James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 1 of 12 |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 2 of 12 |
A. | The proposal | |
Q1. | What is the Proposal? (Section 1) | |
A. | The Proposal is to transform the company from a public limited liability corporation registered in The Netherlands to a European Company known as a Societas Europaea, or in its abbreviated form a SE, in a two-stage transaction, which ultimately will result in the relocation of our corporate domicile from The Netherlands to Ireland. | |
Q2. | What is a SE? (Section 4.2) | |
A. | A SE, or in its non-abbreviated form a Societas Europaea, is a relatively new form of a public limited company recognised in the European Union member states, which can be registered by member states. The corporate domicile of an SE can be transferred after shareholder approval to other EU member states | |
After our transformation to an SE, James Hardie continues with the same assets, liabilities, rights and obligations as prior to the transformation. | ||
A number of enterprises have become SEs in recent years, including Porsche, Allianz, BASF and Swiss RE International. | ||
Q3. | Why is James Hardie undertaking the Proposal now? (Section 3.1) | |
A. | Your directors consider this to be an appropriate time for James Hardie and its shareholders to implement the Proposal, notwithstanding the current market environment for James Hardie and the global financial and liquidity crisis, as implementation of the Proposal will enable us to: |
| allow key senior management with global responsibilities more opportunities to work directly with our local operations and in our markets. Our business in the US has been adversely affected by the decline in the US housing market and the turmoil within financial and mortgage lending institutions. These challenges make it even more costly and difficult to maintain substantial management presence in The Netherlands, away from our major operations and markets; | ||
| provide more certainty regarding our ability to obtain benefits under the tax treaty between the US and Ireland than is the case under the US/Netherlands Treaty; and | ||
| put in place alternative arrangements in light of the pending expiry of the Financial Risk Reserve regime in The Netherlands on December 31, 2010 which currently provides James Hardie with favourable tax concessions. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 3 of 12 |
Q4. | Why is James Hardie leaving The Netherlands? (Section 3.5) | |
A. | Qualifying for benefits under the current tax treaty between the US and The Netherlands has become increasingly costly and distracting for James Hardie since revisions to the treaty became effective in early 2006, because the revised treaty requires, amongst other things, the companys key senior managers with global responsibilities to spend a major portion of their time in The Netherlands. | |
Additionally, in June 2008, the US IRS asserted that James Hardie did not qualify for benefits under the US/Netherlands Treaty for 2006 and 2007. While the company ultimately prevailed, the US IRS could reassert its position for subsequent time periods and, accordingly, James Hardie considers it prudent to mitigate the risk of further disputes with the US IRS. Complying with the US/Ireland Treaty is more straightforward and the requirements are more defined. | ||
Finally, the favourable tax concessions James Hardie currently enjoys in The Netherlands under the Financial Risk Reserve regime are due to expire on 31 December 2010. After that expiry, James Hardies tax rate in The Netherlands would increase to over what it is today. | ||
Q5. | Why is James Hardie moving to Ireland? (Section 3.1) | |
A: | A move to Ireland: |
| allows key senior managers to spend more time with James Hardies operations and in its markets; currently some of our senior managers are required to spend substantial time in the Netherlands away from our key markets | ||
| provides greater certainty for James Hardie to obtain benefits under the US/Ireland Treaty than is the case under the US/Netherlands Treaty; | ||
| increases the companys flexibility to undertake certain transactions under Irish company law, which the directors believe expands the companys future strategic options; | ||
| simplifies the governance structure to a single board of directors; | ||
| permits most shareholders to be eligible to receive dividends not subject to withholding tax. |
Q6. | What makes Ireland an attractive domicile? | |
A. | Ireland has: |
| a stable political and economic environment; | ||
| a well-educated workforce; | ||
| a sophisticated, well-developed corporate and regulatory environment including a common law regime similar to Australia, the US and the UK; and | ||
| offers continued access to European markets, as a member of the EU. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 4 of 12 |
Q7. | Why is James Hardie not moving the parent company to the US? (Section 3.5) | |
A. | We considered a range of options for moving the parent company to the US, including having a new US parent company acquire all of our shares from shareholders in exchange for shares issued by the new US parent company. | |
However due to the requirement under Dutch law that 95% of our entire issued share capital needs to be acquired in order to effect a compulsory acquisition of the remaining shares, this option was considered practically impossible. | ||
We also considered a move of the parent company to the US by way of a dual incorporation structure. | ||
However, the structure resulting from this dual incorporation was determined to be too complex. | ||
Q8. | Why is James Hardie not moving the parent company to Australia? (Section 3.5) | |
A. | We considered moving the parent company to Australia by having a new Australian parent company acquire all of our shares from shareholders in exchange for shares issued by the new Australian parent company. | |
However due to the requirement under Dutch law that 95% of our entire issued share capital needs to be acquired in order to effect a compulsory acquisition of the remaining shares, this option was not considered practically possible. | ||
Moving our corporate domicile to Australia by other means was not considered possible under Dutch company law without a potential tax cost to some shareholders, including Australian shareholders. | ||
