POS AM
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 23, 2005
Registration
No. 333-122856
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Post-Effective Amendment No. 2
to
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Johnson & Johnson
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
2834
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
22-1024240
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08933
Telephone: (732) 524-0400
(Address, including ZIP Code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
James R. Hilton, Esq.
Steven M. Rosenberg, Esq.
Johnson & Johnson
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08933
Telephone: (732) 524-0400
(Name, address, including ZIP Code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Robert I. Townsend, III, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
Telephone: (212) 474-1000 |
|
Bernard E. Kury, Esq.
Guidant Corporation
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Telephone: (317) 971-2000 |
|
Charles W. Mulaney, Jr., Esq.
Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone: (312) 407-0700 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: Upon consummation of the merger.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed |
|
Proposed |
|
|
|
|
maximum |
|
maximum |
|
|
Title of each class of |
|
Amount to |
|
offering price |
|
aggregate |
|
Amount of |
securities to be registered(1) |
|
be registered(2) |
|
per unit |
|
offering price(3) |
|
registration fee(4) |
|
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share
|
|
175,706,915 |
|
N/A |
|
$10,143,242,984 |
|
$1,085,327(5) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This Registration Statement relates to securities of the
registrant issuable to holders of common stock, without par
value (Guidant common stock), of Guidant
Corporation, an Indiana corporation (Guidant), in
the proposed merger of Shelby Merger Sub, Inc., an Indiana
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the registrant
(Shelby Merger Sub), with and into Guidant. |
|
(2) |
Based on the maximum number of shares to be issued in connection
with the merger, calculated as the product of
(a) 356,403,478, the aggregate number of shares of Guidant
common stock outstanding as of December 1, 2005 (other than
shares owned by Guidant, Shelby Merger Sub or the registrant) or
issuable pursuant to the exercise of outstanding options prior
to the date the merger is expected to be completed and
(b) an exchange ratio of 0.493 shares of the
registrants common stock for each share of Guidant common
stock, representing the share consideration issuable in the
merger. |
|
(3) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee required by Section 6(b) of the Securities Act, and
calculated pursuant to Rule 457(f) under the Securities
Act. Pursuant to Rule 457(f)(1) under the Securities Act,
the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the
registrants common stock was calculated based upon the
market value of shares of Guidant common stock (the securities
to be cancelled in the merger) in accordance with
Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act as follows:
(a) $61.71, the average of the high and low prices per
share of Guidant common stock on December 1, 2005, as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions
Tape, multiplied by (b) 356,403,478, the aggregate number
of shares of Guidant common stock outstanding as of
December 1, 2005 (other than shares owned by Guidant,
Shelby Merger Sub or the registrant) or issuable pursuant to the
exercise of outstanding options prior to the date the merger is
expected to be completed, less (c) the minimum amount of
cash to be paid by registrant in exchange for shares of Guidant
common stock (which equals $33.25 times 356,403,478, the
aggregate number of shares of Guidant common stock outstanding
as of December 1, 2005 (other than shares owned by Guidant,
Shelby Merger Sub or the registrant) or issuable pursuant to the
exercise of outstanding options prior to the date the merger is
expected to be completed). |
|
(4) |
Calculated by multiplying the proposed maximum aggregate
offering price for all securities by 0.00010700. |
|
|
(5) |
Previously paid. Registration fees of $1,781,664 were paid in
connection with the first filing of this registration statement
on February 16, 2005. |
|
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5129
December 23, 2005
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to report that the boards of directors of Guidant
and Johnson & Johnson have each approved revised terms
of a merger involving our two companies. Before we can complete
the merger, we must obtain the approval of Guidant shareholders
of the amended and restated merger agreement. We cordially
invite you to attend a special meeting of Guidant shareholders
to be held on January 27, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., local
time, at Guidants corporate headquarters, 111 Monument
Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5129. At the special
meeting, we will ask you to consider and vote on a proposal to
approve the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger we
entered into as of November 14, 2005, which amended and
restated the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
December 15, 2004, with Johnson & Johnson and its
wholly owned subsidiary, Shelby Merger Sub, Inc., pursuant to
which Shelby Merger Sub will merge with and into Guidant. As a
result of the merger, Guidant will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
Under the amended and restated merger agreement, upon completion
of the merger, each share of Guidant common stock you hold will
be converted into the right to receive a combination of
(i) $33.25 in cash and (ii) 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed that no
effects on Guidants business relating to or arising from
Guidants previously announced product recalls or any
related pending or future litigation, governmental
investigations or other developments will be considered in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or is
reasonably likely to occur for any purposes of the amended and
restated merger agreement or whether there is or may be any
failure of any of the closing conditions to the merger.
Johnson & Johnson common stock is listed on the New
York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol JNJ and
on December 22, 2005, the latest practicable date before
the date of the accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus, its
closing price was $61.32 per share.
The Guidant board of directors has carefully reviewed and
considered the terms and conditions of the amended and restated
merger agreement. Based on its review, the Guidant board of
directors unanimously determined that the merger is in the best
interests of Guidant and its shareholders, adopted the amended
and restated merger agreement and recommends that you vote
FOR approval of the amended and restated merger
agreement.
Your vote is very important. We cannot complete the
merger unless the amended and restated merger agreement is
approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Guidant common stock entitled to vote
at the special meeting. Only shareholders who owned shares of
Guidant common stock at the close of business on
December 8, 2005, the record date for the special meeting,
will be entitled to vote at the special meeting. Please complete
and return the enclosed request for admittance card as soon as
possible if you plan to attend the special meeting. If you
return the request card, Guidant will send you an admittance
card. Whether or not you plan to be present at the special
meeting, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed
proxy card or submit your proxy by telephone or on the Internet
as soon as possible. If you hold your shares in street
name, you should instruct your broker how to vote in
accordance with your voting instruction form. If you do not
submit your proxy, instruct your broker how to vote your shares,
or vote in person at the special meeting, it will have the same
effect as a vote against approval of the amended and restated
merger agreement. If you hold your shares under Guidants
employee stock ownership plan you may instruct the plan trustee
as to how to vote your shares. If you do not instruct the plan
trustee as to how to vote your shares, the plan trustee may vote
those shares at its discretion.
On December 5, 2005, Boston Scientific proposed to acquire
each share of Guidant common stock for a combination of $36 in
cash and a fixed number of shares of Boston Scientific common
stock having a value of $36 on or about the time, should it
occur, that a definitive agreement may be signed. Boston
Scientifics proposal is subject to due diligence and the
negotiation of a definitive agreement. Boston Scientifics
proposal is also subject to approvals from shareholders of both
Guidant and Boston Scientific, U.S. and European regulatory
approvals and other conditions. The Guidant board of directors
has made the requisite determination under the amended and
restated merger agreement to provide information to Boston
Scientific and enter into discussions with it, but has not made
any recommendation with respect to Boston Scientifics
proposal. Guidant remains a party to the amended and restated
merger agreement with Johnson & Johnson.
The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus explains the merger
and amended and restated merger agreement and provides specific
information concerning the special meeting. Please review this
document carefully. You should consider the matters discussed
under Risk Factors Relating to the Merger on
page 12 of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus
before voting.
On behalf of the Guidant board of directors, I thank you for
your support and appreciate your consideration of this matter.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
James M. Cornelius |
|
Chairman and interim Chief Executive Officer |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities regulator has approved or disapproved the merger
described in this proxy statement/prospectus or the
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued in
connection with the merger, or determined if this proxy
statement/prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated December 23, 2005,
and is first being mailed to shareholders on or about
December 27, 2005.
REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference
important business and financial information about
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant from documents that are
not included in or delivered with this proxy
statement/prospectus. This information is available to you
without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain
the documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the appropriate company at the following
addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, NJ 08933
Attention: Office of Corporate Secretary
Telephone: (732) 524-2455 |
|
GUIDANT CORPORATION
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor
Indianapolis, IN 46204-5129
Attention: Secretary
Telephone: (317) 971-2000 |
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
January 12, 2006, in order to receive them before the
special meeting.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 96.
GUIDANT CORPORATION
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 27, 2006
To the Shareholders of Guidant Corporation:
A special meeting of shareholders of Guidant Corporation will be
held on January 27, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time,
at Guidants corporate headquarters, 111 Monument
Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5129, for the following
purpose:
|
|
|
To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Amended and
Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
November 14, 2005, which amended and restated the Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated as of December 15, 2004, among
Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, and Guidant,
pursuant to which Shelby Merger Sub will merge with and into
Guidant with Guidant becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of
Johnson & Johnson, and each outstanding share of
Guidant common stock will be converted into the right to receive
a combination of (i) $33.25 in cash and
(ii) 0.493 shares of Johnson & Johnson common
stock. |
We will transact no other business at the special meeting except
such business as may properly be brought before the special
meeting or any adjournment or postponement of it by the Guidant
board of directors.
Only shareholders who owned shares of Guidant common stock at
the close of business on December 8, 2005, the record date
for the special meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement of
it. If you plan to attend the special meeting, please complete
and return the enclosed request for admittance card. Guidant
then will mail you an admittance card, directions to the meeting
and parking information. A shareholders list will be
available for inspection by any shareholder entitled to vote at
the special meeting beginning no later than five business days
before the date of the special meeting and continuing through
the special meeting.
We cannot complete the merger unless the amended and restated
merger agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Guidant
common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. Guidant
shareholders have no dissenters rights under Indiana law
in connection with the merger. The proxy statement/ prospectus
accompanying this notice explains the merger and amended and
restated merger agreement and provides specific information
concerning the special meeting. Please review this document
carefully.
The Guidant board of directors believes that the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the amended and restated
merger agreement are in the best interests of Guidant and its
shareholders and unanimously adopted the amended and restated
merger agreement and recommends that shareholders vote
FOR approval of the amended and restated merger
agreement.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please
complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it
promptly in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope or submit
your proxy by telephone or on the Internet as soon as
possible. You may revoke the proxy at any time prior to its
exercise in the manner described in the proxy statement/
prospectus. Any shareholder of record present at the special
meeting, including any adjournment or postponement of it, may
revoke his or her proxy and vote personally on the amended and
restated merger agreement. Executed proxies with no instructions
indicated thereon will be voted FOR approval
of the amended and restated merger agreement.
Please do not send any stock certificates at this time.
|
|
|
By order of the board of directors, |
|
|
|
|
Bernard E. Kury |
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Indianapolis, Indiana
December 23, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Q-1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Update on Guidants Business
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
i
ii
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
|
|
Q: |
What am I being asked to vote on? |
|
|
A: |
You are being asked to vote to approve the amended and restated
merger agreement entered into among Johnson & Johnson,
Shelby Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Johnson & Johnson, and Guidant. In the merger, Shelby
Merger Sub will be merged with and into Guidant. |
|
|
Q: |
What will happen to Guidant as a result of the merger? |
|
|
A: |
If the merger is completed, Guidant will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. |
|
|
Q: |
Why is Guidant holding another meeting with respect to the
merger? |
|
|
A: |
Following the special meeting on April 27, 2005, at which
Guidant shareholders approved the original merger agreement,
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant renegotiated the terms of
the original merger agreement and since that occurred after the
date of that special meeting of Guidant shareholders and reduced
the consideration you will receive in exchange for your shares
of Guidant common stock, the original merger agreement, in
accordance with Indiana Law, requires Guidant shareholders to
approve the terms of the amended and restated merger agreement
before we can complete the merger. |
|
|
Q: |
If I voted at the shareholders meeting on
April 27, 2005, with respect to the merger, should I vote
again? |
|
|
A: |
Yes, you should vote whether or not you voted at the special
meeting of Guidant shareholders held on April 27, 2005.
Because the terms of the merger have been amended to reduce the
merger consideration you will receive in connection with the
merger, you must vote again. If you voted at the special meeting
on April 27, 2005, that vote does not count as a
vote at the special meeting that will be held on
January 27, 2006. The merger can only be completed if
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Guidant
common stock vote to approve the amended and restated merger
agreement. You are entitled, and we strongly encourage you, to
vote at the Guidant special meeting that will be held on
January 27, 2006. |
|
|
Q: |
What will I receive in the merger? |
|
|
A: |
Upon completion of the merger, you will receive a combination of
(i) $33.25 in cash and (ii) 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. The number of shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued in the
merger for each share of Guidant common stock is now fixed.
Accordingly, shareholders of Guidant may receive more or less
value depending on fluctuations in the price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. |
|
|
Q: |
What has changed in the amended and restated merger
agreement? |
|
|
A: |
The principal changes reflected in the amended and restated
merger agreement are: |
|
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration has been reduced from (i) a
combination of (a) $30.40 in cash and (b) between
0.6797 and 0.8224 shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock
depending upon the volume weighted average trading price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock during the 15 trading
days ending three trading days prior to the completion of the
merger to (ii) a combination of (a) $33.25 in cash and
(b) 0.493 shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock. |
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed that no
effects on Guidants business relating to or arising from
Guidants previously announced product recalls, or any
related pending or future litigation, governmental
investigations or other developments will be considered in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or is
reasonably likely to occur for any purposes of the amended and
restated merger agreement or whether there is or may be any
failure of any of the closing conditions to the merger. |
|
|
|
The termination fee payable in several circumstances by Guidant
to Johnson & Johnson has been reduced from
$750 million to $625 million. The termination fee
payable in several circumstances by Johnson & Johnson
to Guidant has been re- |
Q-1
|
|
|
|
|
duced from $700 million to $300 million, each as
described below in The Amended and Restated Merger
Agreement Fees and Expenses. |
|
|
|
The outside termination date has been extended from
February 28, 2006 to March 31, 2006, as described
below in The Amended and Restated Merger
Agreement Termination of the Amended and Restated
Merger Agreement. |
Aside from these changes, the amended and restated merger
agreement is substantively unchanged from the original merger
agreement.
|
|
Q: |
Has the lawsuit filed by Guidant against Johnson &
Johnson seeking specific performance of the original merger
agreement been dismissed? |
|
|
A: |
Yes, in connection with entering into the amended and restated
merger agreement, Guidant dismissed with prejudice its lawsuit
against Johnson & Johnson seeking specific performance
of the original merger agreement. |
|
|
Q: |
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
|
|
A: |
We are working to complete the merger as quickly as possible. If
approved by Guidant shareholders, it is anticipated that the
merger will be completed promptly following such approval.
However, it is possible that factors outside our control could
require us to complete the merger at a later time or not
complete it at all. |
|
|
Q: |
Does the Guidant board of directors support the merger? |
|
|
A: |
Yes. The Guidant board of directors believes that the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the amended and restated
merger agreement are in the best interests of Guidant and its
shareholders, and unanimously adopted the amended and restated
merger agreement and recommends that Guidant shareholders vote
FOR approval of the amended and restated
merger agreement. |
|
|
Q: |
Where and when is the special meeting of shareholders? |
|
|
A: |
The Guidant special meeting will be held on January 27,
2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at Guidants
headquarters, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana
46204-5129. You may
attend the special meeting and vote your shares in person,
rather than completing, signing, dating and returning your
proxy. However, you must have an admittance card to attend the
special meeting. To obtain an admittance card, please return the
enclosed request for admittance card. |
|
|
Q: |
Who can vote at the special meeting? |
|
|
A: |
You can vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of
Guidant common stock at the close of business on
December 8, 2005, the record date for the special meeting.
As of the close of business on that day, 333,401,845 shares
of Guidant common stock were outstanding. |
|
|
Q: |
What is Boston Scientific Corporations proposal with
regard to the acquisition of Guidant? |
|
|
A: |
On December 5, 2005, Boston Scientific proposed to acquire
each share of Guidant common stock for a combination of $36 in
cash and a fixed number of shares of Boston Scientific common
stock having a value of $36 on or about the time, should it
occur, that a definitive agreement may be signed. Boston
Scientific has stated that it has secured $14 billion of
committed debt financing and that its proposal is not subject to
a financing condition. As a practical matter, completion of a
transaction with Boston Scientific would require receipt of that
financing. Boston Scientifics proposal is subject to due
diligence and the negotiation of a definitive agreement. Boston
Scientifics proposal is also subject to approvals from
shareholders of both Guidant and Boston Scientific, U.S. and
European regulatory approvals and other conditions. Boston
Scientifics proposal indicated that it expected to be able
to obtain all required regulatory approvals before the end of
the first quarter of 2006; however, there can be no assurance
that such approvals will be obtained or obtained within that
timeframe. |
|
|
Q: |
What is the status of Boston Scientifics proposal? |
|
|
A: |
On December 7, 2005, the board of directors of Guidant made
the requisite determination under the amended and restated
merger agreement to provide information to Boston Scientific and
to enter into discussions with Boston Scientific regarding its
proposal. |
Q-2
|
|
|
Boston Scientific and Guidant are currently conducting due
diligence on each other and are in discussions regarding Boston
Scientifics proposal. |
|
|
Q: |
How does Boston Scientifics proposal affect the Guidant
board of directors support of the amended and restated
merger agreement? |
|
|
A: |
The Guidant board of directors continues to recommend that
Guidant shareholders vote FOR approval of the
amended and restated merger agreement and is not making any
recommendation at this time with respect to Boston
Scientifics proposal. Under the terms of the amended and
restated merger agreement, the Guidant board of directors is not
permitted to change its recommendation with respect to the
amended and restated merger agreement or terminate the amended
and restated merger agreement in order to enter into an
alternative agreement with Boston Scientific unless and until it
both (1) determines that the proposal from Boston
Scientific (a) is more favorable to Guidant shareholders
from a financial point of view than the amended and restated
merger agreement and (b) is reasonably capable of being
completed (taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory
and other aspects of such proposal) and (2) waits five
business days after sending Johnson & Johnson notice of such
determination. Any change to the financial terms or any other
material term of the Boston Scientific proposal following such a
determination would require Guidant to deliver a new notice to
Johnson & Johnson and a new five business day period to
commence. The board will continue to evaluate what further
actions, if any, would be appropriate for it to take prior to
the special meeting. |
|
|
Q: |
Under what circumstances may Johnson & Johnson terminate
the amended and restated merger agreement in connection with the
Boston Scientific proposal? |
|
|
A: |
Johnson & Johnson is entitled to terminate the merger
agreement in the event that (1) the merger is not
consummated prior to March 31, 2006, (2) Guidant
shareholders do not approve the merger at the special meeting,
or (3) the board of directors of Guidant, prior to
shareholder approval, (a) withdraws its recommendation of
the merger or adopts Boston Scientifics proposal or
(b) fails to publicly reaffirm its recommendation of the
merger within ten business days of receipt of Johnson &
Johnsons written request to provide such affirmation. |
|
|
Q: |
Under what circumstances must Guidant pay Johnson &
Johnson a termination fee with respect to the Boston Scientific
proposal? |
|
|
A: |
Guidant must pay Johnson & Johnson a termination fee of
$625 million if: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson terminates the amended and restated merger
agreement after the board of directors of Guidant, prior to
shareholder approval, (i) withdraws its recommendation of
the merger or adopts Boston Scientifics proposal or
(ii) fails to publicly reaffirm its recommendation of the
merger within ten business days of receipt of Johnson &
Johnsons written request to provide such affirmation, |
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant terminates the amended and restated merger agreement to
enter into a definitive acquisition agreement with Boston
Scientific, or |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) the amended and restated merger agreement is terminated
by either Guidant or Johnson & Johnson because (a) the
merger has not been consummated by March 31, 2006 (and the
special meeting has not been held) or (b) Guidant
shareholders did not approve the merger at the special meeting
and (2) within 12 months after such termination,
Guidant enters into an agreement or consummates a transaction
with Boston Scientific or any other party. |
|
|
|
Q: |
What do I need to do now? |
|
|
A: |
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus, please complete,
sign and date your proxy and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid return envelope or submit your proxy by telephone
or on the Internet as soon as possible, so that your shares may
be represented at the special meeting. If you sign and send in
your proxy and do not indicate how you want to vote, we will
count your proxy as a vote in favor of approval of the amended
and restated merger agreement. Because the required vote of
Guidant shareholders is based upon the number of outstanding
shares of Guidant common stock, rather than upon the shares
actually voted, the failure by the holder of any such
shares |
Q-3
|
|
|
to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the special
meeting, including abstentions and broker non-votes, will have
the same effect as a vote against approval of the amended and
restated merger agreement. |
|
|
Q: |
Can I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy? |
|
|
A: |
Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the special meeting. You can do this in one of three
ways. First, you can send a written notice stating that you
would like to revoke your proxy. Second, you can complete and
submit a new valid proxy bearing a later date by Internet,
telephone or mail. If you choose to send a written notice or to
mail your new proxy, you must submit your notice of revocation
or your new proxy to Guidant Corporation at 111 Monument Circle,
29th Floor, Indianapolis, Indiana
46204-5129, Attention:
Secretary. Third, you can attend the special meeting and vote in
person. Attendance at the special meeting will not in and of
itself constitute revocation of a proxy. |
|
|
Q: |
If my Guidant shares are held in street name by
my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
|
A: |
Your broker will vote your Guidant shares only if you provide
instructions on how to vote. You should follow the directions
provided by your broker regarding how to instruct your broker to
vote your shares. Without instructions, your shares will not be
voted, which will have the effect of a vote against the approval
of the amended and restated merger agreement. |
|
|
Q: |
If my Guidant shares are held under Guidants employee
stock ownership plan, will the plan trustee vote my shares for
me? |
|
|
A: |
If you are a participant in Guidants employee stock
ownership plan and wish to instruct the plan trustee how to vote
your shares, you should follow the instructions provided by the
plan trustee. The plan trustee under Guidants employee
stock ownership plan may vote shares at its discretion for which
timely instructions are not received. |
|
|
Q: |
Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
|
A: |
No. After the merger is completed, you will receive a
transmittal form with instructions for the surrender of Guidant
common stock certificates. Please do not send in your stock
certificates with your proxy. |
|
|
Q: |
Is the merger expected to be taxable to me? |
|
|
A: |
Generally, yes. The receipt of the merger consideration for
Guidant common stock pursuant to the merger will be a taxable
transaction for United States federal income tax purposes. For
United States federal income tax purposes, generally you will
recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger measured by the
difference, if any, between (i) the fair market value of
the Johnson & Johnson common stock as of the effective
time of the merger and the cash received and (ii) your
adjusted tax basis in the Guidant common stock exchanged
therefor in the merger. |
|
|
|
|
|
You should read The Merger Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
beginning on page 51 for a more complete discussion of the
United States federal income tax consequences of the merger. Tax
matters can be complicated and the tax consequences of the
merger to you will depend on your particular tax situation.
You should consult your tax advisor to determine the tax
consequences of the merger to you. |
|
|
Q: |
Can I dissent and require appraisal of my shares? |
|
|
A: |
No. Guidant shareholders have no dissenters rights
under Indiana law in connection with the merger. |
|
|
Q: |
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
|
A: |
If you have any questions about the merger or if you need
additional copies of this proxy statement/ prospectus or the
enclosed proxy, you should contact: |
Georgeson
Shareholder Communications, Inc.
17
State Street 10th Floor
New
York, New York 10004
Banks
and Brokers Call: (212)
440-9800 All
Others Call Toll Free: (877) 278-4779
Q-4
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement/prospectus and may not contain all the information
that is important to you. To understand the merger fully and for
a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger,
you should carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus
and the other documents to which we refer you, including in
particular the copies of the amended and restated merger
agreement and the opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated that are attached
to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annexes 1, 2
and 3, respectively. See also Where You Can Find More
Information on page 96. We have included page
references parenthetically to direct you to a more complete
description of the topics presented in this summary.
General
What Guidant Shareholders Will Receive in the Merger
(page 49)
In the merger, holders of Guidant common stock will receive, for
each share of Guidant common stock they own, a combination of
(i) $33.25 in cash and (ii) 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. The number of shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued in the
merger for each share of Guidant common stock is now fixed.
Accordingly, shareholders of Guidant may receive more or less
value depending on fluctuations in the price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. Holders of Guidant
common stock will receive cash for any fractional shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock they otherwise would
have received in the merger. The amount of cash for any
fractional shares each holder of Guidant common stock will
receive will be calculated by multiplying the fractional share
interest to which that shareholder is entitled by the closing
price of Johnson & Johnson common stock on the date on
which the merger is completed, as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange Composite Transactions Tape.
The $33.25 in cash, the 0.493 shares of Johnson &
Johnson common stock and any additional cash received by Guidant
shareholders in lieu of any fractional shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock that they otherwise
would have received, is referred to collectively as the
merger consideration in this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Outstanding Guidant stock options at the time of the closing
will be converted into options to purchase Johnson &
Johnson common stock, with appropriate adjustments made to the
number of shares and the exercise price under such options based
on the value of the merger consideration. For a more complete
description of the treatment of Guidant stock options, see
The Merger Effect on Awards Outstanding Under
Guidant Stock Incentive Plans.
Ownership of Johnson & Johnson Following the Merger
(page 49)
Based on the number of outstanding shares of Guidant common
stock on the record date and the number of outstanding shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock on December 22,
2005, we anticipate that Guidant shareholders will own
approximately 5% of the outstanding shares of Johnson &
Johnson common stock following the merger.
Dissenters Rights (page 53)
Under Indiana law, Guidant shareholders will not have
dissenters rights in connection with the merger.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger (page 51)
The receipt of the merger consideration in exchange for Guidant
common stock pursuant to the merger will be a taxable
transaction for United States federal income tax purposes. For
United States federal income tax purposes, generally you will
recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger measured by the
difference, if any, between (i) the fair market value of
the Johnson & Johnson common stock as of the effective
time of the merger and the cash received and (ii) your
adjusted tax basis in the Guidant common stock exchanged
therefor in the merger.
You should read The Merger Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences
1
of the Merger beginning on page 51 for a more
complete discussion of the United States federal income tax
consequences of the merger. Tax matters can be complicated,
and the tax consequences of the merger to you will depend on
your particular tax situation. We urge you to consult your tax
advisor to determine the tax consequences of the merger to
you.
Recommendation of the Guidant Board of Directors
(page 27)
The Guidant board of directors believes that the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the amended and restated
merger agreement are in the best interests of Guidant and its
shareholders and unanimously adopted the amended and restated
merger agreement and recommends that the shareholders vote
FOR the approval of the amended and restated
merger agreement.
To review the background of and reasons for the merger, as well
as certain risks related to the merger, see page 12 and
pages 18 through 31.
Opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated (page 31)
In deciding to approve the amended and restated merger
agreement, the Guidant board of directors considered the
separate opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, its financial advisors in
connection with the merger, that, as of November 14, 2005,
the date of the amended and restated merger agreement, and based
upon and subject to certain matters described in their
respective opinions, the merger consideration contemplated by
the amended and restated merger agreement was fair, from a
financial point of view, to Guidant shareholders. The opinions
address only the fairness of the merger consideration to Guidant
shareholders from a financial point of view, do not address the
merits of the underlying decision by Guidant to engage in the
merger and do not constitute a recommendation to any Guidant
shareholder as to how to vote on the proposal to approve the
amended and restated merger agreement. The full text of the
written opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, which set forth the
assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with each of the opinions, are
attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annexes 2
and 3, respectively. You are urged to read each of the
opinions carefully and in its entirety.
Update on Guidants Business (page 43)
In September 2005, Guidants domestic implantable
defibrillator implant rate, an indicator of Guidants
progress in regaining market share, averaged approximately 80%
of the implant rate experienced by Guidant in March through May
2005 (prior to the recent recalls and related publicity).
Following additional product disclosures and related publicity
in late September and early October, the implant rate declined
to approximately 70% in October of 2005 and has increased
somewhat since then. Preliminary implant rates for the month of
December to date, while not final, have increased and
approximate the rate Guidant experienced in September.
Guidant management currently believes that sales and earnings
for the fourth quarter of 2005 will be between $790-$820 million
and $0.17-$0.23 per share, respectively. This earnings per share
range includes legal expenses associated with product recalls
and merger activities and other one-time adjustments totaling up
to $0.08 per share.
Interests of Guidant Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger (page 43)
In considering the recommendation of the Guidant board of
directors in favor of the approval of the amended and restated
merger agreement, Guidant shareholders should be aware that the
members of the Guidant board of directors and Guidants
executive officers have personal interests in the merger that
are different from, or in addition to, the interests of other
Guidant shareholders. These interests include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
all outstanding options to purchase Guidant common stock issued
prior to the date of the original merger agreement under
Guidants stock incentive plans, including those held by
Guidant executive officers and directors, became fully
exercisable upon |
2
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of shareholder approval of the original merger
agreement. Based upon options outstanding as of April 27,
2005, the date of the first special meeting of Guidant
shareholders, options held by Guidants executive officers
and directors relating to 794,175 shares of Guidant common
stock vested upon receipt of shareholder approval of the
original merger agreement |
|
|
|
all outstanding options to purchase Guidant common stock
existing at the time of the completion of the merger, including
those held by Guidant executive officers and directors, will be
assumed by Johnson & Johnson and will become options to
purchase Johnson & Johnson common stock with
appropriate adjustments made to the number of shares and the
exercise price under such options based on the value of the
merger consideration at the time of the completion of the merger |
|
|
|
all restrictions imposed on restricted stock granted prior to
the date of the original merger agreement under Guidants
stock incentive plans, including restricted stock held by
Guidant executive officers and directors, immediately lapsed
upon receipt of shareholder approval of the original merger
agreement. Based upon grants outstanding as of April 27,
2005, restricted stock grants held by Guidants executive
officers and directors relating to 515,250 shares of
Guidant common stock had their restrictions lapse upon receipt
of shareholder approval of the original merger agreement |
|
|
|
Guidants entering into the original merger agreement
constituted a change in control under its change in
control plan, which generally entitles the executive officers of
Guidant to certain severance payments and other benefits if any
such executive officers employment is terminated during
the period ending two years after consummation of the merger
either by Guidant without cause or by the executive
officer for good reason (as such terms are defined
in the plan) |
|
|
|
shareholder approval of the original merger agreement
constituted, and shareholder approval of the amended and
restated merger agreement, as well as completion of the merger,
will each constitute a change in control under
Guidants change in control plan for purposes of
establishing a 30-day
period beginning on the one year anniversary of the change in
control during which an executive officer may terminate his or
her employment for any reason and receive severance benefits |
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant entered into letter
agreements with certain Guidant executive officers |
that modify such executive officers rights and obligations
under Guidants change in control plan. Pursuant to the
letter agreements, the consummation of the merger (but not the
execution of the original merger agreement or the amended and
restated merger agreement or shareholder approval of the
original merger agreement or the amended and restated merger
agreement) will constitute a change in control under the plan,
and the executive officers will forgo their right to benefits
under the plan if they terminate employment without good
reason (as such term is defined in the plan and as
modified by the letter agreements) either during the
30-day period beginning
on the one year anniversaries of shareholder approval of the
amended and restated merger agreement or consummation of the
merger. The letter agreements provide further that these
executive officers will be entitled to retention bonus payments
based upon their continued employment with Guidant and that
Guidant will not terminate such executive officers
employment prior to completion of the merger other than for
cause (as such term is defined in the plan and as
modified by the letter agreements) and
|
|
|
|
|
Effective November 15, 2005, Ronald W. Dollens retired as
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Guidant and
James M. Cornelius, who previously served as non-executive
Chairman of the Guidant board of directors, was appointed
Chairman and interim Chief Executive Officer of Guidant.
Pursuant to the terms of his appointment, Mr. Cornelius
will receive an annual salary of $900,000 and a bonus of
$1.5 million payable upon the completion of the merger. |
The Guidant board of directors was aware of these interests and
considered them, among other
3
matters, when adopting the amended and restated merger agreement.
For a more complete description, see The
Merger Interests of Guidant Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger.
Comparison of Rights of Common Shareholders of
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant (page 83)
Guidant shareholders, whose rights are currently governed by the
Guidant amended articles of incorporation, the Guidant by-laws
and Indiana law, will, upon completion of the merger, become
shareholders of Johnson & Johnson and their rights will
be governed by the Johnson & Johnson restated
certificate of incorporation, the Johnson & Johnson
by-laws and New Jersey law.
The Special Meeting (page 13)
The special meeting of Guidant shareholders will be held at
Guidants corporate headquarters, 111 Monument Circle,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5129, at 10:00 a.m., local
time, on January 27, 2006. At the special meeting, Guidant
shareholders will be asked to approve the amended and restated
merger agreement.
Record Date; Voting Power (page 13)
Guidant shareholders are entitled to vote at the special meeting
if they owned shares of Guidant common stock as of the close of
business on December 8, 2005, the record date.
On the record date, there were 333,401,845 shares of
Guidant common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Shareholders will have one vote at the special meeting for each
share of Guidant common stock that they owned on the record date.
Vote Required (page 13)
Approval of the amended and restated merger agreement requires
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Guidant common stock entitled to vote on
the record date.
Shares Owned by Guidant Directors and Executive Officers
(page 13)
On the record date, directors and executive officers of Guidant
beneficially owned and were entitled to
vote 5,559,081 shares of Guidant common stock, which
represented approximately 2% of the shares of Guidant common
stock outstanding on that date.
The Merger (page 58)
The amended and restated merger agreement is attached as
Annex 1 to this proxy statement/ prospectus. We encourage
you to read the amended and restated merger agreement because it
is the principal document governing the merger.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger (page 58)
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant are obligated to complete
the merger only if they satisfy, or in some cases, waive,
several conditions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the amended and restated merger agreement has been approved by
the affirmative vote of shareholders of Guidant representing a
majority of the shares of Guidant common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote at the special meeting |
|
|
|
the shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock to be
issued to Guidant shareholders upon completion of the merger
have been approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
|
the waiting period applicable to the merger under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 has
expired or has been terminated. On November 2, 2005, the
Federal Trade Commission terminated the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and issued a consent order conditionally
approving the merger. The consent order became final on
December 21, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
the European Commission has issued, or has been deemed to have
issued, a decision under Article 6(1)(b), 8(1) or 8(2) of
the EC merger regulation declaring the merger compatible with
the Common Market. On August 25, 2005, the European Commis- |
4
|
|
|
|
|
sion issued a decision under Article 8(2) of the EC merger
regulation declaring the merger compatible with the Common Market |
|
|
|
no temporary restraining order, injunction or other court order
or statute, law, rule, legal restraint or prohibition is in
effect that prevents the completion of the merger |
|
|
|
the registration statement on
Form S-4, of which
this proxy statement/ prospectus forms a part, has been declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop
order and |
|
|
|
other customary contractual conditions set forth in the amended
and restated merger agreement. |
In addition, Johnson & Johnson is obligated to complete
the merger only if there is no pending suit, action or
proceeding by any governmental entity:
|
|
|
|
|
seeking to restrain or prohibit the consummation of the merger |
|
|
|
seeking to impose limitations on the ownership of shares of
Guidant common stock by Johnson & Johnson |
|
|
|
seeking to prohibit Johnson & Johnson from effectively
controlling in any material respect the business or operations
of Guidant |
|
|
|
seeking any divestiture that is not required to be effected
pursuant to the amended and restated merger agreement or |
|
|
|
that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a
material adverse effect on Guidant. |
Further, Johnson & Johnson is obligated to complete the
merger only if there is no temporary restraining order,
injunction or other court order or statute, law, rule, legal
restraint or prohibition that is in effect that would reasonably
be expected to result in any of the effects referred to in the
immediately preceding paragraph.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed that no
effects on Guidants business relating to or arising from
Guidants previously announced product recalls or any
related pending or future litigation, governmental
investigations or other developments will be considered in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or is
reasonably likely to occur for any purposes of the amended and
restated merger agreement or whether there is or may be any
failure of any of the closing conditions to the merger.
For a more complete description of the conditions to completion
of the merger, see The Amended and Restated Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger.
Termination of the Amended and Restated Merger Agreement;
Termination Fee (pages 63 and 64)
The amended and restated merger agreement contains provisions
addressing the circumstances under which Johnson &
Johnson or Guidant may terminate the amended and restated merger
agreement. In addition, the amended and restated merger
agreement provides that, in several circumstances, Guidant may
be required to pay Johnson & Johnson a termination fee
of $625 million and Johnson & Johnson may be
required to pay Guidant a termination fee of $300 million.
For a more complete description, see The Amended and
Restated Merger Agreement Termination of the Amended
and Restated Merger Agreement and Fees
and Expenses.
Additional Terms (pages 67)
Subject to the terms and conditions of the amended and restated
merger agreement, Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have
agreed to use all reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to
assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things
necessary to consummate and make effective, in the most
expeditious manner practicable, the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the amended and restated merger
agreement, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the taking of all acts necessary to cause the conditions to
closing to be satisfied as promptly as practicable |
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers,
consents and approvals from governmental entities and the making
of all necessary registrations and filings and |
5
|
|
|
|
|
the taking of all steps as may be necessary to obtain an
approval or waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by,
any governmental entity |
|
|
|
the avoidance of each and every impediment under any antitrust,
merger control, competition or trade regulation law that may be
asserted by any governmental entity with respect to the
merger and |
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers
from third parties, including any such consents, approvals or
waivers required in connection with any divestiture. |
As a result of these requirements, Johnson & Johnson
and Guidant have agreed with the Federal Trade Commission and
the European Commission, conditional upon the closing of the
merger, to divest certain assets.
Regulatory Matters (page 53)
United States antitrust laws prohibit Johnson & Johnson
and Guidant from completing the merger until they have furnished
certain information and materials to the Antitrust Division of
the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade
Commission and a required waiting period has ended.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant filed the required
notification and report forms with the Antitrust Division and
the Federal Trade Commission on January 18 and 19, 2005,
respectively. On November 2, 2005, the Federal Trade
Commission terminated the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and issued a consent order conditionally
approving the merger. The consent order became final on
December 21, 2005. The Federal Trade Commissions
consent order requires Johnson & Johnson to divest,
license or terminate certain rights or assets of its businesses
in drug-eluting stents, endoscopic vessel harvesting products
and anastomotic assist devices. Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant do not anticipate further review by the Federal Trade
Commission.
Both Johnson & Johnson and Guidant conduct business in
member states of the European Union. Council
Regulation No. 139/2004, as amended, and accompanying
regulations require notification to and approval by the European
Commission of specific mergers or acquisitions involving parties
with worldwide sales and individual European Union sales
exceeding specified thresholds before these mergers and
acquisitions can be implemented. Johnson & Johnson
formally notified the European Commission of the merger on
March 15, 2005. On August 25, 2005, the European
Commission issued a decision under the EC merger regulation
declaring the merger compatible with the Common Market. In
connection with the European Commissions decision,
Johnson & Johnson agreed to divest its Cordis steerable
guidewires business in Europe, the Guidant Endovascular
Solutions business in Europe and to pursue a remedy relating to
the companies endoscopic vessel harvesting products.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant do not anticipate further
review by the European Commission.
Fees and Expenses (page 64)
Each of Johnson & Johnson and Guidant will pay its own
fees and expenses in connection with the merger, except that
they will share equally the expenses incurred in connection with
the printing and mailing of the registration statement of which
this proxy statement/prospectus is a part.
The Companies (page 16)
Johnson & Johnson
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08933
Telephone: (732) 524-0400
Johnson & Johnson, with approximately
115,000 employees, is engaged in the manufacture and sale
of a broad range of products in the health care field.
Johnson & Johnson has more than 200 operating
companies in 57 countries, selling products throughout the world.
Guidant Corporation
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5129
Telephone: (317) 971-2000
Guidant is a multinational company that designs, develops,
manufactures and markets innovative, high quality, therapeutic
medical devices for use in treating cardiac and vascular
disease. Approximately 12,000 employees develop,
manufacture and market Guidants medical devices in nearly
100 countries, with key operations in the United States,
Europe and Asia.
6
Market Prices and Dividend Information (page 80)
Shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock and Guidant
common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The
following table presents the last reported sale prices of
Johnson & Johnson common stock and Guidant common
stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions Tape on:
|
|
|
|
|
December 15, 2004, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the original merger agreement, |
|
|
|
November 14, 2005, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the amended and restated merger
agreement, and |
|
|
|
|
December 22, 2005, the last practicable date prior to
mailing this proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
The table also presents the equivalent value of the merger
consideration per share of Guidant common stock on those dates,
calculated by multiplying the closing price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock on those dates by 0.7488
on December 15, 2004 (which reflects the exchange ratio as
determined under the original merger agreement as of
December 15, 2004) and by 0.493 on November 14, 2005,
and December 22, 2005, respectively (which reflects the
exchange ratio under the amended and restated merger agreement),
each representing the fraction of a share of Johnson &
Johnson common stock that Guidant shareholders would receive in
the merger for each share of Guidant common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per | |
|
|
Johnson & | |
|
|
|
Share of | |
|
|
Johnson | |
|
Guidant | |
|
Guidant | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
Date |
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 15, 2004
|
|
$ |
60.90 |
|
|
$ |
72.05 |
|
|
$ |
76.00 |
|
November 14, 2005
|
|
$ |
60.51 |
|
|
$ |
57.75 |
|
|
$ |
63.08 |
|
December 22, 2005
|
|
$ |
61.32 |
|
|
$ |
67.37 |
|
|
$ |
63.48 |
|
These prices will fluctuate prior to the special meeting and the
consummation of the merger, but the fraction of a share of
Johnson & Johnson common stock that Guidant
shareholders will receive for each share of Guidant common stock
is now fixed. Accordingly, shareholders of Guidant may receive
more or less value depending on fluctuations in the price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. Shareholders are urged to
obtain current market quotations prior to making any decision
with respect to the merger.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant declare and pay regular
quarterly dividends. See Comparative Stock Prices and
Dividends.
7
Comparative Per Share Information
The following table sets forth for the periods presented certain
per share data of Johnson & Johnson and Guidant on a
historical basis and on an unaudited pro forma basis after
giving effect to the merger under the purchase method of
accounting. The historical per share data of Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant has been derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, the historical financial statements of
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant incorporated by reference
in this proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information. The unaudited pro forma per share data
has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with,
the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Guidant unaudited pro forma equivalent data was calculated
by multiplying the corresponding Johnson & Johnson
unaudited pro forma consolidated data by the exchange ratio of
0.493. The exchange ratio does not include the $33.25 per
share cash portion of the merger consideration. This data shows
how each share of Guidant common stock would have participated
in the net income and book value of Johnson & Johnson
if the companies had always been consolidated for accounting and
financial reporting purposes for all periods presented. These
amounts, however, are not intended to reflect future per share
levels of net income and book value of Johnson &
Johnson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Nine | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
Jan. 2, 2005 | |
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HISTORICAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
|
1.095 |
|
|
|
0.945 |
|
|
Unaudited book value per share (basic)
|
|
|
10.71 |
|
|
|
12.39 |
|
GUIDANT HISTORICAL(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
Unaudited book value per share (basic)
|
|
|
11.74 |
|
|
|
14.01 |
|
JOHNSON & JOHNSON UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED WITH GUIDANT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
|
$ |
2.57 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
|
1.095 |
|
|
|
0.945 |
|
|
Unaudited book value per share (basic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.20 |
|
GUIDANT UNAUDITED PRO FORMA EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
Unaudited book value per share (basic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.49 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Guidant reports its financial information on a calendar period
basis, while Johnson & Johnson reports its financial
information on a fiscal year basis. Guidants financial
information is as of and for the year ended December 31,
2004, and as of and for the nine months ended September 30,
2005. |
8
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of
Johnson & Johnson
The following selected consolidated financial information of
Johnson & Johnson as of and for each of the five fiscal
years in the period ended January 2, 2005, has been derived
from Johnson & Johnsons audited historical
financial statements incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus. The financial statements for those
periods were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm. The following
selected consolidated financial information of
Johnson & Johnson as of and for the fiscal nine month
periods ended September 26, 2004 and October 2, 2005
has been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial
statements contained in Johnson & Johnsons
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal nine month periods ended September 26, 2004 and
October 2, 2005 incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus and, in the opinion of Johnson &
Johnson management, includes all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of
such information for the interim periods. The operating results
for the fiscal nine month period ended October 2, 2005 are
not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year
ending January 1, 2006. This information should be read in
conjunction with managements discussion and analysis of
results of operations and financial condition of
Johnson & Johnson and the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto of Johnson & Johnson
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Fiscal Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Dec. 30, | |
|
Dec. 29, | |
|
Dec. 28, | |
|
Jan. 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
EARNINGS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to customers
|
|
$ |
29,172 |
|
|
$ |
32,317 |
|
|
$ |
36,298 |
|
|
$ |
41,862 |
|
|
$ |
47,348 |
|
|
$ |
34,596 |
|
|
$ |
37,904 |
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
22,304 |
|
|
|
24,419 |
|
|
|
27,007 |
|
|
|
31,554 |
|
|
|
34,510 |
|
|
|
24,383 |
|
|
|
26,886 |
|
|
Earnings before provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
6,868 |
|
|
|
7,898 |
|
|
|
9,291 |
|
|
|
10,308 |
|
|
|
12,838 |
|
|
|
10,213 |
|
|
|
11,018 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
6,597 |
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
8,509 |
|
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
8,228 |
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.795 |
|
|
|
0.925 |
|
|
|
1.095 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.945 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (as of period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
34,245 |
|
|
$ |
38,488 |
|
|
$ |
40,556 |
|
|
$ |
48,263 |
|
|
$ |
53,317 |
|
|
$ |
52,089 |
|
|
$ |
56,574 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
2,955 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
20,395 |
|
|
|
24,233 |
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
|
|
26,869 |
|
|
|
31,813 |
|
|
|
31,513 |
|
|
|
36,847 |
|
9
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Guidant
Corporation
The following selected consolidated financial information of
Guidant as of and for each of the five fiscal years in the
period ended December 31, 2004, has been derived from
Guidants historical consolidated financial statements
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The consolidated financial statements for those periods were
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm. The following selected consolidated
financial information of Guidant as of and for the fiscal nine
month periods ended September 30, 2004 and
September 30, 2005 has been derived from the unaudited
consolidated financial statements contained in Guidants
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and
September 30, 2005 incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus and, in the opinion of Guidant management,
includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of such information
for the interim periods. The operating results for the fiscal
nine month period ended September 30, 2005 are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005. The following information should
be read in conjunction with managements discussion and
analysis of results of operations and financial condition of
Guidant and the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto of Guidant incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,464.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,636.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,120.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,765.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,797.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,722.4 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,894.0 |
|
|
|
2,023.9 |
|
|
|
2,378.9 |
|
|
|
2,767.4 |
|
|
|
2,844.0 |
|
|
|
2,107.8 |
|
|
|
1,980.7 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
397.2 |
|
|
|
538.5 |
|
|
|
669.3 |
|
|
|
419.3 |
|
|
|
573.0 |
|
|
|
449.3 |
|
|
|
358.2 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
374.3 |
|
|
|
484.0 |
|
|
|
611.8 |
|
|
|
330.3 |
|
|
|
524.0 |
|
|
|
419.5 |
|
|
|
335.0 |
|
Earnings per share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
Earnings per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (as of period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,521.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,916.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,716.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,640.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,372.2 |
|
|
$ |
5,155.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,984.7 |
|
Borrowings (long and short term)
|
|
|
808.9 |
|
|
|
760.0 |
|
|
|
368.5 |
|
|
|
948.3 |
|
|
|
659.2 |
|
|
|
776.9 |
|
|
|
355.1 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,183.5 |
|
|
|
1,545.8 |
|
|
|
2,321.8 |
|
|
|
2,713.3 |
|
|
|
3,742.1 |
|
|
|
3,445.3 |
|
|
|
4,532.9 |
|
10
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information
The following selected unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information of Johnson & Johnson
and Guidant combine the consolidated financial information of
Johnson & Johnson for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2005, and as of and for the fiscal nine month
period ended October 2, 2005, with the consolidated
financial information of Guidant for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, and as of and for the fiscal nine month
period ended September 30, 2005. The selected unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial information is derived
from the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/
prospectus. See Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
We present the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information for informational purposes only. The pro
forma information is not necessarily indicative of what
Johnson & Johnsons financial position or results
of operations actually would have been had we completed the
merger on the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial information does not
purport to project the future financial position or operating
results of the combined company.
We prepared the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information using the purchase method of accounting
with Johnson & Johnson treated as the acquiror. The
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information
does not give effect to any potential cost savings or other
operating efficiencies that could result from the merger. In
addition, Johnson & Johnsons cost to acquire
Guidant will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based upon their estimated fair values as of the date of
acquisition. The allocation is dependent upon certain valuations
and other studies that have not progressed to a stage where
there is sufficient information to make a definitive allocation.
Accordingly, the purchase price allocation pro forma adjustments
are preliminary and have been made solely for the purpose of
providing unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
Fiscal Nine | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
January 2, | |
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
EARNINGS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to customers
|
|
$ |
51,017 |
|
|
$ |
40,533 |
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
38,432 |
|
|
|
29,904 |
|
|
Earnings before provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
12,585 |
|
|
|
10,629 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
8,347 |
|
|
|
8,062 |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
|
1.095 |
|
|
|
0.945 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (as of period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
72,026 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,144 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
47,635 |
|
11
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE MERGER
In addition to the other information included and
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus,
Guidant shareholders should consider carefully the matters
described below in determining whether to approve the amended
and restated merger agreement.
The value of Johnson & Johnson shares received will
fluctuate; shareholders of Guidant may receive more or less
value depending on fluctuations in the price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. The number of
shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued
in the merger for each share of Guidant common stock is now
fixed. The prices of Johnson & Johnson common stock and
Guidant common stock at the closing of the merger may vary from
their respective prices on the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus and on the date of the special meeting. Because the
exchange ratio will not be adjusted to reflect any changes in
the market value of Johnson & Johnson common stock, the
market value of Johnson & Johnson common stock to be
issued in the merger may be higher or lower than the value of
such shares on earlier dates. The prices of Johnson &
Johnson common stock and Guidant common stock may vary as a
result of changes in the business, operations or prospects of
Johnson & Johnson or Guidant, market assessments of the
likelihood that the merger will be completed, the timing of the
completion of the merger, the prospects of post-merger
operations, regulatory considerations, general market and
economic conditions and other factors. During the
12-month period ending
on December 22, 2005, the last practicable date prior to
the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus,
Johnson & Johnson common stock traded in a range from a
low of $59.76 to a high of $69.99 and ended that period at
$61.32. See Comparative Stock Prices and Dividends
on page 80 for more detailed share price information.
The integration of Johnson & Johnson and Guidant
following the merger may present significant challenges.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant may face significant
challenges in combining their operations and product lines in a
timely and efficient manner and retaining key Guidant personnel.
The integration will be complex and time-consuming. The failure
to integrate successfully Johnson & Johnson and Guidant
and to manage successfully the challenges presented by the
integration process may result in Johnson & Johnson not
achieving the anticipated potential benefits of the merger.
The price of Johnson & Johnson common stock may be
affected by factors different from those affecting the price of
Guidant common stock. Upon completion of the merger, holders
of Guidant common stock will become holders of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. Johnson &
Johnsons business is different from that of Guidant, and
Johnson & Johnsons results of operations, as well
as the price of Johnson & Johnson common stock, may be
affected by factors different than those affecting
Guidants results of operations and price of Guidant common
stock. For a discussion of Johnson & Johnsons and
Guidants businesses and certain factors to consider in
connection with such businesses, see Johnson &
Johnsons Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal nine month period ended October 2, 2005, and
Guidants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal nine month period ended September 30, 2005, each of
which is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/
prospectus.
We will incur transaction, integration and restructuring
costs in connection with the merger. Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant expect to incur costs associated with
transaction fees and other costs related to the merger.
Specifically, we expect to incur approximately $155 million
for transaction costs related to the merger, which costs are
expected to be recorded as a component of the purchase price. In
addition, we will incur integration and restructuring costs
following the completion of the merger as we integrate the
businesses of Guidant with those of Johnson & Johnson.
Although Johnson & Johnson and Guidant expect that the
realization of efficiencies related to the integration of the
businesses may offset incremental transaction, merger-related
and restructuring costs over time, we cannot give any assurance
that this net benefit will be achieved in the near term, or at
all.
12
THE SPECIAL MEETING
We are furnishing this proxy statement/ prospectus to Guidant
shareholders as of the record date as part of the solicitation
of proxies by the Guidant board of directors for use at the
special meeting.
Date, Time and Place
The Guidant special meeting will be held on January 27,
2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at Guidants
corporate headquarters, 111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46204-5129. Please complete and return the enclosed
request for admittance card as soon as possible if you plan to
attend the special meeting. If you return the request card,
Guidant will send you an admittance card.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
At the special meeting, Guidant shareholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the amended and
restated merger agreement, pursuant to which Shelby Merger Sub
will merge with and into Guidant, with Guidant becoming a wholly
owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, and each
outstanding share of Guidant common stock will be converted into
the right to receive a combination of (i) $33.25 in cash
and (ii) 0.493 shares of Johnson & Johnson
common stock. It is currently contemplated that no other matters
will be considered at the special meeting.
The Guidant board of directors unanimously determined that the
merger is in the best interests of Guidant and its shareholders,
adopted the amended and restated merger agreement and recommends
that you vote FOR approval of the amended and
restated merger agreement.
Record Date; Shares Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Only holders of record of Guidant common stock at the close of
business on December 8, 2005, the record date for the
special meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
special meeting and any adjournment or postponement of it. On
the record date, 331,401,845 shares of Guidant common stock
were issued and outstanding and held by approximately
4,593 holders of record.
A quorum is present at the special meeting if a majority of all
the shares of Guidant common stock issued and outstanding on the
record date and entitled to vote at the special meeting are
represented at the special meeting in person or by a properly
executed proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described
below) will be treated as present at the special meeting for
purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for
the transaction of all business. In the event that a quorum is
not present at the special meeting, it is expected that the
meeting will be adjourned or postponed to solicit additional
proxies. Holders of record of Guidant common stock on the record
date are entitled to one vote per share on each matter submitted
to a vote at the special meeting.
Vote Required
The approval of the amended and restated merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Guidant common stock entitled to vote
on the record date. Because the required vote of Guidant
shareholders is based upon the number of outstanding shares of
Guidant common stock entitled to vote, rather than upon the
shares actually voted, the failure by the holder of any such
shares to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the special
meeting, including abstentions and broker non-votes, will have
the same effect as a vote against approval of the amended and
restated merger agreement.
Shares Owned by Guidant Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on the record date, directors and
executive officers of Guidant beneficially owned and were
entitled to vote 5,559,081 shares of Guidant common
stock, which represented approximately 2% of the shares of
Guidant common stock outstanding on that date.
13
Voting of Proxies
Shareholders of record may vote their shares by attending the
special meeting and voting their shares in person at the
meeting, or by completing the enclosed proxy card, signing and
dating it and mailing it in the enclosed postage pre-paid
envelope. Shareholders also may submit their proxy by telephone
or on the Internet by following the instructions provided in the
enclosed proxy card. If a proxy card is signed by a shareholder
of record and returned without specific voting instructions, the
shares represented by the proxy will be voted FOR
the proposal presented at the special meeting.
Shareholders whose shares are held in street name
must either instruct the record holder of their shares how to
vote their shares or obtain a proxy from the record holder to
vote at the special meeting. Please check the voting form used
by your bank, broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian for
information on how to submit your instructions to them.
Shareholders whose shares are held under Guidants employee
stock ownership plan may instruct the plan trustee as to how to
vote their shares. If a shareholder does not instruct the plan
trustee as to how to vote his or her shares, the plan trustee
may vote those shares at its discretion. Please consult the
voting form used by the plan trustee for information on how to
submit your instructions to the plan trustee.
The persons named as proxies by a shareholder may propose and
vote for one or more adjournments of the special meeting,
including adjournments to permit further solicitations of
proxies. Any adjournment may be made at any time by shareholders
representing a majority of the votes present in person or by
proxy at the special meeting, whether or not a quorum exists,
without further notice other than by an announcement made at the
meeting. Guidant does not currently intend to seek an
adjournment of its special meeting. No proxy voted against the
proposal to approve the amended and restated merger agreement
will be voted in favor of any such adjournment or postponement.
