e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
Commission file
number: 0-51582
Hercules Offshore,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
56-2542838
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2200
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
77046
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(713) 350-5100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2009, based on the
closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on such date,
was approximately $365 million. (As of such date, the
registrants directors and executive officers and LR
Hercules Holdings, LP and its affiliates were considered
affiliates of the registrant for this purpose.)
As of February 24, 2010, there were 114,723,684 shares
of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 11,
2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
report.
PART I
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we refer to Hercules Offshore, Inc. and its subsidiaries as
we, the Company or Hercules
Offshore, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
Hercules Offshore, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed in July
2004, with its principal executive offices located at 9 Greenway
Plaza, Suite 2200, Houston, Texas 77046. Hercules
Offshores telephone number at such address is
(713) 350-5100
and our Internet address is www.herculesoffshore.com.
Overview
Hercules Offshore, Inc. is a leading provider of shallow-water
drilling and marine services to the oil and natural gas
exploration and production industry globally. We provide these
services to national oil and gas companies, major integrated
energy companies and independent oil and natural gas operators.
As of February 24, 2010, we owned a fleet of 30 jackup
rigs, 17 barge rigs, three submersible rigs, one platform rig, a
fleet of marine support vessels and 60 liftboat vessels. In
addition, we operate five liftboat vessels owned by a third
party. We own four retired jackup rigs and eight retired inland
barges, all located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which are
currently not expected to re-enter active service. We have
operations in nine countries on three continents. Our diverse
fleet is capable of providing services such as oil and gas
exploration and development drilling, well service, platform
inspection maintenance and decommissioning operations.
In January 2009, we reclassified four of our cold-stacked jackup
rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 10 of our
cold-stacked inland barges as retired; subsequently in each of
September and November 2009, we sold one retired inland barge
for approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. Additionally, we recently entered into an
agreement to sell our retired jackups Hercules 191
and Hercules 255 for $5.0 million each and in
February 2010, we entered into an agreement to sell six of our
retired barges for $3.0 million.
We report our business activities in six business segments which
as of February 24, 2010, included the following:
Domestic Offshore includes 22 jackup rigs and
three submersible rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that can
drill in maximum water depths ranging from 85 to 350 feet.
Eleven of the jackup rigs are either working on short-term
contracts or available for contracts, ten are cold-stacked and
one is mobilizing to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico from Mexico.
All three submersibles are cold-stacked.
International Offshore includes 8 jackup rigs
and one platform rig outside of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. We
have two jackup rigs working offshore in each of India and Saudi
Arabia. We have one jackup rig contracted offshore in Malaysia
and one platform rig under contract in Mexico. In addition, we
have one jackup rig warm-stacked in each of Bahrain and Gabon
and one jackup rig contracted to a customer in Angola, however,
the rig is currently on stand-by in Gabon. In August 2009, we
closed the sale of the Hercules 110, which was
cold-stacked in Trinidad.
Inland includes a fleet of 6 conventional and
11 posted barge rigs that operate inland in marshes, rivers,
lakes and shallow bay or coastal waterways along the
U.S. Gulf Coast. Three of our inland barges are either
operating on short-term contracts or available and 14 are
cold-stacked.
Domestic Liftboats includes 41 liftboats in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Thirty-eight are operating and
three are cold-stacked.
International Liftboats includes 24
liftboats. Twenty-two are operating or available for
contract offshore West Africa, including five liftboats owned by
a third party, and two are operating or available for contract
in the Middle East region.
Delta Towing our Delta Towing business
operates a fleet of 29 inland tugs, 12 offshore tugs, 34 crew
boats, 46 deck barges, 16 shale barges and five spud barges
along and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and along the
Southeastern coast and from time to time in Mexico. Of these
vessels, 21 crew boats, 16 inland tugs, five
3
offshore tugs, one deck barge and one spud barge are
cold-stacked, and the remaining are working or available for
contracts.
In December 2009, we entered into an agreement with First Energy
Bank B.S.C. (MENAdrill) whereby we would market,
manage and operate two Friede & Goldman Super M2
design new-build jackup drilling rigs each with a maximum water
depth of 300 feet. The rigs are currently under
construction and are scheduled to be delivered in the fourth
quarter of 2010. We are actively marketing the rigs on an
exclusive and worldwide basis.
In January 2010, we entered into an agreement with SKDP 1 Ltd.,
an affiliate of Skeie Drilling & Production ASA, to
market, manage and operate an ultra high specification KFESL
Class N new-build jackup drilling rig with a maximum water
depth of 400 feet. The rig is currently under construction
and is scheduled to be delivered in either the third or fourth
quarter of 2010, depending upon the exercise of certain options
available to the owner. The agreement is limited to a specified
opportunity in the Middle East.
We had previously entered into similar agreements with Mosvold
Middle East Jackup I Ltd. and Mosvold Middle East Jackup II
Ltd. to market, manage and operate two Friede &
Goldman Super M2 design new-build jackup rigs. We later
terminated these agreements by mutual agreement due to
uncertainties in the timing of the delivery of the rigs and
disputes between the owner and the builder of the rigs.
Our jackup rigs, submersible rigs and barge rigs are used
primarily for exploration and development drilling in shallow
waters. Under most of our contracts, we are paid a fixed daily
rental rate called a dayrate, and we are required to
pay all costs associated with our own crews as well as the
upkeep and insurance of the rig and equipment. Dayrate drilling
contracts typically provide for higher rates while the unit is
operating and lower rates or a lump sum payment for periods of
mobilization or when operations are interrupted or restricted by
equipment breakdowns, adverse weather conditions or other
factors.
Our liftboats are self-propelled, self-elevating vessels that
support a broad range of offshore support services, including
platform maintenance, platform construction, well intervention
and decommissioning services throughout the life of an oil or
natural gas well. A liftboat contract generally is based on a
flat dayrate for the vessel and crew. Our liftboat dayrates are
determined by prevailing market rates, vessel availability and
historical rates paid by the specific customer. Under most of
our liftboat contracts, we receive a variable rate for
reimbursement of costs such as catering, fuel, oil, rental
equipment, crane overtime and other items. Liftboat contracts
generally are for shorter terms than are drilling contracts,
although international liftboat contracts may have terms of
greater than one year.
Our
Fleet
Jackup
Drilling Rigs
Jackup rigs are mobile, self-elevating drilling platforms
equipped with legs that can be lowered to the ocean floor until
a foundation is established to support the drilling platform.
Once a foundation is established, the drilling platform is
jacked further up the legs so that the platform is above the
highest expected waves. The rig hull includes the drilling rig,
jackup system, crew quarters, loading and unloading facilities,
storage areas for bulk and liquid materials, helicopter landing
deck and other related equipment.
Jackup rig legs may operate independently or have a lower hull
referred to as a mat attached to the lower portion
of the legs in order to provide a more stable foundation in soft
bottom areas, similar to those encountered in certain of the
shallow-water areas of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico or
U.S. GOM. Mat-supported rigs generally are able
to more quickly position themselves on the worksite and more
easily move on and off location than independent leg rigs.
Twenty-one of our jackup rigs are mat-supported and nine are
independent leg rigs.
Our rigs are used primarily for exploration and development
drilling in shallow waters. Twenty-three of our rigs have a
cantilever design that permits the drilling platform to be
extended out from the hull to perform drilling or workover
operations over some types of pre-existing platforms or
structures. Seven rigs have a slot-type design, which requires
drilling operations to take place through a slot in the hull.
Slot-type rigs are
4
usually used for exploratory drilling rather than development
drilling, in that their configuration makes them difficult to
position over existing platforms or structures. Historically,
jackup rigs with a cantilever design have maintained higher
levels of utilization than rigs with a slot-type design.
As of February 24, 2010, 15 of our jackup rigs were
operating under contracts ranging in duration from
well-to-well
to three years, at an average contract dayrate of approximately
$63,800, excluding the dayrate associated with our Angola
contract. In the following table, ILS means an
independent leg slot-type jackup rig, MC means a
mat-supported cantilevered jackup rig, ILC means an
independent leg cantilevered jackup rig and MS means
a mat-supported slot-type jackup rig.
The following table contains information regarding our jackup
rig fleet as of February 24, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Rated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built/
|
|
Water Depth
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Upgraded(c)
|
|
Rating
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hercules 85
|
|
ILS
|
|
1982
|
|
|
85/9
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 101
|
|
MC
|
|
1980
|
|
|
100/20
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 120
|
|
MC
|
|
1958
|
|
|
120/22
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 150
|
|
ILC
|
|
1979
|
|
|
150/10
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 152
|
|
MC
|
|
1980
|
|
|
150/22
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 153
|
|
MC
|
|
1980/2007
|
|
|
150/22
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 156
|
|
ILC
|
|
1983
|
|
|
150/14
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Gabon
|
|
Warm Stacked
|
Hercules 170
|
|
ILC
|
|
1981/2006
|
|
|
170/16
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Bahrain
|
|
Warm Stacked
|
Hercules 173
|
|
MC
|
|
1971
|
|
|
173/22
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 185(f)
|
|
ILC
|
|
1982/2009
|
|
|
150/20
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Gabon
|
|
Contracted/Stand-by
|
Hercules 200
|
|
MC
|
|
1979
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 201
|
|
MC
|
|
1981
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 202
|
|
MC
|
|
1981
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 203
|
|
MC
|
|
1982
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 204
|
|
MC
|
|
1981
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 205
|
|
MC
|
|
1979/2003
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
En route
to U.S. GOM
|
|
En route
|
Hercules 206
|
|
MC
|
|
1980/2003
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 207
|
|
MC
|
|
1981
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 208(d)
|
|
MC
|
|
1980/2008
|
|
|
200/22
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 211
|
|
MC
|
|
1980
|
|
|
200/23
|
|
|
18,000(e)
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 250
|
|
MS
|
|
1974
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 251
|
|
MS
|
|
1978
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Ready Stacked
|
Hercules 252
|
|
MS
|
|
1978
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 253
|
|
MS
|
|
1982
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 257
|
|
MS
|
|
1979
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 258
|
|
MS
|
|
1979/2008
|
|
|
250/24
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
India
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 260
|
|
ILC
|
|
1979/2008
|
|
|
250/12
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
India
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 261
|
|
ILC
|
|
1979/2008
|
|
|
250/12
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 262
|
|
ILC
|
|
1982/2008
|
|
|
250/12
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
Contracted
|
Hercules 350
|
|
ILC
|
|
1982
|
|
|
350/16
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rated drilling depth means drilling depth stated by the
manufacturer of the rig. Depending on deck space and other
factors, a rig may not have the actual capacity to drill at the
rated drilling depth. |
|
(b) |
|
Rigs designated as Contracted are under contract
while rigs described as Ready Stacked are not under
contract but generally are ready for service. Rigs described as
Warm Stacked may have a reduced number of crew, but
only require a full crew to be ready for service. Rigs described
as Cold Stacked are not actively marketed, normally
require the hiring of an entire crew and require a maintenance
review and refurbishment before they can function as a drilling
rig. |
5
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Dates shown are the original date the rig was built and the date
of the most recent upgrade and/or major refurbishment, if any. |
|
(d) |
|
This rig is currently unable to operate in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico due to regulatory restrictions. |
|
(e) |
|
Rated workover depth. Hercules 211 is currently
configured for workover activity, which includes maintenance and
repair or modification of wells that have already been drilled
and completed to enhance or resume the wells production. |
|
(f) |
|
Hercules 185 is currently contracted to a customer in
Angola, however, the rig is currently on stand-by in Gabon.
Currently it does not meet our revenue recognition criteria due
to uncertainty surrounding collectability. |
Other
Drilling Rigs
A submersible rig is a mobile drilling platform that is towed to
the well site where it is submerged by flooding its lower hull
tanks until it rests on the sea floor, with the upper hull above
the water surface. After completion of the drilling operation,
the rig is refloated by pumping the water out of the lower hull,
so that it can be towed to another location. Submersible rigs
typically operate in water depths of 14 to 85 feet. Our
three submersible rigs are upgradeable for deep gas drilling.
A platform drilling rig is placed on a production platform and
is similar to a modular land rig. The production platforms
crane is capable of lifting the modularized rig crane that
subsequently sets the rig modules. The assembled rig has all the
drilling, housing and support facilities necessary for drilling
multiple production wells. Most platform drilling rig contracts
are for multiple wells and extended periods of time on the same
platform. Once work has been completed on a particular platform,
the rig can be redeployed to another platform for further work.
We have one platform drilling rig.
In the following table, Sub means a submersible rig
and Plat means a platform drilling rig. The
following table contains information regarding our other
drilling rig fleet as of February 24, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built/
|
|
Water Depth
|
|
Rated Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Upgraded(c)
|
|
Rating
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hercules 75
|
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
85/14
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 77
|
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
1982/2007
|
|
|
85/14
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Hercules 78
|
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
1985/2007
|
|
|
85/14
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
Platform 3
|
|
|
Plat
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
Contracted
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rated drilling depth means drilling depth stated by the
manufacturer of the rig. Depending on deck space and other
factors, a rig may not have the actual capacity to drill at the
rated drilling depth. |
|
(b) |
|
Rigs described as Cold Stacked are not actively
marketed, normally require the hiring of an entire crew and
require a maintenance review and refurbishment before they can
function as a drilling rig while rigs described as
Contracted are under contract. |
|
(c) |
|
Dates shown are the original date the rig was built and the date
of the most recent upgrade and/or major refurbishment, if any. |
Barge
Drilling Rigs
Barge drilling rigs are mobile drilling platforms that are
submersible and are built to work in seven to 20 feet of
water. They are towed by tugboats to the drill site with the
derrick lying down. The lower hull is then submerged by flooding
compartments until it rests on the river or sea floor. The
derrick is then raised and drilling operations are conducted
with the barge resting on the bottom. Our barge drilling fleet
consists of 17 conventional and posted barge rigs. A posted
barge is identical to a conventional barge except that the hull
and superstructure are separated by 10 to 14 foot columns, which
increases the water depth capabilities of the rig. Several of
our barge drilling rigs are upgradeable for deep gas drilling.
6
The following table contains information regarding our barge
drilling rig fleet as of February 24, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built/
|
|
Horsepower
|
|
Rated Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Upgraded(c)
|
|
Rating
|
|
Depth(a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Status(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Conv.
|
|
1980
|
|
2,000
|
|
20,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
9
|
|
Posted
|
|
1981
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
11
|
|
Conv.
|
|
1982
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
15
|
|
Conv.
|
|
1981
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
17
|
|
Posted
|
|
1981
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
19
|
|
Conv.
|
|
1974
|
|
1,000
|
|
14,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
27
|
|
Posted
|
|
1979/2008
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
28
|
|
Conv.
|
|
1980
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
29
|
|
Conv.
|
|
1981
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
41
|
|
Posted
|
|
1981
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
46
|
|
Posted
|
|
1979
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
48
|
|
Posted
|
|
1982
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
49
|
|
Posted
|
|
1980
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Contracted
|
52
|
|
Posted
|
|
1981
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
55
|
|
Posted
|
|
1981
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
57
|
|
Posted
|
|
1975
|
|
2,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
64
|
|
Posted
|
|
1979
|
|
3,000
|
|
30,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
Cold Stacked
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rated drilling depth means drilling depth stated by the
manufacturer of the rig. Depending on deck space and other
factors, a rig may not have the actual capacity to drill at the
rated drilling depth. |
|
(b) |
|
Rigs designated as Contracted are under contract
while rigs described as Cold Stacked are not
actively marketed, normally require the hiring of an entire crew
and require a maintenance review and refurbishment before they
can function as a drilling rig. |
|
(c) |
|
Dates shown are the original date the rig was built and the date
of the most recent upgrade and/or major refurbishment, if any. |
Liftboats
Our liftboats are self-propelled, self-elevating vessels with a
large open deck space, which provides a versatile, mobile and
stable platform to support a broad range of offshore maintenance
and construction services throughout the life of an oil or
natural gas well. Once a liftboat is in position, typically
adjacent to an offshore production platform or well, third-party
service providers perform:
|
|
|
|
|
production platform construction, inspection, maintenance and
removal;
|
|
|
|
well intervention and workover;
|
|
|
|
well plug and abandonment; and
|
|
|
|
pipeline installation and maintenance.
|
Unlike larger and more costly alternatives, such as jackup rigs
or construction barges, our liftboats are self-propelled and can
quickly reposition at a worksite or move to another location
without third-party assistance. Our liftboats are ideal working
platforms to support platform and pipeline inspection and
maintenance tasks because of their ability to maneuver
efficiently and support multiple activities at different working
heights. Diving operations may also be performed from our
liftboats in connection with underwater inspections and repair.
In addition, our liftboats provide an effective platform from
which to perform well-servicing activities such as mechanical
wireline, electrical wireline and coiled tubing operations.
Technological advances, such as coiled tubing, allow more
well-servicing procedures to be conducted from liftboats.
Moreover, during both platform construction and removal, smaller
platform components can be installed and
7
removed more efficiently and at a lower cost using a liftboat
crane and liftboat-based personnel than with a specialized
construction barge or jackup rig.
The length of the legs is the principal measure of capability
for a liftboat, as it determines the maximum water depth in
which the liftboat can operate. The U.S. Coast Guard
restricts the operation of liftboats to water depths less than
180 feet, so boats with longer leg lengths are useful
primarily on taller platforms. Our liftboats in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico range in leg lengths up to
229 feet, which allows us to service approximately 83% of
the approximately 3,700 existing production platforms in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Liftboats are typically moved to a
port during severe weather to avoid the winds and waves they
would be exposed to in open water.
As of February 24, 2010, we owned 41 liftboats operating in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, 17 liftboats operating in West
Africa, and two liftboats operating in the Middle East. In
addition, we operated five liftboats owned by a third party in
West Africa. The following table contains information regarding
the liftboats we operate as of February 24, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built/
|
|
Leg
|
|
Deck
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Liftboat Name(1)
|
|
Upgraded(5)
|
|
Length
|
|
Area
|
|
|
Deck Load
|
|
Location
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Square feet)
|
|
|
(Pounds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whale Shark(4)
|
|
2005 /2009
|
|
260
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
729,000
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Tiger Shark(3)
|
|
2001
|
|
230
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
469
|
|
Kingfish(3)
|
|
1996
|
|
229
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
188
|
|
Man-O-War(3)
|
|
1996
|
|
229
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
188
|
|
Wahoo(3)
|
|
1981
|
|
215
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
491
|
|
Blue Shark(4)
|
|
1981
|
|
215
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
Amberjack(4)
|
|
1981
|
|
205
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
417
|
|
Bullshark(3)
|
|
1998
|
|
200
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
859
|
|
Creole Fish(3)
|
|
2001
|
|
200
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
798,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
192
|
|
Cutlassfish(3)
|
|
2006
|
|
200
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
798,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
183
|
|
Black Jack(4)
|
|
1997/2008
|
|
200
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
777
|
|
Swordfish(3)
|
|
2000
|
|
190
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
189
|
|
Mako(3)
|
|
2003
|
|
175
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
654,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
168
|
|
Leatherjack(3)
|
|
1998
|
|
175
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
575,850
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
168
|
|
Oilfish(4)
|
|
1996
|
|
170
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
590,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
495
|
|
Manta Ray(3)
|
|
1981
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
194
|
|
Seabass(3)
|
|
1983
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
186
|
|
F.J. Leleux(2)
|
|
1981
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
407
|
|
Black Marlin(4)
|
|
1984
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
407
|
|
Hammerhead(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
145
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
178
|
|
Pilotfish(4)
|
|
1990
|
|
145
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
292
|
|
Rudderfish(4)
|
|
1991
|
|
145
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
309
|
|
Blue Runner(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
140
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
174
|
|
Starfish(3)
|
|
1978
|
|
140
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Rainbow Runner(3)
|
|
1981
|
|
140
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
174
|
|
Pompano(3)
|
|
1981
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
196
|
|
Sandshark(3)
|
|
1982
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
196
|
|
Stingray(3)
|
|
1979
|
|
130
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Albacore(3)
|
|
1985
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
171
|
|
Moray(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
178
|
|
Skipfish(3)
|
|
1985
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
91
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built/
|
|
Leg
|
|
Deck
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Liftboat Name(1)
|
|
Upgraded(5)
|
|
Length
|
|
Area
|
|
|
Deck Load
|
|
Location
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
(Feet)
|
|
(Square feet)
|
|
|
(Pounds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sailfish(3)
|
|
1982
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
179
|
|
Mahi Mahi(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
130
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Triggerfish(3)
|
|
2001
|
|
130
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
195
|
|
Scamp(4)
|
|
1984
|
|
130
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
195
|
|
Rockfish(3)
|
|
1981
|
|
125
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
192
|
|
Gar(3)
|
|
1978
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Grouper(3)
|
|
1979
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Sea Robin(3)
|
|
1984
|
|
120
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Tilapia(3)
|
|
1976
|
|
120
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Charlie Cobb(2)
|
|
1980
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
229
|
|
Durwood Speed(2)
|
|
1979
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
210
|
|
James Choat(2)
|
|
1980
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
210
|
|
Solefish(4)
|
|
1978
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
229
|
|
Tigerfish(4)
|
|
1980
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
210
|
|
Zoal Albrecht(2)
|
|
1982
|
|
120
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
213
|
|
Barracuda(3)
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
93
|
|
Carp(3)
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Cobia(3)
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
94
|
|
Dolphin(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Herring(3)
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Marlin(3)
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Corina(3)
|
|
1974
|
|
105
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
98
|
|
Pike(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
92
|
|
Remora(3)
|
|
1976
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
94
|
|
Wolffish(3)
|
|
1977
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Seabream(3)
|
|
1980
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
92
|
|
Sea Trout(3)
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Tarpon(3)
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
97
|
|
Palometa(3)
|
|
1972
|
|
105
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Jackfish(3)
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
U.S. GOM
|
|
|
99
|
|
Bonefish(4)
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
97
|
|
Croaker(4)
|
|
1976
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
82
|
|
Gemfish(4)
|
|
1978
|
|
105
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
223
|
|
Tapertail(4)
|
|
1979
|
|
105
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Palometa, Wolffish and Skipfish are currently
cold-stacked. All other liftboats are either available or
operating. |
|
(2) |
|
We operate these vessels; however, they are owned by a third
party. |
|
(3) |
|
Pursuant to U.S. Coast Guard documentation, international
regulatory bodies or
non-U.S.
Flag states may calculate gross tonnage differently than the
U.S. Coast Guard. |
|
(4) |
|
Pursuant to the registry documents issued by the Republic of
Panama. |
|
(5) |
|
Dates shown are the original date the vessel was built and the
date of the most recent upgrade and/or major refurbishment, if
any. |
9
Competition
The shallow-water businesses in which we operate are highly
competitive. Domestic drilling and liftboat contracts are
traditionally short term in nature whereas international
drilling and liftboat contracts are longer term in nature. The
contracts are typically awarded on a competitive bid basis.
Pricing is often the primary factor in determining which
qualified contractor is awarded a job, although technical
capability of service and equipment, unit availability, unit
location, safety record and crew quality may also be considered.
Certain of our competitors in the shallow-water business may
have greater financial and other resources than we have, and may
better enable them to withstand periods of low utilization,
compete more effectively on the basis of price, build new rigs,
acquire existing rigs, and make technological improvements to
existing equipment or replace equipment that becomes obsolete.
Competition for offshore rigs is usually on a global basis, as
drilling rigs are highly mobile and may be moved, at a cost that
is sometimes substantial, from one region to another in response
to demand. However, our mat-supported jackup rigs are less
capable than independent leg jackup rigs of managing variable
sea floor conditions found in most areas outside the Gulf of
Mexico. As a result, our ability to move our mat-supported
jackup rigs to other regions in response to changes in market
conditions is limited. Additionally, a number of our competitors
have independent leg jackup rigs with generally higher
specifications and capabilities than the independent leg rigs
that we currently operate in the Gulf of Mexico. Particularly
during market downturns when there is decreased rig demand,
higher specification rigs may be more likely to obtain contracts
than lower specification rigs.
Customers
Our customers primarily include major integrated energy
companies, independent oil and natural gas operators and
national oil companies. Each of the following customers
accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Chevron Corporation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Saudi Aramco
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEMEX Exploración y Producción (PEMEX)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our
consolidated revenues in any period.
Contracts
Our contracts to provide services are individually negotiated
and vary in their terms and provisions. Currently, all of our
drilling contracts are on a dayrate basis. Dayrate drilling
contracts typically provide for payment on a dayrate basis, with
higher rates while the unit is operating and lower rates or a
lump sum payment for periods of mobilization or when operations
are interrupted or restricted by equipment breakdowns, adverse
weather conditions or other factors.
A dayrate drilling contract generally extends over a period of
time covering the drilling of a single well or group of wells or
covering a stated term. These contracts typically can be
terminated by the customer under various circumstances such as
the loss or destruction of the drilling unit or the suspension
of drilling operations for a specified period of time as a
result of a breakdown of major equipment or due to events beyond
the control of either party. In addition, customers in some
instances have the right to terminate our contracts with little
or no prior notice, and without penalty or early termination
payments. The contract term in some instances may be extended by
the customers exercising options for the drilling of additional
wells or for an additional term, or by exercising a right of
first refusal. To date, most of our contracts in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico have been on a short-term basis of less
than six months. Our contracts in international locations have
been longer-term, with contract terms of up to three years. For
contracts over six months in term we may have the right to pass
through certain cost escalations. Our customers may have the
right to terminate, or may seek to renegotiate, existing
contracts if we experience downtime or operational problems
above a contractual
10
limit, if the rig is a total loss, or in other specified
circumstances. A customer is more likely to seek to cancel or
renegotiate its contract during periods of depressed market
conditions. We could be required to pay penalties if some of our
contracts with our customers are canceled due to downtime or
operational problems. Suspension of drilling contracts results
in the reduction in or loss of dayrates for the period of the
suspension.
A liftboat contract generally is based on a flat dayrate for the
vessel and crew. Our liftboat dayrates are determined by
prevailing market rates, vessel availability and historical
rates paid by the specific customer. Under most of our liftboat
contracts, we receive a variable rate for reimbursement of costs
such as catering, fuel, oil, rental equipment, crane overtime
and other items. Liftboat contracts generally are for shorter
terms than are drilling contracts.
On larger contracts, particularly outside the United States, we
may be required to arrange for the issuance of a variety of bank
guarantees, performance bonds or letters of credit. The issuance
of such guarantees may be a condition of the bidding process
imposed by our customers for work outside the United States. The
customer would have the right to call on the guarantee, bond or
letter of credit in the event we default in the performance of
the services. The guarantees, bonds and letters of credit would
typically expire after we complete the services.
Contract
Backlog
The following table reflects the amount of our contract backlog
by year as of February 24, 2010, excluding the amount
related to our Angola contract. We calculate our backlog, or
future contracted revenue, as the contract dayrate multiplied by
the number of days remaining on the contract, assuming full
utilization. Backlog excludes revenues for mobilization,
demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables.
The amount of actual revenues earned and the actual periods
during which revenues are earned will be different than the
backlog disclosed or expected due to various factors. Downtime
due to various operational factors, including unscheduled
repairs, maintenance, weather and other factors (some of which
are beyond our control), may result in lower dayrates than the
full contractual operating dayrate. In some of the contracts,
our customer has the right to terminate the contract without
penalty and in certain instances, with little or no notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
33,698
|
|
|
$
|
33,698
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
346,978
|
|
|
|
215,511
|
|
|
|
131,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
399,731
|
|
|
$
|
268,264
|
|
|
$
|
131,467
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately
2,200 employees. We require skilled personnel to operate
and provide technical services and support for our rigs, barges
and liftboats. As a result, we conduct extensive personnel
training and safety programs.
Certain of our employees in West Africa are working under
collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, efforts have
been made from time to time to unionize portions of the offshore
workforce in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. We believe that our
employee relations are good.
Insurance
We maintain insurance coverage that includes coverage for
physical damage, third party liability, workers
compensation and employers liability, general liability,
vessel pollution and other coverages. Our insurance coverage
includes self-insured retentions and deductibles that we must
pay or absorb. Additionally, under certain policies, we are
responsible for 15% of the losses above the applicable retention
or deductible and as
11
high as 30% of losses incurred as a result of a named windstorm
in the Gulf of Mexico. This additional amount is often referred
to as quota share. Management believes that adequate
accruals have been made on known and expected exposures for the
self-insured retentions, deductibles and for our quota share.
However, our insurance is subject to exclusions and limitations
and there is no assurance that such coverage will adequately
protect us against liability from all potential consequences and
damages.
Our primary marine package provides for hull and machinery
coverage for our rigs and liftboats up to a scheduled value for
each asset. The maximum coverage for these assets is
$2.2 billion; however, coverage for U.S. Gulf of
Mexico named windstorm damage is subject to an annual aggregate
limit on liability of $100.0 million. The policies are
subject to exclusions, limitations, deductibles, self-insured
retention and other conditions. Deductibles for events that are
not U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm events are 12.5% of
insured values per occurrence for drilling rigs, and
$1.0 million per occurrence for liftboats, regardless of
the insured value of the particular vessel. The deductibles for
drilling rigs and liftboats in a U.S. Gulf of Mexico named
windstorm event are the greater of $25.0 million or the
operational deductible for each U.S. Gulf of Mexico named
windstorm. We are self-insured for 15% above the deductibles for
removal of wreck, sue and labor, collision, protection and
indemnity general liability and hull and physical damage
policies. The protection and indemnity coverage under the
primary marine package has a $5.0 million limit per
occurrence with excess liability coverage up to
$200.0 million. The primary marine package also provides
coverage for cargo and charterers legal liability. Vessel
pollution is covered under a Water Quality Insurance Syndicate
policy with a $3 million deductible proving limits as
required. In addition to the marine package, we have separate
policies providing coverage for onshore general liability,
employers liability, auto liability and non-owned aircraft
liability, with customary deductibles and coverage as well as a
separate primary marine package for our Delta Towing business.
Our policy related to all but our Delta Towing business, which
we renew annually, expires in April 2010. Our policy related to
our Delta Towing business, which we also renew annually, expires
in August 2010.
Regulation
Our operations are affected in varying degrees by governmental
laws and regulations. Our industry is dependent on demand for
services from the oil and natural gas industry and, accordingly,
is also affected by changing tax and other laws relating to the
energy business generally. In the United States, we are also
subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard, the
National Transportation Safety Board and the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection Service, as well as private industry
organizations such as the American Bureau of Shipping. The Coast
Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board set safety
standards and are authorized to investigate vessel accidents and
recommend improved safety standards, and the U.S. Customs
Service is authorized to inspect vessels at will. Coast Guard
regulations also require annual inspections and periodic drydock
inspections or special examinations of our vessels.
The shorelines and shallow water areas of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico are ecologically sensitive. Heightened environmental
concerns in these areas have led to higher drilling costs and a
more difficult and lengthy well permitting process and, in
general, have adversely affected drilling decisions of oil and
natural gas companies. In the United States, regulations
applicable to our operations include regulations that require us
to obtain and maintain specified permits or governmental
approvals, control the discharge of materials into the
environment, require removal and cleanup of materials that may
harm the environment or otherwise relate to the protection of
the environment. For example, as an operator of mobile offshore
units in navigable U.S. waters and some offshore areas, we
may be liable for damages and costs incurred in connection with
oil spills or other unauthorized discharges of chemicals or
wastes resulting from or related to those operations. Laws and
regulations protecting the environment have become more
stringent and may in some cases impose strict liability,
rendering a person liable for environmental damage without
regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. Some
of these laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the
conduct of or conditions caused by others or for acts which were
in compliance with all applicable laws at the time they were
performed. The application of these requirements or the adoption
of new or more stringent requirements could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
12
The U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972,
commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, prohibits the
discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters of the United
States without a permit. The regulations implementing the Clean
Water Act require permits to be obtained by an operator before
specified exploration activities occur. Offshore facilities must
also prepare plans addressing spill prevention control and
countermeasures. Historically, the discharge of ballast water
and other substances incidental to the normal operation of
vessels visiting U.S. ports was exempted from the Clean
Water Act permitting requirements. Challenges arising largely
out of foreign invasive species contained in discharges of
ballast water resulted in a 2006 court order that vacated, as of
September 30, 2008, an exemption from Clean Water Act
discharge permit requirements for discharges incidental to
normal operation of a vessel. The district court later delayed
the vacation until February 6, 2009. Pursuant to the
courts ruling and recent legislation, the EPA adopted a
Vessel General Permit that became effective on December 19,
2008. The regulated community was required to comply with the
terms of the Vessel General Permit as of February 6, 2009.
We have obtained the necessary Vessel General Permit for all of
our vessels to which this regulation applies. In addition to
this federal development, some states have begun regulating
ballast water discharges. Violations of monitoring, reporting
and permitting requirements can result in the imposition of
civil and criminal penalties. We have incurred and will continue
to incur certain costs associated with the requirements under
the Vessel General Permit and other requirements that may be
adopted. However, we believe that any financial impacts
resulting from the imposition of the permitting exemption and
the implementation of federal and possible state regulation of
ballast water discharges will not be material.
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and
related regulations impose a variety of requirements on
responsible parties related to the prevention of oil
spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills. Few
defenses exist to the liability imposed by OPA, and the
liability could be substantial. Failure to comply with ongoing
requirements or inadequate cooperation in the event of a spill
could subject a responsible party to civil or criminal
enforcement action. OPA also requires owners and operators of
all vessels over 300 gross tons to establish and maintain
with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial
responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities
under OPA. The 2006 amendments to OPA require evidence of
financial responsibility for a vessel over 300 gross tons
in the amount that is the greater of $950 per gross ton or
$800,000. Under OPA, an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels
is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial
responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessel in
the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA.
Vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial
responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond,
self-insurance or guarantee. We have obtained the necessary OPA
financial assurance certifications for each of our vessels
subject to such requirements.
The U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act authorizes
regulations relating to safety and environmental protection
applicable to lessees and permittees operating on the outer
continental shelf. Included among these are regulations that
require the preparation of spill contingency plans and establish
air quality standards for certain pollutants, including
particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, sulfur dioxide,
carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides. Specific design and
operational standards may apply to outer continental shelf
vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles and structures. Violations of
lease conditions or regulations related to the environment
issued pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act can
result in substantial civil and criminal penalties, as well as
potential court injunctions curtailing operations and canceling
leases. Such enforcement liabilities can result from either
governmental or citizen prosecution.
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or the
Superfund law, imposes liability without regard to
fault or the legality of the original conduct on some classes of
persons that are considered to have contributed to the release
of a hazardous substance into the environment. These
persons include the owner or operator of a facility where a
release occurred, the owner or operator of a vessel from which
there is a release, and companies that disposed or arranged for
the disposal of the hazardous substances found at a particular
site. Persons who are or were responsible for releases of
hazardous substances under CERCLA may be subject to joint and
several liability for the cost of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment and for
damages to natural resources. Prior owners and operators are
also subject to liability under CERCLA. It is also
13
not uncommon for third parties to file claims for personal
injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous
substances released into the environment.
In recent years, a variety of initiatives intended to enhance
vessel security were adopted to address terrorism risks,
including the U.S. Coast Guard regulations implementing the
Maritime Transportation and Security Act of 2002. These
regulations required, among other things, the development of
vessel security plans and on-board installation of automatic
information systems, or AIS, to enhance
vessel-to-vessel
and
vessel-to-shore
communications. We believe that our vessels are in substantial
compliance with all vessel security regulations.
Some operations are conducted in the U.S. domestic trade,
which is governed by the coastwise laws of the United States.
