategy/policy of the Defined Benefit Plan is
set by the Trustee (Mercer) for each investment option. The
strategy includes the selection of a long-term mix of
investments (asset classes) that supports the options aims.
F-17
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aims of the Mercer Growth option, in which the Defined
Benefit Plan assets are invested, are:
|
|
|
|
|
to achieve a rate of return (net of tax and investment expenses)
that exceeds inflation (CPI) increases by at least
3% per annum over a moving five year period; |
|
|
|
to achieve a rate of return (net of tax and investment expenses)
above the median result for the Mercer Pooled Fund Survey
over a rolling three year period; and |
|
|
|
over shorter periods, outperform the notional return of the
benchmark mix of investments. |
The assets are invested by appointing professional investment
managers and/or from time to time investing in a range of
investment vehicles offered by professional investment managers.
Investment managers may utilize derivatives in managing
investment portfolios for the Trustee. However, the Trustee
doesnt undertake day-to-day management of derivative
instruments. Derivatives may be used, among other things, to
manage risk (e.g., for currency hedging). Losses from
derivatives can occur (e.g., due to stock market movements). The
Trustee seeks to manage risk by placing limits on the extent of
derivative use in any relevant Investment Management Agreements
between the Trustee and investment managers. The Trustee also
considers the risks and the controls set out in the
managers Risk Management Statements. The targeted ranges
of asset allocations are:
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
40-75% |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
15-60% |
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
0-20% |
|
The following are the actual asset allocations by asset category
for the Defined Benefit Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
62.5 |
% |
|
|
61.5 |
% |
Debt securities
|
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
Real Estate
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the components of net periodic pension cost
for the Defined Benefit Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized transition asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The settlement loss in fiscal year 2005 relates to lump sum
payments made to terminated participants of the Defined Benefit
Plan and is included in other operating expense in the
consolidated statements of income.
The following are the assumptions used in developing the net
periodic benefit cost and projected benefit obligation as of
March 31, for the Defined Benefit Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Periodic Benefit Cost Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
|
7.0% |
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
|
7.0% |
|
Projected Benefit Obligation Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
6.8% |
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
The discount rate methodology is based on the yield on 10-year
high quality investment securities in Australia adjusted to
reflect the rates at which pension benefits could be effectively
settled. The change in the discount rate used on the projected
benefit obligation from 2003 to 2004 is a direct result of the
change in yields of high quality investment securities over the
same periods, adjusted to rates at which pension benefits could
be effectively settled. The increase in the rate of increase in
compensation under the projected benefit obligation assumption
from 2003 to 2004 reflects an increase in the expected margin of
compensation increases over price inflation. The decrease in the
expected return on plan assets from 2004 to 2005 and from 2003
to 2004 is a result of lower expected after-tax rates of return.
The expected return on plan assets assumption is determined by
weighting the expected long-term return for each asset class by
the target/actual allocation of assets to each class. The
returns used for each class are net of investment tax and
investment fees. Net unrecognized gains and losses are amortized
over the average remaining service period of active employees. A
market related value of assets is used to determine pension
costs with the difference between actual and expected investment
return each year recognized over 5 years.
F-19
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the actuarial changes in the benefit
obligation, changes in plan assets and the funded status of the
Defined Benefit Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Changes in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at April 1
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at March 31
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at April 1
|
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at March 31
|
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Unamortized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides further details of the Defined
Benefit Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
Fair market value of plan assets
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
The Defined Benefit Plan measurement date is March 31,
2005. The Company expects to make contributions to the Defined
Benefit Plan of approximately $1.8 million during fiscal
year 2006.
F-20
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the expected Defined Benefit Plan benefits to
be paid in each of the following ten fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
|
|
| |
Years Ending March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
2010
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
2011 - 2015
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future benefit payments
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Trade creditors
|
|
$ |
65.3 |
|
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
Other creditors and accruals
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
Short and Long-Term Debt |
Long-term debt consists of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
US$ noncollateralized notes current portion
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
US$ noncollateralized notes long-term portion
|
|
|
121.7 |
|
|
|
147.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt at 7.12% average rate
|
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
$ |
165.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The US$ non-collateralised notes form part of a seven tranche
private placement facility which provides for maximum borrowings
of $165.0 million. Principal repayments are due in seven
instalments that commenced on November 5, 2004 and end on
November 5, 2013. The tranches bear fixed interest rates of
6.86%, 6.92%, 6.99%, 7.05%, 7.12%, 7.24% and 7.42%. Interest is
payable May 5, and November 5, each year. The first
tranche of $17.6 million was repaid in November 2004.
F-21
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At March 31, 2005, the following are the scheduled
maturities of long-term debt for each of the next
five years and in total thereafter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
|
|
| |
Years Ending March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
2007
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
2008
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
2009
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a short-term US$ line of credit which provides
for maximum borrowings and foreign exchange facilities of
$15.0 million. At March 31, 2005, the Company had
drawn down $11.9 million on this line of credit. The line
of credit can be repaid and redrawn until maturity in April and
December 2005 ($7.5 million on each date). Interest is
recalculated at the commencement of each draw-down period based
on the 90-day Chilean Tasa Activa Bancaria (TAB)
rate plus a margin and is payable at the end of each draw-down
period. At March 31, 2005 and 2004, the weighted average
interest rate on outstanding borrowings under this facility was
3.52% and 3.24%, respectively.
The Company has an A$ denominated non-collateralised revolving
loan facility, which can be repaid and redrawn until maturity in
November 2006 and provides for maximum borrowings of
A$200.0 million ($154.5 million). Interest is
recalculated at the commencement of each draw-down period based
on the US$ LIBOR or the average Australian bank bill rate plus
the margins of individual lenders, and is payable at the end of
each draw-down period. During the year ended March 31,
2005, the Company paid $0.5 million in commitment fees. At
March 31, 2005, there was $154.5 million available
under this revolving loan facility.
The Company has short-term non-collateralised stand-by loan
facilities which provide for maximum borrowings of
$132.5 million. At March 31, 2005, five out of six
facilities or $117.5 million had a maturity date of
April 30, 2005 and the sixth facility or $15.0 million
had a maturity date of October 30, 2005. At March 31,
2005, the Company had not drawn down any of these facilities.
Interest is recalculated at the commencement of each draw-down
period based on either the US$ LIBOR or the average A$ bank bill
bid rate plus the margins of the individual lenders and is
payable at the end of each draw-down period. During the year
ended March 31, 2005, the Company paid $0.3 million in
commitment fees.
Historically, the Company has sought to renew its lines of
credit, revolving loan and stand-by loan facilities each year
under substantially the same terms and conditions. The Company
is currently in negotiations with a number of banks to refinance
all of its debt in a manner that provides the Company with the
same amount of liquidity. However, in light of the events
resulting from the Special Commission of Inquiry (see
Note 13), the Company may not be able to refinance its debt
facilities by the time they expire or at all. The Company may
not be able to enter into new debt financing agreements on terms
that provide the same level of liquidity as its current debt
structure provides. Also, the company may have to agree to other
terms that could increase the cost of having these debt
facilities in place.
Subsequent to March 31, 2005, $117.5 million of the
US$ stand-by loan facilities are not available to the Company
during refinancing negotiations. Also, the short-term US$ line
of credit that matured in April 2005 was renewed through March
2006.
F-22
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As a consequence of the completion of the sale of the Gypsum
business on April 25, 2002, the Company was technically not
in compliance as of that date with certain pre-approval
covenants of its US$ non-collateralised note agreements totaling
$225.0 million. Effective December 23, 2002, the note
purchase agreement was amended to, among other matters, modify
these covenants to remove the technical non-compliance caused by
the sale of the Gypsum business. In connection with such
amendment, the Company prepaid $60.0 million in principal
amount of notes. As a result of the early retirement, the
Company incurred a $9.9 million make-whole payment charge.
The make-whole payment was charged to interest expense during
the year ended March 31, 2003.
At March 31, 2005, management believes that the Company was
in compliance with all restrictive covenants contained in the
non-collateralized notes, revolving loan facility and the
stand-by credit facility agreements. Under the most restrictive
of these covenants, the Company is required to maintain certain
ratios of debt to equity and net worth and levels of earnings
before interest and taxes and has limits on how much it can
spend on an annual basis in relation to asbestos payments to
either Amaca Pty Ltd (formerly James Hardie & Coy Pty
Ltd) (Amaca), Amaba Pty Ltd (formerly Jsekarb Pty
Ltd) (Amaba) or ABN 60 Pty Ltd
(ABN 60).
|
|
11. |
Non-Current Other Liabilities |
Non-current other liabilities consist of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Non-current other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee entitlements
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
Product liability
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current other liabilities
|
|
$ |
61.7 |
|
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers various warranties on its products, including
a 50-year limited warranty on certain of its fiber cement siding
products in the United States. A typical warranty program
requires that the Company replace defective products within a
specified time period from the date of sale. The Company records
an estimate for future warranty related costs based on an
analysis of actual historical warranty costs as they relate to
sales. Based on this analysis and other factors, the adequacy of
the Companys warranty provisions are adjusted as
necessary. While the Companys warranty costs have
historically been within its calculated estimates, it is
possible that future warranty costs could exceed those estimates.
Additionally, the Company includes in its accrual for product
warranties amounts for a Class Action Settlement Agreement
(the Settlement Agreement) related to its previous
roofing product, which is no longer manufactured in the United
States. On February 14, 2002, the Company signed the
Settlement Agreement for all product, warranty and property
related liability claims associated with its previously
manufactured roofing products. These products were removed from
the marketplace between 1995 and 1998 in areas where there had
been any alleged problems. Consequently, the Company recorded a
pre-tax charge of $12.6 million in fiscal year 2002
comprised of $11.5 million to cover the estimated cost of
the settlement and the estimated cost of any other pending
claims or lawsuits remaining which are not covered by the
settlement and $1.1 million of other costs related to the
Settlement Agreement. The total amount included in the product
F-23
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
warranty provision relating to the Settlement Agreement is
$5.8 million and $4.7 million as of March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
The following are the changes in the product warranty provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
Accruals for product warranties
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Settlements made in cash or in kind
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Accruals for product warranties line item above
includes an additional accrual of $2.0 million for the year
ended March 31, 2005 related to the Settlement Agreement.
This increase reflects the results of the Companys most
recent estimate of its total exposure. The Settlements
made in cash or in kind line item above includes
settlements related to the Settlement Agreement of
$0.9 million and $4.4 million for the years ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
13. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
Claims Against Former Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Amaca Pty Ltd, Amaba Pty Ltd and ABN 60 |
In February 2001, ABN 60, formerly known as James Hardie
Industries Limited (JHIL), established the Medical
Research and Compensation Foundation (the
Foundation) by gifting A$3.0 million
($1.7 million) in cash and transferring ownership of Amaca
and Amaba to the Foundation. The Foundation is a special purpose
charitable foundation established to fund medical and scientific
research into asbestos-related diseases. Amaca and Amaba were
Australian companies which had manufactured and marketed
asbestos-related products prior to 1987.
The Foundation is managed by independent trustees and operates
entirely independently of the Company and its current
subsidiaries. The Company does not control (directly or
indirectly) the activities of the Foundation in any way and,
effective from February 16, 2001, has not owned, or
controlled (directly or indirectly) the activities of Amaca or
Amaba. In particular, the trustees of the Foundation are
responsible for the effective management of claims against Amaca
and Amaba, and for the investment of Amacas and
Amabas assets. Other than the offers to provide interim
funding to the Foundation and the indemnity to the directors of
ABN 60 referred to later in this footnote, the Company has
no commitment to or interest in the Foundation, Amaca or Amaba,
and it has no right to dividends or capital distributions made
by the Foundation.
