OMB APPROVAL |
OMB Number: 3235-0578 Expires: April 30, 2013 Estimated average burden hours per response: 5.6 |
Item 1. Schedule of Investments | ||||||||
Item 2. Controls and Procedures | ||||||||
Item 3. Exhibits | ||||||||
SIGNATURES | ||||||||
EXHIBIT INDEX |
Principal | ||||||||||||||
Interest | Maturity | Amount | ||||||||||||
Rate | Date | (000) | Value | |||||||||||
Municipal Obligations107.0% |
||||||||||||||
California 104.3% |
||||||||||||||
Alameda County Joint Powers
Authority, Ser 2008 (AGM Insd)
(a) |
5.00 | % | 12/01/24 | $ | 235 | $ | 247,434 | |||||||
Alhambra Unified School
District, Ser 2009 B (AGC Insd)
(a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/35 | 280 | 58,948 | ||||||||||
Alhambra Unified School
District, Ser 2009 B (AGC Insd)
(a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/36 | 450 | 88,565 | ||||||||||
Alvord Unified School District,
Ser 2008 A (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/01/28 | 185 | 193,436 | ||||||||||
Anaheim Public Financing
Authority, Electric System Ser
2007 A (NATL-RE Insd) (a) |
4.50 | 10/01/37 | 1,000 | 959,210 | ||||||||||
Bay Area Toll Authority, San
Francisco Bay Area Ser 2009 F-1
(c) |
5.25 | 04/01/29 | 760 | 823,186 | ||||||||||
Bay Area Toll Authority, San
Francisco Bay Area Ser 2009 F-1
(c) |
5.25 | 04/01/26 | 680 | 753,270 | ||||||||||
Beverly Hills Unified School
District, Election of 2008 Ser
2009 (b) |
0.00 | 08/01/26 | 205 | 94,031 | ||||||||||
Beverly Hills Unified School
District, Election of 2008 Ser
2009 (b) |
0.00 | 08/01/32 | 430 | 134,861 | ||||||||||
California Health Facilities
Financing Authority, Childrens
Hospital, Ser 2010 A (AGM Insd)
(a) |
5.25 | 07/01/38 | 450 | 452,052 | ||||||||||
California Health Facilities
Financing Authority, Scripps
Memorial Hospital Ser 2010 A |
5.00 | 11/15/36 | 250 | 251,460 | ||||||||||
California Infrastructure &
Economic Development Bank, Bay
Area Toll Bridges Seismic
Retrofit 1st Lien Ser 2003 A
(FGIC Insd) (ETM) (a)(d) |
5.00 | 01/01/28 | 1,500 | 1,819,020 | ||||||||||
California Municipal Finance
Authority, Community Hospitals
Central California (COP) |
5.00 | 02/01/19 | 250 | 252,070 | ||||||||||
California Pollution Control
Financing Authority, San Jose
Water Control Project Ser 2010 |
5.10 | 06/01/40 | 300 | 301,131 | ||||||||||
California State Department of
Veterans Affairs, Home Purchase
Ser 2002 A (AMBAC Insd) (a) |
5.35 | 12/01/27 | 1,500 | 1,524,945 | ||||||||||
California State Public Works
Board, Department of Mental
Health Coaling Ser 2004 A |
5.00 | 06/01/25 | 230 | 230,382 | ||||||||||
California State University,
Ser 2005 A (AMBAC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 11/01/35 | 500 | 508,525 | ||||||||||
California Statewide
Communities Development
Authority, American Baptist
Homes West Ser 2010 |
6.25 | 10/01/39 | 250 | 251,705 | ||||||||||
Campbell Union High School
District, Election of 2006 Ser
2008 B (AGC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/01/35 | 590 | 605,252 | ||||||||||
City & County of San Francisco,
City Buildings Ser 2007 A (COP)
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a) |
4.50 | 09/01/37 | 1,000 | 935,350 | ||||||||||
City & County of San Francisco,
Laguna Honda Hospital Ser 2005
I (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 06/15/30 | 1,360 | 1,398,474 | ||||||||||
City of Irvine, Limited
Obligation Ser 85-7 A (AGM
Insd) (a)(e)(f) |
0.30 | 09/02/32 | 718 | 718,000 | ||||||||||
City of Los Angeles, Ser 2004 A
(NATL-RE Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 09/01/24 | 1,030 | 1,111,308 | ||||||||||
City of Redding, Electric
System Ser 2008 A (COP) (AGM
Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 06/01/27 | 360 | 372,715 | ||||||||||
City of Riverside, Issue of
2008 D (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 10/01/28 | 500 | 520,370 | ||||||||||
City of San Jose, Airport Ser
2001 (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 03/01/25 | 1,000 | 1,003,340 | ||||||||||
City of Simi Valley, Public
Financing Authority Ser 2004
(COP) (AMBAC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 09/01/30 | 1,000 | 1,010,990 | ||||||||||
Clovis Unified School District,
Election of 2004 Ser A (NATL-RE
& FGIC Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/29 | 105 | 34,972 | ||||||||||
Corona-Norco Unified School
District, Election of 2006 Ser
2009 B (AGC Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/28 | 890 | 310,263 | ||||||||||
Dry Creek Joint Elementary
School District, Election 2008