The U.S. coastwise laws reserve marine transportation,
including liftboat services, between points in the United States
to vessels built in and documented under the laws of the United
States and owned and manned by U.S. citizens. Generally, an
entity is deemed a U.S. citizen for these purposes so long
as:
|
|
|
|
|
it is organized under the laws of the United States or a state;
|
|
|
|
each of its president or other chief executive officer and the
chairman of its board of directors is a U.S. citizen;
|
|
|
|
no more than a minority of the number of its directors necessary
to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business are
non-U.S. citizens; and
|
|
|
|
at least 75% of the interest and voting power in the corporation
is held by U.S. citizens free of any trust, fiduciary
arrangement or other agreement, arrangement or understanding
whereby voting power may be exercised directly or indirectly by
non-U.S. citizens.
|
Because we could lose our privilege of operating our liftboats
in the U.S. coastwise trade if
non-U.S. citizens
were to own or control in excess of 25% of our outstanding
interests, our certificate of incorporation restricts foreign
ownership and control of our common stock to not more than 20%
of our outstanding interests. One of our liftboats relies on an
exemption from coastwise laws in order to operate in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico. If this liftboat were to lose this
exemption, we would be unable to use it in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico and would be forced to seek opportunities for it in
international locations.
The United States is one of approximately 165 member countries
to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a
specialized agency of the United Nations that is responsible for
developing measures to improve the safety and security of
international shipping and to prevent marine pollution from
ships. Among the various international conventions negotiated by
the IMO is the International Convention for the Prevention of
Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). MARPOL imposes
environmental standards on the shipping industry relating to oil
spills, management of garbage, the handling and disposal of
noxious liquids, harmful substances in packaged forms, sewage
and air emissions.
Annex VI to MARPOL sets limits on sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits
deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances.
Annex VI also imposes a global cap on the sulfur content of
fuel oil and allows for specialized areas to be established
internationally with more stringent controls on sulfur
emissions. For vessels 400 gross tons and greater,
platforms and drilling rigs, Annex VI imposes various
survey and certification requirements. For this purpose, gross
tonnage is based on the International Tonnage Certificate for
the vessel, which may vary from the standard U.S. gross
tonnage for the vessel reflected in our liftboat table above.
The United States has not yet ratified Annex VI. Any
vessels we operate internationally are, however, subject to the
requirements of Annex VI in those countries that have
implemented its provisions. We believe the rigs we currently
offer for international projects are generally exempt from the
more costly compliance requirements of Annex VI and the
liftboats we currently offer for international projects are
generally exempt from or otherwise substantially comply with
those requirements. Accordingly, we do not anticipate incurring
significant costs to comply with Annex VI in the near term.
If the United States does elect to ratify Annex VI in the
future, we could be required to incur potentially significant
costs to bring certain of our vessels into compliance with these
requirements.
14
Our
non-U.S. operations
are subject to other laws and regulations in countries in which
we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the
importation of and operation of rigs and liftboats, currency
conversions and repatriation, oil and natural gas exploration
and development, environmental protection, taxation of offshore
earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use of local
employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and duties on the
importation and exportation of rigs, liftboats and other
equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become
increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership
of concessions and companies holding concessions, the
exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil
and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of
the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the
amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and
natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Operations in
less developed countries can be subject to legal systems that
are not as mature or predictable as those in more developed
countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal
matters and proceedings.
Although significant capital expenditures may be required to
comply with these governmental laws and regulations, such
compliance has not materially adversely affected our earnings or
competitive position. We believe that we are currently in
compliance in all material respects with the environmental
regulations to which we are subject.
Available
Information
General information about us, including our corporate governance
policies can be found on our Internet website at
www.herculesoffshore.com. On our website we make
available, free of charge, our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically
file or furnish them to the SEC. These filings also are
available at the SECs Internet website at
www.sec.gov. Information contained on our website is not
part of this annual report.
Segment
and Geographic Information
Information with respect to revenues, operating income and total
assets attributable to our segments and revenues and long-lived
assets by geographic areas of operations is presented in
Note 17 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 8 of this annual report. Additional
information about our segments, as well as information with
respect to the impact of seasonal weather patterns on domestic
operations, is presented in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Item 7 of this annual report.
Our
business depends on the level of activity in the oil and natural
gas industry, which is significantly affected by volatile oil
and natural gas prices.
Our business depends on the level of activity of oil and natural
gas exploration, development and production in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and internationally, and in particular,
the level of exploration, development and production
expenditures of our customers. Demand for our drilling services
is adversely affected by declines associated with depressed oil
and natural gas prices. Even the perceived risk of a decline in
oil or natural gas prices often causes oil and gas companies to
reduce spending on exploration, development and production.
Reductions in capital expenditures of our customers reduce rig
utilization and day rates. In particular, changes in the price
of natural gas materially affect our operations because drilling
in the shallow-water U.S. Gulf of Mexico is primarily
focused on developing and producing natural gas reserves.
However, higher prices do not necessarily translate into
increased drilling activity since our clients expectations
about future commodity prices typically drive demand for our
services. Oil and natural gas prices are extremely volatile and
have recently declined considerably. On July 2, 2008
natural gas prices were $13.31 per million British thermal unit,
or MMBtu, at the Henry Hub. They subsequently declined sharply,
reaching a low of $1.88 per MMBtu at the Henry Hub on
September 4, 2009. As of February 24, 2010, the
closing price of
15
natural gas at the Henry Hub was $4.91 per MMBtu. The spot price
for West Texas intermediate crude has recently ranged from a
high of $145.29 per barrel as of July 3, 2008, to a low of
$31.41 per barrel as of December 22, 2008, with a closing
price of $79.75 per barrel as of February 24, 2010.
Commodity prices are affected by numerous factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for oil and natural gas in the United States and
elsewhere;
|
|
|
|
the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering
oil and natural gas, and the relative cost of onshore production
or importation of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
political, economic and weather conditions in the United States
and elsewhere;
|
|
|
|
imports of liquefied natural gas;
|
|
|
|
advances in exploration, development and production technology;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries, commonly called OPEC, to set and maintain
oil production levels and pricing;
|
|
|
|
the level of production in non-OPEC countries;
|
|
|
|
domestic and international tax policies and governmental
regulations;
|
|
|
|
the development and exploitation of alternative fuels, and the
competitive, social and political position of natural gas as a
source of energy compared with other energy sources;
|
|
|
|
the policies of various governments regarding exploration and
development of their oil and natural gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
the worldwide military and political environment and uncertainty
or instability resulting from an escalation or additional
outbreak of armed hostilities or other crises in the Middle
East, West Africa and other significant oil and natural gas
producing regions; and
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism or piracy that affect oil and natural gas
producing regions, especially in Nigeria, where armed conflict,
civil unrest and acts of terrorism have recently increased.
|
As a result of the economic downturn, reduced demand for
drilling and liftboat services has materially eroded dayrates
and utilization rates for our units, adversely affecting our
financial condition and results of operations. The economic
downturn has led to a decline in energy consumption, which has
materially and adversely affected our results of operations.
Continued hostilities in the Middle East and West Africa and the
occurrence or threat of terrorist attacks against the United
States or other countries could contribute to the economic
downturn in the economies of the United States and other
countries where we operate. A sustained or deeper recession
could further limit economic activity and thus result in an
additional decrease in energy consumption, which in turn would
cause our revenues and margins to further decline and limit our
future growth prospects.
The
offshore service industry is highly cyclical and is currently
experiencing low demand and low dayrates. The volatility of the
industry, coupled with our short-term contracts, has resulted
and could continue to result in sharp declines in our
profitability.
Historically, the offshore service industry has been highly
cyclical, with periods of high demand and high dayrates often
followed by periods of low demand and low dayrates. Periods of
low demand or increasing supply, such as we are currently
experiencing, intensify the competition in the industry and
often result in rigs or liftboats being idle for long periods of
time. In response to the recent economic downturn, we have
stacked additional rigs and liftboats and entered into lower
dayrate contracts. As a result of the cyclicality of our
industry, we expect our results of operations to be volatile and
to decrease during market declines such as we are currently
experiencing.
16
Maintaining
idle assets or the sale of assets below their then carrying
value may cause us to experience losses and may result in
impairment charges.
Prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates, the cold
stacking of idle assets or the sale of assets below their then
carrying value may cause us to experience losses. These events
may also result in the recognition of impairment charges on
certain of our assets if future cash flow estimates, based upon
information available to management at the time, indicate that
their carrying value may not be recoverable or if we sell assets
at below their then current carrying value.
Our
industry is highly competitive, with intense price competition.
Our inability to compete successfully may reduce our
profitability.
Our industry is highly competitive. Our contracts are
traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Pricing is
often the primary factor in determining which qualified
contractor is awarded a job, although rig and liftboat
availability, location and technical capability and each
contractors safety performance record and reputation for
quality also can be key factors in the determination. Dayrates
also depend on the supply of rigs and vessels. Generally, excess
capacity puts downward pressure on dayrates, and we have
recently experienced declines in utilization and dayrates.
Excess capacity can occur when newly constructed rigs and
vessels enter service, when rigs and vessels are mobilized
between geographic areas and when non-marketed rigs and vessels
are re-activated.
Several of our competitors also are incorporated in tax-haven
countries outside the United States, which provides them with
significant tax advantages that are not available to us as a
U.S. company, which may materially impair our ability to
compete with them for many projects that would be beneficial to
our company.
We
have a significant level of debt, and could incur additional
debt in the future. Our debt could have significant consequences
for our business and future prospects.
As of December 31, 2009, we had total outstanding debt of
approximately $861.7 million. This debt represented
approximately 47% of our total book capitalization. As of
December 31, 2009, we had $165.0 million of available
capacity under our revolving credit facility, after the
commitment of $10.0 million for standby letters of credit.
We may borrow under our revolving credit facility to fund
working capital or other needs in the near term up to the
remaining availability. Our debt and the limitations imposed on
us by our existing or future debt agreements could have
significant consequences for our business and future prospects,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to obtain necessary financing in the future
for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt
service requirements or other purposes and we may be required
under the terms of the amendment to our credit facility to use
the proceeds of any financing we obtain to repay or prepay
existing debt;
|
|
|
|
we will be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our
cash flow from operations to payments of principal and interest
on our debt;
|
|
|
|
we may be exposed to risks inherent in interest rate
fluctuations because 56 percent of our borrowings are at
variable rates of interest, which will result in higher interest
expense to the extent that we do not hedge such risk in the
event of increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
we could be more vulnerable during downturns in our business and
be less able to take advantage of significant business
opportunities and to react to changes in our business and in
market or industry conditions; and
|
|
|
|
we may have a competitive disadvantage relative to our
competitors that have less debt.
|
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our
indebtedness, including the term loan issued in July 2007, the
convertible notes issued by us in June 2008 and the senior
secured notes issued by us in October 2009, and to fund planned
capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash
in the future, which is subject to general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors
17
that are beyond our control. Our future cash flows may be
insufficient to meet all of our debt obligations and other
commitments, and any insufficiency could negatively impact our
business. To the extent we are unable to repay our indebtedness
as it becomes due or at maturity with cash on hand, we will need
to refinance our debt, sell assets or repay the debt with the
proceeds from equity offerings. Additional indebtedness or
equity financing may not be available to us in the future for
the refinancing or repayment of existing indebtedness, and we
may not be able to complete asset sales in a timely manner
sufficient to make such repayments.
If we
are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants in our
credit agreement, there could be a default, which could result
in an acceleration of repayment of funds that we have
borrowed.
Our Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement) requires
that we meet certain financial ratios and tests. Effective
July 27, 2009, we entered into an amendment of our Credit
Agreement (Credit Amendment) to provide additional
flexibility in certain financial covenants. However, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the modified
financial covenants. Furthermore, the Credit Amendment also
imposes additional and different covenants and restrictions,
including the imposition of a requirement to maintain a minimum
level of liquidity at all times. Our ability to comply with
these financial covenants and restrictions can be affected by
events beyond our control. Continued reduced activity levels in
the oil and natural gas industry and continued construction of
newbuild jackup rigs could adversely impact our ability to
comply with such covenants in the future. Our failure to comply
with such covenants would result in an event of default under
the Credit Agreement. An event of default could prevent us from
borrowing under our revolving credit facility, which could in
turn have a material adverse effect on our available liquidity.
In addition, an event of default could result in our having to
immediately repay all amounts outstanding under the credit
facility, the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2038
(3.375% Convertible Senior Notes), the
10.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2017
(10.5% Senior Secured Notes) and in foreclosure
of liens on our assets. As of December 31, 2009, we were in
compliance with all of our financial covenants under the Credit
Agreement.
Our
Credit Agreement imposes significant additional costs and
operating and financial restrictions on us, which may prevent us
from capitalizing on business opportunities and taking certain
actions.
Our Credit Agreement imposes significant additional costs and
operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions
limit our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
make certain types of loans and investments;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends, redeem or repurchase stock, prepay, redeem or
repurchase other debt or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
use proceeds from asset sales, new indebtedness or equity
issuances for general corporate purposes or investment into our
current business;
|
|
|
|
invest in certain new joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
create or incur liens;
|
|
|
|
place restrictions on our subsidiaries ability to make
dividends or other payments to us;
|
|
|
|
sell our assets or consolidate or merge with or into other
companies;
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
enter into new lines of business.
|
In addition, under our Credit Agreement, we are required to
prepay our term loan with 100% of our excess cash flow for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and, thereafter, 50%
of our excess cash flow through the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2012. Our term loan must also be prepaid using
the proceeds from unsecured debt issuances (with the exception
of refinancing), secured debt issuances and sales of assets in
excess of $25 million annually, as well as 50% of proceeds
from equity issuances (excluding those for
18
permitted acquisitions or to meet the minimum liquidity
requirements) unless we have achieved a specified leverage
ratio. Our Credit Agreement also imposes significant financial
and operating restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our
ability to acquire assets, except in cases in which the
consideration is equity (the net cash proceeds of an issuance
thereof) unless we are in compliance with our financial
covenants as they existed prior to the amendment of the Credit
Agreement in July 2009. Our compliance with these provisions may
materially adversely affect our ability to react to changes in
market conditions, take advantage of business opportunities we
believe to be desirable, obtain future financing, fund needed
capital expenditures, finance our acquisitions, equipment
purchases and development expenditures, or withstand the present
or any future downturn in our business.
The
continuing worldwide economic problems have materially reduced
our revenue, profitability and cash flows.
The current worldwide economic problems have reduced the
availability of liquidity and credit to fund business operations
worldwide, and has adversely affected our customers, suppliers
and lenders. The recent recession has caused a reduction in
worldwide demand for energy and resulted in lower oil and
natural gas prices. Demand for our services depends on oil and
natural gas industry activity and capital expenditure levels
that are directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas
prices. Any prolonged reduction in oil and natural gas prices
will further depress the current levels of exploration,
development and production activity. Perceptions of longer-term
lower oil and natural gas prices by oil and gas companies can
similarly reduce or defer major expenditures. Lower levels of
activity result in a corresponding decline in the demand for our
services, which could have a material adverse effect on our
revenue and profitability.
We may
require additional capital in the future, which may not be
available to us or may be at a cost which reduces our cash flow
and profitability.
Our business is capital-intensive and, to the extent we do not
generate sufficient cash from operations, we may need to raise
additional funds through public or private debt (which would
increase our interest costs) or equity financings to execute our
business strategy, to fund capital expenditures or to meet our
covenants under the Credit Agreement. Adequate sources of
capital funding may not be available when needed or may not be
available on acceptable terms and under the terms of our Credit
Agreement, we may be required to use the proceeds of any capital
that we raise to repay existing indebtedness. If we raise
additional funds by issuing additional equity securities,
existing stockholders may experience dilution. If funding is
insufficient at any time in the future, we may be unable to fund
maintenance of our vessels, take advantage of business
opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which
could harm our business.
Asset
sales are currently an important component of our business
strategy for the purpose of reducing our debt. We may be unable
to identify appropriate buyers with access to financing or to
complete any sales on acceptable terms.
We are currently considering sales or other dispositions of
certain of our assets, and any such disposition could be
significant and could significantly affect the results of
operations of one or more of our business segments. In the
current economic recession, asset sales may occur on less
favorable terms than terms that might be available at other
times in the business cycle. At any given time, discussions with
one or more potential buyers may be at different stages.
However, any such discussions may or may not result in the
consummation of an asset sale. We may not be able to identify
buyers with access to financing or complete any sales on
acceptable terms.
Our
contracts are generally short term, and we will experience
reduced profitability if our customers reduce activity levels or
terminate or seek to renegotiate our drilling or liftboat
contracts or if we experience downtime, operational
difficulties, or safety-related issues.
Currently, all of our drilling contracts with major customers
are dayrate contracts, where we charge a fixed charge per day
regardless of the number of days needed to drill the well.
Likewise, under our current liftboat contracts, we charge a
fixed fee per day regardless of the success of the operations
that are being
19
conducted by our customer utilizing our liftboat. During
depressed market conditions, a customer may no longer need a rig
or liftboat that is currently under contract or may be able to
obtain a comparable rig or liftboat at a lower daily rate. As a
result, customers may seek to renegotiate the terms of their
existing drilling contracts or avoid their obligations under
those contracts. In addition, our customers may have the right
to terminate, or may seek to renegotiate, existing contracts if
we experience downtime, operational problems above the
contractual limit or safety-related issues, if the rig or
liftboat is a total loss, if the rig or liftboat is not
delivered to the customer within the period specified in the
contract or in other specified circumstances, which include
events beyond the control of either party.
In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, contracts are generally short
term, and oil and natural gas companies tend to reduce activity
levels quickly in response to downward changes in oil and
natural gas prices. Due to the
short-term
nature of most of our contracts, a decline in market conditions
can quickly affect our business if customers reduce their levels
of operations.
Some of our contracts with our customers include terms allowing
them to terminate the contracts without cause, with little or no
prior notice and without penalty or early termination payments.
In addition, we could be required to pay penalties if some of
our contracts with our customers are terminated due to downtime,
operational problems or failure to deliver. Some of our other
contracts with customers may be cancelable at the option of the
customer upon payment of a penalty, which may not fully
compensate us for the loss of the contract. Early termination of
a contract may result in a rig or liftboat being idle for an
extended period of time. The likelihood that a customer may seek
to terminate a contract is increased during periods of market
weakness. If our customers cancel or require us to renegotiate
some of our significant contracts, such as the contracts in our
International Offshore segment, and we are unable to secure new
contracts on substantially similar terms, or if contracts are
suspended for an extended period of time, our revenues and
profitability would be materially reduced.
An
increase in supply of rigs or liftboats could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
Reactivation of non-marketed rigs or liftboats, mobilization of
rigs or liftboats back to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico or new
construction of rigs or liftboats could result in excess supply
in the region, and our dayrates and utilization could be reduced.
Construction of rigs could result in excess supply in
international regions, which could reduce our ability to secure
new contracts for our warm stacked rigs and could reduce our
ability to renew, or extend or obtain new contracts for working
rigs at the end of their contract term. The excess supply would
also impact the dayrates on future contracts.
If market conditions improve, inactive rigs and liftboats that
are not currently being marketed could be reactivated to meet an
increase in demand. Improved market conditions in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico, particularly relative to other
regions, could also lead to jackup rigs, other mobile offshore
drilling units and liftboats being moved into the U.S. Gulf
of Mexico. Improved market conditions in any region worldwide
could lead to increased construction and upgrade programs by our
competitors. Some of our competitors have already announced
plans to upgrade existing equipment or build additional jackup
rigs with higher specifications than our rigs. According to
ODS-Petrodata, as of February 24, 2010, 60 jackup rigs were
under construction or on order by industry participants,
national oil companies and financial investors for delivery
through 2012. Many of the rigs currently under construction have
not been contracted for future work, which may intensify price
competition as scheduled delivery dates occur. In addition, as
of February 24, 2010, we believe there were also eight
liftboats under construction or on order in the United States
that may be used in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. A significant
increase in the supply of jackup rigs, other mobile offshore
drilling units or liftboats could adversely affect both our
utilization and dayrates.
20
Our
business involves numerous operating hazards and exposure to
extreme weather and climate risks, and our insurance may not be
adequate to cover our losses.
Our operations are subject to the usual hazards inherent in the
drilling and operation of oil and natural gas wells, such as
blowouts, reservoir damage, loss of production, loss of well
control, punchthroughs, craterings, fires and pollution. The
occurrence of these events could result in the suspension of
drilling or production operations, claims by the operator,
severe damage to or destruction of the property and equipment
involved, injury or death to rig or liftboat personnel, and
environmental damage. We may also be subject to personal injury
and other claims of rig or liftboat personnel as a result of our
drilling and liftboat operations. Operations also may be
suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal operating
conditions, failure of subcontractors to perform or supply goods
or services and personnel shortages.
In addition, our drilling and liftboat operations are subject to
perils of marine operations, including capsizing, grounding,
collision and loss or damage from severe weather. Tropical
storms, hurricanes and other severe weather prevalent in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico, such as Hurricane Ida in November
2009, Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in September 2008, Hurricane
Rita in September 2005, Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and
Hurricane Ivan in September 2004, could have a material adverse
effect on our operations. During such severe weather conditions,
our liftboats typically leave location and cease to earn a full
dayrate. Under U.S. Coast Guard guidelines, the liftboats
cannot return to work until the weather improves and seas are
less than five feet. In addition, damage to our rigs, liftboats,
shorebases and corporate infrastructure caused by high winds,
turbulent seas, or unstable sea bottom conditions could
potentially cause us to curtail operations for significant
periods of time until the damages can be repaired.
Damage to the environment could result from our operations,
particularly through oil spillage or extensive uncontrolled
fires. We may also be subject to property, environmental and
other damage claims by oil and natural gas companies and other
businesses operating offshore and in coastal areas. Our
insurance policies and contractual rights to indemnity may not
adequately cover losses, and we may not have insurance coverage
or rights to indemnity for all risks. Moreover, pollution and
environmental risks generally are subject to significant
deductibles and are not totally insurable. Risks from extreme
weather and marine hazards may increase in the event of ongoing
patterns of adverse changes in weather or climate.
A
significant portion of our business is conducted in
shallow-water areas of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The mature
nature of this region could result in less drilling activity in
the area, thereby reducing demand for our
services.
The U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and in particular the
shallow-water region of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, is a
mature oil and natural gas production region that has
experienced substantial seismic survey and exploration activity
for many years. Because a large number of oil and natural gas
prospects in this region have already been drilled, additional
prospects of sufficient size and quality could be more difficult
to identify. According to the U.S. Energy Information
Administration, the average size of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico
discoveries has declined significantly since the early 1990s. In
addition, the amount of natural gas production in the
shallow-water U.S. Gulf of Mexico has declined over the
last decade. Moreover, oil and natural gas companies may be
unable to obtain financing necessary to drill prospects in this
region. The decrease in the size of oil and natural gas
prospects, the decrease in production or the failure to obtain
such financing may result in reduced drilling activity in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and reduced demand for our services.
We can
provide no assurance that our current backlog of contract
drilling revenue will be ultimately realized.
As of February 24, 2010, our total contract drilling
backlog for our Domestic Offshore, International Offshore,
International Liftboats and Inland segments was approximately
$399.7 million, excluding the amount related to our Angola
contract. We calculate our contract revenue backlog, or future
contracted revenue, as the contract dayrate multiplied by the
number of days remaining on the contract, assuming full
utilization. Backlog excludes revenues for mobilization,
demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables.
We may not be able to perform under our drilling contracts due
to various operational factors, including unscheduled repairs,
maintenance, operational delays, health, safety and
environmental incidents, weather
21
events in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere and other factors
(some of which are beyond our control), and our customers may
seek to cancel or renegotiate our contracts for various reasons,
including the financial crisis or falling commodity prices. In
some of the contracts, our customer has the right to terminate
the contract without penalty and in certain instances, with
little or no notice. Our inability or the inability of our
customers to perform under our or their contractual obligations
may have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Our
insurance coverage has become more expensive, may become
unavailable in the future, and may be inadequate to cover our
losses.
Our insurance coverage is subject to certain significant
deductibles and levels of self-insurance, does not cover all
types of losses and, in some situations, may not provide full
coverage for losses or liabilities resulting from our
operations. In addition, due to the losses sustained by us and
the offshore drilling industry in recent years, primarily as a
result of Gulf of Mexico hurricanes, we are likely to continue
experiencing increased costs for available insurance coverage,
which may impose higher deductibles and limit maximum aggregated
recoveries, including for hurricane-related windstorm damage or
loss. Insurance costs may increase in the event of ongoing
patterns of adverse changes in weather or climate.
Further, we may not be able to obtain windstorm coverage in the
future, thus putting us at a greater risk of loss due to severe
weather conditions and other hazards. If a significant accident
or other event resulting in damage to our rigs or liftboats,
including severe weather, terrorist acts, piracy, war, civil
disturbances, pollution or environmental damage, occurs and is
not fully covered by insurance or a recoverable indemnity from a
customer, it could adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain
adequate insurance in the future at rates we consider reasonable
or be able to obtain insurance against certain risks.
As a result of a number of recent catastrophic events like
Hurricanes Gustav, Ike, Ivan, Katrina and Rita, insurance
underwriters increased insurance premiums for many of the
coverages historically maintained and issued general notices of
cancellation and significant changes for a wide variety of
insurance coverages. The oil and natural gas industry suffered
extensive damage from Hurricanes Gustav, Ike, Ivan, Katrina and
Rita. As a result, over the past four years our insurance costs
increased significantly, our deductibles increased and our
coverage for named windstorm damage was restricted. Any
additional severe storm activity in the energy producing areas
of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in the future could cause
insurance underwriters to no longer insure U.S. Gulf of
Mexico assets against weather-related damage. A number of our
customers that produce oil and natural gas have previously
maintained business interruption insurance for their production.
This insurance is less available and may cease to be available
in the future, which could adversely impact our customers
business prospects in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and reduce
demand for our services.
Our
customers may be unable or unwilling to indemnify
us.
Consistent with standard industry practice, our clients
generally assume, and indemnify us against, well control and
subsurface risks under dayrate contracts. These risks are those
associated with the loss of control of a well, such as blowout
or cratering, the cost to regain control or redrill the well and
associated pollution. There can be no assurance, however, that
these clients will necessarily be financially able to indemnify
us against all these risks. Also, we may be effectively
prevented from enforcing these indemnities because of the nature
of our relationship with some of our larger clients.
Additionally, from time to time we may not be able to obtain
agreement from our customer to indemnify us for such damages and
risks.
Our
international operations are subject to additional political,
economic, and other uncertainties not generally associated with
domestic operations.
An element of our business strategy is to continue to expand
into international oil and natural gas producing areas such as
West Africa, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. We
operate liftboats in West Africa, including Nigeria, and in the
Middle East. We also operate drilling rigs in India, Southeast
Asia, Saudi Arabia, Mexico and West Africa. Our international
operations are subject to a number of risks inherent in any
business operating in foreign countries, including:
|
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability, war and acts of
terrorism;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
potential seizure, expropriation or nationalization of assets;
|
|
|
|
damage to our equipment or violence directed at our employees,
including kidnappings and piracy;
|
|
|
|
increased operating costs;
|
|
|
|
complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment
in remote locations;
|
|
|
|
repudiation, modification or renegotiation of contracts,
disputes and legal proceedings in international jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage in
certain areas;
|
|
|
|
import-export quotas;
|
|
|
|
confiscatory taxation;
|
|
|
|
work stoppages or strikes, particularly in the West African and
Mexican labor environments;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
wage and price controls;
|
|
|
|
imposition of trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
imposition or changes in enforcement of local content laws,
particularly in West Africa where the legislatures are active in
developing new legislation;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on currency or capital repatriations;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations and devaluations; and
|
|
|
|
other forms of government regulation and economic conditions
that are beyond our control.
|
In 2009, the level of political unrest, acts of terrorism,
organized criminality and piracy in Nigeria decreased at certain
periods. However, during the year, there were several attacks
directed at the assets and operations of our largest customer,
Chevron Corporation. The country is currently experiencing
renewed political uncertainty due to the extended absence the
president and the apparent transfer of power and authority to
vice president. This political uncertainty could cause an
increase in the level of political unrest, terrorism, organized
criminality and piracy in Nigeria. In the past, many of our
customers in Nigeria, including Chevron Corporation, have
interrupted their activities during these episodes of increased
terrorism, piracy and armed conflict. These interruptions in
activity can be prolonged, during which time we may not receive
dayrates for our liftboats.
Many governments favor or effectively require that liftboat or
drilling contracts be awarded to local contractors or require
foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies
from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may result in
inefficiencies or put us at a disadvantage when bidding for
contracts against local competitors.
Our
non-U.S. contract
drilling and liftboat operations are subject to various laws and
regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and
regulations relating to the equipment and operation of drilling
rigs and liftboats, currency conversions and repatriation, oil
and natural gas exploration and development, taxation of
offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use
of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and
duties on the importation and exportation of units and other
equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become
increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership
of concessions and companies holding concessions, the
exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil
and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of
the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the
amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and
natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Operations in
developing countries can be subject to legal systems which are
not as predictable as those in more developed countries, which
can lead to greater risk and uncertainty in legal matters and
proceedings.
23
Due to our international operations, we may experience currency
exchange losses when revenues are received and expenses are paid
in nonconvertible currencies or when we do not hedge an exposure
to a foreign currency. We may also incur losses as a result of
an inability to collect revenues because of a shortage of
convertible currency available to the country of operation,
controls over currency exchange or controls over the
repatriation of income or capital.
A
small number of customers account for a significant portion of
our revenues, and the loss of one or more of these customers
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
We derive a significant amount of our revenue from a few energy
companies. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Chevron
Corporation, Saudi Aramco and PEMEX accounted for 16%, 14%, 13%
and 10% of our revenues for the year ended December 31,
2009, respectively. Chevron Corporation represented
approximately 12% and 21% of our consolidated revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In
addition, our financial condition and results of operations will
be materially adversely affected if these customers interrupt or
curtail their activities, terminate their contracts with us,
fail to renew their existing contracts or refuse to award new
contracts to us and we are unable to enter into contracts with
new customers at comparable dayrates. The loss of any of these
or any other significant customer could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Our results of operations for 2009 include $31.6 million
($20.5 million, net of taxes, or $0.21 per diluted share)
related to (i) an allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable of approximately $26.8 million associated with a
customer in West Africa that is contracted to utilize one rig in
our International Offshore segment, (ii) a non-cash charge
of approximately $7.3 million to fully impair related
deferred mobilization and contract preparation costs, partially
offset by (iii) a $2.5 million reduction in previously
accrued contract related operating costs that are not expected
to be settled if the receivable is not collected.
Our
jackup rigs are at a relative disadvantage to higher
specification rigs, which may be more likely to obtain contracts
than lower specification jackup rigs such as ours.
Many of our competitors have jackup fleets with generally higher
specification rigs than those in our jackup fleet. In addition,
the announced construction of new rigs includes approximately 60
higher specification jackup rigs. Further, 21 of our 30 jackup
rigs are mat-supported, which are generally limited to
geographic areas with soft bottom conditions like much of the
Gulf of Mexico. Most of the rigs under construction are
currently without contracts, which may intensify price
competition as scheduled delivery dates occur. Particularly in
periods in which there is decreased rig demand, such as the
current period, higher specification rigs may be more likely to
obtain contracts than lower specification jackup rigs such as
ours. In the past, lower specification rigs have been stacked
earlier in the cycle of decreased rig demand than higher
specification rigs and have been reactivated later in the cycle,
which may adversely impact our business. In addition, higher
specification rigs may be more adaptable to different operating
conditions and therefore have greater flexibility to move to
areas of demand in response to changes in market conditions.
Because a majority of our rigs were designed specifically for
drilling in the shallow-water U.S. Gulf of Mexico, our
ability to move them to other regions in response to changes in
market conditions is limited.
Furthermore, in recent years, an increasing amount of
exploration and production expenditures have been concentrated
in deepwater drilling programs and deeper formations, including
deep natural gas prospects, requiring higher specification
jackup rigs, semisubmersible drilling rigs or drillships. This
trend is expected to continue and could result in a decline in
demand for lower specification jackup rigs like ours, which
could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and
results of operations. One of our customers, PEMEX, has
indicated a shifting focus in drilling rig requirements since
the beginning of 2008, with more emphasis placed on independent
leg cantilever rigs rated for 250 foot water depth or greater,
versus mat-supported cantilever rigs rated for 200 foot water
depth. Demand in Mexico for our 200 foot mat-supported
cantilever fleet declined and the future contracting
opportunities for such rigs in Mexico could diminish.
24
We may
consider future acquisitions and may be unable to complete and
finance future acquisitions on acceptable terms. In addition, we
may fail to successfully integrate acquired assets or businesses
we acquire or incorrectly predict operating
results.
We may consider future acquisitions which could involve the
payment by us of a substantial amount of cash, the incurrence of
a substantial amount of debt or the issuance of a substantial
amount of equity. Unless we have achieved a specified leverage
ratio, our Credit Agreement restricts our ability to make
acquisitions involving the payment of cash or the incurrence of
debt. If we are restricted from using cash or incurring debt to
fund a potential acquisition, we may not be able to issue, on
terms we find acceptable, sufficient equity that may be required
for any such permitted acquisition or investment. In addition,
barring any restrictions under the Credit Agreement, we still
may not be able to obtain, on terms we find acceptable,
sufficient financing or funding that may be required for any
such acquisition or investment.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that any announcement or
consummation of an acquisition would have on the trading price
of our common stock.
Any future acquisitions could present a number of risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk of incorrect assumptions regarding the future results
of acquired operations or assets or expected cost reductions or
other synergies expected to be realized as a result of acquiring
operations or assets;
|
|
|
|
the risk of failing to integrate the operations or management of
any acquired operations or assets successfully and
timely; and
|
|
|
|
the risk of diversion of managements attention from
existing operations or other priorities.
|
If we are unsuccessful in integrating our acquisitions in a
timely and cost-effective manner, our financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
Failure
to retain or attract skilled workers could hurt our
operations.
We require skilled personnel to operate and provide technical
services and support for our rigs and liftboats. The shortages
of qualified personnel or the inability to obtain and retain
qualified personnel could negatively affect the quality and
timeliness of our work. In periods of economic crisis or during
a recession, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining our
skilled workers as these workers may seek employment in less
cyclical or volatile industries or employers. In periods of
recovery or increasing activity, we may have to increase the
wages of our skilled workers, which could negatively impact our
operations and financial results.
Although our domestic employees are not covered by a collective
bargaining agreement, the marine services industry has been
targeted by maritime labor unions in an effort to organize
U.S. Gulf of Mexico employees. A significant increase in
the wages paid by competing employers or the unionization of our
U.S. Gulf of Mexico employees could result in a reduction
of our skilled labor force, increases in the wage rates that we
must pay, or both. If either of these events were to occur, our
capacity and profitability could be diminished and our growth
potential could be impaired.
Governmental
laws and regulations, including those related to climate and
emissions of greenhouse gases, may add to our costs
or limit drilling activity and liftboat
operations.
Our operations are affected in varying degrees by governmental
laws and regulations. We are also subject to the jurisdiction of
the United States Coast Guard, the National Transportation
Safety Board and the United States Customs and Border
Protection Service, as well as private industry organizations
such as the American Bureau of Shipping. We may be required to
make significant capital expenditures to comply with laws and
the applicable regulations and standards of governmental
authorities and organizations. Moreover, the cost of compliance
could be higher than anticipated. Similarly, our international
operations are subject to compliance with the U.S. Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, certain international conventions and the
laws, regulations and standards of other foreign countries in
which we operate. It is also possible that existing and proposed
governmental conventions, laws, regulations and standards,
including those related to climate and
25
emissions of greenhouse gases, may in the future add
significantly to our operating costs or limit our activities or
the activities and levels of capital spending by our customers.
In addition, as our vessels age, the costs of drydocking the
vessels in order to comply with governmental laws and
regulations and to maintain their class certifications are
expected to increase, which could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
Compliance
with or a breach of environmental laws can be costly and could
limit our operations.