On March 31, 2003, the Company transferred control of
ABN 60 to a newly established company named ABN 60
Foundation Pty Ltd (ABN 60 Foundation).
ABN 60 Foundation was established to be the sole
shareholder of ABN 60 and to ensure that ABN 60 meets
payment obligations to the Foundation owed under the terms of a
deed of covenant and indemnity described below. Following the
establishment of the ABN 60 Foundation, the Company no
longer owned any shares in ABN 60. ABN 60 Foundation
is managed by independent directors and operates entirely
independently of the Company. The Company does not control the
activities of ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation in any way,
it has no economic interest in ABN 60 or ABN 60
Foundation, and it has no right to dividends or capital
distributions made by the ABN 60 Foundation.
F-24
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Up to the date of the establishment of the Foundation, Amaca and
Amaba incurred costs of asbestos-related litigation and
settlements. From time to time, ABN 60 was joined as a
party to asbestos suits which were primarily directed at Amaca
and Amaba. Because Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60 are no longer a
part of the Company, and all relevant claims against ABN 60
had been successfully defended, no provision for
asbestos-related claims was established in the Companys
consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2005 and
2004.
It is possible that the Company could become subject to suits
for damages for personal injury or death in connection with the
former manufacture or sale of asbestos products that are or may
be filed against Amaca, Amaba or ABN 60. However, as
described further below, the ability of any claimants to
initiate or pursue such suits may be restricted or removed by
legislation which the New South Wales (NSW)
Government has agreed to contemplate following the
Companys entry into a Heads of Agreement, also described
further below. Although it is difficult to predict the incidence
or outcome of future litigation, the Company believes that, in
the absence of governmental action introducing legislation or a
change in jurisprudence as previously adopted in prior case law
before the NSW Supreme Court and Federal High Court, as more
fully described below, the risk that such suits could be
successfully asserted against the Company is not probable and
estimable at this time. This belief is based in part on the fact
that, following the transfers of Amaca and Amaba to the
Foundation and of ABN 60 to the ABN 60 Foundation:
none of those companies are part of the Company; the
separateness of corporate entities under Australian law; the
limited circumstances where piercing the corporate
veil might occur under Australian and Dutch law; there is
no equivalent under Australian common law of the US legal
doctrine of successor liability, and because
JHI NV has been advised that the principle applicable under
Dutch law, to the effect that transferees of assets may be held
liable for the transferors liabilities when they acquire
assets at a price that leaves the transferor with insufficient
assets to meet claims, is not triggered by those transfers of
Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60 or the restructure of the Company
in 2001 or previous group transactions. The courts in Australia
have generally refused to hold parent entities responsible for
the liabilities of their subsidiaries absent any finding of
fraud, agency, direct operational responsibility or the like.
However, if suits are made possible and/or successfully brought,
they could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, results of operations or financial condition.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, James Hardie has not
been a party to any material asbestos litigation and has not
made any settlement payments in relation to such litigation.
|
|
|
Special Commission of Inquiry |
On October 29, 2003, the Foundation issued a press release
stating that its most recent actuarial analysis estimates
that the compensation bill for the organization could reach
one billion Australian dollars in addition to those funds
already paid out to claimants since the Foundation was formed
and that existing funding could be exhausted within
five years. In February 2004, the NSW Government
established a Special Commission of Inquiry (SCI) to
investigate, among other matters described below, the
circumstances in which the Foundation was established. The SCI
was instructed to determine the current financial position of
the Foundation and whether it is likely to meet its future
asbestos-related claims in the medium to long-term. It was also
instructed to report on the circumstances in which the
Foundation was separated from ABN 60 and whether this may
have resulted in or contributed to a possible insufficiency of
assets to meet future asbestos-related liabilities, and the
circumstances in which any corporate restructure or asset
transfers occurred within or in relation to the James Hardie
Group prior to the funding of the Foundation to the extent that
this may have affected the Foundations ability to meet its
current and future liabilities. The SCI was also instructed to
report on the adequacy of current arrangements available to the
Foundation under the Corporations Act of Australia to assist the
Foundation in managing its liabilities and whether reform is
desirable in order to assist the Foundation in managing its
obligations to current and future claimants.
F-25
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On July 14, 2004, following the receipt of a new actuarial
estimate of asbestos liabilities of the Foundation by KPMG
Actuaries Pty Ltd (KPMG Actuaries), the Company
lodged a submission with the SCI stating that the Company would
recommend to its shareholders that they approve the provision of
an unspecified amount of additional funding to enable an
effective statute-based scheme to compensate all future
claimants for asbestos-related injuries for which Amaca and
Amaba are liable. The Company proposed that the statutory scheme
include the following elements: speedy, fair and equitable
compensation for all existing and future claimants; objective
criteria to reduce superimposed (judicial) inflation;
contributions to be made in a manner which provide certainty to
claimants as to their entitlement, the scheme administrator as
to the amount available for distribution, and the proposed
contributors (including the Company) as to the ultimate amount
of their contributions; significant reductions in legal costs
through reduced and more abbreviated litigation; and limitation
of legal avenues outside of the scheme. The submission stated
that the proposal was made without any admission of liability or
prejudice to the Companys rights or defenses.
The SCI finished taking evidence on August 13, 2004 and
issued its report on September 21, 2004. The SCI indicated
that the establishment of the Foundation and the establishment
of the ABN 60 Foundation were legally effective, that any
liabilities in relation to the asbestos claims for claimants
remained with Amaca, Amaba or ABN 60 (as the case may be),
and that no significant liabilities for those claims could
likely be assessed directly against the Company.
In relation to the assertions by the Foundation concerning the
circumstances of its establishment, the SCI examined these in
detail. Although the SCI made certain adverse findings against
Mr. Macdonald (former CEO) and Mr. Shafron (former
CFO), it did not find that their conduct caused any material
loss to the Foundation or the asbestos claimants which would
create a cause of action against, and therefore a material
liability of the Company or would lead to any of the
restructuring arrangements being reversed. Indeed, the SCI
specifically noted that there were significant hurdles, which
might be insuperable, to establishing any liability in respect
of these claims against the Company, ABN 60 or their
respective directors, and that, even if liability were
established, there were further hurdles which might prove to be
insuperable against any substantial recovery or remedy by such
potential claimants in respect of them.
In relation to the question of the funding of the Foundation,
the SCI found that there was a significant funding shortfall. In
part, this was based on actuarial work commissioned by the
Company indicating that the discounted value of the central
estimate of the asbestos liabilities of Amaca and Amaba was
approximately A$1.573 billion as of June 30, 2003. The
central estimate was calculated in accordance with Australian
Actuarial Standards, which differ from generally accepted
accounting practices in the United States. As of June 30,
2003, the undiscounted value of the central estimate of the
asbestos liabilities of Amaca and Amaba, as determined by KPMG
Actuaries, was approximately A$3.403 billion
($2.272 billion). The SCI found that the net assets of the
Foundation and the ABN 60 Foundation were not sufficient to
meet these prospective liabilities and were likely to be
exhausted in the first half of 2007.
In relation to the Companys statutory scheme proposal, the
SCI reported that there were several issues that needed to be
refined quite significantly but that it would be an appropriate
starting point for devising a compensation scheme.
The SCIs findings are not binding and a court
consideration of the issues presented could lead to one or more
different conclusions.
The NSW Government stated that it would not consider assisting
the implementation of any proposal advanced by the Company
unless it was the result of an agreement reached with the unions
acting through the Australian Council of Trade Unions
(ACTU), UnionsNSW (formerly known as the Labor
Council of New South Wales), and a representative of the
asbestos claimants (together, the Representatives).
Without any discussion with the Company, the statutory scheme
that the Company proposed on July 14, 2004 was not accepted
by the Representatives.
F-26
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company believes that, except to the extent that it agrees
otherwise as a result of these discussions with the NSW
Government and as discussed later in this footnote under the
subheading Interim Funding and ABN 60 Indemnity, under
current Australian law, it is not legally liable for any
shortfall in the assets of Amaca, Amaba, the Foundation, the
ABN 60 Foundation or ABN 60.
It is also possible that the Representatives and/or others may
encourage or continue to encourage consumers and union members
in Australia and elsewhere to boycott the Companys
products, to demonstrate or otherwise create negative publicity
toward the Company in order to influence the Companys
approach to the discussions with the NSW Government or to
encourage governmental action if the discussions are
unsuccessful. The Representatives and/or others might also take
such actions in an effort to influence the Companys
shareholders, a significant number of which are located in
Australia, to approve any proposed arrangement. Any such
measures, and the influences resulting from them, could have a
material adverse impact on the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
On October 28, 2004, the NSW Premier announced that the NSW
Government would seek the agreement of the Ministerial Council
comprising Ministers of the Commonwealth and the Australian
States and Territories, to allow the NSW Government to pass
legislation which he announced would wind back James
Hardies corporate restructure and rescind the cancellation
of A$1.9 billion in partly paid shares. The
announcement said that the laws will effectively enforce
the liability [for asbestos-related claims] against the Dutch
parent company. On November 5, 2004, the Australian
Attorney-General and the Parliamentary Secretary to the
Treasurer (the two relevant ministers of the Australian Federal
Government) issued a news release stating that the Ministerial
Council for Corporations (the relevant body of Federal, State
and Territory Ministers, MINCO) had unanimously
agreed to support a negotiated settlement that will ensure
that victims of asbestos-related diseases receive full and
timely compensation from James Hardie and if the
current negotiations between James Hardie, the ACTU and asbestos
victims do not reach an acceptable conclusion, MINCO also agreed
in principle to consider options for legislative reform.
The news release of November 5, 2004 indicated that
treaties to enforce Australian judgments in Dutch and
U.S. courts are not required, but that the Australian
Government has been involved in communications with Dutch and
U.S. authorities regarding arrangements to ensure that
Australian judgments are able to be enforced where necessary. If
negotiations do not lead to an acceptable conclusion, the
Company is aware of suggestions of legislative intervention, but
has no detailed information as to the content of any such
legislation.
On December 21, 2004, the Company announced that it had
entered into a non-binding Heads of Agreement with the NSW
Government and the Representatives which is expected to form the
basis of a proposed binding agreement (the Principal
Agreement) to establish and fund a special purpose fund
(the SPF) to provide funding on a long-term basis
for asbestos-related injury and death claims (the
Claims) against Amaca, Amaba, and ABN 60 (the
Liable Entities).
