nvcsrs
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-07111
Invesco Insured California Municipal Securities
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77046
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Philip A. Taylor 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77046
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 626-1919
Date of fiscal year end: 10/31
Date of reporting period: 4/30/10
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Welcome,
Shareholder:
In this
report, youll learn about how your investment in
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities
performed during the semiannual period. We will provide an
overview of the market conditions, and discuss some of the
factors that affected performance during the reporting period.
In addition, this report includes the Trusts financial
statements and a list of Trust investments.
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily
come to pass. There is no assurance that the Trust will achieve
its investment objective. The Trust is subject to market risk,
which is the possibility that market values of securities owned
by the Trust will decline and, therefore, the value of the
Trusts shares may be less than what you paid for them.
Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Trust.
Income earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
Trust Report
For the six months ended April 30, 2010
Market
Conditions
Economic data released during the six-month reporting period
indicated that the economy was expanding, although some
investors continued to question whether the recession was really
behind us. The housing market continued to lag and unemployment
remained high, but hints of improvement began to appear late in
the period when the April labor report showed that employment in
the U.S. rose by its largest monthly increase in four years. The
Federal Reserve maintained their accommodative monetary policy,
leaving the federal funds target rate unchanged at near zero
percent, but hiked the discount rate by 25 basis points to
0.75 percent in mid-February perhaps an
indication of monetary tightening ahead.
Municipal bond market performance slowed substantially during
the reporting period from the historically large returns seen in
previous months. The lower rated segment of the market continued
to outperform as investor demand for lower quality, higher
yielding bonds grew over the course of the period. For the six
months ended April 30, 2010, the Barclays Capital High
Yield Municipal Bond Index gained 6.70 percent while the
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the benchmark for the
investment grade segment) gained 3.68 percent. Overall,
longer maturity issues outperformed those with shorter
maturities. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, long
bonds (those with maturities of 22 years or more) returned
5.09 percent while five-year bonds returned
3.22 percent, as measured by the respective Barclays
Capital municipal bond indexes.
With regard to sectors, hospital bonds and tobacco bonds were
among the top performers, outpacing the broad municipal market
as rising demand for these lower quality issues helped boost
returns. Revenue bonds outperformed general obligation bonds
amid media reports of municipalities general financial
weakness and ongoing weakness in tax collections.
Demand for municipal bonds overall remained steady, with
approximately $24 billion flowing into municipal bond funds
during the period. New issue supply remained relatively stable
as well, totaling roughly $205 billion. However,
25 percent of that total issuance was in taxable Build
America Bonds, thereby limiting the supply of traditional
tax-exempt bonds. This has helped buoy tax-exempt bond prices
and the relative value of municipal bonds overall versus other
fixed income sectors.
The state of California still benefits from its large and
diverse economic base and above-average wealth levels yet faces
many challenges from its large exposure to the housing crisis,
falling tax revenues, and recent budgetary shortfalls. In
January 2010 the governor proposed a budget for fiscal year 2011
that seeks to close a $19 billion gap for the balance of
fiscal year 2010 and for fiscal year 2011 and create a
$1 billion surplus. This is to be accomplished through
$8.5 billion of spending cuts, $7 billion of
additional federal funds and $4 billion in other measures.
As of the end of April, California was rated Baa1/Stable by
Moodys, A-/Negative by S&P and BBB/Stable by Fitch.
The state typically leads the national economy and we will
continue to closely monitor its financial performance.
2
Performance
Analysis
For the six-month period ended April 30, 2010, the net
asset value (NAV) of Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal
Securities (ICS) decreased from $14.65 to $14.47 per share.
Based on the NAV change plus reinvestment of tax-free dividends
totaling $0.285 per share, a short-term capital gain
distribution of $0.161891 and a long-term capital gain
distribution of $0.271915 per share, the Trusts total NAV
return was 4.47 percent. ICSs value on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) moved from $13.17 to $13.03 per share
during the same period. Based on this change plus reinvestment
of dividends and distributions, the Trusts total market
return was 4.57 percent. ICSs NYSE market price was
at a 9.95 percent discount to its NAV. During the fiscal
period, the Trust purchased and retired 21,522 shares of
common stock at a weighted average market discount of 10.13
percent. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results.
Monthly dividends for May 2010 were unchanged at $0.0475 per
share. The dividend reflects the current level of the
Trusts net investment income. ICSs level of
undistributed net investment income was $0.115 per share on
April 30, 2010 versus $0.070 per share six months
earlier.1
The Trusts exposure to longer maturity bonds was additive
to performance as the long end of the municipal yield curve
outperformed the shorter maturity segment of the curve for the
overall reporting period. Exposure to BBB rated credits also
enhanced returns. Spreads on these issues tightened over the
period, helping them to outperform higher quality issues. The
Trusts holdings in zero coupon bonds, however, hindered
performance as the market supply of these issues exceeded
demand, leading to their underperformance of the broad municipal
bond market. The portfolios minimal exposure to California
general obligation bonds was also disadvantageous as tightening
spreads on these securities led them to outperform the broader
market.
The Trusts procedure for reinvesting all dividends and
distributions in common shares is through purchases in the open
market. This method helps support the market value of the
Trusts shares. In addition, we would like to remind you
that the Trustees have approved a share repurchase program
whereby the Trust may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price
not above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at
the time of purchase.
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is
no guarantee of future results, and current performance may be
lower or higher than the figures shown. Investment return, net
asset value and common share market price will fluctuate and
Trust shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will
continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in
such sectors will be held by the Trust in the future.
1 Income
earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be subject to
the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
3
|
|
|
|
|
TOP FIVE SECTORS as of 04/30/10
|
|
|
General Obligation
|
|
|
25
|
.9%
|
Appropriation
|
|
|
20
|
.3
|
Dedicated Tax
|
|
|
11
|
.2
|
Public Power
|
|
|
9
|
.8
|
Water / Sewer
|
|
|
7
|
.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATINGS ALLOCATIONS as of 04/30/10
|
Aaa/AAA
|
|
|
5
|
.8%
|
Aa/AA
|
|
|
54
|
.5
|
A/A
|
|
|
24
|
.6
|
Baa/BBB
|
|
|
0
|
.0
|
Ba/BB or Less
|
|
|
0
|
.0
|
Non-Rated
|
|
|
3
|
.6
|
Not Insured
|
|
|
11
|
.5
|
Subject to change daily. Provided for informational purposes
only and should not be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell
the securities mentioned or securities in the sectors shown
above. Top five sectors and ratings allocations are as a
percentage of total investments. Securities are classified by
sectors that represent broad groupings of related industries.
Morgan Stanley is a full-service securities firm engaged in
securities trading and brokerage activities, investment banking,
research and analysis, financing and financial advisory
services. Rating allocations based upon ratings as issued by
Moodys and Standard and Poors, respectively.
For More
Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Morgan Stanley trust provides a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within
60 days of the end of the trusts second and fourth
fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports
are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on
Form N-CSRS
and
Form N-CSR,
respectively. Morgan Stanley also delivers the semiannual and
annual reports to trust shareholders and makes these reports
available on its public web site. Each Morgan Stanley trust also
files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for
the trusts first and third fiscal quarters on
Form N-Q.