Our operations are subject to regulations that require us to
obtain and maintain specified permits or other governmental
approvals, control the discharge of materials into the
environment, require the removal and cleanup of materials that
may harm the environment or otherwise relate to the protection
of the environment. For example, as an operator of mobile
offshore drilling units and liftboats in navigable
U.S. waters and some offshore areas, we may be liable for
damages and costs incurred in connection with oil spills or
other unauthorized discharges of chemicals or wastes resulting
from those operations. Laws and regulations protecting the
environment have become more stringent in recent years, and may
in some cases impose strict liability, rendering a person liable
for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault
on the part of such person. Some of these laws and regulations
may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions
caused by others or for acts that were in compliance with all
applicable laws at the time they were performed. The application
of these requirements, the modification of existing laws or
regulations or the adoption of new requirements, both in
U.S. waters and internationally, could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
We may
not be able to maintain or replace our rigs and liftboats as
they age.
The capital associated with the repair and maintenance of our
fleet increases with age. We may not be able to maintain our
fleet by extending the economic life of existing rigs and
liftboats, and our financial resources may not be sufficient to
enable us to make expenditures necessary for these purposes or
to acquire or build replacement units.
Our
operating and maintenance costs with respect to our rigs include
fixed costs that will not decline in proportion to decreases in
dayrates.
We do not expect our operating and maintenance costs with
respect to our rigs to necessarily fluctuate in proportion to
changes in operating revenues. Operating revenues may fluctuate
as a function of changes in dayrate, but costs for operating a
rig are generally fixed or only semi-variable regardless of the
dayrate being earned. Additionally, if our rigs incur idle time
between contracts, we typically do not de-man those rigs because
we will use the crew to prepare the rig for its next contract.
During times of reduced activity, reductions in costs may not be
immediate as portions of the crew may be required to prepare our
rigs for stacking, after which time the crew members are
assigned to active rigs or dismissed. Moreover, as our rigs are
mobilized from one geographic location to another, the labor and
other operating and maintenance costs can vary significantly. In
general, labor costs increase primarily due to higher salary
levels and inflation. Equipment maintenance expenses fluctuate
depending upon the type of activity the unit is performing and
the age and condition of the equipment. Contract preparation
expenses vary based on the scope and length of contract
preparation required and the duration of the firm contractual
period over which such expenditures are amortized.
Upgrade,
refurbishment and repair projects are subject to risks,
including delays and cost overruns, which could have an adverse
impact on our available cash resources and results of
operations.
We make upgrade, refurbishment and repair expenditures for our
fleet from time to time, including when we acquire units or when
repairs or upgrades are required by law, in response to an
inspection by a governmental authority or when a unit is
damaged. We also regularly make certain upgrades or
modifications to our drilling rigs to meet customer or contract
specific requirements. Upgrade, refurbishment and repair
26
projects are subject to the risks of delay or cost overruns
inherent in any large construction project, including costs or
delays resulting from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
unexpectedly long delivery times for, or shortages of, key
equipment, parts and materials;
|
|
|
|
shortages of skilled labor and other shipyard personnel
necessary to perform the work;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen increases in the cost of equipment, labor and raw
materials, particularly steel;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen design and engineering problems;
|
|
|
|
latent damages to or deterioration of hull, equipment and
machinery in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated actual or purported change orders;
|
|
|
|
work stoppages;
|
|
|
|
failure or delay of third-party service providers and labor
disputes;
|
|
|
|
disputes with shipyards and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
delays and unexpected costs of incorporating parts and materials
needed for the completion of projects;
|
|
|
|
failure or delay in obtaining acceptance of the rig from our
customer;
|
|
|
|
financial or other difficulties at shipyards;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; and
|
|
|
|
inability or delay in obtaining customer acceptance or
flag-state, classification society, certificate of inspection,
or regulatory approvals.
|
Significant cost overruns or delays would adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. Additionally,
capital expenditures for rig upgrade and refurbishment projects
could exceed our planned capital expenditures. Failure to
complete an upgrade, refurbishment or repair project on time
may, in some circumstances, result in the delay, renegotiation
or cancellation of a drilling or liftboat contract and could put
at risk our planned arrangements to commence operations on
schedule. We also could be exposed to penalties for failure to
complete an upgrade, refurbishment or repair project and
commence operations in a timely manner. Our rigs and liftboats
undergoing upgrade, refurbishment or repair generally do not
earn a dayrate during the period they are out of service.
We are
subject to litigation that could have an adverse effect on
us.
We are from time to time involved in various litigation matters.
The numerous operating hazards inherent in our business
increases our exposure to litigation, including personal injury
litigation brought against us by our employees that are injured
operating our rigs and liftboats. These matters may include,
among other things, contract dispute, personal injury,
environmental, asbestos and other toxic tort, employment, tax
and securities litigation, and litigation that arises in the
ordinary course of our business. We have extensive litigation
brought against us in federal and state courts located in
Louisiana, Mississippi and South Texas, areas that were
significantly impacted by the hurricanes in 2005 and, more
recently, by Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. The jury pools in these
areas have become increasingly more hostile to defendants,
particularly corporate defendants in the oil and gas industry.
We cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any
claim or other litigation matter. Litigation may have an adverse
effect on us because of potential negative outcomes, the costs
associated with defending the lawsuits, the diversion of our
managements resources and other factors.
TODCOs
tax sharing agreement with Transocean may require continuing
substantial payments.
We, as successor to TODCO, and TODCOs former parent
Transocean Holdings Inc., or Transocean, are parties to a tax
sharing agreement that was originally entered into in connection
with TODCOs initial public offering in 2004. The tax
sharing agreement was amended and restated in November 2006. The
tax sharing
27
agreement required us to make an acceleration payment to
Transocean upon completion of the TODCO acquisition.
Additionally, the tax sharing agreement continues to require
that additional payments be made to Transocean based on a
portion of the expected tax benefit from the exercise of certain
compensatory stock options to acquire Transocean common stock
attributable to current and former TODCO employees and board
members. The estimated amount of payments to Transocean related
to compensatory options that remained outstanding at
December 31, 2009, assuming a Transocean stock price of
$82.80 per share at the time of exercise of the compensatory
options (the actual price of Transoceans common stock at
December 31, 2009), was approximately $1.1 million.
There is no certainty that we will realize future economic
benefits from TODCOs tax benefits equal to the amount of
the payments required under the tax sharing agreement.
Changes
in effective tax rates, taxation of our foreign subsidiaries,
limitations on utilization of our net operating losses or
adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns
could adversely affect our operating results and financial
results.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by
changes in tax laws, both domestically and internationally. From
time to time, Congress and foreign, state and local governments
consider legislation that could increase our effective tax
rates. We cannot determine whether, or in what form, legislation
will ultimately be enacted or what the impact of any such
legislation would be on our profitability. If these or other
changes to tax laws are enacted, our profitability could be
negatively impacted.
Our future effective tax rates could also be adversely affected
by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities, or by changes in tax treaties, regulations,
accounting principles or interpretations thereof in one or more
countries in which we operate. In addition, we are subject to
the potential examination of our income tax returns by the
Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities where we file
tax returns. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse
outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the
adequacy of our provision for taxes. There can be no assurance
that such examinations will not have an adverse effect on our
operating results and financial condition.
Our
business would be adversely affected if we failed to comply with
the provisions of U.S. law on coastwise trade, or if those
provisions were modified, repealed or waived.
We are subject to U.S. federal laws that restrict maritime
transportation, including liftboat services, between points in
the United States to vessels built and registered in the United
States and owned and manned by U.S. citizens. We are
responsible for monitoring the ownership of our common stock. If
we do not comply with these restrictions, we would be prohibited
from operating our liftboats in U.S. coastwise trade, and
under certain circumstances we would be deemed to have
undertaken an unapproved foreign transfer, resulting in severe
penalties, including permanent loss of U.S. coastwise
trading rights for our liftboats, fines or forfeiture of the
liftboats.
During the past several years, interest groups have lobbied
Congress to repeal these restrictions to facilitate foreign flag
competition for trades currently reserved for
U.S.-flag
vessels under the federal laws. We believe that interest groups
may continue efforts to modify or repeal these laws currently
benefiting
U.S.-flag
vessels. If these efforts are successful, it could result in
increased competition, which could adversely affect our results
of operations.
Our
liquidity depends upon cash on hand, cash from operations and
availability under our revolving credit facility.
Our liquidity depends upon cash on hand, cash from operations
and availability under our revolving credit facility. In the
amendment to our Credit Facility, we reduced the size of our
revolving credit facility from $250.0 million to
$175.0 million. The availability under the revolving credit
facility is to be used for working capital, capital expenditures
and other general corporate purposes and cannot be used to
prepay outstanding term loans under our credit facility. All
borrowings under the revolving credit facility mature on
July 11, 2012, and the revolving credit facility requires
interest-only payments on a quarterly basis until the maturity
date. No amounts were outstanding under the revolving credit
facility as of December 31, 2009, although
28
$10.0 million in stand-by letters of credit had been issued
under it. The remaining availability under the revolving credit
facility is currently $165.0 million at December 31,
2009.
We also maintain a shelf registration statement covering the
future issuance from time to time of various types of
securities, including debt and equity securities. If we issue
any debt securities off the shelf registration statement or
otherwise incur debt, we may be required to make payments on our
term loan. We currently believe we will have adequate liquidity
to fund our operations for the foreseeable future. However, to
the extent we do not generate sufficient cash from operations,
we may need to raise additional funds through public or private
debt or equity offerings to fund operations and under the terms
of the amendment to our credit facility, we may be required to
use the proceeds of any capital that we raise to repay existing
indebtedness. Furthermore, we may need to raise additional funds
through public or private debt or equity offerings or asset
sales to avoid a breach of our financial covenants in our Credit
Facility to refinance our indebtedness or for general corporate
purposes.
We are
a holding company, and we are dependent upon cash flow from
subsidiaries to meet our obligations.
We currently conduct our operations through, and most of our
assets are owned by, both U.S. and foreign subsidiaries,
and our operating income and cash flow are generated by our
subsidiaries. As a result, cash we obtain from our subsidiaries
is the principal source of funds necessary to meet our debt
service obligations. Contractual provisions or laws, as well as
our subsidiaries financial condition and operating
requirements, may limit our ability to obtain cash from our
subsidiaries that we require to pay our debt service
obligations, including payments on our convertible notes.
Applicable tax laws may also subject such payments to us by our
subsidiaries to further taxation.
The inability to transfer cash from our subsidiaries to us may
mean that, even though we may have sufficient resources on a
consolidated basis to meet our obligations, we may not be
permitted to make the necessary transfers from subsidiaries to
the parent company in order to provide funds for the payment of
the parent companys obligations.
We
limit foreign ownership of our company, which may restrict
investment in our common stock and could reduce the price of our
common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation limits the percentage of
outstanding common stock and other classes of capital stock that
can be owned by
non-United
States citizens within the meaning of statutes relating to the
ownership of
U.S.-flagged
vessels. Applying the statutory requirements applicable today,
our certificate of incorporation provides that no more than 20%
of our outstanding common stock may be owned by
non-United
States citizens and establishes mechanisms to maintain
compliance with these requirements. These restrictions may have
an adverse impact on the liquidity or market value of our common
stock because holders may be unable to transfer our common stock
to
non-United
States citizens. Any attempted or purported transfer of our
common stock in violation of these restrictions will be
ineffective to transfer such common stock or any voting,
dividend or other rights in respect of such common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation also provides that any
transfer, or attempted or purported transfer, of any shares of
our capital stock that would result in the ownership or control
of in excess of 20% of our outstanding capital stock by one or
more persons who are not United States citizens for purposes of
U.S. coastwise shipping will be void and ineffective as
against us. In addition, if at any time persons other than
United States citizens own shares of our capital stock or
possess voting power over any shares of our capital stock in
excess of 20%, we may withhold payment of dividends, suspend the
voting rights attributable to such shares and redeem such shares.
We
have no plans to pay regular dividends on our common stock, so
investors in our common stock may not receive funds without
selling their shares.
We do not intend to declare or pay regular dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we generally
intend to invest any future earnings in our business. Subject to
Delaware law, our board of directors will determine the payment
of future dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount
of
29
any dividends in light of any applicable contractual
restrictions limiting our ability to pay dividends, our earnings
and cash flows, our capital requirements, our financial
condition, and other factors our board of directors deems
relevant. Our Credit Agreement restricts our ability to pay
dividends or other distributions on our equity securities.
Accordingly, stockholders may have to sell some or all of their
common stock in order to generate cash flow from their
investment. Stockholders may not receive a gain on their
investment when they sell our common stock and may lose the
entire amount of their investment.
Provisions
in our charter documents, stockholder rights plan or Delaware
law may inhibit a takeover, which could adversely affect the
value of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, stockholder rights
plan and Delaware corporate law contain provisions that could
delay or prevent a change of control or changes in our
management that a stockholder might consider favorable. These
provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered
beneficial by some of our stockholders. If a change of control
or change in management is delayed or prevented, the market
price of our common stock could decline.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our property consists primarily of jackup rigs, barge rigs,
submersible rigs, a platform rig, marine support vessels,
liftboats and ancillary equipment, substantially all of which we
own. Several of our vessels and substantially all of our other
personal property, are pledged to collateralize our Credit
Agreement and 10.5% Senior Secured Notes.
We maintain our principal executive office in Houston, Texas,
which is under lease. We own an office building, yard facilities
and warehouses and lease yard facilities and a waterfront dock
in Houma, Louisiana. We lease office space in Lafayette,
Louisiana; Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia; and Ciudad del Carmen,
Mexico. We also lease a warehouse, yard facilities and office
space in Broussard, Louisiana and lease warehouses and yard
facilities in Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia. We lease warehouses,
office space and residential premises in India and Nigeria and
warehouses, yard facilities, office space, and residential
premises in Malaysia. In addition, we lease a waterfront dock,
yard facilities and a maintenance facility in Nigeria and an
office and a residential premises in Cayman Islands, Qatar and
Angola.
We incorporate by reference in response to this item the
information set forth in Item 1 of this annual report.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In connection with our acquisition of TODCO, we also assumed
certain other material legal proceedings from TODCO and its
subsidiaries.
In October 2001, TODCO was notified by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that
the EPA had identified a subsidiary of TODCO as a potentially
responsible party under CERCLA in connection with the Palmer
Barge Line superfund site located in Port Arthur, Jefferson
County, Texas. Based upon the information provided by the EPA
and our review of our internal records to date, we dispute our
designation as a potentially responsible party and do not expect
that the ultimate outcome of this case will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations,
financial position or cash flows. We continue to monitor this
matter.
Robert E. Aaron et al. vs. Phillips 66 Company et al. Circuit
Court, Second Judicial District, Jones County, Mississippi.
This is the case name used to refer to several cases that have
been filed in the Circuit Courts of the State of Mississippi
involving 768 persons that allege personal injury or whose
heirs claim their deaths arose out of asbestos exposure in the
course of their employment by the defendants between 1965 and
2002. The complaints name as defendants, among others, certain
of TODCOs subsidiaries and certain subsidiaries of
TODCOs former parent to whom TODCO may owe indemnity and
other unaffiliated defendant
30
companies, including companies that allegedly manufactured
drilling related products containing asbestos that are the
subject of the complaints. The number of unaffiliated defendant
companies involved in each complaint ranges from approximately
20 to 70. The complaints allege that the defendant drilling
contractors used asbestos-containing products in offshore
drilling operations, land based drilling operations and in
drilling structures, drilling rigs, vessels and other equipment
and assert claims based on, among other things, negligence and
strict liability, and claims authorized under the Jones Act. The
plaintiffs seek, among other things, awards of unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages. All of these cases were
assigned to a special master who has approved a form of
questionnaire to be completed by plaintiffs so that claims made
would be properly served against specific defendants.
Approximately 700 questionnaires were returned and the remaining
plaintiffs, who did not submit a questionnaire reply, have had
their suits dismissed without prejudice. Of the respondents,
approximately 100 shared periods of employment by TODCO and
its former parent which could lead to claims against either
company, even though many of these plaintiffs did not state in
their questionnaire answers that the employment actually
involved exposure to asbestos. After providing the
questionnaire, each plaintiff was further required to file a
separate and individual amended complaint naming only those
defendants against whom they had a direct claim as identified in
the questionnaire answers. Defendants not identified in the
amended complaints were dismissed from the plaintiffs
litigation. To date, three plaintiffs named TODCO as a defendant
in their amended complaints. It is possible that some of the
plaintiffs who have filed amended complaints and have not named
TODCO as a defendant may attempt to add TODCO as a defendant in
the future when case discovery begins and greater attention is
given to each individual plaintiffs employment background.
We continue to monitor a small group of these other cases. We
have not determined which entity would be responsible for such
claims under the Master Separation Agreement between TODCO and
its former parent. We intend to defend ourselves vigorously and
do not expect the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits to have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
We and our subsidiaries are involved in a number of other
lawsuits, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course of our
business. We do not believe that ultimate liability, if any,
resulting from any such other pending litigation will have a
material adverse effect on our business or consolidated
financial position. However, we cannot predict with certainty
the outcome or effect of any of the litigation matters
specifically described above or of any such other pending
litigation. There can be no assurance that our belief or
expectations as to the outcome or effect of any lawsuit or other
litigation matter will prove correct, and the eventual outcome
of these matters could materially differ from managements
current estimates.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Quarterly
Common Stock Prices and Dividend Policy
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol HERO. As of February 24, 2010,
there were 115 stockholders of record. On February 24,
2010, the closing price of our common stock as reported by
NASDAQ was $3.89 per share. The following table sets forth, for
the periods indicated, the range of high and low sales prices
for our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.94
|
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
39.35
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
39.47
|
|
|
|
24.07
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
27.52
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since
becoming a publicly held corporation in October 2005, and we do
not intend to declare or pay regular dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we generally intend to
invest any future earnings in our business. Subject to Delaware
law, our board of directors will determine the payment of future
dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount of any
dividends in light of any applicable contractual restrictions
limiting our ability to pay dividends, our earnings and cash
flows, our capital requirements, our financial condition, and
other factors our board of directors deems relevant. Our Credit
Agreement and 10.5% Senior Secured Notes restrict our
ability to pay dividends or other distributions on our equity
securities.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain
information with respect to our purchases of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of a
|
|
|
may yet be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Plan(2)
|
|
|
Plan(2)
|
|
|
October 1 - 31, 2009
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
$
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 1 - 30, 2009
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
5.28
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 1 - 31, 2009
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the surrender of shares of our common stock to
satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the
vesting of restricted stock issued to employees under our
stockholder-approved long-term incentive plan. |
|
(2) |
|
We did not have at any time during 2009, 2008 or 2007, and
currently do not have, a share repurchase program in place. |
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
We have derived the following condensed consolidated financial
information as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 from our
audited consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of this annual report. The condensed consolidated
financial information as of December 31, 2007 and for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of our
Annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended by our
current report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 23, 2009. The condensed consolidated
financial information as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and
for the year ended December 31, 2005 was derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of our annual report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We were formed in July 2004 and commenced operations in August
2004. From our formation to December 31, 2009, we completed
the acquisition of TODCO and several significant asset
acquisitions that
32
impact the comparability of our historical financial results.
Our financial results reflect the impact of the TODCO business
and the asset acquisitions from the dates of closing. We have
included pro forma information related to the TODCO acquisition
in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 8 of this annual report.
In addition, in connection with our initial public offering, we
converted from a Delaware limited liability company to a
Delaware corporation on November 1, 2005. Upon the
conversion, each outstanding membership interest of the limited
liability company was converted to 350 shares of common
stock of the corporation. Share-based information contained
herein assumes that we had effected the conversion of each
outstanding membership interest into 350 shares of common
stock for all periods prior to the conversion. Prior to the
conversion, our owners elected to be taxed at the member unit
holder level rather than at the company level. As a result, we
did not recognize any tax provision on our income prior to the
conversion. Upon completion of the conversion, we recorded a tax
provision of $12.1 million related to the recognition of
deferred taxes equal to the tax effect of the difference between
the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities as of the
effective date of the conversion.
The selected consolidated financial information below should be
read together with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in Item 7 of this annual report and our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
Item 8 of this annual report. In addition, the following
information may not be deemed indicative of our future
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009(a)
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
742,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
344,312
|
|
|
$
|
161,334
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(92,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
|
|
158,057
|
|
|
|
55,859
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(90,149
|
)
|
|
|
(1,081,870
|
)
|
|
|
136,012
|
|
|
|
119,050
|
|
|
|
27,456
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
|
(12.25
|
)
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (as of end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
140,828
|
|
|
$
|
106,455
|
|
|
$
|
212,452
|
|
|
$
|
72,772
|
|
|
$
|
47,575
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
144,813
|
|
|
|
224,785
|
|
|
|
367,117
|
|
|
|
110,897
|
|
|
|
70,083
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,277,476
|
|
|
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
|
3,643,948
|
|
|
|
605,581
|
|
|
|
354,825
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
856,755
|
|
|
|
1,015,764
|
|
|
|
890,013
|
|
|
|
91,850
|
|
|
|
93,250
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
978,512
|
|
|
|
925,315
|
|
|
|
2,011,433
|
|
|
|
394,851
|
|
|
|
215,943
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $26.9 million ($13.1 million, net of taxes or
$0.13 per diluted share) of impairment charges related to the
write-down of the Hercules 110 to fair value less costs
to sell during the second quarter of 2009. The sale of the rig
was completed in August 2009. In addition, 2009 includes
$31.6 million ($20.5 million, net of taxes or $0.21
per diluted share) related to an allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable of approximately $26.8 million, associated with
a customer in our International Offshore segment, a non-cash
charge of approximately $7.3 million to fully impair the
related deferred mobilization and contract preparation costs,
partially offset by a $2.5 million reduction in previously
accrued contract related operating costs that are not expected
to be settled if the receivable is not collected. |
33
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes $950.3 million ($950.3 million, net of taxes
or $10.76 per diluted share) and $376.7 million
($236.7 million, net of taxes or $2.68 per diluted share)
in impairment of goodwill and impairment of property and
equipment charges, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
138,919
|
|
|
$
|
269,948
|
|
|
$
|
175,741
|
|
|
$
|
124,241
|
|
|
$
|
54,762
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(60,510
|
)
|
|
|
(515,787
|
)
|
|
|
(825,007
|
)
|
|
|
(149,983
|
)
|
|
|
(174,952
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(44,036
|
)
|
|
|
139,842
|
|
|
|
788,946
|
|
|
|
50,939
|
|
|
|
153,305
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
76,141
|
|
|
|
585,084
|
(a)
|
|
|
155,390
|
|
|
|
204,456
|
|
|
|
168,038
|
|
Deferred drydocking expenditures
|
|
|
15,646
|
|
|
|
17,269
|
|
|
|
20,772
|
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the purchase of Hercules 350, Hercules 262
and Hercules 261 as well as related equipment. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 included in
Item 8 of this annual report. The following discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of certain factors, including those set forth under
Risk Factors in Item 1A and elsewhere in this
annual report. See Forward-Looking Statements.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of shallow-water drilling and marine
services to the oil and natural gas exploration and production
industry globally. We provide these services to national oil and
gas companies, major integrated energy companies and independent
oil and natural gas operators. As of February 24, 2010, we
owned a fleet of 30 jackup rigs, 17 barge rigs, three
submersible rigs, one platform rig, a fleet of marine support
vessels and 60 liftboat vessels. In addition, we operate five
liftboat vessels owned by a third party. We own four retired
jackup rigs and eight retired inland barges, all located in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which are currently not expected to
re-enter active service. We have operations in nine countries on
three continents. Our diverse fleet is capable of providing
services such as oil and gas exploration and development
drilling, well service, platform inspection maintenance and
decommissioning operations.
In January 2009, we reclassified four of our cold-stacked jackup
rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 10 of our
cold-stacked inland barges as retired; subsequently in each of
September and November 2009, we sold one retired inland barge
for approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. Additionally, we recently entered into an
agreement to sell our retired jackups Hercules 191
and Hercules 255 for $5.0 million each and in
February 2010, we entered into an agreement to sell six of our
retired barges for $3.0 million.
In July 2007, we completed the acquisition of TODCO for total
consideration of approximately $2.4 billion, consisting of
$925.8 million in cash and 56.6 million shares of
common stock. TODCO, a provider of contract drilling and marine
services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and international
markets, owned and operated 24 jackup rigs, 27 barge rigs, three
submersible rigs, nine land rigs, one platform rig and a fleet
of marine support vessels. The TODCO acquisition positioned us
as a leading shallow-water drilling provider as well as expanded
our international presence and diversified our fleet. We sold
our nine land rigs and related equipment in the fourth quarter
of 2007 and the results of operations of the land rig operations
are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a
discontinued operation for all periods presented. In the first
34
quarter of 2008, we furthered our strategic growth initiative by
purchasing two jackup drilling rigs and related equipment for
$220.0 million. In addition, during the second quarter of
2008, we purchased a third jackup rig and related equipment for
$100.0 million.
We report our business activities in six business segments which
as of February 24, 2010, included the following:
Domestic Offshore includes 22 jackup rigs and
three submersible rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that can
drill in maximum water depths ranging from 85 to 350 feet.
Eleven of the jackup rigs are either working on short-term
contracts or available for contracts, ten are cold-stacked and
one is mobilizing to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico from Mexico.
All three submersibles are cold-stacked.
International Offshore includes 8 jackup rigs
and one platform rig outside of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. We
have two jackup rigs working offshore in each of India and Saudi
Arabia. We have one jackup rig contracted offshore in Malaysia
and one platform rig under contract in Mexico. In addition, we
have one jackup rig warm-stacked in each of Bahrain and Gabon
and one jackup rig contracted to a customer in Angola, however,
the rig is currently on stand-by in Gabon. In August 2009, we
closed the sale of the Hercules 110 which was
cold-stacked in Trinidad.
Inland includes a fleet of 6 conventional and
11 posted barge rigs that operate inland in marshes, rivers,
lakes and shallow bay or coastal waterways along the
U.S. Gulf Coast. Three of our inland barges are either
operating on short-term contracts or available and 14 are
cold-stacked.
Domestic Liftboats includes 41 liftboats in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Thirty-eight are operating and
three are cold-stacked.
International Liftboats includes 24
liftboats. Twenty-two are operating or available for
contracts offshore West Africa, including five liftboats owned
by a third party and two are operating or available for
contracts in the Middle East region.
Delta Towing our Delta Towing business
operates a fleet of 29 inland tugs, 12 offshore tugs, 34 crew
boats, 46 deck barges, 16 shale barges and five spud barges
along and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and along the
Southeastern coast and from time to time in Mexico. Of these
vessels, 21 crew boats, 16 inland tugs, five offshore tugs, one
deck barge and one spud barge are cold-stacked, and the
remaining are working or available for contracts.
In December 2009, we entered into an agreement with First Energy
Bank B.S.C. (MENAdrill) whereby we would market,
manage and operate two Friede & Goldman Super M2
design new-build jackup drilling rigs each with a maximum water
depth of 300 feet. The rigs are currently under
construction and are scheduled to be delivered in the fourth
quarter of 2010. We are actively marketing the rigs on an
exclusive and worldwide basis.
In January 2010, we entered into an agreement with SKDP 1 Ltd.,
an affiliate of Skeie Drilling & Production ASA, to
market, manage and operate an ultra high specification KFESL
Class N new-build jackup drilling rig with a maximum water
depth of 400 feet. The rig is currently under construction
and is scheduled to be delivered in either the third or fourth
quarter of 2010, depending upon the exercise of certain options
available to the owner. The agreement is limited to a specified
opportunity in the Middle East.
We had previously entered into similar agreements with Mosvold
Middle East Jackup I Ltd. and Mosvold Middle East Jackup II
Ltd. to market, manage and operate two Friede &
Goldman Super M2 design new-build jackup rigs. We later
terminated these agreements by mutual agreement due to
uncertainties in the timing of the delivery of the rigs and
disputes between the owner and the builder of the rigs.
Our jackup and submersible rigs and our barge rigs are used
primarily for exploration and development drilling in shallow
waters. Under most of our contracts, we are paid a fixed daily
rental rate called a dayrate, and we are required to
pay all costs associated with our own crews as well as the
upkeep and insurance of the rig and equipment.
35
Our liftboats are self-propelled, self-elevating vessels that
support a broad range of offshore support services, including
platform maintenance, platform construction, well intervention
and decommissioning services throughout the life of an oil or
natural gas well. Under most of our liftboat contracts, we are
paid a fixed dayrate for the rental of the vessel, which
typically includes the costs of a small crew of four to eight
employees, and we also receive a variable rate for reimbursement
of other operating costs such as catering, fuel, rental
equipment and other items.
Our revenues are affected primarily by dayrates, fleet
utilization, the number and type of units in our fleet and
mobilization fees received from our customers. Utilization and
dayrates, in turn, are influenced principally by the demand for
rig and liftboat services from the exploration and production
sectors of the oil and natural gas industry. Our contracts in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico tend to be short-term in nature and
are heavily influenced by changes in the supply of units
relative to the fluctuating expenditures for both drilling and
production activity. Our international drilling contracts and
some of our liftboat contracts in West Africa are longer term in
nature.
Our operating costs are primarily a function of fleet
configuration and utilization levels. The most significant
direct operating costs for our Domestic Offshore, International
Offshore and Inland segments are wages paid to crews,
maintenance and repairs to the rigs, and insurance. These costs
do not vary significantly whether the rig is operating under
contract or idle, unless we believe that the rig is unlikely to
work for a prolonged period of time, in which case we may decide
to cold-stack or warm-stack the rig.
Cold-stacking is a common term used to describe a rig that is
expected to be idle for a protracted period and typically for
which routine maintenance is suspended and the crews are either
redeployed or laid-off. When a rig is cold-stacked, operating
expenses for the rig are significantly reduced because the crew
is smaller and maintenance activities are suspended. Placing
rigs in service that have been cold-stacked typically requires a
lengthy reactivation project that can involve significant
expenditures and potentially additional regulatory review,
particularly if the rig has been cold-stacked for a long period
of time. Warm-stacking is a term used for a rig expected to be
idle for a period of time that is not as prolonged as is the
case with a cold-stacked rig. Maintenance is continued for
warm-stacked rigs. Crews are reduced but a small crew is
retained. Warm-stacked rigs generally can be reactivated in
three to four weeks.
The most significant costs for our Domestic Liftboats and
International Liftboats segments are the wages paid to crews and
the amortization of regulatory drydocking costs. Unlike our
Domestic Offshore, International Offshore and Inland segments, a
significant portion of the expenses incurred with operating each
liftboat are paid for or reimbursed by the customer under
contractual terms and prices. This includes catering, fuel, oil,
rental equipment, crane overtime and other items. We record
reimbursements from customers as revenues and the related
expenses as operating costs. Our liftboats are required to
undergo regulatory inspections every year and to be drydocked
two times every five years; the drydocking expenses and length
of time in drydock vary depending on the condition of the
vessel. All costs associated with regulatory inspections,
including related drydocking costs, are deferred and amortized
over a period of twelve months.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
On July 11, 2007, we completed the acquisition of TODCO for
total consideration of approximately $2.4 billion,
consisting of $925.8 million in cash and 56.6 million
shares of common stock. Our results include activity from this
acquired business (Acquired Assets) from the date of
acquisition.
On average, domestic industry conditions were generally weaker
in 2009 as evidenced by lower utilization and average jackup,
inland barge and liftboat dayrates in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Although International industry conditions weakened during 2009
with lower demand for jackups and an increasing supply of
jackups, our results were less impacted due to our longer-term
contracts and primarily fixed dayrate contracts.
36
The following table sets forth financial information by
operating segment and other selected information for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of rigs (as of end of period)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
140,889
|
|
|
$
|
382,358
|
|
|
$
|
241,452
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
175,473
|
|
|
|
227,884
|
|
|
|
122,131
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
60,775
|
|
|
|
66,850
|
|
|
|
35,143
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,496
|
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
|
|
6,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(101,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(598,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
78,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Offshore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of rigs (as of end of period)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
393,797
|
|
|
$
|
327,983
|
|
|
$
|
144,778
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
169,418
|
|
|
|
147,899
|
|
|
|
59,593
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
63,808
|
|
|
|
37,865
|
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
35,694
|
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
97,995
|
|
|
$
|
(11,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
67,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of barges (as of end of period)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
19,794
|
|
|
$
|
162,487
|
|
|
$
|
107,100
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
44,593
|
|
|
|
125,656
|
|
|
|
56,636
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
32,465
|
|
|
|
43,107
|
|
|
|
16,264
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(59,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(422,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Liftboats:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of liftboats (as of end of period)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
75,584
|
|
|
$
|
94,755
|
|
|
$
|
137,745
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
48,738
|
|
|
|
54,474
|
|
|
|
59,902
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
20,267
|
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
|
|
24,969
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
4,540
|
|
|
$
|
16,578
|
|
|
$
|
50,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Liftboats:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of liftboats (as of end of period)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
88,537
|
|
|
$
|
85,896
|
|
|
$
|
63,282
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
48,240
|
|
|
|
39,122
|
|
|
|
31,879
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
12,880
|
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,990
|
|
|
|
5,990
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
22,427
|
|
|
$
|
30,872
|
|
|
$
|
19,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Delta Towing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
24,250
|
|
|
$
|
58,328
|
|
|
$
|
31,921
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
27,674
|
|
|
|
36,676
|
|
|
|
16,050
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
10,926
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(12,677
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
742,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
514,136
|
|
|
|
631,711
|
|
|
|
346,191
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
201,421
|
|
|
|
192,894
|
|
|
|
104,634
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
92,558
|
|
|
|
81,160
|
|
|
|
49,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(92,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(77,986
|
)
|
|
|
(63,778
|
)
|
|
|
(34,859
|
)
|
Expense of credit agreement fees
|
|
|
(15,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on early retirment of debt
|
|
|
12,157
|
|
|
|
26,345
|
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
6,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(169,081
|
)
|
|
|
(1,155,031
|
)
|
|
|
195,084
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
78,932
|
|
|
|
73,161
|
|
|
|
(59,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(90,149
|
)
|
|
|
(1,081,870
|
)
|
|
|
136,012
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(91,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,083,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth selected operational data by
operating segment for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
|
per Day(2)
|
|
|
per Day(3)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
4,544
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,649
|
|
|
$
|
38,616
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
|
|
127,031
|
|
|
|
45,616
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
%
|
|
|
30,406
|
|
|
|
28,259
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
9,535
|
|
|
|
14,804
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
%
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
|
|
20,624
|
|
|
|
6,692
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
|
per Day(2)
|
|
|
per Day(3)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
|
5,907
|
|
|
|
8,166
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,730
|
|
|
$
|
27,906
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
91.6
|
%
|
|
|
119,137
|
|
|
|
49,218
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
4,048
|
|
|
|
5,885
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
40,140
|
|
|
|
21,352
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
10,343
|
|
|
|
15,785
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
%
|
|
|
9,161
|
|
|
|
3,451
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
6,501
|
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Utilization(1)
|
|
|
per Day(2)
|
|
|
per Day(3)
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
73,952
|
|
|
$
|
24,633
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
95.3
|
%
|
|
|
93,465
|
|
|
|
36,673
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
2,279
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
|
|
46,994
|
|
|
|
19,257
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
11,265
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
|
|
12,228
|
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
5,077
|
|
|
|
6,149
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
5,184
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Utilization is defined as the total number of days our rigs or
liftboats, as applicable, were under contract, known as
operating days, in the period as a percentage of the total
number of available days in the period. Days during which our
rigs and liftboats were undergoing major refurbishments,
upgrades or construction, and days during which our rigs and
liftboats are cold-stacked, are not counted as available days.