The principles set out in the Heads of Agreement include:
|
|
|
|
|
the establishment of the SPF to compensate asbestos claimants; |
|
|
|
initial funding of the SPF by the Company on the basis of a
November 2004 KPMG report (which provided a net present value
central estimate of A$1.536 billion ($1.03 billion)
for all present and future claims at June 30, 2004). The
undiscounted value of the central estimate of the asbestos
liabilities of Amaca and Amaba as determined by KPMG was
approximately A$3.586 billion ($2.471 billion). At
December 21, 2004, the initial funding for the first three
years was expected to be A$239 million (based on
KPMGs estimate of liabilities as of June 30, 2004)
less the assets to be contributed by the Foundation which were
expected to be approximately A$125 million. The actuarial
assessment is to be updated annually; |
F-27
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
a two year rolling cash buffer in the SPF and an annual
contribution in advance based on actuarial assessments of
expected claims for the next three years, to be revised
annually; |
|
|
|
a cap on the annual payments made by the Company to the SPF,
initially set at 35% of annual net operating cash flow (defined
as cash from operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP) for
the immediately preceding year, with provisions for the
percentage to decline over time depending upon the
Companys financial performance and claims outlook; and |
|
|
|
no cap on individual payments to Claimants. |
The Heads of Agreement contains an agreement from the NSW
Government to provide releases to the James Hardie Group and to
its present and past directors, officers and employees from all
civil liabilities (if any) incurred prior to the date of the
Principal Agreement in relation to the events and transactions
examined by the SCI. These releases will take the form of
legislation to be passed by the NSW Parliament and other state
and territory parliaments in Australia (and the Commonwealth
Parliament) will be approached by the Company and the NSW
Government to pass similar legislation.
As noted above, the NSW Government conducted a review of legal
and administrative costs in dust diseases compensation in New
South Wales. The purpose of this review was primarily to
determine ways to reduce legal and administrative costs, and to
consider the current processes for handling and resolving dust
diseases compensation claims in New South Wales. The NSW
Government announced its findings on March 8, 2005. The
draft legislation and regulations for public comment were
released on April 12, 2005 for comment and the closing date
for responses of April 26, 2005. The bill containing the
proposed legislation was introduced into NSW Parliament on
May 5, 2005, and is due to be debated in the week
commencing May 23, 2005. The timing of passing and
commencement of this potential legislation remains uncertain.
As part of the discussions surrounding the Principal Agreement,
the Company is examining all relevant options in relation to the
establishment of the SPF referred to above, including the
possibility of reacquiring all of the share capital of Amaca,
Amaba and/or ABN 60.
The Principal Agreement will be subject to a number of
conditions precedent, including the delivery of an independent
experts report and approval by the Companys board of
directors, shareholders and lenders. Once executed, the
Principal Agreement will be a legally binding agreement.
The parties have announced their intention to execute the
Principal Agreement, depending on the timing of the resolution
of certain of the conditions precedent in late June 2005. The
parties believe that the agreement will become effective in
August or September 2005, although the timing remains uncertain
depending upon the status of the various conditions that need to
be satisfied.
If an agreement is reached with the NSW Government and approved
by the Companys board of directors, lenders and
shareholders, the Company may be required to make a substantial
provision in its financial statements at a later date, and it is
possible that the Company may need to seek additional borrowing
facilities. If the terms of a future resolution involve the
Company making payments, either on an annual or other basis,
pursuant to the Principal Agreement, James Hardies
financial position, results of operations and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected and its ability to pay
dividends could be reduced or otherwise impaired.
|
|
|
Updated Actuarial Study; Claims Estimate |
The Company commissioned updated actuarial studies of potential
asbestos-related liabilities as of June 30, 2004 and
March 31, 2005. Based on the results of these studies, it
is estimated that the discounted value of the central estimate
for claims against the Liable Entities was approximately
A$1.536 billion ($1.059 billion) and
A$1.685 billion ($1.302 billion) as of June 30,
2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively. The undiscounted
value of the central estimate of the asbestos liabilities of
Amaca and Amaba as determined
F-28
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
by KPMG Actuaries was approximately A$3.586 billion
($2.471 billion) and A$3.604 billion
($2.784 billion) as of June 30, 2004 and
March 31, 2005, respectively. Actual liabilities of those
companies for such claims could vary, perhaps materially, from
the central estimate described above. This central estimate is
calculated in accordance with Australian Actuarial Standards,
which differ from generally accepted accounting practices in the
United States.
In estimating the potential financial exposure, the actuaries
made assumptions related to the total number of claims which
were reasonably estimated to be asserted through 2071, the
typical cost of settlement (which is sensitive to, among other
factors, the industry in which the plaintiff claims exposure,
the alleged disease type and the jurisdiction in which the
action is being brought), the legal costs incurred in the
litigation of such claims, the rate of receipt of claims, the
settlement strategy in dealing with outstanding claims and the
timing of settlements.
Further, the actuaries have relied on the data and information
provided by the Foundation and Amaca Claim Services and assumed
that it is accurate and complete in all material respects. The
actuaries have not verified that information independently nor
established the accuracy or completeness of the data and
information provided or used for the preparation of the report.
Due to inherent uncertainties in the legal and medical
environment, the number and timing of future claim notifications
and settlements, the recoverability of claims against insurance
contracts; and in estimating the future trends in average claim
awards as well as the extent to which the above-named entities
will contribute to the overall settlements, the actual liability
amount could differ materially from that currently projected.
A sensitivity analysis has been performed to determine how the
actuarial estimates would change if certain assumptions (i.e.,
the rate of inflation and superimposed inflation, the average
costs of claims and legal fees, and the projected numbers of
claims) were different than the assumptions used to determine
the central estimates. This analysis shows that the discounted
central estimates could fall in a range of A$1.0 billion to
A$2.3 billion (undiscounted estimates of A$2.0 billion
to A$5.7 billion) and A$1.1 billion to
A$2.6 billion (undiscounted estimates of A$2.0 billion
to A$5.9 billion) as of June 30, 2004 and
March 31, 2005, respectively. It should be noted that the
actual cost of the liabilities could fall outside of that range
depending on the out-turn of actual experience relative to the
assumptions made.
The potential range of costs as estimated by KPMG Actuaries is
affected by a number of variables such as nil settlement rates
(where no settlement is payable by the Liable Entities as the
claim settlement is borne by other (non-Liable Entities)
asbestos defendants who are held liable), peak year of claims,
past history of claims numbers, average settlement rates, past
history of Australian asbestos-related medical injuries, current
number of claims, average defence and plaintiff legal costs,
base wage inflation and superimposed inflation. The potential
range of losses disclosed includes both asserted and unasserted
claims. While no assurances can be provided, if the Company
signs the Principal Agreement and it is approved by all of the
necessary parties, including the board of directors,
shareholders and lenders, the Company expects to be able to
partially recover losses from various insurance carriers. As of
March 31, 2005, KPMG Actuaries undiscounted central
estimate of asbestos-related liabilities was
A$3.604 billion. This undiscounted central estimate is net
of expected insurance recoveries of A$453.0 million after
making a general credit risk allowance for bad debt of insurance
carriers and an allowance for A$49.8 million of by
claim or subrogation recoveries from other third parties.
Currently, the timing of any potential payments is uncertain
because the Company has not yet reached agreement with the NSW
Government and the conditions precedent to any agreement that
may be reached have not been satisfied. In addition, the Company
has not yet incurred any settlement costs because the Foundation
continues to meet all claims of the Liable Entities. The Company
is currently unable to estimate the expected cost of
administering and litigating the claims under the potential
agreement with the NSW
F-29
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Government because this is highly contingent upon the final
outcome of the NSW Governments review of legal and
administrative costs.
Accordingly, the Company has not established a provision for
asbestos-related liabilities as of March 31, 2005 because
at this time it is not probable and estimable in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
The following table, provided by KPMG Actuaries, shows the
number of claims pending as of March 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Australia
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown-Court Not Identified(1)
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
USA
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The Unknown Court Not Identified
designation reflects that the information for such claims had
not been, as of the date of publication, entered into the
database which the Foundation maintains. Over time, as the
details of unknown claims are provided to the
Foundation, the Company believes the database is updated to
reflect where such claims originate. Accordingly, the Company
understands the number of unknown claims pending fluctuates due
to the resolution of claims as well as the reclassification of
such claims. |
For the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the
following tables, provided by KPMG Actuaries, show the claims
filed, the number of claims dismissed, settled or otherwise
resolved for each period, and the average settlement amount per
claim.
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
A |
$157,594 |
|
|
A$ |
167,450 |
|
|
A$ |
204,194 |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
$2,000 |
|
F-30
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Unknown Court Not Identified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
A |
$47,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
$37,090 |
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of claims filed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims dismissed
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of claims settled or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average settlement amount per claim
|
|
A |
$228,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table, provided by KPMG Actuaries, shows the
activity related to the numbers of open claims, new claims, and
closed claims during each of the past five years and the average
settlement per settled claim and case closed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of open claims at beginning of year
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Number of new claims
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Number of closed claims
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Number of open claims at year-end
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
Average settlement amount per settled claim
|
|
A$ |
157,223 |
|
|
A$ |
167,450 |
|
|
A$ |
201,200 |
|
|
A$ |
197,941 |
|
|
A$ |
179,629 |
|
Average settlement amount per case closed
|
|
A$ |
129,949 |
|
|
A$ |
117,327 |
|
|
A$ |
177,752 |
|
|
A$ |
125,435 |
|
|
A$ |
128,653 |
|
The Company has not had any responsibility or involvement in the
management of claims against ABN 60 since the time it left the
James Hardie Group in 2003. Since February 2001, when Amaca and
Amaba were separated from the James Hardie Group neither JHI NV
nor any current subsidiary of JHI NV has had any responsibility
or involvement in the management of claims against those
entities. Prior to that date, the principal entity potentially
involved in relation to such claims was ABN 60, which (as
described above) has not been a member of the James Hardie Group
since March 2003.
On April 15, 2005, the Company announced that it had
extended the coverage of the SPF to permit members of the
Baryugil community in Australia to receive compensation funding
from the SPF for proven and valid claims against a former
subsidiary, Asbestos Mines Pty Ltd (Asbestos Mines).
The Company has no current right to access any claims
information in relation to claims against Asbestos Mines. The
Companys proposal to provide funding with respect to
claims against Asbestos Mines is not limited to the time period
to which the claim arose including the period after
the former subsidiary was sold by James Hardie.
F-31
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys recently announced offer to provide funding
to the SPF for use in meeting proven claims against Asbestos
Mines will be implemented subject to the same or similar
conditions applicable to funding provided to the SPF for use in
meeting proven claims from Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60, including
that information in relation to the proven claims is provided to
the Company. Asbestos Mines has not been part of the James
Hardie Group since 1976, when it was sold to Woodsreef Mines
Ltd, which was subsequently renamed Mineral Commodities Ltd.
From 1954 until 1976, Asbestos Mines was a wholly owned
subsidiary of James Hardie Industries Limited (now ABN 60).
Except as described below, the Company has not had access to any
information regarding claims or the decisions taken by the
Foundation in relation to them.