Morgan Stanley does not deliver the reports for the first and
third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports
posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. You may, however,
obtain the
Form N-Q
filings (as well as the
Form N-CSR
and N-CSRS filings) by accessing the SECs web site,
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also review and copy them at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation
of the SECs public reference room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You can also request
copies of these materials, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at the SECs
e-mail
address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the public reference
section of the SEC, Washington,
DC 20549-1520.
4
Approval of Investment Advisory
and
Sub-Advisory
Agreements
The Board of Trustees (the Board) of Invesco Insured California
Municipal Securities (the Trust) is required under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 to approve the Trusts
investment advisory agreements. At various meetings of the Board
held during the third and fourth quarters of 2009 and early
2010, the Board as a whole and the disinterested or
independent Trustees, voting separately, approved
(i) a new investment advisory agreement with Invesco
Advisers, Inc. (Invesco Advisers), (ii) a new Master
Intergroup
Sub-Advisory
Contract for Mutual Funds (the
sub-advisory
contracts and together with the investment advisory agreement
with Invesco Advisers, the new advisory agreements) with Invesco
Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management
Limited, Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco
Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior
Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd. (collectively,
the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers),
and (iii) the appointment of Invesco Advisers as investment
adviser and the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
as investment
sub-advisers
to the Trust. In doing so, the Board determined that the new
advisory agreements will enable shareholders of the Trust to
obtain high quality services at a cost that is appropriate,
reasonable and in the best interests of the Trust and its
shareholders and that the compensation to Invesco Advisers and
the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
under the Trusts new advisory agreements is fair and
reasonable. The new advisory agreements were approved to become
effective upon approval by the shareholders of the Trust and
closing of a transaction between Morgan Stanley and Invesco Ltd.
(Invesco) under which Invesco acquired the retail mutual fund
assets of Morgan Stanley (the Acquisition).
The Boards
Trust Evaluation Process
In reaching their decision, the Board requested and obtained
information from Morgan Stanley, Invesco Advisers and Invesco,
including information obtained during various meetings with
Senior Management at Invesco, as they deemed reasonably
necessary to evaluate the new advisory agreements for the Trust.
In considering the Trusts new advisory agreements, the
Board evaluated a number of factors and considerations listed
below that they believed, in light of their own business
judgment, to be relevant to their determination.
1. The Board considered the reputation, financial strength
and resources of Invesco, one of the worlds leading
independent global investment management firms, the strength of
Invescos resources and investment capabilities and the
client-focused shareholder services offered by Invesco.
2. The Board discussed the challenges of positioning the
Trust on a common operating platform with Invesco, with
particular emphasis on ensuring portfolio management operations
properly migrate to Invesco as part of the Acquisition, to
ensure uninterrupted services for shareholders and the
opportunity for the portfolio management of the Trust to
recognize savings from economies of scale when such savings
occur.
5
3. The Board noted the continuity of key investment
management personnel that would manage the Trust upon
consummation of the Acquisition, specifically noting that, with
respect to the Trust, the persons responsible for the portfolio
management of the Trust are expected to remain the same except
that Neil Stone will not continue as a portfolio manager of the
Trust. The Board discussed at length the effect of this change
on the Trust.
4. The Board noted that entering into the
sub-advisory
contracts would provide Invesco Advisers with increased
flexibility in assigning portfolio managers to the Trust and
would give the Trust access to portfolio managers and investment
personnel located in other offices, including those outside the
United States, who may have more specialized expertise on local
companies, markets and economies or on various types of
investments and investment techniques.
5. The Board noted that, pursuant to the
sub-advisory
contracts, Invesco Advisers would pay all of the
sub-advisory
fees of the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
out of its management fees.
6. The Board noted the undertaking by Invesco and Morgan
Stanley or their respective affiliates to assume all of the
costs of the Acquisition, including the cost of obtaining the
shareholder approvals discussed above. The Board noted that
Invesco Advisers would provide a two-year contractual guaranty
to limit the total expense ratio of the Trust to the
Trusts total expense ratio prior to the Acquisition. In
determining the obligation to waive advisory fees and/or
reimburse expenses, the following is not taken into account:
(i) interest, (ii) taxes, (iii) dividend expense
on short sales, (iv) extraordinary or non-routine items,
and (v) expenses that the Trust has incurred but did not
actually pay because of an offset arrangement. During the
Boards extensive review process, the Board, including the
independent Trustees, considered, among other things, the
following factors: the terms and conditions of the new advisory
agreements, including the differences from the advisory
agreement with Morgan Stanley affiliates; and the nature, scope
and quality of services that Invesco Advisers and its affiliates
are expected to provide to the Trust, including
sub-advisory
services and compliance services. The Board evaluated all
information available to them on a
trust-by-trust
basis, and their determinations were made separately in respect
of the Trust. The Board also based their decisions on the
following considerations, among others, although they did not
identify any consideration that was all important or controlling
of their discussions, and each Trustee attributed different
weights to the various factors.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of
Services. The Board reviewed and considered the
nature and extent of the investment advisory services to be
provided by Invesco Advisers and the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
under the new advisory agreements, including portfolio
management, investment
6
research and fixed income securities trading. The Board also
reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the
non-advisory, administrative services to be provided by Invesco
Advisers under the Trusts administration agreement,
including accounting services and the provision of supplies,
office space and utilities at Invesco Advisers expense.
The Board was advised that there was no expected diminution in
the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the
Trusts shareholders.
The Board reviewed and considered the qualifications of the
portfolio managers who are expected to continue as portfolio
managers, noting the one portfolio manager who would not
continue to manage the Trust as a result of the new advisory
agreements, and the senior administrative managers and other key
personnel of Invesco Advisers or its affiliates who will provide
the advisory and administrative services to the Trust.
B. Performance, Fees and Expenses of the
Trust. The Board noted that Invesco Advisers and
the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
had not yet begun providing services to the Trust and,
therefore, concluded that performance was not a factor they
needed to address with respect to the approval of the new
advisory agreements. They also considered that management fees
would not increase under the new advisory agreements and that
Invesco Advisers would pay the fee under the
sub-advisory
contract out of its management fees. Furthermore, the Board
considered that Invesco Advisers would provide a two-year
contractual guaranty to limit the total expense ratio of the
Trust to the Trusts total expense ratio prior to the
Acquisition.
C. Economies of Scale. The Board
considered the benefits that the shareholders of the Trust would
be afforded as a result of anticipated economies of scale.
D. Other Benefits of the
Relationship. The Board considered other benefits
to Invesco Advisers and its affiliates that may be derived from
their relationship with the Trust and other funds advised by
Invesco Advisers.
E. Resources of the Adviser. The Board
considered whether Invesco Advisers and the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
were financially sound and had the resources necessary to
perform their obligations under the new advisory agreements,
noting assurances that Invesco Advisers and the Affiliated
Sub-Advisers
had the financial resources necessary to fulfill their
obligations under the new advisory agreements and the benefits
to the Trust of such a relationship.