Ser 2009 E (b) |
0.00 | 08/01/48 | 2,860 | 236,665 | ||||||||||
El Segundo Unified School
District, Election of 2008 Ser
2009 A (b) |
0.00 | 08/01/33 | 615 | 151,991 | ||||||||||
Fontana Unified School
District, Ser 2008 B (AGM Insd)
(a)(b) |
0.00 | 02/01/33 | 1,055 | 262,400 | ||||||||||
Gilroy Unified School District,
Election of 2008 Ser 2009 A
(AGC Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/29 | 750 | 244,778 |
Principal | ||||||||||||||
Interest | Maturity | Amount | ||||||||||||
Rate | Date | (000) | Value | |||||||||||
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp.,
Enhanced Asset-Backed Ser 2005 A (FGIC Insd)
(a) |
5.00 | % | 06/01/38 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 933,130 | |||||||
Grossmont Union High School District, Ser 2006
(NATL-RE Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/24 | 775 | 365,707 | ||||||||||
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District,
Election of 2002 Ser 2008 C (AGC Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/30 | 775 | 242,482 | ||||||||||
Huntington Beach Union High School District,
Ser 2004 (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/01/26 | 1,280 | 1,337,510 | ||||||||||
Kern County Board of Education, Refg Ser 2006 A
(COP) (NATL-RE Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 06/01/31 | 1,110 | 1,111,598 | ||||||||||
Kern County Water Agency Improvement District
No. 4, Ser 2008 A (COP) (AGC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 05/01/28 | 245 | 253,087 | ||||||||||
La Quinta Financing Authority, Local Agency Ser
2004 A (AMBAC Insd) (a) |
5.25 | 09/01/24 | 1,100 | 1,116,082 | ||||||||||
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority, Ser 2005 A (AMBAC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 07/01/35 | 450 | 466,137 | ||||||||||
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority, Ser 2006 A (AGM Insd) (a) |
4.50 | 07/01/29 | 500 | 510,535 | ||||||||||
Los Angeles Department of Airports, Los Angeles
International Airport Ser A |
5.00 | 05/15/35 | 250 | 255,323 | ||||||||||
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, Ser
2001 A (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.25 | 07/01/21 | 1,000 | 1,039,460 | ||||||||||
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp., Police
Headquarters Ser 2006 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
(a) |
4.75 | 01/01/31 | 800 | 791,208 | ||||||||||
Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California, Ser 2009 B (c) |
5.00 | 07/01/27 | 1,240 | 1,368,910 | ||||||||||
Moorpark Unified School District, Election of
2008 Ser 2009 A (AGC Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/31 | 2,000 | 557,000 | ||||||||||
Moreland School District, Ser 2014 C (AMBAC
Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/29 | 315 | 96,525 | ||||||||||
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public
Financing Authority, Election of 2006 Ser 2008
(AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/31 | 1,020 | 282,642 | ||||||||||
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public
Financing Authority, Election of 2006 Ser 2008
(AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/33 | 820 | 196,726 | ||||||||||
Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority,
Oakland Administration Buildings Refg 2008 B
(AGC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/01/26 | 235 | 244,828 | ||||||||||
Oxnard Financing Authority, Redwood Trunk Sewer
& Headworks Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
(a) |
5.00 | 06/01/29 | 1,000 | 1,017,020 | ||||||||||
Patterson Joint Unified School District,
Election of 2008 Ser 2009 B (AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 03/01/49 | 3,920 | 311,483 | ||||||||||
Planada Elemantary School District, Ser 2009 B
(AGC Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 07/01/49 | 2,095 | 170,219 | ||||||||||
Poway Unified School District, School
Facilities Improvement District No. 07-1, 2008
Election Ser A (b) |
0.00 | 08/01/30 | 790 | 245,935 | ||||||||||
Poway Unified School District, School
Facilities Improvement District No. 07-1, 2008
Election Ser A (b) |
0.00 | 08/01/31 | 730 | 212,634 | ||||||||||
Rancho Mirage Redevelopment Agency, Ser 2003 A
(NATL-RE Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 04/01/33 | 1,000 | 922,210 | ||||||||||
Rocklin Unified School District Community
Facilities District, No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE
Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/34 | 1,235 | 251,174 | ||||||||||
Rocklin Unified School District Community
Facilities District, No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE
Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/35 | 1,255 | 235,564 | ||||||||||
Rocklin Unified School District Community
Facilities District, No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE
Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/36 | 1,230 | 214,512 | ||||||||||
Rocklin Unified School District Community
Facilities District, No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE
Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/37 | 1,025 | 167,280 | ||||||||||
Roseville Joint Union High School District,
Election of 2004 Ser 2007 C (AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/25 | 675 | 298,728 |
Principal | ||||||||||||||
Interest | Maturity | Amount | ||||||||||||
Rate | Date | (000) | Value | |||||||||||
Sacramento City Financing Authority, 1999 Solid
Waste & Redevelopment (AMBAC Insd) (a) |
5.75 | % | 12/01/22 | $ | 180 | $ | 181,346 | |||||||
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Election
Ser U (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/15/24 | 1,000 | 1,097,570 | ||||||||||
San Diego County Water Authority, Ser 2004 A
(COP) (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 05/01/29 | 700 | 724,465 | ||||||||||
San Francisco City & County Airports
Commission, Ser 2010 F |
5.00 | 05/01/40 | 500 | 500,535 | ||||||||||
San Francisco City & County Public Utilities
Commission, Water Refg Ser A 2001 (AGM Insd)
(a) |
5.00 | 11/01/31 | 2,000 | 2,022,740 | ||||||||||
San Jose Evergreen Community College District,
Election Ser 2008 B (AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 09/01/32 | 1,000 | 256,960 | ||||||||||
School Facilities Financing Authority, Grant
Joint Union High School District Ser 2008 A
(AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/33 | 1,870 | 437,861 | ||||||||||
Simi Valley Unified School District, Election
of 2004 Ser 2007 C (AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/28 | 480 | 159,346 | ||||||||||
Simi Valley Unified School District, Election
of 2004 Ser 2007 C (AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/30 | 380 | 107,859 | ||||||||||
Southern California Public Power Authority,
Transmission Refg Ser 2002 A (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.25 | 07/01/18 | 1,000 | 1,074,930 | ||||||||||
Turlock Irrigation District, Ser 2010 A |
5.00 | 01/01/35 | 300 | 306,201 | ||||||||||
Tustin Unified School District, No. 2002-1
Election of 2002 Ser 2008 C (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 06/01/28 | 250 | 263,395 | ||||||||||
Twin Rivers Unified School District, Ser 2009
(BANs) (b) |
0.00 | 04/01/14 | 250 | 226,610 | ||||||||||
University of California, Ser 2007 A (NATL-RE
Insd) (a) |
4.50 | 05/15/37 | 1,000 | 931,450 | ||||||||||
University of California, Ser 2007 J (AGM Insd)
(a) |
4.50 | 05/15/31 | 1,000 | 1,006,780 | ||||||||||
University of California, Ser 2009 O |
5.25 | 05/15/39 | 500 | 538,800 | ||||||||||
University of California, Ser 2009 W (c)(g) |
5.00 | 05/15/34 | 1,435 | 1,497,437 | ||||||||||
Upland Unified School District, Election 2000
Ser 2001 B (AGM Insd) (a) |
5.125 | 08/01/25 | 1,000 | 1,058,430 | ||||||||||
Val Verde Unified School District, Ser 2005 B
(COP) (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 01/01/30 | 675 | 625,887 | ||||||||||
Washington Unified School District-Yolo County,
Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/01/22 | 1,375 | 1,469,724 | ||||||||||
West Basin Municipal Water District, Refg Ser
2008 B (COP) (AGC Insd) (a) |
5.00 | 08/01/27 | 245 | 257,270 | ||||||||||
Yosemite Community College District, Election
of 2004 Ser 2008 C (AGM Insd) (a)(b) |
0.00 | 08/01/25 | 570 | 260,040 | ||||||||||
Yosemite Community College District, Election
of 2004 Ser 2008 C (AGM Insd) (a)(c) |
5.00 | 08/01/32 | 2,515 | 2,603,855 | ||||||||||
Yucaipa Valley Water District, Ser 2004 A (COP)
(NATL-RE Insd) (a) |
5.25 | 09/01/24 | 1,000 | 1,016,470 | ||||||||||
51,702,709 | ||||||||||||||
Guam0.2% |
||||||||||||||
Territory of Guam Section 30, Ser A |
5.625 | 12/01/29 | 95 | 97,914 | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico1.4% |
||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Ser XX |
5.25 | 07/01/40 | 200 | 202,072 | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Ser 2009
A |
5.00 | 08/01/11 | 240 | 251,472 | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Ser 2010