On October 26, 2004, the Company, the Foundation and KPMG
Actuaries entered into an agreement under which the Company
would be entitled to obtain a copy of the actuarial report
prepared by KPMG Actuaries in relation to the claims liabilities
of the Foundation and Amaba and Amaca, and would be entitled to
publicly release the final version of such reports. The Company
is seeking to obtain similar rights of access to actuarial
information produced for the SPF by the actuary to be appointed
by the SPF (the Approved Actuary). The terms of such
access are not yet settled. The Companys future
disclosures with respect to claims statistics is subject to it
obtaining such information from the Approved Actuary. The
Company has had no general right (and will not obtain any right
under the Principal Agreement) to audit or otherwise itself
independently verify such information as the methodologies to be
adopted by the Approved Actuary. As a result of the above, the
Company cannot make any representations or warranties as to the
accuracy or completeness of the actuarial information to be
disclosed.
|
|
|
SCI and Other Related Expenses |
The Company has incurred substantial costs associated with the
SCI and may incur material costs in the future related to the
SCI or subsequent legal proceedings. The following are the
components of SCI and other related expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
SCI
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Internal investigation
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
ASIC investigation
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Severance and consulting
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Resolution advisory fees
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Funding advice and other
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SCI and other related expenses
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Internal investigation costs relate to an internal investigation
conducted by independent legal advisors to investigate the
impact on the financial statements of allegations raised during
the SCI and in order to assist in completion of the preparation
and filing of the Companys Form 20-F in the United
States for the year ended March 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Investigation |
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission
(ASIC) has announced that it is conducting an
investigation into the events examined by the SCI, without
limiting itself to the evidence compiled by the SCI. ASIC has
served notices to produce relevant documents upon the Company,
various directors and officers of the Company and on certain of
its advisers and auditors at the time of the separation and
F-32
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
restructure transactions described above. To date, ASIC has
announced that it is investigating various matters, but it has
not specified the particulars of alleged contraventions under
investigation, nor has it announced that it has reached any
conclusion that any person or entity has contravened any
relevant law.
To assist ASICs investigation, the Australian Federal
Government enacted legislation to abrogate the legal
professional privilege which would otherwise have attached to
certain documents relevant to matters under investigation or to
any future proceedings to be taken. The legislation is set out
in the James Hardie (Investigations and Proceedings) Act 2004.
The Company may incur costs of current or former officers of the
James Hardie Group to the extent that those costs are covered by
indemnity arrangements granted by the Company to those persons.
To date, no claims have been received by any current or former
officers in relation to the ASIC investigation and, if claims do
arise, the Company may be reimbursed in whole or in part under
directors and officers insurance policies maintained
by the Company.
On October 20, 2004, Mr. Peter Shafron resigned from
the Company and on October 21, 2004, Mr. Peter
Macdonald resigned from the Company. In connection with these
resignations, the Company incurred severance costs of
$8.9 million in the period ended March 31, 2005. These
costs comprised $6.0 million of additional expense and
$2.9 million of previously existing accruals.
|
|
|
Interim Funding and ABN 60 Indemnity |
The Company has undertaken a number of initiatives to seek to
ensure that payment of asbestos-related Claims by the Foundation
is not interrupted due to insolvency of Amaba or Amaca prior to
the Companys entry into the Principal Agreement. The
initiatives are described further below. The Company believes
that the Foundation is unlikely to need to avail itself of the
financial assistance which has been offered by the Company, on
the basis that on December 3, 2004 and in part as a result
of the initiatives undertaken by the Company, the Foundation
received a payment of approximately A$88.5 million from ABN
60 for use in processing and meeting asbestos-related claims
pursuant to the terms of a deed of covenant and indemnity which
ABN 60, Amaca and Amaba had entered into in February 2001.
The Company facilitated the payment of such funds by granting an
indemnity (under a separate deed on indemnity) to the directors
of ABN 60, which it announced on November 16, 2004. Under
the terms of that indemnity, the Company agreed to meet any
liability incurred by the ABN 60 directors resulting from
the release of the A$88.5 million by ABN 60 to the
Foundation. The Company believes that the release of funding by
ABN 60 is in accordance with law and contracts in place and
therefore the Company should not incur liability under this
indemnity. The Company did not make any payments in relation to
this indemnity during the year ended March 31, 2005.
Additionally, on November 16, 2004, the Company offered to
provide funding to the Foundation on an interim basis for a
period of up to six months from that date. Such funding would
only be provided once existing Foundation funds have been
exhausted. The Company believes, based on actuarial and legal
advice, that claims against the Foundation should not exceed the
funds which are available to the Foundation (particularly in the
light of its receipt of the A$88.5 million described above)
or which are expected to become available to the Foundation
during the period of the interim funding proposal.
On March 31, 2005, the Company renewed its commitment to
assist the Foundation to provide interim funding, if necessary,
prior to the Principal Agreement being finalized in accordance
with the updated timetable announced at that date and described
above.
F-33
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has not recorded a provision for either the proposed
indemnity or the potential payments under the interim funding
proposal. The Company has not made any payments in relation to
this offer.
With regard to the ABN 60 indemnity, there is no maximum value
or limit on the amount of payments that may be required. As
such, the Company is unable to disclose a maximum amount that
could be required to be paid. The Company believes, however,
that the expected value of any potential future payments
resulting from the ABN 60 indemnity is zero and that the
likelihood of any payment being required under this indemnity is
remote.
|
|
|
Financial Position of the Foundation |
On the basis of the current cash and financial position of the
Foundations subsidiaries (Amaca and Amaba) and following
the Companys entry into the Heads of Agreement, the
applications previously made to the Supreme Court of NSW for the
appointment of a provisional liquidator to the Foundations
subsidiaries, were dismissed with their consent.
The operations of the Company, like those of other companies
engaged in similar businesses, are subject to various federal,
state and local laws and regulations on air and water quality,
waste handling and disposal. The Companys policy is to
accrue for environmental costs when it is determined that it is
probable that an obligation exists and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. In the opinion of management, based on
information presently known, the ultimate liability for such
matters should not have a material adverse effect on either the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
The Company is involved from time to time in various legal
proceedings and administrative actions incidental or related to
the normal conduct of its business. Although it is impossible to
predict the outcome of any pending legal proceeding, management
believes that such proceedings and actions should not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect
on either its consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
The Company believes that future legal costs related to the
Companys negotiations toward a Principal Agreement are
reasonably possible, but the amount of such costs cannot be
estimated at this time. The Company does not expect any
additional legal costs to be incurred in connection with the SCI.
Under the terms of the Companys agreement to sell its
Gypsum business to BPB US Holdings, Inc., the Company agreed to
customary indemnification obligations related to its
representations and warranties in the agreement. The
Companys indemnification obligation generally extends for
two years from the closing date of April 25, 2002 and
arises only if claims exceed $5 million in the aggregate
and is limited to $100 million in the aggregate. This
obligation expired April 25, 2004. In addition, the Company
agreed to indemnify BPB U.S. Holdings, Inc. for any future
liabilities arising from asbestos-related injuries to persons or
property. Although the Company is not aware of any
asbestos-related claims arising from the Gypsum business, nor
circumstances that would give rise to such claims, under the
sale agreement, the Companys obligation to indemnify the
purchaser for liabilities arising from asbestos-related injuries
arises only if such claims exceed $5 million in the
aggregate, is limited to $250 million in the aggregate and
will continue for 30 years after the closing date of the
sale of the Gypsum business.
Pursuant to the terms of the Companys agreement to sell
its Gypsum business, the Company also retained responsibility
for any losses incurred by the purchaser resulting from
environmental conditions at the Duwamish River in Washington
state so long as notice of a claim is given within 10 years
of closing. The Companys indemnification obligations are
subject to a $34.5 million limitation. The Seattle gypsum
facility
F-34
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
had previously been included on the Confirmed and
Suspected Contaminate Sites Report released in 1987, prior
to the Companys ownership, due to the presence of metals
in the groundwater. Because the Company believes the metals
found emanated from an offsite source, the Company does not
believe it is liable for, and has not been requested to conduct,
any investigation or remediation relating to the metals in the
groundwater.
As the lessee, the Company principally enters into property,
building and equipment leases. The following are future minimum
lease payments for non-cancellable operating leases having a
remaining term in excess of one year at March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
|
|
| |
Years Ending March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
2007
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
2008
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
2009
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
2010
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
133.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense amounted to $9.1 million, $8.1 million
and $9.0 million for the years ended March 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
Commitments for the acquisition of plant and equipment and other
purchase obligations, primarily in the United States, contracted
for but not recognized as liabilities and generally payable
within one year, were $50.2 million at March 31, 2005.
F-35
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income tax (expense) benefit includes income taxes
currently payable and those deferred because of temporary
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities. The income tax expense for continuing
operations consists of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic(1)
|
|
$ |
90.5 |
|
|
$ |
103.5 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
$ |
189.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.7 |
|
|
$ |
109.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic(1)
|
|
$ |
(14.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.0 |
) |
Foreign
|
|
|
(37.1 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense
|
|
|
(51.2 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic(1)
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense for continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(61.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(40.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Since JHI NV is the Dutch parent holding company, domestic
represents The Netherlands. |
F-36
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income tax (expense) benefit computed at the statutory
rates represents taxes on income applicable to all jurisdictions
in which the Company conducts business, calculated as the
statutory income tax rate in each jurisdiction multiplied by the
pre-tax income attributable to that jurisdiction. The income tax
expense from continuing operations is reconciled to the tax at
the statutory rates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Income tax expense computed at statutory tax rates
|
|
$ |
(65.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(60.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(37.2 |
) |
U.S. state income taxes, net of the federal benefit
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Benefit from Dutch financial risk reserve regime
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Expenses not deductible
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Non-assessable items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses not available for carryforward
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Taxes related to 2001 Reorganization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Net operating losses brought back to account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Increase in reserves
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Result of tax audits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$ |
(61.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(40.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax balances consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions and accruals
|
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
Capital loss carryforwards
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
Prepaid interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Taxes on intellectual property transfer
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(76.3 |
) |
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Foreign currency movements
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Prepayments
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(84.1 |
) |
|
|
(82.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes, net
|
|
$ |
(39.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, the Company establishes a valuation allowance
against a deferred tax asset if it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized. The Company has established a valuation allowance
pertaining to a portion of its Australian net operating loss
carryforwards and all of its Australian capital loss
carryforwards. The valuation allowance increased by
$0.4 million during the year primarily due to foreign
currency movements.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had Australian tax loss
carryforwards of approximately $30.6 million that will
never expire. During fiscal year 2004, the Company wrote-off
$43.1 million in Australian tax loss carryforwards that are
permanently impaired. The Company had previously provided a 100%
valuation allowance against these carryforwards.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had $112.2 million in
Australian capital loss carryforwards which will never expire.
During fiscal years 2005 and 2004, the Company used
$0.2 million and $21.4 million of these losses,
respectively. During fiscal year 2004, the Company added
Australian capital loss carryforwards of approximately
$99.4 million primarily as a result of the Company electing
to file its Australian income tax returns as a single
consolidated group. At March 31, 2005, the Company had a
100% valuation allowance against the Australian capital loss
carryforwards.
Under Australian legislation in fiscal year 2003, the
Companys Australian entities have elected to file their
Australian income tax returns as a single consolidated group.
The election allows the group to recognize value in certain
deferred tax assets against which the Company had in prior years
established a valuation allowance. Accordingly, the Company
released $13.0 million of valuation allowance during the
year ended March 31, 2003.
F-38
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At March 31, 2005, the undistributed earnings of non-Dutch
subsidiaries approximated $425.0 million. The Company
intends to indefinitely reinvest these earnings, and
accordingly, has not provided for taxes that would be payable
upon remittance of those earnings. The amount of the potential
deferred tax liability is impracticable to determine at this
time.
Due to the size of the Company and the nature of its business,
the Company is subject to ongoing reviews by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) and other taxing jurisdictions
on various tax matters, including challenges to various
positions the Company asserts. The Company accrues for tax
contingencies based upon its best estimate of the taxes
ultimately expected to be paid, which it updates over time as
more information becomes available. Such amounts are included in
taxes payable or other non-current liabilities, as appropriate.