7
F. General Conclusion. After considering
and weighing all of the above factors, the Board, including the
independent Trustees, unanimously concluded that it would be in
the best interest of the Trust and its shareholders to approve
the new advisory agreements with respect to the Trust. In
reaching this conclusion, the Board did not give particular
weight to any single factor referenced above. The Board
considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings,
some of which were in executive session with only the
independent Trustees and their counsel present.
8
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - April 30, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (106.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (105.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
Alameda County Joint Powers Authority, Ser 2008 (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00%
|
|
|
|
12/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,133
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
Alhambra Unified School District, Ser 2009 B (AGC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,003
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Alhambra Unified School District, Ser 2009 B (AGC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,398
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
Alvord Unified School District, Ser 2008 A (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,211
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, Electric System
Ser 2007 A
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
|
10/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900,500
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, San Francisco Bay Area Ser 2009
F-1 (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
04/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
746,320
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, San Francisco Bay Area Ser 2009
F-1 (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
04/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
814,597
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
Beverly Hills Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,014
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
Beverly Hills Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,386
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Scripps
Memorial Hospital Ser 2010 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
11/15/36
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,630
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank,
Bay Area Toll Bridges Seismic Retrofit 1st Lien
Ser 2003 A (FGIC Insd) (ETM)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
01/01/28
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
2,339,220
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
California Municipal Finance Authority, Community Hospitals
Central California (COPs)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
02/01/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,500
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
California State Department of Veterans Affairs, Home Purchase
Ser 2002 A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.35
|
|
|
|
12/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522,140
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
California State Public Works Board, Department of Mental Health
Coaling Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,113
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
California State University, Ser 2005 A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
11/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,505
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, American
Baptist Homes West Ser 2010
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
|
10/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,985
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
Campbell Union High School District, Election of 2006
Ser 2008 B
(AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,738
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City & County of San Francisco, City Buildings
Ser 2007 A (COPs)
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
|
921,670
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
City & County of San Francisco, Laguna Honda Hospital
Ser 2005 I
(AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/15/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,395,047
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
City of Fairfield, Water Financing Ser 2007 A (COPs)
(XLCA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
04/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
818,535
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
City of Los Angeles, Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097,547
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
City of Redding, Electric System Ser 2008 A (COPs)
(AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
|
369,864
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
City of Riverside, Issue of 2008 D (AGM insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
10/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,985
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City of San Jose, Airport Ser 2001 (NATL-RE &
FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
03/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002,210
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City of Simi Valley, Public Financing Authority Ser 2004
(COPs)
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,900
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
Clovis Unified School District, Election of 2004 Ser A
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,470
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
Corona-Norco Unified School District, Election of 2006
Ser 2009 B
(AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,337
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
9
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
2,860
|
|
|
Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District, Election 2008
Ser 2009 E (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00%
|
|
|
|
08/01/48
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
228,543
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
El Segundo Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 A (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,739
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
Fontana Unified School District, Ser 2008 B (AGM
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
02/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,849
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Gilroy Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 A
(AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,217
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Enhanced Asset Backed
Ser 2005 A (FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
|
928,850
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
Grossmont Union High School District, Ser 2006 (NATL-RE
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,896
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Election of 2002
Ser 2008 C (AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,605
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
Huntington Beach Union High School District, Ser 2004 (AGM
Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324,710
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
Kern County Board of Education, Refg Ser 2006 A (COPs)
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,545
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
Kern County Water Agency Improvement District No. 4,
Ser 2008 A (COPs) (AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
05/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,500
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
La Quinta Financing Authority, Local Agency Ser 2004 A
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106,270
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Ser 2005 A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
07/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,020
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Ser 2006 A (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,020
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Airports, Los Angeles International
Airport Ser A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
05/15/35
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,952
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power,
Ser 2001 A (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
07/01/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039,370
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp., Police Headquarters
Ser 2006 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.75
|
|
|
|
01/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
781,416
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California,
Ser 2009 B (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
07/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354,200
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Moorpark Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 A
(AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
552,000
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
Moreland School District, Ser 2014 C (AMBAC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,838
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public Financing
Authority, Election of 2006 Ser 2008 (AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,944
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public Financing
Authority, Election of 2006 Ser 2008 (AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,386
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, Oakland Administration
Buildings Refg 2008 B (AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,191
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Oxnard Financing Authority, Redwood Trunk Sewer &
Headworks Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008,040
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
Patterson Joint Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 B (AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
03/01/49
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,580
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Placer County Water Agency, Ser 2008 (COPs) (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.75
|
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,175
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
Planada Elementary School District, Ser 2009 B (AGC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
07/01/49
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,000
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
10
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
Poway Unified School District, School Facilities Improvement
District
No. 07-1,
2008 Election Ser A (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
%
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
241,898
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
Poway Unified School District, School Facilities Improvement
District
No. 07-1,
2008 Election Ser A (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,970
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Rancho Mirage Redevelopment Agency, Ser 2003 A
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
04/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
914,590
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,642
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,238
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,027
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,374
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
Roseville Joint Union High School District, Election of 2004
Ser 2007 C (AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,790
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
Sacramento City Financing Authority, 1999 Solid
Waste & Redevelopment (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
|
12/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,670
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Election Ser U (AGM
Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/15/24
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,940
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
San Diego County Water Authority, Ser 2004 A (COPs)
(AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
05/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,210
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
San Francisco City & County Public Utilities
Commission, Water Refg Ser A 2001 (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
11/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,016,680
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
San Jose Evergreen Community College District, Election
Ser 2008 B (AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
09/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,170
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
San Rafael City High School District, Election
Ser 2002 B (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,987
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
School Facilities Financing Authority, Grant Joint Union High
School District Ser 2008 A (AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,933
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
Simi Valley Unified School District, Election of 2004
Ser 2007 C
(AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,296
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
Simi Valley Unified School District, Election of 2004
Ser 2007 C
(AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,995
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Southern California Public Power Authority, Transmission Refg
Ser 2002 A (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
07/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078,390
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Tustin Unified School District,
No. 2002-1
Election of 2002 Ser 2008 C (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
06/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,837
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Twin Rivers Unified School District, Ser 2009
(BANs) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
04/01/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,348
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2007 A (NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
|
05/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
|
940,390
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2007 J (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
|
05/15/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,450
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2009 O
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
05/15/39
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,230
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2009 W (b) (d)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
05/15/34
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,492,437
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Upland Unified School District, Election 2000
Ser 2001 B (AGM Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,046,770
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
Val Verde Unified School District, Ser 2005 B (COPs)
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
01/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
|
616,511
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
11
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
|
Washington Unified School District-Yolo County,
Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
%
|
|
|
08/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,440,409
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
West Basin Municipal Water District, Refg Ser 2008 B
(COPs)
(AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,376
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
Yosemite Community College District, Election of 2004
Ser 2008 C
(AGM Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,257
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
Yosemite Community College District, Election of 2004
Ser 2008 C
(AGM Insd) (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,586,887
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Yucaipa Valley Water District, Ser 2004 A (COPs)
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,007,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,749,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam (0.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
Territory of Guam Section 30, Ser A
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
|
12/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico (0.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Ser XX
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
|
07/01/40
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,978
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Ser 2009 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
|
08/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Loan
Diago A
|
|
|
6
|
.625
|
|
|
|
10/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
(Cost $52,234,313)
|
|
|
|
|
52,556,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal
Obligation (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
City of Irvine, Limited Obligation
Ser 85-7 A
(Demand 05/03/10)
(AGM Insd) (Cost $500,000)
|
|
|
0
|
.30
|
(e)
|
|
|
09/02/32
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
(Cost $52,734,313) (f)(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
53,056,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations Related to
Securities Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes with interest rates ranging from 0.27% to 0.30% at
04/30/10 and contractual maturities of collateral ranging from
04/01/26 to 05/15/34 (See Note 1D) (h)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(4,415,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,272,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
12
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
Note: The categories of investments are shown as a
percentage of net assets applicable to common shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANs
|
|
Bond Anticipation Notes.