Guidant does not expect that any matter other than the proposal
to approve the amended and restated merger agreement will be
brought before the special meeting. If, however, other matters
are properly brought before the special meeting, or any
adjourned meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote in
accordance with their judgment.
Revocability of Proxies
Shareholders of record may revoke their proxy at any time prior
to the time it is voted at the meeting. Shareholders of record
may revoke their proxy by:
|
|
|
|
|
executing a later-dated proxy card relating to the same shares
and delivering it to Guidants Secretary by Internet,
telephone or mail before the taking of the vote at the special
meeting |
|
|
|
filing with Guidants Secretary before the taking of the
vote at the special meeting a written notice of revocation
bearing a later date than the proxy card or |
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person (although
attendance at the special meeting will not, in and of itself,
revoke a proxy). |
Any written revocation or subsequent proxy card should be
delivered to Guidant Corporation, 111 Monument Circle,
29th Floor, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5129, Attention:
Secretary, or hand delivered to Guidants Secretary or his
representative before the taking of the vote at the special
meeting.
Solicitation of Proxies
Guidant is soliciting proxies for the special meeting and will
bear all expenses in connection with solicitation of proxies,
except those expenses incurred in connection with the printing
and mailing of this proxy statement/ prospectus will be shared
equally by Guidant and Johnson & Johnson. Upon request,
Guidant will pay banks, brokers, nominees, fiduciaries or other
custodians their reasonable expenses for sending proxy material
to, and obtaining instructions from, persons for whom they hold
shares.
14
Guidant has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc.
to assist with the solicitation of proxies. Georgeson will
receive customary fees as compensation for its services plus
reimbursement for its related
out-of-pocket expenses.
Guidant expects to solicit proxies primarily by mail, but
directors, officers and other employees of Guidant or Georgeson
may also solicit in person or by Internet, telephone or mail.
Guidant shareholders who receive more than one proxy card or
voting instruction form have shares registered in different
forms or in more than one account. Please complete, sign, date
and return all proxy cards and provide instructions for all
voting instruction forms received to ensure that all shares are
voted.
Shareholders should not send stock certificates with their
proxies. A transmittal form with instructions for the
surrender of Guidant common stock certificates will be mailed to
Guidant shareholders shortly after completion of the merger.
15
THE COMPANIES
Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson, with approximately 115,000
employees, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of a broad
range of products in the health care field. Johnson &
Johnson has more than 200 operating companies in 57 countries,
selling products throughout the world.
Johnson & Johnsons worldwide business is divided
into three segments: consumer, pharmaceutical and medical
devices and diagnostics. The consumer segments principal
products are personal care and hygienic products, including oral
and baby care products, first aid products, nonprescription
drugs, sanitary protection products and adult skin and hair care
products. These products are marketed principally to the general
public and distributed both to wholesalers and directly to
independent and chain retail outlets.
The pharmaceutical segments principal worldwide franchises
are in the anti-infective, anti-fungal, anti-anemia, central
nervous system, contraceptive, dermatology, gastrointestinal and
pain management fields. These products are distributed both
directly and through wholesalers for use by health care
professionals and the general public.
The medical devices and diagnostics segment includes suture and
mechanical wound closure products, minimally invasive surgical
instruments, diagnostic products, cardiology products,
disposable contact lenses, surgical instruments, orthopedic
joint replacements and products for wound management and
infection prevention and other medical equipment and devices.
These products are used principally in the professional fields
by physicians, nurses, therapists, hospitals, diagnostic
laboratories and clinics. Distribution to these markets is done
both directly and through surgical supply and other dealers.
Johnson & Johnson was organized in the State of New
Jersey in 1887. The address of its principal executive offices
is One Johnson & Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New
Jersey 08933, and the telephone number at that address is
(732) 524-0400.
Guidant
Guidant is a multinational company that designs, develops,
manufactures and markets innovative, high quality, therapeutic
medical devices for use in treating cardiac and vascular
disease. Approximately 12,000 employees develop, manufacture and
market Guidants medical devices in nearly 100 countries,
with key operations in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Guidant products that focus on the treatment of coronary
arrhythmias, heart failure and coronary and peripheral disease
include:
|
|
|
|
|
implantable defibrillator systems used to detect and treat
abnormally fast heart rhythms (tachycardia) that could
result in sudden cardiac death, including implantable cardiac
resynchronization therapy defibrillator systems used to treat
heart failure |
|
|
|
implantable pacemaker systems used to manage slow or irregular
heart rhythms (bradycardia), including implantable cardiac
resynchronization therapy pacemaker systems used to treat heart
failure |
|
|
|
coronary stent systems for the treatment of coronary artery
disease |
|
|
|
angioplasty systems including dilatation catheters, guidewires
and related accessories for the treatment of coronary artery
disease |
|
|
|
cardiac surgery systems to perform cardiac surgical
ablation, endoscopic vessel harvesting and clampless
beating-heart bypass surgery and |
|
|
|
peripheral systems, including those to treat biliary, peripheral
vascular and carotid artery disease. |
Guidant was incorporated in Indiana in September 1994 to be the
parent of several of the medical device and diagnostics
businesses of Eli Lilly and Company. In December 1994, Guidant
consummated an
16
initial public offering of a portion of its outstanding common
shares. In September 1995, Eli Lilly and Company, by means of a
split-off, disposed of all of its remaining interests in
Guidant. The address of Guidants principal executive
offices is 111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46204-5129, and the telephone number at that address is
(317) 971-2000.
Significant Contracts Between Guidant and Johnson &
Johnson
Cordis Corporation, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, and
Guidant entered into several commercial arrangements in April
2000, several of which have been subsequently amended, pursuant
to which (1) Cordis agreed to distribute Guidants
Rapid-Exchange catheters and stent delivery systems and
(2) the parties settled outstanding litigation under
certain patents by agreeing, among other things, to
cross-license certain patents related to stents, stent delivery
systems and other cardiovascular applications and to arbitrate
certain remaining patent disputes. In February 2004, Cordis and
Guidant also entered into a strategic agreement to co-promote
certain of Cordis drug-eluting coronary stents. Guidant
also received an option to pursue a similar arrangement in Japan
in the future. In addition, Guidant agreed to assist Cordis in
the development of a drug-eluting stent that utilizes
Guidants MULTI-LINK
VISION®Stent
Delivery System.
In addition, in August 2003 an arbitration panel found that
Guidants Multi-Link Duet Coronary Stent System infringed a
patent of Cordis. As a result of this finding, Guidant made a
one-time payment, pursuant to the April 2000 commercial
arrangements, of $425 million to Cordis in the third
quarter of 2003.
17
THE MERGER
Background to the Merger
Cordis, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, and Guidant are
currently involved in a number of commercial arrangements, which
are described under the caption The Companies
Significant Contracts Between Guidant and Johnson &
Johnson. In the course of this relationship,
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have had discussions
regarding other possible business collaborations. During the
spring of 2004, Michael J. Dormer, Worldwide Chairman, Medical
Devices of Johnson & Johnson, and Ronald W. Dollens,
then Chief Executive Officer of Guidant, had discussions about
potentially expanding the relationship between the two companies.
On July 19, 2004, at a meeting of the board of directors of
Johnson & Johnson, Mr. Dormer,
Dr. Guy J. LeBeau, Company Group Chairman, and
Dominic J. Caruso, Vice-President of Group
Finance Medical Devices and Diagnostics, made a
presentation regarding a potential acquisition of Guidant and
the perceived benefits of such a transaction to the shareholders
of Johnson & Johnson. At that meeting, the board of
directors of Johnson & Johnson authorized the
initiation of discussions with Guidant regarding a potential
acquisition by Johnson & Johnson.
On July 21, 2004, at a meeting of the board of directors of
Guidant, the board discussed Guidants long-term strategic
alternatives, including a potential acquisition transaction with
Johnson & Johnson. Following this discussion, the board
of directors of Guidant authorized Mr. Dollens to have
exploratory discussions with Johnson & Johnson
regarding a possible business combination.
On July 22, 2004, Messrs. Dormer and Caruso and
Robert J. Darretta, Johnson & Johnsons Vice
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, met with Mr. Dollens,
Keith E. Brauer, Guidants Chief Financial Officer,
and Bernard E. Kury, Guidants General Counsel, to
explore the possible acquisition of Guidant by
Johnson & Johnson. The meeting included a general
discussion of the perceived benefits of such a transaction to
both companies and their respective employees, as well as to
patients and healthcare providers.
On August 4, 2004, Johnson & Johnson and Guidant
executed a confidentiality agreement.
On August 6, 2004, Messrs. Dormer, Caruso and Darretta
and James R. Hilton, Associate General Counsel of
Johnson & Johnson, met with representatives of Guidant,
including Messrs. Dollens, Brauer and Kury and A. Jay Graf,
former Guidant Group Chairman, to discuss and review information
regarding Guidants business.
On August 17, 2004, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Guidant, Mr. Dollens reported on his meetings with
Johnson & Johnsons representatives. At this
meeting, representatives of JPMorgan, Guidants financial
advisor, made a presentation regarding Johnson &
Johnsons business and the potential financial implications
of a combination between the two companies. At this meeting, the
board of directors authorized continued discussions with
Johnson & Johnson.
On August 19, 2004, Messrs. Darretta, Dormer, Caruso
and Hilton of Johnson & Johnson met with
Messrs. Dollens, Brauer, Kury and Graf of Guidant, along
with representatives of JPMorgan, to discuss various issues
relating to the potential acquisition. During the latter part of
August 2004 and the early part of September 2004, discussions
between representatives of Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant continued regarding issues relating to the proposed
transaction.
On September 8, 2004, Mr. Dormer of Johnson &
Johnson telephoned Mr. Dollens of Guidant to discuss a
number of issues, including the consideration to be paid to
Guidant shareholders in the proposed transaction.
On September 13, 2004, at a meeting of the board of
directors of Johnson & Johnson, Mr. Dormer
provided an update on the status of the discussions between the
two companies. After this update, the board of directors
authorized management to continue discussions with respect to
the proposed transaction.
18
On September 17, 2004, Messrs. Darretta, Dormer and
Caruso and Nicholas J. Valeriani, Johnson &
Johnsons Vice President of Human Resources and Worldwide
Chairman, Diagnostics, and other representatives of
Johnson & Johnson, met with executive officers and
other representatives of Guidant to conduct further due
diligence on various aspects of Guidants operations and to
discuss various business and organizational issues relating to
the proposed transaction.
Following this meeting, on September 24, 2004,
Messrs. Dormer, Caruso and Valeriani of Johnson &
Johnson met with Mr. Dollens and Roger Marchetti,
Guidants then Vice President of Human Resources, to
discuss the Guidant organizational structure and employee
matters in relation to the proposed transaction.
On September 30, 2004, Messrs. Dormer, Caruso and
Hilton and other representatives of Johnson & Johnson
met with Messrs. Dollens and Kury and other representatives
of Guidant to further discuss some of the terms and conditions
of a potential merger agreement.
On October 4, 2004, a draft merger agreement was circulated
to senior management and advisors of each company. On
October 8, October 9 and October 10, 2004,
Mr. Kury, other representatives of Guidant and
Guidants outside legal advisors met with Mr. Hilton,
other representatives of Johnson & Johnson and
Johnson & Johnsons outside legal advisors to
negotiate certain terms of the proposed transaction. These
negotiations continued through October 27, 2004.
On October 6, 2004, in connection with Johnson &
Johnsons due diligence review of Guidant, representatives
of Guidant made a presentation to representatives of
Johnson & Johnson and Goldman Sachs & Co.,
financial advisor to Johnson & Johnson, regarding the
business and financial condition of Guidant.
On October 11, 2004, Guidant formally engaged Morgan
Stanley to serve as financial advisor to the company in addition
to the previously engaged JPMorgan.
On October 18, 2004, at a meeting of the Guidant board of
directors, Mr. Dollens updated the board on the status of
the discussions with Johnson & Johnson. Representatives
of JPMorgan and Guidants outside legal advisors provided
the board with analyses of the financial and legal matters that
continued to be under negotiation with Johnson &
Johnson. Representatives of Morgan Stanley were also in
attendance. After discussion, the board of directors of Guidant
authorized Guidants management and advisors to continue
negotiations.
On October 22, 2004, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Johnson & Johnson, Mr. Dormer reported on the
discussions that had occurred with representatives of Guidant.
This review included an update on the diligence effort with
respect to Guidants business as well as financial aspects
of the proposed transaction. At this meeting, Russell C.
Deyo, Johnson & Johnsons General Counsel, along
with senior members of the Johnson & Johnson Law
Department, discussed general legal matters concerning the
potential transaction. In addition, representatives of Goldman
Sachs provided a perspective on the proposed transaction.
On October 26, 2004, Messrs. Darretta and Dormer met
with Mr. Dollens to continue negotiations, including with
respect to the consideration to be paid to Guidant shareholders
in the proposed transaction and the exchange ratio for the stock
portion of the merger consideration.
On October 27, 2004, the board of directors of Guidant met
to review the status of the discussions with Johnson &
Johnson and the merits of Johnson & Johnsons
then-current proposal as compared to remaining a stand-alone
entity. At this meeting, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley each
separately discussed financial aspects of Johnson &
Johnsons proposal, valuation issues regarding Guidant and
other alternatives available to Guidant as a stand-alone entity.
Guidants outside legal advisors reviewed in detail the
regulatory approvals that would be required to complete the
proposed transaction. Following extensive discussion, the board
of directors determined to pursue other alternatives as a
stand-alone entity rather than Johnson & Johnsons
then-current proposal. On October 28, 2004, James M.
Cornelius, then non-
19
executive Chairman of the Board of Guidant, telephoned
William C. Weldon, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Johnson & Johnson, to inform him
of the boards decision.
During the week of November 8, 2004, Messrs. Dollens
and Dormer had a series of telephone conversations regarding the
value of resuming discussions and arranged a meeting between
Messrs. Weldon, Dormer and Darretta of Johnson &
Johnson and Messrs. Cornelius and Dollens to be held on
November 16, 2004, to discuss whether further conversations
between the two companies would be productive.
On November 17, 2004, at a special meeting of the board of
directors of Guidant, Messrs. Dollens and Cornelius
reported on the November 16 meeting with Messrs. Weldon,
Dormer and Darretta. Following discussion and a review of
various strategic alternatives, the board decided to resume
discussions with Johnson & Johnson.
Following the Guidant board meeting, Mr. Cornelius
telephoned Mr. Weldon to continue to explore the prospect
of further discussions between the two companies. On
November 19, 2004, and November 24, 2004,
Messrs. Weldon, Darretta, Dormer, Deyo and Hilton of
Johnson & Johnson, as well as Johnson &
Johnsons outside legal advisors, met with
Messrs. Cornelius, Dollens and Kury of Guidant, as well as
Guidants outside legal advisors, to continue negotiations
with respect to the proposed transaction.
Over the course of the next several weeks, the parties and their
respective advisors conducted further negotiations over the
terms and conditions of a merger agreement for the proposed
transaction. These negotiations focused on the representations,
warranties, covenants and closing conditions to be included in
the merger agreement, as well as the obligations of the parties
to obtain regulatory approvals for the acquisition and the
limitations to be included in the agreement on Guidants
ability to contact or engage in discussions with potential
acquirors. The negotiations also addressed the circumstances
under which the parties could terminate the merger agreement and
the circumstances under which termination fees would be payable
under the merger agreement, and the amount of these fees.
On November 30, 2004, Messrs. Dormer and Valeriani of
Johnson & Johnson met with certain executive officers
of Guidant to discuss various organizational issues regarding
the proposed transaction, including a proposal whereby such
executives would agree to modify the terms of their change in
control agreements in connection with the proposed transaction.
These conversations continued on December 8, 2004.
On December 2, 2004, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Johnson & Johnson, Messrs. Dormer and Darretta
provided an update on the status of the negotiations regarding
the proposed transaction and the due diligence investigation
with respect to Guidant. Johnson & Johnsons legal
advisors described the principal terms that had been negotiated
in the draft merger agreement as well as the boards
fiduciary duties, both generally and in the specific context of
the proposed transaction. Johnson & Johnsons
financial advisor provided an update on its perspective on the
proposed transaction. After discussion, the board of directors
directed its management and advisors to continue negotiations
with Guidant.
During late November and early December 2004, representatives of
Johnson & Johnson continued their due diligence
investigation of Guidant. Representatives and advisors of
Guidant also continued their due diligence review of
Johnson & Johnson and, on December 7, 2004,
Messrs. Brauer and Kury and other representatives of
Guidant, together with representatives from Guidants
financial advisors met with representatives of
Johnson & Johnson, including Messrs. Darretta and
Deyo, to discuss and review various business and financial
information of Johnson & Johnson.
On December 9, 2004, Mr. Weldon of Johnson &
Johnson telephoned Mr. Cornelius of Guidant to discuss the
consideration to be paid to Guidant shareholders in the merger,
including the exchange ratio for the stock portion of the merger
consideration. No agreement was reached on these matters during
this discussion.
On December 12, 2004, the board of directors of
Johnson & Johnson met to discuss the proposed
transaction. At this meeting, which was also attended by
Johnson & Johnsons legal and financial advisors,
20
Messrs. Dormer and Darretta gave a presentation regarding
the expected terms of the proposed transaction. At this meeting,
Goldman Sachs reviewed various financial analyses with respect
to the proposed transaction using various methodologies and
assumptions. After discussion, the board of directors authorized
the execution and delivery of the original merger agreement,
with final terms to be negotiated by Johnson & Johnson
management and approved by the finance committee of the board.
On December 12, 2004, after the meeting of the
Johnson & Johnson board of directors, the parties
scheduled a meeting among Messrs. Cornelius, Dollens,
Weldon, Darretta and Dormer to attempt to agree upon the
principal terms of the proposed transaction.
On December 13, 2004, Messrs. Weldon, Darretta and
Dormer met with Messrs. Cornelius and Dollens to continue
negotiations. Negotiations between the management and advisors
of Johnson & Johnson and Guidant continued through
December 15, 2004.
On December 15, 2004, the finance committee of the
Johnson & Johnson board of directors discussed the
final terms of the original merger agreement and authorized the
execution and delivery of the original merger agreement.
On December 15, 2004, the board of directors of Guidant met
to consider the proposed original merger agreement.
Guidants outside legal advisors reviewed in detail the
principal terms of the agreement as well as the boards
fiduciary duties, both generally and in the specific context of
the proposed transaction. Each of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley
separately presented its financial analyses of the original
merger consideration and each delivered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of
December 15, 2004, and based upon and subject to the
matters described in its respective opinion, the original merger
consideration was fair from a financial point of view to the
Guidant shareholders. Following extended discussion, the Guidant
board approved the proposed original merger agreement as being
in the best interests of Guidant and its shareholders and
authorized the execution and delivery of the original merger
agreement.
Following the meeting of the Guidant board of directors,
representatives of Guidant and Johnson & Johnson and
their advisors finalized the documentation for the transaction.
After the closing of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 15, 2004, the original merger agreement was
executed and the parties issued a joint press release announcing
their agreement.
Following execution of the original merger agreement, Guidant
and Johnson & Johnson worked together to secure the
various regulatory approvals required to close the transaction,
particularly with respect to antitrust matters. On
February 18, 2005, Guidant and Johnson & Johnson
issued a joint press release announcing the receipt of an
anticipated request for additional information from the Federal
Trade Commission. On April 22, 2005, they issued a joint
press release announcing that they had been notified, as
anticipated, that the European Commission had decided to open a
second phase review into the proposed transaction. Over the
course of the next several months, Guidant and
Johnson & Johnson continued to work together and with
the appropriate regulatory authorities to respond to these
requests.
On April 27, 2005, Guidant shareholders approved the
original merger agreement at a special shareholders
meeting.
On May 23, 2005, Guidant issued a communication to
physicians regarding a failure of Guidants VENTAK PRIZM 2
DR Model 1861 implantable defibrillators manufactured before
November 2002.
On May 24, 2005, Johnson & Johnson issued a public
statement noting that it continued to be confident in its
decision to acquire Guidant and that it anticipated closing the
transaction in the third quarter of 2005.
On June 17, 2005, Guidant issued a communication to
physicians regarding failures occurring in several additional
Guidant products. The communication provided additional
information relating to the May 2005 communication regarding the
VENTAK PRIZM 2 DR Model 1861, as well as information regarding
issues with respect to several of Guidants other
defibrillator products. At that time, the United States Food and
Drug Administration, referred to as the FDA,
indicated that it would be classifying
21
these actions as recalls. In connection with these events,
Johnson & Johnson issued a public statement on the same
day that while it was still working towards a third quarter
close of the acquisition of Guidant, the events reported by
Guidant were serious matters and Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant were engaged in discussions to help Johnson &
Johnson understand the issues. These discussions consisted of
representatives of Guidant providing representatives of
Johnson & Johnson with information regarding the nature
of the issues addressed in the physician communications as well
as the substance of Guidants discussions with the FDA in
connection with such communications.
From June 2005 through late September 2005, Guidant issued a
number of additional physician communications relating to
failures occurring in certain Guidant products, including
implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac
resynchronization therapy defibrillators and pacemakers. The FDA
classified a number of these physician communications as recalls
under FDA recall classifying standards. In connection with the
June 24, 2005, physician notification regarding
Guidants CONTAK RENEWAL 3 and 4, RENEWAL 3
and 4 AVT and RENEWAL RF devices, Guidant voluntarily
removed these devices from distribution and advised physicians
to discontinue implantation. In August 2005, the FDA approved a
component solution and the distribution and implantation of
these devices resumed. In August 2005, the FDA commenced an
investigation of Guidant, inspecting Guidants cardiac
rhythm management facilities in St. Paul, Minnesota, and issued
a Form 483, noting several observations of non-compliance.
Guidant was also named in numerous product liability lawsuits
and became the subject of various claims and governmental
investigations during the summer and fall of 2005.
On July 18, 2005, at a meeting of the board of directors of
Johnson & Johnson, representatives of
Johnson & Johnson and their legal advisors reported on
the status of the transaction, and provided the board of
directors with a summary of Guidants physician
communications and recalls that had occurred to date and the
potential implications of these matters under the original
merger agreement. No decisions regarding the status of the
transaction were made at this meeting, and management of
Johnson & Johnson informed the board that it would
continue to analyze the effects of the recalls and related
claims, investigations and other developments on Guidants
business.
On Johnson & Johnsons second quarter earnings
call with analysts on July 19, 2005, Mr. Darretta
indicated that although Federal Trade Commission approval of the
merger was still expected in October 2005, the closing of the
transaction might be delayed until the product recall issues had
been resolved with Guidant and that he could not speculate as to
when Guidant and Johnson & Johnson would reach
resolution.
On July 21, 2005, Mr. Deyo telephoned Mr. Kury to
emphasize that although Johnson & Johnson was still
working towards completion of the merger, the product recalls
and related events were serious matters and Johnson &
Johnson needed to understand all of the issues and their impact
on Guidant. Mr. Deyo further stated to Mr. Kury that
Johnson & Johnson needed further information regarding
the recalls and their impact in order to analyze the potential
implications of these events under the original merger
agreement. Mr. Kury agreed to continue to facilitate
discussions among various representatives of the two companies
in this regard.
During the summer of 2005, Guidant continued to provide
Johnson & Johnson with information about Guidants
business performance, as well as information concerning the
product recalls and the related claims, investigations and other
developments, including Guidants assessment of how these
events were affecting Guidants business. Representatives
of the companies conducted a number of meetings and telephone
conferences during this period to discuss this information.
On August 25, 2005, the European Commission issued a
decision declaring the merger compatible with the Common Market.
In connection with the European Commissions decision,
Johnson & Johnson agreed to divest its Cordis steerable
guidewires business in Europe, the Guidant Endovascular
Solutions business in Europe and to pursue a remedy relating to
the companies endoscopic vessel harvesting products. In
connection with the announcement of the European Commission
decision, Johnson & Johnson issued a public statement
on the same day that it was continuing to work with Guidant to
understand and evaluate the impact of the various product
recalls announced by Guidant.
22
On September 12, 2005, at a meeting of the board of
directors of Johnson & Johnson, representatives of
Johnson & Johnson and their legal advisors provided the
board with an update on the status of the Guidant transaction.
This update included further information regarding the physician
notifications, recalls and other related claims, investigations
and other developments, as well as the impact of these matters
on Guidants business and the original merger agreement.
After discussion, the board of directors of Johnson &
Johnson authorized Johnson & Johnsons management
to pursue such alternatives with regard to the original merger
agreement as they considered appropriate.
On September 15, 2005, at a meeting of the board of
directors of Guidant, representatives of Guidant and their
outside legal advisors provided the board with information
concerning the FDA inspection and other regulatory matters.
Representatives of Guidant also provided the board with an
update with respect to Guidants business condition and
share of the implantable defibrillator market.
On September 27, 2005, Mr. Weldon telephoned
Mr. Cornelius to suggest a meeting to discuss developments
at Guidant and the impact of these developments on the merger.
On September 28, 2005, at a meeting of the board of
directors of Guidant, Mr. Cornelius informed the board of
his conversation with Mr. Weldon and members of Guidant
management provided information regarding Guidants current
business outlook. Guidants legal advisors also
participated in this meeting. After discussion, the board
directed Mr. Cornelius to meet with Mr. Weldon.
On September 29, 2005, Mr. Weldon and
Mr. Cornelius met to discuss the developments at Guidant
and the impact of those events under the original merger
agreement. At this meeting, Mr. Weldon stated to
Mr. Cornelius that Johnson & Johnson would like to
discuss a renegotiation of the terms of the original merger
agreement in light of these events, and that any renegotiated
price would have to represent a significant reduction from the
price reflected in the original merger agreement.
Mr. Cornelius agreed to report Johnson &
Johnsons position to the Guidant board of directors for
its evaluation.
On September 30, 2005, at a meeting of the board of
directors of Guidant, Mr. Cornelius reported
Johnson & Johnsons position to the board. After
discussion, the board authorized Mr. Cornelius to inform
Johnson & Johnson that the events at Guidant did not
warrant a significant renegotiation of the terms of the original
merger agreement and that Guidants position was that
Johnson & Johnson was obligated to complete the merger
under the terms of the original merger agreement.
During the week of October 3, 2005, Mr. Cornelius and
Mr. Weldon had several telephone conversations during which
they further discussed the developments at Guidant and the
potential impact of those events. Mr. Cornelius stated that
Guidant believed that Johnson & Johnson was obligated
to complete the merger under the terms of the original merger
agreement and that recent events at Guidant did not warrant a
significant renegotiation of the terms of the original merger
agreement. On October 6, 2005, Messrs. Weldon,
Valeriani, Deyo and Caruso of Johnson & Johnson met
with Messrs. Cornelius, Dollens and Kury of Guidant to
discuss the developments at Guidant and the effect of these
developments on Guidants business going forward. The
parties continued to disagree over their obligations under the
original merger agreement and the terms of a potential
renegotiated transaction.
On October 9, 2005, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Guidant, Mr. Cornelius updated the board regarding the
discussions that had occurred between the two companies
regarding a potential renegotiated transaction and the
likelihood of consummating the original merger agreement in
accordance with its terms. Guidant management reported on
Guidants business conditions and outlook and JPMorgan and
Morgan Stanley discussed with the board various financial
aspects of Guidants financial performance and outlook.
Guidants outside legal advisors also outlined various
legal considerations with respect to the pending merger with
Johnson & Johnson.
On October 10, 2005, Mr. Cornelius telephoned
Mr. Weldon to discuss the substance of the meeting that had
taken place on October 6, 2005, and to discuss the
parameters of a potential renegotiated transaction. This
discussion did not result in any agreement, and
Messrs. Weldon and Cornelius did not establish any plans
for further discussions at that time.
23
On October 10, 2005, the board of directors of
Johnson & Johnson met and received an update from
Mr. Weldon regarding the discussions that had occurred
between the two companies regarding a renegotiated transaction.
Mr. Weldon informed the board of directors that no
agreement had been reached on the terms of a revised
transaction. Other representatives of Johnson & Johnson
management provided further updates on the developments at
Guidant that had occurred since the previous board meeting.
On October 17, 2005, Mr. Deyo telephoned Mr. Kury
to inform Mr. Kury that Mr. Darretta of
Johnson & Johnson would be making a statement during
Johnson & Johnsons third quarter earnings call
with analysts, scheduled for October 18, 2005, to the
effect that Johnson & Johnson considered the recalls
and related events at Guidant to be serious matters, and was
considering its alternatives under the original merger agreement
in light of these events. Johnson & Johnson held its
analyst call on October 18, 2005 and Mr. Daretta made
a statement to this effect during the call. On October 19,
2005, Guidant made a public statement in response to
Mr. Darrettas comments to the effect that neither
company depended on the transaction for its continued future
success and that it believed the strategic rationale for
combining the two companies was as strong as when the original
merger agreement was entered into. In this statement, Guidant
also provided an update on its business performance for the
third quarter of 2005.
On October 24, 2005, Mr. Weldon telephoned
Mr. Cornelius to continue discussion regarding possible
terms for a restructured transaction. Messrs. Weldon and
Cornelius continued these discussions during the week of
October 24, 2005. In connection with these discussions, on
October 26, 2005, a draft amended and restated merger
agreement was circulated by Johnson & Johnsons
legal advisors.
On October 26, 2005, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Guidant, Guidants outside legal advisors provided the
board with an overview of recent developments. Guidant
management presented updated financial information with respect
to Guidants business condition and share of the
implantable defibrillator market. The board also continued to
discuss the parameters of a potential renegotiated transaction
with Johnson & Johnson.
Based on the discussions that had occurred between
Messrs. Weldon and Cornelius during the week of
October 24, 2005, Mr. Cornelius informed
Mr. Weldon that a meeting of the board of directors of
Guidant was scheduled for November 1, 2005, to evaluate the
discussions that had occurred between Messrs. Weldon and
Cornelius and to determine whether there were terms on which the
Guidant board of directors would proceed with a revised
transaction in light of these discussions.
On October 29 and November 1, 2005, Messrs. Dollens
and Dormer had telephone conversations confirming both
parties interest in continuing discussions and their
belief that it was still in the strategic interest of both
companies for a merger to take place, provided the parties could
come to agreement on revised terms.
On November 1, 2005, at a meeting of the Guidant board of
directors, Mr. Cornelius informed the board that the
companies had not reached an agreement as to a potential
renegotiated price. Guidant management reported on business
conditions and each of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley then
discussed preliminary valuation issues with the board. After
detailed discussion, the board directed Guidants outside
legal advisors to initiate a lawsuit for specific performance in
the event that Johnson & Johnson failed to consummate
the pending merger in accordance with the terms of the original
merger agreement.
After the Guidant board meeting, Mr. Cornelius telephoned
Mr. Weldon and discussed potential terms for a revised
transaction. Messrs. Weldon and Cornelius were unable to
reach agreement. The Johnson & Johnson board of
directors met during the evening of November 1, 2005, at
which meeting Mr. Weldon notified the board that he had
been unable reach agreement with Mr. Cornelius on terms for
a renegotiated transaction.
On November 1, 2005, Mr. Cornelius received an
unsolicited call from a representative of Boston Scientific
Corporation, inquiring as to his availability for a meeting to
discuss a possible business combination transaction involving
the two companies. On November 2, 2005, after consultation
with Guidants legal advisors, Mr. Cornelius informed
the representative that in light of the original merger
24
agreement with Johnson & Johnson, he could not attend
such a meeting. In accordance with the terms of the original
merger agreement, Guidant promptly notified Johnson &
Johnson of this matter.
On November 2, 2005, the Federal Trade Commission notified
Johnson & Johnson that it had conditionally approved
its acquisition of Guidant, subject to Johnson &
Johnson divesting, licensing or terminating certain rights or
assets of its businesses in drug-eluting stents, endoscopic
vessel harvesting products and anastomotic assist devices.
Following receipt of Federal Trade Commission approval of the
transaction, Johnson & Johnson issued a public
statement on November 2, 2005 that it continued to view
Guidants product recalls and the related developments as
serious matters and that it believed that the events had
resulted in a material adverse effect on Guidant
under the terms of the original merger agreement such that
Johnson & Johnson was not required under the terms of
the original merger agreement to close the merger. On the same
day, Guidant issued a public statement stating that Guidant had
informed Johnson & Johnson that the parties remained
legally obligated to complete the merger under the terms of the
original merger agreement.
On November 2, 2005, Mr. Kury of Guidant sent a letter
addressed to Mr. Deyo of Johnson & Johnson stating
that Guidant believed that all conditions to closing the merger
had been satisfied and that Guidant was ready, willing and able
to close. The letter further stated that Guidant would consider
failure to close a breach of the original merger agreement and
that Guidant would act to protect its rights under the original
merger agreement if Johnson & Johnson did not close.
On November 3, 2005, Mr. Deyo sent a letter addressed
to Mr. Kury stating that the breaches of the
representations and warranties in the original merger agreement
as a result of Guidants previously announced product
recalls and the related regulatory investigations, lawsuits,
claims and other developments constituted a material adverse
effect on Guidants business, and that as a result, under
the terms of the original merger agreement, a closing condition
had not been satisfied and Johnson & Johnson was not
required to effect the merger.
On November 3, 2005, representatives from JPMorgan and
Morgan Stanley, financial advisors to Guidant, telephoned
representatives from Goldman Sachs, financial advisor to
Johnson & Johnson, to explore whether there were
financial terms upon which Johnson & Johnson would
agree to renegotiate the transaction with Guidant. In connection
with this conversation, representatives from Goldman Sachs
confirmed for the representatives of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley
that Johnson & Johnson believed that the events at
Guidant warranted a significant price reduction.
In the morning of November 7, 2005, Guidant filed a civil
suit against Johnson & Johnson in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York. The
complaint alleged that Johnson & Johnson was required
to complete the acquisition of Guidant under the terms of the
original merger agreement and sought specific performance of the
original merger agreement.
In the afternoon of November 7, 2005, Mr. Dollens
telephoned Mr. Dormer to confirm Guidants interest in
continuing discussions concerning a renegotiated transaction and
they discussed channels of communication for such discussions.
Thereafter, representatives of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley again
contacted representatives of Goldman Sachs to explore whether
there were financial terms upon which Johnson & Johnson
and Guidant could agree to renegotiate the transaction.
Representatives of JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs
continued discussions during the course of the week of
November 7, 2005, regarding potential terms relating to a
renegotiated transaction, including with respect to price, mix
of cash and stock consideration and other terms.
As a result of the progress made during these discussions,
Messrs. Weldon and Cornelius engaged in a series of
conversations during the week of November 7, 2005,
regarding the terms of a renegotiated transaction. In addition,
during this week, representatives of Johnson & Johnson
and Guidant met to discuss Guidants most recent assessment
of the impact of the recalls and related events on its business.
Discussions between the two companies continued into the weekend
of November 12 and 13, 2005, and resulted in an agreement
to restructure the original merger agreement to provide for
adjusted merger
25
consideration to be paid for each share of Guidant common stock
of a combination of $33.25 in cash and 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock.
During this weekend, representatives of Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant and their respective legal advisors
negotiated the terms of the amended and restated merger
agreement and other ancillary matters relating to a restructured
transaction.
On November 13, 2005, the board of directors of Guidant met
to consider the proposed structure of the renegotiated
transaction between the two companies. Guidants outside
legal advisors provided an update as to the status of the
negotiations regarding the proposed amended and restated merger
agreement and Johnson & Johnsons due diligence
investigation of Guidant. Guidant management reported on current
business conditions and Guidants future outlook. Each of
JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley discussed their preliminary
financial analyses of the merger consideration contemplated by
the amended and restated merger agreement to the board.
Following discussion, the Guidant board unanimously authorized
Mr. Cornelius and Guidant management to proceed with
negotiating final terms of a transaction based on consideration
to be paid for each share of Guidant common stock of $33.25 in
cash and 0.493 shares of Johnson & Johnson common
stock. After the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. Cornelius
telephoned Mr. Weldon to convey the Guidant board of
directors acceptance of the proposed price subject to
satisfactory resolution of the final terms of the amended and
restated merger agreement.
On November 13, 2005, the board of directors of
Johnson & Johnson met to discuss the proposed
transaction. At this meeting, which was also attended by
Johnson & Johnsons legal and financial advisors,
Messrs. Weldon and Caruso gave presentations regarding the
expected terms of the proposed transaction. Mr. Deyo and
Johnson & Johnsons legal advisors reviewed for
the board the revised terms of the proposed amended and restated
merger agreement, and the due diligence effort that had been
undertaken by Johnson & Johnson in connection with the
recalls and related matters to that date. At this meeting,
Goldman Sachs reviewed various financial analyses with respect
to the proposed transaction using various methodologies and
assumptions. After discussion, the board of directors authorized
the execution and delivery of the amended and restated merger
agreement, with final terms to be negotiated by
Johnson & Johnson management and approved by the
finance committee of the board.
Negotiations between the management and advisors of
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant to finalize the terms of
the amended and restated merger agreement continued through
November 14, 2005.
On November 14, 2005, at a meeting of the board of
directors of Guidant, Guidants outside legal advisors
reviewed in detail the principal terms of the amended and
restated merger agreement as well as the boards fiduciary
duties, both generally and in the specific context of the
proposed transaction. Each of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley
separately presented its financial analyses of the merger
consideration contemplated by the amended and restated merger
agreement and each delivered its oral opinion, subsequently
confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of
November 14, 2005 and based upon and subject to the matters
described in its respective opinion, the merger consideration
contemplated by the amended and restated merger agreement was
fair from a financial point of view to the Guidant shareholders.
Following extended discussion, the Guidant board approved the
amended and restated merger agreement as being in the best
interests of Guidant and its shareholders and authorized the
execution and delivery of the amended and restated merger
agreement.
After the closing of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on
November 14, 2005, final terms were agreed between the
parties. The finance committee of the Johnson & Johnson
board of directors discussed the final terms of the amended and
restated merger agreement and authorized the execution and
delivery of the amended and restated merger agreement.
On November 14, 2005, the amended and restated merger
agreement was executed and on November 15, 2005, the
parties issued a joint press release announcing their agreement.
On December 5, 2005, Guidant received a letter from Boston
Scientific proposing to acquire Guidant for a combination of $36
in cash and a fixed number of shares of Boston Scientific common
stock having a value of $36 on or about the time, should it
occur, that a definitive agreement may be signed. Boston
26
Scientifics proposal is subject to due diligence, and any
transaction would be subject to U.S. and European regulatory
approvals and approvals from shareholders of both Guidant and
Boston Scientific. Guidant made a public statement on the same
day acknowledging receipt of the letter and stating that
Guidants board of directors would consider the proposal.
On December 7, 2005, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Guidant, Guidants outside legal advisors reviewed
Guidants obligations to Johnson & Johnson under
the amended and restated merger agreement with respect to Boston
Scientifics proposal. Each of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley
discussed their preliminary financial analyses of the merger
consideration contemplated by Boston Scientifics proposal.
After extensive discussion, the board made the requisite
determination under the amended and restated merger agreement to
provide information to Boston Scientific and enter into
discussions with it regarding its proposal. (See description of
the relevant provisions of the Merger Agreement under The
Amended and Restated Merger Agreement No
Solicitation on p. 60-61.) Guidant issued a public
statement to this effect on the same day, noting that the board
was not making any recommendation at that time with respect to
Boston Scientifics proposal.
Boston Scientific and Guidant are currently conducting due
diligence on each other and are in discussions regarding Boston
Scientifics proposal. Under the terms of the amended and
restated merger agreement, the Guidant board of directors is not
permitted to change its recommendation with respect to the
amended and restated merger agreement or terminate the amended
and restated merger agreement in order to enter into an
alternative agreement with Boston Scientific unless and until it
both (1) determines that the proposal from Boston
Scientific (a) is more favorable to Guidant shareholders
from a financial point of view than the amended and restated
merger agreement and (b) is reasonably capable of being
completed (taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory
and other aspects of such proposal) and (2) waits five
business days after sending Johnson & Johnson notice of
such determination. Any change to the financial terms or any
other material term of the Boston Scientific proposal following
such a determination would require Guidant to deliver a new
notice to Johnson & Johnson and a new five business day
period to commence.
Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of the Guidant
Board of Directors
At a special meeting held on November 14, 2005, the Guidant
board of directors unanimously determined that the merger is in
the best interests of Guidant and its shareholders, adopted the
amended and restated merger agreement and recommended that
Guidant shareholders vote FOR approval of the
amended and restated merger agreement.
In reaching its decision to adopt the amended and restated
merger agreement and recommend that Guidant shareholders vote to
approve the amended and restated merger agreement, the Guidant
board of directors considered a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price. The Guidant board of directors considered
the value of the merger consideration to be received by Guidant
shareholders in the merger, including the fact that Guidant
shareholders will receive, for each share of Guidant common
stock that they own, merger consideration consisting of $33.25
in cash and 0.493 shares of Johnson & Johnson
common stock, which as of the close of business on
November 14, 2005, had a value of $63.08 and, as of the
close of business on December 22, 2005, had a value of
$63.48. The Guidant board also considered that, because the
exchange ratio for the stock portion of the merger consideration
is now fixed and is not subject to a collar, the value of the
merger consideration to be received by Guidant shareholders will
increase or decrease in proportion to the extent that
Johnson & Johnsons common stock increases or
decreases in value. |
|
|
|
|
Form of Merger Consideration. The Guidant board of
directors considered that the stock portion of the merger
consideration will permit Guidant shareholders to exchange their
shares of Guidant common stock for shares of Johnson &
Johnson common stock and retain an equity interest in the
combined enterprise with the related opportunity to share in its
future growth. The Guidant board also reviewed
Johnson & Johnsons current and historical results
of operations, the trading prices for |
27
|
|
|
|
|
its common stock and its future prospects. The board also noted
the liquidity that holding shares of Johnson & Johnson
common stock would provide to Guidant shareholders who do not
wish to continue to hold shares of Johnson & Johnson
common stock following the merger. |
|
|
|
Business, Condition and Prospects. The Guidant board of
directors considered how Guidants financial condition,
results of operations, business, competitive position,
reputation, relationships with regulators, outstanding legal
proceedings and investigations and business prospects have
changed since the original merger agreement was executed in
December 2004, as well as current industry, economic, government
regulatory and market conditions and trends. The Guidant board
evaluated recent changes in Guidants implantable
defibrillator implant rates, an indicator of Guidants
progress in regaining market share, including a decline in such
rate in October of 2005 and related uncertainty as to the
overall timing and pace of Guidants market share recovery.
The Guidant board considered managements belief that
fourth quarter 2005 sales and income from continuing operations
before income taxes are likely to be lower than the fourth
quarter of 2004. The Guidant board of directors also reviewed
Guidants future prospects if a merger with
Johnson & Johnson were not completed under current
circumstances and Guidant were to remain independent, including
the risks inherent in remaining independent such as, among other
things, the possible consequences of potentially protracted
litigation with Johnson & Johnson to enforce the
original merger agreement, the potential impact of recent
developments on Guidants business prospects as an
independent company and its ability to retain key management and
sales personnel. |
|
|
|
Terms of the Amended and Restated Merger Agreement. The
Guidant board of directors, with the assistance of its legal
advisors, reviewed the terms of the amended and restated merger
agreement, which is substantially the same as the original
merger agreement except as to the pricing terms described above,
the amount of the termination fees payable under certain
circumstances described below, the termination date (which has
been extended from February 28, 2006 to March 31,
2006) and the date from which any material adverse change would
be measured (September 30, 2005 as compared to
September 30, 2004). In addition, the representations and
warranties of Guidant are qualified to exclude the effects on
Guidants business relating to or arising from
Guidants previously announced product recalls or any
related pending or future litigation, governmental
investigations or other developments and any information in
Guidants Securities and Exchange Commission filings prior
to the date of the amended and restated merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Litigation. The Guidant board of directors considered the
assertion made by Johnson & Johnson that it had the
right to refuse to complete the merger in accordance with the
original merger agreement as a result of the effects of
Guidants previously announced product recalls and related
governmental investigations, lawsuits, claims and other
developments on Guidant, that the outcome of the suit filed by
Guidant against Johnson & Johnson seeking specific
performance of the original merger agreement was not certain and
that this litigation could be protracted and could divert
management attention and resources away from operating the
business. |
|
|
|
Strategic Advantages. The Guidant board of directors
considered reports from Guidant management and advisors as to
the results of their review of Johnson & Johnsons
business. The Guidant board also considered the existing
relationships between Guidant and Johnson & Johnson,
its assessment of the complementary strengths of each of the
companies, the compatibility of the corporate structures and the
historical success of Johnson & Johnson in
incorporating acquired companies into a decentralized corporate
organization. The Guidant board also reviewed information with
respect to the prospects of the combined enterprise, including
the potential for the combined enterprise to have a stronger
competitive position and greater opportunities for growth than
Guidant would have operating independently due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to combine Johnson & Johnsons
expertise in drug coating technology and the manufacturing of
drug-eluting stents with Guidants expertise in stent
design and stent delivery systems |
28
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant gaining access to Johnson & Johnsons
strengths in developing long-term product pipelines, improving
clinical outcomes, integrating technologies, securing regulatory
approvals and supporting the adoption of new therapies |
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson gaining access to Guidants
strengths in improving devices brought to market, supplying
products to customers and sales and marketing |
|
|
|
the potential that the combined resources of Guidant and
Johnson & Johnson could increase the likelihood of
recovering Guidants market share at a faster pace than
Guidant could achieve alone and |
|
|
|
the potential to apply Guidants technology platforms (such
as implantable micro-electronic devices and site-specific
therapies) to current and future Johnson & Johnson
products. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Accept Superior Proposal Upon Payment of
Termination Fee. The Guidant board of directors considered
Guidants ability to terminate the amended and restated
merger agreement prior to its approval by shareholders to enter
into an alternative transaction in response to a superior
proposal. In this regard, Guidant may not solicit competing
offers and would be required to pay a $625 million
termination fee in connection with accepting a superior
proposal. The termination fee was reduced from $750 million
in the original merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Regulatory Matters. The Guidant board of directors
considered the fact that the European Commission approved the
merger on August 25, 2005 and that the Federal Trade
Commission conditionally approved the merger on November 2,
2005, making the consummation of the merger possible promptly
following the special meeting of Guidant shareholders to approve
the amended and restated merger agreement. The Guidant board
took account of Johnson & Johnsons agreement to
assume certain continuing regulatory risks, including its
agreement that, if the merger is not completed solely for
antitrust reasons, Johnson & Johnson will: (1) pay
a termination fee to Guidant of $300 million and
(2) provide Guidant with an option to (i) take a
license under certain patents owned by Johnson &
Johnson relating to drugs and polymers for use in stents and
(ii) arbitrate any issues of validity and infringement
relating to such patents under claims Johnson & Johnson
may bring against Guidant, in which case Johnson &
Johnsons sole remedy against Guidant for any finding of
infringement would be a predetermined royalty. The termination
fee was reduced from $700 million in the original merger
agreement. |
|
|
|
Tax Treatment. The Guidant board noted the expected tax
treatment of the merger to Guidant shareholders, including the
fact that the merger is not structured as a reorganization for
United States federal income tax purposes which would generally
allow Guidant shareholders to refrain from recognizing any gain
from the receipt of the stock portion of the merger
consideration. |
|
|
|
Potential Risks. The Guidant board of directors
considered a number of potential risks, as well as related
mitigating factors, in connection with its evaluation of the
merger. These risks include the potential diversion of
management resources from operational matters and the
opportunity costs associated with the merger prior to the
completion or abandonment of the merger. Other risks considered
by the Guidant board included: |
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the merger might not be completed as a
result of the failure to satisfy closing conditions, which could
result in significant distractions of Guidants employees
and increased expenses from an unsuccessful attempt to complete
the merger |
|
|
|
under the terms of the amended and restated merger agreement,
prior to the completion or abandonment of the merger, Guidant
will be required to conduct its business only in the ordinary
course consistent with past practice and subject to operational
restrictions and |
|
|
|
Guidant would be required to pay a $625 million termination
fee if the amended and restated merger agreement is terminated
under specified circumstances and Guidant later agrees to or
consummates a takeover proposal. |
29
|
|
|
In the judgment of Guidants board, however, these
potential risks were more than offset by the potential benefits
of the merger discussed above. |
|
|
|
|
|
Opinions of Financial Advisors. The Guidant board of
directors considered the presentations delivered by JPMorgan and
Morgan Stanley and the written opinions of JPMorgan and Morgan
Stanley to the Guidant board of directors to the effect that, as
of the date of the opinions and based on and subject to the
matters set forth in the respective opinions, the merger
consideration to be received by shareholders pursuant to the
amended and restated merger agreement was fair, from a financial
point of view, to Guidant shareholders. A copy of
JPMorgans written opinion is attached as Annex 2 to
this proxy statement/ prospectus and a copy of Morgan
Stanleys written opinion is attached as Annex 3 to
this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
|
|
Additional Considerations. In the course of its
deliberations on the merger, the Guidant board of directors
consulted with members of Guidants management and
Guidants legal, financial, accounting and tax advisors on
various legal, business and financial matters. Additional
factors considered by the Guidant board in determining whether
to adopt the amended and restated merger agreement and recommend
that Guidant shareholders vote to approve the amended and
restated merger agreement included: |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Guidant shareholders will have an opportunity to
vote on the merger on the terms provided in the amended and
restated merger agreement and |
|
|
|
the uncertainty that any alternative transaction would yield a
superior value to Guidants shareholders. |
The above discussion is not intended to be exhaustive, but
Guidant believes it addresses the material information and
factors considered by the Guidant board of directors in its
consideration of the merger, including factors that may support
the merger as well as factors that may weigh against it. In view
of the variety of factors and the amount of information
considered, the Guidant board of directors did not find it
practicable to, and did not make specific assessments of,
quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to, the specific
factors considered in reaching its determination. In addition,
the Guidant board of directors did not undertake to make any
specific determination as to whether any particular factor, or
any aspect of any particular factor, was favorable or
unfavorable to its ultimate determination, and individual
members of Guidants board of directors may have given
different weights to different factors.
In considering the recommendation of the Guidant board of
directors to approve the amended and restated merger agreement,
Guidant shareholders should be aware that certain executive
officers and directors of Guidant have certain interests in the
merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the
interests of Guidant shareholders generally. The Guidant board
of directors was aware of these interests and considered them
when adopting the amended and restated merger agreement and
recommending that Guidant shareholders vote to approve the
merger agreement. See Interests of Guidant
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.
At a special meeting held on December 7, 2005, the Guidant
board of directors made the requisite determination under the
amended and restated merger agreement to provide information to
Boston Scientific and to enter into discussions with Boston
Scientific regarding its proposal, but did not make any
recommendation at that time with respect to Boston
Scientifics proposal.
Boston Scientific and Guidant are currently conducting due
diligence on each other and are in discussions regarding Boston
Scientifics proposal. Under the terms of the amended and
restated merger agreement, the Guidant board of directors is not
permitted to change its recommendation with respect to the
amended and restated merger agreement or terminate the amended
and restated merger agreement in order to enter into an
alternative agreement with Boston Scientific unless and until it
both (1) determines that the proposal from Boston
Scientific (a) is more favorable to Guidant shareholders
from a financial point of view than the amended and restated
merger agreement and (b) is reasonably capable of being
completed (taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory
and other aspects of such proposal) and (2) waits five
business days after sending Johnson & Johnson notice of such
determination. Any change to
30
the financial terms or any other material term of the Boston
Scientific proposal following such a determination would require
Guidant to deliver a new notice to Johnson & Johnson and a
new five business day period to commence.
In considering its actions and decision not to make any
recommendation with respect to Boston Scientifics proposal
at this time, the Guidant board of directors took into
consideration, among other things, that at the present time, the
Boston Scientific proposal is non-binding and subject to
completion of due diligence and other conditions. The board also
considered the provisions of the amended and restated merger
agreement that govern the boards ability to change its
recommendation of the amended and restated merger agreement, as
described above. In addition, the board was mindful of the fact
that if it changed its recommendation, Johnson & Johnson
could terminate the amended and restated merger agreement which
would obligate Guidant to pay Johnson & Johnson a
$625 million termination fee. The board will continue to
evaluate what further actions, if any, would be appropriate for
it to take prior to the special meeting.
Opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. |
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated August 18, 2004,
Guidant retained JPMorgan as a financial advisor in connection
with the merger. At the meeting of Guidants board of
directors on November 14, 2005, JPMorgan rendered its oral
opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to the board of
directors that, based upon and subject to the matters set forth
in JPMorgans opinion, as of that date, the consideration
to be received by the holders of Guidant common stock in the
merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to those
holders. No limitations were imposed by the Guidant board of
directors upon JPMorgan with respect to the investigations made
or procedures followed by it in rendering its opinions, except
that JPMorgan was not authorized to, and did not, solicit any
expressions of interest from any other parties with respect to
the sale of all or any part of Guidant or any other alternative
transaction.
The full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated
November 14, 2005, which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered and limits on the review undertaken by
JPMorgan in rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex 2
to this proxy statement/ prospectus and is incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus. Guidant
shareholders are urged to read the opinion carefully in its
entirety. JPMorgans written opinion is addressed to the
Guidant board of directors, is directed only to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be
received by the holders of Guidant common stock in the merger
and does not constitute a recommendation to any Guidant
shareholder as to how the shareholder should vote at the Guidant
special meeting. The summary of the opinion of JPMorgan set
forth in this proxy statement/ prospectus is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, JPMorgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft, dated November 12, 2005, of the amended
and restated merger agreement |
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Guidant and Johnson & Johnson
and the industries in which they operate, including publicly
available financial forecasts relating to Johnson &
Johnson that were reviewed and discussed with JPMorgan by the
management of Johnson & Johnson (JPMorgan was not
provided internal financial information or projections for
Johnson & Johnson) |
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with
publicly available financial terms of transactions involving
companies JPMorgan deemed relevant and the consideration
received for those companies |
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of Guidant and
Johnson & Johnson with publicly available information
concerning other companies JPMorgan deemed relevant and reviewed
the |
31
|
|
|
|
|
current and historical market prices of Guidant common stock and
Johnson & Johnson common stock and publicly traded
securities of those other companies |
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by the management of Guidant relating to its
business and |
|
|
|
performed other financial studies and considered other
information as JPMorgan deemed appropriate for the purposes of
its opinion. |
JPMorgan also held discussions with members of the managements
of Guidant and Johnson & Johnson with respect to
certain aspects of the merger, the past and current business
operations of Guidant and Johnson & Johnson, the
financial condition and future prospects and operations of
Guidant and Johnson & Johnson, the effects of the
merger on the financial condition and future prospects of
Guidant and Johnson & Johnson and certain other matters
that JPMorgan believed necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.
In giving its opinion, JPMorgan relied upon and assumed, without
independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all
information that was publicly available or otherwise reviewed by
JPMorgan, and JPMorgan has not assumed any responsibility or
liability for such information. JPMorgan did not conduct any
valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor were
any valuations or appraisals provided to JPMorgan. In relying on
financial analyses and forecasts provided to it by Guidant,
JPMorgan assumed that they were reasonably prepared based on
assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments by the management of Guidant as to the expected
future results of operations and financial condition of Guidant.
With respect to the publicly available financial forecasts and
estimates relating to Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan
assumed, with Guidants consent and without independent
verification or investigation, that the forecasts represent
reasonable estimates and judgments as to the future financial
performance of Johnson & Johnson. JPMorgan also assumed
that the merger will have the tax consequences described in
discussions with, and materials furnished to JPMorgan by,
representatives of Guidant, that the other transactions
contemplated by the amended and restated merger agreement will
be consummated as described in the amended and restated merger
agreement and that the definitive amended and restated merger
agreement will not differ in any material respects from the
draft thereof provided to JPMorgan. JPMorgan relied as to all
legal matters relevant to the rendering of its opinion upon the
advice of counsel. JPMorgan further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the merger will be obtained
without any material adverse effect on Guidant,
Johnson & Johnson or on the contemplated benefits of
the merger.