If the Company ultimately determines that payment of these
amounts is unnecessary, the Company reverses the liability and
recognizes a tax benefit during the period in which the Company
determines that the liability is no longer necessary. The
Company records an additional charge in the period in which it
determines that the recorded tax liability is less than it
expects the ultimate assessment to be.
The IRS has audited the Companys U.S. income tax
returns for all the years ended through March 31, 2000. The
California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) audited the
Companys California franchise tax returns for all tax
years ended through March 31, 1999 and proposed substantial
assessments. The Company settled the audits with the FTB during
fiscal year 2005 and also filed amended income tax returns and
paid additional tax for the years ended March 31, 2000
through 2003. The Company recorded a $2.5 million tax
benefit to reduce amounts accrued in excess of all amounts paid
to the FTB through March 31, 2003.
Tax authorities from various jurisdictions in which the Company
operates are in the process of auditing the Companys
respective jurisdictional income tax returns for various ranges
of years. None of the audits have progressed sufficiently to
predict their ultimate outcome. The Company has accrued income
tax liabilities for these audits based upon knowledge of all
relevant facts and circumstances, taking into account existing
tax laws, its experience with previous audits and settlements,
the status of current tax examinations, and how the tax
authorities view certain issues.
The Company currently derives significant tax benefits under the
U.S.-Netherlands tax treaty. During fiscal year 2005, this
treaty was amended to provide, among other things, new
requirements that the Company must meet for the Company to
continue to qualify for treaty benefits. If the Company is
unable to satisfy the requirements for treaty benefits it could
significantly increase the Companys effective tax rate in
fiscal year 2006 forward. The Company is in the process of
considering changes to its organizational and operational
structure to satisfy the requirements of the amended treaty.
Accordingly, the Company is planning to implement various
reorganization options to satisfy those requirements to be
eligible for benefits under the amended treaty. However, the
Company cannot guarantee that it will be successful in
implementing these plans, or that the restructured organization
and operations will comply with the new treaty requirements.
|
|
15. |
Discontinued Operations |
On May 30, 2003, the Company sold its New Zealand Building
Systems business to a third party. A gain of $1.9 million
represented the excess of net proceeds from the sale of
$6.7 million over the net book value of assets sold of
$4.8 million. The proceeds from the sale were comprised of
cash of $5.0 million and a note receivable in the amount of
$1.7 million. As of March 2005, the $1.7 million note
receivable had been collected in full.
On March 13, 2002, the Company announced that it had signed
an agreement to sell the Gypsum business to a third party. The
transaction was completed on April 25, 2002. A pre-tax gain
of $81.4 million was
F-39
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recorded representing the excess of net proceeds from the sale
of $334.4 million over the net book value of assets sold of
$253.0 million. The sale resulted in income tax expense of
$26.1 million. The proceeds from the sale were comprised of
cash of $345.0 million less selling costs of
$10.6 million.
On June 28, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement to
sell its gypsum mine property in Las Vegas, Nevada to a
developer. The transaction was completed on March 21, 2003.
A pre-tax gain of $49.2 million represented the excess of
net proceeds from the sale of $48.4 million less the cost
of assets sold of $0.7 million and the assumption of
$1.5 million in liabilities by the buyer. The sale resulted
in income tax expense of $19.2 million. The proceeds from
the sale were comprised of cash of $50.6 million less
selling costs of $2.2 million.
During the year ended March 31, 2003, the Company recorded
a loss of $1.3 million related to its Building Services
business which was disposed of in November 1996. The loss
consisted of expenses of $0.8 million and a
$0.5 million write down of an outstanding receivable that
was retained as part of the sale.
On March 31, 2003, James Hardie transferred control of ABN
60 to a newly established company named ABN 60 Foundation. ABN
60 Foundation was established to be the sole shareholder of ABN
60 and to ensure ABN 60 meets its payment obligations to the
Foundation. Following the establishment of the ABN 60
Foundation, JHI NV no longer owns any shares of ABN 60. ABN 60
Foundation is managed by independent directors and operates
entirely independently of James Hardie. James Hardie does not
control the activities of ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation in any
way. James Hardie has no economic interest, other than described
in Note 13, in ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation and has no right
to dividends or capital distributions. Apart from the express
indemnity for non-asbestos matters provided to ABN 60 and a
possible arrangement to fund some or all future claimants for
asbestos-related injuries caused by former James Hardie
subsidiary companies and to the potential liabilities more fully
described in Note 13, the Company does not believe it will
have any liability under current Australian law should future
liabilities of ABN 60 or ABN 60 Foundation exceed the funds
available to those entities. As a result of the change in
ownership of ABN 60 on March 31, 2003, a loss on disposal
of $0.4 million was recorded by James Hardie at
March 31, 2003, representing the liabilities of ABN 60 (to
the Foundation) of A$94.6 million ($57.2 million), the
A$94.5 million ($57.1 million) in cash held on the
balance sheet, and costs associated with the establishment and
funding of ABN 60 Foundation.
JHI NV has agreed to indemnify ABN 60 Foundation for any non
asbestos-related legal claims made on ABN 60. There is no
maximum amount of the indemnity and the term of the indemnity is
in perpetuity. James Hardie believes that the likelihood of any
material non asbestos-related claims occurring is remote. As
such, the Company has not recorded a liability for the indemnity.
James Hardie has not pledged any assets as collateral for such
indemnity.
Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60 have all agreed to indemnify JHI NV and
its related corporate entities for past and future
asbestos-related liabilities as part of the establishment of the
respective foundations. Amaca, Amaba and ABN 60s
obligation to indemnify JHI NV and its related entities includes
claims that may arise associated with the manufacturing
activities of those companies.
F-40
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the results of operations of discontinued
businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Building Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gypsum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on disposal, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
87.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
At March 31, 2005, the Company had the following
stock-based compensation plans: three Peter Donald Macdonald
Share Option Plans; the Executive Share Purchase Plan; the 2001
Equity Incentive Plan; one Shadow Stock Plan and one Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan.
In fiscal year 2003, the Company adopted the fair value
provisions of SFAS No. 123, which requires the Company
to value stock options issued based upon an option pricing model
and recognize this value as compensation expense over the
periods in which the options vest (see Note 2).
F-41
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company estimates the fair value of each option grant on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In
the table below are the weighted average assumptions and
weighted average fair values used for grants in fiscal years
2005, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Expected life in years
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Weighted average fair value at grant date
|
|
A$ |
1.35 |
|
|
A$ |
1.42 |
|
|
A$ |
1.12 |
|
Compensation expense arising from stock option grants as
determined using the Black-Scholes model was $3.0 million,
$3.2 million and $1.9 million for the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plans |
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan |
As a replacement for options previously granted by JHIL on
November 17, 1999, Mr. Macdonald was granted an option
to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Companys
common stock at an exercise price of A$3.87 per share under
the JHI NV Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan. As with the
original JHIL option grant, this stock option became fully
vested and exercisable on November 17, 2004. The options
expired on April 20, 2005, six months after the date of
Mr. Macdonalds resignation. The exercise price and
the number of shares available on exercise may be adjusted on
the occurrence of certain events, including new issues, share
splits, rights issues and capital reconstructions, as set out in
the plan rules. Consequently, the exercise price was reduced by
A$0.21, A$0.38 and A$0.10 for the November 2003, November 2002
and December 2001 returns of capital, respectively. All
1,200,000 options were outstanding and exercisable at
March 31, 2005. Mr. Macdonald exercised all of these
options in April 2005.
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2001 |
As a replacement for options previously granted by JHIL on
July 12, 2001, Mr. Macdonald was granted an option to
purchase 624,000 shares of the Companys common
stock at an exercise price per share equal to A$5.45 under the
JHI NV Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2001. The
replacement options were to become exercisable for
468,000 shares on the first business day on or after
July 12, 2004, if JHI NVs total shareholder returns
(TSR) (essentially its dividend yield and common
stock performance) from July 12, 2001 to that date was at
least equal to the median TSR for the companies comprising JHI
NVs peer group, as set out in the plan. In addition, the
replacement options were to become exercisable on that same day
for an additional 6,240 shares for each one-percent
improvement in JHI NVs TSR ranking above the median total
shareholder returns for its peer group (up to a total of 156,000
additional shares). On the first business day of each month from
November 2004 until the options expired on April 20, 2005,
six months after the date of Mr. Macdonalds
resignation, JHI NVs total shareholder returns were
compared with that of its peer group to determine if any
previously unvested options vest according to the applicable
test described above. As set out in the plan rules, the exercise
price and the number of shares available on exercise may be
adjusted on the occurrence of certain events, including new
issues, share splits, rights issues and capital reconstructions.
Consequently, the exercise price was reduced by A$0.21, A$0.38
and A$0.10 for the November 2003, November 2002 and December
2001 returns of capital, respectively. All 624,000 options were
outstanding at March 31, 2005. As the TSR requirement had
not been met six months after Mr. Macdonald ceased to be
employed by JHI NV, all of these options expired in April 2005.
F-42
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option Plan 2002 |
On July 19, 2002, under the JHI NV Peter Donald Macdonald
2002 Share Option Plan, Mr. Macdonald was granted an
option to purchase 1,950,000 shares of the
Companys common stock at an exercise price of
A$6.30 per share. These options will become exercisable for
1,462,500 shares of JHI NVs common stock on the first
business day on or after July 19, 2005, if JHI NVs
TSR from July 19, 2002 to that date is at least equal to
the median TSR for the companies comprising its peer group,
which comprises those companies included in the S&P/ ASX 200
index excluding the companies listed in the 200 Financials and
200 Property Trust indices. Additionally, for each one-percent
improvement in JHI NVs TSR ranking above the median TSR
for its peer group 19,500 shares become exercisable (up to
a total of 487,500 additional shares). If any options remain
unexercisable on that date because the applicable test for TSR
is not satisfied, then on the first business day of each month
occurring from that day until October 31, 2005, JHI
NVs TSR will again be compared with that of its peer group
to determine if any previously unvested options vest according
to the applicable test described above. The vested options will
remain exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the issue
date, July 19, 2012. As set out in the plan rules, the
exercise price and the number of shares available on exercise
may be adjusted on the occurrence of certain events, including
new issues, share splits, rights issues and capital
reconstructions. Consequently, the exercise price was reduced by
A$0.21 and A$0.38 for the November 2003 and November 2002
returns of capital, respectively. All 1,950,000 options were
outstanding at March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Executive Share Purchase Plan |
Prior to July 1998, JHIL issued stock under an Executive Share
Purchase Plan (the Plan). Under the terms of the
Plan, eligible executives purchased JHIL shares at their market
price when issued. Executives funded purchases of JHIL shares
with non-recourse, interest-free loans provided by JHIL and
collateralised by the shares. In such cases, the amount of
indebtedness is reduced by any amounts payable by JHIL in
respect of such shares, including dividends and capital returns.