Days during which our liftboats are in the shipyard undergoing
drydocking or inspection are considered available days for the
purposes of calculating utilization. |
|
(2) |
|
Average revenue per rig or liftboat per day is defined as
revenue earned by our rigs or liftboats, as applicable, in the
period divided by the total number of operating days for our
rigs or liftboats, as applicable, in the period. Included in
Domestic Offshore revenue is a total of $0.4 million
related to amortization of contract specific capital
expenditures reimbursed by the customer for the year ended
December 31, 2007. There was no such revenue in the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Included in International
Offshore revenue is a total of $16.3 million,
$11.6 million and $3.2 million related to amortization
of deferred mobilization revenue and contract specific capital
expenditures reimbursed by the customer for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Included in
International Liftboats revenue is a total of $0.2 million
and $0.3 million related to amortization of deferred
mobilization revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. There was no such revenue in the year
ended December 31, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Average operating expense per rig or liftboat per day is defined
as operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization,
incurred by our rigs or liftboats, as applicable, in the period
divided by the total number of available days in the period. We
use available days to calculate average operating expense per
rig or liftboat per day rather than operating days, which are
used to calculate average revenue per rig or liftboat per day,
because we incur operating expenses on our rigs and liftboats
even when they are not under contract and earning a dayrate. In
addition, the operating expenses we incur on our rigs and
liftboats per day when they are not under contract are typically
lower than the
per-day
expenses we incur when they are under contract. Included in
International Offshore operating expense is a total of
$6.3 million, $5.6 million and $2.8 million
related to amortization of deferred mobilization expenses for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Included in the International Offshore 2009
amortization is a $2.6 million charge to impair the
deferred mobilization costs related to one international
contract. Included in International Liftboats operating expense
is a total of $0.2 million related to amortization of
deferred mobilization expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2009. There was no such operating expense in
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
39
Our domestic liftboat operations generally are affected by the
seasonal weather patterns in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. These
seasonal patterns may result in increased operations in the
spring, summer and fall periods and a decrease in the winter
months. The rainy weather, tropical storms, hurricanes and other
storms prevalent in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico during the year
affect our domestic liftboat operations. During such severe
storms, our liftboats typically leave location and cease to earn
a full dayrate. Under U.S. Coast Guard guidelines, the
liftboats cannot return to work until the weather improves and
seas are less than five feet. Demand for our domestic rigs may
decline during hurricane season as our customers may reduce
drilling activity. Accordingly, our operating results may vary
from quarter to quarter, depending on factors outside of our
control.
2009
Compared to 2008
Revenues
Consolidated. Total revenues for 2009 were
$742.9 million compared with $1,111.8 million for
2008, a decrease of $369.0 million, or 33.2%. This decrease
is further described below.
Domestic Offshore. Revenues for our Domestic
Offshore segment were $140.9 million for 2009 compared with
$382.4 million for 2008, a decrease of $241.5 million,
or 63.2%. This decline resulted from decreased operating days
from 5,907 in 2008 to 2,676 in 2009 primarily due to an overall
decrease in demand and our cold stacking of rigs, which
contributed $170.1 million of the decrease, and lower
average dayrates which contributed $71.4 million of the
decrease. Average utilization was 58.9% in 2009 compared with
72.3% in 2008.
International Offshore. Revenues for our
International Offshore segment were $393.8 million for 2009
compared with $328.0 million for 2008, an increase of
$65.8 million, or 20.1%. Approximately $154 million of
this increase was due to increased operating days as a result of
the commencement of the Hercules 260 in late April 2008,
Hercules 258 in June 2008, Hercules 208 in August
2008, Hercules 261 in December 2008 and Hercules 262
in January 2009. These favorable increases were partially
offset by a decrease of approximately $76 million related
to the Hercules 156 and Hercules 170 being in warm
stack, Hercules 206 being transferred to Domestic
Offshore for cold stack in the fourth quarter of 2009 and
Hercules 110 in cold stack during the 2009 until the date
of sale, and a lower average dayrate realized on Hercules
205. In addition, the Hercules 185 contributed to an
approximately $14 million decrease as it was in the
shipyard for an upgrade for a portion of the Current Period.
Average revenue per rig per day increased to $127,031 in 2009
from $119,137 in 2008 due primarily to higher average dayrates
earned on Hercules 261 and Hercules 208 for a more
significant portion of 2009 as well as the commencement of the
Hercules 262 in January 2009, partially offset by lower
average dayrates earned on Hercules 205 and Hercules
206, and Hercules 156 in warm stack a majority of the
year as well as Hercules 185 which operated at a higher
dayrate, but for fewer operating days.
Inland. Revenues for our Inland segment were
$19.8 million for 2009 compared with $162.5 million
for the 2008, a decrease of $142.7 million, or 87.8% as a
result of an industry-wide decline in drilling in the transition
zones. This decrease resulted primarily from decreased operating
days, 651 in 2009 compared to 4,048 in 2008, an 83.9% decrease.
Available days declined 73.2% during 2009 as compared to 2008
due to our cold stacking plan. Furthermore, average utilization
was 41.3% on fewer available days in 2009 compared with 68.8% in
2008 as demand in the segment declined.
Domestic Liftboats. Revenues for our Domestic
Liftboats segment were $75.6 million for 2009 compared with
$94.8 million in 2008, a decrease of $19.2 million, or
20.2%. This decrease resulted primarily from lower average
dayrates, which contributed $12.8 million of the decrease,
as well as a $6.4 million decrease due to fewer operating
days in 2009. Average revenue per vessel per day was $7,927 in
2009 compared with $9,161 in 2008, a decrease of $1,234 per day
due primarily to lower dayrates in all vessel classes with a
slight decrease due to mix of vessel class.
International Liftboats. Revenues for our
International Liftboats segment were $88.5 million for 2009
compared with $85.9 million in 2008, an increase of
$2.6 million, or 3.1%. This increase resulted from higher
average dayrates, which contributed $17.8 million of the
increase, significantly offset by fewer operating days,
40
which contributed a $15.2 million decrease. The higher
average dayrate was due to increased operating days on our
larger class vessels, which have higher dayrates and lower
utilization on the smaller class vessels which have lower
dayrates.
Delta Towing. Revenues for our Delta Towing
segment were $24.3 million for 2009 compared with
$58.3 million for the 2008, a decrease of
$34.1 million, or 58.4%, due to decreased activity both
offshore and in the transition zone.
Operating
Expenses
Consolidated. Total operating expenses for
2009 were $514.1 million compared with $631.7 million
in 2008, a decrease of $117.6 million, or 18.6%. This
decrease is further described below.
Domestic Offshore. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Offshore segment were $175.5 million in 2009
compared with $227.9 million in 2008, a decrease of
$52.4 million, or 23.0%. The decrease was driven primarily
by lower labor, catering, repairs and maintenance, and insurance
expenses primarily as a result of our cold stacking of rigs.
Available days decreased to 4,544 in 2009 from 8,166 in 2008 due
to our cold stacking of rigs. Average operating expenses per rig
per day were $38,616 in 2009 compared with $27,906 in 2008 due
in part to shore based support and cold stacked rig costs being
allocated over fewer available days.
International Offshore. Operating expenses for
our International Offshore segment were $169.4 million in
2009 compared with $147.9 million in 2008, an increase of
$21.5 million, or 14.5%. Available days increased to 3,714
in 2009 from 3,005 in 2008. Average operating expenses per rig
per day were $45,616 in 2009 compared with $49,218 in 2008. This
decrease related primarily to the Hercules 156 and
Hercules 170 being in warm stack during a portion of 2009
and the initial
start-up
costs incurred during 2008 related to our India and Malaysia
operations, partially offset by an increase due to the
commencement of Hercules 261 and Hercules 262 in
December 2008 and January 2009, respectively.
Inland. Operating expenses for our Inland
segment were $44.6 million in 2009 compared with
$125.7 million in 2008, a decrease of $81.1 million,
or 64.5%. By mid 2009, fourteen of our seventeen barges were
cold stacked which significantly reduced the segments
variable operating costs. Average operating expenses per rig per
day were $28,259 in 2009 compared with $21,352 in 2008. The
increase in cost per day was driven primarily by costs
associated with shore based support and cold stacked barges
being allocated over fewer available days.
Domestic Liftboats. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Liftboats segment were $48.7 million in 2009
compared with $54.5 million in 2008, a decrease of
$5.7 million, or 10.5% due primarily to lower labor
expense, fuel and oil and insurance costs. Available days
decreased to 14,804 in 2009 from 15,785 in 2008 due to four
vessels that were transferred to our International Liftboats
Segment, these four vessels were not marketed during the third
quarter 2009 in preparation of their mobilization to our
International Liftboats Segment in the fourth quarter of 2009,
and due to the cold stacking of several liftboats during 2009
that were available in 2008. Average operating expenses per
vessel per day had a slight decrease to $3,292 per day during
2009 from $3,451 per day during 2008.
International Liftboats. Operating expenses
for our International Liftboats segment were $48.2 million
for 2009 compared with $39.1 million in 2008, an increase
of $9.1 million, or 23.3%. Available days increased to
7,209 in 2009 from 6,501 in 2008 largely related to the current
year availability of the Whale Shark and
Amberjack, which were transferred to our International
Liftboats segment from the Domestic Liftboats segment during
2008. Average operating expenses per liftboat per day were
$6,692 in 2009 compared with $6,018 in 2008 due to higher
repairs and maintenance expenses and costs associated with
transferring and preparing the four domestic vessels to work in
West Africa.
Delta Towing. Operating expenses for our Delta
Towing segment were $27.7 million in 2009 compared with
$36.7 million in 2008, a decrease of $9.0 million, or
24.5%. Due to the decline in activity in both offshore and the
transition zone, we cold stacked certain assets in our fleet
which resulted in lower labor, repairs and maintenance and fuel
and oil expenses during 2009.
41
Impairment
of Property and Equipment
Impairment of Property and Equipment in 2009 was
$26.9 million compared with $376.7 million in 2008.
The 2008 impairment charges of $376.7 million related to
certain property and equipment on our Domestic Offshore and
Inland segments in 2008. In June 2009, we entered into an
agreement to sell Hercules 110, which was cold stacked in
Trinidad, and incurred a $26.9 million impairment charge to
write-down the rig to its fair value less costs to sell.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense in 2009 was
$201.4 million compared with $192.9 million in 2008,
an increase of $8.5 million, or 4.4%. This increase
resulted primarily from additional depreciation related to the
commencement of Hercules 260 in late April 2008,
Hercules 350 in June 2008, Hercules 208 in August
2008, Hercules 261 in December 2008 and Hercules 262
in January 2009. These increases are partially offset by
reduced depreciation due to the impairment of certain rigs,
barges and related equipment in the fourth quarter of 2008 and
lower amortization of our international contract values.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in 2009 were
$92.6 million compared with $81.2 million in 2008, an
increase of $11.4 million, or 14.0%. This increase relates
primarily to an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable of
$30.8 million, net, of which approximately
$26.8 million as of December 31, 2009, related to a
customer in its International Offshore segment, partially offset
by the cost reduction initiatives implemented in late 2008 and
in 2009 in response to the significant decline in activity in
several of our business segments. In addition, 2008 included
$7.5 million in executive severance related costs.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $14.2 million, or 22.3%. This
increase was primarily related to the higher interest
capitalized in 2008 and interest expense incurred on our
10.5% Senior Secured Notes issued in October 2009. In
addition, the increase in interest rates after the Credit
Amendment were offset by lower debt balances due to the early
retirement of a portion of our term loan.
Expense
of Credit Agreement Fees
During 2009, we amended our Credit Agreement and repaid and
terminated a portion of our credit facility. In doing so, we
recorded the write-off of certain deferred debt issuance costs
and certain fees directly related to these activities totaling
$15.1 million.
Gain
(Loss) on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
Gain on early retirement of debt, net was $12.2 million in
2009 compared with $26.3 million in 2008, a decrease of
$14.2 million or 53.9%. During 2009, we retired a portion
of our term loan facility and wrote off $1.6 million in
associated unamortized issuance costs. In addition, in 2009 we
retired $65.8 million aggregate principal amount of the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes for cash and equity
consideration of approximately $40.1 million, resulting in
a gain of $13.7 million, net of an associated write-off of
a portion of our unamortized issuance costs. In 2008, the gain
on early retirement of debt in the amount of $26.3 million
related to the December 2008 redemption of $73.2 million
accreted principal amount ($88.2 million aggregate
principal amount) of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
for a cost of $44.8 million, net of the related write off
of $2.1 million of unamortized issuance costs.
Other
Income
Other income in 2009 was $4.0 million compared with
$3.3 million in 2008, an increase of $0.7 million or
19.7%. This increase is primarily due to foreign currency
exchange gains, partially offset by lower interest income.
42
Income
Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit was $78.9 million on pre-tax loss of
$169.1 million during 2009, compared to a benefit of
$73.2 million on pre-tax loss of $1,155.0 million for
2008. The effective tax rate changed to a tax benefit of 46.7%
in 2009 from a tax benefit of 6.3% in 2008. The change in the
effective tax rate is due to the non-deductible goodwill
impairment in 2008 as well as a state tax benefit of
$14.1 million based on prior year state tax audits
concluded in the fourth quarter of 2009 and a federal tax
benefit of $2.5 million based on recent court cases related
to alternative minimum tax positions.
2008
Compared to 2007
Revenues
Consolidated. Total revenues for 2008 were
$1,111.8 million compared with $726.3 million for
2007, an increase of $385.5 million, or 53%. This increase
resulted primarily from revenues generated from assets acquired
from TODCO (Acquired Assets) in July 2007. Total
revenues included $15.6 million in reimbursements from our
customers for expenses paid by us in 2008 compared with
$15.2 million in 2007.
Domestic Offshore. Revenues for our Domestic
Offshore segment were $382.4 million for 2008 compared with
$241.5 million for 2007, an increase of
$140.9 million, or 58%. Revenues for 2008 include
approximately $266.8 million compared to
$119.4 million for 2007 from the Acquired Assets. Revenue
increased $171.0 million due to additional operating days
primarily from the Acquired Assets, partially offset by a
$30.1 million decrease due to lower average dayrates.
Average revenue per rig per day decreased to $64,730 in 2008
from $73,952 in 2007. Average utilization was 72.3% in 2008
compared with 65.9% in 2007. Revenues for our Domestic Offshore
segment include $1.3 million and $2.4 million in
reimbursements from our customers for expenses paid by us in
2008 and 2007, respectively.
International Offshore. Revenues for our
International Offshore segment were $328.0 million for 2008
compared with $144.8 million for 2007, an increase of
$183.2 million, or 127%. Revenues for 2008 include
approximately $124.5 million compared to $65.1 million
for 2007 from the Acquired Assets. Revenue increased
$143.4 million due to additional operating days primarily
from the Acquired Assets and $39.8 million due to higher
average dayrates. Average revenue per rig per day was $119,137
in 2008 compared with $93,465 in 2007 as a result of the
commencement of Hercules 260 and the associated revenue
from the provision of marine services, and certain rigs
operating at higher dayrates in 2008. Included in our revenues
for the International Offshore segment is a total of
$11.6 million and $3.2 million related to amortization
of deferred mobilization revenue and contract specific capital
expenditures reimbursed by the customer for 2008 and 2007,
respectively. In addition, revenues for our International
Offshore segment included $1.0 million and
$1.5 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Inland. Revenues for our Inland segment were
$162.5 million for 2008 compared with $107.1 million
for the 2007, an increase of $55.4 million, or 52%. The
2007 revenue is for the period from July 11, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 as we did not have an Inland segment
prior to the TODCO acquisition. Average dayrates and average
utilization in 2008 declined to $40,140 and 68.8% from $46,994
and 77.5% in 2007, respectively. Lower revenue per day also
reflects our customers lower drilling activity. Revenues
for our Inland segment include $1.5 million and
$0.7 million in reimbursements from our customers for
expenses paid by us in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Domestic Liftboats. Revenues for our Domestic
Liftboats segment were $94.8 million for 2008 compared with
$137.7 million in 2007, a decrease of $43.0 million,
or 31%. This decrease resulted primarily from lower average
dayrates, which contributed $34.5 million of the decrease,
and fewer operating days, which contributed $8.5 million of
the decrease. Operating days decreased to 10,343 in 2008 from
11,265 in 2007 due primarily to lower customer activity in the
Gulf of Mexico in 2008 as compared to the 2007. Average
utilization also declined to 65.5% in 2008 from 67.3% in 2007.
Average revenue per vessel per day was $9,161 in 2008 compared
with $12,228 in 2007, a decrease of $3,067. Approximately $2,369
of the decrease in average revenue per vessel per day was due to
lower dayrates and approximately $698 was due to
43
mix of vessel class. Revenues for our Domestic Liftboats segment
included $4.8 million in reimbursements from our customers
for expenses paid by us in 2008 compared with $5.6 million
in 2007.
International Liftboats. Revenues for our
International Liftboats segment were $85.9 million for 2008
compared with $63.3 million in 2007, an increase of
$22.6 million, or 36%. The increase resulted primarily from
higher average dayrates, which contributed $23.5 million of
the increase, partially offset by fewer operating days.
Operating days decreased from 5,077 days in 2007 to
5,028 days in 2008. Average revenue per liftboat per day
was $17,084 in 2008 compared with $12,464 in 2007, with average
utilization of 77.3% in 2008 compared with 82.6% in 2007.
Revenues for our International Liftboats segment included
$6.3 million and $4.7 million in reimbursements from
our customers for expenses paid by us in 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Delta Towing. Revenues for our Delta Towing
segment were $58.3 million for 2008 compared with
$31.9 million for the 2007, an increase of
$26.4 million, or 83%. Prior to our acquisition of TODCO in
July 2007, we did not have a Delta Towing segment.
Operating
Expenses
Consolidated. Total operating expenses for
2008 were $631.7 million compared with $346.2 million
in 2007, an increase of $285.5 million, or 82%. This
increase is further described below.
Domestic Offshore. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Offshore segment were $227.9 million in 2008
compared with $122.1 million in 2007, an increase of
$105.8 million, or 87%. Operating expenses for 2008 include
approximately $146.8 million associated with the Acquired
Assets compared to approximately $67.9 million in 2007.
Available days increased to 8,166 in 2008 from 4,958 in 2007.
Average operating expenses per rig per day were $27,906 in 2008
compared with $24,633 in 2007. The increase was driven primarily
by higher costs related to labor and repairs and maintenance,
partially offset by lower insurance costs.
International Offshore. Operating expenses for
our International Offshore segment were $147.9 million in
2008 compared with $59.6 million in 2007, an increase of
$88.3 million, or 148%. Operating expenses for 2008 include
approximately $19.9 million associated with the Acquired
Assets compared to $30.2 million in 2007. Available days
increased to 3,005 in 2008 from 1,625 in 2007. Average operating
expenses per rig per day were $49,218 in 2008 compared with
$36,673 in 2007. The increase resulted primarily from higher
costs related to marine service equipment rentals, labor and
additional amortization of deferred mobilization and contract
preparation expenses. Included in operating expense is
$5.6 million in amortization of deferred mobilization
expense in 2008 compared with $2.8 million in 2007.
Inland. Operating expenses for our Inland
segment were $125.7 million in 2008 compared with
$56.6 million in 2007, an increase of $69.0 million,
or 122%. Available days increased to 5,885 in 2008 from 2,941 in
2007 due to the full year of operations in 2008, partially
offset by cold stacking additional barges in 2008. Average
operating expenses per rig per day were $21,352 in 2008 compared
with $19,257 in 2007. The increase was driven primarily by
higher costs related to labor and fuel, partially offset by
lower equipment rental costs. Prior to our acquisition of TODCO
in July 2007, we did not have an Inland segment.
Domestic Liftboats. Operating expenses for our
Domestic Liftboats segment were $54.5 million in 2008
compared with $59.9 million in 2007, a decrease of
$5.4 million, or 9%. Available days decreased to 15,785 in
2008 from 16,749 in 2007. Average operating expenses per vessel
per day were $3,451 in 2008 compared with $3,576 in 2007. The
decrease was primarily due to lower repairs and maintenance and
insurance costs.
International Liftboats. Operating expenses
for our International Liftboats segment were $39.1 million
for 2008 compared with $31.9 million in 2007, an increase
of $7.2 million, or 23%. Average operating expenses per
liftboat per day were $6,018 in 2008 compared with $5,184 in
2007. This increase was driven primarily by costs accrued for a
payment to a former owner, as well as increased repairs and
maintenance costs.
44
Delta Towing. Operating expenses for our Delta
Towing segment were $36.7 million in 2008 compared with
$16.1 million in 2007, an increase of $20.6 million,
or 129% as we did not have a Delta Towing segment prior to our
acquisition of TODCO in July 2007.
Impairment
of Goodwill
In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred
$950.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill.
There were no comparable charges in the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Impairment
of Property and Equipment
In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred
$376.7 million of impairment charges related to certain
property and equipment on our Domestic Offshore and Inland
segments. There were no comparable charges in the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense in 2008 was
$192.9 million compared with $104.6 million in 2007,
an increase of $88.3 million, or 84%. This increase
resulted partially from the full year depreciation related to
the Acquired Assets. Depreciation related to Acquired Assets was
approximately $135.9 million for 2008 compared to
approximately $52.1 million in 2007.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in 2008 were
$81.2 million compared with $49.8 million in 2007, an
increase of $31.3 million, or 63%. The increase is
primarily related to incurring the full year incremental general
and administrative costs associated with the Acquired Assets in
2008, a provision for doubtful accounts receivable of
$6.2 million, as well as $7.5 million in executive
severance related costs.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $28.9 million, or 83%. The
increase was primarily due to interest on our borrowings under
our 2007 senior secured term loan and interest on our
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2008,
including amortization of the original issue discount related to
the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes.
Gain
(Loss) on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
In 2008, the gain on early retirement of debt in the amount of
$26.3 million related to the December 2008, redemption of
$73.2 million accreted principal amount ($88.2 million
aggregate principal amount) of the 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes for a cost of $44.8 million which resulted in
a gain of $28.4 million and the related write off of
$2.1 million of unamortized issuance costs. In 2007, the
loss on early retirement of debt in the amount of
$2.2 million related to the write off of deferred financing
fees in connection with repayment of term loan principal in
April and July 2007.
Other
Income
Other income in 2008 was $3.3 million compared with
$6.5 million in 2007, a decrease of $3.2 million or
49%. This decrease is primarily due to lower interest income due
to lower cash balances in 2008.
Income
Tax Benefit (Provision)
Income tax benefit was $73.2 million on pre-tax loss of
$1,155.0 million during 2008, compared to a provision of
$59.1 million on pre-tax income of $195.1 million for
2007. The effective tax rate decreased to a tax benefit of 6.3%
in 2008 from a tax provision of 30.3% in 2007. The decrease in
the effective tax rate primarily reflects the impact of the
non-deductible goodwill impairment.
45
Discontinued
Operation
We had a loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes of
$1.5 million in 2008 compared to income from discontinued
operation, net of taxes of $0.5 million in 2007. The 2008
loss includes the impact of the wind down costs associated with
our land rigs sold in December 2007.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
Regulation G, General Rules Regarding Disclosure of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and other SEC regulations
define and prescribe the conditions for use of certain
Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(Non-GAAP) financial measures. We use various
Non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted operating income
(loss), adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations,
adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing
operations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as net
income plus interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization. We believe that in addition to GAAP based
financial information, Non-GAAP amounts are meaningful
disclosures for the following reasons: (i) each are
components of the measures used by our board of directors and
management team to evaluate and analyze our operating
performance and historical trends, (ii) each are components
of the measures used by our management team to make
day-to-day
operating decisions, (iii) the Credit Agreement contains
covenants that require us to maintain a total leverage ratio and
a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, which contain
Non-GAAP adjustments as components, (iv) each are
components of the measures used by our management to facilitate
internal comparisons to competitors results and the
shallow-water drilling and marine services industry in general,
(v) results excluding certain costs and expenses provide
useful information for the understanding of the ongoing
operations without the impact of significant special items, and
(vi) the payment of certain bonuses to members of our
management is contingent upon, among other things, the
satisfaction by the Company of financial targets, which may
contain Non-GAAP measures as components. We acknowledge that
there are limitations when using Non-GAAP measures. The measures
below are not recognized terms under GAAP and do not purport to
be an alternative to net income as a measure of operating
performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a
measure of liquidity. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not
intended to be a measure of free cash flow for managements
discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash
requirements such as tax payments and debt service requirements.
In addition, the EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA amounts presented in
the following table should not be used for covenant compliance
purposes as these amounts could differ materially from the
amounts ultimately calculated under our Credit Agreement.
Because all companies do not use identical calculations, the
amounts below may not be comparable to other similarly titled
measures of other companies.
46
The following tables present a reconciliation of the GAAP
financial measures to the corresponding adjusted financial
measures (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(92,146
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
225,642
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment impairment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive separation and benefit related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
1,334,423
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(65,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
213,510
|
|
|
$
|
228,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(90,149
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,081,870
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,012
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment impairment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive separation and benefit related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
(Gain) loss on early retirement of debt, net
|
|
|
(12,157
|
)
|
|
|
(26,345
|
)
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
Expense of credit agreement fees
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax impact of adjustments
|
|
|
(14,799
|
)
|
|
|
(133,331
|
)
|
|
|
(1,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
14,999
|
|
|
|
1,174,747
|
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(75,150
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,877
|
|
|
$
|
139,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment impairment
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive separation and benefit related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
(Gain) loss on early retirement of debt, net
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Expense of credit agreement fees
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax impact of adjustments
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.51
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
13.29
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share from Continuing
Operations
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(90,149
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,081,870
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,012
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
77,986
|
|
|
|
63,778
|
|
|
|
34,859
|
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(78,932
|
)
|
|
|
(73,161
|
)
|
|
|
59,072
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
201,421
|
|
|
|
192,894
|
|
|
|
104,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
110,326
|
|
|
|
(898,359
|
)
|
|
|
334,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment impairment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive separation and benefit related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
(Gain) loss on early retirement of debt, net
|
|
|
(12,157
|
)
|
|
|
(26,345
|
)
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
Expense of credit agreement fees
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
29,798
|
|
|
|
1,308,078
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
140,124
|
|
|
$
|
409,719
|
|
|
$
|
339,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Critical
Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are important to our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and
require managements most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments. Different amounts would be reported under alternative
assumptions. We have evaluated the accounting policies used in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report. We
apply those accounting policies that we believe best reflect the
underlying business and economic events, consistent with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
We believe that our policies are generally consistent with those
used by other companies in our industry. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
We periodically update the estimates used in the preparation of
the financial statements based on our latest assessment of the
current and projected business and general economic environment.
During recent periods, there has been substantial volatility and
a decline in commodity prices. In addition, there has been
uncertainty in the capital markets and available financing has
been limited. These conditions adversely impact the business of
our customers, and in turn our business. This could result in
changes to estimates used in preparing our financial statements,
including the assessment of certain of our assets for
impairment. Our significant accounting policies are summarized
in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. We
believe that our more critical accounting policies include those
related to property and equipment, revenue recognition, income
tax, allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred charges,
stock-based compensation, cash and cash equivalents and
intangible assets. Inherent in such policies are certain key
assumptions and estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits
with banks and all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less.
Other
Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisition of TODCO, we allocated
$17.6 million in value to certain international customer
contracts. These amounts are being amortized over the life of
the contracts. As of December 31, 2009, the customer
contracts had a carrying value of $2.2 million, net of
accumulated amortization of $15.4 million, and are included
in Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Amortization expense was $5.0 million, $7.6 million
and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Future estimated amortization
expense for the carrying amount of intangible assets as of
December 31, 2009 is expected to be $1.6 million in
2010 and $0.6 million in 2011.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment represents 84.5% of our total assets as
of December 31, 2009. Property and equipment is stated at
cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures that
substantially increase the useful lives of our assets are
capitalized and depreciated, while routine expenditures for
repairs and maintenance items are expensed as incurred, except
for expenditures for drydocking our liftboats. Drydock costs are
capitalized at cost as Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and amortized on the straight-line method over a
period of 12 months (see Deferred Charges).
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method, after
allowing for salvage value where applicable, over the useful
life of the asset, which is typically 15 years for our rigs
and liftboats. We review our property and equipment for
potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of any asset may not be
recoverable or when reclassifications are made between property
and equipment and assets held for sale. Factors that might
indicate a potential impairment may include, but are not limited
to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived
asset, a significant change in the long-lived assets
physical condition, a change in industry conditions or a
substantial reduction in cash flows associated with the use of
the long-lived asset. For property
48
and equipment held for use, the determination of recoverability
is made based on the estimated undiscounted future net cash
flows of the related asset or group of assets being reviewed.
Any actual impairment charge would be recorded using the
estimated discounted value of future cash flows. This evaluation
requires us to make judgments regarding long-term forecasts of
future revenues and costs. In turn these forecasts are uncertain
in that they require assumptions about demand for our services,
future market conditions and technological developments.
Significant and unanticipated changes to these assumptions could
require a provision for impairment in a future period. Given the
nature of these evaluations and their application to specific
asset groups and specific times, it is not possible to
reasonably quantify the impact of changes in these assumptions.
Supply and demand are the key drivers of rig and vessel
utilization and our ability to contract our rigs and vessels at
economical rates. During periods of an oversupply, it is not
uncommon for us to have rigs or vessels idled for extended
periods of time, which could indicate that an asset group may be
impaired. Our rigs and vessels are mobile units, equipped to
operate in geographic regions throughout the world and,
consequently, we may move rigs and vessels from an oversupplied
region to one that is more lucrative and undersupplied when it
is economical to do so. As such, our rigs and vessels are
considered to be interchangeable within classes or asset groups
and accordingly, we perform our impairment evaluation by asset
group.
Our estimates, assumptions and judgments used in the application
of our property and equipment accounting policies reflect both
historical experience and expectations regarding future industry
conditions and operations. Using different estimates,
assumptions and judgments, especially those involving the useful
lives of our rigs and liftboats and expectations regarding
future industry conditions and operations, would result in
different carrying values of assets and results of operations.
For example, a prolonged downturn in the drilling industry in
which utilization and dayrates were significantly reduced could
result in an impairment of the carrying value of our assets.
Useful lives of rigs and vessels are difficult to estimate due
to a variety of factors, including technological advances that
impact the methods or cost of oil and gas exploration and
development, changes in market or economic conditions and
changes in laws or regulations affecting the drilling industry.
We evaluate the remaining useful lives of our rigs and vessels
when certain events occur that directly impact our assessment of
the remaining useful lives of the rigs and vessels and include
changes in operating condition, functional capability and market
and economic factors. We also consider major capital upgrades
required to perform certain contracts and the long-term impact
of those upgrades on the future marketability when assessing the
useful lives of individual rigs and vessels.
During the fourth quarter 2008, demand for our domestic drilling
assets declined dramatically, significantly beyond our
expectations. Demand in these segments is driven by underlying
commodity prices which fell to levels lower than those seen in
several years. The deterioration in these industry conditions in
the fourth quarter negatively impacted our outlook for 2009 and
we responded by cold stacking several additional rigs in 2009.
We considered these factors and our change in our outlook as an
indicator of impairment and assessed the rig assets of the
Inland and Domestic Offshore segments for impairment. When
analyzing our assets for impairment, we separate our marketable
rigs, those rigs that are actively marketed and can be warm
stacked or cold stacked for short periods of time depending on
market conditions, from our non-marketable rigs, those rigs that
have been cold stacked for an extended period of time or those
rigs that we do not reasonably expect to market in the
foreseeable future. Based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis,
it was determined that the non-marketable rigs for both segments
were impaired and we recorded an impairment charge of
$376.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In addition, we analyzed our other segments for impairment as of
December 31, 2008 and noted that each segment had adequate
undiscounted cash flows to recover their property and equipment
carrying values. In 2009 we entered into an agreement to sell
Hercules 110 and we realized approximately
$26.9 million ($13.1 million, net of tax) of
impairment charges related to the write-down of the rig to fair
value less costs to sell during the second quarter of 2009. The
sale was completed in August 2009. There were no impairment
charges for the year ended December 31, 2007.
49
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues generated from our contracts are recognized as services
are performed, as long as collectability is reasonably assured.
Some of our contracts also allow us to recover additional direct
costs, including mobilization and demobilization costs,
additional labor and additional catering costs. Additionally,
some of our contracts allow us to receive fees for contract
specific capital improvements to a rig. Under most of our
liftboat contracts, we receive a variable rate for reimbursement
of costs such as catering, fuel, oil, rental equipment, crane
overtime and other items. Revenue for the recovery or
reimbursement of these costs is recognized when the costs are
incurred except for mobilization revenues and reimbursement for
contract specific capital expenditures, which are recognized as
services are performed over the term of the related contract.
Income
Taxes
Our provision for income taxes takes into account the
differences between the financial statement treatment and tax
treatment of certain transactions. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in
tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that
includes the enactment date.
Our net income tax expense or benefit is determined based on the
mix of domestic and international pre-tax earnings or losses,
respectively, as well as the tax jurisdictions in which we
operate. We operate in multiple countries through various legal
entities. As a result, we are subject to numerous domestic and
foreign tax jurisdictions and are taxed on various bases: income
before tax, deemed profits (which is generally determined using
a percentage of revenue rather than profits), and withholding
taxes based on revenue. The calculation of our tax liabilities
involves consideration of uncertainties in the application and
interpretation of complex tax regulations in our operating
jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and
treaties, or our level of operations or profitability in each
taxing jurisdiction could have an impact upon the amount of
income taxes that we provide during any given year.
In March 2007, one of our subsidiaries received an assessment
from the Mexican tax authorities related to our operations for
the 2004 tax year. This assessment contests our right to certain
deductions and also claims the subsidiary did not remit
withholding tax due on certain of these deductions. We are
pursuing our alternatives to resolve this assessment.
Certain of our international rigs are owned or operated,
directly or indirectly, by our wholly owned Cayman Islands
subsidiaries. Most of the earnings from these subsidiaries are
reinvested internationally and remittance to the United States
is indefinitely postponed. We recognized $1.1 million of
deferred U.S. tax expense on foreign earnings which
management expects to repatriate in the future.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable represents approximately 5.9% of our total
assets and 41.6% of our current assets as of December 31,
2009. We continuously monitor our accounts receivable from our
customers to identify any collectability issues. An allowance
for doubtful accounts is established based on reviews of
individual customer accounts, recent loss experience, current
economic conditions and other pertinent factors. Accounts deemed
uncollectable are charged to the allowance. We establish an
allowance for doubtful accounts based on the actual amount we
believe is not collectable. As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, there was $38.5 million and $7.8 million in
allowance for doubtful accounts, respectively. During 2009, we
increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by a net
$30.8 million, of which $26.8 million related to a
single customer operating one rig in our International Offshore
segment.
50
Deferred
Charges
All of our U.S. flagged liftboats are required to undergo
regulatory inspections on an annual basis and to be drydocked
two times every five years to ensure compliance with
U.S. Coast Guard regulations for vessel safety and vessel
maintenance standards. Costs associated with these inspections,
which generally involve setting the vessels on a drydock, are
deferred, and the costs are amortized over a period of
12 months. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, our net
deferred charges related to regulatory inspection costs totaled
$4.8 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The
amortization of the regulatory inspection costs was reported as
part of our depreciation and amortization expense.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We recognize compensation cost for all share-based payments
awarded in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Codification Topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation and in
accordance with such we record the grant date fair value of
share-based payments awarded as compensation expense using a
straight-line method over the service period. The fair value of
our restricted stock grants is based on the closing price of our
common stock on the date of grant. Our estimate of compensation
expense requires a number of complex and subjective assumptions
and changes to those assumptions could result in different
valuations for individual share awards. We estimate the fair
value of the options granted using the Trinomial Lattice option
pricing model using the following assumptions: expected dividend
yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate
and employee exercise patterns (expected life of the options).
We also estimate future forfeitures and related tax effects.
We are estimating that the cost relating to stock options
granted through December 31, 2009 will be $3.5 million
over the remaining vesting period of 1.8 years and the cost
relating to restricted shares granted through December 31,
2009 will be $4.4 million over the remaining vesting period
of 0.8 years; however, due to the uncertainty of the level
of share-based payments to be granted in the future, these
amounts are estimates and subject to change.
OUTLOOK
Offshore
In general, demand for our drilling rigs is a function of our
customers capital spending plans, which are largely driven
by current commodity prices and their expectations of future
commodity prices. Demand in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico is
particularly driven by natural gas prices, with demand
internationally typically driven by oil prices.