JPMorgans opinion is based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to JPMorgan as of, the date of its opinion. Subsequent
developments may affect the opinion, and JPMorgan does not have
any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm such opinion.
JPMorgans opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by
the holders of Guidant common stock in the merger, and JPMorgan
has expressed no opinion as to the underlying decision by
Guidant to engage in the merger. JPMorgan expressed no opinion
as to the price at which Johnson & Johnson common stock
will trade at any future time.
JPMorgan was not authorized to and did not solicit any
expressions of interest from any other parties with respect to
the sale of all or any part of Guidant or any other alternative
transaction. Consequently, JPMorgan assumed that the terms of
the merger were the most beneficial terms from Guidants
perspective that could under the circumstances be negotiated
among the parties to the merger, and JPMorgan expressed no
opinion whether any alternative transaction might produce
consideration for Guidant shareholders in an amount in excess of
the consideration in the merger.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
JPMorgan employed generally accepted valuation methods in
reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the material
financial analyses utilized by JPMorgan in connection with
providing its opinion.
32
Selected Companies Analysis. Using publicly available
information, JPMorgan compared selected financial data of
Guidant with similar data for the following selected publicly
traded large-cap cardiovascular companies that JPMorgan judged
to be similar to Guidant:
|
|
|
|
|
Medtronic, Inc. |
|
|
|
Boston Scientific Corporation |
|
|
|
St. Jude Medical, Inc. |
For each comparable company, JPMorgan used estimates of calendar
year 2006 and 2007 results published in publicly available
equity analyst research reports. For Guidant, JPMorgan used
estimates of calendar year 2006 and 2007 results provided by
Guidant management. JPMorgan reviewed per share equity values as
a multiple of estimated calendar year 2006 and 2007 earnings per
share, commonly referred to as EPS. JPMorgan then applied a
range of selected multiples of estimated 2006 and 2007 EPS
derived from the comparable companies to corresponding financial
data of Guidant in order to derive an implied per share equity
reference range for Guidant. This analysis indicated an
approximate implied per share equity reference range for Guidant
of $37.00 to $44.00 based on estimated results for 2006 and
$48.00 to $60.00 based on estimated results for 2007.
It should be noted that no company utilized in the analysis
above is identical to Guidant.
Selected Transactions Analysis. Using publicly available
information, JPMorgan reviewed the following merger and
acquisition transactions involving companies in the medical
device industry:
|
|
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
|
|
|
Medtronic, Inc.
|
|
Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. |
Medtronic, Inc.
|
|
Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc. |
Boston Scientific Corporation
|
|
Schneider Worldwide |
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
DePuy, Inc. |
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
Cordis Corporation |
General Electric Company
|
|
Amersham plc |
Guidant Corporation
|
|
Intermedics Inc. |
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Centerpulse AG |
JPMorgan calculated a range of multiples of firm value to the
latest 12 month earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, commonly referred to as EBITDA,
implied in these transactions. JPMorgan then applied a range of
selected multiples for the selected transactions to
corresponding data of Guidant in order to derive an implied per
share equity reference range for Guidant. This analysis
indicated an approximate implied per share equity reference
range for Guidant of $43.00 to $56.00.
It should be noted that no company utilized in the analysis
above is identical to Guidant and no transaction is identical to
the merger.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. JPMorgan conducted a
discounted cash flow analysis for the purpose of determining the
implied fully diluted equity value per share for Guidants
common stock. In conducting its analysis, JPMorgan considered
two projected financial cases each prepared by Guidant
management for the fiscal years 2006 through 2015. In the first
case, referred to as Management Case 1, Guidant management
assumed, among other things, a more rapid recovery in the
Guidant CRM franchise. In the second case, referred to as
Management Case 2, Guidant management assumed, among other
things, a less rapid recovery in the Guidant CRM franchise.
For both scenarios, JPMorgan calculated the unlevered free cash
flows that Guidant is expected to generate during fiscal years
2006 through 2015. JPMorgan calculated an implied range of
terminal values for Guidant using a range of perpetuity growth
rates for free cash flows from 3.50% to 4.50% and a range of
discount rates from 9.75% to 10.75%. The unlevered free cash
flows and the range of terminal values
33
were then discounted to present value using a range of discount
rates from 9.75% to 10.75%. The present value of the unlevered
free cash flows and the range of terminal values were then
adjusted for Guidants cash and total debt as of
October 31, 2005. This analysis indicated an approximate
implied per share equity reference range for Guidant of $57.00
to $72.00 in the case of Management Case 1 and an approximate
implied per share equity reference range for Guidant of $54.00
to $68.00 in the case of Management Case 2.
Pro Forma Analysis. JPMorgan analyzed the potential pro
forma impact of the merger on Johnson & Johnsons
pro forma earnings per share on a GAAP basis and on a cash basis
which excludes the estimated impact of the amortization of
identifiable intangibles relating to Johnson &
Johnsons acquisition of Guidant. In this analysis, 2006
and 2007 earnings projections for Johnson & Johnson
were based on publicly available equity analyst research reports
and earnings projections for Guidant were based on publicly
available analyst research reports (referred to below as Guidant
Analyst Estimates), Management Case 1 and Management Case 2.
JPMorgan assumed, among other things, for purposes of this
analysis, that the merger would close on December 31, 2005
and that there would be no synergies. JPMorgan was not provided
internal financial information or projections for Johnson &
Johnson.
Based on this analysis, JPMorgan observed that the merger would
result in earnings per share dilution for Johnson &
Johnson shareholders on a GAAP basis in 2006 of 7.3%, 7.3% and
5.9%, based on Management Case 1, Management Case 2
and Guidant Analyst Estimates, respectively. According to this
analysis, the pre-tax synergies required for the combined entity
to realize no earnings dilution in 2006 were
$1.239 billion, $1.239 billion and $992 million,
based on Management Case 1, Management Case 2 and
Guidant Analyst Estimates, respectively. For 2007, JPMorgan
observed that the merger would result in earnings per share
dilution for Johnson & Johnson shareholders on a GAAP
basis of 3.7%, 3.9% and 3.4%, based on Management Case 1,
Management Case 2 and Guidant Analyst Estimates,
respectively. According to this analysis, the pre-tax synergies
required for the combined entity to realize no earnings dilution
in 2007 were $675 million, $721 million and
$621 million, based on Management Case 1, Management
Case 2 and Guidant Analyst Estimates, respectively.
JPMorgan also analyzed the pro forma impact of the merger on
Johnson & Johnsons pro forma earnings per share
on a cash basis. Based on this analysis, JPMorgan observed that
the merger would result in earnings per share dilution for
Johnson & Johnson shareholders in 2006 of 3.3%, 3.3%
and 1.9%, based on Management Case 1, Management
Case 2 and Guidant Analyst Estimates, respectively.
According to this analysis, the pre-tax synergies required for
the combined entity to realize no earnings dilution in 2006 were
$580 million, $580 million and $333 million,
based on Management Case 1, Management Case 2 and
Guidant Analyst Estimates, respectively. For 2007, JPMorgan
observed that the merger would result in earnings per share
dilution for Johnson & Johnson shareholders on a cash
basis of 0.1% based on Management Case 1 and 0.3%, based on
Management Case 2. Based on Guidant Analyst Estimates,
JPMorgan observed that for 2007 the merger would result in
earnings per share accretion for Johnson & Johnson
shareholders of 0.2%. According to this analysis, the pre-tax
synergies required for the combined entity to realize no
earnings dilution in 2007 was $17 million based on
Management Case 1 and $63 million based on Management
Case 2.
Other Factors. In rendering its opinion, JPMorgan also
reviewed and considered other factors, including the average
price of Johnson & Johnson common stock during the one week,
two week, one month, three month, six month and one year periods
prior to announcement of the amended and restated merger
agreement and the relationship between the average price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock during these periods and
the consideration to be received by the holders of Guidant
common stock in the merger.
The summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses or data utilized by JPMorgan. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is
not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. JPMorgan believes that the summary set forth above
and its analyses must be considered as a whole and that
selecting portions thereof, without considering all of its
analyses, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying its analyses and
34
opinion. JPMorgan based its analyses on assumptions that it
deemed reasonable, including assumptions concerning general
business and economic conditions and industry-specific factors.
The other principal assumptions upon which JPMorgan based its
analyses are set forth above under the description of each
analysis. JPMorgans analyses are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or actual future results that might
be achieved, which values may be higher or lower than those
indicated. Moreover, JPMorgans analyses are not and do not
purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices
at which businesses actually could be bought or sold.
As a part of its investment banking business, JPMorgan and its
affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. JPMorgan was selected to
advise Guidant with respect to the merger and deliver an opinion
to the Guidant board of directors with respect to the merger on
the basis of JPMorgans experience and its familiarity with
Guidant.
For services rendered in connection with the merger, Guidant has
agreed to pay JPMorgan a fee based on the aggregate
consideration payable in the merger, which is contingent upon
the consummation of the merger. In addition, Guidant has agreed
to reimburse JPMorgan for its reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with its services, including reasonable fees of
outside counsel, and will indemnify JPMorgan against certain
liabilities, including liabilities arising under federal
securities laws.
In addition, JPMorgan and its affiliates maintain commercial and
investment banking and other business relationships with
Guidant, Johnson & Johnson and their respective
affiliates, for which it receives customary fees. In the
ordinary course of their businesses, JPMorgan and its affiliates
may actively trade the debt and equity securities of Guidant or
Johnson & Johnson for their own accounts or for the
accounts of customers and, accordingly, they may at any time
hold long or short positions in such securities. In addition,
JPMorgan served as sole book-runner and administrative agent for
Guidants $500 million credit facility that expires in
2009 and Guidants $400 million credit facility that
expires in 2007.
|
|
|
Opinion of Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated |
Pursuant to an engagement letter effective October 11,
2004, Guidant retained Morgan Stanley as a financial advisor in
connection with the merger. The Guidant board of directors
selected Morgan Stanley to act as its financial advisor based on
Morgan Stanleys qualifications, expertise, reputation and
its knowledge of the business and affairs of Guidant. At the
meeting of the Guidant board of directors on November 14,
2005, Morgan Stanley rendered its oral opinion, subsequently
confirmed in writing, that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the considerations set forth in its opinion, the
consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Guidant
common stock pursuant to the amended and restated merger
agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such
holders.
The full text of Morgan Stanleys opinion, dated
November 14, 2005, which sets forth, among other things,
the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered
and qualifications and limitations of the review undertaken in
rendering its opinion is attached as Annex 3 to this
document. The summary of Morgan Stanleys fairness opinion
set forth in this document is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion. Shareholders should
read this opinion carefully and in its entirety. Morgan
Stanleys opinion is directed to the Guidant board of
directors, addresses only the fairness from a financial point of
view of the consideration to be received by holders of Guidant
common stock pursuant to the amended and restated merger
agreement, and does not address any other aspect of the merger.
Morgan Stanleys opinion does not constitute a
recommendation to any shareholders of Guidant as to how such
shareholders should vote with respect to the proposed
transaction and should not be relied upon by any shareholder as
such.
35
In connection with rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other information of Guidant and Johnson & Johnson |
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Guidant prepared by the
management of Guidant |
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
management of Guidant |
|
|
|
reviewed the pro forma impact of the merger on
Johnson & Johnsons earnings per share |
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Guidant and Johnson &
Johnson with senior executives of Guidant and Johnson &
Johnson, respectively |
|
|
|
discussed the strategic rationale for the merger with senior
executives of Guidant |
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for Guidant
common stock and Johnson & Johnson common stock |
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of Guidant and the prices and
trading activity of Guidant common stock with that of certain
other comparable publicly-traded companies and their securities |
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of Johnson & Johnson
and the prices and trading activity of Johnson &
Johnson common stock with that of certain other comparable
publicly-traded companies and their securities |
|
|
|
participated in discussions among representatives of Guidant and
Johnson & Johnson and their financial and legal advisors |
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the amended and restated merger agreement
dated November 12, 2005, the original merger agreement and
certain related documents and |
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as Morgan Stanley deemed appropriate. |
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied
upon without independent verification the accuracy and
completeness of the information reviewed by it for the purposes
of its opinion. With respect to the financial projections,
Morgan Stanley assumed that they were reasonably prepared on
bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the future financial performance of Guidant. With
respect to developments related to certain of Guidants
products, Morgan Stanley has relied without independent
investigation on the assessment of Guidants senior
management as to the effect of any such developments on the
operations and financial condition and prospects of Guidant.
Morgan Stanley was not provided internal financial information
or projections for Johnson & Johnson, and as a result,
it relied upon publicly available estimates of equity research
analysts who report on Johnson & Johnson. In addition,
Morgan Stanley assumed that the merger would be consummated in
accordance with the terms set forth in the amended and restated
merger agreement with no material modification, waiver, or
delay. Morgan Stanley also assumed that, in connection with the
execution of the amended and restated merger agreement,
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant would execute a
settlement agreement with respect to the litigation filed by
Guidant against Johnson & Johnson in connection with
the original merger agreement. Morgan Stanley is not a legal,
regulatory or tax expert and relied on the assessments provided
by Guidants advisors with respect to such issues. Morgan
Stanley did not make any independent valuation or appraisal of
the assets or liabilities of Guidant, nor had it been furnished
with any such appraisals. Morgan Stanleys opinion was
necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to it as of November 14, 2005.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley was not authorized to
solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with
respect to the acquisition of Guidant or any of its assets, nor
did it negotiate with any parties. In addition, Morgan
Stanleys opinion is limited to the fairness from a
financial point of view of the consideration to be received by
the holders of Guidant common stock in the merger and Morgan
Stanley expresses no opinion as to the underlying decision by
Guidant to engage in the merger or the strategic rationale for
the merger. Morgan Stanley provided advice to the Guidant board
of directors
36
during its negotiations with Johnson & Johnson but did
not, however, recommend any specific merger consideration or
recommend that any specific merger consideration constituted the
only appropriate consideration.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed by Morgan Stanley in connection with its oral opinion
and the preparation of its written opinion. Some of these
summaries include information in tabular format. In order to
understand fully the financial analyses used by Morgan Stanley,
the tables must be read together with the text of each summary.
The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
analyses.
Morgan Stanley noted certain recent developments concerning
Guidant occurring after the execution of the original merger
agreement. In particular, Morgan Stanley noted that
Guidants revenue for its fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2005 was $795.0 million, a decline of
14% from the same period in 2004, and its diluted earnings per
share from continuing operations was $0.20, a decline of 60%
from the same period in 2004. Morgan Stanley also noted
Guidants previously announced product recalls and related
governmental investigations, lawsuits, claims and other
developments. With respect to developments related to certain of
Guidants products, Morgan Stanley has relied without
independent investigation on the assessment of Guidants
senior management as to the effect of any such developments on
the operations and financial condition and prospects of Guidant.
Guidant Historical Share Price Analysis. Morgan Stanley
reviewed the price performance and trading volumes of Guidant
common stock during various periods ending on November 11,
2005. Morgan Stanley compared an implied merger consideration
for a share of Guidant common stock at $63.28 as of
November 11, 2005 (calculated as the sum of $33.25 in cash
plus a fixed exchange ratio of 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock per share of Guidant
common stock and a closing market price of Johnson &
Johnson common stock of $60.92 on November 11, 2005)
relative to the Guidant common stock price over the period
referenced above. Morgan Stanley noted that the range of low and
high closing prices of Guidant common stock from
November 1, 2005 through November 11, 2005 was
approximately $57.00 and $60.00. November 1, 2005 was one
day prior to the Federal Trade Commissions conditional
approval of the transaction and Johnson &
Johnsons press release stating its belief that it had the
right to refuse to complete the merger in accordance with the
terms of the original merger agreement. Morgan Stanley also
noted that the low and high closing prices of Guidant common
stock from October 17, 2005 through November 11, 2005
were approximately $57.00 and $65.00. October 17, 2005 was
one day prior to Johnson & Johnsons third quarter
earnings call with analysts and its indication that it was
continuing to consider the alternatives under the
original merger agreement.
Johnson & Johnson Historical Share Price
Analysis. Morgan Stanley reviewed the price performance and
trading volumes of Johnson & Johnson common stock
during various periods ending on November 11, 2005. Morgan
Stanley noted that the range of low and high closing prices of
Johnson & Johnson common stock during the 52 week
period ending on November 11, 2005 was approximately $60.00
and $69.00. Morgan Stanley also noted that the low and high
closing prices of Johnson & Johnson common stock during
the six month period ending on November 11, 2005 were
approximately $61.00 and $68.00. Morgan Stanley also noted that
the low and high closing prices of Johnson & Johnson
common stock during the three month period ending on
November 11, 2005 were approximately $61.00 and $65.00 and
that the low and high closing prices of Johnson &
Johnson common stock during the one month period ending on
November 11, 2005 were approximately $61.00 and $64.00.
Morgan Stanley also reviewed the price performance and trading
volumes of Johnson & Johnson common stock during
various periods ending on
37
November 11, 2005. The table below presents the absolute
share prices of Johnson & Johnson common stock over the
period referenced above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
Period Ending on November 11, 2005 |
|
Common Stock Price | |
|
|
| |
5-Year High
|
|
$ |
69.40 |
|
5-Year Low
|
|
$ |
41.63 |
|
5-Year Average
|
|
$ |
56.25 |
|
3-Year Average
|
|
$ |
57.52 |
|
1-Year Average
|
|
$ |
64.76 |
|
6-Month Average
|
|
$ |
64.34 |
|
In addition, Morgan Stanley compared the trading performance of
Johnson & Johnson to the performance of other
comparable publicly traded corporations and the S&P 500
Index. The table below presents the percentage change from
November 13, 2000 through November 11, 2005 for
Johnson & Johnson and a group of selected
pharmaceutical companies and the S&P 500 Index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative 5 Year | |
Company/ Market Index |
|
Price Change | |
|
|
| |
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
|
31 |
% |
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
-9 |
% |
Peer Index(1)
|
|
|
-22 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Peer Index included Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc. and Wyeth. |
Morgan Stanley also reviewed the price performance of
Johnson & Johnson common stock during various periods
ending on November 11, 2005, and the implied merger
consideration during those periods. The table below presents the
absolute share price of Johnson & Johnson common stock
over the period referenced above, and the implied price for each
share of Guidant common stock based on the merger consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Guidant | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
Price Based on | |
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
|
Merger | |
Period Ending on November 11, 2005 |
|
Common Stock Price | |
|
Consideration(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
November 11, 2005
|
|
$ |
60.92 |
|
|
$ |
63.28 |
|
November 1, 2005(2)
|
|
$ |
61.90 |
|
|
$ |
63.77 |
|
October 17, 2005(3)
|
|
$ |
63.00 |
|
|
$ |
64.31 |
|
1-Week Average
|
|
$ |
61.11 |
|
|
$ |
63.38 |
|
2-Week Average
|
|
$ |
61.35 |
|
|
$ |
63.49 |
|
1-Month Average
|
|
$ |
62.45 |
|
|
$ |
64.04 |
|
3-Month Average
|
|
$ |
63.07 |
|
|
$ |
64.34 |
|
6-Month Average
|
|
$ |
64.34 |
|
|
$ |
64.97 |
|
1-Year Average
|
|
$ |
64.76 |
|
|
$ |
65.17 |
|
Average Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 15, 2004(4)
|
|
$ |
65.14 |
|
|
$ |
65.36 |
|
52-Week High
|
|
$ |
69.40 |
|
|
$ |
67.46 |
|
52-Week Low
|
|
$ |
60.20 |
|
|
$ |
62.93 |
|
|
|
(1) |
$33.25 in cash plus a fixed exchange ratio of 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock per each share of
Guidant common stock. |
|
(2) |
Day prior to the Federal Trade Commissions conditional
approval of the transaction and Johnson &
Johnsons press release stating its belief that it had the
right to refuse to complete the merger in accordance with the
terms of the original merger agreement. |
38
|
|
(3) |
Day prior to Johnson & Johnsons third quarter
earnings call with analysts and its indication that it was
continuing to consider the alternatives under the
original merger agreement. |
|
(4) |
Date of first announcement that Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant had signed the original merger agreement. |
Guidant Comparable Company Analysis. Morgan Stanley
reviewed and analyzed certain public market trading multiples
for public companies similar to Guidant from a size and business
mix perspective. The multiples analyzed for these comparable
companies included, among others, the per share price divided by
2006 and 2007 estimated earnings per share. The earnings per
share estimates for Guidant were based on two projected
financial cases each prepared by Guidant management for the
fiscal years 2006 through 2015. In the first case, referred to
as Management Case 1, management assumed, among other
things, a more rapid recovery in the Guidant CRM franchise. In
the second case, referred to as Management Case 2,
management assumed, among other things, a less rapid recovery in
the Guidant CRM franchise. For the other publicly traded
corporations, the earnings per share estimates were based on
I/B/E/S consensus estimates (I/B/E/S refers to the database
provided by I/B/E/S International Inc. of equity research
analysts estimates of future earnings of publicly traded
companies). Morgan Stanley calculated these financial multiples
and ratios based on publicly available financial data as of
November 11, 2005. For purposes of this analysis, Morgan
Stanley identified the following three publicly traded
corporations:
|
|
|
|
|
Boston Scientific Corporation |
|
|
|
Medtronic, Inc. |
|
|
|
St. Jude Medical, Inc. |
A summary of the reference range of market trading multiples and
those multiples calculated for Guidant are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Guidant | |
|
Implied Guidant | |
|
|
|
|
Metric at $63.28 Per | |
|
Metric at $63.28 Per | |
|
|
Reference Range of | |
|
Share Based on | |
|
Share Based on | |
Metric |
|
Multiples | |
|
Management Case 1(1) | |
|
Management Case 2(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Price/ 2006 Earnings
|
|
|
13.6x - 28.9x |
|
|
|
34.3x |
|
|
|
34.3x |
|
Price/ 2007 Earnings
|
|
|
12.2x - 24.8x |
|
|
|
22.2x |
|
|
|
23.0x |
|
|
|
(1) |
$63.28 based on a merger consideration of $33.25 in cash plus a
fixed exchange ratio of 0.493 shares of Johnson &
Johnson common stock per each share of Guidant common stock and
a closing market price of Johnson & Johnson common
stock of $60.92 on November 11, 2005. |
Morgan Stanley calculated an implied valuation range for Guidant
by applying multiple ranges to the applicable Guidant earnings
per share statistics based on information provided by management
and other publicly available data. Based upon and subject to the
foregoing, Morgan Stanley calculated an implied valuation range
for Guidant common stock of $47.00 to $57.00 per share
based on median 2006 earnings per share estimates for Guidant by
equity research analysts that released updated estimates after
Guidant announced financial results for its fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2005 on November 7, 2005 (research
consensus estimates), and using a price divided by
estimated 2006 earnings multiple range of 20x to 24x. Morgan
Stanley also calculated an implied valuation range for Guidant
common stock of $37.00 to $44.00 per share based on the
2006 estimates from Management Case 1 and Management Case 2, and
using the same price divided by estimated 2006 earnings multiple
range of 20x to 24x. Morgan Stanley also calculated an implied
valuation range for Guidant common stock of $50.00 to
$62.00 per share based on the median 2007 research
consensus estimate, using a price divided by estimated 2007
earnings multiple range of 17x to 21x. Morgan Stanley also
calculated an implied valuation range for Guidant common stock
of $48.00 to $60.00 per share based on Management Case 1
2007 earnings and $47.00 to $58.00 based on Management Case 2
2007 earnings, using the same price divided by estimated 2007
earnings multiple range of 17x to 21x. Morgan Stanley noted that
the per share implied merger consideration for Guidant common
stock was $63.28 per share as of November 11, 2005.
39
Although the foregoing companies were compared to Guidant for
purposes of this analysis, Morgan Stanley noted that no company
utilized in this analysis is identical to Guidant because of
differences between the business mix, regulatory environment,
operations and other characteristics of Guidant and the
comparable companies. In evaluating the comparable companies,
Morgan Stanley made judgments and assumptions with regard to
industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory,
market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which
are beyond the control of Guidant, such as the impact of
competition on the business of Guidant and on the industry
generally, industry growth and the absence of any material
adverse change in the financial condition and prospects of
Guidant or the industry or in the markets generally.
Mathematical analysis (such as determining the average or
median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable
company data.
Johnson & Johnson Comparable Company Analysis.
Morgan Stanley reviewed and analyzed certain public market
trading multiples for public companies similar to
Johnson & Johnson from a size and business mix
perspective. The multiples analyzed for these comparable
companies included the per share price divided by 2006 and 2007
estimated earnings per share, and the per share price divided by
2006 estimated earnings per share divided by the long term
earnings per share growth rate. The earnings per share estimates
and long term earnings per share growth rates were based on
I/B/E/S consensus estimates. Morgan Stanley calculated these
financial multiples and ratios based on publicly available
financial data as of November 11, 2005. For purposes of
this analysis, Morgan Stanley identified the following four
publicly traded corporations:
|
|
|
|
|
Abbott Laboratories |
|
|
|
Eli Lilly and Company |
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc. |
|
|
|
Wyeth |
A summary of the reference range of market trading multiples and
those multiples calculated for Johnson & Johnson are
set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Range | |
|
Implied Johnson & | |
Metric |
|
of Multiples | |
|
Johnson Metric | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Price/ 2006 Earnings
|
|
|
10.9x - 16.4x |
|
|
|
16.0x |
|
Price/ 2007 Earnings
|
|
|
10.1x - 15.1x |
|
|
|
14.7x |
|
Price/ 2006 Earnings / Long Term Earnings Growth Rate
|
|
|
1.5x - 2.0x |
|
|
|
1.5x |
|
Morgan Stanley calculated an implied valuation range for
Johnson & Johnson by applying multiple ranges to the
applicable Johnson & Johnson operating statistics based
upon publicly available data. Based upon and subject to the
foregoing, Morgan Stanley calculated an implied valuation range
for Johnson & Johnson common stock of $53.00 to
$65.00 per share based on I/B/E/S 2006 consensus earnings
estimates using a price divided by estimated 2006 earnings
multiple range of 14x to 17x. Morgan Stanley also calculated an
implied valuation range for Johnson & Johnson common
stock of $54.00 to $66.00 per share based on
I/B/E/S 2007 consensus earnings estimates using a price
divided by estimated 2007 earnings multiple range of 13x to 16x.
Morgan Stanley noted that the price per share of
Johnson & Johnson common stock was $60.92 as of
November 11, 2005.
Although the foregoing companies were compared to
Johnson & Johnson for purposes of this analysis, Morgan
Stanley noted that no company utilized in this analysis is
identical to Johnson & Johnson because of differences
between the business mix, regulatory environment, operations and
other characteristics of Johnson & Johnson and the
comparable companies. In evaluating the comparable companies,
Morgan Stanley made judgments and assumptions with regard to
industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory,
market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which
are beyond the control of Johnson & Johnson, such as
the impact of competition on the business of Johnson &
Johnson and on the industry generally, industry growth and the
absence of any adverse material change in the financial
40
condition and prospects of Johnson & Johnson or the
industry or in the markets generally. Mathematical analysis
(such as determining the average or median) is not in itself a
meaningful method of using comparable company data.
Discounted Analyst Price Targets. Morgan Stanley reviewed
published estimates for Guidant by equity research analysts from
November 7, 2005 and November 8, 2005. Morgan Stanley
discounted the analyst price targets to November 11, 2005
at Guidants estimated cost of equity capital of
approximately 10%, based on the capital asset pricing model, a
theoretical financial model that is designed to estimate the
cost of equity capital of a particular company based on such
companys Beta. A companys Beta is a
metric designed to represent the systemic business risk and
financial risk of such company versus the overall market. Equity
research analyst price targets yielded an implied valuation of
Guidant common stock of $45.00 to $62.00. Morgan Stanley noted
that the per share implied merger consideration for Guidant
common stock was $63.28 per share as of November 11,
2005.
Morgan Stanley also reviewed published estimates for
Johnson & Johnson by equity research analysts from
October 26, 2005 to November 4, 2005. Morgan Stanley
discounted the analyst price targets to November 11, 2005
at Johnson & Johnsons estimated cost of equity
capital of approximately 10%, based on the capital asset pricing
model (as discussed above). Analyst price targets yielded an
implied valuation of Johnson & Johnsons common
stock of $68.00 to $73.00. Morgan Stanley noted that the price
per share of Johnson & Johnson common stock was $60.92
as of November 11, 2005.
Guidant Sum of the Parts Analysis. Morgan Stanley
performed an analysis, calculated as of December 31, 2005,
of the implied present value per share of Guidant common stock
based on Guidants projected future equity value using a
sum of the parts analysis for Guidant and based on Management
Case 1 and Management Case 2. To calculate
Guidants projected future equity value as of
December 31, 2007, Morgan Stanley analyzed Guidants
drug-eluting stent business and Guidants other businesses
separately. To calculate the projected future equity value of
Guidants drug-eluting stent business as of
December 31, 2007, Morgan Stanley performed a discounted
cash flow analysis of the estimated after-tax unlevered free
cash flow for fiscal years 2008-2015. Morgan Stanley estimated a
range of terminal values calculated in 2015 based on a range of
terminal growth rates of 3.5% to 4.5%. Morgan Stanley discounted
the unlevered free cash flow streams and the estimated terminal
value to an implied equity value as of December 31, 2007 at
a range of discount rates from 9.5% to 10.5%. The discount rates
utilized were chosen based upon an analysis of the weighted
average cost of capital of Guidant and other comparable
companies. To calculate the projected future equity value of
Guidants other businesses as of December 31, 2007,
Morgan Stanley multiplied Guidants 2008 earnings estimate
excluding the drug-eluting stent contribution by the next
calendar year multiple range of 20x to 24x. To calculate the
implied present value per share of Guidant common stock, Morgan
Stanley discounted the sum of the projected future equity values
of Guidants drug-eluting stent and other businesses as of
December 31, 2007 to a present value at a discount rate of
10.0%, which reflected the estimated cost of equity capital of
Guidant. Based on Management Case 1 projections and assumptions,
the sum of the parts analysis of Guidant yielded an implied
valuation range of $60.00 to $72.00 per share. Based on
Management Case 2 projections and assumptions, the sum of the
parts analysis of Guidant yielded an implied valuation range of
$55.00 to $67.00 per share. Morgan Stanley noted that the
per share implied merger consideration for Guidant common stock
was $63.28 per share as of November 11, 2005.
Guidant Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Morgan Stanley
performed a 10-year
discounted cash flow analysis for Guidant, calculated as of
December 31, 2005, of the estimated after-tax unlevered
free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2015, based on
Management Case 1 and Management Case 2. Morgan Stanley
estimated a range of terminal values calculated in 2015 based on
a range of terminal growth rates of 3.5% to 4.5%. Morgan Stanley
discounted the unlevered free cash flow streams and the
estimated terminal value to a present value at a range of
discount rates from 9.5% to 10.5%. The discount rates utilized
in this analysis were chosen based upon an analysis of the
weighted average cost of capital of Guidant and other comparable
companies. Based on the Management Case 1 projections and
assumptions, the discounted cash flow analysis of Guidant
yielded an implied valuation range of Guidant common stock of
$59.00 to $75.00 per share. Based on the Management Case 2
projections and assumptions, the
41
discounted cash flow analysis of Guidant yielded an implied
valuation range of Guidant common stock of $55.00 to
$70.00 per share. Morgan Stanley noted that the per share
merger consideration for Guidant common stock was
$63.28 per share as of November 11, 2005.
Pro Forma Analysis. Morgan Stanley analyzed the pro forma
impact of the merger on Johnson & Johnsons pro
forma earnings per share. Such analysis considered 2006 and 2007
earnings projections for both Guidant and Johnson &
Johnson. Guidants earnings projections were based on
Management Case 1, provided by Guidant management, and
Johnson & Johnsons earnings projections were
based on I/B/E/S earnings estimates. Morgan Stanley was not
provided internal financial information or projections for
Johnson & Johnson. Based on this analysis, Morgan
Stanley observed that the merger would result in earnings per
share dilution for Johnson & Johnson shareholders on a
GAAP basis in 2006 of 7.3%, before taking into account any
one-time charges or synergies. According to this analysis, the
pre-tax synergies required for the combined entity to realize no
earnings dilution in 2006 was $1,239 million. Including
pretax synergies of $500 million in 2006, the merger would
result in earnings per share dilution for Johnson &
Johnson shareholders of 4.4%. For 2007, Morgan Stanley observed
that the merger would result in earnings per share dilution for
Johnson & Johnson shareholders of 3.7%, before taking
into account any one-time charges or synergies. According to
this analysis, the pre-tax synergies required for the combined
entity to realize no earnings dilution in 2007 was
$675 million. Including pretax synergies of
$500 million in 2007, the merger would result in earnings
per share dilution for Johnson & Johnson shareholders
of 1.0%.
Morgan Stanley also analyzed the pro forma impact of the merger
on Johnson & Johnsons pro forma earnings per
share excluding the estimated impact of the amortization of
identifiable intangibles relating to Johnson &
Johnsons acquisition of Guidant. Based on this analysis,
Morgan Stanley observed that the merger would result in earnings
per share dilution for Johnson & Johnson shareholders
in 2006 of 3.3%, before taking into account any one-time charges
or synergies. According to this analysis, the pre-tax synergies
required for the combined entity to realize no earnings dilution
in 2006 was $580 million. Including pretax synergies of
$500 million in 2006, the merger would result in earnings
per share dilution for Johnson & Johnson shareholders
of 0.5%. For 2007, Morgan Stanley observed that the merger would
result in earnings per share dilution for Johnson &
Johnson shareholders of 0.1%, before taking into account any
one-time charges or synergies. According to this analysis, the
pre-tax synergies required for the combined entity to realize no
earnings dilution in 2007 was $17 million. Including pretax
synergies of $500 million in 2007, the merger would result
in earnings per share accretion for Johnson & Johnson
shareholders of 2.5%.
Morgan Stanley performed a variety of financial and comparable
analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion. The preparation
of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In
arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley considered the results
of all of its analyses as a whole and did not attribute any
particular weight to any analysis or factor considered.
Furthermore, Morgan Stanley believes that the summary provided
and the analyses described above must be considered as a whole
and that selecting any portion of the analyses, without
considering all of them, would create an incomplete view of the
process underlying Morgan Stanleys analysis and opinion.
As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any
particular analysis or combination of analyses described above
should not be taken to be the view of Morgan Stanley with
respect to the actual value of Guidant or Johnson &
Johnson or their respective common stock.
In performing its analyses, Morgan Stanley made numerous
assumptions with respect to the industry performance, general
business, regulatory and economic conditions and other matters,
many of which are beyond the control of Morgan Stanley, Guidant
or Johnson & Johnson. Any estimates contained in the
analysis of Morgan Stanley are not necessarily indicative of
future results or actual values, which may be significantly more
or less favorable than those suggested by such estimates. The
analyses performed were prepared solely as part of the analyses
of Morgan Stanley of the fairness of the merger consideration to
be received by holders of shares of Guidant common stock
pursuant to the amended and restated merger agreement from a
financial point of view, and were prepared in connection with
the delivery by Morgan
42
Stanley of its oral opinion on November 14, 2005 to the
Guidant board of directors, subsequently confirmed in writing as
of the same date.
The opinion of Morgan Stanley was one of the many factors taken
into consideration by the Guidant board of directors in making
its determination to approve the proposed transaction. The
foregoing summary describes the material analyses performed by
Morgan Stanley but does not purport to be a complete description
of the analyses performed by Morgan Stanley.
Morgan Stanley is an internationally recognized investment
banking and advisory firm. Morgan Stanley, as part of its
investment banking business, is continuously engaged in the
valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive
biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate,
estate and other purposes. In the ordinary course of its
business, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may from time to
time trade in the securities or the indebtedness of Guidant,
Johnson & Johnson and their affiliates for its own
account, the accounts of investment funds and other clients
under the management of Morgan Stanley and for the accounts of
its customers and accordingly, may at any time hold a long or
short position in such securities or indebtedness for any such
account. In the past, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates have
provided financial advisory and financing services for Guidant
and have received fees for the rendering of these services. In
addition, Morgan Stanley is a participant in a $500 million
credit facility for Guidant that expires in 2009.
Guidant has agreed to pay Morgan Stanley customary fees in
connection with the merger, a significant portion of which is
contingent upon the consummation of the merger. Guidant has also
agreed to reimburse Morgan Stanley for its fees and expenses
incurred in performing its services. In addition, Guidant has
agreed to indemnify Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their
respective directors, officers, agents and employees and each
person, if any, controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its
affiliates against certain liabilities and expenses, including
certain liabilities under the federal securities laws, related
to or arising out of Morgan Stanleys engagement and any
related transactions.
Update on Guidants Business
In September 2005, Guidants domestic implantable
defibrillator implant rate, an indicator of Guidants
progress in regaining market share, averaged approximately 80%
of the implant rate experienced by Guidant in March through May
2005 (prior to the recent recalls and related publicity).
Following additional product disclosures and related publicity
in late September and early October, the implant rate declined
to approximately 70% in October of 2005 and has increased
somewhat since then. Preliminary implant rates for the month of
December to date, while not final, have increased and
approximate the rate Guidant experienced in September.
Guidant management currently believes that sales and earnings
for the fourth quarter of 2005 will be between $790-$820 million
and $0.17-$0.23 per share, respectively. This earnings per share
range includes legal expenses associated with product recalls
and merger activities and other one-time adjustments totaling up
to $0.08 per share.
Interests of Guidant Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of the Guidant board of
directors with respect to the merger, Guidant shareholders
should be aware that certain executive officers and directors of
Guidant have certain interests in the merger that may be
different from, or in addition to, the interests of Guidant
shareholders generally. The Guidant board of directors was aware
of the interests described below and considered them, among
other matters, when adopting the amended and restated merger
agreement and recommending that Guidant shareholders vote to
approve the amended and restated merger agreement. These
interests are summarized below.
43
Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards. Under the
stock option plans adopted by vote of Guidant shareholders in
1994, 1996 and 1998, respectively, all outstanding options to
purchase Guidant common stock issued under the option plans
prior to the date of the original merger agreement, including
those held by executive officers and directors, became fully
exercisable upon receipt of shareholder approval of the original
merger agreement. Based upon options outstanding as of
April 27, 2005, the date of the first special meeting of
Guidant shareholders, options held by Guidants executive
officers and directors relating to 794,175 shares of
Guidant common stock vested upon receipt of shareholder approval
of the original merger agreement. In addition, all restrictions
imposed on restricted stock grants granted under the option
plans prior to the date of the original merger agreement,
including those held by Guidant executive officers and
directors, immediately lapsed upon receipt of shareholder
approval of the original merger agreement. Based upon grants
outstanding as of April 27, 2005, restricted stock grants
held by Guidants executive officers and directors relating
to 515,250 shares of Guidant common stock had their
restrictions lapse upon receipt of the shareholder approval of
the original merger agreement. Please see the table below for
further details relating to options and grants of restricted
stock held by Guidants executives and directors that were
subject to accelerated vesting or lapsing of restrictions.
The following table sets forth, as of April 27, 2005, the
number of shares subject to options that vested upon receipt of
shareholder approval of the original merger agreement held by
Guidants executives and directors and the weighted average
exercise prices of those options and the number of shares
subject to grants of restricted stock held by Guidants
executives and directors that had their restrictions lapse upon
receipt of shareholder approval of the original merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Subject | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Grants of Restricted | |
|
|
Number of Shares Subject | |
|
Weighted Average Exercise | |
|
Stock that had their | |
Name |
|
to Options that Vested | |
|
Price per Share($) | |
|
Restrictions Lapse | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Cornelius
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then non-executive Chairman* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maurice A. Cox
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy-Ann DeParle
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrique C. Falla
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Grobstein
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kristina M. Johnson
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.B. King
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kevin Moore
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Novitch
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack A. Shaw
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene L. Step
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Effective November 15, 2005, Mr. Cornelius was appointed
Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
** |
Mr. Dollens retired effective November 15, 2005. |
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Subject | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Grants of Restricted | |
|
|
Number of Shares Subject | |
|
Weighted Average Exercise | |
|
Stock that had their | |
Name |
|
to Options that Vested | |
|
Price per Share($) | |
|
Restrictions Lapse | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruedi E. Wager
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August M. Watanabe
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald W. Dollens**
|
|
|
109,350 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
84,700 |
|
|
former Director, President
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
46,700 |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
50,900 |
|
|
President, Cardiac Rhythm Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana G. Mead, Jr.***
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
50,900 |
|
|
former President, Vascular Intervention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guido J. Neels****
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
61,800 |
|
|
former Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Guidant Executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers (12 People)
|
|
|
429,175 |
|
|
|
46.93 |
|
|
|
220,250 |
|
|
|
*** |
Mr. Mead served until May 12, 2005. |
|
|
**** |
Mr. Neels retired as Chief Operating Officer effective
November 30, 2005 and is serving as special advisor to the
Chairman until December 31, 2005. |
Under the terms of the amended and restated merger agreement,
all outstanding options to purchase Guidant common stock
existing at the time of the completion of the merger, including
those held by executive officers and directors, will be assumed
by Johnson & Johnson and will become options to
purchase Johnson & Johnson common stock with
appropriate adjustments to be made to the number of shares and
the exercise price under such options based on the value of the
merger consideration at the time of the completion of the
merger. For a more complete description of the treatment of
Guidant stock options, see Effect on Awards
Outstanding Under Guidant Stock Incentive Plans.
Under the terms of the amended and restated merger agreement,
each former restricted share will be converted into
(i) $33.25 in cash and (ii) 0.493 unrestricted shares
of Johnson & Johnson common stock.
Change in Control Plan. Each of Guidants
executive officers (other than Mr. Cornelius) is a
participant in Guidants Change In Control Severance Pay
Plan for Select Employees, referred to in this proxy statement/
prospectus as the change in control plan.
Under the change in control plan, upon a change in
control of Guidant, an executive officer is entitled to
severance payments and other benefits (as summarized below) if
the executive officers employment is terminated within two
years following a change in control by the Company without
cause or by the employee for good reason
(each as defined in the change in control plan), or if the
executive officers employment is terminated by the
executive officer for any reason within the
30-day period beginning
on the one year anniversary of a change in control (other than a
change in control resulting from Guidants entering into a
definitive agreement or Guidants board adopting a
resolution relating to a change in control, each as further
described below). Within 15 days of the eligible
termination, Guidant must pay the executive officer a single
lump-sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of the
executive officers annual base salary at the time of
termination (or, if greater, at the time of the change in
control) and the greater of the executive officers target
incentive bonus for the year of the termination or the incentive
bonus earned for the year immediately prior to the change in
control.
45
Under the change in control plan, in general a change in
control of Guidant occurs upon the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of 20% of
more of Guidants voting shares |
|
|
|
shareholder approval of certain business transactions, including
transactions such as the merger |
|
|
|
Guidants entering into a definitive agreement which, if
consummated, would result in a change in control and |
|
|
|
the Guidant board of directors adopting a resolution to the
effect that a change in control has occurred. |
Guidants entering into the original merger agreement and
the amended and restated merger agreement each constituted a
change in control under the change in control plan. Shareholder
approval of the original merger agreement constituted and
shareholder approval of the amended and restated merger
agreement as well as the completion of the merger will each
constitute a change in control for purposes of establishing the
30-day period
commencing on the one year anniversary of a change in control
during which an executive officer may terminate his or her
employment for any reason and be entitled to severance payments
(as described above).
If an executive officers employment terminates and he or
she is entitled to receive severance payments under the change
in control plan, the executive officer would also receive:
|
|
|
|
|
continued welfare benefits at Guidants sole expense for
three years following the date of termination at the level for
which the executive officer was eligible at the time of the
termination of employment or immediately prior to the change in
control, whichever provides coverage more favorable to the
executive officer |
|
|
|
three years of additional age and service credit for pension
purposes and the crediting of severance benefits as pensionable
earnings pro-rata over the three-year severance period |
|
|
|
to the extent not already vested and exercisable, immediate
acceleration of any stock options or other stock-based awards |
|
|
|
payment of any accrued bonus (or, if greater, the pro-rata
target bonus for the year of the termination) and any deferred
compensation (unless the obligation to pay such amounts is
subject to payment under a grantor (i.e., rabbi)
trust) |
|
|
|
outplacement services and, if applicable, relocation
expenses and |
|
|
|
a gross-up for any
golden parachute excise tax that may be payable by
the executive under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code, and any income and employment withholding taxes on the
gross-up payment, with
respect to the severance payments and other benefits due to the
executive officer (whether under the change in control plan or
otherwise). |
Ronald W. Dollens, former President and Chief Executive
Officer of Guidant, has informed Guidant that he has agreed to
waive any severance payments and other benefits he would be
entitled to in connection with the merger under the change in
control plan. The terms of James M. Cornelius
appointment as Chairman and interim Chief Executive Officer of
Guidant provide that he shall not be entitled to any severance
payments or any other benefits in connection with the merger
under the change in control plan.
Change in Control Letter Agreements. In connection
with the execution of the original merger agreement,
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant entered into letter
agreements with six Guidant executive officers, including
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr., that modify each such
executive officers rights and obligations under the change
in control plan.
The letter agreements modify the change in control plan
definitions as follows: (i) the definition of change
in control was amended to exclude from the definition the
execution of a definitive agreement which, if consummated, would
result in a change in control, and to exclude from the
definition the adoption by Guidants board of directors of
a resolution to the effect that a change in control has
occurred, and the definition is further modified to provide that
a change in control will occur upon consummation of
46
certain business transactions, including transactions such as
the merger, rather than upon shareholder approval of such
transactions; (ii) the definition of covered
termination was modified to eliminate the executive
officers ability to receive change in control plan
benefits upon a voluntary termination of employment for any
reason (i.e., without good reason) during the
30-day period beginning
on the first anniversary of the merger; (iii) the
definition of good reason was modified generally to
limit the circumstances that will constitute good reason for
termination of employment; and (iv) the definition of
cause was modified generally to expand the
circumstances that constitute cause for termination of
employment.
Under the terms of each of the letter agreements, if the
executive officer remains in continuous employment with Guidant
through the expiration of the two-year period immediately
following consummation of the merger (for purposes of this
paragraph, the second anniversary), he will receive
a bonus in an amount equal to 50% of the cash severance payment
that otherwise would have been payable in accordance with the
terms of the change in control plan had a covered termination of
employment occurred immediately following consummation of the
merger (for purposes of this section, the first retention
bonus). If the executive officer remains in continuous
employment with Guidant following the second anniversary through
the expiration of the three-year period immediately following
consummation of the merger (for purposes of this paragraph, the
third anniversary), he will receive an additional
bonus in an amount equal to the first retention bonus (for
purposes of this section, the second retention
bonus). In addition, if during the period commencing
immediately following the second anniversary and ending on the
third anniversary, the executive officer is involuntarily
terminated by Guidant other than for cause (as such term is
defined in the change in control plan, as modified by the letter
agreement), the executive officer will be entitled to receive
the second retention bonus following termination, plus the
non-cash benefits that would have been otherwise payable
pursuant to the change in control plan had such termination
occurred during the two-year period immediately following
consummation of the merger. Payment of the first and second
retention bonuses is contingent upon execution of a general
waiver and release of claims.
The letter agreements do not alter the provisions of the change
in control plan that provide benefits upon a covered termination
of employment (taking into account the modifications as set
forth in the letter agreements of certain definitions under the
change in control plan as described above) before the second
anniversary of the merger. The letter agreements also provide
that, if payment of the first or second retention bonus results
in the imposition of an excise tax under Section 4999 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the provisions of
the change in control plan providing for additional payments in
respect of such taxes will apply.
Pursuant to the letter agreements, Guidant also agrees prior to
completion of the merger not to terminate the executive officers
other than for cause (as such term is defined in the change in
control plan and as modified by the letter agreements), except
if such termination is effectuated prior to consummation of the
merger in connection with a specified divestiture of assets. In
addition, individuals who are parties to the letter agreements
are not permitted to terminate their employment for good reason
(as such term is defined in the change in control plan and as
modified by the letter agreements) during the period prior to
consummation of the merger.
47
The following chart sets forth, for each of Guidants
executive officers, the estimated value of the cash severance
pay and other benefits due the executive officer (based on
levels of pay and other circumstances as of December 1,
2005), excluding the amount of any excise tax
gross-up and the value
of any stock options and other stock based awards that vested or
for which restrictions lapsed (See Stock
Options and Other Stock-Based Awards), if applicable, if
the executive officer terminated employment in a covered
termination under the change in control plan (as modified,
if applicable, by the letter agreements described above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Payment and Benefit Amounts ($) | |
|
|
| |
James M. Cornelius
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Chairman and interim Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Ronald W. Dollens
|
|
|
** |
|
|
former Director, President
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
2,675,795 |
|
|
Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
2,313,837 |
|
|
President, Cardiac Rhythm Management |
|
|
|
|
Dana G. Mead, Jr.
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
former President, Vascular Intervention |
|
|
|
|
Guido J. Neels
|
|
|
4,048,656 |
**** |
|
former Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
Other Guidant Executive Officers (11 People)
|
|
|
17,245,297 |
|
|
|
* |
The terms of Mr. Cornelius appointment as Chairman
and interim Chief Executive Officer of Guidant provide that he
shall not be entitled to any severance payments or any other
benefits in connection with the merger under the change in
control plan. |
|
|
** |
Mr. Dollens has informed Guidant that he has agreed to
waive any severance payments and other benefits to which he
would be entitled in connection with the merger under the change
in control plan. |
|
|
*** |
Mr. Mead no longer serves as an executive officer and is
not entitled to any severance payments or other benefits to
which he would have been entitled in connection with the merger
under the change in control plan. |
|
|
**** |
Pursuant to the terms of the change in control plan, Guidant has
deemed Mr. Neels retirement a covered termination of
employment under the change in control plan and he will receive
a payment of $4,048,656 in January of 2006. |
The aggregate value of the first and second retention bonuses
(based on levels of pay as of December 1, 2005) that would
be payable to the Guidant executive officers subject to the
letter agreements described above would be approximately
$7,892,460, including $1,868,304 to Mr. McCoy, assuming all
the executive officers were to become eligible for such payments
and assuming further that no excise tax
gross-up is payable. In
addition, another executive officer of Guidant entered into a
letter agreement providing for payments of up to $100,000 over a
period of time following the merger.
Resignation of Ronald W. Dollens as Director, President
and Chief Executive Officer and Appointment of James M.
Cornelius as Chairman and interim Chief Executive
Officer. Effective November 15, 2005, Ronald W.
Dollens retired as Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Guidant and James M. Cornelius, who previously served
as non-executive Chairman of the Guidant board of directors, was
appointed Chairman and interim Chief Executive Officer of
Guidant. Pursuant to the terms of his appointment,
Mr. Cornelius will receive an annual salary of $900,000 and
a bonus of $1.5 million payable upon the completion of the
merger.
48
Indemnification and Insurance. The amended and
restated merger agreement provides that all rights to
indemnification and exculpation from liabilities for acts or
omissions occurring at or prior to the effective time of the
merger existing in favor of current or former directors or
officers of Guidant under the Guidant amended articles of
incorporation, by-laws or indemnification agreements will be
assumed by the surviving corporation in the merger and will
continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms
following completion of the merger.
The amended and restated merger agreement also provides that for
six years after the effective time of the merger,
Johnson & Johnson will maintain directors and
officers liability insurance for acts or omissions
occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger,
covering each person who was, as of the date of the amended and
restated merger agreement, covered by Guidants
directors and officers liability insurance, on terms
no less favorable than those in effect as of the date of the
original merger agreement.
Form of the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the amended and restated
merger agreement and in accordance with Indiana law, at the
effective time of the merger, Shelby Merger Sub, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson and a party to the
amended and restated merger agreement, will merge with and into
Guidant. Guidant will survive the merger as a wholly owned
Indiana subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
Merger Consideration
At the effective time of the merger, each share of Guidant
common stock (other than shares owned by Guidant,
Johnson & Johnson and Shelby Merger Sub) will be
converted into the right to receive a combination of
(i) $33.25 in cash and (ii) 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. The number of shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued in the
merger for each share of Guidant common stock is now fixed.
Accordingly, shareholders of Guidant may receive more or less
value depending on fluctuations in the price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock.
Holders of Guidant common stock will receive cash for any
fractional shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock
they otherwise would have received in the merger. Each Guidant
shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a
fraction of a share of Johnson & Johnson common stock
will receive cash in an amount equal to the product obtained by
multiplying (1) the fractional share interest to which such
holder would otherwise be entitled by (2) the closing price
for a share of Johnson & Johnson common stock on the
closing date of the merger as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange Composite Transactions Tape.
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that, if
between the date of the original merger agreement and the
effective time of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the outstanding shares of Johnson & Johnson common
stock are changed into a different number of shares or a
different class, by reason of the occurrence or record date of
any stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification,
recapitalization, split, combination, exchange of shares or
similar transaction |
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson declares or pays cash dividends in
any fiscal quarter in excess of 200% or the amount of regular
quarterly dividends paid by Johnson & Johnson prior to
the date of the new agreement or |
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson engages in any spin off or split off |
then, in any such case, the exchange ratio will be appropriately
adjusted to reflect such action.
Ownership of Johnson & Johnson Following the
Merger
Based on the number of outstanding shares of Guidant common
stock on the record date and the number of outstanding shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock on December 22,
2005, we anticipate
49
that Guidant shareholders will own approximately 5% of the
outstanding shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock
following the merger.
Conversion of Shares; Procedures for Exchange of
Certificates; Fractional Shares
The conversion of Guidant common stock into the right to the
merger consideration will occur automatically at the effective
time of the merger. As soon as reasonably practicable after the
completion of the merger, EquiServe Trust Company, the exchange
agent and paying agent, will send a letter of transmittal to
each former holder of record of shares of Guidant common stock.
The transmittal letter will contain instructions for obtaining
the merger consideration, including the shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock, the cash portion of the
merger consideration and cash for any fractional shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock, in exchange for shares
of Guidant common stock. Guidant shareholders should not return
stock certificates with the enclosed proxy.
After the effective time of the merger, each certificate that
previously represented shares of Guidant common stock will no
longer be outstanding, will be automatically canceled and
retired, will cease to exist and will represent only the right
to receive the merger consideration as described above.
Until holders of certificates previously representing Guidant
common stock have surrendered those certificates to the exchange
agent for exchange, those holders will not receive dividends or
distributions on the Johnson & Johnson common stock
into which such shares have been converted with a record date
after the effective time of the merger and will not receive cash
for any fractional shares of Johnson & Johnson common
stock. When holders surrender such certificates, they will
receive any dividends with a record date after the effective
time of the merger and a payment date on or prior to the date of
surrender and any cash for fractional shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock, in each case without
interest.
In the event of a transfer of ownership of Guidant common stock
that is not registered in the transfer records of Guidant,
payment of the merger consideration as described above will be
made to a person other than the person in whose name the
certificate so surrendered is registered if:
|
|
|
|
|
such certificate is properly endorsed or otherwise is in proper
form for transfer and |
|
|
|
the person requesting such exchange pays any transfer or other
taxes resulting from the payment of the merger consideration as
described above to a person other than the registered holder of
such certificate. |
No fractional shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock
will be issued to any Guidant shareholder upon surrender of
certificates previously representing Guidant common stock. Each
Guidant shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to
receive a fraction of a share of Johnson & Johnson
common stock will receive cash in an amount equal to the product
obtained by multiplying (1) the fractional share interest
to which such holder would otherwise be entitled by (2) the
closing price for a share of Johnson & Johnson common
stock on the closing date of the merger as reported on the New
York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Tape.
Effective Time of the Merger
The merger will become effective upon the filing of the
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State
of Indiana or such later time as is agreed upon by
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant and specified in the
certificate of merger. The filing of the certificate of merger
will occur as soon as practicable after satisfaction or waiver
of the conditions to the completion of the merger described in
the amended and restated merger agreement.