These loans are generally payable within two years after
termination of an executives employment. As part of the
2001 Reorganization, the identical terms of the agreement have
been carried over to JHI NV. Variable plan accounting under the
provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 has been applied to the
Executive Share Purchase Plan shares granted prior to
April 1, 1995 and fair value accounting, pursuant to the
requirements of SFAS No. 123, has been applied to
shares granted after March 31, 1995. Accordingly, the
Company recorded variable compensation expense of nil,
$0.1 million and nil for the years ended March 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. No shares were issued to
executives during fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
On October 19, 2001 (the grant date), JHI NV granted a
total of 5,468,829 stock options under the JHI NV 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan (the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan) to
key US executives in exchange for their previously granted Key
Management Equity Incentive Plan (KMEIP) shadow
shares that were originally granted in November 2000 and 1999 by
JHIL. These options may be exercised in five equal tranches (20%
each year) starting with the first anniversary of the original
shadow share grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Original | |
|
Options | |
|
|
Original Shadow Share Grant Date |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Granted | |
|
Option Expiration Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
November 1999
|
|
A$ |
3.82 |
|
|
|
1,968,544 |
|
|
|
November 2009 |
|
November 2000
|
|
A$ |
3.78 |
|
|
|
3,500,285 |
|
|
|
November 2010 |
|
As set out in the plan rules, the exercise prices and the number
of shares available on exercise may be adjusted on the
occurrence of certain events, including new issues, share
splits, rights issues and capital
F-43
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reconstructions. Consequently, the exercise price was reduced by
A$0.21, A$0.38 and A$0.10 for the November 2003, November 2002
and December 2001 returns of capital, respectively.
Under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, additional grants have
been made at fair market value to management and other employees
of the Company as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Original | |
|
Options | |
|
|
Share Grant Date |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Granted | |
|
Option Expiration Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 2001
|
|
A$ |
5.65 |
|
|
|
4,248,417 |
|
|
|
December 2011 |
|
December 2002
|
|
A$ |
6.66 |
|
|
|
4,037,000 |
|
|
|
December 2012 |
|
December 2003
|
|
A$ |
7.05 |
|
|
|
6,179,583 |
|
|
|
December 2013 |
|
December 2004
|
|
A$ |
5.99 |
|
|
|
5,391,100 |
|
|
|
December 2014 |
|
February 2005
|
|
A$ |
6.30 |
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
February 2015 |
|
Each option confers the right to subscribe for one ordinary
share in the capital of JHI NV. The options may be exercised as
follows: 25% after the first year; 25% after the second year;
and 50% after the third year. All unexercised options expire
10 years from the date of issue or 90 days after the
employee ceases to be employed by the Company. Also, as set out
in the plan rules, the exercise prices and the number of shares
available on exercise may be adjusted on the occurrence of
certain events, including new issues, share splits, rights
issues and capital reconstructions. Consequently, the exercise
price on the December 2002 and December 2001 option grants were
reduced by A$0.21 for the November 2003 return of capital and
the December 2001 option grant was reduced by A$0.38 for the
November 2002 return of capital.
The Company is authorized to issue 45,077,100 shares under
the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. The following table summarizes
the shares available for grant under this plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
Shares Available for Grant |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares available at April 1
|
|
|
27,293,210 |
|
|
|
32,884,940 |
|
|
|
35,435,281 |
|
Awards granted
|
|
|
(5,664,100 |
) |
|
|
(6,179,583 |
) |
|
|
(4,037,000 |
) |
Options forfeited
|
|
|
2,711,148 |
|
|
|
587,853 |
|
|
|
1,486,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares available at March 31
|
|
|
24,340,258 |
|
|
|
27,293,210 |
|
|
|
32,884,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the movement in all of the
Companys outstanding options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In Australian dollars) | |
Outstanding at
April 1
|
|
|
17,978,707 |
|
|
A$ |
5.72 |
|
|
|
13,410,024 |
|
|
A$ |
5.20 |
|
|
|
10,969,562 |
|
|
A$ |
4.54 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,664,100 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
6,179,583 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
5,987,000 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(803,049 |
) |
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
(1,023,047 |
) |
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
(2,059,879 |
) |
|
|
3.57 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,711,148 |
) |
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
(587,853 |
) |
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
(1,486,659 |
) |
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31
|
|
|
20,128,610 |
|
|
A$ |
5.75 |
|
|
|
17,978,707 |
|
|
A$ |
5.72 |
|
|
|
13,410,024 |
|
|
A$ |
5.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31
|
|
|
7,155,625 |
|
|
A$ |
5.08 |
|
|
|
3,858,736 |
|
|
A$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
1,948,346 |
|
|
A$ |
4.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Outstanding at | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Exercisable at | |
|
Average | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise | |
|
March 31, | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
2005 | |
|
(in years) | |
|
Price | |
|
2005 | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In Australian dollars) | |
A$3.09
|
|
|
1,114,562 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
A$ |
3.09 |
|
|
|
718,489 |
|
|
A$ |
3.09 |
|
3.13
|
|
|
369,598 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
369,598 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
3.18
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
4.76
|
|
|
624,000 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
2,153,525 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
2,153,525 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
5.71
|
|
|
1,950,000 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
5,193,100 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
6.30
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
2,696,575 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
|
|
1,435,975 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
7.05
|
|
|
4,554,250 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
1,253,038 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$3.09 to A$7.05
|
|
|
20,128,610 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
A$ |
5.75 |
|
|
|
7,155,625 |
|
|
A$ |
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow Stock and Stock Appreciation Rights Plans |
The U.S. Shadow Stock Plan provides an incentive to certain
key employees in the United States based on growth in the JHI NV
share price over time as if such employees were the owners of
that number of JHI NVs common stock equal to the number of
shares of shadow stock issued to employees. The vesting period
of this shadow stock plans is five years. The last grant date
under the U.S. Shadow Stock Plan was December 17, 2001.
In December 1998, a shadow stock plan for non-U.S. based
employees was instituted under similar terms to the
U.S. Shadow Stock Plan with a vesting period of three
years. The last grant date under this plan was August 15,
2001.
Both the U.S. Shadow Stock Plan and the December 1998
Non-U.S. Based Employees Stock Plan were terminated on
February 28, 2005. The value on that day of all the
outstanding shares of those plans was paid to the participants.
On December 5, 2003, 12,600 shadow stock shares were
granted under the terms and conditions of the Key Management
Shadow Stock Incentive Plan. At March 31, 2005, 12,600
shadow stock shares were outstanding. All of these shadow stock
shares were cancelled in April 2005.
On December 14, 2004, 527,000 stock appreciation rights
were granted under the terms and conditions of the JHI NV Stock
Appreciation Rights Incentive Plan. This plan provides similar
incentives as the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. All of these stock
appreciation rights were outstanding at March 31, 2005 and
will vest over three years from date of grant.
All of these plans have been accounted for as stock appreciation
rights under SFAS No. 123 and, accordingly,
compensation expense of nil, $2.6 million and
$1.9 million was recognized in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively.
F-45
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
17. |
Financial Instruments |
As a multinational corporation, the Company maintains
significant operations in foreign countries. As a result of
these activities, the Company is exposed to changes in exchange
rates which affect its results of operations and cash flows. At
March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had not entered into
any material contracts to hedge these exposures.
The Company purchases raw materials and fixed assets and sells
some finished product for amounts denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of the business in which the
related transaction is generated. In order to protect against
foreign exchange rate movements, the Company may enter into
forward exchange contracts timed to mature when settlement of
the underlying transaction is due to occur. At March 31,
2005 and 2004, there were no material contracts outstanding.
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
investments and trade accounts receivable.
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents, investments and
certain other financial instruments with various major financial
institutions. At times, these financial instruments may be in
excess of federally insured limits. To minimize this risk, the
Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit
standing of these financial institutions and, where appropriate,
places limits on the amount of credit exposure with any one
institution.
For off-balance sheet financial instruments, including
derivatives, credit risk also arises from the potential failure
of counterparties to meet their obligations under the respective
contracts at maturity. The Company controls risk through the use
of credit ratings and reviews of appropriately assessed
authority limits.
The Company is exposed to losses on forward exchange contracts
in the event that counterparties fail to deliver the contracted
amount. The credit exposure to the Company is calculated as the
mark-to-market value of all contracts outstanding with that
counterparty. At March 31, 2005 and 2004, total credit
exposure arising from forward exchange contracts was not
material.
Credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable is
concentrated due to the concentration of the distribution
channels for the Companys fiber cement products. Credit is
extended based on an evaluation of each customers
financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required.
The Company has historically not incurred significant credit
losses.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had $11.9 million
outstanding under its short-term line of credit, which is
subject to variable interest rates. No interest rate hedging
contracts in respect to that debt have been entered into.
F-46
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings and
accounts payable and accrued liabilities are a reasonable
estimate of their fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments. The following table summarises the estimated
fair value of the Companys long-term debt (including
current portion of long-term debt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
147.4 |
|
|
|
173.6 |
|
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
186.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
$ |
173.6 |
|
|
$ |
165.0 |
|
|
$ |
186.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values of long-term debt were determined by reference to
the March 31, 2005 and 2004 market values for comparably
rated debt instruments.
|
|
18. |
Operating Segment Information and Concentrations of Risk |
The Company has reported its operating segment information in
the format that the operating segment information is available
to and evaluated by the Board of Directors. USA Fiber Cement
manufactures and sells fiber cement interior linings, exterior
siding and related accessories products in the United States.
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement includes all fiber cement manufactured
in Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines and sold in
Australia, New Zealand and Asia. Research and Development
represents the cost incurred by the research and development
centers. Other includes the manufacture and sale of fiber cement
products in Chile, the manufacture and sale of fiber cement
reinforced pipes in the United States, fiber cement operations
in Europe and fiber cement roofing operations in the United
States. The Companys reportable operating segments are
strategic operating units that are managed separately due to
their different products and/or geographical location.
