sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 2, 2009
Registration Number 333-161345
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 3
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
DOLE FOOD COMPANY,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
0100
|
|
99-0035300
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
One Dole Drive
Westlake Village, California
91362
(818) 879-6600
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
of principal executive offices)
David A. DeLorenzo
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Dole Food Company,
Inc.
One Dole Drive
Westlake Village, California 91362
(818) 879-6600
(Name, address and telephone
number, including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan K. Layne
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 552-8500
|
|
C. Michael Carter
Dole Food Company, Inc.
One Dole Drive
Westlake Village, California 91362
(818) 879-6600
|
|
Alison S. Ressler
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 712-6600
|
As soon as practicable after
this Registration Statement becomes effective.
(Approximate date of
commencement of proposed sale to the public)
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether there registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of Securities
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
to be Registered
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering Price(1)(2)
|
|
|
Registration Fee
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
|
$
|
500,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,900(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
computing the amount of the registration fee, in accordance with
to Rule 457(o) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.
|
(2)
|
|
Includes offering price of
additional shares that the underwriters have the option to
purchase. See Underwriting.
|
(3)
|
|
Previously paid.
|
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON
SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE
DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH
SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL
THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING
PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an
offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an
offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or
sale is not permitted.
|
Subject to Completion. Dated
October 2, 2009.
Shares
DOLE FOOD COMPANY,
INC.
Common Stock
This is an initial public offering of common stock of Dole Food
Company, Inc. We are
offering shares
of common stock.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock since 2003. It is currently estimated that the
initial public offering price per share will be between
$ and
$ .
We intend to apply to list the common stock on The New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol DOLE.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 12 to
read about factors you should consider before buying shares of
our common stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other
regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities
or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial price to public
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
To the extent that the underwriters sell more
than shares
of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up
to an
additional shares
of common stock from Dole Food Company, Inc. at the initial
public offering price less the underwriting discount.
The underwriters and Dole Food Company, Inc. have entered into a
firm commitment underwriting agreement as further described
under Underwriting. The underwriters expect to
deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York
on ,
2009.
|
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs
& Co. |
BofA Merrill
Lynch |
Deutsche Bank
Securities |
Wells Fargo
Securities |
Prospectus
dated ,
2009.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any
information or to represent anything not contained in this
prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or
representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the
shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in
jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information
contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.
i
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you
should consider before buying shares in this offering. You
should read the entire prospectus carefully, especially the
information under Risk Factors. References in this
prospectus to Dole, the Company,
we, us or our refer to Dole
Food Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the
context requires otherwise.
As used in this prospectus, the terms FYE and
fiscal year ended refer to our fiscal year, which
ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. The fiscal
years 2008, 2007 and 2006 ended on January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
The Company operates under a 52/53 week year. Fiscal 2008
was a 53-week year. Fiscal 2007 and 2006 were both 52-week
years. The first half of each fiscal year is 24 weeks in
duration and the first half of fiscal 2009 and 2008 ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008, respectively.
Our
Company
We are the worlds leading producer, marketer and
distributor of fresh fruit and fresh vegetables, including an
expanding line of value-added products. In the primary markets
we serve, we hold the number 1 or number 2 market
share position in our key product categories, including bananas,
packaged salads and packaged fruit. For the last twelve months
ended June 20, 2009, we had revenues of approximately
$7.2 billion, Adjusted EBITDA of approximately
$445 million and net income attributable to Dole Food
Company, Inc. of approximately $92 million. See
Summary Unaudited Pro Forma and Historical
Consolidated Financial Data.
We provide wholesale, retail and institutional customers around
the world with high quality food products that bear the
DOLE®
trademarks. We believe the DOLE trademarks and our products have
global appeal as they offer value and convenience, while also
benefiting from the growing focus on health and wellness among
consumers worldwide.
Founded in 1851, we have built a fully-integrated operating
platform that allows us to source, grow, process, market and
distribute our nearly 200 products in more than 90 countries. We
source our products worldwide both directly on Dole-owned or
leased land and through associated producer and independent
grower arrangements under which we provide varying degrees of
farming, harvesting, packing, shipping and marketing services.
We then use our global cold storage supply chain that features
the largest dedicated refrigerated containerized fleet in the
world, as well as an extensive network of packaging, ripening
and distribution centers, to deliver fresh Dole products to
market.
We have three business segments: fresh fruit, fresh vegetables,
and packaged foods.
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit: Our fresh fruit segment is a
leading worldwide producer, marketer and distributor of fresh
bananas, pineapples and other tropical and deciduous fruits with
operations in approximately 90 countries. We are one of the
worlds largest marketers and distributors of bananas with
the number 1 market share in North America and Japan. We
are also a leading global producer, marketer and distributor of
fresh pineapples and a leading exporter of Chilean fruit. Our
fresh fruit segment had revenues of $5.0 billion for the
last twelve months ended June 20, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Fresh Vegetables: Our fresh vegetables segment
produces, markets and distributes commodity vegetables and fresh
packaged salads and vegetables to retail and foodservice
customers primarily in North America, Asia and, to a lesser
extent, Western Europe. We have strong volumes and market
positions in commodity vegetables which support our
number 2 market share in packaged salads. Our fresh
vegetables segment had revenues of $1.1 billion for the
last twelve months ended June 20, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Packaged Foods: Our packaged foods segment
produces and markets packaged foods, including canned fruit,
fruit juices, fruit in plastic cups, jars and pouches and frozen
fruit
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
products. Our key packaged foods products are packaged pineapple
products and packaged fruit products such as our FRUIT
BOWLS®
line of individual serving fruit cups. We have the number 1
market share in our key packaged food product categories in the
U.S. Our packaged foods segment had revenues of
$1.1 billion for the last twelve months ended June 20,
2009.
|
Our Market
Opportunity
The worldwide fresh produce industry enjoys consistent
underlying demand and favorable growth dynamics. In recent
years, the market in the U.S. for fresh produce has increased
faster than the rate of population growth, supported by ongoing
trends including greater consumer demand for healthy, fresh and
convenient foods, increased retailer square footage devoted to
fresh produce, and greater emphasis among retailers on fresh
produce as a differentiating factor in attracting customers.
Health-conscious consumers are driving much of the growth in
demand for fresh produce. Over the past several decades, the
benefits of natural, preservative-free foods have become an
increasingly significant element of the public dialogue on
health and nutrition. As a result, consumption of fresh fruit
and vegetables has markedly increased. According to the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Americans consumed an
additional 38 pounds of fresh fruit and vegetables per capita in
2006 compared to 1987.
Driven by consumer demand for convenient, healthy snacking
options, the U.S. packaged fruit category has experienced
growth of over 36% in the past ten years. Dole introduced FRUIT
BOWLS plastic cups in 1999, which along with other innovative
packaging items, such as fruit in resealable plastic jars,
parfaits and gels, have attracted new users to this category and
enabled the DOLE brand to achieve the number 1 market share
position in the U.S. packaged fruit category. Dole also
entered the frozen fruit category in 2004. As the leading brand,
Dole was the first to invest in national consumer awareness
which has supported 28% category growth since 2004.
As food retailers compete in a consolidating industry, they have
sought to increase profits by focusing on higher growth product
categories and value-added products, which generally have higher
margins. As a result, some retailers are reducing the dry goods
sections of the store, in favor of expanding their selections of
fresh and chilled items. This trend provides Dole with new
product and merchandising opportunities for fresh produce and
packaged foods, especially for our value-added lines, such as
packaged salads, FRUIT BOWLS and fruit in plastic jars. Fully
integrated produce companies, such as Dole, are well positioned
to meet the needs of large retailers through the delivery of
consistent, high-quality produce, reliable service, competitive
pricing and innovative products responsive to consumer demand.
In addition, these companies, including Dole, have sought to
strengthen relationships with leading retailers through
value-added services such as banana ripening and distribution,
category management, branding initiatives and establishment of
long-term supply agreements.
Our Competitive
Strengths
Our competitive strengths have contributed to our strong
historical operating performance and should enable us to
capitalize on future growth opportunities:
|
|
|
|
|
Market Share Leader. Our key products hold the
number 1 or number 2 positions in their respective
markets. We maintain number 1 market share positions in
bananas in North America and Japan and the number 1 market
share position in the U.S. in packaged fruit products, including
our line of plastic fruit cups called FRUIT BOWLS, FRUIT BOWLS
in Gel, Fruit Parfaits and fruit in plastic jars. Our leadership
position provides us with global scale and support for our
world-class production, distribution and marketing platform that
would be difficult for others to replicate.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Strong Global Brand. The DOLE brand was
introduced in 1933 and is one of the most recognized brands for
fresh and packaged produce in the United States, as evidenced by
DOLEs 68% unaided consumer brand awareness
more than twice that of DOLEs nearest competitor,
according to a major global research company (Millward Brown).
Consumer and institutional recognition of the DOLE trademark and
related brands and the association of these brands with high
quality food products contribute significantly to our leading
positions in the markets that we serve. Additionally, by
implementing a global marketing program, we believe we have made
the distinctive red DOLE letters and sunburst a
familiar symbol of freshness and quality recognized in the
aisles of the supermarket and around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
State-of-the-Art
Infrastructure and Supply Chain Management. Our
production, processing, transportation and distribution
infrastructure is
state-of-the-art,
enabling us to efficiently deliver among the highest quality and
freshest product to our customers. Dole quality starts right on
the farm, and that quality is preserved and protected in our
proprietary
farm-to-customer
refrigerated supply chain. Our network provides a closed-loop
cold storage supply chain that enables the worldwide transport
of perishable products and is the key to Dole quality and shelf
life. The investments in our infrastructure, including the DOLE
trademark, farms, packing houses, manufacturing facilities and
shipping assets, and our market-leading logistics and
distribution capabilities, allow us to act as a preferred fresh
and packaged food provider to leading global supermarkets and
mass merchandisers.
|
|
|
|
Diversity of Sourcing Locations. We currently
source our fresh fruits and vegetables from 25 countries
and distribute products in more than 90 countries. In
addition to owning and operating our own farms, we have
developed a unique worldwide network of over 9,000 farmers
who proudly produce to our standards. We are not dependent on
any one country for the sourcing of our products. The diversity
of our production sources allows us to consistently access the
highest quality products while also reducing our exposure to
events unique in any given region.
|
|
|
|
Low-Cost Production Capabilities. Our supply
chain and global sourcing network enable us to be a low cost
producer in many of our major product lines, including bananas,
North American fresh vegetables and packaged fruit products.
Over the last several years we have undertaken various
initiatives to achieve and maintain this low-cost position,
including leveraging our global logistics infrastructure more
efficiently. We intend to maintain these low-cost positions
through a continued focus on operating efficiency.
|
|
|
|
Strong Management Team. Our management team
has a demonstrated history of delivering strong operating
results through disciplined execution. Under our strong
management teams guidance, Doles net revenues have
increased from $6.0 billion in 2006 to $7.2 billion
for the last twelve months ended June 20, 2009. Adjusted
EBITDA has increased from $293 million for fiscal year 2006
to $445 million for the last twelve months ended
June 20, 2009, and net income attributable to Dole Food
Company, Inc. has increased to $92 million over the same
period from net losses of $54 million and $87 million
in fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
Our
Strategy
Key elements of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Leverage our Strong Brand and Market Leadership
Position. Our key products hold the number 1 or
number 2 market share positions in their respective markets. We
intend to maintain those positions and continue to expand our
leadership in new product areas as well as with new customers.
We have a history of leveraging our strong brand to successfully
enter, and in many cases become the largest player in,
value-added food categories. We intend to continue to evaluate
and strategically introduce other branded products in the
value-added sectors of our business.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on Value-Added Products. We intend to
continue shifting our product mix toward value-added food
categories while maintaining and building on our leadership
positions in fresh fruits and vegetables. For example, we have
successfully increased our percentage of revenue from
value-added products in our fresh vegetables and packaged foods
businesses, where our packaged salad lines and FRUIT BOWL and
other non-canned products now account for approximately 53% and
58% of those businesses respective revenues. Value-added
food categories are growing at a faster rate than traditional
commodity businesses and typically generate stronger margins. We
plan to continue to address the growing demand for convenient
and innovative products by investing in our higher margin,
value-added food businesses.
|
|
|
|
Build on Strong Presence in Stable Markets and Expand in
High-Growth Markets. We intend to continue to
reap the benefits of our strong brand and market position in
profitable, stable markets such as North America, Western
Europe, and Japan. Additionally, we are focusing on expansion in
higher growth markets such as China and Eastern Europe, where we
believe our capabilities in delivering fresh and high quality
products that also offer health, wellness and convenience
benefits, will enhance the existing growth and profitability of
our business.
|
|
|
|
Focus on Improving Operating Efficiency and Cash
Flow. We intend to continue to focus on profit
improvement initiatives and maximizing cash flow by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzing our current customer base and focusing on profitable
relationships with strategically important customers;
|
|
|
|
Leveraging our purchasing power to reduce our costs of raw
materials; and
|
|
|
|
Focusing capital investments to improve productivity.
|
Recent
Developments
Management of Dole has prepared the estimated revenues,
operating income, and adjusted EBITDA below in good faith based
on Doles internal reporting for the third quarter ending
October 10, 2009, which represents the most current
information available to management. Such estimates have not
been subject to Doles normal quarterly financial closing
processes and interim financial statement preparation. As a
result, our actual financial results could be different and
those differences could be material. Our consolidated interim
financial statements for the quarter ending October 10,
2009 are not expected to be filed with the SEC until after this
offering is completed. Neither Doles independent auditors,
nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined,
or performed any procedures with respect to the estimated
financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed
any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information,
and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association
with, such estimated financial information.
Amounts presented below for the third quarter ending
October 10, 2009 are estimated based on currently available
information and are subject to change. Dole, however, does not
expect actual revenues for the third quarter 2009 to be
different by more than % from the
estimated third quarter 2009 revenues presented below. Further,
Dole does not expect actual operating income and Adjusted EBITDA
to be different by more than % from
the estimated third quarter 2009 amounts presented below.
Selected Financial Results Estimated for the Third Quarter
Ending October 10, 2009 and Actual Results for Third
Quarter Ended October 4, 2008 (amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ending
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
October 10,
|
|
|
October 4,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,256.3
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
As of October 10, 2009, management estimates that net debt
(defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents) will be
approximately
$ .
4
Use of Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is
calculated by adding other income (expense), interest income,
equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, and
depreciation and amortization to operating income and then
adding the net unrealized loss or subtracting the net unrealized
gains on certain derivative instruments (foreign currency and
bunker fuel hedges and the cross currency swap), and adding the
foreign currency loss or subtracting the foreign currency gain
on the vessel obligations, and then subtracting the gain on
asset sales. During the first quarter of 2007, all of
Doles foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges were
designated as effective hedges of cash flows as defined by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, and
these designations were changed during the second quarter of
2007. Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, all unrealized
gains and losses related to these instruments have been recorded
in the consolidated statement of operations. During 2008, Dole
initiated an asset sale program in order to reduce debt with
proceeds generated from the sale of non-core assets.
Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated or presented in accordance
with GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA is not a substitute for operating
income from continuing operations, cash flows from operating
activities or any other measure prescribed by GAAP. Further,
Adjusted EBITDA as used herein is not necessarily comparable to
similarly titled measures of other companies. However, we have
included Adjusted EBITDA herein because management believes that
Adjusted EBITDA is a useful performance measure for us.
In addition, Adjusted EBITDA is presented because management
believes that this measure is frequently used by securities
analysts, investors and others in the evaluation of Dole.
Management internally uses Adjusted EBITDA for decision making
and to evaluate our performance. Refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in this
prospectus for further information regarding the use of non-GAAP
measures.
Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as follows for the estimated
amounts for the quarter ending October 10, 2009 and the
actual amounts for the quarter ended October 4, 2008
(amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ending
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
October 10,
|
|
|
October 4,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34.5
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss on vessel obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Risk
Factors
An investment in our common stock involves various risks. You
should consider carefully the risks discussed below and under
Risk Factors before purchasing our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, crop disease,
pests and other natural conditions can impose significant costs
and losses on our business.
|
|
|
|
Our business is highly competitive and we cannot assure you that
we will maintain our current market share.
|
|
|
|
Our earnings are sensitive to fluctuations in market prices and
demand for our products, as well as seasonal variability.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in commodity or raw product costs, such as fuel,
paper, plastics and resins, could adversely affect our operating
results.
|
|
|
|
We face risks because we operate in numerous countries
throughout the world, such as currency exchange fluctuations,
political changes and economic crises, as well as legal and
regulatory changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our substantial indebtedness ($2.0 billion in principal
amount at June 20, 2009; and
$ billion in principal amount
with an anticipated cash balance of
$ million, in each case
giving effect to the consummation of the transactions described
in our unaudited pro forma financial statements included in this
prospectus) could adversely affect our operations, including our
ability to perform under our debt obligations, and we may incur
significant additional indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt instruments contain customary cross-default and
cross-acceleration provisions such that a default under one of
our debt instruments could lead to a default or acceleration
under another of our debt instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our
substantial debt obligations.
|
|
|
|
There has been no prior public market for our shares since 2003
and an active market may not develop or be maintained, which
could limit your ability to sell shares of our common stock.
|
Principal
Stockholder and History
David H. Murdock acquired a controlling interest in Dole
(then called Castle & Cooke, Inc.) in 1985 through the
acquisition of Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc. Mr. Murdock was
named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Castle &
Cooke, Inc. in 1985. Castle & Cooke, Inc. changed its
name to Dole Food Company, Inc. in 1991. In 1995, Dole divested
most of its non-core real estate by spinning it out into a new
company named Castle & Cooke, Inc. In 2000,
Mr. Murdock took Castle & Cooke, Inc. private. On
March 28, 2003, Mr. Murdock took Dole private in a
going-private merger transaction. Mr. Murdock owns
interests in a variety of other businesses and has been an
active private investor for over 45 years.
Contemplated
Transactions in Connection with the Offering
Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, we and
our parent company, DHM Holding Company, Inc., or DHM Holdings,
will engage in certain internal restructuring transactions. As a
result of these internal restructuring transactions, our
existing stockholder will own shares of Dole directly, instead
of through DHM Holdings simplifying Doles ownership
structure.
Current Structure. DHM Holdings has only two
assets 100% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock and an 85% limited liability company membership interest
in Westlake Wellbeing Properties, LLC, or WWP, a hotel operating
company. In addition, DHM Holdings has $115 million of
debt, which is secured by a mortgage on the hotel owned by WWP,
and is also supported by a personal guarantee from our existing
stockholder.
Restructuring Transactions. The restructuring
transactions consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
DHM Holdings will contribute to us no more than 50% of the
outstanding limited liability company membership interests it
holds in WWP and will retain the remaining interest in WWP.
|
|
|
|
DHM Holdings will merge with and into us, and we will be the
surviving corporation in the merger. In the merger, each share
of DHM Holdings common stock outstanding immediately prior to
the merger will be converted
into shares of Dole common
stock, and each share of Dole common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the merger, each of which is held by DHM
Holdings, will be cancelled. As a result of the merger, we will
hold the 85% interest in WWP and
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
will assume approximately $115 million of debt of DHM
Holdings associated with WWP. This transaction is referred to in
this prospectus as the Merger Transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the Merger Transaction, we will transfer our 85%
interest in WWP and $30 million of the debt associated with
WWP, in each case previously held by DHM Holdings, to affiliates
of Mr. Murdock. We will use a portion of the net proceeds
from this offering to pay off in its entirety the
$85 million of debt that we assumed in the Merger
Transaction and did not assign to affiliates of
Mr. Murdock. We will also transfer ownership interests in
one parcel of idle farm land of approximately 1,600 acres
in Honduras, with a fair market value of approximately
$12 million and a book value of approximately $150,000, to
our existing stockholder.
|
Results of Restructuring Transactions. The pay
off of the $85 million of debt assumed by us in the Merger
Transaction, and the transfer of the remaining $30 million
to an affiliate of our existing stockholder will eliminate the
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions that currently
exist between our senior secured facilities and the DHM Holdings
indebtedness. As a result of the repayment of $85 million
of the total $115 million of debt at DHM Holdings, the
amount of debt that is supported by the mortgage on the hotel
operated by WWP, and the amount of debt supported by our
existing stockholders personal guarantee, will be reduced
to $30 million. Accordingly, our existing stockholder and
affiliates of our existing stockholder will be in a more
favorable financial position upon completion of these
transactions than they were before such transactions. In
addition, as a result of the Merger Transaction, the federal net
operating loss carryforwards of DHM Holdings will become
available to us, subject to normal statutory expiration periods.
DHM Holdings estimated federal net operating loss
carryforwards were approximately $160 million as of
June 20, 2009. Accordingly, we will be in a more favorable
tax position upon completion of the Merger Transaction than we
were before such transaction.
In addition, upon consummation of the offering all other current
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions that exist
between our senior secured facilities and certain indebtedness
of affiliates of DHM Holdings will be eliminated through the
payment of $90 million of debt owed by an affiliate of our
existing stockholder, which matures on December 22, 2009.
In connection with the Trust offering (described below under
The Offering), an affiliate of our
existing stockholder will enter into a purchase agreement with a
newly established Trust pursuant to which our existing
stockholder will agree to deliver shares of our common stock on
exchange of the Trusts securities
on ,
2012. Our existing stockholder will use a portion of the net
proceeds from such transactions to pay off the $90 million
in debt.
As a result, no event of default under any indebtedness of
affiliates of DHM Holdings or of other affiliates of our
existing stockholder will thereafter be able to cause an event
of default under our senior secured credit facilities.
Corporate
Information
Dole Food Company, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in April
2001. Our principal executive offices are located at One Dole
Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362-7300, and our
telephone number is
(818) 879-6600.
Our website is located at www.dole.com. The information
contained on our website is not a part of this prospectus.
DOLE®,
the DOLE logo and other trademarks or service marks of Dole
appearing in this prospectus are the property of Dole Food
Company, Inc.
7
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered |
|
shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
shares |
|
Option to purchase additional shares
|
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
To pay down indebtedness. See Use of Proceeds for
additional information. |
|
Dividends |
|
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. |
|
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol
|
|
DOLE |
Except as otherwise indicated, all of the information in this
prospectus assumes the underwriters do not exercise their option
to purchase additional shares.
In addition to the offering made
hereby, ,
a newly formed Trust, is offering up
to
of its automatic common exchange securities exchangeable into up
to shares of our common stock
that may be delivered by the Trust upon exchange of those
securities
on ,
2012. In this prospectus, we refer to that separate offering as
the Trust offering. The initial purchasers in that offering have
an option to acquire from the Trust additional automatic common
exchange securities with respect to up to an
additional shares of our
common stock. The Trust will enter into a purchase agreement
with an affiliate of our existing stockholder with respect to
the shares of our common stock deliverable upon exchange of the
Trusts securities. The shares of common stock and the
Trusts securities in the Trust offering are being offered
only to qualified institutional buyers as defined in
Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, in an offering exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act.
The Trust will not be affiliated with us or our existing
stockholder. The day-to-day affairs of the Trust will be managed
by a third party commercial bank under the supervision of three
individual trustees unaffiliated with Dole or our existing
stockholder. We will not receive any of the proceeds of the
Trust offering, and we will not pay any of the expenses of the
Trust in connection with its establishment or the offering and
sale of its securities. We anticipate that each of the
Trusts securities will be mandatorily exchangeable into
shares of common stock based on a pricing formula to be
negotiated by our existing stockholder and the Trust and subject
to customary adjustments. We also anticipate that the Trust will
pay a fixed quarterly distribution from the proceeds of treasury
securities purchased by the Trust from the net proceeds of the
offering of its securities.
8
Summary Unaudited
Pro Forma and Historical Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated
financial data. We have derived the summary historical
consolidated financial data for the years ended January 3,
2009, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006 from the
audited financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the summary historical
consolidated financial data as of June 20, 2009 and for the
half year ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 from
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus, which, in the opinion of
our management, have been prepared on the same basis as the
audited financial statements and reflect all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of our results of operations and financial
position for such periods. Results for the half year ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.
We derived the summary unaudited pro forma financial data as of
and for the half year ended June 20, 2009 and for the year
ended January 3, 2009. The summary historical consolidated
financial data set forth below are not necessarily indicative of
the results of future operations and should be read in
conjunction with the audited and unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus and the discussion under
the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The
unaudited pro forma balance sheet data give effect to the Merger
Transaction and related transactions, a proposed refinancing
transaction and the receipt and use of proceeds from the
offering contemplated hereby as if the transactions had occurred
as of June 20, 2009. The unaudited pro forma statements of
operations data for the half year ended June 20, 2009 and
the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009 give effect to these
transactions as if they had occurred as of December 30,
2007. The unaudited pro forma data is provided for informational
purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the financial
position or results of operations that would have existed or
occurred if the transactions were completed on such dates, nor
are they necessarily indicative of future operating results. The
unaudited pro forma data should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus under the heading
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended(1)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended(1)
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share and share data in
thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net:
|
|
$
|
3,311
|
|
|
$
|
7,620
|
|
|
$
|
3,311
|
|
|
$
|
3,723
|
|
|
$
|
7,620
|
|
|
$
|
6,821
|
|
|
$
|
5,991
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share, basic and
diluted(4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended (1)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended (1)
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
$
|
2,343
|
|
|
$
|
5,401
|
|
|
$
|
2,343
|
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
5,401
|
|
|
$
|
4,737
|
|
|
$
|
3,969
|
|
Fresh Vegetables
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Packaged Foods
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues, net
|
|
|
3,311
|
|
|
|
7,620
|
|
|
|
3,311
|
|
|
|
3,723
|
|
|
|
7,620
|
|
|
|
6,821
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Fresh Vegetables
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Packaged Foods
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EBIT(2)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to
EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT(2)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss on vessel obligations
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin(3)
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Capital expenditures from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
Other Pro Forma Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of pro forma debt to Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
10
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We operate under a 52/53 week year. The first half of each
fiscal year is 24 weeks in duration. Our fiscal year ends
on the Saturday closest to December 31 of the applicable year. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
EBIT is calculated by adding back interest expense and income
taxes to income (loss) from continuing operations. Adjusted
EBITDA is calculated by adding depreciation and amortization
from continuing operations to EBIT, and by adding the net
unrealized loss or subtracting the net unrealized gains on
certain derivative instruments to EBIT (foreign currency and
bunker fuel hedges and the cross currency swap), by adding the
foreign currency loss or subtracting the foreign currency gain
on the vessel obligations to EBIT, and by subtracting the gain
on asset sales from EBIT. EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are
reconciled to income (loss) from continuing operations in the
tables above. During the first quarter of 2007, all of the
Companys foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges were
designated as effective hedges of cash flows as defined by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, and
these designations were changed during the second quarter of
2007. Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, all unrealized
gains and losses related to these instruments have been recorded
in the respective consolidated statement of operations. During
2008, Dole initiated an asset sale program in order to reduce
debt with proceeds generated from the sale of non-core assets.
Gains on asset sales for periods prior to the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2009 were not material. |
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not calculated or presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America, or GAAP, and EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
are not a substitute for net income attributable to Dole Food
Company, Inc., net income, income from continuing operations,
cash flows from operating activities or any other measure
prescribed by GAAP. Further, EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA as used
herein are not necessarily comparable to similarly titled
measures of other companies. However, we have included EBIT and
Adjusted EBITDA herein because management believes that EBIT and
Adjusted EBITDA are useful performance measures for us. In
addition, EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are presented because our
management believes that these measures are frequently used by
securities analysts, investors and others in the evaluation of
our Company. Management internally uses EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
for decision making and to evaluate our performance. Refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in this
prospectus for further information regarding the use of non-GAAP
measures. |
|
(3) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin is defined as the ratio of Adjusted
EBITDA to net revenues. We present Adjusted EBITDA margin
because management believes that it is a useful performance
measure for us. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Historical income (loss) from continuing operations per share,
basic and diluted per share data and weighted average shares
used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
for the half years ended June 20, 2009 and June 14,
2008 and the fiscal years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006 have not been
adjusted for the share conversion that is contemplated to occur
in connection with the Merger Transaction. Pro forma income
(loss) from continuing operations per share, basic and diluted
per share data and weighted average shares used in computing
basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the half year
ended June 20, 2009 and fiscal year ended January 3,
2009 have been adjusted for the share conversion
of to to occur in
connection with the Merger Transaction. |
11
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below and the
other information in this prospectus, including the consolidated
financial statements and the related notes, before making a
decision to buy our common stock. If any of the following risks
actually occurs, our business could be harmed. In that case, the
trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may
lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to
Our Business and Industry
Adverse
weather conditions, natural disasters, crop disease, pests and
other natural conditions can impose significant costs and losses
on our business.
Fresh produce, including produce used in canning and other
packaged food operations, is vulnerable to adverse weather
conditions, including windstorms, floods, drought and
temperature extremes, which are quite common but difficult to
predict. Unfavorable growing conditions can reduce both crop
size and crop quality. This risk is particularly true with
respect to regions or countries from which we source a
significant percentage of our products. In extreme cases, entire
harvests may be lost in some geographic areas. These factors can
increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges
to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Fresh produce is also vulnerable to crop disease and to pests,
which may vary in severity and effect, depending on the stage of
production at the time of infection or infestation, the type of
treatment applied and climatic conditions. For example, black
sigatoka is a fungal disease that affects banana cultivation in
most areas where they are grown commercially. The costs to
control this disease and other infestations vary depending on
the severity of the damage and the extent of the plantings
affected. Moreover, there can be no assurance that available
technologies to control such infestations will continue to be
effective. These infestations can increase costs, decrease
revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our business
is highly competitive and we cannot assure you that we will
maintain our current market share.
Many companies compete in our different businesses. However,
only a few well-established companies operate on both a national
and a regional basis with one or several branded product lines.
We face strong competition from these and other companies in all
our product lines.
Important factors with respect to our competitors include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Some of our competitors may have greater operating flexibility
and, in certain cases, this may permit them to respond better or
more quickly to changes in the industry or to introduce new
products and packaging more quickly and with greater marketing
support.
|
|
|
|
Several of our packaged food product lines are sensitive to
competition from national or regional brands, and many of our
product lines compete with imports, private label products and
fresh alternatives.
|
|
|
|
We cannot predict the pricing or promotional actions of our
competitors or whether those actions will have a negative effect
on us.
|
There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete
effectively with our present and future competitors, and our
ability to compete could be materially adversely affected by our
leveraged position.
12
Our earnings
are sensitive to fluctuations in market prices and demand for
our products.
Excess supplies often cause severe price competition in our
industry. Growing conditions in various parts of the world,
particularly weather conditions such as windstorms, floods,
droughts and freezes, as well as diseases and pests, are primary
factors affecting market prices because of their influence on
the supply and quality of product.
Fresh produce is highly perishable and generally must be brought
to market and sold soon after harvest. Some items, such as
lettuce, must be sold more quickly, while other items can be
held in cold storage for longer periods of time. The selling
price received for each type of produce depends on all of these
factors, including the availability and quality of the produce
item in the market, and the availability and quality of
competing types of produce.
In addition, general public perceptions regarding the quality,
safety or health risks associated with particular food products
could reduce demand and prices for some of our products. To the
extent that consumer preferences evolve away from products that
we produce for health or other reasons, and we are unable to
modify our products or to develop products that satisfy new
consumer preferences, there will be a decreased demand for our
products. However, even if market prices are unfavorable,
produce items which are ready to be, or have been harvested must
be brought to market promptly. A decrease in the selling price
received for our products due to the factors described above
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our earnings
are subject to seasonal variability.
Our earnings may be affected by seasonal factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the seasonality of our supplies and consumer demand;
|
|
|
|
the ability to process products during critical harvest periods;
and
|
|
|
|
the timing and effects of ripening and perishability.
|
Although banana production tends to be relatively stable
throughout the year, banana pricing is seasonal because bananas
compete against other fresh fruit that generally comes to market
beginning in the summer. As a result, banana prices are
typically higher during the first half of the year. Our fresh
vegetables segment experiences some seasonality as reflected by
higher earnings in the first half of the year. Our packaged
foods segment experiences peak demand during certain well-known
holidays and observances.
Currency
exchange fluctuations may impact the results of our
operations.
We distribute our products in more than 90 countries throughout
the world. Our international sales are usually transacted in
U.S. dollars, and European and Asian currencies. Our
results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency
exchange rates in both sourcing and selling locations. Although
we enter into foreign currency exchange forward contracts from
time to time to reduce our risk related to currency exchange
fluctuation, our results of operations may still be impacted by
foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the
yen-to-U.S. dollar and euro-to-U.S. dollar exchange
rates. For instance, we currently estimate that a 10%
strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Japanese
yen, euro and Swedish krona would have reduced 2008 operating
income by approximately $76 million excluding the impact of
foreign currency exchange hedges. Because we do not hedge
against all of our foreign currency exposure, our business will
continue to be susceptible to foreign currency fluctuations.
Increases in
commodity or raw product costs, such as fuel, paper, plastics
and resins, could adversely affect our operating
results.
Many factors may affect the cost and supply of fresh produce,
including external conditions, commodity market fluctuations,
currency fluctuations, changes in governmental laws and
regulations,
13
agricultural programs, severe and prolonged weather conditions
and natural disasters. Increased costs for purchased fruit and
vegetables have in the past negatively impacted our operating
results, and there can be no assurance that they will not
adversely affect our operating results in the future.
The price of various commodities can significantly affect our
costs. For example, the price of bunker fuel used in shipping
operations, including fuel used in ships that we own or charter,
is an important variable component of transportation costs. Our
fuel costs have increased substantially in recent years, and
there can be no assurance that there will not be further
increases in the future. In addition, fuel and transportation
cost is a significant component of the price of much of the
produce that we purchase from growers or distributors, and there
can be no assurance that we will be able to pass on to our
customers the increased costs we incur in these respects.
The cost of paper and tinplate are also significant to us
because some of our products are packed in cardboard boxes or
cans for shipment. If the price of paper or tinplate increases
and we are not able to effectively pass these price increases
along to our customers, then our operating income will decrease.
Increased costs for paper and tinplate have in the past
negatively impacted our operating income, and there can be no
assurance that these increased costs will not adversely affect
our operating results in the future.
We face risks
related to our former use of the pesticide DBCP.
We formerly used dibromochloropropane, or DBCP, a nematocide
that was used on a variety of crops throughout the world. The
registration for DBCP with the U.S. government was
cancelled in 1979 based in part on an apparent link to male
sterility among chemical factory workers who produced DBCP.
There are a number of pending lawsuits in the United States and
other countries against the manufacturers of DBCP and the
growers, including us, who used it in the past. The cost to
defend or settle these lawsuits, and the costs to pay any
judgments or settlements resulting from these lawsuits, or other
lawsuits which might be brought, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The use of
herbicides and other potentially hazardous substances in our
operations may lead to environmental damage and result in
increased costs to us.
We use herbicides and other potentially hazardous substances in
the operation of our business. We may have to pay for the costs
or damages associated with the improper application, accidental
release or the use or misuse of such substances. Our insurance
may not be adequate to cover such costs or damages or may not
continue to be available at a price or under terms that are
satisfactory to us. In such cases, payment of such costs or
damages could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
The financing
arrangements for the going-private merger transactions in
2003 may increase our exposure to tax
liability.
A portion of our senior secured credit facilities have been
incurred by our foreign subsidiaries and were used to fund the
going-private merger transactions in 2003 through which
Mr. Murdock became our sole, indirect stockholder. On
August 27, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS,
completed its examination of our U.S. federal income tax
returns for the years 2002 to 2005 and issued a Revenue
Agents Report, or RAR, that includes various proposed
adjustments, including with respect to the going-private merger
transactions. The IRS is proposing that certain funding used in
the going-private merger transactions is currently taxable and
that certain related investment banking fees are not deductible.
The net tax deficiency associated with the RAR is
$122 million plus interest. We will file a protest letter
vigorously challenging the proposed adjustments contained in the
RAR and will pursue resolution of these issues with the Appeals
Division of the IRS. However, we may not be successful with
respect to some or all of our appeal, which could result in a
material tax liability and
14
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. We believe, based in part upon the advice of our tax
advisors, that our tax treatment of such transactions was
appropriate.
We face other
risks in connection with our international
operations.
Our operations are heavily dependent upon products grown,
purchased and sold internationally. In addition, our operations
are a significant factor in the economies of many of the
countries in which we operate, increasing our visibility and
susceptibility to legal or regulatory changes. These activities
are subject to risks that are inherent in operating in foreign
countries, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
foreign countries could change laws and regulations or impose
currency restrictions and other restraints;
|
|
|
|
in some countries, there is a risk that the government may
expropriate assets;
|
|
|
|
some countries impose burdensome tariffs and quotas;
|
|
|
|
political changes and economic crises may lead to changes in the
business environment in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
international conflict, including terrorist acts, could
significantly impact our business, financial condition and
results of operations;
|
|
|
|
in some countries, our operations are dependent on leases and
other agreements; and
|
|
|
|
economic downturns, political instability and war or civil
disturbances may disrupt production and distribution logistics
or limit sales in individual markets.
|
Banana imports from Latin America are subject to a tariff of 176
euros per metric ton for entry into the European Union, or EU,
market. Under the EU, previous banana regime, banana imports
from Latin America were subject to a tariff of 75 euros per
metric ton and were also subject to both import license
requirements and volume quotas. These license requirements and
volume quotas had the effect of limiting access to the EU banana
market. The increase in the applicable tariff and the
elimination of the volume restrictions applicable to Latin
American bananas may increase volatility in the market, which
could materially adversely affect our business, results of
operations or financial condition. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation Other Matters.
In 2005, we received a tax assessment from Honduras of
approximately $137 million (including the claimed tax,
penalty, and interest through the date of assessment) relating
to the disposition of all of our interest in Cervecería
Hondureña, S.A. in 2001. We have been contesting the tax
assessment. See Note 11 in the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements for the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009 included elsewhere in this prospectus.
We may be
required to pay significant penalties under European antitrust
laws.
The European Commission, or EC, issued a decision imposing a
45.6 million fine against Dole and its German
subsidiary, or the Decision, on October 15, 2008. On
December 24, 2008, we appealed the Decision by filing an
Application for Annulment, or Application, with the European
Court of First Instance, or CFI.
On December 3, 2008, the EC agreed in writing that if Dole
made an initial payment of $10 million
(7.6 million) to the EC on or before January 22,
2009, then the EC would stay the deadline for a provisional
payment, or coverage by a prime bank guaranty, of the remaining
balance (plus interest as from January 22, 2009), until
April 30, 2009. Dole made this initial $10 million
payment on January 21, 2009, and Dole provided the required
bank guaranty for the remaining balance of the fine to the EC by
the deadline of April 30, 2009.
15
We believe that we have not violated the European competition
laws and that our Application has substantial legal merit, both
for an annulment of the Decision and fine in their entirety, or
for a substantial reduction of the fine, but no assurances can
be given that we will be successful on appeal. Furthermore, the
ultimate resolution of these items could materially impact our
liquidity. We cannot predict the timing or outcome of our appeal
of the ECs Decision. See Note 11 in the notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements for the second
quarter of fiscal year 2009 included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The current
global economic downturn could continue to result in a decrease
in our sales and revenue, which could continue to adversely
affect the results of our operations, and we cannot predict the
extent or duration of these trends.
As a result of the current global economic downturn, consumers
may continue to reduce their purchases and seek value pricing,
which may continue to affect sales and pricing of some of our
products. Such trends could continue to adversely affect the
results of our operations and there can be no assurance whether
or when consumer confidence will return or that these trends
will not increase.
Global capital
and credit market issues could negatively affect our liquidity,
increase our costs of borrowing and disrupt the operations of
our suppliers and customers.
The global capital and credit markets have experienced increased
volatility and disruption over the past year, making it more
difficult for companies to access those markets. We depend in
part on stable, liquid and well-functioning capital and credit
markets to fund our operations. Although we believe that our
operating cash flows, access to capital and credit markets and
existing revolving credit agreement will permit us to meet our
financing needs for the foreseeable future, there can be no
assurance that continued or increased volatility and disruption
in the capital and credit markets will not impair our liquidity
or increase our costs of borrowing. Our business could also be
negatively impacted if our suppliers or customers experience
disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or
a slowdown in the general economy.
The current
global economic downturn may have other impacts on participants
in our industry, which cannot be fully predicted.
The full impact of the current global economic downturn on
customers, vendors and other business partners cannot be
anticipated. For example, major customers or vendors may have
financial challenges unrelated to us that could result in a
decrease in their business with us or, in extreme cases, cause
them to file for bankruptcy protection. Similarly, parties to
contracts may be forced to breach their obligations under those
contracts. Although we exercise prudent oversight of the credit
ratings and financial strength of our major business partners
and seek to diversify our risk to any single business partner,
there can be no assurance that there will not be a bank,
insurance company, supplier, customer or other financial partner
that is unable to meet its contractual commitments to us.
Similarly, stresses and pressures in the industry may result in
impacts on our business partners and competitors which could
have wide ranging impacts on the future of the industry.
Terrorism and
the uncertainty of war may have a material adverse effect on our
operating results.
Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred in New York
and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001, the
subsequent response by the United States in Afghanistan, Iraq
and other locations, and other acts of violence or war in the
United States or abroad may affect the markets in which we
operate and our operations and profitability. From time to time
in the past, our operations or personnel have been the targets
of terrorist or criminal attacks, and the risk of such attacks
impacts our operations and results in increased security costs.
Further terrorist attacks against the United States or operators
of United States-owned businesses outside the United States may
occur, or
16
hostilities could develop based on the current international
situation. The potential near-term and long-term effect these
attacks may have on our business operations, our customers, the
markets for our products, the United States economy and the
economies of other places we source or sell our products is
uncertain. The consequences of any terrorist attacks, or any
armed conflicts, are unpredictable, and we may not be able to
foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our markets
or our business.
Our worldwide
operations and products are highly regulated in the areas of
food safety and protection of human health and the
environment.
Our worldwide operations are subject to a broad range of
foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations, including laws and regulations
governing the use and disposal of pesticides and other
chemicals. These regulations directly affect day-to-day
operations, and violations of these laws and regulations can
result in substantial fines or penalties. There can be no
assurance that these fines or penalties would not have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. To maintain compliance with all of the
laws and regulations that apply to our operations, we have been
and may be required in the future to modify our operations,
purchase new equipment or make capital improvements. Further, we
may recall a product (voluntarily or otherwise) if we or the
regulators believe it presents a potential risk. In addition, we
have been and in the future may become subject to lawsuits
alleging that our operations and products caused personal injury
or property damage.
We are subject
to the risk of product contamination and product liability
claims.
The sale of food products for human consumption involves the
risk of injury to consumers. Such injuries may result from
tampering by unauthorized third parties, product contamination
or spoilage, including the presence of foreign objects,
substances, chemicals, other agents, or residues introduced
during the growing, storage, handling or transportation phases.
We have from time to time been involved in product liability
lawsuits, none of which were material to our business. While we
are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and
believe our facilities comply in all material respects with all
applicable laws and regulations, we cannot be sure that
consumption of our products will not cause a health-related
illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims
or lawsuits relating to such matters. For example, in the fall
of 2006, a third party from whom we and others had purchased
spinach recalled certain packaged fresh spinach due to
contamination by E. coli. Even if a product liability
claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative
publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused
illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with
existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand
image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be
covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or
contribution that we may have against others. We maintain
product liability insurance, however, we cannot be sure that we
will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not
insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage.
We are subject
to transportation risks.
An extended interruption in our ability to ship our products
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Similarly, any extended
disruption in the distribution of our products could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. While we believe we are adequately
insured and would attempt to transport our products by
alternative means if we were to experience an interruption due
to strike, natural disasters or otherwise, we cannot be sure
that we would be able to do so or be successful in doing so in a
timely and cost-effective manner.
17
Events or
rumors relating to the DOLE brand could significantly impact our
business.
Consumer and institutional recognition of the DOLE trademarks
and related brands and the association of these brands with high
quality and safe food products are an integral part of our
business. The occurrence of any events or rumors that cause
consumers
and/or
institutions to no longer associate these brands with high
quality and safe food products may materially adversely affect
the value of the DOLE brand name and demand for our products. We
have licensed the DOLE brand name to several affiliated and
unaffiliated companies for use in the United States and abroad.
Acts or omissions by these companies over which we have no
control may also have such adverse effects.
A portion of
our workforce is unionized and labor disruptions could decrease
our profitability.
As of June 20, 2009, approximately 35% of our employees
worldwide worked under various collective bargaining agreements.
Our collective bargaining agreements with expirations in fiscal
2009 have each been renewed, other than one agreement that is
currently under extension. Our other collective bargaining
agreements will expire in later years. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to negotiate these or other collective
bargaining agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the
current agreements, or at all, and without production
interruptions, including labor stoppages. A prolonged labor
dispute, which could include a work stoppage, could have a
material adverse effect on the portion of our business affected
by the dispute, which could impact our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Risks Relating to
Our Indebtedness
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our operations,
including our ability to perform our obligations under our debt
obligations.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of
June 20, 2009, we had approximately $1.2 billion in
senior secured indebtedness, $738 million in senior
unsecured indebtedness, including outstanding senior notes and
debentures, approximately $66 million in capital leases and
approximately $53 million in unsecured notes payable and
other indebtedness. In addition, in connection with the Merger
Transaction, we will assume $85 million of DHM
Holdings debt that will be repaid from a portion of the
net proceeds of this offering.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences
to you. For example, our substantial indebtedness may:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations;
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional amounts in the future for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt
service requirements, execution of our growth strategy or other
purposes or make such financing more costly;
|
|
|
|
|
|
result in a triggering of customary cross-default and
cross-acceleration provisions with respect to certain of our
debt obligations if an event of default or acceleration occurs
under one of our other debt obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, which would
reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund future working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
corporate purposes (by way of example, the issuance of our
13.875% senior secured notes due 2014, or 2014 Notes, and
amendment to the senior secured credit facilities during March
2009 increased our interest rates on these instruments
significantly as compared to the interest rates as they existed
prior to such events);
|
|
|
|
expose us to the risk of increased interest rates, as certain of
our borrowings are at variable rates of interest;
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
require us to sell assets (beyond those assets currently
classified as assets held-for-sale) to reduce
indebtedness or influence our decisions about whether to do so;
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to competitive pressures and to
general adverse economic and industry conditions, including
fluctuations in market interest rates or a downturn in our
business;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industries in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or pursuing
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have
relatively less indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the restrictive covenants in our credit
facilities and senior note indentures, among other things, our
ability to borrow additional funds. Failing to comply with those
covenants could result in an event of default which, if not
cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
We may be
unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations.
To service our debt, we require a significant amount of cash.
Our ability to generate cash, make scheduled payments or
refinance our obligations depends on our successful financial
and operating performance. Our financial and operating
performance, cash flow and capital resources depend upon
prevailing economic conditions and various financial, business
and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. These
factors include among others:
|
|
|
|
|
economic and competitive conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
operating difficulties, increased operating costs or pricing
pressures we may experience; and
|
|
|
|
delays in implementing any strategic projects.
|
If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund
our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or
delay capital expenditures, sell material assets or operations,
obtain additional capital or restructure our debt. If we are
required to take any actions referred to above, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that we
would be able to take any of these actions on terms acceptable
to us, or at all, that these actions would enable us to continue
to satisfy our capital requirements or that these actions would
be permitted under the terms of our various debt agreements, in
any of which events the default and cross-default risks set
forth in the risk factor below titled Restrictive
covenants in our debt instruments restrict or prohibit our
ability to engage in or enter into a variety of transactions,
which could adversely restrict our financial and operating
flexibility and subject us to other risks would become
relevant.
Despite our
current indebtedness levels and the restrictive covenants set
forth in agreements governing our indebtedness, we and our
subsidiaries may still incur significant additional
indebtedness, including secured indebtedness. Incurring more
indebtedness could increase the risks associated with our
substantial indebtedness.
Subject to the restrictions in our senior secured credit
facilities and the indentures governing our 7.25% senior notes
due 2010, or 2010 Notes, our 8.875% senior notes due 2011, or
2011 Notes, our 8.75% debentures due 2013, or 2013 Debentures,
our 2014 Notes and our 8% senior secured notes due 2016, or 2016
Notes, we and certain of our subsidiaries may incur significant
additional indebtedness, including additional secured
indebtedness. Although the terms of our senior secured credit
facilities and the indentures governing our 2010 Notes, our 2011
Notes, our 2013 Debentures, our 2014 Notes and our 2016 Notes
contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional
indebtedness, these
19
restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and
exceptions, and additional indebtedness incurred in compliance
with these restrictions could be significant. If new debt is
added to our and our subsidiaries current debt levels, the
related risks that we now face could increase.
Restrictive
covenants in our debt instruments restrict or prohibit our
ability to engage in or enter into a variety of transactions,
which could adversely restrict our financial and operating
flexibility and subject us to other risks.
The indentures governing our 2010 Notes, our 2011 Notes, our
2013 Debentures, our 2014 Notes, our 2016 Notes and our senior
secured credit facilities, contain various restrictive covenants
that limit our and our subsidiaries ability to take
certain actions. In particular, these agreements limit our and
our subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
make restricted payments (including paying dividends on,
redeeming or repurchasing our capital stock);
|
|
|
|
issue preferred stock of subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
create liens on our assets to secure debt;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain types of transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
place restrictions on the ability of restricted subsidiaries to
make payments to us;
|
|
|
|
merge, consolidate or transfer substantially all of our assets;
and
|
|
|
|
transfer and sell assets.
|
Any or all of these covenants could have a material adverse
effect on our business by limiting our ability to take advantage
of financing, merger and acquisition or other corporate
opportunities and to fund our operations. Any future debt could
also contain financial and other covenants more restrictive than
those imposed under our senior secured credit facilities and the
indentures governing our debt securities.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in any debt instrument
governing our current or future indebtedness could result in a
default under that instrument and, due to cross-default and
cross-acceleration provisions, could result in a default under
our other debt instruments. Upon the occurrence of an event of
default under the senior secured credit facilities or any other
debt instrument, lenders representing more than 50% of our
senior secured term credit facility or more than 50% of our
senior secured revolving credit facility, or any indenture
trustee or holders of at least 25% of any series of our debt
securities could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be
immediately due and payable and, with respect to the revolving
credit and letter of credit components of our senior secured
credit facilities, terminate all commitments to extend further
credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders
could proceed against the collateral granted to them, if any, to
secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under our current or
future indebtedness were to so accelerate the payment of the
indebtedness, we cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow
would be sufficient to repay in full our outstanding
indebtedness, in which event we likely would seek reorganization
or protection under bankruptcy or other, similar laws.
Some of our
debt, including the borrowings under our senior secured credit
facilities, is based on variable rates of interest, which could
result in higher interest expenses in the event of an increase
in interest rates.
As of June 20, 2009, approximately $900 million, or
44% of our total indebtedness, was subject to variable interest
rates. If we borrow additional amounts under the revolving
portion of our senior
20
secured credit facilities, the interest rates on those
borrowings may vary depending on the base rate or Eurodollar
Rate (LIBOR). A 1% increase in the weighted average interest
rates on our variable rate debt outstanding as of June 20,
2009, would result in higher interest expense of approximately
$9 million per year.
Risks Relating to
this Offering and Our Common Stock
There has not
been a public market for our shares since 2003 and an active
market may not develop or be maintained, which could limit your
ability to sell shares of our common stock.
Before this offering, there has not been a public market for our
shares of common stock since 2003. Although we intend to apply
to list the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or
NYSE, an active public market for our shares may not develop or
be sustained after this offering. The initial public offering
price will be determined by negotiations between the
underwriters and our Board of Directors and may not be
representative of the market price at which our shares of common
stock will trade after this offering. In particular, we cannot
assure you that you will be able to resell our shares at or
above the initial public offering price.
We are a
controlled company, controlled by David H. Murdock,
whose interests in our business may be different from
yours.
Upon completion of this offering, David H. Murdock and his
affiliates will own
approximately shares,
or %, of our outstanding common
stock. Mr. Murdock and his affiliates will, for the
foreseeable future, have significant influence over our
management and affairs, and will be able to control virtually
all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the
election of directors and significant corporate transactions
such as mergers or other sales of our company or assets.
David H. Murdock and his controlled companies are able to,
subject to applicable law, designate a majority of the members
of our Board of Directors and control actions to be taken by us
and our Board of Directors, including amendments to our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws and approval of
significant corporate transactions, including mergers and sales
of substantially all of our assets. The directors so elected
will have the authority, subject to the terms of our
indebtedness and the rules and regulations of the NYSE, to issue
additional stock, implement stock repurchase programs, declare
dividends and make other decisions. Because of the equity
ownership of Mr. Murdock, we are considered a
controlled company for the purposes of the NYSE
listing requirements. As such, we would be exempt from the NYSE
corporate governance requirements that our Board of Directors,
our Corporate Compensation and Benefits Committee and our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet the standard
of independence established by those corporate governance
requirements. However, upon consummation of this offering, we
will not need to rely on this exemption, and will be fully
compliant with all NYSE corporate governance standards with a
majority independent board and fully independent committees. The
NYSE independence standards are intended to ensure that
directors who meet the independence standard are free of any
conflicting interest that could influence their actions as
directors. It is possible that the interests of Mr. Murdock
may in some circumstances conflict with our interests and the
interests of our other stockholders.
The value of
our common stock could be volatile.
The overall market and the price of our common stock may
fluctuate greatly. The trading price of our common stock may be
significantly affected by various factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
quarterly fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in investors and analysts perception of the
business risks and conditions of our business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance
expectations of financial analysts or investors;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity
research analysts;
|
|
|
|
termination of
lock-up
agreements or other restrictions on the ability of our existing
stockholder to sell his shares after this offering;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the stock prices of our peer companies or in
stock markets in general; and
|
|
|
|
general economic or political conditions.
|
Our charter
documents contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a
change of control.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of
us, even if the change in control would be beneficial to
stockholders. These provisions include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
division of our Board of Directors into three classes, with each
class serving a staggered three-year term;
|
|
|
|
removal of directors by stockholders by a supermajority of
two-thirds of the outstanding shares;
|
|
|
|
ability of the Board of Directors to authorize the issuance of
preferred stock in series without stockholder approval;
|
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
nominations for election to the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
prohibitions on our stockholders from acting by written consent
and limitations on calling special meetings.
|
Future sales
of our common stock may lower our stock price.
If our existing stockholder sells a large number of shares of
our common stock following this offering, the market price of
our common stock could decline significantly. In addition, the
perception in the public market that our existing stockholder
might sell shares of common stock could depress the market price
of our common stock, regardless of the actual plans of our
existing stockholder. In connection with the Trust offering, an
affiliate of our existing stockholder has agreed to sell to the
Trust up
to shares
of common stock deliverable upon exchange of the Trusts
securities (or up
to shares
of common stock if the initial purchasers option to
purchase additional Trust securities in the Trust offering is
exercised in full). Although the affiliate has the option to
settle its obligation to the Trust in cash, all such shares
could be delivered upon exchange of the Trusts securities
on , 2012. Any
such shares delivered upon exchange will be freely tradable
under the Securities Act. All other shares of common stock
(or shares)
held by our existing stockholder are subject to a
lock-up
agreement restricting the sale of those shares
for days from the date of
this prospectus. However, the underwriters may waive this
restriction and allow our existing stockholder to sell shares at
any time.
After this offering, we intend to register
approximately
shares of common stock that will be reserved for issuance under
our stock incentive plan. Once we register these shares, they
can be sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to
restrictions under the securities laws applicable to resales by
affiliates. See Executive Compensation Stock
Incentive Plan.
Purchasers in
this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution
in net tangible book value.
The initial public offering price per share is expected to be
substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share
of our outstanding common stock. Purchasers of shares in this
offering will experience immediate dilution in the net tangible
book value of their shares. Based on an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share, the
mid-point of the range set forth on the cover of this
22
prospectus, dilution per share in this offering will be
$ per share
(or % of the price). Further, if we
issue additional equity securities to raise additional capital,
your ownership interest in our company may be diluted and the
value of your investment may be reduced. See
Dilution.
We do not
expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable
future.
Except for the potential transfer of the non-core assets
described under the heading Summary
Contemplated Transactions in Connection with the Offering,
we do not anticipate paying any dividends to our stockholders
for the foreseeable future. The agreements governing our
indebtedness also restrict our ability to pay dividends.
Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your common
stock in order to generate cash flow from your investment. You
may not receive a gain on your investment when you sell our
common stock and may lose some or all of the amount of your
investment. Any determination to pay dividends in the future
will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and
will depend on our results of operations, financial conditions,
contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law
and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.
We could incur
increased costs as a result of being a publicly-traded
company.
As a company with publicly-traded securities, we could incur
significant legal, accounting and other expenses not presently
incurred. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well
as rules promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, and the NYSE, require us to adopt corporate
governance practices applicable to U.S. public companies.
These rules and regulations may increase our legal and financial
compliance costs.
If we do not
timely satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the trading price of our common
stock could be adversely affected.
As a voluntary filer with the SEC, we are currently subject to
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX, as a
non-accelerated filer. SOX requires us to document and test the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with an established internal control framework and
to report on our conclusion as to the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. Our annual report for
fiscal year ended January 3, 2009 included
managements first report of internal control over
financial reporting. Beginning with the fiscal year ending
January 2, 2010, our independent registered public
accounting firm is also required to test, evaluate and report on
Doles internal control over financial reporting. Any
delays or difficulty in satisfying the requirements of SOX
could, among other things, cause investors to lose confidence
in, or otherwise be unable to rely on, the accuracy of our
reported financial information, which could adversely affect the
trading price of our common stock.
23
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains statements which, to the extent that
they do not recite historical fact, constitute forward-looking
statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that
they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and
may include the words may, will,
could, should, would,
believe, expect, anticipate,
estimate, intend, plan or
other words or expressions of similar meaning. We have based
these forward-looking statements on our current expectations
about future events. The forward-looking statements include
statements that reflect managements beliefs, plans,
objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations and intentions
with respect to our financial condition, results of operations,
future performance and business, including statements relating
to our business strategy and our current and future development
plans.
The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our
actual financial condition, results of operations and future
performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied
in this prospectus include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in laws, regulations, rules, quotas, tariffs, export and
import laws;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions that affect the production, transportation,
storage, import and export of fresh produce or packaged foods;
|
|
|
|
market responses to industry volume pressures;
|
|
|
|
DBCP litigation;
|
|
|
|
outcome of the appeal of the European Commissions Decision
imposing a fine and assessing antitrust violations;
|
|
|
|
product and raw materials supplies and pricing;
|
|
|
|
energy supply and pricing;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest and currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
political changes and economic crises;
|
|
|
|
security risks in foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
international conflict;
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
labor disruptions, strikes or work stoppages;
|
|
|
|
loss of important intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
|
other factors disclosed in this prospectus.
|
In addition, this prospectus contains industry data related to
our business and the markets in which we operate. This data
includes projections that are based on a number of assumptions.
If these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual results
could differ from the projections.
We urge you to review carefully this prospectus, particularly
the section Risk Factors, for a more complete
discussion of the risks of an investment in our common stock.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, level of activity, performance or achievements.
Many factors discussed in this prospectus, some of which are
beyond our control, will be important in determining our future
performance. Consequently, actual results may differ materially
from those that might be anticipated from forward-looking
statements. In light of these and other uncertainties, you
should not regard the inclusion of a forward-looking statement
in this prospectus as a representation by us that our plans and
objectives will be achieved, and you should not place undue
reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by law.
24
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds (after deducting the
underwriting discount payable to the underwriters and our
estimated offering expenses) from this offering will be
$ million
($ million if the
underwriters exercise their option to acquire additional shares
from us in full), based upon an assumed initial public offering
price of $ per share, which is the
mid-point of the offering range indicated on the cover of this
prospectus.
We expect to use the net proceeds to pay down indebtedness.
Until we use the net proceeds as described above, we intend to
invest the net proceeds in short-term securities.
MARKET SHARE,
RANKING AND SIMILAR INFORMATION
The market share, ranking and other information contained in
this prospectus is based either on our own estimates,
independent industry publications, reports by market research
firms or other published independent sources. In each case, we
believe that they are reasonable estimates. Market share
information is subject to change, however, and cannot always be
verified with complete certainty due to limits on the
availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature
of the data-gathering process and other limitations and
uncertainties inherent in any statistical survey of market
share. In addition, customer preferences can and do change and
the definition of the relevant market is a matter of judgment
and analysis. As a result, you should be aware that market
share, ranking and other similar information set forth in this
prospectus and estimates and beliefs based on such data, may not
be reliable. Market share data for our fresh fruits and fresh
vegetables segments is based on unit sales, while market share
data for our packaged foods segment is based on dollar amount
sold.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future
earnings, if any, to operate our business and finance future
growth strategies while also continuing to pay down
indebtedness. Any determination to pay dividends in the future
will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and
will depend on our results of operations, financial conditions,
contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law
and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant. In
addition, as described in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Guarantees, Contingencies and Debt
Covenants, our ability to pay cash dividends is limited by
the terms of our existing senior notes indenture and senior
secured facilities indebtedness, and may be limited by the
instruments governing our future indebtedness.
Except for a $15 million cash dividend declared on
June 22, 2009 and paid to DHM Holdings in four installments
on June 23, 2009, July 20, 2009, August 18, 2009
and August 31, 2009, we have not paid any dividends since
December 31, 2006. As described under
Summary Contemplated Transactions in
Connection with the Offering, we will transfer,
potentially through a dividend, ownership interests in one
parcel of idle farmland of approximately 1,600 acres in
Honduras with a fair market value of approximately
$12 million and a book value of approximately $150,000, to
our existing stockholder.
25
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our consolidated cash and cash
equivalents and capitalization as of June 20, 2009 on an
actual basis, and on a pro forma basis giving effect to the pro
forma adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. As described under Summary
Contemplated Transactions in Connection with the Offering,
DHM Holdings currently owns 100% of our outstanding common stock
and 85% of WWP, a hotel operating company. The pro forma columns
in the capitalization table below give effect to the following:
(i) the Merger Transaction in which Dole will be the
surviving entity, or Merged Dole, (ii) the transfer of
Merged Doles 85% interest in WWP and approximately
$30 million of Merged Doles debt to other affiliates
of David H. Murdock, or the Transfer Transaction, (iii) the
receipt of net proceeds from the offering of $315 million
of senior secured notes due 2016 and the application of those
proceeds, available cash on hand and drawings under the
revolving credit facility to refinance $383 million of the
2010 Notes, or the Refinancing Transaction, and (iv) the
receipt of net proceeds from the sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share, the mid-point of the range set forth on the front cover
of this prospectus, and after deducting the underwriting
discount and estimated offering expenses, and the application of
the net proceeds to repay
$ of
our debt and various other related adjustments more fully
described in the notes below.
The Merger Transaction and the Transfer Transaction are expected
to occur in the order presented above just prior to the
consummation of this offering. The Refinancing Transaction
occurred on September 25, 2009. In connection with the Merger
Transaction, it is contemplated that we will complete a share
conversion that will have the effect of increasing the number of
outstanding shares in a manner similar to that of a stock split.
Because the size and other terms of this offering, including the
specific debt obligations to be repaid, as well as the exchange
ratio in the Merger Transaction, have not yet been finalized,
any related pro forma adjustments have not been included. In
addition, following the Merger Transaction, we will transfer
ownership interests in one parcel of idle farm land of
approximately 1,600 acres in Honduras, with a fair market
value of approximately $12 million and a book value of
approximately $150,000, to our existing stockholder. We expect
to account for the transfer of ownership interests in such idle
farm land in Honduras to our existing stockholder as a transfer
of assets between entities under common control at historical
carryover basis. The pro forma adjustments reflected below have
not been adjusted for any proposed land transfer because the
carryover basis of the assets to be transferred is insignificant.
The pro forma adjustments reflected below are subject to change
and are based upon available information and certain assumptions
that Dole believes are reasonable. You should read this
capitalization table together with Use of Proceeds,
Selected Consolidated Financial Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for the
|
|
|
Pro Forma as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
for the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for the
|
|
|
Transaction, the
|
|
|
Transaction, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Transfer Transaction,
|
|
|
|
Actual Dole
|
|
|
Adjusted for the
|
|
|
Transaction and
|
|
|
Transaction, and
|
|
|
Refinancing
|
|
|
|
Food
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
the Transfer
|
|
|
the Refinancing
|
|
|
Transaction and
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Transaction(1)
|
|
|
Transaction(2)
|
|
|
Transaction(3)
|
|
|
this Offering(4)(5)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
|
$
|
107,924
|
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
|
$
|
79,919
|
|
|
$
|
79,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% notes due 2010
|
|
$
|
383,000
|
|
|
$
|
383,000
|
|
|
$
|
383,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
8.875% notes due 2011
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.75% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for the
|
|
|
Pro Forma as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
for the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for the
|
|
|
Transaction, the
|
|
|
Transaction, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Transfer Transaction,
|
|
|
|
Actual Dole
|
|
|
Adjusted for the
|
|
|
Transaction and
|
|
|
Transaction, and
|
|
|
Refinancing
|
|
|
|
Food
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
the Transfer
|
|
|
the Refinancing
|
|
|
Transaction and
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Transaction(1)
|
|
|
Transaction(2)
|
|
|
Transaction(3)
|
|
|
this Offering(4)(5)
|
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% notes due 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.875% notes due 2014
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan facilities
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
119,172
|
|
|
|
119,172
|
|
|
|
119,172
|
|
|
|
119,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(24,311
|
)
|
|
|
(24,311
|
)
|
|
|
(24,311
|
)
|
|
|
(30,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,011,061
|
|
|
|
2,146,061
|
|
|
|
2,096,061
|
|
|
|
2,076,061
|
|
|
|
1,633,468
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, no shares authorized or
issued and outstanding,
actual; shares
authorized and no shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized, issued and outstanding,
actual; shares
authorized
and shares
issued and outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
409,681
|
|
|
|
481,475
|
|
|
|
481,475
|
|
|
|
481,475
|
|
|
|
949,475
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
159,087
|
|
|
|
276,767
|
|
|
|
58,449
|
|
|
|
57,912
|
|
|
|
26,942
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
528,280
|
|
|
|
717,754
|
|
|
|
499,436
|
|
|
|
498,899
|
|
|
|
935,929
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
74,282
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
555,455
|
|
|
|
792,036
|
|
|
|
526,611
|
|
|
|
526,074
|
|
|
|
963,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
2,566,516
|
|
|
$
|
2,938,097
|
|
|
$
|
2,622,672
|
|
|
$
|
2,602,135
|
|
|
$
|
2,596,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with the Merger Transaction, we will assume an
additional $135 million of DHM Holdings debt and add an
additional $236 million of equity related to DHM Holdings
and WWP. |
|
(2) |
|
Upon the closing of the Transfer Transaction, all balances
related to our 85% interest in WWP and approximately
$30 million of our debt will be transferred to an entity
that is unrelated to us. In addition, the Transfer Transaction
also reflects a $20 million reduction in DHM Holdings debt
from proceeds of a capital contribution received from DHM
Holdings parent on June 22, 2009. As a result of the
Transfer Transaction, total debt and total shareholders
equity will decrease by $50 million and $265 million,
respectively. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The Refinancing Transaction reflects the use of net proceeds of
$302 million from the offering of $315 million senior
secured notes due 2016, recorded net of original discount of
approximately $6 million, and drawings under the revolving
credit facility to redeem $363 million outstanding
principal amount of the 2010 Notes, after reflecting the payment
of $20 million of principal made after June 20, 2009
with available cash on hand. Estimated transaction costs of
approximately $8 million that will be incurred in
connection with the Refinancing Transaction will be paid with
cash on hand. |
27
|
|
|
|
|
Equity has also been adjusted to reflect the write-off of
$537 thousand of debt issuance costs related to the pay
down of the 2010 Notes. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ ,
the mid-point of the range set forth on the front cover of this
prospectus, would result in an approximately
$ million increase or
decrease in each of the as adjusted cash and cash equivalents,
as adjusted additional paid-in capital, as adjusted total
shareholders equity and as adjusted total capitalization,
assuming the number of shares offered by Dole set forth on the
front cover of this prospectus, remains the same, and after
deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by Dole. An increase or decrease of
1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by Dole
would increase or decrease as adjusted cash and cash
equivalents, as adjusted additional paid-in capital, as adjusted
total shareholders equity and as adjusted total
capitalization by approximately
$ million assuming the
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of
the range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus,
remains the same and after deducting the underwriting discount
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The as adjusted
information discussed above is illustrative only and will adjust
based on the actual initial public offering price and other
terms of this offering. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Net proceeds received from this offering will be used to pay
transaction related fees and costs of approximately
$32 million, and to extinguish approximately
$85 million of the WWP debt that was assumed by us as a
result of the Merger Transaction, and the remaining net proceeds
of $383 million will be used to pay down
$ million of our debt. In addition, equity has
been adjusted by approximately $ million to
reflect the write-off of debt issuance costs and debt discount
related to early retirement of our debt. |
28
DILUTION
Our net tangible book value at June 20, 2009 was
$ million, or
$ per share. Net tangible book
value per share before the offering has been determined by
dividing net tangible book value (total book value of tangible
assets less total liabilities) by the number of shares of common
stock outstanding at June 20, 2009 (after giving effect to
the Merger Transaction).
After giving effect to the sale of our common stock in this
offering at an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after
deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, our adjusted net tangible book value at
June 20, 2009 would have been
$ million or
$ per share. This represents an
immediate increase in net tangible book value per share of
$ to the existing stockholder and
dilution in net tangible book value per share of
$ to new investors who purchase
shares in the offering. The following table illustrates this per
share dilution to new investors:
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share at June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
new investors
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net tangible book value per share
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share, the
mid-point of the range set forth on the front cover of this
prospectus, would increase or decrease as adjusted net tangible
book value per share by approximately
$ million, or approximately
$ per share, and the dilution per
share to investors in this offering by approximately
$ per share, assuming that the
number of shares offered by us set forth on the front cover of
this prospectus remains the same and after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us. We may also increase or decrease the number of shares we are
offering. An increase of 1.0 million shares in the number
of shares offered by us would result in an as adjusted net
tangible book value of approximately
$ million, or approximately
$ per share, and the dilution per
share to investors in this offering would be approximately
$ per share, assuming the assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share, the mid-point of the range set forth on the front
cover of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. Similarly, a decrease of 1.0 million shares
in the number of shares offered by us would result in an as
adjusted net tangible book value of approximately
$ million, or approximately
$ per share, and the dilution per
share to investors in this offering would be approximately
$ per share, assuming the assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share, the mid-point of the range set forth on the front
cover of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. The as adjusted information discussed above is
illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual initial
public offering price and other terms of this offering.
The following table sets forth, on the as adjusted basis
described above, at June 20, 2009, the difference between
the number of shares of common stock purchased, the total
consideration paid and the average price per share paid by the
existing stockholder and by investors purchasing shares in this
offering, before deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share, the
mid-point of the range set forth on the front cover of this
prospectus, would increase or decrease total consideration paid
by new investors and total consideration paid by all
stockholders by $ million,
assuming that the number of shares offered by us set forth on
the front cover of this prospectus, remains the same, and after
deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us. An increase or decrease of
1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us
would increase or decrease the total consideration paid to us by
new investors and total consideration paid to us by all
stockholders by $ million,
assuming the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of the
range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus, remains
the same and after deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
30
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements are derived from the historical financial
statements of Dole included elsewhere in this prospectus. As
described under Summary Contemplated
Transactions in Connection with the Offering, DHM Holdings
currently owns 100% of our outstanding common stock and 85% of
WWP, a hotel operating company. The historical financial
statements of Dole have been adjusted to give effect to the
following: (i) the Merger Transaction, in which we will be
the surviving entity, (ii) the Transfer Transaction,
(iii) the Refinancing Transaction, and (iv) this
offering and the application of the net proceeds thereof. See
Capitalization for more information on each of these
transactions. The Merger Transaction and the Transfer
Transaction are expected to occur in the order presented above
just prior to the consummation of this offering. In connection
with the Refinancing Transaction, on September 25, 2009, Dole
completed the sale and issuance of $315 million aggregate
principal amount of 8% Senior Secured Notes due October 1,
2016, or the 2016 Notes, at a discount of approximately
$6.2 million. Dole has issued a redemption notice for the
remaining principal amount outstanding of the 2010 Notes of
$363 million, which reflects the repayment of
$20 million of principal by Dole after June 20, 2009,
and has irrevocably deposited the net proceeds from the sale and
issuance of the 2016 Notes with the trustee of the
2010 Notes to be used to repay such notes. In connection
with the Merger Transaction, it is contemplated that we will
complete a share conversion that will have the effect of
increasing the number of outstanding shares in a manner similar
to that of a stock split. Because the size and other terms of
this offering, including the specific debt obligations to be
repaid from the net proceeds from this offering, as well as the
exchange ratio in the Merger Transaction, have not yet been
finalized, any related pro forma adjustments have not been
included. In addition, following the Merger Transaction, we will
transfer ownership interests in one parcel of idle farm land of
approximately 1,600 acres in Honduras, with a fair market
value of approximately $12 million and a book value of
approximately $150,000, to our existing stockholder. We expect
to account for the transfer of ownership interests in such idle
farm land in Honduras to other affiliates of our existing
stockholder as a transfer of assets between entities under
common control at historical carryover basis. The unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements have not been
adjusted for any proposed land transfer because the carryover
basis for such amount is insignificant. In addition, the pro
forma adjustments are based upon available information and
certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable and
may change as additional information becomes available.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements were prepared to illustrate the estimated effects of
the transactions described above. The unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet gives effect to the
transactions as if the transactions had occurred as of
June 20, 2009. The unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the half year ended
June 20, 2009 and the fiscal year ended January 3,
2009 give effect to the transactions as if they had occurred as
of December 30, 2007, the first day of the 2008 fiscal
year. The pro forma adjustments are based upon assumptions that
Dole believes are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet is provided for informational
purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of our financial
position that would have existed if the transactions were
completed on June 20, 2009. The unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statements of operations are also
provided for informational purposes only and are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred
if the transactions were completed on December 30, 2007 nor
are they necessarily indicative of our future operating results.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with
(i) Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included
elsewhere in this prospectus and (ii) the historical
consolidated financial statements for Dole and DHM Holdings,
which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
31
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As of June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer Transaction,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma for
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
the Refinancing
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
Adjustments for the
|
|
|
the Merger
|
|
|
the Transfer
|
|
|
the Refinancing
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Transaction and
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Merger Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
this Offering
|
|
|
this Offering
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
107,924
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)(b)
|
|
$
|
(28,000
|
)(c)
|
|
$
|
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
79,919
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
803,897
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
(a)
|
|
|
805,410
|
|
|
|
(1,513
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803,897
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
725,999
|
|
|
|
479
|
(a)
|
|
|
726,478
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,999
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
76,640
|
|
|
|
161
|
(a)
|
|
|
76,801
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,640
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
22,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,180
|
|
Assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,831,017
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
1,833,175
|
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
(28,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,803,017
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
8,070
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
76,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,537
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,017,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017,062
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335,006
|
(a)
|
|
|
335,006
|
|
|
|
(335,006
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
713,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,923
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
172,691
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
(a)
|
|
|
173,903
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)(b)
|
|
|
7,463
|
(d)
|
|
|
(5,563
|
)(k)
|
|
|
175,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
$
|
340,376
|
|
|
$
|
4,564,216
|
|
|
$
|
(339,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,198,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
485,213
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
(a)
|
|
|
486,225
|
|
|
|
(1,012
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,213
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
416,922
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
(a)
|
|
|
425,613
|
|
|
|
(8,691
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,922
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
390,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(383,000
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,896
|
|
Current portion of Hotel and Wellness Center long term-debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
(a)
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
(50,000
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)(j)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,339,286
|
|
|
|
144,703
|
|
|
|
1,483,989
|
|
|
|
(59,703
|
)
|
|
|
(383,000
|
)
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
956,286
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,576,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,576,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,000
|
(e)
|
|
|
(357,593
|
)(j)
|
|
|
1,581,432
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
257,512
|
|
|
|
(33,192
|
)(a)
|
|
|
224,320
|
|
|
|
(14,769
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,551
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
495,562
|
|
|
|
(7,716
|
)(a)
|
|
|
487,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,846
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
|
528,280
|
|
|
|
189,474
|
(a)
|
|
|
717,754
|
|
|
|
(218,318
|
)(b)
|
|
|
(537
|
)(f)
|
|
|
437,030
|
(l)
|
|
|
935,929
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
47,107
|
(a)
|
|
|
74,282
|
|
|
|
(47,107
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
555,455
|
|
|
|
236,581
|
|
|
|
792,036
|
|
|
|
(265,425
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
437,030
|
|
|
|
963,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
$
|
340,376
|
|
|
$
|
4,564,216
|
|
|
$
|
(339,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,198,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
32
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Half Year ended June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Merger Transaction,
|
|
|
|
Half Year
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
the Transfer Transaction,
|
|
|
|
Ended June 20,
|
|
|
the Merger
|
|
|
for the Merger
|
|
|
the Transfer
|
|
|
the Refinancing
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Refinancing Transaction,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
this Offering
|
|
|
and this Offering
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
|
$
|
15,943
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
3,327,255
|
|
|
$
|
(15,943
|
)(b)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(2,885,325
|
)
|
|
|
(20,643
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(2,905,968
|
)
|
|
|
20,643
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,885,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
425,987
|
|
|
|
(4,700
|
)
|
|
|
421,287
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,987
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(211,350
|
)
|
|
|
(8,654
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(220,004
|
)
|
|
|
8,654
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211,350
|
)
|
Gain on assets sales
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
231,430
|
|
|
|
(13,354
|
)
|
|
|
218,076
|
|
|
|
13,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,430
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
2
|
(a)
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(87,788
|
)
|
|
|
(3,215
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(91,003
|
)
|
|
|
1,191(b
|
)
|
|
|
(994
|
)(g)
|
|
|
20,348
|
(m)
|
|
|
(70,458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity earnings
|
|
|
135,684
|
|
|
|
(16,567
|
)(a)
|
|
|
119,117
|
|
|
|
14,543
|
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
20,348
|
|
|
|
153,014
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(17,011
|
)
|
|
|
1,782
|
(a)
|
|
|
(15,229
|
)
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)(b)
|
|
|
373
|
(h)
|
|
|
(7,630
|
)(h)
|
|
|
(23,509
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
123,144
|
|
|
$
|
(14,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
108,359
|
|
|
$
|
13,520
|
|
|
$
|
(621
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
133,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
123,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
123,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
33
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Pro Forma for the
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Refinancing
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
the Merger
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
the Transfer
|
|
|
the Refinancing
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
Transaction, and
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
this Offering
|
|
|
this Offering
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
|
$
|
39,796
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
7,659,748
|
|
|
$
|
(39,796
|
)(b)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(6,862,892
|
)
|
|
|
(46,395
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(6,909,287
|
)
|
|
|
46,395
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,862,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
757,060
|
|
|
|
(6,599
|
)
|
|
|
750,461
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,060
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(509,418
|
)
|
|
|
(21,387
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(530,805
|
)
|
|
|
21,387
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509,418
|
)
|
Gain on assets sales
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
274,618
|
|
|
|
(27,986
|
)
|
|
|
246,632
|
|
|
|
27,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,618
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
|
|
75
|
(a)
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(174,485
|
)
|
|
|
(10,410
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(184,895
|
)
|
|
|
3,856
|
(b)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)(g)
|
|
|
36,696
|
(m)
|
|
|
(145,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity earnings
|
|
|
92,522
|
|
|
|
(38,321
|
)
|
|
|
54,201
|
|
|
|
31,767
|
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
36,696
|
|
|
|
121,424
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
48,015
|
|
|
|
12,891
|
(a)
|
|
|
60,906
|
|
|
|
(10,433
|
)(b)
|
|
|
465
|
(h)
|
|
|
(13,761
|
)(h)
|
|
|
37,177
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
146,925
|
|
|
$
|
(25,430
|
)
|
|
$
|
121,495
|
|
|
$
|
21,334
|
|
|
$
|
(775
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,935
|
|
|
$
|
164,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
146,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
146,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
34
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Notes Applying to
the Merger Transaction
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pro forma adjustments for the Merger Transaction reflect the
merger of DHM Holdings with and into Dole with Dole
continuing as the surviving legal entity. Prior to the Merger
Transaction, DHM Holdings assets consisted of 100% of the
common stock of Dole and an 85% ownership interest in WWP, and
DHM Holdings liabilities consisted of a senior secured credit
facility, that was used to finance the construction of a hotel
and wellness center and that was collateralized by the assets of
WWP, or the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt. As a
result, the pro forma adjustments for the Merger Transaction
solely consist of those needed to add the balances of
DHM Holdings that are not currently part of Doles
consolidated financial information to the existing balances of
Dole, as the balances of DHM Holdings have not been
previously presented on a consolidated basis with the balances
of Dole. As of June 20, 2009, approximately
$135 million of Hotel and Wellness Center Debt was
outstanding. On June 22, 2009, the balance outstanding
under the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt was reduced by
$20 million with proceeds from a capital contribution by
DHM Holdings parent on that date. In connection with the
Merger Transaction, net deferred tax assets of DHM Holdings of
$33,192,000 including deferred tax assets for net operating loss
carryforwards of $47,961,000 and deferred tax liabilities of
$14,769,000 are included as a pro forma adjustment to our
deferred income tax liabilities. Additionally, $7,716,000 of
liabilities for uncertain tax positions of Dole have been
reclassified from other long-term liabilities to net deferred
tax liabilities in order to properly classify these liabilities
against deferred tax assets for net operating losses of DHM
Holdings. This is consistent with the presentation requirements
of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Merger Transaction will be accounted for as a common control
merger with carryover basis for the balances transferred.
Subsequent to the merger, the Merger Transaction will be
presented in our historical financial statements on a
retrospective basis, reflecting the balances on a merged basis
for all periods presented, similar to a pooling of interests. |
Notes Applying to
the Transfer Transaction
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Pro forma adjustments for the Transfer Transaction reflect the
transfer of the membership interest in WWP and approximately
$30 million of the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt to
affiliates of David H. Murdock that are not subsidiaries of
ours. In addition, the Transfer Transaction also reflects the
$20 million reduction in the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
as described in note (a). As a result of the transfer, the
historical results of the Hotel and Wellness Center and the
related net assets have been removed from the pro forma
financial statements along with approximately $50 million
of the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt and a proportional amount
of debt issuance costs and interest expense. The income
statement activity of the Hotel and Wellness Center for
historical periods, which is currently reflected in the pro
forma financial statements as a component of continuing
operations, is expected to be reflected in our discontinued
operations subsequent to completion of the Transfer Transaction. |
35
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the Transfer Transaction, the Hotel and Wellness
Center Debt will be reduced by the following transactions
(dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center Debt that will be transferred outside
of us
|
|
$
|
(30,000
|
)
|
Reduction of principal of the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt due
to the June 22, 2009 capital contribution received from DHM
Holdings parent
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
|
|
$
|
(50,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to the Transfer Transaction, and prior to the
completion of this offering, approximately $85 million of
the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt will remain outstanding. The
remaining balance will be repaid with proceeds from this
offering (see note (i)). |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, Net: Represents the transfer of
other assets, net, principally associated with the Hotel and
Wellness Center that will be transferred out in connection with
the Transfer Transaction (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs related to the Hotel and Wellness
Center debt to be transferred
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
Other assets outside of the Hotel and Wellness Center to be
transferred
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to other assets, net
|
|
$
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities and Other Long-Term
Liabilities: The Transfer Transaction includes a pro forma
adjustment to deferred income tax liabilities of $14,769,000
representing the basis differences associated with the assets
and liabilities of the Hotel and Wellness Center that will be
transferred out in connection with the Transfer Transaction.
Consistent with the provisions of federal tax law, however, net
operating loss carryforwards of DHM Holdings existing at
June 20, 2009 will remain with the surviving entity
subsequent to the Merger Transaction and the Transfer
Transaction. Accordingly, the pro forma adjustment for the
Transfer Transaction of $14,769,000 differs from the pro forma
adjustment for the Merger Transaction of $33,192,000 due to the
deferred tax assets related to the net operating loss
carryforwards of $47,961,000. Such deferred tax assets of
$47,961,000 will continue to reflect the impact of the
reclassification of $7,716,000 of liabilities for uncertain tax
positions of Dole, after the Transfer Transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Attributable to DHM Holdings: The pro forma
adjustment to equity attributable to DHM Holdings represents the
net assets of the Hotel and Wellness Center that will be
transferred out in connection with the Transfer Transaction. The
pro forma adjustment is computed as follows (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments to total assets as a result of the
Transfer Transaction
|
|
$
|
(339,897
|
)
|
Pro forma adjustments to total liabilities as a result of the
Transfer Transaction
|
|
|
74,472
|
|
Pro forma adjustments to equity attributable to noncontrolling
interests of the Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
47,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to equity attributable to DHM Holdings
|
|
$
|
(218,318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: Represents the reduction in
interest expense related to the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
that will be transferred out in connection with the Transfer
Transaction (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half-Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
DHM Holdings interest expense related to the debt of the Hotel
and Wellness Center
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
|
$
|
10,410
|
|
Interest expense related to the portion of the Hotel and
Wellness Center debt to be repaid with proceeds from this
offering
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
(6,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments to decrease interest expense
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
$
|
3,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes: The pro forma adjustment to
income taxes reflects the impact of interest expense associated
with debt of the Hotel and Wellness Center transferred out in
connection with the Transfer Transaction. Only the portion of
the losses of DHM Holdings determined to be more likely than not
recoverable under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, has been given
a tax benefit in connection with the Merger Transaction
adjustments. The remaining losses do not include an income tax
benefit. The following comprises the pro forma adjustment to
income taxes as a result of the Transfer Transaction (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half-Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
DHM Holdings income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
(1,782
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,891
|
)
|
Adjustment of the income tax benefit due to the decrease in
interest expense related to the portion of the Hotel and
Wellness Center debt to be repaid with proceeds from this
offering
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments to decrease income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma adjustment to income tax benefit has been computed
using Doles U.S. estimated statutory income tax rate
of 37.5%. |
Notes Applying to
the Refinancing Transaction
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The net effect of
the Refinancing Transaction on cash is as follows (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Offering of $315 million senior secured notes due 2016
(with an original issue discount of $6 million)
|
|
$
|
309,000
|
|
Borrowings from the revolving credit facility
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Uses:
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010
|
|
|
(383,000
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(28,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Other Assets: Represents our estimated portion
of the transaction fees and costs attributable to the offering
of our $315 million senior secured notes due 2016 and the
write-off of deferred debt issuance costs on the
7.25% Senior Notes due 2010 (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs estimated to be incurred in connection with
our offering of our $315 million senior secured notes due
2016 that will be capitalized as part of the refinancing
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
Write-off of deferred debt issuance costs on the repayment of
the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to other assets
|
|
$
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Long-term Debt: Adjustments to the current
portion of long-term debt and to long-term debt as a result of
the Refinancing Transaction reflect the following (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to current portion of long-term debt as a result of
the repayment of our 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010
|
|
$
|
(383,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to long-term debt as a result of the issuance of our
$315 million senior secured notes due 2016, net of a
$6 million original issuance discount, and borrowings from
the revolving credit facility of $54,000
|
|
$
|
363,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Shareholders Equity: Shareholders
equity pro forma adjustment reflects the write-off of deferred
issuance costs of $537 thousand related to the repayment of
the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Interest Expense: Adjustments to interest
expense as a result of the Refinancing Transaction reflect the
following (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest expense (including amortization of debt issuance costs)
to be incurred on our $315 million senior secured notes due
2016
|
|
$
|
12,554
|
|
|
$
|
27,200
|
|
Less: Interest expense (including amortization of debt issuance
costs) incurred on our 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010
|
|
|
(11,560
|
)
|
|
|
(25,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments to increase interest expense
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma adjustments to interest expense for the half year
ended June 20, 2009 and for the year ended January 3,
2009 have been computed using the stated interest rate of 8% for
the $315 million senior secured notes due 2016. No pro
forma adjustment for interest expense has been made for the
anticipated additional borrowings under the revolving credit
facility of $54 million used to repay any remaining
principal amounts outstanding under the 2010 Notes given
the interest rates under the 2010 Notes and revolving
credit facility are substantially the same.
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Income Taxes: The income tax impacts of the
adjustments have been computed using Doles estimated U.S.
statutory income tax rate of 37.5%. |
Notes Applying to
this Offering
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Adjustment reflects
the net effect of this offering and the application of the net
proceeds therefrom on the cash balance, which has been adjusted
for the following transactions: (i) the proceeds from the
issuance
of shares
of our common stock at an assumed initial public offering price
of $ per share, the mid-point of
the range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus, and
after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses, (ii) the application of a portion of the net
proceeds to pay transaction related fees and costs,
(iii) the application of a portion of the net proceeds to
extinguish the remaining |
38
|
|
|
|
|
$85 million balance outstanding on the Hotel and Wellness
Center Debt and (iv) the application of the remaining net
proceeds to pay
down
of our debt (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Uses:
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
Repayment of Notes and Term Loans
|
|
|
(383,000
|
)
|
Transaction fees and costs
|
|
|
(32,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
|
Current Portion of Long-term debt and Long Term
Debt: Reflects the repayment of debt from the net
proceeds from the issuance of common stock as follows (dollars
in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
Notes and Term Loans, net of write off of debt discounts
|
|
|
357,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustment to Debt
|
|
|
442,593
|
|
Less: Adjustment for Hotel and Wellness Center Debt
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Long-term Debt
|
|
$
|
357,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) |
|
Other Assets: Represents the write-off of debt
issuance costs as a result of the application of a portion of
the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock to extinguish
the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt and to pay down a portion of
our debt. |
|
(l) |
|
Shareholders Equity: Adjustment to
shareholders equity is computed as follows (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds from the offering of common stock
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Less: Write-off of original deferred debt issuance costs and
debt discount
|
|
|
(30,970
|
)
|
Less: Estimated transaction fees and costs
|
|
|
(32,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment to shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
437,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, in connection with the offering, a stock incentive
plan will be adopted by Dole with certain awards to be granted
in connection with the offering. The Company expects that in
future years additional awards will be granted on a regular
basis and accordingly no pro forma adjustments have been
provided for in the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial statements. |
|
|
|
(m) |
|
Interest Expense: Adjustments to interest
expense reflect the elimination of interest expense on the Hotel
and Wellness Center Debt and the interest expense related to our
debt that will be repaid from the net proceeds of this offering
(see note (j)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half-Year
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Elimination of interest expense on the Hotel and Wellness Center
Debt
|
|
$
|
2,024
|
|
|
$
|
6,554
|
|
Elimination of interest expense as a result of principal
reductions on our notes and term loans
|
|
|
18,324
|
|
|
|
30,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments to decrease interest expense
|
|
$
|
20,348
|
|
|
$
|
36,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n) |
|
Earnings per share: Earnings per share
information is being presented on a pro forma basis to reflect
the effect of
a : share
conversion that is expected to occur in connection with the
Merger Transaction, and the impact of the pro forma adjustments
included herein on income from continuing operations. |
39
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth a summary of our selected
consolidated financial data. We derived the selected
consolidated financial data as of January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007 and for the years ended January 3,
2009, December 29, 2007, and December 30, 2006 from
our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data as
of December 30, 2006, December 31, 2005, and
January 1, 2005, and for the years ended December 31,
2005 and January 1, 2005 have been derived from our
financial statements for such years, which are not included in
this prospectus. Amounts from these previously audited financial
statements have been revised to reflect the reclassifications
required as a result of our adoption of FASB Statement
No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51, for which the related reclassification for such
years have not been audited, as well as the reclassification of
certain businesses as discontinued operations, for which the
related reclassifications have not been audited for the year
ended January 1, 2005.
We derived the selected consolidated financial data for the half
years ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 from our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus, which, in the opinion of our
management, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited
financial statements and reflect all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of our results of operations and financial position
for such periods. Results for the half years ended June 20,
2009 and June 14, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the entire year.
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below are not
necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and
should be read in conjunction with the discussion under the
heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
other financial information included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share and share data in
thousands)
|
|
|
Summary of Operations:(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
3,311
|
|
|
$
|
3,723
|
|
|
$
|
7,620
|
|
|
$
|
6,821
|
|
|
$
|
5,991
|
|
|
$
|
5,638
|
|
|
$
|
5,093
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(3)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company,
Inc.(3)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share, basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share and share data in
thousands)
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other Financial Metrics:(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT(4)
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(4)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin(5)
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet and Other Information:(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
4,758
|
|
|
|
4,365
|
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
|
|
4,612
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
4,327
|
|
Long-term debt (excludes current portion)
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
2,001
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
Cash dividends declared and paid to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses, net
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Capital additions from continuing operations
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Discontinued operations for the periods presented relate to the
reclassification of the Companys fresh-cut flowers and
North American citrus and pistachio operations to discontinued
operations during 2008 and 2007, respectively, the sale of the
Companys Pacific Coast Truck operations during 2006 and
the resolution during 2005 of a contingency related to the 2001
disposition of the Companys interest in Cervecería
Hondureña, S.A. |
|
(2) |
|
Dole sold its JP Fresh and Dole France subsidiaries during the
fourth quarter of 2008 to Compagnie Fruitière Paris, an
equity method affiliate. The historical periods presented
include the results of these entities as part of the Fresh Fruit
operating segment. |
|
(3) |
|
Dole adopted FASB Statement No. 160, or FAS 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51,
during the first quarter of 2009. Historical periods presented
have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. |
41
|
|
|
(4) |
|
EBIT is calculated by adding back interest expense and income
taxes to income (loss) from continuing operations. Adjusted
EBITDA is calculated by adding depreciation and amortization
from continuing operations to EBIT, by adding the net unrealized
loss or subtracting the net unrealized gains on certain
derivative instruments to EBIT (foreign currency and bunker fuel
hedges and the cross currency swap), by adding the foreign
currency loss or subtracting the foreign currency gain on the
vessel obligations to EBIT, and by subtracting the gain on asset
sales from EBIT. During the first quarter of 2007, all of the
Companys foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges were
designated as effective hedges of cash flows as defined by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, and
these designations were changed during the second quarter of
2007. Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, all unrealized
gains and losses related to these instruments have been recorded
in the consolidated statement of operations. During 2008, Dole
initiated an asset sale program in order to reduce debt with
proceeds generated from the sale of non-core assets. Gains on
asset sales for periods prior to the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2009 were not material. |
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not calculated or presented in
accordance with GAAP and EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not a
substitute for net income attributable to Dole Food Company,
Inc., net income, income from continuing operations, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure prescribed by
GAAP. Further, EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA as used herein are not
necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies. However, we have included EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
herein because management believes that EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
are useful performance measures for us. In addition, EBIT and
Adjusted EBITDA are presented because our management believes
that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts,
investors and others in the evaluation of our Company.