50
Stock Exchange Listing of Johnson & Johnson Common
Stock
It is a condition to the completion of the merger that the
Johnson & Johnson common stock issuable to:
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant shareholders in the merger and |
|
|
|
holders of options to acquire shares of Guidant common stock,
which will be converted into options to acquire shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock |
have been approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange,
subject to official notice of issuance.
Delisting and Deregistration of Guidant Common Stock
If the merger is completed, Guidant common stock will be
delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock
Exchange and will be deregistered under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
The following is a summary of the material United States federal
income tax consequences of the merger to United States Holders
(as defined below) of Guidant common stock whose shares are
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration
under the merger. This summary is based on the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, applicable Treasury Regulations, and
administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, each as in
effect as of the date hereof, all of which may change, possibly
with retroactive effect. This summary assumes that shares of
Guidant common stock are held as capital assets. It does not
address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to
particular holders in light of their personal circumstances, or
to other types of holders, including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions |
|
|
|
broker-dealers |
|
|
|
traders |
|
|
|
expatriates |
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations |
|
|
|
Non-United States Holders (as defined below) |
|
|
|
persons who are investors in a pass-through entity |
|
|
|
persons who are subject to alternative minimum tax |
|
|
|
persons who hold their shares of common stock as a position in a
straddle or as part of a hedging or
conversion transaction |
|
|
|
persons deemed to sell their shares of common stock under the
constructive sale provisions of the Internal Revenue Code |
|
|
|
persons that have a functional currency other than the United
States dollar or |
|
|
|
persons who acquired their shares of our common stock upon the
exercise of stock options or otherwise as compensation. |
In addition, this discussion does not address any state, local
or foreign tax consequences of the merger.
We urge each holder of Guidant common stock to consult his or
her own tax advisor regarding the United States federal income
or other tax consequences of the merger to such holder.
51
For purposes of this discussion, a United States
Holder means a holder of Guidant common stock who is:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States |
|
|
|
a corporation or an entity treated as a corporation for United
States federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or
under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision
thereof |
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source or |
|
|
|
a trust (a) the administration over which a United States
court can exercise primary supervision and (b) all of the
substantial decisions of which one or more United States persons
have the authority to control and certain other trusts
considered United States persons for United States federal
income tax purposes. |
A Non-United States Holder is a holder other than a
United States Holder.
If a partnership holds Guidant common stock, the tax treatment
of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the
status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If
you are a partner of a partnership holding Guidant common stock,
you should consult your tax advisor regarding the tax
consequences of the merger.
|
|
|
Consequences of the Merger |
The receipt of the merger consideration in exchange for shares
of Guidant common stock pursuant to the merger will be a taxable
transaction for United States federal income tax purposes. In
general, a United States Holder who receives the merger
consideration in exchange for shares of Guidant common stock
pursuant to the merger will recognize capital gain or loss for
United States federal income tax purposes equal to the
difference, if any, between (i) the fair market value of
the Johnson & Johnson common stock as of the effective
time of the merger and the cash received and (ii) the
holders adjusted tax basis in the shares of Guidant common
stock exchanged for the merger consideration pursuant to the
merger. Any such gain or loss would be long-term capital gain or
loss if the holding period for the shares of Guidant common
stock exceeded one year. Long-term capital gains of noncorporate
taxpayers generally are taxable at a maximum rate of 15%.
Capital gains of corporate shareholders generally are taxable at
the regular tax rates applicable to corporations.
A United States Holders aggregate tax basis in
Johnson & Johnson common stock received in the merger
will equal the fair market value of such stock as of the
effective time of the merger. The holding period of the
Johnson & Johnson common stock received in the merger
will begin on the day after the merger.
Backup withholding may apply to payments made in connection with
the merger. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a
holder who (1) furnishes a correct taxpayer identification
number and certifies that it is not subject to backup
withholding on the substitute
Form W-9 or
successor form included in the letter of transmittal to be
delivered to holders of our common stock prior to completion of
the merger, (2) provides a certification of foreign status
on the applicable Form W-8 (typically Form W-8BEN) or
appropriate successor form or (3) is otherwise exempt from
backup withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against
such holders United States federal income tax liability
provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.
THE FOREGOING DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF
THE POTENTIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE MERGER, AND IS
NOT TAX ADVICE. THEREFORE, HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK ARE URGED
TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY
OF FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
52
Regulatory Matters
United States Antitrust. Under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and related
rules, certain transactions, including the merger, may not be
completed until notifications have been given and information
furnished to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice
and the Federal Trade Commission and the specified waiting
period requirements have been satisfied. Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant filed Notification and Report Forms with the
Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and the Federal
Trade Commission on January 18 and 19, 2005, respectively.
On November 2, 2005, the Federal Trade Commission
terminated the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act
and issued a consent order conditionally approving the merger.
The consent order became final on December 21, 2005. The
Federal Trade Commissions consent order requires
Johnson & Johnson to divest, license or terminate
certain rights or assets of its businesses in drug-eluting
stents, endoscopic vessel harvesting products and anastomotic
assist devices. Johnson & Johnson and Guidant do not
anticipate further review by the Federal Trade Commission.
Europe. Both Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant conduct business in member states of the European Union.
Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004, as amended, and
accompanying regulations require notification to and approval by
the European Commission of specific mergers or acquisitions
involving parties with worldwide sales and individual European
Union sales exceeding specified thresholds before these mergers
and acquisitions can be implemented. Johnson & Johnson
formally notified the European Commission of the merger on
March 15, 2005. On August 25, 2005, the European
Commission issued a decision under the EC merger regulation
declaring the merger compatible with the Common Market. In
connection with the European Commissions decision,
Johnson & Johnson agreed to divest its Cordis steerable
guidewires business in Europe, the Guidant Endovascular
Solutions business in Europe and to pursue a remedy relating to
the companies endoscopic vessel harvesting products.
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant do not anticipate further
review by the European Commission.
General. It is possible that any of the
governmental entities with which filings have been made may seek
additional regulatory concessions or states or private parties
may commence litigation to prevent the completion of the merger.
There can be no assurance that:
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson or Guidant will be able to satisfy or
comply with such conditions |
|
|
|
compliance or non-compliance will not have adverse consequences
on Johnson & Johnson after completion of the
merger or |
|
|
|
such litigation, if any, will be resolved favorably by
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant. |
See The Amended and Restated Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger.
Dissenters Rights
Under Indiana law, holders of Guidant common stock will not be
entitled to dissenters rights in connection with the
merger because shares of Guidant common stock are traded on the
New York Stock Exchange.
Guidants Rights Agreement
The Guidant board of directors adopted a shareholder rights plan
on December 15, 2004 and adopted an amendment thereto on
November 14, 2005. To implement the shareholder rights
plan, on December 14, 2004, Guidant declared a dividend of
one preferred share purchase right, which we refer to in this
prospectus/proxy statement as a right, for each
outstanding share of Guidant common stock to shareholders of
record at the close of business on December 27, 2004. Each
right entitles the registered holder to purchase from Guidant a
unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of
Series A Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price
of $325 per unit, subject to adjustment.
53
The rights are not exercisable until the earlier of:
|
|
|
|
|
10 business days following a public announcement that a person
or group has acquired 15% or more of the outstanding shares of
Guidant common stock (thereby becoming an acquiring
person under the shareholder rights plan) or |
|
|
|
10 business days following the commencement of a tender offer or
exchange offer that would result in a person or group becoming
an acquiring person. |
The date in which the rights are exercisable as described above
is referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the
distribution date. The rights expire at the earlier
of (1) the effective time of the merger or (2) at
5:00 P.M. (New York City time) on December 15, 2014,
unless such date is extended or the rights are earlier redeemed
or exchanged.
Until the distribution date, the rights will be evidenced only
by shares of Guidant common stock and will be transferred with
and only with such common stock. After the distribution date,
rights certificates will be mailed to holders of record of the
Guidant common stock as of the close of business on the
distribution date.
In the event that a person becomes an acquiring person, subject
to certain exceptions for offers that the independent directors
of the Guidant board of directors determine to be fair and not
inadequate and to otherwise be in the best interests of Guidant
and its shareholders, each holder of a right other than the
acquiring person will have the right to receive Guidant common
stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of
the right. In the event that, at any time following the date on
which a person becomes an acquiring person, Guidant engages in
certain types of merger or other business combination
transactions, each holder of a right other than the acquiring
person will have the right to receive common stock of the
acquiring company having a value equal to two times the exercise
price of the right. At any time after a person becomes an
acquiring person and prior to their acquisition of 50% or more
of the outstanding Guidant common stock, the Guidant board of
directors may exchange the rights (other than rights owned by
the acquiring person), in whole or in part, for one share of
Guidant common stock, or one one-thousandth of a share of the
Series A Participating Preferred Stock, per right (subject
to adjustment). At any time until 10 business days following the
date on which a person becomes an acquiring person, Guidant may
redeem the rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of
$0.001 per right.
Pursuant to the terms of the shareholder rights plan, as
amended, the execution of each of the original merger agreement
and the amended and restated merger agreement and the
consummation of the merger are exempt from the effects of the
plan.
Guidant Employee Benefits Matters
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
for a period of 12 months following the merger, the
employees of Guidant and its subsidiaries who remain in the
employment of the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries
will receive employee benefits that in the aggregate are
substantially comparable to the employee benefits provided to
such employees immediately prior to the merger |
|
|
|
for the six-month period immediately following the expiration of
the 12-month period
following the merger, the employees of Guidant and its
subsidiaries who remain in the employment of the surviving
corporation and its subsidiaries will receive employee benefits
that in the aggregate are substantially comparable to either the
employee benefits provided to such employees immediately prior
to the merger or the employee benefits provided to similarly
situated employees of Johnson & Johnson and its
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
for a period of not less than 18 months following the
merger, employees of Guidant and its subsidiaries who remain in
the employment of the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries
will receive base salary or wage rates that are not less than
those in effect for such employees immediately prior to the
merger, except that neither Johnson & Johnson nor the
surviving corporation nor any of their subsidiaries will have
any obligation to issue, or adopt any plans or arrangements
providing for the issuance of, shares of capital stock,
warrants, options, stock |
54
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation rights or other rights in respect of any shares of
capital stock of any entity or any securities convertible or
exchangeable into such shares pursuant to any such plans or
arrangements and |
|
|
|
no plans or arrangements of Guidant or any of its subsidiaries
providing for the issuance of rights in the capital stock of
Guidant or otherwise will be taken into account in determining
whether employee benefits are substantially comparable in the
aggregate. |
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed that nothing
contained in the amended and restated merger agreement should be
construed as requiring, and Guidant should take no action that
would have the effect of requiring, Johnson & Johnson
or the surviving corporation to continue any specific employee
benefit plans or to continue the employment of any specific
person.
Johnson & Johnson has also agreed that, for the
following purposes but not otherwise under the employee benefit
plans of Johnson & Johnson, it will cause the surviving
corporation to recognize the service of each Guidant employee
who remains employed by the surviving corporation as if such
service had been performed with Johnson & Johnson:
|
|
|
|
|
for purposes of vesting (but not benefit accrual) under
Johnson & Johnsons defined benefit pension plan |
|
|
|
for purposes of eligibility for vacation under
Johnson & Johnsons vacation program |
|
|
|
for purposes of eligibility and participation under any health
or welfare plan maintained by Johnson & Johnson (other
than any post-employment health or post-employment welfare plan) |
|
|
|
for purposes of eligibility for the company matching
contribution under Johnson & Johnsons 401(k)
savings plan (it being understood that each such employee who
was participating in Guidants 401(k) savings plan
immediately prior to becoming eligible to participate in
Johnson & Johnsons 401(k) savings plan shall be
immediately eligible for the company matching contribution under
Johnson & Johnsons 401(k) savings plan) and |
|
|
|
unless covered under another arrangement with or of Guidant, for
benefit accrual purposes under Johnson & Johnsons
severance plan (but in the case of such severance and with
respect to each plan or program that is the subject of any of
the four bullet points above, solely to the extent that
Johnson & Johnson makes such plan or program available
to employees of the surviving corporation, it being
Johnson & Johnsons current intention to do so). |
With respect to any welfare plan maintained by
Johnson & Johnson in which such employees are eligible
to participate after the merger, the amended and restated merger
agreement provides that Johnson & Johnson will, and
will cause the surviving corporation to:
|
|
|
|
|
waive all limitations as to preexisting conditions and
exclusions with respect to participation and coverage
requirements applicable to such employees to the extent such
conditions and exclusions were satisfied or did not apply to
such employees under the welfare plans maintained by Guidant
prior to the merger and |
|
|
|
provide each such employee with credit for any co-payments and
deductibles paid prior to the effective time in satisfying any
analogous deductible or
out-of-pocket
requirements to the extent applicable under any such plan. |
Subject to the requirements discussed in this section,
Johnson & Johnson has agreed to assume all obligations
under and honor in accordance with their terms, and to cause the
surviving corporation to honor in accordance with their terms,
each Guidant benefit plan and agreement. Johnson &
Johnson has acknowledged and agreed that the merger will
constitute a change in control within the meaning of
those plans and agreements which include a definition of such
(or substantially similar) concept, except to the extent
otherwise agreed between Johnson & Johnson and
individual employees of Guidant and its subsidiaries.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the amended and restated merger
agreement provides that the provisions above relating to
employee matters shall apply only with respect to such employees
who are
55
covered under Guidant benefit plans that are maintained
primarily for the benefit of employees employed in the United
States (including such employees regularly employed outside the
United States to the extent they participate in such Guidant
benefit plans). With respect to such employees not described in
the preceding sentence, Johnson & Johnson will, and
will cause the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries to,
comply with all applicable laws, directives and regulations
relating to employees and employee benefits matters applicable
to such employees.
Effect on Awards Outstanding Under Guidant Stock Incentive
Plans
Under the amended and restated merger agreement, the Guidant
board of directors must adopt, as soon as practicable, such
resolutions or take such other actions as may be required to
effect the following:
|
|
|
|
|
each Guidant stock option outstanding immediately prior to the
merger shall be amended and converted into an option to acquire,
on the same terms and conditions as were applicable under such
Guidant stock option, the number of shares of Johnson &
Johnson common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share)
equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
the product of (A) the number of shares of Guidant common
stock subject to such Guidant stock option and
(B) 0.493 and |
|
|
|
the product of (A) the number of shares of Guidant common
stock subject to such Guidant stock option and (B) the
quotient obtained by dividing (x) $33.25 by (y) the
volume weighted average trading price of Johnson &
Johnson common stock for the 15 trading days ending three
trading days prior to the consummation of the merger at an
exercise price per share of Johnson & Johnson common
stock (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to the
quotient obtained by dividing (1) the aggregate exercise
price for the shares of Guidant common stock subject to such
Guidant stock option by (2) the aggregate number of shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be subject to such
Guidant stock option after giving effect to the adjustments in
this and the two preceding bullet points and |
|
|
|
make such other changes to the Guidant stock incentive plans as
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant may agree are appropriate
to give effect to the merger. |
The amended and restated merger agreement further provides that
the Guidant board of directors must adopt, as soon as
practicable, such resolutions or take such other actions as may
be required to provide that with respect to the Guidant employee
stock purchase plan:
|
|
|
|
|
participants will not increase their payroll deductions or
purchase elections from those in effect on the date of the
original merger agreement |
|
|
|
each participants outstanding right to purchase shares of
Guidant common stock under the Guidant employee stock purchase
plan will terminate on the day immediately prior to the day on
which merger occurs, provided that all amounts allocated to each
participants account under the Guidant employee stock
purchase plan as of such date will thereupon be used to purchase
from Guidant whole shares of Guidant common stock at the
applicable price determined under the terms of the Guidant
employee stock purchase plan for the then outstanding offering
periods using such date as the final purchase date for each such
offering period and |
|
|
|
the Guidant employee stock purchase plan will terminate
immediately following such purchases of Guidant common stock. |
In addition, Guidant must ensure that, following the merger, no
holder of a Guidant stock option (or former holder of a Guidant
stock option) or any participant in any Guidant stock incentive
plan or other Guidant benefit plan or agreement will have any
right thereunder to acquire any capital stock of Guidant or the
surviving corporation or any other equity interest therein
(including phantom stock or stock appreciation
rights).
Johnson & Johnson has agreed that as soon as
practicable following the merger, it will deliver to the holders
of Johnson & Johnson stock options that were converted
from Guidant options appropriate notices setting forth such
holders rights pursuant to the respective stock incentive
plans and the contracts
56
evidencing the grants of such options, which shall provide,
among other things, that such options and contracts have been
assumed by Johnson & Johnson and will continue in
effect on the same terms and conditions (subject to the
adjustments described in this section).
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that except
as otherwise described by this section and except to the extent
required under the respective terms of the converted options,
all restrictions or limitations on transfer and vesting with
respect to converted options, to the extent that such
restrictions or limitations shall not have already lapsed, and
all other terms thereof, shall remain in full force and effect
with respect to such converted options after giving effect to
the merger and their assumption by Johnson & Johnson as
set forth above.
In addition, as soon as practicable following the merger,
Johnson & Johnson must prepare and file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on
Form S-8 (or
another appropriate form) registering shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock subject to issuance upon
the exercise of the converted options. Guidant will cooperate
with, and assist Johnson & Johnson in the preparation
of, such registration statement. Johnson & Johnson must
keep such registration statement effective (and maintain the
current status of the prospectus required thereby) for so long
as any converted options remain outstanding.
Resale of Johnson & Johnson Common Stock
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued in the
merger will not be subject to any restrictions on transfer
arising under the Securities Act of 1933, except for shares
issued to any Guidant shareholder who may be deemed to be an
affiliate of Guidant or Johnson & Johnson
for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act. It is
expected that each affiliate will agree not to transfer any
Johnson & Johnson common stock received in the merger
except in compliance with the resale provisions of Rule 144
or 145 under the Securities Act or as otherwise permitted under
the Securities Act. The amended and restated merger agreement
requires Guidant to use its reasonable efforts to cause its
affiliates to enter into such agreements. This proxy statement/
prospectus does not cover resales of Johnson & Johnson
common stock received by any person upon completion of the
merger, and no person is authorized to make any use of this
proxy statement/ prospectus in connection with any such resale.
Notices to Guidant Shareholders Resident in Canada and
Canadian Resale Restrictions
Notices to Guidant Shareholders Resident in Canada. The
Johnson & Johnson common stock that is being
distributed to holders of Guidant common stock that reside in a
province of Canada is being distributed under an exemption from
the registration and prospectus requirements of Canadian
provincial securities laws.
Canadian Resale Restrictions. The provincial securities
laws in all provinces of Canada require the first trade in the
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be made in accordance
with certain conditions, including that no unusual effort is
made to prepare the market or to create a demand for such shares
and no extraordinary commission or consideration is paid in
respect of the trade. In addition, when selling the shares,
holders resident in a province of Canada must use a dealer
appropriately registered in such province or rely on an
exemption from the registration requirements of such province.
If a holder requires advice on any applicable prospectus or
registration exemption, the holder should consult its own legal
advisor.
57
THE AMENDED AND RESTATED MERGER AGREEMENT
This is a summary of the material provisions of the amended
and restated merger agreement. The amended and restated merger
agreement, which is attached as Annex 1 to this proxy
statement/ prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference,
contains the complete terms of that agreement. You should read
the entire amended and restated merger agreement carefully.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
Conditions to Johnson & Johnsons and
Guidants Obligations to Complete the Merger. Each
partys obligation to effect the merger is subject to the
satisfaction or waiver of various conditions that include, in
addition to other customary closing conditions, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the amended and restated merger agreement has been approved by
the affirmative vote of shareholders of Guidant representing a
majority of the shares of Guidant common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote at the special meeting |
|
|
|
the shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock to be
issued to: |
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant shareholders upon completion of the merger and |
|
|
|
holders of options to acquire shares of Guidant common stock,
which will be converted into options to acquire shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock, have been approved for
listing on the New York Stock Exchange, subject to official
notice of issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the waiting period applicable to the merger under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act has expired or
has been terminated. On November 2, 2005, the Federal Trade
Commission terminated the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and issued a consent order conditionally
approving the merger. The consent order became final on
December 21, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
the European Commission has issued, or has been deemed to have
issued, a decision under Article 6(1)(b), 8(1) or 8(2) of
the EC merger regulation declaring the merger compatible with
the Common Market. On August 25, 2005, the European
Commission issued a decision under Article 8(2) of the EC
merger regulation declaring the merger compatible with the
Common Market |
|
|
|
no temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other court order or statute, law, rule, legal
restraint or prohibition is in effect that prevents the
completion of the merger and |
|
|
|
the registration statement on
Form S-4, of which
this proxy statement/ prospectus forms a part, has been declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop
order. |
Conditions to Johnson & Johnsons Obligation
to Complete the Merger. Johnson &
Johnsons obligation to effect the merger is further
subject to satisfaction or waiver of the following additional
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Guidant relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
capitalization |
|
|
|
authority and noncontravention |
|
|
|
the absence of recent changes in the compensation and benefits
for certain key personnel of Guidant, including increases in
compensation or benefits, grants or increases in severance or
termination pay, the entry into or amendment of employment and
other similar contracts, the removal of restrictions in benefit
plans or the adoption of new benefit plans for such personnel |
|
|
|
agreements that may restrict the ability of affiliates of
Guidant to compete (other than any such agreement that only
restricts Guidants ability to compete) in any line of
business, geographic area or customer segment |
58
|
|
|
|
|
the vote required by the shareholders of Guidant to approve the
amended and restated merger agreement |
|
|
|
the adoption of the amended and restated merger agreement by the
board of directors of Guidant and the inapplicability of state
takeover statutes to the merger and |
|
|
|
the taking of all action by Guidant to render its rights
agreement inapplicable with respect to the merger |
|
|
|
that are qualified as to materiality or material adverse effect
are true and correct, and such representations and warranties
that are not so qualified by materiality or material adverse
effect are true and correct in all material respects, in each
case as of the date of the original merger agreement and as of
the closing date of the merger as though made on the closing
date, or if such representations and warranties expressly relate
to an earlier date, then as of such date. |
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Guidant relating to
various other agreements that either (1) may restrict the
ability of Guidant or any of its subsidiaries ability to compete
in any line of business, geographic area or customer segment or
(2) relate to the distribution, sale, supply, licensing,
co-promotion or manufacturing of any products or services are
true and correct as of the date of the original merger agreement
and as of the closing date of the merger as though made on the
closing date, except to the extent that the facts or matters as
to which such representations and warranties are not so true and
correct as of such dates, individually or in the aggregate,
would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on the reasonably expected benefits of the merger to
Johnson & Johnson |
|
|
|
all the other representations and warranties of Guidant set
forth in the amended and restated merger agreement are true and
correct as of the date of the original merger agreement and as
of the closing date of the merger as though made on the closing
date, or if such representations and warranties expressly relate
to an earlier date, then as of such date, except to the extent
that the facts or matters as to which such representations and
warranties are not so true and correct as of such dates, without
giving effect to any qualifications or limitations as to
materiality or material adverse effect set forth in such
representations and warranties, individually or in the
aggregate, have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on Guidant |
|
|
|
Guidant has performed in all material respects all obligations
required to be performed by it under the amended and restated
merger agreement on or prior to the date on which the merger is
to be completed |
|
|
|
there is no pending suit, action or proceeding by any
governmental entity (i) seeking to restrain or prohibit the
consummation of the merger or any other transaction contemplated
by the amended and restated merger agreement or seeking to
obtain from Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub or
Guidant or any other affiliate of Johnson & Johnson any
damages that are material in relation to Guidant,
(ii) seeking to impose limitations on the ability of
Johnson & Johnson or any affiliate of
Johnson & Johnson to hold, or exercise full rights of
ownership of, any shares of capital stock of the surviving
corporation, including the right to vote such shares on all
matters properly presented to the shareholders of the surviving
corporation, (iii) seeking to prohibit Johnson &
Johnson or any of its subsidiaries from effectively controlling
in any material respect the business or operations of Guidant or
any of its affiliates, (iv) seeking any divestiture that is
not required to be effected pursuant to the terms of the amended
and restated merger agreement or (v) that has had or would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on
Guidant or Johnson & Johnson and |
|
|
|
there is no temporary restraining order, injunction or other
court order or statute, law, rule, legal restraint or
prohibition that is in effect that would reasonably be expected
to result in any of the effects referred to in the immediately
preceding clause. |
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed by means of a
supplemental disclosure schedule that no effects on
Guidants business relating to or arising from
Guidants previously announced product recalls or
59
any related pending or future litigation, governmental
investigations or other developments will be considered in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or is
reasonably likely to occur for any purposes of the amended and
restated merger agreement or whether there is or may be any
failure of any of the closing conditions to the merger.
Conditions to Guidants Obligation to Complete the
Merger. Guidants obligation to effect the merger
is further subject to satisfaction or waiver of the following
additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Johnson & Johnson
and Shelby Merger Sub relating to authority and noncontravention
which are qualified as to materiality or material adverse effect
are true and correct, and such representations and warranties
that are not so qualified by materiality or material adverse
effect are true and correct in all material respects, in each
case as of the date of the original merger agreement and as of
the closing date of the merger as though made on the closing
date, or if such representations and warranties expressly relate
to an earlier date, then as of such date |
|
|
|
all the other representations and warranties of
Johnson & Johnson and Shelby Merger Sub set forth in
the amended and restated merger agreement are true and correct
as of the date of the original merger agreement and as of the
closing date of the merger as though made on the closing date,
or if such representations and warranties expressly relate to an
earlier date, then as of such date, except to the extent that
the facts or matters as to which such representations and
warranties are not so true and correct as of such dates, without
giving effect to any qualifications or limitations as to
materiality or material adverse effect set forth in such
representations and warranties, individually or in the
aggregate, have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on Johnson &
Johnson and |
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson and Shelby Merger Sub have performed
in all material respects all obligations required to be
performed by them under the amended and restated merger
agreement on or prior to the date on which the merger is to be
completed. |
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that a
material adverse effect or material adverse
change means, when used in connection with Guidant or
Johnson & Johnson, any change, effect, event,
occurrence or state of facts, or any development which,
individually or in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected
to result in any change or effect that is materially adverse to
the business, financial condition or results of operations of
Guidant and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, as the case may be, other than any change, effect, event,
occurrence, state of facts or development:
|
|
|
|
|
relating to the financial or securities markets or the economy
in general, |
|
|
|
relating to the industry in which Guidant operates or the
industries in which Johnson & Johnson operates, as the
case may be, in general to the extent that such change, effect,
event, occurrence, state of facts or development does not
disproportionately impact Guidant or Johnson & Johnson, |
|
|
|
resulting from any divestiture required to be effected pursuant
to the amended and restated merger agreement or |
|
|
|
relating to any failure, in and of itself, by Guidant or
Johnson & Johnson, as applicable, to meet any internal
or published projections, forecasts or revenue or earnings
prediction. |
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed by means of a
supplemental disclosure schedule that no effects on
Guidants business relating to or arising from
Guidants previously announced product recalls or any
related pending or future litigation, governmental
investigations or other developments will be considered in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or is
reasonably likely to occur for any purposes of the amended and
restated merger agreement or whether there is or may be any
failure of any of the closing conditions to the merger.
60
Guidant can provide no assurance that all of the conditions
precedent to the merger will be satisfied or waived by the party
permitted to do so. Guidant cannot at this point determine
whether it would resolicit proxies in the event that it decides
to waive any of the items listed above. This decision would
depend upon the facts and circumstances leading to
Guidants decision to complete the merger and whether
Guidant believes there has been a material change in the terms
of the merger and its effect on Guidant and its shareholders. In
making this determination, Guidant would consider, among other
factors, the reasons for the waiver, the effect of the waiver on
the terms of the merger, whether the requirement being waived
was necessary in order to make the transaction fair to the
shareholders from a financial point of view, the availability of
alternative transactions and the prospects of Guidant as an
independent entity. If Guidant determines that a waiver of a
condition would materially change the terms of the merger, it
will resolicit proxies.
No Solicitation
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that Guidant
will not, nor will it authorize or permit any of its
subsidiaries, any of their respective directors, officers or
employees or any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney,
accountant or other advisor, agent or representative retained by
it or any of its subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly through
another person:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage, or take any other
action designed to, or which could reasonably be expected to
lead to, a takeover proposal, as described below, or |
|
|
|
enter into, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions
or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any
information, or otherwise cooperate in any way with, any
takeover proposal. |
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that the term
takeover proposal means an inquiry, proposal or
offer from any person relating to, or that could reasonably be
expected to lead to:
|
|
|
|
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase, in one
transaction or a series of transactions, of assets (including
equity securities of any subsidiary of Guidant) or business that
constitute 15% or more of the revenues, net income or assets of
Guidant and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or 15% or more
of any class of equity securities of Guidant |
|
|
|
any tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would
result in any person beneficially owning 15% or more of any
class of equity securities of Guidant or |
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint venture,
binding share exchange or similar transaction involving Guidant
or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to which any person or the
shareholders of any person would own 15% or more of any class of
equity securities of Guidant or of any resulting parent company
of Guidant, |
in each case, other than the transactions contemplated by the
amended and restated merger agreement.
The amended and restated merger agreement provides further that,
notwithstanding the restrictions described above, if, at any
time prior to the time Guidant shareholders have adopted the
amended and restated merger agreement with Johnson &
Johnson:
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant receives a bona fide written takeover proposal that the
Guidant board of directors determines (after consultation with
outside counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation) constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a
superior proposal, as described below, and |
|
|
|
such takeover proposal was not solicited after the date of the
original merger agreement and did not otherwise result from a
breach by Guidant of the no solicitation provisions described
above, |
Guidant may:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish information about Guidant and its subsidiaries to the
person making such takeover proposal pursuant to a customary
confidentiality agreement not less restrictive to such person
than the confidentiality provisions of the confidentiality
agreement between Guidant and Johnson & Johnson, |
61
|
|
|
|
|
provided that all such information is also, or has previously
been, provided to Johnson & Johnson and |
|
|
|
participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such
takeover proposal. |
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that the term
superior proposal means any bona fide offer made by
a third party that if consummated would result in such person
(or its shareholders) owning, directly or indirectly, more than
80% of the shares of Guidant common stock then outstanding (or
of the surviving entity in a merger or the direct or indirect
parent of the surviving entity in a merger) or all or
substantially all the assets of Guidant, which the Guidant board
of directors reasonably determines (after consultation with a
financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation) to be:
|
|
|
|
|
more favorable to the Guidant shareholders from a financial
point of view than the merger (taking into account all the terms
and conditions of such proposal and the amended and restated
merger agreement (including any changes to the financial terms
of the amended and restated merger agreement proposed by
Johnson & Johnson in response to such offer or
otherwise)) and |
|
|
|
reasonably capable of being completed, taking into account all
financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of such proposal. |
The amended and restated merger agreement provides further that
neither the Guidant board of directors nor any committee of the
Guidant board of directors may:
|
|
|
|
|
withdraw, modify in a manner adverse to Johnson &
Johnson, or publicly propose to withdraw, or modify in a manner
adverse to Johnson & Johnson, the adoption or
recommendation by the Guidant board of directors of the amended
and restated merger agreement, the merger or other transactions
contemplated by the amended and restated merger agreement |
|
|
|
adopt or recommend, or publicly propose to adopt or recommend,
any takeover proposal or |
|
|
|
adopt or recommend, or publicly propose to adopt or recommend,
or allow Guidant or any of its subsidiaries to execute or enter
into, any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding,
agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement,
option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement
or other similar contract constituting or related to, or that is
intended to or could reasonably be expected to lead to, any
takeover proposal. |
Notwithstanding the above, at any time prior to the time Guidant
shareholders have approved the amended and restated merger
agreement with Johnson & Johnson, the Guidant board of
directors may:
|
|
|
|
|
withdraw its recommendation of the amended and restated merger
agreement and the merger or recommend the approval of a takeover
proposal if the Guidant board of directors determines in good
faith, after consultation with outside counsel and a financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation that (i) a
material adverse effect with respect to Johnson &
Johnson has occurred and (ii) as a result thereof such
action is consistent with its fiduciary duties to the Guidant
shareholders under applicable law or |
|
|
|
in response to a takeover proposal that the Guidant board of
directors reasonably determines, after consultation with outside
counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation, constitutes a superior proposal and that was
unsolicited and made after the date of the original merger
agreement and that did not otherwise result from a breach of the
no solicitation provisions described above, (i) withdraw
its recommendation of the amended and restated merger agreement
and the merger or recommend the approval of a takeover proposal
or (ii) terminate the amended and restated merger agreement
and enter into an agreement or contract constituting or related
to, or that is intended to or could reasonably be expected to
lead to, a takeover proposal. |
No withdrawal of the Guidant board of directors
recommendation of the amended and restated merger agreement and
the merger or recommendation of a takeover proposal, or
termination of the amended and restated merger agreement by
Guidant, in response to a takeover proposal that constitutes a
superior proposal may be made until after the fifth business day
following Johnson & Johnsons receipt of
62
written notice from Guidant advising Johnson & Johnson
that the Guidant board of directors intends to take such action
and specifying the terms and conditions of such superior
proposal. In determining whether to take such action, the
Guidant board of directors must take into account any changes to
the financial terms of the amended and restated merger agreement
proposed by Johnson & Johnson in response to its
receipt of such notice from Guidant or otherwise.
In addition to the no solicitation provisions described above,
the amended and restated merger agreement provides that Guidant
must promptly advise Johnson & Johnson orally and in
writing of any takeover proposal, the material terms and
conditions of any such takeover proposal and the identity of the
person making any such takeover proposal and if the Guidant
board of directors is considering, or has decided to consider,
whether any change, effect, event, occurrence, state of facts or
development constitutes a material adverse effect with respect
to Johnson & Johnson. Guidant must keep
Johnson & Johnson fully informed in all material
respects of the status and details, including any changes, of
any such takeover proposal and must provide to
Johnson & Johnson copies of all correspondence and
other written material sent or provided by any person to Guidant
or any of its subsidiaries that describes any of the terms or
conditions of any takeover proposal as soon as practicable after
receipt or delivery of such correspondence or other written
material and keep Johnson & Johnson fully informed in
all material respects of the status and details of any
determination by the Guidant board of directors with respect to
a potential material adverse effect with respect to
Johnson & Johnson.
Nothing in the amended and restated merger agreement prohibits
the Guidant board of directors from taking and disclosing to the
Guidant shareholders a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
under the Exchange Act or making a statement required under
Rule 14a-9 under
the Exchange Act or making any disclosure to the Guidant
shareholders that is required by applicable law, except that in
no event may Guidant or its board of directors take, or agree to
take, any action prohibited by the no solicitation provisions
described above.
Termination of the Amended and Restated Merger Agreement
The amended and restated merger agreement may be terminated at
any time prior to the effective time of the merger, even if the
amended and restated merger agreement has been adopted by the
Guidant shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Johnson & Johnson, Shelby
Merger Sub and Guidant |
|
|
|
by either Johnson & Johnson or Guidant, if the merger
has not been completed by March 31, 2006, except that this
right to terminate the amended and restated merger agreement
will not be available to any party whose willful breach of a
representation or warranty in the amended and restated merger
agreement or whose other action or failure to act has been a
principal cause of or resulted in the failure of the merger to
be consummated on or before that date |
|
|
|
by either Johnson & Johnson or Guidant, if there exists
a restraining order, injunction or other court order or statute,
law, rule, legal restraint or prohibition, in any such case that
has become final and cannot be appealed and which prevents the
completion of the merger |
|
|
|
by either Johnson & Johnson or Guidant, if the Guidant
shareholders do not approve the amended and restated merger
agreement at the Guidant shareholders meeting duly
convened or at any adjournment or postponement |
|
|
|
by either Johnson & Johnson or Guidant, if the other
party has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth
in the amended and restated merger agreement, which breach or
failure to perform would give rise to the failure of a condition
to the merger and has not been or cannot be cured within 30
calendar days following receiving written notice from the other
party of such breach or failure to perform |
|
|
|
by Johnson & Johnson, if there exists a restraining
order, injunction or other court order or statute, law, rule,
legal restraint or prohibition that has become final and
nonappealable, in any such case |
63
|
|
|
|
|
that (i) seeks to restrain or prohibit the consummation of
the merger or any other transaction contemplated by the amended
and restated merger agreement or seeks to obtain from
Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub or Guidant or any
other affiliate of Johnson & Johnson any damages that
are material in relation to Guidant, (ii) seeks to impose
limitations on the ability of Johnson & Johnson or any
affiliate of Johnson & Johnson to hold, or exercise
full rights of ownership of, any shares of capital stock of the
surviving corporation, including the right to vote such shares
on all matters properly presented to the shareholders of the
surviving corporation, (iii) seeks to prohibit
Johnson & Johnson or any of its affiliates from
effectively controlling in any material respect the business or
operations of Guidant or any of its affiliates, (iv) seeks
any divestiture that is not required to be effected pursuant to
the terms of the amended and restated merger agreement or
(v) has had or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect with respect to Guidant or
Johnson & Johnson |
|
|
|
by Johnson & Johnson, if the Guidant board of directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
fails publicly to reaffirm its adoption and recommendation of
the amended and restated merger agreement, the merger or the
other transactions contemplated by the amended and restated
merger agreement within 10 business days of receipt of a written
request by Johnson & Johnson to provide such
reaffirmation following a takeover proposal |
|
|
|
withdraws, or modifies in a manner adverse to Johnson &
Johnson, or proposes to withdraw, or modify in a manner adverse
to Johnson & Johnson, its approval, recommendation or
declaration of advisability of the amended and restated merger
agreement, or the merger or recommends, adopts or approves, or
proposes publicly to recommend, adopt or approve, any takeover
proposal |
|
|
|
|
|
by Guidant in accordance with the terms and subject to the
conditions described in No Solicitation. |
Fees and Expenses
General. The amended and restated merger agreement
provides that each party will pay its own fees and expenses in
connection with the amended and restated merger agreement, the
merger and the transactions contemplated by the amended and
restated merger agreement, whether or not the merger is
completed, except that Johnson & Johnson and Guidant
will each pay one-half of the expenses incurred in connection
with printing and mailing of the registration statement of which
this proxy statement/prospectus is a part.
Termination Fee. Guidant must pay to
Johnson & Johnson a termination fee of
$625 million in each of the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
the amended and restated merger agreement is terminated by
Johnson & Johnson pursuant to its right described in
the second to last bullet point under
Termination of the Amended and Restated Merger
Agreement (other than following the occurrence of a
material adverse effect with respect to Johnson &
Johnson) |
|
|
|
the amended and restated merger agreement is terminated by
Guidant in accordance with the terms and subject to the
conditions described in No
Solicitation or |
|
|
|
prior to Guidants shareholders approving the amended and
restated merger agreement, a takeover proposal is made to
Guidant or directly to the Guidant shareholders generally or
otherwise becomes publicly known or any person publicly
announces an intention, whether or not conditional, to make a
takeover proposal, the amended and restated merger agreement is
terminated by either Johnson & Johnson or Guidant
pursuant to their respective rights described in the second (but
only if a vote to obtain shareholder approval of the amended and
restated merger agreement or the shareholder meeting has not
been held) or fourth bullet points under
Termination of the Amended and Restated Merger
Agreement and within 12 months after such
termination, Guidant enters into a |
64
|
|
|
|
|
definitive agreement to consummate, or consummates, the
transactions contemplated by any takeover proposal (for purposes
of this circumstance, the term takeover proposal has
the same meaning as described under No
Solicitation, except that references to 15% are replaced
by 35%). |
Johnson & Johnson must pay Guidant a termination fee of
$300 million in each of the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
the amended and restated merger agreement is terminated by
either Johnson & Johnson or Guidant pursuant to their
respective rights described in the second, third or sixth bullet
points under Termination of the Amended and
Restated Merger Agreement and at the time of any such
termination all of the conditions set forth in
Conditions to Completion of the Merger
have been satisfied or waived, except for the conditions
described in the second, third, fourth and fifth bullet points
under Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger Conditions to Johnson &
Johnsons and Guidants Obligations to Complete the
Merger and the conditions described in the fifth and sixth
bullet points under Conditions to the
Completion of the Merger Conditions to
Johnson & Johnsons Obligation to Complete the
Merger (in the case of the conditions described in the
fourth bullet point under Conditions to
Completion of the Merger Conditions to
Johnson & Johnsons and Guidants Obligations
to Complete the Merger and the conditions described in the
fifth and sixth bullet points under Conditions to
Completion of the Merger Conditions to
Johnson & Johnsons Obligations to Complete the
Merger, only to the extent that the conditions set forth
therein have not been satisfied due to a suit, action or
proceeding by any national governmental entity or the imposition
of a restraint, in either case relating to competition, merger
control, antitrust or similar laws). |
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
Under the amended and restated merger agreement, Guidant has
agreed that, during the period from the date of the original
merger agreement to the effective time of the merger, except as
consented to by Johnson & Johnson, it will, and will
cause each of its subsidiaries to, carry on its business in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice and, to the extent
consistent with such course of conduct, use all commercially
reasonable efforts to preserve intact its current business
organizations, keep available the services of its current
officers, employees and consultants and preserve its
relationships with customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees,
distributors and others having business dealings with Guidant.
In addition, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
during the period from the date of the original merger agreement
to the effective time of the merger, Guidant has agreed to
specific restraints relating to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the declaration or payment of dividends (other than, among other
things, regular cash dividends in respect of Guidant common
stock not exceeding $0.10 per share per fiscal quarter) |
|
|
|
the alteration of share capital, including, among other things,
stock splits, combinations or reclassifications |
|
|
|
the repurchase or redemption of capital stock |
|
|
|
the issuance or sale of capital stock or other voting securities |
|
|
|
amendments to its articles of incorporation or by-laws, or the
indenture for its existing 6.15% senior unsecured notes due
2006 |
|
|
|
the acquisition of assets or other entities |
|
|
|
the sale, lease or mortgaging of assets |
|
|
|
the incurrence or guarantee of indebtedness |
|
|
|
the making of capital expenditures |
65
|
|
|
|
|
the extension of loans, advances, capital contributions or
investments |
|
|
|
the payment, discharge or settlement of material claims or
liabilities |
|
|
|
the waiver or assignment of material claims |
|
|
|
the waiver or modification of material contracts |
|
|
|
the entrance into certain types of agreements |
|
|
|
compensation and benefit matters with respect to directors,
executive officers and key employees and |
|
|
|
the revaluation of assets and changes in accounting policies. |
Representations and Warranties
The amended and restated merger agreement contains customary
representations and warranties relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization and similar corporate matters of
Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub and Guidant |
|
|
|
subsidiaries of Guidant |
|
|
|
capital structure of Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger
Sub and Guidant |
|
|
|
authorization, execution, delivery, performance and
enforceability of, and required consents, approvals, orders and
authorizations of governmental authorities relating to, the
amended and restated merger agreement and related matters of
Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub and Guidant |
|
|
|
documents filed by each of Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
accuracy of information contained in such documents |
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities of Guidant |
|
|
|
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by Guidant and other
matters relating to internal controls of Guidant |
|
|
|
accuracy of information supplied by each of Johnson &
Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub and Guidant in connection with this
proxy statement/ prospectus and the registration statement of
which it is a part |
|
|
|
absence of material changes or events concerning
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant |
|
|
|
pending or threatened material litigation of Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant |
|
|
|
certain contracts and agreements of Guidant |
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws, including environmental laws,
by Guidant |
|
|
|
absence of changes in benefit plans and labor relations matters
of Guidant |
|
|
|
matters relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
for Guidant |
|
|
|
absence of excess parachute payments to any director, officer,
employee or consultant of Guidant or its affiliates |
|
|
|
filing of tax returns and payment of taxes by Guidant |
|
|
|
title to Guidants properties and Guidants compliance
with the terms of its material leases |
|
|
|
intellectual property rights of Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant |
|
|
|
required shareholder vote of Guidant |
66
|
|
|
|
|
satisfaction of the requirements of certain state takeover
statutes and provisions of the Guidant amended articles of
incorporation and the Guidant by-laws by Guidant |
|
|
|
engagement and payment of fees of brokers, investment bankers,
finders and financial advisors of Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant |
|
|
|
receipt of fairness opinions by Guidant from its financial
advisors |
|
|
|
inapplicability of the rights agreement between Guidant and
EquiServe Trust Company |
|
|
|
compliance by Johnson & Johnson and Guidant with
applicable regulatory and governmental requirements |
|
|
|
organization and operations of Shelby Merger Sub and |
|
|
|
availability to Johnson & Johnson of sufficient funds
to effect the merger. |
The representations and warranties of each of Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant have been made solely for the benefit of the
other party and such representations and warranties should not
be relied on by any other person. In addition, such
representations and warranties:
|
|
|
|
|
will not survive consummation of the merger and, other than
certain representations and warranties relating to broker and
advisor fees, cannot be the basis for any claims under the
amended and restated merger agreement by the other party after
termination of the amended and restated merger agreement except
if wilfully and materially breached |
|
|
|
may be intended not as statements of actual fact, but rather as
a way of allocating risk between the parties |
|
|
|
are subject to the materiality standard described in the amended
and restated merger agreement, which may differ from what may be
viewed as material by you and |
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the original merger agreement
or such other date as is specified in the amended and restated
merger agreement. |
Further, the representations and warranties of Guidant are
qualified to exclude the effects on Guidants business
relating to or arising from Guidants previously announced
product recalls or any related pending or future litigation,
governmental investigations or other developments and any
information in Guidants Securities and Exchange Commission
filings prior to the date of the amended and restated merger
agreement.
Additional Terms
Subject to the terms and conditions of the amended and restated
merger agreement, Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have
agreed to use all reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to
assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things
necessary to consummate and make effective, in the most
expeditious manner practicable, the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the amended and restated merger
agreement, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
taking of all acts necessary to cause the conditions to closing
to be satisfied as promptly as practicable |
|
|
|
obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers,
consents and approvals from governmental entities and the making
of all necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all
steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from,
or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any governmental entity |
|
|
|
the avoidance of each and every impediment under any antitrust,
merger control, competition or trade regulation law that may be
asserted by any governmental entity with respect to the merger
so as to enable the closing to occur as soon as reasonably
possible and |
67
|
|
|
|
|
obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers from
third parties, including any such consents, approvals or waivers
required in connection with any divestiture. |
The amended and restated merger agreement further provides that
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant must:
|
|
|
|
|
duly file with the United States Federal Trade Commission and
the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice the
notification and report form required under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and |
|
|
|
duly make all notifications and other filings required
(1) under the EC merger regulation or (2) under any
other applicable competition, merger control, antitrust or
similar law that Guidant and Johnson & Johnson deem
advisable or appropriate, in each case with respect to the
transactions contemplated by the amended and restated merger
agreement and as promptly as practicable. |
The amended and restated merger agreement further provides that
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant must:
|
|
|
|
|
cooperate with the other party to the extent necessary to assist
the other party in the preparation of its antitrust filings and,
if requested, to promptly amend or furnish additional
information thereunder |
|
|
|
use their reasonable best efforts to furnish to each other all
information required for any filing, form, declaration,
notification, registration and notice, other than confidential
or proprietary information not directly related to the
transactions contemplated by the amended and restated merger
agreement, and to keep the other party reasonably informed with
respect to the status of each clearance, approval or waiver
sought from a governmental entity in connection with the
transactions contemplated by the amended and restated merger
agreement and the material communications between such party and
such governmental entity and |
|
|
|
consult with the other party, and consider in good faith the
views of the other party, prior to entering into any agreement
with any antitrust authority. |
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant have agreed that neither
party will, nor will it permit any of its subsidiaries to,
acquire or agree to acquire any business, person or division
thereof, or otherwise acquire or agree to acquire any assets if
the entering into of a definitive agreement relating to or the
consummation of such acquisition, could reasonably be expected
to materially increase the risk of not obtaining the applicable
clearance, approval or waiver from an antitrust authority with
respect to the transactions contemplated by the amended and
restated merger agreement.
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that Guidant
and its board of directors must (1) use reasonable best
efforts to ensure that no state takeover law or similar law is
or becomes applicable to the amended and restated merger
agreement, the merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated by the amended and restated merger agreement and
(2) if any state takeover law or similar law becomes
applicable to the amended and restated merger agreement, the
merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the
amended and restated merger agreement, use reasonable best
efforts to ensure that the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the amended and restated merger agreement may be
consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated
by the amended and restated merger agreement and otherwise to
minimize the effect of such law on the amended and restated
merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the amended and restated merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the
amended and restated merger agreement, in connection with
obtaining the waivers, consents and approvals described above:
(a) with respect to the assets of the cardiac rhythm
management businesses of Johnson & Johnson, Guidant and
their respective affiliates, Johnson & Johnson, and its
affiliates shall only be required to agree to divestitures of
such assets that individually or in the aggregate would not
reasonably be expected to have greater than a de minimis adverse
effect on the combined cardiac rhythm management business of
Johnson & Johnson, Guidant and
68
their respective affiliates, taken as a whole; (b) with
respect to the assets of the coronary vascular intervention
business of Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates,
Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates shall only be
required to agree to divestitures of such assets that
individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be
expected to have greater than a de minimis adverse effect on the
drug eluting stent business of Johnson & Johnson and
its affiliates, taken as a whole; (c) with respect to the
assets of the vascular intervention business of Guidant and its
affiliates, Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates shall
only be required to agree to divestitures of such assets that
individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on the combined
vascular intervention business of Johnson & Johnson,
Guidant and their respective affiliates, taken as a whole;
(d) none of Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates
shall be required to agree to any divestiture of any of their
assets except as provided in clauses (a) and
(b) above; and (e) if, but only if, directed by
Johnson & Johnson, Guidant shall agree to any
divestiture of any of its assets or the assets of any of its
affiliates if such divestiture is conditioned on the
consummation of the merger.
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the Surviving
Corporation
The amended and restated merger agreement provides that the
amended articles of incorporation of Guidant will be amended to
read in their entirety as set forth in Annex A to the
amended and restated merger agreement and, as so amended, will
be the articles of incorporation of the surviving corporation
until changed or amended. The amended and restated merger
agreement further provides that the by-laws of Shelby Merger
Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the completion of the
merger, will be the by-laws of the surviving corporation until
changed or amended. For a summary of certain provisions of the
current Guidant amended articles of incorporation, by-laws and
the associated rights of Guidant shareholders, see
Comparison of Rights of Common Shareholders of
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant.
Amendment; Extension and Waiver
Subject to applicable law:
|
|
|
|
|
the amended and restated merger agreement may be amended by
mutual consent of the parties in writing at any time, before or
after the amended and restated merger agreement has been adopted
by the shareholders of Guidant, except that no amendment may be
entered into which requires further approval by Guidant
shareholders unless such approval is obtained and |
|
|
|
at any time prior to the effective time of the merger, a party
may, by written instrument signed on behalf of such party: |
|
|
|
extend the time for performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of any other party to the amended and restated merger
agreement |
|
|
|
waive inaccuracies in representations and warranties of any
other party contained in the amended and restated merger
agreement or in any related document or |
|
|
|
waive compliance by any other party with any agreements or
conditions in the amended and restated merger agreement, except
that no such waiver may be made after the amended and restated
merger agreement has been adopted by the shareholders of Guidant
which requires further approval by Guidant shareholders unless
such approval is obtained. |
69
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND GUIDANT
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of
earnings combines the historical consolidated statements of
earnings of Johnson & Johnson and Guidant, giving
effect to the merger as if it had occurred on December 29,
2003, the first day of Johnson & Johnsons 2004
fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet combines the historical balance sheets of
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant, giving effect to the
merger as if it had been consummated on October 2, 2005,
the last day of Johnson & Johnsons 2005 fiscal
third quarter. The historical consolidated financial information
has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the merger or considered
intercompany transactions and (2) factually supportable.
With respect to the statements of earnings, the pro forma events
must be expected to have a continuing impact on the combined
results. You should read this information in conjunction with
the:
|
|
|
|
|
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements |
|
|
|
separate historical unaudited financial statements of
Johnson & Johnson as of and for the fiscal nine months
ended October 2, 2005 included in Johnson &
Johnsons Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal nine month period ended October 2, 2005, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/
prospectus and |
|
|
|
separate historical audited financial statements of
Johnson & Johnson as of and for the year ended
January 2, 2005 included in Johnson &
Johnsons Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended January 2, 2005, which is incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus and |
|
|
|
separate historical unaudited financial statements of Guidant as
of and for the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2005
included in Guidants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal nine month period ended September 30, 2005, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/
prospectus and |
|
|
|
separate historical audited financial statements of Guidant as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in
Guidants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information is presented for informational purposes only. The
pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the
financial position or results of operations actually would have
been had the merger been completed at the dates indicated. In
addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information does not purport to project the future
financial position or operating results of Johnson &
Johnson after completion of the merger.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information was prepared by using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, Johnson & Johnsons cost
to acquire Guidant will be allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values as of
the date of completion of the merger. This allocation is
dependent upon certain valuations and other studies that have
not progressed to a stage where sufficient information is
available to make a definitive allocation. Accordingly, the
purchase price allocation adjustments reflected in the following
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements
are preliminary and have been made solely for the purpose of
preparing these statements.
70
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
For the Year Ended January 2, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
|
Guidant | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
Sales to customers
|
|
$ |
47,348 |
|
|
$ |
3,766 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
)a |
|
$ |
51,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
843 |
b |
|
|
15,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
33,926 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
35,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,860 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
(38 |
)a |
|
|
17,013 |
|
Research expense
|
|
|
5,203 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,719 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
174 |
c |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Interest expense, net of portion capitalized
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
55 |
c |
|
|
268 |
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,088 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
23,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
12,838 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
12,585 |
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
4,329 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
(396 |
)d |
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
8,509 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
(735 |
) |
|
$ |
8,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common
share amount:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,968.40 |
|
|
|
312.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122.24 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,003.50 |
|
|
|
321.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161.87 |
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
$ |
1.095 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.095 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
71
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
For the Fiscal Nine Months Ended October 2, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
|
Guidant | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
Sales to customers
|
|
$ |
37,904 |
|
|
$ |
2,722 |
|
|
$ |
(93 |
)a |
|
$ |
40,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
10,330 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
532 |
b |
|
|
11,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,574 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
28,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,315 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
(34 |
)a |
|
|
13,271 |
|
Research expense
|
|
|
4,336 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,762 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
215 |
c |
|
|
(160 |
) |
Interest expense, net of portion capitalized
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,556 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
11,018 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
10,629 |
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(282 |
)d |
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
8,228 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
(524 |
) |
|
$ |
8,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.57 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common
share amount:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,973.5 |
|
|
|
323.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,133.07 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,019.0 |
|
|
|
332.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,182.79 |
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
$ |
0.945 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.945 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
72
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
As of October 2, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
|
Guidant | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) | |
Assets |
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
14,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
$ |
(9,903 |
)c |
|
$ |
6,917 |
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
(1,081 |
)c |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable trade, less allowances for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
7,154 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)a |
|
|
7,869 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
120 |
e |
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
Deferred taxes on income
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other receivables
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)a |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
$ |
30,576 |
|
|
$ |
4,270 |
|
|
$ |
(10,885 |
) |
|
$ |
23,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, non current
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
10,227 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
f |
|
|
11,210 |
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
12,086 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
20,304 |
g |
|
|
32,994 |
|
|
Deferred taxes on income
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(52 |
)h |
|
|
691 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
56,574 |
|
|
$ |
5,985 |
|
|
$ |
9,467 |
|
|
$ |
72,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and notes payable
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
i |
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
(121 |
)a |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
Accrued rebates, returns, and promotions
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and commissions
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
Accrued taxes on income
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$ |
12,047 |
|
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
13,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
2,139 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,229 |
j |
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
Employee related obligations
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
19,727 |
|
|
$ |
1,452 |
|
|
$ |
3,212 |
|
|
$ |
24,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock without par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
(836 |
)k |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
Note receivable from employee stock ownership plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
l |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
(165 |
)m |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
40,422 |
|
|
|
3,379 |
|
|
|
7,246 |
n |
|
|
51,047 |
|
|
Less: common stock held in treasury, at cost
|
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
36,847 |
|
|
$ |
4,533 |
|
|
$ |
6,255 |
|
|
$ |
47,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
56,574 |
|
|
$ |
5,985 |
|
|
$ |
9,467 |
|
|
$ |
72,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
73
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Description of Transaction and Basis of Presentation |
At the effective time of the merger, each share of Guidant
common stock (other than shares owned by Guidant,
Johnson & Johnson and Shelby Merger Sub) will be
converted into the right to receive a combination of
(i) $33.25 in cash and (ii) 0.493 shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. The number of shares of
Johnson & Johnson common stock to be issued in the
merger for each share of Guidant common stock is now fixed.