U.S. natural gas prices tend to be highly volatile. Since
mid-2008, the spot price for Henry Hub natural gas has ranged
from a high of $13.31 per MMBtu in July 2008, to a low of $1.88
in September 2009. As of February 24, 2010, the spot price
for Henry Hub natural gas was $4.91 per MMBtu, The twelve month
strip, or the average of the next twelve months futures
contract, was $5.33 per MMBtu on February 24, 2010. A
myriad of factors combined to cause natural gas prices to
decline to extremely depressed levels during the late summer and
fall of 2009 from its recent high in mid-2008. The worldwide
economic downturn resulted in reduced energy consumption,
creating a sharp decline in the demand for natural gas. On the
supply side, increases in onshore production in the U.S., driven
by a significant increase in onshore drilling activity through
mid-2008 and increased activity in prolific unconventional
natural gas basins also put downward pressure on natural gas
prices. Growing deepwater production and potential increased
deliveries of liquefied natural gas are additional factors which
weighed on natural gas prices.
We believe the recovery in natural gas prices to recent levels
has been driven by several factors, including the expectations
for an economic rebound leading to a recovery in industrial
demand for natural gas and the belief that the decline in North
American drilling activity from its recent peak may lead to
declines in production. All of these factors, together with
weather, will likely remain key drivers in the natural gas
market for the foreseeable future.
51
Oil prices also declined significantly from mid-2008 to early
2009 as a result of the anticipated effects of global economic
weakness, increase in oil inventories relative to consumption
and a strengthening in the U.S. dollar. The price of West
Texas intermediate crude (WTI) declined from $145.29
as of July 3, 2008, to a multi-year low of $31.41 in
December 2008. However, it has since recovered meaningfully to
$79.75 as of February 24, 2010.
Many of our customers, particularly those focused in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico, significantly reduced their capital
spending in 2009 relative to 2008 spending due to the
substantial declines in commodity prices, the weak global
economic outlook and poor capital market conditions during early
2009.
Based on 2010 capital spending surveys, we expect domestic
focused exploration and production capital spending will
increase in 2010. The expected higher level of capital spending,
may lead to an increase in drilling activity in the shallow
water U.S. Gulf of Mexico, however, activity levels will
continue to be highly dependent upon natural gas prices, among
other factors as our domestic focused customers often quickly
adjust their drilling plans to changes in the outlook.
Additionally, operators focused in the U.S., have increasingly
been deploying incremental capital to other less mature basins
such as the various shale formations, a trend that is expected
to continue for the foreseeable future. Further, during 2009, we
experienced an increase in seasonality with certain operators
completing their drilling programs during the first half of the
year, so as to avoid drilling during the Atlantic hurricane
season. A continuation of this trend could be negative for our
operating results as it would be difficult to adjust our cost
structure to account for such seasonality.
While international spending programs are much longer-term in
nature than typical U.S. drilling programs, and the
customers tend to have greater financial resources,
international capital spending also declined in 2009, following
nine years of growth, but to a lesser degree. However,
international focused capital spending is also expected to
modestly increase during 2010.
While increased capital spending may lead to additional demand
in both domestic and international regions, the offshore
drilling industry is still expected to have excess capacity of
jackup drilling rigs in 2010, given the current number of idle
jackup rigs and expected growth in supply. As of
February 24, 2010, there were a total of 79 jackup rigs in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, with 39 contracted, 8 stacked
ready, one en route and 31 in the shipyard or cold stacked. Cold
stacked rigs are generally not marketed and in some cases would
require significant capital to reactivate. Also as of
February 24, 2010, there were 374 jackup rigs located in
international markets, with 305 contracted, 34 stacked ready, 2
in port or on standby and 33 in the shipyard or cold stacked.
Further, 60 new jackup rigs are either under construction or on
order for delivery through 2012. Twenty-six of these are
scheduled to be delivered during 2010. While we anticipate
several of these orders may be delayed or cancelled, the
majority of these will likely ultimately be delivered and
compete with our fleet. As a result of generally higher
dayrates, longer duration contracts and lower insurance costs
which are prevalent internationally, among other factors, we
believe the vast majority of the newbuild jackup rigs will
target international regions rather than the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico. Our ability to secure new contracts for our
international fleet or to expand our international drilling
operations may be limited by the increased supply of newbuild
jackup rigs.
While potential increases in capital spending may lead to
improving jackup rig demand in 2010, the expected newbuild
deliveries, coupled with relatively large number of idle
marketed jackup rigs, represent a significant amount of over
capacity relative to current demand and may make it challenging
for the industry to see any meaningful improvement in dayrates.
Nonetheless, a number of factors give us optimism for the longer
term. First, with steep initial decline rates in many North
American natural gas basins and a substantial reduction in the
rig count from the peak, the recent strong natural gas market
production growth could slow or even reverse. With respect to
international markets, which are typically driven by crude oil
prices, the lack of any significant oil production growth over
the last five years, despite a more than doubling of
international exploration and production capital spending over
this period, leads us to believe that production would decline
in response to a decrease in exploration and production spending.
52
Furthermore, the offshore drilling market remains highly
competitive and cyclical, and it has historically been difficult
to forecast future market conditions. While future commodity
price expectations have typically been a key driver for demand
for drilling rigs, other factors also affect our customers
drilling programs, including the quality of drilling prospects,
exploration success, relative production costs, availability of
insurance, and political and regulatory environments, including
offshore lease access. Additionally, the offshore drilling
business has historically been cyclical, marked by periods of
low demand, excess rig supply and low dayrates, followed by
periods of high demand, short rig supply and increasing
dayrates. These cycles have been volatile and are subject to
rapid change.
Inland
The activity for inland barge drilling in the
U.S. generally follows the same drivers as drilling in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico with activity following operators
expectations of prices for natural gas and crude oil. Barge rig
drilling activity historically lags activity in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico due to a number of factors such as the
lengthy permitting process that operators must go through prior
to drilling a well in Louisiana, where the majority of our
inland drilling takes place, and the predominance of smaller
independent operators active in inland waters.
Inland barge drilling activity has slowed dramatically over the
past two years and dayrates have declined as a result of the
number of the key operators that have curtailed or ceased their
activity in the inland market for various reasons, including
lack of funding, lack of drilling success and re-allocation of
capital to other onshore basins. Activity has increased
recently, with a higher percentage of the drilling focused on
crude oil. As of February 24, 2010, all three of our
marketed inland barges had contracts for work. While we may have
some increased activity for our inland barges based on stronger
capital budgets and improved natural gas prices, we expect
activity levels to remain very low versus historic norms for
2010.
Liftboats
Demand for liftboats is typically a function of our
customers demand for platform inspection and maintenance,
well maintenance, offshore construction, well plugging and
abandonment, and other related activities. Although activity
levels for liftboats are not as closely correlated to movement
in commodity prices as for offshore drilling rigs, commodity
prices are still a key driver of the demand for liftboats.
Despite the production maintenance related nature of the
majority of the work, some of the work may be deferred from time
to time.
Following the active 2005 hurricane season, which caused
tremendous damage to the infrastructure in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico, liftboat utilization and dayrates in the region were
stronger than historical levels for approximately two years. As
a result of this robust activity, many of our competitors
ordered new liftboats and approximately 23 have been delivered
for work in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico since January 2007. As
of February 24, 2010, we believe that there are another
eight liftboats under construction or on order in the
U.S. that could potentially be delivered through 2011. Once
delivered, these liftboats may further impact the demand and
utilization of our domestic liftboat fleet. However, some of
these new liftboats in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico could be
offset by mobilizations to meet growing demand in other regions.
Our customers growth in international capital spending for
the last several years, coupled with an aging infrastructure and
significant increases in the cost of alternatives for servicing
this infrastructure, has generally resulted in strong demand for
our liftboats in West Africa. As international markets mature
and the focus shifts from exploration to development in
locations such as West Africa, the Middle East and Southeast
Asia, we expect to experience strong demand growth for
liftboats. We anticipate that there may be contract
opportunities in international locations for liftboats currently
working in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and for newly
constructed liftboats. In 2008 we mobilized two of our liftboats
to the Middle East from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and we
recently mobilized four liftboats to West Africa from the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico. While we believe that international
demand for liftboats will continue to increase over the longer
term, political instability in certain regions may negatively
impact our customers capital spending plans.
53
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources
and Uses of Cash
Sources and uses of cash for 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
138.9
|
|
|
$
|
269.9
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320.8
|
)
|
Additions of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(76.1
|
)
|
|
|
(264.2
|
)
|
Deferred Drydocking Expenditures
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
Sale of Marketable Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
Proceeds from Sale of Assets, Net
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
Insurance Proceeds Received
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
Increase in Restricted Cash
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
(515.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt Borrowings (Repayments), Net
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Long-term Debt Borrowings
|
|
|
292.1
|
|
|
|
350.0
|
|
Long-term Debt Repayments
|
|
|
(403.6
|
)
|
|
|
(121.5
|
)
|
Redemption of 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(44.8
|
)
|
Common Stock Issuance (Repurchase)
|
|
|
89.6
|
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)
|
|
|
139.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
34.4
|
|
|
$
|
(106.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Liquidity and Financing Arrangements
Our liquidity is comprised of cash on hand, cash from operations
and availability under our revolving credit facility. We also
maintain a shelf registration statement covering the future
issuance from time to time of various types of securities,
including debt and equity securities. If we issue any debt
securities off the shelf or otherwise incur debt, we would
generally be required to allocate the proceeds of such debt to
repay or refinance existing debt. We currently believe we will
have adequate liquidity to meet the minimum liquidity
requirement under our Credit Agreement that governs our
$482.9 million term loan and $175.0 million revolving
credit facility and to fund our operations. However, to the
extent we do not generate sufficient cash from operations we may
need to raise additional funds through debt, equity offerings or
the sale of assets. Furthermore, we may need to raise additional
funds through debt or equity offerings or asset sales to meet
certain covenants under the Credit Agreement, to refinance
existing debt or for general corporate purposes. In July 2012,
our $175.0 million revolving credit facility matures. To
the extent we are unsuccessful in extending the maturity or
entering into a new revolving credit facility, our liquidity
would be negatively impacted. In June 2013, we may be required
to settle our 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes. As of
December 31, 2009, the notional amount of these notes
outstanding was $95.9 million. Additionally, our term loan
matures in July 2013 and currently requires a balloon payment of
$466.8 million at maturity. We intend to meet these
obligations through one or more of the following: cash flow from
operations, asset sales, debt refinancing and future debt or
equity offerings.
Our Credit Agreement requires that we meet certain financial
ratios and tests, which we currently meet. Our failure to comply
with such covenants would result in an event of default under
the Credit Agreement. An event of default could prevent us from
borrowing under the revolving credit facility, which would in
turn have a material
54
adverse effect on our available liquidity. Additionally, an
event of default could result in us having to immediately repay
all amounts outstanding under the term loan facility, the
revolving credit facility, our 10.5% Senior Secured Notes
and our 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes and in the
foreclosure of liens on our assets.
Cash
Requirements and Contractual Obligations
Debt
Our current debt structure is used to fund our business
operations.
In July 2007, we terminated all prior facilities and entered
into a new $1,050.0 million credit facility with a
syndicate of financial institutions, consisting of a
$900.0 million term loan and a $150.0 million
revolving credit facility which is governed by the Credit
Agreement. On April 28, 2008, we entered into an agreement
to increase the revolving credit facility to $250.0 million.
On July 27, 2009, we amended the Credit Agreement (the
Credit Amendment). A fee of 0.50% was paid to
lenders consenting to the Credit Amendment, based on their total
commitment, which approximated $4.8 million.
The Credit Amendment reduced the revolving credit facility by
$75.0 million to $175.0 million. The commitment fee on
the revolving credit facility increased from 0.375% to 1.00% and
the letter of credit fee with respect to the undrawn amount of
each letter of credit issued under the revolving credit facility
increased from 1.75% to 4.00% per annum. Additionally, the
Credit Amendment establishes a minimum London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) of 2.00% for Eurodollar Loans, a
minimum rate of 3.00% with respect to Alternative Base Rate
(ABR) Loans, and increases the margin applicable to
Eurodollar Loans and ABR Loans, subject to a grid based on the
aggregate principal amount of the Term Loans outstanding as
follows ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount Outstanding
|
|
Margin Applicable to:
|
Less than or equal to:
|
|
Greater than:
|
|
Eurodollar Loans
|
|
ABR Loans
|
|
$
|
882.00
|
|
|
$
|
684.25
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
684.25
|
|
|
|
484.25
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
484.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
The Credit Amendment also modifies certain provisions of the
Credit Agreement to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate the requirement that we comply with the total leverage
ratio financial covenant for the nine month period commencing
October 1, 2009 and ending on June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Amend the maximum total leverage ratio that we must comply with
to the following schedule. The total leverage ratio for any test
period is calculated as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness
on the test date to consolidated EBITDA for the trailing twelve
months, all as defined in the Credit Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
Test Date
|
|
Total Leverage Ratio
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
8.00 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
7.50 to 1.00
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
7.00 to 1.00
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
6.75 to 1.00
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
6.00 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
5.50 to 1.00
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
5.25 to 1.00
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
5.00 to 1.00
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
4.75 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
4.50 to 1.00
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
4.25 to 1.00
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
4.00 to 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
At December 31, 2009, our total leverage ratio was 5.32.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity, measured as
the amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents we have on
hand and availability under the revolving credit facility, of
(i) $100.0 million for the period between
October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010,
(ii) $75.0 million during calendar year 2011 and
(iii) $50.0 million thereafter. As of
December 31, 2009, as calculated pursuant to our Credit
Agreement, our total liquidity was $305.8 million.
|
|
|
|
Revise the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio definition
and reduce the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio that we must
maintain to the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge
|
Period
|
|
Coverage Ratio
|
|
July 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1.00 to 1.00
|
|
January 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
1.05 to 1.00
|
|
April 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
1.10 to 1.00
|
|
July 1, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 to 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio for any test period
is defined as the sum of consolidated EBITDA for the test period
plus an amount that may be added for the purpose of calculating
the ratio for such test period, not to exceed
$130.0 million in total during the term of the credit
facility, to consolidated fixed charges for the test period, all
as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of December 31,
2009, our fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Require mandatory prepayments of debt outstanding under the
Credit Agreement with 100% of excess cash flow as defined in the
Credit Agreement for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009 and 50% of excess cash flow thereafter and with proceeds
from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsecured debt issuances, with the exception of refinancing,
through June 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
secured debt issuances;
|
|
|
|
sales of assets in excess of $25 million annually; and
|
|
|
|
unless we have achieved a specified leverage ratio, 50% of
proceeds from equity issuances, excluding those for permitted
acquisitions or to meet the minimum liquidity requirements.
|
The credit facility consists of a $482.9 million term loan
which matures on July 11, 2013 and a $175.0 million
revolving credit facility which matures on July 11, 2012.
The availability under the $175.0 million revolving credit
facility must be used for working capital, capital expenditures
and other general corporate purposes and cannot be used to
prepay our term loan. As of December 31, 2009, no amounts
were outstanding and $10.0 million in stand-by letters of
credit had been issued under the revolving credit facility,
therefore the remaining availability under this revolving credit
facility was $165.0 million. Other than the required
prepayments as outlined previously, the principal amount of the
term loan amortizes in equal quarterly installments of
approximately $1.2 million, with the balance due on
July 11, 2013. Interest payments on both the revolving and
term loan facility are due at least on a quarterly basis and in
certain instances, more frequently. In addition to our scheduled
payments, during the fourth quarter of 2009, we used the net
proceeds from the partial exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option and the 10.5% Senior Secured Notes
due 2017, which approximated $287.5 million, as well as
cash on hand to retire $379.6 million of the outstanding
balance on our term loan facility. In connection with the early
retirement, we recorded a pretax charge of $1.6 million,
$1.0 million, net of tax, related to the write off of
unamortized issuance costs. As of December 31, 2009,
$482.9 million was outstanding on the term loan facility
and the interest rate was 6.00%. The annualized effective
interest rate was 7.18% for the year ended December 31,
2009 after giving consideration to revolver fees and derivative
activity.
Other covenants contained in the Credit Agreement restrict,
among other things, asset dispositions, mergers and
acquisitions, dividends, stock repurchases and redemptions,
other restricted payments, debt issuances, liens, investments,
convertible notes repurchases and affiliate transactions. The
Credit Agreement also contains a provision under which an event
of default on any other indebtedness exceeding
$25.0 million would be considered an event of default under
our Credit Agreement.
56
In May 2008 and July 2007, we entered into derivative
instruments with the purpose of hedging future interest payments
on our term loan facility. We entered into a
floating-to-fixed
interest rate swap with varying notional amounts beginning with
$100.0 million with a settlement date of October 1,
2008 and ending with $75.0 million which was settled on
December 31, 2009. We received an interest rate of
three-month LIBOR and paid a fixed coupon of 2.980% over six
quarters. The terms and settlement dates of the swap matched
those of the term loan through July 27, 2009, the date of
the Credit Amendment. We also entered into a zero cost LIBOR
collar on $300.0 million of term loan principal with a
final settlement date of October 1, 2010 with a ceiling of
5.75% and a floor of 4.99%. The counterparty is obligated to pay
us in any quarter that actual LIBOR resets above 5.75% and we
pay the counterparty in any quarter that actual LIBOR resets
below 4.99%. The terms and settlement dates of the collar
matched those of the term loan through July 27, 2009, the
date of the Credit Amendment. As a result of the inclusion of a
LIBOR floor in the Credit Agreement, we do not believe, as of
July 27, 2009 and on an ongoing basis, that the interest
rate swap and collar will be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the hedged
interest rate risk during the period that the hedge was
designated. As such, we have prospectively discontinued cash
flow hedge accounting for the interest rate swap and collar as
of July 27, 2009 and no longer apply cash flow hedge
accounting to these instruments. Because cash flow hedge
accounting will not be applied to these instruments, changes in
fair value related to the interest rate swap and collar
subsequent to July 27, 2009 have been recorded in earnings
and will be on a go-forward basis. As a result of discontinuing
the cash flow hedging relationship, we recognized a decrease in
fair value of $1.7 million related to the hedge
ineffectiveness of our interest rate swap and collar as Interest
Expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009. We did not recognize a gain
or loss due to hedge ineffectiveness in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,
2008 or 2007 related to interest rate derivative instruments.
The change in the fair value of our hedging instruments resulted
in a decrease in derivative liabilities of $12.7 million
during the year ended December 31, 2009. We had net
unrealized gains on hedge transactions of $9.2 million, net
of tax of $4.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2009, and net unrealized losses on hedge transactions of
$6.8 million, net of tax of $3.7 million and
$8.9 million, net of tax of $4.8 million for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Overall,
our interest expense was increased by $18.3 million and
$7.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively and was decreased by $0.2 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007, as a result of our
interest rate derivative instruments.
On October 20, 2009, we completed an offering of
$300.0 million of senior secured notes at a coupon rate of
10.5% (10.5% Senior Secured Notes) with a
maturity in October 2017. The interest on the notes will be
payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October
15 of each year, commencing on April 15, 2010, to holders
of record at the close of business on April 1 or October 1.
Interest on the notes will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months. The notes were sold at 97.383% of their face amount to
yield 11.0% and were recorded at their discounted amount, with
the discount to be amortized over the life of the notes. We used
the net proceeds of approximately $284.4 million from the
offering to repay a portion of the indebtedness outstanding
under our term loan facility. As of December 31, 2009,
$300.0 million notional amount of the 10.5% Senior
Secured Notes was outstanding. The carrying amount of the
10.5% Senior Secured Notes was $292.3 million at
December 31, 2009.
The notes are guaranteed by all of our existing and future
restricted subsidiaries that incur or guarantee indebtedness
under a credit facility, including our existing credit facility.
The notes are secured by liens on all collateral that secures
our obligations under our secured credit facility, subject to
limited exceptions. The liens securing the notes share on an
equal and ratable first priority basis with liens securing our
credit facility. Under the intercreditor agreement, the
collateral agent for the lenders under our secured credit
facility are generally entitled to sole control of all decisions
and actions.
All the liens securing the notes may be released if our secured
indebtedness, other than these notes, does not exceed the lesser
of $375.0 million and 15.0% of our consolidated tangible
assets. We refer to such a release as a collateral
suspension. If a collateral suspension is in effect, the
notes and the guarantees will be unsecured, and will effectively
rank junior to our secured indebtedness. If, after any such
release of liens on collateral, the aggregate principal amount
of our secured indebtedness, other than these notes, exceeds the
57
greater of $375.0 million and 15.0% of our
consolidated tangible assets, as defined in the indenture, then
the collateral obligations of the company and guarantors will be
reinstated and must be complied with within 30 days of such
event.
The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that, among
other things, limit our ability and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions;
|
|
|
|
make other restricted payments or investments;
|
|
|
|
sell assets;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends and other payments
by restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with our affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our
assets.
|
The indenture governing the notes also contains a provision
under which an event of default by us or by any restricted
subsidiary on any other indebtedness exceeding
$25.0 million would be considered an event of default under
the indenture if such default is: a) caused by failure to
pay the principal at final maturity, or b) results in the
acceleration of such indebtedness prior to maturity.
Prior to October 15, 2012, we may redeem the notes with the
net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a redemption
price equal to 110.50% of the aggregate principal amount plus
accrued and unpaid interest; provided, that (i) after
giving effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the notes
originally issued would remain outstanding immediately after
such redemption and (ii) we make such redemption not more
than 90 days after the consummation of such equity
offering. In addition, prior to October 15, 2013, we may
redeem all or part of the notes at a price equal to 100% of the
aggregate principal amount of notes to be redeemed, plus the
applicable premium, as defined in the indenture, and accrued and
unpaid interest.
On or after October 15, 2013, we may redeem the notes, in
whole or part, at the redemption prices set forth below,
together with accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Optional Redemption Price
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
105.2500
|
%
|
2014
|
|
|
102.6250
|
%
|
2015
|
|
|
101.3125
|
%
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.0000
|
%
|
If we experience certain kinds of changes of control, we must
offer to repurchase the notes at an offer price in cash equal to
101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. Furthermore, following certain asset sales, we may be
required to use the proceeds to offer to repurchase the notes at
an offer price in cash equal to 100% of their principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest.
On June 3, 2008, we completed an offering of
$250.0 million convertible senior notes at a coupon rate of
3.375% (3.375% Convertible Senior Notes) with a
maturity in June 2038. As of December 31, 2009,
$95.9 million notional amount of the $250.0 million
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes was outstanding. The
carrying amount of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes was
$83.1 million at December 31, 2009.
The interest on the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes is
payable in cash semi-annually in arrears, on June 1 and December
1 of each year until June 1, 2013, after which the
principal will accrete at an annual yield to maturity of 3.375%
per year. We will also pay contingent interest during any
six-month interest period commencing June 1, 2013, for
which the trading price of these notes for a specified period of
time equals or exceeds 120% of their accreted principal amount.
The notes will be convertible under certain circumstances into
shares of our common stock (Common Stock) at an
initial conversion rate of 19.9695 shares of Common Stock
per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which is equal to an
initial conversion price of
58
approximately $50.08 per share. Upon conversion of a note, a
holder will receive, at our election, shares of Common Stock,
cash or a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock. At
December 31, 2009, the number of conversion shares
potentially issuable in relation to our 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes was 1.9 million. We may redeem the notes at
our option beginning June 6, 2013, and holders of the notes
will have the right to require us to repurchase the notes on
June 1, 2013 and certain dates thereafter or on the
occurrence of a fundamental change.
The indenture governing the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
contains a provision under which an event of default by us or by
any subsidiary on any other indebtedness exceeding
$25.0 million would be considered an event of default under
the indenture if such default: a) is caused by failure to
pay the principal at final maturity, or b) results in the
acceleration of such indebtedness prior to maturity.
During December 2008 and April 2009, we repurchased
$88.2 million and $20.0 million aggregate principal
amount of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes,
respectively, for a cost of $44.8 million and
$6.1 million, respectively. In addition, during December
2008 and April 2009 we recognized a gain of $28.4 million
and $10.7 million, respectively and expensed
$2.1 million and $0.4 million of unamortized issuance
costs, respectively, in connection with the retirement. In June
2009, we retired $45.8 million aggregate principal amount
of its 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes in exchange for the
issuance of 7,755,440 shares of Common Stock valued at
$4.38 per share and payment of accrued interest, resulting in a
gain of $4.4 million. In addition, we expensed
$1.0 million of unamortized issuance costs in connection
with the retirement. The settlement consideration was allocated
to the extinguishment of the liability component in an amount
equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to
extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and
the net carrying amount of the liability component and
unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a gain or loss on
debt extinguishment. If there would have been any remaining
settlement consideration, it would have been allocated to the
reacquisition of the equity component and recognized as a
reduction of Stockholders Equity.
The Company also had a foreign overdraft facility, which was
designed to manage local currency liquidity in Venezuela. This
facility was terminated in March 2009 and all outstanding
amounts were repaid.
The fair value of our 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes,
10.5% Senior Secured Notes and term loan facility is
estimated based on quoted prices in active markets. The fair
value of our 7.375% Senior Notes is estimated based on
discounted cash flows using inputs from quoted prices in active
markets for similar debt instruments. We believe the carrying
value of our short-term debt instruments outstanding at
December 31, 2008 approximate fair value. The following
table provides the carrying value and fair value of our
long-term debt instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility, due July 2013
|
|
$
|
482.9
|
|
|
$
|
468.4
|
|
|
$
|
886.5
|
|
|
$
|
571.8
|
|
10.5% Senior Secured Notes, due October 2017
|
|
|
292.3
|
|
|
|
315.8
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
7.375% Senior Notes, due April 2018
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
In May 2009, we completed the annual renewal of all of our key
insurance policies. Our primary marine package provides for hull
and machinery coverage for our rigs and liftboats up to a
scheduled value for each asset. The maximum coverage for these
assets is $2.2 billion; however, coverage for
U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm damage is subject to an
annual aggregate limit on liability of $100.0 million. The
policies are subject to exclusions, limitations, deductibles,
self-insured retention and other conditions. Deductibles for
events that are not U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm
events are 12.5% of insured values per occurrence for drilling
rigs, and $1.0 million per occurrence for liftboats,
regardless of the insured value of the particular vessel. The
deductibles for drilling rigs and liftboats in a U.S. Gulf
of Mexico named windstorm event are the greater of
$25.0 million or the operational deductible for each
U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm. We are self-insured
for 15% above the deductibles for removal of wreck, sue and
labor, collision, protection and
59
indemnity general liability and hull and physical damage
policies. The protection and indemnity coverage under the
primary marine package has a $5.0 million limit per
occurrence with excess liability coverage up to
$200.0 million. The primary marine package also provides
coverage for cargo and charterers legal liability. Vessel
pollution is covered under a Water Quality Insurance Syndicate
policy with a $3 million deductible proving limits as
required. In addition to the marine package, we have separate
policies providing coverage for onshore general liability,
employers liability, auto liability and non-owned aircraft
liability, with customary deductibles and coverage as well as a
separate primary marine package for our Delta Towing business.
In 2009, in connection with the renewal of certain of our
insurance policies, we entered into agreements to finance a
portion of our annual insurance premiums. Approximately
$23.3 million was financed through these arrangements, and
$5.5 million was outstanding at December 31, 2009. The
interest rate on the $21.4 million note is 4.15% and it is
scheduled to mature in March 2010. The interest rate on the
$1.9 million note is 3.75% and it is scheduled to mature in
July 2010. The amounts financed in connection with the prior
year renewal were fully paid as of March 31, 2009.
Common
Stock Offering
In September 2009, we raised approximately $82.3 million in
net proceeds from an underwritten public offering of
17,500,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, on
October 9, 2009, we sold an additional
1,313,590 shares of our common stock pursuant to the
partial exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option
and raised an additional $6.3 million in net proceeds. We
used a portion of the net proceeds from these sales of common
stock to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under
our term loan facility, and may use some or all of the remaining
proceeds to repay additional indebtedness.
Capital
Expenditures
We expect to spend approximately $60 million on capital
expenditures and drydocking during 2010. Planned capital
expenditures include refurbishment or upgrades to certain of our
rigs, liftboats, and other marine vessels. The timing and
amounts we actually spend in connection with our plans to
upgrade and refurbish other selected rigs and liftboats are
subject to our discretion and will depend on our view of market
conditions and our cash flows. Furthermore, should we elect to
reactivate cold stacked rigs, our capital expenditures may
increase.
Costs associated with refurbishment or upgrade activities which
substantially extend the useful life or operating capabilities
of the asset are capitalized. Refurbishment entails replacing or
rebuilding the operating equipment. An upgrade entails
increasing the operating capabilities of a rig or liftboat. This
can be accomplished by a number of means, including adding new
or higher specification equipment to the unit, increasing the
water depth capabilities or increasing the capacity of the
living quarters, or a combination of each.
We are required to inspect and drydock our liftboats on a
periodic basis to meet U.S. Coast Guard requirements. The
amount of expenditures is impacted by a number of factors,
including, among others, our ongoing maintenance expenditures,
adverse weather, changes in regulatory requirements and
operating conditions. In addition, from time to time we agree to
perform modifications to our rigs and liftboats as part of a
contract with a customer. When market conditions allow, we
attempt to recover these costs as part of the contract cash flow.
From time to time, we may review possible acquisitions of rigs,
liftboats or businesses, joint ventures, mergers or other
business combinations, and we may have outstanding from time to
time bids to acquire certain assets from other companies. We may
not, however, be successful in our acquisition efforts. We are
generally restricted by our Credit Agreement from making
acquisitions for cash consideration, except to the extent the
acquisition is funded by an issuance of our stock or cash
proceeds from the issuance of stock, or unless we are in
compliance with our financial covenants as they existed prior to
the Credit Amendment. If we acquire additional assets, we would
expect that the ongoing capital expenditures for our company as
a whole would increase in order to maintain our equipment in a
competitive condition.
60
Our ability to fund capital expenditures would be adversely
affected if conditions deteriorate in our business.
Contractual
Obligations
Our contractual obligations and commitments principally include
obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness,
certain income tax liabilities, surety bonds, letters of credit,
future minimum operating lease obligations, purchase commitments
and management compensation obligations.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and
contingent commitments by period as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations and
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Commitments
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Recorded Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
4,952
|
|
|
$
|
9,904
|
|
|
$
|
563,919
|
|
|
$
|
303,508
|
|
|
$
|
882,283
|
|
Insurance notes payable
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
Interest on debt and notes payable(c)
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
Tax liabilities(b)
|
|
|
18,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,554
|
|
Purchase obligations(a)
|
|
|
3,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,574
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
Unrecorded Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on debt and notes payable(c)
|
|
|
59,739
|
|
|
|
138,160
|
|
|
|
83,918
|
|
|
|
95,406
|
|
|
|
377,223
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
9,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,060
|
|
Surety bonds
|
|
|
37,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,469
|
|
Management compensation obligations
|
|
|
3,293
|
|
|
|
6,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
Purchase obligations(a)
|
|
|
4,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,546
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
5,578
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
21,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
163,980
|
|
|
$
|
169,869
|
|
|
$
|
652,072
|
|
|
$
|
405,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,391,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A purchase obligation is defined as an agreement to
purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally
binding on the company and that specifies all significant terms,
including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed,
minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing
of the transaction. These amounts are primarily comprised of
open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors. |
|
(b) |
|
Tax liabilities of $9.3 million have been excluded from the
table above as a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of
cash settlement cannot be made. |
|
(c) |
|
Estimated Interest on our Term Loan Facility and Interest Rate
Collar is based on 3 month LIBOR reset quarterly and
extrapolated from the forward curve dated as of the balance
sheet date. There was $482.9 million outstanding under our
Term Loan Facility as of December 31, 2009 and the interest
estimates above assume the reduction in principal related to
scheduled principal payments. The remaining interest estimates
are based on the rates associated with the respective fixed rate
instrument. |
61
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Guarantees
Our obligations under the credit facility and 10.5% Senior
Secured Notes are secured by liens on a majority of our vessels
and substantially all of our other personal property.
Substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries, and several of
our international subsidiaries, guarantee the obligations under
the credit facility and 10.5% Senior Secured Notes and have
granted similar liens on several of their vessels and
substantially all of their other personal property.
Letters
of Credit and Surety Bonds
We execute letters of credit and surety bonds in the normal
course of business. While these obligations are not normally
called, these obligations could be called by the beneficiaries
at any time before the expiration date should we breach certain
contractual or payment obligations. As of December 31,
2009, we had $48.5 million of letters of credit and surety
bonds outstanding, consisting of $1.0 million in unsecured
outstanding letters of credit, $10.0 million letters of
credit outstanding under our revolver and $37.5 million
outstanding in surety bonds that guarantee our performance as it
relates to our drilling contracts, insurance, tax and other
obligations primarily in Mexico. If the beneficiaries called
these letters of credit and surety bonds, the called amount
would become an on-balance sheet liability, and we would be
required to settle the liability with cash on hand or through
borrowings under our available line of credit. We have
restricted cash of $3.7 million to support surety bonds
primarily related to the Companys Mexico operations.
Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162 (SFAS No. 168).
SFAS No. 168 modifies the Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) hierarchy by
establishing only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and
nonauthoritative accounting literature. Effective July 2009, the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), also
known collectively as the Codification is considered
the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and
reporting standards, except for additional authoritative rules
and interpretive releases issued by the SEC. Nonauthoritative
guidance and literature would include, among other things, FASB
Concepts Statements, American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Issue Papers and Technical Practice Aids and
accounting textbooks. The Codification was developed to organize
GAAP pronouncements by topic so that users can more easily
access authoritative accounting guidance. It is organized by
topic, subtopic, section, and paragraph, each of which is
identified by a numerical designation. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. Accordingly,
accounting references have been updated.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2009-05,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU
No. 2009-5),
which amends Subtopic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall for the
fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU
No. 2009-5
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted
price in an active market for the identical liability is not
available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value
using one or more of the following techniques: (1) a
valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical
liability or similar liabilities when traded as assets; or
(2) another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of Topic 820, such as a present value technique or
market approach. ASU
No. 2009-5
is effective for the first reporting period after issuance.
Accordingly, we adopted ASU
No. 2009-5
in the third quarter 2009 with no impact to our financial
statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165),
which was primarily codified into Topic 855, Subsequent
Events in the ASC. SFAS No. 165 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events
that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued.
SFAS No. 165 requires disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This statement is effective for
62
interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15,
2009. Accordingly, we adopted SFAS No. 165 in June
2009 with no impact to our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP 107-1),
which was primarily codified into Topic 825, Financial
Instruments in the ASC. This FSP extends the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to interim financial
statements of publicly traded companies as defined in APB
Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial reporting. This
statement is effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. Accordingly, we adopted
FSP 107-1
in June 2009 with no impact to our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset and Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP 157-4)
which was primarily codified into Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures in the ASC. This FSP provides
additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and
level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have
significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity
for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides additional
guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction
is not orderly. This statement is effective for interim or
annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009.
Accordingly, we adopted
FSP 157-4
in June 2009 with no impact to our financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161), which was
primarily codified into Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging
in the ASC. SFAS No. 161 amends
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities requiring enhanced disclosures about
an entitys derivative and hedging activities, thereby
improving the transparency of financial reporting.
SFAS No. 161s disclosures provide additional
information on how and why derivative instruments are being
used. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
Accordingly, we adopted SFAS No. 161 as of
January 1, 2009 with no impact to our financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, included
in this annual report that address outlook, activities, events
or developments that we expect, project, believe or anticipate
will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements.
These include such matters as:
|
|
|
|
|
our levels of indebtedness, covenant compliance and access to
capital under current market conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into new contracts for our rigs and
liftboats and future utilization rates and dayrates for the
units;
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew or extend our long-term international
contracts, or enter into new contracts, when such contracts
expire;
|
|
|
|
demand for our rigs and our liftboats and our earnings;
|
|
|
|
activity levels of our customers and their expectations of
future energy prices;
|
|
|
|
sufficiency and availability of funds for required capital
expenditures, working capital and debt service;
|
|
|
|
levels of reserves for accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
success of our cost cutting measures and plans to dispose of
certain assets;
|
|
|
|
expected completion times for our refurbishment and upgrade
projects;
|
|
|
|
our plans to increase international operations;
|
|
|
|
expected useful lives of our rigs and liftboats;
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
future capital expenditures and refurbishment, reactivation,
transportation, repair and upgrade costs;
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively reactivate rigs that we have recently
stacked;
|
|
|
|
liabilities and restrictions under coastwise laws of the United
States and regulations protecting the environment;
|
|
|
|
expected outcomes of litigation, claims and disputes and their
expected effects on our financial condition and results of
operations; and
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding offshore drilling activity and dayrates,
market conditions, demand for our rigs and liftboats, operating
revenues, operating and maintenance expense, insurance coverage,
insurance expense and deductibles, interest expense, debt levels
and other matters with regard to outlook.
|
We have based these statements on our assumptions and analyses
in light of our experience and perception of historical trends,
current conditions, expected future developments and other
factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances.