Management internally uses EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA for decision
making and to evaluate our performance. Refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in this
prospectus for further information regarding the use of non-GAAP
measures. EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss on vessel obligations
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin is defined as the ratio of Adjusted
EBITDA to net revenues. We present Adjusted EBITDA margin
because management believes that it is a useful performance
measure for us. |
42
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with
our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and
other financial information included in this prospectus. In
addition to historical consolidated financial information, the
following discussion contains forward-looking statements that
reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results
could differ materially. Factors that could cause or contribute
to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere
in this prospectus, particularly in Risk Factors.
General
Overview
We are the worlds leading producer, marketer and
distributor of fresh fruit and fresh vegetables, including an
expanding line of value-added products. In the markets we serve,
we hold the number 1 or number 2 market share position
in our key product categories, including bananas, packaged
salads and packaged fruit. For the last twelve months ended
June 20, 2009, we had revenues of approximately
$7.2 billion, Adjusted EBITDA of approximately
$445 million and net income attributable to Dole Food
Company, Inc. of approximately $92 million.
We provide wholesale, retail and institutional customers around
the world with high quality food products that bear the
DOLE®
trademarks. We believe the DOLE trademarks and our products have
global appeal as they offer value and convenience, while also
benefiting from the growing focus on health and wellness among
consumers worldwide.
Founded in 1851, we have built a fully-integrated operating
platform that allows us to source, grow, process, market and
distribute our nearly 200 products in more than 90 countries. We
source our products worldwide both directly on Dole-owned or
leased land and through associated producer and independent
grower arrangements under which we provide varying degrees of
farming, harvesting, packing, shipping and marketing services.
We then use our global cold storage supply chain that features
the largest dedicated refrigerated containerized fleet in the
world, as well as an extensive network of packaging, ripening
and distribution centers, to deliver fresh Dole products to
market.
We believe we are well-positioned to take advantage of worldwide
growth opportunities in each of our product segments. Unlike
multi-branded companies, all of our products carry the DOLE
label, making DOLE one of the most recognizable brands in the
world. Our brand is placed in key aisles throughout
supermarkets, including center aisles with canned fruit and
fruit cups, the frozen section with our growing line of frozen
fruits, outer aisles in the refrigerated juice section, as well
as the refrigerated salad section and the fresh produce
section. In addition, we believe that our well-developed, state
of the art infrastructure provides us with cost and scale
benefits and is a strong platform from which we can meet
worldwide demand for our products.
We anticipate the following factors will contribute to growth in
revenues and unit sales:
In our fresh fruit segment, our worldwide refrigerated supply
chain, and the management of this platform, are core
competencies and will contribute to future growth. We believe
that as the world economies improve, the consumption of fresh
fruit and bananas will increase along with per capita income.
In particular, demand in Eastern Europe, Russia, the Middle East
and China is expected to grow at a much faster rate than
elsewhere in the years ahead. We are well positioned to
capitalize on these trends based on our growing worldwide
distribution network supported by our integrated refrigerated
supply chain and refrigerated shipping fleet.
In our fresh vegetables segment, we believe that operational
improvements position us for future growth and increased
profitability. The improvements, including the recent opening
of our East Coast production facility, the introduction of a
series of new salad products and increased consumer promotions,
will contribute to the future growth of our fresh vegetables
segment.
43
In our packaged foods segment, we have a line of multi-serve
fruit in plastic jars and an expanding line of frozen fruit
products. Based on our packaged foods product portfolio, we
believe we will continue to benefit from consumers growing
focus on health, wellness and convenience worldwide. Growth in
our packaged foods segment is expected to come from our pipeline
of new products in North America and growing international
markets.
Contemplated
Transactions in Connection with the Offering
Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, we and
our parent company, DHM Holdings, will engage in certain
internal restructuring transactions. As a result of these
internal restructuring transactions, our existing stockholder
will own shares of Dole directly, instead of through DHM
Holdings simplifying Doles ownership structure.
Current
Structure
DHM Holdings has only two assets 100% of the
outstanding shares of our common stock and an 85% limited
liability company membership interest in WWP. In addition, DHM
Holdings has $115 million of debt, which is secured by a
mortgage on the hotel owned by WWP, and is also supported by a
personal guarantee from our existing stockholder.
Restructuring
Transactions
The restructuring transactions consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
DHM Holdings will contribute to us no more than 50% of the
outstanding limited liability company membership interests it
holds in WWP and will retain the remaining interest in WWP.
|
|
|
|
We will consummate the Merger Transaction in which each share of
DHM Holdings common stock outstanding immediately prior to the
Merger Transaction will be converted
into shares of Dole common
stock, and each share of Dole common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the Merger Transaction, each of which is
held by DHM Holdings, will be cancelled. As a result of the
Merger Transaction, we will hold the 85% interest in WWP and
will assume approximately $115 million of debt of DHM
Holdings associated with WWP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the Merger Transaction, we will transfer our 85%
interest in WWP and $30 million of the debt associated with
WWP, in each case previously held by DHM Holdings, to affiliates
of Mr. Murdock. We will use a portion of the net proceeds
from this offering to pay off in its entirety the
$85 million of debt that we assumed in the Merger
Transaction and did not assign to affiliates of
Mr. Murdock. We will also transfer ownership interests in
one parcel of idle farm land of approximately 1,600 acres in
Honduras, with a fair market value of approximately
$12 million and a book value of approximately $150,000, to
our existing stockholder.
|
Results of
Restructuring Transactions
The pay off of the $85 million of debt assumed by us in the
Merger Transaction, and the transfer of the remaining
$30 million to an affiliate of our existing stockholder
will eliminate the cross-default and cross-acceleration
provisions that currently exist between our senior secured
facilities and the DHM Holdings indebtedness. As a result of the
repayment of $85 million of the total $115 million of
debt at DHM Holdings, the amount of debt that is supported by
the mortgage on the hotel operated by WWP, and the amount of
debt supported by our existing stockholders personal
guarantee, will be reduced to $30 million. Accordingly, our
existing stockholder and affiliates of our existing stockholder
will be in a more favorable financial position upon completion
of these transactions than they were before such transactions.
In addition, as a result of the Merger Transaction, the federal
net operating loss carryforwards of DHM Holdings will become
available to us, subject to normal statutory expiration periods.
DHM Holdings estimated federal net operating loss
carryforwards were approximately
44
$160 million as of June 20, 2009. Accordingly, we
will be in a more favorable tax position upon completion of the
Merger Transaction than we were before such transaction.
In addition, upon consummation of the offering all other current
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions that exist
between our senior secured facilities and certain indebtedness
of affiliates of DHM Holdings will be eliminated through the
payment of $90 million of debt owed by an affiliate of our
existing stockholder, which matures on December 22, 2009.
In connection with the Trust offering, an affiliate of our
existing stockholder will enter into a purchase agreement with a
newly established Trust pursuant to which our existing
stockholders will agree to deliver shares of our common stock an
exchange of the Trusts securities
on ,
2012. Our existing stockholder will use a portion of the net
proceeds from such transactions to pay off the $90 million
in debt. As a result, no event of default under any indebtedness
of affiliates of DHM Holdings or of other affiliates of our
existing stockholder will thereafter be able to cause an event
of default under our senior secured credit facilities.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are measures commonly used by financial
analysts in evaluating the performance of companies. EBIT is
calculated by adding back interest expense and income taxes to
income (loss) from continuing operations. Adjusted EBITDA is
calculated by adding depreciation and amortization from
continuing operations to EBIT, by adding the net unrealized loss
or subtracting the net unrealized gains on certain derivative
instruments to EBIT (foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges and
the cross currency swap), by adding the foreign currency loss or
subtracting the foreign currency gain on the vessel obligations
to EBIT, and by subtracting the gain on asset sales from EBIT.
During the first quarter of 2007, all of the Companys
foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges were designated as
effective hedges of cash flows as defined by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, and these
designations were changed during the second quarter of 2007.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, all unrealized gains
and losses related to these instruments have been recorded in
the consolidated statement of operations. During 2008, Dole
initiated an asset sale program in order to reduce debt with
proceeds generated from the sale of non-core assets. Gains on
asset sales for periods prior to the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2009 were not material.
EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not calculated or presented in
accordance with GAAP and EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not a
substitute for net income attributable to Dole Food Company,
Inc., net income, income from continuing operations, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure prescribed by
GAAP. Further, EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA as used herein are not
necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies. However, we have included EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
herein because management believes that EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
are useful performance measures for us. In addition, EBIT and
Adjusted EBITDA are presented because our management believes
that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts,
investors and others in the evaluation of our Company.
Management internally uses EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA for decision
making and to evaluate our performance.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should
not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative to,
operating income, cash flow or other combined income or cash
flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Some of these
limitations are:
|
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect cash outlays for capital expenditures or
contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for,
working capital;
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect the interest expense, or the cash
requirements necessary to service interest or principal
payments, on indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect income tax expense or the cash necessary to
pay income taxes;
|
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be
replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect
cash requirements for such replacements; and
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
other companies, including other companies in our industry, may
calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than as presented in this
prospectus, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.
|
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA and the related
ratios presented throughout the prospectus should not be
considered as measures of discretionary cash available to invest
in business growth or reduce indebtedness. We compensate for
these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and
using Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally.
The SEC has adopted rules to regulate the use in filings with
the SEC and public disclosures and press releases of non-GAAP
financial measures, such as EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA, that are
derived on the basis of methodologies other than in accordance
with GAAP. These rules require, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a presentation with equal or greater prominence of the most
comparable financial measure or measures calculated and
presented in accordance with GAAP; and
|
|
|
|
a statement disclosing the purposes for which our management
uses the non-GAAP financial measure.
|
The rules prohibit, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
exclusion of charges or liabilities that require cash settlement
or would have required cash settlement absent an ability to
settle in another manner, from non-GAAP liquidity measures;
|
|
|
|
adjustment of a non-GAAP performance measure to eliminate or
smooth items identified as non-recurring, infrequent or unusual,
when the nature of the charge or gain is such that it is
reasonably likely to recur; and
|
|
|
|
presentation of non-GAAP financial measures on the face of any
financial information.
|
For a reconciliation of EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA to its most
directly comparable GAAP measure, see Summary
Summary Unaudited Pro Forma and Historical Consolidated
Financial Data and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Supplemental Financial Information.
Results of
Operations
Second Quarter
and First Half of 2009
Overview
Significant highlights for our quarter and half year ended
June 20, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
We reduced our total net debt outstanding by $145 million
during the second quarter of 2009. Total net debt is defined as
total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Over the last five
quarters, we reduced our total net debt outstanding by
$480 million, or 20%, as a result of monetizing non-core
assets, cost cutting initiatives and improved earnings. Net debt
at the end of the second quarter of 2009 was $1.9 billion
and there were no amounts outstanding under our asset based
revolving credit facility of $350 million, or ABL revolver.
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the first half
of 2009 were $209.3 million compared to cash flows used in
operating activities of $2.6 million during the first half
of 2008. Cash flows provided by operating activities increased
primarily due to higher operating income and better working
capital management.
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues for the second quarter of 2009 were
$1.7 billion compared to $2 billion in the second
quarter of 2008. The primary reasons for the decrease were the
sale of our divested businesses, and unfavorable foreign
currency exchange movements in selling locations.
|
|
|
|
Operating income totaled $108.3 million in the second
quarter of 2009 and includes net unrealized hedging losses and
gains on asset sales totaling $1 million. Operating income
in the second quarter of 2008 totaled $121.7 million and
includes unrealized hedging net gains and gains on asset sales
totaling approximately $20.4 million. Operating income
totaled $231.4 million for the first half of 2009, an
increase of 32% over the first half of 2008. Operating income
during the first half of 2009 contained $30.6 million of
net unrealized hedging losses and gains on asset sales.
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2009, fresh fruit earnings
excluding unrealized hedging activity and gains on asset sales
were $103 million, an improvement of approximately
$1 million compared to strong 2008 operating results.
Favorable market pricing worldwide offset increases in costs due
to unfavorable weather conditions in Latin America.
|
|
|
|
Packaged foods EBIT improved by $17.2 million during the
second quarter of 2009. Earnings grew due to improved pricing
and lower product and distribution costs and included unrealized
hedging gains of $7.7 million during the second quarter of
2009.
|
|
|
|
Packaged salads operating results in the second quarter of 2009
improved over the prior year as improved utilization and more
efficient distribution were offset by increased marketing,
general and administrative expenditures. Commodity vegetables
earnings decreased over the prior year mainly due to lower
pricing for celery and strawberries.
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we closed the first phase of
the sale of our fresh-cut flowers business, closed the sale of
certain banana properties in Latin America and closed the sale
of certain vegetable properties in California. We received net
cash proceeds of approximately $83 million from these three
transactions.
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2009, we signed letters of intent to
sell certain operating properties in Latin America for
approximately $68 million. We anticipate that the sales of
these properties will not have a significant impact on ongoing
earnings.
|
|
|
|
There were also favorable developments in legal proceedings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
On June 17, 2009, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Chaney
dismissed with prejudice two remaining lawsuits brought on
behalf of Nicaraguan plaintiffs who had falsely claimed they
were sterile as a result of exposure to DBCP on Dole-contracted
Nicaraguan banana farms, finding that the plaintiffs, and
certain of their attorneys, fabricated their claims, engaged in
a long-running conspiracy to commit a fraud on the court, used
threats of violence to frighten witnesses and suppress the
truth, and conspired with corrupt Nicaraguan judges, depriving
us and the other companies of due process.
|
|
|
|
On June 9, 2009, the First Circuit Court of Hawaii
dismissed the Patrickson case, which had involved ten plaintiffs
from Honduras, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Guatemala, finding that
their DBCP claims were time-barred by the statute of limitations.
|
|
|
|
In seven cases pending in Los Angeles involving 672 claimants
from Ivory Coast, where we did not operate when DBCP was in use,
on July 17, 2009, plaintiffs counsel filed a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record in response to a witness who
has come forward alleging fraud.
|
|
|
|
On July 7, 2009, the California Second District Court of
Appeals issued an order to show cause why the $1.58 million
judgment issued against us in 2008 should not be vacated and
judgment be entered in defendants favor on the grounds
that the judgment was procured through fraud.
|
47
Selected Results
for the Second Quarter and First Half of 2009 and 2008
Selected results of operations for the quarters and half years
ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
June 14,
|
|
June 20,
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
1,714,722
|
|
|
$
|
1,994,943
|
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
|
$
|
3,723,288
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
108,331
|
|
|
|
121,664
|
|
|
|
231,430
|
|
|
|
175,024
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
23,653
|
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
|
(5,058
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(50,242
|
)
|
|
|
(41,245
|
)
|
|
|
(87,788
|
)
|
|
|
(84,742
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,963
|
)
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
(17,011
|
)
|
|
|
60,200
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
20,145
|
|
|
|
180,754
|
|
|
|
122,965
|
|
|
|
151,809
|
|
Second Quarter
and First Half of 2009 vs. Second Quarter and First Half of
2008
Revenues. For the quarter ended June 20,
2009, revenues decreased 14% to $1.7 billion from
$2 billion for the quarter ended June 14, 2008.
Excluding second quarter 2008 sales from our divested
businesses, sales decreased 9%. Lower sales were reported in all
of our three operating segments. The decrease in fresh fruit
sales was attributable to lower sales in the European ripening
and distribution business and Chilean deciduous fruit
operations. Fresh vegetables sales decreased due to lower
pricing for celery and strawberries and lower volumes sold of
romaine lettuce and packaged salads. Packaged foods sales
decreased due to lower worldwide volumes sold of FRUIT
BOWLStm,
fruit in jars and frozen fruit. Net unfavorable foreign currency
exchange movements in our selling locations resulted in lower
revenues of approximately $98 million. These decreases were
partially offset by higher sales of bananas resulting from
higher local pricing worldwide and improved volumes sold in
North America and Asia.
For the half year ended June 20, 2009, revenues decreased
11% to $3.3 billion from $3.7 billion for the half
year ended June 14, 2008. Lower sales were reported in all
three of our operating segments. The decrease in fresh fruit,
fresh vegetables and packaged foods revenues was due primarily
to the same factors that impacted the quarter. Net unfavorable
foreign currency exchange movements in our selling locations
resulted in lower revenues of approximately $182 million.
Operating Income. For the quarter ended
June 20, 2009, operating income was $108.3 million
compared to $121.7 million for the quarter ended
June 14, 2008. Excluding the net impact of unrealized
hedging activity and gains on asset sales of $19.2 million,
operating income in the second quarter of 2009 improved
$5.8 million, or 6%, over the second quarter of 2008. The
fresh fruit and packaged foods operating segments reported
higher operating income. Fresh fruit results increased as a
result of improved operating performance in the Chilean
deciduous fruit business and in the Asia fresh pineapple
operations. These improvements were partially offset by lower
earnings in our banana operations worldwide. Banana earnings
were impacted by higher product costs due to adverse weather
conditions in Latin America. Packaged foods reported higher
earnings as a result of improved pricing, lower product costs
attributable to lower commodity costs (tinplate and plastic) and
favorable foreign currency movements in Thailand and the
Philippines, where product is sourced. In addition, shipping and
distribution costs decreased. Fresh vegetables reported lower
earnings due to lower pricing in the North America commodity
vegetables business.
48
For the half year ended June 20, 2009, operating income
increased to $231.4 million from $175 million for the
half year ended June 14, 2008. Excluding the net impact of
unrealized hedging activity and gains on asset sales of
$11.8 million, operating income for the first half of 2009
improved to $201 million, an increase of 29% over the first
half of 2008. All three of our operating segments reported
improved operating income. Fresh fruit operating results
increased primarily as a result of higher pricing in our North
America banana and Asia banana and fresh pineapple operations as
well as lower product costs in the Chilean deciduous fruit
business. Fresh vegetables reported higher earnings due to
improved operating performance in the packaged salads business.
In addition, fresh vegetables operating income also benefited
from a gain of $9.2 million on the sale of property in
California. Packaged foods operating income increased due to
higher earnings worldwide as well as from lower selling and
general and administrative expenses. In addition, packaged foods
product costs benefited from favorable currency movements in
Thailand and the Philippines.
Other Income (Expense), Net. For the quarter
ended June 20, 2009, other income (expense), net was an
expense of $33 million compared to income of
$23.7 million in the prior year. The change was primarily
due to an increase in unrealized losses of $43.4 million
generated on our cross currency swap and $13.1 million
generated on our foreign denominated debt obligations.
For the half year ended June 20, 2009, other income
(expense), net was an expense of $11.1 million compared to
an expense of $5.1 million for the half year ended
June 14, 2008. The change was due to losses of
$6.5 million generated on our foreign denominated debt
obligations and a $5.2 million write-off of debt issuance
costs associated with our March 2009 amendment of our senior
secured credit facilities. These factors were partially offset
by a decrease in unrealized losses of $6.7 million
generated on the cross currency swap.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the
quarter ended June 20, 2009 was $50.2 million compared
to $41.2 million for the quarter ended June 14, 2008.
Interest expense for the half year ended June 20, 2009 was
$87.8 million compared to $84.7 million for the half
year ended June 14, 2008. Interest expense for both periods
increased primarily as a result of higher borrowing rates
resulting from our March 2009 refinancing transaction.
Income Taxes. We recorded $17 million of
income tax expense on $135.7 million of pretax income from
continuing operations for the half year ended June 20,
2009. Income tax expense included interest expense of
$1.2 million (net of associated income tax benefits of
approximately $0.3 million) related to our unrecognized tax
benefits. An income tax benefit of $60.2 million was
recorded for the half year ended June 14, 2008 which
included $61.1 million for the favorable settlement of the
federal income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001. Excluding
the impact of the favorable settlement, income tax expense was
$0.9 million which included interest expense of
$2.1 million (net of associated income tax benefits of
approximately $0.7 million) related to our unrecognized tax
benefits. As of the second quarter and first half of 2009, cash
generated by our U.S. operations combined with accumulated
previously taxed income was sufficient to fund U.S. cash
flow requirements. As such, repatriation of foreign earnings had
no impact on our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate
varies significantly from period to period due to the level, mix
and seasonality of earnings generated in our various
U.S. and foreign jurisdictions.
Under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, or APB 28, and FASB
Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in
Interim Periods, or FIN 18, we are required to adjust
our effective tax rate for each quarter to be consistent with
the estimated annual effective tax rate. Jurisdictions with a
projected loss where no tax benefit can be recognized are
excluded from the calculation of the estimated annual effective
tax rate. Applying the provisions of APB 28 and FIN 18
could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a
particular quarter, based upon the mix and timing of actual
earnings versus annual projections.
For the periods presented, our income tax provision differs from
the U.S. federal statutory rate applied to our pretax
income primarily due to operations in foreign jurisdictions that
are taxed at a rate lower than the U.S. federal statutory
rate offset by the accrual for uncertain tax positions.
49
Segment Results
of Operations
We have three reportable operating segments: fresh fruit, fresh
vegetables and packaged foods. These reportable segments are
managed separately due to differences in their products,
production processes, distribution channels and customer bases.
Our management evaluates and monitors segment performance
primarily through earnings before interest expense and income
taxes, or EBIT. EBIT is calculated by adding interest expense
and income taxes to income (loss) from continuing operations.
Management believes that segment EBIT provides useful
information for analyzing the underlying business results as
well as allowing investors a means to evaluate the financial
results of each segment in relation to the Company as a whole.
EBIT is not defined under GAAP and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for net income measures prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of our profitability.
Additionally, our computation of EBIT may not be comparable to
other similarly titled measures computed by other companies,
because not all companies calculate EBIT in the same fashion.
Revenues from external customers and EBIT for the reportable
operating segments and corporate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
1,221,433
|
|
|
$
|
1,466,922
|
|
|
$
|
2,343,415
|
|
|
$
|
2,695,450
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
258,087
|
|
|
|
279,643
|
|
|
|
491,529
|
|
|
|
510,672
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
234,892
|
|
|
|
248,118
|
|
|
|
475,742
|
|
|
|
516,623
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,714,722
|
|
|
$
|
1,994,943
|
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
|
$
|
3,723,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
96,466
|
|
|
$
|
131,266
|
|
|
$
|
195,288
|
|
|
$
|
184,153
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
(1,939
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
23,998
|
|
|
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
45,888
|
|
|
|
30,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
116,955
|
|
|
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
254,140
|
|
|
|
213,213
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(12,474
|
)
|
|
|
(9,853
|
)
|
|
|
(19,494
|
)
|
|
|
(23,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(36,893
|
)
|
|
|
9,148
|
|
|
|
(26,197
|
)
|
|
|
(37,033
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(50,242
|
)
|
|
|
(41,245
|
)
|
|
|
(87,788
|
)
|
|
|
(84,742
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,963
|
)
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
(17,011
|
)
|
|
|
60,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
20,857
|
|
|
$
|
177,091
|
|
|
$
|
123,144
|
|
|
$
|
151,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit. Fresh fruit revenues for the
quarter ended June 20, 2009 decreased 17% to
$1.2 billion from $1.5 billion for the quarter ended
June 14, 2008. Excluding second quarter 2008 sales from our
divested businesses in the European ripening and distribution
operations, fresh fruit revenues decreased 10% during the second
quarter of 2009. The decrease in fresh fruit sales was
attributable to lower sales in our European ripening and
distribution operations as a result of unfavorable euro and
Swedish krona foreign currency exchange movements and lower
volumes sold in Germany due to current economic conditions. In
addition, sales in the Chilean deciduous business decreased due
to lower pricing of product sold in Latin America and Europe.
Overall, bananas sales increased as a result of improved local
pricing worldwide partially offset by a reduction in volumes
sold in Europe. Fresh fruit revenues for the half year ended
June 20, 2009 decreased 13% to $2.3 billion from
$2.7 billion for the half year ended June 14, 2008.
Excluding first half 2008 sales from our divested businesses,
fresh fruit revenues during the first half of 2009 decreased 5%.
The change in revenue for the first half of the year was mainly
due to the same factors that impacted sales during the second
quarter. Net unfavorable foreign currency exchange movements in
our foreign
50
selling locations resulted in lower revenues of approximately
$95 million and $173 million during the second quarter
and half year of 2009, respectively.
Fresh fruit EBIT for the quarter ended June 20, 2009
decreased to $96.5 million from $131.3 million for the
quarter ended June 14, 2008. Excluding the net impact of
unrealized hedging activity, losses on our pound sterling
denominated vessel loan and gains on asset sales which totaled
$36 million, EBIT in the second quarter of 2009 improved
$1 million. Higher earnings in Chiles deciduous fruit
operations resulted from improved farm margins and lower product
costs due in part to favorable currency exchange movements in
the Chilean peso. Earnings in the fresh pineapples business
increased primarily as a result of improved operating
performance in Asia. In addition, EBIT in the European banana
business improved due to lower shipping and marketing and
general administrative expenses. These improvements were
partially offset by lower earnings in our banana operations in
North America and Asia. The decrease in banana EBIT was largely
driven by adverse weather conditions in Latin America which
impacted production yields and resulted in significantly higher
fruit costs. Higher fruit costs were partially offset by higher
local pricing worldwide. Fresh fruit EBIT for the half year
ended June 20, 2009 increased to $195.3 million from
$184.2 million for the half year ended June 14, 2008.
Excluding the net impact of unrealized hedging activity, losses
on our pound sterling denominated vessel loan and gains on asset
sales of $9 million, EBIT in the first half of 2009
improved $20 million or 12% over the first half of 2008.
EBIT increased primarily due to improved earnings in the Chilean
deciduous fruit operations and in Asias banana and fresh
pineapple operations. If foreign currency exchange rates in our
significant fresh fruit foreign operations during the quarter
and half year ended June 20, 2009 had remained unchanged
from those experienced during the quarter and half year ended
June 14, 2008, we estimate that fresh fruit EBIT would have
been higher by approximately $8 million and
$14 million, respectively.
Fresh Vegetables. Fresh vegetables revenues
for the quarter ended June 20, 2009 decreased 8% to
$258.1 million from $279.6 million for the quarter
ended of June 14, 2008. Sales decreased in both our North
America commodity vegetable business as well as in packaged
salads. Lower sales in the North America commodity vegetable
business resulted from lower pricing for celery and lower
volumes sold of romaine lettuce partially offset by higher sales
of strawberries. Sales in the packaged salads operations
decreased primarily due to lower volumes sold and a change in
product mix resulting from a shift of purchases from higher to
lower priced products. Fresh vegetables revenues for the half
year ended June 20, 2009 decreased 4% to
$491.5 million from $510.7 million for the half year
ended June 14, 2008. The change in revenues for the first
half of the year was mainly due to the same factors that
impacted sales during the second quarter.
Fresh vegetables EBIT for the quarter ended June 20, 2009
decreased to a loss of $3.5 million from EBIT of
$1.5 million for the quarter ended June 14, 2008.
Excluding a workers compensation reserve adjustment of
$7 million recorded in the prior year, EBIT improved
$2 million in the second quarter of 2009 to a loss of
$3.5 million. This improvement was primarily due to higher
earnings in the packaged salads operations as a result of
improved utilization and more efficient distribution. The North
America commodity vegetable business had lower earnings due to
lower pricing and higher strawberry growing costs. Fresh
vegetables EBIT for the half year ended June 20, 2009
increased to $13 million from a loss of $1.9 million
for the half year ended June 14, 2008. Excluding a gain of
$9.2 million on property sold in California in the first
quarter of 2009 and the workers compensation reserve adjustments
recorded in the prior year, EBIT increased $12.7 million to
$3.8 million in the half year ended June 20, 2009 from
a loss of $8.9 million in the prior year. The increase in
EBIT was primarily due to higher earnings in the packaged salads
business from continued operating efficiencies. EBIT in the
North America commodity vegetables business also increased due
to improved pricing for iceberg and romaine lettuce.
Packaged Foods. Packaged foods revenues for
the quarter ended June 20, 2009 decreased 5% to
$234.9 million from $248.1 million for the quarter
ended June 14, 2008. The decrease in revenues was primarily
due to lower worldwide volumes sold of FRUIT BOWLS, fruit in
jars and frozen fruit. Lower volumes were due in part to a
contraction in the overall total packaged fruit category
51
attributable to current economic conditions. In addition, price
increases have also impacted volumes. Packaged foods revenues
for the half year ended June 20, 2009 decreased 8% to
$475.7 million from $516.6 million for the half year
ended June 14, 2008. The change in revenues for the first
half of the year was mainly due to the same factors that
impacted sales during the second quarter.
EBIT in the packaged foods segment for the quarter ended
June 20, 2009 increased to $24 million from
$6.8 million for the quarter ended June 14, 2008.
Excluding the net impact of unrealized hedging activity, EBIT
increased $9.6 million during the second quarter of 2009
over 2008. The increase in EBIT was attributable to improved
pricing and lower product and shipping and distribution costs.
Lower product costs benefited from lower commodity costs
(tinplate and plastics) as well as favorable foreign currency
movements in Thailand and the Philippines, where product is
sourced. Lower shipping and distribution costs resulted from
lower fuel prices. EBIT for the half year ended June 20,
2009 increased to $45.9 million from $31 million. The
increase in EBIT was attributable to improved earnings worldwide
and lower selling, general and administrative expenses. For the
first half of 2009, the net change from unrealized foreign
currency hedging activity benefited EBIT by $2 million. If
foreign currency exchange rates in our packaged foods foreign
operations during the quarter and half year ended June 20,
2009 had remained unchanged from those experienced during the
quarter and half year ended June 14, 2008, we estimate that
packaged foods EBIT would have been lower by approximately
$7 million and $9 million, respectively.
Corporate. Corporate EBIT was a loss of
$36.9 million for the quarter ended June 20, 2009
compared to income of $9.1 million for the quarter ended
June 14, 2008. The decrease in EBIT was primarily due to
unrealized losses generated on the cross currency swap of
$24.4 million compared to unrealized gains generated in the
prior year of $19 million. In addition, EBIT in 2009 was
impacted by unrealized losses on foreign denominated borrowings
of $4 million. Corporate EBIT was a loss of
$26.2 million for the half year ended June 20, 2009
compared to a loss of $37 million for the half year ended
June 14, 2008. The improvement in EBIT was primarily due to
a decrease in unrealized losses of $6.7 million generated
on the cross currency swap, lower levels of general and
administrative expenditures and unrealized gains of
$1.6 million on foreign denominated borrowings, partially
offset by the write-off of deferred debt issuance costs of
$5.2 million associated with the March 2009 amendment of
our senior secured credit facilities.
Discontinued
Operations
During the second quarter of 2008, we approved and committed to
a formal plan to divest our fresh-cut flowers operations. The
first phase of this transaction was completed during the first
quarter of 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we approved
and committed to a formal plan to divest our citrus and
pistachio operations, or Citrus, located in central California.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2007, the operating results of
Citrus were included in the fresh fruit operating segment. The
Citrus sale closed during the third quarter of 2008 and we
received net cash proceeds of $44 million. As the assets of
Citrus were held by non-wholly owned subsidiaries of the
Company, our share of the proceeds was $28.1 million. The
results of operations of these businesses have been reclassified
as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed the sale of our
Pacific Coast Truck Center, or Pac Truck, business for
$20.7 million. The Pac Truck business consisted of a full
service truck dealership that provided medium and heavy-duty
trucks to customers in the Pacific Northwest region. We received
$15.3 million of net cash proceeds from the sale after the
assumption of $5.4 million of debt and realized a gain of
approximately $2.8 million on the sale, net of income taxes
of $2 million. Prior to the reclassification to
discontinued operations, the operating results of Pac Truck were
included in the other operating segment.
52
Second Quarter and First Half of 2009 vs. Second Quarter and
First Half of 2008. The operating results of
fresh-cut flowers and Citrus for the quarters and half years
ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 are reported in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
29,063
|
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
32,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
(5,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,190
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
10,396
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
10,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
Half Year Ended June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
|
$
|
62,879
|
|
|
$
|
5,020
|
|
|
$
|
67,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
(9,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,288
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
10,691
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
10,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
(157
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers income before income taxes for the half year
ended June 20, 2009 increased to $0.5 million from a
loss of $9 million for the half year ended June 14,
2008. As a result of the January 16, 2009 close of the
first phase of the flowers transaction, fresh-cut flowers
operating results for the half year of 2009 consisted of only
two weeks of operations compared to twelve weeks during 2008. In
connection with the sale, we received cash proceeds of
$21 million and recorded a note receivable of
$8.3 million, which is due January 2011. We recorded a gain
of $1.3 million on the sale.
Subsequent
Events
Internal Revenue Service Audit: On
August 27, 2009, the IRS completed its examination of our
U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2002 to 2005
and issued a RAR that includes various proposed adjustments,
including with respect to the going-private merger transactions.
The IRS is proposing that certain funding used in the
going-private merger is currently taxable and that certain
related investment banking fees are not deductible. The net tax
deficiency associated with the RAR is $122 million, plus
interest. We will file a protest letter vigorously challenging
the proposed adjustments contained in the RAR and will pursue
resolution of these issues with the Appeals Division of the IRS.
We believe, based in part upon the advice of our tax advisors,
that our tax treatment of such transactions was appropriate.
Although the timing and ultimate resolution of any issues
arising from the IRS examination are highly uncertain, at this
time we do not anticipate that the total unrecognized tax
benefits will significantly change within the next twelve months
nor do we believe at this time that any material tax payments
will be made related to these matters within the next twelve
months.
Sale of 2016 Notes: On September 25,
2009, we completed the sale and issuance of $315 million
aggregate principal amount of 8% senior secured notes due
October 2016, or the 2016 Notes, at
53
a discount of approximately $6.2 million. The
2016 Notes were sold to qualified institutional investors
pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to
persons outside the United States in compliance with
Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
Interest on the 2016 Notes will be paid semiannually in
arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year,
beginning on April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes have the
benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of ours and our
U.S. subsidiaries that is junior to the liens of our senior
secured credit facilities and pari passu with the liens of our
2014 Notes, and are senior obligations ranking equally with
our existing senior debt.
Also on September 25, 2009, Dole irrevocably deposited the
net proceeds of the 2016 Notes offering with the trustee
under the indenture governing Doles 7.25% Senior Notes due
2010, or the 2010 Notes, and issued to the trustee a notice
of redemption for all of the outstanding $363 million
principal amount of 2010 Notes. The redemption is scheduled
to occur on October 26, 2009, using such net proceeds and
additional cash on hand and/or borrowings under Doles
senior secured revolving credit facility to be irrevocably
deposited with the trustee prior to such redemption.
Fiscal
2008
Overview
Significant highlights for our year ended January 3, 2009
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased in all three of our operating segments
resulting in record revenues of $7.6 billion, an increase
of 12% compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Operating income increased to $275 million, an improvement
of 84% compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Strong worldwide pricing for bananas was driven by higher
worldwide demand and adverse weather conditions which led to
product shortages during 2008.
|
|
|
|
Revenues and earnings grew in our European ripening and
distribution business, due to higher local pricing and favorable
euro and Swedish krona foreign currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
Higher pricing and volumes as well as improved utilization in
production and more efficient distribution contributed to
improved operating results in our packaged salads business.
Earnings in our North America commodity vegetable business
decreased as a result of lower sales and higher growing costs
due to higher fuel and fertilizer costs.
|
|
|
|
Higher pricing and volumes in our packaged foods segment were
offset by higher product, shipping and distribution costs.
Product costs during 2008 were impacted by an increase in
commodity costs as well as the strengthening of the Thai baht
and Philippine peso against the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net decreased $15.9 million due to
an increase in the non-cash unrealized loss of
$39.7 million on our cross currency swap partially offset
by an increase of the foreign currency gain of
$22.7 million on a British pound sterling denominated
vessel lease obligation due to the weakening of the British
pound sterling against the U.S. dollar in 2008. During
2006, we executed a cross currency swap to synthetically convert
$320 million of Term Loan C into Japanese yen denominated
debt. The increase in the non-cash unrealized loss of
$39.7 million was the result of the Japanese yen
strengthening against the U.S. dollar by 20% during fiscal
2008. The value of the cross currency swap will continue to
fluctuate based on changes in the exchange rate and market
interest rates until maturity in 2011, at which time it will
settle at the then current exchange rate.
|
|
|
|
We received cash proceeds of approximately $226.5 million
for assets sold during fiscal 2008, including $214 million
for assets which had been reclassified as held-for-sale. The
total realized gain recorded on assets classified as
held-for-sale was $18 million for the year ended
January 3,
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
2009. We also realized gains of $9 million during fiscal
2008 on sales of assets not classified as held-for-sale.
|
Selected Results
for Fiscal Years 2008, 2007 and 2006
Selected results of operations for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 29,
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
|
$
|
6,820,812
|
|
|
$
|
5,990,863
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
274,618
|
|
|
|
149,284
|
|
|
|
135,978
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
15,176
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(174,485
|
)
|
|
|
(194,851
|
)
|
|
|
(174,715
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
48,015
|
|
|
|
(4,054
|
)
|
|
|
(22,609
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
(50,386
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
122,849
|
|
|
|
(54,271
|
)
|
|
|
(86,425
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
(3,202
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
121,005
|
|
|
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
|
(89,627
|
)
|
Fiscal Year 2008
vs. Fiscal Year 2007
Revenues. For the year ended January 3,
2009, revenues increased 12% to $7.6 billion from
$6.8 billion in the prior year. Higher sales were reported
in all three of our operating segments. Fresh fruit revenues
increased as a result of higher worldwide sales of bananas which
contributed $392 million, or 49%, of the overall revenue
increase. Banana sales benefited from stronger pricing in all
markets as well as improved volumes in Asia. European ripening
and distribution sales contributed $227 million, or 28%, of
the overall revenue increase. The increase was attributable to
higher local pricing, improved volumes and the impact of
favorable euro and Swedish krona foreign currency exchange
rates. Fresh vegetables sales increased $27 million as a
result of higher pricing and improved volumes of packaged salads
and strawberries sold in North America. Higher worldwide sales
of packaged foods products, primarily for FRUIT
BOWLS®,
canned pineapple and frozen fruit accounted for approximately
$108 million, or 13%, of the overall revenues increase.
Revenues also benefited from an additional week as a result of a
53-week year in fiscal 2008 compared to 52 weeks in fiscal
2007. The impact on revenues of this additional week was
approximately $113 million. Favorable foreign currency
exchange movements in our selling locations positively impacted
revenues by approximately $175 million. These increases
were partially offset by lower volumes of lettuce sold in North
America and broccoli sold in Asia.
Operating Income. For the year ended
January 3, 2009, operating income was $274.6 million
compared with $149.3 million in 2007. The fresh fruit and
fresh vegetables operating segments reported higher operating
income. Fresh fruit operating results increased primarily as a
result of strong pricing in our banana operations worldwide and
in the European ripening and distribution business. In addition,
fresh fruit operating income benefited from gains on asset sales
of $25.5 million. Fresh vegetables reported higher earnings
due to improved pricing and volumes in the packaged salads
business as well as a reduction in workers compensation related
accruals. These improvements were
55
partially offset by lower earnings in our packaged foods segment
and North American commodity vegetables business. Commodity
vegetables earnings decreased mainly due to lower sales and
higher growing and distribution costs caused by substantially
higher fuel and fertilizer costs. Packaged foods operating
income was lower due to higher product costs resulting from
increased purchased fruit costs, commodity and shipping costs as
well as unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements in
Thailand and the Philippines. Additionally, all three operating
segments continued to experience significant cost increases in
many of the commodities they used in production, including fuel,
agricultural chemicals, tinplate, containerboard and plastic
resins. If foreign currency exchange rates in our significant
foreign operations during 2008 had remained unchanged from those
experienced in 2007, we estimate that our operating income would
have been lower by approximately $38 million, excluding the
impact of hedging. The $38 million is primarily related to
favorable foreign currency exchange movements in our selling
locations more than offsetting unfavorable foreign currency
exchange movements in our sourcing locations. Operating income
in 2008 also included realized foreign currency transaction
losses of $4 million and foreign currency hedge losses of
$16 million. In addition, we settled early our Canadian
dollar hedge which generated a gain of $4 million.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income
(expense), net was expense of $14.1 million in 2008
compared to income of $1.8 million in 2007. The change was
due to an increase in the unrealized loss generated on our cross
currency swap of $39.7 million, partially offset by an
increase in the foreign currency exchange gain on our vessel
obligation of $22.7 million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for fiscal
2008 was $174.5 million compared to $194.9 million in
fiscal 2007. The decrease was primarily related to lower
borrowing rates on our debt facilities and a reduction in
borrowings.
Income Taxes. We recorded an income tax
benefit of $48 million on $92.5 million of income from
continuing operations before income taxes for the year ended
January 3, 2009, reflecting a (51.9%) effective tax rate
for the year. Income tax expense decreased $52 million in
2008 compared to 2007 due primarily to the settlement of the
federal income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001. The
effective tax rate in 2007 was (11.2%). Our effective tax rate
varies significantly from period to period due to the level, mix
and seasonality of earnings generated in our various
U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. For 2008, our income tax
provision differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate
applied to our pretax income due to the settlement of the
federal income tax audit, operations in foreign jurisdictions
that are taxed at a rate lower than the U.S. federal
statutory rate offset by the accrual for uncertain tax positions.
For 2008, 2007 and 2006, we have not provided for
U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes for
nearly all of the excess of the amount for financial reporting
over the tax basis of investments that are essentially permanent
in duration. While we believe that such excess at
January 3, 2009 will remain indefinitely invested at this
time, if significant differences arise between our anticipated
and actual earnings estimates and cash flow requirements, we may
be required to provide U.S. federal income tax and foreign
withholding taxes on a portion of such excess. As of the second
quarter and first half of 2009, cash generated by our
U.S. operations combined with accumulated previously taxed
income was sufficient to fund U.S. cash flow requirements.
As such, repatriation of foreign earnings had no impact on our
effective tax rate.
See Note 7 in the notes to consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information about
our income taxes.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated
Subsidiaries. Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries for the year ended January 3,
2009 increased to $6.4 million from $1.7 million in
2007. The increase was primarily related to higher earnings
generated by a European equity investment in which we hold a
non-controlling 40% ownership interest.
56
Fiscal Year 2007
vs. Fiscal Year 2006
Revenues. For the year ended December 29,
2007, revenues increased 14% to $6.8 billion from
$6 billion in the prior year. Higher worldwide sales of
fresh fruit and packaged foods products in North America and
Europe drove the increase in revenues during 2007. Higher
volumes of bananas and pineapples accounted for approximately
$222 million or 27% of the overall revenues increase.
Higher revenues in the our European ripening and distribution
operations contributed an additional $528 million. This
increase in the ripening and distribution business was due to
the acquisition of the remaining 65% ownership in JP Fruit
Distributors Limited, or JP Fresh, that we did not previously
own in October 2006 as well as higher volumes in our Swedish,
Spanish and Eastern European operations. JP Fresh increased 2007
revenues by approximately $230 million. Higher sales of
packaged foods products, primarily for FRUIT BOWLS, fruit in
plastic jars and frozen fruit accounted for approximately
$85 million, or 10%, of the overall revenues increase.
Favorable foreign currency exchange movements in our selling
locations also positively impacted revenues by approximately
$171 million. These increases were partially offset by a
reduction in fresh vegetables sales due to lower volumes of
commodity vegetables sold in North America and Asia.
Operating Income. For the year ended
December 29, 2007, operating income was $149.3 million
compared with $136 million in 2006. The increase was
primarily attributable to improved operating results in our
banana operations worldwide which benefited from stronger
pricing and higher volumes. In addition, operating income
improved in the European ripening and distribution business due
to the absence of restructuring costs of $12.8 million.
These improvements were partially offset by lower earnings in
our packaged salads business and packaged foods segment
primarily due to higher product costs. Packaged salads operating
results were impacted by higher manufacturing costs due in part
to the opening of a new plant in North Carolina. Packaged foods
operating income was lower due to higher product costs resulting
from higher third party purchased fruit costs in Thailand and
higher commodity costs. Unfavorable foreign currency exchange
movements, principally in Thailand and in the Philippines, also
increased sourcing costs. In addition, all of our reporting
segments were impacted by higher product, distribution and
shipping costs, due to higher commodity costs. Unfavorable
foreign currency movements in our international sourcing
locations more than offset favorable foreign currency exchange
movements in our international selling locations. If foreign
currency exchange rates in our significant foreign operations
during 2007 had remained unchanged from those experienced in
2006, we estimate that our operating income would have been
higher by approximately $7 million, excluding the impact of
hedging. Operating income in 2007 also included realized foreign
currency transaction gains of $7 million and foreign
currency hedge losses of $10 million. We also settled early
its Philippine peso and Colombian peso hedges, which generated
gains of $11 million.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income
(expense), net decreased to income of $1.8 million in 2007
from income of $15.2 million in 2006. The decrease was due
to a reduction in the gain generated on our cross currency swap
of $22.7 million, partially offset by a reduction in the
foreign currency exchange loss on our vessel obligation of
$9.2 million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the
year ended December 29, 2007 was $194.9 million
compared to $174.7 million in 2006. The increase was
primarily related to higher levels of borrowings during 2007 on
our term loan facilities and the asset based revolving credit
facility.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense for the year
ended December 29, 2007 decreased to $4.1 million from
$22.6 million in 2006 primarily due to a shift in the mix
of earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at a lower rate than
in the U.S. The effective tax rate in 2006 was (137.7%).
For 2007 and 2006, our income tax provision differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate applied to our pretax losses
due to operations in foreign jurisdictions that are taxed at a
rate lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate offset by
the accrual for uncertain tax positions.
As noted above, for 2008, 2007 and 2006, we have not provided
for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes for
nearly all of the excess of the amount for financial reporting
over the tax basis of investments that are essentially permanent
in duration. While we believe that such excess at
57
January 3, 2009 will remain indefinitely invested at this
time, if significant differences arise between our anticipated
and actual earnings estimates and cash flow requirements, we may
be required to provide U.S. federal income tax and foreign
withholding taxes on a portion of such excess.
Refer to Note 7 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information about
our income taxes.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated
Subsidiaries. Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries for the year ended December 29,
2007 increased to $1.7 million from $0.2 million in
2006. The increase was primarily related to higher earnings
generated by a European equity investment in which we hold a
non-controlling 40% ownership interest.
Segment Results
of Operations
We have three reportable operating segments: fresh fruit, fresh
vegetables and packaged foods. These reportable segments are
managed separately due to differences in their products,
production processes, distribution channels and customer bases.
Our management evaluates and monitors segment performance
primarily through earnings before interest expense and income
taxes, or EBIT. EBIT is calculated by adding interest expense
and income taxes to income (loss) from continuing operations.
Management believes that segment EBIT provides useful
information for analyzing the underlying business results as
well as allowing investors a means to evaluate the financial
results of each segment in relation to the Company as a whole.
EBIT is not defined under GAAP and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for net income measures prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of our profitability.
Additionally, our computation of EBIT may not be comparable to
other similarly titled measures computed by other companies,
because not all companies calculate EBIT in the same fashion.
In the tables below, revenues from external customers and EBIT
reflect only the results from continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
5,401,145
|
|
|
$
|
4,736,902
|
|
|
$
|
3,968,963
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
1,086,888
|
|
|
|
1,059,401
|
|
|
|
1,082,416
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
1,130,791
|
|
|
|
1,023,257
|
|
|
|
938,336
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
|
$
|
6,820,812
|
|
|
$
|
5,990,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
305,782
|
|
|
$
|
172,175
|
|
|
$
|
104,976
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
(21,668
|
)
|
|
|
(7,241
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
70,944
|
|
|
|
80,093
|
|
|
|
93,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
377,849
|
|
|
|
230,600
|
|
|
|
191,184
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
|
20,664
|
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(54,043
|
)
|
|
|
(59,506
|
)
|
|
|
(53,377
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate
|
|
|
(104,454
|
)
|
|
|
(70,247
|
)
|
|
|
(32,713
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(174,485
|
)
|
|
|
(194,851
|
)
|
|
|
(174,715
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
48,015
|
|
|
|
(4,054
|
)
|
|
|
(22,609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
146,925
|
|
|
$
|
(38,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Fiscal Year 2008
vs. Fiscal Year 2007
Fresh Fruit. Fresh fruit revenues in 2008
increased 14% to $5.4 billion from $4.7 billion in
2007. The increase in fresh fruit revenues was primarily driven
by higher worldwide sales of bananas and higher sales in the
European ripening and distribution operation. In addition, sales
of Chilean deciduous fruit and fresh pineapple also increased.
Banana sales increased approximately $392 million due to
higher pricing worldwide and increased volumes sold in Asia.
Higher demand for bananas, product shortages and higher fuel
costs contributed to an increase in banana pricing and
surcharges during 2008. European ripening and distribution sales
were $227 million higher as result of increased volumes in
Sweden, Germany, Italy and Eastern Europe, and stronger pricing
and favorable euro and Swedish krona foreign currency exchange
rates. This growth in the European ripening and distribution
business was partially offset by lower revenues as a result of
the sale of the JP Fresh and Dole France subsidiaries in
November 2008. JP Fresh and Dole France revenues totaled
$382 million and $480 million during fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively. Sales of Chilean deciduous fruit also
increased due to improved pricing in the European and Latin
American markets. Increased sales of fresh pineapple were
primarily driven by higher volumes sold in North America.
Favorable foreign currency exchange movements in our foreign
selling locations, primarily the euro, Japanese yen and Swedish
krona, benefited revenues by approximately $171 million.
Fresh fruit EBIT increased 79% to $305.8 million in 2008
from $172.2 million in 2007. EBIT increased due to
significantly higher banana earnings and improved pricing in the
European ripening and distribution operations. The increase in
worldwide banana EBIT was driven by higher pricing, partially
offset by increased product and shipping costs as a result of
higher commodity costs. Banana EBIT also benefited from foreign
currency translation gains on our vessel obligation of
$22.7 million. Our Chilean deciduous fruit operations also
reported an increase in EBIT as a result of higher sales and
improved farm margins. Higher EBIT in the fresh fruit operating
segment was also attributable to gains recorded on asset sales
of $25.5 million. These increases were partially offset by
lower fresh pineapple earnings due primarily to higher product,
shipping and distribution costs worldwide. If foreign currency
exchanges rates, primarily in our fresh fruit foreign selling
locations, during 2008 had remained unchanged from those
experienced in 2007, we estimate that fresh fruit EBIT would
have been lower by approximately $50 million, excluding the
impacts of hedging. Fresh fruit EBIT in 2008 included foreign
currency hedge losses of $14 million, fuel hedge losses of
$4 million and realized foreign currency transaction gains
of $1 million.
Fresh Vegetables. Fresh vegetables revenues
for 2008 increased 3% to $1.09 billion from
$1.06 billion. The increase in revenues was primarily due
to improved pricing and higher volumes of packaged salads sold
in North America. Packaged salad sales also benefited from the
introduction of premium salad kits. In addition, higher volumes
and pricing for strawberries and higher celery volumes were
reported in the North American commodity business. These
increases were partially offset by lower volumes of lettuce and
mixed produce sold in North America and broccoli and asparagus
sold in Asia.
Fresh vegetables EBIT for 2008 increased to $1.1 million
compared to a loss of $21.7 million in 2007. The increase
in EBIT was primarily due to improved pricing as well as lower
distribution and production costs in the packaged salads
business. EBIT also increased due to lower workers compensation
related accruals of $9 million as a result of favorable
closures of historical claims and a reduction in claims
activity. In addition, earnings in the Asia commodity vegetable
business improved due to stronger pricing. These increases were
partially offset by lower earnings in the North American
commodity vegetables business due to higher growing and
distribution costs as a result of significantly higher fuel and
fertilizer costs. In addition, the packaged salads business
incurred higher selling and marketing costs due to increased
promotional activities.
Packaged Foods. Packaged foods revenues for
2008 increased 11% to $1.1 billion from $1 billion in
2007. Revenues increased primarily due to higher pricing and
volumes of FRUIT BOWLS, canned pineapple, pineapple juice and
tropical fruit sold worldwide. In addition, North America
revenues
59
benefited from higher sales of frozen food products as a result
of improved pricing. Foreign currency exchange rate movements on
revenues were not material in 2008.
Packaged foods EBIT in 2008 decreased to $70.9 million from
$80.1 million in 2007. EBIT decreased due primarily to
higher product, shipping and distribution costs. Increases in
commodity costs (such as fuel, tinplate and plastics) continued
to impact operating results. In addition, higher product costs
were attributable to unfavorable foreign currency exchange
movements in Thailand and the Philippines, where product is
sourced. If foreign currency exchanges rates during 2008 had
remained unchanged from those experienced in 2007, we estimate
that packaged foods EBIT would have been higher by approximately
$11 million. Packaged foods EBIT in 2008 included realized
foreign currency transaction losses of $5 million and
foreign currency hedge losses of $2 million. Packaged foods
also settled early its Canadian dollar hedges, which generated
gains of $4 million.
Corporate. Corporate EBIT includes general and
administrative costs not allocated to the operating segments.
Corporate EBIT in 2008 was a loss of $104.5 million
compared to a loss of $70.2 million in 2007. EBIT decreased
primarily due to a net loss generated on our cross currency swap
of $39.2 million. This decrease was partially offset by
lower general and administrative expenses due primarily to a
reduction in legal costs and lower unrealized losses on foreign
denominated borrowings.
Fiscal Year 2007
vs. Fiscal Year 2006
Fresh Fruit. Fresh fruit revenues in 2007
increased 19% to $4.7 billion from $4 billion in 2006.
The increase in fresh fruit revenues was primarily driven by
higher worldwide sales of bananas and higher sales in the
European ripening and distribution operation. Banana sales
increased approximately $200 million due to improved
volumes and higher pricing worldwide. European ripening and
distribution sales were $528 million higher as result of
increased volumes in Sweden, Spain and Eastern Europe as well as
the October 2006 acquisition of the remaining 65% interest in JP
Fresh, an importer and distributor of fresh produce in the
United Kingdom. In addition, revenues benefited from higher
sales of fresh pineapples in North America and Asia. The
increase in fresh pineapple sales resulted from improved pricing
worldwide and higher volumes sold in North America and Asia.
Favorable foreign currency exchange movements in our foreign
selling locations, primarily the euro and Swedish krona,
benefited revenues by approximately $163 million.
Fresh fruit EBIT increased 64% to $172.2 million in 2007
from $105 million in 2006. EBIT increased due to improved
banana earnings and the absence of restructuring costs recorded
by Saba Trading AB, or Saba, during 2006. Higher earnings in our
banana operations were attributable to higher sales worldwide,
which were partially offset by higher purchased fruit costs.
EBIT also benefited by $9.1 million due to the final
settlement of our property insurance claim associated with
Hurricane Katrina. These increases were partially offset by
lower fresh pineapple earnings due mainly to higher product,
shipping and distribution costs and a $3.8 million
impairment charge for farm assets in the Chilean deciduous fruit
operations. If foreign currency exchanges rates, primarily in
our fresh fruit foreign sourcing locations, during 2007 had
remained unchanged from those experienced in 2006, we estimate
that fresh fruit EBIT would have been lower by approximately
$16 million, excluding the impacts of hedging. Fresh fruit
EBIT in 2007 included foreign currency hedge losses of
$6 million, foreign currency exchange losses related to the
vessel obligation of $1 million and realized foreign
currency transaction gains of $7 million. In addition,
fresh fruit EBIT benefited from fuel hedge gains of
$5 million and $2 million related to the early
settlement of Colombian peso hedges.
Fresh Vegetables. Fresh vegetables revenues
for 2007 decreased 2% to $1.06 billion from
$1.08 billion. The decrease in revenues was primarily due
to lower volumes sold in the North America and Asia commodity
vegetables businesses, primarily for berries, lettuce, broccoli
and asparagus, as well as lower surcharges in North America.
These decreases were partially offset by improved pricing for
commodity vegetables in both North America and Asia. In the
packaged salads business, revenues were relatively unchanged as
improved pricing was offset by lower volumes during the first
half of
60
2007. Additional costs were incurred as a result of increased
promotional activity, which were recorded as a reduction to
revenues during 2007. Consumer demand in the packaged salads
business experienced higher volumes in the second half of 2007
as the packaged salads category began to recover from a third
quarter 2006 E. coli incident. In an effort to increase
demand in the packaged salads category, we continued to offer
incentives to our customers and consumers.
Fresh vegetables EBIT for 2007 was a loss of $21.7 million
compared to a loss of $7.2 million in 2006. The decrease in
EBIT was primarily due to higher manufacturing costs and general
and administrative expenses in the packaged salads business due
in part to the new salad plant in North Carolina. These
decreases were partially offset by higher margins generated in
the North America commodity vegetables business due to higher
pricing for lettuce and celery.
Packaged Foods. Packaged foods revenues for
2007 increased 9% to $1 billion from $938.3 million in
2006. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher
pricing and volumes of FRUIT BOWLS, fruit in plastic jars and
packaged frozen food products, and higher volumes of canned
juice sold in North America. Revenues also grew in Europe due to
higher pricing and volumes of canned solid pineapple, higher
pricing of FRUIT BOWLS and higher sales volumes of concentrate.
Revenues in Asia were lower due primarily to the disposition of
a small distribution company in the Philippines during the
fourth quarter of 2006.
Packaged foods EBIT in 2007 decreased to $80.1 million from
$93.4 million in 2006. EBIT was impacted by higher product
costs in both North America and Europe, which were driven by
unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates in Thailand and the
Philippines, where product is sourced. EBIT in Asia was impacted
by lower sales and higher product costs. If foreign currency
exchanges rates, in packaged foods sourcing locations, during
2007 had remained unchanged from those experienced in 2006, we
estimate that packaged foods EBIT would have been higher by
approximately $23 million. Packaged foods EBIT in 2007
included realized foreign currency transaction gains of
$4 million partially offset by foreign currency hedge
losses of $2 million. Packaged foods also settled early its
Philippine peso hedges, which generated gains of
$8.8 million.
Corporate. Corporate EBIT includes general and
administrative costs not allocated to the operating segments.
Corporate EBIT in 2007 was a loss of $70.2 million compared
to a loss of $32.7 million in 2006. EBIT decreased
primarily due to a reduction in the gain generated on our cross
currency swap of $22.7 million. In addition, there were
higher general and administrative expenses compared to the prior
year due primarily to additional legal costs. Corporate EBIT in
2007 also included realized foreign currency transaction losses
of $4 million.
Discontinued
Operations
During the second quarter of 2008, we approved and committed to
a formal plan to divest our fresh-cut flowers operations. The
first phase of this transaction was completed during the first
quarter of 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we approved
and committed to a formal plan to divest our citrus and
pistachio operations, or Citrus, located in central California.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2007, the operating results of
Citrus were included in the fresh fruit operating segment. The
Citrus sale closed during the third quarter of 2008 and we
received net cash proceeds of $44 million. As the assets of
Citrus were held by non-wholly owned subsidiaries of the
Company, our share of the proceeds was $28.1 million. The
results of operations of these businesses have been reclassified
as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed the sale of our
Pacific Coast Truck Center, or Pac Truck, business for
$20.7 million. The Pac Truck business consisted of a full
service truck dealership that provided medium and heavy-duty
trucks to customers in the Pacific Northwest region. We received
$15.3 million of net cash proceeds from the sale after the
assumption of $5.4 million of debt and realized a gain of
approximately $2.8 million on the sale, net of income taxes
of $2 million. Prior to the reclassification to
discontinued operations, the operating results of Pac Truck were
included in the other operating segment.
61
The operating results of fresh-cut flowers, Citrus and Pac Truck
for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 are reported in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Pac Truck
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
106,919
|
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(43,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(44,643
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(26,299
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of $4.3 million
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
110,153
|
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(19,146
|
)
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,413
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(16,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
160,074
|
|
|
$
|
20,527
|
|
|
$
|
47,851
|
|
|
$
|
228,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(57,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
(52,837
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(52,622
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,002
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(50,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of $2 million
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers loss before income taxes in 2008 increased to
$43.2 compared to a loss of $19.1 million in 2007. The
change was due primarily to a $17 million impairment charge
on long-lived assets related to the flowers transaction, of
which the first phase closed during the first quarter of 2009.
Product costs also increased as a result of unfavorable foreign
currency exchange rates in Colombia, where the product is
sourced. In addition, there were foreign currency hedge losses
in 2008 of $0.3 million compared to foreign currency hedge
gains of $6 million in 2007. These factors were partially
offset by gains generated from the sale of the Miami
headquarters building and a farm in Mexico as well as lower
distribution costs due to changes in the customer base. If
foreign currency exchange rates, in Colombia, during 2008 had
remained unchanged from those experienced in 2007, we estimate
that our fresh-cut flowers loss before taxes would have been
lower by approximately $4 million, excluding the impacts of
hedging.
Fresh-cut flowers loss before income taxes in 2007 improved to a
loss of $19.1 million from a loss of $57 million in
2006. The lower loss is primarily due to the absence of
restructuring-related and asset impairment charges recorded in
2006 of $29 million. Lower shipping expenses, due in part
to the renegotiation of an airfreight contract, also contributed
to the improvement of the loss. These improvements were
partially offset by higher product costs resulting from damage
to roses in Colombia caused by adverse weather conditions. If
foreign currency exchange rates, in Colombia, during 2007 had
remained unchanged from those experienced in 2006, we estimate
that our fresh-cut flowers loss before taxes would have been
lower by approximately $7 million, excluding the impacts of
62
hedging. Fresh-cut flowers also benefited from foreign currency
hedge gains of $4 million and $2 million related to
the early settlement of the Colombian peso hedges.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Overview
As of June 20, 2009, Dole had a cash balance of
$107.9 million and an ABL revolver borrowing base of
$320 million. After taking into account approximately
$76.4 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under
the ABL revolver, Dole had approximately $243.6 million
available for borrowings as of June 20, 2009. The ABL
revolver is secured by and is subject to a borrowing base
consisting of up to 85% of eligible accounts receivable plus a
predetermined percentage of eligible inventory, as defined in
the credit facility.
Amounts outstanding under the term loan facilities were
$828.3 million at June 20, 2009. In addition, Dole had
approximately $97 million of letters of credit and bank
guarantees outstanding under its $100 million pre-funded
letter of credit facility at June 20, 2009.
The ABL revolver and term loan facilities are collateralized by
substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets,
including certain capital stock of our subsidiaries, but
excluding certain intercompany debt, certain equity interests
and each of our U.S. manufacturing plants and processing
facilities that has a net book value exceeding 1% of our net
tangible assets.
In addition to amounts available under the revolving credit
facility, as of January 3, 2009 our subsidiaries had
uncommitted lines of credit of approximately $142.9 million
at various local banks, of which $85.3 million was
available. These lines of credit are used primarily for
short-term borrowings, foreign currency exchange settlement and
the issuance of letters of credit or bank guarantees. Several of
our uncommitted lines of credit expire in 2009 while others do
not have a commitment expiration date. These arrangements may be
cancelled at any time by us or the banks. Our ability to utilize
these lines of credit may be impacted by the terms of its senior
secured credit facilities and bond indentures.
As noted above under General
Overview Contemplated Transactions in Connection
with the Offering, as a result of the Merger Transaction,
we will assume approximately $115 million of debt of DHM
Holdings associated with WWP, $30 million of which we will
transfer to affiliates of our existing stockholder following the
Merger Transaction. We will use a portion of the net proceeds
from this offering to pay off in its entirety the
$85 million of debt of DHM Holdings that we will have
assumed in the Merger Transaction and not assigned to affiliates
of our existing stockholder.
We believe that available borrowings under our revolving credit
facility and subsidiaries uncommitted lines of credit,
together with our existing cash balances, future cash flow from
operations, planned asset sales and access to capital markets,
will enable us to meet our working capital, capital expenditure,
debt maturity and other commitments and funding requirements.
Managements plan is dependent upon the occurrence of
future events which will be impacted by a number of factors
including the availability of refinancing, the general economic
environment in which we operate, our ability to generate cash
flows from our operations, and our ability to attract buyers for
assets being marketed for sale. Factors impacting our cash flow
from operations include such items as commodity prices, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, among other things,
as more fully set forth in Risk Factors elsewhere in
this prospectus.
Cash Flows
from Operating Activities
For the half year ended June 20, 2009, cash flows provided
by operating activities were $209.3 million compared to
cash flows used in operating activities of $2.6 million for
the half year ended June 14, 2008. Cash flows provided by
operating activities increased $211.9 million primarily due
to higher operating income and better working capital
management. Cash from operating activities improved due to
better collections of receivables and lower levels of crop
inventory. These
63
improvements were partially offset by lower levels of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities due in part to the timing of
payments.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were
$44.6 million in 2008 compared to cash flows provided by
operating activities of $46.3 million in the prior year.
The change was primarily due to net income in 2008 compared with
a net loss in 2007, lower levels of accounts receivable and a
smaller increase in inventory balances offset by lower levels of
accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The change in
inventories was driven primarily by a reduction of raw material
purchases in the packaged foods segment. Lower levels of
accounts payable and accrued liabilities were attributable to
the timing of payments to suppliers and growers and reduced
inventory purchases at year-end. Cash flows provided by
operations in 2007 were $46.3 million compared to cash
flows provided by operating activities of $15.9 million in
2006. The increase was primarily due to a lower net loss during
2007 and higher levels of accounts payable partially offset by
higher levels of accounts receivable and an increase in the
investment in inventory. Higher accounts payable was
attributable to the timing of payments to suppliers and growers
and additional inventory-related purchases. The increase in
inventory was driven mainly by a build up in finished goods
inventory in the packaged foods segment in anticipation of 2008
sales and the impact of higher product costs. In addition, there
were higher crop growing costs in the fresh fruit segment due to
the timing of plantings.
Cash Flows
from Investing Activities
Cash flows provided by investing activities were
$28.3 million for the half year ended June 20, 2009,
compared to cash flows used in investing activities of
$3.5 million for the half year ended June 14, 2008.
The change during 2009 was primarily due to an increase in cash
proceeds received on asset sales and lower levels of capital
expenditures.
Cash flows provided by investing activities increased to
$141.1 million in 2008 from $61.4 million used in
investing activities in the prior year. The increase during 2008
was primarily due to $214 million of cash proceeds received
from the sale of assets held-for-sale during 2008. Capital
expenditures in 2008 were also lower by $21.7 million. Cash
flows used in investing activities in 2007 decreased to
$61.4 million from $117 million in 2006. The decrease
in cash outflow during 2007 was primarily due to
$30.5 million of cash proceeds received on the sale of land
parcels in central California by two limited liability companies
in which the company is a majority owner, $11 million of
cash proceeds received on sales of other assets and lower levels
of capital expenditures of $18.2 million.
Cash Flows
from Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financing activities were $219.7 million
for the half year ended June 20, 2009, compared to cash
flows used in financing activities of $14.6 million for the
half year ended June 14, 2008. As a result of improved
earnings and proceeds received from asset sales during the first
half of 2009, we repaid $150.5 million under the ABL
revolver and repurchased $17 million of our 2010 Notes. In
addition, We repaid all of the outstanding 8.625% senior
notes due 2009, or 2009 Notes, and issued our 2014 Notes,
resulting in a net repayment of $20 million. We also
incurred $18 million of debt issuance costs associated with
our March 2009 refinancing transaction.
Cash flows used in financing activities increased to
$185.5 million in 2008 from $16 million provided by
financing activities in the prior year. The increase was
primarily due to higher current year debt principal payments,
net of borrowings of $172 million versus 2007 net
borrowings of $26.5 million. Cash flows provided by
financing activities in 2007 decreased to $16 million from
$142.8 million in 2006. The decrease was primarily due to
lower 2007 borrowings, net of repayments of $26.5 million
versus 2006 net borrowings of $339.4 million and the
absence of an equity contribution of $28.4 million made by
Dole Holding Company, LLC, our immediate parent, during 2006.
These items were partially offset by the absence of
$163.7 million of dividends paid to DHC during 2006 as well
as a net return of capital payment to DHC of $31 million.
64
Recent
Transactions Affecting Liquidity and Capital
Resources
2009 Debt Maturity and Debt Issuance. During
the second quarter of 2008, we reclassified to current
liabilities $350 million of our 2009 Notes. We also
completed the early redemption of $5 million of the 2009
Notes during the third quarter of 2008.
On February 13, 2009, we commenced a tender offer to
purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding 2009 Notes for
a purchase price equal to $980 per $1,000 of 2009 Notes validly
tendered, with an additional payment of $20 per $1,000 of 2009
Notes tendered early in the process. In connection with the
tender offer, we sought consents to certain amendments to the
indenture governing the 2009 Notes to eliminate substantially
all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default
contained therein. On March 4, 2009, we announced that we
had received the required consents necessary to amend the
indenture with respect to the 2009 Notes and, accordingly,
executed the supplemental indenture effecting such amendments,
which became operative on March 18, 2009, when we accepted
and paid for the tendered 2009 Notes. The tender offer expired
on March 17, 2009.
On March 18, 2009, we completed the sale and issuance of
$350 million aggregate principal amount of our 2014 Notes,
at a discount of $25 million. The 2014 Notes were sold to
qualified institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A
under the Securities Act and to persons outside the United
States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities
Act. The sale was exempt from the registration requirements of
the Securities Act. Interest on the 2014 Notes will be paid
semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each
year, beginning on September 15, 2009. The 2014 Notes have
the benefit of a lien on certain of our U.S. assets that is
junior to the liens of our senior secured credit facilities, and
are senior obligations ranking equally with our existing senior
debt. We used the net proceeds from this offering, together with
cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to purchase all
of the tendered 2009 Notes and to irrevocably deposit with the
trustee of the 2009 Notes funds sufficient to repay the
remaining outstanding 2009 Notes, which matured on May 1,
2009.
In connection with these refinancing transactions, we amended
our senior secured credit facilities. Such amendments, among
other things, (i) permit debt securities secured by a
junior lien to be issued to refinance our 2009 Notes and
2010 Notes in an amount up to the greater of
(x) $500 million and (y) the amount of debt that
would not cause the senior secured leverage ratio to exceed 3.75
to 1.00; (as of March 18, 2009, the amounts in
clauses (x) and (y) were approximately equal);
(ii) added a new restricted payments basket of up to
$50 million to be used to prepay our 2009 Notes and
2010 Notes subject to pro forma compliance with the senior
secured credit facilities and $70 million of unused
availability under the revolving credit facility;
(iii) increased the applicable margin for (x) the term
loan facilities to LIBOR plus 5.00% or the base rate plus
4.00% subject to a 50 basis point step down when the
priority senior secured leverage ratio is less than or equal to
1.75 to 1.00 and (y) for the revolving credit facility, to
a range of LIBOR plus 3.00% to 3.50% or the base rate plus 2.00%
to 2.50%; (iv) provide for a LIBOR floor of 3.00% per annum
for the term loan facilities; (v) added a first priority
secured leverage maintenance covenant to the term loan
facilities; and (vi) provide for other technical and
clarifying changes. These amendments became effective
concurrently with the closing of the 2014 Notes offering.
2010 Debt Maturity and Debt Issuance. During
the second quarter of 2009, we reclassified to current
liabilities $400 million of our 2010 Notes. During the
second quarter of 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to $95 million of the 2010 Notes. We
subsequently repurchased $17 million and $20 million
of the 2010 Notes during the second and third quarters of 2009,
respectively.
On September 25, 2009, we completed the sale and issuance
of $315 million aggregate principal amount of 8% senior
secured notes due October 2016, or the 2016 Notes, at a
discount of approximately $6.2 million. The 2016 Notes
were sold to qualified institutional investors pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to persons outside
the United States in compliance with
65
Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
Interest on the 2016 Notes will be paid semiannually in
arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year,
beginning on April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes have the
benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of ours and our
U.S. subsidiaries that is junior to the liens of our senior
secured credit facilities and pari passu with the liens of our
2014 Notes, and are senior obligations ranking equally with
our existing senior debt.
Also on September 25, 2009, Dole irrevocably deposited the
net proceeds of the 2016 Notes offering with the trustee
under the indenture governing Doles 7.25% Senior Notes due
2010, or the 2010 Notes, and issued to the trustee a notice
of redemption for all of the outstanding $363 million
principal amount of 2010 Notes. The redemption is scheduled
to occur on October 26, 2009, using such net proceeds and
additional cash on hand and/or borrowings under Doles
senior secured revolving credit facility to be irrevocably
deposited with the trustee prior to such redemption.
See Note 8 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for additional details of our
outstanding debt.
Other
Items
On June 22, 2009, we declared a dividend of
$15 million to our parent, DHM Holdings. We paid the
dividend in four installments on June 23, 2009,
July 20, 2009, August 18, 2009 and August 31,
2009. As a result of this dividend, we do not at present have
the ability to declare future dividends under the terms of our
senior notes indentures and senior secured credit facilities.
On April 30, 2009, we obtained letters of credit to support
a bank guarantee issued to the European Commission in connection
with their Decision that imposed a fine on us. These letters of
credit were issued under the ABL revolver and the pre-funded
letter of credit facility.
As a result of the issuance of the 2014 Notes and
amendments to the senior secured credit facilities during March
2009, interest rates on these instruments increased
significantly as compared to the interest rates as they existed
prior to the new debt issuance and amendments. The interest rate
on the 2014 Notes is 13.875%, compared to 8.625% on the
2009 Notes. The interest rate on the ABL revolver and term
loan facilities increased by approximately 1.75% and 5%,
respectively, as a result of the amendments.
See Note 8 in the notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for the second quarter of 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for additional details of our
outstanding debt.
66
Cash
Requirements
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual
obligations and commitments at January 3, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-2 Years
|
|
|
3-4 Years
|
|
|
4 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt
|
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
$
|
155,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
Variable rate debt
|
|
|
8,785
|
|
|
|
169,738
|
|
|
|
812,294
|
|
|
|
4,039
|
|
|
|
994,856
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
6,114
|
|
|
|
45,806
|
|
|
|
60,448
|
|
Non-cancelable operating lease commitments
|
|
|
143,054
|
|
|
|
195,762
|
|
|
|
110,519
|
|
|
|
115,034
|
|
|
|
564,369
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
781,559
|
|
|
|
877,660
|
|
|
|
403,283
|
|
|
|
131,404
|
|
|
|
2,193,906
|
|
Minimum required pension funding
|
|
|
19,422
|
|
|
|
53,033
|
|
|
|
56,535
|
|
|
|
104,955
|
|
|
|
233,945
|
|
Postretirement benefit payments
|
|
|
4,271
|
|
|
|
8,293
|
|
|
|
7,910
|
|
|
|
18,457
|
|
|
|
38,931
|
|
Interest payments on fixed and variable rate debt
|
|
|
107,388
|
|
|
|
134,986
|
|
|
|
62,585
|
|
|
|
22,190
|
|
|
|
327,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
1,461,231
|
|
|
$
|
2,045,037
|
|
|
$
|
1,614,240
|
|
|
$
|
441,885
|
|
|
$
|
5,562,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Debt
Additional information with respect to each individual material
borrowing or facility, including a description of the borrowing,
the material terms and amounts outstanding, is set forth in
Note 12 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The table in Note 12 assumes
that long-term debt is held to maturity. The variable rate
maturities include amounts payable under our senior secured
credit facilities. During the half year ended June 20,
2009, we completed the sale and issuance of $350 million of
our 2014 Notes and repaid our 2009 Notes. We also modified
our term loan facilities in connection with the issuance of our
2014 Notes. In addition, on September 25, 2009, we
completed the sale and issuance of $315 million of our
2016 Notes and called for redemption our outstanding
$363 million of 2010 Notes. The amounts included in
the table above do not reflect the impact of these transactions
on our contractual obligations including interest payments.
Capital Lease
Obligations
Our capital lease obligations include $58.5 million related
to two vessel leases. The obligations under these leases, which
continue through 2024, are denominated in British pound
sterling. The lease obligations are presented in
U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on
January 3, 2009 and therefore will continue to fluctuate
based on changes in the exchange rate.
Operating
Lease Commitments
We have obligations under cancelable and non-cancelable
operating leases, primarily for land, machinery and equipment,
vessels and containers and office and warehouse facilities. The
leased assets are used in our operations where leasing offers
advantages of operating flexibility and is less expensive than
alternate types of funding. A significant portion of our
operating lease payments are fixed. Lease payments are charged
to operations, primarily through cost of products sold. Total
rental expense, including rent related to cancelable and
non-cancelable leases, was $204.2 million,
67
$169.2 million and $153 million (net of sublease
income of $17.1 million, $16.6 million and
$16.4 million) for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We modified the terms of our corporate aircraft lease agreement
during 2007. The modification primarily extended the lease
period from 2010 to 2018. Our corporate aircraft lease agreement
includes a residual value guarantee of up to $4.8 million
at the termination of the lease in 2018. We do not currently
anticipate any future payments related to this residual value
guarantee.
Purchase
Obligations
In order to secure sufficient product to meet demand and to
supplement our own production, we enter into non-cancelable
agreements with independent growers, primarily in Latin America
and North America, to purchase substantially all of their
production subject to market demand and product quality. Prices
under these agreements are generally tied to prevailing market
rates and contract terms range from one to ten years. Total
purchases under these agreements were $658.8 million,
$564.5 million and $474.5 million for 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
In order to ensure a steady supply of packing supplies and to
maximize volume incentive rebates, we enter into contracts for
the purchase of packing supplies; some of these contracts run
through 2010. Prices under these agreements are generally tied
to prevailing market rates. Purchases under these contracts for
2008, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $292.6 million,
$272.7 million and $207.6 million, respectively.
Interest
payments on fixed and variable rate debt
Commitments for interest expense on debt, including capital
lease obligations, were determined based on anticipated annual
average debt balances, after factoring in mandatory debt
repayments. Interest expense on variable-rate debt has been
based on the prevailing interest rates at January 3, 2009.
For the secured term loan facilities, interest payments reflect
the impact of both the interest rate swap and cross currency
swap. No interest payments were calculated on the notes payable
due to the short term nature of these instruments. The unsecured
notes and debentures as well as the secured term loans and
revolving credit facility mature at various times between 2009
and 2013.
Other
Obligations and Commitments
We have obligations with respect to our pension and OPRB plans.
During 2008, we did not make any contributions to our qualified
U.S. pension plan. Under the minimum funding requirements
of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, no contribution was
required for fiscal 2008. We expect to contribute
$8 million to our U.S. qualified plan in 2009, which
is the estimated minimum funding requirement calculated under
the Pension Protection Act of 2006. We also have nonqualified
U.S. and international pension and OPRB plans. During 2008,
we made payments of $25.4 million related to these pension
and OPRB plans. We expect to make payments related to our other
U.S. and foreign pension and OPRB plans of
$15.7 million in 2009. The table includes pension and other
postretirement payments through 2018. See Note 13 to the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
January 3, 2009 included in this prospectus.
We have numerous collective bargaining agreements with various
unions covering approximately 35% of our hourly full-time and
seasonal employees. Of the unionized employees, 35% are covered
under a collective bargaining agreement that will expire within
one year and the remaining 65% are covered under collective
bargaining agreements expiring beyond the upcoming year. These
agreements are subject to periodic negotiation and renewal.
Failure to renew any of these collective bargaining agreements
may result in a strike or work stoppage; however management does
not expect that the outcome of these negotiations and renewals
will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition
or results of operations.
68
We had approximately $143 million of total gross
unrecognized tax benefits, including interest that is not
included in the table above, based on Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, or FIN 48. The timing of any payments
which could result from these unrecognized tax benefits will
depend on a number of factors, and accordingly the amount and
timing of any future payments cannot be reasonably estimated. We
do not expect a significant tax payment related to these
benefits within the next year. See Note 7 in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
January 3, 2009 included elsewhere in this prospectus for
additional information regarding income taxes.
Guarantees,
Contingencies and Debt Covenants
We are a guarantor of indebtedness of some of our key fruit
suppliers and other entities integral to our operations. At
June 20, 2009, guarantees of $1.8 million consisted
primarily of amounts advanced under third-party bank agreements
to independent growers that supply us with product. We have not
historically experienced any significant losses associated with
these guarantees.
We issue letters of credit and bank guarantees through our ABL
revolver and its pre-funded letter of credit facilities, and, in
addition, separately through major banking institutions. We also
provide insurance company issued bonds. These letters of credit,
bank guarantees and insurance company bonds are required by
certain regulatory authorities, suppliers and other operating
agreements. As of June 20, 2009, total letters of credit,
bank guarantees and bonds outstanding under these arrangements
were $205.7 million, of which $97 million were issued
under our pre-funded letter of credit facility.
We also provide various guarantees, mostly to foreign banks, in
the course of our normal business operations to support the
borrowings, leases and other obligations of our subsidiaries. We
guaranteed $213.2 million of our subsidiaries
obligations to their suppliers and other third parties as of
June 20, 2009.
We have change of control agreements with certain key
executives, under which severance payments and benefits would
become payable in the event of specified terminations of
employment following a change of control (as defined) of the
Company. See Executive Compensation for additional
information concerning the change of control agreements.
As disclosed in Note 11 in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements for the quarter and half year ended
June 20, 2009 included in this prospectus, we are subject
to legal actions, most notably related to our prior use of the
agricultural chemical dibromochloropropane, or DBCP. Although no
assurance can be given concerning the outcome of these cases, in
the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel
and based on past experience defending and settling DBCP claims,
the pending lawsuits are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Provisions under our senior secured credit facilities and the
indentures to the senior notes and debentures require us to
comply with certain covenants. These covenants include
limitations on, among other things, indebtedness, investments,
loans to subsidiaries, employees and third parties, the issuance
of guarantees and the payment of dividends, some of which are
discussed in further detail below. We could borrow approximately
an additional $320 million at January 3, 2009 and
remain within these covenants; this figure represents the unused
capacity under our revolving credit facility plus the unused
portion of the exception baskets pursuant to the indebtedness
covenant under our senior secured credit facilities.
Our senior secured revolving credit facility contains a
springing covenant, but that covenant has never been
effective and would only become effective if the availability
under the revolving credit facility were to fall below
$35 million for any eight consecutive business days, which
it has never done during the life of such facility. In the event
that such availability were to fall below $35 million for
such
69
eight consecutive business day period, the springing
covenant would require that our fixed charge coverage
ratio, defined as (x) consolidated EBITDA for the four
consecutive fiscal quarters then ending divided by
(y) consolidated fixed charges for such four fiscal quarter
period, equal or exceed 1.00:1.00. We expect such fixed charge
coverage ratio to continue to be in excess of 1.00:1.00. At
June 20, 2009, we were in compliance with all applicable
covenants contained in the indentures and senior secured credit
facilities.
Effective concurrently with the closing of our 2014 Notes
offering, we amended our senior secured credit facilities to,
among other things, permit us to issue a certain amount of
junior lien notes. The amendment to the term loan facilities
impose a first priority secured leverage maintenance covenant on
us, which we expect to continue to be able to satisfy. This
requires us to keep our first priority senior secured leverage
ratio at or below: 3.25 to 1.00 as of the last day of the fiscal
quarters ending March 28, 2009 through October 10,
2009; 3.00 to 1.00 as of the last day of the fiscal quarters
ending January 2, 2010 through March 26, 2011; 2.75 to
1.00 as of the last day of the fiscal quarters ending
June 18, 2011 through March 24, 2012; and 2.50 to 1.00
as of the last day of the fiscal quarters ending June 16,
2012 through March 23, 2013. The first priority senior
secured leverage ratio, for each such date, is the ratio of our
Consolidated First Priority Secured Debt to our Consolidated
EBITDA (as such terms are defined in the amended senior secured
term credit facility) for the four consecutive fiscal quarter
period most recently ended on or prior to such date. At
June 20, 2009, the first priority senior secured leverage
ratio was less than 2.25 to 1.00.
Pursuant to the indenture governing our 2014 Notes, we cannot
incur indebtedness, other than Permitted
Indebtedness (as defined in the indenture), unless, before
and after giving effect to the proposed indebtedness, our
consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio exceeds 2.0:1.0. As of
June 20, 2009, that ratio was approximately 2.45 to 1.00.
Pursuant to our senior secured credit facilities, we cannot
incur indebtedness, other than Permitted
Indebtedness (as defined in the credit facilities),
unless, before and after giving effect to the proposed
indebtedness, the total leverage ratio at such time does not
exceed 5.50:1.00 (as of June 20, 2009, it was approximately
4.5:1.0, excluding the effect of our discontinued, and now sold,
fresh-cut flowers business); (ii) the Senior Secured
Leverage Ratio at such time does not exceed 3.00:1.00 (as of
June 20, 2009, it was less than 3.00:1.00).
Pursuant to the indenture governing our 2014 Notes, we also
cannot pay a dividend (other than a stock dividend payable in
qualified capital stock) if there is a continuing default or
event of default, if our consolidated fixed charge coverage
ratio would be less than or equal to 2.0:1.0 (as of
June 20, 2009, that ratio exceeded 2.45:1.00), or if the
sum of all dividends paid after March 18, 2009 would exceed
the sum of: $15 million; plus (after our 2010 Notes are no
longer outstanding, and only if our consolidated leverage ratio
would be less than or equal to 4.00:1.00 (at June 20, 2009,
that ratio was approximately 4.50:1.0)) 50% of our cumulative
consolidated net income (or, if negative, 100% of such loss)
beginning March 29, 2009; plus 100% of the value of any
contribution to capital received or proceeds from the issuance
of qualified capital stock (or, from the sale of warrants,
options, or other rights to acquire the same); plus 100% of the
net cash proceeds of any equity contribution received from a
holder of our capital stock; plus the aggregate amount returned
in cash on or with respect to investments (other than
Permitted Investments, as defined in the indenture)
made after March 18, 2009; plus the value we receive from
the disposition of all or any portion of such investments; plus
the fair market value of any unrestricted subsidiary that is
redesignated as a restricted subsidiary. We currently expect
that as a result of these provisions the amount of dividends
that we will be able to pay from March 18, 2009 through the
end of 2009 will be limited to no more than $15 million. As
of August 31, 2009, we had paid aggregate dividends of
$15 million since March 18, 2009.
With respect to limitations on asset sales, we are permitted by
our senior secured credit facilities and our note and debenture
indentures to sell up to $150 million of any of our assets
in any fiscal year, and we are permitted to sell an unlimited
amount of additional assets that are not material to the
operations of Dole Food Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries, so
long as we comply, on a pro forma basis, with the first priority
senior secured leverage ratio test set forth in the preceding
paragraph, as of the last day of the most recently completed
four fiscal quarter test period for which financial
70
statements are available. In general, 75% of any asset sale
proceeds must be in the form of cash, cash equivalents or
replacement assets, and the proceeds must be reinvested in the
business within 12 months (pending which they may be used
to repay revolving debt), in the case of asset sales of up to
$100 million per year, or used to permanently pay down term
debt or revolving debt under our senior secured credit
facilities.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in a debt instrument
governing our current or future indebtedness could result in a
default under that instrument and, due to cross-default and
cross-acceleration provisions, could result in a default under
our other debt instruments. Upon the occurrence of an event of
default under the senior secured credit facilities or other debt
instrument, the lenders or holders of such other debt
instruments could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be
immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to
extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts,
the lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to
them, if any, to secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under
our current indebtedness were to accelerate the payment of the
indebtedness, we cannot give assurance that our assets or cash
flow would be sufficient to repay in full our outstanding
indebtedness.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts.
These estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing
basis and are based on historical experience and on other
factors that management believes are reasonable. Estimates and
assumptions include, but are not limited to, the areas of
customer and grower receivables, inventories, impairment of
assets, useful lives of property, plant and equipment,
intangible assets, marketing programs, income taxes,
self-insurance reserves, retirement benefits, financial
instruments and commitments and contingencies.
We believe that the following represent the areas where more
critical estimates and assumptions are used in the preparation
of our consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 2
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended January 3, 2009 included elsewhere in this
prospectus for a summary of the Companys significant
accounting policies.
Application of
Purchase Accounting
Our acquisitions require the application of purchase accounting
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141(R), Business Combinations. This results in
tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities of
the acquired entity being recorded at fair value. The difference
between the purchase price and the fair value of net assets
acquired is recorded as goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets and liabilities
acquired in a business combination, we use a variety of
valuation methods including present value, depreciated
replacement cost, market values (where available) and selling
prices less costs to dispose. Valuations are performed by either
independent valuation specialists or by our management, where
appropriate.
Assumptions must often be made in determining fair values,
particularly where observable market values do not exist.
Assumptions may include discount rates, growth rates, cost of
capital, royalty rates, tax rates and remaining useful lives.
These assumptions can have a significant impact on the value of
identifiable assets and accordingly can impact the value of
goodwill recorded. Different assumptions could result in
materially different values being attributed to assets and
liabilities. Since these values impact the amount of annual
depreciation and amortization expense, different assumptions
could also significantly impact our statement of operations and
could impact the results of future impairment reviews.
71
Grower
Advances
We make advances to third-party growers primarily in Latin
America and Asia for various farming needs. Some of these
advances are secured with property or other collateral owned by
the growers. We monitor these receivables on a regular basis and
record an allowance for these grower receivables based on
estimates of the growers ability to repay advances and the
fair value of the collateral. These estimates require
significant judgment because of the inherent risks and
uncertainties underlying the growers ability to repay
these advances. These factors include weather-related phenomena,
government-mandated fruit prices, market responses to industry
volume pressures, grower competition, fluctuations in local
interest rates, economic crises, security risks in developing
countries, political instability, outbreak of plant disease,
inconsistent or poor farming practices of growers, and foreign
currency fluctuations. The aggregate amounts of grower advances
made during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 were approximately
$170.7 million, $172.4 million and
$156.5 million, respectively. Net grower advances
receivable were $49.5 million and $51.8 million at
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, respectively.
Long-Lived
Assets
Our long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment
and amortized intangibles and goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Amortized
Intangibles: We depreciate property, plant and
equipment and amortize intangibles principally by the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of these
assets. Estimates of useful lives are based on the nature of the
underlying assets as well as our experience with similar assets
and intended use. Estimates of useful lives can differ from
actual useful lives due to the inherent uncertainty in making
these estimates. This is particularly true for our significant
long-lived assets such as land improvements, buildings, farming
machinery and equipment, vessels and containers and customer
relationships. Factors such as the conditions in which the
assets are used, availability of capital to replace assets,
frequency of maintenance, changes in farming techniques and
changes to customer relationships can influence the useful lives
of these assets. See Notes 10 and 11 of the consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a
summary of useful lives by major asset category and for further
details on our intangible assets, respectively. We incurred
depreciation expense from continuing operations of approximately
$133.4 million, $146.9 million and $139 million
in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and amortization
expense of approximately $4.3 million, $4.5 million
and $4.5 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006.
We review property, plant and equipment and amortizable
intangibles to be held and used for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
may not be recoverable. If an evaluation of recoverability is
required, the estimated total undiscounted future cash flows
directly associated with the asset is compared to the
assets carrying amount. If this comparison indicates that
there is an impairment, the amount of the impairment is
calculated by comparing the carrying value to the discounted
expected future cash flows expected to result from the use of
the asset and its eventual disposition or comparable market
values, depending on the nature of the asset. Changes in
commodity pricing, weather-related phenomena and other market
conditions are events that have historically caused us to assess
the carrying amount of its long-lived assets.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible
Assets: Our indefinite-lived intangible assets
consist of the
DOLE®
brand trade name, with a carrying value of $689.6 million.
In determining whether intangible assets have indefinite lives,
we consider the expected use of the asset, legal or contractual
provisions that may limit the life of the asset, length of time
the intangible has been in existence, as well as competitive,
industry and economic factors. The determination as to whether
an intangible asset is indefinite-lived or amortizable could
have a significant impact on our statement of operations in the
form of amortization expense and potential future impairment
charges.
72
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for
impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances
indicate that an impairment may have occurred. Indefinite-lived
intangibles are tested for impairment by comparing the fair
value of the asset to the carrying value.
Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of
a reporting unit with its net book value including goodwill.
Fair values of reporting units are determined based on
discounted cash flows, market multiples or appraised values, as
appropriate, which requires making estimates and assumptions
including pricing and volumes, industry growth rates, future
business plans, profitability, tax rates and discount rates. If
the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying
amount, then goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered
to be impaired. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, then the implied fair value of goodwill
is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill
recognized in a business combination is determined. An
impairment loss is recognized if the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than its carrying amount. Changes to
assumptions and estimates can significantly impact the fair
values determined for reporting units and the implied value of
goodwill, and consequently can impact whether or not an
impairment charge is recognized, and if recognized, the size
thereof. Management believes that the assumptions used in our
annual impairment review are appropriate.
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the income tax effect
of temporary differences between financial statement carrying
amounts and the income tax bases of assets and liabilities. Our
provision for income taxes is based on domestic and
international statutory income tax rates in the jurisdictions in
which we operate. We regularly review our deferred income tax
assets to determine whether future taxable income will be
sufficient to realize the benefits of these assets. A valuation
allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets for which
it is deemed more likely than not that future taxable income
will not be sufficient to realize the related income tax
benefits from these assets. In making such determination, we
consider all available positive and negative evidence, including
scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected
future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent
financial operations. In the event it is determined that we will
not be able to realize our net deferred tax assets in the
future, we will reduce such amounts through a charge to income
in the period such determination is made. Conversely, if it is
determined that we will be able to realize deferred tax assets
in excess of the carrying amounts, we will decrease the recorded
valuation allowance through a credit to income in the period
that such determination is made.
At January 3, 2009, our estimates of future taxable income
to recover its existing U.S. federal deferred tax assets
totaling approximately $114 million are principally related
to the realization of income on appreciated non-core assets,
including income to be generated from the reversal of the
related existing taxable temporary differences upon the sale of
such assets. Although we currently believe we will be able to
sell such assets in amounts sufficient to realize our
U.S. federal deferred tax assets, the ultimate sale prices
for such assets are dependent on future market conditions and
may vary from those currently expected by us. If we are unable
to sell such assets at the amounts currently anticipated,
additional valuation allowances would be necessary which would
result in the recognition of additional income tax expense in
our consolidated statements of operations.