Accordingly, shareholders of Guidant may receive more or less
value depending on fluctuations in the price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock. Outstanding Guidant
stock options at the time of the closing will be converted into
options to purchase Johnson & Johnson common stock.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, each outstanding stock
option with respect to a share of Guidant common stock will be
converted into an option to acquire (1) that number of
shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock equal to 0.493
and (2) that number of shares of Johnson & Johnson
common stock with a value (based upon the volume weighted
average trading price per share of Johnson & Johnson
common stock for the 15 trading days ending three days prior to
the closing) equal to $33.25, which is the cash portion of the
merger consideration payable to holders of Guidant common stock.
In addition, appropriate adjustments will be made to the
exercise price in respect of such options. See The
Merger Effect on Awards Outstanding Under Guidant
Stock Incentive Plans for a more complete discussion of
the treatment of Guidant stock options in the merger.
Johnson & Johnson will account for the merger as a
purchase under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Under the purchase method of
accounting, the assets and liabilities of Guidant will be
recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair
values, and consolidated with those of Johnson &
Johnson. The reported consolidated financial condition and
results of operations of Johnson & Johnson after
completion of the merger will reflect these fair values.
The merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including
the approval of Guidant shareholders and regulatory approvals.
Subject to these conditions, it is anticipated that the merger
will be completed during the first quarter of 2006.
The following is a preliminary estimate of the purchase price
for Guidant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Number of shares of Guidant common stock outstanding as of
October 31, 2005 (in thousands)
|
|
|
330,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange ratio(1)
|
|
|
0.493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock to
be issued to holders of Guidant common stock (in thousands)(1)
|
|
|
162,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by assumed price per share of Johnson &
Johnson common stock(1)
|
|
$ |
62.17 |
|
|
$ |
10,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash portion of merger consideration ($33.25 × 330,357)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,984 |
|
Estimated fair value of outstanding Guidant stock options to be
exchanged for Johnson & Johnson stock options
(calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
Estimated transaction costs(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the purpose of this pro forma analysis, the above estimated
purchase price has been allocated based on a preliminary
estimate of the fair value of assets and liabilities to be
acquired.
74
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Purchase Price |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
| |
Net book value of assets acquired as of September 30, 2005
|
|
$ |
4,533 |
|
Less: Write-off of existing goodwill and other intangible
assets, including related deferred taxes
|
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted book value of net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
3,923 |
|
Remaining allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase inventory to fair value
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
Increase property plant and equipment to fair value
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
In-process research and development charge(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets at fair value(3)
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
Restructuring costs(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on income
|
|
|
(3,229 |
) |
|
Goodwill(3)
|
|
|
11,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated purchase price
|
|
$ |
21,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Guidant shareholders will receive $33.25 in cash and
0.493 shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock for
each share of Guidant common stock. Under the purchase method of
accounting, the total equity consideration was determined using
the average Johnson & Johnson closing stock prices
beginning two days before and ending two days after
November 15, 2005, the date the acquisition was announced. |
|
(2) |
Remaining estimated transaction costs to be recorded as of the
closing date of the merger. |
|
(3) |
Sufficient information is not available at this time to provide
specifics with regard to individual products, valuation methods
and appraisal methods. Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and other
relevant laws and regulations, there are significant limitations
regarding what Johnson & Johnson can learn about
specific Guidant currently marketed products and scientific
projects that are underway. |
|
|
|
For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements, the estimated allocation to acquired
identifiable intangible assets is expected to be within the
following general categories: |
|
|
|
|
|
currently marketed products, including patented and unpatented
technology |
|
|
|
collaboration agreements and or other licensing arrangements |
|
|
|
trademarks and trade names and |
|
|
|
customer contracts/relationships. |
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements include an estimated identifiable intangible asset
value of $9 billion amortized on a straight line basis over
12 years. These estimates will be adjusted accordingly if
the final identifiable intangible asset valuation generates
results, including corresponding useful lives and related
amortization methods, that differ from the pro forma estimates.
The final valuation is expected to be completed within
12 months from the completion of the merger. |
|
|
In accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, any goodwill and acquired
indefinite-lived intangibles associated with the merger will not
be amortized. |
75
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
As required by Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 4, Applicability of FASB Statement
No. 2 to Business Combinations Accounted for by the
Purchase Method, the purchase price allocated to
in-process research and development will be expensed
immediately. It is reasonable to assume that an in-process
research and development charge will be incurred, however the
amount of the charge will not be determined until the final
valuation is completed. |
|
|
(4) |
Certain restructuring and integration charges will be recorded
subsequent to the merger that, under purchase accounting, may or
may not be treated as part of the purchase price for Guidant.
These costs are not factually supportable or expected to be
material and as such have not been reflected in the unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
3. |
Accounting Policies and Financial Statement
Classifications |
For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements, certain reclassifications were made to
Guidants financial statements to conform to those
classifications used by Johnson & Johnson.
Reclassifications primarily relate to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties, net to Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
Amortization to Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
Impairment charge, Litigation, net, Restructuring charge and
Foundation contribution to Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
Interest, net allocated to Interest income and Interest expense |
|
|
|
Investments and Sundry to Other assets |
|
|
|
Goodwill to Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital and Unearned compensation to Retained
earnings. |
Upon completion of the merger, Johnson & Johnson will
review Guidants accounting policies and financial
statement classifications. As a result of that review, it may
become necessary to make additional changes in accounting
policies or reclassifications to the consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
4. |
Intercompany Transactions |
Transactions between Johnson & Johnson and Guidant are
primarily limited to arrangements between Cordis, a subsidiary
of Johnson & Johnson, and Guidant. Cordis and Guidant
entered into several commercial arrangements in April 2000,
several of which have been subsequently amended, pursuant to
which (1) Cordis agreed to distribute Guidants
Rapid-Exchange catheters and stent delivery systems and
(2) the parties settled outstanding litigation under
certain patents by agreeing, among other things, to
cross-license certain patents related to stents, stent delivery
systems and other cardiovascular applications and to arbitrate
certain remaining patent disputes. In February 2004, Cordis and
Guidant also entered into a strategic agreement to co-promote
certain of Cordis drug-eluting coronary stents.
Guidant also received an option to pursue a similar arrangement
in Japan in the future. In addition, Guidant agreed to assist
Cordis in the development of a drug-eluting stent that utilizes
Guidants MULTI-LINK
VISION®
Stent Delivery System. In addition, in August 2003 an
arbitration panel found that Guidants Multi-Link Duet
Coronary Stent System infringed a patent of Cordis. As a result
of this finding, Guidant made a one-time payment, pursuant to
the April 2000 commercial arrangements, of $425 million to
Cordis in the third quarter of 2003.
Upon completion of the merger, transactions that occurred in
connection with these arrangements would be considered
intercompany transactions. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions
76
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related to these arrangements have been eliminated from the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accounting for preexisting contractual relationships has
been reflected in accordance with EITF
Issue 04-01,
Accounting for Preexisting Relationships between the
Parties to a Business Combination.
Adjustments included in the column under the heading Pro
Forma Adjustments primarily relate to the following
(amounts in millions):
(a) To eliminate balances and transactions between
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant, which upon completion of
the merger, would be considered intercompany balances and
transactions. These transactions would result in the elimination
of certain sales, alliance revenues, co-promotion expenses and
deferred revenue balances.
(b) To record the following cost of products sold
adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Nine Months | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Ended October 2, | |
|
|
January 2, 2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
Acquired intangible amortization
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
PP&E depreciation step-up
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Inventory step-up
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-existing Guidant intangible amortization
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) To record the payment of the cash portion of the merger
consideration ($10,984) and the related impact to interest
income and expense.
(d) To adjust income taxes for the pro forma adjustments
utilizing Johnson & Johnsons statutory tax rate.
(e) To record the following inventory adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
Inventory step-up
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f) To record the difference between the book value and the
fair value of net property plant and equipment acquired in the
merger (step up).
77
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(g) To record the following intangible asset adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Elimination of pre-existing Guidant goodwill
|
|
$ |
(512 |
) |
Elimination of pre-existing Guidant intangibles
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
Acquired identifiable amortizable intangibles
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
Acquired goodwill and indefinite lived trademarks
|
|
|
11,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
20,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
(h) To record the following deferred tax adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
Deferred tax asset on pre-existing Guidant goodwill and
intangible assets
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(i) To record the following accounts payable adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
Transaction costs
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
(j) To record the deferred tax liability related to
acquired identifiable intangibles, inventory and property plant
and equipment step ups.
(k) To record the following common stock adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Elimination of Guidant common stock (no par value)
|
|
$ |
(999 |
) |
Issuance of Johnson & Johnson common stock ($1 par
value)
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(l) To eliminate Guidants deferred cost, ESOP balance.
(m) To eliminate Guidants accumulated other
comprehensive income balance.
(n) To record the following retained earnings adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
October 2, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Elimination of Guidants retained earnings
|
|
$ |
(2,895 |
) |
Elimination of Guidants additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
Elimination of Guidants unearned compensation
|
|
|
89 |
|
Intercompany elimination impact
|
|
|
68 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
10,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$ |
7,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
78
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements do not present any adjustments to dividends paid per
share on a pro forma basis. Johnson & Johnsons
current quarterly dividend is $0.33 ($1.32 per share
annualized) and is subject to future lawful approval and
declaration by Johnson & Johnsons board of
directors. Guidants current quarterly dividend is $0.10
($0.40 per share annualized) and is subject to future
lawful approval and declaration by Guidants board of
directors. The dividend policy of Johnson & Johnson
following the merger will be determined by its board of
directors.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated basic and diluted earnings
per share for the respective periods presented are based on the
consolidated basic and diluted weighted average shares of
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant. The historical basic and
diluted weighted average shares of Guidant were converted at the
exchange ratio of 0.493.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements do not reflect the realization of potential cost
savings, or any related restructuring costs. Certain cost
savings may result from the merger, however, there can be no
assurance that these cost savings will be achieved. Cost
savings, if achieved, could result from, among other things, the
reduction of overhead expenses, changes in corporate
infrastructure, the elimination of duplicative facilities and
the leveraging of the consolidated annual external purchases.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include accruals in excess of amounts recorded
by Guidant for contingencies related to its previously announced
product recalls and related governmental investigations,
lawsuits, claims and other developments.
The impact of the divestitures and other remedies required by
the Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission in
connection with the merger are not expected to be material to
the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements and as such have not been included.
79
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
The merger will be accounted for by Johnson & Johnson
using the purchase method of accounting. Under this method of
accounting, the purchase price will be allocated to the fair
value of the net assets acquired. The excess purchase price over
the fair value of the assets acquired will be allocated to
goodwill.
COMPARATIVE STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Johnson & Johnson common stock is listed for trading on
the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol
JNJ and Guidant common stock is listed for trading
on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol
GDT. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, dividends declared and the high and low sales prices
per share of Johnson & Johnson common stock and of
Guidant common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange
Composite Transaction Tape. For current price information,
Guidant shareholders are urged to consult publicly available
sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
|
Guidant | |
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dividends | |
|
|
|
Dividends | |
Calendar Period |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Declared | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Declared | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
58.68 |
|
|
$ |
49.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.205 |
|
|
$ |
37.95 |
|
|
$ |
28.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
59.08 |
|
|
|
50.75 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
45.75 |
|
|
|
34.59 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
54.24 |
|
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
52.04 |
|
|
|
43.00 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
52.89 |
|
|
|
48.05 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
60.53 |
|
|
|
44.95 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
54.90 |
|
|
|
49.25 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
73.70 |
|
|
|
59.39 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
57.28 |
|
|
|
49.90 |
|
|
|
0.285 |
|
|
|
69.50 |
|
|
|
51.50 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
58.80 |
|
|
|
54.37 |
|
|
|
0.285 |
|
|
|
66.87 |
|
|
|
49.95 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
64.25 |
|
|
|
54.81 |
|
|
|
0.285 |
|
|
|
74.20 |
|
|
|
62.05 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
68.68 |
|
|
|
61.20 |
|
|
|
0.285 |
|
|
|
75.08 |
|
|
|
70.80 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
69.99 |
|
|
|
64.43 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
75.15 |
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
65.35 |
|
|
|
61.65 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
72.91 |
|
|
|
64.20 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through December 22, 2005)
|
|
|
64.60 |
|
|
|
59.76 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
72.50 |
|
|
|
55.26 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
The following table sets forth the high, low and last reported
sales prices per share of Johnson & Johnson common
stock and of Guidant common stock as reported by the New York
Stock Exchange Composite Transaction Tape and the market value
of a share of Guidant common stock on an equivalent price per
share basis, as determined by reference to the value of the
merger consideration to be received in respect of each share of
Guidant common stock in the merger, in each case on:
|
|
|
|
|
December 15, 2004, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the original merger agreement, |
|
|
|
November 14, 2005, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the amended and restated merger
agreement, and |
|
|
|
|
December 22, 2005, the last practicable date prior to
mailing this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
The table also presents the equivalent value of the merger
consideration per share of Guidant common stock on those dates,
calculated by multiplying the closing price of
Johnson & Johnson common stock on those dates by 0.7488
on December 15, 2004 (which reflects the exchange ratio as
determined under the original merger agreement as of
December 15, 2004) and 0.493 on November 14, 2005, and
December 22, 2005, respectively (which reflects the
exchange ratio under the amended and restated
80
merger agreement), each representing the fraction of a share of
Johnson & Johnson common stock that Guidant
shareholders would receive in the merger for each share of
Guidant common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent Price | |
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | |
|
Guidant | |
|
per Share of | |
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Guidant | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 15, 2004
|
|
$ |
61.38 |
|
|
$ |
60.62 |
|
|
$ |
60.90 |
|
|
$ |
72.48 |
|
|
$ |
70.90 |
|
|
$ |
72.05 |
|
|
$ |
76.00 |
|
November 14, 2005
|
|
$ |
61.12 |
|
|
$ |
60.43 |
|
|
$ |
60.51 |
|
|
$ |
58.45 |
|
|
$ |
57.70 |
|
|
$ |
57.75 |
|
|
$ |
63.08 |
|
December 22, 2005
|
|
|
$61.32 |
|
|
$ |
60.56 |
|
|
$ |
61.32 |
|
|
$ |
67.37 |
|
|
$ |
66.95 |
|
|
$ |
67.37 |
|
|
$ |
63.48 |
|
These prices will fluctuate prior to the special meeting and the
consummation of the merger, and shareholders are urged to obtain
current market quotations prior to making any decision with
respect to the merger.
81
DESCRIPTION OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary of the capital stock of Johnson &
Johnson is subject in all respects to applicable New Jersey law,
the Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation, as amended, and the Johnson & Johnson
by-laws. See Comparison of Rights of Common Shareholders
of Johnson & Johnson and Guidant and Where
You Can Find More Information.
The total authorized shares of capital stock of
Johnson & Johnson consist of
(1) 4,320,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$1.00 per share, and (2) 2,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, without par value. At the close of business on
December 22, 2005, approximately 2,974,515,836 shares
of Johnson & Johnson common stock were issued and
outstanding and no shares of Johnson & Johnson
preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
The Johnson & Johnson board of directors is authorized
to provide for the issuance from time to time of
Johnson & Johnson preferred stock in series and, as to
each series, to fix the designation, the dividend rate and the
preferences, if any, which dividends on that series will have
compared to any other class or series of capital stock of
Johnson & Johnson, the voting rights, if any, the
voluntary and involuntary liquidation prices, the conversion or
exchange privileges, if any, applicable to that series and the
redemption price or prices and the other terms of redemption, if
any, applicable to that series. Cumulative dividends, dividend
preferences and conversion, exchange and redemption provisions,
to the extent that some or all of these features may be present
when shares of Johnson & Johnson preferred stock are
issued, could have an adverse effect on the availability of
earnings for distribution to the holders of Johnson &
Johnson common stock or for other corporate purposes.
82
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND GUIDANT
Johnson & Johnson is a New Jersey corporation subject
to the provisions of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act,
which we refer to as New Jersey law. Guidant is an Indiana
corporation subject to the provisions of the Indiana Business
Corporation Law, which we refer to as Indiana law. Guidant
shareholders, whose rights are currently governed by the Guidant
amended articles of incorporation, the Guidant by-laws and
Indiana law, will, if the merger is completed, become
shareholders of Johnson & Johnson and their rights will
be governed by the Johnson & Johnson restated
certificate of incorporation, the Johnson & Johnson
by-laws and New Jersey law.
The following description summarizes the material differences
that may affect the rights of shareholders of Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant but does not purport to be a complete
statement of all those differences, or a complete description of
the specific provisions referred to in this summary. The
identification of specific differences is not intended to
indicate that other equally or more significant differences do
not exist. Shareholders should read carefully the relevant
provisions of New Jersey law, Indiana law, the
Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation, the Johnson & Johnson by-laws, the
Guidant amended articles of incorporation and the Guidant
by-laws.
Capitalization
Johnson & Johnsons authorized capital stock is
described under Description of Johnson & Johnson
Capital Stock.
The total authorized shares of capital stock of Guidant consist
of (1) 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, without
par value, and (2) 50,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, without par value, of which 1,000,000 are designed as
Series A Participating Preferred Stock and
relate to Guidants shareholder rights plan, which is
described in The Merger Guidants Rights
Agreement. On the close of business on December 8,
2005, approximately 333,401,845 shares of Guidant common
stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of Guidant
preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Number, Election, Vacancy and Removal of Directors
The Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation and the Johnson & Johnson by-laws provide
that the total number of Johnson & Johnson directors
will be not less than nine nor more than 18, as determined
by the Johnson & Johnson board of directors from time
to time. Johnson & Johnson currently has
15 directors. All directors are elected at each annual
meeting of shareholders to serve until the next annual meeting.
The Johnson & Johnson by-laws do not provide for
cumulative voting in the election of directors. The
Johnson & Johnson by-laws provide that vacancies on the
Johnson & Johnson board of directors will be filled by
appointment made by a majority vote of the remaining directors.
The Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation and the Johnson & Johnson by-laws provide
that directors may be removed, with cause, by a majority vote of
the shareholders.
The Guidant amended articles of incorporation and the Guidant
by-laws provide that the total number of Guidant directors will
not be less than seven nor more than 19, as determined by
the Guidant board of directors from time to time. Guidant
currently has 14 directors. The Guidant board of directors
is divided into three classes with approximately one-third of
the directors standing for election each year for three-year
terms. The Guidant by-laws do not provide for cumulative voting
in the election of directors. The Guidant by-laws provide that
vacancies on the Guidant board of directors will be filed by
appointment
83
made by a majority vote of the remaining directors. The Guidant
amended articles of incorporation and the Guidant by-laws
provide that directors may be removed, with or without cause, by
an affirmative vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of
voting stock voting together as a single class.
Amendments to Charter Documents
Under New Jersey law, a proposed amendment to a
corporations certificate of incorporation requires
approval by its board of directors and an affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to
vote on the amendment, unless a specific provision of New Jersey
law or the corporations certificate of incorporation
provides otherwise. The Johnson & Johnson restated
certificate of incorporation provides that if any class or
series of shares is entitled to vote thereon as a class, the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in each class
is required. The Johnson & Johnson restated certificate
of incorporation also provides that the affirmative vote of the
holders of not less than 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by
the holders of all then outstanding shares of voting stock,
voting together as a single class, and the affirmative vote of a
majority of the combined votes entitled to be cast by
disinterested shareholders voting together as a
single class is required to amend, repeal or adopt provisions
inconsistent with Article Eight of the Johnson &
Johnson restated certificate of incorporation which relates to
business combinations with interested parties, unless the
amendment, repeal or adoption is unanimously recommended by the
Johnson & Johnson board of directors if none of its
directors are affiliates or associates of any interested
shareholder.
Under Indiana law, a proposed amendment to a corporations
articles of incorporation must generally be recommended by the
corporations board of directors and approved by an
affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes cast at a
shareholders meeting at which a quorum exists (and, in
certain cases, a majority of all shares held by any voting group
entitled to vote), unless the corporations articles of
incorporation or board of directors provides otherwise. The
Guidant amended articles of incorporation also provide that the
affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 80% of the
votes entitled to be cast by the holders of all then outstanding
shares of Guidant common stock voting together as a single class
is required to alter, amend or repeal Article Five of the
Guidant amended articles of incorporation which relates to,
among other things, the number of directors, classes of
directors, removal of directors, amendments to the Guidant
by-laws, transactions involving a conflict of interest, approval
or ratification by shareholders of contracts or acts of Guidant
or its board of directors and the indemnification of directors,
officers, employees and agents of Guidant. The Guidant amended
articles of incorporation further provide that the affirmative
vote of the holders of not less than 80% of the votes entitled
to be cast by the holders of all then outstanding shares of
Guidant common stock voting together as a single class is
required to alter, amend or repeal Article Six of the
Guidant amended articles of incorporation which relates to
certain transactions with related persons and which
is described in Voting Rights; Required Vote
for Authorization of Certain Actions below.
Amendments to By-laws
Under New Jersey law, the Johnson & Johnson restated
certificate of incorporation and the Johnson & Johnson
by-laws, the Johnson & Johnson by-laws generally may be
amended or repealed in whole or in part by the shareholders at a
regular or special meeting of the shareholders or by the
Johnson & Johnson board of directors at a regular or
special meeting of the board of directors, if notice of the
proposed amendment is contained in the notice of such meeting,
except that a by-law adopted or amended by the
Johnson & Johnson board of directors may be superseded
by shareholder action and that shareholder action may preempt
any further action by the Johnson & Johnson board of
directors with respect to that by-law provision.
84
The Guidant amended articles of incorporation and the Guidant
by-laws provide that the Guidant by-laws may be amended, adopted
or repealed by a majority vote of the Guidant board of
directors. The Guidant amended articles of incorporation further
provide that shareholders have no power to make, alter or repeal
the Guidant by-laws.
Action by Written Consent
Under New Jersey law, any action required or permitted to be
taken at a meeting of shareholders may be taken without a
meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, upon the
written consent of shareholders who would have been entitled to
cast the minimum number of votes which would be necessary to
authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders
entitled to vote thereon were present and voting; provided,
however, that in case of an annual meeting of shareholders for
the election of directors, any consent in writing must be
unanimous.
Under Indiana law, any action required or permitted to be taken
at a meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting only
by a unanimous written consent that is signed by all the
shareholders entitled to vote on the action and delivered to the
corporation. Neither the Guidant amended articles of
incorporation nor the Guidant by-laws provide otherwise.
Notice of Shareholder Actions
New Jersey law and the Johnson & Johnson by-laws
provide that written notice of the time, place and purpose or
purposes of every meeting of shareholders must be given not less
than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date of the
meeting, either personally or by mail, telegram or telex, to
each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. The
Johnson & Johnson by-laws further provide that the only
matters that may be considered and acted upon at an annual
meeting of shareholders are those matters brought before the
meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
through the notice of meeting |
|
|
|
by the Johnson & Johnson board of directors or |
|
|
|
by a shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. |
Generally, the Johnson & Johnson by-laws require a
shareholder who intends to bring matters before an annual
meeting to provide advance notice of such intended action not
less than 120 days prior to the date of the proxy statement
relating to the prior years annual meeting. The notice
must contain a brief description of the business desired to be
brought before the meeting and must identify any personal or
other material interest of the shareholder in such proposed
business. The person presiding at the meeting will have the
discretion to determine whether any item of business was brought
before such meeting in compliance with the above procedures.
Indiana law and the Guidant by-laws provide that written notice
of the time, place and date of every meeting of shareholders
must be delivered or mailed not less than 10 nor more than
60 days before the date of the meeting to each shareholder
of record entitled to vote at the meeting. The Guidant by-laws
further require that the purpose or purposes of the meeting of
shareholders be so provided. The Guidant
85
by-laws provide that the only business to be conducted at an
annual meeting of shareholders is such business properly brought
before the meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
through the notice of meeting |
|
|
|
by the Guidant board of directors or |
|
|
|
by a shareholder with legal right and authority to do so. |
Generally, the Guidant by-laws require a shareholder who intends
to bring matters before an annual meeting to provide advance
notice of such intended action not less than 120 days prior
to the anniversary date of the prior years annual meeting.
The notice must contain, among other things, a brief description
of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and
must identify any personal or other material interest of the
shareholder in such proposed business. The chairman of the
annual meeting will have the discretion to determine whether any
item of business was brought before such meeting in compliance
with the above procedures.
Special Shareholder Meetings
Under the Johnson & Johnson by-laws, a special meeting
of the shareholders may be called at any time by the chairman of
the Johnson & Johnson board of directors, a
vice-chairman of the Johnson & Johnson board of
directors, the chairman of the executive committee, a
vice-chairman of the executive committee, the president or by a
majority of the Johnson & Johnson board of directors,
and may be held on the business day and place stated in the
notice of the meeting.
In addition, New Jersey law provides that holders of not less
than 10% of all shares entitled to vote at a meeting may apply
to the New Jersey Superior Court to request that a special
meeting of the shareholders be called for good cause shown. At
such a meeting, the shareholders present in person or by proxy
will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business
described in such order.
Under the Guidant by-laws, a special meeting of the shareholders
may be called at any time by the Guidant board of directors, the
chairman of the Guidant board of directors, or the Guidant
president. Shareholders do not have the right to call special
meetings or to bring business before special meetings.
Shareholder Inspection Rights; Shareholder Lists
Under New Jersey law, a shareholder who has been a shareholder
for at least six months or who holds, or is authorized in
writing by holders of, at least 5% of the outstanding shares of
any class or series of stock of a corporation has the right, for
any proper purpose and upon at least five days written notice,
to inspect in person or by agent or attorney the minutes of the
proceedings of the corporations shareholders and its
record of shareholders. Irrespective of the period such
shareholder has held his, her or its stock or the amount of
stock such shareholder holds, a court may, upon proof of proper
purpose, compel production for examination by the shareholder of
the books and records of account, minutes and record of
shareholders of Johnson & Johnson.
86
Under Indiana law, any shareholder who gives at least five
business days written notice has the right to inspect and copy,
during normal business hours at the corporations principal
office, the following records and documents, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the corporations charter documents |
|
|
|
board resolutions with respect to one or more classes or series
of shares and fixing their relative rights, preferences and
limitations, if shares issued pursuant to the resolutions are
outstanding |
|
|
|
the minutes of all shareholder meetings and executed written
consents from the past three years |
|
|
|
all written communications to shareholders generally within the
past three years, including annual financial statements and |
|
|
|
the corporations most recent biennial report filed with
the Secretary of State of the State of Indiana. |
In addition, subject to the limitations described below, upon at
least five business days written notice to the corporation,
shareholders may inspect and copy, during normal business hours
at a reasonable location specified by the corporation, the
following records of the corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
excerpts from the minutes of any board meeting |
|
|
|
records of any action of a committee of the board while acting
for the board |
|
|
|
minutes of shareholder meetings |
|
|
|
records of action taken by shareholders or the board without a
meeting, to the extent not subject to inspection under the
provisions described above |
|
|
|
accounting records of the corporation and |
|
|
|
the record of shareholders. |
The right to inspect and copy described in this paragraph is
limited to instances where:
|
|
|
|
|
the shareholders demand is made in good faith and for a
proper purpose |
|
|
|
the shareholder describes with reasonable particularity the
shareholders purpose and the records the shareholders
desires to inspect and |
|
|
|
the records are directly connected with the shareholders
described purpose. |
Limitation of Personal Liability and Indemnification of
Directors and Officers
Under New Jersey law, a corporation may indemnify a director or
officer against his or her expenses and liabilities in
connection with any proceeding involving the director or officer
by reason of his or her being or having been a director or
officer, other than a proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation, if:
|
|
|
|
|
the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he
or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation and |
|
|
|
with respect to any criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was
unlawful. |
The Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation provides that, to the full extent permitted under
New Jersey law, no director or officer of Johnson &
Johnson will be personally liable to Johnson & Johnson
or its shareholders for damages for breach of any duty owed to
Johnson & Johnson or its shareholders.
87
The Johnson & Johnson by-laws provide that to the full
extent permitted under New Jersey law, Johnson &
Johnson will indemnify any person who was or is involved in any
manner in any threatened, pending or completed investigation,
claim, action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative, arbitrative, legislative or investigative, or
who is threatened with being so involved, by reason of the fact
that he or she is or was a director or officer of
Johnson & Johnson or, while serving as a director or
officer of Johnson & Johnson, is or was at the request
of Johnson & Johnson also serving as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against all expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines, penalties,
excise taxes and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred in connection with such proceeding.
Johnson & Johnson enters into indemnification
agreements with its directors and officers and enters into
insurance agreements on its own behalf.
Under Indiana law, a corporation may indemnify officers,
directors, employees and agents against liabilities and expenses
incurred in proceedings if the person acted in good faith and
reasonably believed that, in the case of conduct in the
persons official capacity with the corporation, the
persons conduct was in the corporations best
interests, and, in all other cases, the persons conduct
was at least not opposed to the corporations best
interests. In criminal proceedings, the person must either have
had reasonable cause to believe the conduct was lawful or must
have had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was
unlawful. Under Indiana law, unless a corporations
articles of incorporation provide otherwise, indemnification is
mandatory in two instances:
|
|
|
|
|
a director is wholly successful in defending himself or herself,
on the merits or otherwise, in a proceeding to which the
director was a party because the director is or was a director
of the corporation or |
|
|
|
indemnification is ordered by a court. |
Under Indiana law, a Guidant director will not be liable to
Guidant shareholders for any action or failure to act in his or
her capacity as director, unless the director has breached or
failed to perform his or her duties as a director in good faith,
with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position
would exercise under similar circumstances and in a manner the
director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the
corporation, and the breach or failure to perform these duties
constitutes willful misconduct or recklessness.
The Guidant amended articles of incorporation provide that to
the full extent permitted under Indiana law, Guidant will
indemnify any person who was or is involved in any manner in any
pending, threatened or completed claim, action, suit or
proceeding and all appeals thereof, whether civil, criminal,
administrative, or investigative, formal or informal, by reason
of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer,
employee, or agent of Guidant or is or was serving at the
request of Guidant as a director, officer, employee, agent or
fiduciary of another foreign or domestic corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other organization or entity, whether for profit or not, against
all reasonable expenses (including counsel fees and
disbursements), judgments, fines, penalties, excise taxes and
amounts paid in settlement incurred in connection with such
proceeding. The Guidant amended articles of incorporation deem
its indemnification provisions to be a contract between Guidant
and the affected person, and any rights held by the affected
person in accordance with the indemnification provisions cannot
be diminished or negatively impaired by any repeal, amendment or
modification of the provisions occurring after the affected
person had reason to rely on such provisions.
88
Dividends
The Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation provides that the Johnson & Johnson board
of directors may from time to time declare dividends on its
outstanding shares in accordance with New Jersey law.
Under Indiana law, the Guidant board of directors may not
authorize and pay dividends to its shareholders if after giving
it effect:
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in
the usual course of business or |
|
|
|
Guidants total assets would be less than its total
liabilities plus any amount that would be needed if Guidant were
to be dissolved. |
Conversion
Holders of Johnson & Johnson common stock have no
rights to convert their shares into any other securities.
Holders of Guidant common stock have no rights to convert their
shares into any other securities.
Shareholder Rights Plan
Johnson & Johnson does not have a rights plan. New
Jersey law, however, endorses share rights or options issued by
New Jersey corporations that, among other things, include
conditions precluding holders of a specified percentage of
outstanding shares of a corporation from exercising such share
rights or options or which invalidate the share rights or
options beneficially owned by such holders and their transferees.
For a description of Guidants shareholder rights plan, see
The Merger Guidants Rights Plan.
Voting Rights; Required Vote for Authorization of Certain
Actions
Each holder of Johnson & Johnson common stock is
entitled to one vote for each share held of record and may not
cumulate votes for the election of directors.
Merger or Consolidation. Under New Jersey law, the
consummation of a merger or consolidation of a New Jersey
corporation organized prior to January 1, 1969, such as
Johnson & Johnson, requires the approval of such
corporations board of directors and the affirmative vote
of two-thirds of the votes cast by the holders of shares of the
corporation entitled to vote thereon; however, no such approval
and vote are required if such corporation is the surviving
corporation and
|
|
|
|
|
such corporations certificate of incorporation is not
amended |
|
|
|
the shareholders of the surviving corporation whose shares were
outstanding immediately before the effective date of the merger
will hold the same number of shares, with identical
designations, preferences, limitations, and rights, immediately
after and |
89
|
|
|
|
|
the number of voting shares and participation shares outstanding
after the merger will not exceed by 40% the total number of
voting or participating shares of the surviving corporation
before the merger. |
Similarly, a sale of all or substantially all of such
corporations assets other than in the ordinary course of
business, or a voluntary dissolution of such corporation,
requires the approval of such corporations board of
directors and the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes
cast by the holders of shares of such corporation entitled to
vote thereon.
Business Combinations. Under New Jersey law, no New
Jersey corporation may engage in any business
combination with any interested shareholder (generally, a
10% or greater shareholder) for a period of five years following
such interested shareholders stock acquisition, unless
such business combination is approved by the board of directors
of such corporation prior to the stock acquisition.
Under New Jersey law, business combination includes:
|
|
|
|
|
merger or consolidation of a resident domestic corporation or
one of its subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
with an interested shareholder or |
|
|
|
with any corporation which is, or would be after such merger or
consolidation, an affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder |
|
|
|
|
|
any transfer or other disposition to or with an interested
shareholder or any affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder of at least 10% of (1) the assets, (2) the
outstanding shares or (3) the earning power or income, on a
consolidated basis, of such resident domestic
corporation and |
|
|
|
other specified self-dealing transactions between such resident
domestic corporation and an interested shareholder or any
affiliate or associate thereof. |
In addition, no resident domestic corporation may engage, at any
time, in any business combination with any interested
shareholder of such corporation other than:
|
|
|
|
|
a business combination approved by the board of directors of
such corporation prior to the stock acquisition |
|
|
|
a business combination approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of two-thirds of the voting stock not beneficially owned
by such interested shareholder at a meeting called for such
purpose or |
|
|
|
a business combination in which the interested shareholder meets
certain fair price criteria. |
In addition to the requirement under New Jersey law regarding
business combinations with an interested shareholder, the
Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of incorporation
prohibits Johnson & Johnson from engaging in any
business combination with any interested shareholder
(generally, a 10% or greater shareholder) without (1) the
affirmative vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be
cast by the holders of all then outstanding shares of
Johnson & Johnson voting stock, voting together as a
single class, and (2) the affirmative vote of a majority of
the combined votes entitled to be cast by disinterested
shareholders (as defined in the Johnson & Johnson
restated certificate of incorporation), voting together as a
single class; provided that any business combination will
require only the approval required under New Jersey law if,
among other things, such business combination has been approved
at any time by a majority of the continuing
directors (as defined in the Johnson & Johnson
restated certificate of incorporation) and certain fair price
requirements are met.
The Johnson & Johnson restated certificate of
incorporation defines business combination to
include:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation of Johnson & Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
with an interested shareholder or |
90
|
|
|
|
|
with any other corporation which is, or after such merger or
consolidation would be, an affiliate or associate of an
interested shareholder |
|
|
|
|
|
any transfer or other disposition to or with any interested
shareholder or any affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder of any assets or securities of Johnson &
Johnson or any of its subsidiaries having an aggregate fair
market value of 5% of the total assets of Johnson &
Johnson and its subsidiaries |
|
|
|
the adoption of a plan of liquidation of Johnson &
Johnson proposed by an interested shareholder or any affiliate
or associate of an interested shareholder and |
|
|
|
any transaction which increases the capital stock beneficially
owned by an interested shareholder or any affiliate or associate
of an interested shareholder. |
Control share acquisition. There is no control share
acquisition rule under New Jersey law similar to that described
in Voting Rights; Required Vote for
Authorization of Certain Actions Guidant
Control Share Acquisitions.
Each holder of Guidant common stock is entitled to one vote for
each share held of record and may not cumulate votes for the
election of directors.
Merger or Consolidation. Under Indiana law, the
consummation of a merger requires the approval of a majority of
the board of directors of each corporation and the approval of
each voting group entitled to vote separately on the plan by a
majority of all the votes entitled to be cast by that voting
group, unless a greater vote or a vote by voting groups is
required by Indiana law, the corporations articles of
incorporation or its board of directors. Separate voting by
voting groups is required if the plan of merger contains a
provision that, if contained in a proposed amendment to a
corporations articles of incorporation, would require
action by one or more separate voting groups.
Under Indiana law, approval of the shareholders of an Indiana
corporation which is a surviving corporation in a merger is not
required if:
|
|
|
|
|
the articles of the surviving corporation will not differ from
its articles before the merger |
|
|
|
immediately after the effective date each shareholder of the
surviving corporation will hold the same proportionate number of
shares as those held by the shareholder immediately prior to the
merger, with identical designations, preferences, limitations
and rights and |
|
|
|
the number of voting or participating shares, as the case may
be, outstanding immediately after the merger (either by
conversion of other securities or upon exercise of rights or
warrants issued pursuant to the merger), plus the number of
voting or participating shares issuable as a result of the
merger, will not exceed by more than 20% the number of voting or
participating shares (adjusted to reflect any share split under
the plan of merger) of the surviving corporation outstanding
immediately prior to the merger. |
Under Indiana law, a sale of all or substantially all of
Guidants assets outside of the regular course of business
requires the approval of the board of directors and the
affirmative vote of a majority of all the votes entitled to be
cast on the transaction unless the Guidant board of directors or
the Guidant amended articles of incorporation require a greater
vote or a vote by voting groups.
Business Combinations. Under Indiana law, an
interested shareholder (e.g., any holder of 10% or
more of the shares) of an Indiana corporation with a class of
voting shares registered under Section 12 of the Exchange
Act, or which has specifically adopted this provision in the
corporations articles of incorporation, is prohibited for
a period of five years from completing a business combination
(generally a merger, significant asset sale or disposition or
significant issuance of additional shares) with the corporation
unless, prior to the acquisition of the 10% interest, the board
of directors of the target corporation approved either the
acquisition of such interest or the proposed business
combination. If board approval is
91
not obtained, then five years after a 10% or more shareholder
has become such, a business combination with the 10% or more
shareholder is permitted if all provisions of the articles of
incorporation of the corporation are met and either a majority
of disinterested shareholders approve the transaction or all
shareholders receive a price per share determined in accordance
with the fair price criteria of the business combinations
provision of Indiana law.
An Indiana corporation may elect to remove itself from the
protection provided by the Indiana business combinations
provision by amending its articles of incorporation with the
approval of holders of at least a majority of the
corporations outstanding shares not held by a 10% or more
shareholder. However, this election remains ineffective for
18 months after the amendment and does not apply to a
combination with a shareholder who had acquired a 10% or more
ownership position prior to the effective time of the election.
Guidant has not elected to remove itself from the protection
provided by the Indiana business combinations provision.
The Guidant amended articles of incorporation provide that, in
addition to applicable law and unless otherwise provided for in
the Guidant amended articles of incorporation, Guidant, acting
on its own behalf or as a shareholder of any majority-owned
subsidiary, shall not give effect to or approve certain
specified transactions involving a related person.
Related person is defined in the Guidant amended
articles of incorporation and generally includes any other
corporation, person, or entity which beneficially owns or
controls, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the outstanding
shares of Guidant voting stock. However, Guidant may give effect
or approve transactions involving a related person if all of the
following are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
the actions and transactions were authorized by the affirmative
vote of at least 80% of all of the votes entitled to be cast by
holders of the outstanding shares of voting stock voting
together as a single class (which is not applicable if the
action or transaction is approved by the Guidant board of
directors and by a majority of the continuing
directors (generally, directors that are not affiliates of
a related person and who either were board members prior to the
related person becoming a related person or were nominated by a
majority of the remaining continuing directors)) |
|
|
|
unless approved by a majority of the continuing directors, after
becoming a related person and prior to consummation of such
action or transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
the related person shall not have acquired from Guidant or any
of its subsidiaries any newly issued or treasury shares of
capital stock or any newly issued securities convertible into
capital stock of Guidant or any of its majority-owned
subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, subject to certain
exceptions |
|
|
|
the related person shall not have received the benefit, directly
or indirectly (except proportionately as a shareholder), of any
form of financial assistance or tax credits provided by Guidant
or any of its majority-owned subsidiaries, or made any major
changes to the businesses or capital structures of Guidant or
any of its majority-owned subsidiaries, or reduced the current
rate of dividends payable on Guidants capital stock below
the rate in effect immediately prior to the time such Related
Person became a Related Person |
|
|
|
the related person shall have taken all required actions within
its power to ensure that the Guidant board of directors included
representation by continuing directors as provided in the
Guidant amended articles of incorporation and |
|
|
|
|
|
a proxy statement in compliance with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and the Guidant amended articles of incorporation
shall be mailed to the shareholders of Guidant for the purpose
of soliciting shareholder approval of such action or transaction
unless the action or transaction has been approved by a majority
of the continuing directors. |
Control share acquisitions. Under Indiana law, unless an
Indiana corporation provides an exemption in its articles of
incorporation or by-laws, any person who makes a control
share acquisition may not vote the shares acquired in that
acquisition, except to the extent voting rights relating to
those shares are
92
granted by a resolution approved by a vote of disinterested
shareholders. A control share acquisition is defined
as either:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition by a person of, either within a
90-day period or
pursuant to a plan to make a control share acquisition of
ownership or |
|
|
|
the power to direct the voting of, shares representing between
one-fifth and one-third, between one-third and one-half, or
one-half or more of an issuing public corporations voting
power in the election of directors. |
The acquiring person may request, and the corporation must call,
a special shareholders meeting to restore or approve
voting rights after the acquiring person delivers to the
corporation a statement describing the acquisition or proposed
acquisition (an acquiring person statement), and an
undertaking to pay the expenses relating to the meeting. Shares
acquired in a control share acquisition in which no acquiring
person statement has been filed may be redeemed by the
corporation at their fair value, under certain circumstances.
Unless otherwise provided in a corporations articles of
incorporation or by-laws, if shares acquired in a control share
acquisition are given full voting rights and the acquiring
person has acquired shares representing a majority or more of
the corporations voting power, then the other shareholders
will be entitled to dissenters rights of appraisal.
Pursuant to the Guidant by-laws, Guidant has elected to exempt
itself from the Indiana control share statute.
Other Corporate Constituencies
New Jersey law provides that in determining whether a proposal
or offer to acquire a corporation is in the best interest of the
corporation, a board of directors may, in addition to
considering the effects of any action on shareholders, consider
(1) the effects of the proposed action on the
corporations employees, suppliers, creditors and
customers, (2) the effects on the community in which the
corporation operates and (3) the long-term as well as
short-term interests of the corporation and its shareholders,
including the possibility that those interests may be served
best by the continued independence of the corporation. New
Jersey law also provides that if, based on those factors, a
board determines that the offer is not in the best interest of
the corporation it may reject the offer.
Under Indiana law, in discharging his or her duties to the
corporation and in determining what is in the best interests of
the corporation, a director may, in addition to considering the
effects of any action on shareholders, consider the effects of
the action on employees, suppliers, customers, the communities
in which the corporation operates and any other factors that the
director considers pertinent. Directors are not required to
approve a proposed business combination or other corporate
action if the directors determine in good faith that the
approval is not in the best interests of the corporation. In
addition, directors are not required to:
|
|
|
|
|
render inapplicable the business combination provisions of
Indiana law |
|
|
|
redeem any rights under, or render inapplicable, a shareholder
rights plan or |
|
|
|
to take or decline to take any action solely because of the
effect that the action might have on a proposed change of
control. |
Guidants amended articles of incorporation require the
Guidant board of directors, when considering any business
combination with a related person, to give due
consideration to all relevant factors, including, without
limitation, the effects on shareholders, employees, suppliers,
and customers of Guidant, communities in which offices or other
facilities of Guidant are located, and any other factors
considered to be pertinent by the Guidant board of directors.
93
Indiana law explicitly provides that any different or higher
degree of scrutiny imposed in Delaware and some other
jurisdictions upon director actions taken in response to
potential changes in control will not apply.
Dissenters Rights
Under New Jersey law, shareholders have the right to dissent
from any plan of merger or consolidation to which the
corporation is a party, and to demand payment for the fair value
of their shares. However, unless the certificate of
incorporation otherwise provides, New Jersey law provides that
shareholders do not have a right to dissent from any plan of
merger or consolidation with respect to shares (1) of a
class or series which is listed on a national securities
exchange or is held of record by not less than
1,000 holders; or (2) for which, pursuant to the plan
of merger or consolidation, such shareholder will receive
(x) cash, (y) shares, obligations or other securities
which, upon consummation of the merger or consolidation, will
either be listed on a national securities exchange or held of
record by not less than 1,000 holders, or (z) cash and
such securities. In addition, New Jersey law provides that,
unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise,
shareholders of a surviving corporation do not have the right to
dissent from a plan of merger if the merger did not require for
its approval the vote of such shareholders. In addition, unless
a corporations certificate of incorporation provides
otherwise, New Jersey law provides that shareholders do not have
a right to dissent from any sale, lease, exchange or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of a
corporation (1) with respect to shares of a class or series
which is listed on a national securities exchange or is held of
record by not less than 1,000 holders; (2) from a
transaction pursuant to a plan of dissolution of the corporation
which provides for distribution of substantially all of its net
assets to shareholders in accordance with their respective
interests within one year after the date of such transaction,
where such transaction is wholly for (x) cash or
(y) shares, obligations or other securities which, upon
consummation of the plan of dissolution, will either be listed
on a national securities exchange or held of record by not less
than 1,000 holders, or (z) cash and such securities; or
(3) from a sale pursuant to an order of a court having
jurisdiction.
Johnson & Johnsons restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws are silent as to dissenters
rights.
Under Indiana law, shareholders of an Indiana corporation
possess dissenters rights in connection with certain
mergers and other significant corporate actions. A shareholder
is entitled to dissent from and obtain payment of the fair value
of the shareholders shares in the event of:
|
|
|
|
|
consummation of a plan of merger, if shareholder approval is
required and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the plan |
|
|
|
consummation of a plan of share exchange by which the
shareholders shares will be acquired, if the shareholder
is entitled to vote on the plan |
|
|
|
consummation of a sale or exchange of all, or substantially all,
the property of the corporation, other than in the usual course
of business, if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the sale
or exchange |
|
|
|
approval of a control share acquisition under Indiana
law and |
|
|
|
any corporate action taken pursuant to a shareholder vote to the
extent the articles of incorporation, by-laws or resolution of
the board of directors provides that voting or non-voting
shareholders are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for
their shares. |
The dissenters rights provisions described above do not
apply, however, to the holders of shares of any class or series
with respect to any transaction described above if the shares of
that class or series were registered on a United States
securities exchange registered under the Exchange Act or traded
on the Nasdaq National Market. As of the date of this proxy
statement/ prospectus, shares of Guidant common
94
stock were traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Therefore,
Guidant shareholders currently would not be entitled to assert
dissenters rights pursuant to Indiana law with respect to
any of the transactions discussed above.
LEGAL MATTERS
The legality of Johnson & Johnson common stock offered
by this proxy statement/ prospectus will be passed upon for
Johnson & Johnson by Philip P. Crowley, Assistant
General Counsel of Johnson & Johnson. Mr. Crowley
is paid a salary by Johnson & Johnson, is a participant
in various employee benefit plans offered to employees of
Johnson & Johnson generally and owns and has options to
purchase shares of Johnson & Johnson common stock.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting (which is included in Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting) of
Johnson & Johnson and subsidiaries incorporated in this
proxy statement/ prospectus by reference to the
Johnson & Johnson Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 2, 2005, have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Guidant appearing in
Guidants Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (including the schedule
appearing therein), and Guidant managements assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004, included therein, have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon,
included therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such
consolidated financial statements and managements
assessment are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon
such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the Guidant
board of directors knows of no matters that will be presented
for consideration at the special meeting other than as described
in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Guidant will not hold a 2005 annual meeting of Guidant
shareholders and will hold a 2006 annual meeting of Guidant
shareholders only if the merger is not completed. The deadline
for receipt by Guidants secretary of shareholder proposals
for inclusion in Guidants proxy materials for the 2006
annual meeting (if it is held) will be a reasonable time before
Guidant begins to print and mail its proxy materials.
Additionally, if a Guidant shareholder wishes to nominate a
candidate for director or propose other business for the 2006
annual meeting (if it is held), Guidants secretary must
have received written notice no later than the close of business
on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the
date of the 2006 annual meeting is mailed or public announcement
of the date of the 2006 annual meeting is made, whichever first
occurs. The notice must provide additional information as
described in Guidants
by-laws.
95
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant file annual, quarterly
and special reports, proxy statements and other information with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy
any reports, statements or other information that
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions public reference room at the following
location:
Public Reference Room
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Room 1024
Washington, D.C. 20549
Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the public reference room. These
Securities and Exchange Commission filings are also available to
the public from commercial document retrieval services and at
the website maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission
at http://www.sec.gov. Reports, proxy statements and
other information concerning Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant may also be inspected at the offices of the New York
Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
The Securities and Exchange Commission allows Johnson &
Johnson and Guidant to incorporate by reference
information into this proxy statement/ prospectus, which means
that the companies can disclose important information to you by
referring you to other documents filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The information incorporated
by reference is considered part of this proxy statement/
prospectus, except for any information superseded by information
contained directly in this proxy statement/ prospectus or in
later filed documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates by reference the
documents set forth below that Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant have previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These documents contain important business and
financial information about Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant that is not included in or delivered with this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson Filings
|
|
Period |
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Fiscal Year ended January 2, 2005 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed on May 10, 2005 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed on August 10, 2005 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed on November 7, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on November 15, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on November 18, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on December 16, 2005 |
|
Guidant Filings
|
|
Period |
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed on May 9, 2005 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed on August 5, 2005 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed on November 7, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on November 7, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on November 15, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on November 18, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on November 30, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on December 7, 2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on December 21, 2005 |
96
Johnson & Johnson and Guidant also incorporate by
reference additional documents that may be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 13(a),
13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act between the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and, in the case of
Johnson & Johnson, the date of the completion of the
merger, and, in the case of Guidant, the date of the special
meeting of Guidants shareholders. These include periodic
reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q and
Current Reports on
Form 8-K, as well
as proxy statements.
Johnson & Johnson has supplied all information
contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/
prospectus relating to Johnson & Johnson and Guidant
has supplied all such information relating to Guidant.
If you are a shareholder, we may have previously sent you some
of the documents incorporated by reference, but you can obtain
any of them through the companies, the Securities and Exchange
Commission or the Securities
and Exchange Commissions website as described above.
Documents incorporated by reference are available from the
companies without charge, excluding all exhibits, except that if
the companies have specifically incorporated by reference an
exhibit in this proxy statement/ prospectus, the exhibit will
also be provided without charge. Shareholders may obtain
documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/
prospectus by requesting them in writing or by telephone from
the appropriate company at the following addresses:
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson |
|
Guidant Corporation |
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza |
|
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor |
New Brunswick, NJ 08933 |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204-5129 |
Attention: Office of Corporate Secretary |
|
Attention: Secretary |
Telephone: (732) 524-2455 |
|
Telephone: (317) 971-2000 |
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information
that is different from what is contained in this proxy
statement/ prospectus. This proxy statement/ prospectus is dated
December 23, 2005. You should not assume that the
information contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus is
accurate as of any date other than that date. Neither the
mailing of this proxy statement/ prospectus to shareholders nor
the issuance of Johnson & Johnson common stock in the
merger creates any implication to the contrary.
97
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/ prospectus contains certain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the
financial condition, results of operations, business strategies,
operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive positions,
growth opportunities for existing products, plans and objectives
of management, markets for stock of Johnson & Johnson
and Guidant and other matters. Statements in this proxy
statement/ prospectus that are not historical facts are hereby
identified as forward-looking statements for the
purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the
Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act. Such
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those
relating to the future business prospects, revenues and income,
in each case relating to Johnson & Johnson or Guidant,
wherever they occur in this proxy statement/ prospectus, are
necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of the senior
management of Johnson & Johnson (with regard to matters
relating to Johnson & Johnson) or Guidant (with regard
to matters relating to Guidant) and involve a number of risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those suggested by the forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements should, therefore,
be considered in light of various important factors, including
those set forth in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking
statements include without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
competitive factors, including technological advances achieved
and patents attained by competitors and generic competition as
patents on products expire and |
|
|
|
government laws and regulations affecting domestic and foreign
operations, including those relating to trade, monetary and
fiscal policies, taxes, price controls, regulatory approval of
new products and licensing. |
Words such as estimate, project,
plan, intend, expect,
believe and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are found at various places throughout this proxy
statement/ prospectus and the other documents incorporated by
reference. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. Neither
Johnson & Johnson nor Guidant undertakes any obligation
to publicly update or release any revisions to these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus or to reflect
the occurrence of unanticipated events.
The foregoing list sets forth some, but not all, of the factors
that could impact upon Johnson & Johnsons and
Guidants ability to achieve results described in any
forward-looking statements. A further list and description of
these and other factors can be found in Exhibit 99(b) of
Johnson & Johnsons Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 2, 2005, and in Exhibit 99
of Guidants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements that
speak only as of the date made. Investors also should understand
that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors
and that this list should not be considered a complete statement
of all potential risks and uncertainties. Investors should also
realize that if underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or
unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could
vary materially from Johnson & Johnsons or
Guidants projections. Johnson & Johnson and
Guidant undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements as a result of future events or developments.
98
Annex 1
AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
Dated as of November 14, 2005
Among
JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
SHELBY MERGER SUB, INC.
And
GUIDANT CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1-i
1-ii
|
|
|
AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this
Agreement) dated as of November 14, 2005, among
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, a New Jersey corporation
(Parent), SHELBY MERGER SUB, INC., an Indiana
corporation and a wholly owned Subsidiary of Parent
(Sub), and GUIDANT CORPORATION, an Indiana
corporation (the Company). |
WHEREAS Parent, Sub and the Company entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated as of December 15, 2004 (the
Original Merger Agreement), and they now desire to
amend and restate the Original Merger Agreement (it being
understood that all references to the date hereof or
the date of this Agreement refer to
December 15, 2004);
WHEREAS the Board of Directors of each of the Company and Sub
has adopted, and the Board of Directors of Parent has approved,
this Agreement and the merger of Sub with and into the Company
(the Merger), upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement, whereby each issued and
outstanding share of common stock, without par value, of the
Company (Company Common Stock), other than shares of
Company Common Stock directly owned by Parent, Sub or the
Company, will be converted into the right to receive (a) a
number of validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of
common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Parent
(Parent Common Stock) and (b) $33.25 in cash,
without interest;
WHEREAS simultaneously with the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, Parent and the Company are entering into a Settlement
Agreement for the purpose of permanently settling and resolving
any and all claims, disputes, issues or matters that exist
between them relating to the matters contemplated by the
Original Merger Agreement or raised by the litigation filed by
the Company with respect to the Original Merger Agreement, and
agreeing to dismiss such litigation with prejudice; and
WHEREAS Parent, Sub and the Company desire to make certain
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
connection with the Merger and also to prescribe various
conditions to the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement, and subject to the conditions set forth herein, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger
SECTION 1.01. The
Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Business
Corporation Law of the State of Indiana (the IBCL),
Sub shall be merged with and into the Company at the Effective
Time. Following the Effective Time, the separate corporate
existence of Sub shall cease and the Company shall continue as
the surviving corporation in the Merger (the Surviving
Corporation) and shall succeed to and assume all the
rights and obligations of Sub in accordance with the IBCL.
