sv4za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 4, 2011
Registration
No. 333-176582
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
MEDQUIST HOLDINGS
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
7374
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
98-0676666
(I. R. S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
9009 Carothers
Parkway
Franklin, Tennessee
37067
(615) 261-1740
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants
principal executive offices)
Roger L. Davenport
Chief Executive
Officer
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
9009 Carothers Parkway
Franklin, Tennessee
37067
(615) 261-1740
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
With copy to:
Steven J.
Abrams, Esq.
Pepper Hamilton LLP
3000 Two Logan Square
Eighteenth and Arch
Streets
Philadelphia, PA
19103-2779
(215) 981-4241
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this
Registration Statement is declared effective and upon
consummation of the transactions described in the enclosed
prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, please
check the following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the
appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this
transaction:
Exchange Act
Rule 13e-4(i)
(Cross-Border Issue Tender
Offer) o
Exchange Act
Rule 14d-1(d)
(Cross-Border Third-Party Tender
Offer) o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Offering Price Per
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Registered
(1)
|
|
|
Share
(2)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Registration Fee
(3)(4)
|
Common stock, par value US$0.10 per share
|
|
|
1,231,246
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
$9,148,158
|
|
|
$1,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This Registration Statement
registers the maximum number of shares of the Registrants
common stock par value $0.10 per share, that may be issued in
connection with the merger of a newly-formed subsidiary of CBay
Inc. with and into MedQuist Inc. as described in the enclosed
prospectus.
|
|
|
(2) |
Pursuant to Rule 457(c) and
Rule 457(f), and solely for the purpose of calculating the
registration fee, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price
is equal to the market value of the total number shares of
MedQuist Inc. common stock estimated to be held by holders as of
the date hereof that may be issued in the merger, based upon a
market value of $7.43 per share of MedQuist Inc. common stock,
the average of the high and low prices of shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock as reported by the OTCQB on September 30,
2011.
|
|
|
(3) |
Pursuant to Rule 457(f), the
fee is calculated by multiplying the product of the maximum
aggregate offering price by .0001146.
|
The Registrant hereby amends
this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be
necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall
file a further amendment which specifically states that this
Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in
accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or until this Registration Statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to
said Section 8(a), may determine.
NOTICE OF
MERGER
OF
MEDQUIST MERGER CORPORATION
(A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF MEDQUIST HOLDINGS INC.)
WITH AND INTO
MEDQUIST INC.
October , 2011.
To the Shareholders of MedQuist Inc.:
We are pleased to give you notice that, pursuant to
Section 14A:10-5.1
of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act, MedQuist Merger
Corporation, a New Jersey corporation (Merger
Subsidiary) and wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of
MedQuist Holdings Inc., will merge (the Merger) with
and into MedQuist Inc., a New Jersey corporation on the date
hereof. Under applicable New Jersey law, the Merger will be
effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated the
date hereof between MedQuist Holdings Inc., Merger Subsidiary
and MedQuist Inc. (the Merger Agreement), a copy of
which accompanies this notice. The Merger Agreement and the
Merger were approved by the board of directors of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and Merger Subsidiary. No action on the part of
the MedQuist Inc. shareholders is required for the Merger to
become effective.
WE ARE NOT ASKING
YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A
PROXY.
As a result of the Merger, MedQuist Inc. will be the surviving
corporation and the separate corporate existence of Merger
Subsidiary will cease. Each outstanding share of MedQuist Inc.
common stock, no par value per share (MedQuist Inc. Common
Stock), other than shares held by Merger Subsidiary, will
be canceled and converted in the Merger to the right to receive
one share of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock, par value
$0.10 per share (MedQuist Holdings Inc. Common
Stock).
To receive certificates representing shares of MedQuist Holdings
Inc. Common Stock issued in the Merger, MedQuist Inc.
shareholders must complete and execute the enclosed Letter of
Transmittal and deliver their certificates representing MedQuist
Inc. Common Stock and the Letter of Transmittal to American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, the Exchange
Agent, at the following address:
|
|
|
By hand or overnight courier:
|
|
By mail:
|
|
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
|
|
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
|
Operations Center,
|
|
Operations Center,
|
Attn: Reorganization Department,
|
|
Attn: Reorganization Department,
|
6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219
|
|
P.O. Box 2042, New York, New York 10272-2042
|
The Prospectus accompanying this Notice of Merger describes the
terms of the Merger, certain background information and other
information concerning MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc.
We urge you to read the Prospectus carefully.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Roger L. Davenport
Roger L. Davenport
Chief Executive Officer
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where such offer is not
permitted.
|
Subject to Completion, dated
October 4, 2011
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
Merger with MedQuist
Inc.
1,231,246 shares of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock
for all issued
and outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
not already owned by MedQuist Holdings Inc. or its
subsidiaries
MedQuist Holdings Inc. is furnishing this Prospectus to those
persons, other than MedQuist Merger Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (Merger Subsidiary) and wholly-owned,
indirect subsidiary of MedQuist Holdings Inc., who hold common
stock, no par value per share, of MedQuist Inc., a New Jersey
corporation, immediately prior to the merger (the
Merger) of Merger Subsidiary, a New Jersey
corporation (Merger Subsidiary) and wholly-owned,
indirect subsidiary of MedQuist Holdings Inc., with and into
MedQuist Inc. Immediately prior to the Merger, MedQuist Holdings
Inc. owns all of the outstanding capital stock of CBay Inc., a
Delaware corporation, which in turn owns all of the outstanding
capital stock of Merger Subsidiary, which in turn owns
approximately 97% of the outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc.
The Merger, which does not require the affirmative vote of any
shareholder of MedQuist Inc. under applicable law, will become
effective upon the filing of the certificate of merger with the
Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey on the
date hereof (the Effective Time). At the Effective
Time, each share of MedQuist Inc. common stock will be canceled
and converted into the right to receive one share of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. common stock.
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the
MedQuist Inc. common stock that is the subject of the Merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERGER CONSIDERATION PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES OF OUR
|
|
|
CUSIP
|
|
TITLE OF SECURITY
|
|
COMMON STOCK
(1)
|
|
ESTIMATED VALUE
(1)
|
|
584949101
|
|
MedQuist Inc. common stock
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
$
|
8.95
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The estimated value of the per
share merger consideration is equal to the closing price per
share of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on
September 26, 2011.
|
Because the number of shares of our common stock to be issued in
the Merger is fixed, changes in the trading prices of our common
stock will result in the market value of our common stock you
receive pursuant to the conversion of your shares in the Merger
being different than the value reflected in the table above.
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol MEDH. The closing price of our shares on The
NASDAQ Global Market on September 26, 2011 was $8.95. See
Market Price Information for Common Stock herein.
MedQuist Inc. common stock trades on the OTCQB under the symbol
MEDQ.
WE ARE NOT ASKING
YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A
PROXY.
We urge you to carefully read the Risk Factors
section of this prospectus beginning on page 23.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of this
transaction or these securities or determined if this prospectus
is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
The Exchange Agent for the
Merger is:
American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company LLC
Prospectus dated October , 2011.
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
|
|
(iii)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
F-1
|
This prospectus incorporates important business and financial
information about MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc. that
is not included in or delivered with this document and is
included as an exhibit to the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part. Copies of documents referred to in
this prospectus will be made available to holders in the Merger
at no cost. See Where You Can Find More Information.
About This
Prospectus
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the
SEC, and we will not consummate the Merger until the
SEC has declared the registration statement effective. You
should read this prospectus, including the annex, together with
the registration statement, the exhibits thereto and the
additional information described under the heading Where
You Can Find More Information.
None of MedQuist Holdings Inc. or the Exchange Agent have
authorized any person (including any dealer, salesperson or
broker) to provide you with any information or to make any
representation other than as contained in this prospectus.
MedQuist Holdings Inc. does not take any responsibility for, and
can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any
information that others may give you. The information included
in this prospectus is accurate as of the date of this
prospectus. You should not assume that the information included
in this prospectus is accurate as of any other date.
The Merger will be effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the Merger Agreement). The conversion of
your shares of common stock into shares of common stock of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. as a result of the Merger will be made on
the basis of this prospectus, the Merger Agreement and the
letter of transmittal and is subject to the terms described in
this prospectus and the letter of transmittal. Investors should
not construe anything in this prospectus, the Merger Agreement
and the letter of transmittal as legal, investment, business or
tax advice. Each investor should consult its advisors as needed.
This prospectus contains summaries believed to be accurate with
respect to certain documents, but reference is made to the
actual documents themselves for complete information. All such
summaries are qualified in their entirety by such reference.
Copies of documents referred to in this prospectus will be made
available to holders in the Merger at no cost. See Where
You Can Find More Information.
You should not rely on or assume the accuracy of any
representation or warranty in any agreement that we have filed
as an exhibit to any document that we have publicly filed or
that we may otherwise publicly file in the future because such
representation or warranty may be subject to exceptions and
qualifications contained in separate disclosure schedules, may
have been included in such agreement for the purpose of
allocating risk between the parties to the particular
transaction, and may no longer continue to be true as of any
given date.
Except where the context otherwise requires, or where otherwise
indicated, references to the Company,
we, us, or our are to
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries, and references to
Spheris are to Spheris Inc. for the period prior to
April 22, 2010 and to the business we acquired from Spheris
Inc. for the period after such date.
References in this prospectus to dollars or
$ are to the currency of the United States and
references to £, pound or
pence are to the currency of the United Kingdom.
There are 100 pence to each pound.
Except where otherwise indicated, reference in this prospectus
to volume or volumes are to lines of
text edited or transcribed by our medical transcriptionists, or
MTs, and medical editors, or MEs.
The industry and market data and other statistical information
used throughout this prospectus are based on independent
industry publications, government publications, reports by
market research firms or other published independent sources
that we believe to be reliable.
(ii)
Questions and
Answers About the Merger
These answers to questions that you may have as a holder of
MedQuist Inc. common stock are highlights of selected
information included elsewhere in this prospectus. To fully
understand the Merger and the risks associated with holding
shares of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock, you should
carefully read this prospectus in its entirety, including the
section entitled Risk Factors and our financial
statements and related notes.
Why are we
consummating the Merger?
We intend to consummate the Merger as part of our ongoing plan
to acquire full ownership of our majority-owned subsidiary
MedQuist Inc. Since our acquisition of the majority ownership
stake in MedQuist Inc., our management and directors have been
aware that further consolidating our operations with those of
MedQuist Inc. could lead to substantial overhead reductions and
allow us to capitalize on our underlying technology, healthcare
domain expertise and attractive long-term relationships with
customers of MedQuist Inc.
In February 2011, we consummated an exchange agreement, or
Exchange Agreement, with certain of MedQuist
Inc.s noncontrolling shareholders pursuant to which we
issued 4.8 million shares of our common stock in exchange
for their 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock.
This private exchange increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc.
from 69.5% to 82.2%. We then commenced a public registered
exchange offer with the same exchange ratio as the private
exchange to those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc. shareholders who
did not participate in the private exchange, which we refer to
as the Registered Exchange Offer, to exchange shares
of our common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock as
an additional means to acquire full ownership of MedQuist Inc.
As a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
We continue to believe that if we acquire full ownership of
MedQuist Inc. it will simplify our capital structure, help us to
achieve greater integration with MedQuist Inc., and reduce costs
and eliminate potential conflicts of interests between us and
MedQuist Inc. Therefore we intend to consummate the Merger as a
step in our plan to acquire full ownership of MedQuist Inc.
We intend to consummate a merger of Merger Subsidiary with and
into MedQuist Inc. The purpose of the Merger is to acquire all
of the issued and outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. stock not
already owned by us. Pursuant to the Shareholder Litigation
(described below), we agreed that if, as a result of the
Registered Exchange Offer, we obtained ownership of at least 90%
of the outstanding common stock of MedQuist Inc., we would
conduct a short-form merger under applicable law to acquire the
remaining shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that we do not
currently own at the same exchange ratio applicable under the
Registered Exchange Offer. The terms of the Merger Agreement
will provide that each remaining issued and outstanding share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock will be converted into the right to
receive one share of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock. Please
see the section of this prospectus entitled MedQuist
Holdings Inc. Business Legal proceedings for
more information on the Shareholder Litigation.
What will you
receive in the Merger?
You will receive one share of our common stock for each share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock that you hold at the effective time
of the Merger. Shares of our common stock issued in the Merger
will be issued in book-entry form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger consideration per share
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of our
|
|
|
CUSIP
|
|
Title of security
|
|
common stock
(1)
|
|
Estimated value
(1)
|
|
584949101
|
|
MedQuist Inc. common stock
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
$
|
8.95
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The estimated value of the per
share merger consideration is equal to the closing price per
share of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on
September 26, 2011.
|
(iii)
Because the number of shares of our common stock to be issued in
the Merger is fixed, changes in the trading prices of our common
stock will result in the market value of our common stock you
receive pursuant to the conversion of your shares in the Merger
being different than the value reflected in the table above. Our
common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol MEDH. The closing price of our shares on The
NASDAQ Global Market on September 26, 2011 was $8.95.
MedQuist Inc. common stock trades on the OTCQB under the symbol
MEDQ. The closing price of shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock on the OTCQB on September 26, 2011 was $9.10.
See Market Price Information for Common Stock herein.
Your right to receive the Merger consideration in the Merger is
subject to the terms set forth in this prospectus, the Merger
Agreement and the related letter of transmittal.
Do you have a
choice in whether to participate in the Merger?
No. Upon the consummation of the Merger, your shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock will automatically convert into the right to
receive an equal number of shares of MedQuist Holdings common
stock.
Will our common
stock to be issued in the Merger be listed for
trading?
Yes. The shares of our common stock to be issued in the Merger
have been approved for listing on The NASDAQ Global Market under
the symbol MEDH. For more information regarding the
market for our common stock, see the section of this prospectus
entitled Comparative Market Price and Dividend
Information.
Will MedQuist
Inc. deregister under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, following the Merger?
Yes. Following the consummation of the Merger, we intend to
cause MedQuist Inc. to deregister its common stock under the
Exchange Act and MedQuist Inc. will cease to be a separate SEC
reporting company. Please see the section of this prospectus
entitled The Merger Registration Under
Exchange Act.
How do you get
shares of MedQuist Holdings common stock pursuant to the
Merger?
The MedQuist Inc. shareholders will receive written instructions
set forth in a letter of transmittal from the exchange agent
detailing how to exchange their MedQuist Inc. stock certificates
for certificates representing shares of MedQuist Holdings common
stock or evidence of such shares in book entry form.
What are the
potential benefits of the Merger to holders of MedQuist Inc.
common stock?
We believe the Merger will enable MedQuist Inc. and us to create
a simpler, unified capital structure in which equity investors
would participate in the equity of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
MedQuist Inc. through ownership at the MedQuist Holdings Inc.
level.
We believe that unifying public stockholders at a single level
could lead to greater liquidity for investors, particularly for
the former holders of MedQuist Inc. common stock, due to the
increased combined public float.
Additionally, the unified capital structure that would result
from the Merger would facilitate the investment and transfer of
funds between MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc. and our
respective subsidiaries, thereby facilitating more efficient
uses of our consolidated financial resources.
Finally, by acquiring full ownership of MedQuist Inc. we will
eliminate any potential conflicts between our interests and the
interests of the other MedQuist Inc. shareholders. We currently
have the ability to cause the election of all of the members of
the MedQuist Inc. board of directors, the appointment of new
management and the approval of actions requiring the approval of
MedQuist Inc. shareholders, including amendments to its
certificate of incorporation and mergers or sales of
substantially all of its assets. The directors we elect are able
to make decisions affecting the capital structure of MedQuist
Inc., including decisions to issue additional capital
(iv)
stock, implement stock repurchase programs and declare
dividends. Without full ownership of MedQuist Inc. our interests
could conflict with the interests of MedQuist Inc., and the
interests of its other shareholders.
How long will it
take to complete the Merger?
We will not consummate the Merger until the SEC has declared the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part
effective. As soon as practicable after such registration
statement is declared effective we intend to cause the Merger to
take place.
Why is there no
MedQuist Inc. shareholder vote for the Merger?
Your vote is not required for the Merger.
Section 14A:10-5.1
of the New Jersey Business Corporations Act (the
NJBCA) governs short-form mergers between two New
Jersey corporations (the NJ Short-Form Merger
Statute). This provision allows a New Jersey corporation
owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class and
series of another New Jersey corporation to merge the subsidiary
corporation into itself, or merge itself into the subsidiary
corporation, without approval of the shareholders of either
corporation, though the board of the parent corporation must
approve the plan of merger.
Section 14A:10-5.1(6)
of the NJBCA requires the approval of the shareholders of the
parent corporation when the subsidiary corporation will be the
surviving corporation in the short-form merger. Our board of
directors and the board of directors and sole shareholder of the
Merger Subsidiary approved the Merger.
Prior to the Merger, we will contribute the shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock that we hold to CBay Inc., our majority-owned
subsidiary, pursuant to a contribution agreement (the
MedQuist Holdings Contribution Agreement). In
consideration of our contribution of such shares pursuant to the
MedQuist Holdings Contribution Agreement, we will receive shares
of CBay Inc. common stock. Immediately following the
contribution of shares pursuant to the MedQuist Holdings
Contribution Agreement, CBay Inc. will enter into a contribution
agreement (the CBay Contribution Agreement) with
Merger Subsidiary pursuant to which CBay Inc. will contribute
the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that it then holds to
Merger Subsidiary. Immediately following the contributions
pursuant to the MedQuist Holdings Contribution Agreement and the
CBay Contribution Agreement, Merger Subsidiary will own
approximately 97% of MedQuist Inc. We will then consummate the
Merger by merging Merger Subsidiary with and into MedQuist Inc.
in accordance with the NJ Short-Form Merger Statute. As a
result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger
Subsidiary will terminate and MedQuist Inc. will survive the
Merger and exist as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours.
Will you have to
pay any fees or commissions upon the automatic conversion of
your shares pursuant to the Merger?
Holders are not obligated to pay brokerage fees or commissions
to us or the exchange agent in connection with the Merger. If
your shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock are held through a
broker or other nominee who transmits the MedQuist Inc. common
stock on your behalf in connection with the Merger, your broker
may charge you a commission for doing so. You should consult
with your broker or nominee to determine whether any charges
will apply. See The Merger.
(v)
What are the U.S.
federal income tax consequences of participating in the
Merger?
For United States federal income tax purposes, your receipt of
shares pursuant to the Merger generally will be taxable to you.
Please see the section of this prospectus entitled
Material United States Federal Income Tax
Consequences for more information. You should consult your
own tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences
to you of the Merger.
What is the
impact of the Merger to our earnings per share and
capitalization?
As a result of the Merger described herein, we intend to issue
an additional 1.2 million shares of our common stock
resulting in an aggregate of 56.3 million shares being
issued and outstanding. This will result in dilution of
ownership to existing holders of our common stock. However, our
share of MedQuist Inc.s net income will increase as a
result of the Merger. After giving effect to the Spheris
Acquisition (as defined in Summary
History MedQuist Inc.), the Recapitalization
Transactions (as defined in Summary Recent
Developments Recapitalization Transactions),
the private exchange, the Registered Exchange Offer and our
initial public offering, or IPO, for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30,
2011, the incremental impact of the Merger on our diluted
earnings per share would have been an increase of $0.01 and
$0.03 per share of our common stock on a pro forma basis,
respectively.
The impact of the Merger will be a reclassification between
noncontrolling interests and additional paid in capital with no
net impact to stockholders equity as a result of the
Merger. See The Merger Accounting
treatment.
Do our directors
or executive officers beneficially own any shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock that will be subject to the Merger?
As of September 26, 2011, our directors and executive
officers beneficially owned in the aggregate 66 shares of
MedQuist Inc. common stock that are subject to the Merger.
What percentage
of our common stock will current MedQuist Inc. shareholders own
after the Merger?
We anticipate that the Merger will result in the conversion of
the outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc.s common stock that
we do not currently own into approximately 2.2% of shares of our
common stock outstanding at the consummation of the Merger. In
general, this assumes that:
|
|
|
|
n
|
55.1 million shares of our common stock are outstanding
before giving effect to the Merger; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
1.2 million shares of our common stock will be issued in
the Merger.
|
Are
dissenters or appraisal rights available in the
Merger?
You do not have dissenters or appraisal rights as a result
of the Merger. Under New Jersey law, which governs your rights
as a shareholder of a New Jersey corporation, you do not have
the right to dissent in the Merger. See The
Merger No appraisal rights.
With whom may you
talk if you have questions about the Merger?
If you have questions regarding the Merger, please contact the
exchange agent. The contact information for the exchange agent
is set forth on the back cover of this prospectus. Holders of
MedQuist Inc. common stock may also contact their brokers,
dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or other nominees
through whom they hold their MedQuist Inc. common stock with
questions and requests for assistance.
(vi)
Summary
This summary highlights certain information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus and may not contain all of the
information you should consider before investing in our shares.
You should read this summary together with the entire
prospectus, including the information presented under the
heading Risk Factors, the consolidated financial
statements and related notes and the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information and related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Except where the context otherwise requires, or where
otherwise indicated, references in this prospectus to
we, us, or our are to
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries, references to
MedQuist Inc. are to MedQuist Inc. and its
subsidiaries and references to Spheris are to
Spheris Inc. and its subsidiaries for the period prior to
April 22, 2010 and to the business we acquired from Spheris
Inc. for the period after such date.
Overview
The
Companies
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert physicians dictation of patient
interactions, or the Physician Narrative, into a
high quality and customized electronic record. These solutions
integrate technologies and services for voice capture and
transmission, automated speech recognition, or ASR,
medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution to deliver a complete
managed service for our customers. Our solutions enable
hospitals, clinics, and physician practices to improve the
quality of clinical data as well as accelerate and automate the
documentation process, and we believe our solutions improve
physician productivity and satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle
performance, and facilitate the adoption and meaningful use of
electronic health records. We also offer speech recognition
solutions for radiology, cardiology, pathology and related
specialties, that help healthcare providers dictate, edit and
sign reports without manual transcription.
On August 18, 2011, we completed the acquisition of
MultiModal Technologies, Inc. With this acquisition, we now
provide speech and natural language understanding technologies
to healthcare providers and to local and regional transcription
partners.
MedQuist
Inc.
MedQuist Inc. is a leading provider of integrated clinical
documentation solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Its
end-to-end
solutions convert physicians dictation of the Physician
Narrative into a high quality and customized electronic record.
These solutions integrate technologies and services for voice
capture and transmission, ASR, medical transcription and
editing, workflow automation, and document management and
distribution to deliver a complete managed service for its
customers. MedQuist Inc.s solutions enable hospitals,
clinics, and physician practices to improve the quality of
clinical data as well as accelerate and automate the
documentation process, and MedQuist Inc. believes its solutions
improve physician productivity and satisfaction, enhance revenue
cycle performance, and facilitate the adoption and meaningful
use of electronic health records.
Merger
Subsidiary
Merger Subsidiary will be a New Jersey corporation, wholly-owned
by CBay Inc., one of our majority-owned subsidiaries. Merger
Subsidiary will be formed to facilitate the short-form merger
with MedQuist Inc. At the time of the Merger, Merger Subsidiary
will have engaged in no activities and have no material assets
or liabilities of any kind, in each case other than those
incidental to its formation and its activities and obligations
in connection with the Merger.
1
The Clinical
Documentation Industry
Over the past several decades, the clinical documentation
industry has evolved from almost exclusively in-house production
to outsourced services and from labor-intensive services to
technologically-enabled solutions. The market opportunity for
solutions is driven by overall healthcare utilization and cost
containment efforts in the United States. Numerous factors are
driving increases in the demand for healthcare services
including population growth, longer life expectancy, the
increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses, and expanded
coverage from healthcare reform. According to a September 2010
report by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services, spending on healthcare grew from $1.2 trillion in 1998
to $2.3 trillion in 2008 representing a compound annual growth
rate of 7.0%. It also projects that healthcare spending will
grow to reach $4.2 trillion, or 19.3% of U.S. gross
domestic product, by 2018, representing a compound annual growth
rate of 6.3%. At the same time, U.S. healthcare providers
remain under substantial pressure to reduce costs while
maintaining or improving the quality of care.
Accurate and timely clinical documentation has become a critical
requirement of the growing U.S. healthcare system.
Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance companies demand extensive
patient care documentation. The Health Information Technology
for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH Act,
which was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or
ARRA, includes numerous incentives to promote the
adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records, or
EHRs, across the healthcare industry. Consequently,
healthcare providers are increasingly using EHRs to input,
store, and manage their clinical data in a digital format.
Healthcare providers that use EHRs require accurate,
easy-to-use, and cost-effective means to input clinical data
that are not disruptive to the physician workflow.
The market for outsourced clinical documentation solutions based
on the Physician Narrative is substantial. Key components of
this market include voice capture and transmission technologies,
ASR software, medical transcription and editing services, and
document workflow and management software. ValueNotes Database
Pvt. Ltd., or ValueNotes, a market research firm,
estimates that the market for outsourced medical transcription
services was $5.4 billion in 2009 and is expected to grow
8.2% per annum over the next five years to $8.0 billion in
2014.
Healthcare providers are increasingly choosing to outsource
their clinical documentation processes. The benefits of
outsourcing include reduced costs, access to leading
technologies, accelerated turn-around times, improved data
accuracy, greater physician productivity, and satisfaction of
security and compliance requirements. We believe that the
majority of clinical documentation is still produced in-house by
U.S. hospitals and physician practices today. ValueNotes
estimates that the in-house medical transcription market was 67%
of the overall market in 2009, and projects the percentage of
outsourced production of medical transcription will grow from
33% in 2009 to 38% in 2014.
While outsourcing provides many benefits, the landscape for
outsourced service providers is highly fragmented with varying
degrees of technological automation and offshore capabilities
amongst providers. Thousands of local and regional providers
offer limited services without technology offerings. A small set
of national providers offer a combination of technology and
services, but have varying degrees of technological
sophistication and production capacity.
Our competitive
strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Leader in a large, fragmented market We are
the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the Physician Narrative in the United States.
Our size enables us to meet the needs of large, sophisticated
healthcare customers, provides economies of scale, and enables
us to devote significantly more resources to research and
development and quality assurance than many other providers.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Integrated solutions delivered as a complete managed
service We offer fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services that capture and convert the Physician
Narrative into a high quality customized electronic record. We
integrate technologies and services for voice capture and
transmission, ASR,
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution. The end result is
value-added clinical documentation with high accuracy and quick
turn-around times.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Large and diversified customer base with long-term
relationships We serve hospitals, clinics and
physician practices throughout the United States. We have a
long-standing history with our customers and the majority of our
revenue is from recurring services.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Highly-efficient operating model Since we
acquired MedQuist Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2008, we have
driven down our cost structure through leveraging our scalable
infrastructure, standardizing processes, and increased
utilization of ASR. Our use of ASR, which has grown from 39% of
our volume in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 74% in the second
quarter of 2011, has increased our productivity. With the
acquisition of MultiModal, we now own our own ASR technology
which we expect will further reduce our cost structure.
Additionally, our expanding footprint in India has enabled us to
increase our offshore production from 28% of our volume to 42%
over this same period. The financial impact of these measures
has been an improvement in gross margins during this timeframe
from 34% to 40%.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Proven management team We have assembled an
outstanding senior leadership team with significant industry
experience and domain expertise in both domestic and offshore
operations. Our management team has delivered substantial
results and brings an entrepreneurial spirit with proven
experience in managing growth, driving operational improvements,
and successfully integrating acquisitions.
|
Our
strategy
Key elements of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expand our customer base and increase existing customer
penetration We intend to grow our customer base
by targeting three market segments: large healthcare providers
still using in-house services, large healthcare providers
currently using competing outsourced alternatives, and
small-to-medium
medical practices. Given our market leadership, strong solution
offerings, and low cost structure, we believe we are well
positioned to both replace in-house solutions as well as
displace competing outsourced alternatives for large healthcare
providers. In order to increase penetration within our existing
customer base, we intend to continue targeting additional
healthcare clinical areas and facilities of our current
customers. Additionally, as healthcare providers centralize
their purchasing decisions, we believe that our ability to
deliver outstanding services for large, complex requirements
provides us with increasing access to new sales opportunities
within our existing customer base and through existing customer
relationships. Through our acquisition of MultiModal, we have
expanded our customer base to include medical transcription
service organizations, or MTSOs. We intend to grow our business
by providing new and innovative speech and natural language
understanding technologies and new products to these
transcription partners.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Continue to develop and enhance our integrated
solutions We seek to differentiate our
integrated solutions through sophisticated technology and
process improvement. With the acquisition of MultiModal, we now
have over 200 employees dedicated to research and
development, with in-house expertise in speech and natural
language understanding technologies. Over the last year, we
launched numerous enhancements, including a front end speech
platform for general medicine, additional EHR system
integration, and advanced performance monitoring.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Enhance profitability through technical and operational
expertise We have made significant improvements
in productivity through business process and infrastructure
improvements. Notwithstanding reductions in customer pricing,
our gross margins have expanded from 34% in the fourth quarter
of 2008, our first fiscal quarter after we acquired MedQuist
Inc., to 40% in the second quarter of 2011. Our management team
has proven its ability to implement continuous process
improvements and we intend to further increase offshore
production and our use of technological automation, including
ASR, to
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
lower costs and enhance our profitability. We also expect that
the acquisition of MultiModal will further enhance our gross
margins by building market share in the in-house transcription
market.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Facilitate the adoption and promote meaningful use of EHR
systems Our integrated solutions provide a
comprehensive, accurate and effective method to incorporate
Physician Narrative into an EHR system. We interface with
substantially all of the leading EHR vendors to integrate our
clinical documentation solutions and to help our customers
realize the full potential of their EHR systems through the use
of the Physician Narrative. In our experience, when EHR is
adopted, customers tend to consolidate their purchase decisions,
which benefits us as a leading provider of clinical
documentation solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Pursue strategic acquisitions We believe that
there are significant opportunities available to create value
through strategic acquisitions. We intend to seek appropriate
opportunities to grow our customer base, enhance or expand our
solutions, incorporate synergy opportunities, and expand our
value proposition to our customers. For example, we recently
completed our acquisition of MultiModal which provides us with
ownership of speech and natural language understanding
technologies, and is expected to facilitate consolidation to a
single speech recognition platform, provide a broader product
offering to local and regional transcription partners and
leverage MultiModals cloud based services to enhance our
gross margins.
|
Risks associated
with our business
Our business is subject to a number of risks which you should be
aware of before making an investment decision. Those risks are
discussed more fully in Risk Factors beginning on
page 23. For example:
|
|
|
|
n
|
We compete with many others in the market for clinical
documentation solutions which may result in lower prices for our
services, reduced operating margins and an inability to maintain
or increase our market share.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Our business is dependent on the continued demand for
transcription services, and, if electronic health records
companies produce solutions acceptable to large hospital systems
for the creation of electronic clinical documentation, the
overall demand for medical transcription services could be
reduced.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Our ability to sustain and grow profitable operations is
dependent on the willingness of new customers to outsource and
adopt new technology platforms, as well as our ability to retain
customers.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Our success will depend on our ability to support existing
technologies, as well as adopt and integrate new technology into
our workflow platforms.
|
History
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
We began operations in 1998 with the goal of providing
high-quality outsourced clinical documentation solutions to
U.S. healthcare providers at a low cost. We combined
U.S. sales, marketing, and customer service with offshore
operations, primarily in India, and have grown our scale through
strategic acquisitions. In August 2011 we completed the
acquisition of MultiModal Technologies, Inc. which provides us
with ownership of speech and natural language understanding
technologies, and is expected to facilitate consolidation to a
single speech recognition platform, provide a broader product
offering to local and regional transcription partners and
leverage cloud-based services to enhance gross margins.
MedQuist
Inc.
MedQuist Inc. was established in 1970 and developed a
computer-based medical transcription package that replaced tape
and cassette recorders with digital recording equipment.
MedQuist Inc. purchased Transcriptions Ltd. in May 1994, and
grew quickly over the next few years through sales and
acquisitions of smaller transcription service organizations.
With several strategic acquisitions in 2001 and 2002, MedQuist
Inc. obtained the technology and expertise to offer
comprehensive document workflow management products and
solutions.
4
Acquisitions
MedQuist
Inc.
In August 2008, an affiliate of S.A.C. Private Capital Group,
LLC, or SAC PCG, invested $124.0 million to
acquire a majority interest in us. Concurrent with this
investment, we acquired a 69.5% interest in MedQuist Inc., or
the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition. At the time of the
acquisition, MedQuist Inc. was the largest U.S. medical
transcription service provider by revenue, but had been
adversely impacted by inefficient operations, litigation and
customer disputes. Net revenues for MedQuist Inc. had fallen
from $483.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2002 to $340.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2007.
We believed that MedQuist Inc., despite its operational
challenges and substantial overhead, had strong underlying
technology, deep healthcare domain expertise, and a long-tenured
customer base. Following our acquisition of MedQuist Inc., we
embarked upon a strategy to enhance the management team,
streamline operations, improve relationships with customers,
leverage our offshore resources, increase the utilization of ASR
technology, and resolve all outstanding litigation. This
strategy resulted in a stabilization of volume trends starting
in the second quarter of 2009.
Spheris
In April 2010, we acquired certain assets, principally customer
contracts, from Spheris in a transaction conducted under
Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Spheris was the second
largest U.S. medical transcription service provider by
revenue at the time. Spheris had experienced declines in volumes
from customer attrition, which we believed was attributable to
quality issues and underinvestment in product development caused
by financial constraints leading up to its bankruptcy. Some
volume declines continued after the date of the Spheris
Acquisition as the result of notices of termination given prior
to that date.
We considered the negative volume trend for Spheris in our
acquisition valuation. Net revenues for Spheris were
$156.6 million and $35.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended March 31,
2010, respectively. Customers who submitted notices of
termination prior to the acquisition generated revenues of
$24.6 million and $1.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended March 31,
2010, respectively. Therefore, net revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the three months ended March 31,
2010, less revenues attributable to customers who submitted
notices of termination prior to the Spheris Acquisition, were
$132.0 million and $33.5 million, respectively.
MultiModal
Technologies, Inc.
On August 18, 2011, we completed the acquisition of
Multimodal Technologies, Inc., or MultiModal,
through a series of mergers between MultiModal and certain of
our direct wholly-owned subsidiaries (the MultiModal
Merger). As a result of the MultiModal Merger, MultiModal
became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. The MultiModal
Merger provides us ownership of speech and natural language
understanding technologies, and is expected to facilitate
consolidation to a single speech recognition platform, provide a
broader product offering to local and regional transcription
partners and leverage MultiModals cloud based services to
enhance gross margins.
Recent
developments
Recapitalization
Transactions
On October 14, 2010, MedQuist Inc. incurred
$85.0 million of indebtedness through the issuance of
13% senior subordinated notes due 2016, or the Senior
Subordinated Notes, under a note purchase agreement, or
the Note Purchase Agreement, and incurred
$200.0 million of indebtedness under a term loan, or the
Term Loan, under a $225.0 million credit
facility, or the Senior Secured Credit Facility. We
are a guarantor of both the Senior Subordinated Notes and the
Senior Secured Credit Facility. MedQuist Inc. used the proceeds
to repay $80.0 million of indebtedness under its prior
credit facility, or the Acquisition Credit Facility,
to repay $13.6 million of indebtedness under a subordinated
promissory note, or the Acquisition Subordinated
Promissory
5
Notes, each issued in connection with the Spheris
Acquisition, and to pay a $176.5 million special dividend
to its shareholders. We received $122.6 million of this
special dividend and used $104.1 million to extinguish our
6% convertible notes, or the 6% Convertible Notes, issued
to Royal Philips Electronics in connection with the MedQuist
Inc. Acquisition and $3.7 million to extinguish certain
other lines of credit. We refer to these transactions
collectively as the Recapitalization Transactions.
Private
Exchange
Certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling shareholders
entered into the Exchange Agreement, whereby we issued
4.8 million shares of our common stock in exchange for
their 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. We
refer to this transaction as the Private Exchange.
The Private Exchange was completed on February 11, 2011 and
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Registered
Exchange Offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced a public exchange offer, or
Registered Exchange Offer, to those noncontrolling
MedQuist Inc. shareholders who did not participate in the
Private Exchange to exchange shares of our common stock for
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The Registered Exchange
Offer expired on March 11, 2011. We accepted and
consummated the exchange of MedQuist Inc. shares of common stock
that were validly tendered in the Registered Exchange Offer. As
a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
U.S. Initial
Public Offering
The U.S. initial public offering of our common stock closed
on February 9, 2011. Our common stock is listed on The
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
Redomiciliation
and Share Conversion
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and redomiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation. In
connection with our redomiciliation, we adjusted the number of
our shares outstanding through a reverse share split pursuant to
which every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding
prior to our redomiciliation was converted into one share of our
common stock upon our redomiciliation. Our redomiciliation and
such reverse share split resulted in no change to our common
stockholders relative ownership interests in us.
For a more detailed description of the Recapitalization
Transactions, the Private Exchange, the Registered Exchange
Offer, our U.S. initial public offering and the
redomiciliation and share conversion, collectively, the
Corporate Reorganization, see Corporate
Reorganization.
Acquisition of
MultiModal Technologies, Inc.
On August 18, 2011 (the Closing Date), we
completed the acquisition of MultiModal through a series of
mergers between MultiModal and certain of our direct
wholly-owned subsidiaries. As a result of the MultiModal Merger,
MultiModal became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. On
the Closing Date, we paid an aggregate of approximately
$48.4 million in cash to MultiModals shareholders,
optionholders and other third parties and issued an aggregate of
4,134,896 shares of our common stock (the
Shares) to MultiModals shareholders who are
accredited investors (the MultiModal
Accredited Investors) within the meaning of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.
We are also obligated to pay up to approximately
$28.8 million of additional cash consideration in three
installments of approximately $16.3 million,
$4.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, following
the first, second and third anniversaries of the Closing Date.
Also on the Closing Date, we granted to certain of
MultiModals employees that become employees of ours up to
$10 million of restricted shares of our common stock.
6
Amendment to
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On September 14, 2011, we amended the Senior Secured Credit
Facility to, among other things, (i) add an accordion
feature that allows for additional borrowing capacity of up to
$50.0 million in the form of additional revolving credit
commitments or incremental term loans, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, and (ii) permit
repurchases of our outstanding common stock in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $25.0 million.
Stock Repurchase
Program
On September 19, 2011, our board of directors authorized
the repurchase of up to $25.0 million of our outstanding
common stock from time to time during the six months following
the completion of the Merger (hereinafter referred to as the
Share Repurchase Program). Under the Share
Repurchase Program, shares may be repurchased in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions at our discretion. The
Share Repurchase Program does not require us to repurchase any
specific number of shares, and we may terminate the Share
Repurchase Program at any time. We will not repurchase any
shares directly from our directors and officers or S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment L.P. and its affiliates under the Share Repurchase
Program.
Corporate
information
Our principal executive offices are located at 9009 Carothers
Parkway, Franklin, TN 37067. The telephone number of our
principal executive offices is
(615) 261-1740.
The principal executive offices of MedQuist Inc. are located at
9009 Carothers Parkway, Franklin, TN 37067. The telephone number
of the principal executive offices of MedQuist Inc. is
(615) 261-1740.
7
Background and
Reasons for the Merger
Background of our
investment in MedQuist Inc.
MedQuist Inc. was established in 1970 and developed a
computer-based medical transcription package that replaced tape
and cassette recorders with digital recording equipment.
MedQuist Inc. purchased Transcriptions Ltd. in May 1994, and
grew quickly over the next few years through sales and
acquisitions of smaller transcription service organizations.
Royal Philips Electronics purchased approximately 60% of
MedQuist Inc. in June 2000, and later increased its holdings to
69.5%. With several strategic acquisitions in 2001 and 2002,
MedQuist Inc. obtained the technology and expertise to offer
comprehensive document workflow management products and
solutions.
In August 2008, Royal Philips Electronics sold its 69.5%
ownership interest in MedQuist Inc. to us, a holding company
with a portfolio of investments in medical transcription,
healthcare technology and healthcare financial services, for a
total consideration of $239.7 million. The transaction was
completed following the subscription to approximately
89 million shares in our common stock by S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment, L.P. Additionally, in April 2010, MedQuist Inc.
completed the purchase of the domestic business of Spheris Inc.
while simultaneously, CBay Inc., one of our subsidiaries that
directly holds the majority ownership in MedQuist Inc., acquired
the stock of Spheris India Private Limited, a subsidiary of
Spheris, creating a combined company for healthcare providers to
improve their clinical documentation and drive toward electronic
health record, or EHR, adoption faster and at a lower cost
through advanced technology and expanded domestic and global
services.
In early 2011, certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling
shareholders entered into the exchange agreement with us whereby
we issued 4.8 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for their 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock. We refer to this transaction as the Private
Exchange. The Private Exchange was completed on
February 11, 2011 and increased our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
In addition to the Private Exchange, we commenced the Registered
Exchange Offer to those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc.
shareholders who did not participate in the Private Exchange to
exchange shares of our common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock. The Registered Exchange Offer expired on
March 11, 2011. As a result of the Registered Exchange
Offer, we increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to
approximately 97%.
Background of the
Merger
Since our acquisition of the majority ownership stake in
MedQuist Inc., our management and directors have been aware that
further consolidating our operations with those of MedQuist Inc.
could lead to substantial overhead reductions and allow us to
capitalize on our underlying technology, healthcare domain
expertise and attractive long-term relationships with customers
of MedQuist Inc.
During the course of our consultations with our financial
advisors and outside counsel in the summer of 2010, our
management determined that a two-tiered private and public
exchange offer was the best method for acquiring the remaining
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock held by third parties. Our
management wanted to pursue the most efficient course for
combining MedQuist Inc. and our company, and believed that
offering to buy shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock directly
from the other MedQuist Inc. shareholders would result in an
expedited and fair process. Additionally, our management
concluded that pursuing a two-tiered exchange offer, whereby a
significant portion of the minority MedQuist Inc. shareholders
agreed to participate in a private exchange of their MedQuist
Inc. common stock for our common stock, followed by a registered
public exchange for the remaining MedQuist Inc. common stock,
gave us the best opportunity to acquire the highest number of
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock in the most efficient and
expeditious manner. In choosing to recommend the two-tiered
exchange offer structure to our board, our management sought to
choose a path consistent with recent precedents for transactions
involving the acquisition of the minority interests of publicly
traded companies by their principal stockholders. In contrast to
an exchange offer transaction, our management also considered a
merger transaction, but due to certain provisions of New Jersey
corporate law, a merger transaction was deemed not to be a
viable option at that time.
8
On September 30, 2010, our board of directors met to
consider the advisability of the two-tiered exchange offer. At
this meeting, the board engaged in a discussion, with members of
our management, outside counsel and financial advisors
participating, of the proposed two-tiered exchange offer
structure. Following this discussion, our board of directors
determined unanimously to approve the Private Exchange.
At its meeting on October 17, 2010, our board of directors
unanimously approved the Registered Exchange Offer. In reaching
its conclusion, our board of directors considered, among others,
the following factors:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the completion of the Registered Exchange Offer would enable
MedQuist Inc. and us to create a simpler, unified capital
structure in which equity investors would participate in the
equity of us and MedQuist Inc. only at the MedQuist Holdings
Inc. level. Our board also believed that unifying public
stockholdings at a single level could lead to greater liquidity
for investors, particularly for the former holders of MedQuist
Inc. common stock, due to the increased combined public float;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the unified capital structure that would result from the
Registered Exchange Offer would facilitate the investment and
transfer of funds between us and MedQuist Inc. and its
subsidiaries, thereby facilitating more efficient uses of our
consolidated financial resources;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the belief that we will be better positioned than MedQuist Inc.
on a stand-alone basis to develop and exploit MedQuist
Inc.s assets, including through acquisitions and
dispositions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the elimination of public shareholders at the MedQuist Inc.
level would create opportunities for cost reductions through the
reduction of overhead and reporting and compliance costs;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the opportunity to eliminate, by converting the publics
ownership of MedQuist Inc. common stock into ownership of our
common stock through the Registered Exchange Offer, the
potential for conflicts of interest between us, on the one hand,
and the assets of MedQuist Inc. and its public shareholders, on
the other, including with respect to the disposition or use of
MedQuist Inc. for the benefit of us and our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the ability of MedQuist Inc.s shareholders, through
ownership of our common stock, to participate in the growth of
MedQuist Inc.s business and our other businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the financial and operating results of MedQuist Inc.;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the terms and conditions of the Registered Exchange Offer; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the level of dilution that our current stockholders would
experience in connection with the Registered Exchange Offer.
|
The Private Exchange was completed on February 11, 2011 and
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
The Registered Exchange Offer expired on March 11, 2011. As
a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
We intend to consummate the Merger in connection with our
ongoing plan to acquire full ownership of our majority-owned
subsidiary MedQuist Inc. In addition, pursuant to the
Shareholder Litigation, we agreed that if, as a result of the
Registered Exchange Offer, we obtained ownership of at least 90%
of the outstanding common stock of MedQuist Inc., we would
conduct a short-form merger under applicable law to acquire the
remaining shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that we do not
currently own at the same exchange ratio applicable under the
Registered Exchange Offer. On October 3, 2011, our board of
directors unanimously approved the Merger. In reaching its
conclusion, our board of directors reiterated that it continues
to believe that if we acquire full ownership of MedQuist Inc. it
will simplify our capital structure, achieve greater integration
between us and MedQuist Inc., and reduce costs and eliminate
potential conflicts of interests between us and MedQuist Inc.
The board of directors also considered the same factors listed
above from its October 17, 2010 meeting as applied to the
Merger. Please see Background and Reasons for the
Merger for more information on our desire to acquire full
ownership of MedQuist Inc.
9
CBay Inc., one of our majority-owned subsidiaries, intends to
consummate a merger of one of its newly-formed subsidiaries with
and into MedQuist Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger, each
remaining issued and outstanding share of MedQuist Inc. common
stock will convert into the right to receive one share of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock.
Please see MedQuist Holdings Inc. Business
Legal proceedings for more information on the Shareholder
Litigation.
Interests of
directors and executive officers
As of September 26, 2011, our directors and executive
officers beneficially owned in the aggregate 66 shares of
MedQuist Inc. common stock that are subject to the Merger.
10
Summary of Terms
of the Merger
We have summarized the terms of the Merger below. You should
read the discussion under The Merger in this
prospectus for further information regarding the Merger.
|
|
|
Merger |
|
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the certificate of merger and
in accordance with the NJBCA, Merger Subsidiary will merge with
and into MedQuist Inc., the separate corporate existence of
Merger Subsidiary will terminate and MedQuist Inc. will survive
the Merger and exist as a wholly owned subsidiary of ours.
Merger Subsidiary has not conducted any activities other than
those incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated
by the certificate of merger. |
|
|
|
Ongoing Trading and Reporting |
|
Following the Merger, MedQuist Inc. shares will no longer trade
on the OTCQB and MedQuist Inc. will terminate its reporting
obligations to the SEC. |
|
|
|
Consideration to be Received in the Merger
|
|
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock will be converted into the right to
receive one share of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock. |
|
|
|
Procedures for Exchange of Certificates
|
|
We have appointed American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company LLC as the exchange agent for the purpose of
exchanging certificates and uncertificated shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock for the Merger consideration.
Contemporaneously with the effective date of the Merger, the
exchange agent will mail transmittal materials to each holder of
MedQuist Inc. common stock, advising such holders of the
procedure for surrendering their share certificates (or an
appropriate affidavit) to the exchange agent in exchange for
shares of our common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
Each holder of a share of MedQuist Inc. common stock that has
been converted into a right to receive shares of our common
stock will receive such shares upon surrender to the exchange
agent of the applicable MedQuist Inc. common stock certificate
(or an appropriate affidavit), together with an executed letter
of transmittal covering such shares and such other documents as
the exchange agent may reasonably require. |
|
|
|
|
|
After the effective time and until surrendered, each certificate
that previously represented shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
will represent only the right to receive shares of our common
stock as described above under Consideration to be
Received in the Merger. In addition, MedQuist Inc. will
not register any transfers of shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock after the effective time of the Merger. |
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of MedQuist Inc. common stock should not send in their
MedQuist Inc. stock certificates until they receive, complete
and submit a signed letter of transmittal sent by the exchange
agent with instructions for the surrender of MedQuist Inc. stock
certificates. |
|
|
|
Closing and Effective Time of the Merger
|
|
The Merger will become effective upon the filing of the
certificate of merger with the Department of the Treasury of the
State of New Jersey. The filing of the certificate of merger
will occur as soon as reasonably practicable after the
effectiveness of the registration statement. |
|
|
|
No Appraisal Rights |
|
No appraisal rights are available to holders of MedQuist Inc.
common stock in connection with the Merger. |
11
|
|
|
Comparative Market Price Information
|
|
MedQuist Inc. common stock is currently traded on the OTCQB
under the symbol MEDQ. On September 26, 2011,
the closing price of MedQuist Inc. common stock on the OTCQB was
$9.10 per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol MEDH. On September 26, 2011, the closing
price of our shares on The NASDAQ Global Market was $8.95. |
|
|
|
Accounting Treatment |
|
The Merger will be accounted for as an equity transaction, as we
would retain control of MedQuist Inc. after the transaction. |
|
|
|
Comparison of Rights of Holders of Our Common Stock and MedQuist
Inc. Common Stock
|
|
After the completion of the Merger, you will become a
stockholder of our company and your rights as a stockholder will
be governed by our certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
There are differences between the certificates of incorporation
and by-laws of MedQuist Inc. and our company. MedQuist Inc. is a
New Jersey corporation and our company is a Delaware
corporation, so your rights will be governed by Delaware law
after the completion of the Merger. For a summary comparison of
the rights of holders of our common stock and holders of
MedQuist Inc. common stock, see Comparison of Rights of
Holders of Our Common Stock and MedQuist Inc. Common Stock. |
|
|
|
Risk Factors |
|
The Merger is subject to a number of risks. You should consider
carefully all of the information set forth in this prospectus
and, in particular, you should evaluate the specific factors set
forth under Risk Factors in order to assess the
impact of the Merger. |
|
|
|
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations For MedQuist
Inc. Common Stock Holders
|
|
The receipt of shares pursuant to the Merger generally will be
taxable to you for United States federal income tax purposes.
The tax consequences to you pursuant to the Merger will depend
on the facts and circumstances of your own situation. Please
consult your tax adviser for a full understanding of the tax
consequences to you. See Material United States Federal
Income Tax Consequences. |
|
|
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the conversion of the
MedQuist Inc. common stock pursuant to the Merger. |
|
|
|
Brokerage Commissions |
|
If your shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock are held through a
broker or other nominee who transmits shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock on your behalf in connection with the Merger, your
broker may charge you a commission for doing so. |
|
|
|
Exchange Agent |
|
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC has
been appointed as the exchange agent for the Merger. We have
agreed to pay American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC reasonable and customary fees for its
services and will reimburse American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC for its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. |
|
|
|
Further Information |
|
If you have questions regarding the Merger, please contact the
exchange agent. If you would like additional copies of this
prospectus, our annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy
statement and other information, please contact the exchange
agent. The contact information for the exchange agent is set
forth on the back cover of this prospectus. |
12
Summary
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Data
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
The following table sets forth our summary historical
consolidated financial data for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and as of June 30,
2011 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
The summary historical consolidated financial data for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 have been derived
from our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical
consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2011 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 have been derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We prepared the unaudited
historical information on a basis consistent with that used in
preparing our audited consolidated financial statements, which
reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring
adjustments, that we consider necessary to present fairly our
financial position and results of operations for the unaudited
periods.
Our summary historical consolidated statements of operations and
other operating data reflect the consolidation of the results of
operations of MedQuist Inc. since August 6, 2008 and
Spheris since April 22, 2010, the respective dates of their
acquisition. Our summary historical consolidated statements of
operations and other operating data give effect to the
reclassification for discontinued operations for the sale of our
PFS business, which was sold on December 31, 2010.
The summary consolidated financial data also sets forth our
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
and the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet
have been derived from the historical consolidated financial
information of us and Spheris, which are included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
The pro forma combined statements of operations and other
operating data for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the
six months ended June 30, 2011 give effect to the following
transactions as if they had occurred on January 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the Spheris Acquisition and the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of
$113.6 million of debt to finance the Spheris Acquisition;
|
|
n
|
the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of $285.0 million of
indebtedness under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Senior
Subordinated Notes, the simultaneous repayment of
$80.0 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition Credit
Facility, the repayment of $13.6 million of indebtedness
under the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Notes, the payment
of a $176.5 million special dividend to MedQuist
Inc.s shareholders, of which we received
$122.6 million and the noncontrolling shareholders of
MedQuist Inc. received $53.9 million, and the repayment by
us, using the proceeds of such dividend of $104.1 million
to extinguish our 6% Convertible Notes including a
$7.7 million premium on early prepayment and
$3.7 million under certain of our other lines of credit;
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement with
certain noncontrolling shareholders of MedQuist Inc., which
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 0.8 million shares of our common stock
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement (as defined in
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with SAC PCG and affiliates
and related transactions Consulting Services
Agreement,);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 5.4 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for 5.4 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock under the Registered Exchange Offer. This increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%; and
|
13
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of approximately 1.2 million shares of our
common stock in exchange for 1.2 million shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock under the Merger. This would increase our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from approximately 97% to 100%.
|
The pro forma balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011 gives
effect to the Merger as if it occurred as of June 30, 2011.
Our historical consolidated financial information has been
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the Spheris Acquisition, the
Corporate Reorganization (excluding our U.S. Initial Public
Offering), the Merger and the shares of our common stock issued
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement,
(2) factually supportable and (3) with respect to the
statements of operations, expected to have a continuing impact
on the combined results. The pro forma information does not
reflect revenue opportunities and cost savings that may be
realized after the Spheris Acquisition. The pro forma financial
information also does not reflect expenses related to
integration activity that may be incurred by us in connection
with the Spheris Acquisition.
The pro forma data is based upon available information and
certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The pro
forma data is for informational purposes only and does not
purport to represent what our results of operations or financial
position actually would have been if such events had occurred on
the dates specified above and does not purport to project the
results of operations or financial position for any future
period or date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations and the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet should be read in conjunction with
the accompanying notes, our historical consolidated financial
statements, and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus as adjusted for the acquisition of Spheris using the
acquisition method of accounting.
14
You should read the following summary historical and unaudited
pro forma consolidated financial information with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus and the information under the
section Capitalization, Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist Holdings
Inc. appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
$
|
417,326
|
|
|
$
|
193,592
|
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
|
$
|
460,697
|
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
113,127
|
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
259,194
|
|
|
|
124,950
|
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
290,537
|
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,286
|
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
158,132
|
|
|
|
68,642
|
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
170,160
|
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
|
|
61,062
|
|
|
|
30,099
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
67,225
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
7,726
|
|
|
|
3,973
|
|
|
|
11,079
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
159,539
|
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
59,475
|
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
123,695
|
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(101,253
|
)
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
37,739
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
|
|
46,465
|
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3,813
|
)
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
|
|
(19,268
|
)
|
|
|
(7,306
|
)
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
(29,491
|
)
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(104,991
|
)
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
(2,067
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(99,460
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,171
|
|
|
$
|
17,191
|
|
|
$
|
2,867
|
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
$
|
15,401
|
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued Patient Financial Services
business, net of tax
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
15,957
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(9,240
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
$
|
15,957
|
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
35,102
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
45,128
|
|
|
|
47,333
|
|
|
|
49,714
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
46,410
|
|
|
|
48,185
|
|
|
|
50,996
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
17,038
|
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
$
|
86,265
|
|
|
$
|
33,350
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
$
|
91,890
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See below for reconciliations of
net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA does not include earnings
attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was sold in
October 2010.
|
15
Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges
The following table shows our historical ratio of earnings to
fixed charges for each of the five fiscal years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 and our pro forma
ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010 and for the six months ended
June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(1)
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
|
(16.12
|
)
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(1)
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For the purposes of calculating the
ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings
consists of income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes and noncontrolling interests increased by fixed
charges. Fixed charges consists of interest expense
including an estimate of the interest within rental expense and
amounts payable to our principal stockholders. Earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges in the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
Working
capital(a)
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
159,726
|
|
|
|
159,726
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
239,353
|
|
|
|
239,353
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
399,079
|
|
|
|
399,079
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
78,893
|
|
|
|
78,893
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
266,131
|
|
|
|
266,131
|
|
Long term debt, including current portion of debt
|
|
|
269,832
|
|
|
|
269,832
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Working capital is defined as total
current assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, minus total
current liabilities, excluding current portion of debt.
|
16
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
$
|
15,957
|
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
(2,067
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
19,268
|
|
|
|
7,306
|
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
|
29,491
|
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
7,726
|
|
|
|
3,973
|
|
|
|
11,079
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges, severance charges and accrual
reversals(a)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation and other non-cash awards
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
17,038
|
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
$
|
86,265
|
|
|
$
|
33,350
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
$
|
91,890
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes the write-off of amounts
due from an unconsolidated affiliate of Spheris, an impairment
charge to write-off the balance of an investment and the
reversal of certain accruals, related to litigation claims, as a
result of the expiration of the applicable statute of
limitations.
|
17
Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management to measure
operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc., as applicable,
plus net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests,
income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization,
cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements, acquisition
and restructuring charges, goodwill impairment charge, equity in
income (loss) of affiliated company, (income) loss from
discontinued operations resulting from the sale of our PFS
business, asset impairment charges, severance costs, certain
unusual or nonrecurring items and share based compensation and
other non-cash awards. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a
supplemental performance measure because we believe it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential differences caused by variations in capital structures
(affecting interest expense, net), tax positions (such as the
impact on periods or companies for changes in effective tax
rates), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting
depreciation expense);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of non-cash charges, such as goodwill impairment
charges and asset impairment charges; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of acquisition related charges, restructuring
charges, severance costs and certain unusual or nonrecurring
items.
|
Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of
operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use
Adjusted EBITDA in measuring our performance relative to that of
our competitors. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our
financial performance under generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States, or GAAP, and should
not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating
income or any other performance measures derived in accordance
with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating
activities as measures of our profitability or liquidity. We
understand that although Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by
securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of
companies, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical
tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a
substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.
Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being
depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
MedQuist
Inc.
The following table sets forth the summary historical
consolidated financial data of MedQuist Inc. for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and as of June 30,
2011 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
The summary historical consolidated financial data for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 have been derived
from MedQuist Inc.s audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary
historical consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2011
and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 have
been derived from MedQuist Inc.s unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
MedQuist Inc. prepared the unaudited historical information on a
basis consistent with that used in preparing its audited
consolidated financial statements, which reflect all
adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments,
that it considers necessary to present fairly its financial
position and results of operations for the unaudited periods.
As a result of the Private Exchange, on February 11, 2011,
MedQuist Holdings ownership interest in MedQuist Inc.
increased to 82.2%. Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
805-50-S99-1
Business Combinations-Related issues governs the
application of push down accounting in situations where
ownership is increased to 80% or more. The
post-February 11, 2011 consolidated financial statements
for MedQuist Inc. reflect the new basis of accounting as
required by the authoritative guidance under
ASC 805-50-S99-1,
and have applied the SEC rules and guidance regarding push
down accounting treatment.
18
Accordingly, MedQuist Inc.s consolidated financial
statements prior to the closing of the Private Exchange reflect
the historical accounting basis in its assets and liabilities
and are labeled Predecessor Company, while such consolidated
financial statements subsequent to the Private Exchange are
labeled Successor Company and reflect the push down basis of
accounting for the fair values of assets and liabilities
acquired by MedQuist Holdings in August 2008, rolled forward to
February 11, 2011. This effect is presented in MedQuist
Inc.s consolidated financial statements by a vertical
black line division between the columns entitled Predecessor
Company and Successor Company on the statements and relevant
notes. The black line signifies that the amounts shown for the
periods prior to and subsequent to the exchange agreement are
not comparable.
MedQuist Inc.s summary historical consolidated statements
of operations and other operating data reflect the consolidation
of the results of operations of Spheris since April 22,
2010, the date of its acquisition.
19
You should read the following summary historical financial
information with MedQuist Inc.s consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data
of MedQuist Inc. and Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
MedQuist Inc. appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
ended June 30,
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
326,853
|
|
|
$
|
307,200
|
|
|
$
|
375,240
|
|
|
$
|
171,509
|
|
|
$
|
47,048
|
|
|
|
$
|
154,588
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
230,375
|
|
|
|
206,265
|
|
|
|
249,571
|
|
|
|
116,923
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
|
99,840
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
47,520
|
|
|
|
33,441
|
|
|
|
37,070
|
|
|
|
18,817
|
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
|
|
15,046
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
15,848
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
12,813
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
|
12,021
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
14,843
|
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
(7,524
|
)
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
82,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
415,273
|
|
|
|
283,815
|
|
|
|
334,882
|
|
|
|
159,605
|
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
|
127,859
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(88,420
|
)
|
|
|
23,385
|
|
|
|
40,358
|
|
|
|
11,904
|
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(13,429
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(85,308
|
)
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
31,722
|
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
4,419
|
|
|
|
|
16,203
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(16,513
|
)
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
$
|
31,051
|
|
|
$
|
8,224
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,852
|
|
|
|
|
37,803
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,383
|
|
Working
capital(a)
|
|
|
40,050
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
109,043
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
220,694
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
329,737
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
49,610
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
261,603
|
|
Long term debt, including current portion of debt
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
18,524
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Working capital is defined as total
current assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, minus total
current liabilities, excluding current portion of debt.
|
Comparative per
share data
In the following table we present historical per share data for
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc., unaudited pro forma
condensed combined per share data for MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
and equivalent pro forma per share data for MedQuist Inc. for,
and as of, the year ended December 31, 2010 and for, and as
of, the six months ended June 30, 2011 using certain
assumptions as set forth in the footnotes to the table. The data
does not purport to be indicative of:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the results of operations or financial position which would have
been achieved if the Corporate Reorganization (excluding our
U.S. Initial Public Offering) and the stock issuance under
the Consulting Services Agreement had occurred at the beginning
of the period or as of the date indicated, or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the results of operations or financial position which may be
achieved in the future.
|
For further information regarding the calculation of pro forma
net income per share, see Summary Historical and Unaudited
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data above, and
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information of MedQuist Holdings Inc.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. historical basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. historical diluted
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. pro forma
basic(1)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. pro forma
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
MedQuist Inc. historical
basic(2)
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
MedQuist Inc. historical
diluted(2)
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
MedQuist Inc. pro forma equivalent
basic(3)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
MedQuist Inc. pro forma equivalent
diluted(3)
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Cash dividends per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Inc. historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
MedQuist Inc. pro forma
equivalent(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Book value per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. historical
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. pro
forma(4)
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
MedQuist Inc. historical
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
MedQuist Inc. pro forma
equivalent(3)
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Determined by dividing the pro
forma net income by the pro forma number of weighted average
shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
the six months ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
(2) |
Represents MedQuist Inc. historical
net income per share. Comprised of $0.11 (basic) and $0.10
(diluted) for Predecessor Company and $0.40 for Successor
Company for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
(3) |
The MedQuist Inc. equivalent pro
forma amounts are calculated by multiplying MedQuist Holdings
Inc. pro forma combined amounts by one.
|
|
|
(4) |
Determined by dividing the pro
forma shareholders equity by the pro forma number of
shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2011.
|
22
Risk
Factors
In addition to the other information included in this
prospectus, including the matters addressed in Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, you should
carefully consider the matters described below in order to
assess the risks associated with the Merger and holding shares
of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock.
Risks related to
the Merger
The conversion
of shares pursuant to the Merger generally will be a taxable
event for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The conversion of MedQuist Inc. common stock into our common
stock pursuant to the Merger generally will be a taxable event
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general,
U.S. holders will recognize gain for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as a result of the Merger in an amount per
share equal to the difference between the closing price of our
common stock on the date of the Merger and the
U.S. holders adjusted basis in such share of MedQuist
Inc. common stock. Holders should discuss the tax treatment of
the Merger to them with their tax advisors. See Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences for more
information.
We will issue
one share of our common stock for each share of MedQuist Inc.
common stock in the Merger. This conversion ratio is fixed and
will not be adjusted. The market price of our common stock may
fluctuate, and the market price of the shares of our common
stock upon the consummation of the Merger could be less than the
market price at the time of this prospectus.
We will issue one share of our common stock for each share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock in the Merger. This conversion ratio
is fixed and will not be adjusted regardless of any increase or
decrease in the market price of our common stock or the MedQuist
Inc. common stock between the date of this prospectus and the
consummation of the Merger. Therefore, the market price of our
common stock at the time you receive our common stock when we
deliver our common stock in exchange for MedQuist Inc. common
stock, could be less than the market price at the time of this
prospectus. The market price of our common stock has recently
been subject to significant fluctuations and volatility.
We may fail to
realize all of the anticipated benefits of the
Merger.
The primary goal of the Merger is to unify public stockholdings
at a single level, which we believe could lead to greater
liquidity for investors, particularly for the former holders of
MedQuist Inc. common stock, due to the increased combined public
float. We also believe that the unified capital structure that
would result from the Merger would also facilitate the
investment and transfer of funds between us and MedQuist Inc.
and its subsidiaries, thereby facilitating more efficient uses
of our consolidated financial resources. To the extent the
challenges of unifying our corporate structure turn out to be
greater than we have expected we may fail to realize these and
other anticipated benefits. Our costs could also be adversely
affected by our inability to fully integrate MedQuist Inc. into
our consolidated operations and management structure.
We have not
obtained a third-party determination that the Merger is fair to
holders of the MedQuist Inc. common stock.
The Merger consideration was not determined by arms length
negotiation and there was no formal valuation by an independent
third party. Neither we, CBay Inc. or MedQuist Inc. has obtained
a fairness opinion by an investment banking firm or other
qualified appraiser in connection with the Merger. Because the
Merger is being effected pursuant to a short form
merger statute, the board of directors of MedQuist Inc. have not
considered or made any determination as to whether the terms of
the Merger are fair to, or in the best interests, of the holders
of MedQuist Inc. common stock. Under the terms of the Memorandum
of Understanding, or MOU, relating to the
Shareholder Litigation, we agreed to conduct a short-form merger
to acquire the remaining shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
that we do not currently own at the same exchange ratio under
the Registered Exchange Offer
(one-for-one).
On April 1, 2011, the parties executed the Stipulation of
Settlement that memorialized the terms of the settlement
outlined in the MOU. On June 17, 2011, the Court entered an
Order and Final Judgment, or Final
23
Judgment, that, among other things, found the terms set
forth in the Stipulation of Settlement to be fair and reasonable
and in the best interests of the Settlement Class.
We do not own
100% of the stock of MedQuist Inc., which may impact our ability
to consummate the Merger.
We do not wholly own MedQuist Inc., and our ability to gain 100%
ownership of MedQuist Inc. through a short-form merger could be
adversely affected by provisions of New Jersey corporate law
described below, that limit certain business combinations
between corporations such as MedQuist Inc. organized in New
Jersey and their significant shareholders. Our costs could also
be adversely affected by our inability to fully integrate
MedQuist Inc. into our consolidated operations and management
structure.
Section 14A:10A of the NJBCA prohibits certain business
combinations involving New Jersey corporations and an interested
shareholder. An interested shareholder is defined
generally as a shareholder who is the beneficial owner, directly
or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of the
outstanding stock of the corporation. The NJBCA prohibits
business combinations subject to the NJBCA for a period of five
years after the date the interested shareholder acquired its
stock, unless the transaction was approved by the
corporations board of directors prior to the time the
interested shareholder acquired its shares. After the five year
period expires, the prohibition on business combinations with an
interested shareholder continues unless: (i) the business
combination is approved by the board of directors of the target
corporation prior to the time the interested shareholder
acquired its shares; (ii) the business combination is
approved by a vote of two-thirds of the voting stock not owned
by the interested shareholder; or (iii) the shareholder of
the corporation receive a price in accordance with a fair price
formula set forth in the NJBCA.
In August 2008, we, through our subsidiary, CBay Inc., acquired
over 10% of the outstanding shares of MedQuist, Inc., a New
Jersey corporation, from Royal Philips Electronics. The board of
directors of MedQuist Inc. did not approve future business
combinations with us, CBay Inc. or any of our affiliates prior
to that acquisition for purposes of the provisions of NJBCA
Section 14A:10A and, accordingly, we believe that these
provisions of the NJBCA apply to CBay Inc., us and our other
affiliates.
We intend to contribute the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
that we hold to CBay Inc. CBay Inc. intends, promptly following
the contribution, to contribute the shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock that CBay Inc. then holds to Merger Subsidiary.
Merger Subsidiary will then own at least 90% of MedQuist Inc.
Since Merger Subsidiary will own at least 90% of MedQuist Inc.,
we will be able to utilize a short-form merger through
Section 14A:10-5.1
of the NJBCA by which Merger Subsidiary will merge with and into
MedQuist Inc. and each share of MedQuist Inc. common stock will
be automatically converted into the right to receive a share of
our common stock. The New Jersey courts have not interpreted the
ability of a corporation to effect a short-form merger in the
context of Section 14A:10A since the adoption of New
Jerseys Shareholder Protection Act. Therefore, our ability
to consummate the short-form merger could be challenged.
The price of
our common stock may be affected by factors different from those
affecting the price of common stock of MedQuist
Inc.
If we complete the Merger, you will become a holder of our
common stock. Our business is broader than the business of
MedQuist Inc., and the results of our operations, as well as the
market price of our common stock, may be affected by factors
different from those affected MedQuist Inc.s results of
operations and the market price of MedQuist Inc. common stock.
As a result, factors that had little or no effect on the price
of MedQuist Inc.s common stock may adversely affect the
price of our common stock.
Our stock
price may decline due to the number of shares of our common
stock that could be sold in the market after the
Merger.
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result
of the large number of shares of our common stock that could be
sold in the market after the Merger or the perception that such
sales could occur. This also might make it more difficult for
stockholders to sell shares in the future at a time and at a
price they would deem appropriate.
24
We will issue approximately 1.2 million shares of our
common stock pursuant to the Merger. As of September 26,
2011 there were 55.1 million shares outstanding.
We may issue
preferred stock in the future, which may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
Our board of directors is authorized to issue one or more
classes or series of preferred stock from time to time without
any action on the part of the stockholders. Our board of
directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to
set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock
that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights,
conversion rights and preferences over our common stock with
respect to dividends or upon our dissolution, winding up and
liquidation and other terms. If we issue preferred shares in the
future that are convertible into common stock, have a preference
over our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends
or upon liquidation, or if we issue preferred shares with voting
rights that dilute the voting power of our common stock, the
rights of holders of our common stock or the market price of our
common stock could be adversely affected.
The shares of
our common stock to be received by MedQuist Inc. shareholders
will have different rights from the shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock.
Upon receipt of shares of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock
pursuant to the Merger, MedQuist Inc. shareholders will become
MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders and their rights as
stockholders will be governed by the certification of
incorporation and bylaws of MedQuist Holdings Inc. Certain of
the rights associated with MedQuist Holdings Inc. are different
from the rights associated with MedQuist Inc. common stock. See
Comparison of Rights of Holders of Our Common Stock and
MedQuist Inc. Common Stock.
Risks related to
our business
Integration of
our acquired MultiModal business may be costly and may cause
disruption to the existing business operations.
On August 18, 2011, we completed our acquisition of
MultiModal. On the closing date of the acquisition we paid an
aggregate of approximately $48.4 million in cash to
MultiModals shareholders, optionholders and other third
parties and issued an aggregate of 4,134,896 shares of our
common stock (the Shares) to certain of
MultiModals shareholders. We are also obligated to pay up
to approximately $28.8 million of additional cash
consideration in three installments of approximately
$16.3 million, $4.8 million and $7.7 million,
respectively, following the first, second and third
anniversaries of the closing date of the acquisition. Also on
the closing date of the acquisition, we granted to certain of
MultiModals employees that became employees of ours up to
$10 million of restricted shares of our common stock. The
costs to acquire and integrate MultiModal may limit the our
ability to pursue other growth opportunities, unless additional
capital can be obtained. The successful integration of
independent businesses like us and MultiModal is a complex,
costly, and time-consuming process that, even with proper
planning and implementation, could significantly disrupt the
business of MultiModal and our other operations. Achieving
anticipated synergies and other benefits of the acquisition is
subject to a number of uncertainties, including the timely
integration of technology, operations and personnel of the two
businesses. The challenges involved in this integration include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Combining solutions in a coherent and effective manner;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Preserving customer, vendor and other important relationships of
both MedQuist and MultiModal;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Minimizing the diversion of management attention from ongoing
business concerns;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Retaining key employees;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Managing new business structures; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Coordinating and combining operations, relationships and
facilities.
|
Failure to successfully integrate the MultiModal business may
reduce or eliminate the anticipated benefits of the MultiModal
acquisition, which in turn could result in increased costs,
decreased revenues, and diversion of managements time and
energy and could materially impact MedQuists,
MultiModals and the combined businesses financial
condition and results of operations, as well as the market price
of MedQuist common stock.
25
We compete
with many others in the market for clinical documentation
solutions which may result in lower prices for our services,
reduced operating margins and an inability to maintain or
increase our market share.
We compete with other outsourced clinical documentation
solutions companies in a highly fragmented market that includes
national, regional and local service providers, as well as
service providers with global operations. These companies have
services that are similar to ours, and certain of these
companies are substantially larger or have significantly greater
financial resources than we do. We also compete with the
in-house medical transcription staffs of our customers and
potential customers. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to compete effectively against our competitors or timely
implement new products and services. Many of our competitors
attempt to differentiate themselves by offering lower priced
alternatives to our outsourced medical transcription services
and customers could elect to utilize less comprehensive
solutions than the ones we offer due to the lower costs of those
competitive products. Some competition may even be willing to
accept less profitable business in order to grow revenue.
Increased competition and cost pressures affecting the
healthcare markets in general may result in lower prices for our
services, reduced operating margins and the inability to
maintain or increase our market share.
Many of
MultiModals speech recognition customer contracts and
vendor agreements can be terminated by its customers and
vendors, respectively, which could have a materially negative
impact on our speech recognition business.
Due to the closing of our recent acquisition of MultiModal, many
of MultiModals speech recognition customer contracts and
vendor agreements can be terminated by its customers and
vendors, respectively. Many of MultiModals speech
recognition customers are direct competitors of our medical
transcription business and may feel threatened by our
acquisition of MultiModal. We continue to have discussions with
these customers and vendors in order to retain their business
and services, respectively. If certain customers or vendors
terminate their contracts with us, our speech recognition
business could be materially impacted in a negative way.
Speech
recognition and natural language understanding technologies may
not achieve widespread acceptance, which could limit our ability
to grow our business.
Our business is primarily focused on, and we continue to invest
heavily in, the development and marketing of speech recognition
and natural language understanding technologies. The market for
such technologies is relatively new and rapidly evolving. Our
ability to increase revenue in the future depends in large
measure on the acceptance of these technologies in general and
our products in particular. The continued development of the
market for our current and future speech understanding solutions
will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
n
|
physician, hospital and other healthcare provider demand for
speech-enabled applications; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
continuous improvement in speech recognition and natural
language understanding technology.
|
Licensing of our products would be harmed if the market for
these technologies does not continue to develop or develops
slower than we expect, and, consequently, our business could be
harmed.
Our business
is dependent upon the continued demand for transcription
services. If EHR companies produce alternatives to medical
transcription that reduce the need for transcription, the demand
for our solutions could be reduced.
EHR companies solutions for the collection of clinical
data typically require physicians to directly enter and organize
patient information through
point-and-click
templates which attempt to reduce or eliminate the need for
transcription. A second alternative to conventional
transcription involves a physician dictating a record of patient
encounters and receiving a speech-recognized draft of their
dictation, which the physician can self-edit. There is
significant uncertainty and risk as to the demand for, and
market acceptance of, these solutions for the creation of
electronic clinical documentation. In the event that these and
other solutions are successful and gain wide acceptance, the
demand for our solutions could be reduced and our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
26
Our growth is
dependent on the willingness of new customers to outsource and
adopt our technology platforms.
We plan to grow, in part, by capitalizing on perceived market
opportunities to provide our services to new customers. These
new customers must be willing to outsource functions which may
otherwise have been performed within their organizations, adopt
new technologies and incur the time and expense needed to
integrate those technologies into their existing systems. For
example, the up-front cost and time involved in changing medical
transcription providers or in converting from an in-house
medical transcription department to an outsourced provider may
be significant. Many customers may prefer to remain with their
current provider or keep their transcription in-house rather
than invest the time and resources required for the
implementation of a new system. Also, as the maintenance of
accurate medical records is a critical element of a healthcare
providers ability to deliver quality care to its patients
and to receive proper and timely reimbursement for the services
it renders, potential customers may be reluctant to outsource or
change providers of such an important function.