|
COPs
|
|
Certificates of Participation.
|
ETM
|
|
Escrowed to Maturity.
|
(a)
|
|
Capital appreciation bond.
|
(b)
|
|
Underlying security related to inverse floater entered into
by the Trust (See Note 1D).
|
(c)
|
|
Prefunded to call date shown.
|
(d)
|
|
Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may
require the Trust to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event
of a significant decline in the market value of the security
underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the
maximum potential amount of payments the Trust could ultimately
be required to make under the agreement is $955,000. However,
such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the
sale of the security underlying the inverse floater.
|
(e)
|
|
Current coupon of variable rate demand obligation.
|
(f)
|
|
Securities have been designated as collateral in connection
with inverse floating rate municipal obligations.
|
(g)
|
|
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes
approximates the aggregate cost for book purposes. The
aggregate gross unrealized appreciation is $1,827,968 and the
aggregate gross unrealized depreciation is $1,505,556 resulting
in net unrealized appreciation of $322,412.
|
(h)
|
|
Floating rate note obligations related to securities held.
The interest rates shown reflect the rates in effect at April
30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond Insurance:
|
AGC
|
|
Assured Guaranty Corporation.
|
AGM
|
|
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation.
|
AMBAC
|
|
AMBAC Assurance Corporation.
|
FGIC
|
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company.
|
NATL-RE
|
|
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation.
|
XLCA
|
|
XL Capital Assurance Inc.
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
13
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Statements
Statement of
Assets and Liabilities
April 30, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value (cost $52,734,313)
|
|
|
$53,056,725
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
55,940
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
645,952
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
22,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
53,780,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate note and dealer trusts obligations
|
|
|
4,415,000
|
|
Payable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
12,614
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest repurchased
|
|
|
12,292
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
Transfer agent fee
|
|
|
553
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
64,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
4,508,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares of beneficial interest,
(1,000,000 shares authorized of non-participating $.01
par value, none issued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
|
|
$49,272,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest (unlimited shares
authorized of $.01 par value, 3,406,032 shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
$48,439,597
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
322,412
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
391,235
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain
|
|
|
118,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
|
|
$49,272,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Common Share
($49,272,067 divided by 3,406,032 common shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
$14.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
14
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Statements continued
Statement of
Operations
For the six months ended
April 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
1,313,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
65,797
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
39,655
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
19,495
|
|
Interest and residual trust expenses
|
|
|
18,191
|
|
Shareholder reports and notices
|
|
|
13,841
|
|
Listing fees
|
|
|
9,570
|
|
Transfer agent fees and expenses
|
|
|
4,241
|
|
Custodian fees
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
960
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
187,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
1,126,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss) on:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(11,768
|
)
|
Futures contracts
|
|
|
405,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Gain
|
|
|
393,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
567,566
|
|
Futures contracts
|
|
|
(274,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation
|
|
|
293,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain
|
|
|
686,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase
|
|
$
|
1,813,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
15
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Statements continued
Statements of
Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE SIX
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
|
MONTHS ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
|
APRIL 30, 2010
|
|
OCTOBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
1,126,220
|
|
|
$
|
2,113,777
|
|
Net realized gain
|
|
|
393,465
|
|
|
|
1,452,672
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation
|
|
|
293,523
|
|
|
|
3,963,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase
|
|
|
1,813,208
|
|
|
|
7,530,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(975,760
|
)
|
|
|
(2,049,352
|
)
|
Net realized gain
|
|
|
(1,486,893
|
)
|
|
|
(12,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
|
|
(2,462,653
|
)
|
|
|
(2,062,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease from transactions in common shares of beneficial
interest
|
|
|
(276,856
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
(926,301
|
)
|
|
|
5,468,092
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
50,198,368
|
|
|
|
44,730,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period
(Including accumulated undistributed net investment
income of $391,235 and $240,775, respectively)
|
|
$
|
49,272,067
|
|
|
$
|
50,198,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
16
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited)
1. Organization
and Accounting Policies
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities (the
Trust) is registered under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, closed-end management
investment company. The Trusts investment objective is to
provide current income which is exempt from both federal and
California income taxes. The Trust was organized as a
Massachusetts business trust on October 14, 1993 and
commenced operations on February 28, 1994.
The Trust may be affected by economic and political developments
in the State of California.
On June 1, 2010, Invesco Ltd., a leading independent global
investment management company, completed its purchase of
substantially all of the retail asset management business of
Morgan Stanley (the Transaction). In contemplation
of the Transaction, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on
April 16, 2010, shareholders of the Trust approved a
new Board of Trustees, a new investment advisory agreement with
Invesco Advisers, Inc., a subsidiary of Invesco Ltd., and a new
master investment
sub-advisory
agreement with several of Invesco Ltd.s wholly-owned
affiliates. At that Special Meeting of Shareholders, the
Trusts shareholders approved all proposals. Thus,
effective June 1, 2010, the Trusts investment
adviser, investment
sub-advisers
and certain other service providers are affiliates of Invesco
Ltd. In addition, effective June 17, 2010, the Audit
Committee of the Board of Trustees appointed, and the Board of
Trustees ratified thereafter and approved,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm of the Trust.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. Valuation of Investments
(1) Portfolio securities are valued by an outside
independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. The
pricing service uses both a computerized grid matrix of
tax-exempt securities and evaluations by its staff, in each case
based on information concerning market transactions and
quotations from dealers which reflect the mean between the last
reported bid and ask price. The portfolio securities are thus
valued by reference to a combination of transactions and
quotations for the same or other securities believed to be
comparable in quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, call
provisions, trading characteristics and other features deemed to
be relevant. The Trustees believe that timely and reliable
market quotations are generally not readily available for
purposes of valuing tax-exempt securities and that the
valuations supplied by the pricing service are more likely to
represent the fair value of such securities; (2) futures
are valued at the latest sale price on the commodities exchange
on which they trade unless it is determined that such price does
not reflect their market value, in which case they will be
valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under
procedures established by and under the supervision of the
Trustees; and (3) short-term debt securities having a
maturity date of more than sixty days at time of purchase are
valued on a
mark-to-market
basis until sixty days prior to maturity and thereafter at
amortized
17
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
cost based on their value on the 61st day. Short-term debt
securities having a maturity date of sixty days or less at the
time of purchase are valued at amortized cost, which
approximates market value.