Significant judgment is required in determining income tax
provisions under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and in
evaluating tax positions. We establish additional provisions for
income taxes when, despite the belief that tax positions are
fully supportable, there remain certain positions that do not
meet the minimum probability threshold, as defined by
FIN 48, which is a tax position that is more likely than
not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing
authority. In the normal course of business, we and our
subsidiaries are examined by various federal, state and foreign
tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of
these examinations and any future examinations for the current
or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes. We continually assesses the
73
likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjusts the
income tax provision, the current tax liability and deferred
taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a
revision become known.
Refer to Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended January 3, 2009 included in this
prospectus for additional information about the Companys
income taxes.
Pension and
Other Postretirement Benefits
We have qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans
covering some of our full-time employees. Benefits under these
plans are generally based on each employees eligible
compensation and years of service, except for hourly plans,
which are based on negotiated benefits. In addition to pension
plans, we have other postretirement benefit, or OPRB, plans that
provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible
retired employees. Covered employees may become eligible for
such benefits if they fulfill established requirements upon
reaching retirement age. Pension and OPRB costs and obligations
are calculated based on actuarial assumptions including discount
rates, health care cost trend rates, compensation increases,
expected return on plan assets, mortality rates and other
factors.
Pension obligations and expenses are most sensitive to the
expected return on pension plan assets and discount rate
assumptions. OPRB obligations and expenses are most sensitive to
discount rate assumptions and health care cost trend rates. We
determine the expected return on pension plan assets based on an
expectation of average annual returns over an extended period of
years for the asset classes in which the plans assets are
invested. In the absence of a change in our asset allocation or
investment philosophy, this estimate is not expected to vary
significantly from year to year. Our 2008 and 2007 pension
expense was determined using an expected rate of return on
U.S. plan assets of 8%. At January 3, 2009, our
U.S. pension plan investment portfolio was invested
approximately 45% in equity securities, 53% in fixed income
securities and 2% in private equity and venture capital funds. A
25 basis point change in the expected rate of return on
pension plan assets would impact annual pension expense by
$0.5 million.
Our U.S. pension plans discount rate of 6.75% in 2008
and 6.25% in 2007 was determined based on a hypothetical
portfolio of high-quality, non-callable, zero-coupon bond
indices with maturities that approximate the duration of the
liabilities in the Companys pension plans. A 25 basis
point decrease in the assumed discount rate would increase the
projected benefit obligation by $5.8 million and increase
the annual expense by $0.2 million.
Our foreign pension plans weighted average discount rate
was 8.3% and 7.52% for 2008 and 2007, respectively. A
25 basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate of the
foreign plans would increase the projected benefit obligation by
approximately $3.5 million and increase the annual expense
by approximately $0.5 million.
While management believes that the assumptions used are
appropriate, actual results may differ materially from these
assumptions. These differences may impact the amount of pension
and OPRB and future expense. Refer to Note 13 of the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
January 3, 2009 included in this prospectus for additional
details of our pension and OPRB plans.
Litigation
We are involved from time to time in claims and legal actions
incidental to our operations, both as plaintiff and defendant.
We have established what management currently believes to be
adequate reserves for pending legal matters. These reserves are
established as part of an ongoing worldwide assessment of claims
and legal actions that takes into consideration such items as
changes in the pending case load (including resolved and new
matters), opinions of legal counsel, individual developments in
court proceedings, changes in the law, changes in business
focus, changes in the litigation environment, changes in
opponent strategy and tactics, new developments as a result of
ongoing discovery, and past experience in defending and settling
similar claims. Changes in accruals
74
are part of the ordinary, recurring course of business, in which
management, after consultation with legal counsel, is required
to make estimates of various amounts for business planning
purposes, as well as for accounting and SEC reporting purposes.
These changes are reflected in the reported earnings each
quarter. The litigation accruals at any time reflect updated
assessments of the then existing pool of claims and legal
actions. Actual litigation settlements could differ materially
from these accruals.
Recently
Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
See Note 2 in the notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for the second quarter of 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for information regarding our
adoption of new accounting pronouncements and recently issued
accounting pronouncements as of June 20, 2009.
See Note 2 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for information regarding our
adoption of new accounting pronouncements and recently issued
accounting pronouncements as of January 3, 2009.
Other
Matters
European Union
Banana Import Regime
On January 1, 2006, the European Union, or EU, implemented
a tariff only import regime for bananas. The 2001
Understanding on Bananas between the European Communities and
the United States required the EU to implement a tariff only
banana import system by this date.
Banana imports from Latin America are currently subject to a
tariff of 176 euro per metric ton for entry into the EU market.
Under the EUs previous banana regime, banana imports from
Latin America were subject to a tariff of 75 euro per metric ton
and were also subject to import license requirements and volume
quotas. License requirements and volume quotas had the effect of
limiting access to the EU banana market.
Although all Latin bananas are subject to a tariff of 176 euro
per metric ton under the tariff only regime, the EU
had allowed up to 775,000 metric tons of bananas from African,
Caribbean, and Pacific, or ACP, countries to be imported
annually into the EU duty-free. This preferential treatment of a
zero tariff on up to 775,000 metric tons of ACP banana imports,
as well as the 176 euro per metric ton tariff applied to Latin
banana imports, was challenged by Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua,
and Colombia in consultation proceedings at the World Trade
Organization, or WTO. In addition, both Ecuador and the United
States formally requested the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, or
DSB, to appoint panels to review the matter.
The DSB issued final and definitive written rulings in favor of
Ecuador and the United States on November 27, 2008,
concluding that the 176 euro per metric ton tariff is
inconsistent with WTO trade rules. The DSB also considered that
the prior duty-free tariff reserved for ACP countries was
inconsistent with WTO trade rules but also recognized that, with
the current entry into force of Economic Partnership Agreements
between the EU and ACP countries, ACP bananas now may have
duty-free, quota-free access to the EU market.
We expect that the current tariff applied to Latin banana
imports will be lowered in order that the EU may comply with
these DSB rulings and with the WTO trade rules. The DSB rulings
did not indicate the amount the EU banana tariff should be
lowered, and we encourage a timely resolution through
negotiations among the EU, the U.S., and the Latin banana
producing countries. Recent press reports indicate that the EU
now expects to reach resolution on the tariff by the end of
October 2009; however the Latin banana producing countries
and the EU do not yet appear to have agreed on the tariff
reduction amount or specific timetable to implement any proposed
reduction. Without such specifics, we cannot yet determine what
potential effects this outcome will have for us.
Notwithstanding, we strongly support the continued efforts to
resolve this dispute and believe that the EU banana tariff, once
lowered, will be a favorable result for us.
75
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We use derivative instruments to hedge against fluctuations in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rate movements and
bunker fuel prices. We do not utilize derivatives for trading or
other speculative purposes.
Through the first quarter of 2007, all of our derivative
instruments, with the exception of the cross currency swap, were
designated as effective hedges of cash flows as defined by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as amended, or FAS 133. However, during the second
quarter of 2007, we elected to discontinue our designation of
both our foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges as cash flow
hedges under FAS 133. The interest rate swap continues to
be accounted for as a cash flow hedge under FAS 133. As a
result, all changes in the fair value of our derivative
financial instruments from the time of discontinuation of hedge
accounting are reflected in our consolidated statements of
operations.
Unrealized gains (losses) on our foreign currency and bunker
fuel hedges and the cross currency swap by reporting segment
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,101
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
14,192
|
|
|
$
|
3,613
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,805
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
(7,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,224
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,101
|
|
|
$
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,329
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,968
|
|
|
$
|
3,613
|
|
|
$
|
19,001
|
|
|
$
|
29,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
6,993
|
|
|
$
|
6,342
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,335
|
|
|
$
|
4,237
|
|
|
$
|
4,051
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,288
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,491
|
|
|
$
|
6,342
|
|
|
$
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,175
|
|
|
$
|
4,051
|
|
|
$
|
(13,353
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
|
$
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,002
|
|
|
$
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
(9,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,504
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
(2,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,812
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Bunker
|
|
|
Cross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,088
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,664
|
|
|
|
20,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,664
|
|
|
$
|
19,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For information regarding our derivative instruments and hedging
activities, refer to Note 13 in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter and half year
ended June 20, 2009 included in this prospectus.
For information regarding our derivative instruments and hedging
activities, refer to Note 17 in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
January 3, 2009 included in this prospectus.
Supplemental
Financial Information
The following financial information has been presented, as
management believes that it is useful information to some
readers of our consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
|
|
$
|
491,731
|
|
|
$
|
531,047
|
|
|
$
|
693,782
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
$
|
4,642,884
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
2,011,061
|
|
|
$
|
2,204,093
|
|
|
$
|
2,411,397
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
555,455
|
|
|
$
|
433,159
|
|
|
$
|
354,886
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
123,144
|
|
|
$
|
151,638
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
87,788
|
|
|
|
84,742
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
17,011
|
|
|
|
(60,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
227,943
|
|
|
|
176,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations
|
|
|
54,822
|
|
|
|
64,441
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(7,130
|
)
|
|
|
6,127
|
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss on vessel obligations
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
(2,075
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
(16,793
|
)
|
|
|
(11,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
265,825
|
|
|
$
|
233,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Capital expenditures from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
17,581
|
|
|
$
|
23,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
146,925
|
|
|
$
|
(38,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,853
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
174,485
|
|
|
|
194,851
|
|
|
|
174,715
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(48,015
|
)
|
|
|
4,054
|
|
|
|
22,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
273,395
|
|
|
|
160,353
|
|
|
|
158,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations
|
|
|
137,660
|
|
|
|
151,380
|
|
|
|
143,530
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
48,734
|
|
|
|
22,057
|
|
|
|
(19,576
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss on vessel obligations
|
|
|
(21,300
|
)
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
10,591
|
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
(26,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
411,513
|
|
|
$
|
335,204
|
|
|
$
|
293,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Capital expenditures from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
73,899
|
|
|
$
|
104,015
|
|
|
$
|
114,979
|
|
EBIT is calculated by adding back interest expense and income
taxes to income (loss) from continuing operations. Adjusted
EBITDA is calculated by adding depreciation and amortization
from continuing operations to EBIT, by adding the net unrealized
loss or subtracting the net unrealized gains on certain
derivative instruments to EBIT (foreign currency and bunker fuel
hedges and the cross currency swap), by adding the foreign
currency loss or subtracting the foreign currency gain on the
vessel obligations to EBIT, and by subtracting the gain on asset
sales from EBIT. During the first quarter of 2007, all of the
Companys foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges were
designated as effective hedges of cash flows as defined by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, and
these designations were changed during the second quarter of
2007. Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, all unrealized
gains and losses related to these instruments have been recorded
in the consolidated statement of operations. During 2008, Dole
initiated an asset sale program in order to reduce debt with
proceeds generated from the sale of non-core assets. Gains on
asset sales for periods prior to the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2009 were not material.
78
EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not calculated or presented in
accordance with GAAP and EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are not a
substitute for net income attributable to Dole Food Company,
Inc., net income, income from continuing operations, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure prescribed by
GAAP. Further, EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA as used herein are not
necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies. However, we have included EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
herein because management believes that EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
are useful performance measures for us. In addition, EBIT and
Adjusted EBITDA are presented because our management believes
that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts,
investors and others in the evaluation of our Company.
Management internally uses EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA for decision
making and to evaluate our performance. Adjusted EBITDA margin
is defined as the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to net revenues. We
present Adjusted EBITDA margin because management believes that
it is a useful performance measure for us. Refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in this
prospectus for further information regarding the use of non-GAAP
measures.
Financial Market
Risks
As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we
are exposed to market risks including fluctuations in interest
rates, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and
changes in commodity pricing. We use derivative instruments to
hedge against fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rate movements and bunker fuel prices. We do not
utilize derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes.
Interest Rate
Risk
As a result of our normal borrowing and leasing activities, our
operating results are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates.
We have short-term and long-term debt with both fixed and
variable interest rates. Short-term debt primarily comprises the
current portion of long-term debt maturing within twelve months
from the balance sheet date. Short-term debt also includes
unsecured notes payable to banks and bank lines of credit used
to finance working capital requirements. Long-term debt
represents publicly held unsecured notes and debentures, as well
as amounts outstanding under our senior secured credit
facilities.
As of January 3, 2009, we had $1.1 billion of
fixed-rate debt and $1.8 million of fixed-rate capital
lease obligations and other debt with a combined
weighted-average interest rate of 8.2% and a fair value of
$820.3 million. We currently estimate that a 100 basis
point increase in prevailing market interest rates would
decrease the fair value of its fixed-rate debt by approximately
$12.3 million.
As of January 3, 2009, we had the following variable-rate
arrangements: $986 million of variable-rate debt with a
weighted-average interest rate of 3.3% and $58.6 million of
variable-rate capital lease obligations with a weighted-average
interest rate of 6.6%. Interest expense under the majority of
these arrangements is based on the London Interbank Offered
Rate, or LIBOR. We currently estimate that a 100 basis
point increase in LIBOR would lower pretax income by
$10.5 million.
As part of our strategy to manage the level of exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates, we entered into an interest rate
swap agreement that effectively converted $320 million of
variable-rate term loan debt to a fixed-rate basis. The interest
rate swap fixed the interest rate at 7.2%. The paying and
receiving rates under the interest rate swap were 5.49% and
4.82% as of January 3, 2009. The fair value of the interest
rate swap at January 3, 2009 was a liability of
$26.5 million.
We also executed a cross currency swap to synthetically convert
$320 million of term loan debt into Japanese yen
denominated debt in order to effectively lower the
U.S. dollar fixed interest rate of 7.2% to a Japanese yen
interest rate of 3.6%. The fair value of the cross currency swap
was a liability of $40.5 million at January 3, 2009.
79
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
We have production, processing, distribution and marketing
operations worldwide in more than 90 countries. Our
international sales are usually transacted in U.S. dollars
and major European and Asian currencies. Some of our costs are
incurred in currencies different from those received from the
sale of products. Results of operations may be affected by
fluctuations in currency exchange rates in both sourcing and
selling locations.
We have significant sales denominated in Japanese yen as well as
European sales denominated primarily in euro and Swedish krona.
Product and shipping costs associated with a significant portion
of these sales are U.S. dollar-denominated. In 2008, we had
approximately $680 million of annual sales denominated in
Japanese yen, $1.8 billion of annual sales denominated in
euro, and $525 million of annual sales denominated in
Swedish krona. If U.S. dollar exchange rates versus the
Japanese yen, euro and Swedish krona during 2008 had remained
unchanged from 2007, our revenues and operating income would
have been lower by approximately $216 million and
$70 million, respectively, excluding the impact of hedges.
In addition, we currently estimate that a 10% strengthening of
the U.S. dollar relative to the Japanese yen, euro and
Swedish krona would lower operating income by approximately
$76 million, excluding the impact of foreign currency
exchange hedges.
We source the majority of our products in foreign locations and
accordingly are exposed to changes in exchange rates between the
U.S. dollar and currencies in these sourcing locations. Our
exposure to exchange rate fluctuations in these sourcing
locations is partially mitigated by entering into
U.S. dollar denominated contracts for third-party purchased
product and most other major supply agreements, including
shipping contracts. However, we are still exposed to those costs
that are denominated in local currencies. The most significant
production currencies to which we have exchange rate risk are
the Thai baht, Philippine peso, Chilean peso and South African
rand. If U.S. dollar exchange rates versus these currencies
during 2008 had remained unchanged from 2007, our operating
income would have been higher by approximately $20 million.
In addition, we currently estimate that a 10% weakening of the
U.S. dollar relative to these currencies would lower
operating income by approximately $50 million, excluding
the impact of foreign currency exchange hedges.
At January 3, 2009, we had British pound sterling
denominated capital lease obligations. The British pound
sterling denominated capital lease of $58.5 million is owed
by foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the
U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in the British pound sterling to
U.S. dollar exchange rate resulted in gains that were
recognized through results of operations. In 2008, we recognized
$21.3 million in foreign currency exchange gains related to
the British pound sterling denominated capital lease. We
currently estimate that the weakening of the value of the
U.S. dollar against the British pound sterling by 10% as it
relates to the capital lease obligation would lower operating
income by approximately $6 million.
Some of our divisions operate in functional currencies other
than the U.S. dollar. The net assets of these divisions are
exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses, which
are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
loss in shareholders equity. Such translation resulted in
unrealized losses of $15.1 million in 2008. We have
historically not attempted to hedge this equity risk.
The ultimate impact of future changes to these and other foreign
currency exchange rates on 2009 revenues, operating income, net
income, equity and comprehensive income is not determinable at
this time.
As part of our risk management strategy, we use derivative
instruments to hedge certain foreign currency exchange rate
exposures. Our objective is to offset gains and losses resulting
from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative
contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of
earnings. We use foreign currency exchange forward contracts and
participating forward contracts to reduce our risk related to
anticipated dollar equivalent foreign currency cash flows,
specifically forecasted revenue transactions and forecasted
operating expenses. Participating forwards
80
are the combination of a put and call option, structured such
that there is no premium payment, there is a guaranteed strike
price, and we can benefit from positive foreign currency
exchange movements on a portion of the notional amount.
At January 3, 2009, our foreign currency hedge portfolio
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Notional Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
Average Strike
|
|
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Hedges(Buy/Sell):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
$
|
(9,800
|
)
|
|
JPY
|
104
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Euro
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
EUR
|
1.43
|
|
Euro/Swedish Krona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
SEK
|
11.09
|
|
Chilean Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
CLP
|
668
|
|
Colombian Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,262
|
|
|
|
52,262
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
COP
|
2,294
|
|
Philippine Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,053
|
|
|
|
39,053
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
PHP
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
247,681
|
|
|
$
|
118,519
|
|
|
$
|
366,200
|
|
|
$
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended January 3, 2009, net unrealized gains on
our foreign currency hedge portfolio totaled $6.5 million.
We also recorded net realized foreign currency hedging losses of
$15.3 million as a component of cost of products sold in
the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
January 3, 2009. In addition, during 2008, we settled early
our Canadian dollar hedges which were expected to settle during
2009, realizing gains of $4.1 million. This gain was also
included as a component of cost of products sold in our
consolidated statement of operations.
Commodity
Sales Price Risk
Commodity pricing exposures include the potential impacts of
weather phenomena and their effect on industry volumes, prices,
product quality and costs. We manage our exposure to commodity
price risk primarily through our regular operating activities,
however, significant commodity price fluctuations, particularly
for bananas, pineapples and commodity vegetables could have a
material impact on our results of operations.
Commodity
Purchase Price Risk
We use a number of commodities in its operations including
tinplate in its canned products, plastic resins in our fruit
bowls, containerboard in its packaging containers and bunker
fuel for its vessels. We are most exposed to market fluctuations
in prices of containerboard and fuel. We currently estimate that
a 10% increase in the price of containerboard would lower
operating income by approximately $17 million and a 10%
increase in the price of bunker fuel would lower operating
income by approximately $20 million.
We enter into bunker fuel hedges to reduce our risk related to
price fluctuations on anticipated bunker fuel purchases. At
January 3, 2009, bunker fuel hedges had an aggregate
outstanding notional amount of 15,018 metric tons. The fair
value of the bunker fuel hedges at January 3, 2009 was a
liability of $3.6 million. For the year ended
January 3, 2009, we recorded unrealized losses of
$4.3 million and realized gains of $0.7 million.
81
Counterparty
Risk
The counterparties to our derivative instruments contracts
consist of a number of major international financial
institutions. We have established counterparty guidelines and
regularly monitors its positions and the financial strength of
these institutions. While counterparties to hedging contracts
expose us to credit-related losses in the event of a
counterpartys non-performance, the risk would be limited
to the unrealized gains on such affected contracts. We do not
anticipate any such losses.
82
BUSINESS
Dole Food Company, Inc. was founded in Hawaii in 1851 and was
incorporated under the laws of Hawaii in 1894. Dole
reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in July 2001. Our
operations are described below. For detailed financial
information with respect to our business and its operations, see
our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to
consolidated financial statements, which are included in this
prospectus beginning on
page F-1.
Overview
We are the worlds leading producer, marketer and
distributor of fresh fruit and fresh vegetables, including an
expanding line of value-added products. In the primary markets
we serve, we hold the number 1 or number 2 market
share position in our key product categories, including bananas,
packaged salads and packaged fruit. For the last twelve months
ended June 20, 2009, we had revenues of approximately
$7.2 billion, Adjusted EBITDA of approximately
$445 million and net income attributable to Dole Food
Company, Inc. of approximately $92 million.
We provide wholesale, retail and institutional customers around
the world with high quality food products that bear the
DOLE®
trademarks. We believe the DOLE trademarks and our products have
global appeal as they offer value and convenience, while also
benefiting from the growing focus on health and wellness among
consumers worldwide.
Founded in 1851, we have built a fully-integrated operating
platform that allows us to source, grow, process, market and
distribute our nearly 200 products in more than 90 countries. We
source our products worldwide both directly on Dole-owned or
leased land and through associated producer and independent
grower arrangements under which we provide varying degrees of
farming, harvesting, packing, shipping and marketing services.
We then use our global cold storage supply chain that features
the largest dedicated refrigerated containerized fleet in the
world, as well as an extensive network of packaging, ripening
and distribution centers, to deliver fresh Dole products to
market.
Industry
The worldwide fresh produce industry enjoys consistent
underlying demand and favorable growth dynamics. In recent
years, the market in the U.S. for fresh produce has increased
faster than the rate of population growth, supported by ongoing
trends including greater consumer demand for healthy, fresh and
convenient foods, increased retailer square footage devoted to
fresh produce, and greater emphasis among retailers on fresh
produce as a differentiating factor in attracting customers.
Health-conscious consumers are driving much of the growth in
demand for fresh produce. Over the past several decades, the
benefits of natural, preservative-free foods have become an
increasingly significant element of the public dialogue on
health and nutrition. As a result, consumption of fresh fruit
and vegetables has markedly increased. According to the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Americans consumed an
additional 38 pounds of fresh fruit and vegetables per
capita in 2006 compared to 1987.
Driven by consumer demand for convenient, healthy snacking
options, the U.S. packaged fruit category has experienced
growth of over 36% in the past ten years. Dole introduced FRUIT
BOWLS plastic cups in 1999, which along with other innovative
packaging items, such as fruit in resealable plastic jars,
parfaits and gels, have attracted new users to this category and
enabled the DOLE brand to achieve the number 1 market share
position in the U.S. packaged fruit category. Dole also
entered the frozen fruit category in 2004. As the leading brand,
Dole was the first to invest in national consumer awareness
which has supported 28% category growth since 2004.
As food retailers compete in a consolidating industry, they have
sought to increase profits by focusing on higher growth product
categories and value-added products, which generally have higher
margins. As a result, some retailers are reducing the dry goods
sections of the store, in favor of expanding their selection of
fresh and chilled items. This trend provides Dole with new
product and
83
merchandising opportunities for fresh produce and packaged
foods, especially for our value-added lines, such as packaged
salads, FRUIT BOWLS and fruit in plastic jars. Fully integrated
produce companies, such as Dole, are well positioned to meet the
needs of large retailers through the delivery of consistent,
high-quality produce, reliable service, competitive pricing and
innovative products responsive to consumer demand. In addition,
these companies, including Dole, have sought to strengthen
relationships with leading retailers through value-added
services such as banana ripening and distribution, category
management, branding initiatives and establishment of long-term
supply agreements.
Competitive
Strengths
Our competitive strengths have contributed to our strong
historical operating performance and should enable us to
capitalize on future growth opportunities:
|
|
|
|
|
Market Share Leader. Our key products hold the
number 1 or number 2 positions in their respective
markets. We maintain number 1 market share positions in
bananas in North America and Japan and the number 1 market
share position in the U.S. in packaged fruit products, including
our line of plastic fruit cups called FRUIT BOWLS, FRUIT BOWLS
in Gel, Fruit Parfaits and fruit in plastic jars. Our leadership
position provides us with global scale and support for our
world-class production, distribution and marketing platform that
would be difficult for others to replicate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong Global Brand. The DOLE brand was
introduced in 1933 and is one of the most recognized brands for
fresh and packaged produce in the United States, as evidenced by
DOLEs 68% unaided consumer brand awareness
more than twice that of DOLEs nearest competitor,
according to a major global research company (Millward Brown).
Consumer and institutional recognition of the DOLE trademark and
related brands and the association of these brands with high
quality food products contribute significantly to our leading
positions in the markets that we serve. Additionally, by
implementing a global marketing program, we believe we have made
the distinctive red DOLE letters and sunburst a
familiar symbol of freshness and quality recognized in the
aisles of the supermarket and around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
State-of-the-Art
Infrastructure and Supply Chain Management. Our
production, processing, transportation and distribution
infrastructure is
state-of-the-art,
enabling us to efficiently deliver among the highest quality and
freshest product to our customers. Dole quality starts right on
the farm, and that quality is preserved and protected in our
proprietary
farm-to-customer
refrigerated supply chain. Our network provides a closed-loop
cold storage supply chain that enables the worldwide transport
of perishable products and is the key to Dole quality and shelf
life. The investments in our infrastructure, including the DOLE
trademark, farms, packing houses, manufacturing facilities and
shipping assets, and our market-leading logistics and
distribution capabilities, allow us to act as a preferred fresh
and packaged food provider to leading global supermarkets and
mass merchandisers.
|
|
|
|
Diversity of Sourcing Locations. We currently
source our fresh fruits and vegetables from 25 countries
and distribute products in more than 90 countries. In
addition to owning and operating our own farms, we have
developed a unique worldwide network of over 9,000 farmers
who proudly produce to our standards. We are not dependent on
any one country for the sourcing of our products. The diversity
of our production sources allows us to consistently access the
highest quality products while also reducing our exposure to
events unique in any given region.
|
|
|
|
Low-Cost Production Capabilities. Our supply
chain and global sourcing network enable us to be a low cost
producer in many of our major product lines, including bananas,
North American fresh vegetables and packaged fruit products.
Over the last several years we have undertaken various
initiatives to achieve and maintain this low-cost position,
including leveraging our global
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
logistics infrastructure more efficiently. We intend to maintain
these low-cost positions through a continued focus on operating
efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong Management Team. Our management team
has a demonstrated history of delivering strong operating
results through disciplined execution. Under our strong
management teams guidance, Doles net revenues have
increased from $6.0 billion in 2006 to $7.2 billion
for the last twelve months ended June 20, 2009. Adjusted
EBITDA has increased from $293 million for fiscal year 2006
to $445 million for the last twelve months ended
June 20, 2009, and net income attributable to Dole Food
Company, Inc. has increased to $92 million over the same
periods from net losses of $54 million and $87 million
in fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
Business
Strategy
Key elements of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Leverage our Strong Brand and Market Leadership
Position. Our key products hold number 1 or
number 2 market positions in their respective markets. We
intend to maintain those positions and continue to expand our
leadership in new product areas as well as with new customers.
We have a history of leveraging our strong brand to successfully
enter, and in many cases become the largest player in
value-added food categories. We intend to continue to evaluate
and strategically introduce other branded products in the
value-added sectors of our business.
|
|
|
|
Focus on Value-Added Products. We intend to
continue shifting our product mix toward value-added food
categories while maintaining and building on our leadership
positions in fresh fruits and vegetables. For example, we have
successfully increased our percentage of revenue from
value-added products in our fresh vegetables and packaged foods
businesses, where our packaged salad lines and FRUIT BOWL and
other non-canned products now account for approximately 53% and
58% of those businesses respective revenues. Value-added
food categories are growing at a faster rate than traditional
commodity businesses and typically generate stronger margins. We
plan to continue to address the growing demand for convenient
and innovative products by investing in our higher margin,
value-added food businesses.
|
|
|
|
Build on Strong Presence in Stable Markets and Expand in
High-Growth Markets. We intend to continue to
reap the benefits of our strong brand and market position in
profitable, stable markets such as North America, Western
Europe, and Japan. Additionally, we are focusing on expansion in
higher growth markets such as China and Eastern Europe, where we
believe our capabilities in delivering fresh and high quality
products that also offer health, wellness and convenience
benefits, will enhance the existing growth and profitability of
our business.
|
|
|
|
Focus on Improving Operating Efficiency and Cash Flow. We
intend to continue to focus on profit improvement initiatives
and maximizing cash flow by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzing our current customer base and focusing on profitable
relationships with strategically important customers;
|
|
|
|
Leveraging our purchasing power to reduce our costs of raw
materials; and
|
|
|
|
Focusing capital investments to improve productivity.
|
Asset
Sales
We have established the reduction of our leverage as a key goal.
This initiative has two principal dimensions: improving
operating results, through leveraging of our strong global brand
and market leadership, coupled with a sharp focus on cost
reduction and increased operating efficiencies, and paying down
debt with the proceeds of asset sales and the increased earnings
resulting from improved operating performance. With respect to
asset sales, we set a goal of selling $200 million in
non-core or underperforming assets in 2008, which we have
exceeded. During 2008, cash
85
consideration related to our asset sale program totaled
approximately $236 million, including sales of land in
Hawaii, our fresh-cut flowers headquarters building in Miami,
Florida, our citrus and pistachio operations in California, two
farms in Chile, a land parcel in Turkey, two older refrigerated
ships, a distribution facility in Europe, our JP Fresh and Dole
France subsidiaries, and additional acreage located in
California.
For 2009, we have set a target of $200 million in
additional asset sales. During the first half of 2009, we
achieved significant progress toward this goal, having completed
the first phase of the sale of our fresh-cut flowers business,
and completed the sale of some of our banana properties in Latin
America and vegetable property in California. We received net
proceeds of $82 million for these three transactions, which
were used to pay down Doles revolving credit facility
pending reinvestment in our businesses. When all phases of these
transactions are complete, net proceeds to Dole will be
approximately $130 million.
During the third quarter of 2009, we signed letters of intent to
sell certain operating properties in Latin America for
approximately $68 million. We anticipate that the sales of
these properties will not have a significant impact on earnings.
We plan to continue to monetize non-core or underperforming
assets beyond 2009. As discussed in Note 12 to the notes to
the consolidated financial statements for the quarter and
half-year ended June 20, 2009, at the end of the second
quarter of 2009, we held $94 million of assets as Assets
Held for Sale. These assets were comprised primarily of land in
Hawaii. We currently expect these assets to be sold within the
next twelve months and that the proceeds from such sales will be
used to reduce our leverage.
Business
Segments
We have three business segments: fresh fruit, fresh vegetables
and packaged foods. The fresh fruit segment contains several
operating divisions that produce and market fresh fruit to
wholesale, retail and institutional customers worldwide. The
fresh vegetables segment contains two operating divisions that
produce and market commodity vegetables and packaged vegetables
and salads to wholesale, retail and institutional customers,
primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. The packaged foods
segment contains several operating divisions that produce and
market packaged foods including fruit, juices and snack foods.
For more information regarding revenues, profit and loss and
assets for each business segment for the last three fiscal
years, see Note 15 in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended January 3, 2009
included elsewhere is this prospectus. During the second quarter
of 2008, we approved and committed to a formal plan to divest
our fresh-cut flowers operations, and during the third quarter
of 2008 we signed a binding letter of intent to sell these
operations. Closing of the first phase of this transaction
occurred early in the first quarter of 2009. Accordingly, the
results of operations of the fresh-cut flowers segment are
reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
All of the related assets and liabilities of that segment have
been reclassified as
held-for-sale.
See Note 15 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus for revenues and assets by
geographic location.
Fresh
Fruit
Our fresh fruit business segment has four primary operating
divisions: bananas, European Ripening and Distribution, fresh
pineapples and Dole Chile. We believe that we are the industry
leader in growing, sourcing, shipping and distributing
consistently high-quality fresh fruit. The fresh fruit business
segment represented approximately 71%, 69% and 66% of
consolidated total revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
86
Bananas
We are one of the worlds largest producers of bananas,
growing and selling approximately 165 million boxes of
bananas annually. We sell most of our bananas under the DOLE
brand. We primarily sell bananas to customers in North America,
Europe and Asia. We are the number 1 brand of bananas in
both the U.S. (an approximate 36% market share) and Japan
(an approximate 31% market share) and the number 2 provider
in Europe (an approximate 12% market share). In Latin America,
we source our bananas primarily in Honduras, Costa Rica,
Ecuador, Colombia, Guatemala and Peru, growing on approximately
38,800 acres of company-owned farms and over
90,000 acres of independent producers farms. We ship
our Latin American bananas to North America and Europe in our
refrigerated and containerized shipping fleet. In Asia, we
source our bananas primarily in the Philippines. Bananas
accounted for approximately 41%, 38% and 41% of our fresh fruit
business segment revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Consistent with our strategy to focus on value-added products,
we have continued to expand our focus on higher margin, niche
bananas. While the traditional green bananas still
comprise the majority of our banana sales, we have successfully
introduced niche bananas (e.g., organic). We have also improved
the profitability of our banana business by focusing on
profitable customer relationships and markets.
While bananas are sold year round, there is a seasonal aspect to
the banana business. Banana prices and volumes are typically
higher in the first and second calendar quarters before the
increased competition from summer fruits.
Approximately 90% of our total retail volume in North America is
sold under contract. The contracts are typically one year in
duration and help to insulate us from fluctuations in the banana
spot market. Our principal competitors in the international
banana business are Chiquita Brands International, Inc. and
Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
European
Ripening and Distribution
Our European Ripening and Distribution business distributes DOLE
and non-DOLE branded fresh produce in Europe. This business
operates 24 ripening and distribution centers in eight
countries, predominantly in Western Europe. This is a
value-added business for us since European retailers generally
do not self-distribute or self-ripen. This business assists us
in firmly establishing our European customer relationships. In
2008, European Ripening and Distribution accounted for
approximately 41%, 42% and 37% of our fresh fruit business
segments revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Fresh
Pineapples
We are the number 2 global marketer of fresh pineapples,
growing and selling more than 34 million boxes annually. We
source our pineapples primarily from Dole-operated farms and
independent growers in Latin America, Hawaii, the Philippines
and Thailand. We produce and sell several different varieties,
including the sweet yellow pineapple. We introduced the sweet
yellow pineapple in 1999, and now market a substantial portion
of this fruit under the DOLE TROPICAL
GOLD®
label. Varieties of pineapple other than the sweet pineapples
are also used in our packaged products. Our primary competitor
in fresh pineapples is Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. Pineapples
accounted for approximately 7%, 8% and 9% of our fresh fruit
business segments revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Dole
Chile
We began our Chilean operations in 1982 and we are a leading
exporter of Chilean fruit. We export grapes, apples, pears,
stone fruit (e.g., peaches and plums) and kiwifruit from
approximately
1,600 Dole-owned
or -leased acres and 12,300 contracted acres. The weather
and geographic
87
features of Chile are similar to those of the Western United
States, with opposite seasons. Accordingly, Chiles harvest
is counter-seasonal to that in the northern hemisphere,
offsetting the seasonality in our other fresh fruit. We
primarily export Chilean fruit to North America, Latin America
and Europe. Our Dole Chile business division accounted for
approximately 6% of our fresh fruit business segments
revenues in 2008 and 2007 and 7% in 2006.
Fresh
Vegetables
Our fresh vegetables business segment operates through two
divisions: commodity vegetables and value-added. We source fresh
vegetables from Dole-owned and contracted farms. Our value-added
products are produced in
state-of-the-art
processing facilities in Yuma, Arizona, Soledad, California,
Springfield, Ohio and Bessemer City, North Carolina. Under
arrangements with independent growers, we purchase fresh produce
at the time of harvest and are generally responsible for
harvesting, packing and shipping the product to our central
cooling and distribution facilities. We pursue a balanced growth
strategy between our commodity and value-added divisions. In
2008, the value-added division accounted for 53% of our revenues
for this segment. The fresh vegetables business segment
accounted for approximately 14%, 16% and 18% of consolidated
total revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Commodity
Vegetables
We source, harvest, cool, distribute and market more than 20
different types of fresh and fresh-cut vegetables, including
iceberg lettuce, red and green leaf lettuce, romaine lettuce,
butter lettuce, celery, cauliflower, broccoli, carrots, brussels
sprouts, green onions, asparagus, snow peas and artichokes, as
well as fresh strawberries. We sell our commodity products
primarily in North America, Asia and, to a lesser extent,
Western Europe. Our primary competitors in this category
include: Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc., Duda Farm
Fresh Foods, Inc., Salyer American Fresh Foods and Ocean Mist
Farms.
Value-Added
Our value-added vegetable products include packaged salads and
packaged fresh-cut vegetables. Our U.S. unit market share
of the packaged salads category reported by IRI was
approximately 34% for the 2008 fiscal year. New product
development continues to drive growth in this area. Our primary
competitors in packaged salads include Chiquita Brands
International, Inc. (which markets Fresh Express), Ready Pac
Produce, Inc. and Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc.
Packaged
Foods
Our packaged foods segment produces canned pineapple, canned
pineapple juice, fruit juice concentrate, fruit in plastic cups,
jars and pouches and fruit parfaits. Most of our significant
packaged foods products hold the number 1 market position
in the U.S. We remain the market leader in the plastic fruit cup
category with six of the top ten items in the category. Fruit
for our packaged food products is sourced primarily in the
Philippines, Thailand, the United States and China and packed
primarily in four Asian canneries, two in Thailand and two in
the Philippines. We have continued to focus on expanding our
product range beyond our traditional canned fruit and juice
products. FRUIT BOWL and other non-canned products accounted for
approximately 58%, 59% and 55% of the segments revenues in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The trend towards convenience and healthy snacking has generated
strong growth in the plastic fruit cup category, which now
significantly exceeds the applesauce cup and shelf-stable
gelatin cup categories. In fact, Dole now produces more plastic
cups than traditional cans. Our FRUIT BOWLS products, introduced
in 1998, have achieved significant market share, as evidenced by
our 50% market share in the United States during 2008, as
reported by IRI. In 2003, Dole introduced fruit in a
24.5 oz. plastic jar, which has attained a 42% market share
in the refrigerated and shelf-stable jar
88
category, and a 74% share in the shelf-stable jar category, as
reported by IRI. To keep up with demand, we have made
substantial investments in our Asian canneries, significantly
increasing our FRUIT BOWLS capacity in the past four years.
These investments should enable us to continue as an industry
innovator and low-cost producer.
In the frozen fruit category, Dole is now the number 1
brand in North America and is positioned for continued growth as
the innovation leader. New product introductions include our new
WILDLY
NUTRITIOUStm
fruit blends, which offer targeted health benefits, as well as
our Sliced Strawberries, which drive consumer convenience. The
brand is also in the process of transitioning into a new
consumer-friendly, easy-open standup bag.
Our packaged foods segment accounted for approximately 15% of
consolidated revenues in 2008 and 2007 and 16% in 2006.
Discontinued
Operations
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we approved and committed to
a formal plan to divest Citrus. During March 2008, we entered
into an agreement to sell land and other related assets of
Citrus. The sale was completed during the third quarter of 2008,
and we received net proceeds of $28.1 million. In addition,
during the second quarter of 2008, we approved and committed to
a formal plan to divest our fresh-cut flowers operations, and
during the third quarter of 2008 we signed a binding letter of
intent to sell these operations. The first phase of the
transaction closed early in the first quarter of 2009.
Global
Logistics
We have significant product sourcing and related operations in
Cameroon, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, Ivory
Coast, the Philippines, South Africa, Spain, Thailand and the
United States. Significant volumes of Doles fresh fruit
and packaged products are marketed in Canada, Western Europe,
Japan and the United States, with lesser volumes marketed in
Australia, China, Hong Kong, New Zealand, South Korea, and other
countries in Asia, Europe, and Central and South America.
The produce that we distribute internationally is transported
primarily by 24 owned or leased ocean-going vessels. We ship our
tropical fruit in owned or chartered refrigerated vessels. All
of our tropical fruit shipments into the North American and core
European markets are delivered using pallets or containers. This
increases efficiency and minimizes damage to the product from
handling. Most of the vessels are equipped with controlled
atmosphere technology, to ensure product quality.
Backhauling services, transporting our own and
third-party cargo primarily from North America and Europe to
Latin America, reduce net transportation costs. We use vessels
that are both owned or operated under long-term leases, as well
as vessels chartered under contracts that typically last one
year.
Customers
Our top 10 customers in 2008 accounted for approximately
30% of total revenues. No one customer accounted for more than
6% of total 2008 revenues. Our customer base is highly
diversified, both geographically and in terms of product mix.
Each of our segments largest customers accounted for no
more than approximately 20% of that segments revenues. Our
largest customers are leading global and regional mass
merchandisers and supermarkets in North America, Europe and Asia.
Sales and
Marketing
We sell and distribute our fruit and vegetable products through
a network of fresh produce operations in North America, Europe,
Asia and Latin America. Some of these operations involve the
sourcing, distribution and marketing of fresh fruits and
vegetables while others involve only distribution
89
and marketing. We have regional sales organizations dedicated to
servicing major retail and wholesale customers. We also use the
services of brokers in certain regions, primarily for sales of
packaged fruits and packaged salads. Retail customers include
large chain stores with which Dole enters into product and
service contracts, typically for a one- or two-year term.
Wholesale customers include large distributors in North America,
Europe and Asia. We use consumer advertising, marketing and
trade spending, to promote new items, bolster our exceptional
brand awareness and promote nutrition knowledge. See information
by geographic location in Note 15 to the notes to the
consolidated financial statements for the three years ended
January 3, 2009.
Competition
The global fresh and packaged produce markets are intensely
competitive, and generally have a small number of global
producers, filled out with independent growers, packers and
middlemen. Our large, international competitors are Chiquita
Brands International, Inc., Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
and Del Monte Foods. In some product lines, we compete with
smaller national producers. In fresh vegetables, a limited
number of grower shippers in the United States and Mexico supply
a significant portion of the United States market, with numerous
smaller independent distributors also competing. We also face
competition from grower cooperatives and foreign government
sponsored producers. Competition in the various markets in which
we operate is affected by reliability of supply, product
quality, brand recognition and perception, price and the ability
to satisfy changing customer preferences through innovative
product offerings.
Employees
At January 3, 2009, we had approximately
40,900 full-time permanent employees and
34,900 full-time seasonal or temporary employees,
worldwide. Approximately 35% of our employees work under
collective bargaining agreements. Our collective bargaining
agreements with expirations in fiscal 2009 have each been
renewed, other than one agreement that is currently under
extension. We believe our relations with our employees are
generally good.
Trademark
Licenses
In connection with the sale of the majority of our juice
business to Tropicana Products, Inc. in May of 1995, we received
cash payments up front and granted to Tropicana a license,
requiring no additional future royalty payments, to use certain
DOLE trademarks on certain beverage products. We continue to
produce and market DOLE canned pineapple juice and pineapple
juice blend beverages, which were not part of the 1995 sale. We
have a number of additional license arrangements worldwide, none
of which is material to Dole and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole.
Research and
Development
Our research and development programs concentrate on sustaining
the productivity of our agricultural lands, food safety,
nutrition science, product quality, value-added product
development and packaging design. Agricultural research is
directed toward sustaining and improving product yields and
product quality by examining and improving agricultural
practices in all phases of production (such as development of
specifically adapted plant varieties, land preparation,
fertilization, cultural practices, pest and disease control,
post-harvesting, handling, packing and shipping procedures), and
includes
on-site
technical services and the implementation and monitoring of
recommended agricultural practices. Research efforts are also
directed towards integrated pest management and biological pest
control. We develop specialized machinery for various phases of
agricultural production and packaging that reduce labor costs,
increase efficiency and improve product quality. We conduct
agricultural research at field facilities primarily in
California, Hawaii, Latin America and Asia. We also sponsor
research related to environmental improvements and the
protection of worker and community health. The aggregate amounts
we spent on research and development in each of the last three
years have not been material in any of such years.
90
Food
Safety
Dole is undertaking strong measures to improve food safety. We
spearheaded the industry-wide Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement
in California and the pending Agreement in Arizona. We developed
and adopted enhanced Good Agricultural Practices, which include
raw material testing in the fields, expanded buffer zones and
increased water testing. We also use radio-frequency
identification (RFID) tags to track leafy greens as they move
from fields to trucks and through processing.
Dole salad plants are sanitized and inspected daily. We wash our
leafy greens three times in chilled, purified water that
includes anti-bacterial chlorine exposure before thorough
rinsing.
Environmental and
Regulatory Matters
Our agricultural operations are subject to a broad range of
evolving environmental laws and regulations in each country in
which we operate. In the United States, these laws and
regulations include the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, the
Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act.
Compliance with these foreign and domestic laws and related
regulations is an ongoing process that is not expected to have a
material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or
competitive position. Environmental concerns are, however,
inherent in most major agricultural operations, including those
conducted by us, and there can be no assurance that the cost of
compliance with environmental laws and regulations will not be
material. Moreover, it is possible that future developments,
such as increasingly strict environmental laws and enforcement
policies thereunder, and further restrictions on the use of
agricultural chemicals, could result in increased compliance
costs.
Our food operations are also subject to regulations enforced by,
among others, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and
state, local and foreign counterparts and to inspection by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture and other federal, state,
local and foreign environmental, health and safety authorities.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration enforces statutory
standards regarding the labeling and safety of food products,
establishes ingredients and manufacturing procedures for certain
foods, establishes standards of identity for foods and
determines the safety of food substances in the United States.
Similar functions are performed by state, local and foreign
governmental entities with respect to food products produced or
distributed in their respective jurisdictions.
In the United States, portions of our fresh fruit and vegetable
farm properties are irrigated by surface water supplied by local
government agencies using facilities financed by federal or
state agencies, as well as from underground sources. Water
received through federal facilities is subject to acreage
limitations under the 1982 Reclamation Reform Act. Worldwide,
the quantity and quality of water supplies varies depending on
weather conditions and government regulations. We believe that
under normal conditions these water supplies are adequate for
current production needs.
Internationally, we are subject to various government laws and
regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act and similar non-U.S. laws and regulations) and local
government regulations. To help ensure compliance with these
laws and regulations, we have adopted specific risk management
and compliance practices and policies, including a specific
policy addressing the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Legal
Proceedings
We are involved from time to time in claims and legal actions
incidental to our operations, both as plaintiff and defendant.
We have established what management currently believes to be
adequate reserves for pending legal matters. These reserves are
established as part of an ongoing worldwide assessment of claims
and legal actions that takes into consideration such items as
changes in the pending case load (including resolved and new
matters), opinions of legal counsel, individual developments in
court proceedings, changes in the law, changes in business
focus, changes in the
91
litigation environment, changes in opponent strategy and
tactics, new developments as a result of ongoing discovery, and
past experience in defending and settling similar claims. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with outside counsel,
the claims or actions to which we are a party are not expected
to have a material adverse effect, individually or in the
aggregate, on our financial condition or results of operations.
DBCP
Cases
A significant portion of Doles legal exposure relates to
lawsuits pending in the United States and in several foreign
countries, alleging injury as a result of exposure to the
agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane).
DBCP was manufactured by several chemical companies including
Dow and Shell and registered by the U.S. government for use
on food crops. Dole and other growers applied DBCP on banana
farms in Latin America and the Philippines and on pineapple
farms in Hawaii. Specific periods of use varied among the
different locations. Dole halted all purchases of DBCP,
including for use in foreign countries, when the U.S. EPA
cancelled the registration of DBCP for use in the United States
in 1979. That cancellation was based in part on a 1977 study by
a manufacturer which indicated an apparent link between male
sterility and exposure to DBCP among factory workers producing
the product, as well as early product testing done by the
manufacturers showing testicular effects on animals exposed to
DBCP. To date, there is no reliable evidence demonstrating that
field application of DBCP led to sterility among farm workers,
although that claim is made in the pending lawsuits. Nor is
there any reliable scientific evidence that DBCP causes any
other injuries in humans, although plaintiffs in the various
actions assert claims based on cancer, birth defects and other
general illnesses.
Currently there are 246 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaragua judgments. In addition, there
are 70 labor cases pending in Costa Rica under that
countrys national insurance program.
Thirty of the 246 lawsuits are currently pending in various
jurisdictions in the United States. On June 17, 2009, Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Chaney formalized her
April 23, 2009 oral ruling by issuing written Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law, formally ordering dismissal with
prejudice of the two remaining lawsuits brought on behalf of
Nicaraguan plaintiffs who had falsely claimed they were sterile
as a result of exposure to DBCP on Dole-contracted Nicaraguan
banana farms, finding that the plaintiffs, and certain of their
attorneys, fabricated their claims, engaged in a long-running
conspiracy to commit a fraud on the court, used threats of
violence to frighten witnesses and suppress the truth, and
conspired with corrupt Nicaraguan judges, depriving Dole and the
other companies of due process. On June 9, 2009, the First
Circuit Court of Hawaii dismissed the Patrickson case, which had
involved ten plaintiffs from Honduras, Costa Rica, Ecuador and
Guatemala, finding that their DBCP claims were time-barred by
the statute of limitations. In seven cases pending in Los
Angeles involving 672 claimants from Ivory Coast, where
Dole did not operate when DBCP was in use, plaintiffs
counsel, on July 17, 2009, has filed a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record in response to a witness who has come
forward alleging fraud. The remaining cases are pending in Latin
America and the Philippines. Claimed damages in DBCP cases
worldwide total approximately $44.2 billion, with lawsuits
in Nicaragua representing approximately 88% of this amount.
Typically in these cases Dole is a joint defendant with the
major DBCP manufacturers. Except as described below, none of
these lawsuits has resulted in a verdict or judgment against
Dole.
One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court with
12 Nicaraguan plaintiffs initially resulted in verdicts
which totaled approximately $5 million in damages against
Dole in favor of six of the plaintiffs. As a result of the
courts March 7, 2008 favorable rulings on Doles
post-verdict motions, including, importantly, the courts
decision striking down punitive damages in the case on
U.S. Constitutional grounds, the damages against Dole were
reduced to $1.58 million in total compensatory awards to
four of the plaintiffs; and the court granted Doles motion
for a new trial as to the claims of one of the plaintiffs. On
July 7, 2009, the Second District Court Appeals issued an
order to show cause why this $1.58 million judgment should
not be vacated and judgment be entered in defendants favor
on the
92
grounds that the judgment was procured through fraud. Plaintiffs
were to provide their response to the order to show cause to the
trial court within 30 days of the issuance of the order. In
that order, the Court of Appeals stated that the trial court
need not hold an evidentiary hearing to decide whether the
judgment was procured by fraud, but instead can rely on the
record that was presented in support of Doles request to
have the case sent back to the trial court. Since the Court of
Appeals order, the four plaintiffs, who prevailed against
Dole, and the one as to whom a new trial was granted, responded
to the Courts order to show cause. They moved to dismiss
Doles petition to set aside the judgment based on fraud.
The Court has set a hearing date of November 19, 2009 on
that motion. Dole believes this motion is without merit. The
Court has also calendered a hearing on Doles petition to
set aside the judgment based on fraud for January 25, 2010.
In Nicaragua, 197 cases are currently filed (of which 20
are active) in various courts throughout the country, all but
one of which were brought pursuant to Law 364, an October
2000 Nicaraguan statute that contains substantive and procedural
provisions that Nicaraguas Attorney General formally
opined are unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court
of Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional. Thirty-two
cases have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua:
$489.4 million (nine cases consolidated with
468 claimants) on December 11, 2002;
$82.9 million (one case with 58 claimants) on
February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one case with 20
claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million (one case with
four claimants) on May 25, 2004; $56.5 million (one
case with 72 claimants) on June 14, 2004;
$64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with
39 claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million
(one case with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005;
$46.4 million (one case with 62 claimants) on
August 20, 2005; $809 million (six cases consolidated
with 1,248 claimants) on December 1, 2006;
$38.4 million (one case with 192 claimants) on
November 14, 2007; and $357.7 million (eight cases
with 417 claimants) on January 12, 2009, which Dole
recently learned of unofficially. Except for the latest one,
Dole has appealed all judgments, with Doles appeal of the
August 8, 2005 $98.5 million judgment and of the
December 1, 2006 $809 million judgment currently
pending before the Nicaragua Court of Appeal. Dole will appeal
the $357.7 million judgment once it has been served.
Of the 20 active cases currently pending in civil courts in
Nicaragua, all have been brought under Law 364 except for one.
In all of the active cases where the proceeding has reached the
appropriate stage (7 of 20 cases), Dole has sought to
have the cases returned to the United States. In three of the
cases where Dole has sought return to the United States, the
courts have denied Doles request and Dole has appealed
that decision. Doles requests remain pending in the other
four cases.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision, which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions against
Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the Court of
Appeals in that case. A Special Master appointed by the Court of
Appeals has recommended that Plaintiffs counsel be ordered
to pay Defendants fees and costs up to $130,000 each to
Dole and the other two defendants; and following such
recommendation, the Court of Appeals has appointed a special
prosecutor. The Court has scheduled an oral argument involving
the special prosecutor and the lawyers who are the subject of
his inquiry on October 2, 2009.
There is one case pending in the U.S. District Court in
Miami, Florida seeking enforcement of the August 8, 2005
$98.5 million Nicaraguan judgment. On September 4,
2009, the Court completed an evidentiary hearing to consider
Doles request that the Court deny enforcement of this
judgment, contending that Nicaraguas judicial system does
not provide due process or an impartial judiciary, which also
lacks transparency and is corrupt. Dole anticipates that Miami
District Court Judge Paul C. Huck will issue a written decision
based on the hearing and related submissions by the parties.
Judge Huck is already aware of the evidence of fraud
detailed in Judge Chaneys June 17, 2009 written
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
93
Claimants have also sought to enforce the Nicaraguan judgments
in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. In Venezuela, the claimants
have attempted to enforce five of the Nicaraguan judgments in
that countrys Supreme Court: $489.4 million
(December 11, 2002); $82.9 million (February 25,
2004); $15.7 million (May 25, 2004);
$56.5 million (June 14, 2004); and $64.8 million
(June 15, 2004). The Venezuela Supreme Court has ordered
the plaintiffs to properly serve the defendants, or have their
request for recognition of these Nicaragua judgments dismissed.
An action filed to enforce the $27.7 million Nicaraguan
judgment (March 17, 2005) in the Colombian Supreme
Court was dismissed. In Ecuador, the claimants attempted to
enforce the five Nicaraguan judgments issued between
February 25, 2004 through June 15, 2004 in the Ecuador
Supreme Court. The First, Second and Third Chambers of the
Ecuador Supreme Court issued rulings refusing to consider those
enforcement actions on the ground that the Supreme Court was not
a court of competent jurisdiction for enforcement of a foreign
judgment. The plaintiffs subsequently refiled those five
enforcement actions in the civil court in Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Two of these subsequently filed enforcement actions have been
dismissed by the 3rd Civil Court
$15.7 million (May 25, 2004) and the
12th Civil Court $56.5 million
(June 14, 2004) in Guayaquil; plaintiffs have
sought reconsideration of those dismissals. The remaining three
enforcement actions are still pending.
Dole believes that none of the Nicaraguan judgments will be
enforceable against any Dole entity in the U.S. or in any
other country, because Nicaraguas Law 364 is
unconstitutional and violates international principles of due
process. Among other things, Law 364 is an improper
special law directed at particular parties; it
requires defendants to pay large, non-refundable deposits in
order to even participate in the litigation; it provides a
severely truncated procedural process; it establishes an
irrebuttable presumption of causation that is contrary to the
evidence and scientific data; and it sets unreasonable minimum
damages that must be awarded in every case.
On October 23, 2006, Dole announced that Standard Fruit de
Honduras, S.A. reached an agreement with the Government of
Honduras and representatives of Honduran banana workers. This
agreement establishes a Worker Program that is intended by the
parties to resolve in a fair and equitable manner the claims of
male banana workers alleging sterility as a result of exposure
to DBCP. The Honduran Worker Program will not have a material
effect on Doles financial condition or results of
operations. The official start of the Honduran Worker Program
was announced on January 8, 2007. On August 15, 2007,
Shell Oil Company was included in the Worker Program.
As to all the DBCP matters, Dole has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. While Dole believes there is no
reliable scientific basis for alleged injuries from the
agricultural field application of DBCP, Dole continues to seek
reasonable resolution of pending litigation and claims in the
U.S. and Latin America. For example, as in Honduras, Dole is
committed to finding a prompt resolution to the DBCP claims in
Nicaragua, and is prepared to pursue a structured worker program
in Nicaragua with science- based criteria. Los Angeles Superior
Court Judge Chaney had previously appointed a mediator to
explore possible settlement of all DBCP cases currently pending
before the court. Although no assurance can be given concerning
the outcome of these cases, in the opinion of management, after
consultation with legal counsel and based on past experience
defending and settling DBCP claims, the pending lawsuits are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on Doles
financial condition or results of operations.
European Union
Antitrust Inquiry
On October 15, 2008, the European Commission, or EC,
adopted a Decision against Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole
Fresh Fruit Europe OHG and against other unrelated banana
companies, finding violations of the European competition
(antitrust) laws. The Decision imposes 45.6 million
in fines on Dole.
The Decision follows a Statement of Objections, issued by the EC
on July 25, 2007, and searches carried out by the EC in
June 2005 at certain banana importers and distributors,
including two of Doles offices.
94
Dole received the Decision on October 21, 2008 and appealed
the Decision to the European Court of First Instance in
Luxembourg on December 24, 2008.
Dole made an initial $10 million (7.6 million)
provisional payment towards the 45.6 million fine on
January 22, 2009. As agreed with the European Commission
(DG Budget), Dole provided the required bank guaranty for the
remaining balance of the fine to the European Commission by the
deadline of April 30, 2009. The bank guaranty renews
annually during the appeals process (which may take several
years) and carries interest of 6.15% (accrued from
January 23, 2009). If the European Court of First Instance
fully agrees with Doles arguments presented in its appeal,
Dole will be entitled to the return of all monies paid, plus
interest.
On November 28 and 29, 2007, the EC conducted searches of
Dole offices in Italy and Spain, as well as of other
companies offices located in these countries. Dole
continues to cooperate with the ECs requests for
information.
Although no assurances can be given, and although there could be
a material adverse effect on Dole, Dole believes that it has not
violated the European competition laws. No accrual for the
Decision has been made in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, since Dole cannot determine at this time
the amount of probable loss, if any, incurred as a result of the
Decision.
Honduran Tax
Case
In 2005, Dole received a tax assessment from Honduras of
approximately $137 million (including the claimed tax,
penalty, and interest through the date of assessment) relating
to the disposition of all of our interest in Cervecería
Hondureña, S.A. in 2001. Dole believes the assessment is
without merit and filed an appeal with the Honduran tax
authorities, which was denied. As a result of the denial in the
administrative process, in order to negate the tax assessment,
on August 5, 2005, Dole proceeded to the next stage of the
appellate process by filing a lawsuit against the Honduran
government in the Honduran Administrative Tax Trial Court. The
Honduran government sought dismissal of the lawsuit and
attachment of assets, which Dole challenged. The Honduran
Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Honduran intermediate
appellate court that a statutory prerequisite to challenging the
tax assessment on the merits is the payment of the tax
assessment or the filing of a payment plan with the Honduran
courts; Dole has challenged the constitutionality of the statute
requiring such payment or payment plan. Although no assurance
can be given concerning the outcome of this case, in the opinion
of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the
pending lawsuits and tax-related matters are not expected to
have a material adverse effect on Doles financial
condition or results of operations.
Trade
Issues
Our foreign operations are subject to risks of expropriation,
civil disturbances, political unrest, increases in taxes and
other restrictive governmental policies, such as import quotas.
Loss of one or more of our foreign operations could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results. We strive to
maintain good working relationships in each country in which we
operate. Because our operations are a significant factor in the
economies of certain countries, our activities are subject to
intense public and governmental scrutiny and may be affected by
changes in the status of the host economies, the makeup of the
government or public opinion in a particular country.
The EU maintains banana regulations that impose tariffs on
bananas. On January 1, 2006, the EU implemented a
tariff only import regime for bananas. The 2001
Understanding on Bananas between the European Communities and
the United States required the EU to implement a tariff only
banana import system by this date.
Banana imports from Latin America are currently subject to a
tariff of 176 euro per metric ton for entry into the EU
market. Under the EUs previous banana regime, banana
imports from Latin America were subject to a tariff of
75 euro per metric ton and were also subject to import
license
95
requirements and volume quotas. License requirements and volume
quotas had the effect of limiting access to the EU banana market.
Although all Latin bananas are subject to a tariff of
176 euro per metric ton under the tariff only
regime, the EU had allowed up to 775,000 metric tons of
bananas from African, Caribbean, and Pacific, or ACP, countries
to be imported annually into the EU duty-free. This preferential
treatment of a zero tariff on up to 775,000 metric tons of
ACP banana imports, as well as the 176 euro per metric ton
tariff applied to Latin banana imports, was challenged by
Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Colombia in consultation
proceedings at the World Trade Organization, or WTO. In
addition, both Ecuador and the United States formally requested
the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, or DSB, to appoint panels to
review the matter.
The DSB issued final and definitive written rulings in favor of
Ecuador and the United States on November 27, 2008,
concluding that the 176 euro per metric ton tariff is
inconsistent with WTO trade rules. The DSB also considered that
the prior duty-free tariff reserved for ACP countries was
inconsistent with WTO trade rules but also recognized that, with
the current entry into force of Economic Partnership Agreements
between the EU and ACP countries, ACP bananas now may have
duty-free, quota-free access to the EU market.
Dole expects that the current tariff applied to Latin banana
imports will be lowered in order that the EU may comply with
these DSB rulings and with the WTO trade rules. The DSB rulings
did not indicate the amount the EU banana tariff should be
lowered, and Dole encourages a timely resolution through
negotiations among the EU, the U.S., and the Latin banana
producing countries. Recent press reports indicate that the EU
now expects to reach resolution on the tariff by the end of
October 2009; however the Latin banana producing countries
and the EU do not yet appear to have agreed on the tariff
reduction amount or specific timetable to implement any proposed
reduction. Without such specifics, Dole cannot yet determine
what potential effects this outcome will have for Dole.
Notwithstanding, Dole strongly supports the continued efforts to
resolve this dispute and believes that the EU banana tariff,
once lowered, will be a favorable result for Dole.
Seasonality
Our sales volumes remain relatively stable throughout the year.
We experience seasonal earnings characteristics, predominantly
in the fresh fruit segment, because fresh fruit prices
traditionally are lower in the second half of the year, when
summer fruits are in the markets. Our packaged foods segment
experiences peak demand during certain well-known holidays and
observances; the impact is less than in the fresh-fruit segment.
Properties
The following is a description of our significant properties.
North
America
We own our executive office facility in Westlake Village,
California, and lease a divisional office in Monterey,
California, from an affiliate.
Our Hawaii operations are located on the island of Oahu and
total approximately 26,000 acres, which we own. Of the
total acres owned, we farm pineapples on 2,700 acres and
coffee and cacao on an additional 195 acres. The remaining
acres are leased or are in pastures and forest reserves. As of
January 3, 2009, approximately 9,000 acres were
classified as assets
held-for-sale.
Other Hawaii land parcels are currently under evaluation for
potential sale.
We own approximately 200 acres of farmland in California,
and lease approximately 12,600 acres of farmland in
California and 4,300 acres in Arizona in connection with
our vegetable and berry operations. The majority of this acreage
is farmed under joint growing arrangements with independent
growers, while we farm the remainder. We own cooling, packing
and shipping facilities in Marina,
96
Gonzales and Huron, California. Additionally, we have
partnership interests in facilities in Yuma, Arizona and
Salinas, California, and leases in facilities in the following
California cities: Oxnard, Monterey and Watsonville. We own and
operate
state-of-the-art,
packaged salad and vegetable plants in Yuma, Arizona, Soledad,
California, Springfield, Ohio and Bessemer City,
North Carolina.
We own approximately 2,600 acres of peach orchards in
California of which we farm 1,200 acres. At January 3,
2009, approximately 600 acres were classified as assets
held-for-sale.
We also own and operate a plant in Atwater, California that
produces individually quick frozen fruit, and lease a production
facility located in Decatur, Michigan.
Latin
America
We own offices in San Jose, Costa Rica, and La Ceiba,
Honduras. We also lease offices in Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador
and Guatemala.
We produce bananas directly from owned plantations in Costa
Rica, Ecuador and Honduras as well as through associated
producers or independent growing arrangements in those countries
and others, including Guatemala and Colombia. We own
approximately 33,600 acres in Costa Rica, 3,900 acres
in Ecuador and 28,400 acres in Honduras, all related to
banana production, although some of the acreage is not presently
under production.
We own approximately 8,100 acres of land in Honduras,
7,300 acres of land in Costa Rica and 3,000 acres of
land in Ecuador, all of which is related to pineapple
production, although some of the acreage is not presently under
production. We also own a juice concentrate plant in Honduras
for pineapple and citrus. Pineapple is grown primarily for the
fresh produce market.
We grow grapes, stone fruit, kiwi and pears on approximately
1,600 acres owned or leased by us in Chile. We own or
operate 11 packing and cold storage facilities, a fresh-cut
salad plant and a small local fruit distribution company in
Chile. We own or operate a packing and cooling plant and a local
fruit distribution company in Argentina.
We also own and operate corrugated box plants in Chile, Costa
Rica, Ecuador and Honduras, which we are in the process of
selling.
We indirectly own 35% of Bananapuerto, an Ecuadorian port, and
operate the port pursuant to a port services agreement signed in
2002, the term of which is up to 30 years.
Dole Latin America operates a fleet of seven refrigerated
container ships, of which four are owned, two are under
long-term capital leases and one is long-term chartered. In
addition, Dole Latin America operates a fleet of
17 breakbulk refrigerated ships, of which seven are owned,
nine are long-term chartered and one is chartered for one year.
We also cover part of our requirements under contracts with
existing liner services and occasionally charter vessels for
short periods on a time or voyage basis as and when required. We
own or lease approximately 15,300 refrigerated containers,
2,000 dry containers, 5,900 chassis and
4,800 generator sets worldwide.
Asia
We operate a pineapple plantation of approximately
33,900 leased acres in the Philippines. Approximately
18,500 acres of the plantation are leased to us by a
cooperative of our employees that acquired the land pursuant to
agrarian reform law. The remaining 15,400 acres are leased
from individual land owners. Two multi-fruit canneries, a blast
freezer, cold storage, a juice concentrate plant, a box forming
plant, a can and drum manufacturing plant, warehouses, wharf and
a fresh fruit packing plant, each owned by us, are located at or
near the pineapple plantation.
We own and operate a tropical fruit cannery and a multi-fruit
processing factory in central Thailand and a second tropical
fruit cannery in southern Thailand. Dole also grows pineapple in
Thailand on approximately 3,800 acres of owned land, not
all of which are currently under cultivation.
97
We produce bananas and papaya from 32,400 acres of leased
land in the Philippines and also source these products through
associated producers or independent growing arrangements in the
Philippines. A plastic extruding plant and a box forming plant,
both owned by us, are located near the banana plantations. We
also operate banana ripening and distribution centers in Hong
Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, The Peoples Republic of China,
the Philippines and New Zealand.
Bananas are also grown on 1,000 acres of leased land in
Australia.
Additionally, we source products from over 1,100 Japanese
farmers through independent growing arrangements.
Europe
We maintain our European headquarters in Paris, France and have
major regional offices in Antwerp, Belgium, Prague, Czech
Republic, Hamburg, Germany, Lübeck, Germany, Milan, Italy,
Madrid, Spain, Athens, Greece, Helsingborg, Sweden and Cape
Town, South Africa, which are leased from third parties.
We operate and own one banana ripening, produce and flower
distribution center in Sweden, two banana ripening and produce
distribution facilities in Spain, two in Germany, one in Turkey
and one in Italy. We also operate and lease three banana
ripening, produce and flower distribution centers in Sweden,
four banana ripening and produce distribution facilities in
Spain, one in Portugal, three in Italy, one in Belgium, two in
Austria, and three in Germany. We have a minority interest in a
French company, Compagnie Fruitière, that owns a majority
interest in banana and pineapple plantations in Cameroon, Ghana
and the Ivory Coast. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
Compagnie Fruitière acquired our JP Fresh subsidiary in the
United Kingdom and Dole France subsidiary which operate banana
ripening and distribution facilities. We are also the majority
owner in a company operating a port terminal and distribution
facility in Livorno, Italy.
In addition, we own Saba Fresh Cuts AB, which owns and operates
a state-of-the-art, packaged salad and vegetable plant in
Helsingborg, Sweden.
98
MANAGEMENT
Board of
Directors and Executive Officers
The names, ages and positions of our directors and executive
officers as of August 11, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
David H. Murdock
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board; Director
|
David A. DeLorenzo
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer; Director
|
C. Michael Carter
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary; Director
|
Andrew J. Conrad
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
Scott A. Griswold
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Corporate Development; Director
|
Justin M. Murdock
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Vice President, New Products and Corporate Development; Director
|
Edward C. Roohan
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Director
|
Joseph S. Tesoriero
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Roberta Wieman
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff; Director
|
Below is a list of the names and ages of all of our directors
and executive officers as of August 11, 2009, indicating
their positions with Dole and their principal occupations during
the past five years. The current terms of the executive officers
will expire at the next organizational meeting of our Board of
Directors or at such time as their successors are elected.
David H. Murdock, Chairman of the
Board. Mr. Murdock, 86, joined Dole as
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in July 1985.
In June 2007, David A. DeLorenzo was elected President and Chief
Executive Officer of Dole, at which time Mr. Murdock
continued as a director and officer of Dole in the capacity of
Chairman of the Board. He has been Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and Director of Castle & Cooke,
Inc., a Hawaii corporation, since October 1995 (Mr. Murdock
has beneficially owned all of the capital stock of
Castle & Cooke, Inc. since September 2000). Since June
1982, he has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc., a Delaware corporation
wholly owned by Mr. Murdock. Mr. Murdock also is the
developer of the Sherwood Country Club in Ventura County,
California, and numerous other real estate developments.
Mr. Murdock also is the sole stockholder of numerous
corporations engaged in a variety of business ventures and in
the manufacture of industrial and building products.
Mr. Murdock is Chairman of the Executive Committee and of
the Corporate Compensation and Benefits Committee of Doles
Board of Directors. Mr. Murdock is also Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of DHM Holdings.
David A. DeLorenzo, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and Director. Mr. DeLorenzo, 62, rejoined
Dole as its President and Chief Executive Officer in June 2007.
Mr. DeLorenzo originally joined Dole in 1970. He was
President of Dole Fresh Fruit Company from September 1986 to
June 1992, President of Dole Food Company from July 1990 to
March 1996, President of Dole Food Company-International from
September 1993 to March 1996, President and Chief Operating
Officer of Dole from March 1996 to February 2001, and Vice
Chairman of Dole from February 2001 through December 2001, at
which time Mr. DeLorenzo became a consultant for Dole under
contract for the period from January 2002 through January 2007.
He has been a director of Dole since February 1991.
C. Michael Carter, Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and
Director. Mr. Carter, 66, became Doles
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
in July 2003, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary in July 2004, and a director of Dole in
April 2003. Mr. Carter joined Dole in October 2000 as Vice
President,
99
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to his employment
by Dole, Mr. Carter had served as Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Pinkertons Inc.
Prior to Pinkertons, Inc., Mr. Carter held positions
at Concurrent Computer Corporation, Nabisco Group Holdings, The
Singer Company and the law firm of Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam and
Roberts. Mr. Carter is also Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of DHM Holdings.
Andrew J. Conrad, Ph.D.,
Director. Dr. Conrad, 45, became a director
in July 2003. Dr. Conrad was a co-founder of the National
Genetics Institute, a provider of advanced genetics testing
services for blood screening, medical testing and clinical
research, and has been its chief scientific officer since 1992.
The National Genetics Institute is now a subsidiary of
Laboratory Corporation of America, where Dr. Conrad is
Chief Scientific Officer.
Scott A. Griswold, Executive Vice President, Corporate
Development, and Director. Mr. Griswold, 56,
became Doles Vice President, Acquisitions and Investments
in July 2003, Executive Vice President, Corporate Development in
July 2004, and a director in April 2003. Mr. Griswold has
been Executive Vice President of Finance of Castle &
Cooke, Inc., which is wholly owned by David H. Murdock, since
2000, and previously, from 1993, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Pacific Holding Company, a sole
proprietorship of David H. Murdock. Since 1987, he has served as
an officer
and/or
director of various other companies held by Mr. Murdock.
Mr. Griswold is also Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of DHM Holdings.
Justin M. Murdock, Vice President, New Products and Corporate
Development, and Director. Mr. Murdock, 36,
became Doles Vice President, New Products and Corporate
Development in November 2004, and a director in April 2003.
Mr. Murdock has been Vice President of Investments of
Castle & Cooke, Inc., which is wholly owned by David
H. Murdock, since 2001, and previously, from 1999, Vice
President of Mergers and Acquisitions of Pacific Holding
Company, a sole proprietorship of David H. Murdock.
Edward C. Roohan, Director. Mr. Roohan,
46, became a director of Dole in April 2003. Mr. Roohan was
President and Chief Operating Officer of Castle &
Cooke, Inc., which is wholly owed by David H. Murdock, from
December 2000 until August 2009. He was Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Castle & Cooke, Inc. from April
1996 to December 2000. He has served as an officer
and/or
director of various companies held by Mr. Murdock for more
than five years. Mr. Roohan is also the former president
and a former director of DHM Holdings. Mr. Roohan is
Chairman of the Audit Committee of Doles Board of
Directors.
Joseph S. Tesoriero, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Tesoriero, 56, became
Doles Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in July
2004, after joining Dole as Vice President of Taxes in October
2002. Prior to his employment by Dole, Mr. Tesoriero was
Senior Vice President of Tax at Global Crossing.
Mr. Tesoriero also held tax positions at Coleman Camping
Equipment, Revlon Cosmetics and International Business Machines.
Mr. Tesoriero is also Vice President of DHM Holdings.
Roberta Wieman, Executive Vice President, Chief of Staff, and
Director. Ms. Wieman, 63, joined Dole in
1991 as Executive Assistant to the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer. She became a Vice President of Dole in
1995, Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff in July 2004,
and a director in April 2003. Ms. Wieman has been Executive
Vice President of Castle & Cooke, Inc. since August
2001; Vice President and Corporate Secretary of
Castle & Cooke, Inc. from April 1996 to August 2001;
Executive Vice President, Administrative and Corporate Secretary
of Castle & Cooke, Inc. from April 1996 to present;
and a Director of Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc., which is wholly owned
by Mr. Murdock, since August 1996, and Assistant Secretary
thereof for more then five years. Ms. Wieman is also
Executive Vice President of Administration and Assistant
Secretary of DHM Holdings.
All directors serve a term from the date of their election until
the next annual meeting. Our executive officers (as defined in
the SECs
Rule 3b-7)
are David H. Murdock, C. Michael Carter, David A. DeLorenzo and
Joseph S. Tesoriero.
100
Justin M. Murdock is a son of David H. Murdock. Otherwise, there
is no family relationship between any other officer or director
of Dole.
Dole has adopted a code of ethics as defined by the
rules of the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, applicable to our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A
copy of the code of ethics, which we call our Code of Conduct,
and which applies to all employees of Dole, is available on
Doles web site at www.dole.com. We intend to post on our
web site any amendments to, or waivers (with respect to our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer) from, this code of ethics within
four business days of any such amendment or waiver.
Composition of
the Board of Directors
Upon the consummation of this offering, the terms of office of
members of our Board of Directors will be divided into three
classes:
|
|
|
|
|
Class I directors, whose terms will expire at the annual
meeting of stockholders to be held in 2012;
|
|
|
|
Class II directors, whose terms will expire at the annual
meeting of stockholders to be held in 2011; and
|
|
|
|
Class III directors, whose terms will expire at the annual
meeting of stockholders to be held in 2010.
|
Our Class I directors will
be ,
our Class II directors will
be ,
and our Class III directors will
be .
At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to the
directors whose terms will then expire will be elected to serve
from the time of election and qualification until the third
annual meeting following such election. Any vacancies in our
classified Board of Directors will be filled by the remaining
directors and the elected person will serve the remainder of the
term of the class to which he or she is appointed. Any
additional directorships resulting from an increase in the
number of directors will be distributed among the three classes
so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of
one-third of the directors.
The Company has traditionally used the standards of independence
provided by the NYSE to determine whether a director is
independent, since Dole securities were listed on the NYSE prior
to Doles going-private merger transaction in 2003. Prior
to the consummation of this offering, our Board of Directors
will make a determination with respect to the independence of
our Board as it will be constituted as of the consummation of
this offering by reference to the standards of the NYSE. We
expect that a majority of our Board of Directors will be
independent upon the consummation of this offering.
101
Board Structure
and Committee Composition
As of the date of this prospectus, our Board of Directors has
eight directors and the following committees: Audit and
Corporate Compensation and Benefits. Prior to the consummation
of this offering, we will reconstitute the Board of Directors so
that it has seven directors and will also constitute a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The composition
of these committees during the last fiscal year and the function
of each of the committees are described below. During fiscal
2008, our Board of Directors held four meetings. Except for
Mr. Andrew J. Conrad, each director attended at least 75%
of all Board and applicable committee meetings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
Compensation and
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
Benefits Committee
|
|
C. Michael Carter
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew J. Conrad
|
|
|
|
X
|
David A. DeLorenzo
|
|
|
|
X
|
Scott A. Griswold
|
|
X
|
|
|
David H. Murdock
|
|
|
|
Chairman
|
Justin M. Murdock
|
|
X
|
|
|
Edward C. Roohan
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
Roberta Wieman
|
|
|
|
X
|
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors consists of Messrs. Scott A. Griswold,
Justin M. Murdock and Edward C. Roohan. The Audit Committee,
which currently has no independent members, but upon
consummation of this offering will consist of only independent
directors, makes recommendations to our Board of Directors
regarding the selection of independent auditors, reviews the
results and scope of the audit and other services provided by
our independent auditors, and reviews and evaluates our audit
and control functions. Our Audit Committee held four meetings
during fiscal year 2008. Our Board of Directors has determined
Mr. Roohan qualifies as an audit committee financial
expert as defined by the rules under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Upon consummation of this
offering, at least one of the independent directors will qualify
as an audit committee financial expert. The
background and experience of each of our audit committee members
are set forth above. Prior to the consummation of this offering,
our Board of Directors will adopt a written charter under which
the Audit Committee will operate. A copy of the charter, which
will satisfy the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE,
will be available on our website.
Corporate Compensation and Benefits
Committee. The Corporate Compensation and
Benefits Committee of our Board of Directors consists of
Messrs. Andrew J. Conrad, David A. DeLorenzo and David H.
Murdock and Ms. Roberta Wieman. The Corporate Compensation
and Benefits Committee, which upon consummation of this offering
will consist of only independent directors, oversees our
compensation plans and organizational matters. Such oversight
includes decisions regarding executive management salaries,
incentive compensation, long-term compensation plans and equity
plans for our employees and consultants. Our Corporate
Compensation and Benefits Committee held two meetings during
fiscal year 2008. Prior to the consummation of this offering,
our Board of Directors will adopt a written charter under which
the Corporate Compensation and Benefits Committee will operate.
A copy of the charter, which will satisfy the applicable
standards of the SEC and the NYSE, will be available on our
website.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee of our Board of Directors will consist
of .
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which upon
consummation of the offering will consist of only independent
directors, will be responsible for recruiting and retention of
qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, including
proposing such individuals to the Board of Directors for
nomination for election as directors, for evaluating the
performance, size and composition of the Board of Directors and
for oversight of our compliance activities. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee will
102
consider written suggestions from stockholders, including
potential nominees for election, and oversee the
corporations governance programs. Prior to the
consummation of this offering, our Board of Directors will adopt
a written charter under which the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee will operate. A copy of the charter, which
will satisfy the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE,
will be available on our website.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our Corporate Compensation and Benefits Committee consisted of
Messrs. Andrew J. Conrad, David A. DeLorenzo and David H.
Murdock and Ms. Roberta Wieman during fiscal year 2008.
During fiscal year 2008, Mr. Murdock served as our
Chairman, Mr. DeLorenzo served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer and Ms. Wieman served as our Executive
Vice President, Chief of Staff. Mr. Murdock is the father
of Justin M. Murdock, our Vice President, New Products and
Corporate Development. Information with respect to the related
party transactions involving the members of our Corporate
Compensation and Benefits Committee is set forth below under
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Limitation of
Directors Liability and Indemnification
The Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes corporations to
limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors to
corporations and their stockholders for monetary damages for
breaches of directors fiduciary duties. Our certificate of
incorporation includes a provision that eliminates the personal
liability of directors for monetary damages for actions taken as
a director, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for breach of duty of loyalty;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional
misconduct or knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(unlawful dividends); or
|
|
|
|
for transactions from which the director derived improper
personal benefit.
|
Our bylaws provide that we must indemnify our directors and
officers to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware
General Corporation Law. We are also expressly authorized to
carry directors and officers insurance providing
indemnification for our directors, officers and certain
employees for some liabilities. We believe that these
indemnification provisions and insurance are useful to attract
and retain qualified directors and officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for
breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have
the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation
against directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders.
In addition to the indemnification provided by our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, we will enter into agreements to
indemnify our directors and executive officers. These
agreements, among other things, will require us to indemnify
these directors and officers for certain expenses, including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts
incurred by any such person in any action or proceeding,
including any action by or in our right, arising out of that
persons services as a director or officer of us or any of
our subsidiaries or any other company or enterprise to which the
person provides services at our request.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which
indemnification is sought.
103
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion & Analysis
Objectives
Dole has historically compensated its Named Executive Officers
through a mix of cash programs: base salary, annual incentives
and long-term incentives. These programs are designed to be
competitive with both general industry and food and consumer
products companies and to align the Named Executive Officers
incentives with the long-term interests of Dole. The
Companys compensation policies are intended to enable Dole
to attract and retain top quality management as well as to
motivate management to set and achieve aggressive goals in their
respective areas of responsibility. The compensation setting
process consists of targeting total compensation for each Named
Executive Officer and reviewing each component of compensation
both individually and as a piece of overall compensation.
In connection with becoming a public company, certain aspects of
our compensation mix will likely change, primarily in connection
with our adoption of the Dole Food Company Inc. 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan, or the 2009 Stock Plan, pursuant to which we
intend to grant equity awards to our Named Executive Officers,
other employees and directors effective upon the consummation of
this offering using the initial offering price.
The Companys Named Executive Officers refers
to those officers identified in the Summary Compensation
Table below. Our Named Executive Officers for 2008 were:
David H. Murdock, Chairman; David A. DeLorenzo, President and
Chief Executive Officer; C. Michael Carter, Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary; and Joseph
S. Tesoriero, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Corporate
Compensation and Benefits Committee Role
The Corporate Compensation and Benefits Committee, or the
Committee, meets as often as required during the year in
furtherance of its duties, including an annual review of
compensation for the Named Executive Officers. The Committee
retains the services of Hewitt Associates, an executive
compensation consulting firm, to review periodically the
competitiveness of the Companys executive compensation
programs relative to comparable companies. Hewitt provides the
Committee with the relevant market data for each Named Executive
Officers position, as well as for other key executives
within Dole. Hewitt also responds to requests generated by the
Committee through management. Hewitt also provides
administrative employee benefit services and actuarial
valuations to the Company.
Role of Named
Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
Mr. Murdock annually reviews Mr. DeLorenzos
performance and receives input from Mr. DeLorenzo with
respect to the performance of Messrs. Carter and Tesoriero.
Recommendations with respect to each component of pay are
presented to the Committee for approval. The Committee can
exercise its discretion in modifying recommendations made for
any Named Executive Officer. The Committee alone makes decisions
with regard to Mr. Murdocks compensation.
Benchmarking
The Committee compares each component of its pay program against
a group of food and consumer products companies. The Committee
also compares pay components to other general industry
companies. For comparison purposes, Doles revenue is
slightly below the median of the group and data is
size-regressed to adjust the compensation data for differences
in revenue. Annual
104
revenues range from approximately $1 billion to
$17 billion. The companies in the group are as follows and
represent the relevant companies found in Hewitts database:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
|
|
Del Monte Foods Company
|
|
Kellogg Company
|
|
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.
|
Campbell Soup Company
|
|
General Mills, Inc.
|
|
McCormick & Company, Inc.
|
|
UST Inc.
|
Chiquita Brands International, Inc.
|
|
H. J. Heinz Company
|
|
Molson Coors Brewing Co.
|
|
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company
|
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
|
|
The Hershey Company
|
|
Reynolds American Inc.
|
|
|
Corn Products International Inc.
|
|
Hormel Foods Corporation
|
|
Sara Lee Corporation
|
|
|
Dole competes with many larger public companies for executive
talent. Historically, the Committee has determined that, because
Dole was a privately-held enterprise, Dole would rely on base
salary and annual incentives that are targeted at or above the
median of other similarly sized companies and that long-term
incentive compensation would trail the median.
Total Direct
Pay Compensation
Total direct pay at Dole has three components: base salary and
annual and long-term incentive programs.
Based on the analysis of the competitive review, targeted 2008
total direct pay is as follows: for the Chairman, approximately
$3.4 million; for the President and Chief Executive
Officer, approximately $4.3 million; for the Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
approximately $1.9 million; and, for the Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, approximately $1.5 million. Base
salary and annual incentives for Mr. DeLorenzo are targeted
slightly above the median of the similar compensation for
similarly situated executive officers at other comparably sized
companies.
In establishing award levels for the other Named Executive
Officers, the Committee uses a similar process. Base salaries
and annual incentives are targeted approximately at or above the
median for the other Named Executive Officers.
Under Doles current total compensation structure, the
approximate mix of base salary, annual incentive and long-term
incentive programs for the Named Executive Officers is as
follows: 25% 35% to base salary, 25% 30%
to annual incentives and 40% 45% to long-term
incentives. In allocating total compensation among these
components of pay, the Committee believes the compensation
package should be predominantly performance-based since these
individuals have the greatest ability to affect and influence
the financial performance of the Company.
Base
Salary
The Committee wants to provide a base salary that is
commensurate with the position in the Company and is comparable
to what other individuals in similarly situated positions might
receive. Base salaries are approximately 25 35% of
total direct compensation. The Committee considers each Named
Executive Officers position relative to the market, his
responsibilities and performance in the job. Mr. Tesoriero
received a salary adjustment in July 2008 based on both his
level of pay relative to the benchmarking data and his level of
performance. Based on benchmarking data, base salary changes to
other Named Executive Officers were determined not to be
necessary. Based on market data and factors noted above, the
Committee decided on the pay levels noted in the Summary
Compensation Table.
Annual
Incentives
General
Doles annual discretionary incentive program, the One-Year
Management Incentive Plan, or the One-Year Plan, has target
bonuses for the Named Executive Officers, as a percentage of
salary, ranging from 75% to 110%. The target bonuses for fiscal
2008 for each Named Executive Officer was as follows: 110% of
base salary for Mr. Murdock and Mr. DeLorenzo, 85% of
base salary for
105
Mr. Carter, and 75% of base salary for Mr. Tesoriero.
Payments are generally made if the specified minimum level of
financial performance is realized and may be increased to
maximum levels only if substantially higher performance levels
are attained, subject to the discretion of the Committee.
Historically, payments could range from 0% to 300% of target.
Maximums over 200% were used at Dole because of the lack of
equity upside.
Annual financial performance goals are recommended by management
and set by the Committee. Financial performance goals are
structured to present a challenging, yet achievable
profitability scenario for the Company. The Committee sets the
minimum, target and maximum levels such that the relative
difficulty of achieving the target level is consistent from year
to year.
Consistent with the approach for allocating total target
compensation among the three components of compensation, target
annual cash incentive levels for the Named Executive Officers
under the One-Year Plan are approximately 25% to 30% of total
direct compensation.
The Named Executive Officers have identical financial
performance goals for their incentives and may earn 100% of
their targeted incentives if established targets for financial
performance goals are met. The Committee may approve
discretionary payments to the Named Executive Officers if the
financial performance goal in a given fiscal year is not
attained, in recognition of their respective overall performance
at the Company.
Metrics for
Fiscal 2008
Cash Flow Return on Investment, or CFROI, was chosen as the
annual financial performance goal for fiscal 2008 and the
incentive pool was funded based on a CFROI target of 13.56%.
Actual results were 15.79%. CFROI was chosen because management
believes it provides a comprehensive view of annual consolidated
performance and focuses management on cash generation and debt
reduction. In determining the funding of the bonus pool, the
Committee compares actual consolidated results with the target
performance level for CFROI. For incentive purposes, CFROI is
our annual budgeted EBITDA divided by budgeted investment. The
annual budget is the budget we use for operating and planning
purposes and is not a special budget used for compensation
purposes.
In determining the achievement of CFROI goals in 2008, the
Committee approved an incentive pool based on CFROI results
adjusted for unusual or non-recurring items such as
unanticipated costs related to weather events and book gains
from various asset sales. 2008 adjusted CFROI was significantly
above budget (due to Doles success in increasing EBITDA
and paying down debt), which resulted in an initial guideline
amount for the overall incentive pool for the Named Executive
Officers equal to approximately 180% of their aggregate target
bonus amounts. The Committee then exercised its discretion under
the terms of the One-Year Plan to reduce the aggregate amount of
the incentive pool for the Named Executive Officers. In
exercising its discretion, the Committee gave consideration to
the then continuing worldwide financial crisis. In addition to
reducing the overall incentive pool for the Named Executive
Officers, the decision was made to reduce bonuses throughout the
Company. The overall incentive pool for the Named Executive
Officers was reduced by approximately 33%, whereas the incentive
pools for corporate management bonuses and divisional bonuses
were reduced by approximately 25% and 10%, respectively. Each
Named Executive Officer was allocated a guideline bonus amount
from the reduced overall incentive pool in proportion to the
Named Executive Officers target bonus for 2008. The
guideline amount for each Named Executive Officer was determined
by multiplying the Named Executive Officers target bonus
for fiscal 2008 by approximately 180% (reflecting Doles
achievement of CFROI goals in 2008) and then applying the
33% discretionary reduction described above. After reviewing the
resulting guideline bonus amounts for each Named Executive
Officer, the Committee again exercised its discretion under the
terms of the One-Year Plan to award the specific bonus amounts
disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table below to
each Named Executive Officer.
As in 2008, CFROI was again selected as the fiscal 2009
financial performance metric for annual incentive payments
because management continues to believe it provides the best
view of annual
106
consolidated performance. Any such payments will be considered
only to the extent they do not reduce consolidated EBITDA below
$440 million, adjusted for unusual or non-recurring items.
Long-Term
Incentives
The Sustained Profit Growth Plan, or the Growth Plan,
contemplates annual grants each with three-year Incentive
Periods. Each Named Executive Officers final award in
connection with each grant is determined as of the end of the
Incentive Period for that grant, and is paid in a lump sum no
later than 90 days following the end of the Incentive Period.
The performance measures and targets are recommended by
management and set by the Committee. The Committee has
authorized all of the Named Executive Officers to participate in
the Growth Plan.
Consistent with the approach for allocating total target
compensation among the three components of compensation, target
long-term cash incentive levels for the Named Executive Officers
under the Growth Plan are set as a percentage of base salary so
as to constitute approximately 40% to 45% of total targeted
direct compensation.
The Named Executive Officers have identical performance goals
and will earn 100% of their targeted long-term incentive
payments if financial performance goals are achieved. Payments
range from 0% to 300% of a Named Executive Officers
target. There is no discretionary pay component available under
the Growth Plan. Achievement of target awards under this plan
requires company performance, on a consolidated basis, to meet
three-year performance goals. Such goals are driven by the
Companys three-year financial and operating plan.
We disclose performance targets with respect to incentive
periods that have concluded, but not with respect to incentive
periods that have not yet concluded. We do provide information
about business trends and outlooks in this prospectus but do not
provide specific performance guidance or forward-looking
statements on our projected operating results. Disclosure of
numerical performance targets under our long-term incentive
plans would pose a risk of competitive harm in that our
competitors, suppliers and key customers might be able to
estimate planned pricing, and other competitively sensitive
information. This is particularly true in our industry, where
there are a relatively small number of global competitors, some
of which are not subject to public disclosure regulations. Our
suppliers could use information concerning our expected
financial performance, including expected pricing to our
customers, to gain an unfair advantage in their negotiations
with us for the supply of fruit and other input commodities. In
addition, our customers could unfairly use information in
negotiations with us.
Metrics for
Incentive Period ended 2008
The Growth Plan for the 2006 2008 Incentive Period,
or the 2006 Incentive Period, was calculated based on
achievement of consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2008 and
average CFROI over the three-year period. The consolidated
revenue goal was $7.2 billion and the average CFROI goal
for the same period was 22%. The combined achievement relative
to targeted performance under the Growth Plan for the
2006 2008 Incentive Period was 38% of target and
will be paid based on consolidated revenue of $7.6 billion
and average CFROI of 13.35%.
Payment under the Growth Plan for the 2006 2008
Incentive Period were paid in 2009 as follows: Mr. Murdock
received $541,500; Mr. DeLorenzo received $0, since he was
rehired by the Company in 2007 and was not, therefore, an award
recipient for the 2006 Incentive Period; Mr. Carter
received $254,125; and Mr. Tesoriero received $185,725.
Metrics for
Other Incentive Periods Outstanding
2007 2009 Incentive Period. Like
the 2006 Incentive Period, the Growth Plan for the
2007 2009 Incentive Period is based on consolidated
revenue in the last fiscal year of the three year period and
average CFROI over the three-year period.
107
2008 2010 Incentive Period. The
Growth Plan for the 2008 2010 Incentive Period is
based on two factors: (a) the ending leverage ratio (net
debt at the end of the three year period, divided by EBITDA for
the last year of the three year period), and (b) the
average annual EBITDA for the three year period, in each case
adjusted for unusual or non-operational items.
The 2008 2010 performance measures were changed from
previous incentive periods, which used consolidated revenue and
average CFROI. Management recommended this change to the
Committee in order to recognize the need to better align
executive pay with the Companys overall strategy of
increasing operating performance and paying down debt. The
targets are set aggressively and require successful achievement
of asset sales and management focus on effective and profitable
use of capital.
Degree of
Difficulty
Generally, the Committee sets the minimum, target and maximum
levels such that the relative difficulty of achieving the target
level is consistent from year to year. Maximum awards reflect
very ambitious goals which can only be attained when business
results are exceptional, thus justifying the higher award
payments. Similarly, if performance targets fall short of
specified levels, there will be no payout under the Growth Plan.
Achievement of the Companys three-year financial plan can
be difficult to reach and is subject to the volatile nature of
Doles businesses, which can be impacted by numerous
factors, such as exposure to commodity input costs like fuel,
shipping and packaging, as well as product supplies which can be
impacted by weather, political risk, currency fluctuations and
other factors.