Our success
will depend on our ability to support existing technologies as
well as to adopt and integrate new technology into our workflow
platforms.
Our ability to remain competitive in the clinical documentation
industry is based, in part, on our ability to develop, utilize
and support technology in the services and solutions that we
provide to our customers. As our customers advance
technologically, we must be able to effectively integrate our
solutions with their systems and provide advanced data
collection technology. We also may need to develop technologies
to provide service systems comparable to those of our
competitors as they develop new technology. If we are unable to
effectively develop and integrate new technologies, we may not
be able to compete effectively with our competitors. In
addition, if the cost of developing and integrating new
technologies is high, we may not realize our expected return on
investment.
Technology
innovations in the markets that we serve may create alternatives
to our products and result in reduced sales.
Technology innovations to which our current and potential
customers might have access could reduce or eliminate their need
for our products. A new or other disruptive technology that
reduces or eliminates the use of one or more of our products
could negatively impact the sale of these products. Our failure
to develop, introduce or enhance products able to compete with
new technologies in a timely manner could have an adverse effect
on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
Many of our
customer contracts are terminable at will by our customers, and
our ability to sustain and grow profitable operations is
dependent upon the ability to retain customers.
Many of our medical transcription contracts can be terminated at
will by our customers. If a significant number of our customers
were to cancel or materially change their medical transcription
commitments with us, we could have significantly decreased
revenue, which would harm our business, operating results and
financial condition. We must, therefore, engage in continual
operational support and sales efforts to maintain revenue
stability and future growth with these customers. If a
significant number of our customers terminate or fail to renew
their medical transcription contracts with us, our business
could be negatively impacted if additional business is not
obtained to replace the business which was lost.
Customer retention is largely dependent on providing quality
service at competitive prices. Customer retention may be
impacted by events outside of our control, such as changes in
customer ownership, management, financial condition and
competitors sales efforts. If we experience a higher than
expected rate of customer attrition the resulting loss of
business could adversely affect results of operations and
financial condition.
27
Our
indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise
additional capital to fund our operations and limit our ability
to pursue our growth strategy or to react to changes in the
economy or our industry, and our debt obligations include
restrictive covenants which may restrict our operations or
otherwise adversely affect us.
As of June 30, 2011 we had approximately
$269.8 million of indebtedness outstanding, consisting of
$175.0 million of Term Loan debt under our Senior Secured
Credit Facility, $85.0 million of Senior Subordinated Notes
and other indebtedness consisting of capital leases and
borrowings under other credit facilities, and we may incur
additional indebtedness in the future. For the years 2011
through 2014, assuming no change in our indebtedness, we will
have average, annual payment obligations of approximately
$20.0 million for the principal amount of our indebtedness.
Our net interest expense for the year ended December 31,
2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 was
$19.3 million and $14.0 million, respectively. Our
variable rate indebtedness bears interest at LIBOR plus 5.50%
with a LIBOR floor of 1.75%. Because the LIBOR floor is
currently in effect, a 1.25% increase in LIBOR above current
LIBOR levels would not increase our effective interest rate. At
June 30, 2011, a 1.0% increase in the interest rate above
this floor would impact our interest expense by approximately
$1.75 million. This indebtedness could have important
negative consequences to our business, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
increasing the difficulty of our ability to make payments on our
outstanding debt;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry
conditions because our debt payment obligations may limit our
ability to use our cash to respond to or defend against changes
in the industry or the economy;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations
to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash
flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements,
acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
limiting our ability to pursue our growth strategy, including
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us
to make non-strategic divestitures; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
placing us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors who are
less leveraged and may be better able to use their cash flow to
fund competitive responses to changing industry, market or
economic conditions.
|
In addition, under our debt financing agreements, we must abide
by certain financial and other restrictive covenants that, among
other things, require us to maintain a minimum consolidated
interest coverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a
maximum consolidated senior leverage ratio. Upon a breach of any
of the covenants in our debt financing agreements, the lenders
could declare us to be in default and could further require any
outstanding borrowings to be immediately due and payable, and
terminate all commitments to extend further credit.
The
deterioration of the credit and capital markets may adversely
affect our access to sources of funding.
We rely on our credit facilities to fund a portion of our
working capital needs and other general corporate purposes. If
any of the banks in the syndicates backing these facilities were
unable to perform on its commitments, our liquidity could be
impacted, which could adversely affect funding of working
capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. In
the event that we need to access the capital markets or other
sources of financing, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to obtain financing on acceptable terms or within an
acceptable time, if at all. Our inability to obtain financing on
terms and within a time acceptable to us could have an adverse
impact on our operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Our ability to
expand our business depends on our ability to effectively manage
our domestic and offshore production capacity, which we may not
be able to do.
Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to effectively
manage our domestic and offshore production capacity, including
our ability to attract and retain qualified MTs and MEs who can
provide accurate medical transcription. We must also effectively
manage our offshore transcription labor pool, which is currently
located in India. If the productivity of our Indian employees
does not outpace any increase in wages, our profits could
suffer.
28
Because medical transcription is a skilled position in which
experience is valuable, we require that our MTs and MEs have
substantial experience or receive substantial training before
being hired. Competition may force us to increase the
compensation and benefits paid to our MTs and MEs, which could
reduce our operating margins and profitability.
If we fail to
comply with contractual obligations and applicable laws and
regulations governing the handling of patient identifiable
medical information, we could suffer material losses or be
adversely affected by exposure to material penalties and
liabilities.
As part of the operation of our business, our customers provide
us with certain patient identifiable medical information.
Although many regulatory and governmental requirements do not
directly apply to our operations, we and our hospital and other
healthcare provider customers must comply with a variety of
requirements related to the handling of patient information,
including laws and regulations protecting the privacy,
confidentiality and security of protected health information, or
PHI. Most of our customers are covered entities
under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996, or HIPAA, and, in many of our relationships,
we function as a business associate. The provisions of HIPAA,
require our customers to have business associate agreements with
us under which we are required to appropriately safeguard the
PHI we create or receive on their behalf. Further, we and our
customers are required to comply with HIPAA security regulations
that require us and them to implement certain administrative,
physical and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality,
integrity and availability of electronic PHI, or
EPHI. We are required by regulation and contract to
protect the security of EPHI that we create, receive, maintain
or transmit for our customers consistent with these regulations.
To comply with our regulatory and contractual obligations, we
may have to reorganize processes and invest in new technologies.
We also are required to train personnel regarding HIPAA
requirements. If we, or any of our MTs, MEs or subcontractors,
are unable to maintain the privacy, confidentiality and security
of the PHI that is entrusted to us, we
and/or our
customers could be subject to civil and criminal fines and
sanctions and we could be found to have breached our contracts
with our customers.
We are bound by business associate agreements with covered
entities that require us to use and disclose PHI in a manner
consistent with HIPAA in providing services to those covered
entities. The HITECH Act, which was enacted into law on
February 17, 2009 as part of ARRA, enhances and strengthens
the HIPAA privacy and security standards and makes certain
provisions applicable to business associates of
covered entities. As of February 17, 2010, some provisions
of HIPAA apply directly to us. In addition, the HITECH Act
creates new security breach notification requirements. The
direct applicability of the new HIPAA Privacy and Security
provisions will require us to incur additional costs and may
restrict our business operations. In addition, these new
provisions will result in additional regulations and guidance
issued by the United States Department of Health and Human
Services and will be subject to interpretation by various courts
and other governmental authorities, thus creating potentially
complex compliance issues for us and our customers.
Since February 17, 2010, we have been directly subject to
HIPAAs criminal and civil penalties for breaches of our
privacy and security obligations.
Security and
privacy breaches in our systems may damage customer relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures or perceived failures in
our security and privacy measures could have a material adverse
effect on our financial position and results of operations. If
we are unable to protect, or our customers perceive that we are
unable to protect, the security and privacy of our electronic
information, our growth could be materially adversely affected.
A security or privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
n
|
cause our customers to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
29
While we believe that we use proven applications designed for
data security and integrity to process electronic transactions,
there can be no assurance that our use of these applications
will be sufficient to address changing market conditions or the
security and privacy concerns of existing and potential
customers.
Recent and
proposed legislation and possible negative publicity may impede
our ability to utilize offshore production
capabilities.
Certain state laws that have recently been enacted and bills
introduced in recent sessions of the U.S. Congress seek to
restrict the transmission of personally identifiable information
regarding a U.S. resident to any foreign affiliate,
subcontractor or unaffiliated third party without adequate
privacy protections or without providing notice of the
transmission and an opportunity to opt out. Some of the
proposals would require patient consent. If enacted, these
proposed laws would impose liability on healthcare businesses
arising from the improper sharing or other misuse of personally
identifiable information. Some proposals would create a private
civil cause of action that would allow an injured party to
recover damages sustained as a result of a violation of the new
law. A number of states have also considered, or are in the
process of considering, prohibitions or limitations on the
disclosure of medical or other information to individuals or
entities located outside of the U.S. Further, as a result
of concerns regarding the possible misuse of personally
identifiable information, some of our customers have
contractually limited our ability to use MTs and MEs located
outside of the U.S. The effect of these proposals would be
to limit our ability to utilize our lower-cost offshore
production facilities for affected customers, which could
adversely affect our operating margins.
Any change in
legislation, regulation or market practices in the United States
affecting healthcare or healthcare insurance may materially
adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Over the past twenty years the U.S. healthcare industry has
experienced a variety of regulatory and market driven changes to
how it is operated and funded. Further changes, whether by
government policy shift, insurance company changes or otherwise,
may happen, and any such changes may adversely affect the
U.S. healthcare information and services market. As
business process outsourcing and off-shoring have
grown in recent years, concerns have also grown about the impact
of these phenomena on jobs in the United States. These concerns
could drive government policy in a way which is disadvantageous
to us. Further, if government regulation or market practices
leads to fewer individuals seeking medical treatment, we could
experience a decline in our processed volumes.
Our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected by the political and economic conditions in
India.
A significant portion of our operations is located in India.
Multiple factors relating to our Indian operations could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
changes in political, regulatory, legal or economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
governmental actions, such as restrictions on the transfer or
repatriation of funds and foreign investments;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
civil disturbances, including terrorism or war;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
public health emergencies;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
changes in employment practices and labor standards;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
local business and cultural factors that differ from our
customary standards and practices; and
|
In addition, the Indian economy may differ favorably or
unfavorably from other economies in several respects, including
the growth rate of Gross Domestic Product, or GDP,
the rate of inflation, resource self-sufficiency and balance of
payments position. The Indian government has traditionally
exercised and continues to exercise a significant influence over
many aspects of the Indian economy. Further actions or changes
in policy, including
30
taxation, of the Indian central government or the respective
Indian state governments could have a significant effect on the
Indian economy, which could adversely affect private sector
companies, market conditions and the success of our operations.
U.S. and Indian transfer pricing regulations require that
any international transactions involving associated enterprises
are undertaken at an arms length price. Applicable income
tax authorities review our tax returns and if they determine
that the transfer prices we have applied are not appropriate, we
may incur increased tax liabilities, including accrued interest
and penalties, which would cause our tax expense to increase,
possibly materially, thereby materially reducing our
profitability and cash flows. Indian tax authorities reviewed
our transfer pricing practices at Spheris India Pvt. Ltd. for
tax years ended March 2004 and 2005, prior to our ownership of
Spheris, and concluded that the transfer price was not at
arms length. They assessed additional taxes for these
years, which we have paid or fully reserved. However, we
continue to dispute this assessment and the matter is currently
under appeal.
We are exposed
to fluctuations of the value of the Indian Rupee against the
U.S. dollar, which could adversely affect our
operations.
Although our accounts are prepared in U.S. dollars, much of
our operations are carried out in India with payments to staff
and suppliers made in Indian Rupees. The exchange rate between
the Indian Rupee and the U.S. dollar has changed
substantially and could fluctuate in the future. Movements in
the rate of exchange between the Indian Rupee and the
U.S. dollar could result in increases or decreases in our
costs and earnings, and may also affect the book value of our
assets located outside the United States and the amount of our
equity.
We are highly
dependent on certain key personnel and the loss of any or all of
these key personnel may have an adverse impact upon future
performance.
Our operations and future success are dependent upon the
existence and expertise in this sector of certain key personnel.
The loss of services of any of these individuals for any reason
or our inability to attract suitable replacements would have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition of our
business and operations.
We have grown,
and may continue to grow, through acquisitions, which could
dilute existing stockholders and could involve substantial
integration risks.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. We may issue equity securities for future
acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders, perhaps
significantly depending on the terms of the acquisition. We may
also incur additional debt in connection with future
acquisitions, which may place additional restrictions on the
ability to operate the business. Furthermore, prior acquisitions
have required substantial integration and management efforts.
Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
difficulty in integrating the operations and personnel of the
acquired businesses, including different and complex accounting
and financial reporting systems;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of finance and accounting
systems;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
products and technology;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
management of geographically remote offices and operations;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
customers delaying purchases or seeking concessions pending
resolution of integration between existing and newly acquired
services or technology platforms;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which management has
limited experience; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential loss of customers or key employees of the acquired
company.
|
31
As a result of these and other risks, we may not realize
anticipated benefits from acquisitions. Any failure to achieve
these benefits or failure to successfully integrate acquired
businesses and technologies could materially and adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
We are subject
to additional regulatory compliance requirements, including
section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we fail
to maintain an effective system of internal controls, our
reputation and our business could be harmed.
As a U.S. public company, our ongoing compliance with
various rules and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, will increase our legal and finance compliance costs
and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
These rules and requirements may be modified, supplemented or
amended from time to time. Implementing these changes may take a
significant amount of time and may require specific compliance
training of our personnel. For example, Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that our management report on, and
our independent auditors attest to, the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting in our annual reports
filed with the SEC. Section 404 compliance may divert
internal resources and will take a significant amount of time
and effort to complete. We may not be able to successfully
complete the procedures and certification and attestation
requirements of Section 404 by the time we will be required
to do so. If we fail to do so, or if in the future our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or independent
registered public accounting firm determines that our internal
controls over financial reporting are not effective as defined
under Section 404, we could be subject to sanctions or
investigations by The NASDAQ Stock Market, the SEC, or other
regulatory authorities. As a result, investor perceptions of our
company may suffer, and this could cause a decline in the market
price of our common stock. Irrespective of compliance with these
rules and regulations, including the requirements under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, any failure of our internal controls could
have a material adverse effect on our stated results of
operations and harm our business and reputation. If we are
unable to implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it
could harm our operations, financial reporting or financial
results and could result in an adverse opinion on internal
controls from our independent auditors.
The historical
and unaudited pro forma financial information included elsewhere
in this prospectus may not be representative of our results as a
combined company after the Spheris Acquisition, and accordingly,
you have limited financial information on which to evaluate the
combined company and your investment decision.
We and Spheris operated as separate companies prior to the
Spheris Acquisition. We have had no prior history as a combined
company and our operations have not previously been managed on a
combined basis. The pro forma financial information included
elsewhere in this prospectus, which was prepared in accordance
with Article 11 of the SECs
Regulation S-X,
is presented for informational purposes only and is not
necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of
operations that would have actually occurred had the Spheris
Acquisition been completed at or as of the dates indicated, nor
is it indicative of the future operating results or financial
position of the combined company. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined consolidated statement of operations does not
reflect future events that may occur after the Spheris
Acquisition, including the potential realization of operating
cost savings (synergies) or restructuring activities or other
costs related to the planned integration of Spheris, and do not
consider potential impacts of current market conditions on
revenues, expense efficiencies or asset dispositions. The pro
forma financial information presented in this prospectus is
based in part on certain assumptions regarding the Spheris
Acquisition that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. We cannot assure you that our assumptions will
prove to be accurate over time.
Our ability to
use our net operating loss carryforwards may be
limited.
As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately
$102 million of federal net operating loss, or
NOL, carryforwards to offset future taxable income,
which will begin to expire in 2025 if not utilized, and
approximately $286 million of state NOLs. Under the
relevant federal and state tax provisions currently in effect,
certain substantial cumulative changes in our ownership may
further limit the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be
utilized annually in the future to offset taxable income.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code, imposes limitations on a
companys ability to use NOL carryforwards if such company
experiences a more-than-50-percent ownership change, or an
ownership shift, over a three-year testing period. We believe
that, as a result of our initial public offering or as a result
of future issuances of capital stock, it is
32
possible that such an ownership change may occur. If we
experience an ownership change, our ability to use our United
States federal and state NOL carryforwards in any future periods
may be restricted. If we are limited in our ability to use our
NOL carryforwards, we will pay more taxes than if we were able
to utilize such NOL carryforwards fully. As a result, any
inability to use our NOL carryforwards could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
Our largest
stockholder may exercise significant control over our
company.
Affiliates of SAC PCG, our largest stockholder, beneficially own
in the aggregate shares representing approximately 32% of our
outstanding capital stock. Furthermore, we have entered into a
Stockholders Agreement with affiliates of SAC PCG pursuant to
which they have the right to nominate to our board three, two or
one directors for so long as they own at least 20%, 10% or 5% of
our voting power, respectively. This concentration of ownership
of our shares and the Stockholders Agreement could delay or
prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, open-market
purchase programs or other purchases of shares of our common
stock that might otherwise give you the opportunity to realize a
premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common
stock. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect
our stock price.
Our
certificate of incorporation contains a provision renouncing our
interest and expectancy in certain corporate opportunities,
which could adversely affect our business or
prospects.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will renounce
any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an
opportunity to participate in, any business opportunity that may
be from time to time presented to (i) members of our board
of directors who are not our employees, (ii) their
respective employers and (iii) affiliates of the foregoing
(other than us and our subsidiaries), other than opportunities
expressly presented to such directors solely in their capacity
as our director. This provision will apply even if the
opportunity is one that we might reasonably have pursued or had
the ability or desire to pursue if granted the opportunity to do
so. Furthermore, no such person will be liable to us for breach
of any fiduciary duty, as a director or otherwise, by reason of
the fact that such person pursues or acquires any such business
opportunity, directs any such business opportunity to another
person or fails to present any such business opportunity, or
information regarding any such business opportunity. None of
such persons or entities will have any duty to refrain from
engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business
activities or lines of business as us or any of our
subsidiaries. See Description of Capital Stock.
For example, affiliates of our non-employee directors may become
aware, from time to time, of certain business opportunities such
as acquisition opportunities and may direct such opportunities
to other businesses in which they have invested or advise, in
which case we may not become aware of or otherwise have the
ability to pursue such opportunities. Further, such businesses
may choose to compete with us for these opportunities. As a
result, our renouncing our interest and expectancy in any
business opportunity that may be from time to time presented to
such persons or entities could adversely impact our business or
prospects if attractive business opportunities are procured by
such persons or entities for their own benefit rather than for
ours.
Risks related to
our intellectual property and technology
We are
dependent on third party speech recognition software
incorporated in certain of our technologies, and the inability
to maintain, support or enhance such third party software over
time could harm our business.
We license certain speech recognition software from a third
party, which is a competitor, which we incorporate into several
of our key products and solutions. Our ability to continue to
sell and support these products and solutions depends on
continued support from this licensor. If we were to experience
the loss of this license, the portion of our business that
relies on this software would be adversely affected while we
transitioned it to our speech recognition software. There can be
no assurance that such third party licensor will continue to
invest the appropriate levels of resources in the software to
maintain and enhance the capabilities of the software and if
such third party licensor does not continue to develop its
products, the development of our solutions to meet the
requirements of our customers and potential customers could be
adversely affected.
33
Our use of
open source and third-party software could impose unanticipated
conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our
solutions.
We incorporate open source software into our speech recognition
software workflow solutions platforms and other software
solutions. Open source software is accessible, usable and
modifiable by anyone, provided that users and modifiers abide by
certain licensing requirements. Under certain conditions, the
use of some open source code to create derivative code may
obligate us to make the resulting derivative code available to
others at no cost. The circumstances under which our use of open
source code would compel us to offer derivative code at no cost
are subject to varying judicial interpretations, and we cannot
guarantee that a court would not require certain of our core
technology be made available as open source code. The use of
such open source code may also ultimately require us to take
remedial action, such as replacing certain code used in our
products, paying a royalty to use some open source code, making
certain proprietary source code available to others or
discontinuing certain products, any of which may divert
resources away from our development efforts.
We may also find that we need to incorporate certain proprietary
third-party technologies, including software programs, into our
products in the future. Licenses to relevant third-party
technologies may not be available to us on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. Therefore, we could face delays in
product releases until equivalent technology can be identified,
licensed or developed and integrated into our current products.
Such delays could materially adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Our business
depends on the reliable and secure operation of our computer
hardware, software, Internet applications and data
centers.
A substantial portion of our business involves the transfer of
large amounts of data to and from our workflow platforms. These
workflow platforms, and their underlying technologies, are
designed to operate and to be accessible by our customers
24 hours a day, seven days a week. Network and information
systems, the Internet and other technologies are critical to our
business activities. We have periodically experienced short term
outages with our workflow platforms that have not significantly
disrupted our business. However, a long term outage could
adversely affect our ability to provide service to our customers.
We also perform data center
and/or
hosting services for certain customers, including the storage of
critical patient and administrative data. Failure of public
power and backup generators, impairment of telecommunications
lines, a concerted denial of service cyber attack,
damage (environmental, accidental, intentional or pandemic) to
the buildings, the equipment inside the buildings housing our
data centers, the customer data contained therein
and/or the
personnel trained to operate such facilities could cause a
disruption in operations and negatively impact customers who
depend on us for data center and system support services. Any
interruption in operations at our data centers
and/or
customer support facilities could damage our reputation, cause
us to lose existing clients, hurt our ability to obtain new
customers, result in revenue loss, create potential liabilities
for our customers and us and increase insurance and other
operating costs.
Speech
software products and services are not 100% accurate, and we
could be subject to claims related to the performance of our
products and services. Any claims, whether successful or
unsuccessful, could result in significant costs and could damage
our reputation.
Speech recognition and natural language understanding
technologies, including our own, are not accurate in every
instance. Our customers, including hospital systems and medical
transcription service organizations, or MTSOs, use our products
to provide important clinical documentation services to their
customers. Any misrecognition of voice commands in connection
with these services could result in claims against our customers
or us for losses incurred. Although our contracts usually
contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to such
liability claims, a claim brought against us based on
misrecognition, even if unsuccessful, could be time-consuming,
divert managements attention from our business operations,
result in costly litigation and harm our reputation. If any such
claim is successful, we could be exposed to an award of
substantial damages and our reputation could be harmed greatly.
Moreover, existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial
decisions could limit the enforceability of limitations of
liability, disclaimers of warranty or other protective
provisions contained in many, but not all of, our contracts.
34
Third-party
intellectual property rights may limit the development and
protection of our intellectual property, which could adversely
affect our competitive position.
Our success is dependent, in large part, on our ability to:
obtain patent protection for our products and processes;
preserve our trade secrets and propriety technology; and operate
without infringing upon the patents or other proprietary rights
of third parties. The speech recognition and natural language
understanding industry has been characterized by extensive
litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property
rights. Companies in the speech recognition and natural language
understanding industry have employed intellectual property
litigation to gain a competitive advantage. Certain competitors
and potential competitors of ours may have obtained patents
which purport to cover the application of certain technologies
that could be used for our products. We have not been a party to
any suits asserting patent infringement against us. In addition,
international patents may not be interpreted in the same manner
as any counterpart United States patent.
Costly and
protracted litigation may be necessary to protect our
intellectual property rights.
We may have to engage in time consuming and costly litigation to
protect our intellectual property rights or to determine the
proprietary rights of third-parties and others. In addition, we
may become subject to patent infringement claims or litigation,
or interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office to determine the priority of inventions.
Defending and prosecuting intellectual property suits, United
States Patent and Trademark Office interference proceedings and
related legal and administrative proceedings are both costly and
time-consuming. We may be required to litigate further to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
enforce assignment
and/or
license agreements against our third-party developers;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
enforce our issued patents;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
protect our trade secrets or know-how;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
enforce non-compete agreements; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the
proprietary rights of others.
|
Any litigation or interference proceedings may result in
substantial expense and significant diversion of effort by
technical and management personnel. If the results of such
litigation or interference proceedings are adverse to us, then
the results may:
|
|
|
|
n
|
require us to seek licenses from third parties;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
prevent us from selling our products in certain markets or at
all;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
subject us to significant liabilities to third parties; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
require us to modify or remove our products from the market.
|
Although patent and intellectual property disputes are often
settled through licensing and similar arrangements, costs
associated with such arrangements may be substantial and could
include ongoing royalties. Furthermore, we may not be able to
obtain the necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all.
Adverse determinations in a judicial or administrative
proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent
us from further developing
and/or
selling our products. This could result in substantial harm to
our business and our business may not be able to sustain such a
loss.
Risks related to
our common stock
Our stock
price may fluctuate significantly.
The stock market, particularly in recent years, has experienced
significant volatility, and the volatility of stocks often does
not relate to the operating performance of the companies
represented by the stock. The market price of our common stock
could be subject to significant fluctuations because of general
market conditions and because
35
of factors specifically related to our businesses. Factors that
could cause volatility in the market price of our common stock
include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
market conditions affecting our customers businesses,
including the level of mergers and acquisitions activity;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the loss of any major customers or the acquisition of new
customers for our services;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
announcements of new services or functions by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
actual and anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
rumors relating to us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
actions of stockholders, including sales of shares by our
directors and executive officers;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
additions or departures of key personnel; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
developments concerning current or future strategic alliances or
acquisitions.
|
These and other factors may cause the market price and demand
for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit
or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common
stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our
common stock. In addition, in the past, when the market price of
a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have instituted
securities class action litigation against the company that
issued the stock. If any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit
against us, we could incur substantial costs defending the
lawsuit. Such a lawsuit could also divert the time and attention
of our management.
Provisions of
Delaware law and our charter documents could delay or prevent an
acquisition of our company, even if the acquisition would be
beneficial to our stockholders, and could make it more difficult
for you to change management
Provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation
and by-laws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger,
acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may
consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders
might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These
provisions may also prevent or delay attempts by stockholders to
replace or remove our current management or members of our board
of directors. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a classified board of directors;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
limitations on the removal of directors;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
nominations;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the inability of stockholders to act by written consent or to
call special meetings;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the ability of our board of directors to make, alter or repeal
our by-laws; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the authority of our board of directors to issue preferred stock
with such terms as our board of directors may determine.
|
In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which limits business combination
transactions with stockholders of 15% or more of our outstanding
voting stock that our board of directors has not approved. These
provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult
for stockholders or potential acquirers to acquire us without
negotiation. These provisions may apply even if some
stockholders may consider the transaction beneficial to them.
As a result, these provisions could limit the price that
investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our
common stock. These provisions might also discourage a potential
acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition
proposal or tender offer is at a premium over the then current
market price for our common stock.
If equity
research analysts do not publish research or reports about our
business, or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade
our common stock, the price of our common stock could
decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the
research and reports that equity research analysts publish about
us and our business. The price of our common stock could decline
if one or more securities analysts
36
downgrade our common stock or if those analysts issue other
unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or
our business.
We do not
currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and,
consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your
investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our
common stock.
We do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock
for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our
future earnings, if any, to fund our growth, including growth
through acquisitions. The payment of any future dividends will
be determined by the board of directors in light of conditions
then existing, including our earnings, financial condition and
capital requirements, business conditions, corporate law
requirements and other factors. See Dividend Policy.
37
Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All
statements other than statements of historical facts included in
this prospectus, including statements regarding our future
financial position, economic performance and results of
operations, as well as our business strategy, and projected
costs and plans and objectives of management for future
operations, and the information referred to under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist Holdings
Inc., are forward-looking statements. In addition,
forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the
use of forward-looking terminology, such as may,
will, expect, intend,
estimate, anticipate,
believe or continue or similar
terminology.
Such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to
statements regarding:
|
|
|
|
n
|
our ability to successfully integrate the MultiModal business;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential synergies from the acquisition of Spheris;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
our ability to develop, adopt and integrate new technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
acceptance of speech recognition and natural language
understanding technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
our expectation as to the future growth of the healthcare
industry;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
increases in the productivity of MTs and MEs in order to outpace
the decline in prices for medical transcription;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential benefits of our size and scale;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
our ability to gain new customers;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
our ability to increase sales; our ability to recruit and retain
qualified MTs, MEs and other employees;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
changes in law, including, without limitation, the impact HIPAA
will have on our business;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential litigation related to speech software services and
products or litigation to protect our intellectual property
rights; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of our new services and products on the demand for
our existing services and products.
|
The preceding list is not intended to be an exhaustive list of
all of our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are not historical facts, and are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about our industry,
managements beliefs and certain assumptions made by
management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, you are cautioned
that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking
statements are reasonable as of the date made, expectations may
prove to have been materially different from the results
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Unless
otherwise required by law, and except for any material updates
or revisions to the forward-looking statements made in this
prospectus occurring prior to the consummation of the Merger, we
disclaim any obligation to update our view of any such risks or
uncertainties or to announce publicly the result of any
revisions to the forward-looking statements made in this
prospectus.
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to
us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in
their entirety by these cautionary statements. You should
evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this prospectus
in the context of these risks and uncertainties.
38
Corporate
Reorganization
Recapitalization
Transactions
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as
co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the Senior Secured
Credit Facility with General Electric Capital Corporation, as
administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto, providing
for (i) a $200.0 million Term Loan and (ii) a
$25.0 million revolving credit facility, or Revolving
Credit Facility. On September 30, 2010, MedQuist
Inc., as issuer, and our subsidiaries, MedQuist Transcriptions,
Ltd. and CBay Inc., as co-issuers and guarantors, and we and
certain of our other subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a
Note Purchase Agreement with BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A.,
and THL Credit, Inc. providing for the issuance of
$85.0 million aggregate principal amount of 13% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016. Interest on the Senior Subordinated
Notes is payable in quarterly installments at the issuers
option at either (i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash
plus 2% in the form of additional Senior Subordinated Notes. See
Description of Indebtedness for a more detailed
description of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes.
The closing and funding of the Term Loan and the Senior
Subordinated Notes occurred on October 14, 2010. MedQuist
Inc. used the proceeds to repay $80.0 million of
indebtedness under its Acquisition Credit Facility, to repay
$13.6 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition
Subordinated Promissory Note it issued in connection with the
Spheris Acquisition and to pay a $176.5 million special
dividend to its shareholders. We received $122.6 million of
this special dividend and used $104.1 million to redeem our
6% Convertible Notes, and $3.7 million to extinguish
certain other lines of credit.
Private
Exchange
On September 30, 2010, we entered into an exchange
agreement with certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling
shareholders that held in the aggregate approximately 12.7% of
MedQuist Inc.s outstanding shares. Pursuant to the
exchange agreement, those MedQuist Inc. shareholders received
one share of our common stock for each MedQuist Inc. share and
entered into a stockholders agreement with us that, among other
things, provides them with registration rights and contains
provisions regarding their voting in the election of our
directors. The closing under the exchange agreement occurred on
February 11, 2011 and increased our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Registered
Exchange Offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced our Registered Exchange Offer to
those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc. shareholders who did not
participate in the Private Exchange to exchange shares of our
common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The
Registered Exchange Offer expired on March 11, 2011. We
accepted and consummated the exchange of MedQuist Inc. shares of
common stock that were validly tendered in the Registered
Exchange Offer. As a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to
approximately 97%.
U.S. Initial
Public Offering
The U.S. initial public offering of our common stock closed
on February 9, 2011. Our common stock is listed on The
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
Redomiciliation
and Share Conversion
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and redomiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation. In
connection with our redomiciliation, we adjusted the number of
our shares outstanding through a reverse share split, pursuant
to which every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding
prior to our redomiciliation was converted into one share of our
common stock upon our redomiciliation. Our redomiciliation and
the reverse share split resulted in no change to our
stockholders relative ownership interests in us. Unless
otherwise noted, all information regarding our shares of common
stock and all per share information presented herein give effect
to the reverse share split.
39
Dividend
Policy
We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, for use
in the operation and expansion of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Payments of future dividends, if any, will be at the sole
discretion of our board of directors after taking into account
various factors, including our business, operating results and
financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs, plans
for expansion and any legal or contractual limitations on our
ability to pay dividends. Our ability to pay dividends on our
common stock is limited by the covenants of the agreements
governing our indebtedness and may be further restricted by any
future debt or preferred securities. See Description of
Indebtedness.
40
Capitalization
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
n
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to the Merger.
|
You should read this table together with the information
contained in this prospectus, including Corporate
Reorganization, Use of Proceeds,
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information of MedQuist Holdings Inc., Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and the consolidated financial statements
and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Pro
forma (3)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
debt (1)
|
|
|
12,025
|
|
|
|
|
12,025
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Other
debt (2)
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
269,832
|
|
|
|
|
269,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: 25 million shares authorized, none issued
or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: 300 million shares authorized,
49.2 million shares issued and outstanding (actual);
50.4 million shares issued and outstanding (pro forma)
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
|
5,041
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
142,336
|
|
|
|
|
141,885
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(92,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
(92,732
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
54,382
|
|
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
323,887
|
|
|
|
$
|
323,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Short-term debt includes amount
outstanding under our short-term credit facilities, the current
portion of long-term borrowings and the current portion of
capital lease obligations.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Other debt includes the long-term
portion of capital lease obligations and indebtedness
outstanding under our credit agreement with ICICI Bank and with
IndusInd Bank.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Pro forma basis reflects the
issuance of 1.2 million shares of our common stock in the
Merger.
|
41
Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information of MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information includes our unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30,
2011 and our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of June 30, 2011. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statements of operations and the unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet have been derived
from the historical consolidated financial information of us and
Spheris, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The pro forma combined statements of operations and other
operating data for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the
six months ended June 30, 2011 give effect to the following
transactions as if they had occurred on January 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the Spheris Acquisition and the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of
$113.6 million of debt to finance the Spheris Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the incurrence by MedQuist Inc. of $285.0 million of
indebtedness under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Senior
Subordinated Notes, the simultaneous repayment of
$80.0 million of indebtedness under the Acquisition Credit
Facility, the repayment of $13.6 million of indebtedness
under the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Notes, the payment
of a $176.5 million special dividend to MedQuist
Inc.s shareholders, of which we received
$122.6 million and the noncontrolling shareholders of
MedQuist Inc. received $53.9 million, and the repayment by
us, using the proceeds of such dividend of $104.1 million
to extinguish our 6% Convertible Notes including a
$7.7 million premium on early prepayment and
$3.7 million under certain of our other lines of credit;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 4.8 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement with
certain noncontrolling shareholders of MedQuist Inc., which
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 0.8 million shares of our common stock
pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of 5.4 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for 5.4 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock under the Registered Exchange Offer. This increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the issuance of approximately 1.2 million shares of our
common stock in exchange for 1.2 million shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock pursuant to the Merger. This would increase
our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from approximately 97% to 100%.
|
The pro forma balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011 gives
effect to the Merger as if it occurred as of June 30, 2011.
Our historical consolidated financial information has been
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the Spheris Acquisition, the
Corporate Reorganization (excluding our U.S. Initial Public
Offering), the shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the
Consulting Services Agreement and the Merger (2) factually
supportable and (3) with respect to the statements of
operations, expected to have a continuing impact on the combined
results. The pro forma information does not reflect revenue
opportunities and cost savings that may be realized after the
Spheris Acquisition. The pro forma financial information also
does not reflect expenses related to integration activity that
may be incurred by us in connection with the Spheris Acquisition.
The pro forma data is based upon available information and
certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The pro
forma data is for informational purposes only and does not
purport to represent what our results of operations or financial
position actually would have been if such events had occurred on
the dates specified above and does not purport to project the
results of operations or financial position for any future
period or date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations and the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet should be read in conjunction with
the accompanying notes, our historical
42
consolidated financial statements, and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus as adjusted for the acquisition of
Spheris using the acquisition method of accounting.
You should read the following unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus and the information under the section
Capitalization, Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist Holdings
Inc. appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
43
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement
of Operations
For the year ended December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Exchange Offer
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
before the
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
Spheris
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
417,326
|
|
|
$
|
43,371
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
460,697
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
460,697
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
460,697
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
259,194
|
|
|
|
31,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
158,132
|
|
|
|
12,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
61,062
|
|
|
|
6,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,225
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
(a)
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings, settlements and accommodations
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
11,079
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
(8,625
|
) (b)
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
9,935
|
|
|
|
(6,633
|
)
|
|
|
123,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
37,739
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
46,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,465
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(19,268
|
)
|
|
|
(3,459
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
(c)
|
|
|
(22,588
|
)
|
|
|
(6,903
|
) (f)
|
|
|
(29,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
reorganization items, income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
6,772
|
|
|
|
20,237
|
|
|
|
(6,903
|
)
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,762
|
)
|
|
|
5,762
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
(7,176
|
)
|
|
|
12,534
|
|
|
|
20,237
|
|
|
|
(6,903
|
)
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(2,822
|
)
|
|
|
2,000
|
(d)
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
1,067
|
(g)
|
|
|
(2,067
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,067
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
17,191
|
|
|
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
|
10,534
|
|
|
|
23,371
|
|
|
|
(7,970
|
)
|
|
|
15,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued Patient Financial Services business,
net of tax
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
|
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
|
10,534
|
|
|
|
23,927
|
|
|
|
(7,970
|
)
|
|
|
15,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,957
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(9,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,616
|
) (e)
|
|
|
(10,856
|
)
|
|
|
9,770
|
(h)
|
|
|
(1,086
|
)
|
|
|
1,086
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,918
|
|
|
$
|
13,071
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
14,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,086
|
|
|
$
|
15,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Net income per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
35,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,102
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
(h,i)
|
|
|
46,102
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
(k)
|
|
|
47,333
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
(h,i)
|
|
|
46,954
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
(k)
|
|
|
48,185
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
44
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement
of Operations
For the six months ended June 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
1,777
|
(l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
45,128
|
|
|
|
4,586
|
(m)
|
|
|
49,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
46,410
|
|
|
|
4,586
|
(m)
|
|
|
50,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements.
45
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
74,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,025
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
24,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
159,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,984
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
90,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,328
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
102,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,552
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
399,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
399,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
29,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,663
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
9,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,731
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
Related party payable
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
78,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term portion of debt
|
|
|
257,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,807
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,666
|
|
Related party payable, non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
345,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,024
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
124
|
(n)
|
|
|
5,041
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
142,336
|
|
|
|
(451
|
) (n)
|
|
|
141,885
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(92,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,732
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
54,382
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
399,079
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
399,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements.
46
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
is based on our and Spheris historical financial
information, and it is prepared and presented pursuant to the
regulations of the SEC regarding pro forma financial
information. The 2010 unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information includes our audited consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2010. The 2011 presentation includes our unaudited historical
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2011. Spheris historical information
includes its unaudited historical consolidated statement of
operations for the period January 1, 2010 through
April 21, 2010, the date prior to the date of the Spheris
Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations for the year ended December 31,
2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 also
include the effects of the Corporate Reorganization (excluding
our U.S. Initial Public Offering), the shares of our common
stock issued under the Consulting Services Agreement and as a
result of the Merger. The unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 is our
historical unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2011 and is adjusted as if the Merger had been
completed as of June 30, 2011.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting under
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification 805, Business Combinations, or ASC Topic
805. ASC Topic 805 requires, among other things, that
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed be
recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date,
which is presumed to be the closing date of the Spheris
Acquisition. Accordingly, the pro forma adjustments reflected in
the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information may be materially different from the
actual acquisition accounting adjustments required as of the
acquisition date.
Under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification 820, Business Combinations, or ASC Topic
820, fair value is defined as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 specifies a hierarchy of
valuation techniques based on the nature of the inputs used to
develop the fair value measures. This is an exit price concept
for the valuation of the asset or liability. In addition, market
participants are assumed to be unrelated buyers and sellers in
the principal or the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. Fair value measurements for an asset assume the
highest and best use by these market participants. Many of these
fair value measurements can be highly subjective, and it is also
possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment
to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a
range of alternative estimated amounts.
Total acquisition-related transaction costs incurred by us are
expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. Under
ASC Topic 805, acquisition-related transaction costs (such as
advisory, legal, valuation and other professional fees) are not
included as components of consideration transferred but are
accounted for as expenses in the periods in which the costs are
incurred.
Reorganization items for Spheris directly relate to the process
of reorganizing Spheris under voluntary Chapter 11
Bankruptcy petitions filed by Spheris and certain subsidiaries
on February 3, 2010.
The historical consolidated financial information has been
adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the Spheris Acquisition, the
Corporate Reorganization (excluding our U.S. Initial Public
Offering), the shares of our common stock issued under the
Consulting Services Agreement and as a result of the Merger,
(2) factually supportable, and (3) with respect to the
statement of operations, expected to have a continuing impact on
the combined results. The pro forma financial information does
not reflect revenue opportunities and cost savings that we may
realize after the Spheris Acquisition. No assurance can be given
with respect to the estimated revenue opportunities and
operating cost savings that may be realized as a result of the
Spheris Acquisition. The pro forma financial information also
does not reflect expenses related to integration activity or
exit costs that may be incurred by us in connection with
integrating the businesses.
47
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
Certain Spheris amounts have been reclassified to conform to our
presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on
previously reported net income (loss). There were no material
transactions between us and Spheris during the periods presented
in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information that would need to be eliminated.
|
|
2.
|
Description of
the Spheris Acquisition
|
On April 22, 2010, we, together with our MedQuist Inc.
subsidiary, completed the acquisition of substantially all of
the domestic assets of Spheris and the stock of certain of its
foreign affiliates, pursuant to the terms of the Stock and Asset
Purchase Agreement entered into on April 15, 2010. The
purchase price consisted of approximately $98.8 million of
cash and MedQuist Inc.s issuance of a promissory note, net
of discount, totaling $13.6 million, or the
Acquisition Promissory Note. We had no prior
material relationship with Spheris other than the agreements
related to the Spheris Acquisition described elsewhere in this
prospectus.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition, MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd., a subsidiary of MedQuist Inc., and certain
other subsidiaries of MedQuist Inc., or collectively, the
Loan Parties, entered into Acquisition Credit
Facility with General Electric Capital Corporation,
CapitalSource Bank, and Fifth Third Bank. The Acquisition Credit
Facility provided for up to $100.0 million in senior
secured credit facilities, consisting of a $50.0 million
term loan, and a revolving credit facility of up to
$50.0 million. The credit facilities were secured by a
first priority lien on substantially all of the property of the
Loan Parties. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
were able to be made from time to time, subject to availability
under such facility, until the fourth anniversary of the closing
date. Amounts borrowed under the Acquisition Credit Facility
bore interest at a rate selected by MedQuist Transcriptions,
Ltd. equal to the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate (each as
defined in the Acquisition Credit Facility agreement) plus a
margin. The Acquisition Credit Facility was repaid in full in
October 2010 in connection with the Recapitalization
Transactions.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition, MedQuist Inc. also
entered into an acquisition subordinated promissory note, or the
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note, with
Spheris Inc. The Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note was to
mature in five years from the date of the Spheris Acquisition.
The face amount of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
was $17.5 million with provisions for prepayment at
discounted amounts, ranging from 77.5% of the principal if paid
within six months, 87.5% from six to nine months, 97.5% from
nine to twelve months, 102.0% between the first and second year,
101.0% between the second and third year and 100.0% thereafter.
For purposes of the purchase price allocation, the note was
discounted at 77.5% of the principal, or $13.6 million. The
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note bore interest at 8.0%
for the first six months. The Acquisition Subordinated
Promissory Note was repaid at 77.5% of the face amount on
October 14, 2010 in connection with the Recapitalization
Transactions.
On April 22, 2010, we transferred the following
consideration for the purchase of Spheris:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid
|
|
$
|
98,834
|
|
Fair value of unsecured Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note would have matured
in five years from the date of closing, and it had provisions
for prepayment at discounted amounts. We estimated the fair
value of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note to be
$13.6 million. The fair value was determined using a Monte
Carlo simulation valuation model with the following key
assumptions: volatility of 3.9% and cost of debt of 10.5%. The
fair value of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note is
included in the total purchase price.
48
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
The following table summarizes the consideration the amounts of
identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date. The total amount assigned to identified
intangible assets and the related amortization period is shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair value of Spheris net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
22,407
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
9,133
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Developed technology (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
Customer relationships (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
Trademarks and trade name (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
44,917
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(20,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total assigned to identified intangible assets and the
related amortization period is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
$
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
7-9 years
|
|
Trademarks and Tradenames
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
44,917
|
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
The amounts and lives of the identified intangibles other than
goodwill were valued at fair value. The analysis included a
combination of the cost approach and an income approach. We used
discount rates from 15% to 17%. The goodwill is attributable to
the workforce and synergies expected to occur after the Spheris
Acquisition. The goodwill and intangible assets are deductible
for tax purposes.
We have performed a review of Spheriss accounting policies
and procedures. As a result of that review, we did not identify
any differences between the accounting policies and procedures
of the two companies that, when conformed, would have a material
impact on the future operating results.
|
|
3.
|
The
Recapitalization Transactions
|
On September 30, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as issuer, and our
subsidiaries MedQuist Transcription Ltd., and CBay Inc., as
co-issuers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the Note Purchase
Agreement for the issuance of $85.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 13% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016
to BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation, PennantPark Investment
Corporation, Citibank, N.A., and THL Credit, Inc. Interest on
the notes is payable in quarterly installments at the
issuers option at either (i) 13% in cash or
(ii) 12% in cash plus 2% in the form of additional Senior
Subordinated Notes. Closing and funding of the Senior
Subordinated Notes occurred on October 14, 2010.
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., and CBay Inc., as
co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the
49
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
Senior Secured Credit Facility with General Electric Capital
Corporation, as administrative agent, and the parties thereto,
consisting of (i) a $200.0 million Term Loan and
(ii) a $25.0 million Revolving Credit Facility.
Closing and funding under the Term Loan occurred on
October 14, 2010. The Senior Secured Credit Facility bears
an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.50% and a LIBOR floor of 1.75%.
In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility bears a fee of
50 basis points on undrawn amounts.
The proceeds from the borrowings from the Term Loan and the
Senior Subordinated Notes were used as follows:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Repayment of the then outstanding indebtedness under the
Acquisition Credit Facility of $80.0 million as of
September 30, 2010. With the repayment on October 14,
2010, the Acquisition Credit Facility was terminated.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Repayment of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note on
October 14, 2010. The amount paid to satisfy and extinguish
the principal amount of the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory
Note was $13.6 million.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Declaration and payment of a special dividend on
October 18, 2010 by MedQuist Inc. of $4.70 per share. The
total amount of the MedQuist Inc. dividend was
$176.5 million, of which $122.6 million was paid to us.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Repayment on October 14, 2010 of our 6% Convertible
Notes due to Royal Philips Electronics. The 6% Convertible
Notes were settled at $104.1 million including
$7.7 million as a negotiated prepayment premium to the
outstanding balance at the time of the repayment.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Repayment of $3.7 million on certain of our other lines of
credit.
|
The sources and uses of funds related to the Recapitalization
Transactions were (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
|
Uses
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
|
Extinguishment of Acquisition Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
80.0
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
|
Extinguishment of Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of 6% Convertible Notes (includes premium on
early prepayment)
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of other debt agreements
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend distribution to noncontrolling stockholders
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash to working capital
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses (Private Exchange)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and expenses (Recapitalization Transactions)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sources
|
|
$
|
285.0
|
|
|
Total Uses
|
|
$
|
285.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2010, we entered into the Exchange
Agreement with certain MedQuist Inc. shareholders that held in
the aggregate approximately 12.7% of MedQuist Inc.s
outstanding shares. The Private Exchange closed on
February 11, 2011 and increased our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement,
those MedQuist Inc. shareholders received one share of our
common stock for each MedQuist Inc. share, and entered into a
stockholders agreement with us that, among other things,
provides them with registration rights and contains provisions
regarding their voting in the election of our directors.
50
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Registered
Exchange Offer
|
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced a public exchange offer, or
Registered Exchange Offer, to those MedQuist Inc. noncontrolling
shareholders who did not participate in the Private Exchange to
exchange shares of our common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock. The Registered Exchange Offer expired on
March 11, 2011. We accepted, and consummated the exchange
of, all MedQuist Inc. shares of common stock that were validly
tendered in the Registered Exchange Offer. As a result of the
Registered Exchange Offer, we issued 5.4 million shares in
exchange for 5.4 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock and increased our ownership interest in MedQuist Inc. from
82.2% to approximately 97%.
On August 31, 2011, we filed a registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this prospectus is a part, in order to register shares
of our common stock to be issued to MedQuist Inc. shareholders
(other than us) pursuant to the Merger. The terms of the Merger
are described in this prospectus. The Merger would increase our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from approximately 97.0% to 100.0%.
|
|
7.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010
|
Spheris
Acquisition pro forma adjustments:
|
|
a. |
Adjustment to reflect increased amortization of acquired
intangibles as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trademarks and Tradenames
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
|
|
7-9 years
|
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization for the period January 1 to April 21, 2010
|
|
$
|
50,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional depreciation of approximately $68,000 would be
incurred related to fair value adjustments for certain tangible
assets, primarily equipment and leasehold improvements.
|
|
b.
|
Adjustment to eliminate direct incremental costs incurred by us
and Spheris for bankruptcy and bankruptcy related matters.
|
|
c.
|
Adjustment to reflect interest expense related to the Spheris
Acquisition, as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility interest January 1 to April 21,
2010
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
Interest on the Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
821
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
Less: Spheris historical interest expense
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
The Acquisition Credit Facility and the Acquisition Subordinated
Promissory Note were repaid in connection with the
Recapitalization Transactions.
|
|
d. |
Adjustment to eliminate the historical income tax benefit of
Spheris and to record the income tax provision of the combined
entities at our historical effective tax rate in effect for the
respective period. However, the effective tax rate of the
combined company could be different depending on
post-acquisition activities.
|
|
|
e. |
Adjustment to recognize noncontrolling interest in MedQuist Inc.
|
Recapitalization
Transactions, Private Exchange and Registered Exchange Offer pro
forma adjustments:
|
|
f. |
Adjustment to reflect interest expense as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest on Term Loan
|
|
$
|
11,761
|
|
Interest on Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
8,963
|
|
Amortization of related deferred financing fees
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
23,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest that would not have been incurred under the prior
debt agreements, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Credit Facility
|
|
|
(6,177
|
)
|
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
(2,678
|
)
|
6% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
(5,477
|
)
|
Other debt agreements
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
Amortization of previous deferred financing fees
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
(6,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Term Loan bears a variable interest rate. Each
1/8%
increase in the base rate (prime or LIBOR) would result in a
$0.3 million increase in annual interest expense.
In connection with the Recapitalization Transactions and our
repayment and termination of the Acquisition Credit Facility,
Acquisition Subordinated Promissory Note and 6% Convertible
Notes, we expensed $6.2 million of financing fees and
recorded a loss of $7.7 million on the repayment of the
6% Convertible Notes. As these amounts are non recurring
and resulted directly from the Recapitalization Transactions
they have not been reflected in the pro forma adjustments.
|
|
g. |
Adjustment to record the income tax provision of the
Recapitalization Transactions, Private Exchange and Registered
Exchange Offer at our historical effective tax rate in effect
for the respective period. However, the effective tax rate after
these transactions could be different.
|
|
|
h. |
In connection with the Private Exchange and the Registered
Exchange Offer, noncontrolling shareholders holding
10.2 million shares of MedQuist Inc. exchanged their
MedQuist Inc. shares for shares of our common stock and received
one share of our common stock for each share of MedQuist Inc.
exchanged, which resulted in approximately 10.2 million
additional shares outstanding. As a result of the Private
Exchange and the Registered Exchange Offer, we own approximately
97.0% of MedQuist Inc., and the noncontrolling interest
decreased from approximately 30.5% to 3.0%. As we hold a
controlling interest in MedQuist Inc. before and after the
Private Exchange and the Registered Exchange Offer, the
exchanges were recorded as equity transactions. Additionally, we
paid $2.5 million of expenses incurred by certain
shareholders who are party to the Exchange Agreement. We
accounted for the payment as a capital transaction.
|
52
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information (Continued)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and net
income (loss) per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect
the issuance of 10.2 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for MedQuist Inc. shares as if the shares had been
outstanding from January 1, 2010.
|
|
i. |
To record the changes in shares outstanding as a result of the
Private Exchange, the Registered Exchange Offer and the
Consulting Services Agreement.
|
Merger pro
forma adjustments:
|
|
j. |
Adjustment to reflect the change in noncontrolling interests as
a result of the proposed Merger which would increase our
ownership to 100%.
|
|
|
k. |
To record the change in shares outstanding as a result of the
Merger.
|
|
|
7.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2011
|
Merger pro
forma adjustments:
|
|
l. |
Adjustment to reflect the change in noncontrolling interests as
a result of the proposed Merger which would increase our
ownership to 100%.
|
|
|
m. |
To reflect the impact of the issuance of approximately
1.2 million shares of our common stock as a result of the
Merger. To also reflect the impact on our weighted average
shares outstanding resulting from the common shares issued
during 2011 pursuant to the Private Exchange, Registered
Exchange Offer and the Consulting Services Agreement.
|
|
|
8.
|
Pro forma
adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011
|
Merger pro
forma adjustments:
|
|
n. |
To adjust common stock, additional paid in capital and
noncontrolling interests to reflect the issuance of
approximately 1.2 million shares of our common stock in
exchange for 1.2 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock as a result of the Merger that would increase our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from approximately 97% to 100%.
|
53
Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
The following tables summarize our consolidated financial data
for the periods presented. You should read the following
selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus and the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of MedQuist Holdings Inc. section of this
prospectus.
We derived the statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and the balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this prospectus. We derived the statement of operations data
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are
not included in this prospectus. We derived the statement of
operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2011 and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011 from
our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which are
included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of our
management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated
financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of
only normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary to
present fairly the financial information set forth in those
statements. Our historical results for any prior period are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year
or any future period.
Our selected historical consolidated statements of operations
and other operating data reflect the consolidation of the
results of operations of MedQuist Inc. since August 6, 2008
and Spheris since April 22, 2010, the respective dates of
their acquisitions. Our selected historical consolidated
statements of operations and other operating data
54
give effect to the reclassification for discontinued operations
for the sale of our PFS business, which was sold on
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
35,222
|
|
|
$
|
42,191
|
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
$
|
417,326
|
|
|
$
|
193,592
|
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
17,585
|
|
|
|
22,108
|
|
|
|
113,127
|
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
259,194
|
|
|
|
124,950
|
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
17,637
|
|
|
|
20,083
|
|
|
|
58,286
|
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
158,132
|
|
|
|
68,642
|
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
14,655
|
|
|
|
19,442
|
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
|
|
61,062
|
|
|
|
30,099
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,726
|
|
|
|
3,973
|
|
|
|
11,079
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
16,530
|
|
|
|
21,593
|
|
|
|
159,539
|
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
59,475
|
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(101,253
|
)
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
37,739
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(1,657
|
)
|
|
|
(3,813
|
)
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
|
|
(19,268
|
)
|
|
|
(7,306
|
)
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(3,272
|
)
|
|
|
(104,991
|
)
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(3,088
|
)
|
|
|
(99,460
|
)
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
|
|
17,191
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(9,240
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
35,102
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
45,128
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
12,873
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
46,410
|
|
Other Operating Data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
17,038
|
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
$
|
86,265
|
|
|
$
|
33,350
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See below for reconciliations of
net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA does not include earnings
attributable to our investment in A-Life, which was sold in
October 2010.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
2,667
|
|
|
$
|
42,868
|
|
|
$
|
29,633
|
|
|
$
|
66,779
|
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
Working capital
(deficit)(a)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
10,870
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
(5,114
|
)
|
|
|
29,988
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
31,817
|
|
|
|
51,420
|
|
|
|
279,177
|
|
|
|
253,068
|
|
|
|
414,879
|
|
|
|
399,079
|
|
Long term debt, including current portion of debt
|
|
|
21,283
|
|
|
|
14,075
|
|
|
|
126,008
|
|
|
|
107,340
|
|
|
|
294,494
|
|
|
|
269,832
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
29,854
|
|
|
|
79,350
|
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
|
|
34,511
|
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Working capital is defined as total
current assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, minus total
current liabilities, excluding current portion of debt.
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinuing operations
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
19,268
|
|
|
|
7,306
|
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,726
|
|
|
|
3,973
|
|
|
|
11,079
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges, severance charges and accrual
reversals(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation and other non-cash awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
17,038
|
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
$
|
86,265
|
|
|
$
|
33,350
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes an impairment charge to
write-off the balance of an investment and the reversal of
certain accruals, related to litigation claims, as a result of
the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
|
56
Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management to measure
operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc., as applicable,
plus net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests,
income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization,
cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements, acquisition
and restructuring charges, goodwill impairment charge, equity in
income (loss) of affiliated company, (income) loss from
discontinued operations resulting from the sale of our PFS
business, asset impairment charges, severance costs, certain
unusual or nonrecurring items and share based compensation and
other non-cash awards. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a
supplemental performance measure because we believe it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential differences caused by variations in capital structures
(affecting interest expense, net), tax positions (such as the
impact on periods or companies for changes in effective tax
rates), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting
depreciation expense);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of non-cash charges, such as goodwill impairment
charges and asset impairment charges; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of acquisition related charges, restructuring
charges, severance costs and certain unusual or nonrecurring
items.
|
Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of
operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use
Adjusted EBITDA in measuring our performance relative to that of
our competitors. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our
financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to net income, operating income or any other
performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an
alternative to cash flow from operating activities as measures
of our profitability or liquidity. We understand that although
Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts,
lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, Adjusted
EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not
consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being
depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
57
Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Inc.
The following tables summarize MedQuist Inc.s consolidated
financial data for the periods presented. You should read the
following selected consolidated financial data in conjunction
with its consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus and the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist Inc.
section of this prospectus.
We derived the statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and the balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 from MedQuist Incs
audited consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the statement of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2007 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008 from MedQuist Inc.s audited consolidated
financial statements, which are not included in this prospectus.
As a result of the Private Exchange, on February 11, 2011,
MedQuist Holdings ownership interest in MedQuist Inc.
increased to 82.2%. Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
805-50-S99-1
Business Combinations-Related issues governs the
application of push down accounting in situations where
ownership is increased to 80% or more. The
post-February 11, 2011 consolidated financial statements
for MedQuist Inc. reflect the new basis of accounting as
required by the authoritative guidance under
ASC 805-50-S99-1,
and have applied the SEC rules and guidance regarding push
down accounting treatment. Accordingly, MedQuist
Inc.s consolidated financial statements prior to the
closing of the Private Exchange reflect the historical
accounting basis in its assets and liabilities and are labeled
Predecessor Company, while such consolidated financial
statements subsequent to the Private Exchange are labeled
Successor Company and reflect the push down basis of accounting
for the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired by
MedQuist Holdings in August 2008, rolled forward to
February 11, 2011. This effect is presented in MedQuist
Inc.s consolidated financial statements by a vertical
black line division between the columns entitled Predecessor
Company and Successor Company on the statements and relevant
notes. The black line signifies that the amounts shown for the
periods prior to and subsequent to the exchange agreement are
not comparable.
In the opinion of MedQuist Inc.s management, the unaudited
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as its audited consolidated financial statements and
include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring
adjustments that it considers necessary to present fairly the
financial information set forth in those statements. MedQuist
Inc.s historical results for any prior period are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year
or any future period.
58
MedQuist Inc.s selected historical consolidated statements
of operations and other operating data reflect the consolidation
of the results of operations of Spheris since April 22,
2010, the date of its acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
|
February 12,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
|
2011 to
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
ended June 30,
|
|
|
February 11,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
358,091
|
|
|
$
|
340,342
|
|
|
$
|
326,853
|
|
|
$
|
307,200
|
|
|
$
|
375,240
|
|
|
$
|
171,509
|
|
|
$
|
47,048
|
|
|
|
$
|
154,588
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
280,273
|
|
|
|
260,879
|
|
|
|
230,375
|
|
|
|
206,265
|
|
|
|
249,571
|
|
|
|
116,923
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
|
99,840
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
53,675
|
|
|
|
62,288
|
|
|
|
47,520
|
|
|
|
33,441
|
|
|
|
37,070
|
|
|
|
18,817
|
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
|
|
15,046
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
|
|
15,848
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
12,813
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,631
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
|
12,021
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
13,001
|
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
14,843
|
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
(7,524
|
)
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
381,241
|
|
|
|
362,200
|
|
|
|
415,273
|
|
|
|
283,815
|
|
|
|
334,882
|
|
|
|
159,605
|
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
|
127,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(23,150
|
)
|
|
|
(21,858
|
)
|
|
|
(88,420
|
)
|
|
|
23,385
|
|
|
|
40,358
|
|
|
|
11,904
|
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
7,628
|
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(13,429
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(14,648
|
)
|
|
|
(12,867
|
)
|
|
|
(85,308
|
)
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
31,722
|
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
4,419
|
|
|
|
|
16,203
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
(16,513
|
)
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(16,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
$
|
31,051
|
|
|
$
|
8,224
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,852
|
|
|
|
|
37,803
|
|
59
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operation should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes of each of
us, MedQuist Inc. and Spheris Inc. and with the information
under Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Selected
Consolidated Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings
Inc. appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition
to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains
forward looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of
certain factors. We discuss factors that we believe could cause
or contribute to these differences below and elsewhere in this
prospectus, including those set forth under Risk
Factors.
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert the Physician Narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
automated speech recognition (ASR), medical transcription and
editing, workflow automation, and document management and
distribution to deliver a complete managed service for our
customers. Our solutions enable hospitals, clinics, and
physician practices to improve the quality of clinical data as
well as accelerate and automate the documentation process, and
we believe our solutions improve physician productivity and
satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle performance, and facilitate
the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records. We
also offer speech recognition solutions for radiology,
cardiology, pathology and related specialties, that help
healthcare providers dictate, edit and sign reports without
manual transcription.
Key factors
affecting our performance
In 2010, we completed the acquisition of Spheris and in 2008 we
completed the acquisition of MedQuist Inc., both of which
materially impacted our financial results. In addition, our
results have also been impacted by volume changes, pricing
impacts as we move to ASR and offshore production, as well as
operating improvements and selling, general and administrative
expense savings resulting from leveraging our scalable platform.
These key factors are described below for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2011.
Volume and
pricing trends
Historically, the vast majority of our revenue was generated by
providing clinical documentation services to our customers.
Medical transcription and medical editing by our MTs and MEs,
respectively, accounted for 95% of our net revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2011. Product sales and related
maintenance contracts and other made up the balance of our
historical net revenues. Our transcription customers are
generally charged a rate per character multiplied by the number
of characters that we process.
We base our transcription pricing on various factors,
principally market forces, the extent to which we can utilize
our offshore production facilities, the extent to which
customers utilize the ASR technology available in our solutions,
the scope of services provided, and turn-around times requested
by a particular transcription customer. We work with our
transcription customers to evaluate how different solutions
affect pricing and to determine what for them is an optimal mix
of service level and price. Higher utilization of offshore
production and ASR leads to lower costs for us, which permits us
to offer better pricing to our transcription customers while at
the same time contributing to margin growth. We have
successfully migrated a significant portion of our transcription
volume offshore and we will continue these efforts.
As technological advances and increased use of offshore
resources have driven down industry costs, the average price per
character has also declined as healthcare providers have sought
to participate in the economic gains. We
60
intend to monitor and adjust our transcription pricing
accordingly to remain competitive as these industry trends
continue.
Operating
improvements
We have executed significant operational improvements since
acquiring MedQuist Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2008. Cost of
revenues on a per unit basis has declined due to the increased
percentage of volume produced offshore and the increased
utilization of ASR technology, as well as reductions of support
staff headcount as we shift volume to India in order to further
reduce operating costs. We have increased our offshore
production volumes from 28% to 42% for the same period.
Additionally, our use of ASR technology has increased from 39%
in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 74% in the quarter ended
June 30, 2011. As we continue to increase the use of ASR
technology and move volume offshore, we expect to continue to
reduce costs.
Some of our contracts specify lower prices for work performed
offshore or using speech recognition technology. Therefore, our
operating income will not increase by the full amount of the
savings we realize.
Selling,
general and administrative expense savings
We have made significant reductions in selling, general and
administrative expenses since 2008. Such expenses were 14% of
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to
22% of net revenue in 2008. These savings were achieved
primarily through headcount reductions and aggressive efforts to
reduce other administrative expenses.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition and the integration
of MedQuist Inc. into us, we have identified potential specific
savings in the sales and marketing and general and
administrative areas. We anticipate that these savings will be
implemented throughout the remainder of 2011. We have shut down
certain redundant facilities in the USA and India.
Adjusted
EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA increased to $86.3 million, or 21% of net
revenues, for 2010, compared with $60.5 million, or 17% of
net revenues, for 2009. Adjusted EBITDA increased to
$55.2 million and $27.7 million or 25.1% and 25.6% of
net revenues, for the first six months and second quarter of
2011, respectively compared with $33.4 million and
$19.4 million, or 17.2% and 17.9% of net revenues for the
same period last year. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA is the
result of higher utilization of offshore resources and ASR
technologies, as well as increased volumes resulting from the
acquisition of Spheris and related synergies. The full year 2010
results only reflect $12 million of Spheris acquisition
synergies due to timing of the acquisition, of which
$7 million was realized in the fourth quarter. Adjusted
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See section
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP financial measure) below
for further discussion of this financial measure.
Basis of
Presentation
U.S. Initial
Public Offering
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and re-domiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation and
authorized 300.0 million shares of common stock par value
at $0.10 per share and 25.0 million shares of preferred
stock at $0.10 par value per share. In connection with our
re-domiciliation, we adjusted the number of our shares
outstanding through a reverse share split pursuant to which
every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding prior to
our re-domiciliation was converted into one share of our common
stock upon our re-domiciliation. Our re-domiciliation and
reverse share split resulted in no change to our common
stockholders relative ownership interests in us.
In February 2011, we completed our IPO selling 3.0 million
shares of our common stock and 1.5 million shares of our
common stock owned by selling shareholders at an offer price of
$8.00 per share, resulting in gross proceeds to us of
$24.0 million and net proceeds to us after underwriting
fees of $22.3 million. Our common stock is listed on The
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
61
Private
Exchange
Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, we issued 4.8 million
shares of our common stock in exchange for 4.8 million
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock from certain of MedQuist
Inc.s noncontrolling shareholders. The Private Exchange
was completed on February 11, 2011 and increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Registered
Exchange Offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced our Registered Exchange Offer to
those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc. shareholders who did not
participate in the Private Exchange to exchange shares of our
common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The
Registered Exchange Offer expired on March 11, 2011. We
accepted and consummated the exchange of, all MedQuist Inc.
shares of common stock that were validly tendered in the
Registered Exchange Offer. As a result of the Registered
Exchange Offer, we increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from
82.2% to approximately 97%. We issued 5.4 million shares of
our common stock in exchange for 5.4 million shares of
MedQuist Inc. common stock.
Business
Segment and Reporting Unit
We currently operate in one business segment and have one
reporting unit, which is clinical documentation solutions for
the healthcare industry. The Patient Financial Services
(PFS) business was sold on December 31, 2010
and results of the PFS business have been accounted for as
discontinued operations for the relevant periods presented.
MultiModal
Merger Agreement
On August 18, 2011, or the Closing Date, we
completed the acquisition of MultiModal through a series of
mergers between MultiModal and certain of our direct
wholly-owned subsidiaries, which we refer to as the
MultiModal Merger. As a result of the MultiModal
Merger, MultiModal became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of
ours. On the Closing Date, we paid an aggregate of approximately
$48.4 million in cash to MultiModals shareholders,
optionholders and other third parties and issued an aggregate of
4,134,896 shares of our common stock to MultiModals
shareholders who are accredited investors within the
meaning of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933, or the MultiModal Accredited Investors.
We are also obligated to pay up to approximately
$28.8 million of additional cash consideration in three
installments of approximately $16.3 million,
$4.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, following
the first, second and third anniversaries of the Closing Date.
To help fund the cash portion of the purchase price, MedQuist
Inc. loaned $19 million to CBay Inc., one of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries, or the Payor, on the
Closing Date. The loan is evidenced by a Subordinated
Intercompany Note dated as of the Closing Date, which matures
two years from the Closing Date and bears a 15% interest rate
per annum on the unpaid principal amount thereof, all or a
portion of which may be prepaid by the Payor at any time upon
one business days notice.
The MultiModal Merger provides us ownership of speech and
natural language understanding technologies, and is expected to
facilitate consolidation to a single speech recognition
platform, provide a broader product offering to local and
regional transcription partners and leverage MultiModals
cloud based services to enhance gross margins.
Net
Revenues
We derive revenues primarily from providing clinical
documentation services to integrated delivery networks, academic
centers, group practices and community hospitals. Our customers
are generally charged a rate times the volume of work that we
transcribe or edit. In the clinical documentation workflow, we
provide, in addition to medical transcription technology and
services, maintenance services, digital dictation, speech
recognition and electronic signature services.
Net revenues from customers in the U.S. were
$411.0 million, $342.8 million, and
$167.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Net revenues from customers outside
the U.S. were
62
$6.3 million, $11.1 million, and $3.5 million for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively. As of the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, net revenues from customers in the U.S. represent 95%
or more of our total revenues.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues includes compensation of our direct employees
and subcontractors, other production costs (primarily related to
operational and production management, quality assurance,
quality control and customer and field service personnel), and
telecommunication and facility costs. Cost of revenues also
includes the direct cost of technology products sold to
customers. MT and ME costs are directly related to medical
transcription and medical editing, respectively.
Selling,
general and administrative expense
Our selling, general and administrative expenses include
marketing and sales costs, accounting costs, information
technology costs, professional fees, corporate facility costs,
corporate payroll and benefits expenses.
Research and
development expense
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of
personnel and related costs, including salaries and employee
benefits for software engineers and consulting fees paid to
independent consultants who provide software engineering
services to us. Our research and development efforts have been
devoted to new products and services offerings and increases in
features and functionality of our existing products and services.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to
seven years for furniture, equipment and software, and the
lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for leasehold
improvements. Intangible assets are being amortized using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which
range from three to twenty years.
Cost of legal
proceedings, settlements and accommodations
Cost of legal proceedings, settlements and accommodations
includes settlement of claims, ongoing litigation, and
associated legal and other professional fees incurred.
Critical
accounting policies and use of estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with GAAP. We believe there are several accounting policies that
are critical to understanding our historical and future
performance, as these policies affect the reported amounts of
revenue and other significant areas that involve
managements judgments and estimates. These critical
accounting policies and estimates have been discussed with our
audit committee.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and related
disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate these estimates and judgments. We base these estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable at such time, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
independent sources. Actual results may ultimately differ from
these estimates. A critical accounting estimate must meet two
criteria: (1) it requires assumptions about highly
uncertain matters, and (2) there would be a material effect
on the financial statements from either using a different,
although reasonable, amount within the range of the estimate in
the current period or from reasonably likely
period-to-period
changes in the estimate. While there are a number of accounting
policies, methods and estimates affecting our consolidated
financial
63
statements as addressed in Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements, areas that are particularly significant
and critical include:
Valuation of Long-Lived and Other Intangible Assets and
Goodwill. In connection with acquisitions, we
allocate portions of the purchase price to tangible and
intangible assets, consisting primarily of acquired
technologies, and customer relationships with the remainder
allocated to goodwill. We assess the realizability of goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at least
annually, or sooner if events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We
have determined that we have three reporting units but a sole
operating segment.
We review our long-lived assets, including amortizable
intangibles, for impairment when events indicate that their
carrying amount may not be recoverable. When we determine that
one or more impairment indicators are present for an asset, we
compare the carrying amount of the asset to net future
undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate.
If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than the net
future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to
generate, we then compare the fair value to the book value of
the asset. If the fair value is less than the book value, we
recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss is the excess
of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value.
Some of the events that we consider as impairment indicators for
our long-lived assets, including goodwill, are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
our net book value compared to our fair value;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
significant adverse economic and industry trends;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
significant decrease in the market value of the asset;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the extent that we use an asset or changes in the manner that we
use it;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
significant changes to the asset since we acquired it; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
other changes in circumstances that potentially indicate all or
a portion of the company will be sold.
|
Deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets
represent future tax benefits that we expect to be able to apply
against future taxable income or that will result in future net
operating losses that we can carry forward to use against future
taxable earnings. Our ability to utilize the deferred tax assets
is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.
To the extent that we believe it is more likely than not that
all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be utilized,
we record a valuation allowance against that asset. In making
that determination we consider all positive and negative
evidence and give stronger consideration to evidence that is
objective in nature.
Commitments and contingencies. We routinely
evaluate claims and other potential litigation to determine if a
liability should be recorded in the event it is probable that we
will incur a loss and can estimate the amount of such loss.
Revenue recognition. We recognize clinical
documentation services revenues when there is persuasive
evidence that an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or
determinable, services have been rendered and collectability is
reasonably assured. These services are recorded using contracted
rates and are net of estimates for customer credits.
Historically, our estimates have been adequate. If actual
results are higher or lower than our estimates, we would have to
adjust our estimates and financial statements in future periods.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful
accounts. Accounts receivable are recorded at the
invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The carrying value of
accounts receivable approximates fair value. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is our best estimate of potential losses
resulting from the inability of our customers to make required
payments due. This allowance is used to state trade receivables
at estimated net realizable value.
We estimate uncollectible amounts based upon our historical
write-off experience, current customer receivable balances,
aging of customer receivable balances, the customers
financial condition and current economic conditions.
Historically, our estimates have been adequate to provide for
our accounts receivable exposure.
Customer Accommodation Program. In response to
customers concerns regarding historical billing matters,
MedQuist Inc. established a plan to offer financial
accommodations to certain of its customers during 2005 and 2006
and recorded the related liability. Since 2008, MedQuist Inc.
has not made additional offers. In March
64
2011, the Board of Directors of MedQuist Inc. terminated the
Customer Accommodation Program. As a result, any amounts that
had not been offered to customers were reversed.
Consolidated
results of operations
Comparison of
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011
The following tables set forth our unaudited consolidated
results of operations for the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
193,592
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
124,950
|
|
|
|
64.5
|
%
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
68,642
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
40.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
30,099
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
59,475
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(7,306
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased $26.1 million, or 13.5%, to
$219.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared with $193.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 due to increased revenue resulting from the
Spheris acquisition. The Spheris acquisition in April 2010,
contributed approximately $37.8 million in incremental
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 arising from
a full period consolidation, offset by decreases in price due to
higher speech recognition and offshore volume.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues were $130.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 compared with $125.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010. As a percentage of net
revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 59.5% for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 from 64.5% for the same period in 2010
primarily due to increased
65
utilization of speech recognition technologies, increased
utilization of offshore resources, and other operating cost
reduction initiatives.
Selling,
general and administrative
SG&A expenses were 13.8% of net revenues for the six month
period ended June 30, 2011 compared to 15.5% for the same
period in the prior year. The improvement versus prior year is
due to the impact of synergies realized from the Spheris
acquisition and other cost savings initiatives.
Research &
development
R&D expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 2.2% for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2.9% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease was due to the
impact of synergies realized from the Spheris acquisition and
other cost saving initiatives.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of net
revenues was 7.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared with 7.6% for the same period in 2010. This increase is
primarily due to amortization of intangibles related to the
Spheris acquisition.
Cost (benefit)
of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 we reversed
$9.7 million of the accommodation accrual as the MedQuist
Inc. board of directors terminated the Customer Accommodation
Program on March 31, 2011. We also recorded a charge for a
settlement of our indemnification obligations with the former
chief financial officer of MedQuist Inc., and fees in connection
with the Shareholder Litigation.
Acquisition
and restructuring
We incurred Acquisition and restructuring charges of
$11.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded net
restructuring charges of $7.4 million including
approximately $4.3 million from a reduction in workforce
and a charge of $1.5 million representing future lease
payments on MedQuist Inc.s former corporate headquarters
in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey and former data center in Sterling,
Virginia, net of estimated sublease rentals. The future minimum
lease payments on the Mt. Laurel facility total
$2.5 million. In addition we recorded non-cash stock
compensation charges of $0.8 million due to the
acceleration of stock option vesting and the extension of the
stock option exercise period for terminated employees.
Acquisition charges related to the completion of the Spheris
integration plus charges related to other acquisitions. We
expect that restructuring activities may continue in 2011 as
management identifies opportunities for synergies from the
integration of MedQuist Inc. into MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
including elimination of redundant functions as we may complete
other acquisitions.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net during the six months ended June 30,
2011 was $14.0 million, compared to $7.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in
interest expense is primarily due to the 2010 debt restructuring.