Q9. | Why does the estimate of costs for the Proposal and the transfer of the intellectual property, treasury and finance operations range from US$51-71 million? | |
A. | Costs of the Transaction, including taxes associated with the transfer of the companys intellectual property, are currently estimated at approximately US$51-71 million, of which: |
| US$14 million has already been incurred and expensed; | ||
| approximately US$30-50 million relates to Dutch taxes as a result of a capital gain on the transfer of the intellectual property from The Netherlands. |
The actual amount of tax paid will depend on, amongst other things, the fair market value of our intellectual property at the time of the transfer. The value of our intellectual property has fluctuated in the past and in the future may vary materially. | ||
As we cannot now determine what the fair market value of our intellectual property will be at the time of the transfer, we have provided an estimate. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 5 of 12 |
Q10. | What is the impact of the Proposal on James Hardie asbestos funding arrangements with Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund? (Section 3.2) | |
A. | The Proposal will not change the overall commitment of James Hardie to make contributions to the Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund under the Amended and Restated Final Funding Agreement. | |
However, if a contribution is due to the AICF in our 2011 financial year, which is not yet known, the costs associated with the Proposal will most likely reduce the amount of the companys contribution. | ||
It should be noted that the capacity of the AICF to satisfy claims is linked to the long-term financial success of James Hardie, especially the companys ability to generate net operating cash flow. | ||
B. | The Shareholder meeting | |
Q11. | When and where is the shareholders meeting? (Section 20) | |
A. | The extraordinary general meeting to consider Stage 1 of the Proposal will be held at the companys offices Atrium, 8th floor, Stawinskylaan 3077, 1077 ZX Amsterdam, The Netherlands at 11:00am Central European Time on August 21, 2009. | |
An extraordinary information meeting also will be held to enable CUFS holders to attend a meeting in Australia to review Stage 1 of the Proposal and the resolution that is to be considered and voted on at the extraordinary general meeting in The Netherlands. | ||
The extraordinary information meeting will be held prior to the extraordinary general meeting at The Auditorium, the Mint, 10 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia at 11:30am Australian Eastern Standard Time) on August 18, 2009. A live webcast of the extraordinary information meeting will be available on our website. | ||
Meeting information will be contained in the Notice of Meetings included in the Explanatory Memorandum. | ||
Q12: | Who can vote at the shareholders meeting? (Section 21) | |
A. | In order to be eligible to vote on Stage 1, you must be the registered owner or holder (as applicable) of: | |
CUFS at 5:00 pm (AEST) on August 17, 2009; ADRs at 5:00pm (US Eastern Daylight Saving Time) on July 9, 2009; or shares at 5:00pm (Australian Eastern Standard Time) on August 17, 2009. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 6 of 12 |
Q13. | What proposal will shareholders be asked to consider and vote on at the extraordinary general meeting in connection with Stage 1 of the Proposal? (Section 20) | |
A. | The shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on the transformation of James Hardie from a Dutch NV company to a Dutch SE company. | |
At a later time, if Stage 1 is successful, shareholders will be asked to vote on transforming the Dutch SE to an Irish SE thereby completing the relocation of James Hardies corporate domicile to Ireland. | ||
Q14. | What do I need to do now? (Section 21) | |
A. | After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this Explanatory Memorandum, please follow the instructions for voting the CUFS, ADSs or CUFS converted to shares that you hold, which are described in the Notice of Meetings included in the EM under Information on Voting in Section 21. | |
The manner by which you vote is determined by whether you hold CUFS, ADSs or CUFS you have converted to shares. Although voting is not compulsory, your vote is important and your directors encourage you to vote on the Proposal. | ||
Q15. | What will happen if I abstain from voting? | |
A. | Any CUFS, ADSs and CUFS you have converted to shares for which no votes are cast effectively will be treated as null votes and will not count toward the voting outcome. | |
Q16. | What are the key remaining steps that must be satisfied to implement Stage 1 of the Proposal? | |
A. | The key remaining steps that must be satisfied to implement Stage 1 of the Proposal are: |
| shareholder approval for Stage 1; | ||
| completion of the European employee consultation (SNB) process; | ||
| receipt of a statement of no objection from the Dutch Ministry of Justice; and, in relation to certain aspects of the transaction, from the Treasurer of Australia; | ||
| expiry of the one-month period for creditor opposition; | ||
| confirmation by the High Court of Ireland that all legal requirements for Stage 1 of the Proposal have been satisfied; and | ||
| the ATO determining the applications that we and the AICF propose to make for rulings to replace the existing tax rulings attained in relation to the AFFA. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 7 of 12 |
Q17. | Why is the Explanatory Memorandum filed with the SEC and the ASX not in final form? | |
A. | We need to update certain information once we have finalised and filed our annual report on Form 20-F with the SEC, which will occur before the Explanatory Memorandum is mailed to shareholders. We also have not yet completed the review process with the SEC. None of the matters under review are expected to have a material impact on the Proposal. A final version of the Explanatory Memorandum will be filed with the SEC and the ASX as soon as it is available and then mailed to all shareholders. | |
Q18. | Why is the Explanatory Memorandum such a long document? | |