SECTION 1.02. Closing.
The closing of the Merger (the Closing) will take
place at 10:00 a.m. on a date to be specified by the
parties, which shall be no later than the second business day
after satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by applicable
Law) waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VI
(other than those conditions that by their terms are to be
satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or (to
the extent permitted by applicable Law) waiver of those
conditions), at the offices of Cravath, Swaine &
Moore LLP, Worldwide Plaza, 825 Eighth Avenue, New
York, New York 10019, unless another time, date or place is
agreed to in writing by Parent and the Company; provided,
however, that if all the conditions set forth in Article VI
shall no longer be satisfied or (to the extent permitted by
applicable Law) waived on such second business day, then the
Closing shall take place on the first business day on which all
such conditions shall again have been satisfied or (to the
extent permitted by
1-1
applicable Law) waived unless another time is agreed to in
writing by Parent and the Company. The date on which the Closing
occurs is referred to in this Agreement as the Closing
Date.
SECTION 1.03. Effective
Time. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, as soon
as practicable on the Closing Date, the parties shall file with
the Secretary of State of the State of Indiana articles of
merger (the Articles of Merger) executed and
acknowledged by the parties in accordance with the relevant
provisions of the IBCL and, as soon as practicable on or after
the Closing Date, shall make all other filings or recordings
required under the IBCL. The Merger shall become effective upon
the filing of the Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State
of the State of Indiana, or at such later time as Parent and the
Company shall agree and shall specify in the Articles of Merger
(the time the Merger becomes effective being the Effective
Time).
SECTION 1.04. Effects of
the Merger. The Merger shall have the effects set forth in
Section 23-1-40-6
of the IBCL.
SECTION 1.05. Articles of
Incorporation and By-laws. (a) The Articles of
Incorporation of the Company (the Company Articles)
shall be amended at the Effective Time to be in the form of
Exhibit A and, as so amended, such Company Articles shall
be the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as provided
therein or by applicable Law.
|
|
|
(b) The By-laws of Sub, as in effect immediately prior to
the Effective Time, shall be the By-laws of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as provided
therein or by applicable Law. |
SECTION 1.06. Directors.
The directors of Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be the directors of the Surviving Corporation until the
earlier of their resignation or removal or until their
respective successors are duly elected and qualified, as the
case may be.
SECTION 1.07. Officers.
The officers of the Company immediately prior to the Effective
Time shall be the officers of the Surviving Corporation until
the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their
respective successors are duly elected and qualified, as the
case may be.
ARTICLE II
Effect of the Merger on
the Capital Stock of the
Constituent Corporations;
Exchange of Certificates
SECTION 2.01. Effect on
Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the
Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any
shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital stock of
Parent or Sub:
|
|
|
(a) Capital Stock of Sub. Each issued and
outstanding share of capital stock of Sub shall be converted
into and become one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable
share of common stock, without par value, of the Surviving
Corporation. |
|
|
(b) Cancelation of Treasury Stock and Parent-Owned
Stock. Each share of Company Common Stock that is directly
owned by the Company, Parent or Sub immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall automatically be canceled and shall cease
to exist, and no consideration shall be delivered in exchange
therefor. |
|
|
(c) Conversion of Company Common Stock. Subject to
Section 2.02(e), each share of Company Common Stock issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other
than shares to be canceled in accordance with
Section 2.01(b)) shall be converted into the right to
receive (i) 0.493 (the Exchange Ratio) validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of Parent Common
Stock (the Stock Portion) and (ii) $33.25 in
cash, without interest (the Cash Portion and,
together with the Stock Portion, the Merger
Consideration). At the Effective Time, all such shares of
Company Common Stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall
automatically be canceled and shall cease to exist, and each
holder of a certificate which immediately prior to the Effective |
1-2
|
|
|
Time represented any such shares of Company Common Stock (each,
a Certificate) shall cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive the Merger
Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable
pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e), in
each case to be issued or paid in consideration therefor upon
surrender of such Certificate in accordance with
Section 2.02(b), without interest. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if between the date of this Agreement and the
Effective Time, (A) the outstanding shares of Parent Common
Stock shall have been changed into a different number of shares
or a different class, by reason of the occurrence or record date
of any stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification,
recapitalization, split, combination, exchange of shares or
similar transaction, (B) Parent declares or pays cash
dividends in any fiscal quarter in excess of 200% of the amount
of regularly quarterly dividends paid by the Parent immediately
prior to the date hereof or (C) Parent engages in any
spin-off or split-off, then in any such case the Exchange Ratio
shall be appropriately adjusted to reflect such action. The
right of any holder of a Certificate to receive the Merger
Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable
pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e) shall
be subject to and reduced by the amount of any withholding that
is required under applicable tax Law. |
SECTION 2.02. Exchange of
Certificates. (a) Exchange Agent. Prior to the
Effective Time, Parent shall appoint EquiServe Trust Company or
another bank or trust company that is reasonably satisfactory to
the Company to act as exchange agent (the Exchange
Agent) for the payment of the Merger Consideration. At the
Effective Time, Parent shall deposit, or cause the Surviving
Corporation to deposit, with the Exchange Agent, for the benefit
of the holders of Certificates, certificates representing shares
of Parent Common Stock and cash in an amount sufficient to pay
the aggregate Merger Consideration required to be paid pursuant
to Section 2.01(c). In addition, Parent shall deposit with
the Exchange Agent, as necessary from time to time after the
Effective Time, any dividends or other distributions payable
pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e). All
shares of Parent Common Stock, cash, dividends and distributions
deposited with the Exchange Agent pursuant to this
Section 2.02(a) shall hereinafter be referred to as the
Exchange Fund.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As soon as reasonably
practicable after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the
Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record of a Certificate
whose shares of Company Common Stock were converted into the
right to receive the Merger Consideration, any dividends or
other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and
cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to
Section 2.02(e) (i) a form of letter of transmittal
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk
of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent and
which shall be in customary form and contain customary
provisions) and (ii) instructions for use in effecting the
surrender of the Certificates in exchange for the Merger
Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable
pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e). Each
holder of record of one or more Certificates shall, upon
surrender to the Exchange Agent of such Certificate or
Certificates, together with such letter of transmittal, duly
executed, and such other documents as may reasonably be required
by the Exchange Agent, be entitled to receive in exchange
therefor (i) the amount of cash to which such holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.01(c), (ii) a
certificate or certificates representing that number of whole
shares of Parent Common Stock (after taking into account all
Certificates surrendered by such holder) to which such holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.01(c) (which shall be in
uncertificated book entry form unless a physical certificate is
requested), (iii) any dividends or distributions payable
pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and (iv) cash in lieu of
any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e),
and the Certificates so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled.
In the event of a transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock
which is not registered in the transfer records of the Company,
payment of the Merger Consideration in accordance with this
Section 2.02(b) may be made to a person other than the
person in whose name the Certificate so surrendered is
registered if such Certificate shall be properly endorsed or
otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the person
requesting such payment shall pay any transfer or other taxes
required by reason of the payment of the Merger Consideration,
any dividends or other
1-3
distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash
in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to
Section 2.02(e) to a person other than the registered
holder of such Certificate or establish to the reasonable
satisfaction of Parent that such taxes have been paid or are not
applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by this
Section 2.02(b), each Certificate shall be deemed at any
time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to
receive upon such surrender the Merger Consideration, any
dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to
Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares
payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e). No interest shall be
paid or will accrue on any payment to holders of Certificates
pursuant to the provisions of this Article II.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. No dividends or other distributions with respect to
Parent Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time
shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate
with respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock that the
holder thereof has the right to receive upon the surrender
thereof, and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares of
Parent Common Stock shall be paid to any such holder pursuant to
Section 2.02(e), in each case until the holder of such
Certificate shall have surrendered such Certificate in
accordance with this Article II. Following the surrender of
any Certificate, there shall be paid to the record holder of the
certificate representing whole shares of Parent Common Stock
issued in exchange therefor, without interest, (i) at the
time of such surrender, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time
theretofore paid with respect to such whole shares of Parent
Common Stock and the amount of any cash payable in lieu of a
fractional share of Parent Common Stock to which such holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.02(e) and (ii) at the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time but
prior to such surrender and a payment date subsequent to such
surrender payable with respect to such whole shares of Parent
Common Stock.
(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common
Stock. The Merger Consideration, any dividends or other
distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash
in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to
Section 2.02(e) paid upon the surrender of Certificates in
accordance with the terms of this Article II shall be
deemed to have been paid in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to the shares of Company Common Stock formerly
represented by such Certificates. At the close of business on
the day on which the Effective Time occurs, the share transfer
books of the Company shall be closed, and there shall be no
further registration of transfers on the share transfer books of
the Surviving Corporation of the shares of Company Common Stock
that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time.
If, after the Effective Time, any Certificate is presented to
the Surviving Corporation for transfer, it shall be canceled
against delivery of the Merger Consideration, any dividends or
other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and
cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to
Section 2.02(e) to the holder thereof as provided in this
Article II.
(e) No Fractional Shares. (i) No certificates
or scrip representing fractional shares of Parent Common Stock
shall be issued upon the surrender for exchange of Certificates,
no dividends or other distributions of Parent shall relate to
such fractional share interests and such fractional share
interests will not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any
rights of a shareholder of Parent.
(ii) In lieu of such fractional share interests, Parent
shall pay to each holder of a Certificate an amount in cash
equal to the product obtained by multiplying (A) the
fractional share interest to which such holder (after taking
into account all shares of Company Common Stock formerly
represented by all Certificates surrendered by such holder)
would otherwise be entitled by (B) the per share closing
price of Parent Common Stock on the Closing Date (the
Closing Price), as such price is reported on the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the NYSE) Composite
Transaction Tape (as reported by Bloomberg Financial Markets or
such other source as the parties shall agree in writing).
(f) Termination of the Exchange Fund. Any portion of
the Exchange Fund which remains undistributed to the holders of
the Certificates for six months after the Effective Time shall
be delivered to Parent, upon demand, and any holders of the
Certificates who have not theretofore complied with this
Article II shall thereafter look only to Parent for, and
Parent shall remain liable for, payment of their claim for the
Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions
payable pursuant to
1-4
Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares
payable pursuant to Section 2.02(e) in accordance with this
Article II.
(g) No Liability. None of Parent, Sub, the Company,
the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent shall be liable
to any person in respect of any shares of Parent Common Stock,
cash, dividends or other distributions from the Exchange Fund
properly delivered to a public official pursuant to any
applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law. If any
Certificate shall not have been surrendered prior to four years
after the Effective Time (or immediately prior to such earlier
date on which any Merger Consideration (and any dividends or
other distributions payable with respect thereto pursuant to
Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares
payable with respect thereto pursuant to Section 2.02(e))
would otherwise escheat to or become the property of any
Governmental Entity), any such Merger Consideration (and any
dividends or other distributions payable with respect thereto
pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares payable with respect thereto pursuant to
Section 2.02(e)) shall, to the extent permitted by
applicable Law, become the property of Parent, free and clear of
all claims or interest of any person previously entitled thereto.
(h) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Exchange Agent
shall invest the cash included in the Exchange Fund as directed
by Parent. Any interest and other income resulting from such
investments shall be paid to and be income of Parent. If for any
reason (including losses) the cash in the Exchange Fund shall be
insufficient to fully satisfy all of the payment obligations to
be made in cash by the Exchange Agent hereunder, Parent shall
promptly deposit cash into the Exchange Fund in an amount which
is equal to the deficiency in the amount of cash required to
fully satisfy such cash payment obligations.
(i) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate shall have
been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the person claiming such Certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed and, if required by Parent, the posting by
such person of a bond in such reasonable amount as Parent may
direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
it with respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent shall
deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
Certificate the Merger Consideration, any dividends or other
distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.02(c) and cash
in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to
Section 2.02(e), in each case pursuant to this
Article II.
(j) Withholding Rights. Parent, the Surviving
Corporation or the Exchange Agent shall be entitled to deduct
and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant
to this Agreement to any holder of Certificates such amounts as
Parent, the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent is
required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of
such payment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code), or any provision of state, local or
foreign tax Law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld and
paid over to the appropriate taxing authority by Parent, the
Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent, such withheld
amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as
having been paid to the holder of Certificates in respect of
which such deduction and withholding was made by Parent, the
Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent.
ARTICLE III
Representations and
Warranties
SECTION 3.01. Representations
and Warranties of the Company. Except as disclosed in the
Company SEC Documents filed by the Company and publicly
available prior to November 14, 2005 (Filed Company
SEC Documents), and except as set forth in (i) the
disclosure schedule delivered by the Company to Parent prior to
the execution of the Original Merger Agreement and (ii) the
supplement thereto delivered by the Company to Parent prior to
the execution of this Agreement (collectively, the Company
Disclosure Schedule) (with specific reference to the
particular Section or subsection of this Agreement to which the
information set forth in such disclosure schedule relates;
provided, however, that any information set forth in one section
of the Company Disclosure Schedule shall be deemed to apply to
1-5
each other Section or subsection thereof to which its relevance
is readily apparent on its face), the Company represents and
warrants to Parent and Sub as follows:
|
|
|
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate Power. Each
of the Company and its Subsidiaries has been duly organized, and
is validly existing and in good standing (with respect to
jurisdictions that recognize that concept) under the Laws of the
jurisdiction of its incorporation or formation, as the case may
be, and has all requisite power and authority and possesses all
governmental licenses, permits, authorizations and approvals
necessary to enable it to use its corporate or other name and to
own, lease or otherwise hold and operate its properties and
other assets and to carry on its business as currently
conducted, except where the failure to have such governmental
licenses, permits, authorizations or approvals individually or
in the aggregate has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company
and its Subsidiaries is duly qualified or licensed to do
business and is in good standing (with respect to jurisdictions
that recognize that concept) in each jurisdiction in which the
nature of its business or the ownership, leasing or operation of
its properties makes such qualification, licensing or good
standing necessary, other than in such jurisdictions where the
failure to be so qualified, licensed or in good standing
individually or in the aggregate has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The
Company has made available to Parent, prior to the date of this
Agreement, complete and accurate copies of the Company Articles
and the Companys By-laws (the Company
By-laws), and the comparable organizational documents of
each Significant Subsidiary (as such term is defined in
Rule 12b-2 under
the Exchange Act), in each case as amended to the date hereof. |
|
|
(b) Subsidiaries. Section 3.01(b) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule lists, as of the date hereof,
(i) each Significant Subsidiary of the Company (including
its state of incorporation or formation) and (ii) each
other Subsidiary of the Company. All of the outstanding capital
stock of, or other equity interests in, each Significant
Subsidiary of the Company, is directly or indirectly owned by
the Company. All the issued and outstanding shares of capital
stock of, or other equity interests in, each such Subsidiary
owned by the Company have been validly issued and are fully paid
and nonassessable and are owned directly or indirectly by the
Company free and clear of all pledges, liens, charges,
encumbrances or security interests of any kind or nature
whatsoever (other than liens, charges and encumbrances for
current taxes not yet due and payable) (collectively,
Liens), and free of any restriction on the right to
vote, sell or otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other
equity interests. Except with respect to securities of
non-Affiliates that, to the Knowledge of the Company, do not
constitute a 20% or greater interest in such non-Affiliates (or
a 5% or greater interest in such non-Affiliates if the
Companys investment therein is greater than $20,000,000),
and except for the capital stock of, or voting securities or
equity interests in, its Subsidiaries, the Company does not own,
directly or indirectly, as of the date hereof, any capital stock
of, or other voting securities or equity interests in, any
corporation, partnership, joint venture, association or other
entity. |
|
|
(c) Capital Structure. The authorized capital stock
of the Company consists of 1,000,000,000 shares of Company
Common Stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
without par value (Company Preferred Stock).
1,500,000 shares of Company Preferred Stock have been
designated as Series A Participating Preferred Stock,
without par value (the Company Series A Preferred
Stock). At the close of business on October 31, 2005,
(i) 332,448,023 shares of Company Common Stock were
issued and outstanding (which number includes
(A) 708,755 shares of Company Common Stock held by the
Company in its treasury, (B) 1,382,196 shares of
Company Common Stock held by the trust established under The
Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan and
(C) 1,084,669 shares of Company Common Stock subject
to vesting and restrictions on transfer (Company
Restricted Stock)), (ii) 28,029,833 shares of
Company Common Stock were reserved and available for issuance
pursuant to the Companys 1994 Stock Plan, as amended, 1996
Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, as amended, 1998 Stock Plan, as
amended, and 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
ESPP) (such plans, collectively, the Company
Stock Plans), of which 26,067,053 shares of Company
Common Stock were subject to outstanding Company Stock Options
or agreements to issue Company Stock Options, and (iii) no
shares of |
1-6
|
|
|
Company Preferred Stock (including Company Series A
Preferred Stock) were issued or outstanding or were held by the
Company as treasury shares. Except as set forth above in this
Section 3.01(c), at the close of business on
October 31, 2005, no shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of the Company were
issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding. At the close of
business on October 31, 2005, there were no outstanding
stock appreciation rights, phantom stock rights,
restricted stock units, performance units, rights to receive
shares of Company Common Stock on a deferred basis or other
rights (other than Company Stock Options) that are linked to the
value of Company Common Stock (collectively, Company
Stock-Based Awards). All outstanding options to purchase
shares of Company Common Stock exclusive of rights under the
ESPP (collectively, Company Stock Options) and
shares of Company Restricted Stock are evidenced by stock option
agreements, restricted stock purchase agreements or other award
agreements. All outstanding shares of capital stock of the
Company are, and all shares which may be issued pursuant to the
Company Stock Options or Company Stock-Based Awards will be,
when issued in accordance with the terms thereof, duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not
subject to preemptive rights. There are no bonds, debentures,
notes or other indebtedness of the Company having the right to
vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable for, securities
having the right to vote) on any matters on which shareholders
of the Company may vote. Except as set forth above in this
Section 3.01(c) and for issuances of shares of Company
Common Stock pursuant to the Company Stock Options set forth
above in this Section 3.01(c) and subject to
Section 4.01(a), (x) there are not issued, reserved
for issuance or outstanding (A) any shares of capital stock
or other voting securities or equity interests of the Company,
(B) any securities of the Company convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other
voting securities or equity interests of the Company, (C) any
warrants, calls, options or other rights to acquire from the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and no obligation of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, any capital stock,
voting securities, equity interests or securities convertible
into or exchangeable or exercisable for capital stock or voting
securities of the Company or (D) any Company Stock-Based
Awards and (y) there are not any outstanding obligations of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any such securities or to issue, deliver or
sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold, any such
securities. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to any voting Contract with respect to the voting of any
such securities. Except as set forth above in this
Section 3.01(c) and subject to Section 4.01(a), there
are no outstanding (1) securities of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable
for shares of capital stock or voting securities or equity
interests of any Subsidiary of the Company, (2) warrants, calls,
options or other rights to acquire from the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries, and no obligation of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to issue, any capital stock, voting securities,
equity interests or securities convertible into or exchangeable
or exercisable for capital stock or voting securities of any
Subsidiary of the Company or (3) obligations of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise
acquire any such outstanding securities or to issue, deliver or
sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold, any such
securities. |
|
|
(d) Authority; Noncontravention. The Company has all
requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver
this Agreement and, subject to receipt of the Shareholder
Approval, to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the
Company and the consummation by the Company of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement have been duly authorized by all
necessary corporate action on the part of the Company and no
other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are
necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, subject, in the
case of the consummation of the Merger, to the obtaining of the
Shareholder Approval. This Agreement has been duly executed and
delivered by the Company and, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery by each of the other parties hereto,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the
Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its
terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer,
moratorium, reorganization or similar Laws affecting the rights
of creditors generally and the availability of equitable
remedies (regardless of |
1-7
|
|
|
whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in
equity or at law). The Board of Directors of the Company, at a
meeting duly called and held, duly and unanimously adopted by
all directors present, resolutions (i) adopting this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, (ii) declaring that it is in the best
interests of the Company and the shareholders of the Company
that the Company enter into this Agreement and consummate the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement
on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, (iii) directing that the Company use its
reasonable best efforts to submit the approval of this Agreement
to a vote at a meeting of the shareholders of the Company as
promptly as practicable, and (iv) recommending that the
shareholders of the Company approve this Agreement, which
resolutions, as of November 14, 2005, have not been
subsequently rescinded, modified or withdrawn in any way. The
execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company do not,
and the consummation by the Company of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and compliance by
the Company with the provisions of this Agreement will not,
conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of, or
default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both)
under, or give rise to a right of, or result in, termination,
cancelation or acceleration of any obligation or to the loss of
a benefit under, or result in the creation of any Lien in or
upon any of the properties or other assets of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries under, (x) the Company Articles or the
Company By-laws or the comparable organizational documents of
any of its Subsidiaries, (y) any loan or credit agreement,
bond, debenture, note, mortgage, indenture, lease, supply
agreement, license agreement, development agreement or other
contract, agreement, obligation, commitment or instrument that
is intended by the Company, Parent or any of their respective
Subsidiaries, as applicable, to be legally binding, (each,
including all amendments thereto, a Contract), to
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or any
of their respective properties or other assets is subject or
(z) subject to the obtaining of the Shareholder Approval
and the governmental filings and other matters referred to in
the following sentence, any (A) statute, law, ordinance,
rule or regulation (each, a Law) applicable to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective
properties or other assets or (B) order, writ, injunction,
decree, judgment or stipulation (each, an Order)
applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their
respective properties or other assets, other than, in the case
of clauses (y) and (z), any such conflicts,
violations, breaches, defaults, rights of termination,
cancelation or acceleration, losses or Liens that individually
or in the aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be
expected to (x) have a Material Adverse Effect,
(y) impair in any material respect the ability of the
Company to perform its obligations under this Agreement or
(z) prevent or materially impede, interfere with, hinder or
delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. No consent, approval, order or authorization of,
action by or in respect of, or registration, declaration or
filing with, any Federal, state, local or foreign government,
any court, administrative, regulatory or other governmental
agency, commission or authority or any organized securities
exchange (each, a Governmental Entity) is required
by or with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in
connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
the Company or the consummation of the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except for
(1) (A) the filing of a premerger notification and
report form by the Company under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the
rules and regulations thereunder (the HSR Act) and
the termination of the waiting period required thereunder,
(B) all required notifications and filings by the Company
under Article 4 of Council Regulation 139/2004 of the
European Community, as amended (the EC Merger
Regulation), and the receipt of a decision under
Article 6(1)(b), 8(1) or 8(2) thereunder declaring the
Merger compatible with the EC Common Market and (C) the
receipt, termination or expiration, as applicable, of approvals
or waiting periods required under any other applicable
competition, merger control, antitrust or similar Law,
(2) the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) of (X) a proxy statement relating to
the adoption by the shareholders of the Company of this
Agreement (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the
Proxy Statement) and (Y) such reports under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Exchange
Act), as may be required in connection with this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, |
1-8
|
|
|
(3) the filing of the Articles of Merger with the Secretary
of State of the State of Indiana and appropriate documents with
the relevant authorities of other states in which the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries is qualified to do business,
(4) any filings with and approvals of the NYSE and
(5) such other consents, approvals, orders, authorizations,
actions, registrations, declarations and filings the failure of
which to be obtained or made individually or in the aggregate
has not had and would not reasonably be expected to
(x) have a Material Adverse Effect, (y) impair in any
material respect the ability of the Company to perform its
obligations under this Agreement or (z) prevent or
materially impede, interfere with, hinder or delay the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(e) Company SEC Documents. (i) The Company has
filed all reports, schedules, forms, statements and other
documents (including exhibits and other information incorporated
therein) with the SEC required to be filed by the Company since
January 1, 2003 (such documents, together with any
documents filed during such period by the Company with the SEC
on a voluntary basis on Current Reports on
Form 8-K, the
Company SEC Documents). As of their respective
filing dates, the Company SEC Documents complied in all material
respects with, to the extent in effect at the time of filing,
the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the
Securities Act), the Exchange Act and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (including the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, SOX) applicable to such
Company SEC Documents, and none of the Company SEC Documents
contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to
state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary
in order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Except
to the extent that information contained in any Company SEC
Document has been revised, amended, supplemented or superseded
by a later-filed Company SEC Document, none of the Company SEC
Documents contains any untrue statement of a material fact or
omits to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading,
which individually or in the aggregate would require an
amendment, supplement or corrective filing to such Company SEC
Documents. Each of the financial statements (including the
related notes) of the Company included in the Company SEC
Documents complied at the time it was filed as to form in all
material respects with the applicable accounting requirements
and the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect
thereto in effect at the time of filing, had been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States (GAAP) (except, in the case of
unaudited statements, as permitted by the rules and regulations
of the SEC) applied on a consistent basis during the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto) and
fairly presented in all material respects the consolidated
financial position of the Company and its consolidated
Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and the consolidated
results of their operations and cash flows for the periods then
ended (subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal
year-end audit adjustments). Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature
(whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise) which
individually or in the aggregate have had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. None of the
Subsidiaries of the Company are, or have at any time since
January 1, 2003 been, subject to the reporting requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
(ii) Each of the principal executive officer of the Company
and the principal financial officer of the Company (or each
former principal executive officer of the Company and each
former principal financial officer of the Company, as
applicable) has made all certifications required by
Rule 13a-14 or
15d-14 under the
Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of SOX with respect
to the Company SEC Documents, and the statements contained in
such certifications are true and accurate. For purposes of this
Agreement, principal executive officer and
principal financial officer shall have the meanings
given to such terms in SOX. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has outstanding, or has arranged any outstanding,
extensions of credit to directors or executive
officers within the meaning of Section 402 of SOX. |
1-9
|
|
|
(iii) The Company maintains a system of internal accounting
controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that
(A) transactions are executed in accordance with
managements general or specific authorizations;
(B) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with
managements general or specific authorization; and
(C) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with
the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate
action is taken with respect to any differences. |
|
|
(iv) The Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) of the
Exchange Act) are reasonably designed to ensure that all
information (both financial and non-financial) required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the SEC, and that all such information is accumulated
and communicated to the Companys management as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to
make the certifications of the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer of the Company required under the Exchange Act
with respect to such reports. |
|
|
(f) Information Supplied. None of the information
supplied or to be supplied by or on behalf of the Company
specifically for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
(i) the
Form S-4 to be
filed with the SEC by Parent in connection with the issuance of
shares of Parent Common Stock in the Merger will, at the time
the Form S-4 is
filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading or
(ii) the Proxy Statement will, at the date it is first
mailed to the shareholders of the Company and at the time of the
Shareholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading, except that no representation or warranty
is made by the Company with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by or on behalf of Parent or Sub specifically for inclusion or
incorporation by reference in the
Form S-4 or the
Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement will comply as to form in
all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
(g) Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Except for
liabilities incurred in connection with this Agreement or as
expressly permitted pursuant to Section 4.01(a)(i) through
(xvi), since the date of the most recent financial statements
included in the Filed Company SEC Documents, the Company and its
Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only in
the ordinary course consistent with past practice, and there has
not been any Material Adverse Change, and from such date until
the date hereof there has not been (i) any declaration,
setting aside or payment of any dividend or other distribution
(whether in cash, stock or property) with respect to any capital
stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than
(x) cash dividends payable by the Company in respect of
shares of Company Common Stock consistent with past practice and
not exceeding $0.10 per share of Company Common Stock per
fiscal quarter or (y) dividends or distributions by a
direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of the Company to its
shareholders, (ii) any purchase, redemption or other
acquisition by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any
shares of capital stock or any other securities of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or any options, warrants, calls or
rights to acquire such shares or other securities, other than in
connection with net share withholding in connection with the
vesting of Company Restricted Stock, (iii) any split,
combination or reclassification of any capital stock of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any issuance or the
authorization of any issuance of any other securities in respect
of, in lieu of or in substitution for shares of their respective
capital stock, (iv) (A) any granting by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries to any current or former
(1) director of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or
(2) employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries who
is treated as a Tier I Employee (a Tier I
Employee) or Tier II Employee (a Tier II
Employee) for purposes of the Companys Change in
Control Severance Pay Plan for Select Employees (all individuals
described in the foregoing clauses (1) and (2) of this
clause (A), collectively, the Key Personnel) of
any increase |
1-10
|
|
|
in compensation, bonus or fringe or other benefits, except for
normal increases in cash compensation (including cash bonuses)
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
or as was required under any Company Benefit Agreement or
Company Benefit Plan, (B) any granting by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries to any Key Personnel of (1) any
increase in severance or termination pay or (2) any right
to receive any severance or termination pay except for severance
or termination pay received in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as was required under any
Company Benefit Agreement or Company Benefit Plan, (C) any
entry by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries into, or any
amendments of, (1) any employment, deferred compensation,
consulting, severance, change of control, termination or
indemnification Contract with any Key Personnel or (2) any
Contract with any Key Personnel the benefits of which are
contingent, or the terms of which are materially altered, upon
the occurrence of a transaction involving the Company of a
nature contemplated by this Agreement (all such Contracts under
this clause (C), collectively, Company Benefit
Agreements), (D) the removal or modification of any
restrictions in any Company Benefit Agreement or Company Benefit
Plan or awards made thereunder, except as required to comply
with applicable Law or any Company Benefit Agreement or Company
Benefit Plan in effect as of the date hereof or (E) the
adoption, amendment or termination of any Company Benefit Plan,
other than, in the cases of clauses (A), (B), (C) and
(D), such increases, amendments, new agreements, removals,
modifications or terminations with respect to Tier II
Employees that (1) do not provide for any increase in
compensation or benefits for any individual Tier II
Employee that is material in relation to such Tier II
Employees compensation or benefits prior to such increase
and (2) in the aggregate do not result in any material
increase in compensation, benefits or other similar expenses of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, (v) any damage,
destruction or loss, whether or not covered by insurance, that
individually or in the aggregate has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (vi) any change
in accounting methods, principles or practices by the Company
materially affecting its assets, liabilities or businesses,
except insofar as may have been required by a change in GAAP or
(vii) any material tax election or any settlement or
compromise of any material income tax liability. |
|
|
(h) Litigation. Except with respect to taxes, which
are the subject of Section 3.01(n), there is no suit,
action or proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, threatened against or affecting the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or any of their respective assets that
individually or in the aggregate has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, nor is there any
demand, letter or Order of any Governmental Entity or arbitrator
outstanding against, or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
investigation by any Governmental Entity involving, the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective assets
that individually or in the aggregate has had or would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(i) Contracts. (1) As of the date hereof,
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to,
and none of their respective properties or other assets is
subject to, any Contract that is a material contract
(as such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K of
the SEC) (a Material Contract). None of the Company,
any of its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of the Company, any
other party thereto is in violation of or in default under (nor
does there exist any condition which upon the passage of time or
the giving of notice or both would cause such a violation of or
default by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the
Knowledge of the Company, any other party thereto under) any
Contract to which it is a party or by which it or any of its
properties or other assets is bound, except for violations or
defaults that individually or in the aggregate have not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
entered into any Contract that is currently in effect that is
required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K of
the SEC. |
|
|
(2) Section 3.01(i)(2) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule contains a complete and accurate list, as of the date
hereof, of (A) each material Contract restricting or
purporting to restrict any of the Companys
Affiliates ability to compete (other than each such
Contract that only restricts the Companys
Subsidiaries ability to compete) in any line of business,
geographic area or customer |
1-11
|
|
|
segment, (B) each material Contract restricting the
Companys or any of its Subsidiaries ability to
compete in any line of business, geographic area or customer
segment and (C) each material Contract relating to
distribution, sale, supply, licensing, co-promotion or
manufacturing of any products or services of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries or any products licensed by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(j) Compliance with Laws; Environmental Matters.
(i) Except with respect to Environmental Laws, the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), taxes and regulatory compliance, which are
the subjects of Sections 3.01(j)(ii), 3.01(l), 3.01(n) and
3.01(u), respectively, each of the Company and its Subsidiaries
is in compliance with all Laws and Orders (collectively,
Legal Provisions) applicable to it, its properties
or other assets or its business or operations, except for
failures to be in compliance that individually or in the
aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries has in effect all approvals, authorizations,
certificates, filings, franchises, licenses, notices and permits
of or with all Governmental Entities (collectively,
Permits), including all Permits under the Federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended (including the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the
FDCA), necessary for it to own, lease or operate its
properties and other assets and to carry on its business and
operations as currently conducted, except where the failure to
have such Permits individually or in the aggregate has not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect. Since January 1, 2000, there has occurred no
default under, or violation of, any such Permit, except for any
such default or violation that individually or in the aggregate
has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect. The consummation of the Merger, in and
of itself, would not cause the revocation or cancelation of any
such Permit that individually or in the aggregate would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) Except for those matters that individually or in the
aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect: (A) during the period of
ownership or operation by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
of any of its currently or formerly owned, leased or operated
properties, there have been no Releases of Hazardous Materials
in, on, under or affecting any properties which would subject
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any liability under
any Environmental Law or require any expenditure by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries for remediation to meet applicable
standards thereunder; (B) prior to and after, as applicable, the
period of ownership or operation by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries of any of its currently or formerly owned, leased
or operated properties, to the Knowledge of the Company, there
were no Releases of Hazardous Materials in, on, under or
affecting any properties which would subject the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries to any liability under any Environmental Law
or require any expenditure by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries for remediation to meet applicable standards
thereunder; (C) neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is subject to any indemnity obligation or other
Contract with any person relating to obligations or liabilities
under Environmental Laws; and (D) to the Knowledge of the
Company, there are no facts, circumstances or conditions that
would reasonably be expected to form the basis for any
investigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding or liability
against or affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
relating to or arising under Environmental Laws. The term
Environmental Laws means all applicable Federal,
state, local and foreign Laws (including the common law),
Orders, notices, Permits or binding Contracts issued,
promulgated or entered into by any Governmental Entity, relating
in any way to the environment, preservation or reclamation of
natural resources or the presence, management, Release of, or
exposure to, Hazardous Materials, or to human health and safety.
The term Hazardous Materials means
(1) petroleum products and by-products, asbestos and
asbestos-containing materials, urea formaldehyde foam
insulation, medical or infectious wastes, polychlorinated
biphenyls, radon gas, radioactive substances,
chlorofluorocarbons and all other ozone-depleting substances and
(2) any other chemical, material, substance, waste,
pollutant or contaminant that is prohibited, limited or
regulated by or pursuant to any Environmental Law. The term
Release means any spilling, leaking, pumping, |
1-12
|
|
|
pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping,
leaching, dumping, disposing or migrating into or through the
environment or any natural or man-made structure. |
|
|
(k) Labor Relations. From the date of the most
recent financial statements included in the Filed Company SEC
Documents through the date hereof, there has not been any
adoption, material amendment or termination by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries of any collective bargaining or other
labor union Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is bound. There are no collective bargaining or
other labor union Contracts to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is bound. As of the date of this Agreement, none of
the employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries are
represented by any union with respect to their employment by the
Company or such Subsidiary. Since January 1, 2003, neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has experienced any
material labor disputes, union organization attempts or work
stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts due to labor disagreements. |
|
|
(l) ERISA Compliance.
(i) Section 3.01(l)(i) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule contains a complete and accurate list, as of the date
hereof, of each employment, bonus, pension, profit sharing,
deferred compensation, incentive compensation, stock ownership,
stock purchase, stock appreciation, restricted stock, stock
option, phantom stock, performance, retirement,
thrift, savings, stock bonus, paid time off, perquisite, fringe
benefit, vacation, severance, disability, death benefit,
hospitalization, medical, welfare benefit or other plan,
program, policy or Contract maintained, contributed to or
required to be maintained or contributed to by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries or any other person or entity that,
together with the Company, is treated as a single employer under
Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code
(each, a Commonly Controlled Entity) (exclusive of
any such plan, program, policy or Contract mandated by and
maintained solely pursuant to applicable law), in each case
providing benefits to any current or former director, officer or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
(collectively, but exclusive of individual option and restricted
award agreements issued under the Company Stock Plans, the
Company Benefit Plans) and each Company Benefit
Agreement (exclusive of local offer letters mandated under
applicable
non-U.S. law that
do not impose any severance obligations other than any mandatory
statutory severance). Each Company Benefit Plan that is an
employee pension benefit plan (as defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA) is sometimes referred to herein as a
Company Pension Plan and each Company Benefit Plan
that is an employee welfare benefit plan (as defined
in Section 3(1) of ERISA) is sometimes referred to herein
as a Company Welfare Plan. |
|
|
(ii) The Company has provided to Parent complete and
accurate copies of (A) each Company Benefit Plan or, at the
Companys option, in the case of Company Benefit Plans
maintained primarily for the benefit of individuals regularly
employed outside the United States, a summary thereof (or, in
either case, with respect to any unwritten Company Benefit
Plans, descriptions thereof) and Company Benefit Agreements
(exclusive of local offer letters mandated under applicable
non-U.S. law that
do not impose any severance obligations other than any mandatory
statutory severance), (B) the two most recent annual
reports on Form 5500 required to be filed with the Internal
Revenue Service (the IRS) with respect to each
Company Benefit Plan (if any such report was required),
(C) the most recent summary plan description for each
Company Benefit Plan for which such summary plan description is
required and (D) each trust Contract and insurance or group
annuity Contract relating to any Company Benefit Plan. |
|
|
(iii) Each Company Benefit Plan has been administered in
all material respects in accordance with its terms. The Company,
its Subsidiaries and all the Company Benefit Plans are all in
compliance in all material respects with the applicable
provisions of ERISA, the Code and all other applicable Laws,
including Laws of foreign jurisdictions, and the terms of all
collective bargaining Contracts. |
|
|
(iv) All Company Pension Plans intended to be tax-qualified
have received favorable determination letters from the IRS with
respect to TRA (as defined in Section 1 of IRS
Rev. |
1-13
|
|
|
Proc. 93-39), and
have timely filed with the IRS determination letter applications
(or have received such a determination letter) with respect to
GUST (as defined in Section 1 of IRS
Notice 2001-42),
to the effect that such Company Pension Plans are qualified and
exempt from Federal income taxes under Sections 401(a) and
501(a), respectively, of the Code, no such determination letter
has been revoked (nor, to the Knowledge of the Company, has
revocation been threatened) and to the Knowledge of the Company,
no event has occurred since the date of the most recent
determination letter or application therefor relating to any
such Company Pension Plan that would reasonably be expected to
adversely affect the qualification of such Company Pension Plan
or materially increase the costs relating thereto or require
security under Section 307 of ERISA. The Company has
provided to Parent a complete and accurate copy of the most
recent determination letter received prior to the date hereof
with respect to each Company Pension Plan, as well as a complete
and accurate copy of each pending application for a
determination letter, if any. The Company has also provided to
Parent a complete and accurate list of all amendments to any
Company Pension Plan as to which a favorable determination
letter has not yet been received. |
|
|
(v) Neither the Company nor any Commonly Controlled Entity
has, during the six-year period ending on the date hereof,
maintained, contributed to or been required to contribute to any
Company Pension Plan that is subject to Title IV of ERISA
or Section 412 of the Code, or any multiemployer
plan as defined in Section 3(37) or 4001(a)(3) of
ERISA. Except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, neither the Company
nor any Commonly Controlled Entity has any unsatisfied liability
under Title IV of ERISA. To the Knowledge of the Company,
no condition exists that presents a material risk to the Company
or any Commonly Controlled Entity of incurring a material
liability under Title IV of ERISA. The Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation has not instituted proceedings under
Section 4042 of ERISA to terminate any Company Benefit Plan
and, to the Knowledge of the Company, no condition exists that
presents a material risk that such proceedings will be
instituted. |
|
|
(vi) Except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (A) all
reports, returns and similar documents with respect to all
Company Benefit Plans required to be filed with any Governmental
Entity or distributed to any Company Benefit Plan participant
have been duly and timely filed or distributed, (B) none of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has received notice of,
and to the Knowledge of the Company, there are no investigations
by any Governmental Entity with respect to, termination
proceedings or other claims (except claims for benefits payable
in the normal operation of the Company Benefit Plans), suits or
proceedings against or involving any Company Benefit Plan or
asserting any rights or claims to benefits under any Company
Benefit Plan that could reasonably be expected to give rise to
any material liability and (C) to the Knowledge of the
Company, there are not any facts that could give rise to any
liability in the event of any such investigation, claim, suit or
proceeding. |
|
|
(vii) Except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (A) all
contributions, premiums and benefit payments under or in
connection with the Company Benefit Plans that are required to
have been made as of the date hereof in accordance with the
terms of the Company Benefit Plans have been timely made or have
been reflected on the most recent consolidated balance sheet
filed or incorporated by reference into the Filed Company SEC
Documents and (B) no Company Pension Plan has an
accumulated funding deficiency (as such term is
defined in Section 302 of ERISA or Section 412 of the
Code), whether or not waived. |
|
|
(viii) With respect to each Company Benefit Plan, except as
has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect, (A) there has not occurred any
prohibited transaction (within the meaning of Section 406
of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code) in which the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective employees,
or, to the Knowledge of the Company, any trustee, administrator
or other fiduciary of such Company Benefit Plan, or any agent of
the foregoing, has engaged that could reasonably be expected to
subject the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective employees, or any such trustee, administrator or
other fiduciary, to the tax or penalty on prohibited
transactions imposed by Section 4975 of the Code or the
sanctions |
1-14
|
|
|
imposed under Title I of ERISA and (B) neither the
Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective
employees nor, to the Knowledge of the Company, any trustee,
administrator or other fiduciary of any Company Benefit Plan nor
any agent of any of the foregoing, has engaged in any
transaction or acted in a manner, or failed to act in a manner,
that could reasonably be expected to subject the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective employees or, to
the Knowledge of the Company, any such trustee, administrator or
other fiduciary, to any liability for breach of fiduciary duty
under ERISA or any other applicable Law. |
|
|
(ix) Each Company Welfare Plan may be amended or terminated
(including with respect to benefits provided to retirees and
other former employees) without material liability to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries at any time after the
Effective Time. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries
complies in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of Section 4980B(f) of the Code,
Sections 601-609
of ERISA or any similar state or local Law with respect to each
Company Benefit Plan that is a group health plan, as such term
is defined in Section 5000(b)(1) of the Code or such state
Law. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
material obligations for health or life insurance benefits
following termination of employment under any Company Benefit
Plan (other than for continuation coverage required under
Section 4980(B)(f) of the Code). |
|
|
(x) None of the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
the obtaining of the Shareholder Approval or the consummation of
the Merger or any other transaction contemplated by this
Agreement (alone or in conjunction with any other event,
including as a result of any termination of employment on or
following the Effective Time) will (A) entitle any current
or former director, officer, employee or consultant of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries to severance or termination
pay, (B) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or
trigger any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or
otherwise) of, compensation or benefits under, increase the
amount payable or trigger any other material obligation pursuant
to, any Company Benefit Plan or Company Benefit Agreement or
(C) result in any breach or violation of, or a default
under, any Company Benefit Plan or Company Benefit Agreement. |
|
|
(xi) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
any material liability or obligations, including under or on
account of a Company Benefit Plan, arising out of the hiring of
persons to provide services to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries and treating such persons as consultants or
independent contractors and not as employees of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries. No current or former independent
contractor that provides or provided personal services to the
Company or its Subsidiaries (other than a current or former
director) is entitled to any material fringe or other benefits
(other than cash consulting fees) pursuant to any plan, program,
policy or Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or which is maintained, sponsored or
contributed to by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(xii) No material deduction by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries in respect of any applicable employee
remuneration (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of
the Code) has been disallowed or is subject to disallowance by
reason of Section 162(m) of the Code. For each of the Key
Personnel, the Company has previously provided to Parent
(A) accurate
Form W-2
information for the 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 calendar
years, (B) annual base salary as of the date hereof, actual
bonus earned for the 2003 calendar year and target annual bonus
for the 2004 calendar year and (C) a list, as of the date
hereof, of all outstanding Company Stock Options, Company
Restricted Stock and Company Stock-Based Awards granted under
the Company Stock Plans or otherwise (other than rights under
the ESPP), together with (as applicable) the number of shares of
Company Common Stock subject thereto, and the grant dates,
expiration dates, exercise or base prices and vesting schedules
thereof, (D) estimated current annual cost of welfare
benefits and (E) estimated cost of the pension benefit
enhancement under Section 8 of the Companys Change in
Control Severance Plan for Select Employees. |
|
|
(m) No Parachute Gross Up. Except as provided in
accordance with the Companys Change in Control Severance
Pay Plan for Select Employees, no current or former employee or
director of the |
1-15
|
|
|
Company or any of its Subsidiaries is entitled to receive any
additional payment from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
or the Surviving Corporation by reason of the excise tax
required by Section 4999(a) of the Code being imposed on
such person by reason of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. |
|
|
(n) Taxes. Except as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect: |
|
|
|
(i) All tax returns required by applicable Law to have been
filed with any taxing authority by, or on behalf of, the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries have been filed in a timely manner
(taking into account any valid extension) in accordance with all
applicable Laws, and all such tax returns are true and complete
in all material respects. |
|
|
(ii) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries has paid (or
has had paid on its behalf) all taxes due and owing, and the
Companys most recent financial statements included in the
Filed Company SEC Documents reflect an adequate accrual for all
taxes payable by Company and its Subsidiaries for all taxable
periods and portions thereof accrued through the date of such
financial statements. |
|
|
(iii) There are no Liens or encumbrances for taxes on any
of the assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries other
than for taxes not yet due and payable. |
|
|
(iv) The Company and its Subsidiaries have complied with
all applicable Laws relating to the payment and withholding of
taxes. |
|
|
(v) No written notification has been received by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries that any federal, state,
local or foreign audit, examination or similar proceeding is
pending, proposed or asserted with regard to any taxes or tax
returns of the Company or its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(vi) There is no currently effective Contract extending, or
having the effect of extending, the period of assessment or
collection of any federal, state and, to the Knowledge of the
Company, foreign taxes with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries nor has any request been made for any such
extension. |
|
|
(vii) No written notice of a claim of pending investigation
has been received from any state, local or other jurisdiction
with which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries currently does
not file tax returns, alleging that the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries has a duty to file tax returns and pay taxes or is
otherwise subject to the taxing authority of such jurisdiction. |
|
|
(viii) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
joins or has joined, for any taxable period during the eight
years prior to the date of this Agreement, in the filing of any
affiliated, aggregate, consolidated, combined or unitary
federal, state, local and, to the Knowledge of the Company,
foreign tax return other than consolidated tax returns for the
consolidated group of which the Company is the common parent. |
|
|
(ix) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to or bound by any tax sharing agreement or tax indemnity
agreement, arrangement or practice (including any advance
pricing agreement, closing agreement or other agreement relating
to taxes with any taxing authority). |
|
|
(x) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
constituted either a distributing corporation or a
controlled corporation in a distribution of stock
qualifying for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the
Code in the two years prior to the date of this Agreement. |
|
|
(xi) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries will
be required to include in a taxable period ending after the
Effective Time taxable income attributable to income that
accrued in a prior taxable period (or portion of a taxable
period) but was not recognized for tax purposes in any prior
taxable period as a result of (A) an open transaction
disposition made on or before the Effective Time, (B) a
prepaid amount received on or prior to the Effective Time, |
1-16
|
|
|
(C) the installment method of accounting, (D) the
long-term contract method of accounting, (E) the cash
method of accounting or Section 481 of the Code or
(F) any comparable provisions of state or local tax Law,
domestic or foreign, or for any other reason, other than any
amounts that are specifically reflected in a reserve for taxes
on the most recent financial statements of the Company included
in the Filed Company SEC Documents. |
|
|
(xii) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
entered into a listed transaction within the meaning
of Treasury
Regulation § 1.6011-4(b)(2)
|
|
|
(xiii) As used in this Agreement (A) tax
means (i) any tax, duty, governmental fee or other like
assessment or charge of any kind whatsoever (including
withholding on amounts paid to or by any person and liabilities
with respect to unclaimed funds), together with any related
interest, penalty, addition to tax or additional amount, and any
liability for any of the foregoing as transferee, (ii) in
the case of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, liability
for the payment of any amount of the type described in
clause (i) as a result of being or having been before the
Effective Time a member of an affiliated, consolidated, combined
or unitary group, or a party to any Contract as a result of
which liability of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is
determined or taken into account with reference to the
activities of any other person and (iii) in the case of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, liability of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries for the payment of any amount as a
result of being party to any tax sharing Contract or with
respect to the payment of any amount imposed on any person of
the type described in (i) or (ii) as a result of any
existing Contract (including an indemnification Contract);
(B) taxing authority means any Federal, state,
local or foreign government, any subdivision, agency, commission
or authority thereof, or any quasi-governmental body exercising
tax regulatory authority; and (C) tax return
means any report, return, document, declaration or other
information or filing required to be filed with respect to taxes
(whether or not a payment is required to be made with respect to
such filing), including information returns, any documents with
respect to or accompanying payments of estimated taxes, or with
respect to or accompanying requests for the extension of time in
which to file any such report, return, document, declaration or
other information. |
|
|
|
(o) Title to Properties. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries has valid title to, or valid leasehold or sublease
interests or other comparable contract rights in or relating to
all of its real properties and other tangible assets necessary
for the conduct of its business as currently conducted, except
as have been disposed of in the ordinary course of business and
except for defects in title, easements, restrictive covenants
and similar encumbrances that individually or in the aggregate
have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries has complied with the terms of all leases or
subleases to which it is a party and under which it is in
occupancy, and all leases to which the Company is a party and
under which it is in occupancy are in full force and effect,
except for such failure to comply or be in full force and effect
that individually or in the aggregate has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any
written notice of any event or occurrence that has resulted or
could result (with or without the giving of notice, the lapse of
time or both) in a default with respect to any lease or sublease
to which it is a party, which defaults individually or in the
aggregate have had or would reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(p) Intellectual Property.
(i) Section 3.01(p)(i) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule sets forth, as of the date hereof, a complete and
accurate list (in all material respects) of all patents and
applications therefor, registered trademarks and applications
therefor, domain name registrations and copyright registrations
(if any) that, in each case, are owned by or licensed to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries and are material to the
conduct of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, as currently conducted. Such intellectual
property rights required to be listed in Section 3.01(p)(i)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule, together with any tradename
rights, trade secret or know how rights, service mark rights,
trademark rights, patent rights, intellectual property |
1-17
|
|
|
rights in computer programs or software or other type of
intellectual property rights, in each case, that are owned or
licensed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and are
material to the conduct of the business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted, are
collectively referred to herein as Intellectual Property
Rights. All Intellectual Property Rights are either
(x) owned by the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company
free and clear of all Liens or (y) licensed to the Company
or a Subsidiary of the Company free and clear (to the Knowledge
of the Company) of all Liens, except where the failure to so own
or license such Intellectual Property Rights individually or in
the aggregate has not had and would not reasonably be expected
to have a Material Adverse Effect. There are no claims pending
or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened with regard to
the ownership or, to the Knowledge of the Company, licensing by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any Intellectual
Property Rights which individually or in the aggregate has had
or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries owns, is
validly licensed or otherwise has the right to use all
Intellectual Property Rights, except where the failure to own,
have a valid license or otherwise have rights to use
individually or in the aggregate has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The
execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company do not,
and the consummation by the Company of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and compliance by
the Company with the provisions of this Agreement will not,
conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of, or
default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both)
under, or give rise to a right of, or result in, termination,
cancelation or acceleration of any obligation or to the loss of
a benefit under, or result in the creation of any Lien in or
upon, any Intellectual Property Right, in each case that
individually or in the aggregate has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.01(p)(i) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets
forth, as of the date hereof, all Contracts under which the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries is obligated to make payments
to third parties for use of any Intellectual Property Rights
with respect to the commercialization of any products that are,
as of the date hereof, being sold, manufactured by or under
development by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and for
which such payments are in excess of $2,000,000 per year
for any single product. The aggregate amount of all such
payments that the Company and its Subsidiaries are obligated to
make under any Contract of the type described in the immediately
preceding sentence that are not required to be disclosed
pursuant to such sentence does not exceed $10,000,000 per
year. |
|
|
(ii) There are no pending or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, threatened claims that the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries has infringed or is infringing (including with
respect to the manufacture, use or sale by the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries of any products or to the operations of the
Company and its Subsidiaries) any intellectual property rights
of any person which individually or in the aggregate has had or
would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
To the Knowledge of the Company, as of the date of this
Agreement, there are no facts, circumstances or conditions that
would reasonably be expected to form the basis for any claim by
a person to exclude or prevent the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries from freely using its Intellectual Property Rights
and that individually or in the aggregate would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iii) All patents required to be listed in
Section 3.01(p)(i) of the Company Disclosure Schedule that
are owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries have been
duly registered and/or filed with or issued by each appropriate
Governmental Entity, all necessary affidavits of continuing use
have been timely filed, and all necessary maintenance fees have
been timely paid to continue all such rights in effect, other
than failures to be duly registered, filed, issued or paid which
individually or in the aggregate have not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. None
of the patents required to be listed in Section 3.01(p)(i)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule that are owned by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries has expired or been declared invalid,
in whole or in part, by any Governmental Entity, other than such
expirations or declarations of invalidity which individually or
in the aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. There are no ongoing
interferences, oppositions, reissues, reexaminations or |
1-18
|
|
|
other proceedings challenging any of the patents or patent
applications required to be listed in Section 3.01(p)(i) of
the Company Disclosure Schedule and owned by the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries (or, to the Companys Knowledge,
challenging any such patents or patent applications licensed to
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries), including ex parte and
post-grant proceedings, in the United States Patent and
Trademark Office or in any foreign patent office or similar
administrative agency, other than such interferences,
oppositions, reissues, reexaminations or proceedings that
individually or in the aggregate have not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iv) Except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, the Company and its
Subsidiaries have used commercially reasonable efforts to
maintain their material trade secrets in confidence. |
|
|
(q) Voting Requirements. The affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company
Common Stock at the Shareholders Meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof to approve this Agreement
(the Shareholder Approval) is the only vote of the
holders of any class or series of capital stock of the Company
necessary to approve this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (it being understood that the
approval of the Original Merger Agreement by the shareholders of
the Company on April 27, 2005, shall not constitute the
Shareholder Approval with regard to this Agreement). |
|
|
(r) State Takeover Laws; Company
Articles Provisions. The Board of Directors of the
Company has unanimously adopted, by all directors present, this
Agreement, the terms of this Agreement and the consummation of
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and such adoption represents all the actions
necessary to render inapplicable to this Agreement, the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the
restrictions (i) on business combinations (as
defined in
Section 23-1-43-5
of the IBCL) set forth in
Section 23-1-43-18
of the IBCL and (ii) on the actions or transactions set
forth in Paragraph 6 of the Company Articles
(Paragraph 6), in each case to the extent, if
any, such restrictions would otherwise be applicable to this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement. For purposes of Paragraph 6, the approval
of the Board of Directors of the Company referred to in the
immediately preceding sentence constitutes the approval of the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement
by the Continuing Directors (as defined in
Paragraph 6) pursuant to clause (c) of
Paragraph 6. No other similar provision of the Company
Articles or the Company By-laws or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, other state takeover Law or similar Law applies or
purports to apply to this Agreement, the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(s) Brokers and Other Advisors. No broker,
investment banker, financial advisor or other person (other than
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated), the fees and expenses of which will be paid
by the Company, is entitled to any brokers, finders,
financial advisors or other similar fee or commission in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company. The
Company has delivered to Parent complete and accurate copies of
all Contracts under which any such fees or expenses are payable
and all indemnification and other Contracts related to the
engagement of the persons to whom such fees are payable. |
|
|
(t) Opinion of Financial Advisors. The Company has
received the opinions of each of J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, in each
case dated as of November 14, 2005, to the effect that, as
of such date, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of shares of Company Common Stock,
a signed copy of which opinion has been, or will promptly be,
delivered to Parent. |
|
|
(u) Regulatory Compliance. (i) As to each
product subject to the FDCA or similar Legal Provisions in any
foreign jurisdiction that are developed, manufactured, tested,
distributed and/or marketed by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries (a Medical Device), each such Medical |
1-19
|
|
|
Device is being developed, manufactured, tested, distributed
and/or marketed in compliance with all applicable requirements
under the FDCA and similar Legal Provisions, including those
relating to investigational use, premarket clearance or
marketing approval to market a Medical Device, good
manufacturing practices, labeling, advertising, record keeping,
filing of reports and security, and in compliance with the
Advanced Medical Technology Association Code of Ethics on
Interactions with Healthcare Professionals and the American
Medical Associations guidelines on gifts to physicians,
except for failures in compliance that individually or in the
aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries has received any notice or other communication
from the Federal Food and Drug Administration (the
FDA) or any other Governmental Entity
(A) contesting the premarket clearance or approval of, the
uses of or the labeling and promotion of any products of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (B) otherwise alleging any
violation applicable to any Medical Device of any Legal
Provision, in the case of (A) and (B), that individually or
in the aggregate have had or would reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) No Medical Device is under consideration by senior
management of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for, or has
been recalled, withdrawn, suspended, seized or discontinued
(other than for commercial or other business reasons) by, the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries in the United States or
outside the United States (whether voluntarily or otherwise), in
each case since January 1, 2002. No proceedings in the
United States or outside of the United States of which the
Company has Knowledge (whether completed or pending) seeking the
recall, withdrawal, suspension, seizure or discontinuance of any
Medical Device are pending against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any licensee of any Medical Device which
individually or in the aggregate have had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iii) As to each Medical Device of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries for which a premarket approval application,
premarket notification, investigational device exemption or
similar state or foreign regulatory application has been
approved, the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance
with 21 U.S.C. §§ 360 and 360e or
21 C.F.R. Parts 812 or 814, respectively, and all
similar Legal Provisions and all terms and conditions of such
licenses or applications, except for any such failure or
failures to be in compliance which individually or in the
aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect. In addition, the Company and its
Subsidiaries are in substantial compliance with all applicable
registration and listing requirements set forth in
21 U.S.C. § 360 and 21 C.F.R. Part 807
and all similar Legal Provisions, except for any such failures
to be in compliance which individually or in the aggregate have
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iv) No article of any Medical Device manufactured and/or
distributed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is
(A) adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.