Income tax
provision
The effective tax rate was 11.1% for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 as compared to (15.4%) for the same period
prior year. This increase in the effective tax rate was due to
increases in the deferred tax liability related to excess tax
goodwill over book goodwill due to amortization of Spheris
goodwill for domestic tax purposes. The tax benefit for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 includes the reversal of
approximately $0.5 million from our
66
accrual for various state uncertain tax positions as a result of
filing voluntary disclosure agreements with state jurisdictions.
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.8 million compared
to $2.5 million in the same period in 2010. During 2011 the
impact of both the Private Exchange and the Registered Exchange
Offer reduced the noncontrolling interest of MedQuist Inc. from
30.5% to 3%.
Adjusted
EBITDA (Non-GAAP financial measure)
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
7,306
|
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation and other non-cash awards
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
33,350
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net revenues
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management to measure
operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc., as applicable,
plus net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests,
income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization,
cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements, acquisition
and restructuring charges, goodwill impairment charge, equity in
income (loss) of affiliated company, (income) loss from
discontinued operations resulting from the sale of our PFS
business, asset impairment charges, severance costs, certain
unusual or nonrecurring items and share based compensation and
other non-cash awards. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a
supplemental performance measure because we believe it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential differences caused by variations in capital structures
(affecting interest expense, net), tax positions (such as the
impact on periods or companies for changes in effective tax
rates), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting
depreciation expense);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of non-cash charges, and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of acquisition and integration related charges,
restructuring charges, and certain unusual or nonrecurring items.
|
Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of
operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use
Adjusted EBITDA in measuring our performance relative to that of
our competitors. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our
financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to net income, operating income or any other
performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an
alternative to cash flow from operating activities as measures
of our profitability or liquidity. We understand that although
Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts,
lenders and others in their evaluation of
67
companies, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical
tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a
substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.
Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being
depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
Comparison of
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations for the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
417,326
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
259,194
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
158,132
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
61,062
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
37,739
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Gain on the sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(19,268
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Other income
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
17,191
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued Patient Financial Services business,
net of tax
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Less: Net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(9,240
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings Inc. for a
reconciliation of net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA.
|
68
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased $63.4 million, or 18%, to
$417.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $353.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The Spheris Acquisition contributed
approximately $88.1 million in incremental revenue for the
year ended December 31, 2010 which was partially offset by
a decrease in legacy maintenance service revenues from
$22.3 million in 2009 to $17.7 million in 2010.
Current year net revenues were also unfavorably impacted by
effects of lower average pricing realized for our transcription
services.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues was 62% in
2010, compared with 65% in 2009 primarily due to increased
utilization of offshore resources, increased utilization of ASR
technologies and other operating cost reduction initiatives. The
increase in total cost versus the prior year period was
primarily due to direct incremental costs associated with the
Spheris Acquisition as well as a nonrecurring $1.2 million
credit in 2009 related to medical claim costs.
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense, as a percentage of
revenue, improved in 2010 compared to 2009 due to synergies and
other cost reduction initiatives.
Research and
development
Research and development expense increased $2.4 million, to
$12.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $9.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to costs
associated with historical Spheris research and development
activities partially offset by synergies realized.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $7.3 million to
$32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $25.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to the
amortization of acquired intangible assets associated with the
Spheris Acquisition.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements decreased
$11.3 million, or 76%, to $3.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010 compared to $14.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was due to
the costs incurred in 2009 related to the Anthurium settlement
of $5.9 million, related legal fees of $3.8 million
and other legal fees of $1.2 million. In 2010 we settled
the Kaiser litigation.
Acquisition
and integration related charges
We incurred acquisition and integration related charges of
$7.4 million related to the Spheris Acquisition for the
year ended December 31, 2010 and $1.2 million in 2009.
Restructuring
charges
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 we recorded
restructuring charges of $3.7 million and
$2.7 million, respectively, primarily for employee
severance obligations and facility exit costs. We expect that
restructuring activities and related charges will continue into
2011 as management identifies opportunities for synergies
resulting from the Spheris Acquisition including the elimination
of redundant functions.
69
Gain on sale
of investment
We recorded a pre-tax gain of $8.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010 related to the sale of our shares
in A-Life, an equity method investment, in October 2010.
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
We incurred loss on extinguishment of debt charges of
$13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
related to $7.7 million redemption premium on repayment of
6% Convertible Notes and $5.8 million of costs
incurred in connection with Corporate Refinancing in October
2010. See discussion below in Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net increased $10.2 million to
$19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $9.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase was due to the debt
incurred in connection with the Spheris Acquisition and the
Corporate Refinancing in October 2010, partially offset by a
decrease of $3.0 million in interest expense as a result of
the 2009 repayment of the bridge note and repayment of
6% Convertible Notes issued to Royal Philips Electronics,
incurred in connection with the MedQuist Inc. acquisition.
Income tax
provision
The effective income tax benefit rate for 2010 was 15.5%
compared to an effective tax rate of 9.9% in 2009. The 2010 tax
benefit includes the following items, the recording of deferred
tax benefits for losses incurred in India, the release of
valuation allowance on our UK subsidiary based on
managements assessment of future earnings available to
utilize the deferred tax assets, the reduction in various tax
reserves related to settlements in certain state jurisdictions,
the reduction in the deferred tax liability related to the sale
of the investment in A-Life, an increase in the tax reserve for
various uncertain tax positions taken in 2010 and an increase in
the deferred tax liability associated with indefinite life
intangibles. The recording of a tax benefit in 2010 on pre-tax
book income is due primarily to the companys recording of
a tax benefit for losses generated in India, the release of the
UK valuation allowance and the release of a valuation allowance
on deferred tax assets related to net operating losses in the
United States which were utilized to offset domestic earnings.
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year
ended December 31, 2010 increased by $2.2 million to
$9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $7.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in net income attributable
to noncontrolling interests was due to the increase in the net
income of MedQuist Inc.
70
Comparison of
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations for the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
113,127
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,286
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
159,539
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(101,253
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Equity in income of affiliated companies
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3,813
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(104,991
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)%
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(99,460
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)%
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued Patient Financial Services business, net
of tax
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)%
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Less: Net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)%
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
17,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data of MedQuist Holdings Inc. for a
reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA.
|
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased $182.5 million, or 106%, to
$353.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $171.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable primarily
to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$171.5 million from the consolidation of MedQuist Inc. for
a full year resulting from our acquisition of MedQuist Inc. in
August 2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
an increase in clinical documentation revenue of
$11.0 million due to organic volume growth.
|
71
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues, as a percentage of net revenues was 65% and
66% in 2009 and 2008, respectively. In absolute terms, costs
increased $116.6 million, or 103%, to $229.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
$113.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
This increase was attributable primarily to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$110.8 million from the consolidation of MedQuist Inc. for
a full year; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
an increase of $5.7 million in clinical documentation cost
of revenues, primarily due to increased personnel cost to
support expansion of capacity.
|
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense, as a percentage of
net revenues, improved to 15% in 2009, compared to 22% in 2008.
In absolute terms, such expenses increased $15.8 million,
or 42%, to $53.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to $37.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily
attributable to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
consolidation of a full-year of MedQuist Inc. selling, general
and administrative expense of $13.9 million;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
increase in share based compensation charge of
$0.8 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
full year impact of the cost of our new management team and
corporate costs in 2009 amounting to $2.6 million.
|
Research and
development
Research and development expense as a percentage of net revenues
were 3% in 2009 compared to 4% in 2008. In absolute terms,
expenses increased $3.5 million, or 57%, to
$9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $6.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable primarily
to the consolidation of a full-year of MedQuist Inc.s
research and development expenses.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$11.9 million, or 88%, to $25.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to $13.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was
attributable primarily to the consolidation of a full-year of
MedQuist Inc. depreciation and amortization expense.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements increased
$9.6 million, or 181%, to $14.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared with $5.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was due
primarily to the consolidation of a full year of MedQuist
Inc.s cost of legal proceedings and settlements, which
includes legal fees incurred in connection with both the SEC
investigations and proceedings and as well as the defense of
certain civil litigation and proceedings. Included in 2009 are
costs incurred related to the Anthurium settlement of
$5.9 million and related legal fees of $3.8 million.
Acquisition and integration related charges
We incurred costs of $1.2 and $5.6 million during the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to
the Spheris Acquisition and the acquisition of MedQuist Inc.
Goodwill
impairment charge
We carried out our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter
of 2008, which included our annual testing date in December.
During our annual impairment testing, we determined the fair
value using a combination of market capitalization based on
market price per share for approximately the 60 days before
December 31, 2008
72
including a control premium and a discounted cash flow analysis.
The analysis indicated that the reporting units fair value
was below the book value for the MedQuist Inc. reporting unit
and we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$89.6 million.
In 2009, the fair value of the MedQuist Inc. reporting unit
substantially exceeded its carrying value and accordingly, no
second step of the goodwill impairment test was performed and no
impairment charge was recorded.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net primarily reflects interest paid on our
credit facilities and long term debt, net of interest earned on
deposits with banks. Interest expense, net increased
$5.2 million, or 137%, to $9.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared with $3.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was
attributable to the full year impact of interest expense on the
acquisition related debt related to the MedQuist Inc.
Acquisition amounting to $4.9 million and other increases
of $200,000.
Income tax
provision
The effective income tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was 9.9% compared with an effective
income tax benefit rate of 5.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The 2009 tax expense includes an
increase in the deferred tax liabilities associated with
indefinite life intangible assets related to goodwill, an
increase in the deferred tax liability associated with an equity
method investment, the reduction of the foreign valuation
allowance and adjustments related to state tax exposures. After
consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded again in 2009, that it was more likely than
not that a significant portion of the domestic deferred income
tax assets would not be realized; therefore, we have a valuation
allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to an amount
that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. The
2008 tax benefit includes the reversal of approximately
$5.6 million of deferred tax liabilities associated with
indefinite life intangible assets related to goodwill which was
impaired in 2008.
Loss from
discontinued operations
We incurred losses of $1.4 million and $9.1 million
during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, related to the PFS business, which was sold in
December 2010. In 2008, the loss primarily related to a
$9.3 million goodwill impairment charge for our PFS
reporting unit.
73
Adjusted
EBITDA (Non-GAAP financial measure)
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. to Adjusted EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
19,268
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
Gain on the sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
Asset impairment charges, severance charges and accrual reversals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,721
|
)
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
17,038
|
|
|
$
|
60,543
|
|
|
$
|
86,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net revenues
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management to measure
operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc., as applicable,
plus net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests,
income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization,
cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements, acquisition
and restructuring charges, goodwill impairment charge, equity in
income (loss) of affiliated company, (income) loss from
discontinued operations resulting from the sale of our PFS
business, asset impairment charges, severance costs, certain
unusual or nonrecurring items and share based compensation and
other non-cash awards. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a
supplemental performance measure because we believe it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
potential differences caused by variations in capital structures
(affecting interest expense, net), tax positions (such as the
impact on periods or companies for changes in effective tax
rates), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting
depreciation expense);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of non-cash charges, such as goodwill impairment
charges and asset impairment charges; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the impact of acquisition and integration related charges,
disposition related charges, restructuring charges, severance
costs and certain unusual or nonrecurring items.
|
Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of
operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use
Adjusted EBITDA in measuring our performance relative to that of
our competitors. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our
financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to net income, operating income or any other
performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an
alternative to cash flow from operating activities as measures
of our profitability or liquidity. We understand that although
Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts,
lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, Adjusted
EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not
consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
74
|
|
|
|
n
|
although depreciation is a non-cash charge, the assets being
depreciated will often have to be replaced in the future, and
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
Unaudited
quarterly results of operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated
quarterly results of operations for each of the eight quarters
during the period from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2011.
In our managements opinion, the unaudited results of
operations for each quarter have been prepared on the same basis
as the audited consolidated financial statements included in
this prospectus and reflect all necessary adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of our results of operations for the quarters
presented. You should read this information together with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Operating results for
any fiscal quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for
the full year. Historical results are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended(a)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
89,071
|
|
|
$
|
85,812
|
|
|
$
|
85,087
|
|
|
$
|
108,505
|
|
|
$
|
113,200
|
|
|
$
|
110,534
|
|
|
$
|
111,236
|
|
|
$
|
108,439
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
58,900
|
|
|
|
54,253
|
|
|
|
54,615
|
|
|
|
70,335
|
|
|
|
69,936
|
|
|
|
64,308
|
|
|
|
65,486
|
|
|
|
65,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
30,171
|
|
|
|
31,559
|
|
|
|
30,472
|
|
|
|
38,170
|
|
|
|
43,264
|
|
|
|
46,226
|
|
|
|
45,750
|
|
|
|
43,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
13,078
|
|
|
|
12,481
|
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
|
|
15,619
|
|
|
|
15,566
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
16,276
|
|
|
|
13,991
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
2,702
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
6,139
|
|
|
|
8,481
|
|
|
|
9,125
|
|
|
|
8,872
|
|
|
|
8,418
|
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
(7,513
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
5,411
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
23,266
|
|
|
|
26,191
|
|
|
|
24,927
|
|
|
|
34,548
|
|
|
|
30,472
|
|
|
|
30,446
|
|
|
|
26,761
|
|
|
|
30,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
5,545
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
15,780
|
|
|
|
18,989
|
|
|
|
13,256
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,258
|
)
|
|
|
(2,150
|
)
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(5,437
|
)
|
|
|
(4,663
|
)
|
|
|
(7,299
|
)
|
|
|
(7,037
|
)
|
|
|
(6,961
|
)
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of A-Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
6,774
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
|
|
8,680
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
11,962
|
|
|
|
6,292
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,178
|
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
4,287
|
|
|
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
|
8,453
|
|
|
|
5,871
|
|
|
|
10,818
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
5,563
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
8,608
|
|
|
|
6,089
|
|
|
|
10,818
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(2,957
|
)
|
|
|
(1,790
|
)
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
|
(4,006
|
)
|
|
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
2,606
|
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
2,088
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,871
|
|
|
$
|
2,083
|
|
|
$
|
9,312
|
|
|
$
|
5,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines processed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ASR
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
% Offshore
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Certain reclassifications have been
made to conform to the current presentation, including for
discontinued operations.
|
75
Liquidity and
capital resources
Our principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from
operations, available cash on hand, and availability under our
Senior Secured Credit Facility, as described below.
Operating
activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $23.0 million and
$13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The significant items impacting
operating cash flows during the six months ended June 30,
2011, included:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Improvements in net income, which increased to
$16.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared to $3.0 million for the same period prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Working capital changes that included (a) improved
collections of accounts receivable balances, which provided
$6.2 million of cash in the current period, (b) timing
of accounts payable and accrued expenses, which used
$2.2 million of cash, (c) payment of 2010 accrued
compensation which was a $7.1 million use of cash and
(d) a $10.2 million prepayment to a technology vendor
impacting current and non current assets, with additional
installments due during the third quarter of 2011.
|
Cash flow provided by operating activities was
$36.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
$42.7 million for the same period in 2009. Net income was
$17.7 million in 2010 and $7.8 million in 2009. The
significant non cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities included:
|
|
|
|
n
|
$33.5 million and $27.0 million of depreciation and
amortization in 2010 and 2009, respectively;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
$13.5 million non-cash loss on debt extinguishment in 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
gain on sale and equity in income of affiliated company (A-Life)
of $9.5 million and $1.9 million in 2010 and 2009
respectively; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
non cash interest expense of $4.1 million in 2010 and
$3.3 million in 2009.
|
Working capital changes that impacted cash flow from operations
in 2010 included (a) $10.0 million higher accounts
receivable balance due to the timing of collections,
(b) $4.2 million lower accrued compensation balance
due to a change in timing of payroll payments and
(c) $5.4 million reduction in accrued expenses
including the $2.0 million settlement of Kaiser litigation,
and additional expenditures as a result of the acquisition,
offset by an increase in interest accrued of $2.6 million.
Investing
activities
Cash used in investing activities was $10.9 million and
$105.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. During the six months ended
June 30, 2010 we invested $98.3 million for the
acquisition of Spheris and its affiliates.
Cash used in investing activities was $82.1 million and
$12.2 million in 2010 and 2009 respectively. In 2010,
$99.8 million of cash was used for the Spheris acquisition,
$14.3 million for capital spending and capitalized software
offset by $32.0 million in proceeds from the sale of
investments and subsidiaries. During 2009 we spent
$9.5 million for capital spending and capitalized software
and $2.7 million as additional investments.
In the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we acquired
several transcription companies at a purchase price of
$9.8 million paid in cash.
Financing
activities
Cash used in financing activities was $18.2 million and
$84.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The activities impacting cash flow from
financing activities during the six months ended June 30,
2011 included:
|
|
|
|
n
|
In January 2011, we made an optional prepayment of
$20.0 million in addition to the $5.0 million due
under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. No additional
principal payments are required until April 2012 under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility.
|
76
|
|
|
|
n
|
In February 2011, we completed our IPO selling 3.0 million
shares of our common stock at an offer price of $8.00 per share,
resulting in gross proceeds to us of $24.0 million, or
$22.3 million after underwriting discounts.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
We made payments of $17.2 million in the period related to
the IPO, the Private Exchange the Registered Exchange Offer.
|
Cash provided by financing activities in 2010 included
$392.4 million in borrowings, offset by $229.7 million
in debt repayments, a use of $53.9 million for dividends,
$3.7 million in payments related to our initial public
offering, and $21.6 million used for debt issuance costs.
In 2009, cash used in financing activities were principally due
to $28.6 million of debt repayments and $15.3 million
of dividends paid.
As part of our business strategy, we plan to consider and, as
appropriate, make acquisitions of other businesses, products,
product rights or technologies. Our cash reserves and other
liquid assets may be inadequate to consummate such acquisitions
and it may be necessary for us to issue stock or raise
substantial additional funds in the future to complete future
transactions. In addition, as a result of our acquisition
efforts, we are likely to experience significant charges to
earnings for merger and related expenses (whether or not our
efforts are successful) that may include transaction costs,
closure costs or costs of restructuring activities.
On August 18, 2011, or the Closing Date, we
completed the acquisition of MultiModal through a series of
mergers between MultiModal and certain of our direct
wholly-owned subsidiaries. As a result of the MultiModal Merger,
MultiModal became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. On
the Closing Date, we paid an aggregate of approximately
$48.4 million in cash to MultiModals shareholders,
optionholders and other third parties and issued an aggregate of
4,134,896 shares of our common stock, or the
Shares, to MultiModals shareholders who are
accredited investors within the meaning of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933,
or the MultiModal Accredited Investors. We are also
obligated to pay up to approximately $28.8 million of
additional cash consideration in three installments of
approximately $16.3 million, $4.8 million and
$7.7 million, respectively, following the first, second and
third anniversaries of the Closing Date. To help fund the cash
portion of the purchase price, MedQuist Inc. loaned
$19 million to CBay Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ours, or the Payor, on the Closing Date. The loan is
evidenced by a Subordinated Intercompany Note dated as of the
Closing Date, which matures two years from the Closing Date and
bears a 15% interest rate per annum on the unpaid principal
amount thereof, all or a portion of which may be prepaid by the
Payor at any time upon one business days notice.
In connection with the MultiModal Merger and on the Closing
Date, we and the MultiModal Accredited Investors entered into a
Stockholders Agreement, or the MultiModal
Stockholders Agreement. The MultiModal
Stockholders Agreement provides for, among other things,
certain registration rights and trading restrictions for the
MultiModal Accredited Investors. With respect to the
registration rights, we will register the Shares for resale on a
shelf registration statement in April 2012 and the
MultiModal Accredited Investors have piggyback
registration rights to participate in certain public offerings
of our common stock. With respect to the restrictions on
trading, those MultiModal Accredited Investors that were not
employees of MultiModal as of the Closing Date are prohibited
from selling (i) 75% of the Shares received by such persons
in the MultiModal Merger during the period beginning on the six
month anniversary of the Closing Date and ending immediately
prior to the one year anniversary of the Closing Date and
(ii) 25% of the Shares received by such persons in the
MultiModal Merger during the period beginning on the one year
anniversary of the Closing Date and ending immediately prior to
the eighteen month anniversary of the Closing Date. In addition,
three MultiModal Accredited Investors are restricted, in
general, to selling Shares equal to no more than 20% of the
average daily trading volume of our common stock in any given
day during the period beginning on the six month anniversary of
the Closing Date and ending on the one year anniversary of the
Closing Date.
Under a Registration Rights Agreement dated February 4,
2011 by and among us and S.A.C. PEI CB Investment L.P., a Cayman
Islands limited partnership (SAC CBI), S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(SAC CBI II) and International Equities (S.A.C.
Asia) Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act of
2001 of Mauritius (SAC Asia and, collectively with
SAC CBI and SAC CBI II and each of their respective affiliates,
the SAC Stockholders) we provide registration rights
with respect to shares of our common stock held by the SAC
Stockholders (the Registration Rights Agreement).
The Registration Rights Agreement provides a mechanism for
cutting back on the number of shares included in a registration
based upon
77
the advice of the underwriters in such registration (the
Underwriter Cutbacks). In connection with the
MultiModal Merger and on the Closing Date, we and the SAC
Stockholders entered into Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Rights Agreement (the Registration Rights
Amendment). The Registration Rights Amendment provides for
the MultiModal Accredited Investors to be treated the same as
the SAC Stockholders in the Underwriter Cutbacks for a period of
six months beginning on the Closing Date.
We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, and cash to be
generated from operations and available borrowings under our
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our
operations for the next twelve months. However, if we fail to
generate adequate cash flows from operations in the future, due
to an unexpected decline in our net revenues, or due to
increased cash expenditures in excess of the net revenues
generated, then our cash balances may not be sufficient to fund
our continuing operations without obtaining additional debt or
selling additional equity. There are no assurances that
sufficient funding from external sources will be available to us
on acceptable terms, if at all.
Amendment to
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On September 14, 2011, we amended the Senior Secured Credit
Facility to, among other things, (i) add an accordion
feature that would allow for potential additional borrowing
capacity of up to $50.0 million in the form of additional
revolving credit commitments or incremental term loans, subject
to the satisfaction of, and agreement to, certain conditions,
and (ii) permit repurchases of our outstanding common stock
in an aggregate amount not to exceed $25.0 million.
On September 30, 2011, MedQuist initiated a draw down of
$22 million under the Revolving Credit Facility for general
corporate purposes (the Advance). The
Advance bears an interest rate of 7.75% per annum. With the
Advance and all previous draw downs, the entire $25 million
of the Revolving Credit Facility has been drawn upon and remains
outstanding.
Stock Repurchase
Program
On September 19, 2011, our board of directors authorized
the repurchase of up to $25.0 million of our outstanding
common stock from time to time during the six months following
the completion of the Merger (hereinafter referred to as the
Share Repurchase Program). Under the Share
Repurchase Program, shares may be repurchased in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions at our discretion. The
Share Repurchase Program does not require us to repurchase any
specific number of shares, and we may terminate the Share
Repurchase Program at any time. We will not repurchase any
shares directly from our directors and officers or S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment L.P. and its affiliates under the Share Repurchase
Program.
Contractual
obligations
The following table summarizes our obligations to make future
payments under current contracts as of December 31, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
28,944
|
|
|
$
|
7,230
|
|
|
$
|
12,056
|
|
|
$
|
7,329
|
|
|
$
|
2,329
|
|
Purchase
obligations(1)
|
|
|
21,311
|
|
|
|
8,567
|
|
|
|
11,820
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and Other Obligations
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities
|
|
|
294,494
|
|
|
|
27,817
|
|
|
|
41,347
|
|
|
|
140,330
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual
obligations(2)
|
|
$
|
348,709
|
|
|
$
|
46,837
|
|
|
$
|
65,693
|
|
|
$
|
148,850
|
|
|
$
|
87,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Purchase obligations are for ASR
agreements ($12,150), telecommunication contracts ($8,636),
software development ($275) and other recurring purchase
obligations ($250).
|
|
|
(2) |
MedQuist Inc. made certain payments
to Nuance Communications, Inc. (Nuance) on
June 30, 2011 and is obligated to make one additional
payments to Nuance during the third quarter of 2011 in full
satisfaction of MedQuist Inc.s license fee obligations
with respect to certain products through June 30, 2015
pursuant to a Fee Agreement with Nuance dated June 30,
2011. On the Closing Date of the MultiModal Merger we paid an
aggregate amount of approximately $48.4 million in cash to
MultiModals shareholders, optionholders and other third
parties. We are also obligated to
|
78
|
|
|
pay up to approximately
$28.8 million of additional cash consideration in three
installments of approximately $16.3 million,
$4.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, following
the first, second and third anniversaries of the Closing Date of
the MultiModal Merger.
|
We have agreements with certain of our named executive officers
that provide for severance payments to the employee in the event
the employee is terminated without cause. The maximum cash
exposure under these agreements was approximately
$5.0 million as of December 31, 2010.
Off-balance sheet
arrangements
We are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that
have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or
future impact on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources. In 2011
we entered into currency hedge contracts for up to
$72.0 million related to our operations in India, of which
$49 million were remaining as of June 30, 2011. In
January 2011, as required under our Credit Agreement, we entered
into Interest Rate Cap Contracts (for $60.0 million
notional amounts which will amortize over time and expire on
January 2013) to limit the risk of increases in interest
rates.
Quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result
of fluctuations in interest rates. We do not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes.
Interest rate
sensitivity
We earn interest income from our balances of cash and cash
equivalents. This interest income is subject to market risk
related to changes in interest rates, which affects primarily
our investment portfolio. We invest in instruments that meet
high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment
policy.
The Term Loan of our Senior Secured Credit Facility bears
interest at LIBOR plus 5.50% with a LIBOR floor of 1.75%. Our
interest expense associated with this loan will increase if
LIBOR increases. Because the LIBOR floor is currently in effect,
a 1.25% increase in LIBOR above current LIBOR levels would not
increase our effective interest rate. As of June 30, 2011,
a 1% increase in LIBOR above this floor would result in an
approximate $1.75 million annual increase in our interest
expense.
In January 2011, as required under our Credit Agreement, we
entered into Interest Rate Cap Contracts (for $60.0 million
notional amount which will amortize over time) to limit the risk
of increases in interest rates.
Recent accounting
pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-05,
which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This
accounting update eliminates the option to present the
components of other comprehensive income as part of the
statement of shareholders equity. Instead, we must report
comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and
other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive
statements. ASU
2011-05 will
be effective for public companies during the interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early
adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU
2011-05 will
not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements as
it only requires a change in the format of the current
presentation.
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) ratified two consensuses affecting revenue recognition:
The first consensus, Revenue Recognition
Multiple-Element Arrangements, sets forth requirements that
must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of
a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement
when other items have not yet been delivered. One of those
current requirements is that there be objective and reliable
evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered
items, which must be supported by either vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) or third-party evidence (TPE).
79
This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered
elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the
portion of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to
items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE
or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered
or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of
those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to
each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those
selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted. The second consensus, Software-Revenue Recognition
addresses the accounting for transactions involving software
to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both
software and non-software and not-software components that
function together to deliver a products functionality.
The Consensuses are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The standards were
adopted in the first quarter of 2011 and did not have a material
impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
Changes in
independent auditors
There have been no changes or disagreements with our independent
auditors during our two most recent fiscal years or any
subsequent interim periods.
80
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of MedQuist
Inc.
Overview
MedQuist Inc. is a leading provider of integrated clinical
documentation solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Its
end-to-end
solutions convert the Physician Narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
ASR, medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution to deliver a complete
managed service for MedQuist Inc.s customers. MedQuist
Inc.s solutions enable hospitals, clinics, and physician
practices to improve the quality of clinical data as well as
accelerate and automate the documentation process, and MedQuist
Inc. believes its solutions improve physician productivity and
satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle performance, and facilitate
the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records.
Key factors
affecting our performance
In 2010, MedQuist Inc. completed the acquisition of Spheris
which materially impacted its financial results. In addition
MedQuist Inc.s results have also been impacted by volume
changes and pricing impacts as it moves to ASR and offshore
production, as well as operating improvements and selling,
general and administrative expense savings leveraging from
MedQuist Inc.s scalable platform. These key factors are
described below for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009
and 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
Volume and
pricing trends
The vast majority of MedQuist Inc.s revenue is generated
by providing clinical documentation services to its customers.
Medical transcription and medical editing by its MTs and MEs,
respectively, accounted for 94% of our net revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2011. Product sales and related
maintenance contracts and other made up the balance of MedQuist
Inc.s net revenues. MedQuist Inc.s customers are
generally charged a rate per character multiplied by the number
of characters that it processes.
MedQuist Inc. bases its pricing on various factors, principally
market forces, the extent to which it can utilize its offshore
production facilities, the extent to which customers utilize the
ASR technology available in MedQuist Inc.s solutions, the
scope of services provided, and turn-around times requested by a
particular customer. MedQuist Inc. works with its customers to
evaluate how different solutions affect pricing and to determine
what for them is an optimal mix of service level and price.
Higher utilization of offshore production and ASR leads to lower
costs for MedQuist Inc., which permits it to offer better
pricing to its customers while at the same time contributing to
margin growth. MedQuist Inc. has successfully migrated a
significant portion of its volume offshore and it will continue
these efforts.
As technological advances and increased use of offshore
resources have driven down industry costs, the average price per
character has also declined as healthcare providers have sought
to participate in the economic gains. MedQuist Inc. intends to
monitor and adjust its pricing accordingly to remain competitive
as these industry trends continue.
Operating
improvements
Cost of revenues on a per unit basis has declined due to the
increased percentage of volume produced offshore and the
increased utilization of ASR technology, as well as reductions
of support staff headcount as MedQuist Inc. shifts volume to
India in order to further reduce operating costs. MedQuist
Inc.s use of ASR technology has increased from 47% to 72%
from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the quarter ended
June 30, 2011. As MedQuist Inc. continues to increase the
use of ASR technology and move volume offshore, it expects to
continue to reduce costs.
Some of MedQuist Inc.s contracts specify lower prices for
work performed offshore or using speech recognition technology.
Therefore, MedQuist Inc.s operating income will not
increase by the full amount of the savings it realizes.
81
Selling,
general and administrative expense savings
MedQuist Inc. has made significant reductions in selling,
general and administrative expenses since 2008. Such expenses
were 14.5% of net revenues in 2008 compared to 9.9% of net
revenues for 2010. These savings were achieved primarily through
headcount reductions and aggressive efforts to reduce other
administrative expenses.
In connection with the Spheris Acquisition MedQuist Inc. has
identified potential specific savings in the sales and marketing
and general and administrative areas. MedQuist Inc. also expects
to consolidate facilities in 2011. MedQuist Inc. anticipates
that these savings will be implemented throughout 2011.
Basis of
Presentation
Net
revenues
MedQuist Inc. derives revenues primarily from providing clinical
documentation services to integrated delivery networks, academic
centers, group practices and community hospital. MedQuist
Inc.s customers are generally charged a rate times the
volume of work that it transcribes or edits. In the clinical
documentation workflow, MedQuist Inc. provides, in addition to
medical transcription technology and services, maintenance
services, digital dictation, speech recognition and electronic
signature services.
Net revenues from customers in the U.S. were
$368.9 million, $301.1 million, and
$321.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Net revenues from customers outside
the U.S. were $6.3 million, $6.1 million, and
$5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009, and 2008, respectively.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues includes compensation of MedQuist Inc.s
U.S. based employee MTs and MEs and MedQuist Inc.s
subcontractor MTs and MEs, other production costs (primarily
related to operational and production management, quality
assurance, quality control and customer and field service
personnel), and telecommunication and facility costs. Cost of
revenues also includes the direct cost of technology products
sold to customers. MT and ME costs are directly related to
medical transcription and medical editing, respectively,
revenues and are based on lines transcribed or edited multiplied
by a specific rate.
Selling,
general and administrative
MedQuist Inc.s selling, general and administrative
expenses include marketing and sales costs, accounting costs,
information technology costs, professional fees, corporate
facility costs, corporate payroll and benefits expenses.
Research and
development
MedQuist Inc.s research and development expenses consist
primarily of personnel and related costs, including salaries and
employee benefits for software engineers and consulting fees
paid to independent consultants who provide software engineering
services to MedQuist Inc. MedQuist Inc.s research and
development efforts have been devoted to new products and
services offerings and increases in features and functionality
of its existing products and services.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to
seven years for furniture, equipment and software, and the
lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for leasehold
improvements. Intangible assets are being amortized using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which
range from three to 20 years.
82
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements includes settlement of
claims, ongoing litigation, and associated legal and other
professional fees incurred.
Other
On February 11, 2011, certain of MedQuist Inc.s
shareholders entered into the Exchange Agreement with us which
increased our ownership interest in MedQuist Inc. to 82.2%.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
805-50-S99-1
Business Combinations-Related issues governs the
application of push down accounting in situations where
ownership is increased to 80% or more. The
post-February 11, 2011 consolidated financial statements
reflect the new basis of accounting as required by the
authoritative guidance under
ASC 805-50-S99-1,
and have applied the SEC rules and guidance regarding push
down accounting treatment. Accordingly, MedQuist
Inc.s consolidated financial statements prior to the
closing of the Exchange Agreement reflect the historical
accounting basis in our assets and liabilities and are labeled
Predecessor Company, while such consolidated financial
statements subsequent to the Exchange Agreement are labeled
Successor Company and reflect the push down basis of accounting
for the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired by us in
August 2008, rolled forward to February 11, 2011. This
effect is presented in MedQuist Inc.s consolidated
financial statements by a vertical black line division between
the columns entitled Predecessor Company and Successor Company
on the statements and relevant notes. The black line signifies
that the amounts shown for the periods prior to and subsequent
to the Exchange Agreement are not comparable.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
MedQuist Inc. prepares its consolidated financial statements in
accordance with GAAP. MedQuist Inc. believes there are several
accounting policies that are critical to understanding its
historical and future performance, as these policies affect the
reported amounts of revenues and other significant areas that
involve managements judgments and estimates. These
critical accounting policies and estimates have been discussed
with MedQuist Inc.s audit committee.
The preparation of MedQuist Inc.s consolidated financial
statements requires MedQuist Inc. to make estimates and
judgments that affect its reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, expenses and related disclosure of contingent
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, MedQuist Inc. evaluates these
estimates and judgments. MedQuist Inc. bases these estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable at such time, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
independent sources. Actual results may ultimately differ from
these estimates. A critical accounting estimate must meet two
criteria: (1) it requires assumptions about highly
uncertain matters, and (2) there would be a material effect
on the financial statements from either using a different,
although reasonable, amount within the range of the estimate in
the current period or from reasonably likely
period-to-period
changes in the estimate. While there are a number of accounting
policies, methods and estimates affecting MedQuist Inc.s
consolidated financial statements as addressed in Note 2 to
our consolidated financial statements, areas that are
particularly significant and critical include:
Valuation of Long-Lived and Other Intangible Assets and
Goodwill: In connection with acquisitions,
MedQuist Inc. allocates portions of the purchase price to
tangible and intangible assets, consisting primarily of acquired
technologies, and customer relationships, with the remainder
allocated to goodwill. MedQuist Inc. assesses the realizability
of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
at least annually, or sooner if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. MedQuist Inc. has determined that the reporting
unit level is its sole operating segment.
MedQuist Inc. reviews its long-lived assets, including
amortizable intangibles, for impairment when events indicate
that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. When MedQuist
Inc. determines that one or more impairment indicators are
present for an asset, it compares the carrying amount of the
asset to net future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is
expected to generate. If the carrying amount of the asset is
greater than the net future undiscounted cash flows that the
asset is expected to generate, MedQuist Inc. then compares the
83
fair value to the book value of the asset. If the fair value is
less than the book value, MedQuist Inc. recognizes an impairment
loss. The impairment loss is the excess of the carrying amount
of the asset over its fair value.
Some of the events that MedQuist Inc. considers as impairment
indicators for its long-lived assets, including goodwill, are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
its net book value compared to its fair value;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
significant adverse economic and industry trends;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
significant decrease in the market value of the asset;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the extent that MedQuist Inc. uses an asset or changes in the
manner that it uses it;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
significant changes to the asset since MedQuist Inc. acquired
it; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
other changes in circumstances that potentially indicate all or
a portion of the company will be sold.
|
Deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets
represent future tax benefits that MedQuist Inc. expects to be
able to apply against future taxable income or that will result
in future net operating losses that MedQuist Inc. can carry
forward to use against future taxable earnings. MedQuist
Inc.s ability to utilize the deferred tax assets is
dependent upon its ability to generate future taxable income. To
the extent that MedQuist Inc. believes it is more likely than
not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be
utilized, MedQuist Inc. records a valuation allowance against
that asset. In making that determination MedQuist Inc. considers
all positive and negative evidence and give stronger
consideration to evidence that is objective in nature.
Commitments and contingencies. MedQuist Inc.
routinely evaluates claims and other potential litigation to
determine if a liability should be recorded in the event it is
probable that MedQuist Inc. will incur a loss and can estimate
the amount of such loss.
Revenue recognition. MedQuist Inc. recognizes
clinical documentation services revenues when there is
persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, the price is
fixed or determinable, services have been rendered and
collectability is reasonably assured. These services are
recorded using contracted rates and are net of estimates for
customer credits. Historically, MedQuist Inc.s estimates
have been adequate. If actual results are higher or lower than
its estimates, MedQuist Inc. would have to adjust its estimates
and financial statements in future periods.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful
accounts. Accounts receivable are recorded at the
invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The carrying value of
accounts receivable approximates fair value. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is MedQuist Inc.s best estimate of
potential losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments due. This allowance is used to state
trade receivables at estimated net realizable value.
MedQuist Inc. estimates uncollectible amounts based upon its
historical write-off experience, current customer receivable
balances, aging of customer receivable balances, the
customers financial condition and current economic
conditions. Historically, MedQuist Inc.s estimates have
been adequate to provide for its accounts receivable exposure.
Customer Accommodation Program. In response to
customers concerns regarding historical billing matters,
MedQuist Inc. established a plan to offer financial
accommodations to certain of its customers during 2005 and 2006
and recorded the related liability. Since 2008, MedQuist Inc.
has not made additional offers. In March 2011, the Board of
Directors of MedQuist Inc. terminated the Customer Accommodation
Program. As a result, any amounts that had not been offered to
customers were reversed.
84
Consolidated
Results of Operations
For purposes of providing a comparison between MedQuist
Inc.s
year-to-date
2011 results and the corresponding 2010 periods, we have
presented its
year-to-date
2011 results as the mathematical addition of the Predecessor
Company and Successor Company, each of which are GAAP financial
measures, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. MedQuist
Inc. believes that this presentation provides the most
meaningful information about its results of operations. This
approach is not consistent with GAAP, may yield results that are
not strictly comparable on a
period-to-period
basis, and may not reflect the actual results MedQuist Inc.
would have achieved. MedQuist Inc. has presented a
reconciliation of our financial statements to the combined
total, which is a non-GAAP financial measure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
Combined Total
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
For the six months
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
$
|
47,048
|
|
|
$
|
154,588
|
|
|
$
|
201,636
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
99,840
|
|
|
|
129,827
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
|
15,046
|
|
|
|
20,265
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
5,546
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
7,981
|
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(7,524
|
)
|
|
|
(7,350
|
)
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
127,859
|
|
|
|
167,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
|
|
34,263
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
|
(10,526
|
)
|
|
|
(13,641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
4,419
|
|
|
|
16,203
|
|
|
|
20,622
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
15,088
|
|
|
$
|
19,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
Consolidated
results of operations
Comparison of
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
The following tables set forth our consolidated results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
201,636
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
171,509
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
129,827
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
%
|
|
|
116,923
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
%
|
|
|
12,904
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
20,265
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
18,817
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,546
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
4,657
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
(7,350
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
(9,502
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
(2,079
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
167,373
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
|
|
159,605
|
|
|
|
93.1
|
%
|
|
|
7,768
|
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
34,263
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
11,904
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
22,359
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(13,641
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(9,862
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
20,622
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
11,951
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,054
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,224
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,830
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
revenues
Net revenues increased $30.1 million, or 17.6%, to
$201.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared with $171.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 due to increased revenue resulting from the
Spheris acquisition. The Spheris acquisition in April 2010,
contributed approximately $37.8 million in incremental
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 arising from
a full period consolidation, offset by decreases in price due to
higher speech recognition and offshore volume.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues were $129.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, compared with $116.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010. As a percentage of net
revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 64.4% for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 from 68.2% for the same period in 2010
primarily due to increased utilization of speech recognition
technologies, increased utilization of offshore resources and
other operating cost reduction initiatives.
Selling,
general and administrative
SG&A expenses were 10.1% of net revenues for the six month
period ended June 30, 2011, compared to 11.0% for the same
period in the prior year. The decrease versus prior year is due
to the impact of synergies realized from the Spheris acquisition
and other cost savings initiatives.
86
Research &
development
R&D expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 2.8% for
the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 3.3% for
the same period in the prior year. This decrease was due to the
impact of synergies realized from the Spheris acquisition and
other cost saving initiatives.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 2.5%
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 2.7%
for the same period in the prior year.
Amortization
Amortization expense as a percentage of net revenues was 4.7%
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 2.8%
for the same period in the prior year. This increase was
primarily due to amortization of acquired intangible assets
associated with the acquisition of Spheris and the effect of the
push down accounting commencing on February 12, 2011.
Cost (benefit)
of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations as a percentage of net revenues were (3.6%) for
the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to 1.3%
for the same period in the prior year. During the six months
ended June 30, 2011, MedQuist Inc.s board of
directors terminated the Customer Accommodation Program and it
reversed $9.7 million of the accrual. MedQuist Inc. also
recorded a charge for a settlement of its indemnification
obligations with its former chief financial officer and fees in
connection with certain litigation against MedQuist Inc. and the
individual members of its board of directors by two of its
minority shareholders.
Acquisition
and restructuring
MedQuist Inc. incurred acquisition and restructuring charges of
$4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, MedQuist Inc.
recorded net restructuring charges of $2.6 million
including approximately $1.1 million from a reduction in
workforce and a charge of $1.5 million representing future
lease payments on the Companys former corporate
headquarters in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey and former data center in
Sterling, Virginia, net of expected sublease rentals. The future
minimum lease payments on the Mt. Laurel facility total
$2.5 million.
MedQuist Inc. expects that acquisition and restructuring
activities may continue in 2011, as management identifies
opportunities for synergies including the elimination of
redundant functions and as MedQuist Inc. may complete other
acquisitions. Additionally, MedQuist Inc. recorded approximately
$1.9 million of acquisition charges related to the
completion of the Spheris integration plan.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net during the six months ended June 30,
2011 was $13.6 million, compared to $3.8 million for
the same period in 2010. The increase in interest expense is
primarily due to the 2010 debt restructuring.
Income tax
provision
The effective income tax rate was 7.6% and 5.2% for the six
month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
MedQuist Inc.s consolidated income tax expense consists
principally of an increase in deferred tax liabilities related
to goodwill amortization deductions for income tax purposes
during the applicable period as well as state and foreign income
taxes. MedQuist Inc. recorded a valuation allowance to reduce
our net deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely
than not to be realized in future years.
87
Effective with the completion of the exchange on
February 11, 2011, MedQuist Inc. filed federal and certain
states short period tax returns for the period January 1,
2011 to February 11, 2011. For periods after
February 11, 2011, MedQuist Inc. will file its income tax
returns as part of the MedQuist Holdings Inc. consolidated tax
return filings. MedQuist Inc. does not expect these changes to
materially impact its income tax expense, cash payments,
refunds, or its ability to use net operating losses during 2011.
MedQuist Inc. expects that its consolidated income tax expense
for the year ended December 31, 2011, similar to the year
ended December 31, 2010, will consist principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable year as well as state and foreign income taxes.
MedQuist Inc. regularly assesses the future realization of
deferred taxes and whether the valuation allowance against the
majority of domestic deferred tax assets is still warranted. To
the extent sufficient positive evidence, including past results
and future projections, exists to benefit all or part of these
benefits, the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.
It is reasonably possible that all or a portion of the valuation
allowance could be adjusted within the next year.
Comparison of
Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
375,240
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
307,200
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
68,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
249,571
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
%
|
|
|
206,265
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
43,306
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
37,070
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
33,441
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12,813
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
6,317
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
14,843
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
(11,240
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
334,882
|
|
|
|
89.2
|
%
|
|
|
283,815
|
|
|
|
92.4
|
%
|
|
|
51,067
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
40,358
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
23,385
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
16,973
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(5,811
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,811
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(13,429
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,295
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
31,722
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
6,456
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(1,304
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
31,051
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,760
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
revenues
Net revenues recorded for the year ended December 31, 2010
were $375.2 million, an increase of $68.0 million or
22.2% when compared to the prior year net revenue amount of
$307.2 million. The Spheris Acquisition contributed
$88.1 million in incremental revenue in 2010, which was
partially offset by a decrease in legacy maintenance services
revenues from $22.3 million in 2009 to $17.7 million
in 2010. Current year net revenues were also unfavorably
impacted by effects of lower average pricing realized for
MedQuist Inc.s transcription services.
88
Cost of
revenues
As a percentage of net revenues, cost of revenues decreased to
66.5% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
67.1% in 2009 primarily due to increased utilization of offshore
resources, increased utilization of automated speech recognition
technologies, and other operating cost reduction initiatives.
The increase in total cost versus the prior year period was
primarily due to direct incremental costs associated with the
Spheris Acquisition as well as a nonrecurring $1.2 million
credit during 2009 related to medical claim costs.
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
net revenues, improved to 9.9% of net revenues in 2010 compared
with 10.9% for the 2009, due to synergies and other cost
reduction initiatives.
Research and
development
Research and development expenses as a percentage of net
revenues were 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared with 3.1% for the same period in 2009. This increase
was attributable to costs associated with the historical Spheris
research and development activities partially offset by
synergies realized.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of net
revenues was 5.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared with 5.1% for the same period in 2009. The increase was
primarily due to the amortization of acquired intangible assets
associated with the Spheris Acquisition.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
In 2010 MedQuist Inc. settled the Kaiser litigation which
resulted in it recording a charge of $0.9 million. Costs in
2009 related to the Anthurium settlement of $5.9 million,
related legal fees of $3.8 million and other legal fees of
$1.2 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
$
|
2,693
|
|
|
$
|
8,593
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,603
|
|
|
$
|
14,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
and integration related charges
MedQuist Inc. incurred acquisition and integration related
charges of $7.0 million and $1.3 million related to
the Spheris acquisition for the years ended December 31,
2010 and 2009.
Restructuring
charges
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, MedQuist
Inc. recorded restructuring charges of $2.8 million and
$2.7 million for employee severance obligations. MedQuist
Inc. expects that restructuring activities will continue in 2011
as management identifies opportunities for synergies related to
the Spheris Acquisition, including the elimination of redundant
functions and locations.
Gain on sale
of investment
In October 2010, MedQuist Inc. sold its investment in A-Life and
recognized a pre-tax gain of $9.9 million.
89
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
In October 2010, MedQuist Inc. refinanced its credit facilities
and incurred $5.8 million in debt extinguishment costs.
Interest
expense, net
Interest expense, net increased $13.3 million to
$13.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared with $0.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase was due to the debt
incurred in connection with the Spheris Acquisition and the
refinancing in October 2010, which increased MedQuist
Inc.s debt to $285 million.
Income tax
provision
Income taxes were $0.7 million in 2010 and
$2.0 million in 2009. The effective tax rates were 2.1% and
7.8% for the years ended 2010 and 2009. The decrease in the 2010
effective tax rate from prior year is due primarily to the
reduction of the valuation allowance associated with foreign
source NOLs based on managements assessment of
future earnings available to utilize these deferred tax assets,
along with the reduction in various tax reserves related to
settlements in certain state jurisdictions and the reduction in
the deferred tax liability related to the sale of MedQuist
Inc.s investment in A-Life, offset by an increase in the
tax reserve for various uncertain tax positions taken in 2010.
The low effective tax rate relative to statutory rates for the
two years is primarily due to the release of valuation
allowances established against net operating losses in past
years that were used to offset current earnings. The 2010 tax
expense includes an increase in the deferred tax liabilities
associated with indefinite life intangible assets related to
goodwill.
Comparison of
Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
307,200
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
326,853
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
206,265
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
230,375
|
|
|
|
70.5
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
33,441
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
47,520
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
15,848
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
14,843
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Acquisition and integration related charges
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,233
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
283,815
|
|
|
|
92.4
|
%
|
|
|
415,273
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
23,385
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
(88,420
|
)
|
|
|
(27.1
|
)%
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
(85,308
|
)
|
|
|
(26.1
|
)%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(16,513
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
Net
revenues
Net revenues recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009
were $307.2 million, a decline of $19.7 million or
6.0% when compared to the prior year net revenue amount of
$326.9 million. The revenue decline was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
lower prices for MedQuist Inc.s transcription service
related revenues, net of revenues realized from higher year over
year transcription volume; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
declining product and legacy maintenance revenues totaling
$6.8 million largely related to customers not renewing
maintenance contracts for legacy systems.
|
Pricing for MedQuist Inc.s transcription services remains
under pressure as many customers seek to reduce their costs by
using more offshore labor and increasing productivity with
expanded use of speech recognition.
Cost of
revenues
Cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues improved to
67.1% in 2009, compared to 70.5% in 2008. The improvement was
attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
staffing reductions that reduced costs by $7.6 million
resulting from restructuring actions taken by management to
align MedQuist Inc.s operating costs to better compete in
a lower price environment for its services;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $13.5 million reduction in medical transcription costs
related to MedQuist Inc.s increased use of speech
recognition technology, and its increased use of offshore labor
to supplement its domestic workforce capacity;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
lower product costs of $1.5 million as a result of lower
product and maintenance related sales and services;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
other reductions of $0.3 million, net; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $1.2 million reversal of an accrual due to the lapsing of
the statute of limitations.
|
Selling,
general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses in total as a
percentage of net revenues were 10.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared with 14.5% for the same period
in 2008. This improvement was the result of company-wide cost
reduction initiatives that included a $3.7 million decrease
in compensation costs due to reductions in workforce and a
$6.6 million decrease in legal and other professional fees.
The remaining cost savings covered employee stock option related
expenses of $0.8 million, a reduction in employee retention
costs resulting from the change in control of MedQuist
Inc.s majority shareholder of $0.5 million, lower
advertising and marketing costs of $0.6 million, lower rent
expenses of $0.4 million, reduced bad debt expense of
$0.4 million, lower travel and entertainment of
$0.3 million, and a decrease in all other selling, general
and administrative categories of $0.8 million.
Research and
development
Research and development expenses as a percentage of net
revenues were 3.1% for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared with 4.8% for the same period in 2008. This improvement
was attributable to reduced compensation expense of
$3.3 million; a decrease in consulting expense of
$1.1 million; an increase in the amount capitalized for
software development of $0.6 million; a decrease of
$0.4 million in stock option compensation as a result of
immediate vesting of previously unvested stock options due to
the change in control of MedQuist Inc.s majority
shareholder; a decrease in retention bonus for certain key
employees during the change in control of $0.4 million; and
a decrease in all other research and development expenses of
$0.4 million.
91
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of net
revenues was 5.1% for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared with 5.4% for the same period in 2008. The higher
expenses in 2009 were the result of software capitalization in
2009 and 2008.
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
The 2009 settlements related to the Anthurium litigation and
reseller arbitration. For the year ended December 31, 2008,
legal and professional fees were $12.3 million and
settlement costs were $7.4 million. The settlement was for
the Department of Justice investigation related to MedQuist
Inc.s historical billing practices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
$
|
8,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,313
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,843
|
|
|
$
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
and integration related charges
MedQuist Inc. incurred acquisition and integration related
charges of $1.3 million related to the Spheris acquisition
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Goodwill
impairment charge
In 2008 MedQuist Inc. recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$82.2 million. In 2009 the fair value substantially
exceeded carrying value.
Restructuring
charges
For the year ended December 31, 2009, restructuring charges
included $2.4 million for employee related severance
obligations and $0.3 million for non-cancelable leases
related to the closure or consolidation of offices. For the year
ended December 31, 2008, MedQuist Inc. had a restructuring
charge of $2.1 million for employee severance obligations.
Interest
income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net decreased $2.6 million, or
105.5%, to ($0.1) million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared with $2.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was due to the
amortization of deferred financing costs and lower interest
rates in the 2009 period as compared to 2008, and lower average
cash balance in the 2009 period ($37.3 million) as compared
to 2008 ($110.5 million).
Income tax
provision (benefit)
The effective income tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was 7.8% compared with an effective
income tax benefit rate of 19.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The 2009 tax expense includes an
increase in the deferred tax liabilities associated with
indefinite life intangible assets related to goodwill and an
increase in the deferred tax liability associated with MedQuist
Inc.s investment in A-Life. After consideration of all
evidence, both positive and negative, management concluded again
in 2009, that it was more likely than not that a significant
portion of the domestic deferred income tax assets would not be
realized. In addition, various adjustments were recorded for the
year ended December 31, 2009 including the reduction of the
foreign valuation allowance and various adjustments related to
state tax exposures.
92
Unaudited
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth MedQuist Inc.s unaudited
consolidated quarterly results of operations for each of the
eight quarters during the period from July 1, 2009 to
June 30, 2011. In MedQuist Inc.s managements
opinion, the unaudited results of operations for each quarter
have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus and reflect all
necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of MedQuist
Inc.s results of operations for the quarters presented.
You should read this information together with its consolidated
financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus. Operating results for any fiscal quarter are
not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended (unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
Successor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
February
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
to February
|
|
|
|
12 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
11,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
76,836
|
|
|
$
|
73,949
|
|
|
$
|
73,981
|
|
|
$
|
97,528
|
|
|
$
|
102,933
|
|
|
$
|
100,798
|
|
|
$
|
47,048
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,026
|
|
|
$
|
99,562
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
52,768
|
|
|
|
48,272
|
|
|
|
49,833
|
|
|
|
67,090
|
|
|
|
68,427
|
|
|
|
64,221
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
|
35,192
|
|
|
|
64,648
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
7,622
|
|
|
|
8,797
|
|
|
|
10,020
|
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
8,901
|
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
|
|
5,846
|
|
|
|
9,199
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
3,539
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
5,801
|
|
|
|
6,216
|
|
|
|
6,242
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
|
4,098
|
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
(7,687
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
Acquisition related charges
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
68,715
|
|
|
|
66,896
|
|
|
|
66,638
|
|
|
|
92,967
|
|
|
|
89,644
|
|
|
|
85,633
|
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
|
41,891
|
|
|
|
85,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
8,121
|
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
13,289
|
|
|
|
15,165
|
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
|
13,135
|
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
(6,723
|
)
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,733
|
)
|
|
|
(6,800
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
|
|
6,316
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
10,432
|
|
|
|
12,619
|
|
|
|
4,419
|
|
|
|
|
9,402
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,704
|
|
|
$
|
5,897
|
|
|
$
|
7,344
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
$
|
8,971
|
|
|
$
|
13,856
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,640
|
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
MedQuist Inc.s principal sources of liquidity include cash
generated from operations, available cash on hand, and
availability under its Senior Secured Credit Facility, as
described below. Cash provided by operating activities was
$17.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
versus $12.5 million provided by operations for the same
period prior year. Some of the significant items impacting
operating cash flows during the current year period included:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Improvements in operating income, which increased to
$34.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared to $11.9 million for the same period prior year.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
In working capital for the six month period MedQuist Inc. saw
improved collections of accounts receivable balances which
provided $4.6 million of cash in the current period.
Accrued compensation was a use of cash for $4.8 million, as
payments had been made under its management incentive program
and timing of pay periods. MedQuist Inc. also made a prepayment
of $10.2 million to a technology vendor, impacting both
current and non-current assets, with additional installments due
during the third quarter of 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Capital spending in the six month period was $8.9 million
for both purchases and internally-developed software projects.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
MedQuist Inc. made no acquisitions in the six months ended
June 30, 2011.
|
On August 18, 2011, MedQuist Inc. loaned $19,000,000 (the
Loan) to CBay Inc. (CBay). The Loan was
documented by a Subordinated Intercompany Note in favor of the
Company by CBay (the Note) and the proceeds of the
Loan were used to partially fund the acquisition of Multimodal
by MedQuist Holdings Inc. MedQuist Inc. believes the Loan was
made on terms no less favorable than what would be obtained by
it in an arms-length transaction.
The Note will mature on August 19, 2013 (the Maturity
Date), which date is the first business day after the
second anniversary of August 18, 2011. Interest will accrue
on any unpaid principal at an annual rate of 15.00% and interest
will be payable on the Maturity Date or, if sooner, the date of
any prepayment. Prepayment of the Note may occur at any time
prior to the Maturity Date with one business days notice,
provided that any prepayment must be for at least $100,000 (or
any whole multiple thereof) and accompanied by any accrued
interest on the amount of principal being paid.
The Loan and Note shall be subordinate and junior to all
obligations of CBay under (i) that certain Credit Agreement
by and among the MedQuist Inc., MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd.
(Transcriptions), MedQuist Holdings, the other Loan
Parties signatory thereto, the Lenders signatory thereto, and
General Electric Capital Corporation as Agent for the Lenders
dated October 1, 2010 (as amended, restated, extended,
supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time)
and (ii) that certain Senior Subordinated Note Purchase
Agreement by and among MedQuist Inc., CBay and Transcriptions as
the issuers, MedQuist Holdings and BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation, Pennantpark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A.
and THL Credit, Inc. as the purchasers dated September 30,
2010 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise
modified in writing from time to time).
On September 14, 2011, MedQuist Holdings amended the Senior
Secured Credit Facility to, among other things, (i) add an
accordion feature that allows for additional borrowing capacity
of up to $50.0 million in the form of additional revolving
credit commitments or incremental term loans, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, and (ii) permit
repurchases of MedQuist Holdings outstanding common stock
in an aggregate amount not to exceed $25.0 million.
94
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes MedQuist Inc.s obligations
to make future payments under current contracts as of
December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
$
|
19,023
|
|
|
$
|
4,947
|
|
|
$
|
9,345
|
|
|
$
|
3,586
|
|
|
$
|
1,145
|
|
Purchase
Obligations(1)
|
|
|
21,311
|
|
|
|
8,567
|
|
|
|
11,820
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and Other Guaranteed Payment Obligations
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Debt including current maturities
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual
Obligations(2)
|
|
$
|
329,278
|
|
|
$
|
36,721
|
|
|
$
|
61,636
|
|
|
$
|
144,776
|
|
|
$
|
86,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Purchase obligations are MedQuist
Inc.s ASR agreements ($12,150), telecommunication
contracts ($8,636), software development ($275) and other
recurring purchase obligations ($250).
|
|
|
(2) |
MedQuist Inc. made certain payments
to Nuance Communications, Inc. (Nuance) on
June 30, 2011 and is obligated to make one additional
payments to Nuance during the third quarter of 2011 in full
satisfaction of MedQuist Inc.s license fee obligations
with respect to certain products through June 30, 2015
pursuant to a Fee Agreement with Nuance dated June 30, 2011.
|
MedQuist Inc. has agreements with certain of its named executive
officers that provide for severance payments to the employee in
the event the employee is terminated without cause. The maximum
cash exposure under these agreements was approximately
$2.5 million as of December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
MedQuist Inc. is not involved in any off-balance sheet
arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources
that are material to investors except as follows. In January
2011, as required under MedQuist Inc.s Credit Agreement,
MedQuist Inc. entered into interest rate cap contracts for
$60.0 million notional amounts, which will amortize over
time and expire in January 2013, to limit the risk of increases
in interest rates.
Quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact MedQuist
Inc.s financial position due to adverse changes in
financial market prices and rates. MedQuist Inc.s market
risk exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in interest
rates. MedQuist Inc. does not hold or issue financial
instruments for trading purposes.
Interest rate
sensitivity
MedQuist Inc. earns interest income from its balances of cash
and cash equivalents. This interest income is subject to market
risk related to changes in interest rates, which affects
primarily MedQuist Inc.s investment portfolio. MedQuist
Inc. invests in instruments that meet high credit quality
standards, as specified in its investment policy.
The Term Loan of MedQuist Inc.s Senior Secured Credit
Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 5.50% with a LIBOR floor
of 1.75%. MedQuist Inc.s interest expense associated with
this loan will increase if LIBOR increases. Because the LIBOR
floor is currently in effect, a 1.25% increase in LIBOR above
current LIBOR levels would not increase our effective interest
rate. At June 30, 2011, a 1% increase in LIBOR above this
floor would result in an approximate $1.75 million annual
increase in our interest expense.
95
In January 2011, as required under MedQuist Inc.s Credit
Agreement, MedQuist Inc. entered into Interest Rate Cap
Contracts (for $60.0 million notional amounts which will
amortize over time) to limit the risk of increases in interest
rates.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-05,
which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This
accounting update eliminates the option to present the
components of other comprehensive income as part of the
statement of shareholders equity. Instead, a company must
report comprehensive income in either a single continuous
statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections,
net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate
but consecutive statements. ASU
2011-05 will
be effective for public companies during the interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early
adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU
2011-05 will
not have an impact on MedQuist Inc.s consolidated
financial statements as it only requires a change in the format
of the current presentation.
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
ratified two consensuses affecting revenue recognition:
The first consensus, Revenue Recognition
Multiple-Element Arrangements, sets forth requirements that
must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of
a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement
when other items have not yet been delivered. One of those
current requirements is that there be objective and reliable
evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered
items, which must be supported by either VSOE or TPE.
This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered
elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the
portion of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to
items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE
or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered
or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of
those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to
each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those
selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted.
The second consensus, Software-Revenue Recognition
addresses the accounting for transaction involving software
to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both
software and non-software and not-software components that
function together to deliver a products functionality.
The Consensuses are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The standards were
adopted in the first quarter of 2011 and did not have a material
impact on MedQuist Inc.s results of operations or its
financial position.
Changes in
independent auditors
There have been no changes or disagreements with the independent
auditors of MedQuist Inc. during its two most recent fiscal
years or any subsequent interim periods.
96
The Clinical
Documentation Industry
Overview
Growth of
clinical documentation in the United States
Over the past several decades, our industry has evolved from
almost exclusively in-house production to outsourced services
and from labor-intensive services to technologically-enabled
solutions. The market opportunity for our solutions is driven by
overall healthcare utilization and cost containment efforts in
the United States. Numerous factors are driving increases in the
demand for healthcare services including population growth,
longer life expectancy, the increasing prevalence of chronic
illnesses, and expanded coverage from healthcare reform.
According to a September 2010 report by the U.S. Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services, spending on healthcare grew
from $1.2 trillion in 1998 to $2.3 trillion in 2008,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 7.0%. It also
projects that healthcare spending will grow to reach $4.2
trillion, or 19.3% of U.S. gross domestic product, by 2018,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 6.3%. At the same
time, U.S. healthcare providers remain under substantial
pressure to reduce costs while maintaining or improving the
quality of care.
Accurate and timely clinical documentation has become a critical
requirement of the growing U.S. healthcare system.
Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance companies demand extensive
patient care documentation. The HITECH Act includes numerous
incentives to promote the adoption and meaningful use of
electronic health records, or EHRs, across the healthcare
industry. Consequently, healthcare providers are increasingly
using EHRs to input, store, and manage their clinical data in a
digital format. Healthcare providers that use EHRs require
accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective means to input
clinical data that are not disruptive to the physician workflow.
Importance of
the Physician Narrative
Physicians generally use one of two methods to capture clinical
data in a digital format: dictation and on-screen data entry.
Dictation allows a physician to use his or her voice to document
patient interactions, which is then converted into a text format
or EHR record. On-screen data entry enables a physician to
populate templates or drop-down menus in an EHR system,
typically with a handheld or other hardware device.
In many hospital settings, dictation is the most popular method
for capturing clinical data because of the many advantages it
provides over on-screen data entry. From an efficiency
standpoint, a physicians time is typically the most
expensive labor component of a clinical documentation process,
and reducing the time required for data capture lowers costs. It
is generally faster to dictate than enter data on-screen, and
dictation frees up the physician to do other tasks in parallel.
From a documentation standpoint, dictation allows for a flexible
narration of patient interactions. Templates and drop-down menus
typically restrict input to a structured format. While dictation
can be converted into structured format later, it provides a
more flexible method for data capture.
Market
opportunity
The need to convert and manage the Physician Narrative
represents a substantial market opportunity. Historically,
in-house hospital labor was used to transcribe clinical reports
using analog recordings from physicians. Later, healthcare
providers began to outsource production to domestic providers
and use digital formats. Today, advanced automation
technologies, such as ASR and workflow platforms, and low-cost
offshore resources are available to drive substantial
improvements in productivity and cost.
Outsourcing enables healthcare providers to reduce costs, gain
access to leading technologies, accelerate turn-around times,
improve accuracy, and fulfill security and compliance
requirements. In a March 2010 report, ValueNotes estimated that
spending on outsourced transcription services by hospitals,
clinics, and physician practices in the United States reached
$5.4 billion in 2009. ValueNotes further projected that the
market for outsourced transcription would grow 8.2% per annum to
$8.0 billion by 2014. As this market expands, ValueNotes
projects that outsourcing will grow relative to in-house
alternatives from 33% of production in 2009 to 38% by 2014.
97
Market
segmentation and trends
While outsourcing provides many benefits, the landscape for
outsourced service providers is highly fragmented with varying
degrees of technological automation and offshore capabilities
amongst providers. Thousands of local and regional providers
offer limited services without technology offerings. A small set
of national providers offer a combination of technology and
services, but have varying degrees of technological
sophistication and production capacity. Some vendors also focus
more on pure technology, offering ASR software, with
partnerships for third-party services, though most of these
vendors lack production scale.
Over the last five years, technological automation and a rise in
offshore capabilities have substantially decreased the cost of
production and have further differentiated outsourcing
providers. ASR has been a key technological driver of
productivity gains. ASR converts the Physician Narrative into a
text form which is available for editing. The effective use of
this technology lowers the cost of production relative to
conventional transcription services. Another key driver for cost
reductions has been the increased use of offshore infrastructure
and resources. Historically, most U.S. healthcare providers
that outsourced their production did so to domestic service
providers. With the advent of internet-based technologies and
improvements in the quality and training of offshore personnel,
the clinical documentation industry has seen a shift towards
offshore resources to reduce costs. India is by far the most
popular destination for outsourcing given relatively low wages
and a highly educated English-speaking workforce.
As the industrys cost of production has declined through
increases in technological automation and offshore capabilities,
the average market price for medical transcription services has
also declined. This has allowed healthcare providers to
participate in these economic gains. However, we believe that
participants in our industry must expand their technology
platforms and offshore capabilities to remain competitive.
98
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. Business
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert the Physician Narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
ASR, medical transcription and editing, workflow automation, and
document management and distribution to deliver a complete
managed service for our customers. Our solutions enable
hospitals, clinics, and physician practices to improve the
quality of clinical data as well as accelerate and automate the
documentation process, and we believe our solutions improve
physician productivity and satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle
performance, and facilitate the adoption and use of electronic
health records. We also offer speech recognition solutions for
radiology, cardiology, pathology and related specialties, that
help healthcare providers dictate, edit and sign reports without
manual transcription.
We are the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the Physician Narrative in the United States.
The majority of lines we process are edited or transcribed
utilizing approximately 14,000 MTs and MEs. For the six months
ended June 30, 2011, 73% was processed using ASR technology
and 42% was produced offshore. Our size allows us to handle the
clinical documentation requirements of many of the largest and
most complex healthcare delivery networks in the United States,
provides us with economies of scale, and enables us to devote
significantly more resources to enhancing our solutions through
research and development than most of our competitors.
We serve more than 2,400 hospitals, clinics, and physician
practices throughout the United States, including 40% of
hospitals with more than 500 licensed beds. The average tenure
of our top 50 customers is over five years, and the majority of
our revenue is from recurring services. Insights gained from our
broad, long-standing customer relationships allow us to optimize
our integrated solutions, and we believe that this positions us
for future growth as we target new customers.
We were organized in 1988. During January of 2011, we
redomiciled from the British Virgin Islands to Delaware, we
changed our name from CBaySystems Holdings Ltd. to MedQuist
Holdings Inc., and we are a Delaware corporation.
We have realized significant increases in both revenue and
profitability as the result of two large acquisitions, MedQuist
Inc., in which we acquired a majority interest in August 2008,
and Spheris, which we acquired in April 2010. From 2007 to 2010,
our net revenue increased from $42.2 million to
$417.3 million. Over this same period, our Adjusted EBITDA,
which is a non-GAAP financial performance measure, increased
from $1.9 million to $86.3 million, and our Adjusted
EBITDA margins expanded from 4.6% to 20.7%. For a reconciliation
of our net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
to Adjusted EBITDA, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
We operate in one reportable operating segment which is clinical
documentation solutions for the healthcare industry. No single
customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in any
period and there is no single geographic area of concentration
of revenues other than the United States.
Recent
Developments
Recapitalization
Transactions
On October 14, 2010, MedQuist Inc. incurred
$85.0 million of indebtedness through the issuance of
13% senior subordinated notes due 2016, or the Senior
Subordinated Notes, under a note purchase agreement, or
the Note Purchase Agreement, and incurred
$200.0 million of indebtedness under a term loan, or the
Term Loan, under a $225.0 million credit
facility, or the Senior Secured Credit Facility. We
are a guarantor of both the Senior Subordinated Notes and the
Senior Secured Credit Facility. MedQuist Inc. used the proceeds
to repay $80.0 million of indebtedness under its prior
credit facility, or the Acquisition Credit Facility,
to repay $13.6 million of indebtedness under a subordinated
promissory note, or the Acquisition Subordinated
Promissory Notes, each issued in connection with the
Spheris Acquisition, and to pay a $176.5 million special
dividend to its shareholders. We received $122.6 million of
this special dividend and used $104.1 million to
99
extinguish our 6% convertible notes, or the 6% Convertible
Notes, issued to Royal Philips Electronics in connection with
the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition and $3.7 million to
extinguish certain other lines of credit. We refer to these
transactions collectively as the Recapitalization
Transactions.
Management
Restricted Stock
In the third quarter of 2011, Medquist Holdings Inc. granted
restricted stock to certain employees, including employees of
MultiModal pursuant to the acquisition, aggregating
1,338,433 shares which vest over various periods.
Private
Exchange
Certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling shareholders
entered into the Exchange Agreement, whereby we issued
4.8 million shares of our common stock in exchange for
their 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. We
refer to this transaction as the Private Exchange.
The Private Exchange was completed on February 11, 2011 and
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Registered
Exchange Offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced our public exchange offer, or
Registered Exchange Offer, to those noncontrolling
MedQuist Inc. shareholders who did not participate in the
Private Exchange to exchange shares of our common stock for
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The Registered Exchange
Offer expired on March 11, 2011. We accepted and
consummated the exchange of MedQuist Inc. shares of common stock
that were validly tendered in the Registered Exchange Offer. As
a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
U.S. Initial
Public Offering
The U.S. initial public offering of our common stock closed
on February 9, 2011. Our common stock is listed on The
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
Redomiciliation
and Share Conversion
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and redomiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation. In
connection with our redomiciliation, we adjusted the number of
our shares outstanding through a reverse share split pursuant to
which every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding
prior to our redomiciliation was converted into one share of our
common stock upon our redomiciliation. Our redomiciliation and
such reverse share split resulted in no change to our common
stockholders relative ownership interests in us.
For a more detailed description of the Recapitalization
Transactions, the Private Exchange, the Registered Exchange
Offer, our U.S. initial public offering and the
redomiciliation and share conversion, collectively, the
Corporate Reorganization, see Corporate
Reorganization.
Acquisition of
MultiModal Technologies, Inc.
On August 18, 2011 (the Closing Date), we
completed the acquisition of MultiModal through a series of
mergers between MultiModal and certain of our direct
wholly-owned subsidiaries (the MultiModal Merger).
As a result of the MultiModal Merger, MultiModal became a direct
wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. On the Closing Date, we paid an
aggregate of approximately $48.4 million in cash to
MultiModals shareholders, optionholders and other third
parties and issued an aggregate of 4,134,896 shares of our
common stock (the Shares) to MultiModals
shareholders who are accredited investors within the
meaning of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933 (the MultiModal Accredited Investors).
We are also obligated to pay up to approximately
$28.8 million of additional cash consideration in three
installments of approximately $16.3 million,
$4.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, following
the first, second and third anniversaries of the Closing Date.
100
Amendment to
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On September 14, 2011, we amended the Senior Secured Credit
Facility to, among other things, (i) add an accordion
feature that allows for additional borrowing capacity of up to
$50.0 million in the form of additional revolving credit
commitments or incremental term loans, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, and (ii) permit
repurchases of our outstanding common stock in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $25.0 million.
Stock
Repurchase Program
On September 19, 2011, our board of directors authorized
the repurchase of up to $25.0 million of our outstanding
common stock from time to time during the six months following
the completion of the Merger (hereinafter referred to as the
Share Repurchase Program). Under the Share
Repurchase Program, shares may be repurchased in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions at our discretion. The
Share Repurchase Program does not require us to repurchase any
specific number of shares, and we may terminate the Share
Repurchase Program at any time. We will not repurchase any
shares directly from our directors and officers or S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment L.P. and its affiliates under the Share Repurchase
Program.
Our competitive
strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Leader in a large, fragmented market We are
the largest provider by revenue of clinical documentation
solutions based on the Physician Narrative in the United States.
Our size enables us to meet the needs of large, sophisticated
healthcare customers, provides economies of scale, and enables
us to devote significantly more resources to research and
development and quality assurance than many other providers.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Integrated solutions delivered as a complete managed
service We offer fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services that capture and convert the Physician
Narrative into a high quality customized electronic record. We
integrate technologies and services for voice capture and
transmission, ASR, medical transcription and editing, workflow
automation, and document management and distribution. The end
result is value-added clinical documentation with high accuracy
and quick turn-around times.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Large and diversified customer base with long-term
relationships We serve hospitals, clinics and
physician practices throughout the United States. We have a
long-standing history with our customers and the majority of our
revenue is from recurring services.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Highly-efficient operating model Since we
acquired MedQuist Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2008, we have
driven down our cost structure through leveraging our scalable
infrastructure, standardizing processes, and increased
utilization of ASR. Our use of ASR, which has grown from 39% of
our volume in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 74% in the second
quarter of 2011, has increased our productivity. With the
acquisition of MultiModal, we now own our own ASR technology
which we expect will further reduce our cost structure.
Additionally, our expanding footprint in India has enabled us to
increase our offshore production from 28% of our volume to 42%
over this same period. The financial impact of these measures
has been an improvement in gross margins during this timeframe
from 34% to 40%.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Proven management team We have assembled an
outstanding senior leadership team with significant industry
experience and domain expertise in both domestic and offshore
operations. Our management team has delivered substantial
results and brings an entrepreneurial spirit with proven
experience in managing growth, driving operational improvements,
and successfully integrating acquisitions.
|
101
Our
strategy
Key elements of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expand our customer base and increase existing customer
penetration We intend to grow our customer base
by targeting three market segments: large healthcare providers
still using in-house services, large healthcare providers
currently using competing outsourced alternatives, and
small-to-medium
medical practices. Given our market leadership, strong solution
offerings, and low cost structure, we believe we are well
positioned to both replace in-house solutions as well as
displace competing outsourced alternatives for large healthcare
providers. In order to increase penetration within our existing
customer base, we intend to continue targeting additional
healthcare clinical areas and facilities of our current
customers. Additionally, as healthcare providers centralize
their purchasing decisions, we believe that our ability to
deliver outstanding services for large, complex requirements
provides us with increasing access to new sales opportunities
within our existing customer base and through existing customer
relationships. Through our acquisition of MultiModal, we have
expanded our customer base to include MTSOs. We intend to grow
our business by providing new and innovative speech and natural
language understanding technologies and new products to these
transcription partners.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Continue to develop and enhance our integrated
solutions We seek to differentiate our
integrated solutions through sophisticated technology and
process improvement. With the acquisition of MultiModal, we now
have over 200 employees dedicated to research and
development, with in-house expertise in speech and natural
language understanding technologies. Over the last year, we
launched numerous enhancements, including a front end speech
platform for general medicine, additional EHR system
integration, and advanced performance monitoring.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Enhance profitability through technical and operational
expertise We have made significant improvements
in productivity through business process and infrastructure
improvements. Notwithstanding reductions in customer pricing,
our gross margins have expanded from 34% in the fourth quarter
of 2008, our first fiscal quarter after we acquired MedQuist
Inc., to 40% in the second quarter of 2011. Our management team
has proven its ability to implement continuous process
improvements and we intend to further increase offshore
production and our use of technological automation, including
ASR, to lower costs and enhance our profitability. We also
expect that the acquisition of MultiModal will further enhance
our gross margins by building market share in the in-house
transcription market.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Facilitate the adoption and promote meaningful use of EHR
systems Our integrated solutions provide a
comprehensive, accurate and effective method to incorporate
Physician Narrative into an EHR system. We interface with
substantially all of the leading EHR vendors to integrate our
clinical documentation solutions and to help our customers
realize the full potential of their EHR systems through the use
of the Physician Narrative. In our experience, when EHR is
adopted, customers tend to consolidate their purchase decisions,
which benefits us as a leading provider of clinical
documentation solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Pursue strategic acquisitions We believe that
there are significant opportunities available to create value
through strategic acquisitions. We intend to seek appropriate
opportunities to grow our customer base, enhance or expand our
solutions, incorporate synergy opportunities, and expand our
value proposition to our customers. For example, we recently
completed our acquisition of MultiModal which provides us with
ownership of speech and natural language understanding
technologies, and is expected to facilitate consolidation to a
single speech recognition platform, provide a broader product
offering to local and regional transcription partners and
leverage MultiModals cloud based services to enhance our
gross margins.
|
102
Our
solutions
Clinical
documentation solutions for healthcare providers
We provide enterprise-class solutions for healthcare providers
ranging from fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services to stand-alone offerings. These solutions
represent the large majority of our revenues. Our solutions
enable our customers to easily access advanced technologies with
confidence that their clinical documentation requirements will
be completed accurately and quickly. Our industry-leading
solutions integrate voice capture and transmission, ASR,
transcription/editing services, workflow management, and
document management and distribution capabilities. In addition,
we have coding technology and services to complement our
clinical documentation offerings which enhance and improve the
revenue cycle.