Perhaps the most useful indicator of the degree of difficulty in
achieving the performance targets is Doles track record:
Dole has not hit its ambitious performance targets in any of the
last three incentive period cycles. The payout percentage has
been between approximately 26% and 46% of the participants
target award opportunity with an average payout over the past
three incentive periods of approximately 37% of target.
Retirement
Plan
Until December 31, 2001, Dole maintained a traditional
defined benefit pension plan. Subsequent to that time no new
participants were added to the plan and benefits under the plan
for existing participants were frozen. The Company did institute
a five-year transition benefit plan for long-term employees and
that concluded at the end of 2006. Mr. Tesoriero had not
accrued any benefit under the benefit pension plan prior to the
freeze. Mr. Carter is entitled to receive an annual
retirement benefit of approximately $5,747. Mr. DeLorenzo
received $344,991 in pension benefit payments in 2008.
Mr. Murdock is over the age of
701/2
and, as required by the Internal Revenue Code, is receiving his
current annual retirement benefit of $208,604. If any
individuals benefit under the pension plan exceeds the
maximum annual benefit or the maximum compensation limit, Dole
will pay the excess from an unfunded excess and supplemental
benefit plan. Additional details regarding the supplemental
retirement plan are provided below following the Pension Plan
Table.
Savings
Plans
Dole matches contributions to the 401(k) plan up to 6% of
eligible compensation. Effective July 1, 2009, Dole reduced
its match to the 401(k) plan to $0.50 of each dollar contributed
up to 6% of eligible compensation.
The Named Executive Officers, as well as other U.S. based
senior executives, are eligible to participate in the Excess
Savings Plan where eligible employees can contribute up to 100%
of eligible earnings (base pay and annual incentive). Additional
details regarding the Excess Savings Plan can be found below
under Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.
108
Perquisite and
Other Agreements
Perquisites for the Named Executive Officers (except for
Mr. Murdock) are the reimbursement of $5,000 per year for
financial planning and a company-paid annual executive physical
not to exceed $6,000. Messrs. Carter and Tesoriero are
provided with company cars, insurance costs and maintenance.
Dole paid an annual subscription to the New York Metropolitan
Opera on behalf of Mr. Murdock.
The Dole airplane (co-leased by an affiliate of Dole) was used
by Mr. Murdock in 2008 solely for business purposes. The
costs to Dole of these expenses are discussed under
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The Named Executive Officers participate in the Companys
other benefit plans on the same terms as other employees. These
plans include medical and dental insurance, life insurance, and
charitable gift matching (limited to $500 per employee per year).
Employment
Agreements
As of end of the 2008 fiscal year, Dole was not party to any
employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers.
Severance and
Change of Control Arrangements
Our Named Executive Officers participate in the same severance
program, on the same terms, as all other eligible employees. The
program provides for severance pay upon certain involuntary
terminations based upon years of service.
Double-trigger change of control agreements are in place for the
Named Executive Officers. As discussed below under
Change of Control, we believe these
change of control agreements are important in order to keep
these executives focused on the business of Dole should a change
of control occur.
Our change of control benefits include a
gross-up
payment in connection with Internal Revenue Code
Section 280G (referred to as the Section 280G
gross-up).
The Section 280G tax on excess parachute
payments is assessed, in part, based on
Form W-2
income over the five year period (or lesser period if the
executive officer has not been employed with the employer for a
full five years) preceding a termination in connection with a
change of control. Thus, the amount of tax imposed varies
depending on factors such as whether the executive officer
elected to defer compensation or to exercise stock options and
how long the executive officer has been employed with the
Company. The Section 280G
gross-up
payments are intended to make certain that the payments and
benefits actually received by our Named Executive Officers, net
of tax, are consistent with our compensation decisions and do
not vary arbitrarily due to the operation of the tax rules. For
these reasons, we believe that the provision of the
Section 280G
gross-up
payments for our Named Executive Officers, is appropriate.
See the discussion below under Severance
and Change of Control for further
information on our severance and change of control arrangements.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
There are currently no equity ownership requirements or
guidelines that any of our Named Executive Officers or other
employees must meet or maintain.
Policy
Regarding Restatements
We do not currently have a formal policy requiring a fixed
course of action with respect to compensation adjustments
following later restatements of financial results. Under those
circumstances, the Board of Directors or Committee would
evaluate whether compensation adjustments were appropriate based
upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the restatement.
109
Tax
Deductibility
The Committee has considered the potential future effects of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code on the
compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers.
Section 162(m) places a limit of $1.0 million on the
amount of compensation that a publicly held corporation may
deduct in any one year with respect to its chief executive
officer and each of the next three most highly compensated
executive officers (other than its chief financial officer). In
general, certain performance-based compensation approved by
stockholders is not subject to this deduction limit. As we are
not currently publicly-traded, the Committee has not previously
taken the deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m)
into consideration in making compensation decisions. We expect
that following this offering, the Committee will adopt a policy
that, where reasonably practicable, we will seek to qualify the
variable compensation paid to our named executive officers for
an exemption from the deductibility limitations of
Section 162(m). However, we may authorize compensation
payments that do not comply with the exemptions in
Section 162(m) when we believe that such payments are
appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.
110
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below summarizes total compensation paid, earned or
awarded to each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal
years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Equity
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Deferred
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
Earnings ($)(5)
|
|
($)(6)(7)(8)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
David H. Murdock
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
968,269
|
|
|
|
1,269,226
|
|
|
|
541,500
|
|
|
|
(114,009
|
)
|
|
|
33,057
|
|
|
|
2,698,043
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
489,250
|
(3)
|
|
|
247,950
|
|
|
|
(85,159
|
)
|
|
|
29,415
|
|
|
|
1,631,456
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
437,950
|
|
|
|
(7,972
|
)
|
|
|
26,795
|
|
|
|
1,406,773
|
|
David A. DeLorenzo
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,223,077
|
|
|
|
1,374,199
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(272,894
|
)
|
|
|
76,965
|
|
|
|
2,401,347
|
|
President & Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
687,692
|
|
|
|
618,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(122,773
|
)
|
|
|
41,352
|
|
|
|
1,224,271
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Michael Carter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
611,538
|
|
|
|
619,431
|
|
|
|
254,125
|
|
|
|
25,693
|
|
|
|
53,929
|
|
|
|
1,564,716
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
118,690
|
|
|
|
78,891
|
|
|
|
80,805
|
|
|
|
1,178,386
|
|
General Counsel &
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
195,925
|
|
|
|
63,095
|
|
|
|
305,893
|
|
|
|
1,577,413
|
|
Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph S. Tesoriero
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
482,692
|
|
|
|
505,464
|
|
|
|
185,725
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
38,995
|
|
|
|
1,217,831
|
|
Vice President & Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
444,231
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
36,703
|
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
|
|
62,293
|
|
|
|
905,171
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
50,134
|
|
|
|
7,665
|
|
|
|
112,248
|
|
|
|
695,047
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Base salary adjustments are made based on performance, internal
equity and market data. Mr. Tesoriero received a salary
adjustment in July 2008 based on both his level of pay relative
to the benchmarking data and his level of performance. None of
the other Named Executive Officers received a pay increase in
2008. Messrs. Murdock and Carters salaries were
higher in 2008 solely due to fiscal 2008 being a 53-week fiscal
year in contrast to fiscal 2007 and 2006 which were both 52-week
fiscal years. Mr. DeLorenzo rejoined the Companys
management team on June 4, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Bonus amounts shown for each fiscal year reflect cash payments
made or to be made in the subsequent fiscal year with respect to
performance for such fiscal year under the One-Year Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
The Committee has approved the payment of 2007 bonus amounts for
Messrs. Murdock and DeLorenzo, previously deferred. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts shown reflect awards earned for the 2006
2008 incentive period (paid in 2009) under the Growth Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
The amounts shown reflect the actuarial decrease or increase in
the present value of Mr. Murdocks,
Mr. DeLorenzos and Mr. Carters benefits
under all pension plans established by the Company using
interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with
those used in the Companys financial statements and
includes amounts which the Named Executive Officer may not
currently be entitled to receive. In general, the present value
of the benefits under the pension plans increase until
attainment of age 65 and thereafter decrease due to the
mortality assumptions. Also reflected in the amounts shown are
the annual earnings on each Named Executive Officers
deferred compensation balance. The 2008 change in actuarial
value for each of the Named Executive Officers is as follows:
for Mr. Murdock ($123,223); for Mr. DeLorenzo
($277,146); and, for Mr. Carter ($3,623).
Mr. Tesoriero joined Dole after the defined benefit plans
were frozen and therefore does not have a benefit. The amounts
shown also include above market earnings on non-qualified
deferred compensation as follows: for Mr. Murdock $9,214;
for Mr. DeLorenzo $4,252; for Mr. Carter $29,316; and,
for Mr. Tesoriero $4,955. |
|
(6) |
|
The 2008 amounts shown include the following: (1) on behalf
of Mr. Murdock an amount of $27,687 for an annual
subscription to the New York Metropolitan Opera;
(2) Doles matching |
111
|
|
|
|
|
contributions to both the 401(k) and Excess Savings Plans of
Dole Food Company, Inc. (see Compensation
Discussion & Analysis Savings Plans and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation) on
behalf of Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $33,846,
Mr. DeLorenzo $73,355, and Mr. Tesoriero $25,154;
(3) for Mr. DeLorenzo, $24,622 interest earned on
deferred compensation as an outside director prior to June 2007
when he was rehired as an employee; (4) the value
attributable to personal use of the company-provided automobiles
for Mr. Carter $598, and Mr. Tesoriero $4,404;
(5) an annual car allowance to Mr. Murdock $5,000, and
Mr. Carter $5,000; (6) the cost of financial planning
services reimbursed (amounts are included in the
executives
W-2 and
taxes are borne by the executive) by the Company for
Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $10,000 (which includes
reimbursement for 2009), Mr. DeLorenzo $0 and
Mr. Tesoriero $4,975; and (7) the cost of an annual
executive physical for Mr. Murdock $370, Mr. Carter
$4,485, Mr. DeLorenzo $3,580 and Mr. Tesoriero $4,462. |
|
(7) |
|
The 2007 amounts shown include the following: (1) on behalf
of Mr. Murdock an amount of $24,415 for an annual
subscription to the New York Metropolitan Opera;
(2) Doles matching contributions to both the 401(k)
and Excess Savings Plans of Dole Food Company, Inc. (see
Compensation Discussion &
Analysis Savings Plans and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation) on
behalf of Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $63,043,
Mr. DeLorenzo $41,262 and Mr. Tesoriero $33,000;
(3) the value attributable to personal use of the
company-provided automobiles for Mr. Carter $2,464, and
Mr. Tesoriero $20,693; (4) an annual car allowance to
Mr. Murdock $5,000, and Mr. Carter $5,000;
(5) the cost of financial planning services reimbursed
(amounts are included in the executives
W-2 and
taxes are borne by the executive) by the Company for
Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $5,000, Mr. DeLorenzo
$0 and Mr. Tesoriero $4,850; and (6) the cost of an
annual executive physical for Mr. Murdock $0,
Mr. Carter $5,298, Mr. DeLorenzo $90 and
Mr. Tesoriero $3,750. |
|
(8) |
|
The 2006 amounts shown include the following (1) on behalf
of Mr. Murdock an amount of $21,795 for an annual
subscription to the New York Metropolitan Opera;
(2) Doles matching contributions to both the 401(k)
and Excess Savings Plans of Dole Food Company, Inc, (see
Compensation Discussion &
Analysis Savings Plans and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation) on
behalf of Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $37,518, and
Mr. Tesoriero $33,132; (3) the value attributable to
personal use of the company-provided automobiles for
Mr. Carter $3,162, and Mr. Tesoriero $19,691;
(4) the cost of financial planning services reimbursed
(amounts are included in the executives
W-2 and
taxes are borne by the executive) by the Company for
Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $5,000, and
Mr. Tesoriero $1,300; (5) an annual car allowance to
Mr. Murdock $5,000, and Mr. Carter $5,000;
(6) the cost of an annual executive physical for
Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $3,213, and
Mr. Tesoriero $5,925; and (7) the delayed payout of
35% under the 2003 executive incentive plan paid in January 2006
for Mr. Murdock $0, Mr. Carter $252,000, and
Mr. Tesoriero $52,200. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payout Under
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
Incentive Period
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
David H. Murdock
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
2008-2010(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,425,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,275,000
|
|
David A. DeLorenzo
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
2008-2010(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,400,000
|
|
C. Michael Carter
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
2008-2010(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
Joseph S. Tesoriero
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
2008-2010(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
517,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,552,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The first day of fiscal year 2008 was Sunday, December 30,
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Under the Growth Plan, target incentives for the Named Executive
Officers range from 115% to 150% of base salary. The performance
matrix established for the Incentive Period 2008
2010 consists of two factors: (1) the leverage ratio at the
end of the three year period and (2) the average EBITDA for
the three year period. Incentive awards can range from 0% to
300% of target |
112
|
|
|
|
|
incentives. If both of the two performance measures fall short
of specified levels, there will be no payout under the Growth
Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
The threshold, zero, applies if both performance measures fall
below specified levels. |
|
(4) |
|
Under the Growth Plan, contingent award amounts are based on
annual salary at the beginning of the Incentive Period. |
Pension
Benefits
The Company sponsors both a qualified and nonqualified defined
benefit plan. The accrued benefit under the qualified plan is
1.1% of final average compensation multiplied by years of
service, plus .33% of final average compensation multiplied by
years of service in excess of 15 years. The nonqualified
plan is a restoration plan, providing benefits that cannot be
provided under the qualified plan on account of Internal Revenue
Code limits on compensation and benefits.
Participation in both defined benefit plans was frozen on
December 31, 2001. Benefits were also frozen for most
employees at that time, although some long-service employees
received additional benefit accruals over the next five years.
No benefits accrued under either defined benefit plan after
December 31, 2006. All participants were fully vested as of
that date.
Participants may receive their full benefit upon normal
retirement at age 65 or a reduced benefit upon early
retirement on or after age 55.
The amounts in the table below reflect the present value of the
Named Executive Officers benefits under all defined
benefit pension plans sponsored by the Company and are
determined using the interest rate and mortality rate
assumptions used for U.S. pension plans discussed in
Note 13 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended January 3, 2009 included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of
|
|
Present Value of
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
During Last
|
Name(1)
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Service
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
David H. Murdock(2)
|
|
|
Plan 29
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,111
|
|
|
$
|
93,973
|
|
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
683,270
|
|
|
$
|
52,368
|
|
David A. DeLorenzo(3)
|
|
|
Plan 29
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
$
|
885,983
|
|
|
$
|
75,621
|
|
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,843,727
|
|
|
$
|
240,616
|
|
C. Michael Carter
|
|
|
Plan 29
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
29,332
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
28,502
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Tesoriero joined Dole after the defined benefit plans
were frozen and is not shown in the table as he does not have an
accrued benefit under the qualified or nonqualified defined
benefits plan. |
|
(2) |
|
As required by the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Murdock, who
is over the age of
701/2,
is receiving his current annual retirement benefit as a joint
and survivor annuity. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. DeLorenzo retired from Dole on December 29, 2001
and began receiving retirement benefit payments.
Mr. DeLorenzo was rehired on June 4, 2007 and
continues to receive retirement benefit payments. |
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
Named Executive Officers and certain other executives are
eligible to participate in the Excess Savings Plan, or the ESP.
This plan is a nonqualified savings plan that provides
participants with the opportunity to contribute amounts on a
deferred tax basis which are in excess of the limits that apply
to the 401(k) Plan. The ESP is coordinated with the Salaried
401(k) Plan so that, on a combined plan basis, participants may
defer up to 100% of eligible earnings (generally, base salary
and annual incentives) and will receive a Company match of the
first 6% of eligible earnings. Effective July 1, 2009, Dole
reduced its match to the 401(k) plan to $0.50 of each dollar
contributed up to 6% of
113
eligible compensation. Amounts contributed to the ESP received a
fixed rate of interest. For 2008, the interest rate was 7.2%.
The interest rate in 2009 has been set at 7.2%, the same as the
previous year. Such rate is declared annually by the Committee
and is based on the Companys weighted average cost of
long-term debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
Name
|
|
in Last FY(3)
|
|
in Last FY(3)
|
|
in Last FY
|
|
Distributions
|
|
Year End
|
|
David H. Murdock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,686
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
293,108
|
|
David A. DeLorenzo
|
|
$
|
85,615
|
|
|
$
|
59,585
|
|
|
$
|
8,001
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,037
|
|
C. Michael Carter
|
|
$
|
18,346
|
|
|
$
|
20,046
|
|
|
$
|
60,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,207,477
|
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
41,918
|
|
Joseph S. Tesoriero
|
|
$
|
9,654
|
|
|
$
|
11,354
|
|
|
$
|
9,773
|
|
|
$
|
133,097
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
96,238
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company permitted a one-time election for participants to
withdraw deferrals for years 2005 2008 in
recognition of the fact that rules governing distributions for
elections were not available at the time the deferral elections
were made. Mr. Carter received a distribution of $270,071
and Mr. Tesoriero $133,097. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Carter requested a nonemergency early withdrawal of
$937,406. Such payment was reduced by a penalty of 10% for early
distribution. |
|
(3) |
|
Executive contributions and company match are also reflected in
the Summary Compensation Table. |
By irrevocable election, an executive may elect to receive
benefits under the ESP in either a lump sum payment or annual
installments up to fifteen years. Lump-sum benefits under the
ESP will be paid the earlier of the beginning of the year
following the executives retirement or termination or a
year as specified by the executive. Effective January 1,
2009, new participants in the ESP may only elect a lump sum
payment to be paid in the year following the participants
retirement or termination. However, upon a showing of financial
hardship and receipt of approval from the Committee, an
executive may be allowed to access funds deferred, earlier than
previously elected by the executive. A nonemergency withdrawal
may be elected prior to termination of employment but only from
benefits accrued prior to January 1, 2005. Such
nonemergency withdrawal is subject to a penalty of 10%.
There are no investment options available under the ESP.
Payments upon
Termination or Change of Control
The tables below reflect the amount of compensation that would
become payable to each of the Named Executive Officers under
existing plans and arrangements if the Named Executive
Officers employment had terminated on January 3,
2009, given the Named Executive Officers compensation and
service levels as of such date. These benefits are in addition
to benefits available prior to the occurrence of any termination
of employment, including benefits generally available to
salaried employees, such as distributions under the
companys 401(k) plan and frozen pension plans, and
previously accrued and vested benefits under the Companys
nonqualified deferred compensation plan, as described in the
tables above. In addition, in connection with any actual
termination of employment, the Company may determine to enter
into an agreement or to establish an arrangement providing
additional benefits or amounts, or altering the terms of
benefits described below, as the Committee determines
appropriate. The actual amounts that would be paid upon a Named
Executive Officers termination of employment can be
determined only at the time of such executives separation
from the Company. Due to the number of factors that affect the
nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events
discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be
higher or lower than reported below. Factors that could affect
these amounts include the timing during the year of any such
event and the executives age.
114
Severance
The Severance Pay Plan for Employees of Dole Food Company, Inc.
and Participating Divisions and Subsidiaries, or the Severance
Plan, is in place for all eligible employees and provides for
payment if an employees, including a Named Executive
Officer, employment is involuntarily terminated as a result a
workforce reduction, elimination of operations or job
elimination. There are no other severance plans or severance
agreements covering the Named Executive Officers. In the
unlikely circumstance that a Named Executive Officer is
involuntarily terminated under the qualifications of the
Severance Plan, the Severance Plan provides for benefits in an
amount equal to the weekly base compensation determined
according to the following schedule:
|
|
|
Years of Service
|
|
Severance Pay Benefit
|
|
1 to 4
|
|
2 weeks for each year of service plus 2 weeks
|
5 to 14
|
|
2 weeks for each year of service plus 4 weeks
|
15 or more
|
|
2 weeks for each year of service plus 6 weeks
|
In no event will the severance benefits under the Severance Plan
exceed either of the following: (i) an amount equal to a
total of 104 weeks of weekly base compensation; or
(ii) an amount equal to twice the Named Executive
Officers compensation (including wages, salary, and any
other benefit of monetary value) during the twelve-month period
immediately preceding his termination of service.
Health and other insurance benefits are continued for up to six
months corresponding to the termination benefits.
Change of
Control
In line with the practice of numerous companies of Doles
size, we recognize that the possibility of a change of control
of Dole may result in the departure or distraction of management
to the detriment of Dole. In March 2001, Dole put in place a
program to offer change of control agreements to each Named
Executive Officer and certain other officers and employees of
Dole. At the time the program was put in place, Dole was advised
by its executive compensation consultants that the benefits
provided under the change of control agreements were within the
range of customary practices of other public companies. The
benefits under the change of control agreements are paid in a
lump sum and are based on a multiple of three for each of the
Named Executive Officers with change of control agreements.
In order to receive a payment under the change of control
agreement, two triggers must occur. The first trigger is a
change of control, as defined below. The second trigger is that
the Named Executive Officer must be terminated without cause or
with good reason, each as defined below, during the period
beginning on the change of control date and ending on the second
anniversary of the date on which the change of control becomes
effective.
The payments to the Named Executive Officers would be in the
form of a lump sum cash payment, determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Three times the Named Executive Officers base salary;
|
|
|
|
Three times the Named Executive Officers target bonus;
|
|
|
|
$30,000, in lieu of any other health and welfare benefits,
fringe benefits and perquisites (including medical, life,
disability, accident and other insurance, car allowance or other
health and welfare plan, programs, policies or practices or
understandings but excluding the Named Executive Officers
rights relative to the option of acquiring full ownership of the
company car) and other taxable perquisites and fringe benefits
that the Named Executive Officer or his family may have been
entitled to receive;
|
|
|
|
The pro-rata portion of the greater of (i) the Named
Executive Officers target amounts under the Growth Plan
and (ii) the Named Executive Officers actual benefits
under the Growth Plan;
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued obligations (any unpaid base salary to date of
termination, any accrued vacation pay or paid time off), and
deferred compensation including interest and
earnings and pursuant to outstanding elections;
|
|
|
|
Pro-rata portion of the Named Executive Officers target
bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs;
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement for outstanding reimbursable expenses; and
|
|
|
|
A gross-up
payment to hold the Named Executive Officer harmless against the
impact, if any, of federal excise taxes imposed on the executive
as a result of the payments contingent on a change of control.
|
There are four events that could constitute a change of control
at Dole. The occurrence of any of these events would be deemed a
change of control. These events were carefully reviewed by both
internal and external experts and were deemed to best capture
those situations in which control of the company would be
altered. Below, we provide a general summary of the events that
constitute a change of control.
1) An acquisition of 20% or more of the combined voting
power of the Companys stock. Excluded from the 20%
acquisition rule is Mr. Murdock, or following his death,
any trust or trustees designated by Mr. Murdock.
2) A change in the majority constitution of the Board of
Directors, unless the changes are approved by two-thirds of the
incumbent Board of Directors.
3) A merger, reorganization, consolidation,
recapitalization, exchange offer or other extraordinary
transaction where the current beneficial owners of the
outstanding securities of the Company do not own at least
50 percent of the outstanding securities of the new
organization.
4) A sale, transfer, or distribution of all or
substantially all of the Companys assets.
For purposes of the change of control agreements:
Cause is defined as Doles termination of the
executives employment related to the occurrence of any one
or more of the following: (1) conviction of, or pleading
guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony; (2) commission of
an act of gross misconduct in connection with the performance of
duties; (3) demonstration of habitual negligence in the
performance of duties; (4) commission of an act of fraud,
misappropriation of funds or embezzlement in connection with
employment by Dole; (5) death; or (6) Disability.
Good Reason is defined as the executives
resignation of employment with Dole related to the occurrence of
one or more of the following: (1) subject to certain
exceptions, whether direct or indirect, a significant diminution
of authority, duties, responsibilities or status inconsistent
with and below those held, exercised and assigned in the
ordinary course during the 90 day period immediately
preceding the change of control date; (2) the assignment of
duties that are inconsistent (in any significant respect) with,
or that impair (in any significant respect) ability to perform,
the duties customarily assigned to an executive holding the
position held immediately prior to the change of control date in
a corporation of the size and nature of Dole or the applicable
subsidiary or business unit of Dole; (3) relocation of
primary office more than 35 miles from current office on
the change of control date; (4) any material breach by Dole
of the change of control agreement or any other agreement with
the executive; (5) the failure of a successor to Dole (in
any transaction that constitutes a change of control), to assume
in writing Doles obligations to the executive under the
change in control agreement or any other agreement with the
executive, if the same is not assumed by such successor by
operation of law; (6) any reduction in base salary below
base salary in effect on the change of control date (or if base
salary was reduced within 180 days before the change of
control date, the base salary in effect immediately prior to
such reduction); or (7) any non de minimis reduction in
aggregate benefits and other compensation, provided that
116
a reduction in the aggregate of not more than 5% in aggregate
benefits in connection with across-the-board reductions or
modifications affecting similarly situated persons of comparable
rank in Dole or a combined organization will not constitute good
reason.
David H.
Murdock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
Connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
with a
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
Normal
|
|
Without
|
|
For Cause
|
|
Change of
|
|
Death &
|
Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
Retirement
|
|
Cause
|
|
Termination
|
|
Control
|
|
Disability
|
|
One-Year Management Incentive Plan(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
Sustained Profit Growth Plan(2)
|
|
$
|
541,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,850,000
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits, Fringe Benefits and other
perquisites
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,981
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash Severance(4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
968,242
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,015,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Excise Tax and
Gross-Up
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,465,896
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
David A.
DeLorenzo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Connection
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
Normal
|
|
Without
|
|
For Cause
|
|
with Change
|
|
Death and
|
Upon Separation
|
|
Termination(3)
|
|
Retirement
|
|
Cause
|
|
Termination
|
|
of Control
|
|
Disability
|
|
One-Year Management Incentive Plan(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
Sustained Profit Growth Plan(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,550,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits, Fringe Benefits and other
perquisites
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash Severance(4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
119,220
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,590,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Excise Tax and
Gross-Up
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,618,133
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
C. Michael
Carter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
Connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
with a
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
Normal
|
|
Without
|
|
For Cause
|
|
Change of
|
|
Death and
|
Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
Retirement
|
|
Cause
|
|
Termination
|
|
Control
|
|
Disability
|
|
One-Year Management Incentive Plan(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
510,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Sustained Profit Growth Plan(2)
|
|
$
|
254,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,418,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,418,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,418,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,418,750
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits, Fringe Benefits and other
perquisites
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,996
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash Severance(4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
236,537
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,360,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Excise Tax and
Gross-Up
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,811,880
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
117
Joseph S.
Tesoriero
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
Connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
with a
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
Normal
|
|
Without
|
|
For Cause
|
|
Change of
|
|
Death and
|
Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
Retirement
|
|
Cause
|
|
Termination
|
|
Control
|
|
Disability
|
|
One-Year Management Incentive Plan(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
Sustained Profit Growth Plan(2)
|
|
$
|
185,725
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,250
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits, Fringe Benefits and other
perquisites
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,901
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash Severance(4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,479
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,655,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Excise Tax and
Gross-Up
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,570,749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of illustration, target amounts are shown. Payments
made in the event of retirement, death or disability would be
based on actual results for the plan year, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Awards for the Sustained Profit Growth Plan are made annually
and numbers shown above include amounts for incentive periods
that overlap. For purposes of illustration, targets amounts are
shown. Payments made in the event of retirement, death,
disability or involuntary termination without cause would be
based on actual results for the applicable incentive periods and
the number of months of participation in any applicable
incentive period. Amounts shown for retirement, death,
disability, and involuntary termination without cause are
payable following the termination and calculation of the
applicable incentive period. Awards, if any, are prorated based
on the applicable termination date for the Named Executive
Officer. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Mr. DeLorenzo rejoined Dole in 2007 and became eligible for
contingent awards in 2007. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes $30,000 in lieu of health and welfare, and other fringe
benefits and perquisites. |
Non-Employee
Director Compensation
The Company uses cash compensation to attract and retain
qualified non-employee candidates to serve on the Board of
Directors. In setting outside director compensation, the Company
considers the significant amount of time that directors expend
in fulfilling their duties to the Company, as well as the skill
sets each outside director brings as a member of the Board.
Currently, members of the Board of Directors who are not
employees of the Company are entitled to receive an annual cash
retainer of $50,000 and a Board meeting fee of $2,000 for each
Board meeting attended. Telephonic Board meeting fees are
$1,000. Directors receive $4,000 annually for service as
chairman of committees of the Board in addition to the cash
retainer, except in the case of the chairman of the Audit
Committee who receives $10,000 annually. Committee meeting fees
are $1,000 per meeting attended, either in person or
telephonically. Directors who are employees of the Company
receive no compensation for their service as directors.
Following the consummation of this offering, the annual cash
retainer will be increased to $60,000 and directors will receive
$10,000 annually for service as a committee chairman except that
the Audit Committee chairman will receive $15,000 annually.
Also, following consummation of this offering, each non-employee
director will receive an annual restricted stock grant valued at
$75,000.
Deferred
Compensation
The Non-Employee Deferred Cash Compensation Plan is a program in
which each non-employee director may defer up to 100% of his or
her total annual retainer and meeting fees. In 2008, each
non-employee director who defers his or her annual retainer or
fees through this program has an interest rate of 7.2%, the same
as the interest rate used for managements Excess Savings
Plan. In 2009, the
118
interest rate for this plan will be the same as 2008, 7.2%.
None of the non-employee directors have elected to defer the
annual retainer or fees in 2009.
Amounts deferred under this program are distributed to each
non-employee director at the termination of service as a
Director, either as a lump-sum, or in equal annual cash
installments over a period not to exceed five years.
Annual
Physical
Each non-employee director has an annual executive physical
benefit.
Director
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Value and Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Qualified Deferred
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name(1)
|
|
Cash(1)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
Andrew J. Conrad
|
|
$
|
57,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,171
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,171
|
|
Edward C. Roohan
|
|
$
|
72,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
David H. Murdock, the Companys Chairman of the Board,
David A. DeLorenzo, President and Chief Executive Officer, C.
Michael Carter, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary, Scott Griswold, Executive Vice President,
Corporate Development, Justin Murdock, Vice President, New
Products and Corporate Development and Roberta Wieman, Executive
Vice President, Chief of Staff, are not included in this table
because they are employees of the Company and do not receive any
compensation for their service as Directors. Compensation for
Messrs. Murdock, DeLorenzo, and Carter is included in the
Summary Compensation Table above. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2008, interest earnings in excess of 120% of the January 2008
Applicable Federal Rate were $3,171. Earnings in total were
$6,679. |
Stock Incentive
Plan
2009 Stock Incentive Plan. The following is a
summary of the material terms of our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan,
which we refer to as the 2009 Stock Plan. This description is
not complete. For more information, we refer you to the full
text of the 2009 Stock Plan, which we will file as an exhibit to
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part. We intend to adopt the 2009 Stock Plan effective
immediately prior to the consummation of this offering and grant
equity awards to employees and directors effective upon the
consummation of this offering using the initial offering price.
The 2009 Stock Plan authorizes the grant of nonqualified stock
options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, or
SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, or RSUs, and
incentive bonuses to employees, officers, non-employee directors
and other service providers. The number of shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to all awards granted under the 2009
Stock Plan shall not
exceed .
Upon the consummation of this
offering, shares
of common stock will be issuable pursuant to outstanding awards
issued in connection with this offering that will only be
exercisable if the offering occurs including awards with respect
to shares of
common stock granted in the aggregate to our named executive
officers,
with shares
granted to
Mr. Murdock, shares
granted to
Mr. DeLorenzo, shares
granted to Mr. Carter
and shares
granted to Mr. Tesoriero. The number of shares issued or
reserved pursuant to the 2009 Stock Plan (or pursuant to
outstanding awards) is subject to adjustment as a result of
mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, stock
dividends and other changes in our common stock. Shares subject
to awards that have been terminated, expired unexercised,
forfeited or settled in cash do not count as shares issued under
the 2009 Stock Plan. In addition, (i) shares subject to
awards that have been retained or withheld by the Company in
payment or satisfaction of the exercise price, purchase price or
tax withholding obligation of an award, and (ii) shares
subject to awards that otherwise do not result in the issuance
of shares in connection with payment or settlement thereof do
not count as shares issued under the 2009 Stock Plan. Further,
shares that have been delivered to the Company in
119
payment or satisfaction of the exercise price, purchase price or
tax withholding obligation of an award will be available for
awards under the 2009 Stock Plan.
Administration. The 2009 Stock Plan is
administered by the Committee. The Committee has the discretion
to determine the individuals to whom awards may be granted under
the 2009 Stock Plan, the manner in which such awards will vest
and the other conditions applicable to awards. Options, SARs,
restricted stock, RSUs and incentive bonuses may be granted by
the Committee to participants in such numbers and at such times
during the term of the 2009 Stock Plan as the Committee shall
determine. The Committee is authorized to interpret the 2009
Stock Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and
regulations relating to the 2009 Stock Plan and to make any
other determinations that it deems necessary or desirable for
the administration of the 2009 Stock Plan. All decisions,
determinations and interpretations by the Committee, and any
rules and regulations under the 2009 Stock Plan and the terms
and conditions of or operation of any award, are final and
binding on all participants, beneficiaries, heirs, assigns or
other persons holding or claiming rights under the 2009 Stock
Plan or any award.
Options. The Committee will determine the
exercise price and other terms for each option and whether the
options are nonqualified stock options or incentive stock
options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to
employees and are subject to certain other restrictions. To the
extent an option intended to be an incentive stock option does
not so qualify, it will be treated as a nonqualified option. A
participant may exercise an option by written notice and payment
of the exercise price in shares, cash or a combination thereof,
as determined by the Committee, including an irrevocable
commitment by a broker to pay over such amount from a sale of
the shares issuable under an option, the delivery of previously
owned shares and withholding of shares deliverable upon exercise.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may
grant SARs independent of or in connection with an option. The
exercise price per share of a SAR will be an amount determined
by the Committee, and the Committee will determine the other
terms applicable to SARs. Generally, each SAR will entitle a
participant upon exercise to an amount equal to:
|
|
|
|
|
the excess of the fair market value on the exercise date of one
share of common stock over the exercise price, times
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of common stock covered by the SAR.
|
Payment shall be made in common stock or in cash, or partly in
common stock and partly in cash, all as shall be determined by
the Committee.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock
Units. The Committee may award restricted common
stock and RSUs. Restricted stock awards consist of shares of
stock that are transferred to the participant subject to
restrictions that may result in forfeiture if specified
conditions are not satisfied. RSUs result in the transfer of
shares of cash or stock to the participant only after specified
conditions are satisfied. The Committee will determine the
restrictions and conditions applicable to each award of
restricted stock or RSUs, which may include performance vesting
conditions.
Incentive Bonuses. An incentive bonus is an
opportunity for a participant to earn a future payment tied to
the level of achievement with respect to one or more performance
criteria established for a performance period set by the
Committee. The terms of any incentive bonus will be set forth in
an award agreement that will include provisions regarding
(i) the target and maximum amount payable to the
participant, (ii) the performance criteria and level of
achievement versus these criteria that shall determine the
amount of such payment, (iii) the term of the performance
period as to which performance shall be measured for determining
the amount of any payment, (iv) the timing of any payment
earned by virtue of performance, (v) restrictions on the
alienation or transfer of the incentive bonus prior to actual
payment, (vi) forfeiture provisions and (vii) such
further terms and conditions as determined by the Committee.
Payment of the amount due under an incentive bonus may be made
in cash or in shares, as determined by the Committee. Incentive
bonuses may be payable pursuant to a subplan.
120
Performance Criteria. Vesting of awards
granted under the 2009 Stock Plan may be subject to the
satisfaction of one or more performance goals established by the
Committee. The performance goals may vary from participant to
participant, group to group, and period to period.
Transferability. Unless otherwise determined
by the Committee, awards granted under the 2009 Stock Plan are
not transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent
and distribution.
Change of Control. Unless otherwise provided
in the applicable award agreement or otherwise agreed to,
(a) with respect to an award that is assumed in a change of
control (as defined in the 2009 Stock Plan), if the awardee
is terminated without cause or leaves for good reason within
24 months of the change of control or (b) if the award
is not assumed in a change of control, in each case the award
will vest and be fully exercisable or be paid or settled in
full, as applicable. Alternatively, the Committee may provide
for the conversion of any award into the right to receive cash
or other per share consideration payable to the holders of our
common stock in connection with the change of control, less any
per share exercise price.
Effectiveness of the 2009 Stock Plan; Amendment and
Termination. The 2009 Stock Plan will become
effective when it is approved by the Companys stockholders
at a meeting of the Companys stockholders or by written
consent in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
The 2009 Stock Plan will remain available for the grant of
awards until the tenth (10th) anniversary of the effective date.
The board may amend, alter or discontinue the 2009 Stock Plan in
any respect at any time, but no amendment may diminish any of
the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted,
without his or her consent. In addition, stockholder approval is
required for any amendment that would increase the maximum
number of shares available for awards, reduce the price at which
options may be granted, change the class of eligible
participants, or otherwise when stockholder approval is required
by law or under stock exchange listing requirements.
121
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Related Party
Transaction Policy
In addition to the procedures with respect to related party
transactions described below, in connection with this offering
we will adopt a written related party transaction policy, which
covers transactions between us and our directors, executive
officers, 5% or greater stockholders and parties related to the
foregoing, such as immediate family members and entities they
control. The policy will require that any such transaction be
considered and approved by our Audit Committee prior to entry
into such transaction. In reviewing such transactions, the
policy will require the Audit Committee to consider all of the
relevant facts and circumstances available to the Audit
Committee, including (if applicable) but not limited to the
benefits to the Company, the availability of other sources for
comparable products or services the terms of the transaction and
the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees
generally.
Under the policy, if we should discover related party
transactions that have not been approved, the Audit Committee
will be notified and will determine the appropriate action,
including ratification, rescission or amendment of the
transaction.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
David H. Murdock, the Companys Chairman, owns, inter
alia, Castle & Cooke, Inc., or Castle, a
transportation equipment leasing company, a private dining club
and a hotel. During the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, the Company
paid Mr. Murdocks companies an aggregate of
approximately $9.3 million, $7.2 million and
$7.6 million, respectively, primarily for the rental of
truck chassis, generator sets and warehousing services. In
addition, during the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, the Company
paid Mr. Murdocks companies an aggregate of
approximately $0.5 million, $0.22 million and
$0.12 million, respectively, for land services, entitlement
services and landscape maintenance services. Castle purchased
approximately $0.7 million, $0.7 million and
$1.1 million of products from the Company during fiscal
years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
Mr. Murdocks companies paid the Company approximately
$0.13 million during fiscal year 2008 in connection with
transfers related to land exchanges. The Company also paid
$0.16 million in rental payments under a sublease with
North Carolina State University, the lessee of the property
under a lease with Castle.
The Company and Castle are responsible for 68% and 32%,
respectively, of all obligations under an aircraft lease
arrangement. Each party is responsible for the direct costs
associated with its use of this aircraft, and all other indirect
costs are shared proportionately. During fiscal years 2008, 2007
and 2006, the Companys proportionate share of the direct
and indirect costs for this aircraft was $2.2 million,
$2 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
The Company and Castle operate their risk management departments
on a joint basis. Insurance procurement and premium costs are
based on the relative risk borne by each company as determined
by the insurance underwriters. Administrative costs of the risk
management department are shared on a
50-50 basis,
and during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Companys
share of these costs was $0.2 million, $0.16 million
and $0.2 million, respectively.
The Company retains risk for commercial property losses
sustained by the Company and Castle totaling $3 million in
the aggregate and $3 million per occurrence, above which
the Company has coverage provided through third-party insurance
carriers. The arrangement provides for premiums to be paid to
the Company by Castle in exchange for the Companys
retained risk. The Company received approximately
$0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million from
Castle during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
122
The Company had outstanding net accounts receivable of
$1.2 million and a note receivable of $5.7 million due
from Castle at January 3, 2009 and outstanding net accounts
receivable of $0.5 million and a note receivable of
$6 million due from Castle at December 29, 2007.
During June 2006, the Company and Castle executed a lease
agreement pursuant to which the Companys fresh vegetables
operations occupy an office building in Monterey, California,
which is owned by Castle. Rent expense for fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006 totaled $1.4 million, $1 million and
$0.6 million, respectively.
Mr. Murdock is a director and executive officer of Dole and
also serves as a director and executive officer of privately
held entities that he owns or controls. Mr. Scott Griswold,
Ms. Roberta Wieman and Mr. Justin Murdock, each a
director and officer of Dole, also serve as directors and
officers of privately held entities controlled by
Mr. Murdock. Mr. Edward C. Roohan is a director of
Dole and was until August 2009 a director and executive officer
of Castle. Any compensation paid by such other entities is
within the discretion of their respective boards of directors.
During December 2006, Dole entered into a five-year lease with
Laboratory Corporation of America, pursuant to which the latter
is leasing approximately 1,483 rentable square feet in
Doles World Headquarters building in Westlake Village,
California, at a rental rate of $115,674 per year, subject to
annual inflation adjustments. The lease provides that the tenant
may renew the lease for two additional five-year terms.
Dr. Conrad, a director of Dole, is the tenants Chief
Scientific Officer.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will effect the
Merger Transaction and other related transactions described in
detail above under the heading Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations General Overview Contemplated
Transactions in Connection with the Offering. Such
transactions will include the transfer of ownership interests in
one parcel of idle farm land of approximately 1,600 acres in
Honduras, with a fair market value of approximately
$12 million and a book value of approximately $150,000, to
our existing stockholder.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will enter into a
registration rights agreement with Mr. Murdock which is
described in detail below under the heading Description of
Capital Stock Registration Rights.
Limitations on
Transactions with Affiliates
Doles secured credit facilities and its unsecured senior
notes and debenture indentures impose substantive and procedural
requirements with respect to the entry by the Company and its
subsidiaries into transactions with affiliates. The credit
facilities generally requires that, except as expressly
permitted in the credit facilities, all such transactions with
affiliates be entered into in the ordinary course of business
and on terms and conditions substantially as favorable to Dole
as would reasonably be expected to be obtainable at the time in
a comparable arms-length transaction with an unaffiliated third
party. The indentures generally require that, except as
expressly permitted in the indentures, all transactions with
affiliates must satisfy the requirements set forth above
pursuant to Doles credit facilities and, in addition, any
transaction or series of related transactions with an affiliate
involving aggregate payments with a fair market value in excess
of $7.5 million must be approved by a Board of Directors
resolution stating that the Board of Directors has determined
that the transaction complies with the preceding requirements;
further, if such aggregate payments have a fair market value of
more than $20 million, the Board of Directors must, prior
to the consummation of the transaction, have obtained a
favorable opinion as to the fairness of the transaction to the
Company from a financial point of view, from an independent
financial advisor, and such opinion must be filed with the
indenture trustee. In addition, the Companys legal
department and finance department review all transactions with
related parties to ensure that they comply with the preceding
requirements. The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of
Directors annually receives and reviews a detailed summary of
all transactions with related parties, which provides a basis
for the Audit Committees approval of the disclosure in
respect of related party transactions contained in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
123
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDER
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as
of ,
2009 by the existing stockholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
|
Name and Address of
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
After the
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
After the
|
Title of Class
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Offering
|
|
Offering
|
|
Offering
|
|
Offering
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
David H. Murdock(1)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc.
One Dole Drive
Westlake Village, CA
91362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Murdock beneficially owns these shares through one or
more affiliates, and has effective sole voting and dispositive
power with respect to the shares. Beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Mr. Murdock is Doles Chairman of the Board of
Directors. |
The foregoing table does not give effect to the up
to shares
of common stock that an affiliate of our existing stockholder
has agreed to sell to the Trust and deliverable upon exchange of
the Trusts securities (or up
to shares
of common stock if the initial purchasers option to
purchase additional Trust securities in the Trust offering is
exercised in full).
All of the outstanding shares of common stock of Dole have been
pledged pursuant to Doles Credit Agreement and ancillary
documents thereto. The Company contemplates that consent of the
lenders under such Credit Agreement will be obtained prior to
the consummation of this offering and the Trust offering.
124
DESCRIPTION OF
CAPITAL STOCK
Our certificate of incorporation as will be in effect
immediately prior to the consummation of this offering
authorizes us to
issue shares
of common stock, par value $ per
share
and shares
of preferred stock, par value $
per share, or Preferred Stock. Our Board of Directors, without
further approval of the stockholders, may establish the powers,
preferences, rights, qualifications and limitations, including
the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights,
conversion prices, voting rights and redemption rights, of any
series of Preferred Stock and may authorize the issuance of any
such series.
Common
Stock
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share
on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders. All shares of
common stock have equal voting rights.
Subject to the rights pertaining to any series of preferred
stock, in the event of our liquidation, holders of our common
stock are entitled to share ratably in our assets legally
available for distribution after the payment of our debts. The
shares of common stock have no preemptive, subscription,
conversion or redemption rights.
Subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, the
holders of the common stock are entitled to receive dividends,
when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, from funds
legally available for such dividend payments.
Preferred
Stock
We have never had and immediately following this offering, we
will not have any shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. Our
Board of Directors, without any further vote or action by our
stockholders, has the authority to issue up to an aggregate
of shares
of preferred stock from time to time, in one or more classes or
series or shares, on terms that it may determine, including
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
its dividend rate;
|
|
|
|
its liquidation preference;
|
|
|
|
whether or not the shares will be convertible into, or
exchangeable for, any other securities; and
|
|
|
|
whether or not the shares will have voting rights, and, if so,
determine the extent of the voting powers and the conditions
under which the shares will vote as a separate class.
|
We believe that our Board of Directors ability to issue
Preferred Stock on such a wide variety of terms will enable the
Preferred Stock to be used for important corporate purposes,
such as financing acquisitions or raising additional capital.
However, were it inclined to do so, our Board of Directors could
issue all or part of the Preferred Stock with, among other
things, substantial voting power or advantageous conversion
rights. This stock could be issued to persons deemed by our
Board of Directors likely to support our current management in a
context for control of us, either as a precautionary measure or
in response to a specific takeover threat. We have no current
plans to issue Preferred Stock for any purpose.
Registration
Rights
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will enter into a
registration rights agreement with Mr. David H. Murdock,
the only current stockholder. This agreement will provide
Mr. Murdock with certain rights with respect to the
registration of his shares under the Securities Act, including
demand, piggyback and Form S-3 shelf registration rights when
available.
125
Delaware
Law
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203
prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in
a business combination with an interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the date on
which the person becomes an interested stockholder, unless
(i) prior to the time that such stockholder becomes an
interested stockholder, the Board of Directors approves such
transaction or business combination, (ii) the stockholder
acquires more than 85% of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation (excluding shares held by directors who are officers
or held in employee stock plans) upon consummation of such
transaction, or (iii) at or subsequent to the time such
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, the business
combination is approved by the Board of Directors and by
two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation
(excluding shares held by the interested stockholder) at a
meeting of stockholders (and not by written consent). A
business combination includes a merger, asset sale
or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to such
interested stockholder. For purposes of Section 203,
interested stockholder is a person who, together
with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years
prior, did own) 15% or more of the corporations voting
stock.
The Delaware General Corporation Law contains provisions
enabling a corporation to avoid Section 203s
restrictions if stockholders holding a majority of the
corporations voting stock approve an amendment to the
corporations certificate of incorporation or bylaws to
avoid the restrictions. We have not and do not currently intend
to elect out of the application of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law.
Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws
Various provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws, in the forms they will be in effect immediately prior to
the consummation of this offering, which are summarized in the
following paragraphs, may be deemed to have an anti-takeover
effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or
takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in its best
interest, including those attempts that might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares held by
stockholders.
No Cumulative Voting. The Delaware General
Corporation Law provides that stockholders are denied the right
to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless our
certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our certificate
of incorporation does not expressly address cumulative voting.
No Stockholder Action by Written Consent; Calling of Special
Meetings of Stockholders. Our certificate of
incorporation prohibits stockholder action by written consent.
It also provides that special meetings of our stockholders may
be called only by the Board of Directors or the chief executive
officer.
Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and
Director Nominations. Our bylaws provide that
stockholders seeking to bring business before an annual meeting
of stockholders must provide timely notice of their proposal in
writing to the corporate secretary. Our bylaws also specify
requirements as to the form and content of a stockholders
notice. These provisions may impede stockholders ability
to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders or
make nominations for directors at an annual meeting of
stockholders.
Classified Board of Directors. Our certificate
of incorporation divides our Board of Directors into three
classes of directors who are elected for three-year terms.
Therefore, the full Board of Directors is not subject to
re-election at each annual meeting of our stockholders.
Limits on Ability of Stockholders to Elect and Remove
Directors. Our Board of Directors has the sole
right to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the
expansion of the Board of Directors or the resignation, death or
removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being
able to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors. In addition,
directors may only be removed by the action of the
126
holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our
capital stock, voting together as a single class.
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and
Directors. The Delaware General Corporation Law
authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the personal
liability of directors to corporations and their stockholders
for monetary damages for breaches of directors fiduciary
duties. Our certificate of incorporation includes a provision
that eliminates the personal liability of directors for monetary
damages for actions taken as a director, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for breach of duty of loyalty;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional
misconduct or knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(unlawful dividends); or
|
|
|
|
for transactions from which the director derived improper
personal benefit.
|
Our bylaws provide that we must indemnify our directors and
officers to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware
General Corporation Law. We are also expressly authorized to
carry directors and officers insurance providing
indemnification for our directors, officers and certain
employees for some liabilities. We believe that these
indemnification provisions and insurance are useful to attract
and retain qualified directors and officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for
breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have
the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation
against directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which
indemnification is sought.
Authorized But Unissued Shares. Our authorized
but unissued shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock will be
available for future issuance without the approval of holders of
Common Stock. We may use these additional shares for a variety
of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise
additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit
plans.
Supermajority Requirement for Amendment of
Bylaws. Under our bylaws, the holders of at least
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our capital stock,
voting together as a single class, must act to amend our bylaws
by stockholder action. The Board of Directors also has the
ability to amend the bylaws without stockholder consent.
Transfer Agent
and Registrar
The Transfer Agent and Registrar for our common stock
is .
127
MATERIAL UNITED
STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR
NON-UNITED
STATES HOLDERS
The following is a general discussion of the material United
States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock to a
non-United
States holder. This discussion assumes that
non-United
States holders will hold our common stock issued pursuant to the
offering as a capital asset (generally, property held for
investment). This discussion does not address all aspects of
United States federal income taxation that may be relevant in
light of a
non-United
States holders special tax status or special tax
situations. For example, United States expatriates, life
insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in
securities or currency, banks or other financial institutions,
pass-through entities, trusts, estates and investors that hold
common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or conversion
transaction are among those categories of potential investors
that are subject to special rules not covered in this
discussion. In addition, this discussion does not address tax
consequences to a holder of the use of a functional currency
other than the United States dollar. This discussion does not
address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any
state, local or
non-United
States taxing jurisdiction or any taxes other than income taxes.
Furthermore, the following discussion is based on current
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
legislative history and Treasury Regulations and administrative
and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the
date hereof, and all of which are subject to change, possibly
with retroactive effect. Accordingly, we urge each
non-United
States Holder to consult a tax advisor regarding the United
States federal, state, local and
non-United
States income and other tax consequences of acquiring, holding
and disposing of shares of our common stock.
For the purpose of this discussion, a
non-United
States holder is any individual, corporation, estate or trust
that is a beneficial holder of our common stock and that for
United States federal income tax purposes is not a United States
person. For purposes of this discussion, the term United States
person means:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created
or organized in the United States or under the laws of the
United States or any political subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to United States federal
income tax regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust (i) whose administration is subject to the primary
supervision of a United States court and which has one or more
United States persons who have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) which has made
an election to be treated as a United States person.
|
If a partnership (or an entity treated as a partnership for
United States federal income tax purposes) holds our common
stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on
the status of the partner and upon the activities of the
partnership. Accordingly, we urge partnerships which hold our
common stock and partners in such partnerships to consult their
tax advisors.
Investors considering the purchase of our common stock should
consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the
United States federal income tax laws to their particular
situations and the consequences of United States federal
estate and gift tax laws, foreign, state and local laws, and tax
treaties.
Dividends
Distributions on our common stock, if any, generally will
constitute dividends for United States federal income tax
purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined under United
States federal income tax principles. Amounts not treated
as dividends for United States federal income tax purposes
will constitute a return of capital and will first be applied
128
against and reduce a holders adjusted tax basis in the
common stock, but not below zero, and then the excess, if any,
will be treated as gain from the sale of the common stock.
Amounts treated as dividends paid to a
non-United
States holder of common stock generally will be subject to
United States withholding at a rate of 30% of the gross amount
of the dividend, unless either: (a) an applicable income
tax treaty reduces or eliminates such tax, and the
non-United
States holder properly claims the benefit of that treaty by
providing a valid IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or suitable successor or substitute form) establishing
qualification for the reduced rate, or (b) the dividend is
effectively connected with the
non-United
States holders conduct of a trade or business in the
United States and the
non-United
States holder provides an appropriate statement to that effect
on a valid IRS
Form W-8ECI
(or suitable successor form).
Dividends received by a
non-United
States holder that are effectively connected with a United
States trade or business conducted by the
non-United
States holder are generally taxed at the same graduated rates
applicable to United States persons, net of certain deductions
and credits, subject to an applicable income tax treaty
providing otherwise. In that case, the 30% withholding tax
described above will not apply, provided the appropriate
statement is provided to us. If a
non-United
States holder is eligible for the benefits of a tax treaty
between the United States and its country of residence, any
dividend income that is effectively connected with a United
States trade or business will be subject to United States
federal income tax in the manner specified by the treaty and
generally will only be subject to such tax if such income is
attributable to a permanent establishment (or a fixed base in
the case of an individual) maintained by the
non-United
States holder in the United States and the
non-United
States holder claims the benefit of the treaty by properly
submitting an IRS
Form W-8BEN.
In addition, dividends received by a corporate
non-United
States holder that are effectively connected with a United
States trade or business of the corporate
non-United
States holder may also be subject to a branch profits tax at a
rate of 30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable tax treaty.
A non-United
States holder may obtain a refund from the IRS to the extent
that the amounts withheld as described above exceed that
holders tax liability if an appropriate claim for refund
is timely filed with the IRS.
If a
non-United
States holder holds our common stock through a foreign
partnership or other passthrough entity or a foreign
intermediary, the foreign partnership or passthrough entity or
foreign intermediary may also be required to comply with
additional certification requirements.
Gain on
Disposition of Common Stock
A non-United
States holder generally will not be subject to United States
federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other
disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the
non-United
States holder is an individual who holds his or her common stock
as a capital asset (generally, an asset held for investment
purposes) and who is present in the United States for a period
or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the calendar
year in which the sale or disposition occurs and certain other
conditions are met;
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a United States trade or
business of the
non-United
States holder; or
|
|
|
|
our common stock constitutes a United States real property
interest by reason of our status as a United States real
property holding corporation, a USRPHC, for United States
federal income tax purposes and the
non-United
States holder held, directly or indirectly, at any time during
the five-year period preceding the disposition more than 5% of
our common stock and the holder is not eligible for a treaty
exemption. The determination of whether we are a USRPHC depends
on the fair market value of our United States real property
interests relative to the fair market value of our other trade
or business assets and foreign real property interests.
|
129
We believe that we are not currently, and that we will not
become, a USRPHC for United States federal income tax purposes.
If the first of these exceptions applies, the
non-United
States holder generally will be subject to tax at a rate of 30%
on the amount by which the United States-source capital gains
exceed capital losses allocable to United States sources.
If the second exception applies, generally the
non-United
States holder will be required to pay United States federal
income tax on the net gain derived from the sale in the same
manner as a United States person. If a
non-United
States Holder is eligible for the benefits of a tax treaty
between the United States and its country of residence, any such
gain will be subject to United States federal income tax in the
manner specified by the treaty and generally will only be
subject to such tax if such gain is attributable to a permanent
establishment (or a fixed base in the case of an individual)
maintained by the
non-United
States holder in the United States and the
non-United
States holder claims the benefit of the treaty by properly
submitting an IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or suitable successor form). Additionally,
non-United
States holders that are treated for United States federal income
tax purposes as corporations and that are engaged in a trade or
business or have a permanent establishment in the United States
could be subject to a branch profits tax on such income at a 30%
rate or a lower rate if so specified by an applicable income tax
treaty.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
Generally, we must report annually to the IRS the amount of
dividends paid, the name and address of the recipient, and the
amount, if any, of tax withheld. Subject to certain exceptions,
a similar report is sent to the holder. Pursuant to tax treaties
or other agreements, the IRS may make its reports available to
tax authorities in the recipients country of residence.
Payments of dividends or of proceeds on the disposition of stock
made to a
non-United
States holder may be subject to backup withholding unless the
non-United
States holder establishes an exemption, for example, by properly
certifying its
non-United
States status on a valid IRS
Form W-8BEN
or another appropriate version of IRS
Form W-8.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, backup withholding may apply if
either we or our paying agent has actual knowledge, or reason to
know, that the holder is a United States person.
Additional information reporting and backup withholding may
apply in the case of dispositions of our common stock by
non-United
States brokers effected through certain brokers or a United
States office of a broker. The backup withholding rate currently
is 28%.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the United
States income tax liability of persons subject to backup
withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If
withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund may be
obtained, provided that the required information is timely
furnished to the IRS.
130
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon the consummation of this offering, we will
have shares
of common stock outstanding (assuming no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option). All of the shares of
common stock sold in the offering will be freely tradable under
the Securities Act. In connection with the Trust offering, an
affiliate of our existing stockholder has agreed to sell to the
Trust shares of common stock deliverable upon exchange of the
Trusts securities. Subject to the option of the affiliate
to settle its obligations to the Trust in cash, the number of
shares to be sold by the affiliate will range from a minimum
of shares
of common stock to a maximum
of shares
of common stock (or up to a minimum
of and
a maximum
of shares
of common stock if the initial purchasers option to
purchase additional Trust securities in the Trust offering is
exercised in full). Any such shares delivered upon exchange will
be freely tradable under the Securities Act. Upon the expiration
of a lock-up
agreement between our existing stockholder and the underwriters,
which will occur days after the date of this
prospectus, all other shares of common stock owned by this
stockholder, or Restricted Shares, will become eligible for
sale, subject to compliance with Rule 144 of the Securities
Act as described below.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
(or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially
owned Restricted Shares for at least one year, will be entitled
to sell in any three-month period a number of shares that does
not exceed the greater of: (i) 1% of the number of shares
of common stock then outstanding
( shares
immediately after the offering
or
if the underwriters over-allotment is exercised in full)
or (ii) the average weekly trading volume of our common
stock on the NYSE during the four calendar weeks immediately
preceding the date on which the notice of sale is filed with the
SEC (or the date of receipt of the order to execute the
transaction if no such notice is required). All of the
Restricted Shares have been held for over one year. Sales
pursuant to Rule 144 are subject to requirements relating
to manner of sale, notice and availability of current public
information about us. A person (or persons whose shares are
aggregated) who is not deemed to be an affiliate of ours
preceding the sale, and who has beneficially owned shares for at
least one year is entitled to sell such shares pursuant to
Rule 144(b)(1) without regard to the limitations and
requirements described above.
The existing stockholder has agreed with the underwriters,
subject to certain exceptions including with respect to the sale
of shares of common stock in connection with the Trust offering,
not to dispose of or hedge any of its common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock
during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing
through the date 180 days after the date of this prospectus
without the prior written consent of Goldman, Sachs &
Co.
With respect to our existing stockholder, the restrictions
described in the immediately preceding paragraph do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
a transfer of shares as a bona fide gift, where the donee
agrees to be bound by such restrictions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a transfer of shares not involving a disposition for value to
any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of the beneficial
holder of such shares or his immediate family, where the trustee
agrees to be bound by such restrictions; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
from and after the date that is 90 days following the date of
such agreement, a pledge as collateral for any loan of up to 30%
of the shares held by our existing stockholder not subject to
the trust offering, where the counterparty to such pledge agrees
to be bound by such restrictions, if such pledge does not
require any public report or filing with the SEC.
|
Not earlier than 90 days after the date of completion of
this offering, we intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act to register shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under our Stock Incentive Plan, thus
permitting the resale of such shares by non-affiliates in the
public market without restriction under the Securities Act. As
of ,
2009,
131
shares are reserved for issuance under our Stock Incentive
Plan. This registration statement will become effective
immediately upon filing.
We are unable to estimate the number of shares that may be sold
in the future by the existing stockholder or the effect, if any,
that sales of shares by such stockholder will have on the market
price of our common stock. Although an affiliate of our existing
stockholder has agreed to sell to the Trust up
to shares
of common stock deliverable upon exchange of the Trusts
securities (or up
to shares
of common stock if the initial purchasers option to
purchase additional Trust securities in the Trust offering is
exercised in full), the affiliate also has the right to settle
that obligation in cash. Sales of substantial amounts of common
stock by the existing stockholder could adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
132
UNDERWRITING
Dole Food Company, Inc. and the underwriters named below have
entered into an underwriting agreement with respect to the
shares being offered. Subject to certain conditions, each
underwriter has severally agreed to purchase the number of
shares indicated in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the
shares being offered, if any are taken, other than the shares
covered by the option described below unless and until this
option is exercised.
If the underwriters sell more shares than the total number set
forth above, the underwriters have an option to buy up to an
additional shares
from us. The underwriters may exercise that option for
30 days.
The following tables show the per share and total underwriting
discount to be paid to the underwriters by us. Such amounts are
shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Full
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the initial public offering price set forth on the
cover of this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to
securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to
$ per share from the initial
public offering price. Any such securities dealers may resell
any shares purchased from the underwriters to certain other
brokers or dealers at a discount of up to
$ per share from the initial
public offering price. If all the shares are not sold at the
initial public offering price, the underwriters may change the
offering price and the other selling terms. The offering of the
shares by the underwriters is subject to receipt and acceptance
and subject to the underwriters right to reject any order
in whole or in part.
We currently anticipate that we will undertake a directed share
program, pursuant to which we will
direct
to reserve up
to
shares of common stock for sale at the initial public offering
price to directors, officers, employees and friends through a
directed share program. The number of shares of common stock
available for sale to the general public in the public offering
will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase any
reserved shares. Any shares not so purchased will be offered
by
to the general public on the same basis as other shares offered
hereby.
We and our officers, directors and the existing stockholder have
agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not
to dispose of or hedge any of their common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock
during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing
through the date 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, except with the prior written consent of the
Goldman, Sachs & Co. See Shares Eligible for
Future Sale for a discussion of certain transfer
restrictions.
With respect to our existing stockholder, the
restrictions described in the immediately preceding paragraph do
not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
a transfer of shares as a bona fide gift, where the donee
agrees to be bound by such restrictions;
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
a transfer of shares not involving a disposition for value to
any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of the beneficial
holder of such shares or his immediate family, where the trustee
agrees to be bound by such restrictions; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
from and after the date that is 90 days following the date of
such agreement, a pledge as collateral for any loan of up to 30%
of the shares held by our existing stockholder not subject to
the trust offering, where the counterparty to such pledge agrees
to be bound by such restrictions, if such pledge does not
require any public report or filing with the SEC.
|
The 180-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
automatically extended if: (1) during the last 17 days
of the
180-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce
material news or a material event; or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, the Company announces that it will release
earnings results during the
15-day
period following the last day of the
180-day
period, in which case the restrictions described in the
preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration
of the
180-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
announcement of the material news or material event.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
shares since 2003. The initial public offering price has been
negotiated between us and the underwriters. Among the factors to
be considered in determining the initial public offering price
of the shares, in addition to prevailing market conditions, are
our historical performance, estimates of our business potential
and earnings prospects, an assessment of our management and the
consideration of the above factors in relation to market
valuation of companies in related businesses.
We intend to apply to list the common stock on the NYSE under
the symbol DOLE. In order to meet one of the
requirements for listing the common stock on the NYSE, the
underwriters will undertake to sell lots of 100 or more shares
to a minimum of 2,000 beneficial holders.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell shares of common stock in the open market. These
transactions may include short sales, stabilizing transactions
and purchases to cover positions created by short sales. Short
sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number
of shares than they are required to purchase in the offering.
Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not
greater than the underwriters option to purchase
additional shares from us in this offering. The underwriters may
close out any covered short position by either exercising their
option to purchase additional shares or purchasing shares in the
open market. In determining the source of shares to close out
the covered short position, the underwriters will consider,
among other things, the price of shares available for purchase
in the open market as compared to the price at which they may
purchase additional shares pursuant to the option granted to
them. Naked short sales are any sales in excess of
such option. The underwriters must close out any naked short
position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the common stock in the open market after pricing that could
adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering.
Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids for or
purchases of common stock made by the underwriters in the open
market prior to the completion of this offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the
account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short cover
transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing
transactions, as well as other purchases by the underwriters for
their own account, may have the effect of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of our stock and may
stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the
common stock. As a result, the price of the common stock may be
higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open
market. If these activities are commenced, they may be
discontinued at any time. These transactions may be effected on
NYSE, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
134
Each of the underwriters may arrange to sell common stock
offered hereby in certain jurisdictions outside the United
States, either directly or through affiliates, where they are
permitted to do so. In that regard, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
may arrange to sell shares in certain jurisdictions through an
affiliate, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, or
WFSIL. WFSIL is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Wells
Fargo & Company and an affiliate of Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC. WFSIL is a U.K. incorporated investment firm
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Wells Fargo
Securities is the trade name for certain corporate and
investment banking services of Wells Fargo & Company
and its affiliates, including Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and
WFSIL.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, or each, a
Relevant Member State, the underwriters have represented and
agreed that with effect from and including the date on which the
Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member
State, or the Relevant Implementation Date, it has not made and
will not make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant
Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in
relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent
authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate,
approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the
competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in
accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that it may,
with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date,
make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member
State at any time:
(a) to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts;
(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than
qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive)
subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives
for any such offer; or
(d) in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by the Company of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of shares to the public in relation to any
shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the
same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State.
Each of the underwriters has represented and agreed that:
(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA) received by
it in connection with the issue or sale of the shares in
circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not
apply to the Company; and
(b) it has complied and will comply with all applicable
provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the
United Kingdom.
The shares may not be offered or sold by means of any document
other than (1) in circumstances which do not constitute an
offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (2) to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder, or (3) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement,
invitation or document
135
relating to the shares may be issued or may be in the possession
of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in
Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is directed at, or the contents
of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in
Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the laws of Hong
Kong) other than with respect to shares which are or are
intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or
only to professional investors within the meaning of
the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong
Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the
Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus
and any other document or material in connection with the offer
or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the
shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares
be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for
subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to
persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional
investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures
Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore, or the SFA, (ii) to a
relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A),
and in accordance with the conditions, specified in
Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to,
and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable
provision of the SFA.
Where the shares are subscribed or purchased under
Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a) a
corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole
business of which is to hold investments and the entire share
capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of
whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the
trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to
hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor,
shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that
corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest in
that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after
that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under
Section 275 except: (1) to an institutional investor
under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person, or
any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance
with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA;
(2) where no consideration is given for the transfer; or
(3) by operation of law.
The shares have not been and will not be registered under the
Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan, or the
Financial Instruments and Exchange Law, and each underwriter has
agreed that it will not offer or sell any shares, directly or
indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident
of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in
Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under
the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale,
directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan,
except pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the Financial
Instruments and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws,
regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
This prospectus has not been prepared in the context of a public
offering of securities in France (appel public à
lépargne) within the meaning of
Article L.411-1
and seq. of the French Code monétaire et financier and
Articles 211-1
and seq. of the Autorité des marchés financiers, or
AMF, regulations and has therefore not been submitted to the AMF
for prior approval or otherwise. The shares of common stock have
not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold,
directly or indirectly, to the public in France and neither this
prospectus nor any other offering material relating to the
common stock has been distributed or caused to be distributed or
will be distributed or caused to be distributed to the public in
France, except only to persons licensed to provide the
investment service of portfolio management for the account of
third parties
and/or to
qualified investors (as defined in
Article L.411-2,
D.411-1 and D.411-2 of the French Code monétaire et
financier)
and/or to a
limited circle of investors (as defined in
Article L.411-2,
D.411-4 of the French Code monétaire et financier) on the
condition that no such prospectus nor any other offering
material relating to the common stock shall be delivered by then
to any person nor reproduced (in whole or in part). Such
qualified investors are notified that they must act
in that connection for their own account in accordance with the
terms set out by
Article L.411-2
of the French Code monétaire et financier and by
Article 211-4
of the AMF regulations and may not re-transfer, directly or
indirectly, the common stock
136
in France, other than in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations and in particular those relating to a public
offering (which are, in particular, embodied in
Articles L.411-1,
L.412-1 and L.621-8 and seq. of the French Code monétaire
et financier).
The offering of the shares of common stock has not been
registered with the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e
la Borsa, or CONSOB, in accordance with Italian securities
legislation. Accordingly, the shares of common stock may not be
offered or sold, and copies of this offering document or any
other document relating to the shares of common stock may not be
distributed in Italy except to Qualified Investors, as defined
in Article 2, paragraph 2, letter e), (i),
(ii) and (iii) of EU Directive 2003/71/EC or in any
other circumstance where an express exemption to comply with
public offering restrictions provided by Legislative Decree
no. 58 of February 24, 1998, referred to as the
Consolidated Financial Act, or CONSOB Regulation no. 11971
of May 14, 1999, as amended, also referred to as the
Issuers Regulation, applies, including those provided for
under Article 100 of the Finance Law and Article 33 of
the Issuers Regulation, and provided, however, that any such
offer or sale of the shares of common stock or distribution of
copies of this prospectus or any other document relating to the
shares of common stock in Italy must (1) be made in
accordance with all applicable Italian laws and regulations,
(2) be conducted in accordance with any relevant
limitations or procedural requirements that CONSOB may impose
upon the offer or sale of the shares of common stock, and
(3) be made only by (a) banks, investment firms or
financial companies enrolled in the special register provided
for in Article 107 of Legislative Decree no. 385 of
September 1, 1993, to the extent duly authorized to engage
in the placement
and/or
underwriting of financial instruments in Italy in accordance
with the Consolidated Financial Act and the relevant
implementing regulations; or (b) foreign banks or financial
institutions (the controlling shareholding of which is owned by
one or more banks located in the same EU Member State)
authorized to place and distribute securities in the Republic of
Italy pursuant to Articles 15, 16 and 18 of the Banking
Act, in each case acting in compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations.
This document does not constitute a prospectus within the
meaning of Art. 652a of the Swiss Code of Obligations. The
shares of common stock may not be sold directly or indirectly in
or into Switzerland except in a manner which will not result in
a public offering within the meaning of the Swiss Code of
Obligations. Neither this document nor any other offering
materials relating to the shares of common stock may be
distributed, published or otherwise made available in
Switzerland except in a manner which will not constitute a
public offer of the shares of common stock in Switzerland.
This prospectus relates to an exempt offer in accordance with
the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services
Authority. This document is intended for distribution only to
persons of a type specified in those rules. It must not be
delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The Dubai
Financial Services Authority has no responsibility for reviewing
or verifying any documents in connection with exempt offers. The
Dubai Financial Services Authority has not approved this
document nor taken steps to verify the information set out in
it, and has no responsibility for it. The shares of common stock
which are the subject of the offering contemplated by this
prospectus may be illiquid
and/or
subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers
of the common stock offered should conduct their own due
diligence on the common stock. If you do not understand the
contents of this document you should consult an authorized
financial adviser.
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts
to exceed five percent of the total number of shares offered.
We estimate that our share of the total expenses of this
offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will
be approximately $ million.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933.
137
The underwriters and their affiliates have, from time to time,
performed, and may in the future perform, various financial
advisory and investment banking services for us, for which they
received or will receive customary fees and expenses.
In addition, affiliates of certain of the underwriters are
lenders and/or agents under our senior secured credit facilities
and our unsecured lines of credit or under the debt instruments
of our parent, DHM Holdings, or of an affiliate of
Mr. Murdock, as set forth below.
Senior Secured Term Loan Facilities. As of
June 20, 2009, the outstanding principal amount of term
loans under our senior secured term loan facilities was
approximately $828 million, of which approximately
$ million was held by
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and its affiliates. In addition,
we had approximately $97 million of letters of credit and
bank guarantees outstanding under our $100 million
pre-funded letter of credit facility as of June 20, 2009.
The commitment of each of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and its
affiliates and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated and its affiliates under the pre-funded letter of
credit facility is approximately
$ million and
$ million, respectively.
The term loan facilities bear interest, at our option, at a rate
per annum equal to either (1) a base rate plus 3.5% to 4%;
or (2) LIBOR (subject to a minimum of 3%) plus 4.5% to 5%,
in each case based upon our senior secured leverage ratio. The
weighted average variable interest rate for the term loan
facilities at June 20, 2009 was 8.3%. There is a facility
fee of 6.86125% on the pre-funded letter of credit facility.
Senior Secured ABL Revolving Facility. We have
a senior secured ABL revolving facility with total commitments
of $350 million (with a borrowing base of $320 million
at June 20, 2009). The commitment of each of Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. and its affiliates, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and its affiliates and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and its affiliates is
$15 million, $30 million and $47 million,
respectively. There were no amounts outstanding under the ABL
revolver at June 20, 2009. There were a total of
approximately $ million
letters of credit committed and approximately $76 million
of letters of credit issued under the ABL revolver as of
June 20, 2009. The commitment of each of Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. and its affiliates, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and its affiliates and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and its affiliates under the letter
of credit facility is approximately
$ million,
$ million and
$ million, respectively.
The ABL revolver bears interest, at our option, at a rate per
annum equal to either (1) a base rate plus 2% to 2.5%, or
(2) LIBOR plus 3% to 3.5%, in each case based upon our
historical borrowing availability under this facility. A
commitment fee, which, during the fiscal quarter ended
June 20, 2009, fluctuated
between %
and %, was paid based on the total
unused portion of the ABL revolver.
We pay an annual agency fee of $300,000 in connection with the
ABL revolver and the term loan facilities.
Westlake Term Facility. Our parent, DHM
Holdings, entered into an amended and restated loan agreement
for $135 million on March 17, 2008 in connection with
its investment in WWP. As of June 20, 2009, the outstanding
amount of terms loans under this facility was $135 million,
of which Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and its affiliates held
approximately $ million and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and its affiliates held
approximately $ million.
The applicable interest rate for the Westlake term facility is
LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum or the base rate plus 2.00% per
annum. DHM Holdings pays an annual agency fee of $75,000 in
connection with this facility.
Existing Stockholder Debt. An affiliate of
Mr. Murdock has debt outstanding of $90 million, of
which Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and its affiliates held
approximately $ million. The
applicable interest rate for such debt
is %.
138
VALIDITY OF
COMMON STOCK
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will
be passed upon for us by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP,
Los Angeles, California. The validity of the shares of common
stock offered hereby will be passed upon for the underwriters by
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Los Angeles, California.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Dole Food Company, Inc.
as of January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, and for
each of the three years in the period ended January 3,
2009, included in this prospectus, and the related financial
statement schedule for each of those respective years, included
elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing
herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of
new accounting standards for noncontrolling interests, fair
value measurements, uncertainty in income taxes, planned major
maintenance activities, and retirement benefits). Such financial
statements and financial statement schedule have been so
included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of DHM Holding Company,
Inc. as of January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, and
for each of the three years in the period ended January 3,
2009, included in this prospectus have been audited by Deloitte
& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the adoption of new accounting standards
for noncontrolling interests, fair value measurements,
uncertainty in income taxes, planned major maintenance
activities, and retirement benefits). Such financial statements
have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm
given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN
FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we
file with the SEC at the SECs public reference rooms at
the following location:
Public Reference
Room
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington D.C. 20549
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operations of the public
reference rooms. Doles SEC filings also are available to
the public at the SECs web site at
http://www.sec.gov.
139
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements for the Quarter and Half Years
Ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Audited Financial Statements for the Three Years Ended
January 3, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
Supplementary Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-106
|
|
DHM HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Unaudited Financial Statements for the Quarter and Half Years
Ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-107
|
|
|
|
|
F-108
|
|
|
|
|
F-109
|
|
|
|
|
F-110
|
|
|
|
|
F-111
|
|
|
|
|
F-112
|
|
Audited Financial Statements for the Three Years Ended
January 3, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-139
|
|
|
|
|
F-140
|
|
|
|
|
F-141
|
|
|
|
|
F-142
|
|
|
|
|
F-144
|
|
|
|
|
F-145
|
|
F-1
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
1,714,722
|
|
|
$
|
1,994,943
|
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
|
$
|
3,723,288
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(1,492,606
|
)
|
|
|
(1,761,707
|
)
|
|
|
(2,885,325
|
)
|
|
|
(3,320,392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
222,116
|
|
|
|
233,236
|
|
|
|
425,987
|
|
|
|
402,896
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(113,944
|
)
|
|
|
(121,411
|
)
|
|
|
(211,350
|
)
|
|
|
(239,515
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales (Note 12)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
11,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
108,331
|
|
|
|
121,664
|
|
|
|
231,430
|
|
|
|
175,024
|
|
Other income (expense), net (Note 3)
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
23,653
|
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
|
(5,058
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(50,242
|
)
|
|
|
(41,245
|
)
|
|
|
(87,788
|
)
|
|
|
(84,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
26,543
|
|
|
|
105,181
|
|
|
|
135,684
|
|
|
|
88,102
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,963
|
)
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
(17,011
|
)
|
|
|
60,200
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,277
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
20,857
|
|
|
|
177,091
|
|
|
|
123,144
|
|
|
|
151,638
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
181,409
|
|
|
|
124,839
|
|
|
|
153,135
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
20,145
|
|
|
$
|
180,754
|
|
|
$
|
122,965
|
|
|
$
|
151,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Basic and Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-2
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
|
$
|
90,829
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $54,599 and $41,357,
respectively
|
|
|
803,897
|
|
|
|
807,235
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
725,999
|
|
|
|
796,407
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
76,640
|
|
|
|
69,347
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
22,180
|
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
Assets held-for-sale (Note 12)
|
|
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,831,017
|
|
|
|
1,987,967
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
76,537
|
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1,075,889 and $1,027,345, respectively
|
|
|
1,017,062
|
|
|
|
1,050,331
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
713,923
|
|
|
|
708,458
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
172,691
|
|
|
|
138,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
485,213
|
|
|
$
|
510,773
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale (Note 12)
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
50,465
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
416,922
|
|
|
|
490,145
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
390,896
|
|
|
|
356,748
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,339,286
|
|
|
|
1,456,920
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,576,025
|
|
|
|
1,798,556
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
257,512
|
|
|
|
254,205
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
495,562
|
|
|
|
421,779
|
|
Contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.001 par value;
1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
409,681
|
|
|
|
409,681
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
159,087
|
|
|
|
36,122
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
(42,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
528,280
|
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
555,455
|
|
|
|
433,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-3
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
124,839
|
|
|
$
|
153,135
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
54,822
|
|
|
|
65,608
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on financial instruments
|
|
|
(966
|
)
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
Asset write-offs and net (gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(18,120
|
)
|
|
|
(11,597
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(4,471
|
)
|
|
|
(3,336
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
5,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
(24,634
|
)
|
Unrecognized tax benefits on federal income tax audit settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,083
|
)
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense
|
|
|
6,231
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
Other
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(5,844
|
)
|
|
|
(171,968
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
67,415
|
|
|
|
(36,584
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(21,822
|
)
|
|
|
(11,875
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(8,551
|
)
|
|
|
74,728
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
12,954
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(2,692
|
)
|
|
|
(11,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
209,314
|
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
59,308
|
|
|
|
31,976
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(24,936
|
)
|
|
|
(35,312
|
)
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merger transaction
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
(3,473
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt repayments, net of borrowings
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(9,996
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
825,178
|
|
|
|
603,849
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,039,172
|
)
|
|
|
(607,225
|
)
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in financing activities
|
|
|
(219,703
|
)
|
|
|
(14,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17,090
|
|
|
|
(19,705
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
90,829
|
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
|
$
|
77,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-4
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Attributable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
to Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
on Hedges
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,907
|
|
|
$
|
(84,883
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,261
|
|
|
$
|
(15,525
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,878
|
|
|
$
|
354,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
153,135
|
|
|
$
|
153,135
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,897
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging losses to net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 14, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,907
|
|
|
$
|
66,926
|
|
|
$
|
(26,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
50,158
|
|
|
$
|
(11,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,865
|
|
|
$
|
518,637
|
|
|
$
|
165,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,681
|
|
|
$
|
36,122
|
|
|
$
|
(40,960
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,187
|
|
|
$
|
(29,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,259
|
|
|
$
|
433,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
124,839
|
|
|
$
|
124,839
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging losses to net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,681
|
|
|
$
|
159,087
|
|
|
$
|
(41,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,801
|
|
|
$
|
(24,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,175
|
|
|
$
|
555,455
|
|
|
$
|
127,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-5
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,122
|
|
|
$
|
181,409
|
|
|
$
|
124,839
|
|
|
$
|
153,135
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
10,808
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging losses to net
income
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
35,391
|
|
|
|
192,081
|
|
|
|
127,251
|
|
|
|
165,096
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(1,871
|
)
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Dole Food Company,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
34,401
|
|
|
$
|
191,618
|
|
|
$
|
125,380
|
|
|
$
|
163,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-6
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements of Dole Food
Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries
(Dole or the Company) include all
adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature,
to present fairly Doles financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. Dole operates under a 52/53-week
year. The quarters ended June 20, 2009 and June 14,
2008 are twelve weeks in duration. For a summary of significant
accounting policies and additional information relating to
Doles financial statements, refer to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Doles
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Form 10-K)
for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009.
Interim results are subject to seasonal variations and are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full
year. Doles operations are sensitive to a number of
factors including weather-related phenomena and their effects on
industry volumes, prices, product quality and costs. Operations
are also sensitive to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates in both sourcing and selling locations as well as economic
crises and security risks.
In March 2003, Dole completed a going-private merger transaction
(going-private merger transaction). The
privatization resulted from the acquisition by David H. Murdock,
Doles Chairman, of the approximately 76% of the shares of
common stock of Dole Food Company, Inc. that he and his
affiliates did not already own. As a result of the transaction,
Dole became wholly-owned by Mr. Murdock through DHM Holding
Company, Inc.
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements and
related footnotes have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
presentation. Dole adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (FAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(FAS 160) during the first quarter of 2009
(see Note 2 for further information).
NOTE 2
RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
During June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FAS No. 168, FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162 (FAS 168), which
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the
single official source of authoritative US GAAP (other than
guidance issued by the SEC), superseding existing FASB, American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task
Force, and related literature. FAS 168 will become
effective during Doles third quarter of 2009. Dole expects
that the adoption of FAS 168 will not have an impact on its
results of operations or financial position.
During June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(FAS 167), which changes the
approach in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity (VIE) and requires companies to more
frequently assess whether they must consolidate VIEs.
FAS 167 is effective for annual periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. Dole is evaluating the impact, if any,
the adoption of FAS 167 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
During May 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (FAS 165), to
establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
FAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through which
an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that
date. Dole adopted FAS 165 during its second fiscal quarter
and it had no impact on Doles results of operations or
financial position. In the preparation of the condensed
consolidated financial statements,
F-7
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Dole evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of
June 20, 2009 through October 2, 2009.
During April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP), which amends FASB Statement
No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to require disclosures about the fair value of
financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as
in annual financial statements. Dole adopted the FSP during its
second fiscal quarter of 2009 and the disclosures required by
the FSP are included in Note 14 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements. The adoption had no impact on
Doles results of operations or financial position.
During March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures About
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FAS 161). This new standard requires
enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments, including those
used in hedging activities. Dole adopted FAS 161 at the
beginning of its first fiscal quarter of 2009. The disclosures
required by FAS 161 are included in Note 13 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements and had no impact on
Doles results of operations or financial position.
During December 2007, the FASB issued
FAS 160. FAS 160 establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Dole
adopted the provisions of FAS 160 as of the beginning of
its 2009 fiscal year. FAS 160 is to be applied
prospectively as of the beginning of 2009 except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements which are to be applied
retrospectively. The condensed consolidated financial statements
now conform to the presentation required under FAS 160.
Other than the change in presentation of noncontrolling
interests, the adoption of FAS 160 had no impact on
Doles results of operations or financial position.
During December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (FAS 141R). FAS 141R
provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
FAS 141R will be applied prospectively to business
combinations with acquisition dates on or after January 1,
2009. As a result of the adoption, changes to valuation
allowances and unrecognized tax benefits established in business
combinations will be recognized in earnings.
F-8
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Included in other income (expense), net in Doles condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the quarters and half
years ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 are the
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
$
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,001
|
|
|
$
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Realized gain on cross currency swap
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
Gain (loss) on foreign denominated borrowings
|
|
|
(11,538
|
)
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
(4,406
|
)
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,653
|
|
|
$
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 13 Derivative Financial
Instruments for further discussion regarding Doles cross
currency swap.
NOTE 4
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During the second quarter of 2008, Dole approved and committed
to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers operations
(Flowers transaction). The first phase of the
Flowers transaction was completed during the first quarter of
2009 (refer to Note 12 Assets Held-For-Sale).
In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007, Dole approved
and committed to a formal plan to divest its citrus and
pistachio operations (Citrus) located in central
California. The operating results of Citrus were included in the
fresh fruit operating segment. The sale of Citrus was completed
during the third quarter of 2008. In evaluating the two
businesses, Dole concluded that they each met the definition of
a discontinued operation as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(FAS 144). Accordingly, the results of
operations of these businesses have been reclassified for all
periods presented. The operating results of fresh-cut flowers
and Citrus for the quarters and half years ended June 20,
2009 and June 14, 2008 are reported in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
29,063
|
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
32,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
(5,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,190
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
10,396
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
10,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
|
$
|
62,879
|
|
|
$
|
5,020
|
|
|
$
|
67,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
(9,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,288
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
10,691
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
10,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
(157
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all periods presented, noncontrolling interests were not
material.
NOTE 5
INCOME TAXES
Dole recorded $17 million of income tax expense on
$135.7 million of pretax income from continuing operations
for the half year ended June 20, 2009. Income tax expense
included interest expense of $1.2 million (net of
associated income tax benefits of approximately
$0.3 million) related to Doles unrecognized tax
benefits. An income tax benefit of $60.2 million was
recorded for the half year ended June 14, 2008 which
included $61.1 million for the favorable settlement of the
federal income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001. Excluding
the impact of the favorable settlement, income tax expense was
$0.9 million, which included interest expense of
$2.1 million (net of associated income tax benefits of
approximately $0.7 million) related to Doles
unrecognized tax benefits. Doles effective tax rate varies
significantly from period to period due to the level, mix and
seasonality of earnings generated in its various U.S. and
foreign jurisdictions.
Under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting (APB 28), and
FASB Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes
in Interim Periods (FIN 18), Dole is
required to adjust its effective tax rate for each quarter to be
consistent with the estimated annual effective tax rate.
Jurisdictions with a projected loss where no tax benefit can be
recognized are excluded from the calculation of the estimated
annual effective tax rate. Applying the provisions of APB 28 and
FIN 18 could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate
during a particular quarter, based upon the mix and timing of
actual earnings versus annual projections.
For the periods presented, Doles income tax provision
differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate applied to
Doles pretax income primarily due to operations in foreign
jurisdictions that are taxed at a rate lower than the
U.S. federal statutory rate offset by the accrual for
uncertain tax positions.
Dole recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to its
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income taxes in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. Accrued
interest and penalties before tax benefits were
$27.5 million and $26.9 million at June 20, 2009
and January 3, 2009, respectively, and are included as a
component of other long-term liabilities in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet. Dole Food Company, Inc. or one or
more of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the
U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, Dole is no longer subject to
U.S. federal, state and local, or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001.
F-10
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Income Tax Audits: Dole believes its tax
positions comply with the applicable tax laws and that it is
adequately provided for all tax related matters. Matters raised
upon audit may involve substantial amounts and could result in
material cash payments if resolved unfavorably; however,
management does not believe that any material payments will be
made related to these matters within the next twelve months.
Management considers it unlikely that the resolution of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on Doles
results of operations.
Internal Revenue Service Audit: Dole is
currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) for the tax years
2002-2005
and it is anticipated that the examination will be completed by
the end of 2009.
Although the timing and ultimate resolution of any issues that
might arise from the ongoing IRS examination are highly
uncertain, at this time, Dole does not anticipate that total
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within the
next twelve months.
NOTE 6
INVENTORIES
The major classes of inventories were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
$
|
364,624
|
|
|
$
|
344,643
|
|
Raw materials and work in progress
|
|
|
141,472
|
|
|
|
168,670
|
|
Crop-growing costs
|
|
|
155,059
|
|
|
|
210,263
|
|
Operating supplies and other
|
|
|
64,844
|
|
|
|
72,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
725,999
|
|
|
$
|
796,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill has been allocated to Doles reporting segments as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
Foods
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009 and June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
274,723
|
|
|
$
|
71,206
|
|
|
$
|
60,611
|
|
|
$
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Details of Doles intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
38,501
|
|
|
$
|
38,501
|
|
Other amortized intangible assets
|
|
|
9,217
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,718
|
|
|
|
40,543
|
|
Accumulated amortization customer relationships
|
|
|
(21,945
|
)
|
|
|
(20,248
|
)
|
Other accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization intangible assets
|
|
|
(23,410
|
)
|
|
|
(21,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets, net
|
|
|
24,308
|
|
|
|
18,843
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark and trade names
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
713,923
|
|
|
$
|
708,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During May 2009, Dole acquired all of the assets of Distrifruit,
a distributor of fresh fruit located in Romania, in exchange for
trade receivables due from the seller. Dole acquired the assets
primarily to obtain control and gain access over
Distrifruits customer base in Romania. At the date of
acquisition, the total fair value of the assets acquired was
$10 million, consisting of $2.9 million of inventory
and property, plant and equipment, net and $7.1 million of
intangible assets. Dole expects to finalize its allocation of
the acquisition during the third quarter of 2009. The revenues
and earnings of Distrifruit from the acquisition date through
June 20, 2009 were not material. Distrifruit revenues and
earnings for the 2009 and 2008 fiscal years also were not
material for pro forma disclosure.
Amortization expense of intangible assets totaled
$0.9 million and $1 million for the quarters ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008, respectively, and
$1.7 million and $2 million for the half years ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008, respectively.
As of June 20, 2009, the estimated remaining amortization
expense associated with Doles intangible assets for the
remainder of 2009 and in each of the next four fiscal years is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
Dole performed its annual impairment review of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, during the second quarter of fiscal
2009. This review indicated no impairment to goodwill or any of
Doles indefinite-lived intangible assets.
F-12
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 8
NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following
amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.625% notes due 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
7.25% notes due 2010
|
|
|
383,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
8.875% notes due 2011
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
8.75% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.875% notes due 2014
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,500
|
|
Term loan facilities
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
Contracts and notes, at a weighted-average interest rate of 6%
in 2009 (6.1% in 2008) through 2014
|
|
|
9,219
|
|
|
|
9,221
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
65,813
|
|
|
|
60,448
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(24,311
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,011,061
|
|
|
|
2,204,093
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(435,036
|
)
|
|
|
(405,537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,798,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Debt
Maturity
During the second quarter of 2009, Dole reclassified to current
liabilities its $400 million 7.25% notes due June 2010
(2010 Notes). During the second quarter of 2009,
Doles Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to $95 million of the 2010 Notes. Dole subsequently
repurchased $17 million and $20 million of the 2010
Notes during the second and third quarters of 2009, respectively.
Doles current plan is to offer senior secured notes during
the third quarter of 2009. Dole plans to use the net proceeds
from this offering, together with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to redeem the
bulk of the outstanding 2010 notes. Dole intends to redeem or
repurchase any remaining 2010 notes during the third
and/or
fourth quarters of 2009 with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility. A failure by
Dole to timely redeem, repurchase or repay the 2010 Notes at or
before maturity could lead to an event of default which would
have a material adverse effect on Doles business,
financial condition and results of operations.
2009 Debt
Refinancing
On March 18, 2009, Dole completed the sale and issuance of
$350 million aggregate principal amount of
13.875% Senior Secured Notes due March 2014 (2014
Notes) at a discount of $25 million. The 2014 Notes
were sold to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933
(Securities Act) and to persons outside the United
States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities
Act. The sale was exempt from the registration requirements of
the
F-13
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Securities Act. Interest on the 2014 Notes will be paid
semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each
year, beginning on September 15, 2009. The 2014 Notes have
the benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of Dole that
is junior to the liens of Doles senior secured credit
facilities (revolving credit and term loan facilities), and are
senior obligations of Dole ranking equally with Doles
existing senior debt. Dole used the net proceeds from this
offering, together with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to purchase all
of the tendered 8.625% notes due May 2009 (2009
Notes) and to irrevocably deposit with the trustee of the
2009 Notes funds that were used to repay the remaining
outstanding 2009 Notes at maturity on May 1, 2009.
In connection with these refinancing transactions, Dole amended
its senior secured credit facilities, which amendments, among
other things, permitted the issuance of new secured debt
securities, increased the interest rate on the term and
revolving credit facilities and added a leverage maintenance
covenant.
Debt Issuance
Costs
In connection with the issuance of the 2014 Notes and the
amendment of Doles senior secured credit facilities, Dole
incurred debt issuance costs of $17.8 million. Debt
issuance costs are capitalized and amortized into interest
expense over the term of the underlying debt.
Dole wrote off $5.2 million of deferred debt issuance costs
during the quarter ended March 28, 2009 resulting from the
amendment of its senior secured credit facilities. This
amendment was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt in
accordance with
EITF 96-19,
Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
Debt Instruments. This write-off was recorded to other
income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the half year ended June 20, 2009.
Dole amortized deferred debt issuance costs of $1.4 million
and $2.3 million during the quarter and half year ended
June 20, 2009, respectively. Dole amortized deferred debt
issuance costs of $0.9 million and $1.9 million during
the quarter and half year ended June 14, 2008.