B. Accounting for Investments Security
transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order
to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains and losses on
security transactions are determined by the identified cost
method. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized over
the life of the respective securities and are included in
interest income. Interest income is accrued daily as earned.
C. Futures A futures contract is an agreement
between two parties to buy and sell financial instruments or
contracts based on financial indices at a set price on a future
date. Upon entering into such a contract, the Trust is required
to pledge to the broker: cash, U.S. Government securities or
other liquid portfolio securities equal to the minimum initial
margin requirements of the applicable futures exchange. Pursuant
to the contract, the Trust agrees to receive from or pay to the
broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the
value of the contract. Such receipts or payments known as
variation margin are recorded by the Trust as unrealized gains
and losses. Upon closing of the contract, the Trust realizes a
gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the
contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it
was closed.
D. Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations Related
to Securities Held The Trust enters into
transactions in which it transfers to Dealer Trusts
(Dealer Trusts), fixed rate bonds in exchange for
cash and residual interests in the Dealer Trusts assets
and cash flows, which are in the form of inverse floating rate
investments. The Dealer Trusts fund the purchases of the fixed
rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes to third parties and
allowing the Trust to retain residual interest in the bonds. The
Trust enters into shortfall agreements with the Dealer Trusts
which commit the Trust to pay the Dealer Trusts, in certain
circumstances, the difference between the liquidation value of
the fixed rate bonds held by the Dealer Trusts and the
liquidation value of the floating rate notes held by third
parties, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The
residual interests held by the Trust (inverse floating rate
investments) include the right of the Trust (1) to cause
the holders of the floating rate notes to tender their notes at
par at the next interest rate reset date, and (2) to
transfer the municipal bond from the Dealer Trusts to the Trust,
thereby collapsing the Dealer Trusts. The Trust accounts for the
transfer of bonds to the Dealer Trusts as secured borrowings,
with the securities transferred remaining in the Trusts
investment assets, and the related floating rate notes reflected
as Trust liabilities under the caption floating rate note
and dealer trusts obligations on the Statement of Assets
and Liabilities. The Trust records the interest income from the
fixed rate bonds under the caption interest income
and records the expenses related to floating rate note and
dealer trusts obligations and any administrative expenses of the
Dealer Trusts under the caption interest and residual
trust expenses on the Statement of Operations. The
floating rate notes issued by the Dealer Trusts have interest
rates that reset weekly and the floating rate note holders have
the option to tender their notes to the
18
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
Dealer Trusts for redemption at par at each reset date. At
April 30, 2010, the Trusts investments with a value
of $6,994,441 are held by the Dealer Trusts and serve as
collateral for the $4,415,000 in floating rate note and dealer
trusts obligations outstanding at that date. The range of
contractual maturities of the floating rate note and dealer
trusts obligations and interest rates in effect at
April 30, 2010 are presented in the Portfolio of
Investments.
E. Federal Income Tax Policy It is the
Trusts policy to comply with the requirements of
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially
all of its taxable and non-taxable income to its shareholders.
Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. The
Trust files tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service,
New York State and New York City. The Trust recognizes the tax
effects of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return only if it is more likely than not to be sustained based
solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The
more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each
reporting period to support continued recognition of the
benefit. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in
the financial statements for a tax position taken and the tax
benefit claimed in the income tax return is referred to as an
unrecognized tax benefit. There are no unrecognized tax benefits
in the accompanying financial statements. If applicable, the
Trust recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax
benefits in interest expense and penalties in other expenses in
the Statement of Operations. Each of the tax years filed in the
four-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to
examination by taxing authorities.
The Trust purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the
opinion of the issuer, is free from federal income tax. There is
no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
will agree with this opinion. In the event the IRS determines
that the issuer does not comply with relevant tax requirements,
interest payments from a security could become federally taxable.
F. Dividends and Distributions to
Shareholders Dividends and distributions to
shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
G. Use of Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
H. Subsequent Events The Trust considers
events or transactions that occur after the date of the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities but before the financial
statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to
certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional
disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the
date of issuance of these financial statements.
19
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
2. Fair Valuation
Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that the Trust would receive
to sell an investment or pay to transfer a liability in a timely
transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market,
or in the absence of a principal market the most advantageous
market for the investment or liability. GAAP utilizes a
three-tier hierarchy to distinguish between (1) inputs that
reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable
inputs) and (2) inputs that reflect the reporting
entitys own assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances (unobservable inputs) and to establish
classification of fair value measurements for disclosure
purposes. Various inputs are used in determining the value of
the Trusts investments. The inputs are summarized in the
three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical investments
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including the Trusts own assumptions in determining the
fair value of investments)
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities and the determination of the significance of
a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety
requires judgment and considers factors specific to each
security.
The following is the summary of the inputs used as of
April 30, 2010 in valuing the Trusts investments
carried at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT APRIL 30, 2010 USING
|
|
|
|
|
UNADJUSTED
|
|
OTHER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUOTED PRICES IN
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVE MARKET FOR
|
|
OBSERVABLE
|
|
UNOBSERVABLE
|
|
|
|
|
IDENTICAL INVESTMENTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
INVESTMENT TYPE
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
(LEVEL 1)
|
|
(LEVEL 2)
|
|
(LEVEL 3)
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
52,556,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,556,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligation
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
53,056,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,056,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Derivative
Financial Instruments
A derivative financial instrument in very general terms refers
to a security whose value is derived from the value
of an underlying asset, reference rate or index.
20
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
The Trust may use derivative instruments for a variety of
reasons, such as to attempt to protect the Trust against
possible changes in the market value of its portfolio or to
generate potential gain. All of the Trusts portfolio
holdings, including derivative instruments, are
marked-to-market
each day with the change in value reflected in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation. Upon disposition, a realized gain or
loss is recognized accordingly, except when taking delivery of a
security underlying a contract. In these instances, the
recognition of gain or loss is postponed until the disposal of
the security underlying the contract. Risk may arise as a result
of the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the
terms of their contracts.
Summarized below are specific types of derivative financial
instruments used by the Trust.
Futures To hedge against adverse
interest rate changes, the Trust may invest in financial futures
contracts or municipal bond index futures contracts
(futures contracts). These futures contracts involve
elements of market risk in excess of the amount reflected in the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Trust bears the risk of
an unfavorable change in the value of the underlying securities.
Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the
potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of
their contracts.
