Maryland
|
0-18082
|
43-1524856
|
||
(State
or other
jurisdiction
of
incorporation)
|
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
Number)
|
1451
East Battlefield, Springfield, Missouri
|
65804
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
o
|
Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)
|
o
|
Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
|
o
|
Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
|
o
|
Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
|
FDIC
|
Combined
|
Average
|
Average
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial
|
Loan
Fair
|
Loss
Recovery
|
Fair
|
Months
to
|
Contractual
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Value
|
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
Value
|
Maturity
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
in
other banks
|
$ |
50,051
|
$ |
50,051
|
$ |
---
|
$ |
50,051
|
---
|
.16
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
51,200
|
51,200
|
---
|
51,200
|
---
|
.22
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
111,770
|
111,770
|
---
|
111,770
|
57
|
5.73
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition,
development and construction loans (1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non
SOP 03-3
|
89,910
|
35,049
|
38,978
|
74,027
|
46
|
5.45
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
SOP
03-3
|
86,303
|
17,807
|
48,665
|
66,472
|
60
|
9.41
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
acquisition, development and construction loans
|
176,213
|
52,856
|
87,643
|
140,499
|
53
|
7.39
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential
mortgages
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non
SOP 03-3
|
46,033
|
33,719
|
8,749
|
42,468
|
138
|
6.50
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
SOP
03-3
|
8,952
|
3,694
|
3,735
|
7,429
|
60
|
9.41
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
residential mortgages
|
54,985
|
37,413
|
12,484
|
49,897
|
125
|
6.97
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
real
estate
loans (1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non
SOP 03-3
|
126,775
|
83,829
|
30,513
|
114,342
|
128
|
6.40
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
SOP
03-3
|
20,643
|
8,519
|
8,614
|
17,133
|
60
|
9.41
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
commercial
real
estate loans
|
147,418
|
92,348
|
39,127
|
131,475
|
118
|
6.82
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
and other loans (1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non
SOP 03-3
|
54,268
|
38,974
|
10,866
|
49,840
|
71
|
5.83
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
SOP
03-3
|
2,898
|
1,196
|
1,209
|
2,405
|
60
|
9.41
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
commercial
and
other loans
|
57,166
|
40,170
|
12,075
|
52,245
|
70
|
6.01
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
loans
|
$ |
435,782
|
$ |
222,787
|
$ |
151,329
|
$ |
374,116
|
86
|
6.96
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
Foreclosed
real estate
|
$ |
5,742
|
$ |
2,871
|
$ |
2,249
|
$ |
5,120
|
(1)
|
See
the discussion of SOP 03-3 loans and other acquired loans under “-
Operating Results and Cash Flows” and the more detailed discussion in Note
11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Great Southern’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009.
|
·
|
the
ability to expand into non-overlapping yet complementary markets -- for
the most part, these locations were close enough to be operationally
efficient, but didn’t overlap our existing
footprint.
|
·
|
the
very strong market position enjoyed by most of the 17 banking centers. We
reviewed market share and total deposits by banking center and realized
that many of these locations were as strong or stronger in their markets
than our legacy Great Southern banking
centers.
|
·
|
the
attractiveness of immediate core deposit growth with low cost of funds.
Over the past several years, organic core deposit growth has been
exceptionally difficult as financial institutions fought over deposits.
This acquisition allowed us to immediately increase core deposits by a
significant amount at an attractive cost. The addition of the TeamBank
deposits created increased liquidity and allowed for a reduction in
brokered deposits.
|
·
|
the
opportunities to enhance income and efficiency due to duplications of
effort and decentralized processes. Great Southern has historically
operated very efficiently, and expects to enhance income by centralizing
some duties and removing duplications of
effort.
|
Percentage
|
|||||
Tier
1 leverage ratio
|
10.05
|
%
|
|||
Tier
1 risk based capital ratio
|
13.80
|
%
|
|||
Total
risk based capital ratio
|
15.05
|
%
|
|||
Total
equity capital / Total assets
|
8.80
|
%
|
Percentage
|
|||||
Tier
1 leverage ratio
|
9.74
|
%
|
|||
Tier
1 risk based capital ratio
|
13.89
|
%
|
|||
Total
risk based capital ratio
|
15.14
|
%
|
|||
Total
equity capital / Total assets
|
7.48
|
%
|
(d)
|
Exhibits
|
||
23.1
|
Consent
of BKD, LLP
|
||
99.2
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Statement
of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed at March 20, 2009
Notes
to Statement of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
|
GREAT
SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC.
|
Date:
|
June
5, 2009
|
By: /s/ Joseph W.
Turner
Joseph
W. Turner, President
and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
23.1
|
Consent
of BKD, LLP
|
99.2
|
Audited
statement of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the FDIC-assisted
transaction involving TeamBank, N.A. as of March 20,
2009.
|