C |
5.00 | 08/01/35 | 250 | 248,060 | ||||||||||
701,604 | ||||||||||||||
Virgin Islands1.1% |
||||||||||||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority,
Matching Fund Loan Diago A |
6.625 | 10/01/29 | 240 | 270,453 | ||||||||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Ser
2010 A |
5.00 | 10/01/25 | 250 | 254,070 | ||||||||||
524,523 | ||||||||||||||
Total Investments107.0% (Cost $52,164,802) |
53,026,750 | |||||||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities1.9% |
947,074 | |||||||||||||
Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations
Related to Securities Held(8.9)% |
||||||||||||||
Notes with interest rates ranging from 0.16% to
0.27% at 07/31/10 and contractual maturities of
collateral ranging from 04/01/26 to 05/15/34 (See
Note 1E) (h) |
(4,415,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Assets100.0% |
$ | 49,558,824 | ||||||||||||
Investment Abbreviations: | ||
AGC | Assured Guaranty Corp. | |
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. | |
AMBAC | AMBAC Assurance Corp. | |
BANs | Bond Anticipation Notes | |
COP | Certificates of Participation | |
ETM | Escrowed to Maturity | |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
NATL-RE | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | |
Refg | Refunding | |
Ser | Series | |
Notes to Schedule of Investments: | ||
(a) | Principal and/or interest payments are secured by the bond insurance company listed. | |
(b) | Capital appreciation bond. | |
(c) | Underlying security related to inverse floater entered into by the Fund. See Note 1E. | |
(d) | Advance refunded; secured by an escrow fund of U.S. Government obligations or other highly rated collateral. | |
(e) | Demand security payable upon demand by the Fund at specified time intervals no greater than thirteen months. Interest rate is redetermined periodically. Rate shown is the rate in effect on July 31, 2010. | |
(f) | Security is considered a cash equivalent. | |
(g) | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Trust to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Trust could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $955,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. | |
(h) | Floating rate note obligations related to securities held. The interest rates shown reflect the rates in effect at July 31, 2010. At July 31, 2010, the Funds investments with a value of $7,046,658 are held by the Dealer Trusts and serve as collateral for the $4,415,000 in floating rate note and dealer trust obligations outstanding at that date. |
A. | Security Valuations Securities, including restricted securities, are valued according to the following policy. |
B. | Securities Transactions and Investment Income Securities transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses on sales are computed on the basis of specific identification of the securities sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis from settlement date. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Bond premiums and discounts are amortized and/or accreted for financial reporting purposes. |
C. | Country Determination For the purposes of making investment selection decisions and presentation in the Schedule of Investments, the investment adviser may determine the country in which an issuer is located and/or credit risk exposure based on various factors. These factors include the laws of the country under which the issuer is organized, where the issuer maintains a principal office, the country in which the issuer derives 50% or more of its total revenues and the country that has the primary market for the issuers securities, as well as other criteria. Among the other criteria that may be evaluated for making this determination are the country in which the issuer maintains 50% or more of its assets, the type of security, financial guarantees and enhancements, the nature of the collateral and the sponsor organization. Country of issuer and/or credit risk exposure has been determined to be the United States of America, unless otherwise noted. |
D. | Other Risks The Fund may invest up to 20% of its net assets in lower-quality debt securities, i.e., junk bonds. Investments in lower-rated securities or unrated securities of comparable quality tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions than higher rated securities. Junk bonds involve a greater risk of default by the issuer because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors claims. |