Transactions in futures contracts for the six months ended
April 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF
|
|
|
CONTRACTS
|
Futures, outstanding at beginning of the period
|
|
|
239
|
|
Futures opened
|
|
|
332
|
|
Futures closed
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures, outstanding at end of the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables set forth by primary risk exposure the
Trusts realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized
gains (losses) by type of derivative contract for the six months
ended April 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT OF REALIZED GAIN ON DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
|
PRIMARY RISK EXPOSURE
|
|
FUTURES
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
$
|
405,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN UNREALIZED APPRECIATION/DEPRECIATION ON DERIVATIVE
CONTRACTS
|
PRIMARY RISK EXPOSURE
|
|
FUTURES
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
$
|
(274,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Investment
Advisory/Administration Agreements
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Investment Advisors Inc. (the Investment Adviser),
the Trust pays an advisory fee, calculated weekly and payable
monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.27% to the
Trusts average weekly net assets.
21
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Services Company Inc. (the Administrator), an
affiliate of the Investment Adviser, the Trust pays an
administration fee, calculated weekly and payable monthly, by
applying the annual rate of 0.08% to the Trusts average
weekly net assets.
Under an agreement between the Administrator and State Street
Bank and Trust Company (State Street), State
Street provides certain administrative services to the Trust.
For such services, the Administrator pays State Street a portion
of the fee the Administrator receives from the Trust.
5. Security
Transactions and Transactions with Affiliates
The cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio
securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months
ended April 30, 2010 aggregated $1,634,223 and $3,358,753,
respectively.
The Trust has an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan (the
Compensation Plan) which allows each independent
Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or
she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees. Each eligible
Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts
credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more
of the Morgan Stanley funds that are offered as investment
options under the Compensation Plan. Appreciation/depreciation
and distributions received from these investments are recorded
with an offsetting increase/decrease in the deferred
compensation obligation and do not affect the net asset value of
the Trust.
6. Preferred
Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Trust is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000
non-participating preferred shares of beneficial interest having
a par value of $.01 per share, in one or more series, with
rights as determined by the Trustees, without approval of the
common shareholders. The preferred shares have a liquidation
value of $50,000 per share plus the redemption premium, if any,
plus accumulated but unpaid dividends, whether or not declared,
thereon to the date of distribution. The Trust may redeem such
shares, in whole or in part, at the original purchase price of
$50,000 per share plus accumulated but unpaid dividends, whether
or not declared, thereon to the date of redemption.
The Trust is subject to certain restrictions relating to the
preferred shares. Failure to comply with these restrictions
could preclude the Trust from declaring any distributions to
common shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could
trigger the mandatory redemption of preferred shares at
liquidation value.
The preferred shares, which are entitled to one vote per share,
generally vote with the common shares but vote separately as a
class to elect two Trustees and on any matters affecting the
rights of the preferred shares.
As of April 30, 2010, there were no preferred shares
outstanding.
22
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
7. Common Shares
of Beneficial Interest
Transactions in common shares of beneficial interest were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAID IN
|
|
|
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
|
EXCESS OF
|
|
|
SHARES
|
|
OF SHARES
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
Balance, October 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,427,554
|
|
|
$
|
34,276
|
|
|
$
|
48,682,177
|
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2009
|
|
|
3,427,554
|
|
|
|
34,276
|
|
|
|
48,682,177
|
|
Shares repurchased (weighted average discount of 10.13%)+
|
|
|
(21,522
|
)
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(276,641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, April 30, 2010
|
|
|
3,406,032
|
|
|
$
|
34,061
|
|
|
$
|
48,405,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustees have approved a share repurchase program whereby
the Trust may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price not
above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at the
time of purchase.
|
|
|
+
|
|
The Trustees have voted to retire
the shares repurchased.
|
8. Dividend to
Common Shareholders
The Trust declared the following dividend from net investment
income subsequent to April 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECLARATION
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
RECORD
|
|
PAYABLE
|
DATE
|
|
PER SHARE
|
|
DATE
|
|
DATE
|
May 11, 2010
|
|
0.0475
|
|
May 21, 2010
|
|
May 27, 2010
|
9. Purposes of
and Risks Relating to Certain Financial Instruments
The Trust may invest a portion of its assets in inverse floating
rate municipal securities, which are variable debt instruments
that pay interest at rates that move in the opposite direction
of prevailing interest rates. These investments are typically
used by the Trust in seeking to enhance the yield of the
portfolio or used as an alternative form of leverage in order to
redeem a portion of the Trusts preferred shares. Inverse
floating rate investments tend to underperform the market for
fixed rate bonds in a rising interest rate environment, but tend
to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when interest
rates decline or remain relatively stable. Inverse floating rate
investments have varying degrees of liquidity. Inverse floating
rate securities in which the Trust may invest include derivative
instruments such as residual interest bonds (RIBs)
or tender option bonds (TOBs). Such instruments are
typically created by a special purpose trust that holds
long-term fixed rate bonds (which may be tendered by the Trust
in certain instances) and sells two classes of beneficial
interests: short-term floating rate interests, which are sold to
third party investors, and inverse floating residual interests,
which are purchased by the Trust. The short-term floating rate
interests have first priority on the cash flow from the bonds
held by the special purpose trust and the Trust is paid the
residual cash flow from the bonds held by the special purpose
trust.
23
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
The Trust generally invests in inverse floating rate investments
that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Trust to
greater risks and increased costs. The market value of a
leveraged inverse floating rate investment generally
will fluctuate in response to changes in market rates of
interest to a greater extent than the value of an unleveraged
investment. The extent of increases and decreases in the value
of inverse floating rate investments generally will be larger
than changes in an equal principal amount of a fixed rate
security having similar credit quality, redemption provisions
and maturity, which may cause the Trusts net asset value
to be more volatile than if it had not invested in inverse
floating rate investments.
In certain instances, the short-term floating rate interests
created by the special purpose trust may not be able to be sold
to third parties or, in the case of holders tendering (or
putting) such interests for repayment of principal, may not be
able to be remarketed to third parties. In such cases, the
special purpose trust holding the long-term fixed rate bonds may
be collapsed. In the case of RIBs or TOBs created by the
contribution of long-term fixed income bonds by the Trust, the
Trust will then be required to repay the principal amount of the
tendered securities. During times of market volatility,
illiquidity or uncertainty, the Trust could be required to sell
other portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time to raise cash
to meet that obligation.
The Trust may also invest in private placement securities. TOBs
are presently classified as private placement securities.
Private placement securities are subject to restrictions on
resale because they have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended or are otherwise not readily
marketable. As a result of the absence of a public trading
market for these securities, they may be less liquid than
publicly traded securities. Although these securities may be
resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized
from these sales could be less than those originally paid by the
Trust or less than what may be considered the fair value of such
securities.
10. Federal
Income Tax Status
The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment
income and net realized capital gains are determined in
accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ
from GAAP. These book/tax differences are either
considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these
differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are
reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal
tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require
reclassification. Dividends and distributions which exceed net
investment income and net realized capital gains for tax
purposes are reported as distributions of
paid-in-capital.
As of October 31, 2009, the Trust had temporary book/tax
differences primarily attributable to book amortization of
discounts on debt securities,
mark-to-market
of open futures contracts and tax adjustments on inverse
floaters.