Term Loans and
Revolving Credit Facility
As of June 20, 2009, the term loan facilities consisted of
$175.3 million of Term Loan B and $653 million of Term
Loan C. The term loan facilities bear interest, at Doles
option, at a rate per annum equal to either (i) a base rate
plus 3.5% to 4%; or (ii) LIBOR (subject to a minimum of 3%)
plus 4.5% to 5%, in each case, based upon Doles senior
secured leverage ratio. The weighted average variable interest
rate at June 20, 2009 for Term Loan B and Term Loan C was
8.3%. The term loan facilities require quarterly principal
payments, plus a balloon payment due in 2013. Dole has an
interest rate swap to hedge future changes in interest rates and
a cross currency swap to effectively lower the U.S. dollar
fixed interest rate to a Japanese yen fixed interest rate on
Term Loan C. Refer to Note 13 Derivative
Financial Instruments for additional information related to
these instruments.
As of June 20, 2009, the asset based revolving credit
facility (ABL revolver) borrowing base was
$320 million. There were no amounts outstanding under the
ABL revolver at June 20, 2009. The ABL revolver bears
interest, at Doles option, at a rate per annum equal to
either (i) a base rate plus 2% to 2.5%, or (ii) LIBOR
plus 3% to 3.5%, in each case, based upon Doles historical
borrowing availability under this facility. The ABL revolver
matures in April 2011. After taking into account approximately
$76.4 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under
the ABL revolver, Dole had approximately $243.6 million
available for borrowings as of June 20, 2009. In addition,
Dole had approximately
F-14
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
$97 million of letters of credit and bank guarantees
outstanding under its $100 million pre-funded letter of
credit facility as of June 20, 2009.
Capital Lease
Obligations
At June 20, 2009 and January 3, 2009, included in
capital lease obligations were $64.1 million and
$58.5 million, respectively, of vessel financing related to
two vessel leases denominated in British pound sterling. The
increase in the capital lease obligation was due to the
strengthening of the British pound sterling against the
U.S. dollar during 2009, which resulted in Dole recognizing
$6.8 million of unrealized losses. These unrealized losses
were recorded as other income (expense), net in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the half year ended
June 20, 2009.
Covenants
Provisions under the indentures governing Doles senior
notes and debentures require Dole to comply with certain
covenants. These covenants include limitations on, among other
things, indebtedness, investments, loans to subsidiaries,
employees and third parties, the issuance of guarantees and the
payment of dividends. The ABL revolver contains a
springing covenant, but that covenant has never been
effective and would only become effective if the availability
under the ABL revolver were to fall below $35 million for
any eight consecutive business days, which it has never done
during the life of such facility. At June 20, 2009, Dole
had $243.6 million of availability under the ABL revolver.
In addition, as a result of the March 2009 amendment to
Doles senior secured term facilities, Dole is now subject
to a first priority senior secured leverage ratio that must be
at or below 3.25 to 1.00 as of the last day of the fiscal
quarters ending March 28, 2009 through October 10,
2009 and steps down to 3.00 to 1.00 as of the last day of the
fiscal quarter ending January 2, 2010. At June 20,
2009, the first priority senior secured leverage ratio was less
than 2.25 to 1.00.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in a debt instrument
governing Doles current or future indebtedness or pursuant
to certain debt instruments under which our parent and an
affiliate of its majority stockholder are borrowers, could
result in a default under that instrument and, due to
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could result in
a default under Doles other debt instruments. Such debt
instruments of our parent, currently $115 million, and an
affiliate of its majority stockholder, currently
$90 million, mature on March 3, 2010 and
December 23, 2009, respectively. Upon the occurrence of an
event of default under one of the above debt instruments, the
lenders or holders of that debt and other debt instruments could
elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due
and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further
credit. If Dole were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders
could proceed against the collateral granted to them, if any, to
secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under Doles
existing indebtedness were to accelerate the payment of the
indebtedness, Dole cannot give assurance that its assets or cash
flow would be sufficient to repay in full its outstanding
indebtedness, in which event Dole likely would seek
reorganization or protection under bankruptcy or other, similar
laws.
Dividends
On June 22, 2009, Dole declared a dividend of
$15 million to its parent, DHM Holding Company, Inc. Dole
paid $7.5 million on June 23, 2009 and
$2.5 million on July 20, 2009, and expects to pay the
remaining $5.0 million prior to August 31, 2009. As a
result of this dividend, Dole does not at present have the
ability to declare future dividends, pursuant to the terms of
its senior notes indentures and senior secured credit facilities.
F-15
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net periodic benefit cost for Doles
U.S. and international pension plans and other
postretirement benefit (OPRB) plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
|
4,288
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(3,898
|
)
|
|
|
(4,186
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
3,172
|
|
|
$
|
3,360
|
|
|
$
|
(249
|
)
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
2,720
|
|
|
$
|
2,893
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,006
|
|
|
|
8,576
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
4,734
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(7,796
|
)
|
|
|
(8,372
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(1,594
|
)
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
954
|
|
|
$
|
6,335
|
|
|
$
|
6,757
|
|
|
$
|
(498
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 10
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Dole has three reportable operating segments: fresh fruit, fresh
vegetables and packaged foods. These reportable segments are
managed separately due to differences in their products,
production processes, distribution channels and customer bases.
Management evaluates and monitors segment performance primarily
through, among other measures, earnings before interest expense
and income taxes (EBIT). EBIT is calculated by
adding interest expense and income taxes to income from
continuing operations. Management believes that segment EBIT
provides useful information for analyzing the underlying
business results as well as allowing investors a means to
evaluate the financial results of each segment in relation to
Dole as a whole. EBIT is not defined under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for net income or cash flow measures prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of Doles
profitability. Additionally, Doles computation of EBIT may
not be comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by
other companies, because not all companies calculate EBIT in the
same fashion.
Revenues from external customers and EBIT for the reportable
operating segments and corporate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
1,221,433
|
|
|
$
|
1,466,922
|
|
|
$
|
2,343,415
|
|
|
$
|
2,695,450
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
258,087
|
|
|
|
279,643
|
|
|
|
491,529
|
|
|
|
510,672
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
234,892
|
|
|
|
248,118
|
|
|
|
475,742
|
|
|
|
516,623
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,714,722
|
|
|
$
|
1,994,943
|
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
|
$
|
3,723,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
96,466
|
|
|
$
|
131,266
|
|
|
$
|
195,288
|
|
|
$
|
184,153
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
(1,939
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
23,998
|
|
|
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
45,888
|
|
|
|
30,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
116,955
|
|
|
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
254,140
|
|
|
|
213,213
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(12,474
|
)
|
|
|
(9,853
|
)
|
|
|
(19,494
|
)
|
|
|
(23,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(36,893
|
)
|
|
|
9,148
|
|
|
|
(26,197
|
)
|
|
|
(37,033
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(50,242
|
)
|
|
|
(41,245
|
)
|
|
|
(87,788
|
)
|
|
|
(84,742
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,963
|
)
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
(17,011
|
)
|
|
|
60,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
20,857
|
|
|
$
|
177,091
|
|
|
$
|
123,144
|
|
|
$
|
151,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doles equity earnings in unconsolidated subsidiaries,
which have been included in EBIT in the table above, relate
primarily to the fresh fruit operating segment.
Total assets for the three reportable operating segments,
corporate and fresh-cut flowers were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
2,293,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,322,899
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
389,331
|
|
|
|
460,221
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
663,420
|
|
|
|
686,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
3,345,881
|
|
|
|
3,469,921
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
865,320
|
|
|
|
832,709
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers discontinued operation
|
|
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
61,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11
CONTINGENCIES
Dole is a guarantor of indebtedness of some of its key fruit
suppliers and other entities integral to Doles operations.
At June 20, 2009, guarantees of $1.8 million consisted
primarily of amounts advanced under third-party bank agreements
to independent growers that supply Dole with product. Dole has
not historically experienced any significant losses associated
with these guarantees.
Dole issues letters of credit and bank guarantees through its
ABL revolver and its pre-funded letter of credit facilities,
and, in addition, separately through major banking institutions.
Dole also provides insurance-company-issued bonds. These letters
of credit, bank guarantees and insurance company bonds are
required by certain regulatory authorities, suppliers and other
operating
F-18
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
agreements. As of June 20, 2009, total letters of credit,
bank guarantees and bonds outstanding under these arrangements
were $205.7 million, of which $97 million was issued
under its pre-funded letter of credit facility.
Dole also provides various guarantees, mostly to foreign banks,
in the course of its normal business operations to support the
borrowings, leases and other obligations of its subsidiaries.
Dole guaranteed $213.2 million of its subsidiaries
obligations to their suppliers and other third parties as of
June 20, 2009.
Dole has change of control agreements with certain key
executives, under which severance payments and benefits would
become payable in the event of specified terminations of
employment in connection with a change of control (as defined)
of Dole.
Dole is involved from time to time in claims and legal actions
incidental to its operations, both as plaintiff and defendant.
Dole has established what management currently believes to be
adequate reserves for pending legal matters. These reserves are
established as part of an ongoing worldwide assessment of claims
and legal actions that takes into consideration such items as
changes in the pending case load (including resolved and new
matters), opinions of legal counsel, individual developments in
court proceedings, changes in the law, changes in business
focus, changes in the litigation environment, changes in
opponent strategy and tactics, new developments as a result of
ongoing discovery, and past experience in defending and settling
similar claims. In the opinion of management, after consultation
with outside counsel, the claims or actions to which Dole is a
party are not expected to have a material adverse effect,
individually or in the aggregate, on Doles financial
condition or results of operations.
DBCP Cases: A significant portion of
Doles legal exposure relates to lawsuits pending in the
United States and in several foreign countries, alleging injury
as a result of exposure to the agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane).
DBCP was manufactured by several chemical companies including
Dow and Shell and registered by the U.S. government for use
on food crops. Dole and other growers applied DBCP on banana
farms in Latin America and the Philippines and on pineapple
farms in Hawaii. Specific periods of use varied among the
different locations. Dole halted all purchases of DBCP,
including for use in foreign countries, when the U.S. EPA
cancelled the registration of DBCP for use in the United States
in 1979. That cancellation was based in part on a 1977 study by
a manufacturer which indicated an apparent link between male
sterility and exposure to DBCP among factory workers producing
the product, as well as early product testing done by the
manufacturers showing testicular effects on animals exposed to
DBCP. To date, there is no reliable evidence demonstrating that
field application of DBCP led to sterility among farm workers,
although that claim is made in the pending lawsuits. Nor is
there any reliable scientific evidence that DBCP causes any
other injuries in humans, although plaintiffs in the various
actions assert claims based on cancer, birth defects and other
general illnesses.
Currently there are 245 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaragua judgments. In addition, there
are 111 labor cases pending in Costa Rica under that
countrys national insurance program.
Thirty of the 245 lawsuits are currently pending in various
jurisdictions in the United States. On June 17, 2009, Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Chaney formalized her
April 23, 2009 oral ruling by issuing written Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law, formally ordering dismissal with
prejudice of the two remaining lawsuits brought on behalf of
Nicaraguan plaintiffs who had falsely claimed they were sterile
as a result of exposure to DBCP on Dole-contracted Nicaraguan
banana farms, finding that the plaintiffs, and certain of their
attorneys, fabricated their claims, engaged in a long-running
F-19
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
conspiracy to commit a fraud on the court, used threats of
violence to frighten witnesses and suppress the truth, and
conspired with corrupt Nicaraguan judges, depriving Dole and the
other companies of due process. On June 9, 2009, the First
Circuit Court of Hawaii dismissed the Patrickson case, which had
involved ten plaintiffs from Honduras, Costa Rica, Ecuador and
Guatemala, finding that their DBCP claims were time-barred by
the statute of limitations. In seven cases pending in Los
Angeles involving 672 claimants from Ivory Coast, where Dole did
not operate when DBCP was in use, plaintiffs counsel, on
July 17, 2009, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record in response to a witness who has come forward alleging
fraud. The remaining cases are pending in Latin America and the
Philippines. Claimed damages in DBCP cases worldwide total
approximately $44.2 billion, with lawsuits in Nicaragua
representing approximately 88% of this amount. Typically in
these cases Dole is a joint defendant with the major DBCP
manufacturers. Except as described below, none of these lawsuits
has resulted in a verdict or judgment against Dole.
One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court with 12
Nicaraguan plaintiffs initially resulted in verdicts which
totaled approximately $5 million in damages against Dole in
favor of six of the plaintiffs. As a result of the courts
March 7, 2008 favorable rulings on Doles post-verdict
motions, including, importantly, the courts decision
striking down punitive damages in the case on
U.S. Constitutional grounds, the damages against Dole were
reduced to $1.58 million in total compensatory awards to
four of the plaintiffs; and the court granted Doles motion
for a new trial as to the claims of one of the plaintiffs. On
July 7, 2009, the Second District Court Appeals issued an
order to show cause why this $1.58 million judgment should
not be vacated and judgment be entered in defendants favor
on the grounds that the judgment was procured through fraud.
Plaintiffs are to provide their response to the order to show
cause to the trial court within 30 days of the issuance of
the order. In that order, the Court of Appeals stated that the
trial court need not hold a hearing to decide whether the
judgment was procured by fraud, but instead can rely on the
record that was presented in support of Doles request to
have the case sent back to the trial court.
In Nicaragua, 196 cases are currently filed (of which 20 are
active) in various courts throughout the country, all but one of
which were brought pursuant to Law 364, an October 2000
Nicaraguan statute that contains substantive and procedural
provisions that Nicaraguas Attorney General formally
opined are unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court
of Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional. Thirty-two cases
have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua: $489.4 million
(nine cases consolidated with 468 claimants) on
December 11, 2002; $82.9 million (one case with 58
claimants) on February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one
case with 20 claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million
(one case with four claimants) on May 25, 2004;
$56.5 million (one case with 72 claimants) on June 14,
2004; $64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with 39
claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million (one case
with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005;
$46.4 million (one case with 62 claimants) on
August 20, 2005; $809 million (six cases consolidated
with 1,248 claimants) on December 1, 2006;
$38.4 million (one case with 192 claimants) on
November 14, 2007; and $357.7 million (eight cases
with 417 claimants) on January 12, 2009, which Dole
recently learned of unofficially. Except for the latest one,
Dole has appealed all judgments, with Doles appeal of the
August 8, 2005 $98.5 million judgment and of the
December 1, 2006 $809 million judgment currently
pending before the Nicaragua Court of Appeal. Dole will appeal
the $357.7 million judgment once it has been served.
Of the 20 active cases currently pending in civil courts in
Nicaragua, all have been brought under Law 364 except for one.
In all of the active cases where the proceeding has reached the
appropriate stage (7 of 20 cases), Dole has sought to have the
cases returned to the United States. In three of
F-20
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
the cases where Dole has sought return to the United States, the
courts have denied Doles request and Dole has appealed
that decision. Doles requests remain pending in the other
four cases.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision, which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions against
Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the Court of
Appeals in that case. A Special Master appointed by the Court of
Appeals has recommended that Plaintiffs counsel be ordered
to pay Defendants fees and costs up to $130,000 each to
Dole and the other two defendants; and following such
recommendation, the Court of Appeals has appointed a special
prosecutor.
There is one case pending in the U.S. District Court in
Miami, Florida seeking enforcement of the August 8, 2005
$98.5 million Nicaraguan judgment. Commencing on
September 1, 2009, there will be an evidentiary hearing to
consider Doles request that the Court deny enforcement of
this judgment, contending that Nicaraguas judicial system
does not provide due process or an impartial judiciary, which
also lacks transparency and is corrupt. Miami District Court
Judge Paul C. Huck is already aware of the evidence of fraud
detailed in Judge Chaneys June 17, 2009 written
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Claimants have also sought to enforce the Nicaraguan judgments
in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. In Venezuela, the claimants
have attempted to enforce five of the Nicaraguan judgments in
that countrys Supreme Court: $489.4 million
(December 11, 2002); $82.9 million (February 25,
2004); $15.7 million (May 25, 2004);
$56.5 million (June 14, 2004); and $64.8 million
(June 15, 2004). The Venezuela Supreme Court has ordered
the plaintiffs to properly serve the defendants, or have their
request for recognition of these Nicaragua judgments dismissed.
An action filed to enforce the $27.7 million Nicaraguan
judgment (March 17, 2005) in the Colombian Supreme
Court was dismissed. In Ecuador, the claimants attempted to
enforce the five Nicaraguan judgments issued between
February 25, 2004 through June 15, 2004 in the Ecuador
Supreme Court. The First, Second and Third Chambers of the
Ecuador Supreme Court issued rulings refusing to consider those
enforcement actions on the ground that the Supreme Court was not
a court of competent jurisdiction for enforcement of a foreign
judgment. The plaintiffs subsequently refiled those five
enforcement actions in the civil court in Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Two of these subsequently filed enforcement actions have been
dismissed by the 3rd Civil Court
$15.7 million (May 25, 2004) and the
12th Civil Court $56.5 million
(June 14, 2004) in Guayaquil; plaintiffs have
sought reconsideration of those dismissals. The remaining three
enforcement actions are still pending.
Dole believes that none of the Nicaraguan judgments will be
enforceable against any Dole entity in the U.S. or in any
other country, because Nicaraguas Law 364 is
unconstitutional and violates international principles of due
process. Among other things, Law 364 is an improper
special law directed at particular parties; it
requires defendants to pay large, non-refundable deposits in
order to even participate in the litigation; it provides a
severely truncated procedural process; it establishes an
irrebuttable presumption of causation that is contrary to the
evidence and scientific data; and it sets unreasonable minimum
damages that must be awarded in every case.
On October 23, 2006, Dole announced that Standard Fruit de
Honduras, S.A. reached an agreement with the Government of
Honduras and representatives of Honduran banana workers. This
agreement establishes a Worker Program that is intended by the
parties to resolve in a fair and equitable manner the claims of
male banana workers alleging sterility as a result of exposure
to DBCP. The Honduran Worker Program will not have a material
effect on Doles financial condition or
F-21
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
results of operations. The official start of the Honduran Worker
Program was announced on January 8, 2007. On
August 15, 2007, Shell Oil Company was included in the
Worker Program.
As to all the DBCP matters, Dole has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. While Dole believes there is no
reliable scientific basis for alleged injuries from the
agricultural field application of DBCP, Dole continues to seek
reasonable resolution of pending litigation and claims in the
U.S. and Latin America. For example, as in Honduras, Dole
is committed to finding a prompt resolution to the DBCP claims
in Nicaragua, and is prepared to pursue a structured worker
program in Nicaragua with science- based criteria. Los Angeles
Superior Court Judge Chaney had previously appointed a mediator
to explore possible settlement of all DBCP cases currently
pending before the court. Although no assurance can be given
concerning the outcome of these cases, in the opinion of
management, after consultation with legal counsel and based on
past experience defending and settling DBCP claims, the pending
lawsuits are not expected to have a material adverse effect on
Doles financial condition or results of operations.
European Union Antitrust Inquiry: On
October 15, 2008, the European Commission (EC)
adopted a Decision against Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole
Fresh Fruit Europe OHG and against other unrelated banana
companies, finding violations of the European competition
(antitrust) laws. The Decision imposes 45.6 million
in fines on Dole.
The Decision follows a Statement of Objections, issued by the EC
on July 25, 2007, and searches carried out by the EC in
June 2005 at certain banana importers and distributors,
including two of Doles offices. Dole received the Decision
on October 21, 2008 and appealed the Decision to the
European Court of First Instance in Luxembourg on
December 24, 2008.
Dole made an initial $10 million (7.6 million)
provisional payment towards the 45.6 million fine on
January 22, 2009. As agreed with the European Commission
(DG Budget), Dole provided the required bank guaranty for the
remaining balance of the fine to the European Commission by the
deadline of April 30, 2009. The bank guaranty renews
annually during the appeals process (which may take several
years) and carries interest of 6.15% (accrued from
January 23, 2009). If the European Court of First Instance
fully agrees with Doles arguments presented in its appeal,
Dole will be entitled to the return of all monies paid, plus
interest.
On November 28 and 29, 2007, the EC conducted searches of Dole
offices in Italy and Spain, as well as of other companies
offices located in these countries. Dole continues to cooperate
with the ECs requests for information.
Although no assurances can be given, and although there could be
a material adverse effect on Dole, Dole believes that it has not
violated the European competition laws. No accrual for the
Decision has been made in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, since Dole cannot determine at this time
the amount of probable loss, if any, incurred as a result of the
Decision.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, Dole received a
tax assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of our
interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A. in 2001. Dole
believes the assessment is without merit and filed an appeal
with the Honduran tax authorities, which was denied. As a result
of the denial in the administrative process, in order to negate
the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005, Dole proceeded to
the next stage of the appellate process by filing a lawsuit
against the Honduran government in the Honduran Administrative
Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government sought dismissal of the
lawsuit and attachment of assets, which Dole challenged. The
Honduran Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Honduran
intermediate appellate court that a statutory prerequisite to
challenging the tax assessment on the merits is the payment of
the tax assessment or
F-22
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
the filing of a payment plan with the Honduran courts; Dole has
challenged the constitutionality of the statute requiring such
payment or payment plan. Although no assurance can be given
concerning the outcome of this case, in the opinion of
management, after consultation with legal counsel, the pending
lawsuits and tax-related matters are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on Doles financial condition or
results of operations.
NOTE 12
ASSETS HELD-FOR-SALE
Dole continuously reviews its assets in order to identify those
assets that do not meet Doles future strategic direction
or internal economic return criteria. As a result of this
review, Dole has identified and is in the process of selling
specific businesses and long-lived assets. In accordance with
FAS 144, Dole has reclassified these assets as
held-for-sale.
Total assets held-for-sale by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
98,105
|
|
|
$
|
38,600
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
61,989
|
|
|
$
|
202,876
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(24,438
|
)
|
|
|
(35,349
|
)
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
(49,350
|
)
|
|
|
(110,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
75,278
|
|
|
$
|
3,251
|
|
|
$
|
3,214
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
$
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 20, 2009, assets held-for-sale related primarily to
property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation.
Total liabilities held-for-sale by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,218
|
|
|
$
|
50,465
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(5,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,218
|
)
|
|
|
(50,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole received total cash proceeds of approximately
$84 million on assets sold during the half year ended
June 20, 2009, which had been classified as held-for-sale.
The total realized gain recorded on assets classified as
held-for-sale was $18.1 million for the half year ended
June 20, 2009, which included $1.3 million related to
the fresh-cut flowers discontinued operation. Realized gains
related to continuing operations for the half year ended
June 20, 2009, of $16.8 million, are shown as a
separate component of operating income in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
F-23
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Fresh
Fruit
During the second quarter of 2009, Dole reclassified one Chilean
farm and the assets and liabilities of an Italian port operation
to held-for-sale.
Dole completed the sale of a portion of its Latin American
banana operations during January 2009. Net proceeds from the
sale totaled approximately $25.8 million. To date, Dole has
collected $18 million in cash ($2 million in 2008 and
$16 million in 2009) and has recorded a
$7.8 million receivable which will be collected through
January 2010. Dole also sold a wood box plant in Chile for
$0.6 million. Total realized gains recorded on these sales
approximated $6.7 million for the half year ended
June 20, 2009.
Third Quarter
2009 Sales
During the third quarter of 2009, Dole signed letters of intent
to sell some operating properties located in Latin America for
approximately $68 million. As of June 20, 2009, the
assets and liabilities of these operating properties have not
been included in assets or liabilities held-for-sale. The sale
of these operating properties are expected to close during the
third quarter of 2009.
Fresh
Vegetables
During the first quarter of 2009, Dole completed the sale of
1,100 acres of property located in California. Dole
received net cash proceeds of $44.5 million and recorded a
gain on the sale of $9.2 million, which is included in gain
on asset sales in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the half year ended June 20, 2009.
Packaged
Foods
During the first half of 2009, Dole sold approximately
160 acres of peach orchards located in California for
approximately $1.9 million and recorded a gain on the sale
of $0.9 million.
Fresh-Cut
Flowers Discontinued Operation
During January 2009, the first phase of the Flowers transaction
was completed. Dole only retains some of the real estate of the
former flowers divisions to be sold in the subsequent phases of
the transaction. Net proceeds from the sale totaled
approximately $29.3 million. Of this amount,
$21 million was collected in cash and the remaining
$8.3 million was recorded as a receivable, which will be
repaid during January 2011. Dole recorded a gain on the sale of
$1.3 million, which is included as a component of gain on
disposal from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in
the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the half
year ended June 20, 2009.
NOTE 13
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Dole is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations,
bunker fuel price fluctuations and interest rate changes in the
normal course of its business. As part of its risk management
strategy, Dole uses derivative instruments to hedge certain
foreign currency, bunker fuel and interest rate exposures.
Doles objective is to offset gains and losses resulting
from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative
contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of
earnings. Dole does not hold or issue derivative financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
All of Doles derivative instruments, with the exception of
the interest rate swap, are not designated as effective hedges
of cash flows as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting
F-24
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, as amended
(FAS 133). The interest rate swap is
accounted for as a cash flow hedge under FAS 133 and
accordingly, unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(AOCI) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Dole entered into an interest rate swap in 2006 to hedge future
changes in interest rates. This agreement effectively converted
$320 million of borrowings under Term Loan C, which was
variable-rate debt, to a fixed-rate basis through 2011. The
interest rate swap fixed the interest rate at 7.2%. The paying
and receiving rates under the interest rate swap were 5.5% and
1.1% as of June 20, 2009, with an outstanding notional
amount of $320 million.
Dole executed a cross currency swap during 2006 to synthetically
convert $320 million of Term Loan C into Japanese yen
denominated debt in order to effectively lower the
U.S. dollar fixed interest rate of 7.2% to a Japanese yen
interest rate of 3.6%. Payments under the cross currency swap
were converted from U.S. dollars to Japanese yen at an
exchange rate of ¥111.9.
During the second quarter of 2009, Dole amended its cross
currency and interest rate swap agreements. The amendments
removed early termination provisions which would have allowed
the counterparty to settle the swaps at certain specified dates
prior to maturity. In addition, the rate at which payments under
the cross currency swap were converted from U.S. dollars to
Japanese yen increased to ¥114.9 from ¥111.9. In
connection with these amendments, Dole also entered into a
collateral arrangement which requires Dole to provide collateral
to its counterparties when the fair market value of the cross
currency and interest rate swap exceed a combined liability of
$35 million. The measurement date for the collateral
required at June 20, 2009 was June 16, 2009, and the
fair value of the swaps at the measurement date was a liability
of approximately $76 million. Dole provided cash collateral
of $6.1 million, which was recorded as restricted deposits
in the condensed consolidated balance sheet, and the remaining
$35 million of collateral was issued through letters of
credit.
At June 20, 2009, the exchange rate of the Japanese yen to
U.S. dollar was ¥96.5. The value of the cross currency
swap will fluctuate based on changes in the U.S. dollar to
Japanese yen exchange rate and market interest rates until
maturity in 2011, at which time it will settle in cash at the
then current exchange rate.
F-25
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
At June 20, 2009, the gross notional value and fair market
value of Doles derivative instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
Average Strike
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
$
|
320,000
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
(23,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges (Buy/Sell):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Euro
|
|
EUR 1.44
|
|
|
48,354
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
1,990
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar
|
|
CAD 1.12
|
|
|
10,706
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
104
|
|
Chilean Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
CLP 671
|
|
|
9,989
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
JPY 101.2
|
|
|
171,249
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
(2,801
|
)
|
Philippine Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
PHP 47.9
|
|
|
21,407
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
Cross currency swap interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(49,007
|
)
|
Bunker fuel hedges
|
|
$277
|
|
|
26,544
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(per metric ton)
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(66,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of the foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges will
occur during 2009 and 2010.
The effect of the interest rate swap on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations for the
quarter and half year ended June 20, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI as of
|
|
Losses Reclassified into Income
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Half Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Classification
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
$
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
$
|
4,007
|
|
F-26
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Unrecognized losses of $13 million related to the interest
rate swap are expected to be realized into earnings over the
next twelve months. These losses will be primarily offset by
gains related to the cross currency swap.
Net unrealized gains (losses) and realized gains (losses) on
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for the
quarters and half years ended June 20, 2009 and
June 14, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
Realized Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
(5,998
|
)
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
711
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23,329
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,582
|
|
|
$
|
3,420
|
|
|
$
|
(2,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
Realized Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
7,491
|
|
|
$
|
3,175
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
$
|
(8,971
|
)
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
|
(2,784
|
)
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,130
|
|
|
$
|
(6,127
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,452
|
|
|
$
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Doles financial instruments primarily comprise short-term
trade and grower receivables, trade payables, notes receivable
and notes payable, as well as long-term grower receivables,
capital lease obligations, term loans, a revolving credit
facility, and notes and debentures. For short-term instruments,
the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short
maturity of these instruments. For the other long-term financial
instruments, excluding Doles secured and unsecured notes
and debentures, and term loans, the carrying amount approximates
the fair value since they bear interest at variable rates or
fixed rates which approximate market.
Dole adopted FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157) as of December 30, 2007 for
financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis.
Dole adopted FAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
liabilities at the beginning of fiscal year 2009. FAS 157
establishes a fair value
F-27
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These levels,
in order of highest to lowest priority are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not
quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by
market data.
The fair values of Doles derivative instruments are
determined using Level 2 inputs, which are defined as
significant other observable inputs. The fair values
of the foreign currency exchange contracts, bunker fuel
contracts, interest rate swap and cross currency swap were
estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based
upon forward foreign currency exchange rates, bunker fuel
futures, interest-rate yield curves or quotes obtained from
brokers for contracts with similar terms less any credit
valuation adjustments. Dole recorded a credit valuation
adjustment at June 20, 2009 which reduced the derivative
liability balances. The credit valuation adjustment was
$3.2 million and $16.3 million at June 20, 2009
and January 3, 2009, respectively. The net change in the
credit valuation adjustment resulted in a loss of
$13.1 million during the half year ended June 20,
2009. Of this loss, $1.6 million was recorded as interest
expense and $11.5 million was recorded as other income
(expense), net. For the quarter ended June 20, 2009, the
net change in the credit valuation adjustment resulted in a loss
of $5.6 million. Of this loss, $1 million was recorded
as interest expense and $4.6 million was recorded as other
income (expense), net.
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of
assets and liabilities under the FAS 157 hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurements at
|
|
|
Measurements at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
4,682
|
|
|
$
|
4,682
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,447
|
|
|
$
|
7,447
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
23,253
|
|
|
|
23,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
|
47,192
|
|
|
|
47,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
73,698
|
|
|
$
|
73,698
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distrifruit assets
|
|
$
|
10,037
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Nonfinancial
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring
Basis
Nonfinancial assets such as goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets are measured at fair value when there is an
indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an
impairment is recognized. Dole performed a goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis during the
second quarter of 2009 and determined that its goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets were not impaired at
June 20, 2009.
The goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
analysis was performed using a combination of discounted cash
flow models and market multiples. As discussed in Note 7,
the fair value of the Distrifruit business was also determined
based on a discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow
models used estimates and assumptions including pricing and
volume data, anticipated growth rates, profitability levels, tax
rates and discount rates.
Credit
Risk
The counterparties to the foreign currency and bunker fuel
forward contracts and the interest rate and cross currency swaps
consist of a number of major international financial
institutions. Dole has established counterparty guidelines and
regularly monitors its positions and the financial strength of
these institutions. While counterparties to hedging contracts
expose Dole to credit-related losses in the event of a
counterpartys non-performance, the risk would be limited
to the unrealized gains on such affected contracts. Dole does
not anticipate any such losses.
Fair Value of
Debt
Dole estimates the fair value of its secured and unsecured notes
and debentures based on current quoted market prices. The term
loans are traded between institutional investors on the
secondary loan market, and the fair values of the term loans are
based on the last available trading price. The carrying value
and estimated fair values of Doles debt is summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Secured and unsecured notes and debentures
|
|
$
|
1,087,903
|
|
|
$
|
1,091,559
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
809,400
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
|
|
585,855
|
|
NOTE 15
GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In connection with the issuance of the 2011 Notes in March 2003
and the 2010 Notes in May 2003, all of Doles wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries (Guarantors) have fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis,
Doles obligations under the indentures related to such
Notes and to Doles 2013 Debentures and 2014 Notes (the
Guarantees). Each Guarantee is subordinated in right
of payment to the Guarantors existing and future senior
debt, including obligations under the senior secured credit
facilities, and will rank pari passu with all senior
subordinated indebtedness of the applicable Guarantor.
The accompanying guarantor consolidating financial information
is presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods
presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are
recorded at cost and adjusted for Doles share in the
subsidiaries cumulative results of operations, capital
contributions and distributions and other changes in equity.
Elimination entries relate to the
F-29
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
elimination of investments in subsidiaries and associated
intercompany balances and transactions as well as cash overdraft
and income tax reclassifications.
The following are condensed consolidating statements of
operations of Dole for the quarters and half years ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008; condensed
consolidating balance sheets as of June 20, 2009 and
January 3, 2009; and condensed consolidating statements of
cash flows for the half years ended June 20, 2009 and
June 14, 2008.
F-30
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Quarter Ended June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
16,445
|
|
|
$
|
741,287
|
|
|
$
|
1,304,894
|
|
|
$
|
(347,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,714,722
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(13,852
|
)
|
|
|
(669,486
|
)
|
|
|
(1,154,323
|
)
|
|
|
345,055
|
|
|
|
(1,492,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
71,801
|
|
|
|
150,571
|
|
|
|
(2,849
|
)
|
|
|
222,116
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(13,115
|
)
|
|
|
(44,950
|
)
|
|
|
(58,728
|
)
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
(113,944
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(10,522
|
)
|
|
|
27,010
|
|
|
|
91,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,331
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
32,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(31,132
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(19,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
9,162
|
|
|
|
59,295
|
|
|
|
40,761
|
|
|
|
(82,675
|
)
|
|
|
26,543
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
10,982
|
|
|
|
(9,324
|
)
|
|
|
(10,621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,963
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
20,145
|
|
|
|
49,944
|
|
|
|
33,443
|
|
|
|
(82,675
|
)
|
|
|
20,857
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
20,145
|
|
|
|
49,944
|
|
|
|
33,708
|
|
|
|
(82,675
|
)
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
20,145
|
|
|
$
|
49,944
|
|
|
$
|
32,731
|
|
|
$
|
(82,675
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter
Ended June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
18,367
|
|
|
$
|
803,391
|
|
|
$
|
1,565,676
|
|
|
$
|
(392,491
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,994,943
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(18,167
|
)
|
|
|
(750,569
|
)
|
|
|
(1,382,254
|
)
|
|
|
389,283
|
|
|
|
(1,761,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
52,822
|
|
|
|
183,422
|
|
|
|
(3,208
|
)
|
|
|
233,236
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(15,004
|
)
|
|
|
(38,745
|
)
|
|
|
(70,870
|
)
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
(121,411
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(13,830
|
)
|
|
|
14,077
|
|
|
|
121,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,664
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
145,256
|
|
|
|
120,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,653
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(27,163
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(13,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
104,288
|
|
|
|
134,678
|
|
|
|
132,336
|
|
|
|
(266,121
|
)
|
|
|
105,181
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
76,467
|
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
(6,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
180,754
|
|
|
|
133,909
|
|
|
|
128,549
|
|
|
|
(266,121
|
)
|
|
|
177,091
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,072
|
|
|
|
(5,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
180,754
|
|
|
|
143,981
|
|
|
|
122,795
|
|
|
|
(266,121
|
)
|
|
|
181,409
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
180,754
|
|
|
$
|
143,981
|
|
|
$
|
122,140
|
|
|
$
|
(266,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
180,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Half Year Ended June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
31,596
|
|
|
$
|
1,460,930
|
|
|
$
|
2,497,605
|
|
|
$
|
(678,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,311,312
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(27,540
|
)
|
|
|
(1,308,632
|
)
|
|
|
(2,222,408
|
)
|
|
|
673,255
|
|
|
|
(2,885,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
|
|
152,298
|
|
|
|
275,197
|
|
|
|
(5,564
|
)
|
|
|
425,987
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(24,057
|
)
|
|
|
(85,477
|
)
|
|
|
(107,380
|
)
|
|
|
5,564
|
|
|
|
(211,350
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,093
|
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(20,001
|
)
|
|
|
76,914
|
|
|
|
174,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,430
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
181,002
|
|
|
|
118,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(56,981
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(30,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
104,114
|
|
|
|
195,674
|
|
|
|
135,647
|
|
|
|
(299,751
|
)
|
|
|
135,684
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
18,852
|
|
|
|
(15,716
|
)
|
|
|
(20,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,011
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
122,965
|
|
|
|
180,124
|
|
|
|
119,806
|
|
|
|
(299,751
|
)
|
|
|
123,144
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Gain on discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
122,965
|
|
|
|
180,124
|
|
|
|
121,501
|
|
|
|
(299,751
|
)
|
|
|
124,839
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
122,965
|
|
|
$
|
180,124
|
|
|
$
|
119,627
|
|
|
$
|
(299,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
122,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Half Year
Ended June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
36,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,505,072
|
|
|
$
|
2,874,048
|
|
|
$
|
(691,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,723,288
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(34,331
|
)
|
|
|
(1,376,375
|
)
|
|
|
(2,595,562
|
)
|
|
|
685,876
|
|
|
|
(3,320,392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
128,697
|
|
|
|
278,486
|
|
|
|
(6,019
|
)
|
|
|
402,896
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(30,497
|
)
|
|
|
(83,059
|
)
|
|
|
(131,978
|
)
|
|
|
6,019
|
|
|
|
(239,515
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(27,791
|
)
|
|
|
45,638
|
|
|
|
157,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,024
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
155,647
|
|
|
|
97,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,058
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(55,074
|
)
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
(29,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
72,869
|
|
|
|
142,700
|
|
|
|
125,696
|
|
|
|
(253,163
|
)
|
|
|
88,102
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
78,944
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
(20,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,200
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
151,809
|
|
|
|
144,326
|
|
|
|
108,666
|
|
|
|
(253,163
|
)
|
|
|
151,638
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,467
|
|
|
|
(8,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
151,809
|
|
|
|
154,793
|
|
|
|
99,696
|
|
|
|
(253,163
|
)
|
|
|
153,135
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
151,809
|
|
|
$
|
154,793
|
|
|
$
|
98,370
|
|
|
$
|
(253,163
|
)
|
|
$
|
151,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,156
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,359
|
|
|
$
|
(596
|
)
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
414,658
|
|
|
|
128,698
|
|
|
|
551,200
|
|
|
|
(290,659
|
)
|
|
|
803,897
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
|
257,288
|
|
|
|
462,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,999
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
9,459
|
|
|
|
11,290
|
|
|
|
55,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,640
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
18,891
|
|
|
|
25,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,277
|
)
|
|
|
22,180
|
|
Assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
72,526
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
15,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
537,827
|
|
|
|
429,307
|
|
|
|
1,177,415
|
|
|
|
(313,532
|
)
|
|
|
1,831,017
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,426,100
|
|
|
|
1,944,617
|
|
|
|
75,979
|
|
|
|
(4,370,159
|
)
|
|
|
76,537
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
162,067
|
|
|
|
265,176
|
|
|
|
589,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017,062
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,818
|
|
|
|
274,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
689,614
|
|
|
|
16,720
|
|
|
|
7,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,923
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
65,240
|
|
|
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
99,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,880,848
|
|
|
$
|
2,795,405
|
|
|
$
|
2,231,278
|
|
|
$
|
(4,683,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
4,676
|
|
|
$
|
432,079
|
|
|
$
|
361,990
|
|
|
$
|
(313,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
485,213
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
60,835
|
|
|
|
162,305
|
|
|
|
193,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,922
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
381,181
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,896
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
446,692
|
|
|
|
594,654
|
|
|
|
611,472
|
|
|
|
(313,532
|
)
|
|
|
1,339,286
|
|
Intercompany payables (receivables)
|
|
|
1,570,762
|
|
|
|
(304,127
|
)
|
|
|
(1,266,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
857,671
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
714,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,576,025
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
202,328
|
|
|
|
7,926
|
|
|
|
47,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,512
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
275,115
|
|
|
|
39,281
|
|
|
|
181,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,562
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
528,280
|
|
|
|
2,454,296
|
|
|
|
1,915,863
|
|
|
|
(4,370,159
|
)
|
|
|
528,280
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
528,280
|
|
|
|
2,454,296
|
|
|
|
1,943,038
|
|
|
|
(4,370,159
|
)
|
|
|
555,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,880,848
|
|
|
$
|
2,795,405
|
|
|
$
|
2,231,278
|
|
|
$
|
(4,683,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,223,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,811
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,460
|
|
|
$
|
(11,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
90,829
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
410,286
|
|
|
|
133,198
|
|
|
|
577,890
|
|
|
|
(314,139
|
)
|
|
|
807,235
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
7,971
|
|
|
|
299,048
|
|
|
|
489,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796,407
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
9,374
|
|
|
|
14,489
|
|
|
|
45,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,347
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
18,891
|
|
|
|
25,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,184
|
)
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
Assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
72,526
|
|
|
|
55,366
|
|
|
|
74,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
535,859
|
|
|
|
527,667
|
|
|
|
1,273,206
|
|
|
|
(348,765
|
)
|
|
|
1,987,967
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,172,994
|
|
|
|
1,786,868
|
|
|
|
72,708
|
|
|
|
(3,959,485
|
)
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
173,850
|
|
|
|
262,269
|
|
|
|
614,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050,331
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,818
|
|
|
|
274,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
18,426
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,458
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
38,084
|
|
|
|
7,542
|
|
|
|
92,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,610,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,734,590
|
|
|
$
|
2,327,877
|
|
|
$
|
(4,308,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
5,411
|
|
|
$
|
438,991
|
|
|
$
|
415,136
|
|
|
$
|
(348,765
|
)
|
|
$
|
510,773
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
|
|
46,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,465
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
67,206
|
|
|
|
173,920
|
|
|
|
249,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,145
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
346,684
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,748
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
419,301
|
|
|
|
616,887
|
|
|
|
769,497
|
|
|
|
(348,765
|
)
|
|
|
1,456,920
|
|
Intercompany payables (receivables)
|
|
|
1,225,590
|
|
|
|
(133,650
|
)
|
|
|
(1,091,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,080,296
|
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
714,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798,556
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
207,073
|
|
|
|
7,926
|
|
|
|
39,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,205
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
275,242
|
|
|
|
37,853
|
|
|
|
108,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,779
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
|
|
2,202,068
|
|
|
|
1,757,417
|
|
|
|
(3,959,485
|
)
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
|
|
2,202,068
|
|
|
|
1,787,676
|
|
|
|
(3,959,485
|
)
|
|
|
433,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,610,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,734,590
|
|
|
$
|
2,327,877
|
|
|
$
|
(4,308,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Half Year Ended June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
202,273
|
|
|
$
|
(49,388
|
)
|
|
$
|
45,583
|
|
|
$
|
10,846
|
|
|
$
|
209,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,512
|
|
|
|
12,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,308
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
|
(5,128
|
)
|
|
|
(18,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,936
|
)
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merger transaction
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(1,574
|
)
|
|
|
41,384
|
|
|
|
(11,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt repayments, net of borrowings
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
8,026
|
|
|
|
(9,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
829,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825,178
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,031,678
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(7,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,039,172
|
)
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(201,354
|
)
|
|
|
8,004
|
|
|
|
(26,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
10,846
|
|
|
|
17,090
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
16,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,460
|
|
|
|
(11,442
|
)
|
|
|
90,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
16,156
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,359
|
|
|
$
|
(596
|
)
|
|
$
|
107,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Half Year Ended June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,460
|
|
|
$
|
(25,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
30,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,976
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(10,442
|
)
|
|
|
(24,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,312
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merger transaction
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
(10,401
|
)
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt repayments, net of borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,036
|
)
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
(9,996
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
603,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603,849
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(601,325
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(5,877
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(607,225
|
)
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
(14,059
|
)
|
|
|
(7,796
|
)
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
(14,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,123
|
)
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
(19,705
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
16,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
(15,164
|
)
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
18,028
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,678
|
|
|
$
|
(10,350
|
)
|
|
$
|
77,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 16
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share
including a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
20,857
|
|
|
$
|
177,091
|
|
|
$
|
123,144
|
|
|
$
|
151,638
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
20,145
|
|
|
$
|
180,754
|
|
|
$
|
122,965
|
|
|
$
|
151,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Internal Revenue Service Audit: On
August 27, 2009, the IRS completed its examination of the
combined U.S. federal income tax returns of DHM Holding
Company, Inc. (HoldCo), which includes the returns
of Dole, for the years 2002 to 2005 (see Note 5
Income Taxes) and issued a Revenue Agents report
(RAR) that includes various proposed adjustments,
including the going-private merger transactions. The IRS is
proposing that certain funding used in the going-private merger
is currently taxable and that certain related investment banking
fees are not deductible. The net tax deficiency associated with
the RAR is $122 million plus interest. Dole will file a
protest letter vigorously challenging the proposed adjustments
contained in the RAR and will pursue resolution of these issues
with the Appeals Division of the IRS. Dole believes, based in
part upon the advice of our tax advisors, that our tax treatment
of such transactions was appropriate.
F-37
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Asset Sale Program: During the third quarter
of fiscal 2009, Dole entered into definitive sales agreements,
for which it previously had signed letters of intent for
approximately $68 million (see Note 12
Assets-Held-For-Sale), to sell certain operating properties in
Latin America. Additionally during the third quarter of 2009,
the Company signed a letter of intent to sell an operating
property in Chile for approximately $32 million. These
sales are expected to close by the end of fiscal 2009.
HoldCo Loan Payment: During June 2009, HoldCo
made a $20 million payment required under the HoldCo loan
agreement.
Proposed Initial Public Offering
Transaction: It is currently expected immediately
prior to the closing of the proposed initial public offering of
shares of Dole common stock (IPO transaction), the
registration statement process of which commenced in August 2009
that HoldCo will be merged into Dole in a downstream merger to
be accounted for as a common control merger under the provisions
of FAS 141R. Immediately following the contemplated merger
transaction, the entire interest in Westlake Wellbeing
Properties, LLC (WWP) held by post-merger Dole will
be transferred to another entity owned by David H. Murdock
(MURCO). The transfer of WWP to MURCO will be
accounted for as a common control transfer at carryover basis
consistent with the provisions of FAS 141R. Further, WWP
long-lived assets will continue to be treated under a held and
used model under FAS 144 in the contemplated transfer to
MURCO. Subsequent to the transfer of WWP to MURCO, the results
of WWP will be presented as a discontinued operation of the
merged entity given WWP will not be a part of the ongoing
operations of such entity. Additionally, Dole intends to
complete other transactions upon consummation of the IPO
Transaction that will result in the elimination of all other
cross-default and cross acceleration provisions that exist
between Doles senior secured facilities and certain
indebtedness of Holdings and its affiliates. See
Note 8 Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt for
discussion of existing cross-default and cross acceleration
provisions.
Senior Note Offering: On September 25,
2009, Dole completed the sale and issuance of $315 million
aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Secured Notes due
October 1, 2016, or the 2016 Notes, at a discount of
approximately $6.2 million. The 2016 Notes were sold to
qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under
the Securities Act and to persons outside the United States in
compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The
sale of the 2016 Notes to the initial purchasers was exempt from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereof. Interest on the 2016 Notes will be
paid semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1
of each year, beginning on April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes
have the benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of Dole
that is junior to the liens of Doles senior secured credit
facilities, and are senior obligations of Dole ranking equally
with Doles existing senior debt. Dole has issued a
redemption notice for the remaining principal amount outstanding
of the 2010 Notes of $363 million and has irrevocably
deposited the net proceeds from the sale and issuance of the
2016 Notes with the trustee of the 2010 Notes to be used to
repay such notes.
F-38
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of
Directors and Shareholder of Dole Food Company, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Dole Food Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the
years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007, and
December 30, 2006. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in Item 16. These financial
statements and the financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007, and
December 30, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, at
the beginning of its fiscal 2009 year. Additionally, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard for fair value
measurements during the year ended January 3, 2009, new
accounting standards for uncertainty in income taxes and planned
major maintenance activities effective at the beginning of its
fiscal 2007 year, and effective December 30, 2006, a
new accounting standard for retirement benefits.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 18, 2009
(August 14, 2009 as to the effects of the retrospective
adjustment for the adoption of SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, and
the inclusion of Earnings Per Share information on the
consolidated statements of operations and in Note 22, and
October 2, 2009 as to the subsequent events disclosure in
Note 23)
F-39
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
|
$
|
6,820,812
|
|
|
$
|
5,990,863
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(6,862,892
|
)
|
|
|
(6,189,938
|
)
|
|
|
(5,420,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
757,060
|
|
|
|
630,874
|
|
|
|
570,361
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(509,418
|
)
|
|
|
(481,590
|
)
|
|
|
(434,383
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales (Note 9)
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
274,618
|
|
|
|
149,284
|
|
|
|
135,978
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
15,176
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
|
|
7,525
|
|
|
|
7,140
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(174,485
|
)
|
|
|
(194,851
|
)
|
|
|
(174,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity earnings
|
|
|
92,522
|
|
|
|
(36,194
|
)
|
|
|
(16,421
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
48,015
|
|
|
|
(4,054
|
)
|
|
|
(22,609
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
146,925
|
|
|
|
(38,552
|
)
|
|
|
(38,853
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
(50,386
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
122,849
|
|
|
|
(54,271
|
)
|
|
|
(86,425
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
(3,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
121,005
|
|
|
$
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Basic and Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-40
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
As of
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
90,829
|
|
|
$
|
97,061
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $41,357 and $61,720,
respectively
|
|
|
807,235
|
|
|
|
839,153
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
796,407
|
|
|
|
750,675
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
69,347
|
|
|
|
71,296
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
Assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
76,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,987,967
|
|
|
|
1,846,514
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
|
|
69,336
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1,027,345 and $980,390, respectively
|
|
|
1,050,331
|
|
|
|
1,340,139
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
509,518
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
708,458
|
|
|
|
721,790
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
138,238
|
|
|
|
155,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
$
|
4,642,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
510,773
|
|
|
$
|
542,959
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
|
50,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
490,145
|
|
|
|
514,584
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
356,748
|
|
|
|
14,171
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
81,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,456,920
|
|
|
|
1,152,732
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,798,556
|
|
|
|
2,316,208
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
254,205
|
|
|
|
277,824
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
421,779
|
|
|
|
541,234
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 16 and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.001 par value;
1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
409,681
|
|
|
|
409,907
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
36,122
|
|
|
|
(84,883
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(42,903
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
|
|
325,008
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
29,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
433,159
|
|
|
|
354,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
$
|
4,642,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-41
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
122,849
|
|
|
$
|
(54,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
(86,425
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
138,828
|
|
|
|
155,605
|
|
|
|
149,347
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on financial instruments
|
|
|
25,086
|
|
|
|
31,473
|
|
|
|
(10,671
|
)
|
Asset write-offs and net (gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(50,751
|
)
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
Impairment of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,574
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations and gain on
disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
12,760
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(6,388
|
)
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,133
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(43,120
|
)
|
|
|
(35,932
|
)
|
|
|
(23,151
|
)
|
Unrecognized tax benefits on federal income tax audit settlement
(Note 7)
|
|
|
(60,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense
|
|
|
21,656
|
|
|
|
19,539
|
|
|
|
15,383
|
|
Gain on settlement of Hurricane Katrina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(37,073
|
)
|
|
|
(68,794
|
)
|
|
|
(48,708
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(59,243
|
)
|
|
|
(96,992
|
)
|
|
|
(47,859
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(10,943
|
)
|
|
|
(9,178
|
)
|
|
|
(3,040
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
27,641
|
|
|
|
13,573
|
|
|
|
19,542
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
30,487
|
|
|
|
86,447
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(45,856
|
)
|
|
|
25,660
|
|
|
|
27,136
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(41,421
|
)
|
|
|
(25,749
|
)
|
|
|
(12,879
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
44,563
|
|
|
|
46,322
|
|
|
|
15,921
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
226,483
|
|
|
|
41,718
|
|
|
|
31,273
|
|
Hurricane Katrina insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,950
|
)
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(85,096
|
)
|
|
|
(106,821
|
)
|
|
|
(125,056
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merger transaction
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
141,142
|
|
|
|
(61,383
|
)
|
|
|
(117,000
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
94,943
|
|
|
|
119,389
|
|
|
|
101,381
|
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(132,266
|
)
|
|
|
(91,176
|
)
|
|
|
(52,872
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,348,050
|
|
|
|
1,167,530
|
|
|
|
2,260,545
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,482,800
|
)
|
|
|
(1,169,213
|
)
|
|
|
(1,969,698
|
)
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,390
|
|
Return of capital to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,390
|
)
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
(13,447
|
)
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
(1,833
|
)
|
Dividends paid to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(185,520
|
)
|
|
|
16,045
|
|
|
|
142,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(6,417
|
)
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,232
|
)
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
48,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
90,829
|
|
|
$
|
97,061
|
|
|
$
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 (Continued)
Supplemental cash
flow information
At January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, accounts payable included approximately
$6.7 million, $17.8 million and $18 million,
respectively, for capital expenditures. Of the
$17.8 million of capital expenditures included in accounts
payable at December 29, 2007, approximately
$16.7 million had been paid during fiscal 2008. Of the
$18 million of capital expenditures included in accounts
payable at December 30, 2006, approximately
$17.4 million had been paid during fiscal 2007.
Income tax payments, net of refunds, for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 were $15.5 million,
$23.7 million and $25.7 million, respectively.
Interest payments on borrowings totaled $175.5 million,
$189.5 million and $159.5 million during the years
ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
During the year ended January 3, 2009, the Company recorded
$77.8 million of tax related adjustments that resulted from
changes to unrecognized tax benefits that existed at the time of
the going-private merger transaction. This tax-related
adjustment resulted in a decrease to goodwill and a decrease to
the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Refer to
Note 7 Income Taxes for additional information.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-43
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Pension & Other
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
on Hedges
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
440,032
|
|
|
$
|
199,506
|
|
|
$
|
(22,735
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,822
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
$
|
644,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
(86,425
|
)
|
|
|
(86,425
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
|
(165,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,557
|
|
|
|
(3,965
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
13,645
|
|
|
|
13,645
|
|
Reclassification of realized gains to net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,799
|
)
|
|
|
(4,799
|
)
|
Adjustment to adopt FAS 158, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of capital to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,032
|
|
|
$
|
(53,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,990
|
|
|
$
|
(4,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,333
|
|
|
$
|
366,416
|
|
|
$
|
(80,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
(54,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,271
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,271
|
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
19,966
|
|
Reclassification of realized gains to net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,816
|
)
|
|
|
(9,816
|
)
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
FIN 48 adoption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of land to affiliate, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,338
|
|
|
|
12,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,907
|
|
|
$
|
(84,883
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,261
|
|
|
$
|
(15,525
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,878
|
|
|
$
|
354,886
|
|
|
$
|
(40,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Pension & Other
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
on Hedges
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
122,849
|
|
|
$
|
122,849
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,108
|
)
|
|
|
(14,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,452
|
)
|
|
|
(18,877
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(36,348
|
)
|
|
|
(36,348
|
)
|
Reclassification of realized losses to net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
Business dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Loss on sale of land to affiliate, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,681
|
|
|
$
|
36,122
|
|
|
$
|
(40,960
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,187
|
|
|
$
|
(29,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,259
|
|
|
$
|
433,159
|
|
|
$
|
79,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-45
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
Note 1
Nature of Operations
Dole Food Company, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of
Hawaii in 1894 and was reincorporated under the laws of Delaware
in July 2001.
Dole Food Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the
Company) are engaged in the worldwide sourcing,
processing, distributing and marketing of high quality, branded
food products, including fresh fruit and vegetables, as well as
packaged foods.
Operations are conducted throughout North America, Latin
America, Europe (including eastern European countries), Asia
(primarily in Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Thailand), the
Middle East and Africa (primarily in South Africa). As a result
of its global operating and financing activities, the Company is
exposed to certain risks including changes in commodity pricing,
fluctuations in interest rates, fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, as well as other environmental and business
risks in both sourcing and selling locations.
The Companys principal products are produced on both
Company-owned and leased land and are also acquired through
associated producer and independent grower arrangements. The
Companys products are primarily packed and processed by
the Company and sold to wholesale, retail and institutional
customers and other food product companies.
In March 2003, the Company completed a going-private merger
transaction (going-private merger transaction). The
privatization resulted from the acquisition by David H. Murdock,
the Companys Chairman, of the approximately 76% of the
Company that he and his affiliates did not already own. As a
result of the transaction, the Company became wholly-owned by
Mr. Murdock through David H. Murdock (DHM)
Holding Company, Inc.
Note 2
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Basis of Consolidation: The Companys
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dole
Food Company, Inc. and its controlled subsidiaries. Intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Annual Closing Date: The Companys fiscal
year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. The
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 ended on January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
The Company operates under a 52/53 week year. Fiscal 2008
was a 53-week year. Fiscal 2007 and 2006 were both 52-week
years. The impact of the additional week in fiscal 2008 was not
material to the Companys consolidated statement of
operations or consolidated statement of cash flows.
Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized at
the point title and risk of loss is transferred to the customer,
collection is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists and the price is fixed or determinable.
Sales Incentives: The Company offers sales
incentives and promotions to its customers (resellers) and to
its consumers. These incentives include consumer coupons and
promotional discounts, volume rebates and product placement
fees. The Company follows the requirements of Emerging Issues
Task Force
No. 01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(including a Reseller of the Vendors Products).
Consideration given to customers and consumers related to
sales incentives is recorded as a reduction of revenues.
Estimated sales discounts are recorded in the period in which
the related sale is recognized. Volume rebates are recognized as
earned by the customer, based upon the contractual terms of the
arrangement with the customer and, where applicable, the
Companys estimate of sales volume over the term of the
arrangement. Adjustments to estimates are made periodically as
new information becomes available
F-46
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
and actual sales volumes become known. Adjustments to these
estimates have historically not been significant to the Company.
Agricultural Costs: Recurring agricultural
costs include costs relating to irrigation, fertilizing, disease
and insect control and other ongoing crop and land maintenance
activities. Recurring agricultural costs are charged to
operations as incurred or are recognized when the crops are
harvested and sold, depending on the product. Non- recurring
agricultural costs, primarily comprising of soil and farm
improvements and other long-term crop growing costs that benefit
multiple harvests, are deferred and amortized over the estimated
production period, currently from two to seven years.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Amounts billed to
third-party customers for shipping and handling are included as
a component of revenues. Shipping and handling costs incurred
are included as a component of cost of products sold and
represent costs incurred by the Company to ship product from the
sourcing locations to the end consumer markets.
Marketing and Advertising Costs: Marketing and
advertising costs, which include media, production and other
promotional costs, are generally expensed in the period in which
the marketing or advertising first takes place. In limited
circumstances, the Company capitalizes payments related to the
right to stock products in customer outlets or to provide
funding for various merchandising programs over a specified
contractual period. In such cases, the Company amortizes the
costs over the life of the underlying contract. The amortization
of these costs, as well as the cost of certain other marketing
and advertising arrangements with customers, are classified as a
reduction in revenues. Advertising and marketing costs, included
in selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses,
amounted to $72.9 million, $77.1 million and
$70.6 million during the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006.
Research and Development Costs: Research and
development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and
development costs were not material for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006.
Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income
taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been
included in the financial statements. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
differences between the financial statements and tax basis of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. Income taxes, which would be due upon the
repatriation of foreign subsidiary earnings, have not been
provided where the undistributed earnings are considered
indefinitely invested. A valuation allowance is provided for
deferred income tax assets for which it is deemed more likely
than not that future taxable income will not be sufficient to
realize the related income tax benefits from these assets. The
Company establishes additional provisions for income taxes when,
despite the belief that tax positions are fully supportable,
there remain certain positions that do not meet the minimum
probability threshold, as defined by Financial Accounting
Standards Boards (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48),
which is a tax position that is more likely than not to be
sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority.
The impact of provisions for uncertain tax positions, as well as
the related net interest and penalties, are included in
Income taxes in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Dole Food Company, Inc. and subsidiaries file its
U.S. federal income tax return and various state income tax
returns as part of the DHM Holding Company, Inc. consolidated
tax group. Dole Food Company, Inc. and subsidiaries calculate
current and deferred tax provisions on a stand-alone basis.
F-47
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash
equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid
investments, primarily money market funds and time deposits,
with original maturities of three months or less.
Grower Advances: The Company makes advances to
third-party growers primarily in Latin America and Asia for
various farming needs. Some of these advances are secured with
property or other collateral owned by the growers. The Company
monitors these receivables on a regular basis and records an
allowance for these grower receivables based on estimates of the
growers ability to repay advances and the fair value of
the collateral. Grower advances are stated at the gross advance
amount less allowances for potentially uncollectible balances.
Inventories: Inventories are valued at the
lower of cost or market. Costs related to certain packaged foods
products are determined using the average cost basis. Costs
related to other inventory categories, including fresh fruit and
vegetables are determined on the
first-in,
first-out basis. Specific identification and average cost
methods are also used primarily for certain packing materials
and operating supplies. Crop growing costs primarily represent
the costs associated with growing bananas on company-owned farms
or growing vegetables on third-party farms where the Company
bears substantially all of the growing risk.
Investments: Investments in affiliates and
joint ventures with ownership of 20% to 50% are recorded on the
equity method, provided the Company has the ability to exercise
significant influence. All other non-consolidated investments
are accounted for using the cost method. At January 3, 2009
and December 29, 2007, substantially all of the
Companys investments have been accounted for under the
equity method.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant
and equipment is stated at cost plus the fair value of asset
retirement obligations, if any, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of these assets. The Company reviews
long-lived assets to be held and used for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. If an evaluation of
recoverability is required, the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows directly associated with the asset are compared to
the assets carrying amount. If this comparison indicates
that there is an impairment, the amount of the impairment is
calculated by comparing the carrying value to discounted
expected future cash flows or comparable market values,
depending on the nature of the asset. All long-lived assets, for
which management has committed itself to a plan of disposal by
sale, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value
less cost to sell. Long-lived assets to be disposed of other
than by sale are classified as held and used until the date of
disposal. Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred.
Goodwill and Intangibles: Goodwill represents
the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of
the net identifiable assets acquired. Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment
annually, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators
arise. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which
are either the operating segment or one reporting level below
the operating segment. Fair values for goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are determined based on
discounted cash flows, market multiples or appraised values, as
appropriate.
The Companys indefinite-lived intangible asset, consisting
of the DOLE brand, is considered to have an indefinite life
because it is expected to generate cash flows indefinitely and
as such is not amortized. The Companys intangible assets
with a definite life consist primarily of customer
relationships. Amortizable intangible assets are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful life. The
weighted average useful life of the Companys customer
relationships is 11 years.
F-48
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to a
concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash
equivalents, derivative contracts, grower advances and trade
receivables. The Company maintains its temporary cash
investments with high quality financial institutions, which are
invested primarily in short-term U.S. government
instruments and certificates of deposit. The counterparties to
the Companys derivative contracts are major financial
institutions. Grower advances are principally with farming
enterprises located throughout Latin America and Asia and are
secured by the underlying crop harvests. Credit risk related to
trade receivables is mitigated due to the large number of
customers dispersed worldwide. To reduce credit risk, the
Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers
but does not generally require advance payments or collateral.
Additionally, the Company maintains allowances for credit
losses. No individual customer accounted for greater than 10% of
the Companys revenues during the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006. No individual customer accounted for
greater than 10% of accounts receivable as of January 3,
2009 or December 29, 2007.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The
Companys financial instruments are primarily composed of
short-term trade and grower receivables, trade payables, notes
receivable and notes payable, as well as long-term grower
receivables, capital lease obligations, term loans, revolving
credit facility, notes and debentures. For short-term
instruments, the carrying amount approximates fair value because
of the short maturity of these instruments. For the other
long-term financial instruments, excluding the Companys
unsecured notes and debentures, and term loans, the carrying
amount approximates the fair value since they bear interest at
variable rates or fixed rates which approximate market.
The Company also holds derivative instruments to hedge against
foreign currency exchange, fuel pricing and interest rate
movements. The Companys derivative financial instruments
are recorded at fair value (Refer to Note 17 for additional
information). The Company estimates the fair values of its
derivatives based on quoted market prices or pricing models
using current market rates less any credit valuation adjustments.
Foreign Currency Exchange: For subsidiaries
with transactions that are denominated in a currency other than
the functional currency, the net foreign currency exchange
transaction gains or losses resulting from the translation of
monetary assets and liabilities to the functional currency are
included in determining net income. Net foreign currency
exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of
assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar are recorded as a part of
cumulative translation adjustment in shareholders equity.
Unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain
intercompany transactions that are of a long-term-investment
nature (i.e. settlement is not planned or anticipated in the
foreseeable future) are also recorded in cumulative translation
adjustment in shareholders equity.
Leases: The Company leases fixed assets for
use in operations where leasing offers advantages of operating
flexibility and is less expensive than alternative types of
funding. The Company also leases land in countries where land
ownership by foreign entities is restricted. The Companys
leases are evaluated at inception or at any subsequent
modification and, depending on the lease terms, are classified
as either capital leases or operating leases, as appropriate
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13,
Accounting for Leases. For operating leases that contain
rent escalations, rent holidays or rent concessions, rent
expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of
the lease. The majority of the Companys leases are
classified as operating leases. The Companys principal
operating leases are for land and machinery and equipment. The
Companys capitalized leases primarily consist of two
vessel leases. The Companys decision to exercise renewal
options is primarily dependent on the level of business
conducted at the location and the profitability
F-49
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
thereof. The Companys leasehold improvements were not
significant at January 3, 2009 or December 29, 2007.
Guarantees: The Company makes guarantees as
part of its normal business activities. These guarantees include
guarantees of the indebtedness of some of its key fruit
suppliers and other entities integral to the Companys
operations. The Company also issues bank guarantees as required
by certain regulatory authorities, suppliers and other operating
agreements as well as to support the borrowings, leases and
other obligations of its subsidiaries. The majority of the
Companys guarantees relate to guarantees of subsidiary
obligations and are scoped out of the initial measurement and
recognition provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and
disclosures reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Estimates and assumptions include, but are
not limited to, the areas of customer and grower receivables,
inventories, impairment of assets, useful lives of property,
plant and equipment, intangible assets, marketing programs,
income taxes, self-insurance reserves, retirement benefits,
financial instruments and commitments and contingencies. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications: Certain prior year amounts
have been reclassified to conform with the 2008 presentation.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
During September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires
enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157
requires companies to disclose the fair value of financial
instruments according to a fair value hierarchy as defined in
the standard. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position
157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP 157-1)
and
FSP 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-1
amends FAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from
its scope.
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of FAS 157 for all non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. These nonfinancial items include
assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair
value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and was
adopted by the Company, as it applies to its financial
instruments, effective December 30, 2007. Refer to
Note 17 Derivative Financial Instruments.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
During May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162).
FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting principles to be used in the
preparation and presentation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This
statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities
and Exchange Commission approves the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Boards amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly
F-50
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. The Company does not anticipate that the
adoption of FAS 162 will have an effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
During March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures About
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FAS 161). This new standard requires
enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments, including those
used in hedging activities. It is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and will
be applicable to the Company in the first quarter of fiscal
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
the adoption of FAS 161 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
During December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). FAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Dole adopted the provisions of
FAS 160 as of the beginning of its 2009 fiscal year.
FAS 160 is to be applied prospectively as of the beginning
of 2009 except for the presentation and disclosure requirements
which are to be applied retrospectively. The consolidated
financial statements now conform to the presentation required
under FAS 160. Other than the change in presentation of
noncontrolling interests, the adoption of FAS 160 had no
impact on Doles results of operations or financial
position.
During December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (FAS 141R). FAS 141R
provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. It
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement
objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and
also requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other
users all of the information they need to evaluate and
understand the nature and financial effect of the business
combination. Changes in acquired tax contingencies, including
those existing at the date of adoption, will be recognized in
earnings if outside the maximum measurement period (generally
one year). FAS 141R will be applied prospectively to
business combinations with acquisition dates on or after
January 1, 2009. Following the date of adoption of
FAS 141R, the resolution of such items at values that
differ from recorded amounts will be adjusted through earnings,
rather than goodwill.
Note 3
2009 Debt Maturity and Debt Issuance
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified to
current liabilities its $350 million 8.625% notes due
May 2009 (2009 Notes). The Company also completed
the early redemption of $5 million of the 2009 Notes during
the third quarter of 2008.
On February 13, 2009, the Company commenced a tender offer
to purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding 2009 Notes
for a purchase price equal to $980 per $1,000 of 2009 Notes
validly tendered, with an additional payment of $20 per $1,000
of 2009 Notes tendered early in the process. In connection with
the tender offer, the Company sought consents to certain
amendments to the indenture governing the 2009 Notes to
eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and
certain events of default contained therein. On March 4,
2009, the Company announced that it had received the required
consents necessary to amend the indenture with respect to the
2009 Notes and, accordingly, executed the supplemental indenture
effecting such amendments, which became operative on
March 18, 2009, when the Company accepted and paid for the
tendered 2009 Notes. The tender offer expired on March 17,
2009.
On March 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale and
issuance of $350 million aggregate principal amount of
13.875% Senior Secured Notes due March 2014 (2014
Notes) at a discount of
F-51
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
$25 million. The 2014 Notes were sold to qualified
institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and to
persons outside the United States in compliance with
Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
Interest on the 2014 Notes will be paid semiannually in arrears
on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on
September 15, 2009. The 2014 Notes have the benefit of a
lien on certain U.S. assets of the Company that is junior
to the liens of the Companys senior secured credit
facilities, and are senior obligations of the Company ranking
equally with the Companys existing senior debt. The
Company used the net proceeds from this offering, together with
cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to purchase all
of the tendered 2009 Notes and to irrevocably deposit with the
trustee of the 2009 Notes funds that will be sufficient to repay
the remaining outstanding 2009 Notes at maturity on May 1,
2009.
In connection with these refinancing transactions, the Company
amended its senior secured credit facilities. Such amendments,
among other things, (i) permit debt securities secured by a
junior lien to be issued to refinance its senior notes due in
2009 and 2010 in an amount up to the greater of
(x) $500 million and (y) the amount of debt that
would not cause the senior secured leverage ratio to exceed 3.75
to 1.00; (ii) add a new restricted payments basket of up to
$50 million to be used to prepay its senior notes due in
2009 and 2010 subject to pro forma compliance with the senior
secured credit facilities and $70 million of unused
availability under the revolving credit facility;
(iii) increase the applicable margin for (x) the term
loan facilities to LIBOR plus 5.00% or the base rate plus
4.00% subject to a 50 basis point step down when the
priority senior secured leverage ratio is less than or equal to
1.75 to 1.00 and (y) for the revolving credit facility, to
a range of LIBOR plus 3.00% to 3.50% or the base rate plus 2.00%
to 2.50%; (iv) provide for a LIBOR floor of 3.00% per annum
for the term loan facilities; (v) add a first priority
secured leverage maintenance covenant to the term loan
facilities; and (vi) provide for other technical and
clarifying changes. These amendments became effective
concurrently with the closing of the 2014 Notes offering.
Note 4
Other Income (Expense), Net
Included in other income (expense), net in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2008, 2007 and
2006 are the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on the cross currency swap
|
|
$
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,664
|
|
Realized gain on the cross currency swap
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
Gains (losses) on foreign denominated borrowings
|
|
|
24,889
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
(9,270
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
15,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 17 Derivative Financial
Instruments for further discussion regarding the Companys
cross currency swap.
Note 5
Discontinued Operations
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company approved and
committed to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers
operations (Flowers transaction). The first phase of
the Flowers transaction was completed during the first quarter
of 2009. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the
Company approved and committed to a formal plan to divest its
citrus and pistachio operations (Citrus) located in
central California. The operating results of Citrus were
included in the fresh fruit operating segment. The sale of
Citrus was completed during the third quarter of 2008 and the
sale of
F-52
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
the fresh-cut flowers operations was completed during the first
quarter of 2009. Refer to Note 9 Assets
Held-For-Sale. In evaluating the two businesses, the Company
concluded that they each met the definition of a discontinued
operation as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (FAS 144).
Accordingly, the results of operations of these businesses have
been reclassified for all periods presented.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company completed the
sale of its Pacific Coast Truck Center (Pac Truck)
business for $20.7 million. The Pac Truck business
consisted of a full service truck dealership that provided
medium and heavy-duty trucks to customers in the Pacific
Northwest region. The Company received $15.3 million of net
proceeds from the sale after the assumption of $5.4 million
of debt and realized a gain of approximately $2.8 million
on the sale, net of income taxes of $2 million. The sale of
Pac Truck qualified for discontinued operations treatment under
FAS 144. Accordingly, the historical results of operations
of this business have been reclassified for all periods
presented. The operating results of Pac Truck were included in
the other operating segment:
The operating results of fresh-cut flowers, Citrus and Pac Truck
for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 are reported in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Pac Truck
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
106,919
|
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(43,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(44,643
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(26,299
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of $4.3 million
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
110,153
|
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(19,146
|
)
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,413
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(16,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
160,074
|
|
|
$
|
20,527
|
|
|
$
|
47,851
|
|
|
$
|
228,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(57,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
(52,837
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(52,622
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,002
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(50,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of $2 million
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the fresh-cut flowers loss before income taxes for
fiscal 2008 is a $17 million impairment charge. Refer to
Note 9 Assets Held-For-Sale for further
information.
F-53
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Included in the fresh-cut flowers loss before income taxes for
fiscal 2007 and 2006 are $1.1 million and $29 million,
respectively, of charges related to restructuring costs and
impairment charges associated with the write-off of certain
long-lived assets, intangible assets and inventory. During the
third quarter of 2006, the Company restructured its fresh-cut
flowers division to better focus on high-value products and
flower varieties, and position the business unit for future
growth. In connection with the restructuring, fresh-cut flowers
ceased its farming operations in Ecuador, closed two farms in
Colombia and downsized other Colombian farms.
Minority interest expense included in Citrus income (loss) from
discontinued operations was $0.5 million, $0.4 million
and $2.3 million for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net
of income taxes, for Citrus for fiscal 2008 included minority
interest expense of $12.3 million.
Note 6
Restructurings and Related Asset Impairments
During the first quarter of 2006, the commercial relationship
substantially ended between the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiary, Saba, and Sabas largest customer. Saba is a
leading importer and distributor of fruit, vegetables and
flowers in Scandinavia. Sabas financial results are
included in the fresh fruit reporting segment. The Company
restructured certain lines of Sabas business and as a
result, incurred $12.8 million of total related costs. Of
the $12.8 million incurred during the year ended
December 30, 2006, $9 million is included in cost of
products sold and $3.8 million in selling, marketing, and
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statement of operations. Total restructuring costs include
$9.9 million of employee severance costs which impacted
275 employees, $2.4 million of contractual lease
obligations as well as $0.5 million of fixed asset
write-offs. At December 29, 2007 all of the restructuring
costs had been paid.
In connection with the Companys ongoing farm optimization
programs in Asia, $2.8 million and $6.7 million of
crop-related costs were written-off during 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These non-cash charges have been recorded in cost
of products sold in the consolidated statements of operations.
Note 7
Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal, state and local
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
22,753
|
|
|
|
15,399
|
|
|
|
18,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,588
|
|
|
|
16,134
|
|
|
|
19,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal, state and local
|
|
|
(16,218
|
)
|
|
|
(29,122
|
)
|
|
|
(15,690
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
|
|
(3,573
|
)
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,941
|
)
|
|
|
(32,695
|
)
|
|
|
(21,271
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current tax expense
|
|
|
(51,662
|
)
|
|
|
20,615
|
|
|
|
24,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(48,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,054
|
|
|
$
|
22,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax earnings attributable to foreign operations including
earnings from discontinued operations, equity method investments
and minority interests were $185.5 million,
$53.9 million and $30.7 million
F-54
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007
and December 30, 2006, respectively. The Company has not
provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding
taxes on approximately $2.3 billion of the excess of the
amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments
that are essentially permanent in duration. Generally, such
amounts become subject to U.S. taxation upon the remittance
of dividends and under certain other circumstances. It is
currently not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax
liability related to investments in these foreign subsidiaries.
The Companys reported income tax expense (benefit) on
continuing operations differed from the expense calculated using
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate for the following
reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Expense (benefit) computed at U.S. federal statutory income tax
rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
32,383
|
|
|
$
|
(12,668
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,748
|
)
|
Foreign income taxed at different rates
|
|
|
(40,236
|
)
|
|
|
8,963
|
|
|
|
27,440
|
|
State and local income tax, net of federal income taxes
|
|
|
(8,467
|
)
|
|
|
(3,948
|
)
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
9,787
|
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
U.S. Appeals Settlement and Other FIN 48 Related
|
|
|
(36,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent items and other
|
|
|
(4,489
|
)
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
(4,071
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(48,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,054
|
|
|
$
|
22,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
$
|
(295,362
|
)
|
|
$
|
(293,666
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(134,819
|
)
|
|
|
(154,771
|
)
|
Investment and other asset basis differences
|
|
|
34,534
|
|
|
|
20,394
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
59,132
|
|
|
|
56,538
|
|
Operating accruals
|
|
|
71,698
|
|
|
|
65,743
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
21,753
|
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
Net operating loss and other carryforwards
|
|
|
106,383
|
|
|
|
167,424
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(144,083
|
)
|
|
|
(174,398
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
47,832
|
|
|
|
26,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(232,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(265,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has gross federal, state and foreign net operating
loss carryforwards of $82.4 million, $1 billion and
$119.9 million, respectively, at January 3, 2009. The
Company has recorded deferred tax assets of $29.8 million
for federal net operating loss and other carryforwards, which,
if unused, will expire between 2023 and 2028. The Company has
recorded deferred tax assets of $45.8 million for state
operating loss carryforwards, which, if unused, will start to
expire in 2009. The Company has recorded deferred tax assets of
$30.8 million for foreign net operating loss carryforwards
which are subject to varying expiration rules. Tax credit
carryforwards of $21.8 million include foreign tax credit
carryforwards of $18.4 million which will expire in 2011,
U.S. general business credit carryforwards of
$0.3 million which expire between 2023 and 2027, and state
tax credit carryforwards of $3.1 million with varying
expiration dates. The Company has recorded a U.S. deferred
tax asset of $35.8 million for disallowed interest expense
which, although subject to certain limitations, can be carried
forward indefinitely.
F-55
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
A valuation allowance has been established to offset foreign tax
credit carryforwards, state net operating loss carryforwards,
certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards and certain
other deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions. The Company
has deemed it more likely than not that future taxable income in
the relevant taxing jurisdictions will be insufficient to
realize all of the related income tax benefits for these assets.
Total deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
489,343
|
|
|
$
|
499,899
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
(144,083
|
)
|
|
|
(174,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,260
|
|
|
|
325,501
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(578,192
|
)
|
|
|
(591,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(232,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(265,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
54,508
|
|
|
$
|
47,763
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(33,235
|
)
|
|
|
(35,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
290,752
|
|
|
|
277,738
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(544,957
|
)
|
|
|
(555,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(254,205
|
)
|
|
|
(277,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(232,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(265,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits opening balance
|
|
$
|
204,421
|
|
|
$
|
200,641
|
|
Gross increases tax positions in prior period
|
|
|
14,361
|
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
Gross decreases tax positions in prior period
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(13,448
|
)
|
Gross increases tax positions in current period
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
8,284
|
|
Settlements*
|
|
|
(105,139
|
)
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(2,083
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits ending balance
|
|
$
|
115,868
|
|
|
$
|
204,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
2008 activity includes $110 million reduction in gross
unrecognized tax benefits due to the settlement of the federal
income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001 less a cash refund
received of $6 million on this settlement plus various
state and foreign audit settlements totaling approximately
$1 million. |
The total for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, was
$143 million and $269 million at January 3, 2009
and December 29, 2007, respectively. The change is
primarily due to the settlement
F-56
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the federal income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001. If
recognized, approximately $131.5 million, net of federal
and state tax benefits, would be recorded as a component of
income tax expense and accordingly impact the effective tax rate.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to
its unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income taxes in
the consolidated statements of operations. Accrued interest and
penalties before tax benefits were $26.9 million and
$64.6 million at January 3, 2009 and December 29,
2007, respectively, and are included as a component of other
long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The
decrease is primarily attributable to the reduction in
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits associated with the
settlement of the federal income tax audit for the years
1995-2001.
Interest and penalties recorded in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations for 2008, 2007 and 2006
were ($32.2) million, including the impact of the
settlement, $17.2 million and $6.9 million,
respectively.
Dole Food Company or one or more of its subsidiaries file income
tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various
states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the
Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and
local, or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001.
Income Tax Audits: The Company believes its
tax positions comply with the applicable tax laws and that it is
adequately provided for all tax related matters. Matters raised
upon audit may involve substantial amounts and could result in
material cash payments if resolved unfavorably; however,
management does not believe that any material payments will be
made related to these matters within the next year. Management
considers it unlikely that the resolution of these matters will
have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations.
1995 2001 Federal Income Tax
Audit: In June 2006, the IRS completed an
examination of the Companys federal income tax returns for
the years 1995 to 2001 and issued a Revenue Agents Report
(RAR) that included various proposed adjustments.
The net tax deficiency associated with the RAR was
$175 million for which the Company provided
$110 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, plus
penalties and interest. The Company filed a protest letter
contesting the proposed adjustments contained in the RAR. During
January 2008, the Company was notified that the Appeals Branch
of the IRS had finalized its review of the Companys
protest and that the Appeals Branchs review supported the
Companys position in all material respects. On
June 13, 2008, the Appeals review was approved by the Joint
Committee on Taxation. The impact of the settlement on the
Companys year ended January 3, 2009 consolidated
financial statements is $136 million, which includes a
$110 million reduction in gross unrecognized tax benefits
recorded in other long-term liabilities plus a reduction of
$26 million for interest and penalties, net of federal and
state tax benefits. Of this amount, $61 million reduced the
Companys income tax provision and effective tax rate for
the year ended January 3, 2009 and the remaining
$75 million reduced goodwill.
2002 2005 Federal Income Tax
Audit: The Company is currently under examination
by the Internal Revenue Service for the tax years
2002-2005
and it is anticipated that the examination will be completed by
the end of 2009.
At this time, the Company does not anticipate that total
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the
settlement of audits and the expiration of statutes of
limitations within the next twelve months.
F-57
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8
Details of Certain Assets and Liabilities
Details of receivables and inventories were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$
|
684,053
|
|
|
$
|
708,545
|
|
Notes and other
|
|
|
126,601
|
|
|
|
145,624
|
|
Grower advances
|
|
|
34,861
|
|
|
|
41,302
|
|
Income tax refund
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848,592
|
|
|
|
900,873
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(41,357
|
)
|
|
|
(61,720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
807,235
|
|
|
$
|
839,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
$
|
344,643
|
|
|
$
|
355,502
|
|
Raw materials and work in progress
|
|
|
168,670
|
|
|
|
155,166
|
|
Crop-growing costs
|
|
|
210,263
|
|
|
|
172,980
|
|
Operating supplies and other
|
|
|
72,831
|
|
|
|
67,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
796,407
|
|
|
$
|
750,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable consists primarily of trade payables.
Accrued liabilities included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Employee-related costs and benefits
|
|
$
|
127,162
|
|
|
$
|
147,329
|
|
Amounts due to growers
|
|
|
64,746
|
|
|
|
98,130
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
64,256
|
|
|
|
60,972
|
|
Shipping related costs
|
|
|
49,622
|
|
|
|
51,427
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
27,217
|
|
|
|
34,678
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
25,820
|
|
|
|
31,299
|
|
Unrealized hedging losses
|
|
|
80,760
|
|
|
|
28,462
|
|
Other
|
|
|
50,562
|
|
|
|
62,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
490,145
|
|
|
$
|
514,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued postretirement and other employee benefits
|
|
$
|
245,357
|
|
|
$
|
249,230
|
|
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
90,767
|
|
|
|
217,570
|
|
Other
|
|
|
85,655
|
|
|
|
74,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
421,779
|
|
|
$
|
541,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 9
Assets Held-for-Sale
The Company continuously reviews its assets in order to identify
those assets that do not meet the Companys future
strategic direction or internal economic return criteria. As a
result of this review, the Company has identified and is in the
process of selling certain businesses and long-lived assets. In
accordance with FAS 144, the Company has reclassified these
assets as held-for-sale.
Total assets held-for-sale by segment were are follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
34,159
|
|
|
$
|
3,251
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,834
|
|
|
$
|
76,244
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
252,581
|
|
|
|
35,349
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
71,833
|
|
|
|
364,215
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(188,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(31,678
|
)
|
|
|
(220,583
|
)
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
98,105
|
|
|
$
|
38,600
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
61,989
|
|
|
$
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held-for-sale by segment were are follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
56,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,218
|
|
|
|
102,097
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(51,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,218
|
|
|
$
|
50,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The major classes of assets and liabilities held-for-sale
included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet at
January 3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets held-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
3,314
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,314
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
9,184
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
85,629
|
|
|
|
38,600
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
30,069
|
|
|
|
158,480
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
|
|
17,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held-for-sale
|
|
$
|
98,105
|
|
|
$
|
38,600
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
61,989
|
|
|
$
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,028
|
|
|
$
|
23,065
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,857
|
|
|
|
25,857
|
|
Deferred income tax and other liabilities
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,218
|
|
|
$
|
50,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company received cash proceeds of $226.5 million on
assets sold during the year ended January 3, 2009,
including $214 million on assets which had been
reclassified as held-for-sale. The total realized gain recorded
on assets classified as held-for-sale, excluding the 2008
amortization of the deferred gain on the ship discussed below,
was $18 million for the year ended January 3, 2009.
The Company also realized gains on assets not classified as
held-for-sale, totaling $9 million for fiscal 2008. Total
realized gains on asset sales of $27 million are shown as a
separate component of operating income in the consolidated
statement of operations for 2008. The net book value associated
with these sales from continuing operations was approximately
$103 million.
Fresh
Fruit
During the year ended January 3, 2009, the Company added
$252.6 million to the assets held-for-sale balance in the
fresh fruit reporting segment. These assets primarily consist of
a packing and cooling facility and wood box plant located in
Chile and approximately 11,000 acres of Hawaiian land.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company entered into a
binding letter of intent to sell certain portions of its Latin
American banana operations. The related assets and liabilities
from these operations were reclassified to held-for-sale during
the fourth quarter of 2008. The sale closed during the first
quarter of 2009.
During the third quarter ended October 4, 2008, the Company
entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to sell
its JP Fresh subsidiary in the United Kingdom and its Dole
France subsidiary which were in the European ripening and
distribution business to Compagnie Fruitière Paris.
Compagnie Fruitière Paris is a subsidiary of Compagnie
Financière de Participations, a
F-60
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
company in which Dole holds a non-controlling 40% ownership
interest. The sale closed during the fourth quarter of 2008.
2008 Sales and
First Quarter 2009 Sales
The Company sold the following assets during the year ended
January 3, 2009, which had been classified as
held-for-sale: approximately 2,200 acres of land parcels in
Hawaii, additional agricultural acreage in California, two
Chilean farms, property located in Turkey and a breakbulk
refrigerated ship. In addition, the Company sold its JP Fresh
and Dole France subsidiaries. The amount of cash collected on
these sales totaled approximately $133.6 million. The total
sales proceeds of $133.6 million includes
$12.7 million for the sale of the ship. The Company also
entered into a lease agreement for the same ship and recognized
a deferred gain of $11.9 million on the sale. The deferred
gain is amortized over the 3 year lease term.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company reclassified
approximately 4,400 acres of land and other related assets
of its citrus and pistachio operations located in central
California as assets held-for-sale. These assets were held by
non-wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. In March 2008, the
Company entered into an agreement to sell these assets. The sale
was completed during the third quarter of 2008 and the
subsidiaries received net proceeds of $44 million. The
Companys share of these net proceeds was
$28.1 million. The Company recorded a gain of
$3.3 million, net of income taxes, which was recorded as
gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes, for the year ended January 3, 2009.
During January 2009, the Company completed the sale of certain
portions of its Latin American banana operations. Net sales
proceeds from the sale totaled approximately $27.3 million.
Of this amount, $15.8 million was collected in cash and the
remaining $11.5 million was recorded as a receivable, to be
collected over the next twelve months.
Fresh
Vegetables
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified
approximately 1,100 acres of vegetable property located in
California as assets held-for-sale and signed a definitive
purchase and sale agreement to sell this property. The sale
closed during March 2009 and the Company received net cash
proceeds of $44.5 million.
Packaged
Foods
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified
approximately 600 acres of peach orchards located in
California as assets held-for-sale. During the fourth quarter of
2008, the Company sold 40 acres for approximately
$0.7 million.
Fresh-Cut
Flowers Discontinued Operation
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company approved and
committed to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers
operating segment. Accordingly, all the assets and liabilities
were reclassified as held-for-sale.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company signed a binding
letter of intent to sell its fresh-cut flowers division
(Flowers transaction). The sale of the fresh-cut
flowers division is expected to take place in phases. The first
phase closed during the first quarter of 2009 as a stock-sale
transaction. The remaining assets can be purchased by the same
buyer under separate option contracts that expire in one year.
The remaining phases are expected to close within the next year.
If the options on
F-61
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
the remaining assets are exercised, the Company will receive
additional sales proceeds of approximately $26 million on
assets with a net book value of $10 million.
Included in liabilities held-for-sale of $45.2 million is
$25.9 million of long-term debt of the former flowers
subsidiaries. This debt ceased to be an obligation of the
Company upon the closing of the first phase of the Flowers
transaction.
The Company recorded an impairment loss of $17 million on
the assets sold in the first phase of the Flowers transaction.
The impairment charge represents the amount by which the net
book value exceeds the fair market value less cost to sell. The
fair market value of the assets was determined by the sales
price agreed upon in the binding letter of intent. The
impairment loss was recorded as a component of loss from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for the year ended
January 3, 2009.
2008 Sales and
First Quarter 2009 Sales
The Company reclassified its fresh-cut flowers headquarters
facility, located in Miami, Florida as assets held-for-sale
during the third quarter of 2007. The Company completed the sale
of this facility during the third quarter of 2008 and received
net cash proceeds of $34 million. In addition, the Company
received net cash proceeds of $1.9 million on the sale of
two farms. The gain realized on the sale of these assets, net of
income taxes, was approximately $3.1 million and is
included as a component of loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended January 3, 2009.
During January 2009, the first phase of the Flowers transaction
was completed. The Company retains only certain real estate of
the former flowers divisions to be sold in the subsequent phases
of the transaction. Net sales proceeds from the sale totaled
approximately $30 million. Of this amount,
$21.7 million was collected in cash and the remaining
$8.3 million was recorded as a receivable, to be collected
over the next two years.
Note 10
Property, Plant and Equipment
Major classes of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$
|
523,355
|
|
|
$
|
698,853
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
398,371
|
|
|
|
430,968
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
810,722
|
|
|
|
803,353
|
|
Vessels and containers
|
|
|
201,178
|
|
|
|
218,970
|
|
Vessels and equipment under capital leases
|
|
|
91,392
|
|
|
|
98,006
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
52,658
|
|
|
|
70,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,077,676
|
|
|
|
2,320,529
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,027,345
|
)
|
|
|
(980,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,331
|
|
|
$
|
1,340,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
5 to 40
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
2 to 50
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
2 to 35
|
Vessels and containers
|
|
5 to 20
|
Vessels and equipment under capital leases
|
|
Shorter of useful life
or life of lease
|
Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment for
continuing operations totaled $133.4 million,
$146.9 million and $139 million for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively. Depreciation expense on
property, plant and equipment for discontinued operations
totaled $1.1 million, $4.2 million and
$5.8 million for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
Note 11
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill has been allocated to the Companys reporting
segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
386,625
|
|
|
$
|
93,874
|
|
|
$
|
65,241
|
|
|
$
|
545,740
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
(22,965
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
|
(30,191
|
)
|
Tax-related adjustments
|
|
|
(4,588
|
)
|
|
|
(1,199
|
)
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(6,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
359,072
|
|
|
$
|
86,675
|
|
|
$
|
63,771
|
|
|
$
|
509,518
|
|
Tax-related adjustments
|
|
|
(59,208
|
)
|
|
|
(15,469
|
)
|
|
|
(3,160
|
)
|
|
|
(77,837
|
)
|
Transfer to assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
(24,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,751
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
274,723
|
|
|
$
|
71,206
|
|
|
$
|
60,611
|
|
|
$
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax-related adjustments in 2007 resulted from changes to
deductible temporary differences, operating loss or tax credit
carryforwards and contingencies that existed at the time of the
going-private merger transaction. The tax-related adjustments in
2008 resulted from changes to unrecognized tax benefits that
existed at the time of the going- private merger transaction
which were due to the settlement of the federal income tax audit
as discussed in Note 7 Income Taxes.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified all
of the assets and liabilities of JP Fresh to assets
held-for-sale. The sale of JP Fresh was completed during the
fourth quarter of 2008. Goodwill and intangible assets related
to JP Fresh totaled $24 million and $7.3 million,
respectively.
F-63
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Details of the Companys intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
38,501
|
|
|
$
|
48,906
|
|
Other amortized intangible assets
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,543
|
|
|
|
51,041
|
|
Accumulated amortization customer relationships
|
|
|
(20,248
|
)
|
|
|
(17,483
|
)
|
Other accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization intangible assets
|
|
|
(21,700
|
)
|
|
|
(18,866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets, net
|
|
|
18,843
|
|
|
|
32,175
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark and trade names
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
708,458
|
|
|
$
|
721,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of identifiable intangibles totaled
$4.3 million, $4.5 million and $4.5 million for
the years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively. Estimated remaining
amortization expense associated with the Companys
identifiable intangible assets in each of the next five fiscal
years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
The Company performed its annual impairment review of goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible assets pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142), during
the second quarter of fiscal 2008. This review indicated no
impairment to goodwill or any of the Companys
indefinite-lived intangible assets. As market conditions change,
the Company continues to monitor and perform updates of its
impairment testing of recoverability of goodwill and long-lived
assets.
F-64
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 12
Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
Notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following
amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.625% notes due 2009
|
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
7.25% notes due 2010
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
8.875% notes due 2011
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
8.75% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
150,500
|
|
|
|
176,400
|
|
Term loan facilities
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
|
|
960,375
|
|
Contracts and notes, at a weighted-average interest rate of 6.1%
in 2008 (8.4% in 2007) through 2014
|
|
|
9,221
|
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
60,448
|
|
|
|
85,959
|
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
81,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,204,093
|
|
|
|
2,411,397
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(405,537
|
)
|
|
|
(95,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,798,556
|
|
|
$
|
2,316,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
Payable
The Company borrows funds on a short-term basis to finance
current operations. The terms of these borrowings range from one
month to three months. The Companys notes payable at
January 3, 2009 consist primarily of foreign borrowings in
Asia and Latin America.