Forward-looking statements by their nature involve substantial
risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected
results, and actual future results could differ materially from
those described in such statements. Although it is not possible
to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and
uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause actual future
results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties
described under Risk Factors in Item 1A of this
annual report and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
oil and natural gas prices and industry expectations about
future prices;
|
|
|
|
levels of oil and gas exploration and production spending;
|
|
|
|
demand and supply for offshore drilling rigs and liftboats;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into and the terms of future contracts;
|
|
|
|
the worldwide military and political environment, uncertainty or
instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak
of armed hostilities or other crises in the Middle East, West
Africa and other oil and natural gas producing regions or acts
of terrorism or piracy;
|
|
|
|
the impact of governmental laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy and costs of sources of credit and liquidity;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties relating to the level of activity in offshore oil
and natural gas exploration, development and production;
|
|
|
|
competition and market conditions in the contract drilling and
liftboat industries;
|
|
|
|
the availability of skilled personnel in view of recent
reductions in our personnel;
|
|
|
|
labor relations and work stoppages, particularly in the West
African and Mexican labor environments;
|
|
|
|
operating hazards such as hurricanes, severe weather and seas,
fires, cratering, blowouts, war, terrorism and cancellation or
unavailability of insurance coverage or insufficient coverage;
|
|
|
|
the effect of litigation and contingencies; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to achieve our plans or carry out our strategy.
|
Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or
predict. Any of these factors, or a combination of these
factors, could materially affect our future financial condition
or results of operations and the ultimate accuracy of the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of our future performance, and our actual results
and future developments may differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. Management cautions
against putting undue reliance on forward-looking statements or
projecting any future results based on such statements or
present or prior earnings levels. In addition, each
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the
particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements except as
required by applicable law.
64
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are currently exposed to market risk from changes in interest
rates. From time to time, we may enter into derivative financial
instrument transactions to manage or reduce our market risk, but
we do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative
purposes. A discussion of our market risk exposure in financial
instruments follows.
Interest
Rate Exposure
We are subject to interest rate risk on our fixed-interest and
variable-interest rate borrowings. Variable rate debt, where the
interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes us to short-term
changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt, where the
interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes
us to changes in market interest rates reflected in the fair
value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance
maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate.
As of December 31, 2009, the long-term borrowings that were
outstanding subject to fixed interest rate risk consisted of the
7.375% Senior Notes due April 2018, the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038 and the
10.5% Senior Secured Notes due October 2017 with a carrying
amount of $3.5 million, $83.1 million, and
$292.3 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009 the interest rate for the
$482.9 million outstanding under the term loan was 6.00%.
If the interest rate averages 1% more for 2010 than the rates as
of December 31, 2009, annual interest expense would
increase by approximately $4.8 million. This sensitivity
analysis assumes there are no changes in our financial structure
and excludes the impact of our derivatives.
The fair value of our 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes,
10.5% Senior Secured Notes and term loan facility is
estimated based on quoted prices in active markets. The fair
value of our 7.375% Senior Notes is estimated based on
discounted cash flows using inputs from quoted prices in active
markets for similar debt instruments. We believe the carrying
value of our short-term debt instruments outstanding at
December 31, 2008 approximate fair value. The following
table provides the carrying value and fair value of our
long-term debt instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility, due July 2013
|
|
$
|
482.9
|
|
|
$
|
468.4
|
|
|
$
|
886.5
|
|
|
$
|
571.8
|
|
10.5% Senior Secured Notes due October 2017
|
|
|
292.3
|
|
|
|
315.8
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
7.375% Senior Notes, due April 2018
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Interest
Rate Swaps and Derivatives
We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired
position of fixed and floating rates and may employ hedge
transactions such as interest rate swaps and zero cost LIBOR
collars as tools to achieve that goal. The major risks from
interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates
affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential
increases in interest expense due to market decreases in
floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the
counterparties in such transactions. The counterparty to our
zero cost LIBOR collar is a creditworthy multinational
commercial bank. We believe that the risk of counterparty
nonperformance is not currently material, but counterparty risk
has recently increased throughout the financial system. Our
interest expense was increased by $18.3 million in 2009 as
a result of our interest rate derivative transactions. (See the
information set forth under the caption Debt in
Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
-Liquidity and Capital Resources.)
In connection with the credit facility, in July 2007 we entered
into a floating to fixed interest rate swap with the purpose of
fixing the interest rate on decreasing notional amounts
beginning with $400.0 million with a settlement date of
December 31, 2007 and ending with $50.0 million which
was settled on April 1, 2009.
65
We also entered into a zero cost LIBOR collar on
$300.0 million of term loan principal with a final
settlement date of October 1, 2010, with a ceiling of 5.75%
and a floor of 4.99%.
In addition, as it relates to our term loan, in May 2008 we
entered into a floating to fixed interest rate swap with the
purpose of fixing the interest rate on varying notional amounts
beginning with $100.0 million with a settlement date of
October 1, 2008 and ending with $75.0 million which
was settled as of December 31, 2009, per the agreement.
As a result of the inclusion of a LIBOR floor in the Credit
Agreement, we do not believe, as of July 27, 2009 and on an
ongoing basis, that the interest rate swap and collar will be
highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in cash flows
attributable to the hedged interest rate risk during the period
that the hedge was designated. As such, we prospectively
discontinued cash flow hedge accounting for the interest rate
swap and collar as of July 27, 2009. Because cash flow
hedge accounting is not applied to these instruments for periods
after July 27, 2009, changes in fair value related to the
interest rate swap and collar subsequent to July 27, 2009
are recorded in earnings. We recognized a decrease in fair value
of $1.7 million related to the hedge ineffectiveness of our
interest rate swap and collar as Interest Expense in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
66
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Hercules Offshore, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, comprehensive income
(loss) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, on January 1, 2009, the Company adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff
Position No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (codified in FASB ASC Topic 470,
Debt) and, as required, the consolidated financial
statements have been adjusted for retrospective application. As
discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (codified in FASB ASC Topic 740, Income
Taxes).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Hercules Offshore, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated March 1, 2010, expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Houston, Texas
March 1, 2010
67
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Hercules Offshore, Inc.:
We have audited Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Hercules Offshore, Inc. and
subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Hercules Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on
the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 of Hercules Offshore, Inc. and
subsidiaries, and our report dated March 1, 2010, expressed
an unqualified opinion thereon.
Houston, Texas
March 1, 2010
68
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
140,828
|
|
|
$
|
106,455
|
|
Restricted Cash
|
|
|
3,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts of
$38,522 and $7,756 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
133,662
|
|
|
|
293,089
|
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
13,706
|
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
22,885
|
|
|
|
17,379
|
|
Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,623
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
19,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,414
|
|
|
|
499,525
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
1,923,603
|
|
|
|
2,049,030
|
|
Other Assets, Net
|
|
|
32,459
|
|
|
|
42,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,277,476
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt and Current Portion of Long-term Debt
|
|
$
|
4,952
|
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
Insurance Notes Payable
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
11,126
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
51,868
|
|
|
|
99,823
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
67,773
|
|
|
|
83,424
|
|
Interest Payable
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
Taxes Payable
|
|
|
5,671
|
|
|
|
32,440
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
34,229
|
|
|
|
35,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,601
|
|
|
|
274,740
|
|
Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion
|
|
|
856,755
|
|
|
|
1,015,764
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
19,809
|
|
|
|
35,529
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
245,799
|
|
|
|
339,547
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value;
200,000 Shares Authorized; 116,154 and
89,459 Shares Issued, Respectively; 114,650 and
87,976 Shares Outstanding, Respectively
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
1,921,037
|
|
|
|
1,785,462
|
|
Treasury Stock, at Cost, 1,504 Shares and
1,483 Shares, Respectively
|
|
|
(50,151
|
)
|
|
|
(50,081
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(5,773
|
)
|
|
|
(14,932
|
)
|
Retained Deficit
|
|
|
(887,763
|
)
|
|
|
(796,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978,512
|
|
|
|
925,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,277,476
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
69
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
742,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
514,136
|
|
|
|
631,711
|
|
|
|
346,191
|
|
Impairment of Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
201,421
|
|
|
|
192,894
|
|
|
|
104,634
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
|
92,558
|
|
|
|
81,160
|
|
|
|
49,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
834,997
|
|
|
|
2,232,720
|
|
|
|
500,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(92,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(77,986
|
)
|
|
|
(63,778
|
)
|
|
|
(34,859
|
)
|
Expense of Credit Agreement Fees
|
|
|
(15,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
|
|
|
12,157
|
|
|
|
26,345
|
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
Other, Net
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
6,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(169,081
|
)
|
|
|
(1,155,031
|
)
|
|
|
195,084
|
|
Income Tax Benefit (Provision)
|
|
|
78,932
|
|
|
|
73,161
|
|
|
|
(59,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(90,149
|
)
|
|
|
(1,081,870
|
)
|
|
|
136,012
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Taxes
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(91,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,083,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
97,114
|
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
58,897
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
97,114
|
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
59,563
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
70
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
89,459
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
|
88,876
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
|
32,008
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
|
|
|
26,569
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,618
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
116,154
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
89,459
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
88,876
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,785,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,157
|
|
Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471,379
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Expense Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
Adjustment due to Convertible Debt Accounting Change (See
Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Capitalized as part of the Purchase Price Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit From Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,836
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,921,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,785,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(50,081
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(1,464
|
)
|
|
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
(1,504
|
)
|
|
|
(50,151
|
)
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(50,081
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Hedge Transactions, Net of
Tax of $(4,932), $3,669 and $4,778, Respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period, Net of Tax of $3,108, $8,040 and
$4,371, Respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(796,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,839
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,083,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(887,763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(796,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
114,650
|
|
|
$
|
978,512
|
|
|
|
87,976
|
|
|
$
|
925,315
|
|
|
|
88,857
|
|
|
$
|
2,011,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
71
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(91,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,083,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of (Gains) Losses, Net included in Net Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
10,813
|
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
Other Comprehensive Losses, Net
|
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|
|
(11,849
|
)
|
|
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(82,575
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,090,205
|
)
|
|
$
|
127,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
72
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(91,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,083,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,522
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
201,421
|
|
|
|
192,918
|
|
|
|
109,064
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
|
12,535
|
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
(89,295
|
)
|
|
|
(118,685
|
)
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
32,912
|
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Original Issue Discount
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Deferred Financing Fees
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
Non-Cash Loss on Derivatives
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Insurance Settlement
|
|
|
(8,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Disposal of Assets
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
(3,029
|
)
|
|
|
(4,491
|
)
|
Expense of Credit Agreement Fees
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) Loss on Early Retirement of Debt, Net
|
|
|
(12,157
|
)
|
|
|
(26,345
|
)
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
Impairment of Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
26,882
|
|
|
|
376,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
(4,571
|
)
|
|
|
(5,860
|
)
|
|
|
(3,836
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in Operating Assets -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
126,515
|
|
|
|
(78,510
|
)
|
|
|
58,827
|
|
Insurance Claims Receivable
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(13,565
|
)
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other
|
|
|
39,889
|
|
|
|
53,635
|
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Operating Liabilities -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(37,256
|
)
|
|
|
(5,482
|
)
|
|
|
(6,794
|
)
|
Insurance Notes Payable
|
|
|
(28,966
|
)
|
|
|
(45,173
|
)
|
|
|
(25,301
|
)
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(35,281
|
)
|
|
|
17,125
|
|
|
|
15,239
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
(116,003
|
)
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(11,841
|
)
|
|
|
23,599
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
138,919
|
|
|
|
269,948
|
|
|
|
175,741
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Business, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(728,396
|
)
|
Acquisition of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Additions of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(76,141
|
)
|
|
|
(264,245
|
)
|
|
|
(155,390
|
)
|
Deferred Drydocking Expenditures
|
|
|
(15,646
|
)
|
|
|
(17,269
|
)
|
|
|
(20,772
|
)
|
Investment in Marketable Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,675
|
)
|
Proceeds from Sale of Marketable Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,300
|
|
|
|
112,375
|
|
Insurance Proceeds Received
|
|
|
9,168
|
|
|
|
30,221
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
Proceeds from Sale of Assets, Net
|
|
|
25,767
|
|
|
|
17,045
|
|
|
|
109,745
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in Restricted Cash
|
|
|
(3,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(60,510
|
)
|
|
|
(515,787
|
)
|
|
|
(825,007
|
)
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt Borrowings (Repayments), Net
|
|
|
(2,455
|
)
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
Long-term Debt Borrowings
|
|
|
292,149
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
Long-term Debt Repayments
|
|
|
(403,648
|
)
|
|
|
(121,427
|
)
|
|
|
(97,750
|
)
|
Redemption of 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
(6,099
|
)
|
|
|
(44,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Issuance (Repurchase)
|
|
|
89,600
|
|
|
|
(49,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,127
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Arrangements
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
3,836
|
|
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
|
(18,143
|
)
|
|
|
(8,097
|
)
|
|
|
(17,753
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
(44,036
|
)
|
|
|
139,842
|
|
|
|
788,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
34,373
|
|
|
|
(105,997
|
)
|
|
|
139,680
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
106,455
|
|
|
|
212,452
|
|
|
|
72,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$
|
140,828
|
|
|
$
|
106,455
|
|
|
$
|
212,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
73
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Nature of
Business and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
Hercules Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
majority owned subsidiaries (the Company) provides
shallow-water drilling and marine services to the oil and
natural gas exploration and production industry globally through
its Domestic Offshore, International Offshore, Inland, Domestic
Liftboats, International Liftboats and Delta Towing segments
(See Note 17). At December 31, 2009, the Company owned
a fleet of 30 jackup rigs, 17 barge rigs, three submersible
rigs, one platform rig, a fleet of marine support vessels
operated through Delta Towing, a wholly owned subsidiary, and 60
liftboat vessels and operated an additional five liftboat
vessels owned by a third party. In addition, the Company owns
four retired jackup rigs and eight retired inland barges, all
located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which are currently not
expected to re-enter active service. In February 2010, the
Company entered into an agreement to sell six of its retired
barges for $3.0 million (See Notes 5, 17 and 21). The
Company has operations in nine countries on three continents.
The Companys diverse fleet is capable of providing
services such as oil and gas exploration and development
drilling, well service, platform inspection maintenance and
decommissioning operations.
On July 11, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of
TODCO (See Note 4), a provider of contract oil and gas
drilling services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and
international locations. TODCO owned and operated 24 jackup
rigs, 27 barge rigs, three submersible rigs, nine land rigs, one
platform rig and a fleet of marine support vessels. During the
fourth quarter of 2007, the Company sold the nine land rigs and
related assets (See Note 5 and 6). In February 2008, the
Company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase three
jackup drilling rigs and related equipment for
$320.0 million. The Company completed the purchase of the
Hercules 350 and the Hercules 261 and related
equipment during March 2008, while the purchase of the
Hercules 262 and related equipment was completed in May
2008 (See Note 4).
In December 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with
First Energy Bank B.S.C. (MENAdrill) whereby it
would market, manage and operate two Friede & Goldman
Super M2 design new-build jackup drilling rigs each with a
maximum water depth of 300 feet. The rigs are currently
under construction and are scheduled to be delivered in the
fourth quarter of 2010. The Company is actively marketing the
rigs on an exclusive and worldwide basis.
In January 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with SKDP
1 Ltd., an affiliate of Skeie Drilling & Production
ASA, to market, manage and operate an ultra high specification
KFESL Class N new-build jackup drilling rig with a maximum
water depth of 400 feet. The rig is currently under
construction and is scheduled to be delivered in either the
third or fourth quarter of 2010, depending upon the exercise of
certain options available to the owner. The agreement is limited
to a specified opportunity in the Middle East.
The Company had previously entered into similar agreements with
Mosvold Middle East Jackup I Ltd. and Mosvold Middle East
Jackup II Ltd. to market, manage and operate two
Friede & Goldman Super M2 design new-build jackup
rigs. The Company later terminated these agreements by mutual
agreement due to uncertainties in the timing of the delivery of
the rigs and disputes between the owner and the builder of the
rigs.
Adjustment
for Retrospective Application of FSP APB
14-1,
Primarily Codified into Financial Accounting Standards
Boards (FASB) Codification Topic
470-20,
Debt Debt with Conversion and Other
Options
The Company has adjusted the financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2008 to reflect its adoption of
the FASB Codification Topic
470-20,
Debt Debt with Conversion and Other Options,
which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments
that may be settled in cash (including partial cash settlement)
upon conversion. It requires issuers to account separately for
the liability and equity components of certain convertible debt
instruments in a manner that reflects the issuers
nonconvertible debt (unsecured debt) borrowing rate when
interest cost is recognized. It also requires bifurcation of a
component
74
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the debt, classification of that component in equity and the
accretion of the resulting discount on the debt to be recognized
as part of interest expense in the Companys consolidated
statement of operations. The standard became effective as of
January 1, 2009 and it required retrospective application
to the terms of instruments as they existed for all periods
presented. This adoption affects the accounting for the
Companys 3.375 percent Convertible Senior Notes due
2038 issued in 2008 (3.375% Convertible Senior
Notes). The retrospective application of FASB Codification
Topic
470-20,
Debt Debt with Conversion and Other Options
only affects 2008 as no other convertible notes were issued
prior to 2008.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
account balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Common
Stock Offering
In September 2009, the Company raised approximately
$82.3 million in net proceeds from an underwritten public
offering of 17,500,000 shares of its common stock. In
addition, on October 9, 2009, the Company sold an
additional 1,313,590 shares of its common stock pursuant to
the partial exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and raised an additional $6.3 million in net
proceeds. In October 2009, the Company used 50% of the net
proceeds from these sales of common stock to repay a portion of
its outstanding indebtedness under its term loan facility, and
may use some or all of the remaining proceeds to repay
additional indebtedness.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior year
financial information to the current period presentation
including reclassifying the assets associated with the
Hercules 100 and Hercules 110 as Assets Held for
Sale which were subsequently sold in August 2009 (See
Notes 2, 5 and 17).
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits
with banks and all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less.
Restricted
Cash
The Company has restricted cash of $3.7 million as of
December 31, 2009 to support surety bonds primarily related
to the Companys Mexico operations. As of December 31,
2008, the Company had no restricted cash balances outstanding.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues generated from our contracts are recognized as services
are performed, as long as collectability is reasonably assured.
For certain contracts, the Company may receive lump-sum fees for
the mobilization of equipment and personnel. Mobilization fees
received and costs incurred to mobilize a rig from one market to
75
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
another under contracts longer than one month are recognized as
services are performed over the term of the related drilling
contract. Amounts related to mobilization fees are summarized
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Mobilization revenue deferred
|
|
$
|
12,180
|
|
|
$
|
33,727
|
|
|
$
|
6,517
|
|
Mobilization expense deferred
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
Mobilization revenue recognized
|
|
|
16,491
|
|
|
|
11,860
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
Mobilization expense recognized(a)
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes a $2.6 million write-off of deferred mobilization
costs in 2009 due to an impairment related to one international
contract. |
For certain contracts, the Company may receive fees from its
customers for capital improvements to its rigs. Such fees are
deferred and recognized as services are performed over the term
of the related contract. The Company capitalizes such capital
improvements and depreciates them over the useful life of the
asset.
The balances related to the Companys Deferred Mobilization
and Contract Preparation Costs and Deferred Mobilization Revenue
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Mobilization and Contract Preparation Costs-Current
Portion
|
|
Other
|
|
$
|
1,092
|
|
|
$
|
5,387
|
|
Deferred Mobilization and Contract Preparation Costs-Non-Current
Portion
|
|
Other Assets, Net
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Mobilization Revenue-Current Portion
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
19,406
|
|
|
|
16,811
|
|
Deferred Mobilization Revenue-Non-Current Portion
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
12,628
|
|
|
|
24,198
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company recognizes compensation cost for all share-based
payments awarded in accordance with FASB Codification Topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation and in
accordance with such records the grant date fair value of
share-based payments awarded as compensation expense using a
straight-line method over the service period. The fair value of
the Companys restricted stock grants is based on the
closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The
Companys estimate of compensation expense requires a
number of complex and subjective assumptions and changes to
those assumptions could result in different valuations for
individual share awards. The Company estimates the fair value of
the options granted using the Trinomial Lattice option pricing
model using the following assumptions: expected dividend yield,
expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and
employee exercise patterns (expected life of the options). The
Company also estimates future forfeitures and related tax
effects.
The Company estimates the cost relating to stock options granted
through December 31, 2009 will be $3.5 million over
the remaining vesting period of 1.8 years and the cost
relating to restricted shares granted through December 31,
2009 will be $4.4 million over the remaining vesting period
of 0.8 years; however, due to the uncertainty of the level
of share-based payments to be granted in the future, these
amounts are estimates and subject to change.
76
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are stated at the historical carrying amount
net of write-offs and allowance for doubtful accounts.
Management of the Company monitors the accounts receivable from
its customers for any collectability issues. An allowance for
doubtful accounts is established based on reviews of individual
customer accounts, recent loss experience, current economic
conditions, and other pertinent factors. Accounts deemed
uncollectable are charged to the allowance. The Company had an
allowance of $38.5 million and $7.8 million at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During 2009, the
Company increased its allowance for doubtful accounts by a net
$30.8 million, of which $26.8 million related to a
customer in its International Offshore segment (See
Note 14).
Insurance
Claims Receivable
Insurance claims receivable include amounts the Company incurred
related to insurance claims the Company filed under its
insurance policies. The Company did not have any outstanding
insurance claims receivable at December 31, 2009. At
December 31, 2008, $0.8 million was outstanding for
insurance claims receivable. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company received $30.2 million
in proceeds related primarily to the settlement of claims for
damage incurred during Hurricanes Rita and Katrina as well as
damage to Hercules 205 in a collision. In addition,
during the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company
adjusted its insurance claims receivables by $13.2 million
in its final purchase price allocation and recorded additional
claims of $0.9 million.
Prepaid
Expenses
Prepaid expenses consist of prepaid insurance, prepaid income
tax and other prepayments. At December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, prepaid insurance totaled
$11.7 million and $14.3 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2008, prepaid taxes totaled $6.4 million.
There were no prepaid taxes at December 31, 2009.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation. Expenditures for property and equipment and items
that substantially increase the useful lives of existing assets
are capitalized at cost and depreciated. Expenditures for
drydocking the Companys liftboats are capitalized at cost
in Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
amortized on the straight-line method over a period of
12 months. Routine expenditures for repairs and maintenance
are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method, after
allowing for salvage value where applicable, over the useful
lives of the assets. Depreciation of leasehold improvements is
computed utilizing the straight-line method over the lease term
or life of the asset, whichever is shorter.
The useful lives of property and equipment for the purposes of
computing depreciation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Drilling rigs and marine equipment (salvage value of 10)%
|
|
|
15
|
|
Drilling machinery and equipment
|
|
|
312
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
37
|
|
Automobiles and trucks
|
|
|
3
|
|
The carrying value of long-lived assets, principally property
and equipment and excluding goodwill, is reviewed for potential
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable or
when reclassifications are made between property and equipment
and assets held for sale. Factors that might indicate a
potential impairment may include, but are not limited to,
77
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived
asset, a significant change in the long-lived assets
physical condition, a change in industry conditions or a
substantial reduction in cash flows associated with the use of
the long-lived asset. For property and equipment held for use,
the determination of recoverability is made based upon the
estimated undiscounted future net cash flows of the related
asset or group of assets being evaluated. Actual impairment
charges are recorded using an estimate of discounted future cash
flows. This evaluation requires the Company to make judgments
regarding long-term forecasts of future revenues and costs. In
turn these forecasts are uncertain in that they require
assumptions about demand for the Companys services, future
market conditions and technological developments. Significant
and unanticipated changes to these assumptions could require a
provision for impairment in a future period. Given the nature of
these evaluations and their application to specific asset groups
and specific times, it is not possible to reasonably quantify
the impact of changes in these assumptions.
Supply and demand are the key drivers of rig and vessel
utilization and the Companys ability to contract its rigs
and vessels at economical rates. During periods of an
oversupply, it is not uncommon for the Company to have rigs or
vessels idled for extended periods of time, which could indicate
that an asset group may be impaired. The Companys rigs and
vessels are mobile units, equipped to operate in geographic
regions throughout the world and, consequently, the Company may
move rigs and vessels from an oversupplied region to one that is
more lucrative and undersupplied when it is economical to do so.
As such, the Companys rigs and vessels are considered to
be interchangeable within classes or asset groups and
accordingly, the Company performs its impairment evaluation by
asset group.
The Companys estimates, assumptions and judgments used in
the application of its property and equipment accounting
policies reflect both historical experience and expectations
regarding future industry conditions and operations. Using
different estimates, assumptions and judgments, especially those
involving the useful lives of the Companys rigs and
liftboats and expectations regarding future industry conditions
and operations, would result in different carrying values of
assets and results of operations. For example, a prolonged
downturn in the drilling industry in which utilization and
dayrates were significantly reduced could result in an
impairment of the carrying value of the Companys assets.
Useful lives of rigs and vessels are difficult to estimate due
to a variety of factors, including technological advances that
impact the methods or cost of oil and gas exploration and
development, changes in market or economic conditions and
changes in laws or regulations affecting the drilling industry.
The Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of its rigs and
vessels when certain events occur that directly impact its
assessment of the remaining useful lives of the rigs and vessels
and include changes in operating condition, functional
capability and market and economic factors. The Company also
considers major capital upgrades required to perform certain
contracts and the long-term impact of those upgrades on the
future marketability when assessing the useful lives of
individual rigs and vessels.
During the fourth quarter 2008, demand for the Companys
domestic drilling assets declined dramatically, significantly
beyond expectations. Demand in these segments is driven by
underlying commodity prices which fell to levels lower than
those seen in several years. The deterioration in these industry
conditions in the fourth quarter negatively impacted the
Companys outlook for 2009 and the Company responded by
cold stacking several additional rigs. The Company considered
these factors and its change in outlook as an indicator of
impairment and assessed the rig assets of the Inland and
Domestic Offshore segments for impairment. When analyzing its
assets for impairment, the Company separates its marketable
rigs, those rigs that are actively marketed and can be warm
stacked or cold stacked for short periods of time depending on
market conditions, from its non-marketable rigs, those rigs that
have been cold stacked for an extended period of time or those
rigs that the Company currently does not reasonably expect to
market in the foreseeable future. Based on an undiscounted cash
flow analysis, it was determined that the non-marketable rigs
for both segments were impaired. The Company estimated the value
of the discounted cash flows for each segments
non-marketable rigs and recorded an impairment charge of
$376.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In addition,
78
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Company analyzed its other segments for impairment as of
December 31, 2008 and noted that each segment had adequate
undiscounted cash flows to recover its property and equipment
carrying values. In 2009 the Company entered into an agreement
to sell Hercules 110 and realized approximately
$26.9 million ($13.1 million, net of tax) of
impairment charges related to the write-down of the rig to fair
value less costs to sell during the second quarter of 2009 (See
Notes 5 and 12). The sale was completed in August 2009.
There were no impairment charges for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of business acquired
over the fair value of the net assets acquired at the date of
acquisition. These assets are not amortized but rather tested
for impairment at least annually by applying a fair-value based
test. This test is generally performed by the Company on October
1 or more frequently if the Company believes impairment
indicators are present. The Company determined its reporting
units to be the same as its operating segments.
Recoverability of goodwill is evaluated using a two-step
process. The first step involves a comparison of the fair value
of each of the reporting units with its carrying amount. If a
reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair value,
the second step is performed. The second step involves a
comparison of the implied fair value and carrying value of that
reporting units goodwill. To the extent that a reporting
units carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value of
its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value is
estimated using discounted cash flows and other market-related
valuation models, including earnings multiples and comparable
asset market values. In making an assessment of fair value, the
Company relies on current and past experience concerning its
industry cycles which historically have proven to be extremely
volatile. In addition, the Company makes future assumptions
based on a number of factors including future operating
performance, expected economic conditions and actions the
Company expects to take. Rates used to discount future cash
flows are dependent upon interest rates and the cost of capital
at a point in time. There are inherent uncertainties related to
these factors and managements judgment in applying them to
the analysis of goodwill impairment.
The Company performed a preliminary annual impairment assessment
as of October 1, 2008. However, during the fourth quarter
of 2008, the Companys market capitalization continued to
decline significantly, therefore, the Company completed its
analysis as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31,
2008, the Companys market capitalization was significantly
below its book value. The Company compared the fair value of
each reporting unit to its carrying value and determined that
each reporting unit was impaired. Upon completion of step two of
the impairment test, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment
of $950.3 million, which represented all of the
Companys goodwill as of December 31, 2008.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore
|
|
|
Offshore
|
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
Towing
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
513,602
|
|
|
$
|
133,046
|
|
|
$
|
206,264
|
|
|
$
|
87,329
|
|
|
$
|
940,241
|
|
Purchase Price and Other Adjustments
|
|
|
(6,408
|
)
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(507,194
|
)
|
|
|
(150,886
|
)
|
|
|
(205,474
|
)
|
|
|
(86,733
|
)
|
|
|
(950,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisition of TODCO (See Note 4),
the Company allocated $17.6 million in value to certain
international customer contracts. These amounts are being
amortized over the life of the
79
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contracts. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the customer
contracts had a carrying value of $2.2 million and
$7.2 million, net of accumulated amortization of
$15.4 million and $10.4 million, respectively, and are
included in Other Assets, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Amortization expense was $5.0 million, $7.6 million
and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Future estimated amortization
expense for the carrying amount of intangible assets as of
December 31, 2009 is expected to be $1.6 million in
2010 and $0.6 million in 2011.
Other
Assets
Other assets consist of drydocking costs for marine vessels,
other intangible assets, deferred costs, financing fees,
investments, deposits and other. Drydock costs are capitalized
at cost and amortized on the straight-line method over a period
of 12 months. Drydocking costs, net of accumulated
amortization, at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were
$4.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively.
Amortization expense for drydocking costs was
$17.2 million, $19.0 million and $18.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Financing fees are deferred and amortized over the life of the
applicable debt instrument. However, in the event of an early
repayment of debt, the related unamortized deferred financing
fees are expensed in connection with the repayment. Unamortized
deferred financing fees at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were
$14.7 million and $18.2 million, respectively. The
amortization expense related to the deferred financing fees is
included in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Amortization expense for financing fees was
$3.6 million, $4.0 million and $1.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The Company recognized a pretax charge of
$10.8 million, $7.0 million net of tax, related to the
write off of unamortized issuance costs in connection with the
July 2009 Credit Amendment, a pretax charge of
$1.4 million, $0.9 million net of tax, related to the
write off of unamortized issuance costs associated with the
April 2009 and June 2009 retirement of a portion of its
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes, as well as a pretax charge
of $1.6 million, $1.0 million net of tax, related to
the write off of unamortized issuance costs associated with its
early retirement of a portion of its term loan facility (See
Note 10). The Company recognized a pretax charge of
$2.1 million related to the write off of unamortized
issuance costs in connection with the redemption of a portion of
its 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes in December 2008 (See
Note 10). The Company recognized a pretax charge of
$2.2 million in 2007 related to the write off of deferred
financing fees in connection with the early debt repayment (See
Note 10).
Income
Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes.
The Companys income tax provision is based upon the tax
laws and rates in effect in the countries in which the
Companys operations are conducted and income is earned.
The income tax rates imposed and methods of computing taxable
income in these jurisdictions vary substantially. The
Companys effective tax rate is expected to fluctuate from
year to year as operations are conducted in different taxing
jurisdictions and the amount of pre-tax income fluctuates.
Current income tax expense reflects an estimate of the
Companys income tax liability for the current year,
withholding taxes, changes in prior year tax estimates as
returns are filed, or from tax audit adjustments, while the net
deferred tax expense or benefit represents the changes in the
balance of deferred tax assets and liabilities as reported on
the balance sheet.
Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future.
The Company currently does not have any valuation allowances
related to the tax assets. While the Company has considered
estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible
tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation
allowances, changes in these estimates and assumptions, as well
as changes in tax laws, could require the Company to adjust the
valuation allowances for deferred tax assets. These adjustments
to the
80
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
valuation allowance would impact the Companys income tax
provision in the period in which such adjustments are identified
and recorded.
Certain of the Companys international rigs and liftboats
are owned or operated, directly or indirectly, by the
Companys wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiaries. Most of
the earnings from these subsidiaries are reinvested
internationally and remittance to the United States is
indefinitely postponed. The Company recognized $1.1 million
of deferred U.S. tax expense on foreign earnings which
management expects to repatriate in the future. In certain
circumstances, management expects that, due to the changing
demands of the offshore drilling and liftboat markets and the
ability to redeploy the Companys offshore units, certain
of such units will not reside in a location long enough to give
rise to future tax consequences in that location. As a result,
no deferred tax asset or liability has been recognized in these
circumstances. Should managements expectations change
regarding the length of time an offshore drilling unit will be
used in a given location, the Company would adjust deferred
taxes accordingly (See Note 16).
Use of
Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, management
makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well
as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, including those related to bad debts, investments,
intangible assets, property and equipment, income taxes,
insurance, employment benefits and contingent liabilities. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
approximate fair values because of the short-term nature of the
instruments.
The fair value of the Companys 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes, 10.5% Senior Secured Notes and term loan
facility is estimated based on quoted prices in active markets.
The fair value of our 7.375% Senior Notes is estimated
based on discounted cash flows using inputs from quoted prices
in active markets for similar debt instruments.
Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162 (SFAS No. 168).
SFAS No. 168 modifies the Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) hierarchy by
establishing only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and
nonauthoritative accounting literature. Effective July 2009, the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), also
known collectively as the Codification is considered
the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and
reporting standards, except for additional authoritative rules
and interpretive releases issued by the SEC. Nonauthoritative
guidance and literature would include, among other things, FASB
Concepts Statements, American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Issue Papers and Technical Practice Aids and
accounting textbooks. The Codification was developed to organize
GAAP pronouncements by topic so that users can more easily
access authoritative accounting guidance. It is organized by
topic, subtopic, section, and paragraph, each of which is
identified by
81
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a numerical designation. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. Accordingly, accounting
references have been updated.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2009-05,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU
No. 2009-5),
which amends Subtopic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall for the
fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU
No. 2009-5
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted
price in an active market for the identical liability is not
available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value
using one or more of the following techniques: (1) a
valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical
liability or similar liabilities when traded as assets; or
(2) another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of Topic 820, such as a present value technique or
market approach. ASU
No. 2009-5
is effective for the first reporting period after issuance.
Accordingly, the Company adopted ASU
No. 2009-5
in the third quarter 2009 with no impact to its financial
statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165),
which was primarily codified into Topic 855, Subsequent
Events in the ASC. SFAS No. 165 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events
that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued.
SFAS No. 165 requires disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This statement is effective for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly,
the Company adopted SFAS No. 165 in June 2009 with no
impact to its financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP 107-1),
which was primarily codified into Topic 825, Financial
Instruments in the ASC. This FSP extends the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to interim financial
statements of publicly traded companies as defined in APB
Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial reporting. This
statement is effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company
adopted
FSP 107-1
in June 2009 with no impact to its financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset and Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP 157-4)
which was primarily codified into Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures in the ASC. This FSP provides
additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and
level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have
significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity
for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides additional
guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction
is not orderly. This statement is effective for interim or
annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009.