With proprietary and licensed technologies, we enable our
customers to efficiently manage their narrative-based
documentation through customizable workflows. A typical workflow
includes the following steps:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Capture As the first step in a workflow
process, users can dictate into one of several input devices,
including a variety of handheld dictation devices, smartphone
applications, proprietary handsets, standard telephones, or
PC-based dictation stations. Users can also use PC-based speech
recognition applications for those who prefer to edit their own
files in real-time. By supporting a wide array of capture
methods, we provide true choice to our customers to decide which
workflow best suits their needs. Users can change as needed from
real-time to batch-based workflows to maximize their
productivity.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Manage Captured voice files are merged with
patient information from our customers information systems
and EHRs where they are loaded into our enterprise platform for
processing. The platform balances production resources across
both in-house and outsourced personnel, and its web-based
management capabilities allow administrators to easily manage
workflows from anywhere at any time. We generate draft reports
using ASR technology which are reviewed by our MEs. We can also
use conventional transcription services from our MTs. To
maintain high quality and efficiency, our platform automatically
matches voice files from various specialties and acuity levels
to the MTs or MEs with the
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate skill sets. It also includes random quality checks
to give timely feedback to our personnel. Turn-around time is an
important metric for our customers, and so the system optimizes
processing to ensure we fulfill our contracted service level
agreements, which typically range from one hour to
48 hours. In addition, the platform provides real-time
access for our customers to not only see into their work moving
through the system, but provides dashboard metrics and reporting
to help manage their enterprises.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Analyze Completed reports are routed back to
physicians or other healthcare professionals for review, final
editing (as required), and authentication. These reports are
then available to drive additional value added services, such as
coding, data abstraction, and billing services. We provide
customers with sophisticated reporting capabilities and
integrated electronic signature solutions to simplify and
accelerate the review of their clinical reports. We use
Quantifytm,
our patent-pending natural language processing technology, to
convert final reports into structured documentation formats.
This technology allows us to scan health records for information
needed by the customer to fulfill their regulatory and local
reporting requirements. This technology can also be used to
structure documentation in the health record for use in
populating EHRs and for data analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Distribute After being approved by the
physician, electronic records are distributed. We provide a
fully featured distribution solution for printing, faxing and
electronic distribution to referring physicians. We have
developed thousands of interfaces with major, mid-level and
proprietary hospital information systems, radiology information
systems, health information repositories and EHR systems. Our
solution supports HL7 and XML-based formats which further allows
us to meet the needs of each individual customer. Throughout the
entire workflow, our managed service platform maintains security
measures and audit trails in full compliance with HIPAA privacy
and security standards and regulations and the protection of the
confidentiality of patient information.
|
In delivering these customized workflows, we offer a variety of
software products. These can work either as stand-alone
solutions or as integrated solutions with our other managed
services. These solutions include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
DocQment Enterprise Platform (DEP) Our core
platform provides a powerful and flexible transcription solution
that integrates the process of dictation, transcription, speech
recognition, editing and document delivery into a unified
clinical information management workflow. We offer the platform
typically as a managed service. For those customers that prefer
to use their own services, we also offer it on a license basis.
Our platform provides a high performance and highly customizable
clinical documentation workflow. It integrates with every major
hospital system vendor, such as Epic, Cerner, and Meditech.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
SpeechQ Our front-end speech recognition
family of solutions enables physicians to dictate, edit, and
sign their reports in real-time. With workflows customized for
numerous medical practices, such as radiology and general
medicine, SpeechQ offers
end-to-end
workflows that combine voice commands and dictation. SpeechQ
integrates with our enterprise platform in scenarios where a
physician prefers to send text to our editors for review.
Additionally, it interfaces with EHRs and other healthcare
systems to allow patient demographic information to be
automatically populated, updated, and distributed in real-time.
Our newest SpeechQ offering, SpeechQDirect can voice-enable
customer EHRs to drive greater adoption, which will assist them
in realizing incentive funds from the government for that
adoption. Healthcare providers can now use their voice in
addition to keyboard and mouse to seamlessly interact with their
desktop clinical applications, including the dictation of
medical narrative and speech-based navigation within
3rd party applications. Using this solution, providers can
improve documentation efficiency and avoid the trap of
template-based
point-and-click
systems, augmenting discretely captured data with a narrative of
the patients story.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
CodeRunnerCAC Our web-based workflow and
workforce management system manages the entire coding process
for our customers. Health records are fed into the system where
natural language processing technology scans the information and
delivers suggested codes to the hospital coding staff. This
allows
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
them to become more accurate, reduce turnaround time and
increase productivity. All of these factors contribute to
increased revenue and improved cash flow by shortening the
revenue cycle and making fewer errors that can result in denials
by payors.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
DocQVoice Our web-based enterprise digital
voice capture and transport solution is deployed at the
customers location and integrates with both our enterprise
platform and legacy dictation systems.
|
In addition, through our acquisition of MultiModal, we now
provide speech and natural language understanding solutions to
MTSOs, original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and healthcare
providers.
Selling and
marketing
As of June 30, 2011, we employed more than
100 personnel in our sales force and account management
organization. Our sales force is focused on new customer sales
opportunities including both the conversion of customers that
are using in-house solutions as well as the displacement of
competitive offerings. This sales organization employs
consultative sales techniques to deliver customized programs and
solutions that respond to the customers unique
requirements. Our account management organization is responsible
for continuity of our current customer relationships and the
expansion of those relationships to include additional services,
facilities, or work types.
We complement our sales efforts with numerous marketing
initiatives, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
attending and sponsoring industry trade shows of national
organizations, such as the American Health Information
Management Association, Healthcare Information and Management
Systems Society, Association for Healthcare Documentation
Integrity, Radiological Society of North America, Society for
Imaging Informatics in Medicine, and Medical Transcription
Industry Alliance;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
participating in work groups and leadership committees of the
industry associations; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
advertising in trade journals related to our industry.
|
Operations
We serve our customers 24 hours a day, seven days a week
with our integrated clinical documentation solutions. We use ASR
in most of our production, which we complement with skilled,
English-speaking MTs and MEs.
Technology
Technology
development
We devote substantial resources to research and development to
ensure that our solutions meet both current and future customer
requirements. As of June 30, 2011, we employed a
development staff of approximately 130 employees. Our
development staff has expertise in multiple disciplines,
including service oriented architectures, web-based clients,
high volume transactional databases, data warehouses, web
services and integration with third-party systems. We also
utilize third party resources for some for specific
technologies, such as ASR, capture-assisted codes, encoders,
databases, portal technologies and reporting. Much of the
technology in our integrated solutions is proprietary. Our
development personnel follow a rigorous development methodology
that ensures repeatable, high quality and timely delivery of
solutions.
ASR is a key component of our narrative-based solutions. With
the MultiModal acquisition, we now own our own ASR technology
and we now have an in-house team of engineers with deep speech
recognition and natural language understanding development
expertise.
Technology
operations
Our clinical documentation solutions are hosted by us and
accessed using high-speed internet connections or private
network connections. We have devoted significant resources to
producing software applications and managed services to meet the
functionality and performance expectations of our customers. We
use commercially
105
available hardware and a combination of proprietary and
commercially-available licensed software to provide our clinical
documentation solutions.
Competition
Because we integrate technologies and services, we compete with
companies in a number of different sectors. These competitors
include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
in-house service departments of healthcare providers, which we
believe produce the majority of clinical documentation today
based on the Physician Narrative;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
national medical transcription service providers, such as Focus
Informatics, Inc. (a subsidiary of Nuance Communications, Inc.,
or Nuance), Transcend Services, Inc., and Webmedex, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
local or regional medical transcription service organizations;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
ASR software vendors, such as Nuance, which market ASR as a
means to reduce clinical documentation labor; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
EHR software vendors which promote their systems as a
replacement to narrative-based input by using on-screen
templates and drop-down boxes for data entry.
|
Competition for our integrated clinical documentation solutions
is based primarily on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
n
|
accuracy and timeliness of documentation produced;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
capacity to handle large volumes and complex workflows;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
ability to provide fully-integrated
end-to-end
solutions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
ease of upgrades and ability to add complementary offerings;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
physician acceptance and productivity;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
analytics provided to customers;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
domestic or offshore production capabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
time to implement for new customers; and
|
We believe we compete effectively on all of the above criteria.
We provide fully integrated
end-to-end
managed services that translate the Physician Narrative into a
customized electronic record with high accuracy and low
turn-around time. We believe that our production cost structure
allows us to offer competitive prices while continuing to invest
in the development of new technologies and services. We have the
largest production capacity in our industry, which we believe
strengthens our operational capabilities and assists us in
meeting customer demands for timely implementation of our
solutions for new accounts.
Government
regulation
The provision of clinical documentation solutions is heavily
regulated by federal and state statutes and regulations. We and
our healthcare customers must comply with a variety of
requirements, including HIPAA and other restrictions regarding
privacy, confidentiality, and security of health information.
We have structured our operations to comply with HIPAA and other
regulatory and contractual requirements. We have implemented
appropriate safeguards related to the access, use, or disclosure
of PHI, to address the privacy and security of PHI consistent
with our regulatory and contractual requirements. We also train
our personnel regarding HIPAA and other requirements. We have
made and continue to make investments in systems to support
customer operations that are regulated by HIPAA and other
regulations. Because these standards are subject to
interpretation and change, we cannot predict the future impact
of HIPAA or other regulations on our business and operations.
106
HIPAA and
HITECH Act
HIPAA establishes a set of national privacy and security
standards for protecting the privacy, confidentiality and
security of PHI. Under HIPAA, health plans, healthcare
clearinghouses, and healthcare providers, together referred to
as covered entities for purposes of HIPAA, and their business
associates must meet certain standards in order to protect
individually identifiable health information. The HITECH Act
which was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of
the ARRA, enhances and strengthens the HIPAA privacy and
security standards and makes certain provisions of HIPAA
applicable to business associates of covered entities.
As part of the operation of our business, our customers provide
us with certain PHI, and we are considered to be a business
associate of most of our customers for purposes of HIPAA. The
provisions of HIPAA require our customers to have agreements in
place with us whereby we are required to appropriately safeguard
the PHI we create or receive on their behalf. As a business
associate, we also have statutory and regulatory obligations
under HIPAA. We are bound by our business associate agreements
to use and disclose PHI in a manner consistent with HIPAA in
providing services to those covered entities.
We and our customers are also subject to HIPAA security
regulations that require the implementation of certain
administrative, physical and technical safeguards to ensure the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of EPHI. We are
required by regulation and contract to protect the security of
EPHI that we create, receive, maintain or transmit for our
customers consistent with these regulations. These requirements
include implementing administrative, physical and technical
safeguards that reasonably and appropriately protect the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of such EPHI. To
comply with our regulatory and contractual obligations, we may
have to reorganize processes and invest in new technologies. On
February 17, 2010, we became directly subject to
HIPAAs criminal and civil penalties for any breaches of
our privacy and security obligations.
Other
restrictions regarding privacy, confidentiality, and security of
health information
In addition to HIPAA, numerous other state and federal laws
govern the collection, dissemination, use, access to,
confidentiality and security of PHI. In addition, Congress and
some states are considering new laws and regulations that
further protect the privacy and security of medical records or
medical information. In many cases, these state laws are not
preempted by the HIPAA privacy and security standards.
Intellectual
property
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark, trade
secret and other intellectual property laws, nondisclosure
agreements, license agreements, contractual provisions and other
measures to protect our proprietary rights. We have a number of
registered trademarks in the United States and abroad, including
CBay®,
MedQuist®,
SpeechQ®,
Always
Understanding®,
Anymodal®
and
Telegentis®.
We have common law rights over a number of unregistered
trademarks. We also own a limited number of United States and
foreign patents and patent applications that relate to our
products, processes and technologies.
In addition to utilizing our own ASR technology, we also license
ASR software that we incorporate into our transcription
platforms and other products.
MedQuist Inc. licenses speech recognition and processing
software from Nuance pursuant to a licensing agreement entered
into in November 2009. MedQuist Inc. pre-paid the licensing fee
and the licensing agreement with Nuance expires in June 2015.
Thereafter, upon written notice to Nuance, MedQuist Inc. has the
right to renew the licensing agreement for two successive
periods of five years each on the same terms (except pricing)
and conditions of the licensing agreement then in effect.
Nuance granted MedQuist Inc. co-ownership rights to and
interests in its SpeechQ product in exchange for a fixed sum,
pursuant to a supply agreement entered into in November 2009.
The supply agreement also provides that MedQuist Inc. receive,
in exchange for periodic fees, the exclusive right in the United
States, Canada and certain Caribbean islands to sell, service
and deliver SpeechQ. MedQuist Inc.s supply agreement with
Nuance expires in June 2015. Upon written notice to Nuance,
MedQuist Inc. has the right to renew the agreement for two
successive terms of five years each on the same terms (except
pricing) and conditions of the agreement then in effect.
107
MedQuist Inc. also licenses the speech recognition and
processing software used for SpeechQ from Nuance, under a
separate licensing agreement entered into in November 2009.
Under this agreement, MedQuist Inc. pays a licensing fee based
on total number of individual users or named-user licenses per
customer order. This agreement expires in June 2015. Thereafter,
upon written notice to Nuance, MedQuist Inc. has the right to
renew the licensing agreement for two successive periods of five
years each on the same terms (except pricing) and conditions of
the licensing agreement then in effect.
Employees
As of June 30, 2011, we had more than 12,000 employees
in the United States and India. Most of our employees are MTs
and MEs involved in the production and quality assurance of
clinical documentation.
We believe we have good relationships with our employees. Our
employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements or
union representation.
Legal
proceedings
When we acquired MedQuist Inc. in August 2008, MedQuist Inc. was
involved in a number of legal matters, including customer and
stockholder issues and regulatory investigations. Substantially
all of these legal matters have been resolved.
Shareholder
Settlement
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, two of
MedQuist Inc.s minority shareholders filed class action
complaints in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Burlington
County, Chancery Division, (the Court) against MedQuist Inc.,
the individual members on MedQuist Inc.s board of
directors and us (the Shareholder Litigation). Plaintiffs
alleged that the defendants breached certain fiduciary duties
they owed to minority shareholders of MedQuist Inc. in
connection with the structuring and disclosure of the Registered
Exchange Offer.
On March 4, 2011, the parties to the Shareholder Litigation
entered into a memorandum of understanding (the MOU) that
outlined the material terms of a proposed settlement of the
Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, we agreed to
extend the expiration of the Registered Exchange Offer and
further agreed that if, as a result of the Registered Exchange
Offer, we obtained ownership of at least 90% of the outstanding
common stock of MedQuist Inc., we would conduct a short-form
merger under applicable law to acquire the remaining shares of
MedQuist Inc. common stock that we do not currently own at the
same exchange ratio applicable under the Registered Exchange
Offer. MedQuist Inc. agreed to make certain supplemental
disclosures concerning the Registered Exchange Offer, which were
contained in an amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that MedQuist Inc. filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. We
also agreed to use our best efforts to finalize a stipulation of
settlement (the Stipulation of Settlement) and present it to the
Court for preliminary approval within thirty days of the date of
the MOU.
On April 1, 2011, the parties executed the Stipulation of
Settlement that memorialized the terms of the settlement
outlined in the MOU. On this same date, plaintiffs counsel
filed with the Clerk of the Court a Motion for Preliminary
Approval of the Proposed Stipulation of Settlement. The Motion
asked the Court to, among other things, (a) hold a hearing
to address preliminary approval of the Stipulation of
Settlement, (b) certify a class, for purposes of
effectuating the Stipulation of Settlement only, of all MedQuist
Inc.s shareholders (except the named defendants and their
families and affiliates) as of and including the date of the
closing of the short-form merger contemplated under the
Stipulation of Settlement, and (c) schedule a final hearing
within 60 days to determine whether the Stipulation of
Settlement is reasonable and fair and should receive final
approval.
The Court held a preliminary approval hearing on April 19,
2011 and entered an Order preliminarily approving the settlement
and setting a final approval hearing for June 17, 2011 (the
Preliminary Approval Order). The Preliminary Approval Order also
required MedQuist Inc. to provide mail and publication notice of
the proposed settlement to all shareholders of recorded and
established deadlines for objections to the settlement and for
filing briefs in support and in opposition to the settlement.
On June 17, 2011, following mail and publication notice to
MedQuist Inc.s shareholders, the Court held a fairness
hearing on the settlement. On this date, the Court entered an
Order and Final Judgment (the Final
108
Judgment) that, among other things, (a) certified the
settlement class consisting of all MedQuist Inc.s
shareholders (except the named defendants and their families and
affiliates) as of and including the date of the closing of the
short-form merger contemplated under the Stipulation of
Settlement (the Settlement Class), (b) found the terms set
forth in the Stipulation of Settlement to be fair and reasonable
and in the best interests of the Settlement Class, and
(c) approved the application for attorneys fees and
costs and awarded plaintiffs counsel $0.4 million.
The Final Judgment also dismissed the case with prejudice.
Affiliates of
the Companys Former Principal Shareholders
Pursuant to an agreement entered into on August 19, 2008,
the Company was obligated to pay S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II,
LLC (SAC CBI II) and Lehman Brothers Commercial Corporation
Asia (LBCCA), an annual fixed amount of $1.9 million and
$0.9 million, respectively, in cash or shares at the
Companys election, in return for financial, managerial and
operational advice. The payment provision of the agreement had a
five-year term that was scheduled to expire in August 18,
2013. The agreement stipulated that the annual amount was
payable regardless of whether any services were rendered by SAC
CBI II or LBCCA. Under the agreement, the Company was committed
to pay for the remaining unexpired term at termination of the
agreement or upon a change in control, with the payment amount
determined as follows: the sum of the present value (using the
discount rate equal to the yield on U.S. Treasury
securities of like maturity) of the annual amounts that would
have been payable with respect to the period from the date of
such change of control or termination, as applicable through
scheduled expiration date. The change in control occurred and
the agreement terminated as a result of the consummation of our
IPO and the Private Exchange. As a result, 0.8 million
shares valued at $6.2 million were issued in March 2011 to
satisfy the obligation to SAC CBI II.
However, provisional liquidators were appointed in respect of
LBCCA in September 2008, and the Company challenged LBCCAs
entitlement to amounts under the agreement. On April 27,
2011, the provisional liquidators filed a lawsuit against the
Company on behalf of LBCCA in the Southern District of New York
seeking payments under the agreement. On July 21, 2011 the
Company reached a settlement with LBCCA, pursuant to which we
paid $4.0 million in July 2011. Pursuant to the terms of
the agreement, the Company recorded $6.6 million and
$1.4 million of charges to additional paid in capital
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Additionally, amounts payable of $4.0 million
and $3.5 million at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, were accrued as a related
party payable.
SEC
Investigation of Former Officer
With respect to MedQuist Inc.s historical billing
practices, the SEC pursued civil litigation against MedQuist
Inc.s former chief financial officer, whose employment
ended in July 2004. Pursuant to its bylaws, MedQuist Inc. had
been providing indemnification for the legal fees for its former
chief financial officer. In February 2011, MedQuist Inc. reached
a settlement under which its former chief financial officer
released MedQuist Inc. from its indemnification obligations to
him upon his settlement of the litigation with the SEC and
MedQuist Inc.s payment to him of a negotiated amount. The
former chief financial officer settled the SEC litigation and
MedQuist Inc. made its settlement payment to him in May 2011.
This settles the last remaining contingency related to the
MedQuist Inc. billing practices.
Other
Litigation
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings or
regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary course of our
business. We are not currently a party to any material legal
proceedings that we believe would likely have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. See Note 11 to our unaudited consolidated financial
statements for the period ended June 30, 2011 included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Properties
We lease 35 facilities in the U.S. and India representing
approximately 694,295 square feet including our
administrative headquarters for our United States operations,
which is located in an approximately 48,000 square foot
facility in Franklin, Tennessee and our sales, administrative
and research and development office, which is located in an
approximately 19,500 square foot facility in Norcross,
Georgia.
109
MedQuist Inc.
Business
Overview
MedQuist Inc. is a leading provider of integrated clinical
documentation solutions for the U.S. healthcare system.
MedQuist Inc.s
end-to-end
solutions convert the Physician Narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
automated speech recognition (ASR), medical transcription and
editing, workflow automation, and document management and
distribution to deliver a complete managed service for MedQuist
Inc.s customers. MedQuist Inc.s solutions enable
hospitals, clinics, and physician practices to improve the
quality of clinical data as well as accelerate and automate the
documentation process, and MedQuist Inc. believes its solutions
improve physician productivity and satisfaction, enhance revenue
cycle performance, and facilitate the adoption and use of
electronic health records.
MedQuist Inc. is the largest provider by revenue of clinical
documentation solutions based on the Physician Narrative in the
United States. The majority of lines MedQuist Inc. processes are
edited or transcribed by its approximately 5,600 medical
transcriptionists (MTs) and medical editors (MEs). MedQuist
Inc.s size allows it to handle the clinical documentation
requirements of many of the largest and most complex healthcare
delivery networks in the United States, provides it with
economies of scale, and enables it to devote significantly more
resources to enhancing its solutions through research and
development than most of its competitors.
MedQuist Inc. serves a large number of hospital and physician
practices and the majority of the work is recurring.
MedQuist Inc. has realized significant increases in both revenue
and profitability as the result of the acquisition of Spheris
Inc. (Spheris), which it acquired in April 2010 as well as
benefits realized from its scalable business model. From 2008 to
2010, MedQuist Inc.s net revenue increased from
$326.9 million to $375.2 million.
MedQuist Inc.
competitive strengths
MedQuist Inc.s competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Leader in a large, fragmented market MedQuist
Inc. is the largest provider by revenue of clinical
documentation solutions based on the Physician Narrative in the
United States. MedQuist Inc.s size enables it to meet the
needs of large, sophisticated healthcare customers, provides
economies of scale, and enables it to devote significantly more
resources to research and development and quality assurance than
many other providers.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Integrated solutions delivered as a complete managed
service MedQuist Inc. offers fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services that capture and convert the Physician
Narrative into a high quality customized electronic record.
MedQuist Inc. integrates technologies and services for voice
capture and transmission, ASR, medical transcription and
editing, workflow automation, and document management and
distribution. The end result is value-added clinical
documentation with high accuracy and quick turn-around times.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Large and diversified customer base with long-term
relationships MedQuist Inc. serves a large
number of hospital and physician practices and the majority of
the work is recurring.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Highly-efficient operating model Over the
past two years, MedQuist Inc. has driven down its cost structure
through leveraging its scalable infrastructure, standardizing
processes, and increased utilization of ASR. MedQuist
Inc.s use of ASR, which has grown from 39% of its volume
in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 76% in the fourth quarter of
2010, has increased its productivity. Additionally, its
expanding footprint in India through its relationship with
MedQuist Holdings Inc.s wholly owned subsidiary, CBay
Systems and Services, Inc., its principal offshore labor
provider has enabled MedQuist Inc. to increase its offshore
production from 28% of its volume to 34% over this same period.
The financial impact of these measures has been an improvement
in gross margins during this timeframe from 34% to 36%.
|
110
|
|
|
|
n
|
Proven management team MedQuist Inc. has
assembled an outstanding senior leadership team with significant
industry experience and domain expertise in both domestic and
offshore operations. Its management team has delivered
substantial results and brings an entrepreneurial spirit with
proven experience in managing growth, driving operational
improvements, and successfully integrating acquisitions.
|
MedQuist
Inc.s strategy
Key elements of MedQuist Inc.s strategy include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expand its customer base and increase existing customer
penetration MedQuist Inc. intends to grow its
customer base by targeting three market segments: large
healthcare providers still using in-house services, large
healthcare providers currently using competing outsourced
alternatives, and small to medium sized hospitals and physician
practices. Given its market leadership, strong solution
offerings, and low cost structure, MedQuist Inc. believes it is
well positioned to both replace in-house solutions as well as
displace competing outsourced alternatives for large healthcare
providers. In order to increase penetration within its existing
customer base, MedQuist Inc. intends to continue targeting
additional healthcare clinical areas and facilities of its
current customers. Additionally, as healthcare providers
centralize their purchasing decisions, MedQuist Inc. believes
that its ability to deliver outstanding services for large,
complex requirements provides it with increasing access to new
sales opportunities within its existing customer base and
through existing customer relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Continue to develop and enhance its integrated
solutions MedQuist Inc. seeks to differentiate
its integrated solutions through sophisticated technology and
process improvement. MedQuist Inc. has approximately
90 employees dedicated to research and development. Over
the last year, MedQuist Inc. launched numerous enhancements,
including a front end speech platform for general medicine,
additional EHR system integration, and advanced performance
monitoring.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Enhance profitability through technical and operational
expertise MedQuist Inc. has made significant
improvements in productivity through business process and
infrastructure improvements. Notwithstanding reductions in
customer pricing, MedQuist Inc.s gross margins have
expanded from 32% in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 36% in the
fourth quarter of 2010. Our management team has proven its
ability to implement continuous process improvements and it
intends to further increase offshore production and its use of
technological automation, including ASR, to lower costs and
enhance its profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Facilitate the adoption and promote meaningful use of EHR
systems MedQuist Inc.s integrated
solutions provide a comprehensive, accurate and effective method
to incorporate Physician Narrative into an EHR system. MedQuist
Inc. interfaces with substantially all of the leading EHR
vendors to integrate its clinical documentation solutions and to
help its customers realize the full potential of their EHR
systems through the use of the Physician Narrative. In MedQuist
Inc.s experience, when EHR is adopted, customers tend to
consolidate their purchase decisions, which benefit MedQuist
Inc. as a leading provider of clinical documentation solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Pursue strategic acquisitions MedQuist Inc.
believes that there are significant opportunities available to
create value through strategic acquisitions. MedQuist Inc.
intends to seek appropriate opportunities to grow its customer
base, enhance or expand its solutions, incorporate synergy
opportunities, and expand its value proposition to its customers.
|
111
MedQuist
Inc.s solutions
Clinical
documentation solutions for healthcare providers
MedQuist Inc. provides enterprise-class solutions for healthcare
providers ranging from fully-integrated
end-to-end
managed services to stand-alone offerings. These solutions
represent the large majority of MedQuist Inc.s revenues.
MedQuist Inc.s solutions enable its customers to easily
access advanced technologies with confidence that their clinical
documentation requirements will be completed accurately and
quickly. MedQuist Inc.s industry-leading solutions
integrate voice capture and transmission, ASR,
transcription/editing services, workflow management, and
document management and distribution capabilities. In addition,
MedQuist Inc. has coding technology and services to complement
its clinical documentation offerings which enhance and improve
the revenue cycle.
With proprietary and licensed technologies, MedQuist Inc.
enables its customers to efficiently manage their
narrative-based documentation through customizable workflows. A
typical workflow includes the following steps:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Capture As the first step in a workflow
process, users can dictate into one of several input devices,
including a variety of handheld dictation devices, Smartphone
applications, proprietary handsets, standard telephones, or
PC-based dictation stations. Users can also use PC-based speech
recognition applications for those who prefer to edit their own
files in real-time. By supporting a wide array of capture
methods, MedQuist Inc. provides true choice to its customers to
decide which workflow best suits their needs. Users can change
as needed from real-time to batch-based workflows to maximize
their productivity.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Manage Captured voice files are merged with
patient information from MedQuist Inc.s customers
information systems and EHRs where they are loaded into MedQuist
Inc.s enterprise platform for processing. The platform
balances production resources across both in-house and
outsourced personnel, and its web-based management capabilities
allow administrators to easily manage workflows from anywhere at
any time. MedQuist Inc. generates draft reports using speech
recognition technology which are reviewed by MedQuist
Inc.s Medical Editors (MEs). MedQuist Inc. can also use
conventional
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
transcription services from MedQuist Inc.s Medical
Transcriptionists (MTs). To maintain high quality and
efficiency, MedQuist Inc.s platform automatically matches
voice files from various specialties and acuity levels to the
MTs or MEs with the appropriate skill sets. It also includes
random quality checks to give timely feedback to MedQuist
Inc.s personnel. Turn-around time is an important metric
for MedQuist Inc.s customers, and so the system optimizes
processing to ensure it fulfills MedQuist Inc.s contracted
service level agreements, which typically range from one hour to
48 hours. In addition, the platform provides real-time
access for MedQuist Inc.s customers to not only see into
their work moving through the system, but provides dashboard
metrics and reporting to help manage their enterprises.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Analyze Completed reports are routed back to
physicians or other healthcare professionals for review, final
editing (as required), and authentication. These reports are
then available to drive additional value added services, such as
coding, data abstraction for analytics, measures reporting, and
billing services. MedQuist Inc. provides customers with
sophisticated reporting capabilities and integrated electronic
signature solutions to simplify and accelerate the review of
their clinical reports. MedQuist Inc. uses
Quantifytm,
its patent-pending natural language processing technology, to
convert final reports into structured documentation formats.
This technology allows MedQuist Inc. to scan health records for
information needed by the customer to fulfill their regulatory
and local reporting requirements. Healthcare entities are
required to report the meaningful use of their EHRs by reporting
on defined quality measures set down by the government. Using
the CAA tool, customers can extract this information for these
quality measures to make sure the reporting is complete and
reduce the time and expense that associated with a manual
abstraction process. It can take as much as 40 minutes to
manually abstract a single medical record. CAA technology can
dramatically reduce this time and improve the accuracy of the
information reported. CAA can also be used, based on a set of
rules, to deliver information to the customer for Clinical
Documentation Improvement initiatives (CDI). In this case, the
tool can tell the customer when a healthcare worker has not
documented something needed to support measures reporting and
reimbursement. Finally, this technology can also be used to
structure documentation in the health record for use in
populating EHRs and for data analysis. In this case, the
unstructured transcribed text can be structured and parsed into
the information that can be populated into the customers
EHR systems at a discrete level. This allows the vital
information located in the narrative part of the
physicians documentation to be used in the EHR to support
continuity of medical care and provide again for measures
reporting and reimbursement needs.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Distribute After being approved by the
physician, electronic records are distributed. MedQuist Inc.
provides a fully featured distribution solution for printing,
faxing and electronic distribution to referring physicians.
MedQuist Inc. has developed thousands of interfaces with major,
mid-level and proprietary hospital information systems,
radiology information systems, health information repositories
and EHR systems. MedQuist Inc.s solution supports HL7 and
XML-based formats which further allows MedQuist Inc. to meet the
needs of each individual customer. Throughout the entire
workflow, MedQuist Inc.s managed service platform
maintains security measures and audit trails in full compliance
with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA) privacy and security standards and regulations and
the protection of the confidentiality of patient information.
|
In delivering these customized workflows, MedQuist Inc. offers a
variety of software products. These can work either as
stand-alone solutions or as integrated solutions with MedQuist
Inc.s other managed services. These solutions include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
DocQment Enterprise Platform (DEP) MedQuist
Inc.s core platform provides a powerful and flexible
transcription solution that integrates the process of dictation,
transcription, speech recognition, editing, and document
delivery into a unified clinical information management
workflow. MedQuist Inc. offers the platform typically as a
managed service. For those customers that prefer to use their
own services, MedQuist Inc. also offers it on a license basis.
MedQuist Inc.s platform provides a high performance and
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
highly customizable clinical documentation workflow. It
integrates with every major hospital system vendor, such as
Epic, Cerner, and Meditech, and MedQuist Inc. developed
thousands of interfaces with customer systems.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
SpeechQ MedQuist Inc.s front-end speech
recognition family of solutions enables physicians to dictate,
edit, and sign their reports in real-time. With workflows
customized for numerous medical practices, such as radiology and
general medicine, SpeechQ offers
end-to-end
workflows that combine voice commands and dictation. SpeechQ
integrates with MedQuist Inc.s enterprise platform in
scenarios where a physician prefers to send text to its editors
for review. It interfaces with EHRs and other healthcare systems
to allow patient demographic information to be automatically
populated, updated, and distributed in real-time. MedQuist
Inc.s newest SpeechQ offering, SpeechQDirect can
voice-enable customer EHRs to drive greater adoption, which will
assist them in realizing incentive funds from the government for
that adoption. Healthcare providers can now use their voice in
addition to keyboard and mouse to seamlessly interact with their
desktop clinical applications, including the dictation of
medical narrative and speech-based navigation within
3rd party applications. Using this solution, providers can
improve documentation efficiency and avoid the trap of
template-based
point-and-click
systems, augmenting discretely captured data with a narrative of
the patients story.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
CodeRunnerCAC MedQuist Inc.s web-based
workflow and workforce management system manages the entire
coding process for its customers. Health records are fed into
the system where natural language processing technology scans
the information and delivers suggested codes to the hospital
coding staff. This allows them to become more accurate, reduce
turnaround time and increase productivity. All of these factors
contribute to increased revenue and improved cash flow by
shortening the revenue cycle and making fewer errors that can
result in denials by payors.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
DocQVoice MedQuist Inc.s web-based
enterprise digital voice capture and transport solution is
deployed at the customers location and integrates with
both MedQuist Inc.s enterprise platform and legacy
dictation systems.
|
Selling and
marketing
MedQuist Inc. employs approximately 100 personnel in its
sales force and account management organization. MedQuist
Inc.s sales force is focused on new customer sales
opportunities including both the conversion of customers that
are using in-house solutions as well as the displacement of
competitive offerings. This sales organization employs
consultative sales techniques to deliver customized programs and
solutions that respond to the customers unique
requirements. MedQuist Inc.s account management
organization is responsible for continuity of its current
customer relationships and the expansion of those relationships
to include additional services, facilities, or work types.
MedQuist Inc. complements its sales efforts with numerous
marketing initiatives, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
attending and sponsoring industry trade shows of national
organizations, such as the American Health Information
Management Association, Healthcare Information and Management
Systems Society, Association for Healthcare Documentation
Integrity, Radiological Society of North America, Society for
Imaging Informatics in Medicine, and Medical Transcription
Industry Alliance;
|
|
n
|
participating in work groups and leadership committees of the
industry associations; and
|
|
n
|
advertising in trade journals related to our industry.
|
114
Operations
MedQuist Inc. serves its customers 24 hours a day, seven
days a week with its integrated clinical documentation
solutions. MedQuist Inc. uses ASR in most of its production,
which it complements with skilled, English-speaking MTs and MEs.
Technology
Technology
development
MedQuist Inc. devotes substantial resources to research and
development to ensure that its solutions meet both current and
future customer requirements. As of June 30, 2011, MedQuist
Inc. employed a development staff of approximately
90 employees. MedQuist Inc.s development staff has
expertise in multiple disciplines, including service oriented
architectures, web-based clients, high volume transactional
databases, data warehouses, web services and integration with
third-party systems. MedQuist Inc. also utilizes third party
resources for some specific technologies, such as ASR,
capture-assisted codes, encoders, databases, portal technologies
and reporting. Much of the technology in MedQuist Inc.s
integrated solutions is proprietary. MedQuist Inc.s
development personnel follow a rigorous development methodology
that ensures repeatable, high quality and timely delivery of
solutions.
ASR is a key component of MedQuist Inc.s narrative-based
solutions, and it licenses software for a portion of its ASR
capabilities. MedQuist Inc. dual sources some components of its
ASR technologies.
Technology
operations
MedQuist Inc.s clinical documentation solutions are hosted
by MedQuist Inc. and accessed using high-speed internet
connections or private network connections. MedQuist Inc. has
devoted significant resources to producing software applications
and managed services to meet the functionality and performance
expectations of its customers. MedQuist Inc. uses commercially
available hardware and a combination of proprietary and
commercially-available licensed software to provide its clinical
documentation solutions.
Competition
Because MedQuist Inc. integrates technologies and services, it
competes with companies in a number of different sectors. These
competitors include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
in-house service departments of healthcare providers, which
MedQuist Inc. believes produce the majority of clinical
documentation today based on the Physician Narrative;
|
|
n
|
national medical transcription service providers, such as Focus
Informatics, Inc. (a subsidiary of Nuance Communications, Inc.
(Nuance)), Transcend Services, Inc., and Webmedex, Inc. (a
subsidiary of Nuance);
|
|
n
|
local or regional medical transcription service organizations;
|
|
n
|
ASR software vendors, such as Nuance, which markets ASR as a
means to reduce clinical documentation labor; and
|
|
n
|
EHR software vendors which promote their systems as a
replacement to narrative-based input by using on-screen
templates and drop-down boxes for data entry.
|
Competition for MedQuist Inc.s integrated clinical
documentation solutions is based primarily on the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
n
|
accuracy and timeliness of documentation produced;
|
|
n
|
capacity to handle large volumes and complex workflows;
|
|
n
|
ability to provide fully-integrated
end-to-end
solutions;
|
|
n
|
ease of upgrades and ability to add complementary offerings;
|
|
n
|
physician acceptance and productivity;
|
115
|
|
|
|
n
|
pricing;
|
|
n
|
physician acceptance and productivity;
|
|
n
|
analytics provided to customers;
|
|
n
|
domestic or offshore production capabilities;
|
|
n
|
time to implement for new customers; and
|
|
n
|
financial stability.
|
MedQuist Inc. believes it competes effectively on all of the
above criteria. It provides fully integrated
end-to-end
managed services that translate the Physician Narrative into a
customized electronic record with high accuracy and low
turn-around time. MedQuist Inc. believes that its production
cost structure allows it to offer competitive prices while
continuing to invest in the development of new technologies and
services. MedQuist Inc. has the largest production capacity in
its industry, which it believes strengthens it operational
capabilities and assists it in meeting customer demands for
timely implementation of its solutions for new accounts.
Government
regulation
The provision of clinical documentation solutions is heavily
regulated by federal and state statutes and regulations.
MedQuist Inc. and its healthcare customers must comply with a
variety of requirements, including HIPAA and other restrictions
regarding privacy, confidentiality, and security of health
information.
MedQuist Inc. has structured its operations to comply with HIPAA
and other regulatory and contractual requirements. MedQuist Inc.
has implemented appropriate safeguards related to the access,
use, or disclosure of PHI, to address the privacy and security
of PHI consistent with its regulatory and contractual
requirements. MedQuist Inc. also trains its personnel regarding
HIPAA and other requirements. MedQuist Inc. has made and
continues to make investments in systems to support customer
operations that are regulated by HIPAA and other regulations.
Because these standards are subject to interpretation and
change, MedQuist Inc. cannot predict the future impact of HIPAA
or other regulations on its business and operations.
HIPAA and
HITECH Act
HIPAA establishes a set of national privacy and security
standards for protecting the privacy, confidentiality and
security of PHI. Under HIPAA, health plans, healthcare
clearinghouses, and healthcare providers, together referred to
as covered entities for purposes of HIPAA, and their business
associates must meet certain standards in order to protect
individually identifiable health information. The HITECH Act
which was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of
the ARRA, enhances and strengthens the HIPAA privacy and
security standards and makes certain provisions of HIPAA
applicable to business associates of covered entities.
As part of the operation of MedQuist Inc.s business, its
customers provide it with certain PHI, and MedQuist Inc. is
considered to be a business associate of most of its customers
for purposes of HIPAA. The provisions of HIPAA require MedQuist
Inc.s customers to have agreements in place with it
whereby it is required to appropriately safeguard the PHI
MedQuist Inc. creates or receive on their behalf. As a business
associate, MedQuist Inc. also has statutory and regulatory
obligations under HIPAA. MedQuist Inc. is bound by its business
associate agreements to use and disclose PHI in a manner
consistent with HIPAA in providing services to those covered
entities.
MedQuist Inc. and its customers are also subject to HIPAA
security regulations that require the implementation of certain
administrative, physical and technical safeguards to ensure the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of EPHI. MedQuist
Inc. is required by regulation and contract to protect the
security of EPHI that it creates, receives, maintains or
transmits for its customers consistent with these regulations.
These requirements include implementing administrative, physical
and technical safeguards that reasonably and appropriately
protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of such
EPHI. To comply with these regulatory and contractual
obligations, MedQuist Inc. may have to reorganize processes and
invest in new technologies. On February 17, 2010, MedQuist
Inc. became directly subject to HIPAAs criminal and civil
penalties for any breaches of its privacy and security
obligations.
116
Other
restrictions regarding privacy, confidentiality, and security of
health information
In addition to HIPAA, numerous other state and federal laws
govern the collection, dissemination, use, access to,
confidentiality and security of PHI. In addition, Congress and
some states are considering new laws and regulations that
further protect the privacy and security of medical records or
medical information. In many cases, these state laws are not
preempted by the HIPAA privacy and security standards.
Intellectual
property
MedQuist Inc. relies on a combination of copyright, patent,
trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws,
nondisclosure agreements, license agreements, contractual
provisions and other measures to protect its proprietary rights.
MedQuist Inc. has a number of registered trademarks in the
United States and abroad, including
MedQuist®
and
SpeechQ®.
MedQuist Inc. has common law rights over a number of
unregistered trademarks. MedQuist Inc. also owns a limited
number of United States and foreign patents and patent
applications that relate to its products, processes and
technologies.
MedQuist Inc. dual sources some components of its ASR
technologies.
Nuance
MedQuist Inc. licenses speech recognition and processing
software from Nuance, pursuant to a licensing agreement between
MedQuist Inc. and Nuance (as successor in interest to Philips
Speech Recognition Systems GmbH, a Republic of Austria
corporation, and Philips Speech Processing GmbH, a Republic of
Austria corporation) dated May 22, 2000 (the Back-End
Speech Recognition Licensing Agreement), as amended.
Nuance granted MedQuist Inc. co-ownership rights to and
interests in its SpeechQ product in exchange for a fixed sum,
pursuant to a supply agreement entered into in November 2009.
The supply agreement also provides that MedQuist Inc. receives,
in exchange for periodic fees, the exclusive right in the United
States, Canada and certain Caribbean islands to sell, service
and deliver SpeechQ. MedQuist Inc.s supply agreement with
Nuance expires in June 2015. Upon written notice to Nuance,
MedQuist Inc. has the right to renew the agreement for two
successive terms of five years each on the same terms (except
pricing) and conditions of the agreement then in effect.
MedQuist Inc. also licenses the speech recognition and
processing software used for SpeechQ from Nuance, under a
separate licensing agreement between MedQuist Inc. and Nuance
dated November 10, 2009 (the Front-End Speech
Recognition Licensing Agreement.)
On June 30, 2011, MedQuist Inc. and Nuance entered into a
Fee Agreement (the Nuance Fee Agreement). MedQuist
Inc. agreed to pay Nuance an agreed upon amount, prior to
September 15, 2011, in full satisfaction of MedQuist
Inc.s license fee obligations through June 30, 2015
(the expiration date for the term of the Back-End Speech
Recognition Licensing Agreement and the Front-End Speech
Recognition Licensing Agreement (together with the Back-End
Speech Recognition Licensing Agreement, the Underlying
Agreements), subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in the Nuance Fee Agreement. Under the Back-End Speech
Recognition Licensing Agreement, MedQuist Inc. obtained a
license to use Nuances SpeechMagic speech recognition and
processing software (SpeechMagic) in MedQuist
Inc.s DocQment Enterprise Platform. Under the Front-End
Speech Recognition Licensing Agreement, MedQuist Inc. obtained a
license to use SpeechMagic in MedQuist Inc.s SpeechQ for
Radiology and SpeechQ for General Medicine applications.
MedQuist Inc. also agreed to pay Nuance for one year of
maintenance services to be provided by Nuance to MedQuist Inc.
with respect to the licensed products under the Underlying
Agreements. The maintenance services will automatically renew
for successive one-year terms unless cancelled in writing by
MedQuist Inc. prior to the annual renewal date or the Nuance
Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with its terms.
Finally, pursuant to the Nuance Fee Agreement, specified terms
of the Underlying Agreements will be suspended until
June 30, 2015 or the earlier termination of such terms in
accordance with the Underlying Agreements, including
(i) certain termination rights of Nuance under the
Underlying Agreements, (ii) the requirement that MedQuist
Inc. incorporate a minimum percentage of royalty bearing
licenses of SpeechMagic for use in MedQuist
117
Inc.s front-end speech recognition application (such as
SpeechQ for Radiology and SpeechQ for General Medicine) that
MedQuist Inc. grants to its customers in the United States and
certain other areas pursuant to the Front-End Speech Recognition
Licensing Agreement, (iii) the requirement that MedQuist
Inc. generate a certain minimum percentage of MedQuist
Inc.s transcription that is produced through the use of
back-end speech recognition software (such as MedQuist
Inc.s DocQment Enterprise Platform) using SpeechMagic
pursuant to the Back-End Speech Recognition Licensing Agreement,
and (iv) the requirement that MedQuist Inc. give Nuance a
period of three (3) months to submit a competitive offer
before MedQuist Inc. can replace SpeechMagic in the DocQment
Enterprise Platform. At its option, MedQuist Inc. may extend the
term of either or both of the Underlying Agreements for up to
two additional five-year terms following June 30, 2015.
MultiModal
MedQuist Inc. also licenses speech recognition and processing
software from Multimodal. MedQuist Inc.s principal license
agreement with Multimodal was entered into in March 2010. Under
that licensing agreement, MedQuist Inc. pays Multimodal a
monthly fee in exchange for a fixed number of minutes of
recording. Each minute of recording that exceeds the fixed
number is charged at a specified rate per minute. MedQuist
Inc.s agreement with Multimodal expires in April 2013.
Thereafter, the agreement automatically renews and is extended
for up to seven additional successive one-year periods, unless
MedQuist Inc. notifies Multimodal in writing of its election not
to extend at least sixty days prior to the last day of the term.
MedQuist Inc. is in discussions with Multimodal regarding an
amendment to the license agreement that would modify the
structure of the term of the agreement. As part of that modified
structure, MedQuist Inc. would have the ability to use the
software licensed under the agreement through April 2021. In the
event of a change of control that results in a direct competitor
of Multimodal having, directly or indirectly, a 50% or greater
ownership interest in MedQuist Inc., or 50% or more of the
voting control of MedQuist Inc., or in the event MedQuist Inc.,
through any acquisition of a direct competitor of Multimodal,
begin selling or licensing a software product other than
Multimodals that is directly competitive with such
technology, Multimodal shall have the right to terminate its
agreement with MedQuist Inc.
Employees
As of June 30, 2011, MedQuist Inc. had approximately
6,500 employees in the United States. Most of its employees
are MTs and MEs involved in the production and quality assurance
of clinical documentation.
MedQuist Inc. believes it has good relationships with its
employees. Its employees are not subject to collective
bargaining agreements or union representation.
Legal
Proceedings
MedQuist Inc. has been involved in a number of legal matters,
including customer and shareholder issues and regulatory
investigations. Substantially all of these legal matters have
been resolved.
Shareholder
Settlement
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, two of
MedQuist Inc.s minority shareholders filed class action
complaints in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Burlington
County, Chancery Division, (Court) against MedQuist
Inc., the individual members on MedQuist Inc.s board of
directors and MedQuist Holdings Inc. (Shareholder
Litigation). Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants
breached certain fiduciary duties they owed to MedQuist
Inc.s minority shareholders in connection with the
structuring and disclosure of MedQuist Holdings Inc.s
Registered Exchange Offer under which it acquired additional
shares of MedQuist Inc.s common stock resulting in
MedQuist Holdings Inc. owning approximately 97% of MedQuist
Inc.s issued and outstanding shares.
On March 4, 2011, the parties to the Shareholder Litigation
entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU)
that outlined the material terms of a proposed settlement of the
Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, MedQuist
Holdings Inc. agreed to extend the expiration of the Registered
Exchange Offer and further agreed that if, as a result of the
Registered Exchange Offer, it obtained ownership of at least 90%
of MedQuist
118
Inc.s outstanding common stock it would conduct a
short-form merger under applicable law to acquire the remaining
shares of MedQuist Inc.s common stock that it does not
currently own at the same exchange ratio applicable under the
Registered Exchange Offer. MedQuist Inc. agreed to make certain
supplemental disclosures concerning the Registered Exchange
Offer, which were contained in an amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that it filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. MedQuist Inc.
also agreed to use its best efforts to finalize a stipulation of
settlement (Stipulation of Settlement) and present
it to the Court for preliminary approval within thirty days of
the date of the MOU.
On April 1, 2011, the parties executed the Stipulation of
Settlement that memorialized the terms of the settlement
outlined in the MOU. On this same date, plaintiffs counsel
filed with the Clerk of the Court a Motion for Preliminary
Approval of the Proposed Stipulation of Settlement. The Motion
asked the Court to, among other things, (a) hold a hearing
to address preliminary approval of the Stipulation of
Settlement, (b) certify a class, for purposes of
effectuating the Stipulation of Settlement only, of all our
shareholders (except the named defendants and their families and
affiliates) as of and including the date of the closing of the
short-form merger contemplated under the Stipulation of
Settlement, and (c) schedule a final hearing within
60 days to determine whether the Stipulation of Settlement
is reasonable and fair and should receive final approval.
The Court held a preliminary approval hearing on April 19,
2011 and entered an Order preliminarily approving the settlement
and setting a final approval hearing for June 17, 2011
(Preliminary Approval Order). The Preliminary
Approval Order also required MedQuist Inc. to provide mail and
publication notice of the proposed settlement to all
shareholders of record and established deadlines for objections
to the settlement and for filing briefs in support and in
opposition to the settlement.
On June 17, 2011, following mail and publication notice to
our shareholders, the Court held a fairness hearing on the
settlement. On this date, the Court entered an Order and Final
Judgment (Final Judgment) that, among other things,
(a) certified the settlement class consisting of all our
shareholders (except the named defendants and their families and
affiliates) as of and including the date of the closing of the
short-form merger contemplated under the Stipulation of
Settlement (Settlement Class), (b) found the
terms set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement to be fair and
reasonable and in the best interests of the Settlement Class,
and (c) approved the application for attorneys fees
and costs and awarded plaintiffs counsel $400,000. The
final judgment also dismissed the case with prejudice.
SEC
Investigation of Former Officer
With respect to MedQuist Inc.s historical billing
practices, the SEC pursued civil litigation against its former
chief financial officer, whose employment ended in July 2004.
Pursuant to its bylaws, it had been providing indemnification
for the legal fees for its former chief financial officer. In
February 2011, MedQuist Inc. reached a settlement under which
its former chief financial officer released it from its
indemnification obligations to him upon his settlement of the
litigation with the SEC and MedQuist Inc.s payment to him
of a negotiated amount. The former chief financial officer
settled the SEC litigation and MedQuist Inc. made its settlement
payment to him in May 2011. This settled the last remaining
contingency related to MedQuist Inc.s billing practices.
Other
Litigation
From time to time, MedQuist Inc. is involved in legal
proceedings or regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary
course of our business. MedQuist Inc. is not currently a party
to any material legal proceedings that it believes would likely
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
Properties
MedQuist Inc. leases its administrative headquarters, which is
located in an approximately 48,000 square foot facility in
Franklin, Tennessee and MedQuist Inc.s sales,
administrative and research and development office, which is
located in an approximately 19,500 square foot facility in
Norcross, Georgia.
119
Management
Identification of
Our Directors and Executive Officers
Our business, property and affairs are managed by, or under the
direction of, our board of directors. Each director holds office
until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his
earlier resignation or removal. Set forth below is the
biographical information for each of our directors and executive
officers, including age, business experience for the last five
years, any public company directorships held during the last
five years, memberships on committees of our board of directors
and the date when each director first became a member of our
board of directors. We are not aware of any arrangements or
understandings between any of the individuals listed below and
any other person pursuant to which such individual was or is to
be selected as a director or executive officer, other than any
arrangements or understandings with our directors and executive
officers acting solely in their capacities as such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Roger L. Davenport
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MedQuist Holdings Inc.
and MedQuist Inc.
|
Michael F. Clark
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Co-Chief Operating Officer of MedQuist Inc.
|
Michael Finke
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
President of MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
Juergen Fritsch
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Scientist of MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
Detlef Koll
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer of MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
Ronald L. Scarboro
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist
Inc.
|
Mark R. Sullivan
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc.
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Chief
Executive Officer of CBay India
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank Baker
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Director
|
Peter Berger
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Merle Gilmore
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
Jeffrey Hendren
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director
|
Kenneth John McLachlan
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
James Patrick Nolan
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
Roger L.
Davenport, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Davenport has served as the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc.
since July 2011 and prior to that he served as special senior
strategic advisor to the Chairman of Quintiles Transnational
Corp., a bio and pharmaceutical services provider offering
clinical, commercial, consulting and capital solutions, from
February 2011 to June 2011. From October 2008 to November 2010,
Mr. Davenport was President, Payer and Public Sectors, of
Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc., a provider of
clinical software, services, information and connectivity
solutions. In this role, Mr. Davenport focused on payer
provider integration and State Medicaid transformations. From
February 2007 until October 2008, Mr. Davenport was Chief
Executive Officer of Misys Healthcare Systems, LLC , a
healthcare software and services company, and led the strategic
merger of Misys and Allscripts. Mr. Davenport has a broad
range of experience across the entire healthcare information
technology spectrum including radiology, modalities and software
technology. He has served as an executive for companies such as
IBM, Shared Medical Systems, Kodak and Siemens Medical
Solutions. He earned a bachelors degree and an MBA from
East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina.
120
Michael F. Clark,
Co-Chief Operating Officer of MedQuist Inc.
Mr. Clark has served as MedQuist Inc.s Co-Chief
Operating Officer since June 2009 and prior to that he served as
MedQuist Inc.s Chief Operating Officer from June 2009 to
June 2010. From February 2005 to June 2009, Mr. Clark
served as MedQuist Inc.s Senior Vice President of
Operations. From November 2003 until February 2005,
Mr. Clark served as MedQuist Inc.s Senior Vice
President of Operations for its Western Division. From May 2002
until November 2003, Mr. Clark served as MedQuist
Inc.s Vice President of Operations for its Southwest
Division and from January 1998 until July 2000, he served as
MedQuist Inc.s Region Vice President for the Southeast.
Mr. Clark joined MedQuist Inc. in 1998 through MedQuist
Inc.s acquisition of MRC Group, where he served as Vice
President, Marketing and Corporate Services. From May 2001 until
May 2002, Mr. Clark also served as Chief Operating Officer
for eScribe, a firm that outsources the HIM function in
hospitals. Mr. Clark has a B.S. in Marketing and
International Business from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio and
an M.B.A. from the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida.
Michael Finke,
President
Mr. Finke has served as the President of MedQuist Holdings
Inc. since August 2011. Mr. Finke co-founded MultiModal
Technologies, Inc. in 2001 and served as its Chairman and CEO
from 2001 until August 2011, when MedQuist Holdings Inc.
acquired MultiModal Technologies, Inc. Prior to MultiModal
Technologies, Inc., Mr. Finke served as Chief Technology
Officer and a Co-Founder of Interactive Systems, Inc. and has
held positions at IBM, the University of Karlsruhe and Carnegie
Mellon University. Mr. Finke earned his B.Eng. and M.Eng.
degrees in computer science from the University of Karlsruhe.
Juergen Fritsch,
Chief Scientist
Dr. Fritsch has served at the Chief Scientist of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. since August 2011. Dr. Fritsch co-founded
MultiModal Technologies, Inc. in 2001 and served as its Chief
Scientist from 2001 until August 2011, when MedQuist Holdings
Inc. acquired MultiModal Technologies, Inc. Prior to MultiModal
Technologies, Inc., Dr. Fritsch was one of the founders of
Interactive Systems, Inc., where he served as Principal Research
Scientist and was responsible for developing a next generation
medical speech understanding system. Dr. Fritsch held
research positions at the University of Karlsruhe and at
Carnegie Mellon University. He earned his M.Sc. and Ph.D.
degrees in computer science from the University of Karlsruhe.
Detlef Koll,
Chief Technology Officer
Mr. Koll has served at the Chief Technology Officer of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. since August 2011. Mr. Koll
co-founded MultiModal Technologies, Inc. in 2001 and served as
its Chief Technology Officer from 2001 until August 2011, when
MedQuist Holdings Inc. acquired MultiModal Technologies, Inc.
Prior to MultiModal Technologies, Inc., Mr Koll was a Co-Founder
and Vice President for product development for Interactive
Systems, Inc. and served as Director of Speech Recognition
Research at Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products. He has
held research positions at Carnegie Mellon University and
Advanced Telecommunications Research Laboratories in Kyoto,
Japan. Mr. Koll earned his B.Eng. and M.Eng. degrees in
computer science from the University of Karlsruhe.
Ronald L.
Scarboro, Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Scarboro has served as the Chief Financial Officer of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc. since September 2011.
Mr. Scarboro joined the Company on August 15, 2011 as
a senior financial executive. Prior to his tenure with the
Company, Mr. Scarboro, most recently served as the CFO of
the Strategic Diversification at Aetna, Inc., a public
international diversified health care benefits company from June
2011 until August 2011. From October 2008 until June 2011,
Mr. Scarboro held the titles of CFO
Professional Solutions, Senior Vice President of Finance and
Senior Vice President Strategic Programs Office of
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc., a provider of clinical
software, services, information and connectivity solutions. From
November 2007 until the merger of Allscripts and Misys
Healthcare Systems, LLC in October 2008, Mr. Scarboro was
Chief Financial Officer of Misys Healthcare Systems, LLC, an
ambulatory and post-acute healthcare software and services
121
company. From April 2004 until October 2007, Mr. Scarboro
was Vice President of Financial Accounting and Corporate
Services for The TriZetto Group, Inc., a public payer focused
healthcare software and services company. Mr. Scarboro has
a broad range of financial and operating experience in payer,
acute, post-acute and ambulatory healthcare information
technology companies. He earned a bachelors degree from
North Carolina State University and is a Certified Public
Accountant.
Mark R. Sullivan,
General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and
Secretary
Mr. Sullivan has served as our General Counsel, Chief
Compliance Officer and Secretary since March 2011. He has also
served as MedQuist Inc.s General Counsel since September
2006, Chief Compliance Officer since July 2006 and Secretary
since January 2005. From August 2004 until September 2006,
Mr. Sullivan served as the Acting General Counsel of
MedQuist Inc. Between March 2003 and August 2004,
Mr. Sullivan served as Associate General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary of MedQuist Inc. Prior to joining MedQuist
Inc., Mr. Sullivan was in private practice with Pepper
Hamilton LLP from January 2000 until March 2003, and Drinker
Biddle & Reath LLP from August 1998 to January 2000.
Mr. Sullivan has a B.A. in History from the University of
Pennsylvania and is a graduate of the Rutgers University School
of Law.
V. Raman Kumar,
Vice Chairman and Director of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Chief
Executive Officer of CBay India
Mr. Kumar is our co-founder and serves as a director. He
has served as our Vice Chairman since February 2007 and, from
February 2007 to October 2010, was also our Chief Executive
Officer. He has also served as an Executive Partner, a senior
operating consulting role, to Siris Capital Group, LLC since
March 2011. He has also served as the President of CBay Inc.
since December 2008, as Chairman & President of CBay
Systems & Services Inc. since April 2010 and as
Executive Chairman & Chief Executive of CBay Systems
(India) Private Limited since July 2010. Prior to his current
position at CBay Systems (India) Private Limited, Mr. Kumar
served as its Chairman & Managing Director from
October 2005 to July 2010. Prior to our founding in 1997, he
worked as a Senior Vice President (International Trade Finance
and Marketing) at the Essar Group, a multinational conglomerate.
Mr. Kumar also currently serves on the board of directors
of CBay Inc., CBay Systems & Services Inc. as well as
several other of our subsidiaries. Mr. Kumar has a BA
(Honors) and Masters Degree in History from St. Stephenss
College, New Delhi, India.
Robert Aquilina,
Director
Mr. Aquilina serves as a director. He served as our
Executive Chairman from August 2008 to July 2011 and as Chief
Executive Officer from October 2010 to March 2011.
Mr. Aquilina also served as chairman of the MedQuist Inc.
board of directors and a member of its compensation committee
from August 2008 to July 2011. Mr. Aquilina has served as
an Executive Partner, a senior operating consultant role, to
Siris Capital Group, LLC since March 2011 and to S.A.C. Private
Capital Group, LLC (SAC PCG) from 2007 to March 2011.
Previously, he served as an Industrial Partner at Ripplewood
Holdings LLC (Ripplewood), held the role of Co-Chairman of Flag
Telecom Group Ltd. and was a board member of Japan Telecom Inc.
Prior to these positions, Mr. Aquilina was a senior
operating executive of AT&T, Inc. with a
21-year
career. His last post at AT&T was as Co-President of
AT&T Consumer Services and a member of the Chairmans
Operating Group. Previously within AT&T, Mr. Aquilina
held a variety of senior positions including President of
Europe, Middle East & Africa, Vice Chairman of
AT&T Unisource, Vice Chairman of WorldPartners, Chairman of
AT&T-UK, and General Manager of Global Data Services.
Mr. Aquilina holds an M.B.A. from The University of Chicago
and a Bachelors of Engineering degree from The Cooper Union for
the Advancement of Science & Art in New York (Cooper
Union). Mr. Aquilina has been a Member of Cooper
Unions Board of Trustees since 2000 and is currently
chairing Cooper Unions audit committee.
122
Frank Baker,
Director
Mr. Baker has served as a director since August 2008.
Mr. Baker currently serves as the chairman of our
compensation committee and as a member of our nomination and
corporate governance committee. He has also served as a
non-executive director of MedQuist Inc since August 2008 and
currently serves as a member of the MedQuist Inc. compensation
committee and nominating committee. Mr. Baker is a Managing
Director and co-founder of Siris Capital Group, LLC, which was
established in March 2011. Mr. Baker was also a co-founder
of SAC PCG and was a Managing Director of SAC PCG from 2007 to
March 2011. From 1999 to 2006, Mr. Baker was at Ripplewood,
a New York based private equity firm, and RHJ International, a
financial services company incorporated under the laws of
Belgium, where he was responsible for making various private
equity investments. Prior to joining Ripplewood, Mr. Baker
spent over three years in investment banking as an Associate at
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. in its Capital Markets Group
and as an Analyst at Goldman, Sachs & Co. in its
mergers and acquisitions department. Mr. Baker also
currently serves as director of Cosmos Bank, Taiwan.
Mr. Baker has a B.A. in Economics from the University of
Chicago and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Peter Berger,
Director
Mr. Berger has served as a director since August 2008.
Mr. Berger currently serves as a member of our audit
committee. He has also served as a non-executive director of
MedQuist Inc. since August 2008 and currently serves as a member
of its compensation committee and the chairman of its audit
committee and nominating committee. Mr. Berger is a
Managing Director and co-founder of Siris Capital Group, LLC,
which was established in March 2011. Mr. Berger was also a
co-founder of SAC PCG and was a Managing Director of SAC PCG
from 2007 to March 2011. From 1995 to 1998 and 2000 to 2006,
Mr. Berger was a founding member of Ripplewood, a New York
based private equity firm, and served as both a Managing
Director of Ripplewood and as a Special Senior Advisor to the
Board of RHJ International, a financial services company
incorporated under the laws of Belgium. From 1999 to 2000,
Mr. Berger served as Managing Director and Chief Executive
Officer of Mediacom Ventures LLC, a boutique investment advisory
firm. From 1989 to 1991, he served as a Managing Director in
investment banking at Bear Stearns Companies. Prior to this,
Mr. Berger was a senior partner and global head of the
Corporate Finance Group at Arthur Andersen & Co.,
where he began his career in 1974. He also served as
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Kepner-Tregoe, Inc., a
management consulting company. Mr. Berger also currently
serves as director of Cosmos Bank, Taiwan. Mr. Berger has a
B.Sc. from Boston University and an M.B.A. from Columbia
University Graduate School of Business.
Merle L. Gilmore,
Director
Mr. Gilmore, has served as a director since August 2008. He
has been President of LKR Technology Partners, LLC since 2001.
Mr. Gilmore served as an Industrial Partner of Ripplewood
from 2001 to 2008. Mr. Gilmore has also served an Executive
Partner, a senior operating consultant role, to Siris Capital,
LLC since March 2011 and to SAC PCG from 2009 to March 2011.
Mr. Gilmore was a senior executive of Motorola, Inc.,
holding numerous senior management positions including Executive
Vice President and President of the Land Mobile Products Sector
from 1993 to 1997, Executive Vice President and President for
Europe, Middle East and Africa from 1997 to 1998 and Executive
Vice President and President of the Communications Enterprise
from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Gilmore has been a director of
Revenew Systems LLC, a marketing company, since 2006. In April
2010, he was named Chairman of the Board of Airvana Network
Solutions, Inc. He was previously a member of the Proxim Corp.,
Japan Telecom, Inc. and Mediabolic, Inc. boards of directors and
the Chairman of the Board and a representative officer of
D&M Holdings Inc. from 2001 to 2006. Mr. Gilmore
received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University
of Illinois and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Florida
Atlantic University.
Jeffrey Hendren,
Director
Mr. Hendren has served as a director since August 2008 and
as Vice Chairman of Finance since May 2010. Mr. Hendren is
a Managing Director and co-founder of Siris Capital Group, LLC,
which was established in March 2011. He was also a co-founder of
SAC PCG and was a Managing Director of SAC PCG from 2007 to
March 2011. From 1997 to 2007, Mr. Hendren was a Managing
Director at Ripplewood, a New York based private equity firm,
and RHJ International, a financial services company incorporated
under the laws of Belgium, where
123
he was responsible for making various private equity investments
and was also a director of RHJ International, which was publicly
traded on the Brussels Stock Exchange. Before joining Ripplewood
and RHJ International, Mr. Hendren was a member of Goldman,
Sachs & Co.s mergers and acquisitions department
from 1989 to 1997. From 1981 to 1988, Mr. Hendren held
various positions at Georgia Pacific Corp, a manufacturer and
marketer of paper and building products. Mr. Hendren also
currently serves as a director of Cosmos Bank, Taiwan and served
as its acting chairman from February 2009 to December 2009 and
its acting president from March 2009 to December 2009.
Mr. Hendren has a B.Sc. from Indiana University and an
M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Kenneth John
McLachlan, Director
Mr. McLachlan has served as a director since May 2007.
Mr. McLachlan currently serves as the chairman of our audit
committee and as a member of our nomination and corporate
governance committee and our compensation committee. He is the
founder and has been the chairman McLachlan &
Associates, a consulting firm, since January 1992. Prior to
that, he held leadership positions at companies such as
PricewaterhouseCoopers, a consulting firm, Boehringer Mannheim,
a pharmaceuticals company, and Mackie Plc. Mr. McLachlan
has held directorships at various UK international private
companies, including Vitaflo International Ltd. He is a
qualified Chartered Accountant in Scotland and a Registered
Accountant in the Netherlands. He is also a Fellow of the
Institute of Taxation in the UK.
James Patrick
Nolan, Director
Mr. Nolan has served as a director since June 2009.
Mr. Nolan currently serves as a member of our audit
committee, our nomination and corporate governance committee and
our compensation committee. He has been Executive Vice President
at Royal Philips Electronics and Head of Mergers &
Acquisitions since June 2005. From
2000-2005,
Mr. Nolan served as an executive in the Mergers and
Acquisitions department at Royal Phillips Electronics. Prior to
joining Royal Phillips Electronics, Mr. Nolan held merger
and acquisition roles at companies including Credit Commercial
de France, a commercial bank, Coopers & Lybrand
Management Consultants and Rabobank Internations, a financial
services provider. He has held several board positions including
being a board member of Navteq Inc., the worlds leading
digital navigation software company, and SHL Telemedicine Ltd.,
an IT-based healthcare company. Mr. Nolan qualified as a
barrister after graduating in Law from the University of Oxford
in the United Kingdom and has an MBA from INSEAD, France.
There are no family relationships among any of our executive
officers and directors.
Director
qualifications
When determining that each of Messrs. Aquilina, Baker,
Berger, Davenport, Gilmore, Hendren, Kumar, McLachlan and Nolan
is particularly well-suited to serve on our board of directors
and that each individual has the experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable our board of
directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively
in light of our business and structure, we considered the
experience and qualifications described above under
Identification of Our Directors and Executive
Officers. We also noted that, as executive officers,
Messrs. Davenport and Kumar bring a management perspective
to board deliberations and provide valuable information about
the status of our
day-to-day
operations. Additionally, Mr. Kumar is a founder of our
company and has played an integral role in our successful
growth. Our directors contribute the following individual
strengths:
Mr. Davenport: We considered
Mr. Davenports broad range of experience across the
entire healthcare information technology spectrum including
radiology, modalities and software technology and his experience
serving as an executive for various public and private companies.
Mr. Kumar: We considered
Mr. Kumars unique familiarity with our business,
structure, culture and history as a founder of our business as
well as his extensive management experience and experience
holding directorships at various private companies.
124
Mr. Aquilina: We considered
Mr. Aquilinas experience chairing a board of
directors, in particular, that of our majority owned subsidiary,
MedQuist Inc. Mr. Aquilina also brings perspective, having
served on other boards of directors and has extensive
professional experience in engineering.
Mr. Baker: We considered
Mr. Bakers extensive financial experience as a
private equity investor and his experience serving on the board
of directors of various public and private companies.
Mr. Berger: We considered
Mr. Bergers extensive financial experience as a
private equity investor and his experience serving on the board
of directors of various public and private companies.
Mr. Gilmore: We considered
Mr. Gilmores engineering background, his experience
as a senior executive of Motorola, Inc. and his experience
serving on the board of directors of various public companies.
Mr. Hendren: We considered
Mr. Hendrens extensive financial experience as a
private equity investor and his experience serving on the board
of directors of various public and private companies.
Mr. McLachlan: We considered
Mr. McLachlans managerial and entrepreneurial skills,
his expertise in tax and accounting and his experience serving
on the board of directors of various international private
companies.
Mr. Nolan: We considered
Mr. Nolans significant expertise in mergers and
acquisitions and his experience with the software and healthcare
industries.
Board of
directors
Our business, property and affairs are managed by, or under the
direction of, our board of directors, which currently consists
of 9 directors. Messrs. McLachlan and Nolan are
independent directors under the Corporate Governance Standards
of NASDAQ and the independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act. Within twelve months of our common
stock listing on NASDAQ, we expect that a majority of our board
members will be independent as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3(b)(i)
under the Exchange Act and in The NASDAQ Listing
Rule 5605(a)(2).
Committees of the
board
Our board currently includes an audit committee, a compensation
committee and a nomination and corporate governance committee.
Audit
Committee
The audit committee oversees our corporate accounting and
financial reporting process. The responsibilities of the audit
committee, which are set forth in a written charter adopted by
our board of directors and available on our website at
www.medquist.com, include:
|
|
|
|
n
|
review and assess the adequacy of the audit committee charter at
least annually;
|
|
n
|
evaluate, determine the selection of, and if necessary, the
replacement/rotation of, our independent registered public
accounting firm;
|
|
n
|
ensure timely rotation of lead and concurring audit partner of
our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
n
|
review our annual audited consolidated financial statements as
well as our quarterly consolidated financial statements which
are not audited;
|
|
n
|
review whether interim accounting policies and significant
events or changes in accounting estimates were considered by our
independent registered public accounting firm to have affected
the quality of our financial reporting;
|
|
n
|
discuss with the independent registered public accounting firm
certain matters required to be discussed relating to the conduct
of our audits;
|
125
|
|
|
|
n
|
discuss with management and the independent registered public
accounting firm significant regulatory and financial reporting
issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of
our financial statements;
|
|
n
|
review with management and our independent registered public
accounting firm their judgments about the quality of disclosures
in our consolidated financial statements;
|
|
n
|
review and discuss the reports prepared by the internal auditor
and managements responses to such reports;
|
|
n
|
obtain from our independent registered public accounting firm
its recommendation regarding our internal control over financial
reporting and review and discuss with the internal auditor and
the independent registered public accounting firm
managements report on its assessment of the design and
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting;
|
|
n
|
review our major financial risk exposures;
|
|
n
|
pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services and
related fees;
|
|
n
|
establish, update periodically and monitor compliance with our
code of business conduct and ethics;
|
|
n
|
establish and review policies for approving related party
transactions between us and our directors, officers or
employees; and
|
|
n
|
adopt procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of
complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters.
|
Our audit committee currently consists of Messrs. McLachlan
(Chairman), Nolan and Berger. Our board of directors has
determined that Messrs. McLachlan and Nolan qualify as
independent directors under the corporate governance standards
of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ) and the independence
requirements of
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act. By February 2012, we expect to have a
third independent member so that all of our audit committee
members will be independent as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3(b)(i)
under the Exchange Act and in NASDAQ Listing
Rule 5605(a)(2). Our board of directors has determined that
Mr. McLachlan qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert as that term is defined in
Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K.
Compensation
Committee
The compensation committee assists our board in discharging its
responsibilities relating to (1) setting our compensation
program and compensation of our executive officers and directors
and (2) monitoring our incentive and equity-based
compensation plans. The responsibilities of the compensation
committee are set forth in a written charter adopted by our
board of directors which is available on our website at
www.medquist.com.
Our compensation committee currently consists of
Messrs. Baker, McLachlan and Nolan. Messrs. McLachlan
and Nolan qualify as independent directors under the corporate
governance standards of NASDAQ. By February 2012, we expect to
have a third independent member so that all of our compensation
committee members will be independent as such term is defined in
NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2).
Nomination and
Corporate Governance Committee
The nomination and corporate governance committee assists our
board in discharging its responsibilities relating to
(1) developing and recommending criteria for selecting new
directors and (2) screening and recommending to the board
individuals qualified to become executive officers. The
responsibilities of the nomination and corporate governance
committee are set forth in a written charter adopted by our
board of directors which is available on our website at
www.medquist.com.
Our nomination and corporate governance committee currently
consists of Messrs. Baker, Nolan and McLachlan.
Mr. Messrs. Nolan and McLachlan qualify as independent
directors under the corporate governance standards of NASDAQ. By
February 2012, we expect to have a third independent member so
that all of our nomination and corporate governance committee
members will be independent as such term is defined in NASDAQ
Listing Rule 5605(a)(2).
Generally, our board of directors seeks diverse members who
possess the background, skills and expertise to make a
significant contribution to our board of directors, us and our
stockholders. The nomination and corporate
126
governance committee supports our view that the continuing
service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and
continuity in the board room, contributing to our board of
directors ability to work as a collective body, while
giving us the benefit of the familiarity and insight into our
affairs that our incumbent directors have accumulated during
their tenure.
As the nomination and corporate governance committee evaluates
new candidates, it will review appropriate biographical
information about the proposed candidates considering the
following criteria, among others: personal and professional
integrity, ethics and values; experience in corporate
management, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a
publicly held company; experience in our industry; experience as
a board member of another publicly held company; diversity of
expertise and experience in substantive matters pertaining to
our business relative to other members of our board of
directors; and practical and mature business judgment.
Duties of
directors
Under Delaware law, our directors have a duty of loyalty to act
honestly and in good faith with a view to our best interests.
Our directors also have a duty to exercise the skill they
actually possess and such care and diligence that a reasonably
prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In
fulfilling their duty of care to us, our directors must ensure
compliance with our certificate of incorporation and by-laws. A
stockholder has the right to seek damages if a duty owed by our
directors is breached. You should refer to Description of
Capital Stock for additional information on our standard
corporate governance under Delaware law.
Compensation
committee interlocks and insider participation
The current members of our compensation committee are
Messrs. Baker (Chair), McLachlan and Nolan. We do not
anticipate any interlocking relationships between any member of
our compensation committee and any of our executive officers
that would require disclosure under the applicable rules
promulgated under the federal securities laws. In 2010, other
than Mr. Aquilina, a former member of our compensation
committee, no member of our compensation committee was an
officer or employee of ours. In addition, there are no
compensation committee interlocks between us and other entities
involving our executive officers and our board members who serve
as executive officers of those other entities.