E. | Floating Rate Obligations Related to Securities Held The Fund enters into transactions in which it transfers to Special Purpose Trusts established by a Broker Dealer (Dealer Trusts) fixed rate bonds in exchange for cash and residual interests in the Dealer Trusts assets and cash flows, which are in the form of inverse floating rate investments. The Dealer Trusts fund the purchases of the fixed rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes to third parties and allowing the Fund to retain residual interest in the bonds. The Fund may enter into shortfall agreements with the Dealer Trusts which commit the Fund to pay the Dealer Trusts, in certain circumstances, the difference between the liquidation value of the fixed rate bonds held by the Dealer Trusts and the liquidation value of the floating rate notes held by third parties, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The residual interests held by the Fund (inverse floating rate investments) include the right of the Fund (1) to cause the holders of the floating rate notes to tender their notes at par at the next interest rate reset date, and (2) to transfer the municipal bond from the Dealer Trusts to the Fund, thereby collapsing the Dealer Trusts. The Fund accounts for the transfer of bonds to the Dealer Trusts as secured borrowings, with the securities transferred remaining in the Funds investment assets, and the related floating rate notes reflected as Fund liabilities under the caption Floating rate note and dealer trust obligations on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund records the interest income from the fixed rate bonds under the caption Interest and records the expenses related to floating rate obligations and any administrative expenses of the Dealer Trusts under the caption Interest and residual trust expenses on the Statement of Operations. The floating rate notes issued by the Dealer Trusts have interest rates that reset weekly and the floating rate note holders have the option to tender their notes to the Dealer Trusts for redemption at par at each reset date. |
Level 1 | | Prices are determined using quoted prices in an active market for identical assets. | |
Level 2 | | Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants may use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, loss severities, default rates, discount rates, volatilities and others. | |
Level 3 | | Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used. Unobservable inputs reflect the Funds own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in determining fair value of the securities or instruments and would be based on the best available information. |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Municipal Obligations |
$ | | $ | 53,026,750 | $ | | $ | 53,026,750 | ||||||||
Aggregate unrealized appreciation of investment securities |
$ | 2,002,835 | ||
Aggregate unrealized (depreciation) of investment securities |
(1,141,201 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation of investment securities |
$ | 861,634 | ||
Cost of investments for tax purposes is $52,165,116. |
(a) | As of September 16, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the officers of the Registrant, including the Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and Principal Financial Officer (PFO), to assess the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Act), as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Registrants officers, including the PEO and PFO, concluded that, as of , September 16, 2010, the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures were reasonably designed so as to ensure: (1) that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-Q is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (2) that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to the PEO and PFO as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||
(b) | There have been no changes in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the Registrants last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Certifications of PEO and PFO as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
By:
|
/s/ Philip A. Taylor
|
|||
Philip A. Taylor | ||||
Principal Executive Officer | ||||
Date:
|
September 29, 2010 |
By:
|
/s/ Philip A. Taylor
|
|||
Principal Executive Officer | ||||
Date:
|
September 29, 2010 | |||
By:
|
/s/ Philip A. Taylor | |||
Sheri Morris | ||||
Principal Financial Officer | ||||
Date:
|
September 29, 2010 |