Accordingly, the Company adopted
FSP 157-4
in June 2009 with no impact to its financial statements (See
Note 12).
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161), which was
primarily codified into Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging
in the ASC. SFAS No. 161 amends
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities requiring enhanced disclosures about
an entitys derivative and hedging activities, thereby
improving the transparency of financial reporting.
SFAS No. 161s disclosures provide additional
information on how and why derivative instruments are being
used. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
Accordingly, the Company adopted SFAS No. 161 as of
January 1, 2009 with no impact to its financial statements.
82
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Property
and Equipment, Net
|
The following is a summary of property and equipment, at cost,
less accumulated depreciation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Drilling rigs and marine equipment
|
|
$
|
2,224,799
|
|
|
$
|
2,206,051
|
|
Drilling machinery and equipment
|
|
|
80,185
|
|
|
|
46,408
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
10,615
|
|
Automobiles and trucks
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
17,787
|
|
|
|
15,294
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
2,338,073
|
|
|
|
2,281,664
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(414,470
|
)
|
|
|
(232,634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,923,603
|
|
|
$
|
2,049,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used for the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares
|
|
|
97,114
|
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
58,897
|
|
Add effect of stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
97,114
|
|
|
|
88,351
|
|
|
|
59,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
period as adjusted for the dilutive effect of the Companys
stock option and restricted stock awards. The effect of stock
option and restricted stock awards is not included in the
computation for periods in which a net loss occurs, because to
do so would be anti-dilutive. Stock equivalents of 4,587,868,
3,009,099 and 350,080 were anti-dilutive and are excluded from
the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock equivalents for
the diluted earnings per share calculations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
4.
|
Asset
Acquisitions and Business Combination
|
On July 11, 2007, the Company acquired TODCO for total
consideration of approximately $2.4 billion, consisting of
$925.8 million in cash and 56.6 million shares of
common stock. The fair value of the shares issued was determined
for accounting purposes using an average price of $25.99, which
represented the average closing price of the Companys
stock for a period before and after the date of the merger
agreement with TODCO. In addition, the Company incurred
additional consideration in the amount of $41.6 million
related primarily to transaction related costs, cash payments to
non-continuing employees and the conversion of certain employee
equity awards. The results of TODCO are included in the
Companys results from the date of acquisition. The
acquisition expanded the Companys international presence
and diversified the Companys fleet.
83
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total consideration was allocated to TODCOs net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their
estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the
net assets was recorded as goodwill (See Note 1).
The following presents the consolidated financial information
for the Company on a pro forma basis assuming the acquisition of
TODCO had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented.
The historical financial information has been adjusted to give
effect to pro forma items that are directly attributable to the
acquisition and expected to have a continuing impact on
consolidated results. These items include adjustments to record
the incremental depreciation expense related to the increase in
fair value of the acquired assets, to record the additional
interest expense related to the incremental borrowings and to
reclassify certain items to conform to the Companys
financial reporting presentation.
The unaudited pro forma financial information set forth below
has been compiled from historical financial statements and other
information, but is not necessarily indicative of the results
that actually would have been achieved had the transaction
occurred on the dates indicated or that may be achieved in the
future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In millions,
|
|
|
except per
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,182.4
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
193.8
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
In February 2008, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to purchase three jackup drilling rigs and related
equipment for $320.0 million. The Company completed the
purchase of the Hercules 350 and the Hercules 261
and related equipment during March 2008, while the purchase
of the Hercules 262 and related equipment was completed
in May 2008.
|
|
5.
|
Dispositions
and Assets Held for Sale
|
In each of September and November 2009, the Company sold one
retired inland barge for approximately $0.2 million and
$0.4 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company
recently entered into an agreement to sell our retired jackups
Hercules 191 and Hercules 255 for
$5.0 million each. In February 2010, the Company entered
into an agreement to sell six of its retired barges for
$3.0 million (See Notes 1, 17 and 21).
In June 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its
Hercules 100 and Hercules 110 jackup drilling rigs
for a total purchase price of $12.0 million. The
Hercules 100 was classified as retired and
was stacked in Sabine Pass, Texas, and the Hercules 110
was cold-stacked in Trinidad. The closing of the sale of the
Hercules 100 and Hercules 110 occurred in August
2009 and the net proceeds of $11.8 million from the sale
were used to repay a portion of the Companys term loan
facility. The Company realized approximately $26.9 million
($13.1 million, net of tax) of impairment charges related
to the write-down of the Hercules 110 to fair value less
costs to sell during the second quarter of 2009 (See
Note 12). The financial information for the Hercules
100 has historically been reported as part of the Domestic
Offshore Segment and the Hercules 110 financial
information has been reported as part of the International
Offshore Segment. In addition, the assets associated with the
Hercules 100 and Hercules 110 are included in
Assets Held for Sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company sold Hercules
256 for gross proceeds of $8.5 million, which
approximated the carrying value of this asset.
84
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company sold the nine
land rigs and related assets purchased in the TODCO acquisition
for gross proceeds of $107.0 million, which approximated
the carrying value of these assets. In addition, during 2007,
the Company sold several marine support vessels purchased in the
TODCO acquisition for gross proceeds of $3.2 million, which
approximated the carrying value of the vessels.
There were no assets held for sale as of December 31, 2009.
Balance sheet information for the assets held for sale as of
December 31, 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Other
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
39,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets Held for Sale
|
|
$
|
39,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Discontinued
Operation
|
The Company sold its nine land rigs and related equipment in the
fourth quarter of 2007 (See Note 5). The results of
operations of the land rig operations are reflected in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations as a discontinued
operation for all periods presented.
Interest charges have been allocated to the discontinued
operation in accordance with FASB Codification Topic
470-20,
Presentation of Financial Statements Discontinued
Operations. The interest was allocated based on a pro rata
calculation of the net assets of the discontinued operation to
the Companys consolidated net assets. Interest allocated
to the discontinued operation was $1.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
Operating results and wind down costs of the land rigs were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
|
$
|
40,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,429
|
|
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
(3,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation, Net of Taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Stock-based
Compensation
|
The company recognizes compensation cost for all share-based
payments awarded in accordance with FASB Codification Topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation and in
accordance with such records the grant date fair value of
share-based payments awarded as compensation expense using a
straight-line method over the service period. In addition it is
required that the excess tax benefit (the amount of the realized
tax benefit related to deductible compensation cost in excess of
the cumulative compensation cost recognized for financial
reporting) be reported as cash flows from financing activities.
The Company classified $4.6 million, $5.9 million, and
$3.8 million in excess tax benefits as a financing cash
inflow for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
The Companys 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2004
Plan) provides for the granting of stock options,
restricted stock, performance stock awards and other stock-based
awards to selected employees and non-employee directors of the
Company. On April 26, 2006, the Companys stockholders
approved an increase in the shares available for grant or award
under the 2004 Plan by 1.0 million shares. Additionally, in
July 2007, the Companys stockholders approved an increase
in the shares available for grant or award under the
85
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2004 Plan by an additional 6.8 million shares to a total of
10.3 million. At December 31, 2009, approximately
4.3 million shares were available for grant or award under
the 2004 Plan. The Compensation Committee of the Companys
Board of Directors selects participants from time to time and,
subject to the terms and conditions of the 2004 Plan, determines
all terms and conditions of awards. Most of the option and
restricted stock grants issued after the initial public offering
are subject to a three year vesting period with some vesting
one-third on each anniversary of the grant date and others
vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date. The Company
issues originally issued shares upon exercise of stock options
and for restricted stock grants. The fair value of restricted
stock grants was calculated based on the average of the high and
low trading price of the Companys stock on the day of
grant for grants prior to 2008. The fair value of restricted
stock grants in 2008 and 2009 was calculated based on the
closing price of the Companys stock on the day of grant.
The total fair value of restricted stock grants is amortized to
expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The unrecognized compensation cost related to the Companys
unvested stock options and restricted share grants as of
December 31, 2009 was $3.5 million and
$4.4 million, respectively, and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years and
0.8 years, respectively.
Cash received from stock option exercises was $5.1 million
and $2.1 million during the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. There were no stock option
exercises in 2009.
The Company recognized $8.3 million, $12.5 million and
$7.7 million in employee stock-based compensation expense
during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
$2.9 million, $4.4 million and $2.7 million,
respectively. In conjunction with the acquisition of TODCO (See
Note 4), the Company assumed 0.3 million stock options
held by former TODCO employees and issued 20,608 restricted
stock awards in exchange for deferred performance units held by
former TODCO employees. All of these awards are fully vested. In
2007, the Company capitalized $3.8 million related to these
awards as part of the purchase price allocation. The Company did
not capitalize any stock-based compensation during 2009 and 2008.
The fair value of the options granted under the 2004 Plan was
estimated on the date of grant using the Trinomial Lattice
option pricing model with the following assumptions used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected price volatility
|
|
|
45.00
|
%
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
Expected life of options (in years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
6.35
|
|
|
$
|
11.18
|
|
The Company currently uses the historical volatility of its
common stock to estimate volatility as it now has several years
of trading data. In prior years up to mid-2008, the company used
the historical volatility of comparable companies to estimate
its volatility. In addition, the Company used the simplified
method to estimate the expected life of the options granted. The
total fair value of options granted is amortized to expense on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period.
86
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the
2004 Plan as of December 31, 2009 and changes during the
year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
2,746,210
|
|
|
$
|
17.73
|
|
|
|
7.96
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,803,125
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(97,014
|
)
|
|
|
12.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,452,321
|
|
|
|
11.36
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
|
|
|
6,145
|
|
Vested or Expected to Vest at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,357,647
|
|
|
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
5,985
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,016,835
|
|
|
|
17.34
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008 and 2007
was $11.7 million and $5.2 million. There were no
options exercised in 2009.
The following table summarizes information about restricted
stock outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and changes
during the year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-Vested at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
492,304
|
|
|
$
|
25.93
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(125,896
|
)
|
|
|
27.24
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(22,331
|
)
|
|
|
26.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
349,077
|
|
|
|
25.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of restricted stock
granted during the years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $4.82,
$26.12 and $28.75, respectively. The total fair value of
restricted stock vested during the years ended 2009, 2008 and
2007 was $0.4 million, $2.6 million and
$1.4 million, respectively.
Accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes other than Income
|
|
$
|
9,435
|
|
|
$
|
17,610
|
|
Accrued Payroll and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
29,283
|
|
|
|
36,160
|
|
Accrued Self-Insurance Claims
|
|
|
28,768
|
|
|
|
29,541
|
|
Other
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,773
|
|
|
$
|
83,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company currently has two 401(k) plans in which
substantially all U.S. employees are eligible to
participate. Under the Hercules plan and Delta Towing plan, the
Company matches participant contributions equal to 100% of the
first 6% of a participants eligible compensation. Under
the Hercules plan, the Company match was reduced to 100% of the
first 3% of participant eligible compensation on April 1,
2009 and subsequently eliminated on August 1, 2009. Under
the Delta Towing plan the Company match was reduced to 100% of
the first 3% of participant eligible compensation on
April 1, 2009 and subsequently eliminated on
October 1, 2009. The Company made total matching
contributions of $3.4 million, $8.6 million and
$5.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility, due July 2013
|
|
$
|
482,852
|
|
|
$
|
886,500
|
|
10.5% Senior Secured Notes due October 2017
|
|
|
292,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038
|
|
|
83,071
|
|
|
|
134,752
|
|
7.375% Senior Notes, due April 2018
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
Foreign Overdraft Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
861,707
|
|
|
|
1,027,219
|
|
Less Short-term Debt and Current Portion of Long-term Debt
|
|
|
4,952
|
|
|
|
11,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion
|
|
$
|
856,755
|
|
|
$
|
1,015,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of scheduled long-term debt
maturities by year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
4,952
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,952
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,952
|
|
2013
|
|
|
551,067
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
295,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
861,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
secured Credit Agreement
In 2007, the Company repaid and terminated its senior secured
credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions that,
as amended, provided for a $140.0 million term loan and a
$75.0 million revolving credit facility and recognized a
pretax charge of $2.2 million related to the write off of
deferred financing fees in connection with the early repayment.
Additionally, the Company cancelled all derivative instruments
related to the term loan, which included two interest rate swaps
on a total of $70.0 million of the term loan principal and
two interest rate caps on a total of $20.0 million of the
term loan principal.
In connection with the July 2007 acquisition of TODCO (See
Note 4), the Company obtained a new $1,050.0 million
credit facility, consisting of a $900.0 million term loan
facility and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility
which is governed by the credit agreement (Credit
Agreement). The proceeds from the term loan were used,
together with cash on hand, to finance the cash portion of the
Companys acquisition of TODCO, to repay amounts under
TODCOs senior secured credit facility outstanding at the
closing of the facility and to make certain other payments in
connection with the Companys acquisition of TODCO. In
88
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
connection with the new term loan facility, the Company entered
into derivative instruments with the purpose of hedging future
interest payments (See Note 11). In April 2008, the Company
entered into an agreement to increase the revolving credit
facility to $250.0 million.
July
2009 Credit Amendment
On July 27, 2009 the Company amended its Credit Agreement
(Credit Amendment) in order to revise its covenants
to be more favorable to the Company. A fee of 0.50%, which
approximated $4.8 million, was paid to lenders consenting
to the Credit Amendment based on their total commitment. The
Credit Amendment reduced the revolving credit facility by
$75.0 million to $175.0 million. The commitment fee on
the revolving credit facility increased from 0.375% to 1.00% and
the letter of credit fee with respect to the undrawn amount of
each letter of credit issued under the revolving credit facility
increased from 1.75% to 4.00% per annum. The availability under
the $175.0 million revolving credit facility must be used
for working capital, capital expenditures and other general
corporate purposes and cannot be used to prepay the term loan.
Additionally, the Credit Amendment establishes a minimum London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rate of 2.00% for
Eurodollar Loans, a minimum rate of 3.00% with respect to
Alternative Base Rate (ABR) Loans, and increases the
margin applicable to Eurodollar Loans and ABR Loans, subject to
a grid based on the aggregate principal amount of the term loans
outstanding as follows ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount Outstanding
|
|
Margin Applicable to:
|
Less than or equal to:
|
|
Greater than:
|
|
Eurodollar Loans
|
|
ABR Loans
|
|
$
|
882.00
|
|
|
$
|
684.25
|
|
|
|
6.50%
|
|
|
|
5.50%
|
|
|
684.25
|
|
|
|
484.25
|
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
4.00%
|
|
|
484.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00%
|
|
|
|
3.00%
|
|
The Credit Amendment also modifies certain provisions of the
Credit Agreement to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate the requirement that the Company comply with the total
leverage ratio financial covenant for the nine month period
commencing October 1, 2009 and ending on June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Amend the maximum total leverage ratio that we must comply with
to the following schedule. The total leverage ratio for any test
period is calculated as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness
on the test date to consolidated EBITDA for the trailing twelve
months, all as defined in the Credit Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
Test Date
|
|
Total Leverage Ratio
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
8.00 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
7.50 to 1.00
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
7.00 to 1.00
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
6.75 to 1.00
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
6.00 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
5.50 to 1.00
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
5.25 to 1.00
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
5.00 to 1.00
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
4.75 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
4.50 to 1.00
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
4.25 to 1.00
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
4.00 to 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
At December 31, 2009, the Companys total leverage
ratio was 5.32.
|
89
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Require maintenance of a minimum level of liquidity, measured as
the amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on hand and
availability under the revolving credit facility, of
(i) $100.0 million for the period between
October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010,
(ii) $75.0 million during calendar year 2011 and
(iii) $50.0 million thereafter. As of
December 31, 2009, as calculated pursuant to the Credit
Agreement, the Companys total liquidity was
$305.8 million.
|
|
|
|
Revise the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio definition
and reduce the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio that the
Company must maintain to the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge
|
Period
|
|
Coverage Ratio
|
|
July 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1.00 to 1.00
|
|
January 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
1.05 to 1.00
|
|
April 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
1.10 to 1.00
|
|
July 1, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 to 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio for any test period
is defined as the sum of consolidated EBITDA for the test period
plus an amount that may be added for the purpose of calculating
the ratio for such test period, not to exceed
$130.0 million in total during the term of the credit
facility, to consolidated fixed charges for the test period, all
as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of December 31,
2009, the Companys fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Require mandatory prepayments of debt outstanding under the
Credit Agreement with 100% of excess cash flow as defined in the
Credit Agreement for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009 and 50% of excess cash flow thereafter and with proceeds
from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsecured debt issuances, with the exception of refinancing,
through June 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
secured debt issuances;
|
|
|
|
sales of assets in excess of $25 million annually; and
|
|
|
|
unless the Company has achieved a specified leverage ratio, 50%
of proceeds from equity issuances, excluding those for permitted
acquisitions or to meet the minimum liquidity requirements.
|
The Companys obligations under the Credit Agreement are
secured by liens on a majority of its vessels and substantially
all of its other personal property. Substantially all of the
Companys domestic subsidiaries, and several of its
international subsidiaries, guarantee the obligations under the
Credit Agreement and have granted similar liens on several of
their vessels and substantially all of their other personal
property.
Other covenants contained in the Credit Agreement restrict,
among other things, asset dispositions, mergers and
acquisitions, dividends, stock repurchases and redemptions,
other restricted payments, debt issuances, liens, investments,
convertible notes repurchases and affiliate transactions. The
Credit Agreement also contains a provision under which an event
of default on any other indebtedness exceeding
$25.0 million would be considered an event of default under
the Companys Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement requires that the Company meet certain
financial ratios and tests, which it met as of December 31,
2009. The Companys failure to comply with such covenants
would result in an event of default under the Credit Agreement.
An event of default could prevent the Company from borrowing
under the revolving credit facility, which would in turn have a
material adverse effect on the Companys available
liquidity. Additionally, an event of default could result in the
Company having to immediately repay all amounts outstanding
under the credit facility, the 10.5% Senior Secured Notes and
the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes and in the foreclosure of
liens on its assets.
90
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other than the required prepayments as outlined previously, the
principal amount of the term loan amortizes in equal quarterly
installments of approximately $1.2 million, with the
balance due on July 11, 2013. All borrowings under the
revolving credit facility mature on July 11, 2012. Interest
payments on both facilities are due at least on a quarterly
basis and in certain instances, more frequently. In addition to
its scheduled payments, during the fourth quarter of 2009, the
Company used the net proceeds from the partial exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option and the
10.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2017, which approximated
$287.5 million, as well as cash on hand to retire
$379.6 million of the outstanding balance on the
Companys term loan facility. In connection with the early
retirement, the Company recorded a pretax charge of
$1.6 million, $1.0 million, net of tax, related to the
write off of unamortized issuance costs (See Note 1).
As of December 31, 2009, no amounts were outstanding and
$10.0 million in stand-by letters of credit had been issued
under the revolving credit facility. The remaining availability
under this revolving credit facility was $165.0 million at
December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009,
$482.9 million was outstanding on the term loan facility
and the interest rate was 6.00%. The annualized effective
interest rate was 7.18% for the year ended December 31,
2009 after giving consideration to revolver fees and derivative
activity.
10.5% senior
secured notes due 2017
On October 20, 2009, the Company completed an offering of
$300.0 million of senior secured notes at a coupon rate of
10.5% (10.5% Senior Secured Notes) with a
maturity in October 2017. The interest on the notes will be
payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October
15 of each year, commencing on April 15, 2010, to holders
of record at the close of business on April 1 or October 1.
Interest on the notes will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months. The notes were sold at 97.383% of their face amount to
yield 11.0% and were recorded at their discounted amount, with
the discount to be amortized over the life of the notes. The
Company used the net proceeds of approximately
$284.4 million from the offering to repay a portion of the
indebtedness outstanding under its term loan facility. As of
December 31, 2009, $300.0 million notional amount of
the 10.5% Senior Secured Notes was outstanding. The
carrying amount of the 10.5% Senior Secured Notes was
$292.3 million at December 31, 2009.
The notes are guaranteed by all of the Companys existing
and future restricted subsidiaries that incur or guarantee
indebtedness under a credit facility, including our existing
credit facility. The notes are secured by liens on all
collateral that secures the Companys obligations under its
secured credit facility, subject to limited exceptions. The
liens securing the notes share on an equal and ratable first
priority basis with liens securing the Companys credit
facility. Under the intercreditor agreement, the collateral
agent for the lenders under the Companys secured credit
facility is generally entitled to sole control of all decisions
and actions.
All the liens securing the notes may be released if the
Companys secured indebtedness, other than these notes,
does not exceed the lesser of $375.0 million and 15.0% of
our consolidated tangible assets. The Company refers to such a
release as a collateral suspension. If a collateral
suspension is in effect, the notes and the guarantees will be
unsecured, and will effectively rank junior to our secured
indebtedness. If, after any such release of liens on collateral,
the aggregate principal amount of the Companys secured
indebtedness, other than these notes, exceeds the greater of
$375.0 million and 15.0% of its consolidated tangible
assets, as defined in the indenture, then the collateral
obligations of the Company and guarantors will be reinstated and
must be complied with within 30 days of such event.
The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that, among
other things, limit the Companys ability and the ability
of its restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions;
|
|
|
|
make other restricted payments or investments;
|
|
|
|
sell assets;
|
91
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends and other payments
by restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with its affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its
assets.
|
The indenture governing the notes also contains a provision
under which an event of default by the Company or by any
restricted subsidiary on any other indebtedness exceeding
$25.0 million would be considered an event of default under
the indenture if such default is: a) caused by failure to
pay the principal at final maturity, or b) results in the
acceleration of such indebtedness prior to maturity.
Prior to October 15, 2012, the Company may redeem the notes
with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a
redemption price equal to 110.50% of the aggregate principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest; provided, that
(i) after giving effect to any such redemption, at least
65% of the notes originally issued would remain outstanding
immediately after such redemption and (ii) the Company
makes such redemption not more than 90 days after the
consummation of such equity offering. In addition, prior to
October 15, 2013, the Company may redeem all or part of the
notes at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount
of notes to be redeemed, plus the applicable premium, as defined
in the indenture, and accrued and unpaid interest.
On or after October 15, 2013, the Company may redeem the
notes, in whole or part, at the redemption prices set forth
below, together with accrued and unpaid interest to the
redemption date.
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Optional Redemption Price
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
105.2500
|
%
|
2014
|
|
|
102.6250
|
%
|
2015
|
|
|
101.3125
|
%
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.0000
|
%
|
If the Company experiences certain kinds of changes of control,
it must offer to repurchase the notes at an offer price in cash
equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. Furthermore, following certain asset sales, the
Company may be required to use the proceeds to offer to
repurchase the notes at an offer price in cash equal to 100% of
their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
3.375%
convertible senior notes due 2038
On June 3, 2008, the Company completed an offering of
$250.0 million convertible senior notes at a coupon rate of
3.375% (3.375% Convertible Senior Notes) with a
maturity in June 2038. The interest on the notes is payable in
cash semi-annually in arrears, on June 1 and December 1 of each
year until June 1, 2013, after which the principal will
accrete at an annual yield to maturity of 3.375% per year. The
Company will also pay contingent interest during any six-month
interest period commencing June 1, 2013, for which the
trading price of these notes for a specified period of time
equals or exceeds 120% of their accreted principal amount. The
notes will be convertible under certain circumstances into
shares of the Companys common stock at an initial
conversion rate of 19.9695 shares of common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of notes, which is equal to an initial
conversion price of approximately $50.08 per share. Upon
conversion of a note, a holder will receive, at the
Companys election, shares of common stock, cash or a
combination of cash and shares of common stock. At
December 31, 2009, the number of conversion shares
potentially issuable in relation to the 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes was 1.9 million. The Company may redeem the
notes at its option beginning June 6, 2013, and holders of
the notes will have the right to require the Company to
repurchase the notes on June 1, 2013 and certain dates
thereafter or on the occurrence of a fundamental change. Net
proceeds of $243.5 million were used to purchase
approximately 1.45 million shares, or $49.2 million,
of the Companys common stock, to repay outstanding
borrowings under its
92
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
senior secured revolving credit facility which totaled
$100.0 million at the time of the offering and for other
general corporate purposes.
The indenture governing the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
contains a provision under which an event of default by the
Company or by any subsidiary on any other indebtedness exceeding
$25.0 million would be considered an event of default under
the indenture if such default: a) is caused by failure to
pay the principal at final maturity, or b) results in the
acceleration of such indebtedness prior to maturity.
As of January 1, 2009, the Company was required to adopt
the provisions of FASB Codification Topic
470-20,
Debt Debt with Conversion and Other Options,
with retrospective application to the terms of the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes as they existed for all
periods presented (See Note 1). The Consolidated Balance
Sheet for December 31, 2008 has been restated to reflect
the adoption, which resulted in a $30.1 million increase to
Capital in Excess of Par Value, a $9.5 million increase to
deferred tax liability, a $27.0 million decrease to
Long-term Debt and an increase to Retained Deficit of
$12.6 million. The Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the year ended December 31, 2008 has also been restated
to reflect the adoption. The restatement of the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31,
2008 resulted in the Company recognizing $4.3 million,
$2.8 million, net of tax, in interest expense, or $0.03 per
diluted share, related to discount amortization as well as
$15.0 million, $9.7 million, net of tax, or $0.11 per
diluted share, to reduce the gain on early retirement of debt
associated with the December 2008 redemption. There were no
other convertible notes issued prior to 2008.
The carrying amount of the equity component of the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes was $30.1 million at
both December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The
principal amount of the liability component of the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes, its unamortized discount
and its net carrying amount was $95.9 million,
$12.8 million and $83.1 million, respectively, as of
December 31, 2009 and $161.8 million,
$27.0 million and $134.8 million, respectively, as of
December 31, 2008. The unamortized discount is being
amortized to interest expense over the expected life of the
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes which ends June 3,
2013. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
recognized $8.2 million, $5.3 million, net of tax, in
interest expense, or $0.05 per diluted share, at an effective
rate of 7.93%, of which $4.2 million related to the coupon
rate of 3.375% and $4.0 million related to discount
amortization.
Upon maturity or redemption, the Company determined it has the
intent and ability to settle the principal amount of its
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes in cash, and any additional
conversion consideration spread (the excess of conversion value
over face value) in shares of the Companys common stock
(Common Stock). There were no stock equivalents to
exclude from the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock
equivalents for the diluted earnings per share calculations for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 related to the
assumed conversion of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes
under the if-converted method as there was no excess of
conversion value over face value in either period.
During December 2008, the Company redeemed $73.2 million
accreted principal amount, or $88.2 million aggregate
principal amount of the 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes for
a cost of $44.8 million resulting in a net gain of
$28.4 million. In addition, we expensed $2.1 million
of unamortized issuance costs in connection with the redemption.
In April 2009, the Company repurchased $20.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the 3.375% Convertible Senior
Notes for a cost of $6.1 million, resulting in a gain of
$10.7 million. In addition, the Company expensed
$0.4 million of unamortized issuance costs in connection
with the retirement. In June 2009, the Company retired
$45.8 million aggregate principal amount of its
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes in exchange for the
issuance of 7,755,440 Common Stock valued at $4.38 per share and
payment of accrued interest, resulting in a gain of
$4.4 million. In addition, the Company expensed
$1.0 million of unamortized issuance costs in connection
with the retirement. The settlement consideration was allocated
to the extinguishment of the liability component in an amount
equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to
extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and
the net carrying amount of the liability component and
unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a gain or loss on
debt extinguishment. If there
93
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
would have been any remaining settlement consideration, it would
have been allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component
and recognized as a reduction of Stockholders Equity.
Other
debt
In connection with the TODCO acquisition in July 2007, one of
our domestic subsidiaries assumed approximately
$3.5 million of 7.375% Senior Notes due in April 2018.
There are no financial or operating covenants associated with
these notes.
The foreign overdraft facility obtained in the TODCO acquisition
in July 2007, which was designed to manage local currency
liquidity in Venezuela, was terminated in March 2009 and all
outstanding amounts were repaid.
Fair
value estimate
The fair value of the Companys 3.375% Convertible
Senior Notes, 10.5% Senior Secured Notes and term loan
facility is estimated based on quoted prices in active markets.
The fair value of our 7.375% Senior Notes is estimated
based on discounted cash flows using inputs from quoted prices
in active markets for similar debt instruments. We believe the
carrying value of our short-term debt instruments outstanding at
December 31, 2008 approximate fair value. The following
table provides the carrying value and fair value of our
long-term debt instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility, due July 2013
|
|
$
|
482.9
|
|
|
$
|
468.4
|
|
|
$
|
886.5
|
|
|
$
|
571.8
|
|
10.5% Senior Secured Notes, due October 2017
|
|
|
292.3
|
|
|
|
315.8
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2038
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
7.375% Senior Notes, due April 2018
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging
|
The Company is required to recognize all of its derivative
instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial position at fair value. The accounting for changes in
the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it
has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship.
For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify
as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging
instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair
value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in
a foreign operation.
The Company periodically uses derivative instruments to manage
its exposure to interest rate risk, including interest rate swap
agreements to effectively fix the interest rate on variable rate
debt and interest rate collars to limit the interest rate range
on variable rate debt. These hedge transactions have
historically been accounted for as cash flow hedges.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on
the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the
period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings. The effective portion of the interest rate swaps and
collar hedging the exposure to variability in expected future
cash flows due to changes in interest rates is reclassified into
interest expense. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative
instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present
value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, or hedged
components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, is
recognized in interest expense.
94
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company cancelled an interest rate swap on
$35.0 million of term loan principal in conjunction with a
debt repayment in April 2007 and received proceeds and
recognized a gain of $0.3 million. In July 2007, the
Company cancelled an interest rate swap on $35.0 million of
term loan principal and two interest rate caps on a total of
$20.0 million of term loan principal and received proceeds
and recognized a gain of $0.4 million.
In May 2008 and July 2007, the Company entered into derivative
instruments with the purpose of hedging future interest payments
on its term loan facility. In May 2008, the Company entered into
a floating to fixed interest rate swap with varying notional
amounts beginning with $100.0 million with a settlement
date of October 1, 2008 and ending with $75.0 million
which was settled on December 31, 2009. The Company
received an interest rate of three-month LIBOR and paid a fixed
coupon of 2.980% over six quarters. The terms and settlement
dates of the swap matched those of the term loan through
July 27, 2009, the date of the Credit Amendment. In July
2007, the Company entered into a floating to fixed interest rate
swap with decreasing notional amounts beginning with
$400.0 million with a settlement date of December 31,
2007 and ending with $50.0 million which was settled on
April 1, 2009. The Company received a payment equal to the
product of three-month LIBOR and the notional amount and paid a
fixed coupon of 5.307% on the notional amount over six quarters.
The terms and settlement dates of the swap matched those of the
term loan. In July 2007, the Company also entered into a zero
cost LIBOR collar on $300.0 million of term loan principal
with a final settlement date of October 1, 2010 with a
ceiling of 5.75% and a floor of 4.99%. The counterparty is
obligated to pay the Company in any quarter that actual LIBOR
resets above 5.75% and the Company pays the counterparty in any
quarter that actual LIBOR resets below 4.99%. The terms and
settlement dates of the collar matched those of the term loan
through July 27, 2009, the date of the Credit Amendment.
As a result of the inclusion of a LIBOR floor in the Credit
Agreement, the Company does not believe, as of July 27,
2009 and on an ongoing basis, that the interest rate swap and
collar will be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes
in cash flows attributable to the hedged interest rate risk
during the period that the hedge was designated. As such, the
Company has prospectively discontinued cash flow hedge
accounting for the interest rate swap and collar as of
July 27, 2009 and no longer applies cash flow hedge
accounting to these instruments. Because cash flow hedge
accounting will not be applied to these instruments, changes in
fair value related to the interest rate swap and collar
subsequent to July 27, 2009 have been recorded in earnings
and will be on a go-forward basis. As a result of discontinuing
the cash flow hedging relationship, the Company recognized a
decrease in fair value of $1.7 million related to the
interest rate swap and collar as Interest Expense in its
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The Company expects to realize all of
the unrealized loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
over the next twelve months.
The following table provides the fair values of the
Companys interest rate derivatives (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
10,312
|
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
15,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives
|
|
$
|
10,312
|
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives
|
|
$
|
22,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These interest rate contracts were designated as cash flow
hedges through July 27, 2009. |
95
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides the effect of the Companys
interest rate derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.
|
|
|
II.
|
|
III.
|
|
|
IV.
|
|
|
V.
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Derivatives(a)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
(16,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,745
|
)
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
$
|
(1,706
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These interest rate contracts were designated as cash flow
hedges through July 27, 2009 at which point they became
ineffective and are no longer designated as such. |
|
|
I.
|
Amount of Gain (Loss), Net of Taxes Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)
|
|
II.
|
Classification of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Loss) (Effective
Portion)
|
|
III.
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Loss) (Effective
Portion)
|
|
IV.
|
Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Loss) on
Derivative
|
|
V.
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Loss) on
Derivative
|
A summary of the changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative unrealized income, net of tax of $407 as of
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
Reclassification of gains into net income, net of tax of $483
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
Other comprehensive losses, net of tax of $4,295
|
|
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative unrealized loss, net of tax of $4,371, as of
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(8,117
|
)
|
Reclassification of losses into net income, net of tax of $2,711
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
Other comprehensive losses, net of tax of $6,380
|
|
|
(11,849
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative unrealized loss, net of tax of $8,040, as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(14,932
|
)
|
Reclassification of losses into net income, net of tax of $5,823
|
|
|
10,813
|
|
Other comprehensive losses, net of tax of $891
|
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative unrealized loss, net of tax of $3,108, as of
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(5,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
FASB Codification Topic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under
generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements; however, it does not require any
new fair value measurements, rather, its application is made
pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements.
Fair value measurements are generally based upon observable and
unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data
obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs
reflect our view of market assumptions in the absence of
observable market information. The Company utilizes valuation
techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. FASB Codification Topic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures includes a fair
value hierarchy that is intended to increase
96
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and
related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy consists of the
following three levels:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs are quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Inputs are derived from valuation
techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value
drivers are unobservable.
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value
are as follows:
(A) Market approach Uses prices and
other relevant information generated by market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities
(B) Income approach Uses valuation
techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount
based on current market expectations about those future amounts,
including present value techniques, option-pricing models and
excess earnings method
(C) Cost approach Based on the amount
that currently would be required to replace the service capacity
of an asset (replacement cost)
The following table represents our derivative assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
Identical Asset or
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Technique
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
$
|
10,312
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,312
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
The following table represents our assets measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis for which an impairment measurement was
made as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
Identical Asset or
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Technique
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Assets Held for Sale
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
(26,882
|
)
|
Long-lived assets held for sale at December 31, 2008 were
written down to their fair value of $10.0 million, less
cost to sell of $0.2 million (or net $9.8 million) in
the second quarter of 2009, resulting in an impairment charge of
approximately $26.9 million ($13.1 million, net of
tax) related to Hercules 110 (See Note 5). The sale
of Hercules 110 was completed in August 2009 (See
Note 5).
97
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
The following summarizes investing activities relating to
acquisitions integrated into the Companys operations for
the periods shown (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fair Value of Assets, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
1,974,086
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
940,241
|
|
Common Stock Issuance
|
|
|
(1,475,763
|
)
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
(710,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Consideration, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
728,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized interest
|
|
$
|
62,297
|
|
|
$
|
55,865
|
|
|
$
|
36,426
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
26,942
|
|
|
|
42,854
|
|
|
|
45,893
|
|
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company capitalized interest of
$0.3 million, $8.8 million and $1.4 million,
respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
the Company had non-cash activities related to its interest rate
derivatives of $9.2 million, $(6.8) million and
$(8.9) million, respectively. In addition, the Company had
non-cash financing activities related to its June 2009
retirement of $45.8 million aggregate principal amount of
its 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes in exchange for the
issuance of 7,755,440 Common Stock valued at $4.38 per share
($34.0 million) and payment of accrued interest, resulting
in a gain of $4.4 million (See Note 10).
|
|
14.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts at high
credit quality financial institutions or in highly rated money
market funds as permitted by its Credit Agreement. The balances,
at many times, exceed federally insured limits.