§ 351 (or similar Legal Provisions),
(B) misbranded within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.
§ 352 (or similar Legal Provisions) or (C) a
product that is in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 360
or § 360e (or similar Legal Provisions), except for
failures to be in compliance with the foregoing that
individually or in the aggregate have not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(v) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor,
to the Knowledge of the Company, any officer, employee or agent
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, has made an untrue
statement of a material fact or fraudulent statement to the FDA
or any other Governmental Entity, failed to disclose a material
fact required to be disclosed to the FDA or any other
Governmental Entity, or committed an act, made a statement, or
failed to make a statement that, at the time such disclosure was
made, could reasonably be expected to provide a basis for the
FDA or any other Governmental Entity to invoke its policy
respecting Fraud, Untrue Statements of Material Facts,
Bribery, and Illegal Gratuities, set forth in 56 Fed.
Reg. 46191 (September 10, 1991) or any similar policy.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor, to the
Knowledge of the Company, any officer, employee or agent of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, has been convicted of any
crime or engaged in any conduct for which debarment is mandated
by 21 U.S.C. § 335a(a) or any similar |
1-20
|
|
|
Legal Provision or authorized by 21 U.S.C.
§ 335a(b) or any similar Legal Provision. Neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor, to the Knowledge of
the Company, any officer, employee or agent of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, has been convicted of any crime or
engaged in any conduct for which such person or entity could be
excluded from participating in the federal health care programs
under Section 1128 of the Social Security Act of 1935, as
amended (the Social Security Act) or any similar
Legal Provision. |
|
|
(vi) Since January 1, 2002, neither the Company nor
any of its Subsidiaries has received any written notice that the
FDA or any other Governmental Entity has (a) commenced, or
threatened to initiate, any action to withdraw its approval or
request the recall of any Medical Device, (b) commenced, or
threatened to initiate, any action to enjoin production of any
Medical Device or (c) commenced, or threatened to initiate,
any action to enjoin the production of any medical device
produced at any facility where any Medical Device is
manufactured, tested or packaged, except for any such action
that individually or in the aggregate has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(vii) To the Knowledge of the Company, there are no facts,
circumstances or conditions that would reasonably be expected to
form the basis for any investigation, suit, claim, action or
proceeding against or affecting the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries relating to or arising under (a) the FDCA or
(b) the Social Security Act or regulations of the Office of
the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human
Services, in each case individually or in the aggregate that has
had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect. |
|
|
(v) Rights Agreement. The Company has taken all
actions necessary to cause the Rights Agreement dated as of
December 15, 2004, between the Company and EquiServe Trust
Company, as rights agent (the Rights Agreement), to
(i) render the Rights Agreement inapplicable to this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, (ii) ensure that (x) none of Parent,
Sub or any other Subsidiary of Parent is an Acquiring Person (as
defined in the Rights Agreement) pursuant to the Rights
Agreement, (y) a Distribution Date or a Stock Acquisition
Date (as such terms are defined in the Rights Agreement) does
not occur and (z) the rights (the Company
Rights) to purchase Company Series A Preferred Stock
issued under the Rights Agreement do not become exercisable, in
the case of clauses (x), (y) and (z), solely by reason
of the execution of this Agreement or the consummation of the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and (iii) provide that the Expiration Date (as defined in
the Rights Agreement) shall occur immediately prior to the
Effective Time. |
SECTION 3.02. Representations
and Warranties of Parent and Sub. Except as disclosed in the
Parent SEC Documents filed by Parent and publicly available
prior to the date of this Agreement (Filed Parent SEC
Documents), Parent and Sub represent and warrant to the
Company as follows:
|
|
|
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate Power. Each
of Parent and Sub is a corporation duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction
in which it is incorporated and has all requisite corporate
power and authority and possesses all governmental licenses,
permits, authorizations and approvals necessary to enable it to
use its corporate or other name and to own, lease or otherwise
hold and operate its properties and other assets and to carry on
its business as now being conducted, except whether the failure
to have such governmental licenses, permits, authorizations and
approvals individually or in the aggregate has not had and would
not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. Each of Parent and Sub is duly qualified or licensed to
do business and is in good standing (with respect to
jurisdictions that recognize that concept) in each jurisdiction
in which the nature of its business or the ownership, leasing or
operation of its properties makes such qualification, licensing
or good standing necessary, other than in such jurisdictions
where the failure to be so qualified, licensed or in good
standing individually or in the aggregate has not had and would
not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. Parent has made available to the Company complete and
accurate copies of |
1-21
|
|
|
its Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws, the
Articles of Incorporation of Sub (the Sub Articles)
and the By-laws of Sub, in each case as amended to the date
hereof. |
|
|
(b) Authority; Noncontravention. Each of Parent and
Sub has all requisite corporate power and authority to execute
and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement by Parent and Sub and the consummation by Parent
and Sub of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement have
been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the
part of Parent and Sub and no other corporate proceedings on the
part of Parent or Sub are necessary to authorize this Agreement
or to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. This Agreement and the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement do not require approval of the holders of any
shares of capital stock of Parent. This Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by each of Parent and Sub and, assuming
the due authorization, execution and delivery by the Company,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Parent and
Sub, as applicable, enforceable against Parent and Sub, as
applicable, in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, moratorium, reorganization or
similar Laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the
availability of equitable remedies (regardless of whether such
enforceability is considered in a proceeding at equity or at
law). The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent and
Sub do not, and the consummation by Parent and Sub of the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
compliance by Parent and Sub with the provisions of this
Agreement will not, conflict with, or result in any violation or
breach of, or default (with or without notice or lapse of time,
or both) under, or give rise to a right of, or result in,
termination, cancelation or acceleration of any obligation or to
the loss of a benefit under, or result in the creation of any
Lien in or upon any of the properties or other assets of Parent
or Sub under (x) the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
or By-laws of Parent, the Sub Articles or the By-laws of Sub,
(y) any Contract to which Parent or Sub is a party or any
of their respective properties or other assets is subject or
(z) subject to the governmental filings and other matters
referred to in the following sentence, any Legal Provision
applicable to Parent or Sub or their respective properties or
other assets, other than, in the case of
clauses (y) and (z), any such conflicts, violations,
breaches, defaults, rights of termination, cancelation or
acceleration, losses or Liens that individually or in the
aggregate have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
(1) have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (2) impair
in any material respect the ability of Parent or Sub to perform
its respective obligations under this Agreement or
(3) prevent or materially impede, interfere with, hinder or
delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. No consent, approval, order or authorization of,
action by or in respect of, or registration, declaration or
filing with, any Governmental Entity is required by or with
respect to Parent or Sub in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Sub or the consummation
by Parent and Sub of the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, except for (1) (A) the
filing of a premerger notification and report form by Parent
under the HSR Act and the termination of the waiting period
required thereunder, (B) all required notifications and
filings by Parent under Article 4 of the EC Merger
Regulation and the receipt of a decision under
Article 6(1)(b), 8(1) or 8(2) thereunder declaring the
Merger compatible with the EC Common Market and (C) the
receipt, termination or expiration, as applicable, of approvals
or waiting periods required under any other applicable
competition, merger control, antitrust or similar Law,
(2) the filing with th e SEC of (X) the
Form S-4 and
(Y) such reports under the Exchange Act as may be required
in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, (3) the filing of the
Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of
Indiana, (4) any filings with and approvals of the NYSE and
(5) such other consents, approvals, orders, authorizations,
actions, registrations, declarations and filings the failure of
which to be obtained or made individually or in the aggregate
has not had and would not reasonably be expected to
(x) have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (y) impair
in any material respect the ability of Parent or Sub to perform
its respective obligations under this Agreement or
(z) prevent or materially impede, interfere with, hinder or
delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. |
1-22
|
|
|
(c) Parent SEC Documents. Parent has filed all
reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents
(including exhibits and other information incorporated therein)
with the SEC required to be filed by Parent since
January 1, 2003 (such documents, together with any
documents filed during such period by Parent with the SEC on a
voluntary basis on Current Reports on
Form 8-K, the
Parent SEC Documents). As of their respective filing
dates, the Parent SEC Documents complied in all material
respects with, to the extent in effect at the time of filing,
the requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and SOX
applicable to such Parent SEC Documents, and none of the Parent
SEC Documents contained any untrue statement of a material fact
or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading. Except to the extent that information contained in
any Parent SEC Document has been revised, amended, supplemented
or superseded by a later-filed Parent SEC Document, none of the
Parent SEC Documents contains any untrue statement of a material
fact or omits to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading, which individually or in the aggregate would require
an amendment, supplement or corrective filing to such Parent SEC
Documents. Each of the financial statements (including the
related notes) of Parent included in the Parent SEC Documents
complied at the time it was filed as to form in all material
respects with the applicable accounting requirements and the
published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto
in effect at the time of filing, had been prepared in accordance
with GAAP (except, in the case of unaudited statements, as
permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC) applied on a
consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto) and fairly presented in all
material respects the consolidated financial position of Parent
and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and
the consolidated results of their operations and cash flows for
the periods then ended (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal year-end audit adjustments). Neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has any liabilities or
obligations of any nature (whether accrued, absolute, contingent
or otherwise) which individually or in the aggregate have had or
would reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. |
|
|
(d) Information Supplied. None of the information
supplied or to be supplied by or on behalf of Parent or Sub
specifically for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
(i) the
Form S-4 will, at
the time the
Form S-4 is filed
with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under the
Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, or
(ii) the Proxy Statement will, at the date it is first
mailed to the shareholders of the Company and at the time of the
Shareholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading, except that no representation or warranty
is made by Parent or Sub with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by or on behalf of the Company specifically for inclusion or
incorporation by reference in the
Form S-4 or the
Proxy Statement. The
Form S-4 will
comply as to form in all material respects with the requirements
of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. |
|
|
(e) Interim Operations of Sub. Sub was formed solely
for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, has engaged in no other business activities and
has conducted its operations only as contemplated hereby. |
|
|
(f) Capital Resources. As of the Closing, Parent
will have funds that are sufficient to effect the Closing on the
terms contemplated hereby. |
|
|
(g) Brokers. No broker, investment banker, financial
advisor or other person, other than Goldman, Sachs &
Co., the fees and expenses of which will be paid by Parent, is
entitled to any brokers, finders, financial
advisors or other similar fee or commission in connection
with the |
1-23
|
|
|
transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon
arrangements made by or on behalf of Parent or Sub. |
|
|
(h) Capital Structure. The authorized capital stock
of Parent consists of 4,320,000,000 shares of Parent Common
Stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without par
value, of Parent (Parent Preferred Stock). At the
close of business on November 11, 2005,
(i) 3,119,842,548 shares of Parent Common Stock were
issued and outstanding, (ii) 145,627,833 shares of
Parent Common Stock were held by Parent in its treasury,
(iii) no shares of Parent Preferred Stock had been
designated or issued, (iv) 252,675,833 shares of
Parent Common Stock were subject to outstanding options to
purchase shares of Parent Common Stock granted under
Parents stock incentive plans and
(v) 6,890,509 shares of Parent Common Stock were
reserved for issuance upon conversion of the 3% Zero Coupon
Convertible Subordinated Debentures of Alza Corporation, a
Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent
(Alza), and the 5.25% Zero Coupon Convertible
Subordinated Debentures of Alza. Except as set forth above in
this Section 3.02(h), at the close of business on
November 11, 2005, there were not issued, reserved for
issuance or outstanding (A) any shares of capital stock or
other voting securities of Parent, (B) any securities of
Parent convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
shares of capital stock or voting securities of Parent or
(C) any warrants, calls, options or other rights to acquire
from Parent, or any obligation of Parent to issue, any shares of
capital stock, voting securities or securities convertible into
or exchangeable or exercisable for capital stock or voting
securities of Parent. Except as set forth above in this
Section 3.02(h), at the close of business on
November 11, 2005, no bonds, debentures, notes or other
indebtedness of Parent having the right to vote (or convertible
into, or exchangeable for, securities having the right to vote)
on any matters on which the shareholders of Parent may vote are
issued or outstanding. The authorized capital stock of Sub
consists of 1,000 shares of common stock, without par
value, of which 1,000 shares are issued and outstanding,
all of which shares are beneficially owned by Parent. |
|
|
(i) Absence of Changes. Except for liabilities
incurred in connection with this Agreement, since the date of
the most recent financial statements included in the Filed
Parent SEC Documents, there has not been any Parent Material
Adverse Change. |
|
|
(j) Litigation. There is no suit, action or
proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened
against or affecting Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any of
their respective assets that individually or in the aggregate
has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Parent
Material Adverse Effect, nor is there any Order of any
Governmental Entity or arbitrator outstanding against, or, to
the Knowledge of Parent, investigation by any Governmental
Entity involving, Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any of
their respective assets that individually or in the aggregate
has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Parent
Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(k) Intellectual Property Rights. Each of Parent and
its Subsidiaries owns or has the right to use all intellectual
property rights which are material to the conduct of the
business of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in
each case (i) with respect to such intellectual property
rights that are owned by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, free
and clear of all Liens and (ii) with respect to such
intellectual property rights that are licensed by Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries, to the Knowledge of Parent, free and clear
of all Liens, except where the failure to so own or have such
right to use such intellectual property rights individually or
in the aggregate has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect. Neither the
manufacture, marketing, license, sale or use by Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries of any product violates any license or
agreement between Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and any
other person and there is no pending or, to the Knowledge of
Parent, threatened claim or litigation contesting the validity,
ownership or right to use, sell, license or dispose of any such
intellectual property rights relating to any product or
asserting that the proposed use, sale, license or disposition
thereof, or the manufacture, use or sale of any product by
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, conflicts with the rights of
any other person, in each case which, individually or in the
aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
1-24
|
|
|
(l) Regulatory Compliance. To the Knowledge of
Parent, the testing, manufacture, storage, distribution, use,
promotion and sale of products of Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries by Parent, such Subsidiary and their respective
contractors have been performed and is performed in compliance
with all applicable requirements under the FDCA and similar
Legal Provisions, including those relating to investigational
use, premarket clearance, good manufacturing practices,
labeling, advertising, record keeping, filing of reports and
security, except for such instances of noncompliance or possible
noncompliance that individually or in the aggregate have not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect. Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has
received any adverse written notice within the past two years
that the FDA or any other similar foreign Governmental Entity
has commenced, or threatened to initiate, any action to withdraw
its approval or request the recall of any product of Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries, or commenced, or overtly threatened to
initiate, any action to enjoin production of any such product,
except where such action has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
ARTICLE IV
Covenants Relating to
Conduct of Business; No Solicitation
SECTION 4.01. Conduct of
Business. (a) Conduct of Business by the
Company. During the period from the date of this Agreement
to the Effective Time, except as set forth in
Section 4.01(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule or as
consented to in writing in advance by Parent or as otherwise
permitted or required by this Agreement, the Company shall, and
shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, carry on its business
in the ordinary course consistent with past practice prior to
the Closing and, to the extent consistent therewith, use all
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its current
business organizations, keep available the services of its
current officers, employees and consultants and preserve its
relationships with customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees,
distributors and others having business dealings with it. In
addition to and without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, during the period from the date of this Agreement to
the Effective Time, except as otherwise set forth in
Section 4.01(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule or as
otherwise permitted or required pursuant to this Agreement, the
Company shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries
to, without Parents prior written consent:
|
|
|
(i) (x) declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or
make any other distributions (whether in cash, stock or
property) in respect of, any of its capital stock, other than
(1) cash dividends payable by the Company in respect of
shares of Company Common Stock consistent with past practice and
not exceeding $0.10 per share of Company Common Stock per
fiscal quarter, (2) dividends and distributions in
connection with the Rights Agreement and (3) dividends or
distributions by a direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of
the Company to its shareholders, (y) split, combine or
reclassify any of its capital stock or issue or authorize the
issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in
substitution for shares of its capital stock or
(z) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its
capital stock or any other securities thereof or any rights,
warrants or options to acquire any such shares or other
securities, except for purchases, redemptions or other
acquisitions of capital stock or other securities
(1) required by the terms of the Company Stock Plans or the
ESPP or (2) required by the terms of any plans,
arrangements or Contracts existing on the date hereof between
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any director or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (to the
extent complete and accurate copies of which have been
heretofore delivered to Parent); |
|
|
(ii) issue, deliver, sell, grant, pledge or otherwise
encumber or subject to any Lien any shares of its capital stock,
any other voting securities or any securities convertible into,
or any rights, warrants or options to acquire, any such shares,
voting securities or convertible securities, or any
phantom stock, phantom stock rights,
stock appreciation rights or stock based performance units,
including pursuant to Contracts as in effect on the date hereof
(other than (x) the issuance of shares of Company Common
Stock upon the exercise of Company Stock Options or in
connection with Company Stock Based Awards, in each case in
accordance with their terms on the date hereof, and |
1-25
|
|
|
(y) the issuance of Company Rights and shares of the
Companys capital stock pursuant to the Company Rights or
the Rights Agreement); |
|
|
(iii) amend (x) the Company Articles or the Company
By-laws or other comparable charter or organizational documents
of any of the Companys Subsidiaries or (y) the
Indenture dated as of January 18, 1996 between the Company
and Citibank, N.A., with respect to the 6.15% Senior
Unsecured Notes due February 15, 2006 of the Company (the
Company Notes), in each case except as may be
required by applicable Law or the rules and regulations of the
SEC or the NYSE; |
|
|
(iv) directly or indirectly acquire (x) by merging or
consolidating with, by purchasing a substantial portion of the
assets of, by making an investment in or capital contribution
to, or by any other manner, any person or division, business or
equity interest of any person or (y) any asset or assets,
except for (1) capital expenditures, which shall be subject
to the limitations of clause (vii) below,
(2) purchases of components, raw materials or supplies in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
and (3) acquisitions of material intellectual property
rights in respect of cross-licenses permitted in connection with
the discharge, settlement or satisfaction of claims and
litigation under clause (viii) below; |
|
|
(v) (x) sell, lease, license, mortgage, sell and
leaseback or otherwise encumber or subject to any Lien or
otherwise dispose of any of its material properties or other
material assets or any interests therein (including
securitizations), except for (1) sales of inventory and
used equipment in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice and (2) licenses of Intellectual
Property Rights permitted in connection with the discharge,
settlement or satisfaction of claims and litigation under
clause (viii) below, or (y) enter into, modify or
amend any lease of material property, except for modifications
or amendments that are not materially adverse to the Company and
its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; |
|
|
(vi) (x) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or
guarantee any such indebtedness of another person, issue or sell
any debt securities or calls, options, warrants or other rights
to acquire any debt securities of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, guarantee any debt securities of another person,
enter into any keep well or other Contract to
maintain any financial statement condition of another person or
enter into any arrangement having the economic effect of any of
the foregoing (other than short-term borrowings in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice under the
Companys commercial paper program, in an aggregate amount
not to exceed $800,000,000 at any time outstanding) or
(y) make any loans or advances to any other person, other
than to employees in respect of travel expenses in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, which would
result in the aggregate principal amount of all of the
outstanding foregoing loans and advances of the Company and its
Subsidiaries exceeding $25,000,000; |
|
|
(vii) make any new capital expenditure or expenditures
exceeding the amounts set forth in Section 4.01(a)(vii) of
the Company Disclosure Schedule; |
|
|
(viii) except as required by Law or any judgment by a court
of competent jurisdiction, (v) pay, discharge, settle or
satisfy any material claims, liabilities, obligations or
litigation (absolute, accrued, asserted or unasserted,
contingent or otherwise), other than the payment, discharge,
settlement or satisfaction in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or in accordance with their terms,
of liabilities disclosed, reflected or reserved against in the
most recent audited financial statements (or the notes thereto)
of the Company included in the Filed Company SEC Documents (for
amounts not in excess of such reserves) or incurred since the
date of such financial statements in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, (w) cancel any
material indebtedness, (x) waive or assign any claims or
rights of material value, (y) waive any benefits of, or
agree to modify in any respect, or, subject to the terms hereof,
knowingly fail to enforce, or consent to any matter with respect
to which consent is required under, any standstill or similar
Contract to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party or (z) waive any material benefits of, or agree to
modify in any material respect, or, subject to the terms hereof,
knowingly fail to enforce in any material |
1-26
|
|
|
respect, or consent to any matter with respect to which consent
is required under, any material confidentiality or similar
Contract to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party; |
|
|
(ix) enter into (1) any material Contract that would
be of a type referred to in Section 3.01(i)(2)(A) or
(2) any other material Contract that would be of a type
referred to in Section 3.01(i)(2)(B) or (C) and, in
the case of this clause (2), that (A) would reasonably
be expected to impair in any material respect the ability of the
Company and its Subsidiaries to conduct their business as
currently conducted or (B) would reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on the reasonably expected
benefits of the Merger to Parent; |
|
|
(x) enter into, modify, amend or terminate any Contract or
waive, release or assign any material rights or claims
thereunder, which if so entered into, modified, amended,
terminated, waived, released or assigned would reasonably be
expected to (A) have a Material Adverse Effect,
(B) impair in any material respect the ability of the
Company to perform its obligations under this Agreement or
(C) prevent or materially impede, interfere with, hinder or
delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement; |
|
|
(xi) enter into any material Contract to the extent
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
or compliance by the Company with the provisions of this
Agreement could reasonably be expected to conflict with, or
result in a violation or breach of, or default (with or without
notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right
of, or result in, termination, cancelation or acceleration of
any obligation or to the loss of a benefit under, or result in
the creation of any Lien in or upon any of the properties or
other assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries under, or
require Parent to license or transfer any of its Intellectual
Property Rights or other material assets under, or give rise to
any increased, additional, accelerated, or guaranteed right or
entitlements of any third party under, or result in any material
alteration of, any provision of such Contract; |
|
|
(xii) except as required to ensure that any Company Benefit
Plan or Company Benefit Agreement is not then out of compliance
with applicable Law or to comply with any Company Benefit Plan,
Company Benefit Agreement or other Contract entered into prior
to the date hereof (to the extent complete and accurate copies
of which have been heretofore delivered to Parent),
(A) adopt, enter into, terminate or amend (I) any
collective bargaining Contract or Company Benefit Plan or
(II) any Company Benefit Agreement or other Contract, plan
or policy involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and
Key Personnel, (B) increase in any manner the compensation,
bonus or fringe or other benefits of, or pay any discretionary
bonus of any kind or amount whatsoever to, any current or former
director, officer, employee or consultant, except in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice to
employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries other than Key
Personnel, (C) grant or pay any severance or termination
pay, except for severance or termination pay granted or paid in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
to, or increase in any material manner the severance or
termination pay of, any current or former director, officer,
employee or consultant of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
other than Key Personnel, (D) remove any existing
restrictions in any Company Benefit Agreements, Company Benefit
Plans or awards made thereunder, (E) take any action to
fund or in any other way secure the payment of compensation or
benefits under any Company Benefit Plan or Company Benefit
Agreement, (F) take any action to accelerate the vesting or
payment of any compensation or benefit under any Company Benefit
Plan or Company Benefit Agreement or awards made thereunder or
(G) materially change any actuarial or other assumption
used to calculate funding obligations with respect to any
Company Pension Plan or change the manner in which contributions
to any Company Pension Plan are made or the basis on which such
contributions are determined; |
|
|
(xiii) except as required by GAAP, revalue any material
assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or make any
change in accounting methods, principles or practices; or |
|
|
(xiv) authorize any of, or commit, resolve, propose or
agree to take any of, the foregoing actions. |
1-27
(b) Other Actions. The Company, Parent and Sub shall
not, and shall not permit any of their respective Subsidiaries
to, take any action that could reasonably be expected to result
in any of the conditions to the Merger set forth in
Article VI not being satisfied.
(c) Advice of Changes; Filings. The Company and
Parent shall promptly advise the other party orally and in
writing if (i) any representation or warranty made by it
(and, in the case of Parent, made by Sub) contained in this
Agreement becomes untrue or inaccurate in a manner that would
result in the failure of the condition set forth in
Section 6.02(a) or Section 6.03(a) or (ii) it
(and, in the case of Parent, Sub) fails to comply with or
satisfy in any material respect any covenant, condition or
agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it (and, in the
case of Parent, Sub) under this Agreement; provided, however,
that no such notification shall affect the representations,
warranties, covenants or agreements of the parties (or remedies
with respect thereto) or the conditions to the obligations of
the parties under this Agreement. The Company and Parent shall,
to the extent permitted by Law, promptly provide the other with
copies of all filings made by such party with any Governmental
Entity in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, other than the portions of such
filings that include confidential or proprietary information not
directly related to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
(d) Certain Tax Matters. (i) During the period
from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, the
Company shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to
(A) timely file all material tax returns (taking into
account any applicable extensions) required to be filed by or on
behalf of each such entity (Post-Signing Returns);
(B) timely pay all material taxes due and payable;
(C) accrue a reserve in the books and records and financial
statements of any such entity in accordance with past practice
for all taxes payable but not yet due; (D) promptly notify
Parent of any material suit, claim, action, investigation, audit
or similar proceeding (collectively, Actions)
pending against or with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries in respect of any amount of tax and not settle or
compromise any tax liability in excess of $10 million for
individual claims, or $50 million in the aggregate, without
Parents prior written consent, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld; (E) not make any material tax
election, other than with Parents prior written consent or
other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice; and (F) cause all existing tax sharing
agreements, tax indemnity agreements and similar agreements,
arrangements or practices to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is or may be a party or by which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries is or may otherwise be bound to be
terminated as of the Closing Date so that after such date
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall have any
further rights or liabilities thereunder. Any tax returns
described in this Section 4.01(d) shall be complete and
correct in all material respects and shall be prepared on a
basis consistent with the past practice of the Company and in a
manner that does not distort taxable income, including by
deferring income or accelerating deductions. The Company shall
notify Parent upon the filing of any such material tax return
and shall make such tax returns available to Parent.
(ii) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
the Company shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries
incorporated outside the United States (a
Non-U.S. Subsidiary)
to make a cash distribution to the Company or any of the
Companys Subsidiaries incorporated in the United States in
excess of amounts described in Section 965(b)(2)(B) of the
Code (an Excess Distribution) except to the extent
the Company has provided Parent with substantiation, in a form
reasonably satisfactory to Parent, that the deduction described
in Section 965(a) of the Code will apply to the entire
amount of the Excess Distribution. For purposes of this Section,
a written opinion of a nationally recognized law firm to the
effect that the deduction described in Section 965(a) of
the Code should apply to the entire amount of the Excess
Distribution shall be a form of substantiation deemed reasonably
satisfactory to Parent. Furthermore, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not permit any of
its
Non-U.S. Subsidiaries
to increase its indebtedness to any related person as described
in Section 965(b)(3) of the Code without the prior written
consent of Parent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
For purposes of the preceding sentence, indebtedness of a
Non-U.S. Subsidiary
to a related person shall include indebtedness of a
Non-U.S. Subsidiary
guaranteed by a related person.
1-28
SECTION 4.02. No
Solicitation. (a) The Company shall not, nor shall it
authorize or permit any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective directors, officers or employees or any investment
banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other
advisor, agent or representative (collectively,
Representatives) retained by it or any of its
Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly through another person,
(i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage, or take any
other action designed to, or which could reasonably be expected
to, facilitate, any Takeover Proposal or (ii) enter into,
continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any
information, or otherwise cooperate in any way with, any
Takeover Proposal. Without limiting the foregoing, it is agreed
that any violation of the restrictions set forth in the
preceding sentence by any Representative of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries shall be a breach of this
Section 4.02(a) by the Company. The Company shall, and
shall cause its Subsidiaries to, immediately cease and cause to
be terminated all existing discussions or negotiations with any
person conducted heretofore with respect to any Takeover
Proposal and request the prompt return or destruction of all
confidential information previously furnished. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the Shareholder
Approval, in response to a bona fide written Takeover Proposal
that the Board of Directors of the Company reasonably determines
(after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor
of nationally recognized reputation) constitutes or is
reasonably likely to lead to a Superior Proposal, and which
Takeover Proposal was not solicited after the date hereof and
was made after the date hereof and did not otherwise result from
a breach of this Section 4.02(a), the Company may, subject
to compliance with Section 4.02(c), (x) furnish
information with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries to
the person making such Takeover Proposal (and its
Representatives) pursuant to a customary confidentiality
agreement not less restrictive to such person than the
confidentiality provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement,
provided that all such information has previously been provided
to Parent or is provided to Parent prior to or substantially
concurrent with the time it is provided to such person, and
(y) participate in discussions or negotiations with the
person making such Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives)
regarding such Takeover Proposal.
The term Takeover Proposal means any inquiry,
proposal or offer from any person relating to, or that could
reasonably be expected to lead to, any direct or indirect
acquisition or purchase, in one transaction or a series of
transactions, of assets (including equity securities of any
Subsidiary of the Company) or businesses that constitute 15% or
more of the revenues, net income or assets of the Company and
its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or 15% or more of any class
of equity securities of the Company, any tender offer or
exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person
beneficially owning 15% or more of any class of equity
securities of the Company, or any merger, consolidation,
business combination, recapitalization, liquidation,
dissolution, joint venture, binding share exchange or similar
transaction involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
pursuant to which any person or the shareholders of any person
would own 15% or more of any class of equity securities of the
Company or of any resulting parent company of the Company, in
each case other than the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
The term Superior Proposal means any bona fide offer
made by a third party that if consummated would result in such
person (or its shareholders) owning, directly or indirectly,
more than 80% of the shares of Company Common Stock then
outstanding (or of the shares of the surviving entity in a
merger or the direct or indirect parent of the surviving entity
in a merger) or all or substantially all the assets of the
Company, which the Board of Directors of the Company reasonably
determines (after consultation with a financial advisor of
nationally recognized reputation) to be (i) more favorable
to the shareholders of the Company from a financial point of
view than the Merger (taking into account all the terms and
conditions of such proposal and this Agreement (including any
changes to the financial terms of this Agreement proposed by
Parent in response to such offer or otherwise)) and
(ii) reasonably capable of being completed, taking into
account all financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of
such proposal.
(b) Neither the Board of Directors of the Company nor any
committee thereof shall (i) (A) withdraw (or modify in
a manner adverse to Parent), or publicly propose to withdraw (or
modify in a manner adverse to Parent), the adoption or
recommendation by such Board of Directors or any such committee
thereof of this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this
1-29
Agreement or (B) adopt or recommend, or propose publicly to
adopt or recommend, any Takeover Proposal (any action described
in this clause (i) being referred to as a Company
Adverse Recommendation Change) or (ii) adopt or
recommend, or publicly propose to adopt or recommend, or allow
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to execute or enter into,
any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in
principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option
agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or
other similar Contract constituting or related to, or that is
intended to or could reasonably be expected to lead to, any
Takeover Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement
referred to in Section 4.02(a)) (an Acquisition
Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time
prior to obtaining the Shareholder Approval and subject to
Section 4.02(c), the Board of Directors of the Company may
(x) make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if the
Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith
(after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor
of nationally recognized reputation) that (A) a Parent
Material Adverse Effect has occurred and (B) as a result
thereof such action is consistent with their fiduciary duties
under applicable Laws or (y) in response to a Takeover
Proposal that the Board reasonably determines (after
consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor of
nationally recognized reputation) constitutes a Superior
Proposal and that was unsolicited and made after the date hereof
and that did not otherwise result from a breach of this
Section 4.02, (1) make a Company Adverse
Recommendation Change or (2) cause the Company to terminate
this Agreement and concurrently with or after such termination
enter into an Acquisition Agreement; provided, however, that the
Company shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make a
Company Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this
Agreement pursuant to clause (y) until after the fifth
business day following Parents receipt of written notice
(a Notice of Superior Proposal) from the Company
advising Parent that the Board of Directors of the Company
intends to take such action and specifying the reasons therefor,
including the terms and conditions of any Superior Proposal that
is the basis of the proposed action by the Board of Directors
(it being understood and agreed that any amendment to the
financial terms or any other material term of such Superior
Proposal shall require a new Notice of Superior Proposal and a
new five business day period). In determining whether to make a
Company Adverse Recommendation Change or to cause the Company to
so terminate this Agreement, the Board of Directors of the
Company shall take into account any changes to the financial
terms of this Agreement proposed by Parent in response to a
Notice of Superior Proposal or otherwise.
(c) In addition to the obligations of the Company set forth
in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
Section 4.02, the Company shall promptly advise Parent
orally and in writing (i) of any Takeover Proposal, the
material terms and conditions of any such Takeover Proposal
(including any changes thereto) and the identity of the person
making any such Takeover Proposal and (ii) if the Board of
Directors of the Company is considering, or has decided to
consider, whether any change, effect, event, occurrence, state
of facts or development constitutes a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. The Company shall (x) keep Parent fully informed in
all material respects of the status and details (including any
change to the terms thereof) of any Takeover Proposal,
(y) provide to Parent as soon as practicable after receipt
or delivery thereof copies of all correspondence and other
written material sent or provided to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries from any person that describes any of the terms or
conditions of any Takeover Proposal and (z) keep Parent
fully informed in all material respects of the status and
details of any determination by the Companys Board of
Directors with respect to a potential Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
(d) Nothing contained in this Section 4.02 shall
prohibit the Company from (x) taking and disclosing to its
shareholders a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
under the Exchange Act or making a statement required under
Rule 14a-9 under
the Exchange Act or (y) making any disclosure to the
shareholders of the Company that is required by applicable Law;
provided, however, that in no event shall the Company or its
Board of Directors or any committee thereof take, or agree or
resolve to take, any action prohibited by Section 4.02(b)
(it being understood that any accurate disclosure of factual
information to the shareholders of the Company that is required
to be made to such shareholders under applicable federal
securities Laws shall not be considered a modification
prohibited by clause (i)(A) of Section 4.02(b)).
1-30
ARTICLE V
Additional Agreements
SECTION 5.01. Preparation
of the Form S-4
and the Proxy Statement; Shareholders Meeting.
(a) As promptly as practicable following November 14,
2005, the Company and Parent shall prepare and Parent shall file
with the SEC a post-effective amendment to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4 of Parent
(Registration
No. 333-122856),
originally filed with the SEC on February 16, 2005, in
connection with the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock in
the Merger (as may be further amended or supplemented from time
to time, the
Form S-4),
in which the Proxy Statement will be included as a prospectus.
Each of the Company and Parent shall use its reasonable best
efforts to have the
Form S-4 declared
effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable
after such filing. The Company shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to the
shareholders of the Company as promptly as practicable after the
Form S-4 is
declared effective under the Securities Act. Parent shall also
take any action (other than qualifying to do business in any
jurisdiction in which it is not now so qualified or filing a
general consent to service of process) required to be taken
under any applicable state securities Laws in connection with
the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock in the Merger, and
each of Parent and the Company shall furnish all information as
may be reasonably requested by the other in connection with any
such action and the preparation, filing and distribution of the
Form S-4 and the
Proxy Statement. No filing of, or amendment or supplement to,
the Form S-4 will
be made by Parent, and no filing of, or amendment or supplement
to, the Proxy Statement will made by the Company, in each case
without providing the other party a reasonable opportunity to
review and comment thereon. If at any time prior to the
Effective Time any information relating to the Company or
Parent, or any of their respective Affiliates, directors or
officers, should be discovered by the Company or Parent which
should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to either the
Form S-4 or the
Proxy Statement, so that either such document would not include
any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading,
the party which discovers such information shall promptly notify
the other parties hereto and an appropriate amendment or
supplement describing such information shall be promptly filed
with the SEC and, to the extent required by Law, disseminated to
the shareholders of the Company. The parties shall notify each
other promptly of the time when the
Form S-4 has
become effective, of the issuance of any stop order or
suspension of the qualification of the Parent Common Stock
issuable in connection with the Merger for offering or sale in
any jurisdiction, or of the receipt of any comments from the SEC
or the staff of the SEC and of any request by the SEC or the
staff of the SEC for amendments or supplements to the Proxy
Statement or the
Form S-4 or for
additional information and shall supply each other with copies
of (i) all correspondence between it or any of its
Representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or the staff of
the SEC, on the other hand, with respect to the Proxy Statement,
the Form S-4 or
the Merger and (ii) all orders of the SEC relating to the
Form S-4.
(b) The Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to,
as promptly as practicable, establish a record date for, duly
call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its
shareholders (the Shareholders Meeting) solely
for the purpose of obtaining the Shareholder Approval. Subject
to Section 4.02, the Company shall, through its Board of
Directors, recommend to its shareholders approval of this
Agreement and shall include such recommendation in the Proxy
Statement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, but
subject to the terms of this Agreement, the Companys
obligations pursuant to the first sentence of this
Section 5.01(b) shall not be affected by the commencement,
public proposal, public disclosure or communication to the
Company of any Takeover Proposal.
SECTION 5.02. Access to
Information; Confidentiality. (a) To the extent
permitted by applicable Law, the Company shall afford to Parent,
and to Parents officers, employees, accountants, counsel,
financial advisors and other Representatives, reasonable access
(including for the purpose of coordinating integration
activities and transition planning with the employees of the
Company and its Subsidiaries) during normal business hours and
upon reasonable prior notice to the Company during the period
prior to the Effective Time or the termination of this Agreement
to all its and its Subsidiaries properties, books,
Contracts, commitments, personnel and records, but only to the
extent that such access does not
1-31
unreasonably interfere with the business or operations of the
Company and its Subsidiaries, and, during such period, the
Company shall furnish promptly to Parent (a) a copy of each
report, schedule, registration statement and other document
filed by it during such period pursuant to the requirements of
Federal or state securities Laws and (b) all other
information concerning its and its Subsidiaries business,
properties and personnel as Parent may reasonably request;
provided, however, that the Company shall not be required
to (or to cause any of its Subsidiaries to) so confer, afford
such access or furnish such copies or other information to the
extent that doing so would result in the loss of attorney-client
privilege (provided that the Company shall use its reasonable
best efforts to allow for such access or disclosure in a manner
that does not result in a loss of attorney-client privilege).
Except for disclosures expressly permitted by the terms of the
Confidentiality Agreement dated as of August 4, 2004,
between Parent and the Company (as it may be amended from time
to time, the Confidentiality Agreement), Parent
shall hold, and shall cause its officers, employees,
accountants, counsel, financial advisors and other
Representatives to hold, all information received from the
Company, directly or indirectly, in confidence in accordance
with the Confidentiality Agreement. The Confidentiality
Agreement shall survive any termination of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement,
Parent and the Company agree that until the earlier of the
consummation of this Agreement or the six month anniversary of
the date of the termination of this Agreement, as applicable,
each party and its respective Subsidiaries shall not, without
the other partys prior written consent, directly or
indirectly solicit for employment (other than through
advertising in newspapers or periodicals of general circulation
or recruiters searches, in each case not specifically
directed at the other partys employees) any person
currently employed by the other party or any of its Subsidiaries
with whom it has contact or who is identified to such party in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
No investigation pursuant to this Section 5.02 or
information provided or received by any party hereto pursuant to
this Agreement will affect any of the representations or
warranties of the parties hereto contained in this Agreement or
the conditions hereunder to the obligations of the parties
hereto.
(b) To the extent permitted by applicable Law, Parent shall
afford to the Company and its Representatives reasonable access
to Parents personnel and records (i) on a basis
consistent with the Companys access to such personnel and
records prior to the date hereof in connection with the
Companys due diligence review of Parent and its
Subsidiaries in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby and (ii) to the extent reasonably necessary for the
Company to determine whether the conditions set forth in
Section 6.03 are satisfied.
SECTION 5.03. Reasonable
Best Efforts. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in this Agreement, each of the parties agrees to use
its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and
cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary
to consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious manner
practicable, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
by this Agreement, including using reasonable best efforts to
accomplish the following: (i) the taking of all acts
necessary to cause the conditions to Closing to be satisfied as
promptly as practicable, (ii) the obtaining of all
necessary actions or nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals
from Governmental Entities and the making of all necessary
registrations and filings (including filings with Governmental
Entities) and the taking of all steps as may be necessary to
obtain an approval or waiver from, or to avoid an action or
proceeding by, any Governmental Entity, (iii) the avoidance
of each and every impediment under any antitrust, merger
control, competition or trade regulation Law that may be
asserted by any Governmental Entity with respect to the Merger
so as to enable the Closing to occur as soon as reasonably
possible and (iv) the obtaining of all necessary consents,
approvals or waivers from third parties, including any such
consents, approvals or waivers required in connection with any
Divestiture. In connection with and without limiting the
foregoing, the Company and Parent shall (A) duly file with
the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust
Division of the Department of Justice the notification and
report form (the HSR Filing) required under the HSR
Act and (B) duly make all notifications and other filings
required (i) under the EC Merger Regulation (together with
the HSR Filings, the Antitrust Filings) or
(ii) under any other applicable competition, merger
control, antitrust or similar Law that the Company and Parent
deem advisable or appropriate, in each case with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and as promptly as
practicable.
1-32
The Antitrust Filings shall be in substantial compliance with
the requirements of the HSR Act, the EC Merger Regulation or
other Laws, as applicable. Each party shall cooperate with the
other party to the extent necessary to assist the other party in
the preparation of its Antitrust Filings and, if requested, to
promptly amend or furnish additional information thereunder.
Each party shall use its reasonable best efforts to furnish to
each other all information required for any filing, form,
declaration, notification, registration and notice, other than
confidential or proprietary information not directly related to
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and to keep the
other party reasonably informed with respect to the status of
each clearance, approval or waiver sought from a Governmental
Entity in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and the material communications between such party and
such Governmental Entity. Each party shall consult with the
other party, and consider in good faith the views of the other
party, prior to entering into any agreement with any Antitrust
Authority. Neither party shall, nor shall it permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, acquire or agree to acquire any business,
person or division thereof, or otherwise acquire or agree to
acquire any assets if the entering into of a definitive
agreement relating to or the consummation of such acquisition,
could reasonably be expected to materially increase the risk of
not obtaining the applicable clearance, approval or waiver from
an Antitrust Authority with respect to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The Company and its Board of
Directors shall (1) use reasonable best efforts to ensure
that no state takeover Law or similar Law is or becomes
applicable to this Agreement, the Merger or any of the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (2) if any
state takeover Law or similar Law becomes applicable to this
Agreement, the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, use reasonable best efforts to
ensure that the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as practicable
on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and otherwise to
minimize the effect of such Law on this Agreement, the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this
Agreement: (a) with respect to the assets of the cardiac
rhythm management businesses of Parent, the Company and their
respective Affiliates, Parent and its Affiliates shall only be
required to agree to Divestitures of such assets that
individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be
expected to have greater than a de minimis adverse effect
on the combined cardiac rhythm management business of Parent,
the Company and their respective Affiliates, taken as a whole;
(b) with respect to the assets of the coronary vascular
intervention business of Parent and its Affiliates, Parent and
its Affiliates shall only be required to agree to Divestitures
of such assets that individually or in the aggregate would not
reasonably be expected to have greater than a de minimis
adverse effect on the drug eluting stent business of Parent
and its Affiliates, taken as a whole; (c) with respect to
the assets of the vascular intervention business of the Company
and its Affiliates, Parent and its Affiliates shall only be
required to agree to Divestitures of such assets that
individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on the combined
vascular intervention business of Parent, the Company and their
respective Affiliates, taken as a whole; (d) none of Parent
and its Affiliates shall be required to agree to any Divestiture
of any of their assets except as provided in clauses (a)
and (b) above and (e) if, but only if, directed by
Parent, the Company shall agree to any Divestiture of any of its
assets or the assets of any of its Affiliates if such
Divestiture is conditioned on the consummation of the Merger.
For purposes of this Agreement, a Divestiture of any
asset shall mean (i) any sale, transfer, license, separate
holding, divestiture or other disposition, or any prohibition
of, or any limitation on, the acquisition, ownership, operation,
effective control or exercise of full rights of ownership, of
such asset or (ii) the termination or amendment of any
existing relationships and contractual rights. It is agreed and
understood that, for purposes of this Agreement, a Divestiture
of a business unit, product line or development program may
include (x) the transfer of any and all assets primarily
relating to that business unit or to the research, development,
manufacture, marketing or sale of that product line or
development program and (y) licensing or otherwise making
available assets that are related, but not primarily, to that
business unit, product line or development program; provided
that Parent, the Company or their Affiliates will be entitled to
a license back or otherwise having made available transferred
assets to the extent that such assets otherwise relate to other
retained businesses, product lines or development programs of
Parent, the Company or any of their respective Affiliates. It is
understood and agreed by the parties that, for purposes of this
Agreement, the effect of any Divestiture required to be made
pursuant to this Section 5.03 shall
1-33
not, directly or indirectly, be deemed to result in a breach of
the representations and warranties set forth herein.
SECTION 5.04. Company Stock
Options; ESPP. (a) As soon as practicable following the
date of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company
(or, if appropriate, any committee thereof administering the
Company Stock Plans) shall adopt such resolutions or take such
other actions as may be required to effect the following:
|
|
|
(i) each Company Stock Option outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be amended and converted into an
option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were
applicable under such Company Stock Option, the number of shares
of Parent Common Stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share)
equal to the sum of (x) the product of (A) the number
of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such Company Stock
Option and (B) the Exchange Ratio and (y) the product
of (A) the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject
to such Company Stock Option and (B) the Cash Portion
Option Exchange Multiple, at an exercise price per share of
Parent Common Stock (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal
to the quotient obtained by dividing (1) the aggregate
exercise price for the shares of Company Common Stock subject to
such Company Stock Option by (2) the aggregate number of
shares of Parent Common Stock to be subject to such Company
Stock Option after giving effect to the adjustments in this
clause (i) (each, as so adjusted, an Adjusted
Option); and |
|
|
(ii) make such other changes to the Company Stock Plans as
Parent and the Company may agree are appropriate to give effect
to the Merger. |
(b) As soon as practicable following the date of this
Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company (or, if
appropriate, any committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company administering the ESPP), shall adopt such resolutions or
take such other actions as may be required to provide that with
respect to the ESPP (i) participants may not increase their
payroll deductions or purchase elections from those in effect on
the date of this Agreement, (ii) each participants
outstanding right to purchase shares of Company Common Stock
under the ESPP shall terminate on the day immediately prior to
the day on which the Effective Time occurs, provided that all
amounts allocated to each participants account under the
ESPP as of such date shall thereupon be used to purchase from
the Company whole shares of Company Common Stock at the
applicable price determined under the terms of the ESPP for the
then outstanding offering periods using such date as the final
purchase date for each such offering period, and (iii) the
ESPP shall terminate immediately following such purchases of
Company Common Stock.
(c) The Company shall ensure that following the Effective
Time, no holder of a Company Stock Option (or former holder of a
Company Stock Option) or any participant in any Company Stock
Plan, Company Benefit Plan or Company Benefit Agreement shall
have any right thereunder to acquire any capital stock of the
Company or the Surviving Corporation or any other equity
interest therein (including phantom stock or stock
appreciation rights).
(d) The adjustments provided in Section 5.04(a) with
respect to any Company Stock Option to which Section 421(a)
of the Code applies shall be and are intended to be effected in
a manner which is consistent with Section 424(a) of the
Code. As soon as practicable following the Effective Time,
Parent shall deliver to the holders of Adjusted Options
appropriate notices setting forth such holders rights
pursuant to the respective Company Stock Plans and the Contracts
evidencing the grants of such Adjusted Options, which shall
provide, among other things, that such Adjusted Options and
Contracts have been assumed by Parent and shall continue in
effect on the same terms and conditions (subject to the
adjustments required by this Section 5.04 after giving
effect to the Merger).
(e) Except as otherwise contemplated by this
Section 5.04 and except to the extent required under the
respective terms of the Adjusted Options, all restrictions or
limitations on transfer and vesting with respect to Adjusted
Options, to the extent that such restrictions or limitations
shall not have already lapsed, and all other terms thereof,
shall remain in full force and effect with respect to such
Adjusted Options after giving effect to the Merger and the
assumption by Parent as set forth above.
1-34
(f) As soon as practicable following the Effective Time,
Parent shall prepare and file with the SEC a registration
statement on
Form S-8 (or
another appropriate form) registering shares of Parent Common
Stock subject to issuance upon the exercise of the Adjusted
Options. The Company shall cooperate with, and assist Parent in
the preparation of, such registration statement. Parent shall
keep such registration statement effective (and to maintain the
current status of the prospectus required thereby) for so long
as any Adjusted Options remain outstanding.
(g) For purposes of this Agreement, Cash Portion
Option Exchange Multiple means the quotient obtained by
dividing (x) the Cash Portion by (y) the Average
Parent Stock Price.
(h) For purposes of this Agreement, Average Parent
Stock Price means the average of the volume weighted
averages of the trading prices of Parent Common Stock, as such
price is reported on the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape (as
reported by Bloomberg Financial Markets or such other source as
the parties shall agree in writing), for the 15 trading days
ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the
Effective Time.
(i) Prior to the Effective Time, each of Parent and the
Company shall use reasonable best efforts to cause any
dispositions of Company Common Stock (including derivative
securities with respect to Company Common Stock) or acquisitions
of Parent Common Stock (including derivative securities with
respect to Parent Common Stock) resulting from the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement by each individual who is subject
to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act with respect to the Company to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act, such efforts to include all
steps required be taken in accordance with the No-Action Letter
dated January 12, 1999, issued by the SEC to Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.
SECTION 5.05. Indemnification,
Exculpation and Insurance. (a) Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to assume the obligations with respect to
all rights to indemnification and exculpation from liabilities,
including advancement of expenses, for acts or omissions
occurring at or prior to the Effective Time now existing in
favor of the current or former directors or officers of the
Company as provided in the Company Articles, the Company By-laws
or any indemnification Contract between such directors or
officers and the Company (in each case, as in effect on the date
hereof), without further action, as of the Effective Time and
such obligations shall survive the Merger and shall continue in
full force and effect in accordance with their terms.
(b) In the event that the Surviving Corporation or any of
its successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges
into any other person and is not the continuing or surviving
corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its
properties and other assets to any person, then, and in each
such case, Parent shall cause proper provision to be made so
that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation
shall expressly assume the obligations set forth in this
Section 5.05. In the event (A) the Surviving
Corporation transfers any material portion of its assets, in a
single transaction or in a series of transactions or
(B) Parent takes any action to materially impair the
financial ability of the Surviving Corporation to satisfy the
obligations referred to in Section 5.05(a), Parent will
either guarantee such obligations or take such other action to
insure that the ability of the Surviving Corporation, legal and
financial, to satisfy such obligations will not be diminished in
any material respect.
(c) For six years after the Effective Time, Parent shall
maintain (directly or indirectly through the Companys
existing insurance programs) in effect the Companys
current directors and officers liability insurance
in respect of acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the
Effective Time, covering each person currently covered by the
Companys directors and officers liability
insurance policy (a complete and accurate copy of which has been
heretofore delivered to Parent), on terms with respect to such
coverage and amounts no less favorable than those of such policy
in effect on the date hereof; provided, however, that
Parent may (i) substitute therefor policies of Parent
containing terms with respect to coverage (including as coverage
relates to deductibles and exclusions) and amounts no less
favorable to such directors and officers or (ii) request
that the Company obtain such extended reporting period coverage
under its existing insurance programs (to be effective as of the
Effective Time); provided further, however,
1-35
that in satisfying its obligation under this
Section 5.05(c), neither the Company nor Parent shall be
obligated to pay more than in the aggregate the amount set forth
in Section 5.05(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedule to
obtain such coverage. It is understood and agreed that in the
event such coverage cannot be obtained for such amount or less
in the aggregate, Parent shall only be obligated to provide such
coverage as may be obtained for such aggregate amount.
(d) The provisions of this Section 5.05 (i) are
intended to be for the benefit of, and will be enforceable by,
each indemnified party, his or her heirs and his or her
representatives and (ii) are in addition to, and not in
substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or
contribution that any such person may have by Contract or
otherwise.
SECTION 5.06. Fees and
Expenses. (a) Except as provided in
paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of this
Section 5.06, all fees and expenses incurred in connection
with this Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall be paid by the party
incurring such fees or expenses, whether or not the Merger is
consummated, except that expenses incurred in connection with
the printing and mailing of the
Form S-4 and the
Proxy Statement shall be shared equally by Parent and the
Company.
(b) In the event that (i) this Agreement is terminated
by Parent pursuant to Section 7.01(e) (other than as a
result of a Company Adverse Recommendation Change following the
occurrence of a Parent Material Adverse Effect), (ii) this
Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant to
Section 7.01(f) or (iii) (A) prior to the
obtaining of the Shareholder Approval, a Takeover Proposal shall
have been made to the Company or shall have been made directly
to the shareholders of the Company generally or shall have
otherwise become publicly known or any person shall have
publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to
make a Takeover Proposal, (B) thereafter this Agreement is
terminated by either Parent or the Company pursuant to
Section 7.01(b)(i) (but only if a vote to obtain the
Shareholder Approval or the Shareholders Meeting has not
been held) or Section 7.01(b)(iii) and (C) within
12 months after such termination, the Company enters into a
definitive Contract to consummate, or consummates, the
transactions contemplated by any Takeover Proposal, then the
Company shall pay Parent a fee equal to $625,000,000 (the
Parent Termination Fee) by wire transfer of same-day
funds on the first business day following (x) in the case
of a payment required by clause (i) or (ii) above, the
date of termination of this Agreement and (y) in the case
of a payment required by clause (iii) above, the date of
the first to occur of the events referred to in
clause (iii)(C). For purposes of clause (iii)(C) of
the immediately preceding sentence only, the term Takeover
Proposal shall have the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 4.02(a) except that all references to
15% therein shall be deemed to be references to
35%.