The following are the Companys operating segments and
geographical information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales to Customers(1) | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
939.2 |
|
|
$ |
738.6 |
|
|
$ |
599.7 |
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement
|
|
|
236.1 |
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
Other Fiber Cement
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1,210.4 |
|
|
$ |
981.9 |
|
|
$ |
783.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from | |
|
|
Continuing Operations | |
|
|
Before Income Taxes | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
USA Fiber Cement(2)
|
|
$ |
241.5 |
|
|
$ |
195.6 |
|
|
$ |
155.1 |
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement(2)
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
Research and Development(2)
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
Other Fiber Cement
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments total
|
|
|
259.0 |
|
|
|
199.7 |
|
|
|
158.7 |
|
General Corporate(3),(4)
|
|
|
(62.8 |
) |
|
|
(27.5 |
) |
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
|
196.2 |
|
|
|
172.2 |
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
Net interest expense(5)
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
189.8 |
|
|
$ |
165.7 |
|
|
$ |
109.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Identifiable | |
|
|
Assets March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
670.1 |
|
|
$ |
554.9 |
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement
|
|
|
181.4 |
|
|
|
175.9 |
|
Other Fiber Cement
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments total
|
|
|
933.1 |
|
|
|
805.5 |
|
General Corporate(6)
|
|
|
155.8 |
|
|
|
165.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total
|
|
$ |
1,088.9 |
|
|
$ |
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to Property, | |
|
|
Plant and Equipment(7) | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
144.8 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
81.0 |
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Other Fiber Cement
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments total
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total
|
|
$ |
153.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
90.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and | |
|
|
Amortization | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
USA Fiber Cement
|
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
Asia Pacific Fiber Cement
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Other Fiber Cement
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments total
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total
|
|
$ |
36.3 |
|
|
$ |
36.4 |
|
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales to Customers(1) | |
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
USA
|
|
$ |
955.7 |
|
|
$ |
748.9 |
|
|
$ |
605.0 |
|
Australia
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
154.9 |
|
|
|
124.7 |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Other Countries
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1,210.4 |
|
|
$ |
981.9 |
|
|
$ |
783.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Identifiable | |
|
|
Assets March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
USA
|
|
$ |
729.2 |
|
|
$ |
609.8 |
|
Australia
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
|
|
119.1 |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
Other Countries
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments total
|
|
|
933.1 |
|
|
|
805.5 |
|
General Corporate(6)
|
|
|
155.8 |
|
|
|
165.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide total
|
|
$ |
1,088.9 |
|
|
$ |
971.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Export sales and inter-segmental sales are not significant. |
|
(2) |
Research and development costs of $7.6 million,
$6.3 million and $5.3 million in fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively, were expensed in the USA Fiber
Cement operating segment. Research and development costs of
$1.9 million, $2.2 million and $2.4 million in
fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were expensed in
the Asia Pacific Fiber Cement segment. Research and development
costs of $12.0 million, $14.1 million and
$10.4 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, were expensed in the Research and Development
segment. The Research and Development segment also included
selling, general and administrative expenses of
$5.5 million, $3.5 million and $2.7 million in
fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively. |
F-49
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred
and in total amounted to $21.6 million, $22.6 million
and $18.1 million for the years ended March 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. |
|
|
(3) |
The principal components of General Corporate are officer and
employee compensation and related benefits, professional and
legal fees, administrative costs and rental expense, net of
rental income, on the Companys corporate offices. |
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost related to the Australian Defined
Benefit Plan for the Asia Pacific Fiber Cement segment totaling
$2.3 million, $1.8 million and $2.3 million in
fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, has been
included in the General Corporate segment. Also a settlement
loss of $5.3 million on the Defined Benefit Plan in fiscal
year 2005 has been included in the General Corporate segment. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes costs of $28.1 million for SCI and other related
expenses. See Note 13. |
|
(5) |
The Company does not report net interest expense for each
reportable segment as reportable segments are not held directly
accountable for interest expense. |
|
(6) |
The Company does not report deferred tax assets and liabilities
for each reportable segment as reportable segments are not held
directly accountable for deferred taxes. All deferred taxes are
included in General Corporate. |
|
(7) |
Additions to property, plant and equipment are calculated on an
accrual basis, and therefore differ from property, plant and
equipment in the consolidated statements of cash flows. |
The distribution channels for the Companys fiber cement
products are concentrated. If the Company were to lose one or
more of its major customers, there can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to find a replacement. Therefore, the loss
of one or more customers could have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. The Company has three major customers
that individually account for over 10% of the Companys net
sales.
These three customers accounts receivable represented 49%
and 50% of the Companys trade accounts receivable at
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The following are
net sales generated by these three customers, which are all from
the USA Fiber Cement segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Customer A
|
|
$ |
131.8 |
|
|
$ |
111.3 |
|
|
$ |
125.1 |
|
Customer B
|
|
|
295.4 |
|
|
|
252.2 |
|
|
|
211.4 |
|
Customer C
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
558.9 |
|
|
$ |
476.4 |
|
|
$ |
420.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 21% of the Companys fiscal year
2005 net sales from continuing operations were derived from
outside the United States. Consequently, changes in the value of
foreign currencies could significantly affect the consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the
Companys non-U.S. operations on translation into
U.S. dollars.
F-50
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
19. |
Other Comprehensive Loss |
The following are the components of total accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net of related tax, which is displayed in
the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
US dollars) | |
Unrealized transition loss on derivative instruments classified
as cash flow hedges
|
|
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
Accumulated amortization of unrealized transition loss on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(24.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2000, the Company entered into a contract with a third
party to hedge the price of 5,000 metric tonnes per month of
pulp, a major commodity used in the manufacture of fiber cement
products. The original contract term was effective from
September 1, 2000 to August 31, 2005, with settlement
payments due each month. On April 1, 2001, the Company
adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The
cumulative effect on April 1, 2001 of adopting this
statement was to reduce other comprehensive income, a component
of shareholders equity, by $4.9 million.
Subsequently, this amount is being amortized over the original
term of the pulp contract to cost of goods sold.
On December 2, 2001, the counterparty to this pulp contract
filed for bankruptcy. This had the effect of terminating all
outstanding swap transactions immediately prior to the
bankruptcy filing. The estimated fair value at the date of
termination of the pulp contract was a $6.2 million
liability and was recorded in other non-current liabilities at
March 31, 2002. Also a current payable of $0.6 million
related to the contract was recorded at March 31, 2002. In
November 2002, the Company settled its obligation under this
contract for a cash payment of $5.8 million. Accordingly, a
gain on settlement of the contract in the amount of
$1.0 million was recorded in other operating income during
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.
On November 5, 2003, the Company converted its common stock
par value from Euro dollar 0.64 to Euro dollar 0.73. This
resulted in an increase in common stock and a decrease in
additional paid-in capital of $48.4 million.
Simultaneously, the Company returned capital of Euro dollar
0.1305 per share to shareholders in the amount of
$68.7 million. Effectively, the return of capital decreased
the par value of common stock to Euro dollar 0.5995. The Company
then converted its common stock par value from Euro dollar
0.5995 to Euro dollar 0.59. This resulted in a decrease in
common stock and an increase in additional paid-in capital of
$5.0 million.
On November 1, 2002, the Company converted its common stock
par value from Euro 0.50 to Euro 0.85. This resulted in an
increase in common stock and a decrease in additional paid-in
capital of $157.9 million. Simultaneously, the Company
returned capital to shareholders in the amount of
$94.8 million. Effectively, the return of capital decreased
the par value of common stock to Euro 0.64.
F-51
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
21. |
Related Party Transactions |
|
|
|
JHI NV Directors Securities Transactions |
The Companys Directors and their director-related entities
held an aggregate of 266,217 ordinary shares and
9,170,726 ordinary shares at March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and 1,189,544 options and
3,782,775 options at March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Supervisory Board members on December 3, 2004 participated
in an allotment of 11,691 shares at A$5.94 per share
under the terms of the Supervisory Board Share Plan which was
approved by JHI NV shareholders on July 19, 2002.
Directors allocations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Shares Allotted | |
|
|
| |
M. Hellicar
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
J. Barr
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
M.R. Brown
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
P.S. Cameron
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
G.J. Clark
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
M.J. Gillfillan
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
J.R.H. Loudon
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
D.G. McGauchie
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
The JHI NV dividend paid on July 1, 2004 to Directors and
their related entities was on the same terms and conditions that
applied to other holders.
|
|
|
Existing Loans to the Companys Directors and
Directors of James Hardie Subsidiaries |
At March 31, 2005 and 2004, loans totaling $33,204 and
$167,635 respectively were outstanding from directors of JHI NV
and its subsidiaries under the terms and conditions of the
Executive Share Purchase Plan (the Plan). Loans
under the Plan are interest free and repayable from dividend
income earned by, or capital returns from, securities acquired
under the Plan. The loans are collateralised by CUFS under the
Plan. No new loans to Directors or executive officers of
JHI NV, under the plan or otherwise, and no modifications
to existing loans have been made since December 1997.
During fiscal years 2005 and 2004, repayments totaling $18,632
and $22,693, respectively, were received in respect of the Plan
from A.T. Kneeshaw, P.D. Macdonald, P.G. Morley
and D.A.J. Salter. During fiscal years 2005 and 2004,
Directors resigned with loans outstanding totaling $117,688 and
$26,204, respectively, at the date of their resignation.
|
|
|
Payments Made to Directors and Director Related Entities
of the Companys Subsidiaries |
During the Year
In August 2004, Chairman Meredith Hellicar was appointed to a
role as Chairman of a special committee of the Board of
Directors. The special committee was established to oversee the
Companys asbestos matters. In this role, she received a
fee of $45,000 for the year ended March 31, 2005.
Supervisory Board Director G.J. Clark is a director of
ANZ Banking Group Limited with whom the Company transacts
banking business. Supervisory Board Director D.G. McGauchie
is also a director of Telstra Corporation Limited from whom the
Company purchases communications services. All transactions were
in accordance with normal commercial terms and conditions. It is
not considered that these Directors had significant influence
over these transactions.
F-52
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In February 2004, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a
consulting agreement in usual commercial terms and conditions
with The Gries Group in respect to professional services. The
principal of The Gries Group, James P. Gries, is
Mr. Louis Gries brother. Under the agreement,
approximately $12,000 is paid each month to The Gries Group. The
agreement expires in June 2005 and payments of $157,080 and
$18,423 were made for the year ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Mr. Louis Gries has no economic
interest in The Gries Group.
Payments of $6,817 and $13,240 for the years ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were made to Grech,
Vella, Tortell & Hyzler Advocates.
Dr. J.J. Vella was a director of a number of the
Companys subsidiaries. The payments were in respect of
professional services and were negotiated in accordance with
usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments of $86,822 and $111,705 for the years ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were made to Pether
and Associates Pty Ltd, technical contractors. The late
J.F. Pether was a director of a subsidiary of the Company
and was a director of Pether and Associates Pty Ltd. The
payments were in respect of technical services and were
negotiated in accordance with usual commercial terms and
conditions.
Payments totaling $27,634 and $845 for the years ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were made to
R. Christensen and T. Norman who are directors of a
subsidiary of the Company. The payments were in respect of
professional services and were negotiated in accordance with
usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments totaling $71,849 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to M. Helyar, R. Le Tocq and
N. Wild who are directors of a subsidiary of the Company.
The payments were in respect of professional services and were
negotiated in accordance with usual commercial terms and
conditions.
Payments totaling $15,488 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to Marlee (UK) Ltd. Marlee (UK) Ltd is a
director of a subsidiary of the Company. The payments were in
respect of professional services and were negotiated in
accordance with usual commercial terms and conditions.
Payments totaling $4,730 for the year ended March 31, 2005
were made to Bernaldo, Mirador and Directo Law Offices.
R. Bernaldo is a director of a subsidiary of the Company.
The payments were in respect of professional services and were
negotiated in accordance with usual commercial terms and
conditions.
F-53
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Remuneration Disclosures
(Unaudited, not forming part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements)
|
|
|
Remuneration of Directors |
Income paid or payable, or otherwise made available by the
Company and related parties to Directors of the Company in
connection with the management of affairs of the Company totaled
$15.1 million and $11.5 million for the years ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Remuneration for non-executive Directors includes fees for
attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and its
subcommittees. Remuneration for the executive Director is
determined on the same basis as for other executives as
described in below.
|
|
|
Remuneration of Executives |
Remuneration received or receivable from the Company by all
executives (including Directors) whose remuneration was at least
$100,000 was $18.5 million and $13.4 million for the
years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Remuneration for each executive includes salary, incentives,
superannuation, stock options, retirement and termination
payments, motor vehicles, fringe benefits, tax and other
benefits.
The number of such executives within the specified bands are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
Range starting at: |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(US dollars) | |
$320,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
$430,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
$440,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$460,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$480,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$530,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
$620,000
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
$630,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$660,000
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
$710,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$770,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$930,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
$1,070,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$1,120,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,140,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,390,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
$1,500,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$2,030,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$3,189,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$7,153,000
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Remuneration Disclosures
(Unaudited, not forming part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements) (Continued)
An executive is defined as the Chief Executive Officer, members
of the Group Management Team, General Managers of Business Units
and Company Secretaries of JHI NV.