Code of business
conduct and ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics
which applies to all of our directors, officers and other
employees, including our principal executive officer, our
principal financial officer and our principal accounting
officer. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available on
our website at www.medquist.com. Disclosure regarding any
amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of the code of
business conduct and ethics that apply to our directors,
principal executive and financial and accounting officers will
be included in a Current Report on
Form 8-K
within four business days following the date of the amendment or
waiver, unless web site posting of such amendments or waivers is
then permitted by the rules of NASDAQ.
Compensation
discussion and analysis
Named
executive officers
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the following
individuals constitute our named executive officers, or
NEOs:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Robert Aquilina, our former Executive Chairman, former Chief
Executive Officer and a current director;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
V. Raman Kumar, our former Chief Executive Officer and our
current Vice Chairman of the Board;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Clyde Swoger, our former Chief Financial Officer;
|
|
|
n
|
Michael Seedman, our former Chief Technology Officer; and
|
|
|
n
|
Peter Masanotti, former President and Chief Executive Officer of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc.
|
127
Compensation
committee
Our compensation committee currently consists of
Messrs. Baker (Chairman), McLachlan and Nolan. The key
responsibilities of the compensation committee are to consider
and recommend to our board the framework for the compensation of
our executive officers. The compensation committee is also
required to consider and recommend to our board the total
individual compensation package of each employee director and
executive officer, including bonuses, incentive payments and
stock options or other equity and equity-based awards. The
compensation committee is also empowered to review the design of
all equity and equity-based incentive plans and recommend the
approval of such plans to our board. None of the directors votes
on decisions concerning his or her own compensation.
MedQuist Inc.
compensation committee
MedQuist Inc., our majority-owned subsidiary, has a separately
constituted compensation committee composed of
Messrs. Baker and Berger. The key responsibilities of the
compensation committee are to make recommendations to the
MedQuist Inc. board of directors regarding the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the corporate and individual goals and objectives relevant to
the compensation of MedQuist Inc.s executive officers;
|
|
n
|
the evaluation of MedQuist Inc.s corporate performance and
the performance of its executive officers in light of such goals
and objectives; and
|
|
n
|
the compensation of MedQuist Inc.s executive officers
based on such evaluations.
|
Compensation
philosophy
We provide our NEOs with incentives tied to the achievement of
our corporate objectives.
Our compensation committee has established a total compensation
philosophy and structure designed to accomplish the following
objectives:
|
|
|
|
n
|
attract, retain and motivate executives who can thrive in a
competitive environment of continuous change and who can achieve
positive business results in light of challenging circumstances;
|
|
n
|
provide executives with a total compensation package that
recognizes individual contributions, as well as overall business
results; and
|
|
n
|
promote and reward the achievement of objectives that our board
and management believe will lead to long-term growth in
stockholder value.
|
To achieve these objectives, we intend to maintain compensation
arrangements that tie a substantial portion of our NEOs
overall compensation to the achievement of our key strategic,
operational and financial goals or to our individual business
divisions, as applicable.
Role of named
executive officers in setting compensation
Our NEOs do not play a role in their own compensation
determinations, other than discussing their own individual
performance objectives with members of our compensation
committee.
Elements of
compensation
Our executive compensation programs utilize five primary
elements to accomplish the objectives described above:
|
|
|
|
n
|
base salary;
|
|
n
|
annual cash incentives linked to corporate and individual
performance;
|
|
n
|
long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards;
|
|
n
|
severance
and/or
change in control benefits; and
|
|
n
|
perquisites.
|
128
We believe that we can meet the objectives of our executive
compensation program by achieving a balance among these elements
that is competitive with our industry peers and creates
appropriate incentives for our NEOs. Actual compensation levels
are a function of both corporate and individual performance as
described under each compensation element set forth below. In
making compensation determinations, our compensation committee
considers the competitiveness of compensation both in terms of
individual pay elements and the aggregate compensation package
provided to our NEOs. However, we do not engage in any formal
benchmarking or specifically target a percentile of compensation
within any peer groups as a reference point on which to base
compensation decisions for our NEOs.
Base
salary
We provide our NEOs with base salary in the form of fixed cash
compensation to compensate them for services rendered during the
fiscal year. The current salaries for our NEOs (or most recent
salaries for those NEOs that are no longer employed by us) were
negotiated at the time that they were hired and are set forth in
their employment agreements, which were negotiated individually
with each executive. Our compensation committee believes that
the initial salaries of our NEOs were set at levels competitive
with individuals with similar responsibilities in
similarly-sized public companies in the healthcare IT sector.
The base salary of each of our NEOs is reviewed annually by our
compensation committee to determine if any salary adjustments
are appropriate. Generally, in making a determination of whether
to make base salary adjustments, our compensation committee
considers the following factors:
|
|
|
|
n
|
success in meeting our strategic operational and financial goals;
|
|
n
|
an assessment of such executive officers individual
performance; and
|
|
n
|
changes in scope of responsibilities of such executive officer.
|
In addition, our compensation committee considers internal pay
equity within our organization and the aggregate levels of
compensation earned by our NEOs.
None of our NEOs received base salary increases during 2009
since each of them had commenced employment in the second half
of 2008 in accordance with newly negotiated employment
arrangements. In addition, no base salary adjustments for our
NEOs were made for 2010 or 2011 in light of the difficult
economic climate and because it was determined that the salaries
were sufficient to retain and incentivize our executives. The
current or most recent, as the case may be, base salaries of our
NEOs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Annual base
|
|
Name
|
|
salary rate ($)
|
|
|
Robert
Aquilina (1)
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
V. Raman
Kumar (2)
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Clyde
Swoger (3)
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Michael
Seedman (4)
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
Peter
Masanotti (5)
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Aquilina served as our
Chief Executive Officer from October 2010 to March 16, 2011
and as our Chairman through July 11, 2011.
Mr. Aquilina separated employment with us, effective as of
the close of business on June 30, 2011 and thereafter
continued to serve as the non-executive chairman on our board of
directors until July 11, 2011. Mr. Aquilina continues
to serve as a director on our board.
|
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Kumar served as our Chief
Executive Officer from February 2007 to October 2010. He
currently serves as our Vice Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of CBay India.
|
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Swoger served as our Chief
Financial Officer from August 2008 to March 16, 2011. He
remained employed by us until April 1, 2011 to assist with
the transition of responsibilities to our subsequent and now
former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. James.
|
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Seedman served as our
Chief Technology Officer from August 2008 to March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
(5) |
Mr. Masanotti served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 to
July 11, 2011 and he has agreed to provide consulting
services to us until September 30, 2011 to assist with the
transition of responsibilities to our current Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Masanotti served as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer from September 2008 through July 11, 2011
and as Medquist Inc.s President from November 2008 through
July 11, 2011.
|
129
Annual cash
compensation performance-based incentive bonus
program
We believe that performance-based cash incentives play an
essential role to motivate our NEOs to achieve defined annual
goals. The objectives of our annual management incentive plan is
to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
align the interests of executives and senior management with our
strategic plan and critical performance goals;
|
|
n
|
motivate and reward achievement of specific, measurable annual
and corporate performance objectives;
|
|
n
|
provide payouts commensurate with corporate performance;
|
|
n
|
provide our compensation committee with the discretion to pay an
incentive for effective individual performance;
|
|
n
|
provide competitive total compensation opportunities; and
|
|
n
|
enable us to attract, motivate and retain talented executive
management.
|
Our incentive bonus plans are designed to reward our executives
for the achievement of pre-established annual financial targets
and for personal performance. The financial objectives are
established for each individual NEO based upon the scope of his
responsibility. Specifically, Messrs. Aquilina, Kumar,
Swoger and Seedmans 2010 bonuses were based upon our
consolidated performance (including MedQuist Inc.), and
Mr. Masanottis 2010 bonus was based upon the
performance of MedQuist Inc. alone.
2010 incentive
plans
Each of our NEOs was eligible to earn an annual bonus up to
either a predetermined dollar amount or a percentage of such
executives base salary, as set forth in each NEOs
employment agreement. Our NEOs are eligible to earn their annual
bonus based upon the achievement of target performance
objectives under our 2010 Incentive Plan and, for
Mr. Masanotti, under the MedQuist Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan
(together with our 2010 Incentive Plan, the 2010
Plans), as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
bonus for
|
|
Executive
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Robert
Aquilina (1)
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
V. Raman
Kumar (2)
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
Clyde
Swoger (3)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Michael
Seedman (4)
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
Peter
Masanotti (5)
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Aquilina served as our
Chief Executive Officer from October 2010 to March 16, 2011
and as our Chairman through July 11, 2011.
Mr. Aquilina separated employment with us, effective as of
the close of business on June 30, 2011 and thereafter
continued to serve as the non-executive chairman on our board of
directors until July 11, 2011. Mr. Aquilina continues
to serve as a director on our board.
|
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Kumar served as our Chief
Executive Officer from February 2007 to October 2010. He
currently serves as our Vice Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of CBay India.
|
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Swoger served as our Chief
Financial Officer from August 2008 to March 16, 2011. He
remained employed by us until April 1, 2011 to assist with
the transition of responsibilities to our subsequent and now
former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. James.
|
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Seedman served as our
Chief Technology Officer from August 2008 to March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
(5) |
Mr. Masanotti served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 to
July 11, 2011 and he has agreed to provide consulting
services to us until September 30, 2011 to assist with the
transition of responsibilities to our current Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Masanotti served as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer from September 2008 through July 11, 2011
and as Medquist Inc.s President from November 2008 through
July 11, 2011.
|
Performance
measures
Payments of incentive awards were based on the achievement of a
combination of corporate performance objectives which were
established for each NEO and an assessment of individual
performance toward achievement of such corporate objectives as a
way to communicate and measure our performance expectations and
to maintain and unify our executives focus on our key
strategic objectives. The actual bonus payable for a particular
year is bifurcated into a corporate performance-based element
and a discretionary element based on our Compensation
130
Committees and the MedQuist Inc. compensation
committees subjective assessment of the applicable
NEOs individual performance in relation to the achievement
of pre-established net revenues and adjusted EBITDA goals
established exclusively for the 2010 Plans. For 2010, the
percentage weightings for the corporate and personal objectives
under the 2010 Plans for all of the NEOs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual
|
|
Executives
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
The calculation of the payments of incentive awards for 2010
(which were made on May 3, 2011) was based on the
achievement of a combination of corporate performance objectives
which were established for each NEO, and an assessment of
individual performance toward the achievement of such corporate
objectives.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Our board of
directors and the MedQuist Inc. board of directors calculated
the Adjusted EBITDA achievement exclusively for the 2010 Plan as
standard EBITDA, adjusted for any item of expense or income that
was non-recurring and unrelated to normal operating activities.
Our board of directors and the MedQuist Inc. board of directors
determined that the levels of Adjusted EBITDA and Net Revenue
Targets established exclusively for the 2010 Plans were achieved
and that each 2010 Plan participant, other than
Messrs. Seedman and Swoger, should receive a payout equal
to the full portion of his Adjusted EBITDA Net Revenue Targets
established exclusively for the 2010 Plans. Our board of
directors and the MedQuist Inc. board of directors, in their
discretion pursuant to the 2010 Plan, determined that in order
to be more aligned with the rest of the senior management team,
Mr. Aquilina, should be paid 80% of his 2010 Plan maximum
incentive amount (which equaled 120% of his salary for 2010);
Mr. Kumar should be paid 80% of his 2010 Plan maximum
incentive amount (which equaled 120% of his salary for 2010);
Mr. Seedman should be paid 32.2% of his 2010 Plan maximum
incentive amount (which equaled 48.3% of his salary for 2010);
and Mr. Masanotti should be paid 78.6% of his 2010 Plan
maximum incentive amount (which equaled 110% of his salary for
2010). Our board of directors exercised its discretion and
determined that Mr. Swoger would not receive a 2010
Incentive Payment. The incentive awards discussed above resulted
in the following payment calculations to our named executive
officers under the 2010 Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
Executives
|
|
Incentive Payment
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
$
|
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
$
|
58,000
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
Equity incentive
awards
Our equity award program is the primary vehicle for offering
long-term incentives to our NEOs. Historically, all of our
equity awards have been in the form of stock options. However,
our board of directors is evaluating the use of alternative
equity vehicles in 2011, and in particular, is considering
moving from grants of stock options to grants of restricted
stock.
In connection with the termination of the MedQuist Inc. Long
Term Incentive Plan, on July 11, 2011 the Company granted
restricted stock awards under the MedQuist Holdings Inc. 2010
Equity Incentive Plan to members of the Companys
management. All of the restricted stock awards granted vest
ratably every calendar quarter over three years. At the date of
the grant 1/12th of the grant was immediately vested. The
shares of
131
restricted stock become fully vested and non-forfeitable on a
termination without cause or a voluntary departure
for good reason (as each term is defined in the
restricted stock award agreement).
We believe that equity-based compensation provides our NEOs with
a direct interest in our long-term performance, creates an
ownership culture and aligns the interests of our NEOs and our
stockholders. Grants of stock options, including those to our
NEOs, are approved by our board and are granted at an exercise
price at or above the fair market value of our common stock on
the date of grant. Options are generally subject to a time-based
vesting schedule, which furthers our objective of employee
retention, as it provides an incentive to our executives to
remain in our employ during the vesting period. Similarly,
MedQuist Inc. implemented its own equity award program to offer
long-term incentives to its executives, including
Mr. Masanotti, who held options granted under a MedQuist
Inc. equity incentive plan.
In connection with the Corporate Reorganization, in July 2011 we
assumed the MedQuist Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan and the
MedQuist Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended (collectively,
the MedQuist Inc. Plans). All options pursuant to
the MedQuist Inc. Plans converted into options to purchase one
share of our common stock at the same exercise price per share
as applicable to such MedQuist Inc. option immediately prior to
our assumption of the MedQuist Inc. Plans. No additional awards
may be granted under the MedQuist Inc. Plans.
Severance and
change in control benefits
In general, the severance benefits we provide to our NEOs are
designed to provide economic protection in order for them to
remain focused on our business without undue personal concern in
the event that an executives position is eliminated or
significantly altered, including in connection with a change in
control. We recognize that circumstances may arise in which we
may consider eliminating certain key positions that are no
longer necessary, including in connection with a change in
control transaction. These benefits are intended to provide the
security needed for the executives to remain focused and reduce
the distraction regarding personal concerns during a transition.
In addition, under the terms of the option awards granted to our
NEOs, all options that are unvested at the time of an
executives termination without cause or resignation for
good reason will automatically vest in full upon such
termination. Additionally, all unvested options will
automatically accelerate in the event of a change of control of
us or MedQuist Inc., as the case may be.
Benefits and
perquisites
We and MedQuist Inc. each maintain broad-based benefits for all
of our respective full-time employees, including health, dental,
life and disability insurance, as well as our 401(k) plan. These
benefits are offered to our NEOs on the same basis as all other
employees, except that we provide, and pay the premiums for,
additional long-term disability and life insurance coverage for
Mr. Masanotti.
Tax and
accounting considerations
We structure our compensation program in a manner that is
consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives.
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) denies a federal
income tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of
$1 million per year paid to the chief executive officer and
the three other most highly-paid executive officers (other than
the chief financial officer) of a publicly-traded corporation.
Certain types of compensation, including compensation based on
performance criteria that are approved in advance by
stockholders, are excluded from the deduction limit. In
addition, grandfather provisions may apply to
certain compensation arrangements that were entered into by a
corporation before it was publicly held. Our policy is to pay
compensation to our executive officers that qualifies for
deductibility for federal income tax purposes to the extent
feasible. However, to retain highly skilled executives and
remain competitive with other employers, our compensation
committee and the MedQuist Inc. compensation committee have the
right to authorize compensation that is not otherwise deductible
under Section 162(m) or otherwise.
We endeavor to design our equity incentive awards in a manner
that will result in equity accounting treatment under applicable
accounting standards.
132
Summary
compensation table for 2010
The following table sets forth summary information concerning
the compensation of our NEOs for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
incentive plan
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
|
awards
|
|
|
compensation(2)
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
Former Chairman and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
175,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,085,263
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Raman Kumar,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
Vice Chairman and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
382,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
882,500
|
|
Director of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Chief Executive Officer
of
CBay
India(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clyde Swoger,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Former Chief Financial
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
518,500
|
|
Officer(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Seedman,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
178,000
|
|
Former Chief Technology
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
$
|
42,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
260,463
|
|
Officer(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Masanotti,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
Former President and Chief Executive
Officer(7)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
192,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The amounts in this column
represent payments made pursuant to the discretionary element of
the 2009 incentive plans and the 2010 Plans.
|
|
|
(2) |
The amounts in this column
represent payments made pursuant to the corporate
performance-based elements of the 2009 incentive plans and the
2010 Plans.
|
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Aquilina served as our
Chief Executive Officer from October 2010 to March 16, 2011
and as our Executive Chairman from August 2008 to June 30,
2011. Mr. Aquilina separated employment with us, effective
as of the close of business on June 30, 2011 and thereafter
continued to serve as the non-executive chairman on our board of
directors until July 11, 2011. Mr. Aquilina continues
to serve as a director on our board.
|
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Kumar served as our Chief
Executive Officer from February 2007 to October 2010. He
currently serves as our Vice Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of CBay India.
|
|
|
(5) |
Mr. Swoger served as our Chief
Financial Officer from August 2008 to March 16, 2011. He
remained employed by us until April 1, 2011 to assist with
the transition of responsibilities to our subsequent and now
former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. James.
|
|
|
(6) |
Mr. Seedman served as our
Chief Technology Officer from August 2008 to March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
(7) |
Mr. Masanotti served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 to
July 11, 2011 and he has agreed to provide consulting
services to us until September 30, 2011 to assist with the
transition of responsibilities to our current Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Masanotti served as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer from September 2008 through July 11, 2011
and as Medquist Inc.s President from November 2008 through
July 11, 2011.
|
Grants of
plan-based awards in fiscal year 2010
The following table sets forth each grant of an award made to
each NEO for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated possible payouts under non-
|
|
|
|
equity incentive plan awards
(1)
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
$
|
421,875
|
|
|
$
|
562,500
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
$
|
393,750
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
$
|
94,500
|
|
|
$
|
108,000
|
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
$
|
393,750
|
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the objective
performance-based element of the awards granted under the 2010
Plans. The material terms of these annual cash incentive awards
are discussed above (see Management Annual
cash compensation performance-based incentive bonus
program).
|
133
Outstanding
equity awards at fiscal year-end
The following table sets forth all outstanding equity awards
held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unexercised options (#)
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
expiration date
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
|
|
|
322,660
|
|
|
|
161,451
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
|
|
|
826,490
|
|
|
|
413,559
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
56,373
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
June 12, 2017
|
|
Clyde Swoger
|
|
|
115,230
|
|
|
|
57,659
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
Michael Seedman
|
|
|
161,323
|
|
|
|
80,721
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
(3)
|
|
|
August 6, 2018
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Masanotti
|
|
|
197,166
|
(4)
|
|
|
98,583
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
(5)
|
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
(1) |
All options to purchase shares of
our common stock granted to each of our NEOs (other than the
option to purchase 56,373 shares issued to Mr. Kumar
and the award to Mr. Masanotti) were issued under the 2007
Plan on August 6, 2008. These options became fully vested
on August 6, 2011.
|
|
|
(2) |
Represents options granted on
June 12, 2007 outside of the 2007 Plan which vested on
June 18, 2007.
|
|
|
(3) |
The option exercise price has been
converted to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate in
effect on January 27, 2011, the last day on which our
common stock was traded on AIM.
|
|
|
(4) |
Represents options to purchase
common stock of MedQuist Inc. granted on September 30, 2008
which vest as to one-third of the shares subject to the option
on the first anniversary of the grant date and one-sixth of the
shares subject to the option vest every six months thereafter,
such that the option will be fully vested the third anniversary
of the grant date.
|
|
|
(5) |
The exercise price of the option
was adjusted to $2.22 per share in December 2010, in accordance
with anti-dilution terms of the option agreement, to account for
the payment of an extraordinary cash dividend to the
shareholders of MedQuist Inc. on each of September 15, 2009
and October 15, 2010.
|
In connection with the Corporate Reorganization, in July 2011 we
assumed the MedQuist Inc. Plans. All options pursuant to the
MedQuist Inc. Plans converted into options to purchase one share
of our common stock at the same exercise price per share as
applicable to such MedQuist Inc. option immediately prior to our
assumption of the MedQuist Inc. Plans. No additional awards may
be granted under the MedQuist Inc. Plans.
Option exercises
and stock vested during last fiscal year
There were no option exercises by any of our NEOs during the
year ended December 31, 2010.
Pension benefits
and non-qualified deferred compensation
None of our NEOs participates in any qualified or non-qualified
defined benefit plan or any non-qualified deferred compensation
plan that provides for payments or other benefits at or in
connection with retirement sponsored by us or by MedQuist Inc.
Executive
employment agreements
Robert
Aquilina
We entered into an employment agreement with Robert Aquilina in
August 2008 pursuant to which Mr. Aquilina previously
served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The term of
the agreement was set to expire on December 31, 2012, but
is automatically extended for additional one year periods unless
notice is provided by either party that the term will not be
extended. Mr. Aquilina ceased serving as our Chairman on
July 11, 2011 and as our Chief Executive Officer on
March 16, 2011.
Mr. Aquilina is also subject to certain restrictive
covenants regarding non-competition, non-interference and
non-solicitation of employees and consultants for a period of
one year following termination of employment and certain
restrictive covenants regarding non-disclosure of confidential
information and intellectual property.
134
Separation
Agreement
On August 2, 2011 we entered into an Agreement and Release
with Mr. Aquilina. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement,
Mr. Aquilina will be entitled to receive cash severance
equal to his annual base salary of $500,000 plus $475,000,
payable in substantially equal installments over a period of
12 months.
In addition, all of Mr. Aquilinas outstanding and
unvested MedQuist Holdings stock options have become vested and
will be exercisable until December 30, 2012 pursuant to an
amendment to his share option agreement, also dated
August 2, 2011, subject to Mr. Aquilinas
continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants.
This agreement provides that Mr. Aquilina will be bound by
the non-competition and non-solicitation covenants set forth in
his employment agreement for a period of 12 months
following his termination of employment. This agreement also
provides that Mr. Aquilina releases us from claims
occurring on or prior to the date of the agreement.
Anthony
James
We entered into an employment agreement with Anthony D. James
dated June 24, 2010. The term of the agreement was set to
expire on June 24, 2013, but would automatically extend for
additional one year periods unless notice was provided by either
party that the term would not be extended. Mr. James ceased
serving as Chief Financial Officer of us and of MedQuist Inc. on
September 2, 2011.
V. Raman
Kumar
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kumar on
August 2, 2008, which was amended and restated as of
December 6, 2010, pursuant to which Mr. Kumar serves
as our Vice-Chairman and previously served as our Chief
Executive Officer. The term of the agreement expires
December 31, 2012, but will be automatically extended for
additional one-year periods unless notice is provided by either
party that the term will not be extended.
Mr. Kumar is subject to the same severance benefits and
subject to the same restrictive covenants as Mr. Aquilina,
as set forth above.
Clyde
Swoger
Employment
Agreement
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Swoger
dated August 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Swoger served as
Chief Financial Officer of us and MedQuist Inc. The term of the
agreement was set to expire December 31, 2012, but would
automatically extend for additional one year periods unless
notice was provided by either party that the term would not be
extended. Mr. Swoger ceased serving as Chief Financial
Officer on March 16, 2011.
Mr. Swoger is subject to the same restrictive covenants as
Mr. Aquilina, as set forth above.
Separation
Agreement
On June 23, 2011, we entered into a separation agreement
and general release with Mr. Swoger. Pursuant to this
agreement, Mr. Swoger is entitled to receive severance
payments in the aggregate amount of $540,000 payable over a
period of 12 months.
In addition, all of Mr. Swogers outstanding and
unvested MedQuist Holdings stock options have become vested and
will be exercisable until December 30, 2012 pursuant to an
amendment to his share option agreement, dated April 13,
2011, subject to Mr. Swogers continued compliance
with certain restrictive covenants.
In addition, the separation agreement provides that
Mr. Swoger will be bound by the non-competition and
non-solicitation covenants set forth in his employment agreement
for a period of 12 months following his termination
135
of employment. The separation agreement also provides that
Mr. Swoger releases us from claims arising or occurring on
or prior to the date of the separation agreement.
Michael
Seedman
Employment
Agreement
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Seedman
dated August 8, 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Seedman
served as Chief Technology Officer of us and MedQuist Inc. The
term of the agreement was set to expire December 31, 2012,
but would automatically extend for additional one year periods
unless notice was provided by either party that the term would
not be extended. Mr. Seedman ceased serving as Chief
Technology Officer on March 31, 2011.
Mr. Seedman is subject to the same restrictive covenants as
Mr. Aquilina, as set forth above.
Separation
Agreement
On August 2, 2011, we entered into a separation agreement
and general release with Mr. Seedman. Pursuant to this
agreement, Mr. Seedman is entitled to receive severance
payments in the aggregate amount of $192,000 payable over a
period of 12 months.
In addition, all of Mr. Seedmans outstanding and
unvested MedQuist Holdings stock options have become vested and
will be exercisable until December 30, 2012 pursuant to an
amendment to his share option agreement, also dated
August 2, 2011, subject to Mr. Seedmans
continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants.
In addition, the separation agreement provides that
Mr. Seedman will be bound by the non-competition and
non-solicitation covenants set forth in his employment agreement
for a period of 12 months following his termination of
employment. The agreement also provides that Mr. Seedman
releases us from claims arising or occurring on or prior to the
date of the separation agreement.
Peter
Masanotti
Employment
Agreement
In connection with his appointment as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer, MedQuist Inc. entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Masanotti, dated as of September 3,
2008, pursuant to which he agreed to serve through
December 31, 2011. The term of the agreement was set to
expire December 31, 2012, but would automatically extend
for additional one year periods unless notice was provided by
either party that the term would not be extended.
Mr. Masanotti separated employment from us and MedQuist
Inc. effective as of the close of business on July 11, 2011.
Mr. Masanotti is subject to certain restrictive covenants
regarding non-competition, non-interference and non-solicitation
of employees and consultants for a period of one year following
termination of employment, and certain restrictive covenants
regarding non-disclosure of confidential information and
intellectual property.
Separation
Agreement
In order to facilitate the smooth transition of our leadership
and to encourage Mr. Masanotti to aid in the transition of
our new Chief Executive Officer, we entered into a formal
Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. Masanotti, the
former President and Chief Executive Officer of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc. Pursuant to the terms of this
agreement, Mr. Masanotti will be entitled to receive
severance payments in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000 over a
period of 12 months.
In addition, this agreement provides that Mr. Masanotti
will be bound by the non-competition and non-solicitation
covenants set forth in his employment agreement for a period of
12 months following his termination of employment. This
agreement also provides that Mr. Masanotti releases us from
claims occurring on or prior to the date of the agreement.
Mr. Masanotti also agrees to make himself available, upon
request, until September 30,
136
2011 to provide consulting services. During the consulting
period, Mr. Masanotti will receive a consulting fee at a
rate of $9,615 per week.
Potential
payments upon termination or change in control
The following provides the total dollar value of the
compensation that would be due to certain of our NEOs upon the
termination of his service with us or upon a change in control
of us or MedQuist Inc., as the case may be. The amounts in the
table below assume that each termination was effective as of
December 31, 2010 and are merely illustrative of the impact
of a hypothetical termination of each executives
employment or the consummation of a change in control on
December 31, 2010 of us or MedQuist Inc., as applicable.
The amounts that were actually paid upon termination of
employment to Messrs. Swoger, Seedman and Masanotti are
described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
without cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on death or
|
|
|
or for
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Named executive officer
|
|
Compensation
|
|
disability
|
|
|
good reason
|
|
|
control
|
|
|
Robert
Aquilina (1)
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata Bonus
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
760,440
|
|
|
$
|
760,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,010,440
|
|
|
$
|
760,440
|
|
Clyde
Swoger (2)
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata Bonus
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
271,596
|
|
|
$
|
271,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
971,596
|
|
|
$
|
271,596
|
|
Peter
Masanotti (3)
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Rata Bonus
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Acceleration (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,833,889
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Aquilina served as our
Chief Executive Officer from October 2010 to March 16, 2011
and as our Executive Chairman from August 2008 to June 30,
2011. Mr. Aquilina separated employment with us, effective
as of the close of business on June 30, 2011 and thereafter
continued to serve as the non-executive chairman on our board of
directors until July 11, 2011. Mr. Aquilina continues
to serve as a director on our board.
|
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Swoger served as our Chief
Financial Officer from August 2008 to March 16, 2011. He
remained employed by us until April 1, 2011 to assist with
the transition of responsibilities to our subsequent and now
former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. James.
|
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Masanotti served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 to
July 11, 2011 and he has agreed to provide consulting
services to us until September 30, 2011 to assist with the
transition of responsibilities to our current Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Masanotti served as MedQuist Inc.s Chief
Executive Officer from September 2008 through July 11, 2011
and as Medquist Inc.s President from November 2008 through
July 11, 2011.
|
|
|
(4) |
Value represents the gain the NEO
would receive in the event all unvested options were accelerated
on December 31, 2010, calculated as the positive
difference, or spread, between our share price on
December 31, 2010 of £6.21 per share and the exercise
price of the option, converted into U.S. dollars using an
exchange rate of $1.54/£1, which is the Federal Reserve
noon buying rate in effect on December 30, 2010.
|
137
Employment
agreements with current executives
We entered into employment agreements with Mr. Davenport,
the current Chief Executive Officer of us and MedQuist Inc., and
with Mr. James, the current Chief Financial Officer of us
and MedQuist Inc. These agreements are described below.
Roger L.
Davenport
We entered into an employment agreement with Roger L. Davenport
dated July 11, 2011 pursuant to which Mr. Davenport
agreed to serve as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
both us and MedQuist Inc. until July 31, 2014. The
agreement renews automatically for successive one-year periods
thereafter unless either party provides written notice that the
term will not be extended.
In structuring Mr. Davenports compensation, our board
of directors considered the importance of motivating a new Chief
Executive Officer to make a long-term commitment to us and
MedQuist Inc. and to consistently grow the businesses.
Mr. Davenport is entitled to receive an annual base salary
of $500,000 and an annual bonus award based upon the achievement
of performance objectives established by our board of up to
$750,000.
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Davenport received a restricted stock award grant to
purchase up to 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock.
Any unvested restricted shares will become fully vested on a
change in control.
The employment agreement provides that in the case of
termination without cause (including our election
not to extend the employment term) or resignation with
good reason, Mr. Davenport is entitled to
payment of
one-and-a-half
times his base salary for a period of 12 months following
the date of such termination, subsidized cost of COBRA
continuation of his group health benefits for 12 months, a
payment of a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination and, a
lump sum of $35,000 in lieu of the continuation of his annual
allowance for financial planning, tax preparation and
supplemental life insurance costs, each subject to his execution
of a release.
Mr. Davenport is also subject to certain restrictive
covenants regarding non-competition, non-interference and
non-solicitation of employees and consultants for a period of
one year following termination of employment, and certain
restrictive covenants regarding non-disclosure of confidential
information and intellectual property.
Ronald L.
Scarboro
We entered into an employment agreement with Ronald L. Scarboro
dated August 15, 2011. The agreement continues in effect
until August 31, 2014, subject to automatic renewal for
successive one-year periods thereafter unless either party
provides written notice that the term will not be extended.
Mr. Scarboro is entitled to receive an annual base salary
of $350,000 and an annual bonus award based upon the achievement
of performance objectives established by our board of up to 45%
of annual base salary. In addition, Mr. Scarboro received a
cash signing bonus of $300,000 and we agreed to pay certain
expenses associated with his relocation to the Franklin,
Tennessee vicinity.
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Scarboro received a restricted stock award grant of
44,834 shares of our common stock. In addition, beginning
with the 2012 fiscal year, Mr. Scarboro will be eligible to
receive an annual restricted stock award based upon the
achievement of performance objectives established by our board
in a number of shares equal to $300,000 divided by the fair
market value of our common stock on the date the award is
granted. The above described restricted stock awards each vest
in quarterly installments over three years, subject to full
acceleration upon Mr. Scarboros termination without
cause or resignation with good reason.
In the event of a change in control following a
fiscal year for which the specified performance objectives have
been achieved but the restricted stock award for such
achievement have not been issued, then, in lieu of such
restricted stock award, we will pay a cash bonus to
Mr. Scarboro in an amount up to $300,000.
The employment agreement provides that in the case of
termination without cause (including our election
not to extend the employment term) or resignation with
good reason, Mr. Scarboro is entitled to
payment of his base salary for a period of 12 months
following the date of such termination, subsidized cost of COBRA
continuation of his group health benefits for 12 months, a
payment of a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination and a
payment
138
of any annual bonus for the preceding fiscal year that was
otherwise earned but unpaid as of the date of termination. These
severance benefits are all conditioned on
Mr. Scarboros execution of a general release of
claims against us and our affiliates.
Mr. Scarboro is also subject to certain restrictive
covenants regarding non-competition, non-interference and
non-solicitation of employees and consultants for a period of
one year following termination of employment, and certain
restrictive covenants regarding non-disclosure of confidential
information and intellectual property.
Michael Finke,
Detlef Koll & Juergen Fritsch
In connection with our acquisition of MultiModal, we entered
into substantially similar employment agreements with each of
Michael Finke, Juergen Fritsch and Detlef Koll dated
August 18, 2011. Each employment agreement continues in
effect until the applicable executives employment with us
ceases for any reason.
The following table sets forth each such executives
position, initial base salary and target annual bonus, as set
forth in their respective agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Position:
|
|
Initial Base Salary:
|
|
|
Target Annual Bonus:
|
|
|
Michael Finke
|
|
President
|
|
$
|
280,000
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
Juergen Fritsch
|
|
Chief Scientist
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
54,000
|
|
Detlef Koll
|
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
In addition, pursuant to the terms of their respective
agreements, each such executive received a restricted stock
award of our common stock in the following amounts:
Mr. Finke 195,894 shares;
Mr. Fritsch 78,358 shares and
Mr. Koll 117,536 shares. The restricted
stock vests three years from grant, subject to full acceleration
upon (i) termination without cause,
(ii) resignation with good reason,
(iii) termination due to the executives
disability, (iv) the executives death or
(v) a change in control.
The employment agreements provide that in the case of
termination without cause or resignation with
good reason, we will continue to pay the applicable
executive his base salary for a period of twelve months, will
pay him a pro-rata bonus for the year of his termination and
will pay him any annual bonus for the preceding fiscal year that
was otherwise earned but unpaid as of the date of termination.
These severance benefits are all conditioned on the
executives execution of a general release of claims
against us and our affiliates.
Each executive is also subject to certain restrictive covenants
regarding non-competition, non-interference and non-solicitation
of employees and consultants for a period of one year following
termination of employment, and certain restrictive covenants
regarding non-disclosure of confidential information and
intellectual property.
Michael
Clark
We entered into a letter agreement with Michael Clark dated
April 21, 2005. Mr. Clark serves as Chief Operating
Officer of us and of MedQuist Inc.
The agreement provides that in the case of termination without
cause, Mr. Clark is entitled to payment of his
base salary for a period of 12 months following the date of
such termination subject to his execution of a release.
Mark
Sullivan
We entered into a letter agreement with Mark Sullivan dated
April 21, 2005. Mr. Sullivan serves as General Counsel
of us and of MedQuist Inc.
The agreement provides that in the case of termination without
cause, Mr. Sullivan is entitled to payment of
his base salary for a period of 12 months following the
date of such termination subject to his execution of a release.
139
Equity
incentive plans
Legacy Equity
Plans
We maintain our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which was adopted on
June 12, 2007 and subsequently amended on September 4,
2008. The 2007 Plan provides a framework for the grant of equity
and other-equity related incentives to our employees, directors,
officers and consultants (excluding those who provide services
exclusively to MedQuist Inc.). As a result of the adoption of
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, described below, no additional
awards will be granted under the 2007 Plan, but the 2007 Plan
will continue to govern the terms and conditions of all options
granted under the 2007 Plan which remain outstanding.
In addition, MedQuist Inc. maintains the MedQuist Inc. 2002
Stock Option Plan (the 2002 Plan), pursuant to which
the MedQuist Inc. board granted certain stock option awards to
Mr. Masanotti. As a result of the adoption of the 2010
Equity Incentive Plan, described below, no additional awards
will be granted under the 2002 Plan, but the 2002 Plan will
continue to govern the terms and conditions of all options
granted under the 2002 Plan which remain outstanding. In
connection with the Corporate Reorganization, we assumed the
2002 Plan and converted each share of the stock options
outstanding under these plans into an option to purchase shares
of our common stock.
2010 Equity
Incentive Plan
We believe that the use of stock-based awards promotes our
overall executive compensation objectives and expect that
stock-based awards will continue to be a significant source of
potential compensation for our executives. Therefore, we have
adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2010
Plan. The purpose of the 2010 Plan is to attract and
retain key personnel and to provide a means for directors,
officers, employees, consultants and advisors to acquire and
maintain an interest in us, which interest may be measured by
reference to the value of our common stock. The 2010 Plan is
also designed to permit us to make cash-based awards and
equity-based awards intended to qualify as
performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code.
The principal features of the 2010 Plan are summarized below.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
text of the 2010 Plan, which is incorporated by reference as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part.
Administration
Our compensation committee administers our 2010
Plan. The compensation committee has the
authority to determine the terms and conditions of any
agreements evidencing any awards granted under our 2010 Plan and
to adopt, alter and repeal rules, guidelines and practices
relating to our 2010 Plan. Our compensation committee has full
discretion to administer and interpret the 2010 Plan and to
adopt such rules, regulations and procedures as it deems
necessary or advisable and to determine, among other things, the
time or times at which the awards may be exercised and whether
and under what circumstances an award may be exercised.
Eligibility
Our employees, directors, officers, advisors, consultants or
affiliates are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan. Our
compensation committee has the sole and complete authority to
determine who will be granted an award under the 2010 Plan,
however, it may delegate such authority to one or more of our
officers under the circumstances set forth in our 2010 Plan.
Number of shares
authorized
The 2010 Plan reserves for awards 3,369,927 shares, or the
Share Reserve. As of August 1, 2011, there were
947,685 shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2010
Plan and 2,422,242 shares available for issuance in respect
of new awards under the 2010 Plan. No participant may be granted
awards of options and stock appreciation rights with respect to
more than 20% of the Share Reserve shares in any one year. No
more than 20% of the Share Reserve shares may be granted under
our 2010 Plan to any participant during any single year
140
with respect to performance compensation awards in any one
performance period. The maximum amount payable pursuant to a
cash bonus for an individual employee or officer under our 2010
Plan for any single year during a performance period is
$5,000,000. If any award is forfeited or if any option
terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised, the
common stock subject to such award will again be made available
for future grant. Shares that are used to pay the exercise price
of an option or that are withheld to satisfy a
participants tax withholding obligation will not be
available for re-grant under the 2010 Plan. If there is any
change in our corporate capitalization, the compensation
committee will make or recommend to our board for approval
substitutions or adjustments to the number of shares reserved
for issuance under our 2010 Plan, the number of shares covered
by awards then outstanding under our 2010 Plan, the limitations
on awards under our 2010 Plan, the exercise price of outstanding
options and such other equitable substitution or adjustments as
it may determine appropriate in its sole discretion.
The 2010 Plan has a term of ten years and no further awards may
be granted under the 2010 Plan after the expiration of the term.
Awards available
for grant
The compensation committee may grant awards of non-qualified
stock options, incentive (qualified) stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, stock bonus awards, dividend equivalents, performance
compensation awards (including cash bonus awards) or any
combination of the foregoing.
Options
The compensation committee is authorized to grant options to
purchase shares of common stock that are either
qualified, meaning they are intended to satisfy the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code for incentive stock
options, or non-qualified, meaning they are not
intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the
Code. Options granted under our 2010 Plan will be subject to the
terms and conditions established by the compensation committee.
Under the terms of our 2010 Plan, unless the compensation
committee determines otherwise in the case of an option
substituted for another option in connection with a corporate
transaction, the exercise price of the options will not be less
than the fair market value of our common stock at the time of
grant. Options granted under the 2010 Plan will be subject to
such terms, including the exercise price and the conditions and
timing of exercise, as may be determined by our compensation
committee and specified in the applicable award agreement. The
maximum term of an option granted under the 2010 Plan will be
ten years from the date of grant (or five years in the case of a
qualified option granted to a 10% stockholder). Payment in
respect of the exercise of an option may be made in cash or by
check, by surrender of unrestricted shares (at their fair market
value on the date of exercise) that have been held by the
participant for any period deemed necessary to avoid an
additional compensation charge or have been purchased on the
open market, or the compensation committee may, in its
discretion and to the extent permitted by law, allow such
payment to be made through a broker-assisted cashless exercise
mechanism, a net exercise method or by such other method as our
compensation committee may determine to be appropriate. Unless
provided otherwise in the option agreement, options will vest in
four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries
of the grant date.
Stock
appreciation rights
Our compensation committee is authorized to award stock
appreciation rights, or SARs, under the 2010 Plan.
SARs will be subject to the terms and conditions established by
the compensation committee. An SAR is a contractual right that
allows a participant to receive, either in the form of cash,
shares or any combination of cash and shares, the appreciation,
if any, in the value of a share over a certain period of time.
An option granted under the 2010 Plan may include SARs and SARs
may also be awarded to a participant independent of the grant of
an option. SARs granted in connection with an option shall be
subject to terms similar to the option corresponding to such
SARs. The terms of the SARs shall be subject to terms
established by the compensation committee and reflected in the
award agreement. Unless provided otherwise in the SAR agreement,
SARs will vest in four equal installments on each of the first
four anniversaries of the grant date.
141
Restricted
stock
Our compensation committee is authorized to award restricted
stock under the 2010 Plan. Unless provided otherwise in the
award agreement, restrictions on restricted stock will lapse in
four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries
of the grant date. Our compensation committee will determine the
terms of such restricted stock awards. Restricted stock is
common stock that generally is non-transferable and is subject
to other restrictions determined by our compensation committee
for a specified period. Unless our compensation committee
determines otherwise or specifies otherwise in an award
agreement, if the participant terminates employment or service
during the restricted period, then any unvested restricted stock
will be forfeited.
Restricted stock
unit awards
Our compensation committee is authorized to award restricted
stock units under the 2010 Plan. Unless provided otherwise in
the award agreement, restrictions on restricted stock units will
lapse in four equal installments on each of the first four
anniversaries of the grant date. Our compensation committee will
determine the terms of such restricted stock units. Unless the
compensation committee determines otherwise or specifies
otherwise in an award agreement, if the participant terminates
employment or service during the restricted period, then any
unvested restricted stock units will be forfeited. At the
election of the compensation committee, the participant will
receive a number of shares of common stock equal to the number
of units earned or an amount in cash equal to the fair market
value of that number of shares at the expiration of the period
over which the units are to be earned or at a later date
selected by the compensation committee.
Stock bonus
awards
Our compensation committee is authorized to grant awards of
unrestricted common stock or other awards denominated in common
stock, either alone or in tandem with other awards, under such
terms and conditions as the compensation committee may determine.
Dividend
equivalents
Our compensation committee is authorized to grant participants
the right to receive the equivalent value (in cash or common
stock) of dividends paid to holders of our common stock.
Performance
compensation awards
Our compensation committee is authorized to grant any award
under the 2010 Plan in the form of a performance compensation
award by conditioning the vesting of the award on the
satisfaction of certain performance goals. Our compensation
committee may establish these performance goals with reference
to one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Net earnings or net income (before or after taxes);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Basic or diluted earnings per share (before or after taxes);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Net revenues or revenue growth;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Operating profit (before or after taxes);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets
or equity);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow
and free cash flow);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and
total stockholder return);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Measures of economic value added;
|
142
|
|
|
|
n
|
Objective measures of personal targets, goals or completion of
projects;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Any combination of the foregoing.
|
Transferability
Each award may be exercised during the participants
lifetime only by the participant or, if permissible under
applicable law, by the participants guardian or legal
representative and may not be otherwise transferred or
encumbered by a participant other than by will or by the laws of
descent and distribution. Our compensation committee, however,
may permit awards (other than incentive stock options) to be
transferred to family equityholders, a trust for the benefit of
such family equityholders, a partnership or limited liability
company whose partners or stockholders are the participant and
his or her family equityholders or anyone else approved
by it.
Amendment
Our 2010 Plan has a term of ten years. Our board may amend,
suspend or terminate our 2010 Plan at any time; however,
stockholder approval to amend our 2010 Plan may be necessary if
the law so requires. No amendment, suspension or termination
will impair the rights of any participant or recipient of any
award without the consent of the participant or recipient.
Change in
control
In the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2010
Plan), our compensation committee may provide that all
outstanding options and equity awards (other than performance
compensation awards) issued under the 2010 Plan will become
fully vested and that performance compensation awards will vest,
as determined by our compensation committee, based on the level
of attainment of the specified performance goals. Our
compensation committee may, in its discretion, cancel
outstanding awards and pay the value of such awards to the
participants in connection with a change in control. Our
compensation committee can also provide otherwise in an award
agreement under the 2010 Plan. Under the 2010 Plan, a change in
control is generally defined as:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Any person or group becomes the beneficial owner of 50% or more
of our voting shares;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
A change in a majority of our board over a two-year period other
than through board approved elections or nominations;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
A merger, share exchange, consolidation or other business
transaction in which we are involved, directly or indirectly,
other than a transaction which results in our outstanding voting
securities immediately before the transaction continuing to
represent a majority of the voting power of the acquiring
companys outstanding voting securities which are held in
substantially the same proportions as immediately before the
transaction, and after which no person or group beneficially
owns 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the
surviving entity immediately after the transaction and at least
a majority of our board following the transaction were
equityholders of the incumbent board immediately prior to the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
The sale, exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of
our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
The boards determination that as a consequence of any
transaction or event, a change in control has occurred; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
Shareholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution.
|
In addition, if an award under the 2010 Plan is subject to
Section 409A of the Code, a change in control transaction
may constitute a payment event only if the transaction is also a
change in control event for purposes of
Section 409A of the Code.
143
United States
federal income tax consequences
The following is a general summary of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the grant, vesting and
exercise of awards under the 2010 Plan and the disposition of
shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of such awards and is
intended to reflect the current provisions of the Code and the
regulations thereunder. This summary is not intended to be a
complete statement of applicable law, nor does it address
foreign, state, local and payroll tax considerations. Moreover,
the United States federal income tax consequences to any
particular participant may differ from those described herein by
reason of, among other things, the particular circumstances of
such participant.
Options
The Code requires that, for treatment of an option as a
qualified option, common stock acquired through the exercise of
a qualified option cannot be disposed of before the later of
(i) two years from the date of grant of the option or
(ii) one year from the date of exercise. Holders of
qualified options will generally incur no federal income tax
liability at the time of grant or upon exercise of those
options. However, the spread at exercise will be an item
of tax preference, which may give rise to
alternative minimum tax liability for the taxable
year in which the exercise occurs. If the holder does not
dispose of the shares before two years following the date of
grant and one year following the date of exercise, the
difference between the exercise price and the amount realized
upon disposition of the shares will constitute long-term capital
gain or loss, as the case may be. Assuming both holding periods
are satisfied, we will not be allowed a deduction for federal
income tax purposes in connection with the grant or exercise of
the qualified option. If, within two years following the date of
grant or within one year following the date of exercise, the
holder of shares acquired through the exercise of a qualified
option disposes of those shares, the participant will generally
realize taxable compensation at the time of such disposition
equal to the difference between the exercise price and the
lesser of the fair market value of the share on the date of
exercise or the amount realized on the subsequent disposition of
the shares, and that amount will generally be deductible by us
for federal income tax purposes, subject to the possible
limitations on deductibility under Sections 280G and 162(m)
of the Code for compensation paid to executives designated in
those Sections. Finally, if an otherwise qualified option
becomes first exercisable in any one year for shares having an
aggregate value in excess of $100,000 (based on the grant date
value), the portion of the qualified option in respect of those
excess shares will be treated as a non-qualified stock option
for federal income tax purposes.
No income will be realized by a participant upon grant of a
non-qualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a non-qualified
stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary
compensation income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of
the fair market value of the underlying exercised shares over
the option exercise price paid at the time of exercise. We will
be able to deduct this same amount for United States federal
income tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under
Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid
to certain executives designated in those Sections.
Restricted stock. A participant will not be
subject to tax upon the grant of an award of restricted stock
unless the participant otherwise elects to be taxed at the time
of grant pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code. On the date
an award of restricted stock becomes transferable or is no
longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the
participant will have taxable compensation equal to the
difference between the fair market value of the shares on that
date over the amount the participant paid for such shares, if
any, unless the participant made an election under
Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed at the time of grant.
If the participant made an election under Section 83(b),
the participant will have taxable compensation at the time of
grant equal to the difference between the fair market value of
the shares on the date of grant over the amount the participant
paid for such shares, if any. (Special rules apply to the
receipt and disposition of restricted stock received by officers
and directors who are subject to Section 16(b) of the
Exchange Act). We will be able to deduct, at the same time as it
is recognized by the participant, the amount of taxable
compensation to the participant for United States federal income
tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under
Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid
to certain executives designated in those Sections.
Restricted stock units. A participant will not
be subject to tax upon the grant of a restricted stock unit
award. Rather, upon the delivery of shares or cash pursuant to a
restricted stock unit award, the participant will have taxable
compensation equal to the fair market value of the number of
shares (or the amount of cash) the
144
participant actually receives with respect to the award. We will
be able to deduct the amount of taxable compensation to the
participant for United States federal income tax purposes, but
the deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m)
of the Code for compensation paid to certain executives
designated in those Sections.
SARs. No income will be realized by a
participant upon grant of an SAR. Upon the exercise of an SAR,
the participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in
an amount equal to the fair market value of the payment received
in respect of the SAR. We will be able to deduct this same
amount for United States federal income tax purposes, but such
deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m) of
the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated
in those Sections.
Stock Bonus Awards and Dividend Equivalents. A
participant will have taxable compensation equal to the
difference between the fair market value of the shares on the
date the common stock subject to the award is transferred to the
participant over the amount the participant paid for such
shares, if any. We will be able to deduct, at the same time as
it is recognized by the participant, the amount of taxable
compensation to the participant for United States federal income
tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under
Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid
to certain executives designated in those Sections. Dividend
equivalents are taxable at ordinary income tax rates upon
receipt.
Section 162(m). In general,
Section 162(m) of the Code denies a publicly held
corporation a deduction for United States federal income tax
purposes for compensation in excess of $1 million per year
per person to its principal executive officer, and the three
other officers (other than the principal executive officer and
principal financial officer) whose compensation is disclosed in
its prospectus or proxy statement as a result of their total
compensation, subject to certain exceptions. Subject to
obtaining approval of the 2010 Plan by our stockholders prior to
the payment of any awards thereunder, the 2010 Plan is intended
to satisfy an exception with respect to grants of options to
covered employees. In addition, the 2010 Plan is designed to
permit certain awards of restricted stock, restricted stock
units, cash bonus awards and other awards to be awarded as
performance compensation awards intended to qualify under the
performance-based compensation exception to
Section 162(m) of the Code.
2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The purpose of the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, is to promote our
interests and that of our shareholders by providing our
employees with an opportunity to purchase our common stock at a
discount through accumulated payroll deductions. By encouraging
stock ownership, we seek to attract, retain and motivate
employees and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to
our business and financial success. The Employee Stock Purchase
Plan is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase
plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code.
The following is a summary of the material terms of the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the text of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, a
copy of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Administration
Our compensation committee administers the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and shall have full and exclusive discretionary
authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, to determine eligibility and to
adjudicate all disputed claims filed thereunder.
Share
purchases
Participation in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is voluntary.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan permits shares of our common
stock to be sold to participating employees on the last trading
day of any offering period at a price that may not be not less
than the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of our common
stock at the beginning of an offering period and 85% of the fair
market value of our common stock at the end of such offering
period.
145
Each six-month period will constitute an offering period under
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The compensation committee
may, in its discretion and with prior notice, change the
duration
and/or
frequency of offering periods from time to time. The initial
offering period under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will
commence on the first trading day on or after July 1, 2011
and end on the last trading day on or before December 1,
2011.
Eligible
participants
Each of our employees is eligible to participate in the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, provided that:
|
|
|
|
a.
|
the employees customary employment is more than
20 hours per week and is more than five months per
year; and
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
the employee has been continuously employed by us or one of our
eligible subsidiaries for at least 30 days prior to the
start of the applicable offering period.
|
Our compensation committee may also exclude any
(i) highly compensated employee within the
meaning of Code Section 414(q) or (ii) employee of a
participating subsidiary if it determines that participation by
employees of the participating subsidiary would not be permitted
under applicable local laws, would be unduly burdensome as a
result of constraints imposed by such laws or would cause a
violation of Section 423 of the Code.
Number of
shares
The aggregate number of shares of our common stock that are
available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is
916,987 shares. The number of shares of common stock
available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
as well as the price per share of our common stock covered by
share purchase rights that have not been exercised, are subject
to adjustment by the compensation committee in the event of a
stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or
reclassification of our common stock, or other increase or
reduction of our outstanding common stock effected without the
receipt of consideration, provided that conversion of
convertible securities shall not be deemed to have been effected
without consideration.
No employee may receive the right to purchase our common stock
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan: (i) to the extent
that he or she would own or have the right to purchase stock
possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or
value of all classes of our common stock of us or any of our
subsidiaries; or (ii) to the extent that his or her rights
to purchase stock under all stock purchase plans of us or any of
our subsidiaries would accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 in
fair market value in any calendar year.
Terms and
conditions
Eligible employees may elect to participate in the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan by giving proper notice to us to withhold a
specified percentage of the employees base salary (in any
multiple of 1% up to a maximum of 15%) on each pay period during
the applicable offering period.
A participant may increase or decrease the amount of his or her
contributions for future pay periods within an offering period,
subject to limitations set by the compensation committee. A
participant may withdraw his or her cash contributions that have
accumulated during an offering period but have not yet been used
to purchase our common stock. Participants who withdraw from the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan will not be permitted to re-enroll
in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan until the next offering
period. Upon a participants termination of employment with
us an eligible subsidiary for any reason, the participant will
be deemed to have withdrawn from the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan.
Participants have no interest or voting rights in shares of our
common stock covered by share purchase rights until such rights
have been exercised.
146
Duration,
termination and amendment
Unless earlier terminated by our board or the compensation
committee, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will continue in
effect for ten years from the later of the date that it is
adopted by our board or approved by stockholders. The Employee
Stock Purchase Plan permits our board or the compensation
committee to amend or terminate the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
at any time, except that no amendment to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan may make any change in any share purchase rights
previously granted that adversely affects the rights of any
participant, except as otherwise provided in the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. In the event of a proposed sale of all or
substantially all of our assets, or a merger with another
corporation, each outstanding option shall be assumed or an
equivalent option substituted by the successor corporation. In
the event that the successor corporation refuses or assume or
substitute for the options, any offering period(s) then in
progress will be shortened by setting a new exercise date, and
participants will be notified that their options will be
exercised automatically on such new exercise date.
Transferability
of contributions and purchase rights
The right of a participant to purchase our common stock through
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will not be assignable or
transferable by the participant, except by will or the laws of
inheritance following a participants death.
Holding period
for purchased shares
Once shares are purchased at the end of an offering period, the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan requires that the participants hold
the shares of common stock in a restricted account for a period
of twenty-four months (or a shorter or longer period of time as
may be established by the compensation committee). The shares
may not be sold or otherwise disposed of while held in the
restricted account without the compensation committees
prior written consent. However, in the event of a qualifying
merger or asset sale, the twenty-four month holding period will
no longer apply.
Federal Income
Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the grant and exercise of
awards under the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
disposition of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of such
awards and is intended to reflect the current provisions of the
Code and the regulations thereunder. This summary is not
intended to be a complete statement of applicable law, nor does
it address foreign, state, local and payroll tax considerations.
Moreover, the United States federal income tax consequences to
any particular participant may differ from those described
herein by reason of, among other things, the particular
circumstances of such participant.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an
employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of
Section 423 of the Code. The purchase of stock under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan is made with after-tax earnings.
Generally, neither the grant of a right to buy stock under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan on the first trading day of the
offering period, or the Grant Date, nor the exercise
of the right to buy stock on the last trading day of the
offering period will result in taxable income to a participant
or a tax deduction for us. Thereafter, the federal income taxes
for a participant who sells the stock will depend on when the
participant sells the stock.
Generally, a participant in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
will recognize income in the year in which he or she disposes of
the shares or in which he or she dies. The participants
federal tax liability will depend on whether the participant
makes a qualifying or disqualifying disposition of the purchased
shares. A qualifying disposition generally will occur if the
sale or other disposition of the shares occurs after the
participant has held the shares for (i) more than two years
after the start of the offering period and (ii) more than
one year after the last trading day of the offering period.
A participant who makes a qualifying disposition will recognize
ordinary income in the year of the qualifying disposition equal
to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value on
the Grant Date of the shares being sold
147
or otherwise transferred over the aggregate purchase price for
such shares and (ii) the excess of the amount realized for
such shares on the date of the qualifying disposition over the
aggregate purchase price paid for such shares. Any additional
gain recognized upon a qualifying disposition will be a
long-term capital gain. If the fair market value of the shares
being sold or otherwise transferred on the date of the
qualifying disposition is less than the aggregate purchase price
paid for such shares, there will be no ordinary income, and any
loss recognized will be a long-term capital loss.
A participant who makes a disqualifying disposition will
recognize ordinary income in the year of the disqualifying
disposition equal to the excess of (i) the fair market
value of the shares on the last trading day of the offering
period over (ii) the purchase price. Any additional gain or
loss recognized upon a disqualifying disposition will be capital
gain, which will be long-term if the shares are held for more
than twelve months.
Generally, we are entitled to a tax deduction when a participant
engages in a disqualifying disposition for the amount of
ordinary income recognized by the participant. Otherwise, we are
not entitled to a tax deduction under the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan.
Compensation of
directors
We currently do not pay Messrs. Aquilina, Baker, Berger,
Hendren or our employee directors any compensation for their
service on our board. Our other non-employee directors are paid
an annual retainer of $50,000, except for Mr. McLachlan who
receives $60,000 annually which reflects an additional $10,000
retainer for his role as chair of our audit committee. All
directors are reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred by
them in connection with their service on our board.
During 2010, our non-employee directors (other than
Messrs. Aquilina, Berger, Baker and Hendren) received the
following compensation from us:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees earned or
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
paid in cash
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Charles Siegfried Habermacher (former director)
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Atim Kabra (former director)
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Kenneth John McLachlan
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
Merle Gilmore
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
James Patrick Nolan
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
148
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
The following table and accompanying footnotes set forth
information regarding the beneficial ownership of our shares as
of September 26, 2011 based on the shares outstanding as of
September 26, 2011, of (i) each person known by us to
own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock,
(ii) each of the named executive officers, (iii) each
of our current directors and (iv) all current members of
the board and the executive officers as a group.
The amounts and percentages of shares beneficially owned are
reported on the basis of SEC regulations governing the
determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under SEC
rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner
of a security if that person has or shares voting power or
investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to
direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed
to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person
has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding
for purposes of computing such persons ownership
percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other
persons percentage. Under these rules, more than one
person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same
securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner
of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.
The number of shares and percentages of beneficial ownership
prior to the Merger set forth below are based on
55,054,121 shares issued and outstanding as of
September 26, 2011. The number of shares and percentages of
beneficial ownership after the Merger set forth below are based
on the number of shares to be issued and outstanding immediately
after the consummation of the Merger.
Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of
the beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and
investment power with respect to the indicated shares of common
stock. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each director and
executive officer is
c/o MedQuist
Holdings Inc., 9009 Carothers Parkway, Franklin, TN 37067.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Merger
|
|
|
After the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and address of
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percent of Shares
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percent of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
beneficial owner
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.A.C. PEI CB
Investment, L.P.
and affiliates
(1)
|
|
|
17,557,802
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
17,557,802
|
|
|
|
31.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers
Commercial Corporation
Asia Limited
(in Liquidation)
(2)
|
|
|
2,897,859
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,897,859
|
|
|
|
5.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P.
(3)
|
|
|
2,832,716
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
2,832,716
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and named executive
officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Aquilina
(4)
|
|
|
484,111
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
484,111
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
V. Raman Kumar
(5)
|
|
|
1,913,903
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,913,903
|
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Seedman
(6)
|
|
|
242,044
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
242,044
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Clyde Swoger
(7)
|
|
|
172,889
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
172,889
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Masanotti
(8)
|
|
|
295,749
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
295,749
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Davenport
(9)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Baker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Berger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merle Gilmore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Hendren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth John McLachlan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Patrick Nolan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current directors and executive
officers as a group (16 persons)
(10)
|
|
|
5,379,491
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
5,379,557
|
|
|
|
9.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
(1)
|
Include 15,768,938 shares
directly beneficially owned by S.A.C. PEI CB Investment, L.P., a
Cayman Islands limited partnership, or SAC CBI,
1,484,689 shares directly beneficially owned by S.A.C. PEI
CB Investment II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or
SAC CBI II, and 304,175 shares directly beneficially owned
by International Equities (S.A.C. Asia) Limited, a Mauritius
company, or SAC Asia. The general partner of SAC CBI is S.A.C.
PEI CB Investment GP, Limited, a Cayman Islands company, or SAC
CBI GP; S.A.C. Private Equity Investors, L.P., a Cayman Islands
limited partnership, or SAC PEI, is the sole shareholder of SAC
CBI GP; S.A.C. Private Equity GP, L.P., a Cayman Islands limited
partnership, or SAC PEI GP, is the general partner of SAC PEI;
S.A.C. Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, or SAC Management LLC, is the general partner of SAC
PEI GP; and Mr. Steven A. Cohen controls SAC Management
LLC. The manager of SAC CBI II is SAC PCG, a Delaware limited
liability company; S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, or SAC Advisors LP, manages SAC PCG; S.A.C.
Capital Advisors Inc., a Delaware corporation, or SAC Advisors
Inc., is the general partner of SAC Advisors LP; and
Mr. Cohen controls SAC Advisors Inc. Pursuant to investment
management agreements, SAC Advisors LP and S.A.C. Capital
Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or SAC
Advisors LLC, maintain voting and dispositive power with respect
to securities held by SAC Asia; and Mr. Cohen controls SAC
Advisors LLC. SAC CBI GP, SAC PEI, SAC PEI GP, SAC Management
LLC, SAC PCG, SAC Advisors LP, SAC Advisors Inc., SAC Advisors
LLC and Mr. Cohen expressly disclaim beneficial ownership
of securities directly beneficially owned by any person or
entity other than, to the extent of any pecuniary interest
therein, the various accounts under their respective management
and control.
|
|
|
|
The address of SAC CBI is
c/o Walkers
Corporate Services Limited, Walker House, 87 Mary Street, George
Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9002, Cayman Islands. The address of SAC
CBI II is 72 Cummings Point Road, Stamford, Connecticut 06902.
The address of SAC Asia is
c/o Citco
(Mauritius) Ltd., 4th Floor, Tower A, One CyberCity, Ebene,
Mauritius.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The address of Lehman Brothers
Commercial Corporation Asia Limited (in liquidation) is
c/o KPMG,
8th Floor, Princes Building, 10 Chater Road, Central, Hong
Kong. Messrs. Paul Brough, Edward Middleton and Patrick
Cowley in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of
Lehman Brothers Commercial Corporation Asia Limited
(LBCCA) acting as agents without personal liability,
have voting and dispositive power over the shares held by LBCCA
pursuant to section 199 of the Companies Ordinance (Ch. 32
of the laws of Hong Kong).
|
|
|
(3)
|
The address of Costa Brava
Partnership III, L.P. is 222 Berkeley Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02116.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Aquilina served as our
Chairman and served as our Chief Executive Officer from October
2010 to March 16, 2011. Of the shares shown as beneficially
owned, all represent shares issuable pursuant to options that
are currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Kumar is our Vice Chairman
and a director, and he served as our Chief Executive Officer
from February 2007 to October 2010. These shares include
506,970 shares over which Mr. Kumar has sole voting
and investment power, 110,516 shares over which
Mr. Kumar has shared voting and investment power and
1,296,417 shares issuable pursuant to options that are
currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Mr. Seedman served on our
board and as our Chief Technology Officer from August 2008 to
March 31, 2011. Of the shares shown as beneficially owned,
all represent shares issuable pursuant to options that are
currently vested and exercisable.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Mr. Swoger served as our Chief
Financial Officer from August 2008 to March 16, 2011. Of
the shares shown as beneficially owned, all represent shares
issuable pursuant to options that are currently vested and
exercisable.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Mr. Masanotti served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 to
July 11, 2011.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Davenport serves as our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Includes our current directors
(Messrs. Aquilina, Baker, Berger, Davenport, Gilmore,
Hendren, Kumar, McLachlan and Nolan) and our current executive
officers (Messrs. Davenport, Clark, Finke, Fritsch, Koll,
Scarboro and Sullivan).
|
150
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Related Party
Transaction Policy
Historically, any transaction involving us and related persons
was presented to, evaluated by and needed to be approved by the
disinterested directors on our board.
The board of MedQuist Inc. adopted a related party transaction
policy in August 2007, which charges its audit committee (or the
disinterested members of its board) with the responsibility of
ratifying all related party transactions. Transactions involving
compensation also required approval by the compensation
committee. On July 28, 2009, the board of MedQuist Inc.
amended the related party transaction policy such that any
transaction involving compensation where the related party is
CBay, Inc. or its affiliates must only be approved by the audit
committee.
On January 28, 2011, our board of directors adopted a
Related Party Transaction Policy which charges our audit
committee (or the disinterested members of our board) with the
responsibility of ratifying all related party transactions.
Transactions involving compensation also requires approval by
the compensation committee.
Agreements with
SAC PCG and affiliates and related transactions
Subscription
Agreement
On May 21, 2008, we entered into a subscription agreement,
or the Subscription Agreement, with SAC CBI and SAC PCG. Under
the Subscription Agreement, we issued 19,997,522 shares of
our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$124.0 million and SAC CBI thereby acquired a majority
interest in us. We used the proceeds received under the
Subscription Agreement to fund a portion of the costs of the
MedQuist Inc. Acquisition.
Stock purchase
agreement
On May 21, 2008, we and our majority-owned subsidiary, CBay
Inc., entered into a stock purchase agreement with Royal Philips
Electronics N.V., or Philips, pursuant to which CBay Inc.
purchased 26,085,086 shares of common stock, or
approximately 69.5% of the outstanding common stock, of MedQuist
Inc. for (i) $98.1 million in cash, (ii) the
$90.9 million 6% Convertible Notes and (iii) a
$26.2 million promissory note. The 6% Convertible
Notes and the $26.2 million promissory note have been
repaid.
Management
Stockholders Agreements
In connection with the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition, we, SAC CBI
and certain current and former members of our senior management
team, collectively, the Management Stockholders,
including Robert Aquilina, Raman Kumar, Michael Seedman and
Clyde Swoger, entered into stockholders agreements,
collectively, the Management Stockholders
Agreements. Each Management Stockholders Agreement
provided that transfers to a third party of shares of our common
stock owned by the relevant Management Stockholder generally
required our consent and the consent of SAC CBI, provided for
drag-along and tag-along rights in
connection with certain sales of shares by SAC CBI and contained
a grant by each Management Stockholder to SAC CBI of a proxy
enabling SAC CBI to vote the shares held by the relevant
Management Stockholder. The Management Stockholders Agreement
for Mr. Kumar was amended to eliminate all of the foregoing
provisions. As amended, Mr. Kumars Management
Stockholders Agreements contains provisions addressing the
requirements of the Securities Act relating to the
transferability of shares of our common stock issued to the
Management Stockholders pursuant to option agreements entered
into at the time of the MedQuist Inc. Acquisition and provisions
requiring the Mr. Kumar to enter into to a
lock-up
agreement in respect of shares of our common stock owned by him
in connection with certain public offerings of our common stock.
The Management Stockholders Agreements for
Messrs. Aquilina, Seedman and Swoger have been terminated.
151
Consulting
Services Agreement
On August 19, 2008, we entered into an agreement with
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC, or SAC CBI II, an
affiliate of SAC CBI, and LBCCA and collectively with SAC CBI
II, the Consultants, or Consulting Services
Agreement. The Consulting Services Agreement was entered
into to, among other things, effect the economic understanding
regarding the terms upon which SAC CBI acquired its ownership
interest in us and to address potential dilutive and related
effects at the time of SAC CBIs investment in us. It
provides for annual payments, to be made in quarterly
installments, of approximately $1.9 million to SAC CBI II
and $0.9 million to LBCCA, which may at our option be paid
in shares of our common stock at fair market value or in cash.
We account for the annual payments as a capital transaction. In
addition, we agreed to indemnify and reimburse the Consultants
and their affiliates for their
out-of-pocket
expenses in connection with the services rendered under this
agreement. The payment provision of the agreement has a five
year term that expires in August 2013. The agreement provides
that SAC CBI II and LBCCA may provide financial, managerial and
operational advice, the annual amount is payable regardless of
whether any management services are rendered and the annual
amount is fixed. Under the agreement, we are committed to pay
for the remaining unexpired term on termination of the agreement
or upon a change in control, determined as the sum of the
present value (using the discount rate equal to the yield on
U.S. Treasury securities of like maturity) of the annual
amounts that would have been payable with respect to the period
from the date of such change of control or termination, as
applicable through August 18, 2013. The change in control
occurred and the agreement terminated as a result of the
consummation of our IPO and the Private Exchange. As a result,
0.8 million shares valued at $6.2 million were issued
in March 2011 to satisfy the obligation to SAC CBI II.
Provisional liquidators were appointed in respect of LBCCA in
September 2008 and we challenged LBCCAs entitlement to
amounts under the agreement. On April 27, 2011, the
provisional liquidators filed a lawsuit against us on behalf of
LBCCA in the Southern District of New York seeking payments
under the agreement. On July 21, 2011, we reached a
settlement with LBCCA, pursuant to which we paid
$4.0 million in July 2011. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement, we recorded $7.0 million and $0.7 million
of charges to additional paid in capital during the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additionally,
amounts payable of $4.0 million and $3.5 million at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
were accrued as a related party payable.
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
$2.8 million, $2.8 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, have been recorded in the consolidated statements
of equity and comprehensive income (loss). During 2010 and 2009,
145,000 shares and 571,000 shares, respectively, of
our common stock were issued to satisfy a portion of the annual
amounts. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
$3.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of the
amounts payable were accrued and recorded in due to related
parties in the consolidated balance sheets.
Transaction
Fees
On May 4, 2010, the audit committee of MedQuist Inc.s
board of directors approved a $1.5 million success-based
payment to SAC PCG in connection with the Spheris Acquisition.
The payment was approved by MedQuist Inc.s audit committee
in accordance with MedQuist Inc.s related party
transaction approval policy described above.
Prior to the adoption of our Related Party Transaction Policy,
the disinterested directors on our board approved a
$5.0 million payment to SAC PCG in connection with the
Corporate Reorganization.
In the future, SAC PCG and its affiliates may receive customary
payments for other services rendered to us. To ensure that the
terms of the related party transactions are not less favorable
than what would be obtained in an arms-length transaction,
the material terms and conditions of any such arrangements with
SAC PCG or any related party will be reviewed and approved
pursuant to the our Related Party Transaction Policy.
152
Voting
Agreement
In connection with the Private Exchange, we entered into a
voting agreement, dated September 30, 2010, with SAC CBI,
SAC CBI II, and International Equities (S.A.C. Asia) Limited,
the SAC Stockholders. Under this agreement, the SAC Stockholders
agreed to vote the shares held by them in favor of any matter
subject to a vote of our stockholders that was reasonably
necessary for consummation of the Private Exchange.
Registration
Rights Agreement
In connection with the IPO, we entered into a registration
rights agreement dated February 4, 2011 with the SAC
Stockholders, or the Registration Rights Agreement,
to provide registration rights with respect to shares of our
common stock held by the SAC Stockholders and their affiliates.
The Registration Rights Agreement provides them with an
unlimited number of demand registrations and
piggyback registration rights. In addition, the
Registration Rights Agreement provides that the SAC Stockholders
and their affiliates may request that we file a shelf
registration statement beginning on the 181st day after the
IPO. The Registration Rights Agreement also provides that we
will pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and
indemnify against certain liabilities.
Stockholders
Agreements
In connection with the IPO, we entered into a stockholders
agreement with the SAC Stockholders dated February 4, 2011,
or the IPO Stockholders Agreement. The IPO
Stockholders Agreement grants the SAC Stockholders and their
affiliates the right to nominate to our board a number of
designees, or SAC Directors, equal to:
(i) three directors so long as they hold at least 20% of
our voting power; (ii) two directors so long as they hold
at least 10% of our voting power; and (iii) one director so
long as they hold at least 5% of our voting power. They have the
right to remove and replace their director-designees at any time
and for any reason and to nominate any individual(s) to fill any
such vacancies.
In connection with the Private Exchange, we entered into a
stockholders agreement dated February 11, 2011, or the
Private Exchange Stockholders Agreement, with the
SAC Stockholders and the investors party to the Private
Exchange. For so long as the SAC Stockholders have the right to
nominate the SAC Directors, each Investor (as defined in the
Private Exchange Stockholders Agreement) agrees, among other
things (i) that for a period of one year from the closing
under the Private Exchange and thereafter for so long as it owns
at least three percent of our outstanding shares, it will vote
all of its voting shares, or (as applicable) provide its written
consent in respect thereof, in favor of the election of the SAC
Directors to our board and (ii) not to take any action that
would cause the number of directors constituting the entire
board to be greater than nine without the prior written consent
of SAC CBI.
Under the Private Exchange Stockholders Agreement, with respect
to any underwritten public offering, each investor has agreed to
a lock-up
period of 90 days beginning on the effective date of any
other public offering.
Redemption Agreement
In connection with the IPO, we entered into an agreement dated
February 2, 2011, or the
Redemption Agreement, with SAC CBI, SAC PEI,
SAC CBI GP, LBCCA and the liquidators of LBCCA pursuant to which
SAC PEI contributed $13.7 million in cash to SAC CBI in
exchange for partnership interests in SAC CBI, SAC CBI redeemed
all of LBCCAs limited partnership interests in SAC CBI for
$13.7 million in cash and 4,228,584 shares of our
common stock, LBCCA entered into a
180-day
contractual
lock-up on
the shares of our common stock that LBCCA now owns following the
completion of the IPO and LBCCA granted SAC CBI an irrevocable
proxy to vote such shares so long as they are beneficially owned
by LBCCA.
153
Agreements with
MultiModal
Merger
Agreement
On August 18, 2011, we completed the acquisition of
MultiModal through a series of mergers between MultiModal and
direct wholly-owned subsidiaries of ours. As a result of the
MultiModal Merger, MultiModal became a direct wholly-owned
subsidiary of ours. Three of our current executive officers,
Messrs. Finke, Fritsch and Koll, were employees and
investors of MultiModal prior to the acquisition and are
MultiModal Accredited Investors. On the Closing Date, we paid an
aggregate of approximately $48.4 million in cash to
MultiModals shareholders, optionholders and other third
parties and issued an aggregate of 4,134,896 shares of our
common stock to the Multimodal Accredited Investors. We are also
obligated to pay up to approximately $28.8 million of
additional cash consideration in three installments of
approximately $16.3 million, $4.8 million and
$7.7 million, respectively, following the first, second and
third anniversaries of the Closing Date. Also on the Closing
Date, we granted to certain of MultiModals employees that
become employees of ours up to $10 million of restricted
shares of our common stock.
Stockholders
Agreement
In connection with the MultiModal acquisition, we entered into a
stockholders agreement with the MultiModal Accredited Investors
(including Messrs. Finke, Fritsch and Koll) dated
August 18, 2012, or the MultiModal Stockholders
Agreement. The MultiModal Stockholders Agreement
provides for, among other things, certain registration rights
and trading restrictions for the Multimodal Accredited
Investors. With respect to the registration rights, we will
register the Shares for resale on a shelf
registration statement in April 2012 and the Multimodal
Accredited Investors have piggyback registration
rights to participate in certain public offerings of our common
stock. In addition, Messrs. Finke, Fritsch and Koll are
restricted, in general, to selling shares equal to no more than
20% of the average daily trading volume of our common stock in
any given day during the period beginning on the six month
anniversary of the closing date of the MultiModal Merger and
ending on the one year anniversary of the closing date of the
MultiModal Merger.
Other Related
Party Transactions
Effective February 10, 2009, the former CEO and President
of Mirrus Systems Inc., or Mirrus, Nanda Krishnaiah,
who also formerly served as a director on our board, resigned
from services with us. Under the terms of his settlement, we
paid him $390,000 in severance and purchased his 13% stake in
Mirrus for $690,000. Mirrus is now our wholly owned subsidiary.