Notes and
Debentures
In April 2002, the Company completed the sale and issuance of
$400 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due
2009 (the 2009 Notes). The 2009 Notes are
redeemable, at the discretion of the Company, at par plus a
make-whole amount, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest, any
time prior to maturity. The 2009 Notes were issued at 99.50% of
par. In 2005 in conjunction with an amendment and restatement of
its senior secured credit agreement, the Company repurchased
$50 million of its 2009 Notes. During September 2008, the
Company completed the early redemption of $5 million of its
2009 Notes at a price of 99% of the principal amount plus
accrued interest through the date of redemption. Refer to
Note 3 2009 Debt Maturity and Debt Issuance.
In May 2003, the Company issued and sold $400 million
aggregate principal amount of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010
(the 2010 Notes). The 2010 Notes were issued at par.
The Company may redeem some or all of the 2010 Notes at a
redemption price of 100% of their principal amount during 2009
and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
In connection with the going-private merger transaction of 2003,
the Company issued $475 million aggregate principal amount
of 8.875% Senior Notes due 2011 (the 2011
Notes). The 2011 Notes were issued at par. The Company may
redeem some or all of the 2011 Notes at a redemption price of
100% of their principal amount during 2009 and thereafter, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. In 2005
F-65
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
in conjunction with an amendment and restatement of its senior
secured credit agreement, the Company repurchased
$275 million of its 2011 Notes.
In July 1993, the Company issued and sold debentures due 2013
(the 2013 Debentures). The 2013 Debentures are not
redeemable prior to maturity and were issued at 99.37% of par.
Interest on the notes and debentures is paid semi-annually.
None of the Companys notes or debentures are subject to
any sinking fund requirements. The notes and debentures are
guaranteed by the Companys wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries (Note 21).
April 2006
Amendments to Credit Facilities
In April 2006, the Company completed an amendment and
restatement of its senior secured credit agreement. The purposes
of this refinancing included increasing the combined size of the
Companys revolving credit and letter of credit facilities,
eliminating certain financial maintenance covenants, realizing
currency gains arising out of the Companys then existing
yen-denominated term loan, and refinancing the higher-cost bank
indebtedness of the Companys immediate parent, Dole
Holding Company, LLC (DHC) at the lower-cost Dole
Food Company, Inc. level. The Company obtained $975 million
of term loan facilities and $100 million in a pre-funded
letter of credit facility, both of which mature in April 2013.
The proceeds of the term loans were used to repay the then
outstanding term loans and revolving credit facilities, as well
as pay a dividend of $160 million to DHC, which proceeds
were used to repay its existing debt facility.
In addition, the Company entered into a new asset based
revolving credit facility (ABL revolver) of
$350 million. The facility is secured by and is subject to
a borrowing base consisting of up to 85% of eligible accounts
receivable plus a predetermined percentage of eligible
inventory, as defined in the credit facility. The ABL revolver
matures in April 2011.
Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loans
As of January 3, 2009, the term loan facilities consisted
of $176.8 million of Term Loan B and $658.6 million of
Term Loan C, bearing interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging
from 1.75% to 2%, dependent upon the Companys senior
secured leverage ratio. The weighted average variable interest
rates at January 3, 2009 for Term Loan B and Term Loan C
were LIBOR plus 2%, or 4.3%. The term loan facilities require
quarterly principal payments, plus a balloon payment due in
2013. Related to the term loan facilities, the Company holds an
interest rate swap to hedge future changes in interest rates and
a cross currency swap to effectively lower the U.S. dollar
fixed interest rate of 7.2% to a Japanese yen fixed interest
rate of 3.6%. Refer to Note 17 Derivative
Financial Instruments for additional discussion of the
Companys hedging activities.
As of January 3, 2009, the ABL revolver borrowing base was
$328.6 million and the amount outstanding under the ABL
revolver was $150.5 million, bearing interest at LIBOR plus
a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75%, dependent upon the
Companys historical borrowing availability under this
facility. At January 3, 2009, the weighted average variable
interest rate for the ABL revolver was LIBOR plus 1.5%, or 2.2%.
The ABL revolver matures in April 2011. After taking into
account approximately $5.3 million of outstanding letters
of credit issued under the ABL revolver, the Company had
approximately $172.8 million available for borrowings as of
January 3, 2009. In addition, the Company had approximately
$71 million of letters of credit and bank guarantees
outstanding under its pre-funded letter of credit facility as of
January 3, 2009.
F-66
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
A commitment fee, which fluctuated between 0.25% and 0.375%, was
paid based on the total unused portion of the revolving credit
facility. In addition, there is a facility fee on the pre-funded
letter of credit facility. The Company paid a total of
$1 million, $0.7 million and $1 million in
commitment and facility fees for the years ended January 3,
2009, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006.
The revolving credit facility and term loan facilities are
collateralized by substantially all of the Companys
tangible and intangible assets, other than certain intercompany
debt, certain equity interests and each of the Companys
U.S. manufacturing plants and processing facilities that
has a net book value exceeding 1% of the Companys net
tangible assets. Refer to Note 3 2009 Debt
Maturity and Debt Issuance for information on the
March 2009 amendments to the credit facilities.
Capital Lease
Obligations
At January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, included in
capital lease obligations was $58.5 million and
$83.4 million, respectively, of vessel financing related to
two vessel leases denominated in British pound sterling. The
reduction in the capital lease obligation was primarily due to
the weakening of the British pound sterling against the
U.S. dollar during 2008, which resulted in the Company
recognizing $21.3 million of unrealized gains. These
unrealized gains were recorded as other income (expense), net in
the consolidated statement of operations. The interest rates on
these leases are based on LIBOR plus a spread. The remaining
$1.9 million of capital lease obligations relate primarily
to machinery and equipment. Interest rates under these leases
are fixed. The capital lease obligations are collateralized by
the underlying leased assets. Total payments, including
principal and interest, through the remaining life of the lease
total approximately $98.7 million. These leases expire in
2024.
Covenants
Provisions under the indentures to the Companys senior
notes and debentures require the Company to comply with certain
covenants. These covenants include limitations on, among other
things, indebtedness, investments, loans to subsidiaries,
employees and third parties, the issuance of guarantees and the
payment of dividends. The senior secured revolving credit
facility contains a springing covenant, but that
covenant has never been effective and would only become
effective if the availability under the revolving credit
facility were to fall below $35 million for any eight
consecutive business days, which it has never done during the
life of such facility. In the event that such availability were
to fall below $35 million for such eight consecutive
business day period, the springing covenant would
require that the Companys fixed charge coverage ratio,
defined as (x) consolidated EBITDA for the four consecutive
fiscal quarters then ending divided by (y) consolidated
fixed charges for such four fiscal quarter period, equal or
exceed 1.00:1.00. The Company expects such fixed charge coverage
ratio to continue to be in excess of 1.00:1.00. At
January 3, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all
applicable covenants. The Company amended its senior secured
credit facilities to, among other things, permit the Company to
issue a certain amount of junior lien notes; the amendment
became effective concurrently with the closing of the 2014 Notes
offering. The amendment to the term loan facilities will impose
a first priority secured leverage maintenance covenant on the
Company, which the Company expects to continue to be able to
satisfy.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in a debt instrument
governing the Companys current or future indebtedness
could result in a default under that instrument and, due to
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could result in
a default under the Companys other debt instruments. Upon
the occurrence of an event of default under the senior secured
credit facilities or other debt instrument, the lenders or
holders of such other debt instruments could elect to declare
all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and
terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If the
Company were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could
proceed against the
F-67
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
collateral granted to them, if any, to secure the indebtedness.
If the lenders under the Companys current indebtedness
were to accelerate the payment of the indebtedness, the Company
cannot give assurance that its assets or cash flow would be
sufficient to repay in full its outstanding indebtedness, in
which event the Company likely would seek reorganization or
protection under bankruptcy or other, similar laws.
The Companys parent, DHM Holding Company, Inc.
(HoldCo), entered into an amended and restated loan
agreement for $135 million on March 17, 2008 in
connection with its investment in Westlake Wellbeing Properties,
LLC. The obligations under such loan agreement mature on
March 3, 2010. In addition, a $20 million principal
payment on the loan is due on June 17, 2009. Failure to
make this payment when due would give lenders under this loan
agreement the right to accelerate that debt. Because HoldCo is a
party to the Doles senior secured credit facilities, any
failure of HoldCo to pay the $20 million principal payment
by June 17, 2009 or any other default under the HoldCo
agreement would result in a default under the Companys
senior secured credit facilities under the existing
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions set forth in
those senior secured credit facilities. If such a default were
to occur, the Companys senior secured credit facilities
could be declared due at the request of the lenders holding a
majority of the senior secured debt under the applicable
agreement and unless the default were waived the Company would
no longer have the ability to request advances or letters of
credit under its revolving credit facility. The acceleration of
the indebtedness under the senior secured credit facilities
would, if not cured within 30 days, also allow the holders
of 25% or more in principal amount of any series of the
Companys notes or debentures to accelerate the maturity of
such series. Although HoldCo has assured the Company that it
expects to have sufficient funds available from its shareholders
to timely make the $20 million principal payment by
June 17, 2009, there is no assurance that it will occur.
Debt Issuance
Costs
Expenses related to the issuance of long-term debt are
capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term of
the underlying debt. During the years ended January 3,
2009, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, the
Company amortized deferred debt issuance costs of
$4.1 million, $4.1 million and $4.4 million,
respectively.
The Company wrote off $8.1 million of deferred debt
issuance costs during the year ended December 30, 2006. The
2006 write-off was a result of a refinancing transaction that
occurred in April 2006. This write-off was recorded to other
income (expense), net in the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 30, 2006.
Fair Value of
Debt
The Company estimates the fair value of its unsecured notes and
debentures based on current quoted market prices. The term loans
are traded between institutional investors on the secondary loan
market, and the fair values of the term loans are based on the
last available trading price. The carrying value and estimated
fair values of the Companys debt is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
December 29, 2007
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Unsecured notes and debentures
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
809,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,105,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,350
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
|
|
585,855
|
|
|
|
960,375
|
|
|
|
902,753
|
|
F-68
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Maturities of
Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
Maturities with respect to notes payable and long-term debt as
of January 3, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
405,537
|
|
2010
|
|
|
412,114
|
|
2011
|
|
|
363,189
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,910
|
|
2013
|
|
|
960,498
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
49,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,204,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
In addition to amounts available under the revolving credit
facility, the Companys subsidiaries have uncommitted lines
of credit of approximately $142.9 million at various local
banks, of which $85.3 million was available at
January 3, 2009. These lines of credit are used primarily
for short-term borrowings, foreign currency exchange settlement
and the issuance of letters of credit or bank guarantees.
Several of the Companys uncommitted lines of credit expire
in 2009 while others do not have a commitment expiration date.
These arrangements may be cancelled at any time by the Company
or the banks. The Companys ability to utilize these lines
of credit may be impacted by the terms of its senior secured
credit facilities and bond indentures.
Note 13
Employee Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans
covering certain employees worldwide. Benefits under these plans
are generally based on each employees eligible
compensation and years of service, except for certain hourly
plans, which are based on negotiated benefits. In addition to
pension plans, the Company has other postretirement benefit
(OPRB) plans that provide certain health care and
life insurance benefits for eligible retired employees. Covered
employees may become eligible for such benefits if they fulfill
established requirements upon reaching retirement age.
The Company sponsors one qualified pension plan for
U.S. employees, which is funded. All but one of the
Companys international pension plans and all of its OPRB
plans are unfunded.
All pension benefits for U.S. salaried employees were
frozen in 2002. The assumption for the rate of compensation
increase of 2.5% on the U.S. plans represents the rate
associated with those participants whose benefits are negotiated
under collective bargaining arrangements.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for all of its
plans.
Adoption of
FAS 158
As of December 30, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (FAS 158), which changed the
accounting rules for reporting and disclosures related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans. FAS 158
requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or
liability in its statement of financial position and to
recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the
changes occur as a component of comprehensive income. The
standard also requires an employer to measure
F-69
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
the funded status as of the date of its year-end statement of
financial position. The adoption in 2006 had no effect on the
computation of net periodic benefit expense for pensions and
postretirement benefits.
Pension
Protection Act of 2006 and Worker, Retiree, and Employer
Recovery Act of 2008
In August 2006, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 was signed
into law. This legislation changed the method of valuing the
U.S. qualified pension plan assets and liabilities for
funding purposes, as well as the minimum funding requirements.
The Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 was
signed into law in December 2008. The combined effect of these
laws will be larger contributions over the next eight to ten
years, with the goal of being fully funded by the end of that
period. The amount of unfunded liability in future years will be
affected by future contributions, demographic changes,
investment returns on plan assets, and interest rates, so full
funding may be achieved sooner or later. The Company anticipates
funding pension contributions with cash from operations.
As a result of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and the
decrease in the value of the U.S. qualified plans
assets, the Company anticipates contributions averaging
approximately $12 million per year over the next nine
years. The Company also anticipates that certain forms of
benefit payments, such as lump sums, will be partially
restricted over the next few years.
OPRB Plan
Amendment
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company amended its
domestic OPRB Plan. This amendment became effective
January 1, 2009. The Company replaced health care coverage
(including prescription drugs) for Medicare eligible retirees
and surviving spouses who are age 65 and older with a new
Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA), whereby each
participant will be provided an annual amount in an HRA account.
The HRA account will be used to offset health care costs. This
plan amendment will reduce the benefit obligation by
$21.8 million. The amortization of this reduction in
liability, combined with a lower interest cost, will reduce the
expense for this plan by approximately $4.2 million for the
next 8 years and by $1.5 million thereafter.
F-70
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Obligations and Funded Status The
status of the Companys defined benefit pension and OPRB
plans was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
308,097
|
|
|
$
|
310,186
|
|
|
$
|
141,714
|
|
|
$
|
134,098
|
|
|
$
|
63,803
|
|
|
$
|
68,628
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
7,069
|
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
18,481
|
|
|
|
17,139
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,721
|
)
|
|
|
10,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(34,261
|
)
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
(7,736
|
)
|
|
|
(1,610
|
)
|
|
|
(5,194
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(25,404
|
)
|
|
|
(25,155
|
)
|
|
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
|
(11,171
|
)
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
267,062
|
|
|
$
|
308,097
|
|
|
$
|
94,822
|
|
|
$
|
141,714
|
|
|
$
|
40,025
|
|
|
$
|
63,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
237,881
|
|
|
$
|
236,712
|
|
|
$
|
38,485
|
|
|
$
|
35,036
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(49,237
|
)
|
|
|
17,451
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
8,873
|
|
|
|
17,874
|
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
5,254
|
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,001
|
)
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(25,404
|
)
|
|
|
(25,155
|
)
|
|
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
|
(11,171
|
)
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
165,533
|
|
|
$
|
237,881
|
|
|
$
|
3,924
|
|
|
$
|
38,485
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(101,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70,216
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(99,305
|
)
|
|
|
(70,216
|
)
|
|
|
(85,169
|
)
|
|
|
(103,229
|
)
|
|
|
(35,754
|
)
|
|
|
(63,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(101,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70,216
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company sold two European
businesses, each of which had defined benefit plans. The sale of
these businesses has been reflected in the tables above as
divestitures. Refer to Note 9 Assets
Held-For-Sale.
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
74,383
|
|
|
$
|
42,754
|
|
|
$
|
11,592
|
|
|
$
|
7,970
|
|
|
$
|
(8,091
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,136
|
)
|
Prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
(25,506
|
)
|
|
|
(5,460
|
)
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(27,894
|
)
|
|
|
(16,034
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
13,260
|
|
|
|
3,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,490
|
|
|
$
|
26,721
|
|
|
$
|
14,807
|
|
|
$
|
8,303
|
|
|
$
|
(20,337
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the Companys pension plans were underfunded at
January 3, 2009, having accumulated benefit obligations
exceeding the fair value of plan assets. The accumulated benefit
obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was
$333.8 million and $417.6 million at January 3,
2009 and December 29, 2007, respectively. The aggregate
projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and
fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated
benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
361,884
|
|
|
$
|
449,811
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
333,814
|
|
|
$
|
417,581
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
169,457
|
|
|
$
|
276,366
|
|
F-72
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Components of
Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Changes Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Loss
The components of net periodic benefit cost and other changes
recognized in other comprehensive loss for the Companys
U.S. and international pension plans and OPRB plans were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
1,550
|
|
|
$
|
7,069
|
|
|
$
|
6,947
|
|
|
$
|
4,443
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
18,481
|
|
|
|
17,139
|
|
|
|
16,878
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
7,165
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(18,139
|
)
|
|
|
(17,721
|
)
|
|
|
(18,021
|
)
|
|
|
(2,378
|
)
|
|
|
(2,473
|
)
|
|
|
(905
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
804
|
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
16,554
|
|
|
$
|
14,607
|
|
|
$
|
12,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-73
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other changes recognized in other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
33,115
|
|
|
$
|
6,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
|
$
|
(6,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
(1,485
|
)
|
|
|
(1,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(11,860
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
19,769
|
|
|
$
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,504
|
|
|
$
|
(6,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
21,746
|
|
|
$
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,058
|
|
|
$
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-74
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
3,908
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
Curtailments, settlements and terminations, net
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,125
|
|
|
$
|
4,128
|
|
|
$
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes recognized in other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain
|
|
$
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service benefit
|
|
|
(20,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net (loss) gain
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
9,936
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(12,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss, prior service cost and transition
obligation for the defined benefit pension plans that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net
periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is
$1.3 million of expense. The estimated actuarial net gain
and prior service benefit for the OPRB plans that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into
periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is
$4.1 million of income.
Assumptions
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Rate assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
|
|
7.52
|
%
|
|
|
7.03
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-75
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Rate assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.47
|
%
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
Compensation increase
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.85
|
%
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International plan discount rates, assumed rates of increase in
future compensation and expected long-term return on assets
differ from the assumptions used for U.S. plans due to
differences in the local economic conditions in the countries in
which the international plans are based.
The APBO for the Companys U.S. OPRB plan in 2008 and
2007 was determined using the following assumed annual rate of
increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 29,
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2009
|
|
2007
|
|
Health care costs trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Rate of increase to which the cost of benefits is assumed to
decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
The health care plan offered to retirees in the U.S. who
are age 65 or older was changed effective January 1,
2009 to provide the reimbursement of health care expenses up to
a certain fixed amount. There is no commitment to increase the
fixed dollar amount and no increase was assumed in determining
the APBO. Therefore, the trend rate applies only to benefits for
U.S. retirees prior to age 65 and to foreign retirees.
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following impact on the Companys OPRB
plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Percentage-Point
|
|
One-Percentage-Point
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Increase (decrease) in service and interest cost
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
(1,292
|
)
|
Plan
Assets
The following is the plans target asset mix, which
management believes provides the optimal tradeoff of
diversification and long-term asset growth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
Asset Class
|
|
Allocation
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Private equity and venture capital funds
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
F-76
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys U.S. pension plan weighted-average asset
allocations at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 29,
|
Asset Class
|
|
2009
|
|
2007
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Private equity and venture capital funds
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plans asset allocation includes a mix of fixed income
investments designed to reduce volatility and equity investments
designed to maintain funding ratios and long-term financial
health of the plan. The equity investments are diversified
across U.S. and international stocks as well as growth,
value, and small and large capitalizations.
Private equity and venture capital funds are used to enhance
long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. The
Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix
of fixed income and equity investments is used to maximize the
long-term return of plan assets with a prudent level of risk.
The objectives of this strategy are to achieve full funding of
the accumulated benefit obligation, and to achieve investment
experience over time that will minimize pension expense
volatility and minimize the Companys contributions
required to maintain full funding status. Risk tolerance is
established through careful consideration of plan liabilities,
plan funded status and corporate financial condition. Investment
risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through
annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies
and quarterly investment portfolio reviews.
The Companys actual weighted average asset allocation
varied from the Companys target allocation at
January 3, 2009 due to the economic volatility in the stock
and bond markets during 2008. The Company is currently assessing
its positions and expects to rebalance its portfolio during 2009.
The pension plan did not hold any of the Companys common
stock at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007.
The Company determines the expected return on pension plan
assets based on an expectation of average annual returns over an
extended period of years. The Company also considers the
weighted-average historical rate of returns on securities with
similar characteristics to those in which the Companys
pension assets are invested.
The Company applies the 10% corridor approach to
amortize unrecognized actuarial gains (losses) on both its
U.S. and international pension and OPRB plans. Under this
approach, only actuarial gains (losses) that exceed 10% of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the
market-related value of the plan assets are amortized. The
amortization period is based on the average remaining service
period of active employees expected to receive benefits under
each plan or over the life expectancy of inactive participants
where all, or nearly all, participants are inactive. For the
year ended January 3, 2009, the average remaining service
period used to amortize unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)
for its domestic plans was approximately 10.5 years.
Plan
Contributions and Estimated Future Benefit
Payments
During 2008, the Company did not make any contributions to its
qualified U.S. pension plan. Under the minimum funding
requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, no
contribution was
F-77
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
required for fiscal 2008. The Company expects to contribute
approximately $8 million to its U.S. qualified plan in
2009, which is the estimated minimum funding requirement
calculated under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Future
contributions to the U.S. pension plan in excess of the
minimum funding requirement are voluntary and may change
depending on the Companys operating performance or at
managements discretion. The Company expects to make
$15.7 million of payments related to its other
U.S. and foreign pension and OPRB plans in 2009.
The following table presents estimated future benefit payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
23,126
|
|
|
$
|
8,471
|
|
|
$
|
4,271
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,848
|
|
|
|
8,941
|
|
|
|
4,179
|
|
2011
|
|
|
22,385
|
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,375
|
|
|
|
9,110
|
|
|
|
3,999
|
|
2013
|
|
|
22,039
|
|
|
|
9,268
|
|
|
|
3,911
|
|
2014-2018
|
|
|
106,662
|
|
|
|
57,967
|
|
|
|
18,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
219,435
|
|
|
$
|
102,303
|
|
|
$
|
38,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
The Company offers defined contribution plans to eligible
employees. Such employees may defer a percentage of their annual
compensation in accordance with plan guidelines. Some of these
plans provide for a Company match that is subject to a maximum
contribution as defined by the plan. Company contributions to
its defined contribution plans totaled $8.1 million,
$7.6 million and $7.3 million in the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
Multi-Employer
Plans
The Company is also party to various industry-wide collective
bargaining agreements that provide pension benefits. Total
contributions to these plans for eligible participants were
approximately $1.6 million, $2.8 million and
$3.7 million in the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
Note 14
Shareholders Equity
The Companys authorized share capital as of
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007 consisted of
1,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock of which
1,000 shares were issued and outstanding. All issued and
outstanding shares are owned by DHC, a Delaware limited
liability company and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of DHM
Holding Company, Inc. (HoldCo).
Dividends
The Company did not declare or pay a dividend to its parent
during either of the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007. During the year ended December 30,
2006, the Company declared and paid dividends of
$163.7 million to DHC.
The Companys ability to declare dividends is limited under
the terms of its senior secured credit facilities and senior
notes indentures. As of January 3, 2009, the Company had no
ability to declare and pay dividends or other similar
distributions.
F-78
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Capital
Contributions and Return of Capital
There were no capital contributions or return of capital
transactions during either of the years ended January 3,
2009 and December 29, 2007.
On March 3, 2006, HoldCo executed a $150 million
senior secured term loan agreement. In March 2006, HoldCo
contributed $28.4 million to its wholly-owned subsidiary,
DHC, the Companys immediate parent, which contributed the
funds to the Company. As planned, in October 2006, the Company
declared a cash capital repayment of $28.4 million to DHC,
returning the $28.4 million capital contribution made by
DHC in March 2006. The Company repaid this amount during the
fourth quarter of 2006.
On October 4, 2006, the Company loaned $31 million to
DHC, which then dividended the funds to HoldCo for contribution
to Westlake Wellbeing Properties, LLC. In connection with this
funding, an intercompany loan agreement was entered into between
DHC and the Company. DHC has no operations and would need to
repay the loan with a dividend from the Company, a contribution
from HoldCo, or through a financing transaction. It is currently
anticipated that amounts under the intercompany loan agreement
will be replaced with dividend proceeds or the loan would be
forgiven in the future. The Company has accounted for the
intercompany loan as a distribution of additional paid-in
capital.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of changes to
shareholders equity, other than contributions from or
distributions to shareholders, and net income (loss). The
Companys other comprehensive income (loss) principally
consists of unrealized foreign currency translation gains and
losses, unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging
instruments and pension liability. The components of, and
changes in, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are
presented in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity.
Note 15
Business Segments
As discussed in Note 5, the Company approved and committed
to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers operating
segment and accordingly reclassified the results of operations
to discontinued operations. As a result of this reclassification
of the fresh-cut flowers segment, the Company now has three
reportable operating segments.
The Company has three reportable operating segments: fresh
fruit, fresh vegetables and packaged foods. These reportable
segments are managed separately due to differences in their
products, production processes, distribution channels and
customer bases.
Management evaluates and monitors segment performance primarily
through, among other measures, earnings before interest expense
and income taxes (EBIT). EBIT is calculated by
adding interest expense and income taxes to income (loss) from
continuing operations. Management believes that segment EBIT
provides useful information for analyzing the underlying
business results as well as allowing investors a means to
evaluate the financial results of each segment in relation to
the Company as a whole. EBIT is not defined under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for net income or cash flow measures prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of the Companys
profitability. Additionally, the Companys computation of
EBIT may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures
computed by other companies, because not all companies calculate
EBIT in the same fashion.
F-79
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the tables below, only revenues from external customers and
EBIT reflect results from continuing operations. Total assets,
depreciation and amortization and capital additions reflect
results from continuing and discontinued operations for 2008,
2007 and 2006.
The results of operations and financial position of the three
reportable operating segments and corporate were as follows:
Results of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
5,401,145
|
|
|
$
|
4,736,902
|
|
|
$
|
3,968,963
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
1,086,888
|
|
|
|
1,059,401
|
|
|
|
1,082,416
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
1,130,791
|
|
|
|
1,023,257
|
|
|
|
938,336
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
|
$
|
6,820,812
|
|
|
$
|
5,990,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
305,782
|
|
|
$
|
172,175
|
|
|
$
|
104,976
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
(21,668
|
)
|
|
|
(7,241
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
70,944
|
|
|
|
80,093
|
|
|
|
93,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
377,849
|
|
|
|
230,600
|
|
|
|
191,184
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
|
20,664
|
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(54,043
|
)
|
|
|
(59,506
|
)
|
|
|
(53,377
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(104,454
|
)
|
|
|
(70,247
|
)
|
|
|
(32,713
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(174,485
|
)
|
|
|
(194,851
|
)
|
|
|
(174,715
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
48,015
|
|
|
|
(4,054
|
)
|
|
|
(22,609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
146,925
|
|
|
$
|
(38,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate EBIT includes general and administrative costs not
allocated to operating segments.
Substantially all of the Companys equity earnings in
unconsolidated subsidiaries, which have been included in EBIT in
the table above, relate to the fresh fruit operating segment.
F-80
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial
Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
2,322,899
|
|
|
$
|
2,528,169
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
460,221
|
|
|
|
476,501
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
686,801
|
|
|
|
693,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
3,469,921
|
|
|
|
3,698,185
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
832,709
|
|
|
|
832,121
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers discontinued operations
|
|
|
61,989
|
|
|
|
112,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
$
|
4,642,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization and capital additions by segment
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
90,289
|
|
|
$
|
96,480
|
|
|
$
|
92,196
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
19,420
|
|
|
|
18,414
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
|
|
32,989
|
|
|
|
31,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
135,128
|
|
|
|
147,883
|
|
|
|
139,394
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
3,498
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,828
|
|
|
$
|
155,605
|
|
|
$
|
149,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
44,381
|
|
|
$
|
52,511
|
|
|
$
|
41,286
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
9,152
|
|
|
|
27,433
|
|
|
|
52,990
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
20,111
|
|
|
|
23,913
|
|
|
|
19,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
73,644
|
|
|
|
103,857
|
|
|
|
114,004
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
76,915
|
|
|
$
|
107,230
|
|
|
$
|
119,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys revenues from external customers and tangible
long-lived assets by country/region were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,982,968
|
|
|
$
|
2,669,932
|
|
|
$
|
2,580,820
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
723,195
|
|
|
|
590,218
|
|
|
|
578,504
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
564,499
|
|
|
|
474,139
|
|
|
|
354,390
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
551,555
|
|
|
|
470,570
|
|
|
|
439,741
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
242,258
|
|
|
|
329,999
|
|
|
|
108,040
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
287,758
|
|
|
|
262,217
|
|
|
|
222,846
|
|
Other Euro zone countries
|
|
|
944,470
|
|
|
|
817,082
|
|
|
|
744,416
|
|
Other international
|
|
|
1,323,249
|
|
|
|
1,206,655
|
|
|
|
962,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
|
$
|
6,820,812
|
|
|
$
|
5,990,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No individual country in the Other international category above
had material revenues from external customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Tangible long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
|
$
|
654,051
|
|
Oceangoing assets
|
|
|
134,681
|
|
|
|
161,531
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
144,114
|
|
|
|
148,786
|
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|
96,916
|
|
|
|
97,576
|
|
Honduras
|
|
|
79,298
|
|
|
|
77,093
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
48,647
|
|
|
|
56,974
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
64,426
|
|
|
|
54,254
|
|
Other international
|
|
|
140,487
|
|
|
|
245,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,495,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16
Operating Leases and Other Commitments
In addition to obligations recorded on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 3, 2009, the
Company has commitments under cancelable and non-cancelable
operating leases, primarily for land, machinery and equipment,
vessels and containers and office and warehouse facilities. A
significant portion of the Companys lease payments are
fixed. Total rental expense, including rent related to
cancelable and non-cancelable leases, was $204.2 million,
$169.2 million and $153 million (net of sublease
income of $17.1 million, $16.6 million and
$16.4 million) for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
The Company modified the terms of its corporate aircraft lease
agreement during 2007. The modification primarily extended the
lease period from terminating in 2010 to 2018. The
Companys corporate aircraft lease agreement includes a
residual value guarantee of up to $4.8 million at the
termination of the lease in 2018.
F-82
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of January 3, 2009, the Companys non-cancelable
minimum lease commitments, including the residual value
guarantee, before sublease income, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
143,054
|
|
2010
|
|
|
110,736
|
|
2011
|
|
|
85,026
|
|
2012
|
|
|
62,842
|
|
2013
|
|
|
47,677
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
115,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
564,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expected future sublease income expected to be earned over
7 years is $42.6 million.
In order to secure sufficient product to meet demand and to
supplement the Companys own production, the Company has
entered into non-cancelable agreements with independent growers,
primarily in Latin America and North America, to purchase
substantially all of their production subject to market demand
and product quality. Prices under these agreements are generally
tied to prevailing market rates and contract terms generally
range from one to ten years. Total purchases under these
agreements were $658.8 million, $564.5 million and
$474.5 million for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
At January 3, 2009, aggregate future payments under such
purchase commitments (based on January 3, 2009 pricing and
volumes) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
622,921
|
|
2010
|
|
|
395,143
|
|
2011
|
|
|
348,642
|
|
2012
|
|
|
218,687
|
|
2013
|
|
|
184,596
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
131,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,901,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to ensure a steady supply of packing supplies and to
maximize volume incentive rebates, the Company has entered into
contracts for the purchase of packing supplies; some of these
contracts run through 2010. Prices under these agreements are
generally tied to prevailing market rates. Purchases under these
contracts for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006 were
approximately $292.6 million, $272.7 million and
$207.6 million, respectively.
Under these contracts, the Company was committed at
January 3, 2009, to purchase packing supplies, assuming
current price levels, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
158,638
|
|
2010
|
|
|
133,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
292,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-83
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has numerous collective bargaining agreements with
various unions covering approximately 35% of the Companys
hourly full-time and seasonal employees. Of the unionized
employees, 35% are covered under a collective bargaining
agreement that will expire within one year and the remaining 65%
are covered under collective bargaining agreements expiring
beyond the upcoming year. These agreements are subject to
periodic negotiation and renewal. Failure to renew any of these
collective bargaining agreements may result in a strike or work
stoppage; however, management does not expect that the outcome
of these negotiations and renewals will have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial condition or results of
operations.
Note 17
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations, bunker fuel price fluctuations and interest rate
changes in the normal course of its business. As part of its
risk management strategy, the Company uses derivative
instruments to hedge certain foreign currency, bunker fuel and
interest rate exposures. The Companys objective is to
offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with
losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them,
thereby reducing volatility of earnings. The Company does not
hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended (FAS 133),
establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that
every derivative instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as
either an asset or liability and measured at fair value.
FAS 133 also requires that changes in the derivatives
fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific
criteria are met and that a company must formally document,
designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that
receive hedge accounting. For those instruments that qualify for
hedge accounting as cash flow hedges, any unrealized gains or
losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), with the corresponding asset or liability recorded on
the balance sheet. Any portion of a cash flow hedge that is
deemed to be ineffective is recognized into current period
earnings. When the transaction underlying the hedge is
recognized into earnings, the related other comprehensive income
(loss) is reclassified to current period earnings.
Through the first quarter of 2007, all of the Companys
derivative instruments, with the exception of the cross currency
swap, were designated as effective hedges of cash flows as
defined by FAS 133. However, during the second quarter of
2007, the Company elected to discontinue its designation of both
its foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges as cash flow hedges
under FAS 133. The interest rate swap continues to be
accounted for as a cash flow hedge under FAS 133. As a
result, all changes in the fair value of the Companys
derivative financial instruments from the time of
discontinuation of hedge accounting are reflected in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations. Gains and
losses on foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges are recorded
as a component of cost of products sold in the consolidated
statement of operations. Gains and losses related to the
interest rate swap are recorded as a component of interest
expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Foreign
Currency Hedges
Some of the Companys divisions operate in functional
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, the
Company enters into cash flow derivative instruments to hedge
portions of anticipated revenue streams and operating expenses.
At January 3, 2009, the Company had forward contract hedges
for forecasted revenue transactions denominated in the Japanese
yen, the Euro and the Swedish krona and for forecasted operating
expenses denominated in the Chilean peso, Colombian peso and the
Philippine peso. The Company uses foreign currency exchange
forward contracts and
F-84
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
participating forward contracts to reduce its risk related to
anticipated dollar equivalent foreign currency cash flows.
In addition, the net assets of some of the Companys
foreign subsidiaries are exposed to foreign currency translation
gains and losses, which are included as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
shareholders equity. The Company has historically not
attempted to hedge this equity risk.
At January 3, 2009, the gross notional value and fair
market value of the Companys foreign currency hedges were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Notional Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Participating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
Strike
|
|
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Hedges(Buy/Sell):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
$
|
(9,800
|
)
|
|
JPY
|
104
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Euro
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
EUR
|
1.43
|
|
Euro/Swedish Krona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
SEK
|
11.09
|
|
Chilean Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
CLP
|
668
|
|
Colombian Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,262
|
|
|
|
52,262
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
COP
|
2,294
|
|
Philippine Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,053
|
|
|
|
39,053
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
PHP
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
247,681
|
|
|
$
|
118,519
|
|
|
$
|
366,200
|
|
|
$
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 29, 2007 the Company had outstanding hedges
denominated in the Japanese yen, the Euro, the Canadian dollar,
the Chilean peso and the Thai baht. The fair market value of
these hedges was a liability of $12.1 million at
December 29, 2007.
Bunker Fuel
Hedges
The Company enters into bunker fuel hedges for its shipping
operations to reduce its risk related to price fluctuations on
anticipated bunker fuel purchases. At January 3, 2009, the
notional volume and the fair market value of the Companys
bunker fuel hedges were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Volume
|
|
Value
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(per metric ton)
|
|
Bunker Fuel Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rotterdam
|
|
|
15,018
|
|
|
$
|
(3,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
At December 29, 2007, the fair market value of the bunker
fuel hedges was an asset of $1.1 million, which included
$0.4 million related to unsettled bunker fuel hedges that
received FAS 133 treatment prior to the discontinuation of
hedge accounting during the second quarter of 2007.
For both the foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges, the fair
market value of these instruments is recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet as either a current asset or current
liability. Settlement of these hedges will occur during 2009.
F-85
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net unrealized gains (losses) and realized gains (losses)
included as a component of cost of products sold in the
consolidated statement of operations on the foreign currency and
bunker fuel hedges for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts and other
|
|
$
|
6,002
|
|
|
$
|
(12,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts discontinued
operations
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
(11,316
|
)
|
|
|
(1,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gains (Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
(11,255
|
)
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
6,098
|
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
(3,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,313
|
)
|
|
|
22,720
|
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,404
|
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the exception of some Colombian peso hedges, all unrealized
gains (losses) on foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges for
2006 were included as a component of other comprehensive income
(loss) in shareholders equity. Unrealized losses for 2006
included in the table above relate to Colombian peso hedges that
did not receive FAS 133 treatment and the ineffective
portion of bunker fuel hedges. The realized and unrealized gains
(losses) related to discontinued operations were included as a
component of loss from discontinued operations.
Interest Rate
and Cross Currency Swaps
As discussed in Note 12, the Company completed an amendment
and restatement of its senior secured credit facilities in April
2006. As a result of this refinancing transaction, the Company
recognized a gain of $6.5 million related to the settlement
of its interest rate swap associated with its then existing Term
Loan A. This amount was recorded to other income (expense), net
in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 30, 2006.
In June 2006, subsequent to the refinancing transaction, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap in order to hedge
future changes in interest rates. This agreement effectively
converted $320 million of borrowings under Term Loan C,
which was variable-rate debt, to a fixed-rate basis through June
2011. The interest rate swap fixed the interest rate at 7.24%.
The paying and receiving rates under the interest rate swap were
5.49% and 4.82% as of January 3, 2009, with an outstanding
notional amount of $320 million. The critical terms of the
interest rate swap were substantially the same as those of Term
Loan C, including quarterly principal and interest settlements.
The interest rate swap hedge has been designated as an effective
hedge of cash flows as defined by FAS 133. The fair value
of the interest rate swap was a liability of $26.5 million
and $15.9 million at January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007, respectively. Net payments of the
interest rate swap are recorded as a component of interest
expense in the consolidated statements of operations for 2008
and 2007. Net payments were $5.6 million and
$0.4 million for the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007, respectively.
F-86
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, in June 2006, the Company executed a cross currency
swap to synthetically convert $320 million of Term Loan C
into Japanese yen denominated debt in order to effectively lower
the U.S. dollar fixed interest rate of 7.24% to a Japanese
yen interest rate of 3.6%. Payments under the cross currency
swap were converted from U.S. dollars to Japanese yen at an
exchange rate of ¥111.9. At January 3, 2009, the
exchange rate of the Japanese yen to U.S. dollar was
¥90.6. The value of the cross currency swap will fluctuate
based on changes in the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen
exchange rate and market interest rates until maturity in 2011,
at which time it will settle in cash at the then current
exchange rate. The fair market value of the cross currency swap
was a liability of $40.5 million and an asset of
$9.9 million at January 3, 2009 and December 29,
2007, respectively.
The unrealized gains (losses) and realized gains on the cross
currency swap for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,664
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
24,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on the cross currency
swap are recorded through other income (expense), net in the
consolidated statements of operations.
FAS 157
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted FAS 157 as
of December 30, 2007 for financial assets and liabilities
measured on a recurring basis and the impact of the adoption was
not material. FAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. These levels, in order of
highest to lowest priority are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not
quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by
market data.
The fair values of the Companys derivative instruments are
determined using Level 2 inputs, which are defined as
significant other observable inputs. The fair values
of the foreign currency exchange contracts, bunker fuel
contracts, interest rate swap and cross currency swap were
estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based
upon forward foreign currency exchange rates, bunker fuel
futures, interest-rate yield curves or quotes obtained from
brokers for contracts with similar terms less any credit
valuation adjustments. The Company recorded a credit valuation
adjustment at January 3, 2009 which reduced the derivative
liability balances by approximately $16.3 million and
resulted in a corresponding decrease in the unrealized loss
recorded for the derivative instruments. Approximately
$2.7 million of the credit valuation adjustment was
recorded as a component of interest expense and
$13.6 million was recorded as a component of other income
(expense), net.
F-87
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of
assets and liabilities under the FAS 157 hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurements at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
26,467
|
|
|
|
26,467
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
|
40,488
|
|
|
|
40,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,771
|
|
|
$
|
81,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk
The counterparties to the foreign currency exchange forward
contracts, bunker fuel hedges and the interest rate swap consist
of a number of major international financial institutions. The
Company has established counterparty guidelines and regularly
monitors its positions and the financial strength of these
institutions. While counterparties to hedging contracts expose
the Company to credit-related losses in the event of a
counterpartys non-performance, the risk would be limited
to the unrealized gains on such affected contracts. The Company
does not anticipate any such losses.
Note 18
Contingencies
The Company is a guarantor of indebtedness to some of its key
fruit suppliers and other entities integral to the
Companys operations. At January 3, 2009, guarantees
of $3.2 million consisted primarily of amounts advanced
under third-party bank agreements to independent growers that
supply the Company with product. The Company has not
historically experienced any significant losses associated with
these guarantees.
The Company issues letters of credit and bank guarantees through
its ABL revolver and its pre-funded letter of credit facilities,
and, in addition, separately through major banking institutions.
The Company also provides insurance company issued bonds. These
letters of credit, bank guarantees and insurance company bonds
are required by certain regulatory authorities, suppliers and
other operating agreements. As of January 3, 2009, total
letters of credit, bank guarantees and bonds outstanding under
these arrangements were $107.3 million, of which
$71 million were issued under its pre-funded letter of
credit facility.
The Company also provides various guarantees, mostly to foreign
banks, in the course of its normal business operations to
support the borrowings, leases and other obligations of its
subsidiaries. The Company guaranteed $218.8 million of its
subsidiaries obligations to their suppliers and other
third parties as of January 3, 2009.
F-88
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has change of control agreements with certain key
executives, under which severance payments and benefits would
become payable in the event of specified terminations of
employment following a change of control (as defined) of the
Company.
The Company is involved from time to time in claims and legal
actions incidental to its operations, both as plaintiff and
defendant. The Company has established what management currently
believes to be adequate reserves for pending legal matters.
These reserves are established as part of an ongoing worldwide
assessment of claims and legal actions that takes into
consideration such items as changes in the pending case load
(including resolved and new matters), opinions of legal counsel,
individual developments in court proceedings, changes in the
law, changes in business focus, changes in the litigation
environment, changes in opponent strategy and tactics, new
developments as a result of ongoing discovery, and past
experience in defending and settling similar claims. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with outside counsel,
the claims or actions to which the Company is a party are not
expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in
the aggregate, on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
DBCP Cases: A significant portion of the
Companys legal exposure relates to lawsuits pending in the
United States and in several foreign countries, alleging injury
as a result of exposure to the agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane). DBCP was manufactured by several
chemical companies including Dow and Shell and registered by the
U.S. government for use on food crops. The Company and
other growers applied DBCP on banana farms in Latin America and
the Philippines and on pineapple farms in Hawaii. Specific
periods of use varied among the different locations. The Company
halted all purchases of DBCP, including for use in foreign
countries, when the U.S. EPA cancelled the registration of
DBCP for use in the United States in 1979. That cancellation was
based in part on a 1977 study by a manufacturer which indicated
an apparent link between male sterility and exposure to DBCP
among factory workers producing the product, as well as early
product testing done by the manufacturers showing testicular
effects on animals exposed to DBCP. To date, there is no
reliable evidence demonstrating that field application of DBCP
led to sterility among farm workers, although that claim is made
in the pending lawsuits. Nor is there any reliable scientific
evidence that DBCP causes any other injuries in humans, although
plaintiffs in the various actions assert claims based on cancer,
birth defects and other general illnesses.
Currently there are 249 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaragua judgments. In addition, there
are 150 labor cases pending in Costa Rica under that
countrys national insurance program.
Thirty-three of the 249 lawsuits are currently pending in
various jurisdictions in the United States. Eighteen lawsuits in
Los Angeles Superior Court brought by foreign workers who
alleged exposure to DBCP in countries where Dole did not even
have operations during the relevant period, are to be dismissed
without prejudice by March 30, 2009 pursuant to a tolling
agreement which terminates on December 31, 2012. Two
additional lawsuits in Texas and in Hawaii were also dismissed.
On April
21-23, 2009
the Los Angeles Superior Court will hold a scheduled hearing on
an order to show cause as why the two pending lawsuits
(including the case with a previous trial date of
September 10, 2009) brought by Nicaraguan plaintiffs
should not be terminated with prejudice, pursuant to the
courts stated inherent power and responsibility to
terminate litigation if deliberate and egregious misconduct
makes any sanctions other than dismissal inadequate to ensure a
fair trial. One of two U.S. law firms representing the
plaintiffs in these two pending lawsuits has filed a notice of
discharge of attorneys of record; and the second law firm has
filed a motion to be relieved as counsel for the plaintiffs.
Another case pending in Hawaii Superior Court with 10 plaintiffs
from Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador and Panama currently has a
trial date of January 18, 2010. The remaining cases are
pending in Latin America and the Philippines. Claimed damages in
DBCP cases worldwide total approximately
F-89
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
$44.5 billion, with lawsuits in Nicaragua representing
approximately 88% of this amount. Typically in these cases the
Company is a joint defendant with the major DBCP manufacturers.
Except as described below, none of these lawsuits has resulted
in a verdict or judgment against the Company.
One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court with 12
Nicaraguan plaintiffs initially resulted in verdicts which
totaled approximately $5 million in damages against Dole in
favor of six of the plaintiffs. As a result of the courts
March 7, 2008 favorable rulings on Doles post-verdict
motions, including, importantly, the courts decision
striking down punitive damages in the case on
U.S. Constitutional grounds, the damages against Dole have
now been reduced to $1.58 million in total compensatory
awards to four of the plaintiffs; and the court granted
Doles motion for a new trial as to the claims of one of
the plaintiffs. The parties in this lawsuit have filed appeals.
Once the court makes its determination of costs, the Company
will file an appeal bond, which will further stay the judgment
pending the resolution of the appeal. Additionally, the court
appointed a mediator to explore possible settlement of all DBCP
cases currently pending before the court.
In Nicaragua, 196 cases are currently filed (of which 20 are
active) in various courts throughout the country, all but one of
which were brought pursuant to Law 364, an October 2000
Nicaraguan statute that contains substantive and procedural
provisions that Nicaraguas Attorney General formally
opined are unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court
of Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional. Thirty-two cases
have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua: $489.4 million
(nine cases consolidated with 468 claimants) on
December 11, 2002; $82.9 million (one case with 58
claimants) on February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one
case with 20 claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million
(one case with four claimants) on May 25, 2004;
$56.5 million (one case with 72 claimants) on June 14,
2004; $64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with 39
claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million (one case
with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005; $46.4 million
(one case with 62 claimants) on August 20, 2005;
$809 million (six cases consolidated with 1,248 claimants)
on December 1, 2006; $38.4 million (one case with 192
claimants) on November 14, 2007; and $357.7 million
(eight cases with 417 claimants) on January 12, 2009, which
the Company recently learned of unofficially. Except for the
latest one, the Company has appealed all judgments, with
Doles appeal of the August 8, 2005 $98.5 million
judgment and of the December 1, 2006 $809 million
judgment currently pending before the Nicaragua Court of Appeal.
Dole will appeal the $357.7 million judgment once it has
been served.
The 20 active cases are currently pending in civil courts in
Managua (9), Chinandega (10) and Puerto Cabezas (1), all of
which have been brought under Law 364 except for one of the
cases pending in Chinandega. In 2 of the 9 cases in Managua
(Dole has not been ordered to answer in seven cases), the
Company has sought to have the cases returned to the United
States pursuant to Law 364. Doles requests are still
pending and the Company expects to make similar requests in the
remaining seven cases at the appropriate time. In four of the 10
cases in Chinandega (Dole has not been ordered to answer in six
cases), the Company has sought to have the cases returned to the
United States pursuant to Law 364. In one case, the Chinandega
court has ordered the plaintiffs to respond to our request; in
two cases, the court had denied the Companys requests, and
Dole has appealed that decision; and in the other case, the
court has not yet ruled on Doles request. In the one case
in Puerto Cabezas, the Company has sought to have the case
returned to the United States, and Dole has appealed the
courts denial of the Companys request.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision, which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals
F-90
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions
against Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the
Court of Appeals in that case. A Special Master appointed by the
Court of Appeals has recommended that Plaintiffs counsel
be ordered to pay Defendants fees and costs up to $130,000
each to Dole and the other two defendants; and following such
recommendation, the Court of Appeals has appointed a special
prosecutor.
Claimants have also sought to enforce the Nicaraguan judgments
in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. In addition, there is one
case pending in the U.S. District Court in Miami, Florida
seeking enforcement of the August 8, 2005
$98.5 million Nicaraguan judgment. This case is currently
stayed. In Venezuela, the claimants have attempted to enforce
five of the Nicaraguan judgments in that countrys Supreme
Court: $489.4 million (December 11, 2002);
$82.9 million (February 25, 2004); $15.7 million
(May 25, 2004); $56.5 million (June 14, 2004);
and $64.8 million (June 15, 2004). These cases are
currently inactive. An action filed to enforce the
$27.7 million Nicaraguan judgment (March 17,
2005) in the Colombian Supreme Court was dismissed. In
Ecuador, the claimants attempted to enforce the five Nicaraguan
judgments issued between February 25, 2004 through
June 15, 2004 in the Ecuador Supreme Court. The First,
Second and Third Chambers of the Ecuador Supreme Court issued
rulings refusing to consider those enforcement actions on the
ground that the Supreme Court was not a court of competent
jurisdiction for enforcement of a foreign judgment. The
plaintiffs subsequently refiled those five enforcement actions
in the civil court in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Two of these
subsequently filed enforcement actions have been dismissed by
the 3rd Civil Court $15.7 million
(May 25, 2004) and the 12th Civil
Court $56.5 million (June 14,
2004) in Guayaquil; plaintiffs have sought
reconsideration of those dismissals. The remaining three
enforcement actions are still pending.
The Company believes that none of the Nicaraguan judgments will
be enforceable against any Dole entity in the U.S. or in
any other country, because Nicaraguas Law 364 is
unconstitutional and violates international principles of due
process. Among other things, Law 364 is an improper
special law directed at particular parties; it
requires defendants to pay large, non-refundable deposits in
order to even participate in the litigation; it provides a
severely truncated procedural process; it establishes an
irrebuttable presumption of causation that is contrary to the
evidence and scientific data; and it sets unreasonable minimum
damages that must be awarded in every case.
On October 23, 2006, Dole announced that Standard Fruit de
Honduras, S.A. reached an agreement with the Government of
Honduras and representatives of Honduran banana workers. This
agreement establishes a Worker Program that is intended by the
parties to resolve in a fair and equitable manner the claims of
male banana workers alleging sterility as a result of exposure
to DBCP. The Honduran Worker Program will not have a material
effect on Doles financial condition or results of
operations. The official start of the Honduran Worker Program
was announced on January 8, 2007. On August 15, 2007,
Shell Oil Company was included in the Worker Program.
As to all the DBCP matters, the Company has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. While Dole believes there is no
reliable scientific basis for alleged injuries from the
agricultural field application of DBCP, Dole continues to seek
reasonable resolution of other pending litigation and claims in
the U.S. and Latin America. For example, as in Honduras,
Dole is committed to finding a prompt resolution to the DBCP
claims in Nicaragua, and is prepared to pursue a structured
worker program in Nicaragua with science-based criteria.
Although no assurance can be given concerning the outcome of
these cases, in the opinion of management, after consultation
with legal counsel and based on past experience defending and
settling DBCP claims, the pending lawsuits are not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
European Union Antitrust Inquiry: On
October 15, 2008, the European Commission (EC)
adopted a Decision against Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole
Fresh Fruit Europe OHG (collectively
F-91
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Dole) and against other unrelated banana companies,
finding violations of the European competition (antitrust) laws.
The Decision imposes 45.6 million in fines on Dole.
The Decision follows a Statement of Objections, issued by the EC
on July 25, 2007, and searches carried out by the EC in
June 2005 at certain banana importers and distributors,
including two of Doles offices. On November 28 and 29,
2007, the EC conducted searches of certain of the Companys
offices in Italy and Spain, as well as of other companies
offices located in these countries.
Dole received the Decision on October 21, 2008 and appealed
the Decision on December 24, 2008.
On December 3, 2008, the EC agreed in writing that if Dole
makes an initial payment of $10 million to the EC on or
before January 22, 2009, the EC will stay the deadline for
a provisional payment, or coverage by a prime bank guaranty, of
the remaining balance (plus interest as from January 22,
2009), until April 30, 2009. Dole made this initial
$10 million (7.6 million) payment on
January 21, 2009 and it will be included in other assets in
the Companys first quarter 2009 consolidated balance sheet.
Although no assurances can be given, and although there could be
a material adverse effect on the Company, the Company believes
that it has not violated the European competition laws. No
accrual for the Decision has been made in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements, since the Company cannot
determine at this time the amount of probable loss, if any,
incurred as a result of the Decision.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, the Company
received a tax assessment from Honduras of approximately
$137 million (including the claimed tax, penalty, and
interest through the date of assessment) relating to the
disposition of all of our interest in Cervecería
Hondureña, S.A. in 2001. Dole believes the assessment is
without merit and filed an appeal with the Honduran tax
authorities, which was denied. As a result of the denial in the
administrative process, in order to negate the tax assessment,
on August 5, 2005, the Company proceeded to the next stage
of the appellate process by filing a lawsuit against the
Honduran government in the Honduran Administrative Tax Trial
Court. The Honduran government sought dismissal of the lawsuit
and attachment of assets, which Dole challenged. The Honduran
Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Honduran intermediate
appellate court that a statutory prerequisite to challenging the
tax assessment on the merits is the payment of the tax
assessment or the filing of a payment plan with the Honduran
courts; Dole has challenged the constitutionality of the statute
requiring such payment or payment plan. Although no assurance
can be given concerning the outcome of this case, in the opinion
of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the
pending lawsuits and tax-related matters are not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
Hurricane Katrina Cases: Dole was one of a
number of parties sued, including the Mississippi State Port
Authority as well as other third-party terminal operators, in
connection with the August 2005 Hurricane Katrina. The
plaintiffs asserted that they suffered property damage because
of the defendants alleged failure to reasonably secure
shipping containers at the Gulfport, Mississippi port terminal
before Hurricane Katrina hit. Dole prevailed in its motions to
dismiss several of these cases, and the remainder were
voluntarily withdrawn. No further litigation is pending against
the Company related to Hurricane Katrina, and any new claims
would now be time-barred.
Spinach E. coli Outbreak: On
September 15, 2006, Natural Selection Foods LLC recalled
all packaged fresh spinach that Natural Selection Foods produced
and packaged with Best-If-Used-By dates from August 17 through
October 1, 2006, because of reports of illness due to E.
coli O157:H7 following consumption of packaged fresh spinach
produced by Natural Selection Foods. These packages were sold
under 28 different brand names, only one of which was ours. At
that time, Natural
F-92
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Selection Foods produced and packaged all of our spinach items.
Dole has no ownership or other economic interest in Natural
Selection Foods.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on
September 29, 2006 that all spinach implicated in the
current outbreak has traced back to Natural Selection Foods. The
FDA stated that this determination was based on epidemiological
and laboratory evidence obtained by multiple states and
coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The trace back investigation has narrowed to four implicated
fields on four ranches. FDA and the State of California
announced October 12, 2006 that the test results for
certain samples collected during the field investigation of the
outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in spinach were positive for E. coli
O157:H7. Specifically, samples of cattle feces on one of the
implicated ranches tested positive based on matching genetic
fingerprints for the same strain of E. coli O157:H7 found in the
infected persons. To date, 204 cases of illness due to E. coli
O157:H7 infection have been reported to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (203 in 26 states and one in Canada)
including 31 cases involving a type of kidney failure called
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS), 104 hospitalizations, and three
deaths. The vast majority of the spinach E. coli O157:H7 claims
were handled outside the formal litigation process, and Dole
expects that to continue to be true for the few remaining
claims. Since Natural Selection Foods, not Dole, produced and
packaged the implicated spinach products, Dole has tendered the
defense of these and other claims to Natural Selection Foods and
its insurance carriers and has sought indemnity from Natural
Selection Foods, based on the provisions of the contract between
Dole and Natural Selection Foods. The company (and its insurance
carriers) that grew the implicated spinach for Natural Selection
Foods is involved in the resolution of the E. coli O157:H7
claims. Dole expects that the spinach E. coli O157:H7 matter
will not have a material adverse effect on Doles financial
condition or results of operations.
Note 19
Related Party Transactions
David H. Murdock, the Companys Chairman, owns, inter
alia, Castle & Cooke, Inc. (Castle), a
transportation equipment leasing company, a private dining club
and a hotel. During the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, the Company
paid Mr. Murdocks companies an aggregate of
approximately $9.3 million, $7.2 million and
$7.6 million, respectively, primarily for the rental of
truck chassis, generator sets and warehousing services. Castle
purchased approximately $0.7 million, $0.7 million and
$1.1 million of products from the Company during the years
ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
The Company and Castle are responsible for 68% and 32%,
respectively, of all obligations under an aircraft lease
arrangement. Each party is responsible for the direct costs
associated with its use of this aircraft, and all other indirect
costs are shared proportionately. During the year ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, the Companys proportionate share
of the direct and indirect costs for this aircraft was
$2.2 million, $2 million and $1.9 million,
respectively.
The Company and Castle operate their risk management departments
on a joint basis. Insurance procurement and premium costs are
based on the relative risk borne by each company as determined
by the insurance underwriters. Administrative costs of the risk
management department, which were not significant, are shared on
a 50-50
basis.
The Company retains risk for commercial property losses
sustained by the Company and Castle totaling $3 million in
the aggregate and $3 million per occurrence, above which
the Company has coverage provided through third-party insurance
carriers. The arrangement provides for premiums to be paid to
the Company by Castle in exchange for the Companys
retained risk. The Company received approximately
$0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million from
Castle during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
F-93
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company had a number of other transactions with Castle and
other entities owned by Mr. Murdock, generally on an
arms-length basis, none of which, individually or in the
aggregate, were material. The Company had outstanding net
accounts receivable of $1.2 million and a note receivable
of $5.7 million due from Castle at January 3, 2009 and
outstanding net accounts receivable of $0.5 million and a
note receivable of $6 million due from Castle at
December 29, 2007.
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company and Castle
executed a lease agreement pursuant to which the Companys
fresh vegetables operations occupy an office building in
Monterey, California, which is owned by Castle. Rent expense for
the years ended January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
totaled $1.4 million and $1 million, respectively.
Note 20
Impact of Hurricane Katrina
During the third quarter of 2005, the Companys operations
in the Gulf Coast area of the United States were impacted by
Hurricane Katrina. The Companys fresh fruit division
utilizes the Gulfport, Mississippi port facility to receive and
store product from its Latin American operations. The Gulfport
facility, which is leased from the Mississippi Port Authority,
incurred significant damage from Hurricane Katrina. As a result
of the damage sustained at the Gulfport terminal, the Company
diverted shipments to other Dole port facilities including
Freeport, Texas; Port Everglades, Florida; and Wilmington,
Delaware. The Company resumed discharging shipments of fruit and
other cargo in Gulfport during the fourth quarter of 2005. The
rebuilding of the Companys Gulfport facility was completed
during 2007.
The financial impact to the Companys fresh fruit
operations included the loss of cargo and equipment, property
damage and additional costs associated with re-routing product
to other ports in the region. Equipment that was destroyed or
damaged included refrigerated and dry shipping containers, as
well as chassis and generator-sets used for land transportation
of the shipping containers. The Company maintains customary
insurance for its property, including shipping containers, as
well as for business interruption.
The Hurricane Katrina related expenses, insurance proceeds and
net gain (loss) on the settlement of the claims for 2007, 2006
and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total Cargo and Property Policies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
(551
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,768
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,407
|
)
|
Insurance proceeds
|
|
|
9,607
|
|
|
|
8,004
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
23,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
$
|
6,236
|
|
|
$
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges of $12.4 million include direct incremental
expenses of $6.1 million, write-offs of owned assets with a
net book value of $4.1 million and leased assets of
$2.2 million representing amounts due to lessors. The
Company settled all of its cargo claim for $9.2 million in
December 2006 and, as a result, recognized a gain of
$5.2 million in 2006. In December 2007, the Company settled
all of its property claim for $14.4 million. The Company
realized a gain of $9.1 million in 2007 associated with the
settlement of its property claim, of which $5.2 million was
for the reimbursement of lost and damaged property. The realized
gains associated with the settlements of both the cargo and
property claims are recorded in cost of products sold in the
consolidated statement of operations in 2007 and 2006.
F-94
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 21
Guarantor Financial Information
In connection with the issuance of the 2011 Notes in March 2003
and the 2010 Notes in May 2003, all of the Companys
wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (Guarantors) have
fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several
basis, the Companys obligations under the indentures
related to such Notes and to the Companys 2009 Notes, 2013
Debentures and 2014 Notes (the Guarantees). Each
Guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to the
Guarantors existing and future senior debt, including
obligations under the senior secured credit facilities, and will
rank pari passu with all senior subordinated indebtedness of the
applicable Guarantor.
The accompanying guarantor consolidating financial information
is presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods
presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are
recorded at cost and adjusted for the Companys share in
the subsidiaries cumulative results of operations, capital
contributions and distributions and other changes in equity.
Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination of
investments in subsidiaries and associated intercompany balances
and transactions as well as cash overdraft and income tax
reclassifications.
The following are consolidating statements of operations of the
Company for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006; condensed
consolidating balance sheets as of January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007 and condensed consolidating statements of
cash flows for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006.
F-95
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
79,671
|
|
|
$
|
3,121,814
|
|
|
$
|
5,849,443
|
|
|
$
|
(1,430,976
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,619,952
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(77,252
|
)
|
|
|
(2,841,837
|
)
|
|
|
(5,362,463
|
)
|
|
|
1,418,660
|
|
|
|
(6,862,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
279,977
|
|
|
|
486,980
|
|
|
|
(12,316
|
)
|
|
|
757,060
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(72,823
|
)
|
|
|
(181,028
|
)
|
|
|
(267,883
|
)
|
|
|
12,316
|
|
|
|
(509,418
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
22,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(68,058
|
)
|
|
|
101,440
|
|
|
|
241,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,618
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
195,324
|
|
|
|
143,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(116,996
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(56,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
10,328
|
|
|
|
244,735
|
|
|
|
176,414
|
|
|
|
(338,955
|
)
|
|
|
92,522
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
111,844
|
|
|
|
(26,141
|
)
|
|
|
(37,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,015
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
6,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
122,170
|
|
|
|
218,582
|
|
|
|
145,128
|
|
|
|
(338,955
|
)
|
|
|
146,925
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(27,672
|
)
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
121,005
|
|
|
|
194,225
|
|
|
|
146,574
|
|
|
|
(338,955
|
)
|
|
|
122,849
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
121,005
|
|
|
$
|
194,225
|
|
|
$
|
144,730
|
|
|
$
|
(338,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
121,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-96
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
76,585
|
|
|
$
|
2,823,183
|
|
|
$
|
5,161,424
|
|
|
$
|
(1,240,380
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,820,812
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(58,461
|
)
|
|
|
(2,562,406
|
)
|
|
|
(4,797,872
|
)
|
|
|
1,228,801
|
|
|
|
(6,189,938
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
18,124
|
|
|
|
260,777
|
|
|
|
363,552
|
|
|
|
(11,579
|
)
|
|
|
630,874
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(75,227
|
)
|
|
|
(163,925
|
)
|
|
|
(254,017
|
)
|
|
|
11,579
|
|
|
|
(481,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(57,103
|
)
|
|
|
96,852
|
|
|
|
109,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,284
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
79,619
|
|
|
|
11,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,525
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(125,131
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(69,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194,851
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity earnings
|
|
|
(101,929
|
)
|
|
|
109,066
|
|
|
|
48,281
|
|
|
|
(91,612
|
)
|
|
|
(36,194
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
44,413
|
|
|
|
(25,543
|
)
|
|
|
(22,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,054
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
|
83,655
|
|
|
|
26,911
|
|
|
|
(91,612
|
)
|
|
|
(38,552
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,452
|
)
|
|
|
(9,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
|
77,203
|
|
|
|
17,644
|
|
|
|
(91,612
|
)
|
|
|
(54,271
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
$
|
77,203
|
|
|
$
|
14,409
|
|
|
$
|
(91,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
66,151
|
|
|
$
|
2,723,397
|
|
|
$
|
4,443,397
|
|
|
$
|
(1,242,082
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,990,863
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(58,484
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440,423
|
)
|
|
|
(4,138,044
|
)
|
|
|
1,216,449
|
|
|
|
(5,420,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
7,667
|
|
|
|
282,974
|
|
|
|
305,353
|
|
|
|
(25,633
|
)
|
|
|
570,361
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(61,050
|
)
|
|
|
(176,287
|
)
|
|
|
(222,679
|
)
|
|
|
25,633
|
|
|
|
(434,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(53,383
|
)
|
|
|
106,687
|
|
|
|
82,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,978
|
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
20,325
|
|
|
|
(41,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(3,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,176
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,140
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(115,505
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(59,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity earnings
|
|
|
(150,921
|
)
|
|
|
65,556
|
|
|
|
47,906
|
|
|
|
21,038
|
|
|
|
(16,421
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
61,157
|
|
|
|
(38,293
|
)
|
|
|
(45,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,609
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
|
28,064
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
21,038
|
|
|
|
(38,853
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,322
|
)
|
|
|
(39,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,386
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
|
19,556
|
|
|
|
(37,392
|
)
|
|
|
21,038
|
|
|
|
(86,425
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(3,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,496
|
|
|
$
|
(40,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,038
|
|
|
$
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,811
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,460
|
|
|
$
|
(11,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
90,829
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
410,286
|
|
|
|
133,198
|
|
|
|
577,890
|
|
|
|
(314,139
|
)
|
|
|
807,235
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
7,971
|
|
|
|
299,048
|
|
|
|
489,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796,407
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
9,374
|
|
|
|
14,489
|
|
|
|
45,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,347
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
18,891
|
|
|
|
25,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,184
|
)
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
Assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
72,526
|
|
|
|
55,366
|
|
|
|
74,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
535,859
|
|
|
|
527,667
|
|
|
|
1,273,206
|
|
|
|
(348,765
|
)
|
|
|
1,987,967
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,172,994
|
|
|
|
1,786,868
|
|
|
|
72,708
|
|
|
|
(3,959,485
|
)
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
173,850
|
|
|
|
262,269
|
|
|
|
614,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050,331
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,818
|
|
|
|
274,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
18,426
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,458
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
38,084
|
|
|
|
7,542
|
|
|
|
92,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,610,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,734,590
|
|
|
$
|
2,327,877
|
|
|
$
|
(4,308,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
5,411
|
|
|
$
|
438,991
|
|
|
$
|
415,136
|
|
|
$
|
(348,765
|
)
|
|
$
|
510,773
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
|
|
46,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,465
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
67,206
|
|
|
|
173,920
|
|
|
|
249,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,145
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
346,684
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,748
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
419,301
|
|
|
|
616,887
|
|
|
|
769,497
|
|
|
|
(348,765
|
)
|
|
|
1,456,920
|
|
Intercompany payables (receivables)
|
|
|
1,225,590
|
|
|
|
(133,650
|
)
|
|
|
(1,091,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,080,296
|
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
714,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798,556
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
207,073
|
|
|
|
7,926
|
|
|
|
39,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,205
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
275,242
|
|
|
|
37,853
|
|
|
|
108,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,779
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
|
|
2,202,068
|
|
|
|
1,757,417
|
|
|
|
(3,959,485
|
)
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
|
|
2,202,068
|
|
|
|
1,787,676
|
|
|
|
(3,959,485
|
)
|
|
|
433,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,610,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,734,590
|
|
|
$
|
2,327,877
|
|
|
$
|
(4,308,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,364,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,424
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,801
|
|
|
$
|
(15,164
|
)
|
|
$
|
97,061
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
358,695
|
|
|
|
134,168
|
|
|
|
595,027
|
|
|
|
(248,737
|
)
|
|
|
839,153
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
7,080
|
|
|
|
321,075
|
|
|
|
422,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,675
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,318
|
|
|
|
16,322
|
|
|
|
49,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,296
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
16,942
|
|
|
|
23,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,543
|
)
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
Assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
36,520
|
|
|
|
39,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
405,005
|
|
|
|
531,771
|
|
|
|
1,202,182
|
|
|
|
(292,444
|
)
|
|
|
1,846,514
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,130,680
|
|
|
|
1,733,717
|
|
|
|
68,884
|
|
|
|
(3,863,945
|
)
|
|
|
69,336
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
286,222
|
|
|
|
319,107
|
|
|
|
734,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340,139
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,271
|
|
|
|
358,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509,518
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
689,616
|
|
|
|
22,128
|
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,790
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
42,140
|
|
|
|
5,944
|
|
|
|
124,698
|
|
|
|
(17,195
|
)
|
|
|
155,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,553,663
|
|
|
$
|
2,763,938
|
|
|
$
|
2,498,867
|
|
|
$
|
(4,173,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,642,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
8,339
|
|
|
$
|
404,698
|
|
|
$
|
422,366
|
|
|
$
|
(292,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
542,959
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
74,479
|
|
|
|
223,050
|
|
|
|
217,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,584
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
12,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,171
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
84,768
|
|
|
|
627,850
|
|
|
|
732,558
|
|
|
|
(292,444
|
)
|
|
|
1,152,732
|
|
Intercompany payables (receivables)
|
|
|
983,062
|
|
|
|
(61,695
|
)
|
|
|
(921,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,500,466
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
813,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,316,208
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
284,167
|
|
|
|
10,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,195
|
)
|
|
|
277,824
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
376,192
|
|
|
|
44,082
|
|
|
|
120,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541,234
|
|
Equity attributable to Dole Food Company Inc.
|
|
|
325,008
|
|
|
|
2,140,578
|
|
|
|
1,723,367
|
|
|
|
(3,863,945
|
)
|
|
|
325,008
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
325,008
|
|
|
|
2,140,578
|
|
|
|
1,753,245
|
|
|
|
(3,863,945
|
)
|
|
|
354,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,553,663
|
|
|
$
|
2,763,938
|
|
|
$
|
2,498,867
|
|
|
$
|
(4,173,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,642,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,041
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
42,404
|
|
|
|
41,209
|
|
|
|
142,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,483
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(21,071
|
)
|
|
|
(63,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,096
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merge transaction
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by investing activities
|
|
|
41,846
|
|
|
|
20,138
|
|
|
|
79,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,943
|
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,286
|
)
|
|
|
(120,702
|
)
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
(132,266
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,322,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348,050
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,397,788
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(84,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,482,800
|
)
|
Borrowings between subsidiaries
|
|
|
33,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in financing activities
|
|
|
(41,744
|
)
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
(132,123
|
)
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
(185,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,341
|
)
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
(6,232
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
16,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
(15,164
|
)
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
16,811
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,460
|
|
|
$
|
(11,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
90,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany dividend income
|
|
$
|
17,543
|
|
|
$
|
17,543
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35,086
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(14,441
|
)
|
|
|
40,914
|
|
|
|
19,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,102
|
|
|
|
58,457
|
|
|
|
19,849
|
|
|
|
(35,086
|
)
|
|
|
46,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
40,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,718
|
|
Hurricane Katrina insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(44,309
|
)
|
|
|
(61,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,821
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merge transaction
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
(38,435
|
)
|
|
|
(21,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,968
|
|
|
|
119,389
|
|
|
|
(11,968
|
)
|
|
|
119,389
|
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,419
|
)
|
|
|
(74,757
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,176
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,165,200
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167,530
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,158,088
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(11,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,169,213
|
)
|
Intercompany dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,543
|
)
|
|
|
(17,543
|
)
|
|
|
35,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
7,112
|
|
|
|
(20,022
|
)
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
|
|
23,118
|
|
|
|
16,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,513
|
|
|
|
(11,968
|
)
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,288
|
|
|
|
(3,196
|
)
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
16,424
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,801
|
|
|
$
|
(15,164
|
)
|
|
$
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-102
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(83,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,300
|
|
|
$
|
60,731
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
15,630
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,273
|
|
Acquisitions and investments, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,950
|
)
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
(59,505
|
)
|
|
|
(64,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,056
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merge transaction
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
(43,875
|
)
|
|
|
(74,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,032
|
|
|
|
88,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,381
|
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,957
|
)
|
|
|
(51,181
|
)
|
|
|
6,266
|
|
|
|
(52,872
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,269,405
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
989,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,260,545
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(997,877
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
(970,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,969,698
|
)
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
28,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,390
|
|
Return of capital to parent
|
|
|
(59,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,390
|
)
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,833
|
)
|
Dividends paid to parent
|
|
|
(163,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by financing activities
|
|
|
76,837
|
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
54,154
|
|
|
|
6,266
|
|
|
|
142,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,712
|
|
|
|
6,266
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
12,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,576
|
|
|
|
(9,462
|
)
|
|
|
48,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
7,322
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
88,288
|
|
|
$
|
(3,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 22
Earnings Per Share
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share
including a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
146,925
|
|
|
$
|
(38,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,853
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
(50,386
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
Net Income Attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
(3,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
121,005
|
|
|
$
|
(57,506
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 23
Subsequent Events
Internal Revenue Service Audit: On
August 27, 2009, the IRS completed its examination of the
combined U.S. Federal income tax returns of HoldCo, which
includes the returns of the Company, for the years 2002 to 2005
(see Note 7 Income Taxes) and issued a Revenue
Agents report (RAR) that includes various
proposed adjustments, including the going-private merger
transactions. The IRS is proposing that certain funding used in
the going-private merger is currently taxable and that certain
related investment banking fees are not deductible. The net tax
deficiency associated with the RAR is $122 million plus
interest. The Company will file a protest letter vigorously
challenging the proposed adjustments contained in the RAR and
will pursue resolution of these issues with the Appeals Division
of the IRS.
Asset Sale Program: During the third quarter
of fiscal 2009, the Company entered into definitive sales
agreements, for which it previously had signed letters of intent
for approximately $68 million (see Note 9
Assets Held-For-Sale) to sell certain operating
properties in Latin America. Additionally during the third
quarter of 2009, the Company signed a letter of intent to sell
an operating property in Chile for approximately
$32 million. These sales are expected to close by the end
of fiscal 2009.
HoldCo Loan Payment: During June 2009, HoldCo
made a $20 million payment required under the HoldCo loan
agreement after receiving an extension from its lenders.
Proposed Initial Public Offering
Transaction: It is currently expected that
immediately prior to the closing of the proposed initial public
offering of shares of Dole common stock (IPO
Transaction), the registration statement process of which
commenced in August 2009, that HoldCo will be merged into Dole
in a downstream merger to be accounted for as a common control
merger under the provisions
F-104
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS (Continued)
of FAS 141R. Immediately following the contemplated merger
transaction, the entire interest in Westlake Wellbeing
Properties, LLC (WWP) will be transferred to another
entity owned by David H. Murdock (MURCO). The
transfer of WWP to MURCO will be accounted for as a common
control transfer at carryover basis consistent with the
provisions of FAS 141R. Further, WWP long-lived assets will
continue to be treated under a held and used model under
FAS 144 in the contemplated transfer to MURCO. Subsequent
to the transfer of WWP to MURCO, the results of WWP will be
presented as a discontinued operation of the merged entity given
WWP will not be a part of the ongoing operations of such entity.
Additionally, Dole intends to complete other transactions upon
consummation of the IPO Transaction that will result in the
elimination of all other cross-default and cross acceleration
provisions that exist between Doles senior secured
facilities and certain indebtedness of Holdings and its
affiliates. See Note 12 Notes Payable and
Long-Term Debt for discussion of existing cross-default and
cross acceleration provisions.
Senior Note Offering: On September 25,
2009, the Company completed the sale and issuance of
$315 million aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior
Secured Notes due October 1, 2016, or the 2016 Notes,
at a discount of approximately $6.2 million. The
2016 Notes were sold to qualified institutional buyers
pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to
persons outside the United States in compliance with
Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale of the
2016 Notes to the initial purchasers was exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereof. Interest on the 2016 Notes will be
paid semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1
of each year, beginning on April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes
have the benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of the
Company that is junior to the liens of the Companys senior
secured credit facilities, and are senior obligations of the
Company ranking equally with the Companys existing senior
debt. The Company has issued a redemption notice for the
remaining principal amount outstanding of the 2010 Notes of
$363 million and has irrevocably deposited the net proceeds
from the sale and issuance of the 2016 Notes with the trustee of
the 2010 Notes to be used to repay such notes.
F-105
II. Supplementary
Data
The following table presents summarized quarterly results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 22,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
October 4,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
1,728,345
|
|
|
$
|
1,994,943
|
|
|
$
|
2,256,334
|
|
|
$
|
1,640,330
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
169,660
|
|
|
|
233,236
|
|
|
|
182,273
|
|
|
|
171,891
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(25,453
|
)
|
|
|
177,091
|
|
|
|
(2,342
|
)
|
|
|
(2,371
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(2,821
|
)
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
(21,760
|
)
|
|
|
(7,128
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
(28,945
|
)
|
|
|
180,754
|
|
|
|
(21,318
|
)
|
|
|
(9,486
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to
Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 24,
|
|
|
June 16,
|
|
|
October 6,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
1,517,406
|
|
|
$
|
1,735,302
|
|
|
$
|
1,985,179
|
|
|
$
|
1,582,925
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
141,738
|
|
|
|
184,951
|
|
|
|
161,431
|
|
|
|
142,754
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(9,322
|
)
|
|
|
53,896
|
|
|
|
(55,716
|
)
|
|
|
(27,410
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(4,020
|
)
|
|
|
(6,784
|
)
|
|
|
(4,362
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
(10,215
|
)
|
|
|
49,055
|
|
|
|
(63,327
|
)
|
|
|
(33,019
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to
Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company approved and
committed to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers
operations (Flowers transaction). The first phase of
the Flowers transaction was completed during the first quarter
of 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company approved
and committed to a formal plan to divest its citrus and
pistachio operations (Citrus) located in central
California. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2007, the operating
results of Citrus were included in the fresh fruit operating
segment. The Citrus sale closed during the third quarter of
2008. The results of operations of these businesses have been
reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
F-106
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
1,723,201
|
|
|
$
|
2,005,565
|
|
|
$
|
3,327,255
|
|
|
$
|
3,743,852
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
(1,503,025
|
)
|
|
|
(1,773,461
|
)
|
|
|
(2,905,968
|
)
|
|
|
(3,344,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
220,176
|
|
|
|
232,104
|
|
|
|
421,287
|
|
|
|
399,779
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(118,579
|
)
|
|
|
(126,685
|
)
|
|
|
(220,004
|
)
|
|
|
(250,387
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales (Note 12)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
11,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
101,756
|
|
|
|
115,258
|
|
|
|
218,076
|
|
|
|
161,035
|
|
Other income (expense), net (Note 3)
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
23,653
|
|
|
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
|
(5,058
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(51,855
|
)
|
|
|
(43,402
|
)
|
|
|
(91,003
|
)
|
|
|
(90,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity
earnings
|
|
|
18,355
|
|
|
|
96,638
|
|
|
|
119,117
|
|
|
|
68,777
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,083
|
)
|
|
|
72,451
|
|
|
|
(15,229
|
)
|
|
|
66,701
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,277
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
13,549
|
|
|
|
171,422
|
|
|
|
108,359
|
|
|
|
138,814
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,814
|
|
|
|
175,740
|
|
|
|
110,054
|
|
|
|
140,311
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
13,788
|
|
|
$
|
176,040
|
|
|
$
|
110,113
|
|
|
$
|
141,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Basic and Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Net income attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-107
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
107,924
|
|
|
$
|
90,945
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $54,599 and $41,357,
respectively
|
|
|
805,410
|
|
|
|
809,373
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
726,478
|
|
|
|
796,996
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
76,801
|
|
|
|
70,334
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
22,180
|
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
Assets held-for-sale (Note 12)
|
|
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,833,175
|
|
|
|
1,991,797
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
8,070
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
76,537
|
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1.08 billion and $1.03 billion, respectively
|
|
|
1,017,062
|
|
|
|
1,050,331
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center property, plant and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $47 million and
$37 million, respectively
|
|
|
335,006
|
|
|
|
344,518
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
713,923
|
|
|
|
708,458
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
173,903
|
|
|
|
140,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,564,216
|
|
|
$
|
4,716,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
486,225
|
|
|
$
|
512,374
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale (Note 12)
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
50,465
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
425,613
|
|
|
|
500,362
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
390,896
|
|
|
|
356,748
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt of Hotel and Wellness Center
(Note 16)
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,483,989
|
|
|
|
1,488,738
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,576,025
|
|
|
|
1,798,556
|
|
Long-term debt of Hotel and Wellness Center (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
224,320
|
|
|
|
222,795
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
487,846
|
|
|
|
414,063
|
|
Contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.001 par value;
1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
481,475
|
|
|
|
475,210
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
276,767
|
|
|
|
166,654
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(40,488
|
)
|
|
|
(42,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
|
717,754
|
|
|
|
598,961
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
74,282
|
|
|
|
78,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
792,036
|
|
|
|
677,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,564,216
|
|
|
$
|
4,716,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-108
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
110,054
|
|
|
$
|
140,311
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
64,177
|
|
|
|
74,648
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on financial instruments
|
|
|
(966
|
)
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
Asset write-offs and net (gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(18,120
|
)
|
|
|
(11,597
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(4,471
|
)
|
|
|
(3,336
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
2,899
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
5,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash interest expense on Hotel and Wellness Center long-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
(31,135
|
)
|
Unrecognized tax benefits on federal income tax audit settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,083
|
)
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense
|
|
|
6,231
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
Other
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(5,221
|
)
|
|
|
(171,337
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
67,525
|
|
|
|
(36,245
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(21,011
|
)
|
|
|
(11,428
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(8,922
|
)
|
|
|
74,608
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
15,524
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(2,692
|
)
|
|
|
(11,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
202,464
|
|
|
|
(7,476
|
)
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
59,308
|
|
|
|
31,976
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(24,936
|
)
|
|
|
(35,312
|
)
|
Capital additions for Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
Payment of restricted deposit for Hotel and Wellness Center
long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merger transaction
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
28,105
|
|
|
|
(7,008
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt repayments, net of borrowings
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(9,996
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
825,178
|
|
|
|
603,849
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,039,172
|
)
|
|
|
(607,225
|
)
|
Long-term debt repayments for Hotel and Wellness Center, net of
debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,439
|
)
|
Capital contributions from parent
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
51,053
|
|
Capital contributions from WWP noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
Repayment of Hotel and Wellness Center related party notes
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in financing activities
|
|
|
(212,816
|
)
|
|
|
(7,608
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
16,979
|
|
|
|
(21,176
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
90,945
|
|
|
|
98,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
107,924
|
|
|
$
|
77,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-109
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
on Hedges
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,878
|
|
|
$
|
67,034
|
|
|
$
|
(26,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,261
|
|
|
$
|
(15,525
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,997
|
|
|
$
|
556,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
140,311
|
|
|
$
|
140,311
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,897
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging losses to net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 14, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
463,931
|
|
|
$
|
208,048
|
|
|
$
|
(26,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
50,158
|
|
|
$
|
(11,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
80,299
|
|
|
$
|
764,217
|
|
|
$
|
152,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
475,210
|
|
|
$
|
166,654
|
|
|
$
|
(40,960
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,187
|
|
|
$
|
(29,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
78,677
|
|
|
$
|
677,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
110,054
|
|
|
$
|
110,054
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging losses to net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
481,475
|
|
|
$
|
276,767
|
|
|
$
|
(41,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,801
|
|
|
$
|
(24,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
74,282
|
|
|
$
|
792,036
|
|
|
$
|
112,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-110
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,814
|
|
|
$
|
175,740
|
|
|
$
|
110,054
|
|
|
$
|
140,311
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
10,808
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging losses to net
income
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
28,083
|
|
|
|
186,412
|
|
|
|
112,466
|
|
|
|
152,272
|
|
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to DHM Holding Company,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
28,044
|
|
|
$
|
186,711
|
|
|
$
|
112,528
|
|
|
$
|
152,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
F-111
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
DHM Holding Company, Inc. (Holdings) wholly owns
Dole Food Company, Inc. (Dole) and owns 85% of
Westlake Wellbeing Properties, LLC (WWP or the
Hotel and Wellness Center). Refer to
Note 16 Hotel and Wellness Center, for further
information on the nature of Hotel and Wellness Center
operations. In connection with the consummation of the proposed
initial public offering of Dole common stock, as discussed below
in greater detail, a series of related transactions will be
undertaken that will result in the following: Holdings will
be merged down into Dole and Holdings will cease to exist as a
separate entity, the 85% interest in WWP will be transferred out
to another entity owned by David H. Murdock and so will not
be any part of the ongoing operations of Dole, and all existing
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions will be
eliminated between Doles senior secured facilities, on the
one hand, and currently existing Holdings debt associated with
WWP and certain indebtedness of an affiliate of Holdings, on the
other hand.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements of Holdings and its
consolidated subsidiaries include all adjustments necessary,
which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly
Holdings financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. Holdings operates under a 52/53-week year. The quarters
ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 are twelve weeks
in duration. For a summary of significant accounting policies
and additional information relating to Holdings financial
statements, refer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009 that
are included elsewhere in this document.
Interim results are subject to seasonal variations and are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full
year. Holdings operations are sensitive to a number of factors
including weather-related phenomena and their effects on
industry volumes, prices, product quality and costs. Operations
are also sensitive to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates in both sourcing and selling locations as well as economic
crises and security risks.
In March 2003, Dole completed a going-private merger transaction
(going-private merger transaction). The
privatization resulted from the acquisition by David H. Murdock,
Doles Chairman, of the approximately 76% of the shares of
common stock of Dole that he and his affiliates did not already
own. As a result of the transaction, Dole became wholly-owned by
Mr. Murdock through Holdings.
Proposed Initial Public Offering
Transaction: It is currently expected that
immediately prior to the closing of the proposed initial public
offering of shares of Dole common stock (IPO
Transaction), the registration statement process of which
commenced in August 2009 that Holdings will be merged into Dole
in a downstream merger to be accounted for as a common control
merger under the provisions of FAS 141R. Immediately
following the contemplated merger transaction, the entire
interest in WWP held by post-merger Dole will be transferred to
another entity owned by David H. Murdock (MURCO).
The transfer of WWP to MURCO will be accounted for as a common
control transfer at carryover basis consistent with the
provisions of FAS 141R. Further, WWP long-lived assets will
continue to be treated under a held and used model under
FAS 144 in the contemplated transfer to MURCO. Subsequent
to the transfer of WWP to MURCO, the results of WWP will be
presented as a discontinued operation of the merged entity given
WWP will not be a part of the ongoing operations of such entity.
Dole is also contemplating the offering of at least
$300 million of senior secured notes due 2016 with the
proceeds used to refinance a portion of the senior notes due
2010 Notes. Additionally, Dole intends to complete other
transactions upon consummation of the IPO Transaction that will
result in the elimination of all other cross-default and cross
acceleration provisions that exist between Doles senior
secured facilities and certain indebtedness of Holdings and its
affiliates. See Note 8 Notes
F-112
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Payable and Long-Term Debt for discussion of existing
cross-default and cross acceleration provisions.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
RECENTLY ISSUED
AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
During June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FAS No. 168, FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162 (FAS 168), which
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the
single official source of authoritative US GAAP (other than
guidance issued by the SEC), superseding existing FASB, American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task
Force, and related literature. FAS 168 will become
effective during Holdings third quarter of 2009. The adoption of
FAS 168 is not expected to have an impact on Holdings
results of operations or financial position.
During June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(FAS 167), which changes the
approach in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity (VIE) and requires companies to more
frequently assess whether they must consolidate VIEs.
FAS 167 is effective for annual periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. Holdings is evaluating the impact, if
any, the adoption of FAS 167 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
During May 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (FAS 165), to
establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
FAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through which
an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that
date. FAS 165 was adopted during the second fiscal quarter
and it had no impact on Holdings results of operations or
financial position. In the preparation of the condensed
consolidated financial statements, Holdings evaluated subsequent
events after the balance sheet date of June 20, 2009
through October 2, 2009.
During April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP), which amends FASB Statement
No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to require disclosures about the fair value of
financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as
in annual financial statements. Holdings adopted the FSP during
its second fiscal quarter of 2009 and the disclosures required
by the FSP are included in Note 14 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements. The adoption had no impact on
Holdings results of operations or financial position.
During March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures About
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FAS 161). This new standard requires
enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments, including those
used in hedging activities. Holdings adopted FAS 161 at the
beginning of its first fiscal quarter of 2009. The disclosures
required by FAS 161 are included in Note 13 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements and had no impact on
Holdings results of operations or financial position.
During December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160. FAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Holdings adopted the provisions
of FAS 160 as of the beginning of its 2009 fiscal year.
FAS 160 is to be applied prospectively as of the beginning
of 2009 except for the presentation and disclosure requirements
which are to be applied retrospectively. The condensed
consolidated financial statements now conform to the
presentation required under FAS 160. Other than the change
in
F-113
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
presentation of noncontrolling interests, the adoption of
FAS 160 had no impact on the Holdings results of operations
or financial position.
During December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (FAS 141R). FAS 141R
provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
FAS 141R will be applied prospectively to business
combinations with acquisition dates on or after January 1,
2009. As a result of the adoption, changes to valuation
allowances and unrecognized tax benefits established in business
combinations will be recognized in earnings.
|
|
NOTE 3
|
OTHER INCOME
(EXPENSE), NET
|
Included in other income (expense), net in Holdings condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the quarters and half
years ended June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008 are the
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
$
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,001
|
|
|
$
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Realized gain on cross currency swap
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
Gain (loss) on foreign denominated borrowings
|
|
|
(11,538
|
)
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
(4,406
|
)
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,653
|
|
|
$
|
(11,094
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 13 Derivative Financial
Instruments for further discussion regarding Holdings cross
currency swap.
|
|
NOTE 4
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Holdings approved and
committed to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers
operations (Flowers transaction). The first phase of
the Flowers transaction was completed during the first quarter
of 2009 (refer to Note 12 Assets
Held-For-Sale). In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007,
Holdings approved and committed to a formal plan to divest its
citrus and pistachio operations (Citrus) located in
central California. The operating results of Citrus were
included in the fresh fruit operating segment. The sale of
Citrus was completed during the third quarter of 2008. In
evaluating the two businesses, Holdings concluded that they each
met the definition of a discontinued operation as defined in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (FAS 144). Accordingly, the results
of operations of these businesses have been reclassified for all
periods presented. The
F-114
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
operating results of fresh-cut flowers and Citrus for the
quarters and half years ended June 20, 2009 and
June 14, 2008 are reported in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
29,063
|
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
32,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
(5,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,190
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
10,396
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
10,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
|
$
|
62,879
|
|
|
$
|
5,020
|
|
|
$
|
67,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
(9,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,288
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
10,691
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
10,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
(157
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all periods presented, noncontrolling interests were not
material.
Holdings recorded $15.2 million of income tax expense on
$119.1 million of pretax income from continuing operations
for the half year ended June 20, 2009. Income tax expense
included interest expense of $1.2 million (net of
associated income tax benefits of approximately
$0.3 million) related to Holdings unrecognized tax
benefits. An income tax benefit of $66.7 million was
recorded for the half year ended June 14, 2008 which
included $61.1 million for the favorable settlement of the
federal income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001. Excluding
the impact of the favorable settlement, income tax expense was
$0.9 million, which included interest expense of
$2.1 million (net of associated income tax benefits of
approximately $0.7 million) related to Holdings
unrecognized tax benefits. Holdings effective tax rate varies
significantly from period to period due to the level, mix and
seasonality of earnings generated in its various U.S. and
foreign jurisdictions.
Under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting (APB 28), and
FASB Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes
in Interim Periods (FIN 18), Holdings is
required to adjust its effective tax rate for each quarter to be
consistent with the estimated annual effective tax rate.
Jurisdictions with a projected loss where no tax benefit can be
recognized are excluded from the calculation of the estimated
annual effective tax rate. Applying the provisions of
F-115
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
APB 28 and FIN 18 could result in a higher or lower
effective tax rate during a particular quarter, based upon the
mix and timing of actual earnings versus annual projections.
For the periods presented, Holdings income tax provision differs
from the U.S. federal statutory rate applied to Holdings
pretax income primarily due to operations in foreign
jurisdictions that are taxed at a rate lower than the
U.S. federal statutory rate offset by the accrual for
uncertain tax positions.
Holdings recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to
its unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income taxes in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Accrued
interest and penalties before tax benefits were
$27.5 million and $26.9 million at June 20, 2009
and January 3, 2009, respectively, and are included as a
component of other long-term liabilities in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet. Holdings or one or more of its
subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With
few exceptions, Holdings is no longer subject to
U.S. federal, state and local, or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001.
Income Tax Audits: Holdings believes its tax
positions comply with the applicable tax laws and that it is
adequately provided for all tax related matters. Matters raised
upon audit may involve substantial amounts and could result in
material cash payments if resolved unfavorably; however,
management does not believe that any material payments will be
made related to these matters within the next twelve months.
Management considers it unlikely that the resolution of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on Holdings results
of operations.
Internal Revenue Service Audit: On
August 27, 2009, the IRS completed its examination of the
combined U.S. federal income tax returns of Holdings for
the years 2002 to 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents report
(RAR) that includes various proposed adjustments,
including the going-private merger transactions. The IRS is
proposing that certain funding used in the going-private merger
is currently taxable and that certain related investment banking
fees are not deductible. The net tax deficiency associated with
the RAR is $122 million plus interest. Holdings will file a
protest letter vigorously challenging the proposed adjustments
contained in the RAR and will pursue resolution of these issues
with the Appeals Division of the IRS.
Although the timing and ultimate resolution of any issues that
might arise from the ongoing IRS examination are highly
uncertain, at this time, Holdings does not anticipate that total
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within the
next twelve months.