A. | First of all, we wanted our shareholders to have all the relevant information for both stages of the Proposal in advance of the extraordinary meeting to vote on Stage 1. In addition, because of the distribution of James Hardies shareholders and its listing on the ASX and the New York Stock Exchange, the Explanatory Memorandum has to comply with the rules of the ASX and the US Securities and Exchange Commission. | |
Q19. | What level of shareholder approval is required for Stage 1 to be implemented? | |
A. | For Stage 1 of the Proposal to be implemented, a special resolution must be passed with 75% of the votes represented at the Extraordinary General Meeting cast in favour of the resolution. | |
Q20. | What happens to James Hardie if Stage 1 of the Proposal is approved but Stage 2 of the Proposal does not proceed? (Section 3.4) | |
A. | If Stage 1 of the Proposal is approved, but Stage 2 of the Proposal does not proceed, James Hardie will continue as a Dutch SE with its corporate domicile remaining in The Netherlands. | |
In addition if Stage 2 is not implemented, none of the favourable aspects of the Proposal will be obtained and the risks and disadvantages of staying in The Netherlands described in this Explanatory Memorandum will continue to apply. | ||
Q21. | When do you expect the Proposal to be completed? | |
A. | If shareholders approve both stages, your directors anticipate that the Proposal will be implemented in early 2010. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 8 of 12 |
Q22. | Why have the directors not made a recommendation in respect of Stage 2 at this time? | |
A. | Your directors are not able to make a recommendation in respect of Stage 2 at this time because the SE Regulation requires that the approval of the proposed relocation of the corporate domicile of Dutch SE be approved by the directors and shareholders of Dutch SE. Because we will not become Dutch SE until Stage 1 has been implemented, your directors, in their capacity as directors of Dutch NV, cannot recommend, and Dutch SE cannot approve, Stage 2 of the Proposal at this time. | |
If Stage 1 is approved and implemented and we transform to Dutch SE, your directors will write to you with the formal proposal to proceed with Stage 2. It is important to understand, however, that although this Proposal involves two stages, the Proposals benefits will not be realised until both stages ultimately are approved. | ||
Q23. | What matters will be considered at the annual general meeting immediately following the extraordinary general meeting? | |
A. | At the annual general meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider, among other things, resolutions relating to our annual accounts for our 2009 financial year, our remuneration report for our 2009 financial year, re-election of five directors offering themselves for re-election, amendments to the James Hardie Industries N.V. Long Term Incentive Plan 2006 (which we refer to as our Long Term Incentive Plan), grants of equity securities to our Managing Board directors and other procedural matters. | |
Please refer to the separate notice of meetings for the annual general meeting and annual information meeting delivered to you under separate cover for details and the full text of the resolutions to be considered at the annual general meeting. If you have not received a copy of the notice of meetings for the annual general meeting, please see Where You Can Find Additional Information in Section 13 to request a copy. | ||
Disclaimer: Forward looking statements follow: |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 9 of 12 |
| statements about our future performance; | ||
| projections of our results of operations or financial condition; | ||
| statements regarding our plans, objectives or goals, including those relating to our strategies, initiatives, competition, acquisitions, dispositions and/or our products; | ||
| expectations concerning the costs associated with the suspension or closure of operations at any of our plants and future plans with respect to any such plants; | ||
| expectations that our credit facilities will be extended or renewed; | ||
| expectations concerning dividend payments; | ||
| statements concerning our corporate and tax domiciles and potential changes to them; | ||
| statements regarding tax liabilities and related audits and proceedings; | ||
| statements as to the possible consequences of proceedings brought against us and certain of our former directors and officers by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission; | ||
| expectations about the timing and amount of contributions to the Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund, a special purpose fund for the compensation of proven Australian asbestos-related personal injury and death claims; | ||
| expectations concerning indemnification obligations; and | ||
| statements about product or environmental liabilities. |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 10 of 12 |
| all matters relating to or arising out of the prior manufacture of products that contained asbestos by our current and former subsidiaries; | ||
| required contributions to the Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund and the effect of currency exchange rate movements on the amount recorded in our financial statements as an asbestos liability; compliance with and changes in tax laws and treatments; | ||
| competition and product pricing in the markets in which we operate; | ||
| the consequences of product failures or defects; exposure to environmental, asbestos or other legal proceedings; | ||
| general economic and market conditions; | ||
| the supply and cost of raw materials; | ||
| the success of research and development efforts; | ||
| reliance on a small number of customers; a customers inability to pay; compliance with and changes in environmental and health and safety laws; | ||
| risks of conducting business internationally; compliance with and changes in laws and regulations; | ||
| currency exchange risks; | ||
| the concentration of our customer base on large format retail customers, distributors and dealers; | ||
| the effect of natural disasters; | ||
| changes in our key management personnel; | ||
| inherent limitations on internal controls; use of accounting estimates; | ||
| and all other risks identified in our reports filed with Australian, Dutch and US securities agencies and exchanges (as appropriate). |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 11 of 12 |
James Hardie proposal to change domicile
|
24 June 2009 | 12 of 12 |