The counterparty to the Companys zero cost LIBOR collar is
a creditworthy multinational commercial bank.
The Companys revolving credit facility includes a diverse
group of lenders with no single commitment greater than
$21 million.
The Company provides services to a diversified group of
customers in the oil and natural gas exploration and production
industry. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of each
customers financial condition. The Company maintains an
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on expected
collectability and establishes a reserve when payment is
unlikely to occur.
The Company established an allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable of approximately $26.8 million as of
December 31, 2009, related to a customer in West Africa
that is contracted to utilize one rig in its International
Offshore segment. In addition, the Company incurred a non-cash
charge of approximately $7.3 million to fully impair the
related deferred mobilization and contract preparation costs.
This charge is partially offset by a $2.5 million reduction
in previously accrued contract related operating costs that are
not
98
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expected to be settled if the receivable is not collected. The
amount owed to the Company is undisputed by the customer and the
Company is continuing to rigorously pursue all commercial and
legal avenues for collection of its receivable. However, the
Company established this allowance based on, among other
factors, its recent determination that the credit risk
associated with this customer has deteriorated. As a result of
this determination and until such time that the credit risk
improves, future dayrate from this customer will no longer meet
the revenue recognition criteria due to uncertainty surrounding
collectability.
|
|
15.
|
Sales to
Major Customers
|
The customer base for the Company is primarily concentrated in
the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry.
Sales to customers exceeding 10 percent or more of the
Companys total revenue are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Chevron Corporation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Saudi Aramco
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEMEX Exploración y Producción (PEMEX)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
In addition, Chevron Corporation accounted for 52.7%, 73.2% and
84.9% of the revenue for the Companys International
Liftboats segment in the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Income (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(271,879
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,267,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
111,064
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
102,798
|
|
|
|
112,575
|
|
|
|
84,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(169,081
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,155,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
195,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax (benefit) provision consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current-United
States
|
|
$
|
(16,335
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,733
|
|
|
$
|
23,262
|
|
Current-foreign
|
|
|
35,144
|
|
|
|
31,103
|
|
|
|
11,217
|
|
Current-state
|
|
|
(9,302
|
)
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
|
9,507
|
|
|
|
44,703
|
|
|
|
37,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred-United
States
|
|
|
(80,458
|
)
|
|
|
(103,077
|
)
|
|
|
23,315
|
|
Deferred-foreign
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(5,683
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Deferred-state
|
|
|
(8,042
|
)
|
|
|
(9,104
|
)
|
|
|
(1,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(88,439
|
)
|
|
|
(117,864
|
)
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
$
|
(78,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of and changes in the net deferred taxes were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward (Federal, State &
Foreign)
|
|
$
|
108,307
|
|
|
$
|
53,868
|
|
Credit carryforwards
|
|
|
14,677
|
|
|
|
31,180
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
14,329
|
|
|
|
15,698
|
|
Unearned income
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
5,440
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
Stock Based Compensation
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,622
|
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
165,838
|
|
|
|
124,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(369,639
|
)
|
|
|
(428,427
|
)
|
Convertible Notes
|
|
|
(7,018
|
)
|
|
|
(10,957
|
)
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
(7,602
|
)
|
|
|
(2,612
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,493
|
)
|
|
|
(4,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(388,752
|
)
|
|
|
(446,499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(222,914
|
)
|
|
$
|
(322,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of statutory and effective income tax rates is
as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Taxes on foreign earnings at greater (lesser) than the U.S.
statutory rate
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective rate
|
|
|
46.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of consolidated U.S. net operating losses
(NOLs) available as of December 31, 2009 is
approximately $307.1 million. These NOLs will expire in the
years 2017 through 2029. Because of the TODCO acquisition, the
Companys ability to utilize certain of its tax benefits is
subject to an annual limitation, in addition to certain
additional limitations resulting from TODCOs prior
transactions. However, the Company believes that, in light of
the amount of the annual limitations, it should not have a
material effect on the Companys ability to utilize its tax
benefits for the foreseeable future and the Company has not
recorded any valuation allowance related to the tax assets. In
addition, the Company has $14.7 million of non-expiring
alternative minimum tax credits.
We recognized $1.1 million of deferred U.S. tax
expense on foreign earnings which management expects to
repatriate in the future. The Company has not recorded deferred
income taxes on the remaining undistributed earnings of its
foreign subsidiaries because of managements intent to
permanently reinvest such
100
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
earnings. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of
undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries was
$151.6 million. Upon distribution of these earnings in the
form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject to
U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. It is not
practical, however, to estimate the amount of taxes that may be
payable on the remittance of these earnings.
In connection with the July 2007 acquisition of TODCO, the
Company, as successor to TODCO, and TODCOs former parent,
Transocean Ltd., are parties to a tax sharing agreement that was
originally entered into in connection with TODCOs initial
public offering in 2004. The tax sharing agreement was amended
and restated in November 2006 in a negotiated settlement of
disputes between Transocean and TODCO over the terms of the
original tax sharing agreement. The tax sharing agreement
continues to require that additional payments be made to
Transocean based on a portion of the expected tax benefit from
the exercise of certain compensatory stock options to acquire
Transocean common stock attributable to current and former TODCO
employees and board members. The estimated amount of payments to
Transocean related to compensatory options that remain
outstanding at December 31, 2009, assuming a Transocean
stock price of $82.80 per share at the time of exercise of the
compensatory options (the actual price of Transoceans
common stock at December 31, 2009), is approximately
$1.1 million. The Company accounts for the exercise of
Transocean stock options held by current and former TODCO
employees and board members in the period in which such option
is exercised. As tax deductions are generated from the exercise
of the stock options the Company takes a current tax deduction
for the value of the stock option tax deduction, pays Transocean
for 55% of the tax benefit and increases additional paid-in
capital by 45% of the tax benefit. Because of the Companys
current NOL position, the tax benefit of the stock option
deduction is reclassified as a reduction in net deferred tax
liability. There is no certainty that the Company will realize
future economic benefits from TODCOs tax benefits equal to
the amount of the payments required under the tax sharing
agreement.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, codified in FASB ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes. Its adoption did not have a material impact
on the Companys financial statements. The Company did not
derecognize any tax benefits, nor recognize any interest expense
or penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of
adoption. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related
to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company
recorded interest and penalties of $6.3 million and
$3.1 million through the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. In addition, in 2008 the Company recorded interest
and penalties of $6.3 million as a component of goodwill
related to the TODCO acquisition.
The Company, directly or through its subsidiaries, files income
tax returns in the United States, and multiple state and foreign
jurisdictions. The Companys tax returns for 2005 through
2008 remain open for examination by the taxing authorities in
the respective jurisdictions where those returns were filed. In
addition, certain tax returns filed by TODCO and its
subsidiaries are open for years prior to 2004, however TODCO tax
obligations from periods prior to its initial public offering in
2004 are indemnified by Transocean under the tax sharing
agreement, except for the Trinidad and Tobago jurisdiction. The
Companys Trinidadian tax returns are open for examination
for the years 2002 through 2008.
101
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the reconciliation of the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken in earlier periods
|
|
|
8,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
13,476
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
141
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken in earlier periods
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
13,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time, our tax returns are subject to review and
examination by various tax authorities within the jurisdictions
in which we operate. We are currently contesting tax assessments
in Mexico and Venezuela, and may contest future assessments
where we believe the assessments are meritless.
In December 2002, TODCO received an assessment from SENIAT, the
national Venezuelan tax authority, for approximately
$20.7 million (based on the current exchange rates at the
time of the assessment and inclusive of penalties) relating to
calendar years 1998 through 2001. In March 2003, TODCO paid
approximately $2.6 million of the assessment, plus
approximately $0.3 million in interest, and we are
contesting the remainder of the assessment with the Venezuelan
Tax Court. After TODCO made the partial assessment payment, it
received a revised assessment in September 2003 of approximately
$16.7 million (based on the current exchange rates at the
time of the assessment and inclusive of penalties). Thereafter,
TODCO filed an administrative tax appeal with SENIAT and the tax
authority rendered a decision that reduced the tax assessment to
$8.1 million (based on the current exchange rates at the
time of the decision). TODCO then initiated a judicial tax court
appeal with the Venezuelan Tax Court to set aside the
$8.1 million administrative tax assessment. In August 2008,
the Venezuelan Tax Court ruled in favor of TODCO; however,
SENIAT has the right to appeal this case to the Venezuelan
Supreme Court. In July 2009, the Company settled the taxes and
interest portion of the assessment for approximately
3.3 million Bolivares Fuertes, or approximately
$1.5 million (based on the official exchange rate at the
date of settlement). The Company is disputing any residual
penalties which are currently assessed at 3.4 million
Bolivares Fuertes, or $1.6 million (based on the official
exchange rate at the date of assessment). The Company, as
successor to TODCO, is fully indemnified by TODCOS former
parent, Transocean Ltd. related to this settlement. The Company
does not expect the ultimate resolution of this tax assessment
and settlement to have a material impact on its consolidated
results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In
January 2008, SENIAT commenced an audit for the 2003 calendar
year, which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2008. The
Company has not yet received any proposed adjustments from
SENIAT for that year.
In March 2007, a subsidiary of the Company received an
assessment from the Mexican tax authorities related to its
operations for the 2004 tax year. This assessment contests the
Companys right to certain deductions and also claims it
did not remit withholding tax due on certain of these
deductions. The Company is pursuing its alternatives to resolve
this assessment. In accordance with local statutory
requirements, we have provided a surety bond for an amount equal
to $13.2 million as of December 31, 2009, to contest
these assessments. In 2008, the Mexican tax authorities
commenced an audit for the 2005 tax year. Depending on the
ultimate outcome of the 2004 assessment and the 2005 audit, the
Company anticipates that the Mexican tax authorities could make
similar assessments for other open tax years.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has $10.6 million
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the
effective income tax rate. It is reasonably possible that,
within the next 12 months, total unrecognized tax benefits
may decrease as a result of a potential resolution of the
aforementioned ongoing tax
102
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
audits. The Company estimates that these events could reasonably
result in a possible decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of up
to $7.9 million.
The Company reports its business activities in six business
segments: (1) Domestic Offshore, (2) International
Offshore, (3) Inland, (4) Domestic Liftboats,
(5) International Liftboats and (6) Delta Towing. The
financial information of the Companys discontinued
operation is not included in the financial information presented
for the Companys reporting segments. The Company
eliminates inter-segment revenue and expenses, if any.
In January 2009, the Company reclassified four of its
cold-stacked jackup rigs located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico
and 10 of its cold-stacked inland barges as retired. These rigs
would require extensive refurbishment and currently are not
expected to re-enter active service. In each of September 2009
and November 2009, the Company sold one of the retired inland
barges (See Note 5). Additionally, the Company recently
entered into an agreement to sell our retired jackups
Hercules 191 and Hercules 255 for
$5.0 million each (See Note 5) and in February
2010, the Company entered into an agreement to sell six of its
retired barges for $3.0 million (See Notes 1, 5 and
21).
The following describes the Companys reporting segments as
of December 31, 2009:
Domestic Offshore includes 21 jackup rigs and
three submersible rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that can
drill in maximum water depths ranging from 85 to 350 feet.
Eleven of the jackup rigs are either working on short-term
contracts or available. Ten are cold-stacked. All three
submersibles are cold-stacked.
International Offshore includes nine jackup
rigs and one platform rig outside of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico. The Company has two jackup rigs working offshore in each
of India and Saudi Arabia. The Company has one jackup rig
working offshore in Malaysia, one jackup rig contracted for work
in Angola as well as one jackup rig warm-stacked in each of
Bahrain and Gabon. The Company has one jackup rig and one
platform rig operating in Mexico. In August 2009, the Company
closed the sale of the Hercules 110 which was
cold-stacked in Trinidad (See Note 5).
Inland includes a fleet of 6 conventional and
11 posted barge rigs that operate inland in marshes, rivers,
lakes and shallow bay or coastal waterways along the
U.S. Gulf Coast. Three of the Companys inland barges
are either operating on short-term contracts or available and 14
are cold-stacked.
Domestic Liftboats includes 41 liftboats in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Thirty-eight are operating in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and three are cold-stacked.
International Liftboats includes 24
liftboats. Twenty-two are operating or available for
contract offshore West Africa, including five liftboats owned by
a third party. Two liftboats are operating or available for
contract in the Middle East region.
Delta Towing the Companys Delta Towing
business operates a fleet of 29 inland tugs, 12 offshore tugs,
34 crew boats, 46 deck barges, 17 shale barges and four spud
barges along and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and along the
Southeastern coast and from time to time in Mexico. Of these
vessels, 22 crew boats, 16 inland tugs and five offshore tugs,
one deck barge and one spud barge are cold-stacked, and the
remaining are working or available for contracts.
The Companys jackup rigs, submersible rigs and platform
rigs are used primarily for exploration and development drilling
in shallow waters. The Companys liftboats are
self-propelled, self-elevating vessels that support a broad
range of offshore maintenance and construction services
throughout the life of an oil or natural gas well.
103
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information regarding reportable segments is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore(a)
|
|
$
|
140,889
|
|
|
$
|
(101,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
60,775
|
|
|
$
|
382,358
|
|
|
$
|
(598,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,850
|
|
International Offshore(b)
|
|
|
393,797
|
|
|
|
97,995
|
|
|
|
63,808
|
|
|
|
327,983
|
|
|
|
(11,647
|
)
|
|
|
37,865
|
|
Inland(c)
|
|
|
19,794
|
|
|
|
(59,095
|
)
|
|
|
32,465
|
|
|
|
162,487
|
|
|
|
(422,152
|
)
|
|
|
43,107
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
75,584
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
20,267
|
|
|
|
94,755
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
88,537
|
|
|
|
22,427
|
|
|
|
12,880
|
|
|
|
85,896
|
|
|
|
30,872
|
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
Delta Towing(d)
|
|
|
24,250
|
|
|
|
(12,677
|
)
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
58,328
|
|
|
|
(80,065
|
)
|
|
|
10,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
742,851
|
|
|
$
|
(48,665
|
)
|
|
$
|
198,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
(1,065,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
189,977
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,481
|
)
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,643
|
)
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
742,851
|
|
|
$
|
(92,146
|
)
|
|
$
|
201,421
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
(1,120,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
192,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations includes $507.2 million
and $174.6 million in impairment of goodwill and impairment
of property and equipment charges, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
2009 Income (Loss) from Operations includes an impairment of
property and equipment charge of $26.9 million as well as
an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable of approximately
$26.8 million, related to a customer in West Africa that is
contracted to utilize one rig in its International Offshore
segment, a non-cash charge of approximately $7.3 million to
fully impair the related deferred mobilization and contract
preparation costs, partially offset by a $2.5 million
reduction in previously accrued contract related operating costs
that are not expected to be settled if the receivable is not
collected. In addition, 2008 Income (Loss) from Operations
includes an impairment of goodwill charge of $150.9 million. |
|
(c) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations includes $205.5 million
and $202.1 million in impairment of goodwill and impairment
of property and equipment charges, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
2008 Income (Loss) from Operations includes an impairment of
goodwill charge of $86.7 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
241,452
|
|
|
$
|
78,073
|
|
|
$
|
35,143
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
144,778
|
|
|
|
67,809
|
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
107,100
|
|
|
|
33,667
|
|
|
|
16,264
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
137,745
|
|
|
|
50,684
|
|
|
|
24,969
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
63,282
|
|
|
|
19,896
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
Delta Towing
|
|
|
31,921
|
|
|
|
10,262
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
260,391
|
|
|
$
|
104,106
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,749
|
)
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
$
|
225,642
|
|
|
$
|
104,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
870,723
|
|
|
$
|
930,988
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
860,252
|
|
|
|
955,911
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
160,354
|
|
|
|
217,477
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
88,942
|
|
|
|
148,307
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
164,221
|
|
|
|
168,356
|
|
Delta Towing
|
|
|
62,563
|
|
|
|
92,371
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
70,421
|
|
|
|
77,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
2,277,476
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008(a)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures and Deferred Drydocking Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Offshore
|
|
$
|
8,665
|
|
|
$
|
139,893
|
|
|
$
|
22,720
|
|
International Offshore
|
|
|
46,246
|
|
|
|
390,732
|
|
|
|
78,455
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
9,886
|
|
|
|
39,739
|
|
|
|
17,145
|
|
Domestic Liftboats
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
12,362
|
|
|
|
16,950
|
|
International Liftboats
|
|
|
15,717
|
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
20,183
|
|
Delta Towing
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
16,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
91,787
|
|
|
$
|
602,353
|
|
|
$
|
176,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the purchase of Hercules 350, Hercules 262
and Hercules 261 as well as related equipment (See
Note 4). |
A substantial portion of our assets are mobile. Asset locations
at the end of the period are not necessarily indicative of the
geographic distribution of the revenues generated by such assets
during the periods. The following tables present revenues and
long-lived assets by country based on the location of the
service provided (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
258,868
|
|
|
$
|
697,930
|
|
|
$
|
514,911
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
109,256
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
122,016
|
|
|
|
93,544
|
|
|
|
52,501
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
77,245
|
|
|
|
90,815
|
|
|
|
28,364
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
75,016
|
|
|
|
83,141
|
|
|
|
60,384
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
47,006
|
|
|
|
17,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
53,444
|
|
|
|
128,639
|
|
|
|
70,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
742,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,111,807
|
|
|
$
|
726,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,122,294
|
|
|
$
|
1,224,564
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
311,365
|
|
|
|
301,147
|
|
India
|
|
|
147,497
|
|
|
|
157,686
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
50,728
|
|
|
|
101,429
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
115,656
|
|
|
|
79,886
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
58,965
|
|
|
|
74,840
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
149,557
|
|
|
|
151,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,956,062
|
|
|
$
|
2,091,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other represents countries in which we operate that individually
had operating revenues or long-lived assets representing less
than 4% of total operating revenues or total long-lived assets. |
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company has non-cancellable operating lease commitments that
expire at various dates through 2017. As of December 31,
2009, future minimum lease payments related to non-cancellable
operating leases were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
5,578
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense for all operating leases was $15.3 million,
$13.3 million and $2.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Legal
Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits in the
normal course of business. As of December 31, 2009,
management did not believe any accruals were necessary in
accordance with FASB Codification Topic
450-20,
Contingencies Loss Contingencies.
In connection with the July 2007 acquisition of TODCO, the
Company assumed certain material legal proceedings from TODCO
and its subsidiaries.
In October 2001, TODCO was notified by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that
the EPA had identified a subsidiary of TODCO as a potentially
responsible party under CERCLA in connection with the Palmer
Barge Line superfund site located in Port Arthur, Jefferson
County, Texas. Based upon the information provided by the EPA
and the Companys review of its internal records to date,
the Company disputes the Companys designation as a
potentially responsible party and does not expect that the
ultimate
106
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
outcome of this case will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash
flows. The Company continues to monitor this matter.
Robert E. Aaron et al. vs. Phillips 66 Company et al. Circuit
Court, Second Judicial District, Jones County, Mississippi.
This is the case name used to refer to several cases that have
been filed in the Circuit Courts of the State of Mississippi
involving 768 persons that allege personal injury or whose
heirs claim their deaths arose out of asbestos exposure in the
course of their employment by the defendants between 1965 and
2002. The complaints name as defendants, among others, certain
of TODCOs subsidiaries and certain subsidiaries of
TODCOs former parent to whom TODCO may owe indemnity, and
other unaffiliated defendant companies, including companies that
allegedly manufactured drilling-related products containing
asbestos that are the subject of the complaints. The number of
unaffiliated defendant companies involved in each complaint
ranges from approximately 20 to 70. The complaints allege that
the defendant drilling contractors used asbestos-containing
products in offshore drilling operations, land based drilling
operations and in drilling structures, drilling rigs, vessels
and other equipment and assert claims based on, among other
things, negligence and strict liability, and claims authorized
under the Jones Act. The plaintiffs seek, among other things,
awards of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. All of
these cases were assigned to a special master who has approved a
form of questionnaire to be completed by plaintiffs so that
claims made would be properly served against specific
defendants. Approximately 700 questionnaires were returned and
the remaining plaintiffs, who did not submit a questionnaire
reply, have had their suits dismissed without prejudice. Of the
respondents, approximately 100 shared periods of employment
by TODCO and its former parent which could lead to claims
against either company, even though many of these plaintiffs did
not state in their questionnaire answers that the employment
actually involved exposure to asbestos. After providing the
questionnaire, each plaintiff was further required to file a
separate and individual amended complaint naming only those
defendants against whom they had a direct claim as identified in
the questionnaire answers. Defendants not identified in the
amended complaints were dismissed from the plaintiffs
litigation. To date, three plaintiffs named TODCO as a defendant
in their amended complaints. It is possible that some of the
plaintiffs who have filed amended complaints and have not named
TODCO as a defendant may attempt to add TODCO as a defendant in
the future when case discovery begins and greater attention is
given to each individual plaintiffs employment background.
The Company continues to monitor a small group of these other
cases. The Company has not determined which entity would be
responsible for such claims under the Master Separation
Agreement between TODCO and its former parent. The Company
intends to defend vigorously and does not expect the ultimate
outcome of these lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on
its consolidated results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in a number of
other lawsuits, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course
of business. The Company does not believe that ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from any such other pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its business
or consolidated financial position.
The Company cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect
of any of the litigation matters specifically described above or
of any other pending litigation. There can be no assurance that
the Companys belief or expectations as to the outcome or
effect of any lawsuit or other litigation matter will prove
correct, and the eventual outcome of these matters could
materially differ from managements current estimates.
Insurance
The Company is self-insured for the deductible portion of its
insurance coverage. Management believes adequate accruals have
been made on known and estimated exposures up to the deductible
portion of the Companys insurance coverage. Management
believes that claims and liabilities in excess of the amounts
accrued are adequately insured. However, our insurance is
subject to exclusions and limitations, and there is no assurance
that such coverage will adequately protect us against liability
from all potential consequences.
107
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company maintains insurance coverage that includes coverage
for physical damage, third party liability, workers
compensation and employers liability, general liability,
vessel pollution and other coverages.
In May 2009, the Company completed the annual renewal of all of
its key insurance policies. The Companys primary marine
package provides for hull and machinery coverage for the
Companys rigs and liftboats up to a scheduled value for
each asset. The maximum coverage for these assets is
$2.2 billion; however, coverage for U.S. Gulf of
Mexico named windstorm damage is subject to an annual aggregate
limit on liability of $100.0 million. The policies are
subject to exclusions, limitations, deductibles, self-insured
retention and other conditions. Deductibles for events that are
not U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm events are 12.5% of
insured values per occurrence for drilling rigs, and
$1.0 million per occurrence for liftboats, regardless of
the insured value of the particular vessel. The deductibles for
drilling rigs and liftboats in a U.S. Gulf of Mexico named
windstorm event are the greater of $25.0 million or the
operational deductible for each U.S. Gulf of Mexico named
windstorm. The Company is self-insured for 15% above the
deductibles for removal of wreck, sue and labor, collision,
protection and indemnity general liability and hull and physical
damage policies. The protection and indemnity coverage under the
primary marine package has a $5.0 million limit per
occurrence with excess liability coverage up to
$200.0 million. The primary marine package also provides
coverage for cargo and charterers legal liability. Vessel
pollution is covered under a Water Quality Insurance Syndicate
policy with a $3 million deductible proving limits as
required. In addition to the marine package, the Company has
separate policies providing coverage for onshore general
liability, employers liability, auto liability and
non-owned aircraft liability, with customary deductibles and
coverage as well as a separate primary marine package for its
Delta Towing business.
In 2009, in connection with the renewal of certain of its
insurance policies, the Company entered into agreements to
finance a portion of its annual insurance premiums.
Approximately $23.3 million was financed through these
arrangements, and $5.5 million was outstanding at
December 31, 2009. The interest rate on the
$21.4 million note is 4.15% and the note is scheduled to
mature in March 2010. The interest rate on the $1.9 million
note is 3.75% and it is scheduled to mature in July 2010. There
was $11.1 million outstanding in insurance notes payable at
December 31, 2008 at an interest rate of 4.42%. The amounts
financed in connection with the prior year renewal were fully
paid as of March 31, 2009.
Surety
Bonds and Unsecured Letters of Credit
The Company had $37.5 million outstanding related to surety
bonds at December 31, 2009. The surety bonds guarantee our
performance as it relates to the Companys drilling
contracts, insurance, tax and other obligations in various
jurisdictions. These obligations could be called at any time
prior to the expiration dates. The obligations that are the
subject of the surety bonds are geographically concentrated
primarily in Mexico.
The Company had $1.0 million in unsecured letters of credit
outstanding at December 31, 2009.
Insurance
Claims
The Company acquired several jackup rigs in the TODCO
acquisition (See Note 4) that were damaged by
Hurricanes Rita and Katrina and one jackup rig that was damaged
in a collision. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
the Company received $30.2 million in proceeds related
primarily to the settlement of claims for damage incurred during
Hurricanes Rita and Katrina as well as damage to Hercules 205
in a collision. At December 31, 2008, $0.8 million
was outstanding for insurance claims receivable. The Company had
no outstanding insurance claims receivable at December 31,
2009.
108
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Unaudited
Interim Financial Data
|
Unaudited interim financial information for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30(a)
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31(b)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
223,491
|
|
|
$
|
183,691
|
|
|
$
|
159,262
|
|
|
$
|
176,407
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
9,109
|
|
|
|
(25,829
|
)
|
|
|
(32,712
|
)
|
|
|
(42,714
|
)
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(4,511
|
)
|
|
|
(11,787
|
)
|
|
|
(46,970
|
)
|
|
|
(26,881
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation, Net of Taxes
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(4,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,029
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes approximately $26.9 million of impairment charges
related to the write-down of Hercules 110 to fair value
less costs to sell during the second quarter of 2009 (See
Notes 5 and 12). The sale was completed in August 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable of
approximately $26.8 million as of December 31, 2009,
related to a customer in West Africa that is contracted to
utilize one rig in the Companys International Offshore
segment, a non-cash charge of approximately $7.3 million to
fully impair the related deferred mobilization and contract
preparation costs, partially offset by a $2.5 million
reduction in previously accrued contract related operating costs
that are not expected to be settled if the receivable is not
collected (See Notes 1 and 14). |
109
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31(a)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
212,494
|
|
|
$
|
270,106
|
|
|
$
|
315,738
|
|
|
$
|
313,469
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
21,364
|
|
|
|
40,852
|
|
|
|
67,057
|
|
|
|
(1,250,186
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
16,388
|
|
|
|
31,855
|
|
|
|
(1,134,988
|
)
|
Loss from Discontinued Operation, Net of Taxes
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
4,486
|
|
|
$
|
16,179
|
|
|
$
|
31,687
|
|
|
$
|
(1,135,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(12.90
|
)
|
Loss from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(12.91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(12.90
|
)
|
Loss from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(12.91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $950.3 million and $376.7 million in
impairment of goodwill and impairment of property and equipment
charges, respectively (See Note 1). |
The Company engages in transactions in the ordinary course of
business with entities with whom certain of our directors or
members of management have a relationship. The Company has
determined that these transactions were carried out on an
arms-length basis and are not material individually or in
the aggregate. All of these transactions were approved in
accordance with the Companys Policy on Covered
Transactions with Related Persons. The following provides a
brief description of these relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys Chairman of the Board and its Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer are members of the Board
of Directors for T-3 Energy Services, Inc., an oil field
equipment and services company.
|
|
|
|
The Companys current Chairman of the Board of Directors is
also a Senior Advisor to Lime Rock Partners, who owns a
controlling interest in IDM Group, Ltd. (Cyprus) who purchased
Louisiana Electric Rig Services, Inc., an equipment
manufacturing and service company, and Southwest Oilfield
Products, Inc., an oilfield equipment manufacturing company, in
December 2008 and June 2008, respectively, and who holds an
investment interest in Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc., an oilfield
equipment and services company. In addition, the Companys
former Chairman of the Board of Directors is a Managing Director
of Lime Rock Partners.
|
|
|
|
Another member of the Companys Board of Directors serves
on the Board of Directors for Peregrine Oil & Gas LP,
an exploration and production company, and is the Chairman of
the Board for Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., an exploration
and production company. In addition, another of the
Companys directors serves on the Board of Directors for
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
110
HERCULES
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
A member of the Companys Board of Directors is a member of
the Board of Directors of HCC Insurance Holdings, a specialty
insurance group.
|
|
|
|
The Company holds a three percent investment in each of
Hall-Houston Exploration II, L.P. and Hall-Houston Exploration
III, L.P., exploration and production funds.
|
In February 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to sell
six of its retired barges for $3.0 million (See
Notes 1, 5 and 17).
111
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including John T. Rynd, our
Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lisa W. Rodriguez,
our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant
to
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report. Based upon that
evaluation, Mr. Rynd and Ms. Rodriguez, acting in
their capacities as our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer, concluded that, as of
December 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective, in all material respects, with respect to the
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, of
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that
we file or submit under the Exchange Act.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, it used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on our
assessment, we have concluded that, as of December 31,
2009, our internal control over financial reporting is effective
based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has audited
managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, as stated in their report entitled
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm which appears herein.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
112
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2009.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethical Practices
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which
applies to, among others, our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and
persons performing similar functions. We have posted a copy of
the code in the Corporate Governance section of our
internet website at www.herculesoffshore.com . Copies of
the code may be obtained free of charge on our website or by
requesting a copy in writing from our Corporate Secretary at 9
Greenway Plaza, Suite 2200, Houston, Texas 77046. Any
waivers of the code must be approved by our board of directors
or a designated board committee. Any amendments to, or waivers
from, the code that apply to our executive officers and
directors will be posted in the Corporate Governance
section of our internet website at
www.herculesoffshore.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2009.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2009.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2009.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement, which is to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within
120 days after the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2009.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are included as part of this
report:
(1) Financial Statements
(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule on
page 117 of this Report.
(3) The Exhibits of the Company listed below in
Item 15(b)
113
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated September 24, 2009, by and
between Hercules Offshore, Inc. and Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as representatives of
the underwriters named in Schedule A thereto (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Hercules Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 30, 2009).
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Plan of Conversion (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Hercules Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-126457),
as amended (the
S-1
Registration Statement), originally filed on July 8,
2005).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
effective as of March 18, 2007, by and among Hercules, THE
Hercules Offshore Drilling Company LLC and TODCO (incorporated
by reference to Annex A to the Joint Proxy/Statement
Prospectus included in Part I of Hercules
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-142314),
as amended (the
S-4
Registration Statement), originally filed April 24,
2007).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Hercules (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 1, 2005 (File
No. 0-51582)
(the 2005
Form 8-K)).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (effective December 31, 2009)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Hercules
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 8, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Form of specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
S-1
Registration Statement).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2005, between
Hercules and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, as rights agent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the 2005
Form 8-K).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 1, 2008, between Hercules and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent.
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the 2005
Form 8-K).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of July 11, 2007 among Hercules,
as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, as guarantors, UBS
AG, Stamford Branch, as issuing bank, administrative agent and
collateral agent, Amegy Bank National Association and Comerica
Bank, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands
Branch and Jefferies Finance LLC, as co-documentation agents,
and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 11, 2007 (File
No. 0-51582)).
Hercules and its subsidiaries are parties to several debt
instruments that have not been filed with the SEC under which
the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of
the total assets of Hercules and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. Pursuant to paragraph 4(iii)(A) of
Item 601(b) of
Regulation S-K,
Hercules agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the SEC
upon request.
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of June 3, 2008, by and between the
Company and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 3, 2008
(File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Note (included in Exhibit 4.6).
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated as of July 23, 2009, to the
Credit Agreement dated July 11, 2007, among Hercules
Offshore, Inc., as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, as
guarantors, and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as issuing bank,
administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated July 29, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated as of October 20, 2009, by and among
Hercules Offshore, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and U.S.
Bank National Association as Trustee and Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Hercules
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 26, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Form of 10.50% Senior Secured Note due 2017 (included in
Exhibit 4.9).
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Security Agreement dated as of October 20, 2009, by and
among Hercules Offshore, Inc. and the Guarantors party thereto
and U.S. Bank National Association as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Hercules
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 26, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 20, 2009,
by and among Hercules Offshore, Inc., the Guarantors named
therein and the Initial Purchasers party thereto (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Hercules Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 26, 2009).
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 15,
2008, between Hercules and John T. Rynd (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of June 20, 2008,
between Hercules Offshore, Inc. and John T. Rynd (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 23, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2008, by and
between Hercules and Lisa W. Rodriguez (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and James W. Noe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Terrell L. Carr (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Todd Pellegrin (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
between Hercules and Troy L. Carson (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to the 2008
Form 8-K).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Expatriate Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2006,
between Hercules and Don P. Rodney (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Extension Letter between Hercules and Don P. Rodney, dated
December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 6, 2009 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Waiver of Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and
John T. Rynd, dated April 27, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated April 28, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Waiver of Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and
Lisa W. Rodriguez, dated April 27, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated April 28, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Waiver of Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and
James W. Noe, dated April 27, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated April 28, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Waiver of Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and
Terrell L. Carr, dated April 27, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated April 28, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Waiver of Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and
Todd A. Pellegrin, dated April 27, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated April 28, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 7, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Hercules Offshore 2004 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex E to the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in Part I of the
S-4
Registration Statement).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Hercules Offshore Inc. Amended and Restated
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 3, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees and Consultants.
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Hercules Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Hercules Offshore, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2005,
between Hercules and the holders listed on the signature page
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Hercules Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
Increase Joinder, dated as of April 28, 2008, among
Hercules, as borrower, its subsidiaries party thereto, the
incremental lenders and other lenders party thereto, and UBS AG
Stamford Branch, as administrative agent for the lenders party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 30, 2008 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated May 28, 2008, by and between the
Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co., Banc of America
Securities LLC and UBS Securities LLC, as representatives of the
Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 3, 2008 (File No.-0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2006, by and
between Hercules Liftboat Company, LLC and Laborde Marine Lifts,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 3, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2006, by
and among Hercules International Holdings, Ltd., Halliburton
West Africa Ltd. and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
November 1, 2006, by and among Hercules International
Holdings, Ltd., Hercules Oilfield Services Ltd., Halliburton
West Africa Ltd. and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Hercules Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
|
|
Earnout Agreement, dated November 7, 2006, by and among
Hercules Oilfield Services, Ltd., Halliburton West Africa Ltd.
and Halliburton Energy Services Nigeria Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Hercules Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 7, 2006 (File
No. 0-51582)).
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
|
|
Basic Form of Exchange Agreement between the Company and certain
holders of our 3.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2038
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 18, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated October 8, 2009, by and among
Hercules Offshore, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, UBS
Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated,
as representatives of the initial purchasers named in
Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 14, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 20, 2009, among
Hercules Offshore, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto as
guarantors, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Bank Collateral Agent
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Notes Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Hercules Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 26, 2009).
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Hercules.
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hercules pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hercules pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Hercules pursuant to Section 901 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
(1) Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Allowances
116
SCHEDULE II
HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCES
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Collections/
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
7,756
|
|
|
$
|
32,912
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,522
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
7,756
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
634
|
|
All other financial statement schedules have been omitted
because they are not applicable or not required, or the
information required thereby is included in the consolidated
financial statements or the notes thereto included in this
annual report.
117
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston, State of
Texas, on March 2, 2010.
HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.
John T. Rynd
Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on
March 2, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
T. RYND
John
T. Rynd
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ LISA
W. RODRIGUEZ
Lisa
W. Rodriguez
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ TROY
L. CARSON
Troy
L. Carson
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
R. BATES, JR.
Thomas
R. Bates, Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
N. AMONETT
Thomas
N. Amonett
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ SUZANNE
V. BAER
Suzanne
V. Baer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
M HAMILTON
Thomas
M Hamilton
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
J. MADONNA
Thomas
J. Madonna
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ F.
GARDNER PARKER
F.
Gardner Parker
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THIERRY
PILENKO
Thierry
Pilenko
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEVEN
A. WEBSTER
Steven
A. Webster
|
|
Director
|
118