The major classes of inventories were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
$
|
364,624
|
|
|
$
|
344,643
|
|
Raw materials and work in progress
|
|
|
141,472
|
|
|
|
168,670
|
|
Crop-growing costs
|
|
|
155,059
|
|
|
|
210,263
|
|
Operating supplies and other
|
|
|
65,323
|
|
|
|
73,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
726,478
|
|
|
$
|
796,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-116
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 7
|
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Goodwill has been allocated to Holdings reporting segments as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009 and June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
274,723
|
|
|
$
|
71,206
|
|
|
$
|
60,611
|
|
|
$
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of Holdings intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
38,501
|
|
|
$
|
38,501
|
|
Other amortized intangible assets
|
|
|
9,217
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,718
|
|
|
|
40,543
|
|
Accumulated amortization customer relationships
|
|
|
(21,945
|
)
|
|
|
(20,248
|
)
|
Other accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization intangible assets
|
|
|
(23,410
|
)
|
|
|
(21,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets, net
|
|
|
24,308
|
|
|
|
18,843
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark and trade names
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
713,923
|
|
|
$
|
708,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During May 2009, Holdings acquired all of the assets of
Distrifruit, a distributor of fresh fruit located in Romania, in
exchange for trade receivables due from the seller. Holdings
acquired the assets primarily to obtain control and gain access
over Distrifruits customer base in Romania. At the date of
acquisition, the total fair value of the assets acquired was
$10 million, consisting of $2.9 million of inventory
and property, plant and equipment, net and $7.1 million of
intangible assets. Holdings expects to finalize its allocation
of the acquisition during the third quarter of 2009. The
revenues and earnings of Distrifruit from the acquisition date
through June 20, 2009 were not material. Distrifruit
revenues and earnings for the 2009 and 2008 fiscal years also
were not material for pro forma disclosure.
Amortization expense of intangible assets totaled
$0.9 million and $1 million for the quarters ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008, respectively, and
$1.7 million and $2 million for the half years ended
June 20, 2009 and June 14, 2008, respectively.
F-117
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
As of June 20, 2009, the estimated remaining amortization
expense associated with Holdings intangible assets for the
remainder of 2009 and in each of the next four fiscal years is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
Holdings performed its annual impairment review of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, during the second quarter of fiscal
2009. This review indicated no impairment to goodwill or any of
Holdings indefinite-lived intangible assets.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
NOTES PAYABLE
AND LONG-TERM DEBT
|
Notes payable and long-term debt of Dole consisted of the
following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.625% notes due 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
7.25% notes due 2010
|
|
|
383,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
8.875% notes due 2011
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
8.75% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.875% notes due 2014
|
|
|
349,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,500
|
|
Term loan facilities
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
Contracts and notes, at a weighted-average interest rate of 6%
in 2009 (6.1% in 2008) through 2014
|
|
|
9,219
|
|
|
|
9,221
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
65,813
|
|
|
|
60,448
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
44,140
|
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(24,311
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,011,061
|
|
|
|
2,204,093
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(435,036
|
)
|
|
|
(405,537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,798,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 16 Hotel and Wellness Center, for
further information on the Hotel and Wellness Center senior
credit facility.
2010 Debt
Maturity
During the second quarter of 2009, Dole reclassified to current
liabilities its $400 million 7.25% notes due June 2010
(2010 Notes). During the second quarter of 2009,
Doles Board of
F-118
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $95 million of
the 2010 Notes. Dole subsequently repurchased $17 million
and $20 million of the 2010 Notes during the second and
third quarters of 2009, respectively.
Doles current plan is to offer senior secured notes during
the third quarter of 2009. Dole plans to use the net proceeds
from this offering, together with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to redeem the
bulk of the outstanding 2010 notes. Dole intends to redeem or
repurchase any remaining 2010 notes during the third
and/or
fourth quarters of 2009 with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility. A failure by
Dole to timely redeem, repurchase or repay the 2010 Notes at or
before maturity could lead to an event of default which would
have a material adverse effect on Holdings business, financial
condition and results of operations.
2009 Debt
Refinancing
On March 18, 2009, Dole completed the sale and issuance of
$350 million aggregate principal amount of
13.875% Senior Secured Notes due March 2014 (2014
Notes) at a discount of $25 million. The 2014 Notes
were sold to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933
(Securities Act) and to persons outside the United
States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities
Act. The sale was exempt from the registration requirements of
the Securities Act. Interest on the 2014 Notes will be paid
semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each
year, beginning on September 15, 2009. The 2014 Notes have
the benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of Dole that
is junior to the liens of Doles senior secured credit
facilities (revolving credit and term loan facilities), and are
senior obligations of Dole ranking equally with Doles
existing senior debt. Dole used the net proceeds from this
offering, together with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to purchase all
of the tendered 8.625% notes due May 2009 (2009
Notes) and to irrevocably deposit with the trustee of the
2009 Notes funds that were used to repay the remaining
outstanding 2009 Notes at maturity on May 1, 2009.
In connection with these refinancing transactions, Dole amended
its senior secured credit facilities, which amendments, among
other things, permitted the issuance of new secured debt
securities, increased the interest rate on the term and
revolving credit facilities and added a leverage maintenance
covenant.
Debt Issuance
Costs
In connection with the issuance of the 2014 Notes and the
amendment of Doles senior secured credit facilities, Dole
incurred debt issuance costs of $17.8 million. Debt
issuance costs are capitalized and amortized into interest
expense over the term of the underlying debt.
Dole wrote off $5.2 million of deferred debt issuance costs
during the quarter ended March 28, 2009 resulting from the
amendment of its senior secured credit facilities. This
amendment was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt in
accordance with
EITF 96-19,
Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
Debt Instruments. This write-off was recorded to other
income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the half year ended June 20, 2009.
Dole amortized deferred debt issuance costs of $1.4 million
and $2.3 million during the quarter and half year ended
June 20, 2009, respectively. Dole amortized deferred debt
issuance costs of $0.9 million and $1.9 million during
the quarter and half year ended June 14, 2008.
F-119
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Term Loans and
Revolving Credit Facility
As of June 20, 2009, the term loan facilities consisted of
$175.3 million of Term Loan B and $653 million of Term
Loan C. The term loan facilities bear interest, at Doles
option, at a rate per annum equal to either (i) a base rate
plus 3.5% to 4%; or (ii) LIBOR (subject to a minimum of 3%)
plus 4.5% to 5%, in each case, based upon Doles senior
secured leverage ratio. The weighted average variable interest
rate at June 20, 2009 for Term Loan B and Term Loan C was
8.3%. The term loan facilities require quarterly principal
payments, plus a balloon payment due in 2013. Dole has an
interest rate swap to hedge future changes in interest rates and
a cross currency swap to effectively lower the U.S. dollar
fixed interest rate to a Japanese yen fixed interest rate on
Term Loan C. Refer to Note 13 Derivative
Financial Instruments for additional information related to
these instruments.
As of June 20, 2009, the asset based revolving credit
facility (ABL revolver) borrowing base was
$320 million. There were no amounts outstanding under the
ABL revolver at June 20, 2009. The ABL revolver bears
interest, at Doles option, at a rate per annum equal to
either (i) a base rate plus 2% to 2.5%, or (ii) LIBOR
plus 3% to 3.5%, in each case, based upon Doles historical
borrowing availability under this facility. The ABL revolver
matures in April 2011. After taking into account approximately
$76.4 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under
the ABL revolver, Dole had approximately $243.6 million
available for borrowings as of June 20, 2009. In addition,
Dole had approximately $97 million of letters of credit and
bank guarantees outstanding under its $100 million
pre-funded letter of credit facility as of June 20, 2009.
Capital Lease
Obligations
At June 20, 2009 and January 3, 2009, included in
capital lease obligations were $64.1 million and
$58.5 million, respectively, of vessel financing related to
two vessel leases denominated in British pound sterling. The
increase in the capital lease obligation was due to the
strengthening of the British pound sterling against the
U.S. dollar during 2009, which resulted in Dole recognizing
$6.8 million of unrealized losses. These unrealized losses
were recorded as other income (expense), net in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the half year ended
June 20, 2009.
Covenants
Provisions under the indentures governing Doles senior
notes and debentures require Dole to comply with certain
covenants. These covenants include limitations on, among other
things, indebtedness, investments, loans to subsidiaries,
employees and third parties, the issuance of guarantees and the
payment of dividends. The ABL revolver contains a
springing covenant, but that covenant has never been
effective and would only become effective if the availability
under the ABL revolver were to fall below $35 million for
any eight consecutive business days, which it has never done
during the life of such facility. At June 20, 2009, Dole
had $243.6 million of availability under the ABL revolver.
In addition, as a result of the March 2009 amendment to
Doles senior secured term facilities, Dole is now subject
to a first priority senior secured leverage ratio that must be
at or below 3.25 to 1.00 as of the last day of the fiscal
quarters ending March 28, 2009 through October 10,
2009 and steps down to 3.00 to 1.00 as of the last day of the
fiscal quarter ending January 2, 2010. At June 20,
2009, the first priority senior secured leverage ratio was less
than 2.25 to 1.00.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in one of the debt
instruments governing Doles current or future
indebtedness, or in one of certain debt instruments under which
Holdings and an affiliate of its majority stockholder are
borrowers, could result in a default under that instrument and,
due to
F-120
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could result in
a default under Doles other debt instruments. Such debt
instruments of Holdings, currently $115 million, and an
affiliate of its majority stockholder, currently
$90 million, mature on March 3, 2010, and on
December 23, 2009, respectively. Upon the occurrence of an
event of default under one of the above debt instruments, the
lenders or holders of that debt and other debt instruments could
elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due
and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further
credit. If Holdings and its subsidiaries were unable to repay
those amounts, the lenders could proceed against the collateral
granted to them, if any, to secure the indebtedness. If the
lenders under the existing indebtedness were to accelerate the
payment of the indebtedness, Holdings cannot give assurance that
its consolidated assets or cash flow would be sufficient to
repay in full the outstanding indebtedness, in which event
Holdings likely would seek reorganization or protection under
bankruptcy or other, similar laws.
Refer to Note 16 Hotel and Wellness Center, for
further information on the covenants of the long-term debt of
the Hotel and Wellness Center.
Dividends and
Capital Contributions
During the half years ended June 20, 2009 and June 14,
2008, capital contributions of $6.3 million and
$51.1 million were received from shareholders.
Holdings did not declare or pay a dividend to its parent during
either of the half years ended June 20, 2009 and
June 14, 2008.
Doles ability to declare dividends is limited under the
terms of its senior notes indentures and senior secured credit
facilities. Dole does not at present have the ability to declare
future dividends to its parent, Holdings, pursuant to the terms
of its senior notes indentures and senior credit facilities.
During the half year ended June 20, 2009 and June 14,
2008, approximately $5 million and $1.2 million of
dividends were paid to noncontrolling shareholders.
F-121
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 9
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLANS
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost for Doles
U.S. and international pension plans and other
postretirement benefit (OPRB) plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
|
4,288
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(3,898
|
)
|
|
|
(4,186
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
3,172
|
|
|
$
|
3,360
|
|
|
$
|
(249
|
)
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
2,720
|
|
|
$
|
2,893
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,006
|
|
|
|
8,576
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
4,734
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(7,796
|
)
|
|
|
(8,372
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(1,594
|
)
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
954
|
|
|
$
|
6,335
|
|
|
$
|
6,757
|
|
|
$
|
(498
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-122
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 10
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
Holdings has four reportable operating segments: fresh fruit,
fresh vegetables, packaged foods and the Hotel and Wellness
Center. These reportable segments are managed separately due to
differences in their products, production processes,
distribution channels and customer bases.
Management evaluates and monitors segment performance primarily
through, among other measures, earnings before interest expense
and income taxes (EBIT). EBIT is calculated by
adding interest expense and income taxes to income from
continuing operations. Management believes that segment EBIT
provides useful information for analyzing the underlying
business results as well as allowing investors a means to
evaluate the financial results of each segment in relation to
Holdings as a whole. EBIT is not defined under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for net income or cash flow measures prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of Holdings profitability.
Additionally, Holdings computation of EBIT may not be comparable
to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies,
because not all companies calculate EBIT in the same fashion.
Revenues from external customers and EBIT for the reportable
operating segments and corporate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
1,221,433
|
|
|
$
|
1,466,922
|
|
|
$
|
2,343,415
|
|
|
$
|
2,695,450
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
258,087
|
|
|
|
279,643
|
|
|
|
491,529
|
|
|
|
510,672
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
234,892
|
|
|
|
248,118
|
|
|
|
475,742
|
|
|
|
516,623
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
8,479
|
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
|
|
15,943
|
|
|
|
20,564
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,723,201
|
|
|
$
|
2,005,565
|
|
|
$
|
3,327,255
|
|
|
$
|
3,743,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-123
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
96,466
|
|
|
$
|
131,266
|
|
|
$
|
195,288
|
|
|
$
|
184,153
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
(1,939
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
23,998
|
|
|
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
45,888
|
|
|
|
30,999
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
(6,368
|
)
|
|
|
(6,392
|
)
|
|
|
(12,938
|
)
|
|
|
(13,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
110,587
|
|
|
|
133,219
|
|
|
|
241,202
|
|
|
|
199,693
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(12,681
|
)
|
|
|
(9,847
|
)
|
|
|
(19,908
|
)
|
|
|
(24,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(37,100
|
)
|
|
|
9,154
|
|
|
|
(26,611
|
)
|
|
|
(37,438
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(51,855
|
)
|
|
|
(43,402
|
)
|
|
|
(91,003
|
)
|
|
|
(90,142
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,083
|
)
|
|
|
72,451
|
|
|
|
(15,229
|
)
|
|
|
66,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
13,549
|
|
|
$
|
171,422
|
|
|
$
|
108,359
|
|
|
$
|
138,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings equity earnings in unconsolidated subsidiaries, which
have been included in EBIT in the table above, relate primarily
to the fresh fruit operating segment.
Total assets for the four reportable operating segments,
corporate and fresh-cut flowers were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
2,293,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,322,899
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
389,331
|
|
|
|
460,221
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
663,420
|
|
|
|
686,801
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
340,296
|
|
|
|
352,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
3,686,177
|
|
|
|
3,821,977
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
865,400
|
|
|
|
832,824
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers discontinued operation
|
|
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
61,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,564,216
|
|
|
$
|
4,716,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole is a guarantor of indebtedness of some of its key fruit
suppliers and other entities integral to Doles operations.
At June 20, 2009, guarantees of $1.8 million consisted
primarily of amounts advanced under third-party bank agreements
to independent growers that supply Dole with product. Dole has
not historically experienced any significant losses associated
with these guarantees.
F-124
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Dole issues letters of credit and bank guarantees through its
ABL revolver and its pre-funded letter of credit facilities,
and, in addition, separately through major banking institutions.
Dole also provides insurance-company-issued bonds. These letters
of credit, bank guarantees and insurance company bonds are
required by certain regulatory authorities, suppliers and other
operating agreements. As of June 20, 2009, total letters of
credit, bank guarantees and bonds outstanding under these
arrangements were $205.7 million, of which $97 million
was issued under its pre-funded letter of credit facility.
Dole also provides various guarantees, mostly to foreign banks,
in the course of its normal business operations to support the
borrowings, leases and other obligations of its subsidiaries.
Dole guaranteed $213.2 million of its subsidiaries
obligations to their suppliers and other third parties as of
June 20, 2009.
Dole has change of control agreements with certain key
executives, under which severance payments and benefits would
become payable in the event of specified terminations of
employment in connection with a change of control (as defined)
of Dole.
Holdings is involved from time to time in claims and legal
actions incidental to its operations, both as plaintiff and
defendant. Holdings has established what management currently
believes to be adequate reserves for pending legal matters.
These reserves are established as part of an ongoing worldwide
assessment of claims and legal actions that takes into
consideration such items as changes in the pending case load
(including resolved and new matters), opinions of legal counsel,
individual developments in court proceedings, changes in the
law, changes in business focus, changes in the litigation
environment, changes in opponent strategy and tactics, new
developments as a result of ongoing discovery, and past
experience in defending and settling similar claims. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with outside counsel,
the claims or actions to which Holdings is a party are not
expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in
the aggregate, on Holdings financial condition or results of
operations.
DBCP Cases: A significant portion of Holdings
legal exposure relates to lawsuits pending in the United States
and in several foreign countries, alleging injury as a result of
exposure to the agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane). DBCP was manufactured by several
chemical companies including Dow and Shell and registered by the
U.S. government for use on food crops. Dole and other
growers applied DBCP on banana farms in Latin America and the
Philippines and on pineapple farms in Hawaii. Specific periods
of use varied among the different locations. Dole halted all
purchases of DBCP, including for use in foreign countries, when
the U.S. EPA cancelled the registration of DBCP for use in
the United States in 1979. That cancellation was based in part
on a 1977 study by a manufacturer which indicated an apparent
link between male sterility and exposure to DBCP among factory
workers producing the product, as well as early product testing
done by the manufacturers showing testicular effects on animals
exposed to DBCP. To date, there is no reliable evidence
demonstrating that field application of DBCP led to sterility
among farm workers, although that claim is made in the pending
lawsuits. Nor is there any reliable scientific evidence that
DBCP causes any other injuries in humans, although plaintiffs in
the various actions assert claims based on cancer, birth defects
and other general illnesses.
Currently there are 245 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaragua judgments. In addition, there
are 111 labor cases pending in Costa Rica under that
countrys national insurance program.
Thirty of the 245 lawsuits are currently pending in various
jurisdictions in the United States. On June 17, 2009, Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Chaney formalized her
April 23, 2009 oral ruling by
F-125
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
issuing written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,
formally ordering dismissal with prejudice of the two remaining
lawsuits brought on behalf of Nicaraguan plaintiffs who had
falsely claimed they were sterile as a result of exposure to
DBCP on Dole-contracted Nicaraguan banana farms, finding that
the plaintiffs, and certain of their attorneys, fabricated their
claims, engaged in a long-running conspiracy to commit a fraud
on the court, used threats of violence to frighten witnesses and
suppress the truth, and conspired with corrupt Nicaraguan
judges, depriving Dole and the other companies of due process.
On June 9, 2009, the First Circuit Court of Hawaii
dismissed the Patrickson case, which had involved ten plaintiffs
from Honduras, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Guatemala, finding that
their DBCP claims were time-barred by the statute of
limitations. In seven cases pending in Los Angeles involving 672
claimants from Ivory Coast, where Dole did not operate when DBCP
was in use, plaintiffs counsel, on July 17, 2009, has
filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record in response to a
witness who has come forward alleging fraud. The remaining cases
are pending in Latin America and the Philippines. Claimed
damages in DBCP cases worldwide total approximately
$44.2 billion, with lawsuits in Nicaragua representing
approximately 88% of this amount. Typically in these cases Dole
is a joint defendant with the major DBCP manufacturers. Except
as described below, none of these lawsuits has resulted in a
verdict or judgment against Dole.
One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court with 12
Nicaraguan plaintiffs initially resulted in verdicts which
totaled approximately $5 million in damages against Dole in
favor of six of the plaintiffs. As a result of the courts
March 7, 2008 favorable rulings on Doles post-verdict
motions, including, importantly, the courts decision
striking down punitive damages in the case on
U.S. Constitutional grounds, the damages against Dole were
reduced to $1.58 million in total compensatory awards to
four of the plaintiffs; and the court granted Doles motion
for a new trial as to the claims of one of the plaintiffs. On
July 7, 2009, the Second District Court Appeals issued an
order to show cause why this $1.58 million judgment should
not be vacated and judgment be entered in defendants favor
on the grounds that the judgment was procured through fraud.
Plaintiffs are to provide their response to the order to show
cause to the trial court within 30 days of the issuance of
the order. In that order, the Court of Appeals stated that the
trial court need not hold a hearing to decide whether the
judgment was procured by fraud, but instead can rely on the
record that was presented in support of Doles request to
have the case sent back to the trial court.
In Nicaragua, 196 cases are currently filed (of which 20 are
active) in various courts throughout the country, all but one of
which were brought pursuant to Law 364, an October 2000
Nicaraguan statute that contains substantive and procedural
provisions that Nicaraguas Attorney General formally
opined are unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court
of Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional. Thirty-two cases
have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua: $489.4 million
(nine cases consolidated with 468 claimants) on
December 11, 2002; $82.9 million (one case with 58
claimants) on February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one
case with 20 claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million
(one case with four claimants) on May 25, 2004;
$56.5 million (one case with 72 claimants) on June 14,
2004; $64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with 39
claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million (one case
with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005; $46.4 million
(one case with 62 claimants) on August 20, 2005;
$809 million (six cases consolidated with 1,248 claimants)
on December 1, 2006; $38.4 million (one case with 192
claimants) on November 14, 2007; and $357.7 million
(eight cases with 417 claimants) on January 12, 2009, which
Dole recently learned of unofficially. Except for the latest
one, Dole has appealed all judgments, with Doles appeal of
the August 8, 2005 $98.5 million judgment and of the
December 1, 2006 $809 million judgment currently
pending before the Nicaragua Court of Appeal. Dole will appeal
the $357.7 million judgment once it has been served.
F-126
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Of the 20 active cases currently pending in civil courts in
Nicaragua, all have been brought under Law 364 except for one.
In all of the active cases where the proceeding has reached the
appropriate stage (7 of 20 cases), Dole has sought to have the
cases returned to the United States. In three of the cases where
Dole has sought return to the United States, the courts have
denied Doles request and Dole has appealed that decision.
Doles requests remain pending in the other four cases.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision, which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions against
Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the Court of
Appeals in that case. A Special Master appointed by the Court of
Appeals has recommended that Plaintiffs counsel be ordered
to pay Defendants fees and costs up to $130,000 each to
Dole and the other two defendants; and following such
recommendation, the Court of Appeals has appointed a special
prosecutor.
There is one case pending in the U.S. District Court in
Miami, Florida seeking enforcement of the August 8, 2005
$98.5 million Nicaraguan judgment. Commencing on
September 1, 2009, there will be an evidentiary hearing to
consider Doles request that the Court deny enforcement of
this judgment, contending that Nicaraguas judicial system
does not provide due process or an impartial judiciary, which
also lacks transparency and is corrupt. Miami District Court
Judge Paul C. Huck is already aware of the evidence of fraud
detailed in Judge Chaneys June 17, 2009 written
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Claimants have also sought to enforce the Nicaraguan judgments
in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. In Venezuela, the claimants
have attempted to enforce five of the Nicaraguan judgments in
that countrys Supreme Court: $489.4 million
(December 11, 2002); $82.9 million (February 25,
2004); $15.7 million (May 25, 2004);
$56.5 million (June 14, 2004); and $64.8 million
(June 15, 2004). The Venezuela Supreme Court has ordered
the plaintiffs to properly serve the defendants, or have their
request for recognition of these Nicaragua judgments dismissed.
An action filed to enforce the $27.7 million Nicaraguan
judgment (March 17, 2005) in the Colombian Supreme
Court was dismissed. In Ecuador, the claimants attempted to
enforce the five Nicaraguan judgments issued between
February 25, 2004 through June 15, 2004 in the Ecuador
Supreme Court. The First, Second and Third Chambers of the
Ecuador Supreme Court issued rulings refusing to consider those
enforcement actions on the ground that the Supreme Court was not
a court of competent jurisdiction for enforcement of a foreign
judgment. The plaintiffs subsequently refiled those five
enforcement actions in the civil court in Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Two of these subsequently filed enforcement actions have been
dismissed by the 3rd Civil Court
$15.7 million (May 25, 2004) and the
12th Civil Court $56.5 million
(June 14, 2004) in Guayaquil; plaintiffs have
sought reconsideration of those dismissals. The remaining three
enforcement actions are still pending.
Holdings believes that none of the Nicaraguan judgments will be
enforceable against any Dole entity in the U.S. or in any
other country, because Nicaraguas Law 364 is
unconstitutional and violates international principles of due
process. Among other things, Law 364 is an improper
special law directed at particular parties; it
requires defendants to pay large, non-refundable deposits in
order to even participate in the litigation; it provides a
severely truncated procedural process; it establishes an
irrebuttable presumption of causation that is contrary to the
evidence and scientific data; and it sets unreasonable minimum
damages that must be awarded in every case.
On October 23, 2006, Dole announced that Standard Fruit de
Honduras, S.A. reached an agreement with the Government of
Honduras and representatives of Honduran banana workers. This
F-127
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
agreement establishes a Worker Program that is intended by the
parties to resolve in a fair and equitable manner the claims of
male banana workers alleging sterility as a result of exposure
to DBCP. The Honduran Worker Program will not have a material
effect on Holdings financial condition or results of operations.
The official start of the Honduran Worker Program was announced
on January 8, 2007. On August 15, 2007, Shell Oil
Company was included in the Worker Program.
As to all the DBCP matters, Dole has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. While Dole believes there is no
reliable scientific basis for alleged injuries from the
agricultural field application of DBCP, Dole continues to seek
reasonable resolution of pending litigation and claims in the
U.S. and Latin America. For example, as in Honduras, Dole
is committed to finding a prompt resolution to the DBCP claims
in Nicaragua, and is prepared to pursue a structured worker
program in Nicaragua with science- based criteria. Los Angeles
Superior Court Judge Chaney had previously appointed a mediator
to explore possible settlement of all DBCP cases currently
pending before the court. Although no assurance can be given
concerning the outcome of these cases, in the opinion of
management, after consultation with legal counsel and based on
past experience defending and settling DBCP claims, the pending
lawsuits are not expected to have a material adverse effect on
Holdings financial condition or results of operations.
European Union Antitrust Inquiry: On
October 15, 2008, the European Commission (EC)
adopted a Decision against Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole
Fresh Fruit Europe OHG and against other unrelated banana
companies, finding violations of the European competition
(antitrust) laws. The Decision imposes 45.6 million
in fines on Dole.
The Decision follows a Statement of Objections, issued by the EC
on July 25, 2007, and searches carried out by the EC in
June 2005 at certain banana importers and distributors,
including two of Doles offices. Dole received the Decision
on October 21, 2008 and appealed the Decision to the
European Court of First Instance in Luxembourg on
December 24, 2008.
Dole made an initial $10 million (7.6 million)
provisional payment towards the 45.6 million fine on
January 22, 2009. As agreed with the European Commission
(DG Budget), Dole provided the required bank guaranty for the
remaining balance of the fine to the European Commission by the
deadline of April 30, 2009. The bank guaranty renews
annually during the appeals process (which may take several
years) and carries interest of 6.15% (accrued from
January 23, 2009). If the European Court of First Instance
fully agrees with Doles arguments presented in its appeal,
Dole will be entitled to the return of all monies paid, plus
interest.
On November 28 and 29, 2007, the EC conducted searches of Dole
offices in Italy and Spain, as well as of other companies
offices located in these countries. Dole continues to cooperate
with the ECs requests for information.
Although no assurances can be given, and although there could be
a material adverse effect on Holdings, Holdings believes that
Dole has not violated the European competition laws. No accrual
for the Decision has been made in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, since Holdings cannot determine at this
time the amount of probable loss, if any, incurred as a result
of the Decision.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, Dole received a
tax assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of our
interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A. in 2001. Dole
believes the assessment is without merit and filed an appeal
with the Honduran tax authorities, which was denied. As a result
of the denial in the administrative process, in order to negate
the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005, Dole proceeded to
the next stage of the appellate process by filing a lawsuit
against the Honduran government in the Honduran Administrative
Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government
F-128
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
sought dismissal of the lawsuit and attachment of assets, which
Dole challenged. The Honduran Supreme Court affirmed the
decision of the Honduran intermediate appellate court that a
statutory prerequisite to challenging the tax assessment on the
merits is the payment of the tax assessment or the filing of a
payment plan with the Honduran courts; Dole has challenged the
constitutionality of the statute requiring such payment or
payment plan. Although no assurance can be given concerning the
outcome of this case, in the opinion of management, after
consultation with legal counsel, the pending lawsuits and
tax-related matters are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on Holdings financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
NOTE 12
|
ASSETS
HELD-FOR-SALE
|
Holdings continuously reviews its assets in order to identify
those assets that do not meet Holdings future strategic
direction or internal economic return criteria. As a result of
this review, Holdings has identified and is in the process of
selling specific businesses and long-lived assets. In accordance
with FAS 144, Holdings has reclassified these assets as
held-for-sale.
Total assets held-for-sale by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
98,105
|
|
|
$
|
38,600
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
61,989
|
|
|
$
|
202,876
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(24,438
|
)
|
|
|
(35,349
|
)
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
(49,350
|
)
|
|
|
(110,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
75,278
|
|
|
$
|
3,251
|
|
|
$
|
3,214
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
$
|
94,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 20, 2009, assets held-for-sale related primarily to
property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation.
Total liabilities held-for-sale by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,218
|
|
|
$
|
50,465
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(5,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,218
|
)
|
|
|
(50,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings received total cash proceeds of approximately
$84 million on assets sold during the half year ended
June 20, 2009, which had been classified as held-for-sale.
The total realized gain recorded on assets classified as
held-for-sale was $18.1 million for the half year ended
June 20, 2009, which included $1.3 million related to
the fresh-cut flowers discontinued operation. Realized gains
related to
F-129
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
continuing operations for the half year ended June 20,
2009, of $16.8 million, are shown as a separate component
of operating income in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
Fresh
Fruit
During the second quarter of 2009, Holdings reclassified one
Chilean farm and the assets and liabilities of an Italian port
operation to held-for-sale.
Holdings completed the sale of a portion of its Latin American
banana operations during January 2009. Net proceeds from the
sale totaled approximately $25.8 million. To date, Holdings
has collected $18 million in cash ($2 million in 2008
and $16 million in 2009) and has recorded a
$7.8 million receivable which will be collected through
January 2010. Holdings also sold a wood box plant in Chile for
$0.6 million. Total realized gains recorded on these sales
approximated $6.7 million for the half year ended
June 20, 2009.
2009 Sales
Activity
During the third quarter of 2009, Holdings signed definitive
sale agreements to sell some operating properties located in
Latin America for approximately $68 million. As of
June 20, 2009, the assets and liabilities of these
operating properties have not been included in assets or
liabilities held-for-sale. Additionally during the third quarter
of 2009, Holdings signed a letter of intent to sell an operating
property in Chile for approximately $32 million. The sale
of these operating properties are expected to close by the end
of fiscal 2009.
Fresh
Vegetables
During the first quarter of 2009, Holdings completed the sale of
1,100 acres of property located in California. Holdings
received net cash proceeds of $44.5 million and recorded a
gain on the sale of $9.2 million, which is included in gain
on asset sales in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the half year ended June 20, 2009.
Packaged
Foods
During the first half of 2009, Holdings sold approximately
160 acres of peach orchards located in California for
approximately $1.9 million and recorded a gain on the sale
of $0.9 million.
Fresh-Cut
Flowers Discontinued Operation
During January 2009, the first phase of the Flowers transaction
was completed. Holdings only retains some of the real estate of
the former flowers divisions to be sold in the subsequent phases
of the transaction. Net proceeds from the sale totaled
approximately $29.3 million. Of this amount,
$21 million was collected in cash and the remaining
$8.3 million was recorded as a receivable, which will be
repaid during January 2011. Holdings recorded a gain on the sale
of $1.3 million, which is included as a component of gain
on disposal from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in
the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the half
year ended June 20, 2009.
|
|
NOTE 13
|
DERIVATIVE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
Holdings is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations, bunker fuel price fluctuations and interest rate
changes in the normal course of its business. As part of its
risk management strategy, Holdings uses derivative instruments
to hedge certain foreign currency, bunker fuel and interest rate
exposures. Holdings objective is to offset gains and losses
resulting from these exposures
F-130
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge
them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings. Holdings does not
hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes.
All of Holdings derivative instruments, with the exception of
the interest rate swap, are not designated as effective hedges
of cash flows as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, as amended
(FAS 133). The interest rate swap is
accounted for as a cash flow hedge under FAS 133 and
accordingly, unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(AOCI) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Holdings entered into an interest rate swap in 2006 to hedge
future changes in interest rates. This agreement effectively
converted $320 million of borrowings under Term Loan C,
which was variable-rate debt, to a fixed-rate basis through
2011. The interest rate swap fixed the interest rate at 7.2%.
The paying and receiving rates under the interest rate swap were
5.5% and 1.1% as of June 20, 2009, with an outstanding
notional amount of $320 million.
Holdings executed a cross currency swap during 2006 to
synthetically convert $320 million of Term Loan C into
Japanese yen denominated debt in order to effectively lower the
U.S. dollar fixed interest rate of 7.2% to a Japanese yen
interest rate of 3.6%. Payments under the cross currency swap
were converted from U.S. dollars to Japanese yen at an
exchange rate of ¥111.9.
During the second quarter of 2009, Holdings amended its cross
currency and interest rate swap agreements. The amendments
removed early termination provisions which would have allowed
the counterparty to settle the swaps at certain specified dates
prior to maturity. In addition, the rate at which payments under
the cross currency swap were converted from U.S. dollars to
Japanese yen increased to ¥114.9 from ¥111.9. In
connection with these amendments, Holdings also entered into a
collateral arrangement which requires Holdings to provide
collateral to its counterparties when the fair market value of
the cross currency and interest rate swap exceed a combined
liability of $35 million. The measurement date for the
collateral required at June 20, 2009 was June 16,
2009, and the fair value of the swaps at the measurement date
was a liability of approximately $76 million. Holdings
provided cash collateral of $6.1 million, which was
recorded as restricted deposits in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet, and the remaining $35 million of collateral
was issued through letters of credit.
At June 20, 2009, the exchange rate of the Japanese yen to
U.S. dollar was ¥96.5. The value of the cross currency
swap will fluctuate based on changes in the U.S. dollar to
Japanese yen exchange rate and market interest rates until
maturity in 2011, at which time it will settle in cash at the
then current exchange rate.
F-131
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
At June 20, 2009, the gross notional value and fair market
value of Holdings derivative instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
Strike
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$320,000
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
(23,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges (Buy/Sell):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Euro
|
|
|
EUR 1.44
|
|
|
|
48,354
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
1,990
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar
|
|
|
CAD 1.12
|
|
|
|
10,706
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
104
|
|
Chilean Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
CLP 671
|
|
|
|
9,989
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
|
JPY 101.2
|
|
|
|
171,249
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
(2,801
|
)
|
Philippine Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
PHP 47.9
|
|
|
|
21,407
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
Cross currency swap interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(49,007
|
)
|
Bunker fuel hedges
|
|
|
$277
|
|
|
|
26,544
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(per metric ton
|
)
|
|
|
(metric tons
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(66,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of the foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges will
occur during 2009 and 2010.
The effect of the interest rate swap on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations for the
quarter and half year ended June 20, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI as of
|
|
|
Losses Reclassified into Income
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Half Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
$
|
4,859
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
$
|
4,007
|
|
F-132
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Unrecognized losses of $13 million related to the interest
rate swap are expected to be realized into earnings over the
next twelve months. These losses will be primarily offset by
gains related to the cross currency swap.
Net unrealized gains (losses) and realized gains (losses) on
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for the
quarters and half years ended June 20, 2009 and
June 14, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
Realized Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
(5,998
|
)
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
711
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(24,419
|
)
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23,329
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,582
|
|
|
$
|
3,420
|
|
|
$
|
(2,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
Realized Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
7,491
|
|
|
$
|
3,175
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
$
|
(8,971
|
)
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
|
(2,784
|
)
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(6,703
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,130
|
|
|
$
|
(6,127
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,452
|
|
|
$
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
Holdings financial instruments primarily comprise short-term
trade and grower receivables, trade payables, notes receivable
and notes payable, as well as long-term grower receivables,
capital lease obligations, term loans, a revolving credit
facility, and notes and debentures. For short-term instruments,
the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short
maturity of these instruments. For the other long-term financial
instruments, excluding Doles secured and unsecured notes
and debentures, and term loans, the carrying amount approximates
the fair value since they bear interest at variable rates or
fixed rates which approximate market.
Holdings adopted FAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157) as of
December 30, 2007 for financial assets and liabilities
measured on a recurring basis. Holdings adopted FAS 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and liabilities at the beginning of
fiscal year 2009. FAS 157 establishes a fair value
F-133
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These levels,
in order of highest to lowest priority are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not
quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by
market data.
The fair values of Holdings derivative instruments are
determined using Level 2 inputs, which are defined as
significant other observable inputs. The fair values
of the foreign currency exchange contracts, bunker fuel
contracts, interest rate swap and cross currency swap were
estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based
upon forward foreign currency exchange rates, bunker fuel
futures, interest-rate yield curves or quotes obtained from
brokers for contracts with similar terms less any credit
valuation adjustments. Holdings recorded a credit valuation
adjustment at June 20, 2009 which reduced the derivative
liability balances. The credit valuation adjustment was
$3.2 million and $16.3 million at June 20, 2009
and January 3, 2009, respectively. The net change in the
credit valuation adjustment resulted in a loss of
$13.1 million during the half year ended June 20,
2009. Of this loss, $1.6 million was recorded as interest
expense and $11.5 million was recorded as other income
(expense), net. For the quarter ended June 20, 2009, the
net change in the credit valuation adjustment resulted in a loss
of $5.6 million. Of this loss, $1 million was recorded
as interest expense and $4.6 million was recorded as other
income (expense), net.
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of
assets and liabilities under the FAS 157 hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurements at
|
|
|
Measurements at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
June 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
4,682
|
|
|
$
|
4,682
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,447
|
|
|
$
|
7,447
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
23,253
|
|
|
|
23,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
|
47,192
|
|
|
|
47,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
73,698
|
|
|
$
|
73,698
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distrifruit assets
|
|
$
|
10,037
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-134
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Nonfinancial
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring
Basis
Nonfinancial assets such as goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets are measured at fair value when there is an
indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an
impairment is recognized. Holdings performed a goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis during the
second quarter of 2009 and determined that its goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets were not impaired at
June 20, 2009.
The goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
analysis was performed using a combination of discounted cash
flow models and market multiples. As discussed in Note 7,
the fair value of the Distrifruit business was also determined
based on a discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow
models used estimates and assumptions including pricing and
volume data, anticipated growth rates, profitability levels, tax
rates and discount rates.
Credit
Risk
The counterparties to the foreign currency and bunker fuel
forward contracts and the interest rate and cross currency swaps
consist of a number of major international financial
institutions. Holdings has established counterparty guidelines
and regularly monitors its positions and the financial strength
of these institutions. While counterparties to hedging contracts
expose Holdings to credit-related losses in the event of a
counterpartys non-performance, the risk would be limited
to the unrealized gains on such affected contracts. Holdings
does not anticipate any such losses.
Fair Value of
Debt
Dole estimates the fair value of its secured and unsecured notes
and debentures based on current quoted market prices. The term
loans are traded between institutional investors on the
secondary loan market, and the fair values of the term loans are
based on the last available trading price. The carrying value
and estimated fair values of Doles debt is summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Secured and unsecured notes and debentures
|
|
$
|
1,087,903
|
|
|
$
|
1,091,559
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
809,400
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
828,297
|
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
|
|
585,855
|
|
Refer to Note 16 Hotel and Wellness Center, for
further information on the fair value of debt of the Hotel and
Wellness Center.
F-135
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 15
|
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
|
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share
including a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Half Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
June 14,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
13,549
|
|
|
$
|
171,422
|
|
|
$
|
108,359
|
|
|
$
|
138,814
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
13,788
|
|
|
$
|
176,040
|
|
|
$
|
110,113
|
|
|
$
|
141,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 16
|
HOTEL AND
WELLNESS CENTER
|
WWP, a Delaware limited liability company, operates pursuant to
an operating agreement (the Operating Agreement)
between Holdings and Arcus Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (collectively, the Members). WWP
operates and owns a hotel and wellbeing center located in
Westlake Village, California. The hotel facilities consist of a
269-room five star hotel (the Hotel) and a
full-service spa and fitness center. WWP also operates and owns
a TV production facility and a separate conference center that
focuses on health and wellbeing programming and awareness. In
addition, the WWP leases space to a health and longevity
institute clinic containing a medical and diagnostic and imaging
suite.
The Hotel is managed by Four Seasons Hotels limited (Four
Seasons) pursuant to a hotel management agreement that
expires 10 years from the opening date of the Hotel,
subject to seven
10-year
extensions at the option of Four Seasons. Pursuant to the
Management Agreement, Four Seasons provides services to the
Hotel. Amounts charged by Four Seasons to Holdings for these
services were immaterial for all periods presented.
Under the provisions of FAS 144, long-lived assets are
evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Indicators of impairment currently exist with
respect to the long-lived assets of WWP including evidence that
a significant decline in market value due to currently depressed
market conditions has occurred as well as recent operating
losses sustained by the WWP entity. Holdings has performed an
undiscounted
F-136
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
cash flow test consistent with the provisions of FAS 144
during the week of September 7, 2009. Significant
assumptions with respect to this impairment test include the
useful life of the primary asset, capital expenditures required
to maintain the asset group, the mature level of occupancy and
daily room rental rates of the Hotel and Wellness Center given
WWP began operations in late 2006, and future required staffing
and other costs. Holdings has evaluated these assumptions and
the resulting projections of future undiscounted cash flows of
WWP in view of the currently depressed market conditions and in
comparison with the results of other comparable properties in
performing its impairment test. Holdings impairment test
indicates that WWPs undiscounted cash flows exceed the
carrying value of its long-lived assets and accordingly no
impairment is required.
Hotel and
Wellness Center Senior Secured Credit Facility
Long-term debt related to the senior secured credit facility at
June 20, 2009 and January 3, 2009 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 20,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Senior credit facility of DHM Holding Company, Inc
|
|
$
|
135,000
|
|
|
$
|
135,000
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
(135,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility: Holdings is the
borrower under a $135 million senior credit facility (the
DHM Loan), which matures on March 3, 2010. WWP,
Mr. David H. Murdock, individually, the David H. Murdock
Living Trust, and a company controlled by Mr. David H.
Murdock, are guarantors of the DHM Loan. Should Holdings not
repay amounts owed under the DHM Loan, the creditors under the
DHM Loan have the right to demand repayment of the outstanding
borrowings from any or all of the guarantors. The Hotel and
Wellness Center property and equipment, which is pledged as
collateral for the DHM Loan, as well as cash flows generated
from the Hotel and Wellness Center operations, could be used as
a source to repay amounts owed under the DHM Loan. Other
entities controlled either directly or indirectly by Holdings
could also be used as a source to repay amounts owed under the
DHM Loan. However, certain legal restrictions and other
unrelated debt obligations owed by these other entities could
prevent these other entities from providing a source of
repayment, whether through liquidation of assets or cash flows
from operations.
In March 2008, Holdings amended and restated the DHM Loan
whereby payments totaling $45 million were made to reduce
the principal balance. The terms of the amended and restated DHM
Loan required a $20 million reduction of principal in June
2009, with the remaining principal balance due in March 2010.
The $20 million principal payment was made during June
2009. Under the terms of the amended and restated DHM Loan, the
senior credit facility commitment was reduced from
$180 million to $135 million, effectively resulting in
no additional borrowing availability under the amended and
restated DHM Loan as of the date of the refinancing. Holdings
was also required to fund $2 million in an interest reserve
account, which is presented as a restricted cash deposit in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
June 20, 2009 and January 3, 2009.
At June 20, 2009 and January 3, 2009, total borrowings
under the DHM Loan were $135 million. The DHM Loan bears
interest at the Prime Lending Rate, plus a margin ranging from
2.00% to 3.00%, dependent upon the borrowing availability of the
DHM Loan. At June 20, 2009 and January 3, 2009, the
effective interest rates were 3.70% and 4.195%, respectively.
Total interest expense incurred
F-137
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
under the DHM Loan during the half years ended June 20,
2009 and June 14, 2008, was $2.5 million and
$4.5 million, respectively.
WWP amortized deferred debt issuance costs of $0.3 million
and $0.6 million during the quarter and half year ended
June 20, 2009, respectively. WWP amortized deferred debt
issuance costs of $0.3 million and $0.8 million during
the quarter and half year ended June 14, 2008, respectively.
Covenants under the DHM Loan required to be maintained by
Holdings consisted of a number of restrictive financial
covenants, including minimum net worth and debt service coverage
ratios, and nonfinancial covenants. At June 20, 2009,
Holdings was in compliance with these covenants. Any default
under the DHM loan would result in a default under Doles
senior secured credit facilities under the existing cross
default and cross acceleration provisions set forth in these
senior secured credit facilities.
The carrying value of the DHM loan approximates its fair value
since the long-term debt bears interest at a variable rate,
which approximates fair value.
|
|
Note
17
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On September 25, 2009, Dole completed the sale and issuance
of $315 million aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Secured
Notes due October 1, 2016, or the 2016 Notes, at a discount
of approximately $6.2 million. The 2016 Notes were sold to
qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under
the Securities Act and to persons outside the United States in
compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale
of the 2016 Notes to the initial purchasers was exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereof. Interest on the 2016 Notes will be
paid semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1
of each year, beginning on April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes
have the benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of Dole that
is junior to the liens of Doles senior secured credit
facilities, and are senior obligations of Dole ranking equally
with Doles existing senior debt. Dole has issued a
redemption notice for the remaining principal amount outstanding
of the 2010 Notes of $363 million and has irrevocably
deposited the net proceeds from the sale and issuance of the
2016 Notes with the trustee of the 2010 Notes to be used to
repay such notes.
F-138
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of
Directors and Shareholder of DHM Holding Company, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
DHM Holding Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the
years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007, and
December 30, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007, and
December 30, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, at
the beginning of its fiscal 2009 year. Additionally, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard for fair value
measurements during the year ended January 3, 2009, new
accounting standards for uncertainty in income taxes and planned
major maintenance activities effective at the beginning of its
fiscal 2007 year, and effective December 30, 2006, a
new accounting standard for retirement benefits.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
September 18, 2009
(October 2, 2009 as to the subsequent events disclosure in
Note 23)
F-139
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007
and December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$
|
7,659,748
|
|
|
$
|
6,856,546
|
|
|
$
|
5,993,098
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
(6,909,287
|
)
|
|
|
(6,235,310
|
)
|
|
|
(5,422,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
750,461
|
|
|
|
621,236
|
|
|
|
570,171
|
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(530,805
|
)
|
|
|
(506,168
|
)
|
|
|
(452,154
|
)
|
Gain on asset sales (Note 9)
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
246,632
|
|
|
|
115,068
|
|
|
|
118,017
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
8,002
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
7,999
|
|
|
|
8,097
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(184,895
|
)
|
|
|
(208,734
|
)
|
|
|
(172,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
equity earnings
|
|
|
54,201
|
|
|
|
(83,820
|
)
|
|
|
(38,305
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
60,906
|
|
|
|
11,980
|
|
|
|
(15,399
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
121,495
|
|
|
|
(70,144
|
)
|
|
|
(53,527
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
(50,386
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
97,419
|
|
|
|
(85,863
|
)
|
|
|
(101,099
|
)
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
99,620
|
|
|
$
|
(84,137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Basic and Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
F-140
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
As of
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
90,945
|
|
|
$
|
98,957
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $41 million and
$62 million, respectively
|
|
|
809,373
|
|
|
|
842,587
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
796,996
|
|
|
|
751,881
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
70,334
|
|
|
|
71,808
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
Assets held-for-sale (Note 9)
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
76,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,991,797
|
|
|
|
1,853,562
|
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
|
|
69,336
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1.03 billion and $0.98 billion, respectively
|
|
|
1,050,331
|
|
|
|
1,340,139
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $37 million and
$19 million, respectively (Note 22)
|
|
|
344,518
|
|
|
|
361,079
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
509,518
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
708,458
|
|
|
|
721,790
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
140,061
|
|
|
|
156,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,716,790
|
|
|
$
|
5,011,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
512,374
|
|
|
$
|
545,069
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale (Note 9)
|
|
|
50,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
500,362
|
|
|
|
524,386
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
356,748
|
|
|
|
14,171
|
|
Current portion of Hotel and Wellness Center long term-debt
(Note 22)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
83,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,488,738
|
|
|
|
1,211,644
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,798,556
|
|
|
|
2,316,208
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center long-term debt (Note 22)
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
134,261
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
222,795
|
|
|
|
259,307
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
414,063
|
|
|
|
533,518
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 16 and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.001 par value;
1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
475,210
|
|
|
|
412,878
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
166,654
|
|
|
|
67,034
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(42,903
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
|
598,961
|
|
|
|
479,896
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
78,677
|
|
|
|
76,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
677,638
|
|
|
|
556,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,716,790
|
|
|
$
|
5,011,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
F-141
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
97,419
|
|
|
$
|
(85,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101,099
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
157,256
|
|
|
|
173,160
|
|
|
|
150,771
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on financial instruments
|
|
|
25,086
|
|
|
|
31,473
|
|
|
|
(10,671
|
)
|
Asset write-offs and net (gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(50,751
|
)
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
Impairment of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,574
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations and gain on
disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
12,760
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(6,388
|
)
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
5,499
|
|
|
|
5,449
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,134
|
|
Noncash interest expense on Hotel and Wellness Center long-term
debt
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
12,420
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(56,011
|
)
|
|
|
(51,966
|
)
|
|
|
(30,361
|
)
|
Unrecognized tax benefits on federal income tax audit settlement
(Note 7)
|
|
|
(60,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense
|
|
|
21,656
|
|
|
|
19,539
|
|
|
|
15,383
|
|
Gain on settlement of Hurricane Katrina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(35,778
|
)
|
|
|
(68,965
|
)
|
|
|
(50,836
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(58,626
|
)
|
|
|
(96,228
|
)
|
|
|
(49,830
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(11,418
|
)
|
|
|
(9,501
|
)
|
|
|
(2,935
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
27,641
|
|
|
|
13,573
|
|
|
|
19,542
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
29,876
|
|
|
|
87,685
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(44,929
|
)
|
|
|
27,265
|
|
|
|
28,450
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(41,421
|
)
|
|
|
(25,749
|
)
|
|
|
(12,879
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
28,576
|
|
|
|
33,125
|
|
|
|
(2,218
|
)
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
226,483
|
|
|
|
41,718
|
|
|
|
31,273
|
|
Hurricane Katrina insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,950
|
)
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(85,096
|
)
|
|
|
(106,821
|
)
|
|
|
(125,056
|
)
|
Capital additions for Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
(2,256
|
)
|
|
|
(40,271
|
)
|
|
|
(168,108
|
)
|
Payment of restricted deposit for Hotel and Wellness Center
long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from liquidation of Hotel and Wellness Center
restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock in going-private merger transaction
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
Repayment of employee notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
136,886
|
|
|
|
(97,654
|
)
|
|
|
(285,498
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
94,943
|
|
|
|
119,389
|
|
|
|
101,381
|
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(132,266
|
)
|
|
|
(91,176
|
)
|
|
|
(52,872
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,348,050
|
|
|
|
1,167,530
|
|
|
|
2,260,545
|
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,482,800
|
)
|
|
|
(1,169,213
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119,698
|
)
|
Long-term debt borrowings for Hotel and Wellness Center, net of
debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,282
|
|
Long-term debt repayments for Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
(47,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
62,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from WWP noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
11,856
|
|
|
|
16,917
|
|
Proceeds from Hotel and Wellness Center related party notes
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Hotel and Wellness Center related party notes
payable
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling shareholders
|
|
|
(13,447
|
)
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(167,057
|
)
|
|
|
29,901
|
|
|
|
361,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(6,417
|
)
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,012
|
)
|
|
|
(30,965
|
)
|
|
|
75,854
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
98,957
|
|
|
|
129,922
|
|
|
|
54,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
90,945
|
|
|
$
|
98,957
|
|
|
$
|
129,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-142
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years
Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 (Continued)
Supplemental cash
flow information
At January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, accounts payable included approximately
$6.7 million, $17.8 million and $52.2 million,
respectively, for capital expenditures. Of the
$17.8 million of capital expenditures included in accounts
payable at December 29, 2007, approximately
$16.7 million had been paid during fiscal 2008. Of the
$52.2 million of capital expenditures included in accounts
payable at December 30, 2006, approximately
$51.6 million had been paid during fiscal 2007.
Income tax payments, net of refunds, for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 were $15.5 million,
$23.7 million and $25.7 million, respectively.
Interest payments on borrowings totaled $183.5 million,
$189.5 million and $163.8 million during the years
ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
During the year ended January 3, 2009, Holdings recorded
$77.8 million of tax related adjustments that resulted from
changes to unrecognized tax benefits that existed at the time of
the going-private merger transaction. This tax-related
adjustment resulted in a decrease to goodwill and a decrease to
the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Refer to
Note 7 Income Taxes for additional information.
See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
F-143
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007
and December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension & Other
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
on Hedges
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,003
|
|
|
$
|
226,394
|
|
|
$
|
(22,735
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,822
|
|
|
$
|
47,437
|
|
|
$
|
669,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(101,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,557
|
|
|
|
(3,965
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
13,645
|
|
|
|
13,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of realized gains to net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,799
|
)
|
|
|
(4,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to adopt FAS 158, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,917
|
|
|
|
16,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,003
|
|
|
$
|
124,736
|
|
|
$
|
(30,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,990
|
|
|
$
|
(4,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,557
|
|
|
$
|
588,159
|
|
|
$
|
(95,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,726
|
)
|
|
|
(85,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(85,863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
(10,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging gains
(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,271
|
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of realized gains to net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,816
|
)
|
|
|
(9,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 48 adoption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of land to affiliate, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,338
|
|
|
|
12,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,856
|
|
|
|
11,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,878
|
|
|
$
|
67,034
|
|
|
$
|
(26,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,261
|
|
|
$
|
(15,525
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,997
|
|
|
$
|
556,893
|
|
|
$
|
(71,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
|
97,419
|
|
|
$
|
97,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,108
|
)
|
|
|
(14,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation and hedging losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,452
|
)
|
|
|
(18,877
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(36,348
|
)
|
|
|
(36,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of realized losses to net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in employee benefit plans, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
|
|
(12,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of land to affiliate, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from noncontrolling shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
475,210
|
|
|
$
|
166,654
|
|
|
$
|
(40,960
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,187
|
|
|
$
|
(29,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
78,677
|
|
|
$
|
677,638
|
|
|
$
|
54,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-144
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 1
|
Nature of
Operations
|
DHM Holding Company, Inc. (Holdings) wholly owns
Dole Food Company, Inc. (Dole) and owns 85% of
Westlake Wellbeing Properties, LLC (WWP or the
Hotel and Wellness Center). Refer to
Note 22 Hotel and Wellness Center, for further
information on the nature of Hotel and Wellness Center
operations. In connection with the consummation of the proposed
initial public offering of Dole common stock, as discussed below
in greater detail, a series of related transactions will be
undertaken that will result in the following: Holdings will
be merged down into Dole and Holdings will cease to exist as a
separate entity, the 85% interest in WWP will be transferred out
to another entity owned by David H. Murdock and so will not
be any part of the ongoing operations of Dole, and all existing
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions will be
eliminated between Doles senior secured facilities, on the
one hand, and currently existing Holdings debt associated with
WWP and certain indebtedness of an affiliate of Holdings, on the
other hand.
Dole was incorporated under the laws of Hawaii in 1894 and was
reincorporated under the laws of Delaware in July 2001.
Dole is engaged in the worldwide sourcing, processing,
distributing and marketing of high quality, branded food
products, including fresh fruit and vegetables, as well as
packaged foods.
The operations of Dole are conducted throughout North America,
Latin America, Europe (including eastern European countries),
Asia (primarily in Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Thailand),
the Middle East and Africa (primarily in South Africa). As a
result of its global operating and financing activities, Dole is
exposed to certain risks including changes in commodity pricing,
fluctuations in interest rates, fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, as well as other environmental and business
risks in both sourcing and selling locations.
Doles principal products are produced on both Dole-owned
and leased land and are also acquired through associated
producer and independent grower arrangements. Doles
products are primarily packed and processed by Dole and sold to
wholesale, retail and institutional customers and other food
product companies.
In March 2003, Dole completed a going-private merger transaction
(going-private merger transaction). The
privatization resulted from the acquisition by David H. Murdock,
Doles Chairman, of the approximately 76% of the shares of
the common stock of Dole that he and his affiliates did not
already own. As a result of the transaction, Dole became
wholly-owned by Mr. Murdock through Holdings.
Proposed Initial Public Offering
Transaction: It is currently expected that
immediately prior to the closing of the proposed initial public
offering of shares of Dole common stock (IPO
Transaction), the registration statement process of which
commenced in August 2009 that Holdings will be merged into Dole
in a downstream merger to be accounted for as a common control
merger under the provisions of FAS 141R. Immediately
following the contemplated merger transaction, the entire
interest in WWP held by post-merger Dole will be transferred to
another entity owned by David H. Murdock (MURCO).
The transfer of WWP to MURCO will be accounted for as a common
control transfer at carryover basis consistent with the
provisions of FAS 141R. Further, WWP long-lived assets will
continue to be treated under a held and used model under
FAS 144 in the contemplated transfer to MURCO. Subsequent
to the transfer of WWP to MURCO, the results of WWP will be
presented as a discontinued operation of the merged entity given
WWP will not be a part of the ongoing operations of such entity.
Dole is also contemplating the offering of at least
$300 million of senior secured notes due 2016 with the
proceeds used to refinance a portion of the senior notes due
2010 Notes. Additionally, Dole intends to complete other
transactions upon consummation of the IPO Transaction that will
result in the elimination of all other cross-default and cross
acceleration provisions that exist between Doles senior
secured facilities and certain indebtedness of Holdings and its
affiliates. See Note 12 Notes
F-145
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Payable and Long-Term Debt for discussion of existing
cross-default and cross acceleration provisions.
|
|
Note 2
|
Basis of
Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Basis of Consolidation: Holdings consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Dole and its
consolidated subsidiaries and the accounts of WWP and its
consolidated subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Annual Closing Date: Holdings fiscal year ends
on the Saturday closest to December 31. The fiscal years
2008, 2007 and 2006 ended on January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
Holdings operates under a 52/53 week year. Fiscal 2008 was
a 53-week year. Fiscal 2007 and 2006 were both 52-week years.
The impact of the additional week in fiscal 2008 was not
material to Holdings consolidated statement of operations or
consolidated statement of cash flows.
Revenue Recognition: Holdings recognizes
revenue at the point title and risk of loss is transferred to
the customer, collection is reasonably assured, persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists and the price is fixed or
determinable. Refer to Note 22 Hotel and
Wellness Center, for details on WWPs revenue recognition
policies.
Sales Incentives: Holdings offers sales
incentives and promotions to its customers (resellers) and to
its consumers. These incentives include consumer coupons and
promotional discounts, volume rebates and product placement
fees. Holdings follows the requirements of Emerging Issues Task
Force
No. 01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(including a Reseller of the Vendors Products).
Consideration given to customers and consumers related to
sales incentives is recorded as a reduction of revenues.
Estimated sales discounts are recorded in the period in which
the related sale is recognized. Volume rebates are recognized as
earned by the customer, based upon the contractual terms of the
arrangement with the customer and, where applicable, Holdings
estimate of sales volume over the term of the arrangement.
Adjustments to estimates are made periodically as new
information becomes available and actual sales volumes become
known. Adjustments to these estimates have historically not been
significant to Holdings.
Agricultural Costs: Recurring agricultural
costs include costs relating to irrigation, fertilizing, disease
and insect control and other ongoing crop and land maintenance
activities. Recurring agricultural costs are charged to
operations as incurred or are recognized when the crops are
harvested and sold, depending on the product. Non- recurring
agricultural costs, primarily comprising of soil and farm
improvements and other long-term crop growing costs that benefit
multiple harvests, are deferred and amortized over the estimated
production period, currently from two to seven years.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Amounts billed to
third-party customers for shipping and handling are included as
a component of revenues. Shipping and handling costs incurred
are included as a component of cost revenues and represent costs
incurred by Holdings to ship product from the sourcing locations
to the end consumer markets.
Marketing and Advertising Costs: Marketing and
advertising costs, which include media, production and other
promotional costs, are generally expensed in the period in which
the marketing or advertising first takes place. In limited
circumstances, Holdings capitalizes payments related to the
right to stock products in customer outlets or to provide
funding for various merchandising programs over a specified
contractual period. In such cases, Holdings amortizes the costs
over the life of the underlying contract. The amortization of
these costs, as well as the cost of certain other marketing and
advertising arrangements with customers, are classified as a
reduction in revenues. Advertising and marketing costs, included
in selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses,
F-146
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
amounted to $72.9 million, $77.1 million and
$70.6 million during the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006.
Research and Development Costs: Research and
development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and
development costs were not material for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006.
Income Taxes: Holdings accounts for income
taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been
included in the financial statements. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
differences between the financial statements and tax basis of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. Income taxes, which would be due upon the
repatriation of foreign subsidiary earnings, have not been
provided where the undistributed earnings are considered
indefinitely invested. A valuation allowance is provided for
deferred income tax assets for which it is deemed more likely
than not that future taxable income will not be sufficient to
realize the related income tax benefits from these assets.
Holdings establishes additional provisions for income taxes
when, despite the belief that tax positions are fully
supportable, there remain certain positions that do not meet the
minimum probability threshold, as defined by Financial
Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which is a tax position that is
more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the
applicable taxing authority. The impact of provisions for
uncertain tax positions, as well as the related net interest and
penalties, are included in Income taxes in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash
equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid
investments, primarily money market funds and time deposits,
with original maturities of three months or less.
Grower Advances: Holdings makes advances to
third-party growers primarily in Latin America and Asia for
various farming needs. Some of these advances are secured with
property or other collateral owned by the growers. Holdings
monitors these receivables on a regular basis and records an
allowance for these grower receivables based on estimates of the
growers ability to repay advances and the fair value of
the collateral. Grower advances are stated at the gross advance
amount less allowances for potentially uncollectible balances.
Inventories: Holdings inventories are valued
at the lower of cost or market. Costs related to certain
packaged foods products are determined using the average cost
basis. Costs related to other inventory categories, including
fresh fruit and vegetables are determined on the
first-in,
first-out basis. Specific identification and average cost
methods are also used primarily for certain packing materials
and operating supplies. Crop growing costs primarily represent
the costs associated with growing bananas on Dole-owned farms or
growing vegetables on third-party farms where Holdings bears
substantially all of the growing risk. Inventory related to the
Hotel and Wellness Center are immaterial to the financial
statements.
Investments: Investments in affiliates and
joint ventures with ownership of 20% to 50% are recorded on the
equity method, provided Holdings has the ability to exercise
significant influence. All other non-consolidated investments
are accounted for using the cost method. At January 3, 2009
and December 29, 2007, substantially all of Holdings
investments have been accounted for under the equity method.
F-147
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant
and equipment is stated at cost plus the fair value of asset
retirement obligations, if any, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of these assets. Holdings reviews
long-lived assets to be held and used for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. If an evaluation of
recoverability is required, the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows directly associated with the asset are compared to
the assets carrying amount. If this comparison indicates
that there is an impairment, the amount of the impairment is
calculated by comparing the carrying value to discounted
expected future cash flows or comparable market values,
depending on the nature of the asset. All long-lived assets, for
which management has committed itself to a plan of disposal by
sale, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value
less cost to sell. Long-lived assets to be disposed of other
than by sale are classified as held and used until the date of
disposal. Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred.
Goodwill and Intangibles: Goodwill represents
the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of
the net identifiable assets acquired. Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment
annually, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators
arise. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which
are either the operating segment or one reporting level below
the operating segment. Fair values for goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are determined based on
discounted cash flows, market multiples or appraised values, as
appropriate.
Holdings indefinite-lived intangible asset, consisting of the
DOLE brand, is considered to have an indefinite life because it
is expected to generate cash flows indefinitely and as such is
not amortized. Holdings intangible assets with a definite life
consist primarily of customer relationships. Amortizable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives. The weighted average useful life
of Holdings customer relationships is 11 years.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial
instruments that potentially subject Holdings to a concentration
of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents,
derivative contracts, grower advances and trade receivables.
Holdings maintains its temporary cash investments with high
quality financial institutions, which are invested primarily in
short-term U.S. government instruments and certificates of
deposit. The counterparties to Holdings derivative
contracts are major financial institutions. Grower advances are
principally with farming enterprises located throughout Latin
America and Asia and are secured by the underlying crop
harvests. Credit risk related to trade receivables is mitigated
due to the large number of customers dispersed worldwide. To
reduce credit risk, Holdings performs periodic credit
evaluations of its customers but does not generally require
advance payments or collateral. Additionally, Holdings maintains
allowances for credit losses. No individual customer accounted
for greater than 10% of Holdings revenues during the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006. No individual customer accounted for
greater than 10% of accounts receivable as of January 3,
2009 or December 29, 2007.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Holdings
financial instruments are primarily composed of short-term trade
and grower receivables, trade payables, notes receivable and
notes payable, as well as long-term grower receivables, capital
lease obligations, term loans, revolving credit facility, notes
and debentures. For short-term instruments, the carrying amount
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments. For the other long-term financial instruments,
excluding Holdings unsecured notes and debentures, and term
loans, the carrying amount approximates the fair value since
they bear interest at variable rates or fixed rates which
approximate market.
Holdings also holds derivative instruments to hedge against
foreign currency exchange, fuel pricing and interest rate
movements. Holdings derivative financial instruments are
recorded at fair value (Refer to Note 17 for additional
information). Holdings estimates the fair values of its
derivatives
F-148
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
based on quoted market prices or pricing models using current
market rates less any credit valuation adjustments. Refer to
Note 22 Hotel and Wellness Center, for
information regarding the fair value of WWPs financial
instruments.
Foreign Currency Exchange: For subsidiaries
with transactions that are denominated in a currency other than
the functional currency, the net foreign currency exchange
transaction gains or losses resulting from the translation of
monetary assets and liabilities to the functional currency are
included in determining net income. Net foreign currency
exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of
assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar are recorded as a part of
cumulative translation adjustment in shareholders equity.
Unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain
intercompany transactions that are of a long-term-investment
nature (i.e. settlement is not planned or anticipated in the
foreseeable future) are also recorded in cumulative translation
adjustment in shareholders equity.
Leases: Holdings leases fixed assets for use
in operations where leasing offers advantages of operating
flexibility and is less expensive than alternative types of
funding. Holdings also leases land in countries where land
ownership by foreign entities is restricted. Holdings leases are
evaluated at inception or at any subsequent modification and,
depending on the lease terms, are classified as either capital
leases or operating leases, as appropriate under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for
Leases. For operating leases that contain rent escalations,
rent holidays or rent concessions, rent expense is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the life of the lease. The majority
of Holdings leases are classified as operating leases. Holdings
principal operating leases are for land and machinery and
equipment. Holdings capitalized leases primarily consist of two
vessel leases. Holdings decision to exercise renewal options is
primarily dependent on the level of business conducted at the
location and the profitability thereof. Holdings leasehold
improvements were not significant at January 3, 2009 or
December 29, 2007.
Guarantees: Holdings makes guarantees as part
of its normal business activities. These guarantees include
guarantees of the indebtedness of some of its key fruit
suppliers and other entities integral to Holdings operations.
Holdings also issues bank guarantees as required by certain
regulatory authorities, suppliers and other operating agreements
as well as to support the borrowings, leases and other
obligations of its subsidiaries. The majority of Holdings
guarantees relate to guarantees of subsidiary obligations and
are scoped out of the initial measurement and recognition
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and
disclosures reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Estimates and assumptions include, but are
not limited to, the areas of customer and grower receivables,
inventories, impairment of assets, useful lives of property,
plant and equipment, intangible assets, marketing programs,
income taxes, self-insurance reserves, retirement benefits,
financial instruments and commitments and contingencies. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
During September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires
enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157
requires companies to disclose the fair value of financial
instruments according to a fair value hierarchy as defined in
the standard. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position
157-1,
F-149
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP 157-1)
and
FSP 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-1
amends FAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from
its scope.
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of FAS 157 for all non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. These nonfinancial items include
assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair
value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and was
adopted by Holdings, as it applies to its financial instruments,
effective December 30, 2007. Refer to
Note 17 Derivative Financial Instruments.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
During June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FAS No. 168, FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162 (FAS 168), which
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the
single official source of authoritative US GAAP (other than
guidance issued by the SEC), superseding existing FASB, American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task
Force, and related literature. FAS 168 will become
effective during Holdings third quarter of 2009. The adoption of
FAS 168 is not expected to have an impact on Holdings
results of operations or financial position.
During May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162).
FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting principles to be used in the
preparation and presentation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This
statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities
and Exchange Commission approves the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Boards amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. Holdings does not
anticipate that the adoption of FAS 162 will have an effect
on its consolidated financial statements.
During March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures About
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FAS 161). This new standard requires
enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments, including those
used in hedging activities. It is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and will
be applicable to Holdings in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Holdings is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the
adoption of FAS 161 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
During December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). FAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Holdings adopted the provisions
of FAS 160 as of the beginning of its 2009 fiscal year.
FAS 160 is to be applied prospectively as of the beginning
of 2009 except for the presentation and disclosure requirements
which are to be applied retrospectively. The consolidated
financial statements now conform to the presentation required
under FAS 160. Other than the change in presentation of
noncontrolling interests, the adoption of FAS 160 had no
impact on Holdings results of operations or financial position.
F-150
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (FAS 141R). FAS 141R
provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. It
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement
objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and
also requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other
users all of the information they need to evaluate and
understand the nature and financial effect of the business
combination. Changes in acquired tax contingencies, including
those existing at the date of adoption, will be recognized in
earnings if outside the maximum measurement period (generally
one year). FAS 141R will be applied prospectively to
business combinations with acquisition dates on or after
January 1, 2009. Following the date of adoption of
FAS 141R, the resolution of such items at values that
differ from recorded amounts will be adjusted through earnings,
rather than goodwill.
|
|
Note 3
|
2009 Debt
Maturity and Debt Issuance
|
Refer to Note 22 Hotel and Wellness Center, for
information regarding the Hotel and Wellness Center Debt.
During the second quarter of 2008, Dole reclassified to current
liabilities its $350 million 8.625% notes due May 2009
(2009 Notes). Dole also completed the early
redemption of $5 million of the 2009 Notes during the third
quarter of 2008.
On February 13, 2009, Dole commenced a tender offer to
purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding 2009 Notes for
a purchase price equal to $980 per $1,000 of 2009 Notes validly
tendered, with an additional payment of $20 per $1,000 of 2009
Notes tendered early in the process. In connection with the
tender offer, Dole sought consents to certain amendments to the
indenture governing the 2009 Notes to eliminate substantially
all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default
contained therein. On March 4, 2009, Dole announced that it
had received the required consents necessary to amend the
indenture with respect to the 2009 Notes and, accordingly,
executed the supplemental indenture effecting such amendments,
which became operative on March 18, 2009, when Dole
accepted and paid for the tendered 2009 Notes. The tender offer
expired on March 17, 2009.
On March 18, 2009, Dole completed the sale and issuance of
$350 million aggregate principal amount of
13.875% Senior Secured Notes due March 2014 (2014
Notes) at a discount of $25 million. The 2014 Notes
were sold to qualified institutional investors pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933
(Securities Act) and to persons outside the United
States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities
Act. The sale was exempt from the registration requirements of
the Securities Act. Interest on the 2014 Notes will be paid
semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each
year, beginning on September 15, 2009. The 2014 Notes have
the benefit of a lien on certain U.S. assets of Dole that
is junior to the liens of Doles senior secured credit
facilities, and are senior obligations of Dole ranking equally
with Doles existing senior debt. Dole used the net
proceeds from this offering, together with cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to purchase all
of the tendered 2009 Notes and to irrevocably deposit with the
trustee of the 2009 Notes funds that will be sufficient to repay
the remaining outstanding 2009 Notes at maturity on May 1,
2009.
In connection with these refinancing transactions, Dole amended
its senior secured credit facilities. Such amendments, among
other things, (i) permit debt securities secured by a
junior lien to be issued to refinance its senior notes due in
2009 and 2010 in an amount up to the greater of
(x) $500 million and (y) the amount of debt that
would not cause the senior secured leverage ratio to exceed 3.75
to 1.00; (ii) add a new restricted payments basket of up to
$50 million to be used to prepay its senior notes due in
2009 and 2010 subject to pro forma compliance with the senior
secured
F-151
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
credit facilities and $70 million of unused availability
under the revolving credit facility; (iii) increase the
applicable margin for (x) the term loan facilities to LIBOR
plus 5.00% or the base rate plus 4.00% subject to a
50 basis point step down when the priority senior secured
leverage ratio is less than or equal to 1.75 to 1.00 and
(y) for the revolving credit facility, to a range of LIBOR
plus 3.00% to 3.50% or the base rate plus 2.00% to 2.50%;
(iv) provide for a LIBOR floor of 3.00% per annum for the
term loan facilities; (v) add a first priority secured
leverage maintenance covenant to the term loan facilities; and
(vi) provide for other technical and clarifying changes.
These amendments became effective concurrently with the closing
of the 2014 Notes offering.
|
|
Note 4
|
Other Income
(Expense), Net
|
Included in other income (expense), net in Holdings consolidated
statements of operations for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 are the
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on the cross currency swap
|
|
$
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,664
|
|
Realized gain on the cross currency swap
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
Gains (losses) on foreign denominated borrowings
|
|
|
24,889
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
(9,270
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(14,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,847
|
|
|
$
|
8,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 17 Derivative Financial
Instruments for further discussion regarding Holdings cross
currency swap.
|
|
Note 5
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Holdings approved and
committed to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers
operations (Flowers transaction). The first phase of
the Flowers transaction was completed during the first quarter
of 2009. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007,
Holdings approved and committed to a formal plan to divest its
citrus and pistachio operations (Citrus) located in
central California. The operating results of Citrus were
included in the fresh fruit operating segment. The sale of
Citrus was completed during the third quarter of 2008 and the
sale of the fresh-cut flowers operations was completed during
the first quarter of 2009. Refer to Note 9
Assets Held-For-Sale. In evaluating the two businesses, Holdings
concluded that they each met the definition of a discontinued
operation as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (FAS 144).
Accordingly, the results of operations of these businesses have
been reclassified for all periods presented.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Holdings completed the sale
of its Pacific Coast Truck Center (Pac Truck)
business for $20.7 million. The Pac Truck business
consisted of a full service truck dealership that provided
medium and heavy-duty trucks to customers in the Pacific
Northwest region. Holdings received $15.3 million of net
proceeds from the sale after the assumption of $5.4 million
of debt and realized a gain of approximately $2.8 million
on the sale, net of income taxes of $2 million. The sale of
Pac Truck qualified for discontinued operations treatment under
FAS 144. Accordingly, the historical results of operations
of this business have been reclassified for all periods
presented. The operating results of Pac Truck were included in
the other operating segment.
F-152
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The operating results of fresh-cut flowers, Citrus and Pac Truck
for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 are reported in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut Flowers
|
|
|
Citrus
|
|
|
Pac Truck
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
106,919
|
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(43,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(44,643
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(26,299
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of $4.3 million
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
110,153
|
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(19,146
|
)
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,413
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(16,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
160,074
|
|
|
$
|
20,527
|
|
|
$
|
47,851
|
|
|
$
|
228,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(57,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
(52,837
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(52,622
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,002
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(50,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of $2 million
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the fresh-cut flowers loss before income taxes for
fiscal 2008 is a $17 million impairment charge. Refer to
Note 9 Assets Held-For-Sale for further
information.
Included in the fresh-cut flowers loss before income taxes for
fiscal 2007 and 2006 are $1.1 million and $29 million,
respectively, of charges related to restructuring costs and
impairment charges associated with the write-off of certain
long-lived assets, intangible assets and inventory. During the
third quarter of 2006, Holdings restructured its fresh-cut
flowers division to better focus on high-value products and
flower varieties, and position the business unit for future
growth. In connection with the restructuring, fresh-cut flowers
ceased its farming operations in Ecuador, closed two farms in
Colombia and downsized other Colombian farms.
Income from noncontrolling interests included in Citrus income
(loss) from discontinued operations was $0.5 million,
$0.4 million and $2.3 million for fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Gain on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of income taxes, for Citrus for fiscal 2008
included income from noncontrolling interests of
$12.3 million.
F-153
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6
|
Restructurings
and Related Asset Impairments
|
During the first quarter of 2006, the commercial relationship
substantially ended between Holdings wholly-owned subsidiary,
Saba, and Sabas largest customer. Saba is a leading
importer and distributor of fruit, vegetables and flowers in
Scandinavia. Sabas financial results are included in the
fresh fruit reporting segment. Holdings restructured certain
lines of Sabas business and as a result, incurred
$12.8 million of total related costs. Of the
$12.8 million incurred during the year ended
December 30, 2006, $9 million is included in cost of
revenues and $3.8 million in selling, marketing, and
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statement of operations. Total restructuring costs include
$9.9 million of employee severance costs which impacted
275 employees, $2.4 million of contractual lease
obligations as well as $0.5 million of fixed asset
write-offs. At December 29, 2007 all of the restructuring
costs had been paid.
In connection with Holdings ongoing farm optimization programs
in Asia, $2.8 million and $6.7 million of crop-related
costs were written-off during 2007 and 2006, respectively. These
non-cash charges have been recorded in cost of revenues in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Income tax expense (benefit) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal, state and local
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
22,753
|
|
|
|
15,399
|
|
|
|
18,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,588
|
|
|
|
16,134
|
|
|
|
19,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal, state and local
|
|
|
(29,109
|
)
|
|
|
(45,156
|
)
|
|
|
(22,900
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
|
|
(3,573
|
)
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,832
|
)
|
|
|
(48,729
|
)
|
|
|
(28,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current tax expense
|
|
|
(51,662
|
)
|
|
|
20,615
|
|
|
|
24,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(60,906
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax earnings attributable to foreign operations including
earnings from discontinued operations, equity method investments
and minority interests were $185.5 million,
$53.9 million and $30.7 million for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively. Holdings has not provided
for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on
approximately $2.3 billion of the excess of the amount for
financial reporting over the tax basis of investments that are
essentially permanent in duration. Generally, such amounts
become subject to U.S. taxation upon the remittance of
dividends and under certain other circumstances. It is currently
not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax liability
related to investments in these foreign subsidiaries.
F-154
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holdings reported income tax expense (benefit) on continuing
operations differed from the expense calculated using the
U.S. federal statutory tax rate for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Expense (benefit) computed at U.S. federal statutory income tax
rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
18,971
|
|
|
$
|
(29,337
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,407
|
)
|
Foreign income taxed at different rates
|
|
|
(40,236
|
)
|
|
|
8,963
|
|
|
|
27,440
|
|
State and local income tax, net of federal income taxes
|
|
|
(9,320
|
)
|
|
|
(5,008
|
)
|
|
|
(2,335
|
)
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
U.S. Appeals Settlement and Other FIN 48 Related
|
|
|
(36,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent items and other
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
(3,141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(60,906
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
$
|
(295,362
|
)
|
|
$
|
(293,666
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(149,586
|
)
|
|
|
(164,382
|
)
|
Investment and other asset basis differences
|
|
|
34,534
|
|
|
|
20,394
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
59,132
|
|
|
|
56,538
|
|
Operating accruals
|
|
|
71,698
|
|
|
|
65,743
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
21,753
|
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
Net operating loss and other carryforwards
|
|
|
152,561
|
|
|
|
195,552
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(144,084
|
)
|
|
|
(174,398
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
47,832
|
|
|
|
26,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(201,522
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings has gross federal, state and foreign net operating loss
carryforwards of $218.4 million, $1.1 billion and
$119.9 million, respectively, at January 3, 2009.
Holdings has recorded deferred tax assets of $72.9 million
for federal net operating loss and other carryforwards, which,
if unused, will expire between 2023 and 2028. Holdings has
recorded deferred tax assets of $48.9 million for state
operating loss carryforwards, which, if unused, will start to
expire in 2009. Holdings has recorded deferred tax assets of
$30.8 million for foreign net operating loss carryforwards
which are subject to varying expiration rules. Tax credit
carryforwards of $21.8 million include foreign tax credit
carryforwards of $18.4 million which will expire in 2011,
U.S. general business credit carryforwards of
$0.3 million which expire between 2023 and 2027, and state
tax credit carryforwards of $3.1 million with varying
expiration dates. Holdings has recorded a U.S. deferred tax
asset of $35.8 million for disallowed interest expense
which, although subject to certain limitations, can be carried
forward indefinitely.
A valuation allowance has been established to offset foreign tax
credit carryforwards, state net operating loss carryforwards,
certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards and certain
other deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions. Holdings has
deemed it more likely than not that future taxable income in the
relevant taxing jurisdictions will be insufficient to realize
all of the related income tax benefits for these assets.
F-155
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
520,754
|
|
|
$
|
518,416
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
(144,084
|
)
|
|
|
(174,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,670
|
|
|
|
344,018
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(578,192
|
)
|
|
|
(591,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(201,522
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
54,508
|
|
|
$
|
47,763
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(33,235
|
)
|
|
|
(35,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
21,273
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
322,162
|
|
|
|
296,255
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(544,957
|
)
|
|
|
(555,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(222,795
|
)
|
|
|
(259,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(201,522
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits opening balance
|
|
$
|
204,421
|
|
|
$
|
200,641
|
|
Gross increases tax positions in prior period
|
|
|
14,361
|
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
Gross decreases tax positions in prior period
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(13,448
|
)
|
Gross increases tax positions in current period
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
8,284
|
|
Settlements*
|
|
|
(105,139
|
)
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(2,083
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits ending balance
|
|
$
|
115,868
|
|
|
$
|
204,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
2008 activity includes $110 million reduction in gross
unrecognized tax benefits due to the settlement of the federal
income tax audit for the years 1995 to 2001 less a cash refund
received of $6 million on this settlement plus various
state and foreign audit settlements totaling approximately
$1 million. |
The total for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, was
$143 million and $269 million at January 3, 2009
and December 29, 2007, respectively. The change is
primarily due to the settlement of the federal income tax audit
for the years 1995 to 2001. If recognized, approximately
$131.5 million, net of federal and state tax benefits,
would be recorded as a component of income tax expense and
accordingly impact the effective tax rate.
Holdings recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to
its unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income taxes in
the consolidated statements of operations. Accrued interest and
F-156
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
penalties before tax benefits were $26.9 million and
$64.6 million at January 3, 2009 and December 29,
2007, respectively, and are included as a component of other
long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The
decrease is primarily attributable to the reduction in
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits associated with the
settlement of the federal income tax audit for the years
1995-2001.
Interest and penalties recorded in Holdings consolidated
statements of operations for 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
($32.2) million, including the impact of the settlement,
$17.2 million and $6.9 million, respectively.
Holdings or one or more of its subsidiaries file income tax
returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various
states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, Holdings
is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001.
Income Tax Audits: Holdings believes its tax
positions comply with the applicable tax laws and that it is
adequately provided for all tax related matters. Matters raised
upon audit may involve substantial amounts and could result in
material cash payments if resolved unfavorably; however,
management does not believe that any material payments will be
made related to these matters within the next year. Management
considers it unlikely that the resolution of these matters will
have a material adverse effect on Holdings results of operations.
1995 2001 Federal Income Tax
Audit: In June 2006, the IRS completed an
examination of Holdings federal income tax returns for the years
1995 to 2001 and issued a Revenue Agents Report
(RAR) that included various proposed adjustments.
The net tax deficiency associated with the RAR was
$175 million for which Holdings provided $110 million
of gross unrecognized tax benefits, plus penalties and interest.
Holdings filed a protest letter contesting the proposed
adjustments contained in the RAR. During January 2008, Holdings
was notified that the Appeals Branch of the IRS had finalized
its review of Holdings protest and that the Appeals
Branchs review supported Holdings position in all material
respects. On June 13, 2008, the Appeals review was approved
by the Joint Committee on Taxation. The impact of the settlement
on Holdings year ended January 3, 2009 consolidated
financial statements is $136 million, which includes a
$110 million reduction in gross unrecognized tax benefits
recorded in other long-term liabilities plus a reduction of
$26 million for interest and penalties, net of federal and
state tax benefits. Of this amount, $61 million reduced
Holdings income tax provision and effective tax rate for the
year ended January 3, 2009 and the remaining
$75 million reduced goodwill.
2002 2005 Federal Income Tax
Audit: On August 27, 2009, the IRS completed
its examination of the combined U.S. federal income tax
returns of Holdings for the years 2002 to 2005 and issued a
Revenue Agents report (RAR) that includes
various proposed adjustments, including the going-private merger
transactions. The IRS is proposing that certain funding used in
the going-private merger is currently taxable and that certain
related investment banking fees are not deductible. The net tax
deficiency associated with the RAR is $122 million plus
interest. Holdings will file a protest letter vigorously
challenging the proposed adjustments contained in the RAR and
will pursue resolution of these issues with the Appeals Division
of the IRS.
At this time, Holdings does not anticipate that total
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the
settlement of audits and the expiration of statutes of
limitations within the next twelve months.
F-157
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 8
|
Details of
Certain Assets and Liabilities
|
Details of receivables and inventories were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$
|
685,268
|
|
|
$
|
710,550
|
|
Notes and other
|
|
|
127,524
|
|
|
|
147,053
|
|
Grower advances
|
|
|
34,861
|
|
|
|
41,302
|
|
Income tax refund
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,730
|
|
|
|
904,307
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(41,357
|
)
|
|
|
(61,720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
809,373
|
|
|
$
|
842,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
$
|
344,643
|
|
|
$
|
355,502
|
|
Raw materials and work in progress
|
|
|
168,670
|
|
|
|
155,166
|
|
Crop-growing costs
|
|
|
210,263
|
|
|
|
172,980
|
|
Operating supplies and other
|
|
|
73,420
|
|
|
|
68,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
796,996
|
|
|
$
|
751,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable consists primarily of trade payables.
Accrued liabilities included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Employee-related costs and benefits
|
|
$
|
130,825
|
|
|
$
|
150,947
|
|
Amounts due to growers
|
|
|
64,746
|
|
|
|
98,130
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
64,256
|
|
|
|
60,972
|
|
Shipping related costs
|
|
|
49,622
|
|
|
|
51,427
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
27,217
|
|
|
|
34,678
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
26,087
|
|
|
|
31,335
|
|
Unrealized hedging losses
|
|
|
80,760
|
|
|
|
28,462
|
|
Other
|
|
|
56,849
|
|
|
|
68,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,362
|
|
|
$
|
524,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued postretirement and other employee benefits
|
|
$
|
245,357
|
|
|
$
|
249,230
|
|
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
83,051
|
|
|
|
209,854
|
|
Other
|
|
|
85,655
|
|
|
|
74,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
414,063
|
|
|
$
|
533,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-158
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 9
|
Assets
Held-for-Sale
|
Holdings continuously reviews its assets in order to identify
those assets that do not meet Holdings future strategic
direction or internal economic return criteria. As a result of
this review, Holdings has identified and is in the process of
selling certain businesses and long-lived assets. In accordance
with FAS 144, Holdings has reclassified these assets as
held-for-sale.
Total assets held-for-sale by segment were are follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
34,159
|
|
|
$
|
3,251
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,834
|
|
|
$
|
76,244
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
252,581
|
|
|
|
35,349
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
71,833
|
|
|
|
364,215
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(188,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(31,678
|
)
|
|
|
(220,583
|
)
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
98,105
|
|
|
$
|
38,600
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
61,989
|
|
|
$
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held-for-sale by segment were are follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Held-For-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
56,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,218
|
|
|
|
102,097
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(51,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,218
|
|
|
$
|
50,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-159
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The major classes of assets and liabilities held-for-sale
included in Holdings consolidated balance sheet at
January 3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets held-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
3,314
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,314
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
9,184
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
85,629
|
|
|
|
38,600
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
30,069
|
|
|
|
158,480
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
|
|
17,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held-for-sale
|
|
$
|
98,105
|
|
|
$
|
38,600
|
|
|
$
|
4,182
|
|
|
$
|
61,989
|
|
|
$
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities held-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,028
|
|
|
$
|
23,065
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,857
|
|
|
|
25,857
|
|
Deferred income tax and other liabilities
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held-for-sale
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,218
|
|
|
$
|
50,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings received cash proceeds of $226.5 million on assets
sold during the year ended January 3, 2009, including
$214 million on assets which had been reclassified as
held-for-sale. The total realized gain recorded on assets
classified as held-for-sale, excluding the 2008 amortization of
the deferred gain on the ship discussed below, was
$18 million for the year ended January 3, 2009.
Holdings also realized gains on assets not classified as
held-for-sale, totaling $9 million for fiscal 2008. Total
realized gains on asset sales of $27 million are shown as a
separate component of operating income in the consolidated
statement of operations for 2008. The net book value associated
with these sales from continuing operations was approximately
$103 million.
Fresh
Fruit
During the year ended January 3, 2009, Holdings added
$252.6 million to the assets held-for-sale balance in the
fresh fruit reporting segment. These assets primarily consist of
a packing and cooling facility and wood box plant located in
Chile and approximately 11,000 acres of Hawaiian land.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Holdings entered into a
binding letter of intent to sell certain portions of its Latin
American banana operations. The related assets and liabilities
from these operations were reclassified to held-for-sale during
the fourth quarter of 2008. The sale closed during the first
quarter of 2009.
During the third quarter ended October 4, 2008, Holdings
entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to sell
its JP Fresh subsidiary in the United Kingdom and its Dole
France subsidiary which were in the European ripening and
distribution business to Compagnie Fruitière Paris.
Compagnie Fruitière Paris is a subsidiary of Compagnie
Fruitière Paris. Compagnie Fruitière Paris is a
subsidiary of Compagnie Financière de Participations, a
company in which Dole holds a non-controlling 40% ownership
interest. The sale closed during the fourth quarter of 2008.
F-160
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2008 Sales and
2009 Sales Activity
Holdings sold the following assets during the year ended
January 3, 2009, which had been classified as
held-for-sale: approximately 2,200 acres of land parcels in
Hawaii, additional agricultural acreage in California, two
Chilean farms, property located in Turkey and a breakbulk
refrigerated ship. In addition, Holdings sold its JP Fresh and
Dole France subsidiaries. The amount of cash collected on these
sales totaled approximately $133.6 million. The total sales
proceeds of $133.6 million includes $12.7 million for
the sale of the ship. Holdings also entered into a lease
agreement for the same ship and recognized a deferred gain of
$11.9 million on the sale. The deferred gain is amortized
over the 3 year lease term.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, Holdings reclassified
approximately 4,400 acres of land and other related assets
of its citrus and pistachio operations located in central
California as assets held-for-sale. These assets were held by
non-wholly owned subsidiaries of Holdings. In March 2008,
Holdings entered into an agreement to sell these assets. The
sale was completed during the third quarter of 2008 and the
subsidiaries received net proceeds of $44 million. Holdings
share of these net proceeds was $28.1 million. Holdings
recorded a gain of $3.3 million, net of income taxes, which
was recorded as gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net
of income taxes, for the year ended January 3, 2009.
During January 2009, Holdings completed the sale of certain
portions of its Latin American banana operations. Net sales
proceeds from the sale totaled approximately $27.3 million.
Of this amount, $15.8 million was collected in cash and the
remaining $11.5 million was recorded as a receivable, to be
collected over the next twelve months.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, Holdings signed
definitive sales agreements to sell certain operating properties
in Latin America for approximately $68 million.
Additionally, during the third quarter of 2009, Holdings signed
a letter of intent to sell an operating property in Chile for
approximately $32 million. These sales are expected to
close by the end of fiscal 2009.
Fresh
Vegetables
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Holdings reclassified
approximately 1,100 acres of vegetable property located in
California as assets held-for-sale and signed a definitive
purchase and sale agreement to sell this property. The sale
closed during March 2009 and Holdings received net cash proceeds
of $44.5 million.
Packaged
Foods
During the second quarter of 2008, Holdings reclassified
approximately 600 acres of peach orchards located in
California as assets held-for-sale. During the fourth quarter of
2008, Holdings sold 40 acres for approximately
$0.7 million.
Fresh-Cut
Flowers Discontinued Operation
During the second quarter of 2008, Holdings approved and
committed to a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers
operating segment. Accordingly, all the assets and liabilities
were reclassified as held-for-sale.
During the third quarter of 2008, Holdings signed a binding
letter of intent to sell its fresh-cut flowers division
(Flowers transaction). The sale of the fresh-cut
flowers division is expected to take place in phases. The first
phase closed during the first quarter of 2009 as a stock-sale
transaction. The remaining assets can be purchased by the same
buyer under separate option contracts that
F-161
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expire in one year. The remaining phases are expected to close
within the next year. If the options on the remaining assets are
exercised, Holdings will receive additional sales proceeds of
approximately $26 million on assets with a net book value
of $10 million.
Included in liabilities held-for-sale of $45.2 million is
$25.9 million of long-term debt of the former flowers
subsidiaries. This debt ceased to be an obligation of Holdings
upon the closing of the first phase of the Flowers transaction.
Holdings recorded an impairment loss of $17 million on the
assets sold in the first phase of the Flowers transaction. The
impairment charge represents the amount by which the net book
value exceeds the fair market value less cost to sell. The fair
market value of the assets was determined by the sales price
agreed upon in the binding letter of intent. The impairment loss
was recorded as a component of loss from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes, for the year ended
January 3, 2009.
2008 Sales and
First Quarter 2009 Sales
Holdings reclassified its fresh-cut flowers headquarters
facility, located in Miami, Florida as assets held-for-sale
during the third quarter of 2007. Holdings completed the sale of
this facility during the third quarter of 2008 and received net
cash proceeds of $34 million. In addition, Holdings
received net cash proceeds of $1.9 million on the sale of
two farms. The gain realized on the sale of these assets, net of
income taxes, was approximately $3.1 million and is
included as a component of loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended January 3, 2009.