24
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statements - April 30, 2010
(unaudited) continued
11. Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued new guidance related to Transfers and
Servicing. The new guidance is intended to improve the
relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the
effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The new
guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009
and earlier application is prohibited. The recognition and
measurement provisions of this guidance must be applied to
transfers occurring on or after the effective date.
Additionally, the disclosure provisions of this guidance should
be applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the
effective date. The impact of this new guidance on the
Trusts financial statements, if any, is currently being
assessed.
On January 21, 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU)
2010-06. The
ASU amends Accounting Standards Codification 820 to add new
requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of
Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3
measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures
about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation
techniques in Level 2 and Level 3 fair value
measurements. The application of ASU
2010-06 is
required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3
measurements, which are required for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within
those fiscal years. The impact of this new guidance on the
Trusts financial statements, if any, is currently being
assessed.
25
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Highlights
Selected ratios and per share data for a common share of
beneficial interest outstanding throughout each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE SIX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MONTHS ENDED
|
|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,
|
|
|
APRIL 30, 2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
|
|
$14.65
|
|
|
|
|
$13.05
|
|
|
|
|
$14.86
|
|
|
|
|
$15.15
|
|
|
|
|
$15.17
|
|
|
|
|
$15.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment
income(1)
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
(1.65
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from investment operations
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less dividends and distributions from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
Net realized gain
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions
|
|
|
(0.72
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of acquiring treasury
shares(1)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period
|
|
|
$14.47
|
|
|
|
|
$14.65
|
|
|
|
|
$13.05
|
|
|
|
|
$14.86
|
|
|
|
|
$15.15
|
|
|
|
|
$15.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value, end of period
|
|
|
$13.03
|
|
|
|
|
$13.17
|
|
|
|
|
$12.55
|
|
|
|
|
$14.19
|
|
|
|
|
$14.06
|
|
|
|
|
$13.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Return(3)
|
|
|
4.57%(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
%
|
|
|
(6.46
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
%
|
|
|
7.68
|
|
%
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
%
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets of Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses (before expense offset)
|
|
|
0.77%(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.66%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.76%(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.61%(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.62%(5
|
)
|
|
Total expenses (before expense offset, exclusive of interest and
residual trust expenses)
|
|
|
0.70%(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.66%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.62%(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.61%(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.62%(5
|
)
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
4.61%(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
%
|
Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period, in
thousands
|
|
|
$49,272
|
|
|
|
|
$50,198
|
|
|
|
|
$44,730
|
|
|
|
|
$51,282
|
|
|
|
|
$52,872
|
|
|
|
|
$54,413
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
3%(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The per share amounts were
computed using an average number of shares outstanding during
the period. |
(2) |
|
Amount is less than
$0.01. |
(3) |
|
Total return is based upon the
current market value on the last day of each period reported.
Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the
prices obtained under the Trusts dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return does not reflect brokerage
commissions. |
(4) |
|
Does not reflect the effect of
expense offset of 0.02%. |
(5) |
|
Does not reflect the effect of
expense offset of 0.01%. |
(6) |
|
Not annualized. |
(7) |
|
Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial
Statements
26
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Shareholder
Voting Results (unaudited)
On June 17, 2009, an annual meeting of the Trusts
shareholders was held for the purpose of voting on the following
matter, the results of which were as follows:
Election of
Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstain
|
Kathleen A. Dennis
|
|
3,276,881
|
|
|
70,965
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Manuel H. Johnson
|
|
3,240,210
|
|
|
107,636
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns
|
|
3,276,881
|
|
|
70,965
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Fergus Reid
|
|
3,276,881
|
|
|
70,965
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Special
Shareholder Meeting Results (unaudited)
On June 1, 2010, Invesco Ltd., a leading independent global
investment management company, completed its purchase of
substantially all of the retail asset management business of
Morgan Stanley (the Transaction). In contemplation
of the Transaction, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on
April 16, 2010, shareholders of the Trust approved a new
Board of Trustees, a new investment advisory agreement with
Invesco Advisers, Inc., a subsidiary of Invesco Ltd., and a new
master investment
sub-advisory
agreement with several of Invesco Ltd.s wholly-owned
affiliates. At that Special Meeting of Shareholders, the
Trusts shareholders approved all proposals. Thus,
effective June 1, 2010, the Trusts investment
adviser, investment
sub-advisers
and certain other service providers are affiliates of Invesco
Ltd. The results of that Special Meeting of Shareholders were as
follows:
(1) Election of
Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstain
|
David C. Arch
|
|
2,135,370
|
|
|
107,322
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Bob R. Baker
|
|
2,134,452
|
|
|
108,240
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Frank S. Bayley
|
|
2,135,170
|
|
|
107,522
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
James T. Bunch
|
|
2,135,372
|
|
|
107,320
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Bruce L. Crockett
|
|
2,135,370
|
|
|
107,322
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Rod Dammeyer
|
|
2,134,652
|
|
|
108,040
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Albert R. Dowden
|
|
2,135,370
|
|
|
107,322
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Jack M. Fields
|
|
2,135,372
|
|
|
107,320
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Martin L. Flanagan
|
|
2,030,150
|
|
|
212,542
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Carl Frischling
|
|
2,134,452
|
|
|
108,240
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Prema Mathai-Davis
|
|
2,132,939
|
|
|
109,753
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Lewis F. Pennock
|
|
2,134,515
|
|
|
108,177
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Larry Soll
|
|
2,135,370
|
|
|
107,322
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Hugo F. Sonnenschein
|
|
2,132,941
|
|
|
109,751
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Raymond Stickel, Jr.
|
|
2,135,372
|
|
|
107,320
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Philip A. Taylor
|
|
2,030,150
|
|
|
212,542
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Wayne W. Whalen
|
|
2,134,450
|
|
|
108,242
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
27
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Special
Shareholder Meeting Results
(unaudited) continued
(2) Approval of new investment advisory agreement with
Invesco Advisers, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Broker Non-Vote
|
1,829,860
|
|
62,527
|
|
112,377
|
|
237,928
|
(3) Approval of a new master sub-advisory agreement between
Invesco Advisers, Inc. and its affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Broker Non-Vote
|
1,813,826
|
|
79,603
|
|
111,335
|
|
237,928
|
28
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio
Management (unaudited)
On June 1, 2010, Invesco completed its acquisition of Morgan
Stanleys retail asset management business, and the Trust
was part of that acquisition. Therefore, as of that date, the
Trusts investment adviser is Invesco Advisers, Inc. The
following individuals associated with Invesco Advisers, Inc. are
jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management
of the Trusts portfolio:
|
|
|
Thomas Byron, Senior Portfolio Manager, has been responsible for
the Trust since 2009. Prior to June 1, 2010, Mr. Byron
was associated with Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. or
its investment advisory affiliates in an investment management
capacity since 1981.
|
|
|
Robert J. Stryker, Senior Portfolio Manager, has been
responsible for the Trust since 2009. Prior to June 1,
2010, Mr. Stryker was associated with Morgan Stanley Investment
Advisors Inc. or its investment advisory affiliates in an
investment management capacity since 1994.
|
|
|
Robert W. Wimmel, Senior Portfolio Manager, has been responsible
for the Trust since 2009. Prior to June 1, 2010, Mr.