Remuneration is determined on the basis of the cost of the
remuneration to the Company, but excludes insurance premiums
paid by the Company in respect of directors and
officers liability insurance contracts.
Options and shares issued to executives under the Executive
Share Purchase Plan are valued using the Black-Scholes model and
the fair value of options granted is included in remuneration.
|
|
|
Remuneration of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm |
Remuneration to the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for services provided for fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003 were as follows:
The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by its
independent registered public accounting firm during the years
ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $3.1 million
(including internal investigation fees of $1.9 million),
$1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Professional services include the audit of the Companys
annual financial statements and services that are normally
provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
The aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services
rendered by its independent registered public accounting firm
during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were
$0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.6 million,
respectively.
The aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning services rendered by its independent registered public
accounting firm during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004
and 2003 were $4.2 million, $3.5 million and
$3.4 million, respectively.
In addition to the fees described above, the Company incurred
minor fees from its independent registered public accounting
firm related to the purchase and use of software.
F-55
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited, not forming part of the consolidated financial
statements)
The information furnished in the selected quarterly financial
data for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is
unaudited but includes all adjustments which, in the opinion of
management, are necessary for a fair statement of the financial
results of the respective interim periods. Such adjustments are
of a normal recurring nature. Interim financial statements are
by necessity somewhat tentative; judgments are used to estimate
interim amounts for items that are normally determinable only on
an annual basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
Year Ended March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
By Quarter | |
|
By Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of US dollars) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
306.1 |
|
|
$ |
300.9 |
|
|
$ |
287.0 |
|
|
$ |
316.4 |
|
|
$ |
241.5 |
|
|
$ |
251.6 |
|
|
$ |
237.5 |
|
|
$ |
251.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(194.8 |
) |
|
|
(203.8 |
) |
|
|
(190.3 |
) |
|
|
(195.1 |
) |
|
|
(152.2 |
) |
|
|
(159.2 |
) |
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
|
|
(161.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
121.3 |
|
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations net of income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on disposal of discontinued operations net of income
tax
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
36.3 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
Articles of Association, as amended on November 5, 2003 of
James Hardie Industries N.V. (English Translation)(4) |
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Letter Agreement of September 6, 2001 by and between James
Hardie Industries N.V. and CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty
Limited, as the depositary for CHESS Units of Foreign
Securities(1) |
|
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Deposit Agreement dated as of September 24, 2001 between
The Bank of New York, as depositary, and James Hardie Industries
N.V.(1) |
|
|
2 |
.3 |
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 5, 1998,
among James Hardie Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V. and certain
purchasers thereto re: $225,000,000 Guaranteed Senior Notes(1) |
|
|
2 |
.4 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement and First Amendment to Note
Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2000, by and
among James Hardie Finance B.V., James Hardie U.S. Funding,
Inc., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie Aust Investco Pty Limited
and certain noteholders thereto(1) |
|
|
2 |
.5 |
|
Second Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of
October 22, 2001, by and among, James Hardie
U.S. Funding, Inc., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie Aust
Investco Pty Limited, James Hardie Australia Finance Pty
Limited, James Hardie International Finance B. V. and certain
noteholders thereto(1) |
|
|
2 |
.6 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Limited(2) |
|
|
2 |
.7 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Bank One, NA(2) |
|
|
2 |
.8 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and BNP Paribas(2) |
|
|
2 |
.9 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Australia and Westdeutsche Landesbank
Girozentrale, Sydney Branch(2) |
|
|
2 |
.10 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Limited(2) |
|
|
2 |
.11 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and Bank One, NA(2) |
|
|
2 |
.12 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and BBL Australia Limited(2) |
|
|
2 |
.13 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James Hardie
U.S. Funding Inc. and BNP Paribas(2) |
|
|
2 |
.14 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated 364 Day Standby Loan Agreement among James
Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James
Hardie U.S. Funding Inc. and Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank,
National Association(2) |
|
|
2 |
.15 |
|
Novation Agreement, dated August 27, 2001, relating to
Amended and Restated 364 Day Standby Loan Agreement among James
Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V., James
Hardie U.S. Funding Inc. and Westdeutsche Landesbank
Girozentrale, Sydney Branch(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.16 |
|
Form of Novation Agreement, dated December 16, 2002,
relating to Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement among
James Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V.,
James Hardie U.S. Funding Inc., James Hardie Industries
N.V., and each of the following banks: Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited; Bank One, NA; BNP Paribas; and WestLB AG,
Sydney Branch(3) |
|
|
2 |
.17 |
|
Form of Novation Agreement, dated December 16, 2002,
relating to Amended and Restated Standby Loan Agreement among
James Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie N.V.,
James Hardie U.S. Funding Inc., James Hardie Industries
N.V. and each of the following banks: Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited; Bank One, NA; ING Bank N.V., Sydney
Branch; BNP Paribas; Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, National
Association; and WestLB AG, Sydney Branch(3) |
|
|
2 |
.18 |
|
Amendment Agreement to Amended and Restated Standby Loan
Agreement, effective April 30, 2004, among James Hardie
International Finance B.V., James Hardie Industries N.V. and
Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, National Association(4) |
|
|
2 |
.19 |
|
Form of Extension Letter, relating to 364 Day Standby Loan
Agreement among James Hardie International Finance B.V., James
Hardie Industries N.V. and each of the following banks:
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited; Bank One, NA;
ING Bank NV, Sydney Branch; BNP Paribas; and WestLB AG, Sydney
Branch(4) |
|
|
2 |
.20 |
|
Extension Letter relating to 364 Day Standby Loan Agreement
among James Hardie International Finance B.V., James Hardie
Industries N.V. and Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank N.A.(4) |
|
|
2 |
.21 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Third Amendment to Note
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2002, among
James Hardie U.S. Funding Inc, James Hardie International
Finance B.V., James Hardie Industries N.V., James Hardie N.V.
and certain noteholders thereto(3) |
|
|
2 |
.22 |
|
Common Terms Deed Poll dated June 15, 2005 between James
Hardie International Finance B.V. and James Hardie Industries
N.V. |
|
|
2 |
.23 |
|
Form of Term Facility Agreement between James Hardie
International Finance B.V. and Financier |
|
|
2 |
.24 |
|
Form of 364-day Facility Agreement between James Hardie
International Finance B.V. and Financier |
|
|
2 |
.25 |
|
Form of Guarantee Deed between James Hardie Industries N.V. and
Financier |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
James Hardie Industries N.V. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
4 |
.2 |
|
James Hardie Industries N.V. Peter Donald Macdonald Share Option
Plan 2002(1) |
|
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Economic Profit and Individual Performance Incentive Plans |
|
|
4 |
.4 |
|
JHI NV Stock Appreciation Rights Incentive Plan |
|
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Supervisory Board Share Plan, dated July 19, 2002(1) |
|
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Letter of Resignation, dated October 21, 2004, between
James Hardie Industries N.V. and Peter Donald Macdonald(4) |
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Consulting agreement, dated November 15, 2004, between
James Hardie Industries N.V. and Peter Shafron(4) |
|
|
4 |
.8 |
|
Employment Agreement effective as of February 10, 2005,
among James Hardie Building Products, Inc., James Hardie
Industries N.V. and Louis Gries |
|
|
4 |
.9 |
|
Summary of Employment Terms between James Hardie Industries N.V.
and Russell Chenu |
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
International Assignment Agreement dated May 10, 2005,
between James Hardie Industries N.V. and Benjamin Butterfield |
|
|
4 |
.11 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective September 1, 2004, between
James Hardie Buildings Products, Inc. and David Merkley |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.12 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective September 1, 2004, between
James Hardie Building Products and Donald Merkley |
|
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Amended Secondment dated October 8, 2004 between James
Hardie Building Products Inc. and James Chilcoff(4) |
|
|
4 |
.14 |
|
Final Settlement Agreement between James Hardie International
Finance B.V. and Folkert Zwinkels dated March 24, 2005 |
|
|
4 |
.15 |
|
Form of Joint and Several Indemnity Agreement among James Hardie
N.V., James Hardie (USA) Inc. and certain indemnitees thereto(1) |
|
|
4 |
.16 |
|
Form of Joint and Several Indemnity Agreement among James Hardie
Industries N.V., James Hardie Inc. and certain indemnitees
thereto(1) |
|
|
4 |
.17 |
|
Form of Deed of Access to Documents, Indemnity and Insurance
among James Hardie Industries N.V. and certain indemnitees
thereto(1) |
|
|
4 |
.18 |
|
Form of Joint and Several Indemnity Agreement among James Hardie
Industries N.V., James Hardie Building Products Inc. and certain
indemnities thereto |
|
|
4 |
.19 |
|
Lease Amendment, dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at the corner of Cobalt & Silica Street,
Carole Park, Queensland, Australia(4) |
|
|
4 |
.20 |
|
Variation of Lease dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at the corner of Colquhoun & Devon Streets,
Rosehill, New South Wales, Australia(4) |
|
|
4 |
.21 |
|
Extension of Lease dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at Rutland, Avenue, Welshpool, Western Australia,
Australia(4) |
|
|
4 |
.22 |
|
Lease Amendment dated March 23, 2004, among Amaca Pty
Limited (f/k/a/ James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited), James
Hardie Australia Pty Limited and James Hardie Industries N.V. re
premises at 46 Randle Road, Meeandah, Queensland, Australia (4) |
|
|
4 |
.23 |
|
Lease Agreement dated March 23, 2004 among Studorp Limited,
James Hardie New Zealand Limited and James Hardie Industries
N.V. re premises at the corner of ORorke and Station
Roads, Penrose, Auckland, New Zealand(4) |
|
|
4 |
.24 |
|
Lease Agreement dated March 23, 2004 among Studorp Limited,
James Hardie New Zealand Limited and James Hardie Industries
N.V. re premises at 44-74 ORorke Road, Penrose, Auckland,
New Zealand(4) |
|
|
4 |
.25 |
|
Industrial Building Lease Agreement, effective October 6,
2000, between James Hardie Building Products, Inc. and Fortra
Fiber-Cement L.L.C., re premises at Waxahachie, Ellis County,
Texas(1) |
|
|
4 |
.26 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between James Hardie Building
Products, Inc. and Cemplank, Inc. dated as of December 12,
2001(1) |
|
|
4 |
.27 |
|
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement dated
March 12, 2002, between BPB U.S. Holdings, Inc. and
James Hardie Inc.(1) |
|
|
8 |
.1 |
|
List of significant subsidiaries of James Hardie Industries N.V. |
|
|
12 |
.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
12 |
.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
13 |
.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
15 |
.1 |
|
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm |
|
|
15 |
.2 |
|
Consent of KPMG Actuaries Pty Ltd |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description of Exhibits |
| |
|
|
|
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Excerpts of the ASX Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Ltd
as of May 2005 |
|
|
99 |
.2 |
|
Excerpts of the Financial Services Reform Act 2001, as of
March 11, 2002 |
|
|
99 |
.3 |
|
ASIC Class Order 02/311, dated November 3, 2002 |
|
|
99 |
.4 |
|
ASIC Modification, dated March 7, 2002(1) |
|
|
(1) |
This document was previously filed on paper as an exhibit to a
prior Form 20-F. It is being re-filed herewith
electronically. |
|
(2) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on
Form 20-F dated September 7, 2001 and incorporate
herein by reference. |
|
(3) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F dated July 2, 2003 and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
(4) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F dated November 22, 2004 and incorporated
herein by reference. |