(c) In the event that (i) this Agreement is terminated
pursuant to Section 7.01(b)(i), 7.01(b)(ii) or 7.01(c)(ii)
and (ii) at the time of any such termination all of the
conditions set forth in Article VI have been satisfied or
waived except for any of the conditions set forth in
Section 6.01(b), 6.01(c), 6.01(d), 6.02(c) or 6.02(d) (in
the case of Sections 6.01(d), 6.02(c) and 6.02(d), only to
the extent that the conditions set forth therein have not been
satisfied due to a suit, action or proceeding by any national
Governmental Entity or the imposition of a Restraint, in either
case relating to competition, merger control, antitrust or
similar Laws), then Parent shall pay to the Company a fee equal
to $300,000,000 (the Company Termination Fee) by
wire transfer of same-day funds on the first business day
following the date of termination of this Agreement.
(d) The Company and Parent acknowledge and agree that the
agreements contained in Sections 5.06(b) and 5.06(c) are an
integral part of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and that, without these agreements, the Company and
Parent would not enter into this Agreement; accordingly,
(i) if the Company fails promptly to pay the amount due
pursuant to Section 5.06(b), and, in order to obtain such
payment, Parent commences a suit that results in a judgment
against the Company for the Parent Termination Fee, the Company
shall pay to Parent its costs and expenses (including
attorneys fees and expenses) in connection with such suit,
together with interest on the amount of the Parent Termination
Fee from the date such payment was required to be made until the
date of payment at
1-36
the prime rate of Citibank, N.A., in effect on the date such
payment was required to be made; and (ii) if Parent fails
promptly to pay the amount due pursuant to Section 5.06(c),
and, in order to obtain such payment, the Company commences a
suit that results in a judgment against Parent for the Company
Termination Fee, Parent shall pay to the Company its costs and
expenses (including attorneys fees and expenses) in
connection with such suit, together with interest on the amount
of the Company Termination Fee from the date such payment was
required to be made until the date of payment at the prime rate
of Citibank, N.A., in effect on the date such payment was
required to be made.
SECTION 5.07. Public
Announcements. Except with respect to any Company Adverse
Recommendation Change made in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement, Parent and the Company shall consult with each other
before issuing, and give each other the opportunity to review
and comment upon, any press release or other public statements
with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Merger, and shall not issue any such press release
or make any such public statement prior to such consultation,
except as such party may reasonably conclude may be required by
applicable Law, court process or by obligations pursuant to any
listing agreement with any national securities exchange or
national securities quotation system. The parties agree that the
initial press release to be issued with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be in the form
heretofore agreed to by the parties.
SECTION 5.08. Affiliates.
As soon as practicable after November 14, 2005, the Company
shall deliver to Parent a letter identifying all persons who at
the time this Agreement is submitted for adoption by the
shareholders of the Company may be deemed to be
affiliates of the Company for purposes of
Rule 145 under the Securities Act. The Company shall use
its reasonable best efforts to cause each such person to deliver
to Parent at least 30 days prior to the Closing Date a
written agreement substantially in the form attached as
Exhibit B hereto.
SECTION 5.09. Stock
Exchange Listing. To the extent Parent does not issue or
intend to issue treasury shares in the Merger or to holders of
Adjusted Options that are already listed, Parent shall use its
reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of Parent Common
Stock to be issued in the Merger and to holders of Adjusted
Options to be promptly approved for listing on the NYSE, subject
to official notice of issuance, prior to the Closing Date.
SECTION 5.10. Shareholder
Litigation. The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to
participate in the defense or settlement of any shareholder
litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such
settlement shall be agreed to without Parents prior
written consent.
SECTION 5.11. Employee
Matters. (a) (i) For a period of twelve months
following the Effective Time, the employees of the Company and
its Subsidiaries who remain in the employment of the Surviving
Corporation and its Subsidiaries (the Continuing
Employees) shall receive employee benefits that in the
aggregate are substantially comparable to the employee benefits
provided to such employees immediately prior to the Effective
Time; (ii) for the six-month period immediately following
the expiration of the twelve-month period described in the
preceding clause (i), the Continuing Employees shall
receive employee benefits that in the aggregate are
substantially comparable to either the employee benefits
provided to such employees immediately prior to the Effective
Time or the employee benefits provided to similarly situated
employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries; and (iii) for a
period of not less than eighteen months following the Effective
Time, the Continuing Employees shall receive base salary or wage
rates that are not less than those in effect for such Continuing
Employees immediately prior to the Effective Time; provided that
neither Parent nor the Surviving Corporation nor any of their
Subsidiaries shall have any obligation to issue, or adopt any
plans or arrangements providing for the issuance of, shares of
capital stock, warrants, options, stock appreciation rights or
other rights in respect of any shares of capital stock of any
entity or any securities convertible or exchangeable into such
shares pursuant to any such plans or arrangements; provided,
further, that no plans or arrangements of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries providing for such issuance shall be taken into
account in determining whether employee benefits are
substantially comparable in the aggregate.
1-37
(b) Nothing contained herein shall be construed as
requiring, and the Company shall take no action that would have
the effect of requiring, Parent or the Surviving Corporation to
continue any specific employee benefit plans or to continue the
employment of any specific person.
(c) Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation to
recognize the service of each Continuing Employee as if such
service had been performed with Parent (i) for purposes of
vesting (but not benefit accrual) under Parents defined
benefit pension plan, (ii) for purposes of eligibility for
vacation under Parents vacation program, (iii) for
purposes of eligibility and participation under any health or
welfare plan maintained by Parent (other than any
post-employment health or post-employment welfare plan) ,
(iv) for purposes of eligibility for the company matching
contribution under Parents 401(k) savings plan (it
being understood that each Continuing Employee who was
participating in the Companys 401(k) savings plan
immediately prior to becoming eligible to participate in
Parents 401(k) savings plan shall be immediately
eligible for the company matching contribution under
Parents 401(k) savings plan) and (v) unless
covered under another arrangement with or of the Company, for
benefit accrual purposes under Parents severance plan (in
the case of each of clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and
(v), solely to the extent that Parent makes such plan or program
available to employees of the Surviving Corporation, it being
Parents current intention to do so), but not for purposes
of any other employee benefit plan of Parent.
(d) With respect to any welfare plan maintained by Parent
in which Continuing Employees are eligible to participate after
the Effective Time, Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to, (i) waive all limitations as to preexisting
conditions and exclusions with respect to participation and
coverage requirements applicable to such employees to the extent
such conditions and exclusions were satisfied or did not apply
to such employees under the welfare plans maintained by the
Company prior to the Effective Time and (ii) provide each
Continuing Employee with credit for any co-payments and
deductibles paid prior to the Effective Time in satisfying any
analogous deductible or
out-of-pocket
requirements to the extent applicable under any such plan.
(e) Subject to the provisions of Section 5.11(a)
through (d), Parent shall assume all obligations under and
honor in accordance with their terms, and shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to honor in accordance with their terms,
the Company Benefit Plans and Company Benefit Agreements listed
on Section 5.11(e) of the Company Disclosure Schedule (as
modified, if applicable, as agreed between Parent and individual
employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries). Parent
acknowledges and agrees that the Merger will constitute a
change in control within the meaning of the Company
Benefit Plans and Company Benefit Agreements which include a
definition of such (or substantially similar) concept, except to
the extent otherwise agreed between Parent and individual
employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
(f) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of
Section 5.11, the provisions of Section 5.11(a),
(c) and (d) shall apply only with respect to
Continuing Employees who are covered under Company Benefit Plans
that are maintained primarily for the benefit of employees
employed in the United States (including Continuing Employees
regularly employed outside the United States to the extent they
participate in such Company Benefit Plans). With respect to
Continuing Employees not described in the preceding sentence,
Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation and its
Subsidiaries to, comply with all applicable laws, directives and
regulations relating to employees and employee benefits matters
applicable to such employees.
SECTION 5.12. Company
Notes. Each of the Company, Parent and Sub shall take each
action required to be taken by such party pursuant to the
Indenture dated as of January 18, 1996, between the Company
and Citibank, N.A., with respect to the Company Notes, as
necessary to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement in compliance therewith.
SECTION 5.13. Rights
Agreement. The Board of Directors of the Company shall take
all further actions (in addition to those referred to in
Section 3.01(v)) requested by Parent in order to render the
Company Rights inapplicable to the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Except as provided
above with respect to the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, the Board of Directors of the
Company shall not, without the prior written consent of Parent,
1-38
amend, take any action with respect to, or make any
determination under, the Rights Agreement (including a
redemption of the Company Rights) to facilitate a Takeover
Proposal.
ARTICLE VI
Conditions Precedent
SECTION 6.01. Conditions to
Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger. The
respective obligation of each party to effect the Merger is
subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by Law)
waiver by Parent and the Company on or prior to the Closing Date
of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Shareholder Approval. The Shareholder Approval
shall have been obtained. |
|
|
(b) NYSE Listing. The shares of Parent Common Stock
issuable to the shareholders of the Company and to holders of
Adjusted Options as contemplated by this Agreement shall have
been approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official
notice of issuance. |
|
|
(c) Antitrust. (i) The waiting period (and any
extension thereof) applicable to the Merger under the HSR Act
shall have been terminated or shall have expired and
(ii) the European Commission shall have issued a decision
under Article 6(1)(b), 8(1) or 8(2) of the EC Merger
Regulation (or shall have been deemed to have done so under
Article 10(6) of the EC Merger Regulation) declaring the
Merger compatible with the EC Common Market (and/or, as may be
the case, any national competition authority in the EC to which
all or part of the case may have been transferred shall have
issued a decision with similar effect or have been deemed to
have done so). |
|
|
(d) No Injunctions or Restraints. No temporary
restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other
judgment or order issued by any court or agency of competent
jurisdiction or other Law, rule, legal restraint or prohibition
(collectively, Restraints) shall be in effect
preventing the consummation of the Merger. |
|
|
(e) Form S-4.
The Form S-4 shall
have become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be
the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop
order. |
SECTION 6.02. Conditions to
Obligations of Parent and Sub. The obligations of Parent and
Sub to effect the Merger are further subject to the satisfaction
or (to the extent permitted by Law) waiver by Parent on or prior
to the Closing Date of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) The
representations and warranties of the Company contained in
Sections 3.01(c), 3.01(d), 3.01(g)(iv) (but only with
respect to current and former directors and Tier I
Employees), 3.01(i)(2)(A), 3.01(q), 3.01(r) (but not with
respect to the last sentence thereof) and 3.01(v) of this
Agreement that are qualified as to materiality or by reference
to Material Adverse Effect or Material Adverse Change shall be
true and correct, and such representations and warranties of the
Company that are not so qualified shall be true and correct in
all material respects, in each case as of the date of this
Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though made on the
Closing Date, except to the extent such representations and
warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case as
of such earlier date, (ii) the representations and
warranties of the Company contained in
Sections 3.01(i)(2)(B) and (C) shall be true and
correct as of the date of this Agreement as though made on the
Closing Date, except to the extent that the facts or matters as
to which such representations and warranties are not so true and
correct as of such date, individually or in the aggregate, would
not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on
the reasonably expected benefits of the Merger to Parent and
(iii) all other representations and warranties of the
Company contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct as
of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date as
though made on the Closing Date, except to the extent such
representations and warranties expressly relate to a specified
date, in which case as of such specified date, and except
further, in the case of this clause (iii), to the extent
that the facts or matters as to which such representations and
warranties are not so true and correct as of such dates (without
giving effect to any qualifications or limitations as to
materiality or Material Adverse Effect |
1-39
|
|
|
or Material Adverse Change set forth therein), individually or
in the aggregate, have not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Parent shall have
received a certificate signed on behalf of the Company by an
executive officer of the Company to such effect. |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of the Company. The
Company shall have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement
at or prior to the Closing Date, and Parent shall have received
a certificate signed on behalf of the Company by the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer of the Company
to such effect. |
|
|
(c) No Litigation. There shall not be pending any
suit, action or proceeding by any national Governmental Entity
(i) seeking to restrain or prohibit the consummation of the
Merger or any other transaction contemplated by this Agreement
or seeking to obtain from the Company, Parent, Sub or any other
Affiliate of Parent any damages that are material in relation to
the Company, (ii) seeking to impose limitations on the
ability of Parent or any Affiliate of Parent to hold, or
exercise full rights of ownership of, any shares of capital
stock of the Surviving Corporation, including the right to vote
such shares on all matters properly presented to the
shareholders of the Surviving Corporation, (iii) seeking to
prohibit Parent or any of its Affiliates from effectively
controlling in any material respect the business or operations
of the Company or any of its Affiliates, (iv) seeking any
Divestiture that is not required to be effected pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement or (v) that has had or would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect or
Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(d) Restraints. No Restraint that would reasonably
be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in any of the
effects referred to in clauses (i) through (v) of
paragraph (c) of this Section 6.02 shall be in
effect. |
SECTION 6.03. Conditions to
Obligation of the Company. The obligation of the Company to
effect the Merger is further subject to the satisfaction or (to
the extent permitted by Law) waiver by the Company on or prior
to the Closing Date of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) The
representations and warranties of Parent and Sub contained in
Section 3.02(b) of this Agreement that are qualified as to
materiality or by reference to Parent Material Adverse Effect or
Parent Material Adverse Change shall be true and correct, and
such representations and warranties of Parent that are not so
qualified shall be true and correct in all material respects, in
each case as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing
Date as though made on the Closing Date, except to the extent
such representations and warranties expressly relate to an
earlier date, in which case as of such earlier date and
(ii) all other representations and warranties of Parent
contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the
date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though made
on the Closing Date, except to the extent such representations
and warranties expressly relate to a specified date, in which
case as of such specified date, and except further, in the case
of this clause (ii), to the extent that the facts or
matters as to which such representations and warranties are not
so true and correct as of such dates (without giving effect to
any qualifications or limitations as to materiality or Parent
Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material Adverse Change set
forth therein), individually or in the aggregate, have not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect. The Company shall have received a certificate
signed on behalf of Parent by an executive officer of Parent to
such effect. |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of Parent and Sub.
Parent and Sub shall have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by them under this
Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and the Company shall
have received a certificate signed on behalf of Parent by an
executive officer of Parent to such effect. |
SECTION 6.04. Frustration
of Closing Conditions. None of the Company, Parent or Sub
may rely on the failure of any condition set forth in
Section 6.01, 6.02 or 6.03, as the case may be, to be
satisfied if such failure was caused by such partys
failure to act in good faith or to use its reasonable best
efforts to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, as required by and subject to
Section 5.03.
1-40
ARTICLE VII
Termination, Amendment and
Waiver
SECTION 7.01. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
Effective Time, whether before or after receipt of the
Shareholder Approval:
|
|
|
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent, Sub and the
Company; |
|
|
(b) by either Parent or the Company: |
|
|
|
(i) if the Merger shall not have been consummated on or
before March 31, 2006; provided, however, that the right to
terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.01(b)(i)
shall not be available to any party whose wilful breach of a
representation or warranty in this Agreement or whose other
action or failure to act has been a principal cause of or
resulted in the failure of the Merger to be consummated on or
before such date; |
|
|
(ii) if any Restraint having any of the effects set forth
in Section 6.01(d) shall be in effect and shall have become
final and nonappealable; or |
|
|
(iii) if the Shareholder Approval shall not have been
obtained at the Shareholders Meeting duly convened
therefor or at any adjournment or postponement thereof; |
|
|
|
(c) by Parent (i) if the Company shall have breached
or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement, which
breach or failure to perform (A) would give rise to the
failure of a condition set forth in Section 6.02(a) or
6.02(b) and (B) is incapable of being cured by the Company
within 30 calendar days following receipt of written notice of
such breach or failure to perform from Parent or (ii) if
any Restraint having the effects referred to in clauses (i)
through (v) of Section 6.02(c) shall be in effect and
shall have become final and nonappealable; |
|
|
(d) by the Company, if Parent shall have breached or failed
to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements set forth in this Agreement, which breach or failure
to perform (A) would give rise to the failure of a
condition set forth in Section 6.03(a) or 6.03(b) and
(B) is incapable of being cured by Parent within 30
calendar days following receipt of written notice of such breach
or failure to perform from the Company; |
|
|
(e) by Parent, in the event that prior to the obtaining of
the Shareholder Approval (i) a Company Adverse
Recommendation Change shall have occurred or (ii) the Board
of Directors of the Company fails publicly to reaffirm its
adoption and recommendation of this Agreement, the Merger or the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement within ten
business days of receipt of a written request by Parent to
provide such reaffirmation following a Takeover Proposal; or |
|
|
(f) by the Company in accordance with the terms and subject
to the conditions of Section 4.02(b). |
SECTION 7.02. Effect of
Termination. In the event of termination of this Agreement
by either the Company or Parent as provided in
Section 7.01, this Agreement shall forthwith become void
and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the
part of Parent, Sub or the Company under this Agreement, other
than the provisions of Section 3.01(s) and 3.02(g), the
second, third and fourth sentences of Section 5.02(a),
Section 5.06, this Section 7.02 and Article VIII,
which provisions shall survive such termination; provided,
however, that no such termination shall relieve any party hereto
from any liability or damages resulting from the wilful and
material breach by a party of any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement.
SECTION 7.03. Amendment.
This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto at any time
before or after receipt of the Shareholder Approval; provided,
however, that after such approval has been obtained, there shall
be made no amendment that by applicable Law requires further
approval by the
1-41
shareholders of the Company without such approval having been
obtained. This Agreement may not be amended except by an
instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties
hereto.
SECTION 7.04. Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties
may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the
obligations or other acts of the other parties, (b) to the
extent permitted by applicable Law, waive any inaccuracies in
the representations and warranties contained herein or in any
document delivered pursuant hereto or (c) subject to the
proviso to the first sentence of Section 7.03 and to the
extent permitted by applicable Law, waive compliance with any of
the agreements or conditions contained herein. Any agreement on
the part of a party to any such extension or waiver shall be
valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on
behalf of such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement
to assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise
shall not constitute a waiver of such rights nor shall any
single or partial exercise by any party to this Agreement of any
of its rights under this Agreement preclude any other or further
exercise of such rights or any other rights under this Agreement.
SECTION 7.05. Procedure for
Termination or Amendment. A termination of this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.01 or an amendment of this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.03 shall, in order to be effective,
require, in the case of Parent or the Company, action by its
Board of Directors or, with respect to any amendment of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.03, the duly authorized
committee of its Board of Directors to the extent permitted by
applicable Law.
ARTICLE VIII
General Provisions
SECTION 8.01. Nonsurvival
of Representations and Warranties. None of the
representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive
the Effective Time. This Section 8.01 shall not limit any
covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms
contemplates performance after the Effective Time.
SECTION 8.02. Notices.
Except for notices that are specifically required by the terms
of this Agreement to be delivered orally, all notices, requests,
claims, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed given if delivered personally,
telecopied (which is confirmed) or sent by overnight courier
(providing proof of delivery) to the parties at the following
addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be
specified by like notice):
if to Parent or Sub, to:
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson |
|
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza |
|
New Brunswick, NJ 08933 |
|
|
Telecopy No.: (732) 524-2788 |
|
|
Attention: Office of General Counsel |
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP |
|
Worldwide Plaza |
|
825 Eighth Avenue |
|
New York, NY 10019 |
|
|
Telecopy No.: (212) 474-3700 |
|
|
Attention: Robert I. Townsend, III, Esq. |
1-42
if to the Company, to:
|
|
|
Guidant Corporation |
|
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor |
|
Indianapolis, IN 46204 |
|
|
Telecopy No.: (317) 971-2119 |
|
|
Attention: General Counsel |
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP |
|
333 West Wacker Drive |
|
Chicago, Illinois 60606 |
|
|
Telecopy No.: (312) 407-0411 |
|
|
Attention: Charles W. Mulaney, Jr., Esq. |
SECTION 8.03. Definitions.
For purposes of this Agreement:
|
|
|
(a) an Affiliate of any person means another
person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such first person; |
|
|
(b) Knowledge of any person that is not an
individual means, with respect to any matter in question, the
actual knowledge of such persons executive officers after
making due inquiry of the current Tier I Employees and
Tier II Employees having primary responsibility for such
matter; |
|
|
(c) Material Adverse Change or Material
Adverse Effect means any change, effect, event,
occurrence, state of facts or development which individually or
in the aggregate would reasonably be expected to result in any
change or effect, that is materially adverse to the business,
financial condition or results of operations of the Company and
its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided, that none of the
following shall be deemed, either alone or in combination, to
constitute, and none of the following shall be taken into
account in determining whether there has been or will be, a
Material Adverse Change or Material Adverse Effect: (A) any
change, effect, event, occurrence, state of facts or development
(1) in the financial or securities markets or the economy
in general, (2) in the industries in which the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries operates in general, to the extent that
such change, effect, event, occurrence, state of facts or
development does not disproportionately impact the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, or (3) resulting from any
Divestiture required to be effected pursuant to the terms of
this Agreement or (B) any failure, in and of itself, by the
Company to meet any internal or published projections, forecasts
or revenue or earnings predictions (it being understood that the
facts or occurrences giving rise or contributing to such failure
may be deemed to constitute, or be taken into account in
determining whether there has been or would reasonably be
expected to be, a Material Adverse Effect or a Material Adverse
Change); |
|
|
(d) Parent Material Adverse Change or
Parent Material Adverse Effect means any change,
effect, event, occurrence, state of facts or development which
individually or in the aggregate would reasonably be expected to
result in any change or effect, that is materially adverse to
the business, financial condition or results of operations of
Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided, that
none of the following shall be deemed, either alone or in
combination, to constitute, and none of the following shall be
taken into account in determining whether there has been or will
be, a Parent Material Adverse Change or Parent Material Adverse
Effect: (A) any change, effect, event, occurrence, state of
facts or development (1) in the financial or securities
markets or the economy in general, (2) in the industries in
which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries operates in general, to
the extent that such change, effect, event, occurrence, state of
facts or development does not disproportionately impact Parent
or any of its Subsidiaries or (3) resulting from any
Divestiture required to be effected pursuant to the terms of
this Agreement or (B) any failure, in and of itself, by
Parent to meet any internal or published projections, forecasts
or revenue or earnings predictions (it |
1-43
|
|
|
being understood that the facts or occurrences giving rise or
contributing to such failure may be deemed to constitute, or be
taken into account in determining whether there has been or
would reasonably be expected to be, a Parent Material Adverse
Effect or a Parent Material Adverse Change); |
|
|
(e) person means an individual, corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, joint venture,
association, trust, unincorporated organization or other
entity; and |
|
|
(f) a Subsidiary of any person means another
person, an amount of the voting securities, other voting rights
or voting partnership interests of which is sufficient to elect
at least a majority of its board of directors or other governing
body (or, if there are no such voting interests, 50% or more of
the equity interests of which) is owned directly or indirectly
by such first person. |
SECTION 8.04. Interpretation.
When a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article, a
Section, Exhibit or Schedule, such reference shall be to an
Article of, a Section of, or an Exhibit or Schedule to, this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and
headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes
only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. References to this Agreement shall
include the Company Disclosure Schedule. All terms defined in
this Agreement shall have the defined meanings when used in any
certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant hereto
unless otherwise defined therein. The definitions contained in
this Agreement are applicable to the singular as well as the
plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to
the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Any Contract,
instrument or Law defined or referred to herein or in any
Contract or instrument that is referred to herein means such
Contract, instrument or Law as from time to time amended,
modified or supplemented, including (in the case of Contracts or
instruments) by waiver or consent and (in the case of Laws) by
succession of comparable successor Laws and references to all
attachments thereto and instruments incorporated therein.
References to a person are also to its permitted successors and
assigns.
SECTION 8.05. Consents and
Approvals. For any matter under this Agreement requiring the
consent or approval of any party to be valid and binding on the
parties hereto, such consent or approval must be in writing.
SECTION 8.06. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts
(including by facsimile), all of which shall be considered one
and the same agreement and shall become effective when one or
more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties.
SECTION 8.07. Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement
(including the Exhibits and Schedules) and the Confidentiality
Agreement and any agreements entered into contemporaneously
herewith (a) constitute the entire agreement, and supersede
all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
among the parties with respect to the subject matter of this
Agreement and the Confidentiality Agreement and (b) except
for the provisions of Article II and Section 5.05, are
not intended to and do not confer upon any person other than the
parties any legal or equitable rights or remedies.
SECTION 8.08. GOVERNING
LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, REGARDLESS OF
THE LAWS THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE GOVERN UNDER APPLICABLE PRINCIPLES
OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS THEREOF.
SECTION 8.09. Assignment.
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or
obligations hereunder shall be assigned, in whole or in part, by
operation of law or otherwise by any of the parties without the
prior written consent of the other parties, and any assignment
without such consent shall be
1-44
null and void, except that Sub, upon prior written notice to the
Company, may assign, in its sole discretion, any of or all its
rights, interests and obligations under this Agreement to Parent
or to any direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of Parent,
but no such assignment shall relieve Parent or Sub of any of its
obligations hereunder. Subject to the preceding sentence, this
Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be
enforceable by, the parties and their respective successors and
assigns.
SECTION 8.10. Specific
Enforcement; Consent to Jurisdiction. The parties agree that
irreparable damage would occur and that the parties would not
have any adequate remedy at law in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance
with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is
accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, this being in addition to any other remedy
to which they are entitled at law or in equity. In addition,
each of the parties hereto (a) consents to submit itself to
the personal jurisdiction of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York in the event any dispute
arises out of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, (b) agrees that it will not attempt to deny
or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request
for leave from any such court and (c) agrees that it will
not bring any action relating to this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court other
than the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York.
SECTION 8.11. Waiver of
Jury Trial. Each party hereto hereby waives, to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable Law, any right it may have to a
trial by jury in respect of any suit, action or other proceeding
arising out of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby. Each party hereto (a) certifies that no
representative, agent or attorney of any other party has
represented, expressly or otherwise, that such party would not,
in the event of any action, suit or proceeding, seek to enforce
the foregoing waiver and (b) acknowledges that it and the
other parties hereto have been induced to enter into this
Agreement, by, among other things, the mutual waiver and
certifications in this Section 8.11.
SECTION 8.12. Severability.
If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect.
Upon such determination that any term or other provision is
invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties
hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so
as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as
possible to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law in an
acceptable manner to the end that the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement are fulfilled to the extent possible.
1-45
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Sub and the Company have caused this
Agreement to be signed by their respective officers hereunto
duly authorized, all as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
by |
/s/ Robert J. Darretta
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Robert J. Darretta |
|
Title: Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
SHELBY MERGER SUB, INC., |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: James R. Hilton |
|
Title: President |
|
|
GUIDANT CORPORATION, |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Ronald W. Dollens |
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
1-46
ANNEX I
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED MERGER AGREEMENT
Index of Defined Terms
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Agreement
|
|
Section 4.02(b) |
Actions
|
|
Section 4.01(d) |
Adjusted Option
|
|
Section 5.04(a) |
Affiliate
|
|
Section 8.03(a) |
Agreement
|
|
Preamble |
Alza
|
|
Section 3.02(h) |
Antitrust Filings
|
|
Section 5.03 |
Articles of Merger
|
|
Section 1.03 |
Average Parent Stock Price
|
|
Section 5.04(h) |
Cash Portion
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
Cash Portion Option Exchange Multiple
|
|
Section 5.04(g) |
Certificate
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
Closing
|
|
Section 1.02 |
Closing Date
|
|
Section 1.02 |
Closing Price
|
|
Section 2.02(e) |
Code
|
|
2.02(j) |
Commonly Controlled Entity
|
|
Section 3.01(l) |
Company
|
|
Preamble |
Company Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
Section 4.02(b) |
Company Articles
|
|
Section 1.05 |
Company Benefit Agreements
|
|
Section 3.01(g) |
Company Benefit Plans
|
|
Section 3.01(l) |
Company By-laws
|
|
Section 3.01(a) |
Company Common Stock
|
|
Recitals |
Company Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Section 3.01 |
Company Notes
|
|
Section 4.01(a) |
Company Pension Plan
|
|
Section 3.01(l) |
Company Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Restricted Stock
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Rights
|
|
Section 3.01(v) |
Company SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Company Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Stock-Based Awards
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Stock Options
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Stock Plans
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Termination Fee
|
|
Section 5.06(c) |
Company Welfare Plan
|
|
Section 3.01(l) |
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
Section 5.02 |
Continuing Employees
|
|
Section 5.11(a) |
Contract
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
EC Merger Regulation
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Effective Time
|
|
Section 1.03 |
Environmental Laws
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
ERISA
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
ESPP
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Excess Distribution
|
|
Section 4.01(d) |
Exchange Act
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
1-47
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
Section 2.02(a) |
Exchange Fund
|
|
Section 2.02(a) |
Exchange Ratio
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
FDA
|
|
Section 3.01(u) |
FDCA
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
Filed Company SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.01 |
Filed Parent SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.02 |
Form S-4
|
|
Section 5.01 |
GAAP
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Governmental Entity
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Hazardous Materials
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
HSR Act
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
HSR Filing
|
|
Section 5.03 |
IBCL
|
|
Section 1.01 |
Intellectual Property Rights
|
|
Section 3.01(p) |
IRS
|
|
Section 3.01(l) |
Key Personnel
|
|
Section 3.01(g) |
Knowledge
|
|
Section 8.03(b) |
Law
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Legal Provisions
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
Liens
|
|
Section 3.01(b) |
Material Adverse Change
|
|
Section 8.03(c) |
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
Section 8.03(c) |
Medical Device
|
|
Section 3.01(u) |
Merger
|
|
Recitals |
Merger Consideration
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
New Rights Plan
|
|
Section 5.13 |
Non-U.S. Subsidiary
|
|
Section 4.01(d) |
Notice of Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 4.02(b) |
NYSE
|
|
2.02(e) |
Order
|
|
3.01(d) |
Original Merger Agreement
|
|
Preamble |
Paragraph 6
|
|
3.01(r) |
Parent
|
|
Preamble |
Parent Common Stock
|
|
Recitals |
Parent Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Section 3.02 |
Parent Material Adverse Change
|
|
Section 8.03(d) |
Parent Material Adverse Effect
|
|
Section 8.03(d) |
Parent Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 3.02(h) |
Parent SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.02(c) |
Parent Termination Fee
|
|
Section 5.06(b) |
Permits
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
Person
|
|
Section 8.03(e) |
Post-Signing Returns
|
|
Section 4.01(d) |
Primary Company Executives
|
|
Section 3.01(m) |
Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Representatives
|
|
Section 4.02(a) |
Release
|
|
Section 3.01(j) |
Restraints
|
|
Section 6.01(d) |
Rights Agreement
|
|
Section 3.01(v) |
SEC
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
1-48
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Shareholder Approval
|
|
Section 3.01(q) |
Shareholders Meeting
|
|
Section 5.01(b) |
Significant Subsidiary
|
|
Section 3.01(a) |
Social Security Act
|
|
Section 3.01(u) |
SOX
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Stock Portion
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
Sub
|
|
Preamble |
Sub Articles
|
|
Section 3.02(a) |
Subsidiary
|
|
Section 8.03(g) |
Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 4.02(a) |
Surviving Corporation
|
|
Section 1.01 |
Takeover Proposal
|
|
Section 4.02(a) |
tax
|
|
Section 3.01(n) |
taxing authority
|
|
Section 3.01(n) |
tax return
|
|
Section 3.01(n) |
Tier I Employee
|
|
Section 3.01(g) |
Tier II Employee
|
|
Section 3.01(g) |
1-49
EXHIBIT A
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED MERGER AGREEMENT
Restated Articles of Incorporation
of the Surviving Corporation
FIRST: The name of the corporation (hereinafter called
the Corporation) is Guidant Corporation.
SECOND: The aggregate number of shares which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 1,000 shares
of Common Stock, without par value.
THIRD: The street address of the Corporations
initial registered office in Indiana is 307 East McCarty Street,
Indianapolis 46285 and the name of its initial registered agent
at that office is [Name of Agent].
FOURTH: The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in
any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be
organized under the Business Corporation Law of the State of
Indiana.
FIFTH: In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers
conferred upon it by law, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal
the By-laws of the Corporation.
SIXTH: To the fullest extent permitted by the Business
Corporation Law of the State of Indiana as it now exists and as
it may hereafter be amended, no director or officer of the
Corporation shall be personally liable to the Corporation or any
of its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director or officer.
SEVENTH: The Corporation shall, to the fullest extent
permitted by
Section 23-1-37 of
the Business Corporation Law of the State of Indiana, as the
same may be amended and supplemented, indemnify any and all
persons whom it shall have power to indemnify under said Section
from and against any and all of the expenses, liabilities, or
other matters referred to in or covered by said Section. Such
indemnification shall be mandatory and not discretionary. The
indemnification provided for herein shall not be deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified may be
entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of shareholders or
disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his
or her official capacity and as to action in another capacity
while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who
has ceased to be a director, officer, employee, or agent and
shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and
administrators of such a person. Any repeal or modification of
this Article SEVENTH shall not adversely affect any right
to indemnification of any persons existing at the time of such
repeal or modification with respect to any matter occurring
prior to such repeal or modification.
The Corporation shall to the fullest extent permitted by the
Business Corporation Law of the State of Indiana advance all
costs and expenses (including, without limitation,
attorneys fees and expenses) incurred by any director or
officer within 15 days of the presentation of same to the
Corporation, with respect to any one or more actions, suits or
proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, so long as the Corporation receives from the
director or officer a written affirmation required by the
Business Corporation Law of the State of Indiana of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the applicable standard
of conduct established by the Business Corporation Law of the
State of Indiana, together with an unsecured undertaking to
repay such expenses if it shall ultimately be determined that
such director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified by
the Corporation under the Business Corporation Law of the State
of Indiana. Such obligation to advance costs and expenses shall
be mandatory, and not discretionary, and shall include, without
limitation, costs and expenses incurred in asserting affirmative
defenses, counterclaims and cross claims. Such undertaking to
repay may, if first requested in writing by the applicable
director or officer, be on behalf of (rather than by) such
director or officer, provided that in such case the Corporation
shall have the right to approve the party making such
undertaking.
EIGHTH: Unless and except to the extent that the By-laws
of the Corporation shall so require, the election of directors
of the Corporation need not be by written ballot.
1-50
EXHIBIT B
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED MERGER AGREEMENT
Form of Affiliate Letter
Dear Sirs:
The undersigned, a holder of shares of common stock, without par
value (Company Common Stock), of Guidant
Corporation, an Indiana corporation (the Company),
acknowledges that the undersigned may be deemed an
affiliate of the Company within the meaning of
Rule 145 (Rule 145) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and
Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
November 14, 2005 (the Merger Agreement), among
Johnson & Johnson, a New Jersey corporation
(Parent), Shelby Merger Sub, Inc., an Indiana
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(Sub), and the Company, Merger Sub will be merged
with and into the Company (the Merger), and in
connection with the Merger, the undersigned is entitled to
receive 0.493 shares of the common stock of Parent
(Parent Common Stock) and $33.25 in cash for each
share of Company Common Stock, without interest.
If in fact the undersigned were an affiliate under the
Securities Act, the undersigneds ability to sell, assign
or transfer the shares of Parent Common Stock received by the
undersigned in exchange for any shares of Company Common Stock
in connection with the Merger may be restricted unless such
transaction is registered under the Securities Act or an
exemption from such registration is available. The undersigned
understands that such exemptions are limited and the undersigned
has obtained or will obtain advice of counsel as to the nature
and conditions of such exemptions, including information with
respect to the applicability to the sale of such securities of
Rules 144 and 145(d) promulgated under the Securities Act.
The undersigned understands that Parent will not be required to
maintain the effectiveness of any registration statement under
the Securities Act for the purposes of resale of Parent Common
Stock by the undersigned.
The undersigned hereby represents to and covenants with Parent
that the undersigned will not sell, assign or transfer any of
the shares of Parent Common Stock received by the undersigned in
exchange for shares of Company Common Stock in connection with
the Merger except (i) pursuant to an effective registration
statement under the Securities Act, (ii) in conformity with
the volume and other limitations of Rule 145 or
(iii) in a transaction which, in the opinion of counsel to
the undersigned, such counsel to be reasonably satisfactory to
Parent and such opinion to be in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Parent, or as described in a
no-action or interpretive letter from the Staff of
the SEC specifically issued with respect to a transaction to be
engaged in by the undersigned, is not required to be registered
under the Securities Act.
In the event of a sale or other disposition by the undersigned
of the shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to Rule 145,
the undersigned will supply Parent with evidence of compliance
with such Rule, in the form of a letter in the form of
Annex I hereto or the opinion of counsel or no-action
letter referred to above. The undersigned understands that
Parent may instruct its transfer agent to withhold the transfer
of any shares of Parent Common Stock disposed of by the
undersigned, but that (provided such transfer is not prohibited
by any other provision of this letter agreement) upon receipt of
such evidence of compliance, Parent shall cause the transfer
agent to effectuate the transfer of the shares of Parent Common
Stock sold as indicated in such letter.
Parent covenants that it will take all such actions as may be
reasonably available to it to permit the sale or other
disposition of the shares of Parent Common Stock by the
undersigned under Rule 145 in accordance with the terms
thereof.
The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the legend set
forth below will be placed on certificates representing the
shares of Parent Common Stock received by the undersigned in
connection with the Merger or held by a transferee thereof,
which legend will be removed by delivery of substitute
certificates (i) if the undersigned provides evidence of
compliance with Rule 145 to Parent, in the form of
1-51
a letter in the form of Annex I hereto, or (ii) upon
receipt of an opinion in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Parent from counsel reasonably satisfactory to
Parent to the effect that such legend is no longer required for
purposes of the Securities Act.
There will be placed on the certificates for Parent Common Stock
issued to the undersigned in connection with the Merger, or any
substitutions therefor, a legend stating in substance:
|
|
|
The shares represented by this certificate were issued
pursuant to a transaction to which Rule 145 promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933 applies. The shares have not
been acquired by the holder with a view to, or for resale in
connection with, any distribution thereof within the meaning of
the Securities Act of 1933. The shares may not be sold, pledged
or otherwise transferred except in accordance with
Rule 145, pursuant to a Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 or in accordance with an exemption from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act of
1933. |
The undersigned acknowledges that (i) the undersigned has
carefully read this letter and understands the requirements
hereof and the limitations imposed upon the distribution, sale,
transfer or other disposition of Parent Common Stock and
(ii) the receipt by Parent of this letter is an inducement
to Parents obligations to consummate the Merger.
Execution of this letter should not be considered an admission
on the part of the undersigned that the undersigned is an
affiliate of the Company as described in the first
paragraph of this letter, or as a waiver of any rights the
undersigned may have to object to any claim that the undersigned
is such an affiliate on or after the date of this letter.
Dated:
1-52
ANNEX I
TO EXHIBIT B
On ,
the undersigned sold the securities of Johnson &
Johnson (Parent) described below in the space
provided for that purpose (the Securities). The
Securities were received by the undersigned in connection with
the merger of Shelby Merger Sub, Inc., an Indiana corporation,
with and into Guidant Corporation, an Indiana corporation.
Based upon the most recent report or statement filed by Parent
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Securities sold
by the undersigned were within the prescribed limitations set
forth in paragraph (e) of Rule 144 promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act).
The undersigned hereby represents that the Securities were sold
in brokers transactions within the meaning of
Section 4(4) of the Securities Act or in transactions
directly with a market maker as that term is defined
in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. The undersigned further represents that the
undersigned has not solicited or arranged for the solicitation
of orders to buy the Securities, and that the undersigned has
not made any payment in connection with the offer or sale of the
Securities to any person other than to the broker who executed
the order in respect of such sale.
Dated:
1-53
ANNEX 2
November 14, 2005
The Board of Directors
Guidant Corporation
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common stock, no par
value per share (the Company Common Stock), of
Guidant Corporation (the Company) of the
consideration to be received by such holders in the proposed
merger (the Merger) of the Company with a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson
(Parent). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated
Agreement and Plan of Merger, to be dated as of
November 14, 2005 (the Agreement), among the
Company, Parent and Shelby Merger Sub, Inc. (Merger
Sub), the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Parent, and each outstanding share of Company Common Stock,
other than shares of Company Common Stock held in treasury or
owned by Parent or Merger Sub, will be converted into the right
to receive (i) $33.25 in cash, without interest (the
Cash Consideration) and (ii) 0.493 of a share
of common stock (the Stock Consideration and,
together with the Cash Consideration, the Merger
Consideration), par value $1.00 per share, of Parent
(the Parent Common Stock).
In arriving at our opinion, we have (i) reviewed a draft
dated November 12, 2005 of the Agreement;
(ii) reviewed certain publicly available business and
financial information concerning the Company and Parent and the
industries in which they operate, including publicly available
financial forecasts relating to Parent that were reviewed and
discussed with us by the management of Parent;
(iii) compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger
with the publicly available financial terms of certain
transactions involving companies we deemed relevant and the
consideration received for such companies; (iv) compared
the financial and operating performance of the Company and
Parent with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies we deemed relevant and reviewed the current and
historical market prices of the Company Common Stock and the
Parent Common Stock and certain publicly traded securities of
such other companies; (v) reviewed certain internal
financial analyses and forecasts prepared by the management of
the Company relating to its business; and (vi) performed
such other financial studies and analyses and considered such
other information as we deemed appropriate for the purposes of
this opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the managements of the Company and Parent with respect to
certain aspects of the Merger and the past and current business
operations of the Company and Parent, the financial condition
and future prospects and operations of the Company and Parent,
the effects of the Merger on the financial condition and future
prospects of the Company and Parent, and certain other matters
we believed necessary or appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed, without
independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all
information that was publicly available or was furnished to us
by the Company and Parent or otherwise reviewed by us, and we
have not assumed any responsibility or liability therefor. We
have not conducted any valuation or appraisal of any assets or
liabilities, nor have any such valuations or appraisals been
provided to us. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to us
2-1
by the Company, we have assumed that they have been reasonably
prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments by management of the Company
as to the expected future results of operations and financial
condition of the Company. With respect to the publicly available
financial forecasts and estimates relating to Parent, we have
assumed, with your consent, without independent verification or
investigation, that such forecasts represent reasonable
estimates and judgments as to the future financial performance
of Parent. We have also assumed that the Merger will have the
tax consequences described in discussions with, and materials
furnished to us by, representatives of the Company, that the
other transactions contemplated by the Agreement will be
consummated as described in the Agreement and that the
definitive Agreement will not differ in any material respects
from the draft thereof furnished to us. We have relied as to all
legal matters relevant to rendering our opinion upon the advice
of counsel. We have further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the Merger will be obtained
without any material adverse effect on the Company or Parent or
on the contemplated benefits of the Merger.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration to be
received by the holders of the Company Common Stock in the
proposed Merger, and we express no opinion as to the underlying
decision by the Company to engage in the Merger. We are
expressing no opinion herein as to the price at which the Parent
Common Stock will trade at any future time.
We note that we were not authorized to and did not solicit any
expressions of interest from any other parties with respect to
the sale of all or any part of the Company or any other
alternative transaction. Consequently, we have assumed that such
terms are the most beneficial terms from the Companys
perspective that could under the circumstances be negotiated
among the parties to such transactions, and no opinion is
expressed whether any alternative transaction might produce
consideration for the Companys shareholders in an amount
in excess of the Merger Consideration in the Merger.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Merger and will receive a fee from the Company
if the proposed Merger is consummated. As we have previously
advised you, we and our affiliates, in the ordinary course of
our businesses, have from time to time provided, and in the
future may continue to provide, for customary compensation,
commercial and investment banking services to the Company,
Parent and their respective affiliates. In the ordinary course
of our businesses, we and our affiliates may actively trade the
debt and equity securities of the Company or Parent for our own
account or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, we
may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the Merger Consideration to be
received by the holders of the Company Common Stock in the
proposed Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to such
holders.
This letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company
in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Merger. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder should
vote with respect to the Merger or any other matter. This
opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in
whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose whatsoever
except with our prior written approval. This opinion may be
reproduced in full in any proxy statement/ prospectus or
information statement mailed to shareholders of the Company but
may not otherwise be disclosed publicly in any manner without
our prior written approval.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
/s/ J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC. |
2-2
ANNEX 3
Board of Directors
Guidant Corporation
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor
Indianapolis, IN 46204-5129
Members of the Board:
We understand that Guidant Corporation (the
Company), Johnson & Johnson
(Buyer) and Shelby Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Buyer (Acquisition Sub), propose to
enter into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger,
substantially in the form of the draft dated November 12,
2005 (the Merger Agreement) which provides, among
other things, for the merger of Acquisition Sub with and into
the Company (the Merger). Pursuant to the Merger,
the Company will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Buyer, and
each issued and outstanding share of common stock, without par
value, of the Company (Company Common Stock), other
than shares of Company Common Stock directly owned by Buyer,
Acquisition Sub, or the Company, will be converted into the
right to receive (a) 0.493 shares of common stock, par
value $1.00 per share, of Buyer (Buyer Common
Stock) and (b) $33.25 in cash, without interest
(collectively, the Consideration). The terms and
conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Merger
Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Consideration
to be received by the holders of shares of Company Common Stock
pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair from a financial point
of view to such holders.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
|
|
|
|
i) |
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other information of the Company and Buyer; |
|
|
|
|
ii) |
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning the Company prepared by
the management of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
iii) |
reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
management of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
iv) |
reviewed the pro forma impact of the Merger on Buyers
earnings per share; |
|
|
|
|
v) |
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Company and Buyer, with
senior executives of the Company and Buyer, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
vi) |
discussed the strategic rationale for the Merger with senior
executives of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
vii) |
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for Company
Common Stock and Buyer Common Stock; |
|
|
|
|
viii) |
compared the financial performance of the Company and the prices
and trading activity of Company Common Stock with that of
certain other comparable publicly-traded companies and their
securities; |
|
|
|
|
ix) |
compared the financial performance of Buyer and the prices and
trading activity of Buyer Common Stock with that of certain
other comparable publicly-traded companies and their securities; |
|
|
|
|
x) |
participated in discussions among representatives of the Company
and Buyer and their financial and legal advisors; |
3-1
|
|
|
|
xi) |
reviewed the draft Merger Agreement, dated November 12,
2005 and Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 15,
2004 between Buyer, Acquisition Sub and the Company (the
Original Merger Agreement) and certain related
documents; and |
|
|
|
|
xii) |
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as we have deemed appropriate. |
We have assumed and relied upon without independent verification
the accuracy and completeness of the information reviewed by us
for the purposes of this opinion. With respect to the financial
projections, we have assumed that they have been reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the future financial performance of
the Company. With respect to developments related to certain of
the Companys products, we have relied without independent
investigation on the assessment of the Companys senior
management as to the effect of any such developments on the
operations and financial condition and prospects of the Company.
We were not provided internal financial information or
projections for Buyer, and as a result, we have relied upon
publicly available estimates of equity research analysts who
report on Buyer. In addition, we have assumed that the Merger
will be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in
the Merger Agreement with no material modification, waiver or
delay. We have also assumed that in connection with the
execution of the Merger Agreement the Buyer and the Company will
execute a settlement agreement and mutual release with respect
to the Original Merger Agreement. We are not legal, regulatory
or tax experts and have relied on the assessments provided by
the Companys advisors with respect to such issues. We have
not made any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities of the Company or Buyer, nor were we furnished with
any such appraisals. Our opinion is necessarily based on
financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect
on, and the information made available to us as of, the date
hereof.
In arriving at our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit,
and did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to the
acquisition of the Company or any of its assets, nor did we
negotiate with any parties other than Buyer.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
the Company in connection with this transaction and will receive
a fee for our services, a significant portion of which is
contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In the past,
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (Morgan
Stanley) and its affiliates have provided financial
advisory and financing services for the Company and have
received fees for the rendering of these services. In addition,
Morgan Stanley is a participant in a $500 million credit
facility that expires in 2009. In addition, Morgan Stanley is a
full service securities firm engaged in securities trading,
investment management and brokerage services. In the ordinary
course of its trading, brokerage, investment management and
financing activities, Morgan Stanley or its affiliates may
actively trade the debt and equity securities or senior loans of
the Company or Buyer for its own accounts or for the accounts of
its customers or its managed investment accounts and,
accordingly, may at any time hold long or short positions in
such securities or senior loans.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of the Company and may not be disclosed or
referred to publicly or used for any other purpose without our
prior written consent, except that this opinion may be included
in its entirety in any statement/ prospectus to be distributed
to holders of Company Common Stock in connection with the Merger
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Our
opinion is limited to the fairness from a financial point of
view of the Consideration to be received by the holders of
Company Common Stock in the Merger and we express no opinion as
to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Merger or the strategic rationale for the Merger. In addition,
this opinion does not in any manner address the prices at which
Buyer Common Stock will trade following consummation of the
Merger. Morgan Stanley expresses no opinion or recommendation as
to how the shareholders of the Company should vote at the
shareholders meeting held in connection with the Merger.
3-2
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
on the date hereof that the Consideration to be received by the
holders of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger
Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED |
|
|
By: /s/
Peter
N. Crnkovich
|
|
|
|
Peter N. Crnkovich |
|
Managing Director |
3-3
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
Item 20. Indemnification of
Directors and Officers
The New Jersey Business Corporation Act (the NJBCA)
provides that a New Jersey corporation has the power to
indemnify a director or officer against his or her expenses and
liabilities in connection with any proceeding involving the
director or officer by reason of his or her being or having been
such a director or officer, other than a proceeding by or in the
right of the corporation, if such director or officer acted in
good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation; and
with respect to any criminal proceeding, such director or
officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct
was unlawful.
The indemnification and advancement of expenses shall not
exclude any other rights, including the right to be indemnified
against liabilities and expenses incurred in proceedings by or
in the right of the corporation, to which a director or officer
may be entitled under a certificate of incorporation, by-law,
agreement, vote of shareholders, or otherwise; provided, that no
indemnification shall be made to or on behalf of a director or
officer if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the
director or officer establishes that his or her acts or
omissions (a) were in breach of his or her duty of loyalty
to the corporation or its shareholders, (b) were not in
good faith or involved a knowing violation of law or
(c) resulted in receipt by the director or officer of an
improper personal benefit.
The registrants restated certificate of incorporation
provides that, to the full extent that the laws of the State of
New Jersey permit the limitation or elimination of the liability
of directors or officers, no director or officer of the
registrant shall be personally liable to the registrant or its
shareholders for damages for breach of any duty owed to the
registrant or its shareholders.
The by-laws of the registrant provide that to the full extent
permitted by the laws of the State of New Jersey, the registrant
shall indemnify any person (an Indemnitee) who was
or is involved in any manner (including, without limitation, as
a party or witness) in any threatened, pending or completed
investigation, claim, action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative, arbitrative, legislative or
investigative (including, without limitation, any action, suit
or proceeding by or in the right of the registrant to procure a
judgment in its favor) (a Proceeding), or who is
threatened with being so involved, by reason of the fact that he
or she is or was a director or officer of the registrant or,
while serving as a director or officer of the registrant, is or
was at the request of the registrant also serving as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise (including, without
limitation, any employee benefit plan), against all expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines, penalties,
excise taxes and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with such
Proceeding, provided that, there shall be no indemnification
under such by-laws with respect to any settlement or other
nonadjudicated disposition of any threatened or pending
Proceeding unless the registrant has given its prior consent to
such settlement or disposition. The right of indemnification
created by the by-laws shall be a contract right enforceable by
an Indemnitee against the registrant, and it shall not be
exclusive of any other rights to which an Indemnitee may
otherwise be entitled. The indemnification provisions of the
by-laws shall inure to the benefit of the heirs and legal
representatives of an Indemnitee and shall be applicable to
Proceedings commenced or continuing after the adoption of the
by-laws, whether arising from acts or omissions occurring before
or after such adoption. No amendment, alteration, change,
addition or repeal of or to the by-laws shall deprive any
Indemnitee of any rights under the by-laws with respect to any
act or omission of such Indemnitee occurring prior to such
amendment, alteration, change, addition or repeal.
The registrant enters into indemnification agreements with its
directors and officers and enters into insurance agreements on
its own behalf. The indemnification agreements provide that the
registrant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify its directors
and officers to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by
the NJBCA, or any other applicable law, or by any amendment
thereof or other statutory provisions authorizing or permitting
such indemnification that is adopted after the date hereof.
Without limiting the
II-1
generality of the foregoing, the registrant agrees to hold
harmless and indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law against any and all expenses,
judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by its directors and officers in connection
with the defense of any present or future threatened, pending,
or completed claim, action, suit, or proceeding by reason of the
fact that they were, are, shall be, or shall have been a
director or officer of the registrant, or are or were serving,
shall serve, or shall have served, at the request of the
registrant, as a director or officer of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan, or
other enterprise.
Item 21. Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules
(a) See Exhibit Index.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Not applicable.
Item 22. Undertakings
(a)(1) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the registrants annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each
filing of an employee benefit plans annual report pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
that is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
(2) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as
follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities
registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part
of this Registration Statement, by any person or party who is
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other items of the applicable form.
(3) The registrant undertakes that every prospectus
(i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)
immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the
requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of
1933 and is used in connection with an offering of securities
subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an
amendment to the Registration Statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-2
(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of
this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request,
and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or
other equally prompt means. This includes information contained
in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the
Registration Statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
the Registration Statement when it became effective.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in New Brunswick, New Jersey on the 23rd day of
December, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Name: W.C. Weldon |
|
Title: Chairman, Board of Directors and Chief |
|
Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Registration Statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.C. Weldon
(W.C. Weldon) |
|
Chairman, Board of Directors and Chief Executive Offer, and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(R. J. Darretta) |
|
Vice Chairman, Board of Directors; Chief Financial Officer and
Director (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(S. J. Cosgrove) |
|
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(M. S. Coleman) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(J. G. Cullen) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(A. D. Jordan) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(A. G. Langbo) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(S. L. Lindquist) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(L. F. Mullin) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(S. S. Reinemund) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
*
(D. Satcher) |
|
Director
|
|
December 23, 2005 |
|
|
*By: |
/s/ Steven M. Rosenberg
|
Attorney-in-fact
II-4
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
November 14, 2005, among Johnson & Johnson, Shelby
Merger Sub, Inc. and Guidant Corporation (included as
Annex 1 to the proxy statement/prospectus which is a part
of this Registration Statement). |
|
4 |
.1* |
|
Provisions of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Johnson & Johnson dated May 21, 1996, that define
the rights of security holders of Johnson & Johnson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(iii) to
Johnson & Johnsons Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 1996). |
|
4 |
.2* |
|
Provisions of the By-laws of Johnson & Johnson, as
amended effective April 23, 1999, that define the rights of
security holders of Johnson & Johnson (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3 to Johnson & Johnsons
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended July 4, 1999). |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Philip P. Crowley, Assistant General Counsel of
Johnson & Johnson, regarding the legality of the
securities being issued. |
|
23 |
.1* |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 23.1 of Johnson & Johnsons
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to this Registration
Statement filed on December 6, 2005). |
|
23 |
.2* |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 23.2 of Johnson & Johnsons
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to this Registration
Statement filed on December 6, 2005). |
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of Philip P. Crowley, Assistant General Counsel of
Johnson & Johnson (included in Exhibit 5.1). |
|
23 |
.5 |
|
Consent of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (included in
Annex 2 to the proxy statement/prospectus which is part of
this Registration Statement) |
|
23 |
.6 |
|
Consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. (included
in Annex 3 to the proxy statement/prospectus which is part
of this Registration Statement). |
|
24 |
.1** |
|
Power of Attorney. |
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Request for Admittance/Proxy Card of Guidant Corporation. |
|
|
* |
Incorporated by reference. |
|
|
** |
Previously included on the signature page of this Registration
Statement filed on February 16, 2005. |