We sold software solution services to CBay Systems Limited,
owned by our predecessor parent and in which Mr. Kumar was
a director, in the amount of $471,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31,
2008, CBay Systems Limited transferred certain assets to us at
an aggregate value of $704,000 together with the related
underlying liabilities against certain assets amounting to
$184,000 to be adjusted against receivables from CBay Systems
Limited. During the year ended December 31, 2008, CBay
Systems Limited settled amounts recoverable by transferring to
us certain fixed assets of an aggregate value of $614,000. The
balance receivable from CBay Systems Limited of $760,000 was not
considered recoverable and accordingly it was written off. For
the year ended December 31, 2008, we provided transcription
services of $574,000 to CBay Systems Limited.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold software
solution services of $471,000, to Ztec Ventures Limited, a
company in which Mr. Kumar is a director.
154
Use of
Proceeds
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the Merger. We will
pay all fees and expenses related to the Merger, other than any
commissions or concessions of any broker or dealer. Except as
otherwise provided in the letter of transmittal, we will pay the
transfer taxes, if any, on the conversion of shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock in the Merger.
155
The
Merger
YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN MEDQUIST INC. WILL
AUTOMATICALLY CONVERT INTO THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE SHARES OF
MEDQUIST HOLDINGS INC. COMMON STOCK PURSUANT TO THE MERGER AND
YOU WILL NOT HAVE APPRAISAL RIGHTS. WE URGE YOU TO CAREFULLY
READ THIS PROSPECTUS IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING THE INFORMATION
SET FORTH IN THE SECTION OF THIS PROSPECTUS ENTITLED
RISK FACTORS. WE ALSO URGE YOU TO CONSULT YOUR OWN
FINANCIAL AND TAX ADVISORS TO DETERMINE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
THE MERGER.
General
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and the certificate of merger
and in accordance with the NJBCA, Merger Subsidiary will merge
with and into MedQuist Inc., the separate corporate existence of
Merger Subsidiary will terminate and MedQuist Inc. will survive
the Merger and exist as a wholly owned subsidiary of ours.
Merger Subsidiary has not conducted any activities other than
those incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated
by the certificate of merger. Prior to the Merger, we intend to
contribute the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that we hold
to CBay Inc. CBay Inc. intends, promptly following the
contribution, to contribute the shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock that CBay Inc. then holds to Merger Subsidiary.
Section 14A:10-5.1
of the NJBCA governs short-form mergers between two New Jersey
corporations. This provision allows a New Jersey corporation
owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class and
series of a New Jersey corporation to merge the subsidiary
corporation into itself, or merge itself into the subsidiary
corporation, without approval of the shareholders of either
corporation, though the board of the parent corporation must
approve the plan of merger.
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock will be converted into the right to
receive one share of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock. We
will issue, upon the terms set forth in this prospectus, the
Merger Agreement and in the related letter of transmittal, up to
1.2 million newly issued shares of our common stock for
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock, as described below, as
Merger consideration.
This prospectus, the Merger Agreement and the related letter of
transmittal are being sent to all holders of MedQuist Inc.
common stock. The record date for determining holders of
MedQuist Inc. common stock entitled to receive the Merger
consideration will be the effective date of the Merger.
Purpose and
background of the Merger
Since our acquisition of the majority ownership stake in
MedQuist Inc., our management and directors have been aware that
further consolidating our operations with those of MedQuist Inc.
could lead to substantial overhead reductions and allow us to
capitalize on our underlying technology, healthcare domain
expertise, and attractive long-term relationships with customers
of MedQuist Inc.
During the course of our consultations with our financial
advisors and outside counsel in the summer of 2010, our
management determined that a two-tiered private and public
exchange offer was the best method for acquiring the remaining
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock held by third parties. Our
management wanted to pursue the most efficient course for
combining MedQuist Inc. and our company and believed that
offering to buy shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock directly
from the other MedQuist Inc. shareholders would result in an
expedited and fair process. Additionally, our management
concluded that pursuing a two-tiered exchange offer, whereby a
significant portion of the minority MedQuist Inc. shareholders
agreed to participate in a private exchange of their MedQuist
Inc. common stock for our common stock, followed by a registered
public exchange for the remaining MedQuist Inc. common stock,
gave us the best opportunity to acquire the highest number of
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock in the most efficient and
expeditious manner. In choosing to recommend the two-tiered
exchange offer structure to our board, our management sought to
choose a path consistent with recent precedents for transactions
involving the acquisition of the minority interests of publicly
traded companies by their principal shareholders. In contrast to
an exchange offer transaction, our management also considered a
merger transaction, but due to certain provisions of New Jersey
corporate law, a merger transaction was deemed not to be a
viable option at that time.
156
On September 30, 2010, our board of directors met to
consider the advisability of the two-tiered exchange offer. At
this meeting, the board engaged in a discussion, with members of
our management and outside counsel and financial advisors
participating, of the proposed two-tiered exchange offer
structure. Following this discussion, our board of directors
determined unanimously to approve the Private Exchange.
On September 30, 2010, we entered into the exchange
agreement with certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling
shareholders that held in the aggregate approximately 12.7% of
MedQuist Inc.s outstanding shares. Pursuant to the
exchange agreement, those MedQuist Inc. shareholders received
one share of our common stock for each MedQuist Inc. share, and
entered into a shareholders agreement with us that, among other
things, provides them with registration rights and contains
provisions regarding their voting in the election of our
directors. The closing under the exchange agreement occurred on
February 11, 2011 and increased our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
At its meeting on October 17, 2010, our board of directors
unanimously approved the Registered Exchange Offer.
In February 2011, we commenced our Registered Exchange Offer to
those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc. shareholders who did not
participate in the Private Exchange to exchange shares of our
common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The
Registered Exchange Offer expired on March 11, 2011. We
accepted and consummated the exchange of MedQuist Inc. shares of
common stock that were validly tendered in the Registered
Exchange Offer. As a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to
approximately 97%.
Our reasons for
the Merger
We intend to consummate the Merger in connection with our
ongoing plan to acquire full ownership of our majority-owned
subsidiary MedQuist Inc. We continue to believe that if we
acquire full ownership of MedQuist Inc. it will simplify our
capital structure, achieve greater integration between us and
MedQuist Inc., and reduce costs and eliminate potential
conflicts of interests between us and MedQuist Inc. Therefore we
intend to consummate the Merger as a step in our plan to acquire
full ownership of MedQuist Inc. Please see Purpose and
background of the Merger for more information on our
desire to acquire full ownership of MedQuist Inc.
In addition, pursuant to the Shareholder Litigation, we agreed
that if, as a result of the Registered Exchange Offer, we
obtained ownership of at least 90% of the outstanding common
stock of MedQuist Inc., we would conduct a short-form merger
under applicable New Jersey law to acquire the remaining shares
of MedQuist Inc. common stock that we do not currently own at
the same exchange ratio applicable under the Registered Exchange
Offer. Please see MedQuist Holdings Inc. Business
Legal proceedings for more information on the
Shareholder Litigation.
Our management and directors continue to believe that if we
acquire full ownership of MedQuist Inc. it will simplify our
capital structure, achieve greater integration between us and
MedQuist Inc., and reduce costs and eliminate potential
conflicts of interests between us and MedQuist Inc. We are
conducting the Merger to acquire full ownership of our
majority-owned subsidiary MedQuist Inc. in accordance with the
Stipulation of Settlement in the Shareholder Litigation.
We intend to contribute the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
that we hold to CBay Inc. CBay Inc. intends, promptly following
the contribution, to contribute the shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock that CBay Inc. then holds to Merger Subsidiary.
CBay Inc. then intends to cause a short-form merger by which
Merger Subsidiary will merge with and into MedQuist Inc.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger, each share of MedQuist Inc.
common stock will be automatically converted into the right to
receive a share of our common stock. After this Merger, the
former MedQuist Inc. shareholders will no longer have any
ownership interest in MedQuist Inc.
157
Terms of the
Merger
We intend to issue, upon the terms set forth in this prospectus,
the Merger Agreement and in the related letter of transmittal,
up to 1.2 million newly issued shares of our common stock
pursuant to the Merger. See
Consideration below.
The Merger will become effective upon the filing of the
certificate of merger with the Department of the Treasury of the
State of New Jersey or at such later time as may be agreed upon
by the parties and as specified in the certificate of merger.
The filing of the certificate of merger will occur as soon as
reasonably practicable after the effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock will be converted into the right to
receive one share of MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock.
Consideration
You will receive one share of our common stock for each share of
MedQuist Inc. common stock that you hold at the effective time
of the Merger. Shares of our common stock issued in the Merger
will be issued in book-entry form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger consideration per share
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of our
|
|
Estimated
|
CUSIP
|
|
Title of security
|
|
common
stock (1)
|
|
value (1)
|
|
584949101
|
|
MedQuist Inc. common stock
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
$
|
8.95
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The estimated value of the per
share merger consideration is equal to the closing price per
share of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on
September 26, 2011.
|
Because the number of shares of our common stock to be issued in
the Merger is fixed, changes in the trading prices of our common
stock will result in the market value of our common stock you
receive pursuant to the conversion of your shares in the Merger
being different than the value reflected in the table above. Our
common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol MEDH. The closing price of our shares on The
NASDAQ Global Market on September 26, 2011 was $8.95.
MedQuist Inc. common stock trades on the OTCQB under the symbol
MEDQ. The closing price of shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock on the OTCQB on September 26, 2011 was $9.10.
See Market Price Information for Common Stock herein.
Our shares were formerly listed on the Alternative Investment
Market of the London Stock Exchange, or AIM.
However, we delisted from AIM and January 27, 2011 was the
last day on which our shares traded on AIM.
Your right to receive the Merger consideration in the Merger is
subject to the terms set forth in this prospectus, the Merger
Agreement and the related letter of transmittal.
Source of
consideration
The shares of our common stock to be issued in the Merger are
available from our authorized but unissued shares of our common
stock.
Conversion of
Shares
We have appointed American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company LLC as the exchange agent for the purpose of
exchanging certificates and uncertificated shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock for the Merger consideration.
Contemporaneously with the effective date of the Merger, the
exchange agent will mail transmittal materials to each holder of
MedQuist Inc. common stock, advising such holders of the
procedure for surrendering their share certificates (or an
appropriate affidavit) to the exchange agent in exchange for
shares of our common stock.
Each holder of a share of MedQuist Inc. common stock that has
been converted into a right to receive shares of our common
stock will receive such shares upon surrender to the exchange
agent of the applicable MedQuist Inc. common stock certificate
(or an appropriate affidavit), together with an executed letter
of transmittal covering such shares and such other documents as
the exchange agent may reasonably require.
158
After the effective time and until surrendered, each certificate
that previously represented shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
will represent only the right to receive shares of our common
stock as described above under Consideration to be
Received in the Merger. In addition, MedQuist Inc. will
not register any transfers of shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock after the effective time of the Merger.
Holders of MedQuist Inc. common stock should not send in their
MedQuist Inc. stock certificates until they receive, complete
and submit a signed letter of transmittal sent by the exchange
agent with instructions for the surrender of MedQuist Inc. stock
certificates.
Statutory
Requirements; Short-Form Merger
Under New Jersey law, the approval of Merger Subsidiarys
board of directors and the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Merger Subsidiary common
stock may be required to approve the principal terms of the
agreement and plan of merger. New Jersey law generally permits
the merger of a corporation and its subsidiary without
subsidiary approval, so long as the parent corporation owns at
least 90% of each class of the subsidiarys outstanding
voting stock. As of the effective time of the Merger, Merger
Subsidiary will be the record holder of at least 90% of the
MedQuist Inc. common stock outstanding and MedQuist Inc. will
not have any other class of outstanding voting stock.
Accordingly, no action by the board of directors or shareholders
of MedQuist Inc. will be necessary to complete the Merger as
described in this prospectus. Merger Subsidiarys board of
directors must approve the Merger as well as the majority of
Merger Subsidiarys shareholders because Merger Subsidiary
will not be the surviving entity in the Merger.
Registration
Under Exchange Act
MedQuist Inc. common stock is currently registered under the
Exchange Act. This registration may be terminated upon
application by MedQuist Inc. to the SEC if MedQuist Inc. common
stock is not listed on a national securities
exchange and there are less than 300 holders of MedQuist
Inc. common stock. Termination of registration under the
Exchange Act would substantially reduce the information required
to be furnished by MedQuist Inc. to holders of MedQuist Inc.
common stock and to the SEC and would make certain provisions of
the Exchange Act, such as the short-swing profit recovery
provisions of Section 16(b), the requirement of furnishing
a proxy statement in connection with stockholders meetings
and the related requirement to furnish an annual report to
stockholders and the requirements of Exchange Act
Rules 13e-3
with respect to going private transactions, no
longer applicable to MedQuist Inc. common stock. In addition,
affiliates of MedQuist Inc. and persons holding
restricted securities of MedQuist Inc. may be
deprived of the ability to dispose of these securities pursuant
to Rule 144 under the Securities Act. We intend to seek to
cause MedQuist Inc. to terminate registration of the MedQuist
Inc. common stock under the Exchange Act as soon as practicable
after the requirements for termination of registration of the
shares are met.
Certain
relationships with MedQuist Inc. and Interests of MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
Certain
contracts, agreements, arrangements
Except as discussed in this prospectus, to the best of our
knowledge, as of the date of this prospectus, there are no
material contracts, arrangements, understandings, relationships,
negotiations or transactions between us or our affiliates (other
than MedQuist Inc. and its affiliates) and (i) our
executive officers or directors or (ii) MedQuist Inc. or
its executive officers, directors or affiliates (other than us
and our subsidiaries).
Certain contracts, agreements, arrangements and understandings
between MedQuist Inc. or its affiliates (other than MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and its affiliates) and (i) MedQuist
Inc.s executive officers and directors or
(ii) MedQuist Holdings Inc. or its executive officers,
directors and affiliates (other than MedQuist Inc. and its
subsidiaries) are described in Management,
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management of MedQuist Holdings Inc., Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of
MedQuist Inc. and Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions.
159
Ownership of
Company Common Stock by MedQuist Holdings
As of September 26, 2011, we owned approximately
36.3 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock,
representing approximately 97% of the issued and outstanding
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock.
Ownership of
MedQuist Inc. Common Stock by Executive Officers and
Directors
Our board of directors is comprised of eight members. Frank
Baker, Peter Berger and Roger Davenport, who are members of our
board of directors, are also members of the MedQuist Inc. board
of directors. Messrs. Clark, Davenport and Scarboro, three
of our executive officers, are also executive officers of
MedQuist Inc.
As of September 26, 2011, MedQuist Inc. directors or
executive officers owned in the aggregate 66 shares of its
common stock (excluding shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
held directly or indirectly by MedQuist Holdings Inc.)
Material
Arrangements between MedQuist Holdings Inc. and MedQuist
Inc.
On August 6, 2008, we acquired a 69.5% ownership interest
in MedQuist Inc. from Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., or
Philips. On February 11, 2011 we completed the
Private Exchange with certain of MedQuist Inc.s
non-controlling shareholders whereby we issued 4.8 million
shares of our common stock in exchange for their
4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock, which
increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%. In
March 2011 we completed our Registered Exchange Offer with those
non-controlling MedQuist Inc. shareholders who did not
participate in the Private Exchange to exchange shares of our
common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. As a
result of the Registered Exchange Offer we increased our
ownership in MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
As of September 26, 2011, we beneficially owned, including
through CBay Inc., 36.3 million shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock in the aggregate, or approximately 97% of all of
the issued and outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock.
We and CBay Inc. collectively have the ability to elect MedQuist
Inc.s entire board of directors. In addition, Frank Baker,
Peter Berger and Roger Davenport, who are members of our board
of directors, are also members of the MedQuist Inc. board of
directors. Messrs. Clark, Davenport, James and Sullivan,
four of our executive officers, are also executive officers of
MedQuist Inc.
We are party to several related party and intercompany
agreements with MedQuist Inc.
and/or its
affiliates, a summary description of each of which is provided
below. The audit committees of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
MedQuist Inc. have been charged with the responsibility of
approving or ratifying all related party transactions, including
all arrangements between us and MedQuist Inc.
and/or their
affiliates. Additional information regarding related party
transactions is set forth in under the section entitled
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Sales &
Services Agreement
On March 9, 2010, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of MedQuist Inc., entered into a
Sales & Services Agreement , or
Sales & Service Agreement, with CBay
Systems & Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ours, pursuant to which MedQuist Inc. outsources certain medical
transcription services to CBay Systems. Under the
Sales & Services Agreement, CBay Systems has
discontinued its new customer marketing efforts for
transcription services to hospitals in North America and has
become the exclusive supplier to MedQuist Inc. of Asian-based
transcription production services, which are either performed
directly by CBay Systems or through a network of third party
suppliers managed by CBay Systems. Under the Sales &
Services Agreement, MedQuist Inc. pays CBay Systems a per line
fee based on each transcribed line of text processed and the
specific type of service provided. The initial term of the
Sales & Services Agreement will expire on
March 10, 2015, and thereafter shall automatically renew
for two additional five year terms, unless either party provides
the other with written notice of its election to terminate the
agreement at the end of the initial term or at the end of a
renewal term, provided such notice is provided to the other
party not earlier than 12 months nor less than six months
prior to the end of the initial term or the applicable renewal
term. Either MedQuist Inc. or CBay Systems may terminate the
Sales & Services Agreement if the other party
materially breaches any term of the agreement,
160
or in the event CBay Systems and its affiliates (other than
MedQuist Inc. or its subsidiaries) cease to control, directly or
indirectly, the power to vote at least 30% of MedQuist
Inc.s issued and outstanding common equity. On
July 26, 2010, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay
Systems entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
Sales & Services Agreement to allow for (i) CBay
Systems to assign to MedQuist Inc. CBay Systems services
agreements with its customers that require transcription
services to be performed predominantly within the United States,
(ii) CBay Systems to license from MedQuist Inc. the use of
its DocQment Enterprise Platform, which CBay Systems shall have
the right to market to new CBay Systems customers on a per
line fee basis and for which CBay Systems will pay MedQuist Inc.
its costs plus 15% for professional services related to the
DocQment Enterprise Platform usage, including implementation,
training, maintenance and support, and customization, and
(iii) MedQuist Inc. and CBay Systems to provide certain
ancillary, non-core services to one another during the term of
the Sales & Services Agreement, if mutually agreeable,
at the service providers cost plus 15%.
Subcontracting
Agreement
On March 31, 2009, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. entered
into a transcription services subcontracting agreement, or
Subcontracting Agreement, with CBay Systems,
pursuant to which CBay Systems subcontracts certain medical
transcription, editing and related services to MedQuist Inc.
Under the Subcontracting Agreement, MedQuist Inc. provides the
medical transcription, editing and related services to CBay
Systems using labor located within the United States using
MedQuist Inc.s DocQment Enterprise Platform. The specific
services to be performed are set forth in order forms delivered
by CBay Systems to MedQuist Inc. from time to time during the
term of the Subcontracting Agreement. On July 26, 2010,
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Systems entered into
Amendment No. 1 to the Subcontracting Agreement, to allow
for fees to be paid to MedQuist Inc. by CBay Systems when CBay
Systems subcontracts to MedQuist Inc. only a portion of CBay
Systems operational performance obligations pursuant to
CBay Systems services agreement with its customer. In
those instances when CBay Systems fully subcontracts to MedQuist
Inc. all of CBay Systems operational performance
obligations pursuant to CBay Systems services agreement
with its customer, MedQuist Inc. receives 98% of the net monthly
fees collected by CBay Systems from such customer for the
services provided by MedQuist Inc. In those instances when CBay
Systems subcontracts to MedQuist Inc. only a portion of CBay
Systems operational performance obligations pursuant to
CBay Systems services agreement with its customer,
MedQuist Inc. receives from CBay Systems (i) any of the
implementation costs plus 15% incurred by MedQuist Inc. to set
up the provision of services by MedQuist Inc. to the CBay
Systems customer and (ii) the rate mutually agreed
upon by MedQuist Inc. and CBay Systems set forth in an order
form for the services to be provided by MedQuist Inc.
The Subcontracting Agreement will expire on March 31, 2012
unless sooner terminated by either party. Either MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd. or CBay Systems may terminate the
Subcontracting Agreement prior to its expiration for any reason
upon at least 6 months prior notice to the other party. In
addition, either party may terminate the Subcontracting
Agreement immediately upon written notice to the other party in
the event the other party breaches any material obligation under
the Subcontracting Agreement and fails to cure such breach
within thirty days or the other party files for bankruptcy.
Management
Services Agreement
On September 19, 2009, MedQuist Inc. entered into a
services agreement, or Management Services
Agreement, with CBay Inc., pursuant to which certain
senior executives and directors of CBay Inc. render to MedQuist
Inc., upon the request of MedQuist Inc.s Chief Executive
Officer, certain advisory and consulting services in relation to
the affairs of MedQuist Inc. and its subsidiaries. The
Management Services Agreement will remain in effect until the
earliest to occur of (i) the end of any calendar quarter if
either party gives notice of termination of the Services
Agreement to the other party no later than thirty days prior to
the end of such calendar quarter, (ii) such time as CBay
Inc. or its affiliates (other than MedQuist Inc. and its
subsidiaries) control, directly or indirectly, the power to vote
less than 30% of the issued and outstanding common equity of
MedQuist Inc., and (iii) such earlier date as MedQuist Inc.
and CBay Inc. may mutually agree upon in writing. The Management
Services Agreement provides that, in consideration of the
management services rendered by CBay Inc. to MedQuist Inc. since
July 1, 2009 pursuant to the Management Services Agreement,
MedQuist Inc. will pay CBay Inc. a quarterly services fee equal
to $350,000, which shall be payable in arrears.
161
Trade Name
License Agreement
On November 23, 2010, MedQuist Inc. entered into a Trade
Name License Agreement, License Agreement, with us,
pursuant to which MedQuist Inc. granted us a license to use the
MedQuist trade name to identify our corporate entity
in connection with us becoming a publicly-traded company in the
United States, to identify the corporate entities which are our
subsidiaries and to identify products and services of us and our
subsidiaries other than MedQuist Inc. We and MedQuist Inc.
believe that our use of the MedQuist trade name for
the permitted uses will mutually benefit both parties. The
license is a personal, non-exclusive, non-assignable,
non-sublicensable (other than to our subsidiaries) limited
license to use, reproduce and display the MedQuist
trade name, including as trademarks, domain names or other
source indicators, in connection with the naming of our
corporate entity and the corporate entities which are our
subsidiaries (other than MedQuist Inc.) and the conduct by us
and our subsidiaries (other than MedQuist Inc.) of their
respective businesses.
The term of trade name license commenced on November 23,
2010 and will continue until (i) our termination of the
License Agreement for any reason upon written notice to MedQuist
Inc., (ii) MedQuist Inc.s termination if we fail or
refuse to perform any obligation created by the License
Agreement or we breach the License Agreement and such failure,
refusal or breach is not cured within 30 calendar days following
notice from MedQuist Inc., or (iii) automatically
terminated, without the need for notice or opportunity to cure,
should any of the following occur: (A) we become bankrupt,
(B) we cease to beneficially own a majority of the voting
power of the outstanding MedQuist Inc. common stock or
(C) the termination of the Sales & Services
Agreement (as described above).
MultiModal
License Agreement
MedQuist Inc. licenses speech recognition and processing
software from MultiModal, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary.
MedQuist Inc.s principal license agreement with MultiModal
was entered into in March 2010. Under that licensing agreement,
MedQuist Inc. pays MultiModal a monthly fee in exchange for a
fixed number of minutes of recording. Each minute of recording
that exceeds the fixed number is charged at a specified rate per
minute. MedQuist Inc.s agreement with MultiModal expires
in April 2013. Thereafter, the agreement automatically renews
and is extended for up to seven additional successive one-year
periods, unless MedQuist Inc. notifies MultiModal in writing of
its election not to extend at least sixty days prior to the last
day of the term. MedQuist Inc. is in discussions with MultiModal
regarding an amendment to the license agreement that would
modify the structure of the term of the agreement. As part of
that modified structure, MedQuist Inc. would have the ability to
use the software licensed under the agreement through April 2021.
Payment of Fee to
S.A.C. Private Capital Group, LLC in connection with Spheris
Acquisition
On April 22, 2010, MedQuist Inc. and CBay Inc. completed
the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Spheris,
pursuant to the terms of the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement,
dated April 15, 2010, among MedQuist Inc., CBay Inc. and
Spheris. The acquisition was funded from the proceeds of credit
facilities entered into in connection with the acquisition. On
May 4, 2010, MedQuist Inc.s audit committee approved
the payment of, and MedQuist Inc. expensed, a $1.5 million
success-based fee to SAC PCG in connection with work performed
on the Spheris Acquisition. SAC PCG owned a majority of our
outstanding common stock prior to consummation of the IPO, the
Private Exchange and the Registered Exchange Offer. Two of our
directors were Managing Directors of SAC PCG until March 2011,
and one of our directors served as senior operating consultant
to SAC PCG until March 2011.
Company
Indebtedness
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., together with MedQuist
Transcriptions Ltd. and certain other subsidiaries of MedQuist
Inc., entered into definitive agreements relating to a
$310 million financing consisting of a $225 million
senior secured credit facility and $85 million of
13% senior subordinated notes. The $225 million senior
secured credit facility is led by General Electric Capital
Corporation, as administrative agent, and SunTrust Bank, as
syndication agent. The facility consists of a $200 million
term loan and a $25 million revolving credit facility
bearing an interest rate of LIBOR plus 550 basis points and
a LIBOR floor of 1.75%. In addition, the revolving credit
facility bears a fee of 50 basis points on undrawn amounts.
On September 14, 2011, the senior secured credit facility
was amended to, among other things, add an accordion feature
that allows for additional
162
borrowing capacity of up to $50.0 million in the form of
additional revolving credit commitments or incremental term
loans, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.
On October 14, 2010, MedQuist Inc. incurred
$85.0 million of indebtedness through the issuance of its
13% senior subordinated notes due 2016 pursuant to a note
purchase agreement. At MedQuist Inc.s option, a portion of
the interest is payable in the form of additional senior
subordinated notes, in which event the interest rate would be
12% paid in cash and 2% paid in the form of additional notes. In
addition, on October 14, 2010, MedQuist Inc. incurred
$200.0 million of indebtedness under the term loan.
Proceeds from the financing were used to refinance the debt
incurred in connection with the April 2010 acquisition of the
assets of Spheris (as described above) and to pay a special cash
dividend of $176.5 million ($4.70 per share) to
shareholders of record of MedQuist Inc. as of October 11,
2010. We and CBay Inc. guaranteed MedQuist Inc.s
obligations under the senior secured credit facility and the
senior subordinated notes. On January 3, 2011, MedQuist
Inc. made a $25.0 million cash payment to reduce the
principal amount of the term loan under the senior secured
credit facility.
On August 18, 2011, MedQuist Inc. loaned $19,000,000 (the
Loan) to CBay Inc. (CBay). The Loan was
documented by a Subordinated Intercompany Note in favor of
MedQuist Inc. by CBay (the Note) and the proceeds of
the Loan were used to partially fund the acquisition of
MultiModal, by MedQuist Holdings. MedQuist Inc. believes the
Loan was made on terms no less favorable than what would be
obtained by MedQuist Inc. in an arms-length transaction.
The Note will mature on August 19, 2013 (the Maturity
Date), which date is the first business day after the
second anniversary of August 18, 2011. Interest will accrue
on any unpaid principal at an annual rate of 15.00% and interest
will be payable on the Maturity Date or, if sooner, the date of
any prepayment. Prepayment of the Note may occur at any time
prior to the Maturity Date with one business days notice,
provided that any prepayment must be for at least $100,000 (or
any whole multiple thereof) and accompanied by any accrued
interest on the amount of principal being paid.
The Loan and Note shall be subordinate and junior to all
obligations of CBay under (i) that certain Credit Agreement
by and among the Company, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd.
(Transcriptions), MedQuist Holdings, the other Loan
Parties signatory thereto, the Lenders signatory thereto, and
General Electric Capital Corporation as Agent for the Lenders
dated October 1, 2010 (as amended, restated, extended,
supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time)
and (ii) that certain Senior Subordinated Note Purchase
Agreement by and among MedQuist Inc., CBay and Transcriptions as
the issuers, Holdings and BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation,
Pennantpark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and THL
Credit, Inc. as the purchasers dated September 30, 2010 (as
amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified
in writing from time to time).
Dividend
On October 15, 2010, MedQuist Inc. paid a special cash
dividend of $4.70 per share to shareholders of record on
October 11, 2010. We received $122.6 million of
dividends.
Accounting
treatment
Assuming we acquire all shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
pursuant to the Merger, the transaction would be accounted for
as an equity transaction, as we would retain control of MedQuist
Inc. after the transaction.
Compliance with
securities laws
All holders of outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
on the effective date of the Merger will be entitled to receive
the Merger consideration. We are not aware of any state in which
the issuance of our common stock pursuant to the Merger is not
in compliance with applicable law. If we become aware of any
state in which the issuance of shares pursuant to the Merger
would not be in compliance with applicable law, we will make a
good faith effort to comply with any such law. If, after such
good faith effort, we cannot comply with any such law, the
issuance of shares pursuant to the Merger will not be made to
the holders of shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock residing in
any such state.
163
No action has been or will be taken in any jurisdiction other
than in the United States that would permit a public offering of
our common stock, or the possession, circulation or distribution
of this prospectus or any other material relating to us or our
common stock in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose
is required. Accordingly, our common stock may not be offered or
sold, directly or indirectly, and neither this prospectus nor
any other offering material or advertisement in connection with
our common stock may be distributed or published, in or from any
country or jurisdiction except in compliance with any applicable
rules and regulations of any such country or jurisdiction. This
prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of any offer to buy in any jurisdiction where such
offer or solicitation would be unlawful. Persons into whose
possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform
themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to
this prospectus, the distribution of this prospectus, and the
resale of the shares of our common stock.
Exchange
agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC has
been appointed as the exchange agent for the Merger. We have
agreed to pay American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC reasonable and customary fees for its
services and will reimburse American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC for its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. All required documents should be sent or delivered to
the exchange agent at the address set forth on the back cover of
this prospectus.
Fees and
expenses
Holders of outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock will
not be required to pay any expenses of notifying holders in
connection with the Merger. However, if a holder handles the
transactions through its broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust
company or other institution, such holder may be required to pay
brokerage fees or commissions. We will generally bear the fees
and expenses of the Merger. We will also pay the exchange agent
reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses and we will indemnify the exchange agent against
certain liabilities and expenses in connection with the Merger,
including liabilities under the federal securities laws.
Transfer
taxes
Holders who tender their shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
for exchange will not be obligated to pay any transfer taxes.
If, however:
|
|
|
|
n
|
shares of our common stock are to be delivered to, or issued in
the name of, any person other than the registered owner of the
tendered shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock are registered in the
name of any person other than the person signing the letter of
transmittal,
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
then the amount of any transfer taxes, whether imposed on the
registered owner or any other persons, will be payable by the
tendering holder. If satisfactory evidence of payment of such
taxes or exemption from them is not submitted with the letter of
transmittal, the amount of such transfer taxes will be billed
directly to the tendering holder.
|
164
No appraisal
rights
No appraisal or dissenters rights are available to holders
of shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock under applicable law in
connection with the Merger.
Fairness
opinion
We have not retained, and do not intend to retain, any
unaffiliated representative to act solely on behalf of the
holders of the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock for purposes
of negotiating the Merger or preparing a report concerning the
fairness of the Merger. The value of our common stock to be
issued in the Merger may not equal or exceed the value of the
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock at the time of this
prospectus.
Comparison of
Rights of Holders of Our Common Stock and MedQuist Inc. Common
Stock
The following describes the material differences between the
rights of holders of the shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
and our common stock. The material differences arise in part
from differences between our governing documents and those of
MedQuist Inc., and in part from differences between New Jersey
and Delaware law. While we believe that the description covers
the material differences between the shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock and our common stock, this summary may not contain
all of the information that is important to you. The following
description does not purport to be a complete statement of all
the differences, or a complete description of the specific
provisions referred to in this summary. The identification of
specific differences is not intended to indicate that other
equally or more significant differences do not exist. You should
carefully read this entire prospectus and the other documents we
refer to for a more complete understanding of the differences
between being a holder of shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
and our common stock.
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
Governing document
|
|
|
|
Holders of shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock have their
rights set forth in, and may enforce their rights under, New
Jersey Business Corporation Act, or the NJBCA, and the MedQuist
Inc. certification of incorporation and by-laws.
|
|
Holders of shares of our common stock have their rights set
forth in, and may enforce their rights under, Delaware General
Corporation Law, or the DGCL, and the MedQuist Holdings Inc.
certification of incorporation and by-laws.
|
|
Liquidation preference
|
|
|
|
In the event of liquidation or dissolution, holders of MedQuist
Inc. common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets
remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation
preference of any outstanding preferred stock.
|
|
In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, holders of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. common stock are entitled to share
ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and
the liquidation preference of any outstanding preferred stock.
|
|
Ranking
|
|
|
|
In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
MedQuist Inc., MedQuist Inc. common stock would rank below all
outstanding preferred stock, if any. As a result, holders of
MedQuist Inc. common stock will not be entitled to receive any
payment or other distribution of assets upon the liquidation or
dissolution until after its obligations to its debt holders and
holders of preferred stock, if any, have been satisfied.
|
|
In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, our
common stock would rank below all outstanding preferred stock,
if any. As a result, holders of our common stock will not be
entitled to receive any payment or other distribution of assets
upon the liquidation or dissolution until after our obligations
to our debt holders and holders of preferred stock, if any, have
been satisfied.
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
The common stock may rank junior to the preferred stock, if any,
with respect to the payment of dividends.
|
|
The common stock may rank junior to the preferred stock, if any,
with respect to the payment of dividends.
|
|
Voting rights
|
|
|
|
Holders of shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock are entitled to
one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted
to a vote of shareholders
|
|
Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to one vote
for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote
of holders of common stock.
|
|
Dividend rights
|
|
|
|
The NJBCA generally provides that a corporation may pay
dividends unless, after paying the dividend, (i) the
corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become
due in the usual course of business or (ii) the
corporations total assets would be less than its total
liabilities.
|
|
The DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out
of surplus or, if there is no surplus,
out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend
is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.
Surplus is defined as the excess of the net assets
of the corporation over the amount determined to be the capital
of the corporation by the board. The capital of the corporation
is typically calculated to be (and cannot be less than) the
aggregate par value of all issued shares of capital stock. Net
assets equals the fair value of the total assets minus total
liabilities. The DGCL also provides that dividends may not be
paid out of net profits if, after the payment of the dividend,
capital is less than the capital represented by the outstanding
stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution
of assets.
|
|
|
Declaration and payment of any dividend is subject to the
discretion of our board. The time and amount of dividends are
dependent upon our financial condition, operations, cash
requirements and availability, debt repayment obligations,
capital expenditure needs and restrictions in our debt
instruments, industry trends, the provisions of Delaware law
affecting the payment of distributions to stockholders and other
factors.
|
|
Listing
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Inc. common stock currently trades on the OTCQB under
the symbol MEDQ.
|
|
Our common stock is listed and traded on The NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol MEDH.
|
|
Stockholder meetings
|
|
|
|
The annual shareholder meeting of MedQuist Inc. is held at such
date and time and as is fixed from time to time by its board and
stated in the notice of the meeting.
|
|
Our by-laws provide that annual stockholder meetings will be
held at a time, date and place selected by our board.
|
|
Quorum for stockholder meetings
|
|
|
|
Holders of shares entitled to cast a majority of the votes at a
meeting constitute a quorum at any meeting of shareholders. When
a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, the quorum will
not be broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any holders of
common stock.
|
|
Unless otherwise required by law or our certificate of
incorporation, the holders of a majority of the voting power of
the issued and outstanding shares of stock of our company
entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by
proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business
at all meetings of stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
|
|
When a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, the quorum
will not be broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any holders
of common stock. When a specified item of business requires a
vote by a class or series (if the company shall then have
outstanding shares of more than one class or series) voting as a
class or series, the holders of a majority of the shares of such
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common stock
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock class or
series shall constitute a quorum (as to such class or series)
for the transaction of such item of business.
|
|
Amendments to charter documents
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, a proposed amendment to a corporations
certificate of incorporation requires (i) approval by its
board, (ii) adoption of the amendment by the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares
entitled to vote on the amendment, unless a specific provision
of the NJBCA or the corporations certificate of
incorporation provides otherwise and (iii) the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast in each class or series of
shares entitled to vote thereon as a class or series.
|
|
Under the DGCL, an amendment to a corporations certificate
of incorporation requires (i) the approval of the board, (ii)
the approval of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to
vote upon the proposed amendment and (iii) the approval of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of each class
entitled to vote thereon as a class.
|
|
Amendments to by-laws
|
|
|
|
The by-laws of MedQuist Inc. permit the board to alter, amend,
or repeal existing by-laws, as well as adopt new by-laws, at any
regular or special meeting of the board.
Under
the NJBCA, the initial by-laws of a corporation are adopted by
the board at its organization meeting. Thereafter, the board has
the power to make, alter and repeal by-laws unless such power is
reserved to the shareholders in the certificate of
incorporation, but by-laws made by the board may be altered or
repealed, and new by-laws made, by the shareholders. The
shareholders may prescribe in the by-laws that any by-law made
by them may not be altered or repealed by the board. Whenever
any amendment to the by-laws, other than as regards the election
of directors, is to be taken by vote of the shareholders, it
must be authorized by a majority of the votes cast at a meeting
of shareholders by the holders of shares entitled to vote
thereon, unless a greater plurality is required by the
certificate of incorporation or the NJBCA.
|
|
Our board is expressly authorized to make, repeal, alter, amend
and rescind our by-laws without the assent or vote of the
stockholders, in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of
the State of Delaware or our certificate of incorporation. The
affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% in voting power
of all outstanding shares of stock of our company entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as
a single class, is required in order for the stockholders of our
company to alter, amend or repeal certain sections of our by-
laws or to adopt any provision inconsistent therewith.
|
|
Authorized preferred stock and common stock
|
|
|
|
The total authorized capital stock of MedQuist Inc. consists of
72,111,975 shares, of which 60,000,000 shares is
common stock and 12,111,975 shares are shares of preferred
stock. At the close of business on September 26, 2011,
|
|
Our total authorized capital stock consists of
325,000,000 shares, of which 300,000,000 shares are
common stock and 25,000,000 are shares of preferred stock. At
the close of business on September 26, 2011, approximately
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
approximately 37,555,893 shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock and no shares of MedQuist Inc. preferred stock were issued
and outstanding (including treasury shares).
|
|
55,054,121 shares of our common stock and no shares of our
preferred stock were issued and outstanding (including treasury
shares).
|
|
|
|
The board of MedQuist Inc. is authorized to provide for the
issuance from time to time of preferred stock in series and, as
to each series, to fix the number, designation, rights,
preferences and limitations, including the voting rights, if
any, the voluntary and involuntary liquidation prices, the
conversion or exchange privileges, if any, applicable to that
series and the redemption price or prices and the other terms of
redemption, if any, applicable to that series.
|
|
Our board is authorized establish one or more series of
preferred stock and to determine, with respect to any series of
preferred stock, the terms and rights of that series, including
designation, number of shares, dividend rights and rates and
dates payable, if any, redemption rights and prices and other
terms of redemption, if any, the voluntary and involuntary
liquidation prices, the conversion or exchange privileges, if
any, restrictions on the issuance of shares for the same series
or of any other class or series, and the voting rights, if any,
applicable to that series.
|
|
|
Our
board may issue preferred shares on terms calculated to
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company
or the removal of our management. Moreover, our authorized but
unissued shares of preferred stock are available for future
issuances without stockholder approval and could be utilized for
a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to
raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit
plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved
shares of preferred stock could render more difficult or
discourage an attempt to obtain control of our company by means
of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
|
|
Number of directors
|
|
|
|
The certificate of incorporation of MedQuist Inc. provides that
the whole board of MedQuist Inc. shall be not less than five nor
more than 20. Subject to any rights of holders of preferred
stock, the exact number of directors within such maximum and
minimum shall be determined by resolution duly adopted by the
board. No decrease in the number of directors shall shorten the
term of any incumbent directors.
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the
number of directors will be fixed from time to time pursuant to
a resolution adopted by the board, but must consist of not less
than seven or more than 15 directors.
Our
board currently consists of nine directors.
|
|
|
|
The by-laws of MedQuist Inc. provide that the number of
directors which shall constitute the whole board of MedQuist
Inc. shall be not less than four nor more than 20. Subject to
any rights of holders of preferred stock, the exact number of
directors within such maximum and minimum shall be determined by
resolution duly adopted by the board. No decrease in the number
of directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of MedQuist Inc. currently consists of three directors
with two vacancies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
Classification of directors
|
|
|
|
The certificate of incorporation of MedQuist Inc. provides for
one class of directors.
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation provides that our board is
divided into three classes of directors, with the classes to be
as nearly equal in number as possible. We have a classified
board, with two directors in Class I, three directors in
Class II and two directors in Class III. The members of
Class I will serve for a term expiring at the first succeeding
annual meeting of stockholders. The members of Class II
will serve for a term expiring at the second succeeding annual
meeting of stockholders. The members of Class III will
serve for a term expiring at the third succeeding annual meeting
of stockholders. As a result, approximately one- third of our
board will be elected each year. A replacement director shall
serve in the same class as the former director he or she is
replacing. The classification of our board will have the effect
of making it more difficult for stockholders to change the
composition of our board.
|
|
Removal of directors; vacancies
|
|
|
|
The certificate of incorporation and by-laws of MedQuist Inc.
provide that vacancies and any newly created directorships
resulting from any increase in the authorized number of
directors and any vacancies in the board resulting from death,
resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office
or other cause may be filled only by an affirmative vote of a
majority of the remaining directors even though less than a
quorum of the board, or by a sole remaining director, and
directors so chosen shall hold office until the next annual
meeting of the shareholders and until his or her successor is
elected and qualified or until he or she sooner dies, resigns,
is removed or becomes disqualified. If one or more directors
shall resign from the board effective as of a future date, a
majority of the directors then in office, including those who
have so resigned as of a future date, shall have the power to
fill such vacancy or vacancies, the vote thereon to take effect
when such resignation or resignations shall become effective,
and each director so elected shall hold office as provided in
the by-laws in the filling of other vacancies, if any.
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation provides that directors other
than those elected pursuant to any stockholders agreement
in existence at the time of the adoption of our certificate of
incorporation may be removed only for cause and only upon the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of
all then outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
In addition, our by-laws provide that, except as set forth in
any stockholders agreement in existence at the time of the
adoption of our certificate of incorporation or any certificate
of designation for preferred stock, any vacancies on our board
will be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
remaining directors, although less than a quorum, or by a sole
remaining director.
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, shareholders may remove directors for cause or,
unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise,
without cause, in each case by the affirmative vote of the
majority of votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote
thereon. MedQuist Inc.s certificate of incorporation does
not prohibit shareholders of MedQuist Inc. from removing
directors with or without cause.
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
Cumulative voting
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, shareholders of a New Jersey corporation do not
have the right to cumulate their votes in the election of
directors unless that right is granted in the certificate of
incorporation of the corporation. The MedQuist Inc. certificate
of incorporation does not permit cumulative voting.
|
|
The DGCL provides that stockholders are not entitled to the
right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless an
entitys certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative
voting.
|
|
Special meetings of stockholders
|
|
|
|
The NJBCA provides that holders of not less than 10% of all
shares entitled to vote at a meeting may apply to the New Jersey
Superior Court to request that a special meeting person or by
proxy and having voting powers will constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business described in such order.
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation provides that special meetings
of our stockholders may be called at any time only by or at the
direction of the chairman of the board, the board or a committee
of the board which has been designated by the board.
|
|
Shareholder action by written consent
|
|
|
|
The NJBCA provides that, except as otherwise stated in the
certificate of incorporation, shareholders who would have been
entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize a permitted or required action at a
meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote were present
and voting may act by written consent without a meeting, except
in regard to the annual election of directors, which may be by
written consent only if unanimous. The MedQuist Inc. certificate
of incorporation does not prohibit shareholders from acting by
written consent. The NJBCA also provides that such shareholder
action may not take effect unless the corporation gives all non-
consenting shareholders advance notice of the action consented
to, the proposed effective date of the action, and any
conditions precedent to such action. Also, under the NJBCA, if
the action gives rise to dissenters rights, the board must
fix a date for the tabulation of consents.
|
|
The DGCL permits stockholder action by written consent unless
otherwise provided by a corporations certificate of
incorporation. Our certificate of incorporation precludes
stockholder action by written consent subject to certain
exceptions.
|
|
Advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
director nominations
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, the written notice of any annual meeting must
specify the purpose or purposes of the meeting. Therefore,
business conducted at a MedQuist Inc. annual shareholder meeting
is limited to the business specified in the meeting notice.
|
|
Our by-laws provide that stockholders seeking to nominate
candidates for election as directors or to bring business before
an annual meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice of
their proposal in writing to the corporate secretary.
|
|
|
|
The MedQuist Inc. by-laws provide that the board, or committee
thereof delegated with the authority to select nominees for
election to the board, shall consider written recommendations of
nominees from shareholders so long as any such recommendation is
received by the Secretary of MedQuist Inc., in the case of an
annual meeting, not later than the date specified in the most
recent proxy statement and, provided further, that any such
recommendation is accompanied
|
|
Generally, to be timely, a stockholders notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than
90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
stockholders. Our by-laws also specify requirements as to the
form and content of a stockholders notice. These
provisions, which do not apply to certain stockholders, may
impede stockholders ability to bring matters before a
meeting of stockholders
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
by (i) such information regarding each nominee as would be
required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to
the Exchange Act, as amended, (ii) a description of any
arrangements or understandings among the recommending
shareholders and each nominee and any other person or entity
with respect to such nomination, and (iii) the consent of
each nominee to serve as a director of MedQuist Inc. if so
elected.
|
|
or make nominations for directors at a meeting of stockholders.
|
|
Business combinations
|
|
|
|
The NJBCA provides that no corporation organized under the laws
of New Jersey with its principal executive offices or
significant operations located in New Jersey, or a resident
domestic corporation, may engage in any business
combination (as defined in the NJBCA) with any interested
shareholder (generally a 10% or greater shareholder) of such
corporation for a period of five years following such interested
shareholders stock acquisition, unless such business
combination is approved by the board of such corporation prior
to the stock acquisition. A resident domestic corporation, such
as MedQuist Inc., cannot opt out of the foregoing provisions of
the NJBCA. In addition, after the conclusion of the five-year
period referred to above, no resident domestic corporation may
engage, at any time, in any business combination with any
interested shareholder of such corporation other than:
(i) a business combination approved by the board prior to
the stock acquisition, (ii) a business combination approved
by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the
voting stock not beneficially owned by such interested
shareholder at a meeting called for such purpose or (iii) a
business combination in which the interested shareholder pays a
formula price designed to ensure that all other shareholders
receive at least the highest price per share paid by such
interested shareholder.
|
|
We are governed by Section 203 of the DGCL which provides that
we may not engage in certain business combinations
with any interested stockholder for a three-year
period following the time that the stockholder became an
interested stockholder, unless:
n
prior to such time, our board approved either the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder;
n upon
consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder
owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding at the time
the transaction commenced, excluding certain shares; or
n at
or subsequent to that time, the business combination is approved
by our board and by the affirmative vote of holders of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
|
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger,
asset or stock sale or other transaction resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to
certain exceptions, an interested stockholder is a
person who, together with that persons affiliates and
associates, owns, or within the previous three years owned, 15%
or more of our voting stock.
|
|
|
Under
certain circumstances, this provision will make it more
difficult for a person who would be an interested
stockholder to effect various business combinations with a
company for a three- year period. This provision may encourage
companies interested in acquiring our company to negotiate in
advance with our board because the stockholder approval
requirement would be avoided if our board approves either the
business combination or the transaction which results in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. These provisions
also may have the effect of preventing changes in our board and
may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
|
|
stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
|
|
Corporate opportunity
|
|
|
|
The NJBCA does not permit a corporation to renounce any interest
or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to
participate in, any business opportunity presented to the
corporation or its officers, directors or shareholders.
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce any
interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to
participate in, any business opportunity which may be a
corporate opportunity for members of our board who are not our
employees (including any directors who also serve as officers)
and their respective employers, and affiliates of the foregoing.
We do not renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity
offered to any such director if such opportunity is expressly
offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as our
director.
|
|
Dissenters rights of appraisal and payment
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, appraisal rights are available in connection
with (i) a merger, consolidation or plan of
exchange to which the corporation is a party,
(ii) any sale, lease or exchange or other disposition of
all or substantially all of a companys assets other than
in the usual and regular course of business or (iii) a
proposal to acquire some or all of the outstanding shares or
assets of a legal entity, either directly or through a
subsidiary, in exchange for the corporations shares (a
share exchange) if, as a result of the share
exchange, the number of voting or participating shares issued in
connection with the share exchange, when combined with shares
already outstanding, would exceed by more than 40 percent
the number of those shares outstanding immediately before the
share exchange, unless an exception applies. A New Jersey
corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that
shareholders will have appraisal rights even in cases where the
exceptions to the availability of appraisal rights discussed
below exist. MedQuist Inc.s certificate of incorporation
does not so provide.
|
|
Under the DGCL, with certain exceptions, our stockholders have
appraisal rights in connection with a merger or consolidation of
the company pursuant to which they will have the right to
receive payment of the fair value of their shares as determined
by the Delaware Court of Chancery.
|
|
Stockholders derivative actions
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, no action shall be brought by a shareholder in
the name of the corporation unless the shareholder held shares
or voting trust certificates in that corporation at the time of
the transaction of which the shareholder complains, or the
shareholders shares or voting trust certificates devolved
upon the shareholder by operation of law from a person who was a
shareholder at the time of the complained transaction.
|
|
Under the DGCL, under certain circumstances, our stockholders
may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our
favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the
stockholder bringing the action is a stockholder at the time of
the transaction to which the action relates or such
stockholders stock thereafter devolved by operation of
law.
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
Supermajority provisions
|
|
|
|
Under the NJBCA, an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote is one of the
requirements for amending the certificate of incorporation.
However, this voting requirement may be subject to greater
requirements if so provided in the certificate of incorporation.
The certificate of incorporation of MedQuist Inc. does not
provide for greater voting requirements.
|
|
The DGCL provides generally that the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote is
required to amend a corporations certificate of
incorporation, unless the certificate of incorporation requires
a greater percentage. Our certificate of incorporation provides
that certain provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
any provisions of our by-laws may be amended only by the
affirmative vote of holders of at least 75% of the voting power
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting
as a single class, which include the following provisions:
|
|
|
n
the provisions regarding classified board (the election
and term of our directors);
n the
provisions regarding competition and corporate opportunities;
n the
provisions regarding stockholder action by written consent;
n the
provisions regarding calling meetings of stockholders;
n the
provisions regarding filling vacancies on our board and newly
created directorships;
n the
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
director nominations;
n the
indemnification provisions; and
n the
amendment provision requiring that the above provisions be
amended only with a 75% supermajority vote.
|
|
|
In
addition, our certificate of incorporation grants our board the
authority to amend and repeal our by-laws without a stockholder
vote in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of the State
of Delaware or our certificate of incorporation.
|
|
Limitations on liability and indemnification of officers
and directors
|
|
|
|
The by-laws of MedQuist Inc. provide that it shall, to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify its
directors and officers who were, or are a party or are
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (whether or not such action,
suit or proceeding arises or arose by or in the right of
MedQuist Inc. or other entity) by reason of the fact that such
director or officer is or was a director or officer of MedQuist
Inc. or is or was serving at the request of MedQuist Inc. as a
director, officer, employee, general
|
|
The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the
personal liability of directors to corporations and their
stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of
directors fiduciary duties. Our certificate of
incorporation includes a provision that eliminates the personal
liability of directors for monetary damages for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a corporation may
eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to the
corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
partner, agent or fiduciary of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise (including
service with respect to employee benefit plans), against
expenses (including, but not limited to, attorneys fees
and costs), judgments, fines (including excise taxes assessed on
a person with respect to any employee benefit plan) and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such
director or officer in accordance with such action, suit or
proceeding, except as otherwise provided in its by-laws. Persons
who were directors or officers of MedQuist Inc. prior to
June 4, 2008, but who do not hold such office on or after
such date, shall not be covered by the by-laws
indemnification provisions.
Expenses incurred by a person covered by the by- laws
indemnification provisions in defending a threatened, pending or
completed civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding shall be
paid by MedQuist Inc. in advance of the final disposition of
such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking
by or on behalf of such person to repay such amount if it shall
ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be
indemnified by MedQuist Inc., except as otherwise provided in
the by-laws.
In
accordance with the NJBCA, indemnification of or advancement or
reimbursement of expenses shall be provided (a) with
respect to expenses or the payment of profits arising from the
purchase or sale of securities of MedQuist Inc. in violation of
Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act; (b) if a judgment
or other final adjudication adverse to such director or officer
establishes that his acts or omissions (i) were in breach
of his duty of loyalty to MedQuist Inc. or its shareholders,
(ii) were not in good faith or involved a knowing violation
of law, or (iii) resulted in the receipt by such director
or officer of an improper personal benefit; (c) for
expenses or liabilities of any type whatsoever (including, but
not limited to, judgments, fines, and amounts paid in
settlement) which have been paid to, or for the benefit of, such
person by an insurance carrier under a policy of liability
insurance the premiums for which are paid by the corporation or
an individual or entity other than such director or officer; and
(d) for amounts paid in settlement of any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit or proceeding without the
written consent of the Corporation, which written consent shall
not be unreasonably withheld.
|
|
director, provided that such provision shall not eliminate or
limit the liability of a director (i) for any breach of the
directors duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or
which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL (regarding, among other
things, the payment of unlawful dividends) or (iv) for any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
In
addition, Section 145 of the DGCL provides that a Delaware
corporation has the power to indemnify its officers and
directors in certain circumstances. Our by-laws also provide
that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest
extent authorized by law. We are also expressly required to
advance certain expenses to our directors and officers and carry
directors and officers insurance providing
indemnification for our directors and officers for some
liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions
and the directors and officers insurance are useful
to attract and retain qualified directors and officers.
Section 145(a) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to indemnify
any director, officer, employee or agent, or former director,
officer, employee or agent, who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in
the right of the corporation) by reason of his service as a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or his
service, at the corporations request, as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding provided that such director or officer acted in good
faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, provided that such
director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to indemnify
any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a
party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by
or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its
favor by reason of the fact that such person is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is
or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another
|
The
board of MedQuist Inc. is authorized, at any time by resolution,
to add to the above list of exceptions from the right of
indemnification or advancement or reimbursement of expenses but
any such additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of MedQuist Inc. common
stock
|
|
Provision applicable to holders of our common stock
|
|
exception shall not apply with respect to any act or omission
which has occurred prior to the date that the board in fact
adopted such resolution. Any such additional exception may, at
any time after its adoption, be amended, supplemented, waived,
or terminated by further resolution of the board of MedQuist
Inc. The by-laws of MedQuist Inc. further provide that it may,
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify,
and advance or reimburse expenses for, all persons (whether or
not directors or officers) in all situations in which such
indemnification, advancement or reimbursement of expenses is not
made mandatory under the by- laws indemnification
provisions.
|
|
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit provided that such
director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification
may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to
which such director or officer shall have been adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that
the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which such
action or suit was brought shall determine upon application
that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all
the circumstances of the case, such director or officer is
fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses
which the court shall deem proper.
|
|
|
The
limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our
certificate of incorporation and by-laws may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against its directors for
breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have
the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation
against directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit our company and our
stockholders. In addition, an investment in our common stock may
be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers
pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which
indemnification is sought.
|
|
Constituency provisions
|
|
|
|
The NJBCA provides that boards may, in determining the best
interests of the corporation, in addition to considering the
effects of any action on shareholders consider:
|
|
The DGCL does not contain a corresponding provision in this
regard.
|
n
the effects of the action on the corporations
employees, suppliers and customers;
|
|
|
n
the effects of the action on the community in which the
corporation operates; and
|
|
|
n
the long-term as well as short-term interests of the
corporation and its shareholders, including the possibility that
these interests may best be served by the continued independence
of the corporation.
|
|
|
175
Description of
Indebtedness
Senior secured
credit facility
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc., as borrower, and our
subsidiaries MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as
co-borrowers and guarantors, and we and certain of our other
subsidiaries as guarantors, entered into the Senior Secured
Credit Facility with certain lenders and General Electric
Capital Corporation, as administrative agent.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $200 million term loan, advanced in one drawing on
October 14, 2010, or the Closing Date, with a term of five
years, repayable in equal quarterly installments of
$5 million, commencing on the first day of the first fiscal
quarter beginning after the Closing Date, with the balance
payable at maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $25 million revolving credit facility under which
borrowings may be made from time to time during the period from
the Closing Date until the fifth anniversary of the Closing
Date. The revolving facility includes a $5 million
letter-of-credit
sub-facility
and a $5 million swing line loan
sub-facility.
|
On September 14, 2011, the Senior Secured Credit Facility
was amended to, among other things, add an accordion feature
that allows for additional borrowing capacity of up to
$50.0 million in the form of additional revolving credit
commitments or incremental term loans, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions.
Interest rate
and fees
The borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
co-borrowers option, either (a) a base rate
determined by reference to the highest of (1) the rate last
quoted by the Wall Street Journal as the Prime Rate
in the United States, (2) the federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1% and (3) the LIBOR rate for a one-month interest
period plus 1.00% or (b) the higher of (i) a LIBOR
rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits
in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period
relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs
and (ii) 1.75%. The applicable margin is 4.50% with respect
to base rate borrowings and 5.50% with respect to LIBOR
borrowings.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under
the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the borrowers are required
to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving
credit facility in respect of the unutilized commitments
thereunder at a rate per annum equal to 0.50%. The borrowers are
also required to pay a fee on the average daily issued but
undrawn face amount of all outstanding letters of credit at a
rate per annum equal to the applicable margin then in effect
with respect to LIBOR loans under the revolving credit facility,
as well as a customary fronting fee of 0.125% and other
customary letter of credit fees.
Prepayments
Subject to certain exceptions, the Senior Secured Credit
Facility requires the co-borrowers to prepay outstanding term
loans with:
|
|
|
|
n
|
prior to the earlier of December 31, 2013 or the date upon
which we own 100% of the stock of MedQuist Inc., a percentage of
excess cash flow of MedQuist Inc. ranging from 25% to 65%
depending upon certain leverage tests;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
following the earlier of December 31, 2013 or the date upon
which we own 100% of the stock of MedQuist Inc., a percentage of
our excess cash flow ranging from 60% to 65% depending upon
certain leverage tests;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
50% of the net cash proceeds arising from the issuance or sale
by us or any of our subsidiaries of its own stock, subject to
certain exceptions, including exceptions for up to
$100 million of proceeds arising from one or more sales by
us of its own stock pursuant to one or more underwritten public
offerings; and
|
176
|
|
|
|
n
|
100% of the net cash proceeds received by us or any of our
subsidiaries from any loss, damage, destruction or condemnation
of, or any sale, transfer or other disposition of, any asset,
subject to certain thresholds and certain exceptions and
reinvestment rights.
|
The borrowers may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility or voluntarily reduce unutilized
portions of the revolving credit facility at any time,
generally, without premium or penalty.
Guaranty and
security
The obligations of the borrowers under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by us and substantially
all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries. All
obligations and related guarantees are secured by a first
priority perfected security interest in substantially all
existing and after-acquired real and personal property of the
borrowers and the guarantors.
Certain
covenants and events of default
The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains a number of
significant covenants. We believe that these covenants are
material terms of the credit agreement and that information
about the covenants is material to an investors
understanding of our financial condition and liquidity. Covenant
compliance EBITDA is used to determine our compliance with
certain of these covenants. Any breach of covenants in the
Senior Secured Credit Facility (including those that are tied to
financial ratios based on covenant compliance EBITDA) could
result in a default under our credit agreement and the lenders
could elect to declare all amounts borrowed to be immediately
due and payable.
Subject to certain exceptions and threshold amounts, the
covenants under the credit agreement, among other things,
restrict the ability of us and our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
n
|
incur, create, assume or permit to exist any additional
indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
incur, create, assume or permit to exist any lien on any
property or assets (including stock or other securities of any
person, including any of our subsidiaries);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
enter into sale and lease-back transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
make investments, loans, or advances;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
engage in mergers or consolidations;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
make certain acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
change the business conducted by our company and our
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
amend or modify certain material agreements governing our
indebtedness (including the Senior Subordinated Notes); or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
make capital expenditures in excess of certain amounts.
|
On September 14, 2011, the Senior Secured Credit Facility
was amended to, among other things, permit repurchases of our
outstanding common stock in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$25.0 million.
Under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to
maintain (i) a minimum consolidated interest coverage
ratio, initially, of 2.75x and increasing over the term of the
facility to 4.00x, (ii) a maximum consolidated total
leverage ratio, initially of 4.00x and declining over the term
of the facility to 1.50x and (iii) a maximum consolidated
senior leverage ratio, initially of 3.00x, and declining over
the term of the facility to 1.00x.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains certain
affirmative covenants and events of default, including financial
and other reporting requirements, as well as an event of default
pursuant to a change of control as defined therein.
As of August 25, 2011 we were in compliance in all material
respects with all covenants and provisions in the Senior Secured
Credit Facility.
177
The senior
subordinated notes
In addition to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, in connection
with the Corporate Reorganization, MedQuist Inc., as issuer, and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. and CBay Inc., as co-issuers and
guarantors, and we and certain of our other subsidiaries, as
guarantors, issued $85.0 million aggregate principal amount
of 13% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 pursuant to a
Note Purchase Agreement with BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A.,
and THL Credit, Inc. The Senior Subordinated Notes are
guaranteed on a joint and several, absolute, unconditional and
irrevocable basis, by us and certain of our subsidiaries.
Interest on the notes is payable in quarterly installments at
the issuers option at either (i) 13% in cash or
(ii) 12% in cash plus 2% in the form of additional Senior
Subordinated Notes. Closing and funding of the Senior Secured
Credit Facility and the Senior Subordinated Notes occurred on
October 14, 2010. The Senior Subordinated Notes are
non-callable for the first thirty months following after the
closing date, after which they are redeemable at 107.0%
declining ratably until sixty-six months after the closing date.
The Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of significant
covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to
dispose of assets, repay other indebtedness, incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness,
incur liens, make capital expenditures, investments or
acquisitions, engage in mergers of consolidations, engage in
certain types of transactions with affiliates and otherwise
restrict our activities. Under the Senior Subordinated Notes, we
are required to satisfy and remain in compliance with specified
financial ratios. Under the Senior Subordinated Notes, we are
required to maintain (i) a minimum consolidated interest
coverage ratio, initially of 2.50x and increasing over the term
of the facility 3.60x, (ii) a maximum consolidated total
leverage ratio, initially of 4.40x and declining over the term
of the facility to 1.70x and (iii) a maximum consolidated
senior leverage ratio, initially of 3.30x and declining over the
term of the facility to 1.10x.
Other
indebtedness
CBay Systems and Services, Inc., Mirrus Systems, Inc., CBay Inc.
and CBay Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. have entered into certain
working capital facilities, term loans and revolving lines of
credit for purposes of operating their respective businesses. In
total, there are seven such financing arrangements currently in
place. As of June 30, 2011, there were no amounts
outstanding under these arrangements. We anticipate entering
into similar credit facilities from time to time in the future
to satisfy working capital and other needs.
We were party to a credit agreement with ICICI Bank, Mumbai,
India in the amount of $2.8 million, at interest rates
ranging from LIBOR plus 2.5% and 15.5%, respectively, which is
secured by CBay Indias current assets and fixed assets.
The amount outstanding as of June 30, 2011,
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0 million,
$0.2 million, $1.4 million and $1.7 million,
respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 we
recorded $0, $35,000, $205,000 and $98,000, respectively, of
interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations.
CBay India terminated the agreement and ICICI Bank terminated
its security interest in CBay Indias assets.
We are party to a credit agreement with IndusInd Bank, Mumbai,
India of $6.0 million at interest rates of LIBOR plus 3%,
which is secured by current assets and fixed assets of CBay
India. The amount outstanding under this credit agreement as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was
$5.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively. For the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and for the year ended
December 31, 2010, we recorded $70,000 and $44,000,
respectively, of interest expense in our consolidated statements
of operations.
The foregoing agreements contain restrictive covenants
applicable to our subsidiaries which are parties thereto,
including with respect to the payment to us of dividends by such
subsidiaries.
178
Comparative
Market Price and Dividend Information
Market price
information for common stock
Our shares are listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol MEDH effective February 4, 2011. They
had not previously been listed on The NASDAQ Global Market or
any other U.S. market.
The share information presented below gives effect to our
redomiciliation and the related conversion of our shares,
pursuant to which every 4.5 shares of our common stock
outstanding prior to our redomiciliation have been converted
into one share of our common stock upon our redomiciliation.
Our shares were formerly listed on AIM under the symbol
CBAY. Our shares began trading on AIM in June 2007.
However, we delisted from AIM and January 27, 2011 was the
last day on which our shares traded on AIM. Since
December 24, 2010, the date we announced the schedule for
the delisting of our shares from AIM, the average daily trading
volume for our shares on AIM has been less than
1,000 shares and our shares were traded on AIM on only
three of the sixteen trading days during that period. The
closing price of our shares on AIM on December 24, 2010,
was £6.08, equivalent to $9.36 per share based on the
Federal Reserve noon buying rate of $1.54 to £1.00 in
effect on December 24, 2010.
On March 24, 2011, MedQuist Inc. notified NASDAQ of its
intent to voluntarily delist its shares traded under the ticker
symbol, MEDQ, on the NASDAQ Global Market and the
delisting from NASDAQ became effective on or about
April 14, 2011. MedQuist Inc. common stock currently trades
on the OTCQB under the symbol MEDQ. Prior to that,
MedQuist Inc. common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the ticker symbol MEDQ effective on
July 17, 2008 and before that MedQuist Inc. common stock
traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol MEDQ.PK.
The following table shows (1) the high and low market
prices for our shares for the most recent five years and for
each full financial quarter for the two most recent fiscal years
and (2) the high and low closing bid quotations for those
periods MedQuist Inc. common stock was traded on the OTCQB and
Pink Sheets (as reported by the Pink Sheets LLC) and the
high and low sales prices for those periods MedQuist Inc. common
stock was quoted on The NASDAQ Global Market (as reported by The
NASDAQ Global Market) for the most recent five years and for
each full financial quarter for the two most recent fiscal
years. The
over-the-counter
market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up,
mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily reflect the
prices for actual transactions. The prices listed during the
periods for which the shares traded on AIM have been converted
to U.S. dollars based on the relevant Federal Reserve spot
rate.
Market prices for our shares have fluctuated significantly since
they were listed on AIM and trading volume on AIM have generally
been very small in relation to the number of our total
outstanding shares. On many trading days no shares have traded.
During 2009, the average daily trading volume of our shares on
AIM was 1,568* shares. Between January 1, 2010 and
December 24, 2010, the average daily volume of our shares
on AIM was
179
2,313 shares. As a result, the market prices shown in the
following table may not be indicative of the market prices at
which our shares will trade.
|
|
* |
Excludes a single trade on July 24, 2009 of
3.4 million shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Inc.
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
Share price
|
|
Share price
|
|
|
(dollars)
|
|
(dollars)
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
9.54
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
12.39
|
|
|
$
|
6.61
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
2007
|
|
|
5.04
|
(1)
|
|
|
2.86
|
(1)
|
|
|
6.91
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2011
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
First Quarter 2011
|
|
|
10.21
|
(2)
|
|
|
7.84
|
(2)
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
|
|
8.01
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2010
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
12.39
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
Third Quarter 2010
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
8.76
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
Second Quarter 2010
|
|
|
6.98
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
First Quarter 2010
|
|
|
9.54
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2009
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
7.89
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
Third Quarter 2009
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
Second Quarter 2009
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
6.88
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
First Quarter 2009
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
We were admitted to AIM on
June 18, 2007. Data for 2007 reflects closing prices from
June 15, 2007 to December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
(2)
|
We delisted from AIM and
January 27, 2011 was the last day on which our shares
traded on AIM. We were admitted to the NASDAQ Global Market on
February 4, 2011.
|
The following table sets forth the closing prices of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc. as reported on
September 26, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
Dates
|
|
Closing Price
|
|
Closing Price
|
September 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
8.95
|
|
|
$
|
9.10
|
|
180
Holders
As of September 26, 2011, there were 55,054,121 shares
outstanding and approximately 176 holders of record of our
shares.
As of September 26, 2011, there were 37,555,893 shares
of MedQuist Inc. common stock outstanding and approximately 337
holders of record of MedQuist Inc. shares.
Dividends
No dividends have been declared on our common stock for the
quarter ended June 30, 2011 and the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 or 2008. See Dividend
Policy.
In October 2010, MedQuist Inc. announced a special dividend of
$4.70 per share of its common stock which was paid on
October 14, 2010. This dividend resulted in the use of
$176.5 million of cash. On September 2, 2009, MedQuist
Inc. announced a dividend of $1.33 per share of its common stock
which was paid on September 15, 2009 to shareholders of
record as of the close of business on September 9, 2009.
This resulted in the use of approximately $49.9 million of
cash. On July 14, 2008, MedQuist Inc. announced a dividend
of $2.75 per share of its common stock which was paid on
August 4, 2008 to shareholders of record as of the close of
business on July 25, 2008. This resulted in the use of
approximately $103.3 million of cash. Any future
determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the
MedQuist Inc. board of directors and will depend on its
financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements, and other factors that the board of directors may
deem relevant.
181
Description of
Capital Stock
The following discussion summarizes the material terms of the
common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger
contemplated by this prospectus. This discussion does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to our certificate of incorporation and by-laws to be
filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part. You can obtain copies of those
documents by following the instructions under Where You
Can Find More Information.
Our purpose is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which
corporations may now or hereafter be organized under the DGCL.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue up to
300 million shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per
share, and 25 million shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.10 per share. No shares of preferred stock will be issued or
outstanding immediately after the Merger contemplated by this
prospectus.
Common
stock
The common stock has the voting rights described below under
Voting, and the dividend rights
described below under Dividends. Holders
of common stock do not have conversion or redemption rights or
any preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our unissued
securities. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of
common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of any
preferred shares which may be authorized and issued in the
future.
Preferred
stock
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board to
establish one or more series of preferred stock and to
determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock, the
terms and rights of that series, including:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the designation of the series;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the number of shares of the series, which our board of directors
may, except where otherwise provided in the preferred stock
designation, increase (but not above the total number of
authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the
number of shares then outstanding);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
whether dividends, if any, will be cumulative or non-cumulative
and the dividend rate of the series;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the dates at which dividends, if any, will be payable;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the redemption rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of
the series;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the terms and amounts of any sinking fund provided for the
purchase or redemption of shares of the series;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the amounts payable on shares of the series in the event of any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of the affairs of our company;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
whether the shares of the series will be convertible into shares
of any other class or series, or any other security, of our
company or any other company, and, if so, the specification of
the other class or series or other security, the conversion
price or prices or rate or rates, any rate adjustments, the date
or dates as of which the shares will be convertible and all
other terms and conditions upon which the conversion may be made;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of
any other class or series; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series.
|
182
Voting
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share
on all matters to be voted on by holders of our common stock.
Dividends
The DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out
of surplus or, if there is no surplus,
out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend
is declared
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Surplus is defined as the
excess of the net assets of the corporation over the amount
determined to be the capital of the corporation by the board.
The capital of the corporation is typically calculated to be
(and cannot be less than) the aggregate par value of all issued
shares of capital stock. Net assets equals the fair value of the
total assets minus total liabilities. The DGCL also provides
that dividends may not be paid out of net profits if, after the
payment of the dividend, capital is less than the capital
represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a
preference upon the distribution of assets.
Declaration and payment of any dividend is subject to the
discretion of our board of directors. The time and amount of
dividends will be dependent upon our financial condition,
operations, cash requirements and availability, debt repayment
obligations, capital expenditure needs and restrictions in our
debt instruments, industry trends, the provisions of Delaware
law affecting the payment of distributions to stockholders and
other factors.
Stockholder
meetings
Our by-laws provide that annual stockholder meetings will be
held at a time, date and place selected by our board.
Anti-takeover
effects of certain provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and by-laws
Several provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws have anti-takeover effects. These provisions are
intended to avoid costly takeover battles, reduce our
vulnerability to a hostile change of control and enhance the
ability of our board to maximize stockholder value in connection
with any unsolicited offer to acquire us. However, these
anti-takeover provisions, which are summarized below, could also
discourage, delay or prevent (1) the merger or acquisition
of our company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or
otherwise, that a stockholder may consider in its best interest,
and (2) the replacement
and/or
removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Authorized
preferred stock and common stock
Our board may issue preferred shares on terms calculated to
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company
or the removal of our management. Moreover, our authorized but
unissued shares of preferred stock will be available for future
issuances without stockholder approval and could be utilized for
a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to
raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit
plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved
shares of preferred stock could render more difficult or
discourage an attempt to obtain control of our company by means
of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Classified
board of directors
Our certificate of incorporation provides that our board is
divided into three classes of directors, with the classes to be
as nearly equal in number as possible. We have a classified
board, with three directors in Class I, three directors in
Class II and three directors in Class III. We
currently have one vacancy on our board of directors. The
members of Class I will serve for a term expiring at the
first succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. The members of
Class II will serve for a term expiring at the second
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. The members of
Class III will serve for a term expiring at the third
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. As a result,
approximately one-third of our board of directors will be
elected each year. A replacement director shall
183
serve in the same class as the former director he or she is
replacing. The classification of our board will have the effect
of making it more difficult for stockholders to change the
composition of our board. Our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws provide that the number of directors will be fixed from
time to time pursuant to a resolution adopted by the board, but
must consist of not less than seven or more than
15 directors.
Removal of
directors; vacancies
Our certificate of incorporation provides that directors other
than those elected pursuant to any stockholders agreement
in existence at the time of the adoption of our certificate of
incorporation may be removed only for cause and only upon the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of
all then outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
In addition, our by-laws provide that, except as set forth in
any stockholders agreements in existence at the time of
the adoption of our certificate of incorporation or any
certificate of designation for preferred stock, any vacancies on
our board will be filled only by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the remaining directors, although less than a
quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
No cumulative
voting
The DGCL provides that stockholders are not entitled to the
right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless an
entitys certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative
voting.
Calling of
special meetings of stockholders
Our certificate of incorporation provides that special meetings
of our stockholders may be called at any time only by or at the
direction of the chairman of the board, the board or a committee
of the board which has been designated by the board.
Stockholder
action by written consent
The DGCL permits stockholder action by written consent unless
otherwise provided by a corporations certificate of
incorporation. Our certificate of incorporation precludes
stockholder action by written consent subject to certain
exceptions.
Advance notice
requirements for stockholder proposals and director
nominations
Our by-laws provide that stockholders seeking to nominate
candidates for election as directors or to bring business before
an annual meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice of
their proposal in writing to the corporate secretary.
Generally, to be timely, a stockholders notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than
90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
stockholders. Our by-laws also specify requirements as to the
form and content of a stockholders notice. These
provisions, which do not apply to certain stockholders, may
impede stockholders ability to bring matters before a
meeting of stockholders or make nominations for directors at a
meeting of stockholders.
Business
combinations
We are governed by Section 203 of the DGCL which provides
that we may not engage in certain business
combinations with any interested stockholder
for a three-year period following the time that the stockholder
became an interested stockholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
n
|
prior to such time, our board approved either the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder;
|
184
|
|
|
|
n
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced, excluding certain
shares; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
at or subsequent to that time, the business combination is
approved by our board and by the affirmative vote of holders of
at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger,
asset or stock sale or other transaction resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to
certain exceptions, an interested stockholder is a
person who, together with that persons affiliates and
associates, owns, or within the previous three years owned, 15%
or more of our voting stock.
Under certain circumstances, this provision will make it more
difficult for a person who would be an interested
stockholder to effect various business combinations with a
company for a three-year period. This provision may encourage
companies interested in acquiring our company to negotiate in
advance with our board because the stockholder approval
requirement would be avoided if our board approves either the
business combination or the transaction which results in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. These provisions
also may have the effect of preventing changes in our board and
may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which
stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
Corporate
opportunity
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce any
interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to
participate in, any business opportunity which may be a
corporate opportunity for members of our board who are not our
employees (including any directors who also serve as officers)
and their respective employers, and affiliates of the foregoing.
We do not renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity
offered to any such director if such opportunity is expressly
offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as our
director.
Dissenters
rights of appraisal and payment
Under the DGCL, with certain exceptions, our stockholders will
have appraisal rights in connection with a merger or
consolidation of the company pursuant to which they will have
the right to receive payment of the fair value of their shares
as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery.