Wimmel was associated with Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors
Inc. or its investment advisory affiliates in an investment
management capacity since 1996.
|
29
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan (unaudited)
The dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) offers you a prompt
and simple way to reinvest your dividends and capital gains
distributions (Distributions) into additional shares of the
Trust. Under the Plan, the money you earn from Distributions
will be reinvested automatically in more shares of the Trust,
allowing you to potentially increase your investment over time.
Plan
benefits
Add
to your account
You may increase your shares in the Trust easily and
automatically with the Plan.
Low
transaction costs
Transaction costs are low because the new shares are bought in
blocks and the brokerage commission is shared among all
participants.
Convenience
You will receive a detailed account statement from Computershare
Trust Company, N.A., (the Agent) which administers the
Plan. The statement shows your total Distributions, dates of
investment, shares acquired, and price per share, as well as the
total number of shares in your reinvestment account.
Safekeeping
The Agent will hold the shares it has acquired for you in
safekeeping.
How to
participate in the Plan
If you own shares in your own name, you can participate directly
in the Plan. If your shares are held in street
name in the name of your brokerage firm, bank,
or other financial institution you must instruct
that entity to participate on your behalf. If they are unable to
participate on your behalf, you may request that they reregister
your shares in your own name so that you may enroll in the Plan.
If you choose to participate in the Plan, whenever the Trust
declares a distribution, it will be invested in additional
shares of the Trust that are purchased in the open market.
How to
enroll
To enroll in the Plan, please read the Terms and Conditions in
the Plan brochure. You can obtain a copy of the Plan Brochure
and enroll in the Plan by calling toll-free
800-341-2929
or notifying us in writing at Invesco Closed-End Funds,
Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078,
Providence, Rl
02940-3078.
Please include the Trust name and account number and ensure that
all shareholders listed on the account sign the written
instructions. Your participation in the Plan will begin with the
next Distribution payable after the Agent receives your
authorization, as long as they receive it before the
record date, which is generally
30
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
(unaudited) continued
one week before the dividend is paid. If your authorization
arrives after such record date, your participation in the Plan
will begin with the following Distribution.
Costs of the
Plan
There is no direct charge to you for reinvesting dividends and
capital gains distributions because the Plans fees are
paid by the Trust. However, when applicable, you will pay your
portion of any brokerage commissions incurred when the new
shares are purchased on the open market. These brokerage
commissions are typically less than the standard brokerage
charges for individual transactions, because shares are
purchased for all participants in blocks, resulting in lower
commissions for each individual participant. Any brokerage
commissions or service fees are averaged into the purchase price.
Tax
implications
The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains
distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be
due on dividends or capital gains distributions. You will
receive tax information annually to help you prepare your
federal and state income tax returns.
Morgan Stanley does not offer tax advice. The tax information
contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. It
was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by
any taxpayer, for avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the
taxpayer under U.S. federal tax laws. Federal and state tax laws
are complex and constantly changing. Shareholders should always
consult a legal or tax advisor for Information concerning their
individual situation.
How to withdraw
from the Plan
To withdraw from the Plan, please call
800-341-2929
or notify us in writing at the address below.
Invesco Closed-End Funds
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rl
02940-3078
All shareholders listed on the account must sign any written
withdrawal instructions. If you withdraw, you have three options
with regard to the shares held in your account:
|
|
1.
|
If you opt to continue to hold your non-certificated shares,
whole shares will be held by the Agent and fractional shares
will be sold.
|
2.
|
If you opt to sell your shares through the Agent, we will sell
all full and fractional shares and send the proceeds via check
to your address of record after deducting brokerage commissions.
|
31
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
(unaudited) continued
|
|
3. |
You may sell your shares through your financial advisor through
the Direct Registration System (DRS). DRS is a
service within the securities industry that allows Trust shares
to be held in your name in electronic format. You retain full
ownership of your shares, without having to hold a stock
certificate.
|
The Trust and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. at any
time may amend or terminate the Plan. Participants will receive
written notice at least 30 days before the effective
date of any amendment. In the case of termination,
Participants will receive written notice at least 30 days
before the record date for the payment of any dividend or
capital gains distribution by the Trust. In the case of
amendment or termination necessary or appropriate to comply with
applicable law or the rules and policies of the Securities and
Exchange Commission or any other regulatory authority, such
written notice will not be required.
To obtain a complete copy of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan,
please call us at
800-341-2929
32
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Privacy Policy
(unaudited)
You share personal and financial information with us that is
necessary for your transactions and your account records. We
take very seriously the obligation to keep that information
confidential and private.
Invesco collects nonpublic personal information about you from
account applications or other forms you complete and from your
transactions with us or our affiliates. We do not disclose
information about you or our former customers to service
providers or other third parties except to the extent necessary
to service your account and in other limited circumstances as
permitted by law. For example, we use this information to
facilitate the delivery of transaction confirmations, financial
reports, prospectuses and tax forms.
Even within Invesco, only people involved in the servicing of
your accounts and compliance monitoring have access to your
information. To ensure the highest level of confidentiality and
security, Invesco maintains physical, electronic and procedural
safeguards that meet or exceed federal standards. Special
measures, such as data encryption and authentication, apply to
your communications with us on our website. More detail is
available to you at invesco.com/privacy.
33
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
Information below is as of June 1, 2010
Trustees
Bob R. Baker
Frank S. Bayley
James T. Bunch
Bruce L. Crockett
Rod Dammeyer
Albert R. Dowden
Jack M. Fields
Martin L. Flanagan
Carl Frischling
Prema Mathai-Davis
Lewis F. Pennock
Larry Soll
Hugo F. Sonnenschein
Raymond Stickel, Jr.
Philip A. Taylor
Wayne W. Whalen
Officers
Chair
Philip A. Taylor
President and Principal
Executive Officer
Russell C. Burk
Senior Vice President and Senior
Officer
John M. Zerr
Senior Vice President, Chief
Legal Officer and Secretary
Lisa O. Brinkley
Vice President
Kevin M. Carome
Vice President
Karen Dunn Kelly
Vice President
Sheri Morris
Vice President, Principal
Financial Officer and Treasurer
Lance A. Rejsek
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
Officer
Todd L. Spillane
Chief Compliance
Officer
Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
1201 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston, TX 77002-5678
Legal Counsel
Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP
2600 One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Counsel to the Independent
Trustees
Kramer, Levin, Naftalis &
Frankel LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-2714
Investment Adviser
Invesco Advisers, Inc.
1555 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30309
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
Morgan
Stanley
Insured
California
Municipal Securities
NYSE: ICS
|
|
|
On June 1, 2010, Invesco completed its
acquisition of Morgan Stanleys retail asset
management business. This trust was
included in that acquisition and as of that
date, became Invesco Insured California
Municipal Securities. Please visit
www.invesco.com/transition for more
information or call Invescos Client
Services team at 800 959 4246.
|
Invesco Distributors, Inc.
Semiannual
Report
April 30, 2010
ICSSAN
IU10-02514P-Y04/10