During January 2009, the first phase of the Flowers transaction
was completed. Holdings retains only certain real estate of the
former flowers divisions to be sold in the subsequent phases of
the transaction. Net sales proceeds from the sale totaled
approximately $30 million. Of this amount,
$21.7 million was collected in cash and the remaining
$8.3 million was recorded as a receivable, to be collected
over the next two years.
|
|
Note 10
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
|
Major classes of Doles property, plant and equipment were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$
|
523,355
|
|
|
$
|
698,853
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
398,371
|
|
|
|
430,968
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
810,722
|
|
|
|
803,353
|
|
Vessels and containers
|
|
|
201,178
|
|
|
|
218,970
|
|
Vessels and equipment under capital leases
|
|
|
91,392
|
|
|
|
98,006
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
52,658
|
|
|
|
70,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,077,676
|
|
|
|
2,320,529
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,027,345
|
)
|
|
|
(980,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,331
|
|
|
$
|
1,340,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-162
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Depreciation for Doles property, plant and equipment is
computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
5 to 40
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
2 to 50
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
2 to 35
|
Vessels and containers
|
|
5 to 20
|
Vessels and equipment under capital leases
|
|
Shorter of useful life or life of lease
|
Depreciation expense on Doles property, plant and
equipment for continuing operations totaled $133.4 million,
$146.9 million and $139 million for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively. Depreciation expense on
property, plant and equipment for discontinued operations
totaled $1.1 million, $4.2 million and
$5.8 million for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
Refer to Note 22 Hotel and Wellness Center, for
information regarding the Hotel and Wellness Center property and
equipment.
|
|
Note 11
|
Goodwill and
Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill has been allocated to Holdings reporting segments as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
|
Packaged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
|
|
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
Foods
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
386,625
|
|
|
$
|
93,874
|
|
|
$
|
65,241
|
|
|
$
|
545,740
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
(22,965
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
|
(30,191
|
)
|
Tax-related adjustments
|
|
|
(4,588
|
)
|
|
|
(1,199
|
)
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(6,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
359,072
|
|
|
$
|
86,675
|
|
|
$
|
63,771
|
|
|
$
|
509,518
|
|
Tax-related adjustments
|
|
|
(59,208
|
)
|
|
|
(15,469
|
)
|
|
|
(3,160
|
)
|
|
|
(77,837
|
)
|
Transfer to assets held-for-sale
|
|
|
(24,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,751
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
274,723
|
|
|
$
|
71,206
|
|
|
$
|
60,611
|
|
|
$
|
406,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax-related adjustments in 2007 resulted from changes to
deductible temporary differences, operating loss or tax credit
carryforwards and contingencies that existed at the time of the
going-private merger transaction. The tax-related adjustments in
2008 resulted from changes to unrecognized tax benefits that
existed at the time of the going- private merger transaction
which were due to the settlement of the federal income tax audit
as discussed in Note 7 Income Taxes.
During the third quarter of 2008, Holdings reclassified all of
the assets and liabilities of JP Fresh to assets held-for-sale.
The sale of JP Fresh was completed during the fourth quarter of
2008. Goodwill and intangible assets related to JP Fresh totaled
$24 million and $7.3 million, respectively.
F-163
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Details of Holdings intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
38,501
|
|
|
$
|
48,906
|
|
Other amortized intangible assets
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,543
|
|
|
|
51,041
|
|
Accumulated amortization customer relationships
|
|
|
(20,248
|
)
|
|
|
(17,483
|
)
|
Other accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization intangible assets
|
|
|
(21,700
|
)
|
|
|
(18,866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets, net
|
|
|
18,843
|
|
|
|
32,175
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark and trade names
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
689,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
708,458
|
|
|
$
|
721,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of identifiable intangibles totaled
$4.3 million, $4.5 million and $4.5 million for
the years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively. Estimated remaining
amortization expense associated with Holdings identifiable
intangible assets in each of the next five fiscal years is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
Holdings performed its annual impairment review of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142), during
the second quarter of fiscal 2008. This review indicated no
impairment to goodwill or any of Holdings indefinite-lived
intangible assets. As market conditions change, Holdings
continues to monitor and perform updates of its impairment
testing of recoverability of goodwill and long-lived assets.
F-164
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Notes Payable and
Long-Term Debt
|
For details on the Hotel and Wellness Center senior secured
credit facility, refer to Note 22 Hotel and
Wellness Center. Notes payable and long-term debt for Dole
consisted of the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.625% notes due 2009
|
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
7.25% notes due 2010
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
8.875% notes due 2011
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
8.75% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
150,500
|
|
|
|
176,400
|
|
Term loan facilities
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
|
|
960,375
|
|
Contracts and notes, at a weighted-average interest rate of 6.1%
in 2008 (8.4% in 2007) through 2014
|
|
|
9,221
|
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
60,448
|
|
|
|
85,959
|
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
48,789
|
|
|
|
83,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,204,093
|
|
|
|
2,413,397
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(405,537
|
)
|
|
|
(97,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,798,556
|
|
|
$
|
2,316,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
Payable
Dole borrows funds on a short-term basis to finance current
operations. The terms of these borrowings range from one month
to three months. Doles notes payable at January 3,
2009 consist primarily of foreign borrowings in Asia and Latin
America.
Notes and
Debentures
In April 2002, Dole completed the sale and issuance of
$400 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due
2009 (the 2009 Notes). The 2009 Notes are
redeemable, at the discretion of Dole, at par plus a make-whole
amount, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest, any time prior
to maturity. The 2009 Notes were issued at 99.50% of par. In
2005 in conjunction with an amendment and restatement of its
senior secured credit agreement, Dole repurchased
$50 million of its 2009 Notes. During September 2008, Dole
completed the early redemption of $5 million of its 2009
Notes at a price of 99% of the principal amount plus accrued
interest through the date of redemption. Refer to
Note 3 2009 Debt Maturity and Debt Issuance.
In May 2003, Dole issued and sold $400 million aggregate
principal amount of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2010 (the
2010 Notes). The 2010 Notes were issued at par. Dole
may redeem some or all of the 2010 Notes at a redemption price
of 100% of their principal amount during 2009 and thereafter,
plus accrued and unpaid interest.
In connection with the going-private merger transaction of 2003,
Dole issued $475 million aggregate principal amount of
8.875% Senior Notes due 2011 (the 2011 Notes).
The 2011 Notes
F-165
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
were issued at par. Dole may redeem some or all of the 2011
Notes at a redemption price of 100% of their principal amount
during 2009 and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In
2005 in conjunction with an amendment and restatement of its
senior secured credit agreement, Dole repurchased
$275 million of its 2011 Notes.
In July 1993, Dole issued and sold debentures due 2013 (the
2013 Debentures). The 2013 Debentures are not
redeemable prior to maturity and were issued at 99.37% of par.
Interest on the notes and debentures is paid semi-annually.
None of Doles notes or debentures are subject to any
sinking fund requirements. The notes and debentures are
guaranteed by Doles wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries.
April 2006
Amendments to Credit Facilities
In April 2006, Dole completed an amendment and restatement of
its senior secured credit agreement. The purposes of this
refinancing included increasing the combined size of Doles
revolving credit and letter of credit facilities, eliminating
certain financial maintenance covenants, realizing currency
gains arising out of Doles then existing yen-denominated
term loan, and refinancing the higher-cost bank indebtedness of
Doles immediate parent, Dole Holding Company, LLC
(DHC) at the lower-cost Dole Food Company, Inc.
level. Dole obtained $975 million of term loan facilities
and $100 million in a pre-funded letter of credit facility,
both of which mature in April 2013. The proceeds of the term
loans were used to repay the then outstanding term loans and
revolving credit facilities, as well as pay a dividend of
$160 million to DHC, which proceeds were used to repay its
existing debt facility.
In addition, Dole entered into a new asset based revolving
credit facility (ABL revolver) of $350 million.
The facility is secured by and is subject to a borrowing base
consisting of up to 85% of eligible accounts receivable plus a
predetermined percentage of eligible inventory, as defined in
the credit facility. The ABL revolver matures in April 2011.
Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loans
As of January 3, 2009, the term loan facilities consisted
of $176.8 million of Term Loan B and $658.6 million of
Term Loan C, bearing interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging
from 1.75% to 2%, dependent upon Doles senior secured
leverage ratio. The weighted average variable interest rates at
January 3, 2009 for Term Loan B and Term Loan C were LIBOR
plus 2%, or 4.3%. The term loan facilities require quarterly
principal payments, plus a balloon payment due in 2013. Related
to the term loan facilities, Holdings holds an interest rate
swap to hedge future changes in interest rates and a cross
currency swap to effectively lower the U.S. dollar fixed
interest rate of 7.2% to a Japanese yen fixed interest rate of
3.6%. Refer to Note 17 Derivative Financial
Instruments for additional discussion of Holdings hedging
activities.
As of January 3, 2009, the ABL revolver borrowing base was
$328.6 million and the amount outstanding under the ABL
revolver was $150.5 million, bearing interest at LIBOR plus
a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75%, dependent upon Doles
historical borrowing availability under this facility. At
January 3, 2009, the weighted average variable interest
rate for the ABL revolver was LIBOR plus 1.5%, or 2.2%. The ABL
revolver matures in April 2011. After taking into account
approximately $5.3 million of outstanding letters of credit
issued under the ABL revolver, Dole had approximately
$172.8 million available for borrowings as of
January 3, 2009. In addition, Dole had approximately
$71 million of letters of credit and bank guarantees
outstanding under its pre-funded letter of credit facility as of
January 3, 2009.
F-166
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A commitment fee, which fluctuated between 0.25% and 0.375%, was
paid based on the total unused portion of the revolving credit
facility. In addition, there is a facility fee on the pre-funded
letter of credit facility. Dole paid a total of $1 million,
$0.7 million and $1 million in commitment and facility
fees for the years ended January 3, 2009, December 29,
2007 and December 30, 2006.
The revolving credit facility and term loan facilities are
collateralized by substantially all of Doles tangible and
intangible assets, other than certain intercompany debt, certain
equity interests and each of Doles U.S. manufacturing
plants and processing facilities that has a net book value
exceeding 1% of Doles net tangible assets. Refer to
Note 3 2009 Debt Maturity and Debt
Issuance for information on the March 2009
amendments to the credit facilities.
Capital Lease
Obligations
At January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, included in
capital lease obligations was $58.5 million and
$83.4 million, respectively, of vessel financing related to
two vessel leases denominated in British pound sterling. The
reduction in the capital lease obligation was primarily due to
the weakening of the British pound sterling against the
U.S. dollar during 2008, which resulted in Dole recognizing
$21.3 million of unrealized gains. These unrealized gains
were recorded as other income (expense), net in the consolidated
statement of operations. The interest rates on these leases are
based on LIBOR plus a spread. The remaining $1.9 million of
capital lease obligations relate primarily to machinery and
equipment. Interest rates under these leases are fixed. The
capital lease obligations are collateralized by the underlying
leased assets. Total payments, including principal and interest,
through the remaining life of the lease total approximately
$98.7 million. These leases expire in 2024.
Covenants
Provisions under the indentures to Doles senior notes and
debentures require Dole to comply with certain covenants. These
covenants include limitations on, among other things,
indebtedness, investments, loans to subsidiaries, employees and
third parties, the issuance of guarantees and the payment of
dividends. The senior secured revolving credit facility contains
a springing covenant, but that covenant has never
been effective and would only become effective if the
availability under the revolving credit facility were to fall
below $35 million for any eight consecutive business days,
which it has never done during the life of such facility. In the
event that such availability were to fall below $35 million
for such eight consecutive business day period, the
springing covenant would require that Doles
fixed charge coverage ratio, defined as (x) consolidated
EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending
divided by (y) consolidated fixed charges for such four
fiscal quarter period, equal or exceed 1.00:1.00. Dole expects
such fixed charge coverage ratio to continue to be in excess of
1.00:1.00. At January 3, 2009, Dole was in compliance with
all applicable covenants. Dole amended its senior secured credit
facilities to, among other things, permit Dole to issue a
certain amount of junior lien notes; the amendment became
effective concurrently with the closing of the 2014 Notes
offering. The amendment to the term loan facilities will impose
a first priority secured leverage maintenance covenant on Dole,
which Dole expects to continue to be able to satisfy.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in one of the debt
instruments governing Doles current or future
indebtedness, or a debt instrument under which Holdings is the
borrower, could result in a default under that instrument and,
due to cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could
result in a default under Doles other debt instruments.
Such debt instruments of Holdings, currently $135 million,
matures on March 3, 2010. Upon the occurrence of an event
of default under one of the above debt instruments, the lenders
or holders of that debt and other debt instruments could elect
to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and
payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit.
If Holdings and its subsidiaries were unable to repay those
amounts, the lenders
F-167
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
could proceed against the collateral granted to them, if any, to
secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under the existing
indebtedness were to accelerate the payment of the indebtedness,
Holdings cannot give assurance that its consolidated assets or
cash flow would be sufficient to repay in full the outstanding
indebtedness, in which event Holdings likely would seek
reorganization or protection under bankruptcy or other, similar
laws.
Holdings entered into an amended and restated loan agreement for
$135 million on March 17, 2008 (DHM Loan)
in connection with its investment in WWP. The obligations under
such loan agreement mature on March 3, 2010. Failure to
make payments due under the DHM Loan would give lenders under
this loan agreement the right to accelerate that debt. Any
default under the DHM Loan would result in a default under
Doles senior secured credit facilities under the existing
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions set forth in
those senior secured credit facilities. If such a default were
to occur, Doles senior secured credit facilities could be
declared due at the request of the lenders holding a majority of
the senior secured debt under the applicable agreement and
unless the default were waived Dole would no longer have the
ability to request advances or letters of credit under its
revolving credit facility. The acceleration of the indebtedness
under the senior secured credit facilities would, if not cured
within 30 days, also allow the holders of 25% or more in
principal amount of any series of Doles notes or
debentures to accelerate the maturity of such series. For
further information on the DHM Loan, refer to
Note 22 Hotel and Wellness Center.
Debt Issuance
Costs
Expenses related to the issuance of long-term debt are
capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term of
the underlying debt. During the years ended January 3,
2009, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, Dole
amortized deferred debt issuance costs of $4.1 million,
$4.1 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
Dole wrote off $8.1 million of deferred debt issuance costs
during the year ended December 30, 2006. The 2006 write-off
was a result of a refinancing transaction that occurred in April
2006. This write-off was recorded to other income (expense), net
in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 30, 2006.
Fair Value of
Debt
Dole estimates the fair value of Doles unsecured notes and
debentures based on current quoted market prices. The term loans
are traded between institutional investors on the secondary loan
market, and the fair values of the term loans are based on the
last available trading price. The carrying value and estimated
fair values of Doles debt is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured notes and debentures
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
809,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,105,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,350
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
835,444
|
|
|
|
585,855
|
|
|
|
960,375
|
|
|
|
902,753
|
|
For information regarding the fair value of the Hotel and
Wellness Centers senior secured credit facility, refer to
Note 22 Hotel and Wellness Center.
F-168
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Maturities of
Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt of Dole
Maturities with respect to notes payable and long-term debt as
of January 3, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
405,537
|
|
2010
|
|
|
412,114
|
|
2011
|
|
|
363,189
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,910
|
|
2013
|
|
|
960,498
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
49,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,204,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
In addition to amounts available under the revolving credit
facility, Dole has uncommitted lines of credit of approximately
$142.9 million at various local banks, of which
$85.3 million was available at January 3, 2009. These
lines of credit are used primarily for short-term borrowings,
foreign currency exchange settlement and the issuance of letters
of credit or bank guarantees. Several of Doles uncommitted
lines of credit expire in 2009 while others do not have a
commitment expiration date. These arrangements may be cancelled
at any time by Dole or the banks. Doles ability to utilize
these lines of credit may be impacted by the terms of its senior
secured credit facilities and bond indentures.
|
|
Note 13
|
Employee Benefit
Plans
|
Holdings sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans
covering certain employees worldwide. Benefits under these plans
are generally based on each employees eligible
compensation and years of service, except for certain hourly
plans, which are based on negotiated benefits. In addition to
pension plans, Holdings has other postretirement benefit
(OPRB) plans that provide certain health care and
life insurance benefits for eligible retired employees. Covered
employees may become eligible for such benefits if they fulfill
established requirements upon reaching retirement age.
Holdings sponsors one qualified pension plan for
U.S. employees, which is funded. All but one of Holdings
international pension plans and all of its OPRB plans are
unfunded.
All pension benefits for U.S. salaried employees were
frozen in 2002. The assumption for the rate of compensation
increase of 2.5% on the U.S. plans represents the rate
associated with those participants whose benefits are negotiated
under collective bargaining arrangements.
Holdings uses a December 31 measurement date for all of its
plans.
Adoption of
FAS 158
As of December 30, 2006, Holdings adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (FAS 158), which changed the
accounting rules for reporting and disclosures related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans. FAS 158
requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or
liability in its statement of financial position and to
recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the
changes occur as a component of comprehensive income. The
standard also requires an employer to measure the funded status
as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position.
The adoption in 2006
F-169
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
had no effect on the computation of net periodic benefit expense
for pensions and postretirement benefits.
Pension
Protection Act of 2006 and Worker, Retiree, and Employer
Recovery Act of 2008
In August 2006, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 was signed
into law. This legislation changed the method of valuing the
U.S. qualified pension plan assets and liabilities for
funding purposes, as well as the minimum funding requirements.
The Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 was
signed into law in December 2008. The combined effect of these
laws will be larger contributions over the next eight to ten
years, with the goal of being fully funded by the end of that
period. The amount of unfunded liability in future years will be
affected by future contributions, demographic changes,
investment returns on plan assets, and interest rates, so full
funding may be achieved sooner or later. Holdings anticipates
funding pension contributions with cash from operations.
As a result of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and the
decrease in the value of the U.S. qualified plans
assets, Holdings anticipates contributions averaging
approximately $12 million per year over the next nine
years. Holdings also anticipates that certain forms of benefit
payments, such as lump sums, will be partially restricted over
the next few years.
OPRB Plan
Amendment
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Holdings amended its domestic
OPRB Plan. This amendment became effective January 1, 2009.
Holdings replaced health care coverage (including prescription
drugs) for Medicare eligible retirees and surviving spouses who
are age 65 and older with a new Health Reimbursement
Arrangement (HRA), whereby each participant will be
provided an annual amount in an HRA account. The HRA account
will be used to offset health care costs. This plan amendment
will reduce the benefit obligation by $21.8 million. The
amortization of this reduction in liability, combined with a
lower interest cost, will reduce the expense for this plan by
approximately $4.2 million for the next 8 years and by
$1.5 million thereafter.
F-170
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Obligations and Funded Status The
status of Holdings defined benefit pension and OPRB plans was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
308,097
|
|
|
$
|
310,186
|
|
|
$
|
141,714
|
|
|
$
|
134,098
|
|
|
$
|
63,803
|
|
|
$
|
68,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
7,069
|
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
18,481
|
|
|
|
17,139
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,721
|
)
|
|
|
10,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(34,261
|
)
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
(7,736
|
)
|
|
|
(1,610
|
)
|
|
|
(5,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(25,404
|
)
|
|
|
(25,155
|
)
|
|
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
|
(11,171
|
)
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
267,062
|
|
|
$
|
308,097
|
|
|
$
|
94,822
|
|
|
$
|
141,714
|
|
|
$
|
40,025
|
|
|
$
|
63,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
237,881
|
|
|
$
|
236,712
|
|
|
$
|
38,485
|
|
|
$
|
35,036
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(49,237
|
)
|
|
|
17,451
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
8,873
|
|
|
|
17,874
|
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
5,254
|
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,001
|
)
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(25,404
|
)
|
|
|
(25,155
|
)
|
|
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
|
(11,171
|
)
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
165,533
|
|
|
$
|
237,881
|
|
|
$
|
3,924
|
|
|
$
|
38,485
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(101,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70,216
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(99,305
|
)
|
|
|
(70,216
|
)
|
|
|
(85,169
|
)
|
|
|
(103,229
|
)
|
|
|
(35,754
|
)
|
|
|
(63,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(101,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70,216
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Holdings sold two European
businesses, each of which had defined benefit plans. The sale of
these businesses has been reflected in the tables above as
divestitures. Refer to Note 9 Assets
Held-For-Sale.
F-171
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
74,383
|
|
|
$
|
42,754
|
|
|
$
|
11,592
|
|
|
$
|
7,970
|
|
|
$
|
(8,091
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,136
|
)
|
Prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
(25,506
|
)
|
|
|
(5,460
|
)
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(27,894
|
)
|
|
|
(16,034
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
13,260
|
|
|
|
3,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,490
|
|
|
$
|
26,721
|
|
|
$
|
14,807
|
|
|
$
|
8,303
|
|
|
$
|
(20,337
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of Holdings pension plans were underfunded at
January 3, 2009, having accumulated benefit obligations
exceeding the fair value of plan assets. The accumulated benefit
obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was
$333.8 million and $417.6 million at January 3,
2009 and December 29, 2007, respectively. The aggregate
projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and
fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated
benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
361,884
|
|
|
$
|
449,811
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
333,814
|
|
|
$
|
417,581
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
169,457
|
|
|
$
|
276,366
|
|
F-172
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Components of
Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Changes Recognized in
Other
Comprehensive Loss
The components of net periodic benefit cost and other changes
recognized in other comprehensive loss for Holdings
U.S. and international pension plans and OPRB plans were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
International Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
1,550
|
|
|
$
|
7,069
|
|
|
$
|
6,947
|
|
|
$
|
4,443
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
18,481
|
|
|
|
17,139
|
|
|
|
16,878
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
7,165
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(18,139
|
)
|
|
|
(17,721
|
)
|
|
|
(18,021
|
)
|
|
|
(2,378
|
)
|
|
|
(2,473
|
)
|
|
|
(905
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
804
|
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
16,554
|
|
|
$
|
14,607
|
|
|
$
|
12,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes recognized in other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
33,115
|
|
|
$
|
6,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
|
$
|
(6,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
(1,485
|
)
|
|
|
(1,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(11,860
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
19,769
|
|
|
$
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,504
|
|
|
$
|
(6,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
21,746
|
|
|
$
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,058
|
|
|
$
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-173
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
3,908
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
Curtailments, settlements and terminations, net
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,125
|
|
|
$
|
4,128
|
|
|
$
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes recognized in other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain
|
|
$
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service benefit
|
|
|
(20,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net (loss) gain
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
9,936
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(12,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss, prior service cost and transition
obligation for the defined benefit pension plans that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net
periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is
$1.3 million of expense. The estimated actuarial net gain
and prior service benefit for the OPRB plans that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into
periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is
$4.1 million of income.
Assumptions
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rate assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.75%
|
|
|
|
6.25%
|
|
|
|
8.30%
|
|
|
|
7.52%
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.50%
|
|
|
|
2.50%
|
|
|
|
6.00%
|
|
|
|
5.22%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-174
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rate assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25%
|
|
|
|
5.75%
|
|
|
|
8.47%
|
|
|
|
6.61%
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
Compensation increase
|
|
|
2.50%
|
|
|
|
2.50%
|
|
|
|
5.85%
|
|
|
|
5.15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00%
|
|
|
|
8.00%
|
|
|
|
7.70%
|
|
|
|
6.73%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International plan discount rates, assumed rates of increase in
future compensation and expected long-term return on assets
differ from the assumptions used for U.S. plans due to
differences in the local economic conditions in the countries in
which the international plans are based.
The APBO for Holdings U.S. OPRB plan in 2008 and 2007 was
determined using the following assumed annual rate of increase
in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Health care costs trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Rate of increase to which the cost of benefits is assumed to
decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
The health care plan offered to retirees in the U.S. who
are age 65 or older was changed effective January 1,
2009 to provide the reimbursement of health care expenses up to
a certain fixed amount. There is no commitment to increase the
fixed dollar amount and no increase was assumed in determining
the APBO. Therefore, the trend rate applies only to benefits for
U.S. retirees prior to age 65 and to foreign retirees.
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following impact on Holdings OPRB plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Percentage-Point
|
|
|
One-Percentage-Point
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in service and interest cost
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
(1,292
|
)
|
Plan
Assets
The following is the plans target asset mix, which
management believes provides the optimal tradeoff of
diversification and long-term asset growth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
55%
|
|
Private equity and venture capital funds
|
|
|
5%
|
|
F-175
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holdings U.S. pension plan weighted-average asset
allocations at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007
by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Private equity and venture capital funds
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plans asset allocation includes a mix of fixed income
investments designed to reduce volatility and equity investments
designed to maintain funding ratios and long-term financial
health of the plan. The equity investments are diversified
across U.S. and international stocks as well as growth,
value, and small and large capitalizations.
Private equity and venture capital funds are used to enhance
long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification.
Holdings employs a total return investment approach whereby a
mix of fixed income and equity investments is used to maximize
the long-term return of plan assets with a prudent level of
risk. The objectives of this strategy are to achieve full
funding of the accumulated benefit obligation, and to achieve
investment experience over time that will minimize pension
expense volatility and minimize Holdings contributions required
to maintain full funding status. Risk tolerance is established
through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded
status and corporate financial condition. Investment risk is
measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual
liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and
quarterly investment portfolio reviews.
Holdings actual weighted average asset allocation varied from
Holdings target allocation at January 3, 2009 due to the
economic volatility in the stock and bond markets during 2008.
Holdings is currently assessing its positions and expects to
rebalance its portfolio during 2009.
The pension plan did not hold any of Holdings or Dole common
stock at January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007.
Holdings determines the expected return on pension plan assets
based on an expectation of average annual returns over an
extended period of years. Holdings also considers the
weighted-average historical rate of returns on securities with
similar characteristics to those in which Holdings pension
assets are invested.
Holdings applies the 10% corridor approach to
amortize unrecognized actuarial gains (losses) on both its
U.S. and international pension and OPRB plans. Under this
approach, only actuarial gains (losses) that exceed 10% of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the
market-related value of the plan assets are amortized. The
amortization period is based on the average remaining service
period of active employees expected to receive benefits under
each plan or over the life expectancy of inactive participants
where all, or nearly all, participants are inactive. For the
year ended January 3, 2009, the average remaining service
period used to amortize unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)
for its domestic plans was approximately 10.5 years.
Plan
Contributions and Estimated Future Benefit
Payments
During 2008, Holdings did not make any contributions to its
qualified U.S. pension plan. Under the minimum funding
requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, no
contribution was required for fiscal 2008. Holdings expects to
contribute approximately $8 million to its
U.S. qualified plan in 2009, which is the estimated minimum
funding requirement calculated under the Pension Protection
F-176
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Act of 2006. Future contributions to the U.S. pension plan
in excess of the minimum funding requirement are voluntary and
may change depending on Holdings operating performance or at
managements discretion. Holdings expects to make
$15.7 million of payments related to its other
U.S. and foreign pension and OPRB plans in 2009.
The following table presents estimated future benefit payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
OPRB Plans
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
23,126
|
|
|
$
|
8,471
|
|
|
$
|
4,271
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,848
|
|
|
|
8,941
|
|
|
|
4,179
|
|
2011
|
|
|
22,385
|
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,375
|
|
|
|
9,110
|
|
|
|
3,999
|
|
2013
|
|
|
22,039
|
|
|
|
9,268
|
|
|
|
3,911
|
|
2014-2018
|
|
|
106,662
|
|
|
|
57,967
|
|
|
|
18,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
219,435
|
|
|
$
|
102,303
|
|
|
$
|
38,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
Holdings offers defined contribution plans to eligible
employees. Such employees may defer a percentage of their annual
compensation in accordance with plan guidelines. Some of these
plans provide for a Company match that is subject to a maximum
contribution as defined by the plan. Holdings contributions to
its defined contribution plans totaled $8.1 million,
$7.6 million and $7.3 million in the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
Multi-Employer
Plans
Holdings is also party to various industry-wide collective
bargaining agreements that provide pension benefits. Total
contributions to these plans for eligible participants were
approximately $1.6 million, $2.8 million and
$3.7 million in the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, respectively.
|
|
Note 14
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
Holdings authorized share capital as of January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007 consisted of 1,000 shares of
$0.001 par value common stock of which 1,000 shares
were issued and outstanding. All issued and outstanding shares
are owned by David H. Murdock and by other entities owned by
David H. Murdock.
Dividends
Holdings did not declare or pay a dividend to its parent during
either of the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006. Dividends
paid during the year ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007, and December 30, 2006 represent
dividends paid to WWPs noncontrolling shareholder.
Doles ability to declare dividends is limited under the
terms of its senior notes indentures and senior secured credit
facilities. As of January 3, 2009, Dole had no ability to
declare and pay dividends or other similar distributions.
F-177
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Capital
Contributions and Return of Capital
During the year ended January 3, 2009, capital
contributions of $62.6 million were received from Holdings
shareholders.
There were no capital contributions or return of capital
transactions during the years ended December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006.
During the year ended January 3, 2009, December 29,
2007, and December 30, 2006, capital contributions of
$5.3 million, $11.9 million, and $16.9 million
were received from WWPs noncontrolling shareholder.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of changes to
shareholders equity, other than contributions from or
distributions to shareholders, and net income (loss). Holdings
other comprehensive income (loss) principally consists of
unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses,
unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging instruments and
pension liability. The components of, and changes in,
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are presented in
Holdings Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity.
|
|
Note 15
|
Business
Segments
|
As discussed in Note 5, Holdings approved and committed to
a formal plan to divest its fresh-cut flowers operating segment
and accordingly reclassified the results of operations to
discontinued operations. As a result of this reclassification of
the fresh-cut flowers segment, Holdings now has four reportable
operating segments.
Holdings has four reportable operating segments: fresh fruit,
fresh vegetables, packaged foods, and the Hotel and Wellness
Center. These reportable segments are managed separately due to
differences in their products, production processes,
distribution channels and customer bases.
Management evaluates and monitors segment performance primarily
through, among other measures, earnings before interest expense
and income taxes (EBIT). EBIT is calculated by
adding interest expense and income taxes to income (loss) from
continuing operations. Management believes that segment EBIT
provides useful information for analyzing the underlying
business results as well as allowing investors a means to
evaluate the financial results of each segment in relation to
Holdings as a whole. EBIT is not defined under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for net income or cash flow measures prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of Holdings profitability.
Additionally, Holdings computation of EBIT may not be comparable
to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies,
because not all companies calculate EBIT in the same fashion.
In the tables below, only revenues from external customers and
EBIT reflect results from continuing operations. Total assets,
depreciation and amortization and capital additions reflect
results from continuing and discontinued operations for 2008,
2007 and 2006.
F-178
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The results of operations and financial position of the four
reportable operating segments and corporate were as follows:
Results of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
5,401,145
|
|
|
$
|
4,736,902
|
|
|
$
|
3,968,963
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
1,086,888
|
|
|
|
1,059,401
|
|
|
|
1,082,416
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
1,130,791
|
|
|
|
1,023,257
|
|
|
|
938,336
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
39,796
|
|
|
|
35,734
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,659,748
|
|
|
$
|
6,856,546
|
|
|
$
|
5,993,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
305,782
|
|
|
$
|
172,175
|
|
|
$
|
104,976
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
(21,668
|
)
|
|
|
(7,241
|
)
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
70,944
|
|
|
|
80,093
|
|
|
|
93,449
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
(27,023
|
)
|
|
|
(33,101
|
)
|
|
|
(17,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
350,826
|
|
|
|
197,499
|
|
|
|
173,589
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cross currency swap
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
|
20,664
|
|
Operating and other expenses
|
|
|
(54,931
|
)
|
|
|
(60,148
|
)
|
|
|
(59,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(105,342
|
)
|
|
|
(70,889
|
)
|
|
|
(39,296
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(184,895
|
)
|
|
|
(208,734
|
)
|
|
|
(172,421
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
60,906
|
|
|
|
11,980
|
|
|
|
(15,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
121,495
|
|
|
$
|
(70,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate EBIT includes general and administrative costs not
allocated to operating segments.
Substantially all of Holdings equity earnings in unconsolidated
subsidiaries, which have been included in EBIT in the table
above, relate to the fresh fruit operating segment.
F-179
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial
Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
2,322,899
|
|
|
$
|
2,528,169
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
460,221
|
|
|
|
476,501
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
686,801
|
|
|
|
693,515
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
352,056
|
|
|
|
368,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
3,821,977
|
|
|
|
4,066,794
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
832,824
|
|
|
|
832,459
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers discontinued operations
|
|
|
61,989
|
|
|
|
112,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,716,790
|
|
|
$
|
5,011,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization and capital additions by segment
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
90,289
|
|
|
$
|
96,480
|
|
|
$
|
92,196
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
19,420
|
|
|
|
18,414
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
|
|
32,989
|
|
|
|
31,454
|
|
Hotel and wellness center
|
|
|
18,428
|
|
|
|
17,555
|
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
153,556
|
|
|
|
165,438
|
|
|
|
140,818
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
3,498
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
5,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,256
|
|
|
$
|
173,160
|
|
|
$
|
150,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$
|
44,381
|
|
|
$
|
52,511
|
|
|
$
|
41,286
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
9,152
|
|
|
|
27,433
|
|
|
|
52,990
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
20,111
|
|
|
|
23,913
|
|
|
|
19,728
|
|
Hotel and Wellness Center
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
9,898
|
|
|
|
195,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
75,508
|
|
|
|
113,755
|
|
|
|
309,516
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,779
|
|
|
$
|
117,128
|
|
|
$
|
314,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-180
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holdings revenues from external customers and tangible
long-lived assets by country/region were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,022,764
|
|
|
$
|
2,705,666
|
|
|
$
|
2,583,055
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
723,195
|
|
|
|
590,218
|
|
|
|
578,504
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
564,499
|
|
|
|
474,139
|
|
|
|
354,390
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
551,555
|
|
|
|
470,570
|
|
|
|
439,741
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
242,258
|
|
|
|
329,999
|
|
|
|
108,040
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
287,758
|
|
|
|
262,217
|
|
|
|
222,846
|
|
Other Euro zone countries
|
|
|
944,470
|
|
|
|
817,082
|
|
|
|
744,416
|
|
Other international
|
|
|
1,323,249
|
|
|
|
1,206,655
|
|
|
|
962,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,659,748
|
|
|
$
|
6,856,546
|
|
|
$
|
5,993,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No individual country in the Other international category above
had material revenues from external customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Tangible long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
828,341
|
|
|
$
|
1,015,950
|
|
Oceangoing assets
|
|
|
134,681
|
|
|
|
161,531
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
144,114
|
|
|
|
148,786
|
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|
96,916
|
|
|
|
97,576
|
|
Honduras
|
|
|
79,298
|
|
|
|
77,093
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
48,647
|
|
|
|
56,974
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
64,426
|
|
|
|
54,254
|
|
Other international
|
|
|
140,487
|
|
|
|
245,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,536,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,857,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16
|
Operating Leases
and Other Commitments
|
In addition to obligations recorded on Holdings Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of January 3, 2009, Holdings has
commitments under cancelable and non-cancelable operating
leases, primarily for land, machinery and equipment, vessels and
containers and office and warehouse facilities. A significant
portion of Holdings lease payments are fixed. Total rental
expense, including rent related to cancelable and non-cancelable
leases, was $204.2 million, $169.2 million and
$153 million (net of sublease income of $17.1 million,
$16.6 million and $16.4 million) for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
Holdings modified the terms of its corporate aircraft lease
agreement during 2007. The modification primarily extended the
lease period from terminating in 2010 to 2018. Holdings
corporate aircraft lease agreement includes a residual value
guarantee of up to $4.8 million at the termination of the
lease in 2018.
F-181
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of January 3, 2009, Holdings non-cancelable minimum
lease commitments, including the residual value guarantee,
before sublease income, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
143,054
|
|
2010
|
|
|
110,736
|
|
2011
|
|
|
85,026
|
|
2012
|
|
|
62,842
|
|
2013
|
|
|
47,677
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
115,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
564,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expected future sublease income for Holdings is expected
to be earned over 7 years is $42.6 million.
In order to secure sufficient product to meet demand and to
supplement Holdings own production, Holdings has entered into
non-cancelable agreements with independent growers, primarily in
Latin America and North America, to purchase substantially all
of their production subject to market demand and product
quality. Prices under these agreements are generally tied to
prevailing market rates and contract terms generally range from
one to ten years. Total purchases under these agreements were
$658.8 million, $564.5 million and $474.5 million
for the years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007
and December 30, 2006, respectively.
At January 3, 2009, aggregate future payments under such
purchase commitments (based on January 3, 2009 pricing and
volumes) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
622,921
|
|
2010
|
|
|
395,143
|
|
2011
|
|
|
348,642
|
|
2012
|
|
|
218,687
|
|
2013
|
|
|
184,596
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
131,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,901,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to ensure a steady supply of packing supplies and to
maximize volume incentive rebates, Holdings has entered into
contracts for the purchase of packing supplies; some of these
contracts run through 2010. Prices under these agreements are
generally tied to prevailing market rates. Purchases under these
contracts for the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006 were
approximately $292.6 million, $272.7 million and
$207.6 million, respectively.
Under these contracts, Holdings was committed at January 3,
2009, to purchase packing supplies, assuming current price
levels, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
158,638
|
|
2010
|
|
|
133,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
292,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-182
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holdings has numerous collective bargaining agreements with
various unions covering approximately 35% of Holdings hourly
full-time and seasonal employees. Of the unionized employees,
35% are covered under a collective bargaining agreement that
will expire within one year and the remaining 65% are covered
under collective bargaining agreements expiring beyond the
upcoming year. These agreements are subject to periodic
negotiation and renewal. Failure to renew any of these
collective bargaining agreements may result in a strike or work
stoppage; however, management does not expect that the outcome
of these negotiations and renewals will have a material adverse
impact on Holdings financial condition or results of operations.
Refer to Note 22 Hotel and Wellbeing Center,
for further information on Hotel and Wellbeing Center
commitments.
|
|
Note 17
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
Holdings is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations, bunker fuel price fluctuations and interest rate
changes in the normal course of its business. As part of its
risk management strategy, Holdings uses derivative instruments
to hedge certain foreign currency, bunker fuel and interest rate
exposures. Holdings objective is to offset gains and losses
resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the
derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing
volatility of earnings. Holdings does not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as amended (FAS 133), establishes
accounting and reporting standards requiring that every
derivative instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either
an asset or liability and measured at fair value. FAS 133
also requires that changes in the derivatives fair value
be recognized currently in earnings unless specific criteria are
met and that a company must formally document, designate and
assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge
accounting. For those instruments that qualify for hedge
accounting as cash flow hedges, any unrealized gains or losses
are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
with the corresponding asset or liability recorded on the
balance sheet. Any portion of a cash flow hedge that is deemed
to be ineffective is recognized into current period earnings.
When the transaction underlying the hedge is recognized into
earnings, the related other comprehensive income (loss) is
reclassified to current period earnings.
Through the first quarter of 2007, all of Holdings derivative
instruments, with the exception of the cross currency swap, were
designated as effective hedges of cash flows as defined by
FAS 133. However, during the second quarter of 2007,
Holdings elected to discontinue its designation of both its
foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges as cash flow hedges
under FAS 133. The interest rate swap continues to be
accounted for as a cash flow hedge under FAS 133. As a
result, all changes in the fair value of Holdings derivative
financial instruments from the time of discontinuation of hedge
accounting are reflected in Holdings consolidated statements of
operations. Gains and losses on foreign currency and bunker fuel
hedges are recorded as a component of cost of revenues in the
consolidated statement of operations. Gains and losses related
to the interest rate swap are recorded as a component of
interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Foreign
Currency Hedges
Some of Holdings divisions operate in functional currencies
other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, Holdings enters
into cash flow derivative instruments to hedge portions of
anticipated revenue streams and operating expenses. At
January 3, 2009, Holdings had forward contract hedges for
forecasted revenue transactions denominated in the Japanese yen,
the Euro and the Swedish krona and for forecasted operating
expenses denominated in the Chilean peso, Colombian peso and the
Philippine
F-183
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
peso. Holdings uses foreign currency exchange forward contracts
and participating forward contracts to reduce its risk related
to anticipated dollar equivalent foreign currency cash flows.
In addition, the net assets of some of Holdings foreign
subsidiaries are exposed to foreign currency translation gains
and losses, which are included as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders equity.
Holdings has historically not attempted to hedge this equity
risk.
At January 3, 2009, the gross notional value and fair
market value of Holdings foreign currency hedges were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Notional Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Participating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
Strike
|
|
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Hedges(Buy/Sell):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
$
|
(9,800
|
)
|
|
|
JPY 104
|
|
U.S. Dollar/Euro
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
EUR 1.43
|
|
Euro/Swedish Krona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
SEK 11.09
|
|
Chilean Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
CLP 668
|
|
Colombian Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,262
|
|
|
|
52,262
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
COP 2,294
|
|
Philippine Peso/U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,053
|
|
|
|
39,053
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
PHP 47.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
247,681
|
|
|
$
|
118,519
|
|
|
$
|
366,200
|
|
|
$
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 29, 2007 Holdings had outstanding hedges
denominated in the Japanese yen, the Euro, the Canadian dollar,
the Chilean peso and the Thai baht. The fair market value of
these hedges was a liability of $12.1 million at
December 29, 2007.
Bunker Fuel
Hedges
Holdings enters into bunker fuel hedges for its shipping
operations to reduce its risk related to price fluctuations on
anticipated bunker fuel purchases. At January 3, 2009, the
notional volume and the fair market value of Holdings bunker
fuel hedges were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Volume
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(per metric ton)
|
|
|
Bunker Fuel Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rotterdam
|
|
|
15,018
|
|
|
$
|
(3,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
At December 29, 2007, the fair market value of the bunker
fuel hedges was an asset of $1.1 million, which included
$0.4 million related to unsettled bunker fuel hedges that
received FAS 133 treatment prior to the discontinuation of
hedge accounting during the second quarter of 2007.
For both the foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges, the fair
market value of these instruments is recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet as either a current asset or current
liability. Settlement of these hedges will occur during 2009.
F-184
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net unrealized gains (losses) and realized gains (losses)
included as a component of cost of revenues sold in the
consolidated statement of operations on the foreign currency and
bunker fuel hedges for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts and other
|
|
$
|
6,002
|
|
|
$
|
(12,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts discontinued
operations
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
(11,316
|
)
|
|
|
(1,580
|
)
|
Realized Gains (Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
(11,255
|
)
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
6,098
|
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
(3,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,313
|
)
|
|
|
22,720
|
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,404
|
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the exception of some Colombian peso hedges, all unrealized
gains (losses) on foreign currency and bunker fuel hedges for
2006 were included as a component of other comprehensive income
(loss) in shareholders equity. Unrealized losses for 2006
included in the table above relate to Colombian peso hedges that
did not receive FAS 133 treatment and the ineffective
portion of bunker fuel hedges. The realized and unrealized gains
(losses) related to discontinued operations were included as a
component of loss from discontinued operations.
Interest Rate
and Cross Currency Swaps
As discussed in Note 12, Holdings completed an amendment
and restatement of its senior secured credit facilities in April
2006. As a result of this refinancing transaction, Holdings
recognized a gain of $6.5 million related to the settlement
of its interest rate swap associated with its then existing Term
Loan A. This amount was recorded to other income (expense), net
in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 30, 2006.
In June 2006, subsequent to the refinancing transaction,
Holdings entered into an interest rate swap in order to hedge
future changes in interest rates. This agreement effectively
converted $320 million of borrowings under Term Loan C,
which was variable-rate debt, to a fixed-rate basis through June
2011. The interest rate swap fixed the interest rate at 7.24%.
The paying and receiving rates under the interest rate swap were
5.49% and 4.82% as of January 3, 2009, with an outstanding
notional amount of $320 million. The critical terms of the
interest rate swap were substantially the same as those of Term
Loan C, including quarterly principal and interest settlements.
The interest rate swap hedge has been designated as an effective
hedge of cash flows as defined by FAS 133. The fair value
of the interest rate swap was a liability of $26.5 million
and $15.9 million at January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007, respectively. Net payments of the
interest rate swap are recorded as a component of interest
expense in the consolidated statements of operations for 2008
and 2007. Net payments were $5.6 million and
$0.4 million for the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007, respectively.
F-185
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, in June 2006, Holdings executed a cross currency
swap to synthetically convert $320 million of Term Loan C
into Japanese yen denominated debt in order to effectively lower
the U.S. dollar fixed interest rate of 7.24% to a Japanese
yen interest rate of 3.6%. Payments under the cross currency
swap were converted from U.S. dollars to Japanese yen at an
exchange rate of ¥111.9. At January 3, 2009, the
exchange rate of the Japanese yen to U.S. dollar was
¥90.6. The value of the cross currency swap will fluctuate
based on changes in the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen
exchange rate and market interest rates until maturity in 2011,
at which time it will settle in cash at the then current
exchange rate. The fair market value of the cross currency swap
was a liability of $40.5 million and an asset of
$9.9 million at January 3, 2009 and December 29,
2007, respectively.
The unrealized gains (losses) and realized gains on the cross
currency swap for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,741
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,664
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
24,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on the cross currency
swap are recorded through other income (expense), net in the
consolidated statements of operations.
FAS 157
As discussed in Note 2, Holdings adopted FAS 157 as of
December 30, 2007 for financial assets and liabilities
measured on a recurring basis and the impact of the adoption was
not material. FAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. These levels, in order of
highest to lowest priority are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not
quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by
market data.
The fair values of Holdings derivative instruments are
determined using Level 2 inputs, which are defined as
significant other observable inputs. The fair values
of the foreign currency exchange contracts, bunker fuel
contracts, interest rate swap and cross currency swap were
estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based
upon forward foreign currency exchange rates, bunker fuel
futures, interest-rate yield curves or quotes obtained from
brokers for contracts with similar terms less any credit
valuation adjustments. Holdings recorded a credit valuation
adjustment at January 3, 2009 which reduced the derivative
liability balances by approximately $16.3 million and
resulted in a corresponding decrease in the unrealized loss
recorded for the derivative instruments. Approximately
$2.7 million of the credit valuation adjustment was
recorded as a component of interest expense and
$13.6 million was recorded as a component of other income
(expense), net.
F-186
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of
assets and liabilities under the FAS 157 hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurements at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
Bunker fuel contracts
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
26,467
|
|
|
|
26,467
|
|
Cross currency swap
|
|
|
40,488
|
|
|
|
40,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,771
|
|
|
$
|
81,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk
The counterparties to the foreign currency exchange forward
contracts, bunker fuel hedges and the interest rate swap consist
of a number of major international financial institutions.
Holdings has established counterparty guidelines and regularly
monitors its positions and the financial strength of these
institutions. While counterparties to hedging contracts expose
Holdings to credit-related losses in the event of a
counterpartys non-performance, the risk would be limited
to the unrealized gains on such affected contracts. Holdings
does not anticipate any such losses.
Dole is a guarantor of indebtedness to some of its key fruit
suppliers and other entities integral to Doles operations.
At January 3, 2009, guarantees of $3.2 million
consisted primarily of amounts advanced under third-party bank
agreements to independent growers that supply Dole with product.
Dole has not historically experienced any significant losses
associated with these guarantees.
Dole issues letters of credit and bank guarantees through its
ABL revolver and its pre-funded letter of credit facilities,
and, in addition, separately through major banking institutions.
Dole also provides insurance company issued bonds. These letters
of credit, bank guarantees and insurance company bonds are
required by certain regulatory authorities, suppliers and other
operating agreements. As of January 3, 2009, total letters
of credit, bank guarantees and bonds outstanding under these
arrangements were $107.3 million, of which $71 million
were issued under its pre-funded letter of credit facility.
Dole also provides various guarantees, mostly to foreign banks,
in the course of its normal business operations to support the
borrowings, leases and other obligations of its subsidiaries.
Dole guaranteed $218.8 million of its subsidiaries
obligations to their suppliers and other third parties as of
January 3, 2009.
F-187
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Dole has change of control agreements with certain key
executives, under which severance payments and benefits would
become payable in the event of specified terminations of
employment following a change of control (as defined) of Dole.
Holdings is involved from time to time in claims and legal
actions incidental to its operations, both as plaintiff and
defendant. Holdings has established what management currently
believes to be adequate reserves for pending legal matters.
These reserves are established as part of an ongoing worldwide
assessment of claims and legal actions that takes into
consideration such items as changes in the pending case load
(including resolved and new matters), opinions of legal counsel,
individual developments in court proceedings, changes in the
law, changes in business focus, changes in the litigation
environment, changes in opponent strategy and tactics, new
developments as a result of ongoing discovery, and past
experience in defending and settling similar claims. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with outside counsel,
the claims or actions to which Holdings is a party are not
expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in
the aggregate, on Holdings financial condition or results of
operations.
DBCP Cases: A significant portion of Holdings
legal exposure relates to lawsuits pending in the United States
and in several foreign countries, alleging injury as a result of
exposure to the agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane). DBCP was manufactured by several
chemical companies including Dow and Shell and registered by the
U.S. government for use on food crops. Dole and other
growers applied DBCP on banana farms in Latin America and the
Philippines and on pineapple farms in Hawaii. Specific periods
of use varied among the different locations. Dole halted all
purchases of DBCP, including for use in foreign countries, when
the U.S. EPA cancelled the registration of DBCP for use in
the United States in 1979. That cancellation was based in part
on a 1977 study by a manufacturer which indicated an apparent
link between male sterility and exposure to DBCP among factory
workers producing the product, as well as early product testing
done by the manufacturers showing testicular effects on animals
exposed to DBCP. To date, there is no reliable evidence
demonstrating that field application of DBCP led to sterility
among farm workers, although that claim is made in the pending
lawsuits. Nor is there any reliable scientific evidence that
DBCP causes any other injuries in humans, although plaintiffs in
the various actions assert claims based on cancer, birth defects
and other general illnesses.
Currently there are 249 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaragua judgments. In addition, there
are 150 labor cases pending in Costa Rica under that
countrys national insurance program.
Thirty-three of the 249 lawsuits are currently pending in
various jurisdictions in the United States. Eighteen lawsuits in
Los Angeles Superior Court brought by foreign workers who
alleged exposure to DBCP in countries where Dole did not even
have operations during the relevant period, are to be dismissed
without prejudice by March 30, 2009 pursuant to a tolling
agreement which terminates on December 31, 2012. Two
additional lawsuits in Texas and in Hawaii were also dismissed.
On
April 21-23,
2009 the Los Angeles Superior Court will hold a scheduled
hearing on an order to show cause as why the two pending
lawsuits (including the case with a previous trial date of
September 10, 2009) brought by Nicaraguan plaintiffs
should not be terminated with prejudice, pursuant to the
courts stated inherent power and responsibility to
terminate litigation if deliberate and egregious misconduct
makes any sanctions other than dismissal inadequate to ensure a
fair trial. One of two U.S. law firms representing the
plaintiffs in these two pending lawsuits has filed a notice of
discharge of attorneys of record; and the second law firm has
filed a motion to be relieved as counsel for the plaintiffs.
Another case pending in Hawaii Superior Court with 10 plaintiffs
from Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador and Panama currently has a
trial date of January 18, 2010. The remaining cases are
pending in Latin America and the Philippines. Claimed damages in
DBCP cases worldwide total approximately
F-188
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$44.5 billion, with lawsuits in Nicaragua representing
approximately 88% of this amount. Typically in these cases Dole
is a joint defendant with the major DBCP manufacturers. Except
as described below, none of these lawsuits has resulted in a
verdict or judgment against Dole.
One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court with 12
Nicaraguan plaintiffs initially resulted in verdicts which
totaled approximately $5 million in damages against Dole in
favor of six of the plaintiffs. As a result of the courts
March 7, 2008 favorable rulings on Doles post-verdict
motions, including, importantly, the courts decision
striking down punitive damages in the case on
U.S. Constitutional grounds, the damages against Dole have
now been reduced to $1.58 million in total compensatory
awards to four of the plaintiffs; and the court granted
Doles motion for a new trial as to the claims of one of
the plaintiffs. The parties in this lawsuit have filed appeals.
Once the court makes its determination of costs, Dole will file
an appeal bond, which will further stay the judgment pending the
resolution of the appeal. Additionally, the court appointed a
mediator to explore possible settlement of all DBCP cases
currently pending before the court.
In Nicaragua, 196 cases are currently filed (of which 20 are
active) in various courts throughout the country, all but one of
which were brought pursuant to Law 364, an October 2000
Nicaraguan statute that contains substantive and procedural
provisions that Nicaraguas Attorney General formally
opined are unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court
of Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional. Thirty-two cases
have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua: $489.4 million
(nine cases consolidated with 468 claimants) on
December 11, 2002; $82.9 million (one case with 58
claimants) on February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one
case with 20 claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million
(one case with four claimants) on May 25, 2004;
$56.5 million (one case with 72 claimants) on June 14,
2004; $64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with 39
claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million (one case
with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005; $46.4 million
(one case with 62 claimants) on August 20, 2005;
$809 million (six cases consolidated with 1,248 claimants)
on December 1, 2006; $38.4 million (one case with 192
claimants) on November 14, 2007; and $357.7 million
(eight cases with 417 claimants) on January 12, 2009, which
Dole recently learned of unofficially. Except for the latest
one, Dole has appealed all judgments, with Doles appeal of
the August 8, 2005 $98.5 million judgment and of the
December 1, 2006 $809 million judgment currently
pending before the Nicaragua Court of Appeal. Dole will appeal
the $357.7 million judgment once it has been served.
The 20 active cases are currently pending in civil courts in
Managua (9), Chinandega (10) and Puerto Cabezas (1), all of
which have been brought under Law 364 except for one of the
cases pending in Chinandega. In 2 of the 9 cases in Managua
(Dole has not been ordered to answer in seven cases), Dole has
sought to have the cases returned to the United States pursuant
to Law 364. Doles requests are still pending and Dole
expects to make similar requests in the remaining seven cases at
the appropriate time. In four of the 10 cases in Chinandega
(Dole has not been ordered to answer in six cases), Dole has
sought to have the cases returned to the United States pursuant
to Law 364. In one case, the Chinandega court has ordered the
plaintiffs to respond to our request; in two cases, the court
had denied Doles requests, and Dole has appealed that
decision; and in the other case, the court has not yet ruled on
Doles request. In the one case in Puerto Cabezas, Dole has
sought to have the case returned to the United States, and Dole
has appealed the courts denial of Doles request.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision, which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals
F-189
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions
against Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the
Court of Appeals in that case. A Special Master appointed by the
Court of Appeals has recommended that Plaintiffs counsel
be ordered to pay Defendants fees and costs up to $130,000
each to Dole and the other two defendants; and following such
recommendation, the Court of Appeals has appointed a special
prosecutor.
Claimants have also sought to enforce the Nicaraguan judgments
in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. In addition, there is one
case pending in the U.S. District Court in Miami, Florida
seeking enforcement of the August 8, 2005
$98.5 million Nicaraguan judgment. This case is currently
stayed. In Venezuela, the claimants have attempted to enforce
five of the Nicaraguan judgments in that countrys Supreme
Court: $489.4 million (December 11, 2002);
$82.9 million (February 25, 2004); $15.7 million
(May 25, 2004); $56.5 million (June 14, 2004);
and $64.8 million (June 15, 2004). These cases are
currently inactive. An action filed to enforce the
$27.7 million Nicaraguan judgment (March 17,
2005) in the Colombian Supreme Court was dismissed. In
Ecuador, the claimants attempted to enforce the five Nicaraguan
judgments issued between February 25, 2004 through
June 15, 2004 in the Ecuador Supreme Court. The First,
Second and Third Chambers of the Ecuador Supreme Court issued
rulings refusing to consider those enforcement actions on the
ground that the Supreme Court was not a court of competent
jurisdiction for enforcement of a foreign judgment. The
plaintiffs subsequently refiled those five enforcement actions
in the civil court in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Two of these
subsequently filed enforcement actions have been dismissed by
the 3rd Civil Court $15.7 million
(May 25, 2004) and the 12th Civil
Court $56.5 million (June 14,
2004) in Guayaquil; plaintiffs have sought
reconsideration of those dismissals. The remaining three
enforcement actions are still pending.
Holdings believes that none of the Nicaraguan judgments will be
enforceable against any Dole entity in the U.S. or in any
other country, because Nicaraguas Law 364 is
unconstitutional and violates international principles of due
process. Among other things, Law 364 is an improper
special law directed at particular parties; it
requires defendants to pay large, non-refundable deposits in
order to even participate in the litigation; it provides a
severely truncated procedural process; it establishes an
irrebuttable presumption of causation that is contrary to the
evidence and scientific data; and it sets unreasonable minimum
damages that must be awarded in every case.
On October 23, 2006, Dole announced that Standard Fruit de
Honduras, S.A. reached an agreement with the Government of
Honduras and representatives of Honduran banana workers. This
agreement establishes a Worker Program that is intended by the
parties to resolve in a fair and equitable manner the claims of
male banana workers alleging sterility as a result of exposure
to DBCP. The Honduran Worker Program will not have a material
effect on Holdings financial condition or results of operations.
The official start of the Honduran Worker Program was announced
on January 8, 2007. On August 15, 2007, Shell Oil
Company was included in the Worker Program.
As to all the DBCP matters, Dole has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. While Dole believes there is no
reliable scientific basis for alleged injuries from the
agricultural field application of DBCP, Dole continues to seek
reasonable resolution of other pending litigation and claims in
the U.S. and Latin America. For example, as in Honduras,
Dole is committed to finding a prompt resolution to the DBCP
claims in Nicaragua, and is prepared to pursue a structured
worker program in Nicaragua with science-based criteria.
Although no assurance can be given concerning the outcome of
these cases, in the opinion of management, after consultation
with legal counsel and based on past experience defending and
settling DBCP claims, the pending lawsuits are not expected to
have a material adverse effect on Holdings financial condition
or results of operations.
European Union Antitrust Inquiry: On
October 15, 2008, the European Commission (EC)
adopted a Decision against Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole
Fresh Fruit Europe OHG (collectively
F-190
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Dole) and against other unrelated banana companies,
finding violations of the European competition (antitrust) laws.
The Decision imposes 45.6 million in fines on Dole.
The Decision follows a Statement of Objections, issued by the EC
on July 25, 2007, and searches carried out by the EC in
June 2005 at certain banana importers and distributors,
including two of Doles offices. On November 28 and 29,
2007, the EC conducted searches of certain of Doles
offices in Italy and Spain, as well as of other companies
offices located in these countries.
Dole received the Decision on October 21, 2008 and appealed
the Decision on December 24, 2008.
On December 3, 2008, the EC agreed in writing that if Dole
makes an initial payment of $10 million to the EC on or
before January 22, 2009, the EC will stay the deadline for
a provisional payment, or coverage by a prime bank guaranty, of
the remaining balance (plus interest as from January 22,
2009), until April 30, 2009. Dole made this initial
$10 million (7.6 million) payment on
January 21, 2009 and it will be included in other assets in
Holdings first quarter 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Although no assurances can be given, and although there could be
a material adverse effect on Holdings, Holdings believes that it
has not violated the European competition laws. No accrual for
the Decision has been made in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, since Holdings cannot determine at this
time the amount of probable loss, if any, incurred as a result
of the Decision.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, Dole received a
tax assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of our
interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A. in 2001. Dole
believes the assessment is without merit and filed an appeal
with the Honduran tax authorities, which was denied. As a result
of the denial in the administrative process, in order to negate
the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005, Dole proceeded to
the next stage of the appellate process by filing a lawsuit
against the Honduran government in the Honduran Administrative
Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government sought dismissal of the
lawsuit and attachment of assets, which Dole challenged. The
Honduran Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Honduran
intermediate appellate court that a statutory prerequisite to
challenging the tax assessment on the merits is the payment of
the tax assessment or the filing of a payment plan with the
Honduran courts; Dole has challenged the constitutionality of
the statute requiring such payment or payment plan. Although no
assurance can be given concerning the outcome of this case, in
the opinion of management, after consultation with legal
counsel, the pending lawsuits and tax-related matters are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on Holdings financial
condition or results of operations.
Hurricane Katrina Cases: Dole was one of a
number of parties sued, including the Mississippi State Port
Authority as well as other third-party terminal operators, in
connection with the August 2005 Hurricane Katrina. The
plaintiffs asserted that they suffered property damage because
of the defendants alleged failure to reasonably secure
shipping containers at the Gulfport, Mississippi port terminal
before Hurricane Katrina hit. Dole prevailed in its motions to
dismiss several of these cases, and the remainder were
voluntarily withdrawn. No further litigation is pending against
Dole related to Hurricane Katrina, and any new claims would now
be time-barred.
Spinach E. coli Outbreak: On
September 15, 2006, Natural Selection Foods LLC recalled
all packaged fresh spinach that Natural Selection Foods produced
and packaged with Best-If-Used-By dates from August 17 through
October 1, 2006, because of reports of illness due to E.
coli O157:H7 following consumption of packaged fresh spinach
produced by Natural Selection Foods. These packages were sold
under 28 different brand names, only one of which was ours. At
that time, Natural
F-191
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Selection Foods produced and packaged all of our spinach items.
Dole has no ownership or other economic interest in Natural
Selection Foods.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on
September 29, 2006 that all spinach implicated in the
current outbreak has traced back to Natural Selection Foods. The
FDA stated that this determination was based on epidemiological
and laboratory evidence obtained by multiple states and
coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The trace back investigation has narrowed to four implicated
fields on four ranches. FDA and the State of California
announced October 12, 2006 that the test results for
certain samples collected during the field investigation of the
outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in spinach were positive for E. coli
O157:H7. Specifically, samples of cattle feces on one of the
implicated ranches tested positive based on matching genetic
fingerprints for the same strain of E. coli O157:H7 found in the
infected persons. To date, 204 cases of illness due to E. coli
O157:H7 infection have been reported to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (203 in 26 states and one in Canada)
including 31 cases involving a type of kidney failure called
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS), 104 hospitalizations, and three
deaths. The vast majority of the spinach E. coli O157:H7 claims
were handled outside the formal litigation process, and Dole
expects that to continue to be true for the few remaining
claims. Since Natural Selection Foods, not Dole, produced and
packaged the implicated spinach products, Dole has tendered the
defense of these and other claims to Natural Selection Foods and
its insurance carriers and has sought indemnity from Natural
Selection Foods, based on the provisions of the contract between
Dole and Natural Selection Foods. Dole (and its insurance
carriers) that grew the implicated spinach for Natural Selection
Foods is involved in the resolution of the E. coli O157:H7
claims. Management expects that the spinach E. coli O157:H7
matter will not have a material adverse effect on Holdings
financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
Note 19
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
David H. Murdock, Holdings Chairman, owns, inter alia,
Castle & Cooke, Inc. (Castle), a
transportation equipment leasing company, a private dining club
and a hotel. During the years ended January 3, 2009,
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, Holdings paid
Mr. Murdocks companies an aggregate of approximately
$9.3 million, $7.2 million and $7.6 million,
respectively, primarily for the rental of truck chassis,
generator sets and warehousing services. Castle purchased
approximately $0.7 million, $0.7 million and
$1.1 million of products from Dole during the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
Holdings and Castle are responsible for 68% and 32%,
respectively, of all obligations under an aircraft lease
arrangement. Each party is responsible for the direct costs
associated with its use of this aircraft, and all other indirect
costs are shared proportionately. During the year ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, Holdings proportionate share of the
direct and indirect costs for this aircraft was
$2.2 million, $2 million and $1.9 million,
respectively.
Holdings and Castle operate their risk management departments on
a joint basis. Insurance procurement and premium costs are based
on the relative risk borne by each company as determined by the
insurance underwriters. Administrative costs of the risk
management department, which were not significant, are shared on
a 50-50
basis.
Holdings retains risk for commercial property losses sustained
by Holdings and Castle totaling $3 million in the aggregate
and $3 million per occurrence, above which Holdings has
coverage provided through third-party insurance carriers. The
arrangement provides for premiums to be paid to Holdings by
Castle in exchange for Holdings retained risk. Holdings received
approximately $0.5 million, $0.6 million and
$0.6 million from Castle during 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
F-192
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holdings had a number of other transactions with Castle and
other entities owned by Mr. Murdock, generally on an
arms-length basis, none of which, individually or in the
aggregate, were material. Holdings had outstanding net accounts
receivable of $1.2 million and a note receivable of
$5.7 million due from Castle at January 3, 2009 and
outstanding net accounts receivable of $0.5 million and a
note receivable of $6 million due from Castle at
December 29, 2007.
During the first quarter of 2007, Holdings and Castle executed a
lease agreement pursuant to which Holdings fresh vegetables
operations occupy an office building in Monterey, California,
which is owned by Castle. Rent expense for the years ended
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007 totaled
$1.4 million and $1 million, respectively.
|
|
Note 20
|
Impact of
Hurricane Katrina
|
During the third quarter of 2005, Holdings operations in the
Gulf Coast area of the United States were impacted by Hurricane
Katrina. Holdings fresh fruit division utilizes the Gulfport,
Mississippi port facility to receive and store product from its
Latin American operations. The Gulfport facility, which is
leased from the Mississippi Port Authority, incurred significant
damage from Hurricane Katrina. As a result of the damage
sustained at the Gulfport terminal, Holdings diverted shipments
to other Dole port facilities including Freeport, Texas; Port
Everglades, Florida; and Wilmington, Delaware. Holdings resumed
discharging shipments of fruit and other cargo in Gulfport
during the fourth quarter of 2005. The rebuilding of Holdings
Gulfport facility was completed during 2007.
The financial impact to Holdings fresh fruit operations included
the loss of cargo and equipment, property damage and additional
costs associated with re-routing product to other ports in the
region. Equipment that was destroyed or damaged included
refrigerated and dry shipping containers, as well as chassis and
generator-sets used for land transportation of the shipping
containers. Holdings maintains customary insurance for its
property, including shipping containers, as well as for business
interruption.
The Hurricane Katrina related expenses, insurance proceeds and
net gain (loss) on the settlement of the claims for 2007, 2006
and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cargo and Property Policies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
(551
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,768
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,407
|
)
|
Insurance proceeds
|
|
|
9,607
|
|
|
|
8,004
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
23,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
$
|
6,236
|
|
|
$
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges of $12.4 million include direct incremental
expenses of $6.1 million, write-offs of owned assets with a
net book value of $4.1 million and leased assets of
$2.2 million representing amounts due to lessors. Holdings
settled all of its cargo claim for $9.2 million in December
2006 and, as a result, recognized a gain of $5.2 million in
2006. In December 2007, Holdings settled all of its property
claim for $14.4 million. Holdings realized a gain of
$9.1 million in 2007 associated with the settlement of its
property claim, of which $5.2 million was for the
reimbursement of lost and damaged property. The realized gains
associated with the settlements of both the cargo and property
claims are recorded in cost of revenues in the consolidated
statement of operations in 2007 and 2006.
F-193
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 21
|
Earnings Per
Share
|
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share
including a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
121,495
|
|
|
$
|
(70,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,527
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
(15,719
|
)
|
|
|
(50,386
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
99,620
|
|
|
$
|
(84,137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to DHM Holding Company, Inc.
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 22
|
Hotel and
Wellness Center
|
WWP, a Delaware limited liability company, operates pursuant to
an operating agreement (the Operating Agreement)
between Holdings and Arcus Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (collectively, the Members). WWP
operates and owns a hotel and wellbeing center located in
Westlake Village, California. The hotel facilities consist of a
269-room five star hotel (the Hotel) and a
full-service spa and fitness center. WWP also operates and owns
a TV production facility and a separate conference center that
focuses on health and wellbeing programming and awareness. In
addition, WWP leases space to a health and longevity institute
clinic containing a medical and diagnostic and imaging suite.
The Hotel is managed by Four Seasons Hotels limited (Four
Seasons) pursuant to a hotel management agreement that
expires 10 years from the opening date of the Hotel,
subject to seven
10-year
extensions at the option of Four Seasons. Pursuant to the
Management Agreement, Four Seasons provides services to the
Hotel. Amounts charged by Four Seasons to Holdings for these
services were immaterial for all periods presented.
F-194
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies Specific to the Hotel and
Wellness Center
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Hotel
and Wellness Center financial instruments are primarily composed
of receivables, trade payables, and the senior credit facility.
For short-term instruments such as the receivables and trade
payables, the carrying amount approximates fair value because of
the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of
the senior credit facility approximates its fair value since the
long-term debt bears interest at a variable rate, which
approximates the market.
Capitalized Interest Interest costs
associated with major development and construction projects are
capitalized and included in the cost of the project. When no
debt is incurred specifically for a project, interest is
capitalized on amounts expended on the project using the
weighted-average cost of Holdings outstanding borrowings.
Capitalization of interest ceases when the project is
substantially complete, with the capitalized interest balance
being depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related
assets associated with the project.
Revenue Recognition Revenues from rooms, food
and beverage, and other operating departments at the Hotel, are
recognized as earned at the time of sale or rendering of
service, net of estimated sales, returns, and discounts. Cash
received in advance of the sale or rendering of services is
recorded as advance deposits, which is included as a component
of accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets and
totaled $1,805,200 and $1,171,100 at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Lease revenues are recognized based upon the
terms of the lease contracts.
Holdings leases space to a health and longevity institute for
which a director of Dole wholly-owns and
David H. Murdock has ownership interests. The minimum
lease term is 15 years commencing on November 29,
2006, with minimum annual lease escalations of 3% per annum.
Future non-cancelable rental income under this lease for the
next five years and thereafter at January 3, 2009 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,136
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and
Equipment Related to the Hotel and Wellness Center
Depreciation of the Hotel and Wellness Center property and
equipment is computed by the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
40
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7 to 15
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
5 to 7
|
Communication and information systems
|
|
5
|
F-195
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property and equipment at January 3, 2009 and
December 29, related to the Hotel and Wellness Center
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
|
36,662
|
|
|
|
36,540
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
230,061
|
|
|
|
230,431
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
31,766
|
|
|
|
29,322
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
68,165
|
|
|
|
66,469
|
|
Communication and information systems
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
Antiques
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,843
|
|
|
|
379,979
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(37,325
|
)
|
|
|
(18,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
$
|
344,518
|
|
|
$
|
361,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment related to
the Hotel and Wellness Center totaled $17.5 million,
$16.7 million and $1.4 million for the years ended
January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, respectively.
As of January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007,
capitalized interest associated with major development and
construction projects totaled $22.7 million and have been
included within the Hotel and Wellness Center property and
equipment in the accompanying balance sheets. As of
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, accumulated
depreciation associated with the capitalized interest was
$2.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively. No
depreciation costs were incurred during 2006 related to the
amortization of capitalized interest. No interest costs were
capitalized during the years ended January 3, 2009 and
December 29, 2007.
Under the provisions of FAS 144, long-lived assets are
evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Indicators of impairment currently exist with
respect to the long-lived assets of WWP including evidence that
a significant decline in market value due to currently depressed
market conditions has occurred as well as recent operating
losses sustained by the WWP entity. Holdings has performed an
undiscounted cash flow test consistent with the provisions of
FAS 144 during the week of September 7, 2009.
Significant assumptions with respect to this impairment test
include the useful life of the primary asset, capital
expenditures required to maintain the asset group, the mature
level of occupancy and daily room rental rates of the Hotel and
Wellness Center given WWP began operations in late 2006, and
future required staffing and other costs. Holdings has evaluated
these assumptions and the resulting projections of future
undiscounted cash flows of WWP in view of the currently
depressed market conditions and in comparison with the results
of other comparable properties in performing its impairment
test. Holdings impairment test indicates that WWPs
undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value of its
long-lived assets and accordingly no impairment is required.
F-196
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Hotel and
Wellness Center Senior Secured Credit Facility
Long-term debt related to the senior secured credit facility at
January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Senior credit facility of DHM Holding Company, Inc
|
|
$
|
135,000
|
|
|
$
|
179,261
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
(45,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
115,000
|
|
|
$
|
134,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility Holdings is the borrower
under a $135 million senior credit facility (the DHM
Loan), which matures on March 3, 2010. Holdings,
Mr. David H. Murdock, individually, the David H. Murdock
Living Trust, and a company controlled by Mr. David H.
Murdock, are guarantors of the DHM Loan. Should DHM Holding
Company, Inc. not repay amounts owed under the DHM Loan, the
creditors under the DHM Loan have the right to demand repayment
of the outstanding borrowings from any or all of the guarantors.
The Hotel and Wellness Center property and equipment, which is
pledged as collateral for the DHM Loan, as well as cash flows
generated from the Hotel and Wellness Center operations, could
be used as a source to repay amounts owed under the DHM Loan.
Other entities controlled either directly or indirectly by
Holdings could also be used as a source to repay amounts owed
under the DHM Loan. However, certain legal restrictions and
other unrelated debt obligations owed by these other entities
could prevent these other entities from providing a source of
repayment, whether through liquidation of assets or cash flows
from operations.
In March 2008, Holdings amended and restated the DHM Loan
whereby contributions totaling $45 million were made by
David H. Murdock and his affiliates to reduce the
principal balance. The terms of the amended and restated DHM
Loan required a $20 million reduction of principal in June
2009, with the remaining principal balance due in March 2010.
The $20 million principal payment was made during June 2009
through a capital contribution made by
David H. Murdock. Under the terms of the amended and
restated DHM Loan, the senior credit facility commitment was
reduced from $180 million to $135 million, effectively
resulting in no additional borrowing availability under the
amended and restated DHM Loan as of the date of the refinancing.
Holdings was also required to fund $2 million in an
interest reserve account, which is presented as a restricted
cash deposit in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as
of January 3, 2009.
At January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, total
borrowings under the DHM Loan were $135 million and
$179.3 million, respectively. The DHM Loan bears interest
at the Prime Lending Rate, plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to
3.00%, dependent upon the borrowing availability of the DHM
Loan. At January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007, the
effective interest rates were 4.195% and 6.625%, respectively.
Total interest expense incurred under the DHM Loan during the
years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, was $8.6 million,
$12.4 million and $8 million, respectively. Of the
total interest expense incurred under the DHM Loan during the
years ended January 3, 2009, December 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006, $0.7 million, $12.4 million
and $2.4 million, respectively, represented noncash
interest expense which was added to the principal borrowings of
the DHM Loan.
The June 2009 required reduction of principal of
$20 million has been presented as a current liability
within the accompanying balance sheet as of January 3,
2009. All other amounts owed under the DHM Loan have been
presented as a noncurrent liability within the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2009.
F-197
DHM HOLDING
COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expenses related to the issuance of long-term debt are
capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term of
the underlying debt. During the years ended January 3,
2009, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, WWP
amortized deferred debt issuance costs of $1.4 million,
$1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Covenants under the DHM Loan required to be maintained by
Holdings consisted of a number of restrictive financial
covenants, including minimum net worth and debt service coverage
ratios, and nonfinancial covenants. At January 3, 2009,
Holdings was in compliance with these covenants.
Note
23 Subsequent Events
On September 25, 2009, Dole completed the sale and issuance of
$315 million aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Secured
Notes due October 1, 2016, or the 2016 Notes, at a discount
of approximately $6.2 million. The 2016 Notes were
sold to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to persons outside
the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the
Securities Act. The sale of the 2016 Notes to the initial
purchasers was exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof. Interest
on the 2016 Notes will be paid semiannually in arrears on
April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on
April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes have the benefit of a
lien on certain U.S. assets of Dole that is junior to the
liens of Doles senior secured credit facilities, and are
senior obligations of Dole ranking equally with Doles
existing senior debt. Dole has issued a redemption notice for
the remaining principal amount outstanding of the 2010 Notes of
$363 million and has irrevocably deposited the net proceeds
from the sale and issuance of the 2016 Notes with the
trustee of the 2010 Notes to be used to repay such notes.
F-198
DOLE WORLDWIDE Sourcing/Farming Ripening/Distribution Port Facilities Processing Plants Corporate
Headquarters Countries where Dole products are sold DOLE SOURCING & OPERATIONS EuropE anD africa
Austria Belgium Cameroon France Germany Ghana Greece Italy Ivory Coast Namibia
Portugal Romania South Africa Spain Sweden Turkey United Kingdom latin amErica anD
caribbEan Chile Colombia Costa Rica Ecuador Guatemala Honduras Peru asia Australia
China Hong Kong Japan New Zealand Philippines South Korea Sri Lanka Thailand north
amErica Canada United States |
DOLE MARKETS EuropE, miDDlE East anD africa latin amErica anD caribbEan Albania Algeria Austria
Azerbaijan Bahrain Argentina Bahamas Barbados Bermuda Brazil Chile Belarus
Belgium Bosnia Bulgaria Croatia Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Republic Ecuador Czech
Republic Denmark Estonia Egypt Finland El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Jamaica
Martinique France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Mexico Panama Peru
Puerto Rico Trinidad & Tobago Ireland Italy Kazakhstan Kuwait Latvia Lebanon Uruguay
Venezuela Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Malta Morocco asia Netherlands Norway
Poland Portugal Qatar Australia Brunei China Hong Kong India Indonesia Romania
Russia Saudi Arabia Serbia Sierra Leone Japan Malaysia New Zealand Philippines
Singapore Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden South Korea Taiwan Thailand
Vietnam Switzerland Tunisia Turkey Ukraine north amErica United Arab Emirates United
Kingdom Canada United States |
Shares
DOLE FOOD COMPANY,
INC.
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs
& Co. |
BofA Merrill
Lynch |
Deutsche Bank
Securities |
Wells Fargo
Securities |
Through and
including ,
2009 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to a dealers obligation to
deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT
REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
OTHER EXPENSES
OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
|
The table below lists various expenses, other than underwriting
discounts and commissions, we expect to incur in connection with
the sale and distribution of the securities being registered
hereby. All the expenses are estimates, except the Securities
and Exchange Commission registration fee, the FINRA filing fee
and the NYSE listing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee
|
|
$
|
27,900
|
|
FINRA Filing Fee
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
NYSE Fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
|
Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the
DGCL, allows a corporation to eliminate the personal liability
of directors of a corporation to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director, except where the director breached the duty of
loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional
misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment
of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of
Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit.
Section 145 of the DGCL provides for the indemnification of
officers, directors and other corporate agents in terms
sufficiently broad to indemnify such persons under circumstances
for liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses incurred)
arising under the Securities Act. Our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws provide for indemnification of our
officers, directors, employees and agents to the extent and
under the circumstances permitted under the Delaware General
Corporation Law.
In addition to the indemnification provided by our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, we will enter into agreements to
indemnify our directors and executive officers. These
agreements, among other things, will require us to indemnify
these directors and officers for certain expenses, including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts
incurred by any such person in any action or proceeding,
including any action by or in our right, arising out of that
persons services as a director or officer of us or any of
our subsidiaries or any other company or enterprise to which the
person provides services at our request.
The Underwriting Agreement (Exhibit 1.1) provides for
indemnification by the underwriters of us, our directors,
officers and controlling persons, and by us of the underwriters,
for some liabilities, including liabilities arising under the
Securities Act, and affords some rights of contributions with
respect thereto.
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
RECENT SALES
OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.
|
On March 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale and
issuance of $350 million aggregate principal amount of
13.875% Senior Secured Notes due March 2014, or the 2014
Notes, at a discount
II-1
of $25 million. The 2014 Notes were sold to qualified
institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and
to persons outside the United States in compliance with
Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale of the 2014
Notes to the initial purchasers was exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof. Interest on the 2014 Notes will be paid semiannually in
arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on
September 15, 2009. The 2014 Notes have the benefit of a
lien on certain U.S. assets of the Company that is junior
to the liens of the Companys senior secured credit
facilities, and are senior obligations of the Company ranking
equally with the Companys existing senior debt. The
Company used the net proceeds from this offering, together with
cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to purchase all
of the tendered 8.625% notes due May 2009 , or the 2009
Notes, and to irrevocably deposit with the trustee of the 2009
Notes funds that was sufficient to repay the remaining
outstanding 2009 Notes at maturity on May 1, 2009.
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed the sale and
issuance of $315 million aggregate principal amount of
8% Senior Secured Notes due October 2016, or the 2016
Notes, at a discount of approximately $6.2 million. The
2016 Notes were sold to qualified institutional investors
pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to
persons outside the United States in compliance with
Regulation S under the Securities Act. The sale of the 2016
Notes to the initial purchasers was exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof. Interest on the 2016 Notes will be paid semiannually in
arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on
April 1, 2010. The 2016 Notes have the benefit of a lien on
certain U.S. assets of the Company and its
U.S. subsidiaries that is junior to the liens of the
Companys senior secured credit facilities and pari passu
with the liens of the 2014 Notes, and are senior obligations
ranking equally with the Companys existing senior debt.
The Company irrevocably deposited the net proceeds of the 2016
Notes with the trustee of the Companys 7.25% Senior
Notes due 2010, or the 2010 Notes, and issued to the trustee a
notice of redemption for all of the outstanding
$363 million principal amount of 2010 Notes. The redemption
is scheduled to occur on October 26, 2009, using such net
proceeds and additional cash on hand
and/or
borrowings under the Companys senior secured revolving
credit facility to be irrevocably deposited with the trustee
prior to such redemption.
|
|
ITEM 16.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
1.1#
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3.1(i)#
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Dole Food
Company, Inc., as currently in effect.
|
|
3.1(ii)#
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Dole Food
Company, Inc., to be in effect upon consummation of this
offering.
|
|
3.2(i)#
|
|
|
By-Laws of Dole Food Company, Inc., as currently in effect.
|
|
3.2(ii)#
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Dole Food Company, Inc., to be in
effect upon consummation of this offering.
|
|
4.1#
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1993, between Dole and
Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company (formerly Chemical
Trust Company of California).
|
|
4.2#
|
|
|
Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 30,
2002, between Dole and J.P. Morgan Trust Company,
National Association, to the Indenture dated as of July 15,
1993, pursuant to which $400 million of Doles senior
notes due 2009 were issued.
|
|
4.3#
|
|
|
Officers Certificate, dated August 3, 1993, pursuant
to which $175 million of Doles debentures due 2013
were issued.
|
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
4.4#
|
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 28, 2003,
between Dole and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(successor trustee to J.P. Morgan Trust Company), to
the Indenture dated as of July 15, 1993.
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
Agreement of Removal, Appointment and Acceptance, dated as of
March 28, 2003, by and among Dole, J.P. Morgan
Trust Company, National Association, successor in interest
to Chemical Trust Company of California, as Prior Trustee,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Doles Registration
Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2003, by
and among Dole, Miradero Fishing Company, Inc., the guarantors
signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to
Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.7#
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 28, 2003, among Dole, the
guarantors signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $475 million of
Doles
87/8% senior
notes due 2011 were issued.
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2003, by
and among Dole, Miradero Fishing Company, Inc., the guarantors
signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to
Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.9#
|
|
|
Form of Global Note and Guarantee for Doles new
87/8% senior
notes due 2011 (included as Exhibit B to
Exhibit Number 4.7 hereto).
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 29, 2003, among Dole, the
guarantors signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $400 million of
Doles
71/4% senior
notes due 2010 were issued (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2003, by
and among Dole, Miradero Fishing Company, Inc., the guarantors
signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
Form of Global Note and Guarantee for Doles
71/4% senior
notes due 2010 (included as Exhibit A to
Exhibit Number 4.11 hereto).
|
|
4.13#
|
|
|
Form of Dole Food Company, Inc. Master Retirement Savings
Trust Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1999, between
Dole and The Northern Trust Company.
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 18, 2009, among Dole Food
Company, Inc., the guarantors signatory thereto and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $349,903,000
of Doles 13.875% senior secured notes due 2014 were
issued (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to
Doles Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
Form of Global Note for Doles 13.875% senior secured
notes due 2014 (included as Exhibits A to Exhibit 4.14
hereto).
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
Form of Guarantee for Doles 13.875% senior secured
notes due 2014 (included as Exhibit D to Exhibit 4.14
hereto).
|
|
4.17
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2009,
among Dole Food Company, Inc. and the guarantors named therein,
as issuers, and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Rabo Securities USA,
Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as initial purchasers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Doles
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
4.18**
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate.
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2009, among Dole Food
Company, Inc., the guarantors signatory thereto and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant to which
$315,000,000 of Doles 8% senior secured notes due
2016 were issued (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Doles Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Commission on September 30, 2009).
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
Form of Global Note and Guarantee for Doles 8% senior
secured notes due 2016 (included as Exhibits A and D,
respectively, to Exhibit 14.19 hereto).
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2009,
among Dole Food Company, Inc. and the guarantors named therein,
as issuers, and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Banc of Americas
Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Scotia Capital
(USA) Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as initial purchasers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Doles
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on
September 30, 2009).
|
|
5.1**
|
|
|
Opinion of Company Counsel.
|
|
10.1*
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003, amended and
restated as of April 18, 2005 and further amended and
restated as of April 12, 2006, among DHM Holding Company,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, Dole Holding Company, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Dole Food Company, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, Solvest, Ltd., a company organized under
the laws of Bermuda, the Lenders from time to time party hereto,
Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as Deposit Bank, Deutsche Bank
AG New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, Banc Of America
Securities LLC, as Syndication Agent, The Bank of Nova Scotia,
as Documentation Agent and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as
Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner.
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 18, 2009, to the
Credit Agreement included as Exhibit 10.1 hereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Doles
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2006, among DHM
Holding Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Dole Holding
Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Dole Food
Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the Lenders party hereto
from time to time, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as
Administrative Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC, as
Syndication Agent, Deutsche Bank Securities LLC and Banc of
America Securities LLC, as Joint Book Running Managers and
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Lead Arranger (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Doles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 18, 2009, to the
Credit Agreement included as Exhibit 10.3 hereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Doles
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
10.5#
|
|
|
Doles Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Fourth
Restatement, effective January 1, 2009.
|
|
10.6#
|
|
|
Doles Excess Savings Plan, Restated, effective
January 1, 2009.
|
|
10.7#
|
|
|
Amendment
2009-1,
effective July 1, 2009, to Doles Excess Savings Plan.
|
|
10.8#
|
|
|
Doles Non-Employee Directors Deferred Cash Compensation
Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective January 1, 2009.
|
|
10.9#
|
|
|
Severance Pay Plan for Employees of Dole Food Company, Inc. and
Participating Divisions and Subsidiaries, effective
January 1, 2006.
|
|
10.10#
|
|
|
Amendment to Severance Pay Plan for Employees of Dole Food
Company, Inc. and Participating Divisions and Subsidiaries,
dated December 30, 2008.
|
|
10.11#
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with
Messrs. David H. Murdock, C. Michael Carter and Joseph S.
Tesoriero.
|
|
10.12#
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
10.13#
|
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement.
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.15#
|
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Dole Food
Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.16#
|
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Dole Food
Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.17#
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Dole Food
Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.18*
|
|
|
Form of Tier 1 Change of Control Agreement.
|
|
10.19*
|
|
|
Form of Tier 2 Change of Control Agreement.
|
|
21#
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
23.1**
|
|
|
Consent of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP (included as
part of Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23.2*
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to Dole
financial information).
|
|
23.3*
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to DHM
Holdings financial information).
|
|
24.1#
|
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
# |
|
Previously filed |
II-5
DOLE FOOD
COMPANY, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Deductions(A)
|
|
|
Accounts(B)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year Ended January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
47,238
|
|
|
$
|
8,438
|
|
|
$
|
(25,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,918
|
|
Notes and other current receivables
|
|
|
14,482
|
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
(2,764
|
)
|
|
|
(1,641
|
)
|
|
|
12,439
|
|
Long-term notes and other receivables
|
|
|
18,536
|
|
|
|
3,362
|
|
|
|
(3,005
|
)
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
20,188
|
|
Year Ended December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
47,806
|
|
|
$
|
18,060
|
|
|
$
|
(18,918
|
)
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
47,238
|
|
Notes and other current receivables
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
(3,428
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
14,482
|
|
Long-term notes and other receivables
|
|
|
17,927
|
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
(7,205
|
)
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
18,536
|
|
Year Ended December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
44,154
|
|
|
$
|
16,259
|
|
|
$
|
(9,857
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,806
|
|
Notes and other current receivables
|
|
|
14,431
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
(1,936
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
Long-term notes and other receivables
|
|
|
12,583
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
|
4,460
|
|
|
|
17,927
|
|
Note:
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Includes write-offs of uncollectible amounts |
|
(B) |
|
Includes purchase accounting and transfers among balance sheet
accounts |
II-6
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933, or the Act, may be permitted to
directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(a) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed
as part of this registration statement in reliance upon
Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by
the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or
497(h) under the Act shall be deemed to be part of this
registration statement as of the time it was declared
effective; and
(b) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of
prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
II-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 3 to
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Westlake
Village, California, on October 2, 2009.
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ C.
Michael Carter
|
C. Michael Carter
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
following persons have signed this Amendment No. 3 to
Registration Statement in the capacities and on the date
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
David
H. Murdock
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
David
A. DeLorenzo
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
C.
Michael Carter
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary and Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Scott
A. Griswold
|
|
Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Roberta
Wieman
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief of Staff and Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Joseph
S. Tesoriero
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Yoon
J. Hugh
|
|
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Andrew
J. Conrad
|
|
Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
II-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Justin
Murdock
|
|
Vice President, New Products and Corporate Development and
Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Edward
C. Roohan
|
|
Director
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ C.
Michael Carter
C.
Michael Carter
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-9
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
1.1#
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3.1(i)#
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Dole Food
Company, Inc., as currently in effect.
|
|
3.1(ii)#
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Dole Food
Company, Inc., to be in effect upon consummation of this
offering.
|
|
3.2(i)#
|
|
|
By-Laws of Dole Food Company, Inc., as currently in effect.
|
|
3.2(ii)#
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Dole Food Company, Inc., to be in
effect upon consummation of this offering.
|
|
4.1#
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1993, between Dole and
Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company (formerly Chemical
Trust Company of California).
|
|
4.2#
|
|
|
Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 30,
2002, between Dole and J.P. Morgan Trust Company,
National Association, to the Indenture dated as of July 15,
1993, pursuant to which $400 million of Doles senior
notes due 2009 were issued.
|
|
4.3#
|
|
|
Officers Certificate, dated August 3, 1993, pursuant
to which $175 million of Doles debentures due 2013
were issued.
|
|
4.4#
|
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 28, 2003,
between Dole and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(successor trustee to J.P. Morgan Trust Company), to
the Indenture dated as of July 15, 1993.
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
Agreement of Removal, Appointment and Acceptance, dated as of
March 28, 2003, by and among Dole, J.P. Morgan
Trust Company, National Association, successor in interest
to Chemical Trust Company of California, as Prior Trustee,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Doles Registration
Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2003, by
and among Dole, Miradero Fishing Company, Inc., the guarantors
signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to
Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.7#
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 28, 2003, among Dole, the
guarantors signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $475 million of
Doles
87/8% senior
notes due 2011 were issued.
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2003, by
and among Dole, Miradero Fishing Company, Inc., the guarantors
signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to
Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.9#
|
|
|
Form of Global Note and Guarantee for Doles new
87/8% senior
notes due 2011 (included as Exhibit B to
Exhibit Number 4.7 hereto).
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 29, 2003, among Dole, the
guarantors signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $400 million of
Doles
71/4% senior
notes due 2010 were issued (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.11 to Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2003, by
and among Dole, Miradero Fishing Company, Inc., the guarantors
signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Doles Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the Commission on June 25, 2003, File
No. 333-106493).
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
Form of Global Note and Guarantee for Doles
71/4% senior
notes due 2010 (included as Exhibit A to
Exhibit Number 4.11 hereto).
|
|
4.13#
|
|
|
Form of Dole Food Company, Inc. Master Retirement Savings
Trust Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1999, between
Dole and The Northern Trust Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 18, 2009, among Dole Food
Company, Inc., the guarantors signatory thereto and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $349,903,000
of Doles 13.875% senior secured notes due 2014 were
issued (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to
Doles Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
Form of Global Note for Doles 13.875% senior secured
notes due 2014 (included as Exhibits A to Exhibit 4.14
hereto).
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
Form of Guarantee for Doles 13.875% senior secured
notes due 2014 (included as Exhibit D to Exhibit 4.14
hereto).
|
|
4.17
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2009,
among Dole Food Company, Inc. and the guarantors named therein,
as issuers, and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Rabo Securities USA,
Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as initial purchasers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Doles
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
4.18**
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2009, among Dole Food
Company, Inc., the guarantors signatory thereto and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, pursuant to which
$315,000,000 of Doles 8% senior secured notes due
2016 were issued (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Doles Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Commission on September 30, 2009).
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
Form of Global Note and Guarantee for Doles 8% senior
secured notes due 2016 (included as Exhibits A and D,
respectively, to Exhibit 14.19 hereto).
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2009,
among Dole Food Company, Inc. and the guarantors named therein,
as issuers, and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Banc of Americas
Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Scotia Capital
(USA) Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as initial purchasers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Doles
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on
September 30, 2009).
|
|
5.1**
|
|
|
Opinion of Company Counsel.
|
|
10.1*
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003, amended and
restated as of April 18, 2005 and further amended and
restated as of April 12, 2006, among DHM Holding Company,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, Dole Holding Company, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Dole Food Company, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, Solvest, Ltd., a company organized under
the laws of Bermuda, the Lenders from time to time party hereto,
Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as Deposit Bank, Deutsche Bank
AG New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, Banc Of America
Securities LLC, as Syndication Agent, The Bank of Nova Scotia,
as Documentation Agent and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as
Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner.
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 18, 2009, to the
Credit Agreement included as Exhibit 10.1 hereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Doles
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2006, among DHM
Holding Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Dole Holding
Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Dole Food
Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the Lenders party hereto
from time to time, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as
Administrative Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC, as
Syndication Agent, Deutsche Bank Securities LLC and Banc of
America Securities LLC, as Joint Book Running Managers and
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Lead Arranger (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Doles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 18, 2009, to the
Credit Agreement included as Exhibit 10.3 hereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Doles
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on March 24, 2009).
|
|
10.5#
|
|
|
Doles Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Fourth
Restatement, effective January 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Title
|
|
|
10.6#
|
|
|
Doles Excess Savings Plan, Restated, effective
January 1, 2009.
|
|
10.7#
|
|
|
Amendment
2009-1,
effective July 1, 2009, to Doles Excess Savings Plan.
|
|
10.8#
|
|
|
Doles Non-Employee Directors Deferred Cash Compensation
Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective January 1, 2009.
|
|
10.9#
|
|
|
Severance Pay Plan for Employees of Dole Food Company, Inc. and
Participating Divisions and Subsidiaries, effective
January 1, 2006.
|
|
10.10#
|
|
|
Amendment to Severance Pay Plan for Employees of Dole Food
Company, Inc. and Participating Divisions and Subsidiaries,
dated December 30, 2008.
|
|
10.11#
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with
Messrs. David H. Murdock, C. Michael Carter and Joseph S.
Tesoriero.
|
|
10.12#
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
10.13#
|
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement.
|
|
10.14*
|
|
|
Dole Food Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.15#
|
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Dole Food
Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.16#
|
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Dole Food
Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.17#
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Dole Food
Company, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10.18*
|
|
|
Form of Tier 1 Change of Control Agreement.
|
|
10.19*
|
|
|
Form of Tier 2 Change of Control Agreement.
|
|
21#
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Dole Food Company, Inc.
|
|
23.1**
|
|
|
Consent of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP (included as
part of Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23.2*
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Dole Food Company, Inc.).
|
|
23.3*
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of DHM Holding Company, Inc.)
|
|
24.1#
|
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
# |
|
Previously filed |