Stockholders
derivative actions
Under the DGCL, under certain circumstances, our stockholders
may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our
favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the
stockholder bringing the action is a holder of shares of our
common stock at the time of the transaction to which the action
relates or such stockholders stock thereafter devolved by
operation of law.
Forum
Our certificate of incorporation provides that unless we consent
to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum
for any (i) derivative action or proceeding brought on
behalf of our company, (ii) action asserting a claim of
breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer,
employee or agent of our company to the company or the
companys stockholders, (iii) action asserting a claim
arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, or
(iv) action asserting a claim governed by the internal
affairs doctrine, in each such case subject to said Court of
Chancery having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable
parties named as defendants therein. Any person or entity
purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of
capital stock of our company shall be deemed to have notice of
and consented to the forum provisions in our certificate of
incorporation.
185
Supermajority
provisions
The DGCL provides generally that the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote is
required to amend a corporations certificate of
incorporation, unless the certificate of incorporation requires
a greater percentage. Our certificate of incorporation provides
that certain provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
any provisions of our by-laws may be amended only by the
affirmative vote of holders of at least 75% of the voting power
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting
as a single class. Such provisions include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding classified board (the election and term
of our directors);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding competition and corporate opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding stockholder action by written consent;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding calling meetings of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the provisions regarding filling vacancies on our board and
newly created directorships;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
director nominations;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the indemnification provisions; and
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the amendment provision requiring that the above provisions be
amended only with a 75% supermajority vote.
|
In addition, our certificate of incorporation grants our board
the authority to amend and repeal our by-laws without a
stockholder vote in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of
the State of Delaware or our certificate of incorporation.
Limitations on
liability and indemnification of officers and
directors
The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the
personal liability of directors to corporations and their
stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of
directors fiduciary duties. Our certificate of
incorporation includes a provision that eliminates the personal
liability of directors for monetary damages for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a corporation
may eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to
the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that such
provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a
director (i) for any breach of the directors duty of
loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under
Section 174 of the DGCL (regarding, among other things, the
payment of unlawful dividends) or (iv) for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
In addition, Section 145 of the DGCL provides that a
Delaware corporation has the power to indemnify its officers and
directors in certain circumstances. Our by-laws also provide
that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest
extent authorized by law. We are also expressly required to
advance certain expenses to our directors and officers and carry
directors and officers insurance providing
indemnification for our directors and officers for some
liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions
and the directors and officers insurance are useful
to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.
Section 145(a) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to
indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent, or former
director, officer, employee or agent, who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in
the right of the corporation) by reason of his service as a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or his
service, at the corporations request, as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding provided that such director or officer acted in good
faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, provided that such
director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful.
186
Section 145(b) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action
or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a
judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is
or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit provided that such director
or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, except that no indemnification may be made in
respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such director
or officer shall have been adjudged to be liable to the
corporation unless and only to the extent that the Delaware
Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was
brought shall determine upon application that, despite the
adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances
of the case, such director or officer is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the court shall
deem proper.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against its directors for
breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have
the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation
against directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit our company and our
stockholders. In addition, an investment in our common stock may
be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers
pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which
indemnification is sought.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or
persons controlling MedQuist Holdings Inc. or MedQuist Inc.
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
MedQuist Inc. have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Transfer agent
and registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our shares in the United
States is American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, LLC.
Listing
Our shares are listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol MEDH.
187
Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion sets forth the material United States
federal income tax consequences to holders of MedQuist Inc.
common stock of the receipt of our common stock in the merger of
Merger Subsidiary with and into MedQuist Inc. This discussion
does not address all aspects of United States federal income
taxes and does not deal with foreign, state, local, alternative
minimum or other tax considerations that may be relevant to
U.S. holders and
non-U.S. holders
(each, as defined below) in light of their personal
circumstances. This discussion is based upon the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, the regulations
of the U.S. Treasury Department and court and
administrative rulings and decisions in effect on the date of
this document. These laws may change, possibly retroactively,
and any change could affect the continuing validity of this
discussion.
For purposes of this discussion, we use the term
U.S. holder to mean:
|
|
|
|
n
|
citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United
States or any of its political subdivisions;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a trust that (i) is subject to the supervision of a court
within the United States and the control of one or more United
States persons or (ii) has a valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a
United States person; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source.
|
For purposes of this discussion, a
non-U.S. holder
is a person that is neither a U.S. holder nor a partnership
(or any other entity taxed as a partnership for United States
federal income tax purposes).
If a partnership holds MedQuist Inc. common stock, the tax
treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of
the partners and the activities of the partnership. If you are a
partner of a partnership holding MedQuist Inc. common stock, you
should consult your tax advisors.
This discussion assumes that you hold your shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of
section 1221 of the Code. Further, this discussion does not
address all aspects of United States federal income taxation
that may be relevant to you in light of your particular
circumstances or that may be applicable to you if you are
subject to special treatment under the United States federal
income tax laws, including if you are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a financial institution;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a tax-exempt organization;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
an S corporation or other pass-through entity;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a dealer in securities or foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a trader in securities who elects the
mark-to-market
method of accounting for your securities;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a MedQuist Inc. shareholder subject to the alternative minimum
tax provisions of the Code;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a controlled foreign corporation;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a passive foreign investment company;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
an expatriate or former long-term resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a MedQuist Inc. shareholder who received your MedQuist Inc.
common stock through the exercise of employee stock options or
through a tax-qualified retirement plan;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a person that has a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a holder of options granted under any MedQuist Inc. benefit
plan; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
a MedQuist Inc. shareholder who holds MedQuist Inc. common stock
as part of a hedge against currency risk, straddle or a
constructive sale or conversion transaction.
|
188
Tax consequences
of the Merger
U.S.
holders
Upon the conversion of MedQuist Inc. common stock pursuant to
the Merger, a U.S. holder will recognize gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized upon
receipt of our common stock in the Merger and the
U.S. holders adjusted basis in MedQuist Inc. common
stock converted in the Merger. Generally, such gain or loss will
be capital gain or loss and will be long term capital gain or
loss if the U.S. holders holding period for the
shares exceeds one year. Long term capital gains of
non-corporate U.S. holders are subject to reduced rates of
taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to
limitations.
Non-U.S.
holders
Any gain realized on the conversion of MedQuist Inc. common
stock pursuant to the Merger generally will not be subject to
United States federal income tax unless:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of
the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income
tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent
establishment of the
non-U.S. holder);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition,
and certain other conditions are met; or
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
MedQuist Inc. is or has been a United States real property
holding corporation for United States federal income tax
purposes.
|
An individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the first bullet point immediately above will be
subject to tax on the net gain derived from the disposition
under regular graduated United States federal income tax rates.
An individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet point immediately above will be
subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the
disposition, which may be offset by United States source capital
losses, even though the individual is not considered a resident
of the United States. If a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point
immediately above, it will be subject to tax on its net gain in
the same manner as if it were a United States person as defined
under the Code and, in addition, may be subject to the branch
profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings
and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
We do not believe that MedQuist Inc. is or has been a
United States real property holding corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes.
Tax consequences
of holding our common stock
U.S.
holders
Dividends and
other distributions on our common stock
The gross amount of any distribution by us of cash or property,
other than certain distributions, if any, of common stock
distributed pro rata to all of our shareholders, with respect to
common stock will constitute dividends to the extent such
distributions are paid out of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits as determined under United States federal
income tax principles. To the extent, if any, that the amount of
any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings
and profits, it generally will be treated first as a tax free
return of capital, on a
share-by-share
basis, to the extent of the U.S. holders adjusted tax
basis in our common stock, and thereafter as capital gain.
Dividends received by a corporate U.S. holder generally
will qualify for the dividends received deduction if the
requisite holding period is satisfied. With certain exceptions,
and provided certain holding period requirements are met,
dividends received by a non-corporate U.S. holder generally
will constitute qualified dividends that will be
subject to tax at the maximum tax rate accorded to capital gains
for tax years beginning on or before
189
December 31, 2012, after which the rate applicable to
dividends is currently scheduled to return to the tax rate
generally applicable to ordinary income.
Gain on
Disposition of Common Stock
Upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common
stock, a U.S. holder will recognize gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on
the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock and
the U.S. holders adjusted basis in such common stock.
Generally, such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and
will be long term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. holders holding period for the shares exceeds
one year. Long term capital gains of non-corporate
U.S. holders are subject to reduced rates of taxation. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Non-U.S.
holders
Dividends and
other distributions on our common stock
The gross amount of any distribution by us of cash or property,
other than certain distributions, if any, of common stock
distributed pro rata to all of our shareholders, with respect to
common stock will constitute dividends to the extent such
distributions are paid out of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits as determined under United States federal
income tax principles. To the extent, if any, that the amount of
any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings
and profits, it generally will be treated first as a tax free
return of capital, on a
share-by-share
basis, to the extent of the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in our common stock, and thereafter as
capital gain.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock generally will be subject to withholding of
United States federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower
rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
However, dividends that are effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and, if required by an applicable
income tax treaty, are attributable to a United States permanent
establishment) are not subject to the withholding tax, provided
certain certification and disclosure requirements are satisfied.
Instead, such dividends are subject to United States federal
income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a United States person as defined under the Code. Any such
effectively connected dividends received by a foreign
corporation may be subject to an additional branch profits tax
at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an
applicable treaty rate and avoid backup withholding, as
discussed below, for dividends will be required (a) to
complete Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury
that such holder is not a United States person as defined
under the Code and is eligible for treaty benefits or
(b) if our common stock is held through certain foreign
intermediaries, to satisfy the relevant certification
requirements of applicable United States Treasury
regulations. Special certification and other requirements apply
to certain
non-U.S. holders
that are passthrough entities rather than corporations or
individuals.
A
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock eligible for a reduced rate of United States
withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a
refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate
claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
Gain on
disposition of common stock
Any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock
generally will not be subject to United States federal income
tax unless:
|
|
|
|
n
|
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of
the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income
tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent
establishment of the
non-U.S. holder);
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of that disposition,
and certain other conditions are met; or
|
190
n we
are or have been a United States real property holding
corporation for United States federal income tax purposes.
An individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the first bullet point immediately above will be
subject to tax on the net gain derived from the sale under
regular graduated United States federal income tax rates. An
individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet point immediately above will be
subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale,
which may be offset by United States source capital losses, even
though the individual is not considered a resident of the United
States. If a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point
immediately above, it will be subject to tax on its net gain in
the same manner as if it were a United States person as defined
under the Code and, in addition, may be subject to the branch
profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings
and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
We believe we are not and do not anticipate becoming a
United States real property holding corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes.
Information
reporting and
back-up
withholding
A holder may be subject to information reporting requirements
with respect to dividends paid on our common stock, and on the
proceeds from the sale, exchange or disposition of our common
stock.
In addition, a holder may be subject to
back-up
withholding (currently at 28%) on any dividends paid on our
common stock, and on the proceeds from the sale, exchange or
other disposition of our common stock, unless the holder
provides certain identifying information, such as a duly
executed IRS
Form W-9
or appropriate
W-8, or
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Back-up
withholding is not an additional tax and the amount of any
back-up
withholding will be allowable as a credit against a
holders United States federal income tax liability and may
entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain required
information is timely furnished to the IRS. Holders are urged to
consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the
information reporting and
back-up
withholding rules to them.
Additional
withholding requirements applicable to
non-U.S.
holders
Under recently enacted legislation, the relevant withholding
agent may be required to withhold 30% of any dividends paid
after December 31, 2013 and any proceeds of a sale of our
common stock paid after December 31, 2014 to (i) a
foreign financial institution unless such foreign financial
institution agrees to verify, report and disclose its
U.S. accountholders and meets certain other specified
requirements or (ii) a non-financial foreign entity that is
the beneficial owner of the payment unless such entity certifies
that it does not have any substantial United States owners or
provides the name, address and taxpayer identification number of
each substantial United States owner and such entity meets
certain other specified requirements.
Non-U.S. holders
are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the effect, if
any, of the recent United States federal income tax legislation
on their investment in our common stock.
This discussion does not address tax consequences that may
vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances.
Moreover, it does not address any non-income tax or any foreign,
state or local tax consequences of the Merger. Tax matters are
very complicated, and the tax consequences of the Merger to you
will depend upon the facts of your particular situation.
Accordingly, we strongly urge you to consult with a tax advisor
to determine the particular federal, state, local or foreign
income or other tax consequences to you of the Merger.
191
Legal
Matters
The validity of our common stock to be issued in the Merger will
be passed upon for us by Pepper Hamilton LLP.
Experts
The audited consolidated financial statements of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009
and 2010 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010 have been included herein and in this
prospectus in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The audited consolidated financial statements of MedQuist Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 and
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010 have been included herein and in this
prospectus in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The audited consolidated financial statements of MedQuist Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of December 2006 and 2007 and for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2007 have been included herein and in this prospectus in
reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus,
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing. KPMG LLPs report on the consolidated financial
statements contains explanatory paragraphs that state MedQuist
Inc. and subsidiaries adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective
January 1, 2006 and adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, effective January 1, 2007.
The consolidated financial statements of Spheris Inc. at
December 2008 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2009, appearing in this
prospectus and registration statement have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth
in their report thereon (which contains an explanatory paragraph
describing conditions that raise substantial doubt about Spheris
Inc.s ability to continue as a going concern as described
in Notes 2 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements)
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
Where You Can
Find More Information
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-4
under the Securities Act to register the shares of MedQuist
Holdings Inc. The term registration statement means the initial
registration statement and any and all amendments thereto,
including the exhibits and schedules to the initial registration
statement and any amendments. This prospectus, which constitutes
a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of
the information set forth in the registration statement or the
exhibits and schedules filed therewith. For further information
with respect to us, reference is made to the registration
statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith.
Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the contents
of any contract or any other document that is filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily
complete, and each such statement is qualified in all respects
by reference to the full text of such contract or other document
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. A copy of the
registration statement, along with the exhibits and schedules
filed therewith, may be inspected without charge at the Public
Reference Room maintained by the SEC, located at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549, and copies
of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained
from such offices upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the
SEC. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about the Public Reference Room. The SEC
also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding
registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address
of the website is www.sec.gov.
192
We are subject to the information and periodic reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance therewith,
we will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. Such periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information is available for inspection and
copying at the Public Reference Room and website of the SEC
referred to above. You may access our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC
free of charge at our website (www.medquist.com) as soon as
reasonably practicable after such material is electronically
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The web addresses of the
SEC and MedQuist Holdings Inc. have been included as inactive
textual references only. Except as specifically incorporated by
reference into this prospectus with regards to MedQuist Holdings
Inc., information on those web sites is not part of this
prospectus.
We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports
containing combined financial statements audited by our
independent auditors and to make available to our stockholders
quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each fiscal
year containing unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements.
You may request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing
or telephoning us at the following address:
MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
9009 Carothers Parkway
Franklin, Tennessee 37067
Telephone Number:
(615) 261-1740
MedQuist Inc.
MedQuist Inc. files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and
copy this information at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at
100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the
Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed
rates, or from commercial document retrieval services. The SEC
also maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy
statements and other information about issuers, like MedQuist
Inc., who file electronically with the SEC. The address of the
site is www.sec.gov. The reports and other information
filed by MedQuist Inc. with the SEC are also available at
MedQuist Inc.s website at www.medquist.com. The web
addresses of the SEC and MedQuist Inc. have been included as
inactive textual references only. Except as specifically
incorporated by reference into this prospectus with regards to
MedQuist Inc., information on those web sites is not part of
this prospectus.
Neither we nor MedQuist Inc. has authorized anyone to give any
information or make any representation about the Merger or each
of our companies that is different from, or in addition to, that
contained in this prospectus or in any of the materials that
have been incorporated by reference into this prospectus with
regards to MedQuist Inc. Therefore, if anyone does give you
information of this sort, you should not rely on it. If you are
in a jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or
solicitations of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities
offered by this prospectus or the solicitation of proxies is
unlawful, or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to
direct these types of activities, then the offer presented in
this prospectus does not extend to you. The information
contained in this prospectus speaks only as of the date of this
prospectus unless the information specifically indicates that
another date applies.
193
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
F-3
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
F-4
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
F-5
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
F-6
|
Consolidated statements of equity and comprehensive income
(loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
F-7
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-45
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-46
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-47
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
F-48
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
F-61
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
F-62
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
F-63
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
F-64
|
Consolidated statements of shareholders (deficit) equity
and other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
F-65
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the period
January 1, to February 11, 2011 (Predecessor Company),
for the period February 12, to June 30, 2011
(Successor Company) and for the six months ended June 30,
2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-92
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-93
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-94
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
F-95
|
|
|
|
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
F-106
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
F-107
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007
|
|
F-108
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
F-109
|
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity and other
comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
F-110
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
F-111
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-143
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-144
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-145
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
F-146
|
F-1
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Report of independent auditors
|
|
F-165
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009
|
|
F-166
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
|
|
F-167
|
Consolidated statements of stockholders equity (deficit)
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
|
|
F-168
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
|
|
F-169
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
F-170
|
|
|
|
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries (Debtor- In-Possession)
|
|
|
Condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-193
|
Condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-194
|
Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-195
|
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
F-196
|
F-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
MedQuist Holdings Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, equity and comprehensive income
(loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of MedQuist Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 16, 2011
F-3
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31 ,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
417,326
|
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
259,194
|
|
|
|
229,701
|
|
|
|
113,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
158,132
|
|
|
|
124,231
|
|
|
|
58,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
61,062
|
|
|
|
53,089
|
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
6,099
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
Acquistion and integration related charges
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,633
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
159,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
37,739
|
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
(101,253
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(19,268
|
)
|
|
|
(9,019
|
)
|
|
|
(3,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
(104,991
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
17,191
|
|
|
$
|
9,171
|
|
|
$
|
(99,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued Patient Financial Services
business, net of tax
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(9,240
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
35,102
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
66,779
|
|
|
$
|
29,633
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,466 and $1,753,
respectively
|
|
|
82,038
|
|
|
|
53,099
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
23,706
|
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
172,523
|
|
|
|
91,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
23,018
|
|
|
|
19,511
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
90,268
|
|
|
|
53,187
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
107,962
|
|
|
|
72,838
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
14,212
|
|
|
|
13,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
414,879
|
|
|
$
|
253,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
$
|
27,817
|
|
|
$
|
6,207
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,358
|
|
|
|
11,191
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liability
|
|
|
36,917
|
|
|
|
29,803
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
16,911
|
|
|
|
16,034
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,570
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
103,573
|
|
|
|
73,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
266,677
|
|
|
|
101,133
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
380,368
|
|
|
|
180,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.10 par value; authorized
25,000 shares; none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.10 par value; authorized
300,000 shares; 35,158 and 35,013 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
148,265
|
|
|
|
149,339
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(107,179
|
)
|
|
|
(115,686
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
43,939
|
|
|
|
36,980
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(9,428
|
)
|
|
|
35,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
34,511
|
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
414,879
|
|
|
$
|
253,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
17,747
|
|
|
$
|
7,820
|
|
|
$
|
(108,519
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
33,454
|
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,972
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(3,566
|
)
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
(6,431
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
2,580
|
|
Loss on extinquishment of debt
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(963
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(9,962
|
)
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
819
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(5,378
|
)
|
|
|
(3,634
|
)
|
|
|
(10,850
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
(4,244
|
)
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(4,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
36,225
|
|
|
$
|
42,670
|
|
|
$
|
(2,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(7,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,475
|
)
|
|
|
(4,420
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
19,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(7,155
|
)
|
|
|
(2,995
|
)
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of Patient Financial Services business
|
|
|
12,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions and interests in affiliates, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(99,793
|
)
|
|
|
(2,690
|
)
|
|
|
(69,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(82,084
|
)
|
|
|
(12,160
|
)
|
|
|
(76,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
392,352
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(229,727
|
)
|
|
|
(28,613
|
)
|
|
|
(3,439
|
)
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(53,913
|
)
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(21,607
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
Payments related to initial public offering
|
|
|
(3,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
83,360
|
|
|
|
(44,411
|
)
|
|
|
121,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
37,146
|
|
|
|
(13,235
|
)
|
|
|
40,201
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
29,633
|
|
|
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
66,779
|
|
|
$
|
29,633
|
|
|
$
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
paid in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
(deficit)
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
interests
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
$
|
29,934
|
|
|
$
|
(2,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
848
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
29,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Share of noncontrolling interest in MedQuist, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,740
|
|
|
|
63,740
|
|
Share of noncontrolling interest in goodwill impairment charge
in MedQuist, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,081
|
)
|
|
|
(25,081
|
)
|
Accrued payments to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
Receivable related to offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Components of comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
(113,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
(108,519
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(115,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
$
|
3,444
|
|
|
$
|
150,475
|
|
|
$
|
(116,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,191
|
)
|
|
|
43,043
|
|
|
|
79,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
Accrued payments to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
Issuance of stock warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Dividend paid to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
|
|
(15,256
|
)
|
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
Dilution of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
|
$
|
3,501
|
|
|
$
|
149,339
|
|
|
$
|
(115,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(174
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,321
|
|
|
$
|
72,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
Accrued payments to principal shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
Acquisition of interest in an affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(522
|
)
|
Dividend paid to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,913
|
)
|
|
|
(53,913
|
)
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,507
|
|
|
|
8,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
|
$
|
148,265
|
|
|
$
|
(107,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-7
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business and recent developments
|
We provide technology-enabled clinical documentation services
and related revenue cycle solutions for the healthcare industry
with operations in the United States of America and India. We
provide transcription and information management services to
integrated healthcare facility networks, hospitals, academic
institutions, clinics and physician practices. Our solutions
leverage internet technologies and trained transcriptionists to
provide medical transcription services under a global service
model. Our service and enterprise technology solutions
(including mobile voice capture devices, speech recognition
technologies, web-based workflow platforms), and a global
network of medical transcriptionists (MTs) and editors (MEs)
enable healthcare facilities to improve the quality and
timeliness of clinical data and information, reduce operational
costs, increase physician satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle
performance and facilitate the adoption and utilization of
Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems.
On August 6, 2008, an affiliate of S.A.C. Private Capital
Group, LLC invested $124,000 in us in exchange for 19,998 of our
common shares at a price of approximately $6.21 per share which
was equivalent to approximately 58.1% of the Company. The
proceeds from the issuance and certain borrowings were used to
finance the purchase of an approximately 69.5% shareholding in
MedQuist Inc. from Royal Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips), see
Note 3 Acquisitions.
Our U.S.
initial public offering
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and re-domiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation and
authorized 300,000 shares of common stock par value at
$0.10 per share and 25,000 shares of preferred stock at
$0.10 par value per share. In connection with our
re-domiciliation, we adjusted the number of our shares
outstanding through a reverse share split pursuant to which
every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding prior to
our re-domiciliation was converted into one share of our common
stock upon our re-domiciliation. Our re-domiciliation and
reverse share split resulted in no change to our common
stockholders relative ownership interests in us.
In February 2011, we completed our U.S. initial public
offering of common stock selling 3.0 million shares of our
common stock and 1.5 million shares of our common stock
owned by selling shareholders at an offer price of $8.00 per
share, resulting in gross proceeds to us of $24.0 million
and net proceeds to us after underwriting fees of
$22.3 million. Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol MEDH.
Private
exchange
Certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling stockholders
entered into an exchange agreement with us, the Exchange
Agreement, whereby we issued 4.8 million shares of our
common stock in exchange for their 4.8 million shares of
MedQuist Inc. common stock. We refer to this transaction as the
Private Exchange. The Private Exchange was completed on
February 11, 2011 and increased our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Registered
exchange offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced our public exchange offer, or
Registered Exchange Offer, to those noncontrolling MedQuist Inc.
stockholders who did not participate in the Private Exchange to
exchange shares of our common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc.
common stock. The Registered Exchange Offer expired on
March 11, 2011. We accepted for, and consummated the
exchange of, all MedQuist Inc. shares of common stock that were
validly tendered in the Registered Exchange Offer. As a result
of the Registered Exchange Offer, we increased our ownership in
MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
F-8
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Sale of PFS
business
On December 31, 2010, we completed the sale of our
non-strategic Patient Financial Services, or PFS, business. The
consideration to us was $14.8 million, of which
$12.5 million was paid to us in cash and the balance was in
the form of a note. Our Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
contained herein give effect to the reclassification of the PFS
business into discontinued operations, see Note 18.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
accounting policies
|
Principles of
consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and its subsidiary companies. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of
estimates and assumptions in the preparation of consolidated
financial statements
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Significant items subject to such
estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of
property and equipment, valuation of long-lived and intangible
assets and goodwill, valuation allowances for receivables and
deferred income taxes, revenue recognition, stock-based
compensation and commitments and contingencies. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
The majority of our revenues are derived from providing medical
transcription and editing services. Revenues for medical
transcription and editing services are recognized when the
services are rendered. These services are based on contracted
rates. The remainder of our revenues is derived from the sale of
voice-capture and document management products including
software, hardware and implementation, training and maintenance
service related to these legacy products.
We recognize software-related revenues using the residual method
when vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value
exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement,
but does not exist for one or more delivered elements. We
allocate revenues to each undelivered element based on its
respective fair value determined by the price charged when that
element is sold separately or, for elements not yet sold
separately, the price established by management if it is
probable that the price will not change before the element is
sold separately. We defer revenues for the undelivered elements
including maintenance which is recognized over the contract
period. Provided that the arrangement does not involve
significant production, modification, or customization of the
software, revenues are recognized when all of the following four
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable
and collectability is probable.
F-9
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Sales
taxes
We present taxes assessed by a governmental authority including
sales, use, value added and excise taxes on a net basis and
therefore the presentation of these taxes is excluded from our
revenues and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets until such amounts are remitted to
the taxing authorities.
Litigation and
settlement costs
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, claims,
contingencies and other legal matters. We record a charge equal
to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss
contingency when both of the following conditions are met:
(i) information available prior to issuance of the
financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset
had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date
of the financial statements and (ii) the range of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. We expense legal costs, including
those legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a
loss contingency, as incurred.
Restructuring
costs
A liability for restructuring costs associated with an exit or
disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at fair
value when the liability is incurred. We record a liability for
severance costs when the obligation is attributable to employee
service already rendered, the employees rights to those
benefits accumulate or vest, payment of the compensation is
probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We record a
liability for future, non-cancellable operating lease costs when
we vacate a facility.
Our estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to
record additional restructuring charges or reduce the amount of
liabilities recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we
evaluate the remaining accrued restructuring charges to ensure
their adequacy, that no excess accruals are retained and the
utilization of the provisions are for their intended purposes in
accordance with developed exit plans.
We periodically evaluate currently available information and
adjust our accrued restructuring reserve as necessary. Changes
in estimates are accounted for as restructuring costs or credits
in the period identified.
Research and
development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements,
using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
our statements of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the
carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely
than not that such assets will be realized. Management considers
various sources of future taxable income including projected
book earnings, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the
need for a valuation allowance.
F-10
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Share-based
compensation
We estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant
using an option pricing model. We use the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to determine the fair value of its options. The
determination of the fair value of stock based awards using an
option pricing model is affected by a number of assumptions
including expected volatility of the common stock over the
expected term, the expected term, the risk free interest rate
during the expected term and the expected dividends to be paid.
The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately
expected to vest is recognized as compensation expense over the
requisite service periods.
Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock
options for 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $765, $856 and $124 which
was charged to selling, general and administrative expenses. As
of December 31, 2010 total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $945 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.52 years.
Net income
(loss) per share
Basic net (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is
computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average
shares outstanding, as adjusted for the dilutive effect of
common stock equivalents, which consist of stock options,
convertible notes and certain obligations which may be settled
by the Company through the issuance of shares using the treasury
stock method.
The table below reflects basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
(113,673
|
)
|
Less: amount payable to principal shareholders
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
5,757
|
|
|
$
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
(114,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
35,102
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
34,692
|
|
|
|
22,593
|
|
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.68
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(4.68
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(5.08
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(5.08
|
)
|
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share does not
assume conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would
have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net income (loss) per
share. Potentially dilutive shares having an anti-dilutive
effect on net income (loss) per share and, therefore, excluded
from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share,
totaled 363, 13,127 and 5,345 shares for the years ended
December 31,
F-11
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net income (loss) for the
purpose of the basic income (loss) per share is adjusted for the
amounts payable to the Companys principal shareholders
amounting to $2,750, $2,750 and $1,113 for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively under the
management services agreement, see Note 8, other
commitments related party.
Advertising
costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $1,909, $1,734
and $1,169, respectively.
Cash and cash
equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. The Companys cash management and investment
policies dictate that cash equivalents be limited to investment
grade, highly liquid securities. The Company places its
temporary cash investments with high-credit rated, quality
financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the
amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Consequently, the
Companys cash equivalents are subject to potential credit
risk. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 cash equivalents
consisted of money market investments. The carrying value of
cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.
Restricted cash of $762 and $93, as of December 31, 2010,
and 2009 respectively, represents deposits that are maintained
with banks as security for guarantees issued by them. Such
amounts are included in other current assets in the consolidated
balance sheets.
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The carrying value of accounts receivable
approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
our best estimate for losses inherent in our accounts receivable
portfolio.
We estimate uncollectible amounts based upon our historical
write-off experience, current customer receivable balances, age
of customer receivable balances, the customers financial
condition and current economic conditions. Historically, these
estimates have been adequate to cover our accounts receivable
exposure. We change the allowance if circumstances or economic
conditions change.
Product revenues for sales to end-user customers and resellers
are recognized upon passage of title if all other revenue
recognition criteria have been met. End-user customers generally
do not have a right of return. We provide certain of our
resellers and distributors with limited rights of return of our
products. We reduce revenues for rights to return our products
based upon our historical experience and have included an
estimate of such credits in our allowance for doubtful accounts.
Valuation of
long-lived and other intangible assets and
goodwill
In connection with acquisitions, we allocate portions of the
purchase price to tangible and intangible assets, consisting
primarily of acquired technologies and customer relationships
with the remainder allocated to goodwill. We prepared the
purchase price allocations and in doing so considered the report
of an independent valuation firm. We assess the realizability of
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at
least annually, or sooner if events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We
determined that our three reporting units are MedQuist Inc.,
CBay Transcription Business and PFS business; see Note 7
for goodwill impairment charge recorded in 2008. With the sale
of PFS business in 2010, we have MedQuist Inc and CBay
transcription business as our reporting units.
F-12
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range
from two to seven years for furniture, equipment and software,
and the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for
leasehold improvements. Repairs and maintenance costs are
charged to expense as incurred while additions and betterments
are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposals are charged to
operations. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition, the
related cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from
the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Software
development
Costs incurred in creating a computer software product are
charged to expense when incurred as research and development
until technical feasibility has been established. Technical
feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program
design or, in its absence, completion of a working model.
Thereafter, all software production costs are capitalized until
the product is available for release to customers.
Software costs for internal use incurred in the preliminary
project stage are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of costs
begins when the preliminary project stage is completed and
management, with the relevant authority, authorizes and commits
funding of the project and it is probable that the project will
be completed and the software will be used to perform the
function intended. Capitalization ceases no later than the point
at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its
intended use.
Long-Lived and
other intangible assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. To determine the recoverability of
long-lived assets, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by an asset is compared to the carrying
value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the
carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Annually we
evaluate the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
Intangible assets include certain assets (primarily customer
lists) obtained from business acquisitions and are being
amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives which range from three to 20 years.
Foreign
currency
Our operating subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Canada and
India use the local currency as their functional currency. We
translate the assets and liabilities of those entities into
U.S. dollars using the month-end exchange rate. We
translate revenues and expenses using the average exchange rates
prevailing during the reporting period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) within equity.
Net gains from foreign currency transactions were $203, $325 and
$203 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively and are included as a component of selling,
general, and administrative expense in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. In 2011, we entered into
forward currency contracts totaling $48 million.
F-13
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Business
enterprise segments
We operate in one reportable operating segment which is clinical
documentation solutions for the healthcare industry.
Concentration
of risk, geographic data and enterprise-wide
disclosures
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net
revenues in any period. There is no single geographic area of
significant concentration other than the United States.
The following table summarizes net revenues by the categories of
our products and services as a percentage of our total net
revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical transcription
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other includes product, maintenance, medical coding, application
service provider and other miscellaneous revenues.
The following summarizes net revenues and long-lived assets by
geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
411,015
|
|
|
$
|
342,783
|
|
|
$
|
167,916
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,311
|
|
|
|
11,149
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
417,326
|
|
|
$
|
353,932
|
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
16,233
|
|
|
$
|
13,765
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,018
|
|
|
$
|
19,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Fair value of
financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, accrued expenses, and debt are reflected in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets at carrying values
which approximate fair value.
Comprehensive
income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss)
and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive
income (loss) consists of foreign currency translation
adjustments. Other comprehensive income (loss) and comprehensive
income (loss) are displayed separately in the Consolidated
Statements of Equity and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Deferred
equity offering costs
Costs have been incurred in connection with our
U.S. initial public offering of our common stock. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, legal, consulting and
accounting costs aggregating approximately $4,677 and $270,
respectively, have been deferred and are included in other
current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The initial public offering was consummated on February 4,
2011 and these costs will be treated as a reduction of the
proceeds from the offering and will be included as a reduction
of additional
paid-in-capital.
Acquisition
and integration related costs
Effective January 1, 2009, we expense costs incurred in
reviewing potential acquisitions in the period incurred. This
includes legal, investment banking, accounting, tax and other
consulting, as well as any internal costs. Prior to this date
direct and incremental external costs of acquisitions were
included in the purchase price, and internal costs have been
expensed as incurred.
Operating
leases
Lease rent expenses on operating leases are charged to expense
over the lease term. Certain operating lease agreements provide
for scheduled rent increases over the lease term. Rent expense
for such leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
lease term.
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations incurred to acquire equipment
|
|
$
|
1,708
|
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
14,878
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Issuance of notes payable for acquisition of MedQuist Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,179
|
|
Assets acquired for settlement of receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
Redemption of preferred stock for settlement of receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees to principal shareholders by issuing common stock
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of interest on convertible notes to additional notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash debt incurred in connection with acquisition of Spheris
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable from sale of PFS business
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cash paid for 2010 income taxes includes $340 paid under
dispute related to a transfer pricing taxation assessment in
India.
F-15
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB ratified two consensuses affecting
revenue recognition:
The first consensus, Revenue Recognition-Multiple-Element
Arrangements, sets forth requirements that must be met for
an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item
that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items
have not yet been delivered. One of those current requirements
is that there be objective and reliable evidence of the
standalone selling price of the undelivered items, which must be
supported by either vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or
third-party evidence (TPE).
This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered
elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the
portion of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to
items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE
or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered
or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of
those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to
each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those
selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted.
The second consensus, Software-Revenue Recognition
addresses the accounting for transactions involving software
to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both
software and non-software and not-software components that
function together to deliver a products functionality.
The consensuses are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The standards were
adopted in the first quarter of 2011 and did not have a material
impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
Acquisition of
MedQuist Inc.
On August 6, 2008, CBay Inc acquired approximately
69.5 percent of the outstanding common shares of MedQuist
Inc. from Philips. The results of MedQuist Inc. operations have
been included in the consolidated financial statements from that
date. MedQuist Inc. is engaged in the business of medical
transcription technology and services, which are integral to the
clinical documentation workflow. It services health systems,
hospitals and large medical practices throughout the U.S.; in
the clinical documentation workflow, it provides, in addition to
medical transcription technology and services, digital
dictation, speech recognition, electronic signature and medical
coding technology and services. MedQuist Inc. is listed on The
NASDAQ Global Market.
The acquisition is considered to be beneficial to the Company
based upon the size and projected growth of the
U.S. Medical Transcription industry, the leading market
position of MedQuist Inc. and the complementary and potentially
synergistic nature of MedQuist Inc. and the Companys
businesses in terms of products and services, operations and
technology.
The acquisition of a majority share in MedQuist Inc. will
provide the Company with the scope, scale and resources to
invest in new technology, to expand its suite of products and
services and to pursue revenue and market share growth.
F-16
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The total purchase price was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
98,079
|
|
Issue of 6% Convertible note
|
|
|
90,935
|
|
Issue of Promissory Note (Bridge note)
|
|
|
26,244
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
24,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
239,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounted for the acquisition as a purchase in
accordance with FASB guidance on Business Combinations. In
accordance with the guidance, the purchase price was allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
fair values as at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
experienced management and delivery team (assembled workforce),
which was one of the key drivers for this acquisition, was not
separately recognized and has been included in the value of
goodwill.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
acquisition
|
|
|
|
August 6, 2008
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
12,757
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
71,599
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
74,720
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,756
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(44,337
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
121,430
|
|
Consideration paid
|
|
|
239,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
118,274
|
|
Goodwill recognized from the transaction is a result of the
growth opportunity the investors anticipate in the
Companys core business, medical transcription.
No part of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Intangible assets recognized on acquisition of MedQuist Inc. on
the date of acquisition are set out in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
acquisition
|
|
|
|
August 6, 2008
|
|
|
Customer Relationships
|
|
$
|
40,380
|
|
Trade Names
|
|
|
21,892
|
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Acquisition of
Spheris
On April 22, 2010, the Company, through its subsidiaries
MedQuist Inc. and CBay Inc. (the Purchasers), completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Spheris Inc.
(Spheris) and certain of its affiliates including Spheris India
Private Limited (SIPL). This acquisition provided a substantial
customer base and also provided opportunities for operating
efficiencies and operating margin expansion. See Note 17,
restructuring charges for further discussion of the
Companys 2010 restructuring plan approved by management to
realize some of these savings. Costs incurred for the
acquisition and direct integration costs are included in the
line item acquisition and integration related charges on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The
acquisition was funded from the proceeds of the Companys
credit facilities entered into in connection with the
acquisition. See Note 4 for a description of the
acquisition financing.
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the
consolidated information of the Company as if the business
combination had occurred at the beginning of each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma for years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
460,697
|
|
|
$
|
510,528
|
|
Net income attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
4,961
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. from
continuing operations (Basic)
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. from
continuing operations (Diluted)
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
discontinued operations (Basic)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
discontinued operations (Diluted)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Basic)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Diluted)
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying the
Companys accounting policies and adjusting the results of
Spheris and SIPL to reflect the additional amortization of
intangibles that would have been charged assuming the fair value
adjustments to tangible and intangible assets had been applied
from the beginning of the period being reported on, and the
additional interest expense assuming the acquisition related
debt had been incurred at the beginning of the period being
reported on, excluding the acquisition costs and including the
related tax effects. The acquired business contributed net
revenues of $88.1 million for the period April 22,
2010 to December 31, 2010.
The net income for the purpose of the basic net income per share
is adjusted for the amounts payable to the Companys
majority shareholder.
The following table summarizes the consideration transferred by
the Company to acquire the assets of Spheris and stock of SIPL,
and the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the acquisition date.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid
|
|
$
|
98,834
|
|
Fair value of unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Spheris net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
22,407
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
9,133
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Developed technology (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
Customer relationships (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
Trademarks and trade names (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
44,917
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(20,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
The related amortization period is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
The amounts and lives of the identified intangibles other than
goodwill were valued at fair value. The analyses included a
combination of cost approach and income approach. We used
discount rates from 15% to 17%. The goodwill is attributable to
the workforce of the acquired business and the significant
synergies expected to arise after the Companys acquisition
of Spheris. The goodwill and intangible assets are deductible
for tax purposes.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
There is a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the nature
of the inputs used to develop the fair value measures. This is
an exit price concept for the valuation of the asset or
liability. In addition, market participants are assumed to be
unrelated buyers and sellers in the principal or the most
advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value
measurements for an asset assume the highest and best use by
these market participants. Many of these fair value measurements
can be highly subjective and it is also possible that other
professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts
and circumstances, could develop and support a range of
alternative estimated amounts.
Total acquisition-related transaction costs incurred by the
Company are expensed in the periods in which the costs are
incurred. Acquisition-related transaction costs (such as
advisory, legal, valuation and other professional fees) are not
included as components of consideration transferred but are
accounted for as expenses in the periods in which the costs are
incurred. External costs incurred to acquire the business, and
incremental direct integration costs have been included in the
line item acquisition and integration related charges on the
Companys consolidated statement of operations.
F-19
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Current portion of debt consisted of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current portion of Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term credit facilities
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
Current portion of equipment loans from banks
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current portion of debt
|
|
$
|
27,817
|
|
|
$
|
6,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt consisted of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
Equipment loans from banks
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
6% Convertible note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,419
|
|
Short-term credit facilities
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
294,494
|
|
|
|
107,340
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
27,817
|
|
|
|
6,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
266,677
|
|
|
$
|
101,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
loans
On October 1, 2010, MedQuist Inc. entered into a senior
secured credit facility (the Senior Secured Credit Facility),
with certain lenders and General Electric Capital Corporation,
as Administrative Agent. The Senior Secured Credit Facility
contains a number of covenants and consists of
$225.0 million in senior secured credit facilities
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $200.0 million term loan, advanced in one drawing on
October 14, 2010 (the Closing Date), with a term of five
years, repayable in equal quarterly installments of
$5.0 million, commencing on the first day of the first
fiscal quarter beginning after the Closing Date, with the
balance payable at maturity; and
|
|
n
|
a $25.0 million revolving credit facility under which
borrowings may be made from time to time during the period from
the Closing Date until the fifth anniversary of the Closing
Date. The revolving facility includes a $5.0 million
letter-of-credit
sub-facility
and a $5 million swing line loan
sub-facility.
|
The borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
borrowers option, either (a) a base rate determined
by reference to the highest of (1) the rate last quoted by
the Wall Street Journal as the Prime Rate in the
United States, (2) the federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1% and (3) the LIBOR rate for a one-month interest
period plus 1.00% or (b) the higher of (1) a LIBOR
rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits
in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period
relevant to
F-20
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs and
(2) 1.75%. The applicable margin is 4.50% with respect to
base rate borrowings and 5.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings.
At December 31, 2010 the borrowings had an interest rate of
7.25%.
The loans are secured by substantially all of MedQuist
Inc.s assets and are guaranteed by us. The agreements
contain customary covenants, including reporting and
notification and acquisitions. The financial covenants are
calculated on a consolidated basis, and include a Senior
Leverage Ratio, Total Leverage Ratio, and an Interest Coverage
Ratio. As of December 31, 2010 we believe we were in
compliance. The loans have customary cross default provisions.
In addition to the Senior Secured Credit Facility we issued
$85.0 million aggregate principal amount of 13% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the Senior Subordinated Notes),
pursuant to a purchase agreement. Interest on the notes is
payable in quarterly installments at the issuers option at
either (i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash payment
plus 2% in the form of additional senior subordinated notes. The
Senior Subordinated Notes are non-callable for two years after
the closing date after which they are redeemable at 105.0%
declining ratably until four years after the closing date. The
Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of significant
covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to
dispose of assets, repay other indebtedness, incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness,
incur liens, make capital expenditures, investments or
acquisitions, engage in mergers of consolidations, engage in
certain types of transactions with affiliates and otherwise
restrict our activities.
Proceeds from the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes were used to repay $80.0 million of our
indebtedness under the GE Credit Agreement, as defined below,
plus interest, to repay $13.6 million of our indebtedness
under the Subordinated Promissory Note, as defined below, plus
interest, and to pay a $53.9 million special cash dividend
to noncontrolling shareholders of MedQuist Inc.
We incurred $15.5 million of costs in connection with the
financing, and there were remaining unamortized costs from the
prior financing. In connection with the refinancing, we
evaluated whether the prior facilities had been modified or
extinguished. We recorded an extinguishment loss of
$5.8 million. At December 31, 2010, we had remaining
deferred costs of $10.2 million recorded in other
noncurrent assets and $3.1 million recorded in other
current assets.
In connection with the Spheris acquisition in April 2010,
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., a subsidiary of MedQuist Inc.
(MedQuist Transcriptions), and certain other subsidiaries of
MedQuist Inc. (collectively, the Loan Parties) entered into a
credit agreement (the GE Credit Agreement) with General Electric
Capital Corporation, CapitalSource Bank, and Fifth Third Bank.
The GE Credit Agreement provided for up to $100.0 million
in senior secured credit facilities, consisting of a
$50.0 million term loan, and a revolving credit facility of
up to $50.0 million. The credit facilities were secured by
a first priority lien on substantially all of the property of
the Loan Parties. Amounts borrowed under the GE Credit Agreement
incurred interest at a rate selected by MedQuist Transcriptions
equal to the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate (each as defined
in the GE Credit Agreement) plus a margin, all as more fully set
forth in the GE Credit Agreement. We incurred $6.1 million
in costs in connection with the GE Credit Agreement of which
$4.8 million had not been amortized by the time of the
refinance in October 2010.
When we entered into the GE Credit Agreement, we terminated the
five-year $25.0 million revolving credit agreement with
Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC (the Wells Credit Agreement) that we
entered into on August 31, 2009. We never borrowed under
the Wells Credit Agreement. In 2010, we wrote off deferred
financing fees of $1.1 million and incurred termination
fees of $0.6 million in connection with the termination of
this facility. Such costs are included in interest expense, net
in the accompanying statements of operations.
In connection with the Spheris acquisition, we entered into a
subordinated promissory note with Spheris (the Spheris
Subordinated Promissory Note). The loan was scheduled to mature
in five years from the date of the acquisition. The face amount
of the Spheris Subordinated Promissory Note totaled
$17.5 million with provisions for prepayment at discounted
amounts, ranging from 77.5% of the principal if paid within six
months, 87.5%
F-21
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
from six to nine months, 97.5% from nine to twelve months,
102.0% by year two, 101.0% by year three and 100.0% thereafter.
For purposes of the purchase price allocation, the note was
discounted at 77.5% of the principal ($13.6 million). This
note was a non-cash transaction. The fair value of the note was
determined through the use of a Monte Carlo model which is
Level 3 in the Fair Value hierarchy based upon significant
unobservable inputs. The Spheris Subordinated Promissory Note
was paid in full as noted above.
The Spheris Subordinated Promissory Note had stated interest
rates of 8.0% for the first six months, 9.0% from six to nine
months, and 12.5% thereafter of which 2.5% may be paid by
increasing the principal amount. Payments of interest are made
semi-annually on each six month anniversary of the acquisition.
For financial statement purposes the interest has been
calculated using the average interest rates over the term of the
Spheris Subordinated Promissory Note. As discussed above, we
paid off all amounts outstanding, at 77.5% of the face value,
plus accrued interest under the Spheris Subordinated Promissory
Note thus extinguishing the note.
In January 2011 we made an optional prepayment of
$20.0 million in addition to the $5.0 million due
under the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Credit
facilities
Line of
credit K Bank
We had a revolving line of credit (LOC) from K Bank.
Subject to certain terms and conditions of the agreement with K
Bank, the agreement provided a revolving line of credit of a
maximum of $5,750. For the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 interest expense of $235, $266 and $273
respectively, was recorded in the consolidated statements of
operations. This facility was repaid in October 2010. The amount
outstanding as of December 31, 2010, 2009 was $0, and
$3,343, respectively.
Credit
agreement ICICI Bank
The Company has a Credit Arrangement with ICICI Bank, Mumbai,
India with the maximum borrowing limit of $2,772, at interest
rates ranging from LIBOR + 2.5% and 15.5%, respectively, which
is secured by CBay Systems (India) Private Limited (CBay India)
current assets and fixed assets. The amount outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $219 and $1,426,
respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 interest expense of $35, $205 and $98, respectively,
was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.
Credit
Agreement IndusInd Bank
The Company has a Credit Arrangement with IndusInd Bank, Mumbai,
India with the maximum borrowing of $5,928, at an interest rate
of LIBOR + 3%, respectively, which is secured by current assets
and fixed assets of CBay India, a 100% subsidiary of the
Company. The amount outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and
2009 was $3,353 and $0, respectively. For the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 interest expense of $44,
$0 and $0, respectively, was recorded in the consolidated
statements of operations.
6% Convertible
Note
The Company had issued a 6% Convertible Note in connection
with the acquisition of MedQuist Inc. which was due
August 5, 2015. Any portion of the note may have been
converted at the option of Philips (the holder) into
common stock of the Company, anytime after November 4,
2008. The conversion rate for this purpose was $1 of the
principal amount equals 0.1344 shares of common stock of
the Company. If this option was exercised by the holder,
12,959 shares of common stock would have become issuable.
F-22
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In March and August 2009, the Company exercised its option on
this convertible note to convert interest from August 6,
2008 to August 5, 2009 into additional convertible notes
aggregating to $5,484 with the same terms and conditions as the
original note.
In October 2010, the Company repaid the convertible note at a
redemption premium of 8% aggregating to $104.1 million.
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
interest expense on the note was $4,569, $5,447 and $2,212,
respectively. The redemption premium amounted to $7,714 and is
included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the
consolidated statement of operations.
Term and
equipment loans
The Company has term loans which carry interest rates ranging
from 6.5% to 16% per annum and are repayable monthly through
2015. One loan contains certain non-financial covenants and
limits borrowings for one of the Companys subsidiaries and
we believe we are s incompliance with these covenants. The
Company has a working capital term loan which is a Rupee
denominated loan from EXIM Bank. This loan is repayable in full
in June 2011 and carries an interest rate of 12%. This loan is
secured by certain assets of one of the Companys
subsidiaries.
The Company has various equipment and vehicle loans that carry
interest rates ranging from 10% to 15% per annum and are
repayable monthly through 2015. These loans are secured by the
related equipment and vehicles.
Future minimum principal payments on long term debt as of
December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
27,817
|
|
2012
|
|
|
20,956
|
|
2013
|
|
|
20,391
|
|
2014
|
|
|
20,303
|
|
2015
|
|
|
120,027
|
|
2016
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
294,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded interest expense of $16,578, $8,387, and
$3,416, during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008, respectively, on these borrowings.
|
|
5.
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Charges to revenues and costs
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
Doubtful accounts written-off
|
|
|
(1,825
|
)
|
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the charges relate to revenues.
F-23
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Property and
equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
31,241
|
|
|
$
|
26,567
|
|
Software
|
|
|
5,305
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
9,971
|
|
|
|
4,869
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,717
|
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
51,970
|
|
|
|
37,723
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(28,952
|
)
|
|
|
(18,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
23,018
|
|
|
$
|
19,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 is $14,222, $11,899 and $6,617, respectively.
|
|
7.
|
Goodwill and
other intangible assets
|
In connection with acquisitions, the Company allocates portions
of the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets,
consisting primarily of acquired technologies and customer
relationships with the remainder allocated to goodwill. The
Company prepared the purchase price allocations and in doing so
considered the report of an independent valuation firm. The
Company assesses the realizability of goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives at least annually, or sooner
if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. The Company has determined after
the sale of its PFS business that the impairment testing is to
be conducted at our two reporting units which are: MedQuist Inc.
and CBay Transcription Business.
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
|
|
$
|
152,159
|
|
|
$
|
148,915
|
|
Accumulated impairment loss
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,187
|
|
|
|
49,943
|
|
Goodwill from acquisitions
|
|
|
45,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
Sale of subsidiary
|
|
|
(8,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments and other
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Balance at December 31, Goodwill
|
|
|
189,240
|
|
|
|
152,159
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
(98,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at period end
|
|
$
|
90,268
|
|
|
$
|
53,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We tested goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of
2010 and 2009 which included the Companys annual
impairment testing. The Company determined the fair value using
a combination of market capitalization and a discounted cash
flow analysis. Determining fair value requires the exercise of
significant judgment,
F-24
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
including judgment about appropriate discount rates, perpetual
growth rates, the amount and timing of expected future cash
flows, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples
for the market-based approach. The cash flows employed in the
discounted cash flow analyses are based on the Companys
internal business model for 2011 and, for years beyond 2011, the
growth rates the Company used were an estimate of the future
growth in the industry in which the Company participates. The
discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analyses are
intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows
of the reporting unit and are based on an estimated cost of
capital, which the Company determined based on estimated cost of
capital relative to its capital structure. In addition, the
market-based approach utilizes comparable company public trading
values, research analyst estimates and, where available, values
observed in private market transactions. In 2008, the analysis
indicated that the reporting units fair value was below
the book value for the MedQuist Inc. and PFS reporting units,
and accordingly an impairment charge was recorded to reduce the
carrying value of goodwill to its fair value. The test of
impairment of goodwill is a two-step process:
|
|
|
|
n
|
First, the Company compares the carrying amount of the reporting
units, which is the book value to the fair value of its
reporting unit. If the carrying amount of its reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the Company has to perform the second
step of the process. If not, no further testing is needed. In
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company determined that the
carrying amount of two of its reporting units: MedQuist Inc. and
PFS exceeded the fair value and accordingly performed the second
step in the analysis.
|
|
n
|
If the second part of the analysis is required, the Company
allocates the fair value of its reporting unit to all assets and
liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a
business combination at the date of the impairment test. The
Company then compares the implied fair value of its reporting
units goodwill to its carrying amount. If the carrying
amount of the Companys goodwill exceeds its implied fair
value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss in an amount
equal to that excess.
|
In the second step, the Company allocated the fair value of the
respective reporting unit to all assets and liabilities as if
the respective reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination at the date of the impairment test. The Company then
compared the implied fair value of goodwill of the respective
reporting unit to its respective carrying amount. As the
respective carrying amount of goodwill exceeded its respective
implied fair value, a pre-tax impairment charge for the MedQuist
Inc. and PFS reporting units of $89,633 and $9,339,
respectively, was recorded for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Other
intangible assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including amortizable
intangibles, for impairment when events indicate that their
carrying amount may not be recoverable. When the Company
determines that one or more impairment indicators are present
for an asset, it compares the carrying amount of the asset to
net future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to
generate. If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than
the net future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is
expected to generate, it compares the fair value to the book
value of the asset. If the fair value is less than the book
value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss. The impairment
loss is the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its
fair value.
Some of the events that the Company considers as impairment
indicators for our long-lived assets, including goodwill, are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
net book value compared to its fair value;
|
|
n
|
significant adverse economic and industry trends;
|
|
n
|
significant decrease in the market value of the asset;
|
|
n
|
the extent that the Company uses an asset or changes in the
manner that it uses it;
|
|
n
|
significant changes to the asset since acquired; and
|
|
n
|
other changes in circumstances that potentially indicate all or
a portion of the company will be sold.
|
F-25
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company reviewed the carrying
value of its long-lived assets other than goodwill and
determined that the carrying amounts of such assets was less
than the undiscounted cash flows and accordingly no impairment
charge was recorded.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 other intangible asset
balances were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
105,426
|
|
|
$
|
34,573
|
|
|
$
|
70,853
|
|
Tradmarks and tradenames
|
|
|
23,533
|
|
|
|
8,414
|
|
|
$
|
15,119
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
$
|
9,092
|
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
16,491
|
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
160,600
|
|
|
$
|
52,638
|
|
|
$
|
107,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
63,722
|
|
|
$
|
15,853
|
|
|
$
|
47,869
|
|
Tradmarks and tradenames
|
|
|
21,893
|
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
98,167
|
|
|
$
|
25,329
|
|
|
$
|
72,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated useful life and the weighted average remaining
lives of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2010 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
useful life
|
|
|
remaining lives
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
|
7-10 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Tradmarks and tradenames
|
|
|
6-7 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Estimated annual amortization expense for intangible assets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
21,542
|
|
2012
|
|
|
20,424
|
|
2013
|
|
|
17,710
|
|
2014
|
|
|
15,865
|
|
2015
|
|
|
10,821
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
21,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
107,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We recorded amortization expense of $18,395, $13,467 and $6,871
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
Leases
The Company has acquired certain computers, office equipment and
other assets under capital leases. The gross amount recorded in
property and equipment for such capital leases and the related
accumulated amortization amounted to $2,946 and $2,313 as of
December 31, 2010 and $4,585 and $1,611 as of
December 31, 2009, respectively. Depreciation expense
was$604, $988, and $400 for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Minimum rental payments under
operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over
the term of the lease, including any periods of free rent and
landlord incentives. Rental expense for operating leases for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $7,128,
$5,320 and $3,622, respectively. Future minimum lease payments
under non-cancelable leases (with initial or remaining lease
terms in excess of one year) are as follows as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
2,746
|
|
|
$
|
7,230
|
|
2012
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
2013
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
2014
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
4,266
|
|
|
$
|
28,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion of obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
(2,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations, under capital leases, excluding current portion
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
commitments related party
Pursuant to an agreement entered into on August 19, 2008
the Company is obligated to pay S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC
(SAC CBI II) and Lehman Brothers Commercial Corporation
Asia (LBCCA), an annual amount of $1,863 and $887, respectively,
which the Company can elect to pay in cash or shares. The
payment provision of the agreement has a five year term that
expires in August 2013. The agreement provides that SAC CBI II
and LBCCA may provide financial, managerial and operational
advice, the annual amount is payable regardless of whether any
management services are rendered and the annual amount is fixed.
Under the agreement, the Company is committed to pay for the
remaining unexpired term on termination of the agreement or upon
a change in control, determined as the sum of the present value
(using the discount rate equal to the yield on
U.S. Treasury securities of like maturity) of the annual
amounts that would have been payable with respect to the period
from the date of such change of control or termination, as
applicable through August 18, 2013. The change in control
occurred and the agreement terminated as a result of the
consummation of our IPO and the Private Exchange. As a result,
770 shares valued at $6,160 were issued in March 2011 to
satisfy the obligation to SAC CBI II. However, since provisional
liquidators were appointed in respect of LBCCA in September 2008
and because LBCCA is in liquidation, we are in discussions with
LBCCAs liquidators regarding LBCCAs entitlement to
amounts under the agreement. These amounts have been recorded as
capital transactions. For the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, $2,750, $2,750 and $1,113, respectively,
have been recorded in the consolidated statements of equity and
comprehensive income (loss). During 2010 and 2009,
145 shares and
F-27
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
571 shares, respectively, of our common stock were issued
to satisfy a portion of the annual amounts. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, $3,537 and $2,185,
respectively, of the amounts payable were accrued and recorded
in due to related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.
Other
contractual obligations
The following summarizes our other contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
11,790
|
|
|
$
|
8,567
|
|
|
$
|
3,223
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8,248
|
|
|
|
8,013
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,042
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,271
|
|
|
$
|
21,311
|
|
|
$
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations represent telecommunication contracts,
software development and other recurring purchase obligations.
As of December 31, 2010 we had agreements with certain of
our senior management that provided for severance payments in
the event these individuals were terminated without cause. The
maximum cost exposure related to these agreements was $5,139 as
of December 31, 2010.
|
|
9.
|
Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Customer accommodations
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
Restructure liability
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,270
|
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
36,917
|
|
|
$
|
29,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2003, one of the employees of MedQuist Inc. raised
allegations that it had engaged in improper billing practices.
In response, the board of directors of MedQuist Inc. undertook
an independent review of these allegations (Review). In response
to MedQuist Incs customers concern over its public
disclosure of the certain findings from the Review, it took
action in the fourth quarter of 2005 to avoid unnecessary
litigation, which preserved and solidified its customer business
relationships by offering a financial accommodation to certain
of its customers.
In connection with MedQuist Inc.s decision to offer
financial accommodations to certain of its customers
(Accommodation Customers), MedQuist Inc. analyzed its historical
billing information and the available report level data
(Management Billing Assessment) to develop individualized
accommodation offers to be made to accommodate customers
(Accommodation Analysis). Based on the Accommodation Analysis,
MedQuist Inc. board
F-28
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
of directors authorized management to make cash or credit
accommodation offers to Accommodation Customers in the aggregate
amount of $75,818. By accepting MedQuist Inc.s
accommodation offer, the customer agreed, among other things, to
release MedQuist Inc. from any and all claims and liability
regarding the billing related issues.
MedQuist Inc. is unable to predict how many customers, if any,
may accept the outstanding accommodation offers on the terms
proposed by it, nor it is able to predict the timing of the
acceptance (or rejection) of any outstanding accommodation
offers. Until any offers are accepted, it may withdraw or modify
the terms of the accommodation program or any outstanding offers
at any time. In addition, MedQuist Inc. is unable to predict how
many future offers, if made, will be accepted on the terms
proposed by it. MedQuist Inc. regularly evaluates whether to
proceed with, modify or withdraw the accommodation program or
any outstanding offers.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
related to the customer accommodation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
$
|
12,055
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(1,248
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Kaiser
litigation
On June 6, 2008, plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
Inc. and affiliates (collectively, Kaiser) filed suit against
MedQuist Inc. in the Superior Court of the State of California
related to its billing practices.
In July 2010, the parties reached a settlement of the litigation
whereby we made a payment of $2.0 million to resolve all of
Kaisers claims. Neither MedQuist Inc., nor Kaiser,
admitted to any liability or wrongdoing in connection with the
settlement. Of this amount, $1.1 million was included in
Accrued expenses at December 31, 2009 and we expensed an
additional $0.9 million during 2010.
Kahn putative
class action
In 2008, one of MedQuist Inc.s shareholders filed a
shareholder putative class action lawsuit against MedQuist Inc.,
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips), MedQuist
Inc.s former majority shareholder and four of its former
non-independent directors. MedQuist Inc. is no longer a
defendant in this matter, but MedQuist Inc. is monitoring the
matter since it involves claims against its former directors.
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, MedQuist Inc. received from counsel to
nine current and former resellers of its products (Claimants), a
copy of an arbitration demand filed by the Claimants, initiating
an arbitration proceeding.
On March 31, 2010, the parties entered into a Settlement
Agreement and Release pursuant to which we paid the Claimants
$500 on April 1, 2010 to resolve all claims. Under the
Settlement Agreement and Release, (i) the parties exchanged
mutual releases, (ii) the arbitration and related state
court litigation were dismissed with prejudice and
(iii) MedQuist Inc. did not admit to any liability or
wrongdoing. We accrued the entire amount of this settlement as
of December 31, 2009.
F-29
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
SEC
investigation of former MedQuist Inc. officer
With respect to MedQuist Inc.s historical billing
practices, the SEC is pursuing civil litigation against its
former chief financial officer, whose employment with MedQuist
Inc. ended in July 2004. Pursuant to its bylaws, MedQuist Inc.
has been providing indemnification for the legal fees of this
individual. In February 2011, we entered into a settlement
agreement with MedQuist Inc.s former chief financial
officer and such settlement agreement is dependent on the
individual settling with the SEC.
Shareholder
litigation
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, plaintiffs
Victor N. Metallo and Joseph F. Lawrence, respectively, filed
purported shareholder class action complaints in the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Burlington County (Chancery Division) (the
Shareholder Litigation). In their complaints, the plaintiffs
purported to be shareholders of MedQuist Inc. and sought to
represent a class of MedQuist Inc. minority shareholders in
pursuit of claims against us, MedQuist Inc. and board members of
MedQuist Inc.
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants breached certain
fiduciary duties they owed to minority shareholders of MedQuist
Inc. in connection with the structuring and disclosure of the
Registered Exchange Offer. Among other things, the plaintiffs
alleged that (a) the Registered Exchange Offer is
procedurally and financially unfair, (b) the
January 21, 2011 and February 16, 2011 Schedules 14D-9
that MedQuist Inc. filed with the SEC and the February 3,
2011 Prospectus that we filed with the SEC are materially
misleading and incomplete, and (c) the Registered Exchange
Offer was structured by the defendants in order to circumvent
the provisions of the New Jersey Shareholders Protection
Act. Plaintiffs sought, among other things, preliminary and
permanent injunctive relief enjoining consummation of the
Registered Exchange Offer, unspecified damages, pre- and
post-judgment interest and attorneys fees and costs. The
two Plaintiff actions were consolidated on February 22,
2011 under the caption In Re: MedQuist Inc. Shareholder
Litigation, Docket Number C-018-11.
On March 4, 2011, the parties entered into a memorandum of
understanding (the MOU) that outlined the material terms of the
Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, we agreed to
extend the expiration of the Registered Exchange Offer until
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Friday, March 11,
2011 and further agreed that if, as a result of the Registered
Exchange Offer, we obtained ownership of at least 90% of the
outstanding common stock of MedQuist Inc., we will conduct a
short-form merger under applicable law to acquire the remaining
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that we do not currently
own at the same exchange ratio applicable under the Registered
Exchange Offer. MedQuist Inc. agreed to make certain
supplemental disclosures concerning the Registered Exchange
Offer, which were contained in an amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that MedQuist Inc. filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. The
settlement of the Shareholder Litigation is conditioned upon,
among other things, execution of a Stipulation of Settlement,
notice to all class members, a fairness hearing and final
approval of the settlement by the court.
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, plaintiffs
Victor N. Metallo and Joseph F. Lawrence, respectively, filed
purported shareholder class action complaints in the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Burlington County (Chancery Division) (the
Shareholder Litigation). In their complaints, the plaintiffs
purported to be shareholders of MedQuist Inc. and sought to
represent a class of MedQuist Inc. minority shareholders in
pursuit of claims against defendants, MedQuist Inc., MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and MedQuist Inc. board members.
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants breached certain
fiduciary duties they owed to minority shareholders of MedQuist
Inc. in connection with the structuring and disclosure of the
Registered Exchange Offer by MedQuist Holdings to exchange
shares of MedQuist Holdings common stock for properly tendered
and accepted shares of common stock of MedQuist Inc. Among other
things, the plaintiffs alleged that (a) the Registered
Exchange Offer is procedurally and financially unfair,
(b) the January 21, 2011 and February 16, 2011
Schedules 14D-9 that MedQuist Inc. filed with the SEC and the
February 3, 2011 Prospectus that MedQuist Holdings filed
with the SEC are materially misleading and incomplete, and
(c) the Registered Exchange Offer was structured by the
defendants in order to circumvent the provisions of the New
Jersey Shareholders Protection Act. Plaintiffs sought,
F-30
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
among other things, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief
enjoining consummation of the Registered Exchange Offer,
unspecified damages, pre- and post-judgment interest and
attorneys fees and costs. The two Plaintiff actions were
consolidated on February 22, 2011 under the caption In Re:
MedQuist Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Docket Number C-018-11.
On March 4, 2011, the parties entered into a memorandum of
understanding (the MOU) with respect to settling the Shareholder
Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, MedQuist Holdings agreed
to extend the expiration of the Registered Exchange Offer until
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Friday, March 11,
2011 and further agreed that if, as a result of the Exchange
Offer, MedQuist Holdings obtained ownership of at least 90% of
the outstanding common stock of MedQuist Inc., MedQuist Holdings
will conduct a short-form merger under applicable law to acquire
the remaining shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that it does
not then own at the same exchange ratio applicable under the
Registered Exchange Offer. MedQuist Inc. agreed to make certain
supplemental disclosures concerning the Exchange Offer, which
were contained in an amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that MedQuist Inc. filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. The
settlement and dismissal of the Shareholder Litigation are
conditioned upon, among other things, execution of a final
settlement stipulation and court approval.
2007 Equity
incentive plan (the EI Plan)
The EI Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors (the
Board) of the Company on June 12, 2007. The EI
Plan is administered and operated by the Board in consultation
with the Remuneration Committee of the Board.
The EI Plan provides a framework for the grant of equity and
other equity related incentives to directors, officers,
consultants and other employees of the Company in different
jurisdictions. Awards may be in the form of share options,
including incentive stock options (which comply with
U.S. tax requirements), share appreciation rights,
restricted shares, restricted stock units and other share, share
based or cash awards.
In accordance with the EI Plan, share options for 211 ordinary
shares were granted by the Board on June 12, 2007, at a
price of $7.88. The options were granted to members of the
senior management and key employees of the Company.
In cases where the options granted to any option holder were
less than 4, such options vested in full on the date the shares
of the Company were admitted on AIM. The shares of the Company
were admitted to trading on AIM on June 18, 2007.
Where options granted to any option holder were equal to or more
than 4, such options vested as follows 50% on the
date of grant, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant
and the balance on the second anniversary of the date of grant.
The options are exercisable no later than 10 years from the
date of grant subject to vesting as stated above. However, the
options are subject to early exercise upon a change in control
of the Company, as defined. The options shall lapse at the end
of the option period. Additionally, the options of any option
holder, would lapse on the expiry of three months from the date
of cessation of employment or services to the Company for cause
(unless otherwise determined by the Board). However, if such
option holder leaves otherwise than for cause (as defined in the
option agreement), the option holder would be entitled to
exercise their options within a period of six months from the
date of cessation of employment or service. All share based
employee compensation is settled in equity. The Company has no
legal or constructive obligation to repurchase or cash settle
the options.
Additionally, on June 12, 2007, the board of directors of
the Company approved the grant of 674 options to certain
directors and senior management personnel of the Company. The
options were granted in 3 Tranches in the amounts of 337
options, 225 options and 112 options for Tranche 1,
Tranche 2 and Tranche 3, respectively. The exercise
price for the options in Tranche 1 was $5.85 per share and
for the options in Tranche 2 it was
F-31
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
$7.88. Options in Tranche 1 and 2 were exercisable until
December 31, 2008 and all such options expired unexercised
on December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008 and
2009, there are 112 and 90, respectively, of outstanding options
in Tranche 3, of which all are exercisable and 23 were
forfeited in 2009.
Due to change in control on August 6, 2008, all unvested
options vested immediately on that date, which resulted in a
share based compensation expense of $18.
In April 2009, the board of directors of the Company approved
the key terms of an option award to certain management employees
for the completion of acquisition of MedQuist Inc. and 2,208
options were granted at an exercise price of $5.01 per share.
The options vest over a period ending on August 6, 2011,
with one third of the options vesting on August 6, 2009 and
one sixth of the options vesting every six months thereafter.
These options expire on August 6, 2018.
Share options and weighted average exercise price are as follows
for the reporting periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
7.11
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
9.89
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Weighted average exercise prices
are converted to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate at the
end of the reporting period.
|
Options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest as
of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
remaining contract
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
value as of
|
|
|
options
|
|
exercise price
|
|
term (in years)
|
|
value
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Vested and exercisable at year end
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
$
|
4,951
|
|
|
$
|
4,951
|
|
Expected to vest
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
$
|
4,951
|
|
|
$
|
4,951
|
|
|
F-32
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Company recognized $571 as compensation cost during the
period in respect of these options. The fair values of these
options have been calculated using a Black Scholes model using
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
4.8 5.8 years
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
34% 35
|
%
|
|
The unamortized cost of the options as of December 31, 2010
was $751. The total fair value of the shares vested during
December 31, 2010 was $571. The weighted average grant date
fair values of options granted during the year ended
December 31, 2010 was $9.89. As of December 31, 2010,
there were 968 additional options available for grant under the
EI Plan.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
shares
|
|
|
life (in years)
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
$4.50 $9.00
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
$
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
$
|
5.22
|
|
$9.01 $13.50
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
9.46
|
|
|
$
|
9.89
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
9.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MedQuist Inc.
Stock option plan
MedQuist Inc. stock option plans provide for the granting of
options to purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees
(including officers) as well as to MedQuist Inc. non-employee
directors. Options may be issued with the exercise prices equal
to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of
grant or at a price determined by a committee of MedQuist Inc.
board of directors. Stock options vest and are exercisable over
periods determined by the committee, generally five years, and
expire no more than 10 years after the grant.
F-33
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Information with respect to MedQuist Inc.s common stock
options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
life in
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
23.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
22.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
44.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
19.05
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of 2010
and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
options. As of December 31, 2010, 296 options were in the
money.
There were no options granted or exercised in 2010 or 2009.
There were 296 options granted and 12 options exercised in 2008.
In the first quarter of 2009, MedQuist Inc. modified the options
previously granted in the third quarter of 2008 to its Chief
Executive Officer. The grant price was increased from $4.85 per
share to $8.25 per share by a committee of MedQuist Incs
Board of Directors. There was no incremental cost of the
modification. We estimated fair value for the modified option
grant as of the date of the modification by applying the
Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model. The application of
this model involves assumptions that are judgmental and
sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. The key
assumptions used in determining the fair value of the options
modified in the first quarter of 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
54.5
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
%
|
Expected risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
|
Significant assumptions required to estimate the fair value of
stock options include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expected term: The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No 107
Simplified method has been used to determine a
weighted average expected term of options granted.
|
F-34
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expected volatility: We have estimated expected volatility based
on the historical stock price volatility of a company of similar
publicly traded companies. We believe that the MedQuist Inc.
historical volatility is not indicative of future volatility.
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options modified
in the first quarter of 2009 was $1.97 per share.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, MedQuist Inc. modified the
options previously granted to its Chief Executive Officer. The
grant price was decreased from $8.25 per share to $2.22 per
share by a committee of its Board of Directors in accordance
with plan provisions relating to anti-dilution related cash
dividends paid by MedQuist Inc. There was no incremental cost of
the modification.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options modified
in the fourth quarter of 2010 was $7.28 per share.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise price
|
|
shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
$2.22$10.00
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
$10.01$20.00
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.16
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
17.16
|
|
$20.01$30.00
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
26.29
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
26.29
|
|
$30.01$40.00
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.36
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
32.36
|
|
$40.01$70.00
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
44.21
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
44.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
19.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of shares vested during 2009 was $193.
As of December 31, 2009, there were 994 additional options
available for grant under MedQuist Inc.s stock option
plans.
On August 27, 2009, MedQuist Inc.s board of
directors, upon the recommendation of its compensation
committee, approved the MedQuist Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan.
The Incentive Plan is designed to encourage and reward the
creation of long-term equity value by certain members of
MedQuist Inc.s senior management team. The executives and
key employees will be selected by the Compensation Committee and
will be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. During
the third quarter of 2010, the Compensation Committee awarded
grants under the Long Term Incentive Plan. In December 2010, the
Compensation Committee approved the terms and conditions of the
plan. As of December 2010 no amounts have been recorded as
compensation expense under the Long Term Incentive Plan, as the
amounts were not material.
Warrant
In March 2009, we issued a warrant to a consultant to purchase
82 ordinary shares of the Company. The warrant is exercisable
for a term of three years from the date of issuance at an
exercise price of $5.01 per share. The warrant is equity
classified. We calculated the fair value of the warrant to be
approximately $100 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following inputs: exercise price of $5.01 per share,
contractual life of 3 years, expected volatility of 41.7%,
dividend yield of 0% and expected risk free interest rate of
3.0%.
F-35
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Domestic refers to income taxes recorded on our operations in
the British Virgin Islands and foreign refers to income taxes
recorded on operations in the United States and India as this
was before our redomiciliation to a Delaware Corporation on
January 27, 2011. The sources of income (loss) before
income taxes and the income tax provision (benefit) for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(1,382
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,510
|
)
|
|
$
|
(775
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
16,261
|
|
|
|
12,693
|
|
|
|
(104,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
(104,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,903
|
)
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
(6,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provisions (benefit)
|
|
|
(3,903
|
)
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
(6,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
(5,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) at the
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to the
Companys income tax provision (benefit) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Provision (benefit) at statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(59.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.6
|
)%
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Adjustments to tax reserves
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Intercompany dividend
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
State taxes
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant
F-36
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
components of the Companys deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
51,860
|
|
|
$
|
54,734
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
2,821
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
Employee compensation and benefit plans
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accommodation
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
74,358
|
|
|
|
76,558
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(63,097
|
)
|
|
|
(71,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
11,261
|
|
|
$
|
5,375
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$
|
(522
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(4,179
|
)
|
|
|
(4,085
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,890
|
)
|
|
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
5,371
|
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Indian Income Tax Act, a substantial portion of the
profits of the Companys Indian operations is exempt from
Indian income tax. The Indian tax year ends on March 31.
This tax holiday is available for a period of ten consecutive
years beginning in the year in which the respective Indian
undertaking commenced operations. The tax holiday expires with
respect to the Companys Indian operations through the year
ended March 31, 2011. The aggregate effect on net income
(loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc. of the tax holiday
was$1,240, $838 and $695 for the years ended 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Further, the per common share effect of this
exemption on net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc. was $0.03, $0.05 and $0.05 for the years ended 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had federal net
operating loss carry forwards of approximately $101,588 which
will begin to expire in 2025. The Company had state net
operating losses of approximately $285,533 which will expire
from 2011 to 2029.
Utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards will be
subject to an annual limitation in future years as a result of
the change in ownership as defined by Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. The Group
performed an analysis on the annual limitation as a result of
the ownership change that occurred in 2008.
In assessing the future realization of deferred taxes, the
Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be
realized based on projections of our future taxable earnings.
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods
in which those temporary differences become deductible.
After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it was more likely than not that a
majority of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. As of
December 31, 2010, this valuation allowance has decreased
from $71,183 as of December 31, 2009 to $63,097.
F-37
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of
December 31, 2010 was $9,810 which includes $417 of accrued
interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits which we
recognize as a component of the provision for income taxes. Of
the $9,810 unrecognized tax benefits, $9,240 relates to tax
positions which if recognized would impact the effective tax
rate, not considering the impact of any valuation allowance. Of
the $9,240, $3,503 is attributable to uncertain tax positions
with respect to certain deferred tax assets which if recognized
would currently be offset by a full valuation allowance due to
the fact that at the current time it is more likely than not
that these assets would not be recognized due to a lack of
sufficient projected income in the future.
The following is a roll-forward of the changes in the Company
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,090
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
62
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of
applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(126
|
)
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
5,013
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
575
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of
applicable statute of limitation
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
9,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2010
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to acquisition of SIPL, SIPL had received a notifications
of tax assessments resulting from transfer pricing audits
amounting to 52.2 million Indian Rupees (approximately
$1.15 million), including penalties and interest, for the
tax year ended March 31, 2004 (the 2004
Assessment) and 40.6 million Indian Rupees
(approximately $0.90 million), including penalties and
interest, for the tax year ended March 31, 2005 (the
2005 Assessment). The Company has filed appeals with
India Commissioner of Income Tax for the 2004 and 2005
Assessments. Pending resolution of the Companys appeal
process, the Company was required to make advance tax payments
aggregating to $1.20 million, which is included current
assets in the consolidated balance sheets for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
In December 2010, SIPL received a notification resulting from a
transfer pricing audit amounting to 106.9 million Indian
Rupees (approximately $2.35 million) including penalties
and interest, for the fiscal tax
F-38
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
period ended March 31,2007. In January 2011, the Company
filed an appeal with Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
At the time of acquisition of SIPL, the Company evaluated and
recorded a liability of $4.8 million. The liability was
accounted as a part of the purchase price allocation and was not
charged to Income tax expense.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, all U.S. states which require income tax
returns and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the nature of the
Companys operations, no state or foreign jurisdiction
other than the United States is individually significant. With
limited exceptions the Company is no longer subject to
examination by the U.S. federal or states jurisdiction for
years prior to 2007. The Internal Revenue Service concluded a
federal tax audit for MedQuist Inc and its subsidiaries for the
tax years 2003 through 2006 with no material adjustments.
However those years have not been audited for the other members
of the Company who file a separate consolidated return. The
Company is no longer subject to examination by the UK federal
jurisdiction for years prior to 2008.
The Company does have various state tax audits and appeals in
process at any given time. As of December 31, 2010, the
Indian tax authorities have concluded their tax audits for all
entities except SIPL for the tax years through March 31,
2008 with no significant tax adjustments.
The Companys unrecognized tax benefits are expected to
change in 2011. However we do not anticipate any significant
increases or decreases within the next twelve months.
|
|
13.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
401(k) plans
of U.S. subsidiaries
MedQuist
Inc. 401(k) plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan named the MedQuist
401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan) that provides eligible employees with
an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis.
Our 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to contribute up to
25% of their annual eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis,
subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code limits. Elective
deferral contributions are allocated to each participants
individual account and are then invested in selected investment
alternatives according to the participants directives.
Employee elective deferrals are 100% vested at all times. Our
401(k) Plan provides that we may make a discretionary matching
contribution to the participants in the 401(k) Plan. We did not
match the employee contributions for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
401(k) plan of
other U.S. subsidiaries
The Company maintains tax qualified retirement plans for its
U.S. employees that provide eligible employees the
opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantage basis. The
plans allow for eligible employees to contribute a portion of
their annual eligible compensation on a pretax basis subject to
applicable internal revenue code limits. The Company may make
discretionary matching contributions to the participants
accounts in its sole discretion. The Company did not match
employee contributions for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008.
F-39
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Indian
subsidiary
Gratuity
In accordance with applicable Indian laws, the Indian subsidiary
of the Company provides for a defined benefit retirement plan
(the Gratuity Plan) covering eligible employees. The
Gratuity Plan provides for a lump sum payment to vested
employees on retirement, death, incapacitation or termination of
employment at an amount that is based on salary and tenure of
employment. Liabilities with regard to the Gratuity Plan are
determined by actuarial valuation. The measurement date used to
measure fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations is
December 31, 2010; however, the Gratuity Plan is unfunded
as of December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 the projected
benefit obligation was $913, $330 and $267 respectively. These
amounts have been included in other noncurrent liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheets. The accumulated benefit
obligation was $749, $211 and $143 as of December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Net periodic benefit cost under the
Gratuity Plan amounted to $100, $65 and $187 for 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Other benefit
plans
The Indian subsidiary of the Company also has defined
contribution plans that are largely governed by local statutory
laws and covers the eligible employees. These plans are funded
both by the employees and by the Company with an equal
contribution, primarily based on a specified percentage of the
employees basic salary. The total contribution to these
plans by the Company during the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008 was $924, $565 and $413, respectively, and
the Company has no obligation beyond the amounts contributed.
|
|
14.
|
Related party
transactions
|
Transactions
with affiliates of the companys majority
shareholder
During the year ended December 31, 2008, an aggregate of
$8,000 was paid to two affiliates of the Companys majority
shareholder and to LBCCA for services in connection with the
equity subscription in the Company and the acquisition of
MedQuist Inc. The Company also entered into an agreement with
LBCCA and SAC CBI II, an affiliate of its majority shareholder,
in August 2008. Pursuant to this agreement, the combined amounts
payable to SAC CBI II and LBCCA of $2,750 and $2,750 were
recorded for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, $3,537,and
$2,185, respectively, is accrued as a result of this agreement
and is recorded in due to related parties in the consolidated
balance sheets. This agreement terminated in February 2011, see
Note 8.
On May 4, 2010, the audit committee of MedQuist Inc.s
board of directors approved the payment of and the Company
expensed a $1,500 success-based fee to SAC PCG, an affiliate of
its majority shareholder, in connection with the Spheris
acquisition.
On October 17, 2010, members of the Board unaffiliated with
SAC CBI, having evaluated the services provided and fees charged
for similar transactions, approved a payment of $5,000 to SAC
PCG, an affiliate of SAC CBI, for services rendered in
connection with the Registered Exchange, Private Exchange and
our U.S. initial public offering described in Note 1,
recent developments.
F-40
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Transactions
with an entity under common control
During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company
provided transcription services, software development, customer
relationship and other services to an entity in which the
Companys director exercised significant influence. Such
entity was an entity under common control until the
August 6, 2008 investment by the Companys current
majority shareholder. The amounts charged by the Company for
such services aggregated $633 for the year 2008. Additionally,
the Company at various times prior to August 6, 2008 made
and received short-term advances to and from the related party.
There were no transactions with this party during the year ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Mirrus Systems
Inc.
Effective February 10, 2009 the former CEO and President of
Mirrus Systems Inc. (Mirrus) and former executive director on
the Board of the Company resigned from services with the
company. Under the terms of his settlement among other matters,
he transferred his holdings of approximately 13% in Mirrus to
the Company. As a result of the settlement, Mirrus is a
100% subsidiary of the Company. The difference between the
consideration paid and the carrying value of the non-controlling
interest in Mirrus acquired of $690 has been recorded as
additional paid in capital.
Transactions
with entities in which directors exercise significant
influence
The Company occupied a property owned by a trust in which the
President, CEO and a director of one of its subsidiary, has an
interest as a sole trustee and owner of the trust. An amount of
$188, $181 and $179, was paid as rent for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Effective
December 31, 2010, this arrangement terminated with the
sale of the PFS business.
During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the
Company paid $0 and $113 to a Director to purchase the
noncontrolling interest in one of its subsidiaries. The Company
sold software solution services to a company in which a Director
exercises significant influence aggregating $471 for the year
ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
Transactions
with affiliated companies
The Company purchased transcription services from an affiliated
Company during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 aggregating $0, $819 and $601, respectively. As of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, $0, $222 and $38 was
recorded as accounts receivable from this company. During 2008,
the Company made an additional equity investment in this company
amounting to $116.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the
Company purchased certain services of $337, $365 and $162,
respectively, from an affiliated company.
F-41
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
|
The following is a summary of the amounts recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
8,593
|
|
|
$
|
5,311
|
|
Other, including settlements
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,605
|
|
|
$
|
14,943
|
|
|
$
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts included in settlements for 2010 represent an
additional charge of $0.9 million related to our settlement
with Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and affiliates. The
amounts include in settlements for 2009 represent the settlement
of a patent litigation matter.
|
|
16.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
2010
Restructuring plan
Managements ongoing cost reduction initiatives, including
process improvement, combined with the acquisition of Spheris,
resulted in a restructuring plan involving staff reductions and
other actions designed to maximize operating efficiencies. The
affected employees are entitled to receive severance benefits
under existing established severance policies. The employees
affected were primarily in the operations and administrative
functions. Management approved the initial actions under the
plan during 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(2,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect the remaining balance to be paid in 2011. The Company
expects that restructuring activities may continue in 2011 as
management identifies opportunities for synergies resulting from
the acquisition of Spheris including the elimination of
redundant functions.
2009
Restructuring plan
During the third and fourth quarters of 2009, as a result of
managements continued planned process improvement and
technology development investments we committed to an exit and
disposal plan which includes projected employee severance for
planned reduction in headcount. Because of plan development in
late 2009 and execution of the plan over multiple quarters in
2009 and 2010, not all personnel affected by the plan know of
the plan or its impact. The plan includes costs of
$2.5 million for employee severance and $0.3 million
for vacating operating leases. The table below reflects the
financial statement activity related to the 2009 restructuring
plan
F-42
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, for the years ended
December 31,:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge (reversal)
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect the remaining balance to be paid in 2011.
|
|
17.
|
Investments in
affiliated companies
|
A-Life Medical
Inc. (A-Life)
We previously had an investment of $9,996 at December 31,
2009, in A-Life, a privately held entity which provides advanced
natural language processing technology for the medical industry
that was recorded under the equity method of accounting. In
October 2010 we sold our shares in A-Life for cash consideration
of $23.6 million, of which $4.1 million will be held
in escrow until March 2012. We recorded a pre-tax gain of
$8.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
our investment increased by $2,015 related to our share of
A-Lifes net income, primarily related to a gain resulting
from an acquisition, additional cash investments in A-Life of
$852 offset by $255 for a dilution, which was recorded in
Shareholders Equity in our consolidated balance sheet. Our
investment in A-Life in 2009 had been recorded in other assets
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
On December 31, 2010, we completed the sale of our
non-strategic PFS business. PFS provided revenue management and
billing services. The results for this business were accounted
for as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial
statements for the years presented herein. The sale resulted in
a net gain of $525.
Summarized statement of operations for the PFS business included
as discontinued operations were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
$
|
13,113
|
|
|
$
|
17,836
|
|
|
$
|
22,260
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(8,926
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Income (loss) from operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
Gain from sale of discontinued operation
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operation, net of tax
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
Loss from operations, net of taxes for the year ended
December 31, 2008 includes a goodwill impairment charge of
$9,339.
F-43
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Quarterly
financial information (unaudited)
|
The following table sets forth selected quarterly consolidated
financial information for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009. The operating results for any given quarter are not
necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
85,087
|
|
|
$
|
108,505
|
(d)
|
|
$
|
113,200
|
|
|
$
|
110,534
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
30,472
|
|
|
$
|
38,170
|
|
|
$
|
43,264
|
|
|
$
|
46,226
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
2,088
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,871
|
|
|
$
|
2,083
|
(e)
|
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Net income (loss) per share from discontinuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
|
|
35,078
|
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
35,182
|
|
|
|
35,078
|
|
|
|
48,926
|
|
|
|
36,370
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
89,907
|
|
|
$
|
89,142
|
|
|
$
|
89,071
|
|
|
$
|
85,812
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
30,421
|
|
|
$
|
32,081
|
|
|
$
|
30,171
|
|
|
$
|
31,558
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
(3,223
|
) (a)
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
2,603
|
|
|
$
|
962
|
(b)
|
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income (loss) per share from discontinuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,873
|
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,442
|
|
|
|
34,873
|
|
|
|
35,013
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes $5,950 recorded in cost of
legal proceedings and settlements related to the settlement of
all claims related to the Anthurium patent litigation settlement.
|
(b)
|
Includes $500 recorded in cost of
legal proceedings and settlements related to the settlement of
all claims related to the reseller arbitration settlement.
|
(c)
|
The sum of quarterly net income
(loss) per share may differ from the full year amount.
|
(d)
|
In April 2010, we completed the
acquisition of Spheris.
|
(e)
|
Includes gain on sale of A-Life
amounting to $8,780 and loss on extinguishment of debt amounting
to $13,525.
|
F-44
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
108,439
|
|
|
$
|
108,505
|
|
|
$
|
219,675
|
|
|
$
|
193,592
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
65,151
|
|
|
|
70,335
|
|
|
|
130,637
|
|
|
|
124,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
43,288
|
|
|
|
38,170
|
|
|
|
89,038
|
|
|
|
68,642
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
13,991
|
|
|
|
15,619
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
30,099
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
|
|
8,481
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
30,032
|
|
|
|
34,548
|
|
|
|
56,793
|
|
|
|
59,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
13,256
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
32,245
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(6,961
|
)
|
|
|
(5,437
|
)
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
|
|
(7,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
and noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
6,292
|
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
5,406
|
|
|
$
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
$
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
|
|
$
|
5,135
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
49,168
|
|
|
|
35,078
|
|
|
|
45,128
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,559
|
|
|
|
35,078
|
|
|
|
46,410
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-45
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
|
$
|
66,779
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,707 and $1,466,
respectively
|
|
|
74,025
|
|
|
|
82,038
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
24,900
|
|
|
|
23,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
159,726
|
|
|
|
172,523
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,984
|
|
|
|
23,018
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
90,328
|
|
|
|
90,268
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
102,552
|
|
|
|
107,962
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
|
14,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
399,079
|
|
|
$
|
414,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
|
$
|
27,817
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
|
|
11,358
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
29,663
|
|
|
|
36,917
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
9,731
|
|
|
|
16,911
|
|
Related party payable
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
10,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
78,893
|
|
|
|
103,573
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
257,807
|
|
|
|
266,677
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,666
|
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
Related party payable, non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
345,024
|
|
|
|
380,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.10 par value; authorized
25,000 shares; none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.10 par value; authorized
300,000 shares; 49,168 and 35,158 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
142,336
|
|
|
|
148,265
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(92,732
|
)
|
|
|
(107,179
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MedQuist Holdings Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
54,382
|
|
|
|
43,939
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(9,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
34,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
399,079
|
|
|
$
|
414,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
$
|
3,050
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
15,068
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4,658
|
)
|
|
|
(4,064
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(5,024
|
)
|
|
|
918
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(5,379
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,549
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
(7,141
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2,017
|
)
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
3,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
22,955
|
|
|
|
13,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,129
|
)
|
Purchases of capitalized intangible assets
|
|
|
(5,564
|
)
|
|
|
(3,584
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions and interests in affiliates, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(10,932
|
)
|
|
|
(105,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
107,216
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(27,092
|
)
|
|
|
(16,519
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
6,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(18,198
|
)
|
|
|
84,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,978
|
)
|
|
|
(7,176
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
66,779
|
|
|
|
29,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
60,801
|
|
|
$
|
22,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-47
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
Unaudited
The consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto are
unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations although we believe that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
MedQuist Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company). All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that,
in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair
presentation of our results of operations, financial position
and cash flows. Interim results are not necessarily indicative
of results for a full year. The information in this
Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010
Form 10-K)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on March 16, 2011.
U.S. initial
public offering
On January 27, 2011, we changed our name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and re-domiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation and
authorized 300.0 million shares of common stock at
$0.10 par value per share and 25.0 million shares of
preferred stock at $0.10 par value per share. In connection
with our re-domiciliation, we adjusted the number of our shares
outstanding through a reverse share split pursuant to which
every 4.5 shares of our common stock outstanding prior to
our re-domiciliation was converted into one share of our common
stock upon our re-domiciliation. All shares of common stock and
per share data included in the consolidated financial statements
reflect the reverse stock split. Our re-domiciliation and
reverse share split resulted in no change to our common
stockholders relative ownership interests in us.
In February 2011, we completed our U.S. initial public
offering of common stock (IPO) selling
3.0 million shares of our common stock and 1.5 million
shares of our common stock owned by selling shareholders at an
offer price of $8.00 per share, resulting in gross proceeds to
us of $24.0 million and net proceeds to us after
underwriting fees of $22.3 million. Our common stock is
listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol
MEDH.
Private
exchange
Certain of MedQuist Inc.s noncontrolling stockholders
entered into an exchange agreement with us (the Exchange
Agreement) whereby we issued 4.8 million shares of
our common stock in exchange for their 4.8 million shares
of MedQuist Inc. common stock. We refer to this transaction as
the Private Exchange. The Private Exchange was completed on
February 11, 2011 and increased our ownership in MedQuist
Inc. from 69.5% to 82.2%.
Public
exchange offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, we commenced our public exchange offer (the
Public Exchange Offer), to those noncontrolling
MedQuist Inc. stockholders who did not participate in the
Private Exchange to exchange shares of our common stock for
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The Public Exchange Offer
expired on March 11, 2011. We accepted for, and consummated
the exchange of, all MedQuist Inc. shares of common stock that
were validly tendered in the Public Exchange Offer. As a result
of the Public Exchange Offer, we increased our ownership in
MedQuist Inc. from 82.2% to approximately 97%. We
F-48
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
issued 5.4 million shares of our common stock in exchange
for 5.4 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock.
In accordance with the terms of the stipulation of settlement
entered into in connection with the settlement of certain
MedQuist Inc. shareholder litigation, the remaining
approximately 3% issued and outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc.
are expected to be exchanged on the same terms as the Public
Exchange Offer in a short-form merger by the end of 2011 (the
Short Form Merger); see note 11,
Commitments and Contingencies, Shareholders Settlement. Prior to
the Short Form Merger, we expect to conduct a second public
exchange offer on the same terms as the Public Exchange Offer.
Business
segment and reporting unit
We currently operate in one business segment and have one
reporting unit, which is clinical documentation solutions for
the healthcare industry. The Patient Financial Services
(PFS) business was sold on December 31, 2010
and results of the PFS business have been accounted for as
discontinued operations for all periods presented.
MultiModal
Merger agreement
Subsequent to our current reporting period, on July 11,
2011, we, two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Subs), MultiModal Technologies, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (MultiModal), and Michael Finke, as the
representative of MultiModals shareholders, entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the
Merger Agreement). The Merger Agreement provides for
our acquisition of MultiModal through a series of mergers
between MultiModal and the Subs (the Merger). As a
result of the Merger, MultiModal will become a direct
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
On August 18, 2011 (the Closing Date) we
completed the acquisition of MultiModal through a series of
mergers between MultiModal and the Subs. As a result of the
Merger, MultiModal became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of
ours. On the Closing Date, we paid an aggregate of approximately
$48.4 million in cash to MultiModals shareholders,
optionholders and other third parties and issued an aggregate of
4,134,896 shares of our common stock to MultiModals
shareholders who are accredited investors within the
meaning of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933. We are also obligated to pay up to approximately
$28.8 million of additional cash consideration in three
installments of approximately $16.3 million,
$4.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, following
the first, second and third anniversaries of the Closing Date.
To help fund the cash portion of the purchase price, MedQuist
Inc. loaned $19 million to CBay Inc., one of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Payor), on the
Closing Date. The loan is evidenced by a Subordinated
Intercompany Note dated as of the Closing Date, which matures
two years from the Closing Date and bears a 15% interest rate
per annum on the unpaid principal amount thereof, all or a
portion of which may be prepaid by the Payor at any time upon
one business days notice.
The merger provides us ownership of speech and natural language
understanding technologies, and is expected to facilitate
consolidation to a single speech recognition platform, provide a
broader product offering to local and regional transcription
partners and leverage MultiModals cloud based services to
enhance gross margins.
|
|
2.
|
Acquisition of
Spheris
|
On April 22, 2010, we completed the acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of Spheris Inc.
(Spheris) and certain of its affiliates. This
acquisition provided substantial incremental volume growth and
also provided opportunities for operating efficiencies and
operating margin expansion. Costs incurred for the acquisition
and direct integration costs are included in the line
item Acquisition and restructuring on the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The acquisition was
funded from the proceeds of credit facilities entered into in
connection with the acquisition.
F-49
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the
consolidated information of the Company as if the business
combination had occurred at the beginning of the first quarter
of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma three
|
|
|
Pro Forma six
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
116,698
|
|
|
$
|
236,963
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
4,033
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings (Basic)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Net income per share attributable to MedQuist Holdings (Diluted)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying our accounting
policies and adjusting the results of Spheris to reflect the
additional amortization of intangibles that would have been
charged assuming the fair value adjustments to intangible assets
had been applied from the beginning of the annual period being
reported on, and the additional interest expense assuming the
acquisition related debt had been incurred at the beginning of
the period being reported on, excluding the acquisition costs,
and including the related tax effects. Impacts of
integration-related charges have been excluded from the amounts
above. Additionally, the pro forma revenue amounts reflect only
recognized revenues of the acquired business, but do not reflect
the impacts of losses known at the time of close of the
transaction that impacted the actual results in subsequent
periods.
Debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
All other
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
|
|
9,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,832
|
|
|
|
294,494
|
|
Less: Current maturities
|
|
|
(12,025
|
)
|
|
|
(27,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
257,807
|
|
|
$
|
266,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2011, we made an optional prepayment of
$20.0 million in addition to the $5.0 million due
under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. No additional
principal payments are required in 2011 under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility. In January 2011, as required under our Senior
Secured Credit Facility, we entered into Interest Rate Cap
Contracts (for $60.0 million notional amounts which will
amortize over time) to limit the risk of increase for
fluctuation in interest rates. The interest rates on the term
loan and the Senior Subordinated Notes were 7.25% and 13.0%,
respectively, on June 30, 2011.
As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the
covenants of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes.
F-50
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Transfers from
noncontrolling interests
|
On February 11, 2011, the Private Exchange was completed
which increased our ownership interest in MedQuist Inc. to 82.2%.
Upon expiration of the Public Exchange Offer on March 11,
2011, we increased our ownership in MedQuist Inc. to
approximately 97%. These exchanges resulted in the
reclassification of $7.4 million from noncontrolling
interest to common stock and additional
paid-in-capital.
In accordance with the terms of a Stipulation of Settlement
entered into in connection with the settlement of certain
MedQuist Inc. shareholder litigation, the remaining issued and
outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. not already owned by us are
to be exchanged in the Short Form Merger that is expected
to be completed by the end of 2011. Prior to the Short
Form Merger, we expect to conduct a second public exchange
offer on the same terms as the Public Exchange Offer.
|
|
5.
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,135
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,725
|
|
|
$
|
(2,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,971
|
|
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each
period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted
for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, which
consist only of stock options, using the treasury stock method.
The following table reflects the weighted average shares
outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to MedQuist Holdings
|
|
$
|
5,135
|
|
|
$
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
Less: amount attributable to former principal shareholders
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
(6,619
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
5,535
|
|
|
$
|
(2,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,828
|
|
|
$
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
49,168
|
|
|
|
35,078
|
|
|
|
45,128
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,559
|
|
|
|
35,078
|
|
|
|
46,410
|
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Net income per common share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to MedQuist
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
The computation of diluted net income per share does not assume
conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would have an
anti-dilutive effect on diluted net income per share.
Potentially dilutive shares having an anti-dilutive effect on
net income per share and, therefore, excluded from the
calculation of diluted net income per share, totaled 14,221 and
13,880 shares for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. The net income for the purpose
of the basic income per share is adjusted for the amounts
payable to a former principal shareholders under the terminated
management services agreement discussed in Note 11,
Commitments and Contingencies. The calculation of shares
outstanding reflect the weighted average share counts during the
applicable periods. However, they do not consider the additional
shares of remaining noncontrolling shareholders of MedQuist Inc.
A fully-diluted pro forma share count considering the additional
shares would result in different per share amounts than
reflected in the computations above.
F-52
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table reconciles equity from December 31,
2010 to June 30, 2011.
Underwriter costs incurred for the IPO have been treated as a
reduction of the proceeds and are included as a reduction of
additional
paid-in-capital.
All other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with
the IPO, Private Exchange, the Public Exchange Offer, the second
public exchange offer and the Short Form Merger also have
been treated as a reduction of additional
paid-in-capital.
See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, affiliates of
the Companys former principal shareholder (related party),
for a discussion of the amounts accrued for former principal
stockholders in February 2011 due to the change in control, and
a discussion of the shares issued to a former principal
stockholder to settle a portion of the liability by issuance of
common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
paid-in-
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
loss
|
|
|
interests
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
|
$
|
148,265
|
|
|
$
|
(107,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,511
|
|
Issuance of common stock at $8.00 per share
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
23,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
Common stock offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,336
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock under the Private Exchange and the
Public Exchange Offer
|
|
|
10,240
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
(8,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Exchange and Public Exchange Offer costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,586
|
)
|
Shares issued to former principal stockholder to settle
obligation
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
6,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,156
|
|
Accrued amounts due to former principal stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,619
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,447
|
|
|
|
14,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011
|
|
|
49,168
|
|
|
$
|
4,917
|
|
|
$
|
142,336
|
|
|
$
|
(92,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(139
|
)
|
|
$
|
(327
|
)
|
|
$
|
54,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Customer accommodations
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
5,507
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
Restructure liability
|
|
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
Other (no item exceeds 5% of current liabilities)
|
|
|
11,009
|
|
|
|
13,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
29,663
|
|
|
$
|
36,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
restructuring plan
On March 31, 2011, the board of directors adopted a
restructuring plan to complete the integration of its acquired
Spheris operations into MedQuist Inc. and to integrate MedQuist
Inc. with MedQuist Holdings (2011 Restructuring
Plan). We recorded a charge of $1.5 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2011 representing future lease
payments on MedQuist Inc.s former corporate headquarters
in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey and former data center in Sterling,
Virginia, net of estimated sublease rentals. The future minimum
lease payments on the Mt. Laurel facility total
$2.5 million. The commencement of the integration of
MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Holdings resulted in a charge of
$5.9 million primarily consisting of severance costs of
$4.3 million and non-cash stock compensation costs of
approximately $0.8 million associated with the acceleration
of stock option vesting and the extension of the stock option
exercise period for terminated employees. The 2011 Restructuring
Plan will be implemented throughout 2011 and may result in
additional charges incurred later in 2011. We expect the
majority of the remaining balance to be paid in 2011 and 2012.
The Company expects that restructuring activities may continue
in 2011, as management identifies opportunities for synergies
resulting from integration of MedQuist Inc. with MedQuist
Holdings, including the elimination of redundant functions as
the Company may complete other acquisitions. No other
restructuring plan has a material impact on our balance sheets,
results of operations or cash flows.
The table below reflects the financial statement activity
related to the 2011 Restructuring Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
7,433
|
|
Non-cash use for share based compensation
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
2010
restructuring plan
Managements 2010 cost reduction initiatives, including
process improvement, combined with the acquisition of Spheris,
resulted in a restructuring plan (2010 Restructuring
Plan) involving staff reductions and other actions
designed to maximize operating efficiencies.
The table below reflects the financial statement activity
related to the 2010 Restructuring Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructuring charges were $2.0 million,
$7.4 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million for
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The Company also incurred $2.4 million,
$3.9 million, $5.1 million and $6.0 million of
acquisition and integration-related charges for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Acquisition and integration-related charges represent amounts
related to integration of the acquired Spheris business, as well
as charges related to other acquisitions. We expect the
remaining balance to be paid in 2011.
|
|
9.
|
Cost (benefit) of
legal proceedings, settlements and accommodations
|
The following is a summary of the amounts recorded as Cost
(benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and accommodations
in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Legal fees and settlements
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
Accommodation reversal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
(6,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts included in legal fees and settlements for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 include the settlement with the
former chief financial officer of MedQuist Inc. of
indemnification claims with the former chief financial officer
which will reduce legal fees MedQuist Inc. would otherwise be
required to pay pursuant to the indemnification obligations
under the MedQuist Inc. bylaws, and the legal fees incurred in
connection with the settlement of Shareholder Litigation (See
Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies).
In November 2003, one of MedQuist Inc.s employees raised
allegations that it had engaged in improper billing practices.
In response, the MedQuist Inc. board of directors undertook an
independent review of these allegations (Review). In
response to our customers concern over the public
disclosure of certain findings from the Review, MedQuist Inc.
made the decision in the fourth quarter of 2005 to take action
to try to avoid litigation and preserve and solidify its
customer business relationships by offering a financial
accommodation to certain of its customers.
F-55
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In connection with the decision to offer financial
accommodations to certain of its customers (Accommodation
Customers), MedQuist Inc. analyzed its historical billing
information and the available report-level data to develop
individualized accommodation offers to be made to Accommodation
Customers (Accommodation Analysis). Based on the
Accommodation Analysis, the MedQuist Inc. board of directors
authorized management to make cash or credit accommodation
offers to Accommodation Customers in the aggregate amount of
$75.8 million (Customer Accommodation Program).
By accepting the accommodation offer, the customer agreed, among
other things, to release MedQuist Inc. from any and all claims
and liability regarding the billing related issues. On
March 31, 2011, the MedQuist Inc. board of directors
terminated the Customer Accommodation Program. As a result, any
amounts that had not been offered to customers were reversed.
Our consolidated income tax expense consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite lived
assets amortization deductions for income tax purposes during
the applicable period as well as state and foreign income taxes.
We recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax
assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized
in future years.
We expect that our consolidated income tax expense for the year
ended December 31, 2011, similar to the year ended
December 31, 2010, will consist principally of an increase
in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill amortization
deductions for income tax purposes during the applicable year as
well as state and foreign income taxes. We regularly assess the
future realization of deferred taxes and whether the valuation
allowance against the majority of domestic deferred tax assets
is still warranted. To the extent sufficient positive evidence,
including past results and future projections, exists to benefit
all or part of these benefits, the valuation allowance will be
adjusted accordingly. It is reasonably possible that some or all
of the valuation allowance could be adjusted within the next
year. The tax benefit for the three months ended June 30,
2011 includes the reversal of approximately $0.5 million
from our accrual for various state uncertain tax positions as a
result of filing voluntary disclosure agreements with state
jurisdictions.
In January 2011, we re-domiciled from a British Virgin Island
company to a Delaware corporation. Accordingly, domestic income
taxes now refers to income taxes recorded on operations in the
United States.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Affiliates of
the companys former principal shareholders (related
party)
Pursuant to an agreement entered into on August 19, 2008,
the Company was obligated to pay S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II,
LLC (SAC CBI II) and Lehman Brothers Commercial
Corporation Asia (LBCCA), an annual fixed amount of
$1.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in cash
or shares of the Companys common stock at the
Companys election, in return for financial, managerial and
operational advice. The payment provision of the agreement had a
five-year term that was scheduled to expire in August 18,
2013. The agreement stipulated that the annual amount was
payable regardless of whether any services were rendered by SAC
CBI II or LBCCA. Under the agreement, the Company was committed
to pay for the remaining unexpired term at termination of the
agreement or upon a change in control, with the payment amount
determined as follows: the sum of the present value (using the
discount rate equal to the yield on U.S. Treasury
securities of like maturity) of the annual amounts that would
have been payable with respect to the period from the date of
such change of control or termination, as applicable through
scheduled expiration date. The change in control occurred and
the agreement terminated as a result of the consummation of our
IPO and the Private Exchange. As a result, 770 thousand shares
of common stock valued at $6.2 million were issued in March
2011 to satisfy the obligation to SAC CBI II.
Provisional liquidators were appointed in respect of LBCCA in
September 2008, and the Company challenged LBCCAs
entitlement to amounts under the agreement. On April 27,
2011, the provisional liquidators filed a lawsuit against the
Company on behalf of LBCCA in the Southern District of New York
seeking payments under the agreement. On July 21, 2011, the
Company reached a settlement and paid $4.0 million to LBCCA
.
F-56
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
According to the terms of the agreement, the Company recorded
$6.6 million and $1.4 million of charges to additional
paid-in-capital
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Additionally, amounts payable under the agreement
of $4.0 million and $3.5 million at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively, were reflected as a
related party payable, in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Shareholder
settlement
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, two of
MedQuist Inc.s minority shareholders filed class action
complaints in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Burlington
County, Chancery Division, (the Court) against
MedQuist Inc., the individual members on MedQuist Inc.s
board of directors and us, in a matter entitled in Re: MedQuist
Shareholder Litigation (the Shareholder Litigation).
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants breached certain
fiduciary duties they owed to minority shareholders of MedQuist
Inc. in connection with the structuring and disclosure of the
Public Exchange Offer.
On March 4, 2011, the parties to the Shareholder Litigation
entered into a memorandum of understanding (the MOU)
that outlined the material terms of a proposed settlement of the
Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, we agreed to
extend the expiration of the Public Exchange Offer and further
agreed that if, as a result of the Public Exchange Offer, we
obtained ownership of at least 90% of the outstanding common
stock of MedQuist Inc., we would conduct the Short
Form Merger under applicable law to acquire the remaining
shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock that we do not currently
own at the same exchange ratio applicable under the Public
Exchange Offer. MedQuist Inc. agreed to make certain
supplemental disclosures concerning the Public Exchange Offer,
which were contained in an amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that MedQuist Inc. filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. We
also agreed to use our best efforts to finalize a stipulation of
settlement (the Stipulation of Settlement) and
present it to the Court for preliminary approval within thirty
days of the date of the MOU.
On April 1, 2011, the parties executed the Stipulation of
Settlement that memorialized the terms of the settlement
outlined in the MOU. On this same date, plaintiffs counsel
filed with the Clerk of the Court a Motion for Preliminary
Approval of the Proposed Stipulation of Settlement. The Motion
asked the Court to, among other things, (a) hold a hearing
to address preliminary approval of the Stipulation of
Settlement, (b) certify a class, for purposes of
effectuating the Stipulation of Settlement only, of all MedQuist
Inc.s shareholders (except the named defendants and their
families and affiliates) as of and including the date of the
closing of the Short Form Merger contemplated under the
Stipulation of Settlement, and (c) schedule a final hearing
within 60 days to determine whether the Stipulation of
Settlement is reasonable and fair and should receive final
approval.
The Court held a preliminary approval hearing on April 19,
2011 and entered an Order preliminarily approving the settlement
and setting a final approval hearing for June 17, 2011 (the
Preliminary Approval Order). The Preliminary
Approval Order also required MedQuist Inc. to provide mail and
publication notice of the proposed settlement to all
shareholders of recorded and established deadlines for
objections to the settlement and for filing briefs in support
and in opposition to the settlement.
On June 17, 2011, following mail and publication notice to
MedQuist Inc.s shareholders, the Court held a fairness
hearing on the settlement. On this date, the Court entered an
Order and Final Judgment (the Final Judgment) that,
among other things, (a) certified the settlement class
consisting of all MedQuist Inc.s shareholders (except the
named defendants and their families and affiliates) as of and
including the date of the closing of the Short Form Merger
contemplated under the Stipulation of Settlement (the
Settlement Class), (b) found the terms set
forth in the Stipulation of Settlement to be fair and reasonable
and in the best interests of the Settlement Class, and
(c) approved the application for attorneys fees and
costs and awarded plaintiffs counsel $400 which was
recorded in Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and
in accrued expenses as of June 30, 2011. The final judgment
also dismissed the case with prejudice.
F-57
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Agreement with
Nuance Communications, Inc.
On June 30, 2011, MedQuist Inc. and Nuance Communications,
Inc., (Nuance), entered into an agreement whereby
MedQuist Inc. agreed to pay Nuance an agreed upon amount in full
satisfaction of MedQuist Inc.s license fee obligations
with respect to certain products through June 30, 2015.
MedQuist Inc. also agreed to pay Nuance for one year of
maintenance services to be provided by Nuance to MedQuist with
respect to the licensed products. The maintenance services will
automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless
canceled in writing by MedQuist Inc. prior the annual renewal
date or the underlying agreement expires. The first installment
due under the agreement was paid on June 30, 2011, and is
classified in both other current assets and other assets in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. MedQuist Inc. is
obligated to pay additional installments during the third
quarter of 2011.
SEC
investigation of former officer
With respect to MedQuist Inc.s historical billing
practices, the SEC pursued civil litigation against MedQuist
Inc.s former chief financial officer, whose employment
ended in July 2004. Pursuant to its bylaws, MedQuist Inc. had
been providing indemnification for the legal fees for its former
chief financial officer. In February 2011 MedQuist Inc. reached
a settlement under which its former chief financial officer
released MedQuist Inc. from its indemnification obligations to
him upon his settlement of the litigation with the SEC and
MedQuist Inc.s payment to him of a negotiated amount. The
former chief financial officer settled the SEC litigation and
MedQuist Inc. made its settlement payment to him in May 2011.
This settles the last remaining contingency related to the
MedQuist Inc. billing practices.
|
|
12.
|
Fair value
measurements
|
Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific
measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be
determined based on the assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for
considering market participant assumptions in fair value
measurements, FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820) establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant
assumptions based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are
classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the
reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant
assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3
of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has
the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than
quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted
prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and
yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for are typically
based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little,
if any, related market activity. In instances where the
determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs
from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in
the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value
measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
Companys assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or
liability.
F-58
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company uses interest rate cap contracts to manage its
interest rate risk. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has
interest rate cap contracts for $60.0 million in notional
amounts, which amortize over time and expire in January 2013, to
the limit the risk of increase of fluctuation in interest rates.
The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely
accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow
analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This
analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives,
including the period to maturity, and uses observable
market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied
volatilities. The fair values of interest rate caps are
determined using the market standard methodology of discounting
the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable
interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The
variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected
receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future
interest rates derived from observable market interest rate
curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of
ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements.
The Company also uses foreign exchange forward contracts to
manage its foreign exchange risk. As of June 30, 2011, the
Company has foreign exchange forward cover contracts for
$49.0 million of notional amounts which expire through June
2012, to limit the risk of fluctuation in foreign exchange
rates. The valuation of these instruments is determined using
widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash
flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives,
including the period to maturity, and uses observable
market-based inputs, including foreign exchange forward rates
and implied volatilities. To comply with the provisions of FASB
ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the
inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with these derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs,
such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the
likelihood of default by its counterparties. For counterparties
with publicly available credit information, the credit spreads
over LIBOR used in the calculations represent implied credit
default swap spreads obtained from a third party credit data
provider. However, as of June 30, 2011, the Company has
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions
and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not
significant to the overall valuation of the derivatives. As a
result, the Company has determined that its valuations for the
foreign currency exchange contracts in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Interest rate agreements
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Foreign currency derivatives
|
|
$
|
932
|
|
These contracts are not designated for hedge accounting
treatment and therefore, the Company records the fair value of
these agreements as an asset or liability and the change in fair
value at each reporting period as an adjustment in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The interest rate
derivatives are classified in other assets, and gains and losses
are recorded in Interest expense, net. Foreign currency
derivatives are classified in other current assets, and gains
and losses are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, cost of revenues and selling, general and
administrative allocated based on the costs incurred.
F-59
MedQuist Holdings
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Termination of
MedQuist Inc. long term incentive plan
In connection with the termination of the MedQuist Inc. Long
Term Incentive Plan, on July 11, 2011 the Company granted
restricted stock awards under the MedQuist Holdings Inc. 2010
Equity Incentive Plan to members of the Companys
management. All of the restricted stock awards granted vest
ratably every calendar quarter over three years. At the date of
the grant, 1/12th of the grant was immediately vested. The
shares of restricted stock become fully vested and
non-forfeitable on a termination without cause or a
voluntary departure for good reason (as each term is
defined in the restricted stock award agreement).
Appointment of
executive chairman and chief executive officer
On July 11, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors
appointed Roger L. Davenport to the position of Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (CEO), effective
July 11, 2011, and the MedQuist Inc. of Directors appointed
Mr. Davenport to the position of Chairman and CEO of
MedQuist Inc., also effective July 11, 2011.
The Company and Mr. Davenport have entered into an
employment agreement dated July 11, 2011 (the
Employment Agreement). Under the Employment
Agreement, Mr. Davenport will serve as Chairman and CEO
through July 31, 2014. Thereafter, the term of his
employment will automatically renew for successive one-year
periods, unless either party elects not to renew the term.
In connection with the commencement of his employment, the
Company granted Mr. Davenport 250,000 restricted shares of
the Companys common stock pursuant to a Restricted Stock
Award Agreement dated July 11, 2011 (the Restricted
Stock Agreement), which shares will vest one-third on the
first anniversary of the grant, and will vest one-sixth on each
of the
18-month,
24-month,
30-month and
36-month
anniversaries of the grant date, provided he remains
continuously employed through that date and subject to full
acceleration upon termination without cause, resignation with
good reason or change in control of the Company.
As previously announced, Robert Aquilina, the Companys
former Executive Chairman, separated employment with the Company
effective on the close of business on June 30, 2011;
Mr. Aquilina continues to serve as a member of the
Companys Board of Directors. In addition,
Mr. Aquilina, MedQuist Inc.s former Chairman of the
Board of Directors, resigned from the MedQuist Inc. Board of
Directors effective July 11, 2011.
As previously announced, Peter Masanotti, the former President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and MedQuist Inc.,
separated employment with the Company and MedQuist Inc.,
effective as of the close of business on July 11, 2011.
F-60
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of MedQuist Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MedQuist Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders (deficit) equity
and other comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2010. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of MedQuist Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 16, 2011
F-61
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31 ,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
375,240
|
|
|
$
|
307,200
|
|
|
$
|
326,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
249,571
|
|
|
|
206,265
|
|
|
|
230,375
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
37,070
|
|
|
|
33,441
|
|
|
|
47,520
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12,813
|
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
15,848
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
Cost of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
14,843
|
|
|
|
19,738
|
|
Acquistion and integration related charges
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,233
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
334,882
|
|
|
|
283,815
|
|
|
|
415,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
40,358
|
|
|
|
23,385
|
|
|
|
(88,420
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(5,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
(13,429
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
31,722
|
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
(85,308
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
(16,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
31,051
|
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-62
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
41,265
|
|
|
$
|
25,216
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,142 and $3,159,
respectively
|
|
|
76,155
|
|
|
|
43,627
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
4,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
127,200
|
|
|
|
74,555
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
88,982
|
|
|
|
40,813
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
79,860
|
|
|
|
36,307
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,741
|
|
|
|
9,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
323,918
|
|
|
$
|
174,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
|
|
8,687
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
27,106
|
|
|
|
21,490
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
12,432
|
|
Current portion of lease obligations
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party payable
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,840
|
|
|
|
10,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
82,011
|
|
|
|
54,825
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
265,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,066
|
|
|
|
3,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized
60,000 shares; 37,556 and 37,556 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
238,042
|
|
|
|
237,848
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(271,316
|
)
|
|
|
(125,854
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(30,601
|
)
|
|
|
114,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
323,918
|
|
|
$
|
174,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-63
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
31,051
|
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
5,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale and equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(10,604
|
)
|
|
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,233
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
(17,091
|
)
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(11,421
|
)
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
(5,781
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
661
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(5,557
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(12,701
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
(5,126
|
)
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
(3,559
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(4,939
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
33,958
|
|
|
|
44,552
|
|
|
|
(8,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,824
|
)
|
|
|
(4,932
|
)
|
|
|
(6,574
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(5,208
|
)
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
(3,411
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of invest in affiliated company
|
|
|
19,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(98,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(90,224
|
)
|
|
|
(8,366
|
)
|
|
|
(9,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings
|
|
|
385,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(113,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(176,513
|
)
|
|
|
(49,949
|
)
|
|
|
(103,279
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(21,607
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
72,213
|
|
|
|
(51,150
|
)
|
|
|
(103,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
16,049
|
|
|
|
(14,702
|
)
|
|
|
(121,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
25,216
|
|
|
|
39,918
|
|
|
|
161,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
41,265
|
|
|
$
|
25,216
|
|
|
$
|
39,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
9,297
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash debt incurred in connection with the Spheris acquisition
|
|
$
|
13,570
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired using debt
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(deficit)
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
(deficit) equity
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
$
|
236,412
|
|
|
$
|
72,876
|
|
|
$
|
5,356
|
|
|
$
|
314,644
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,795
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,713
|
)
|
|
|
(3,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehe nsive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,508
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,279
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
$
|
237,907
|
|
|
$
|
(99,198
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
$
|
140,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,949
|
)
|
Dilution of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
$
|
237,848
|
|
|
$
|
(125,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,754
|
|
|
$
|
114,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,051
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,970
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
$
|
238,042
|
|
|
$
|
(271,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,673
|
|
|
$
|
(30,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-65
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
1. Description
of the business and recent developments
We are a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation
solutions for the U.S. healthcare system. Our
end-to-end
solutions convert physicians dictation of patient
interactions, or the physician narrative, into a high quality
and customized electronic record. These solutions integrate
technologies and services for voice capture and transmission,
automated speech recognition (ASR), medical transcription and
editing, workflow automation, and document management and
distribution to deliver a complete managed service for our
customers. Our solutions enable hospitals, clinics, and
physician practices to improve the quality of clinical data as
well as accelerate and automate the documentation process, and
we believe our solutions improve physician productivity and
satisfaction, enhance revenue cycle performance, and facilitate
the adoption and use of electronic health records.
Majority
owner
On August 6, 2008, MedQuist Holdings Inc. (MedQuist
Holdings), formerly CBaySystems Holdings Limited (CBaySystems
Holdings), a company that is now publicly traded on The NASDAQ
market with a portfolio of investments in medical transcription,
which includes a company that competes in the medical
transcription market, healthcare technology, and healthcare
financial services, acquired a large interest in us from
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips).
The Companys consolidated financial statements do not
include any components of purchase accounting, which was
recorded at the MedQuist Holdings reporting level, and are
presented on the historical basis of accounting.
We paid cash dividends of $4.70 per share in 2010 and $1.33 per
share in 2009.
Recent
developments of our majority owner
U.S. initial
public offering
On January 27, 2011, it changed its name from CBaySystems
Holdings Limited to MedQuist Holdings Inc. and re-domiciled from
a British Virgin Islands company to a Delaware corporation and
authorized 300 million shares of common stock par value at
$0.10 per share and 25 million shares of preferred stock at
$0.10 par value per share. In connection with MedQuist
Holdings re-domiciliation, MedQuist Holdings adjusted the
number of its shares outstanding through a reverse share split
pursuant to which every 4.5 shares of its common stock
outstanding prior to its re-domiciliation was converted into one
share of MedQuist Holdings common stock upon its
re-domiciliation.
In February 2011, MedQuist Holdings completed its
U.S. initial public offering of common stock selling
3.0 million of its shares of common stock and
1.5 million shares of its common stock owned by selling
shareholders at an offer price of $8.00 per share, resulting in
gross proceeds to MedQuist Holdings of $24.0 million and
net proceeds to MedQuist Holdings after underwriting fees of
$22.3 million. MedQuist Holdings common stock is
listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol
MEDH.
Private
exchange
Certain of our noncontrolling stockholders entered into an
exchange agreement with MedQuist Holdings, whereby MedQuist
Holdings issued 4.8 million shares of its common stock in
exchange for 4.8 million shares of MedQuist Inc. common
stock. This transaction is referred to as the Private Exchange.
The Private Exchange was completed on February 11, 2011 and
increased MedQuist Holdings ownership in MedQuist Inc.
from 69.5% to 82.2%.
F-66
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Registered
exchange offer
In addition to the Private Exchange referred to above, in
February 2011, MedQuist Holdings commenced its public exchange
offer, or Registered Exchange Offer, to those of our
noncontrolling stockholders who did not participate in the
Private Exchange to exchange shares of MedQuist Holdings
common stock for shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock. The
Registered Exchange Offer expired on March 11, 2011.
MedQuist Holdings accepted for, and consummated the exchange of,
all MedQuist Inc. shares of common stock that were validly
tendered in the Registered Exchange Offer. As a result of the
Registered Exchange Offer, MedQuist Holdings increased its
ownership interest in us from 82.2% to approximately 97%.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
accounting policies
|
Principles of
consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
MedQuist Inc. and its subsidiary companies. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
estimates and assumptions in the preparation of consolidated
financial statements
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Significant items subject to such
estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of
property and equipment, valuation of long-lived and intangible
assets and goodwill, valuation allowances for receivables and
deferred income taxes, revenue recognition, stock-based
compensation and commitments and contingencies. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
The majority of our revenues are derived from providing medical
transcription and editing services. Revenues for medical
transcription and editing services are recognized when the
services are rendered. These services are based on contracted
rates. The remainder of our revenues is derived from the sale of
voice-capture and document management products including
software, hardware and implementation, training and maintenance
service related to these legacy products.
We recognize software-related revenues using the residual method
when vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value
exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement,
but does not exist for one or more delivered elements. We
allocate revenues to each undelivered element based on its
respective fair value determined by the price charged when that
element is sold separately or, for elements not yet sold
separately, the price established by management if it is
probable that the price will not change before the element is
sold separately. We defer revenues for the undelivered elements
including maintenance which is recognized over the contract
period. Provided that the arrangement does not involve
significant production, modification, or customization of the
software, revenues are recognized when all of the following four
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable
and collectability is probable.
Sales
taxes
We present taxes assessed by a governmental authority including
sales, use, value added and excise taxes on a net basis and
therefore the presentation of these taxes is excluded from our
revenues and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets until such amounts are remitted to
the taxing authorities.
F-67
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Litigation and
settlement costs
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, claims,
contingencies and other legal matters. We record a charge equal
to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss
contingency when both of the following conditions are met:
(i) information available prior to issuance of the
financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset
had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date
of the financial statements and (ii) the range of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. We expense legal costs, including
those legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a
loss contingency, as incurred.
Restructuring
costs
A liability for restructuring costs associated with an exit or
disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at fair
value when the liability is incurred. We record a liability for
severance costs when the obligation is attributable to employee
service already rendered, the employees rights to those
benefits accumulate or vest, payment of the compensation is
probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We record a
liability for future, non-cancellable operating lease costs when
we vacate a facility.
Our estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to
record additional restructuring charges or reduce the amount of
liabilities recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we
evaluate the remaining accrued restructuring charges to ensure
their adequacy, that no excess accruals are retained and the
utilization of the provisions are for their intended purposes in
accordance with developed exit plans.
We periodically evaluate currently available information and
adjust our accrued restructuring reserve as necessary. Changes
in estimates are accounted for as restructuring costs or credits
in the period identified.
Research and
development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements,
using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
our statements of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the
carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely
than not that such assets will be realized. Management considers
various sources of future taxable income including projected
book earnings, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the
need for a valuation allowance.
Stock-based
compensation
We estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant
using an option pricing model. We use the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to determine the fair value of our options. The
determination of the fair value of stock based awards using an
option pricing model is affected by a number of assumptions
including expected volatility of the common stock over the
expected term, the expected term, the risk free interest rate
during the expected term and the expected dividends to be paid.
The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately
expected to vest is recognized as compensation expense over the
requisite service periods.
As of December 31, 2010, total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $145 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1 year.
F-68
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We did not grant any stock options for years ended
December 31, 2010 or 2009. In accordance with the terms of
our Chief Executive Officers option agreement, in December
2010, the Compensation Committee approved an adjustment to the
exercise price of our Chief Executive Officers options to
account for the payment of extraordinary dividends in 2010 and
2009 to our shareholders.
Net income
(loss) per share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per
share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average shares outstanding, as adjusted for the dilutive effect
of common stock equivalents, which consist only of stock
options, using the treasury stock method.
The table below reflects basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
31,051
|
|
|
$
|
23,291
|
|
|
$
|
(68,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
(1.83
|
)
|
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share does not
assume conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would
have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net loss per share.
During 2008 we had a net loss. As a result, any assumed
conversions would result in reducing the net loss per share and,
therefore, are not included in the calculation. Shares having an
anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share and, therefore,
excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share,
totaled 1,501 for the year ended December 31, 2008. For the
years ended December 31. 2010, and 2009, 692, and 1,208
options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share as the options exercise price was
greater than the average market price of the common stock during
the respective period.
Advertising
costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $918, $613 and
$1,256, respectively.
Cash and cash
equivalents
We consider all highly liquid instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our
cash management and investment policies dictate that cash
equivalents be limited to investment grade, highly liquid
securities. We place our temporary cash investments with
high-credit rated, quality financial institutions. Deposits held
with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such
deposits. Consequently, our cash equivalents are subject to
potential credit risk. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
cash equivalents consisted of money market investments. The
carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair
value.
F-69
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The carrying value of accounts receivable
approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
our best estimate for losses inherent in our accounts receivable
portfolio.
We estimate uncollectible amounts based upon our historical
write-off experience, current customer receivable balances, age
of customer receivable balances, the customers financial
condition and current economic conditions. Historically, these
estimates have been adequate to cover our accounts receivable
exposure. We change the allowance if circumstances or economic
conditions change.
Product revenues for sales to end-user customers and resellers
are recognized upon passage of title if all other revenue
recognition criteria have been met. End-user customers generally
do not have a right of return. We provide certain of our
resellers and distributors with limited rights of return of our
products. We reduce revenues for rights to return our products
based upon our historical experience and have included an
estimate of such credits in our allowance for doubtful accounts.
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range
from two to seven years for furniture, equipment and software,
and the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for
leasehold improvements. Repairs and maintenance costs are
charged to expense as incurred while additions and betterments
are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposals are charged to
operations. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition, the
related cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from
the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Valuation of
long-lived and other intangible assets and
goodwill.
In connection with acquisitions, we allocate portions of the
purchase price to tangible and intangible assets, consisting
primarily of acquired technologies, and customer relationships,
agreements, with the remainder allocated to goodwill. We assess
the realizability of goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives at least annually, or sooner if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
may not be recoverable. We have determined that the reporting
unit level is our sole operating segment.
Software
development costs
Software costs incurred in creating a computer software product
are charged to expense when incurred as research and development
until technical feasibility has been established. Technical
feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program
design or, in its absence, completion of a working model. The
time between attaining technological feasibility and completion
of software development has been short.
Software costs for internal use software incurred in the
preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred.
Capitalization of costs begins when the preliminary project
stage is completed and management, with the relevant authority,
authorizes and commits funding of the project and it is probable
that the project will be completed and the software will be used
to perform the function intended. Capitalization ceases no later
than the point at which the project is substantially complete
and ready for its intended use.
Long-lived and
other intangible assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
F-70
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
asset may not be recoverable. To determine the recoverability of
long-lived assets, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by an asset is compared to the carrying
value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the
carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Annually we
evaluate the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
Intangible assets include certain assets (primarily customer
lists) obtained from business acquisitions and are being
amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives which range from three to 20 years.
Foreign
currency
Our operating subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada use
the local currency as their functional currency. We translate
the assets and liabilities of those entities into
U.S. dollars using the month-end exchange rate. We
translate revenues and expenses using the average exchange rates
prevailing during the reporting period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income within shareholders equity. Gains and
losses from foreign currency transactions are included as a
component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and were not
material for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Business
enterprise segments
We operate in one reportable operating segment which is clinical
documentation technology and services.
Concentration
of risk, geographic data and enterprise-wide
disclosures
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net
revenues in any period. There is no single geographic area of
significant concentration other than the United States.
The following table summarizes the net revenues by the
categories of our products and services as a percentage of our
total net revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Medical transcription
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
85.7
|
%
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other includes product, maintenance, medical coding, application
service provider and other miscellaneous revenues.
Fair value of
financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, accrued expenses, and debt are reflected in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets at carrying values
which approximate fair value.
Comprehensive
income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of Net income (loss)
and Other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive
income (loss) consists of foreign currency translation
adjustments. Other comprehensive income
F-71
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(loss) and comprehensive income (loss) are displayed separately
in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders (Deficit)
Equity and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Acquisition
and integration related charges
We expense costs incurred for acquisitions and related
integration activities in the period incurred. This includes
legal, investment banking, accounting, tax and other consulting,
as well as any internal costs.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
ratified two consensuses affecting revenue recognition:
The first consensus, Revenue
RecognitioníMultiple-Element Arrangements, sets forth
requirements that must be met for an entity to recognize revenue
from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a
multiple-element arrangement when other items have not yet been
delivered. One of those current requirements is that there be
objective and reliable evidence of the standalone selling price
of the undelivered items, which must be supported by either
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or third-party
evidence (TPE).
This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered
elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the
portion of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to
items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE
or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered
or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of
those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to
each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those
selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted.
The second consensus, Software-Revenue Recognition
addresses the accounting for transactions involving software
to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both
software and non-software and not-software components that
function together to deliver a products functionality.
The consensuses are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The standards were
adopted in the first quarter of 2011 and will not have a
material impact on our results of operations or our financial
position.
|
|
3.
|
Acquisition of
Spheris assets in the United States
|
On April 22, 2010, we and our majority shareholder,
MedQuist Holdings, completed the acquisition of substantially
all of the assets of Spheris and certain of its affiliates,
pursuant to the terms of a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement.
This acquisition provided substantial incremental volume growth
and also provided opportunities for operating efficiencies and
operating margin expansion. See Note 9, Accrued Expenses
for further discussion of our 2010 restructuring plan approved
by management to realize some of these savings. The acquisition
was funded from the proceeds of credit facilities entered into
in connection with the acquisition.
F-72
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the
consolidated information of the Company as if the business
combination had occurred at the beginning of each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
418,611
|
|
|
$
|
463,796
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
35,594
|
|
|
$
|
24,369
|
|
Net income per share (Basic)
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
Net income per share (Diluted)
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying our accounting
policies and adjusting the results of Spheris to reflect the
additional amortization of intangibles that would have been
charged assuming the fair value adjustments to intangible assets
had been applied from the beginning of the annual period being
reported on, and the additional interest expense assuming the
acquisition related debt had been incurred at the beginning of
the period being reported on and including the related tax
effects. The acquired business contributed net revenues of
$88.1 million for the period April 22, 2010 to
December 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes the consideration transferred by
us to acquire the domestic assets of Spheris, and the amounts of
identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid
|
|
$
|
98,834
|
|
Fair value of unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Spheris net assets acquired Working capital
|
|
$
|
7,373
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
Developed technology (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
Customer relationships (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
37,210
|
|
Trademarks and trade names (included in intangibles)
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
48,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
112,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The related amortization period is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
indefinite
|
|
The amounts and lives of the identified intangibles other than
goodwill were valued at fair value. The analysis included a
combination of the cost approach and an income approach. We used
discount rates from 15% to 17%. The goodwill is attributable to
the workforce of the acquired business and the significant
synergies expected to occur after the Spheris acquisition. The
goodwill and intangible assets are deductible for tax purposes.
We have
F-73
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
performed a review of Spheriss accounting policies and
procedures. As a result of that review, we did not identify any
differences between the accounting policies and procedures of
the two companies that, when conformed, would have a material
impact on the future operating results.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
There is a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the nature
of the inputs used to develop the fair value measures. This is
an exit price concept for the valuation of the asset or
liability. In addition, market participants are assumed to be
unrelated buyers and sellers in the principal or the most
advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value
measurements for an asset assume the highest and best use by
these market participants. Many of these fair value measurements
can be highly subjective and it is also possible that other
professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts
and circumstances, could develop and support a range of
alternative estimated amounts.
Debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
$
|
265,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no debt outstanding at December 31, 2009.
On October 1, 2010, we entered into a senior secured credit
facility (the Senior Secured Credit Facility), with certain
lenders and General Electric Capital Corporation, as
Administrative Agent. The Senior Secured Credit Facility
contains a number of significant covenants and consists of
$225.0 million in senior secured credit facilities
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
n
|
a $200.0 million term loan, advanced in one drawing on
October 14, 2010 (the Closing Date), with a term of five
years, repayable in equal quarterly installments of
$5.0 million, commencing on the first day of the first
fiscal quarter beginning after the Closing Date, with the
balance payable at maturity; and
|
|
n
|
a $25.0 million revolving credit facility under which
borrowings may be made from time to time during the period from
the Closing Date until the fifth anniversary of the Closing
Date. The revolving facility includes a $5.0 million letter
of credit
sub-facility
and a $5.0 million swing line loan
sub-facility.
|
The borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
co-borrowers option, either (a) a base rate
determined by reference to the highest of (1) the rate last
quoted by the Wall Street Journal as the Prime Rate
in the United States, (2) the federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1% and (3) the LIBOR rate for a one-month interest
period plus 1.00% or (b) the higher of (1) a LIBOR
rate determined by reference to the costs of funds for deposits
in the currency of such borrowing for the interest period
relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs
and (2) 1.75%. The applicable margin is 4.50% with respect
to base rate borrowings and 5.50% with respect to LIBOR
borrowings. At December 31, 2010 the borrowings had an
interest rate of 7.25%.
F-74
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The loans are secured by substantially all of our assets and are
guaranteed by MedQuist Holdings. The agreements contain
customary covenants, including reporting and notification and
acquisitions. The financial covenants are calculated on a
consolidated basis for MedQuist Holdings. and its subsidiaries
(including us), and include a Senior Leverage Ratio, Total
Leverage Ratio, and an Interest Coverage Ratio. As of
December 31, 2010 we believe we were in compliance. The
loans have customary cross default provisions.
In addition to the Senior Secured Credit Facility we issued
$85.0 million aggregate principal amount of 13% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the Senior Subordinated Notes),
pursuant to a purchase agreement. Interest on the notes is
payable in quarterly installments at the issuers option at
either (i) 13% in cash or (ii) 12% in cash payment
plus 2% in the form of additional senior subordinated notes. The
Senior Subordinated Notes are non-callable for two years after
the closing date after which they are redeemable at 105.0%
declining ratably until four years after the closing date. The
Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of significant
covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to
dispose of assets, repay other indebtedness, incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness,
incur liens, make capital expenditures, investments or
acquisitions, engage in mergers of consolidations, engage in
certain types of transactions with affiliates and otherwise
restrict our activities.
Proceeds from the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Senior
Subordinated Notes were used to repay $80.0 million of our
indebtedness under the GE Credit Agreement, as defined below,
plus interest, to repay $13.6 million of our indebtedness
under the Subordinated Promissory Note, as defined below, plus
interest, and to pay a $176.5 million special cash dividend
to our shareholders.
We incurred $15.5 million of costs in connection with the
financing, and there were remaining unamortized costs from the
prior financing. In connection with the refinancing, we
evaluated whether the prior facilities had been modified or
extinguished. We recorded an extinguishment loss of
$5.8 million. At December 31, 2010, we had remaining
deferred costs of $10.2 million recorded in other
noncurrent assets and $3.1 million recorded in other
current assets.
In connection with the Spheris acquisition in April 2010,
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., a subsidiary of MedQuist Inc.
(MedQuist Transcriptions), and certain other subsidiaries of
MedQuist Inc. (collectively, the Loan Parties) entered into a
credit agreement (the GE Credit Agreement) with General Electric
Capital Corporation, CapitalSource Bank, and Fifth Third Bank.
The GE Credit Agreement provided for up to $100.0 million
in senior secured credit facilities, consisting of a
$50.0 million term loan, and a revolving credit facility of
up to $50.0 million. The credit facilities were secured by
a first priority lien on substantially all of the property of
the Loan Parties. Amounts borrowed under the GE Credit Agreement
incurred interest at a rate selected by MedQuist Transcriptions
equal to the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate (each as defined
in the GE Credit Agreement) plus a margin, all as more fully set
forth in the GE Credit Agreement. We incurred $6.1 million
in costs in connection with the GE Credit Agreement of which
$4.8 million had not been amortized by the time of the
refinance in October 2010.
When we entered into the GE Credit Agreement, we terminated the
five-year $25.0 million revolving credit agreement with
Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC (the Wells Credit Agreement) that we
entered into on August 31, 2009. We never borrowed under
the Wells Credit Agreement. In 2010, we wrote off deferred
financing fees of $1.1 million and incurred termination
fees of $0.6 million in connection with the termination of
this facility. Such costs are included in interest expense in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In connection with the Spheris acquisition, we entered into a
subordinated promissory note with Spheris (the Spheris
Subordinated Promissory Note). The loan was scheduled to mature
in five years from the date of the acquisition. The face amount
of the Spheris Subordinated Promissory Note totaled
$17.5 million with provisions for prepayment at discounted
amounts, ranging from 77.5% of the principal if paid within six
months, 87.5% from six to nine months, 97.5% from nine to twelve
months, 102.0% by year two, 101.0% by year three and 100.0%
thereafter. For purposes of the purchase price allocation, the
note was discounted at 77.5% of the principal
($13.6 million). This note was a non-cash transaction. The
fair value of the note was determined
F-75
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
through the use of a Monte Carlo model which is Level 3 in
the Fair Value hierarchy based upon significant unobservable
inputs. The Subordinated Promissory Note was paid in full as
noted above.
The Spheris Subordinated Promissory Note had stated interest
rates of 8.0% for the first six months, 9.0% from six to nine
months, and 12.5% thereafter of which 2.5% may be paid by
increasing the principal amount. Payments of interest are made
semi-annually on each six month anniversary of the acquisition.
For financial statement purposes the interest has been
calculated using the average interest rates over the term of the
Subordinated Promissory Note. As discussed above, we paid off
all amounts outstanding, at 77.5% of the face value, plus
accrued interest under the Subordinated Promissory Note thus
extinguishing the note.
The aggregate maturities of long-term obligations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2011 we made an optional prepayment of
$20.0 million in addition to the $5.0 million due
under the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
|
|
5.
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charges to
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
beginning
|
|
|
revenues and
|
|
|
accounts
|
|
|
end of
|
|
|
|
of period
|
|
|
and expenses
|
|
|
written off
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
(2,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,802
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
4,802
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,159
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
3,159
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
(1,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,142
|
|
Substantially all of the charges relate to revenues.
F-76
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Property and
equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
37,729
|
|
|
$
|
32,404
|
|
Communication equipment
|
|
|
5,914
|
|
|
|
5,447
|
|
Software
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
|
|
18,743
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
71,679
|
|
|
|
60,654
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(57,544
|
)
|
|
|
(48,882
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
14,135
|
|
|
$
|
11,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $10.1 million in 2010,
$9.5 million in 2009 and $12.0 million in 2008.
|
|
7.
|
Goodwill and
other intangible assets
|
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
123,046
|
|
|
$
|
122,778
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
(82,233
|
)
|
|
|
(82,233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,813
|
|
|
|
40,545
|
|
Goodwill from Spheris acquisition
|
|
|
48,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
171,215
|
|
|
|
123,046
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
(82,233
|
)
|
|
|
(82,233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at December 31,
|
|
$
|
88,982
|
|
|
$
|
40,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We tested goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of
2010 and 2009 and determined that the fair value of the
reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying value based
upon our market capitalization. Determining fair value requires
the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about
appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates, the amount
and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant
comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based
approach. The cash flows employed in the discounted cash flow
analyses were based on our internal business model for 2010 and,
for years beyond 2010 the growth rates we used were an estimate
of the future growth in the industry in which we participate.
The discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analyses are
intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows
of the reporting unit and are based on an estimated cost of
capital, which we determined based on our estimated cost of
capital relative to our capital structure. In addition, the
market-based approach utilizes comparable company public trading
values, research analyst estimates and, where available, values
observed in private market transactions. In
F-77
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2008, our analysis indicated that the reporting unit fair value
was below our book value. The test for impairment of goodwill is
a two-step process:
|
|
|
|
n
|
First, we compare the carrying amount of our reporting unit,
which is the book value of our entire company, to the fair value
of our reporting unit. If the carrying amount of our reporting
unit exceeds its fair value, we have to perform the second step
of the process. If not, no further testing is needed. In the
fourth quarter of 2008 we determined that the carrying amount of
our reporting unit exceeded the fair value and accordingly
performed the second step in the analysis.
|
|
n
|
If the second part of the analysis is required, we allocate the
fair value of our reporting unit to all assets and liabilities
as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination at the date of the impairment test. We then compare
the implied fair value of our reporting units goodwill to
its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of our goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value, we recognize an impairment loss
in an amount equal to that excess. In the fourth quarter of
2008, the carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair
value and accordingly we recorded a non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charge of $82.2 million.
|
Other
intangible assets
Some of the events that we consider as impairment indicators for
our long-lived assets are:
|
|
|
|
n
|
our net book value compared to our fair value;
|
|
n
|
significant adverse economic and industry trends;
|
|
n
|
significant decrease in the market value of the asset;
|
|
n
|
the extent that we use an asset or changes in the manner that we
use it;
|
|
n
|
significant changes to the asset since we acquired it; and
|
|
n
|
other changes in circumstances that potentially indicate all or
a portion of the company will be sold.
|
During 2010, 2009 and 2008 we reviewed the carrying value of our
long lived assets other than goodwill and determined that the
carrying amounts of such assets was less than the undiscounted
cash flows and accordingly no impairment charge was recorded.
As of December 31, other intangible asset balances were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
114,525
|
|
|
$
|
(54,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,745
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
15,839
|
|
|
|
(7,598
|
)
|
|
|
8,241
|
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
10,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
143,394
|
|
|
$
|
(63,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
79,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
77,277
|
|
|
$
|
(46,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,441
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
10,625
|
|
|
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
87,902
|
|
|
$
|
(51,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated useful life and the weighted average remaining
lives of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2010 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
useful life
|
|
|
remaining lives
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
|
10-20 years
|
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
Estimated annual amortization expense for intangible assets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
14,780
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,713
|
|
2013
|
|
|
10,447
|
|
2014
|
|
|
9,268
|
|
2015
|
|
|
8,768
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
79,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets was $11.9 million in
2010, $6.2 million in 2009 and $5.6 million in 2008.
|
|
8.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
Leases
Minimum rental payments under operating leases are recognized on
a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any
periods of free rent and landlord incentives. Rental expense for
operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 was $3,645, $2,991 and $3,201, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one
year) as of December 31, 2010 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
4,947
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,497
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
19,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Other
contractual obligations
The following summarizes our other contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
11,774
|
|
|
$
|
8,567
|
|
|
$
|
3,207
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8,248
|
|
|
|
8,013
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,042
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,255
|
|
|
$
|
21,311
|
|
|
$
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations represent telecommunication contracts,
software development and other recurring purchase obligations.
We have agreements with certain of our executive officers that
provide for severance payments to the employee in the event the
employee is terminated without cause. The maximum cash exposure
under these agreements was approximately $2.5 million at
December 31, 2010.
Accrued expenses consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Customer Accommodations
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
Other (No item exceeds 5% of current liabilities)
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
7,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
27,106
|
|
|
$
|
21,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2003, one of our employees raised allegations that
we had engaged in improper billing practices. In response, our
board of directors undertook an independent review of these
allegations (Review). In response to our customers concern
over the public disclosure of certain findings from the Review,
we took action in the fourth quarter of 2005 to avoid
unnecessary litigation, which preserved and solidified our
customer business relationships by offering a financial
accommodation to certain of our customers
In connection with our decision to offer financial
accommodations to certain of our customers (Accommodation
Customers), we analyzed our historical billing information and
the available report-level data (Managements Billing
Assessment) to develop individualized accommodation offers to be
made to Accommodation Customers (Accommodation Analysis). Based
on the Accommodation Analysis, our board of directors authorized
management to make cash or credit accommodation offers to
Accommodation Customers. By accepting our accommodation offer,
the customer agreed, among other things, to release us from any
and all claims and liability regarding the billing related
issues.
F-80
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We are unable to predict how many customers, if any, may accept
the outstanding accommodation offers on the terms proposed by
us, nor are we able to predict the timing of the acceptance (or
rejection) of any outstanding accommodation offers. Until any
offers are accepted, we may withdraw or modify the terms of the
accommodation program or any outstanding offers at any time. In
addition, we are unable to predict how many future offers, if
made, will be accepted on the terms proposed by us. We regularly
evaluate whether to proceed with, modify or withdraw the
accommodation program or any outstanding offers.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
related to the customer accommodation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
$
|
12,055
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(1,248
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Kaiser
litigation
On June 6, 2008, plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
Inc. and affiliates (collectively, Kaiser) filed suit against us
in the Superior Court of the State of California related to our
billing practices.
In July 2010, the parties reached a settlement of the litigation
whereby we made a payment of $2.0 million to resolve all of
Kaisers claims. Neither we, nor Kaiser, admitted to any
liability or wrongdoing in connection with the settlement. Of
this amount, $1.1 million was included in accrued expenses
at December 31, 2009 and we expensed an additional
$0.9 million during 2010.
Kahn putative
class action
In 2008, one of our shareholders filed a shareholder putative
class action lawsuit against us, Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. (Philips), our former majority shareholder and four of our
former non-independent directors. We are no longer a defendant
in this matter, but we are monitoring the matter since it
involves claims against our former directors.
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, we received from counsel to nine
current and former resellers of our products (Claimants), a copy
of an arbitration demand filed by the Claimants, initiating an
arbitration proceeding.
On March 31, 2010, the parties entered into a Settlement
Agreement and Release pursuant to which we paid the Claimants
$500 on April 1, 2010 to resolve all claims. Under the
Settlement Agreement and Release, (i) the parties exchanged
mutual releases, (ii) the arbitration and related state
court litigation were dismissed with prejudice and (iii) we
did not admit to any liability or wrongdoing. We accrued the
entire amount of this settlement as of December 31, 2009.
Shareholder
litigation
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, plaintiffs
Victor N. Metallo and Joseph F. Lawrence, respectively, filed
purported shareholder class action complaints in the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Burlington County (Chancery Division) (the
Shareholder Litigation). In their complaints, the plaintiffs
purported to be shareholders of
F-81
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
MedQuist Inc. and sought to represent a class of our minority
shareholders in pursuit of claims against us, the members of our
board of directors and MedQuist Holdings.
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants breached certain
fiduciary duties they owed to minority shareholders of MedQuist
Inc. in connection with the structuring and disclosure of the
Registered Exchange Offer. Among other things, the plaintiffs
alleged that (a) the Registered Exchange Offer is
procedurally and financially unfair, (b) the
January 21, 2011 and February 16, 2011 Schedules 14D-9
that we filed with the SEC and the February 3, 2011
Prospectus that MedQuist Holdings filed with the SEC are
materially misleading and incomplete, and (c) the
Registered Exchange Offer was structured by the defendants in
order to circumvent the provisions of the New Jersey
Shareholders Protection Act. Plaintiffs sought, among
other things, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief
enjoining consummation of the Registered Exchange Offer,
unspecified damages, pre- and post-judgment interest and
attorneys fees and costs. The two Plaintiff actions were
consolidated on February 22, 2011 under the caption In Re:
MedQuist Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Docket Number C-018-11.
On March 4, 2011, the parties entered into a memorandum of
understanding (the MOU) that outlined the material terms of the
Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, we agreed to
extend the expiration of the Registered Exchange Offer until
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Friday, March 11,
2011 and further agreed that if, as a result of the Registered
Exchange Offer, MedQuist Holdings obtained ownership of at least
90% of the outstanding common stock of MedQuist Inc., MedQuist
Holdings will conduct a short-form merger under applicable law
to acquire the remaining shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
that MedQuist Holdings does not currently own at the same
exchange ratio applicable under the Registered Exchange Offer.
We agreed to make certain supplemental disclosures concerning
the Registered Exchange Offer, which were contained in an
amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that we filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. The settlement
of the Shareholder Litigation is conditioned upon, among other
things, execution of a Stipulation of Settlement, notice to all
class members, a fairness hearing and final approval of the
settlement by the court.
SEC
Investigation of former officer
With respect to our historical billing practices, the SEC is
pursuing civil litigation against our former chief financial
officer, whose employment with us ended in July 2004. Pursuant
to our bylaws, we have been providing indemnification for the
legal fees for our former chief financial officer. In February
2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with our former
chief financial officer and such settlement agreement is
dependent on the individual settling with the SEC. In February
2010, one of our current employees, who was our former
Controller but who does not currently serve in a senior
management or financial reporting oversight role, reached a
settlement agreement with the SEC in connection with the civil
litigation that the SEC had brought against him in connection
with our historical billing practices.
Our stock option plans provide for the granting of options to
purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees (including
officers) as well as to our non-employee directors. Options may
be issued with the exercise prices equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant or at a price
determined by a committee of our board of directors. Stock
options vest and are exercisable over periods determined by the
committee, generally five years, and expire no more than
10 years after the grant.
F-82
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Information with respect to our common stock options is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life in years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
23.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
$
|
44.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
19.05
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share does not
assume conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would
have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net income (loss) per
share. For the years ended December 31. 2010, and 2009, 692
and 1,262 options, respectively, were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share as the options
exercise price was greater than the average market price of the
common stock during the respective period. During 2008 we had a
net loss. As a result, any assumed conversions would result in
reducing the net loss per share and, therefore, are not included
in the calculation. Shares having an anti-dilutive effect on net
loss per share and, therefore, excluded from the calculation of
diluted net loss per share, totaled 1,501 for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of 2010
and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
options. As of December 31, 2010, 296 options were in the
money.
There were no options granted or exercised in 2010 or 2009.
There were 296 options granted and 12 options exercised in 2008.
In the first quarter of 2009, we modified the options previously
granted in the third quarter of 2008 to our Chief Executive
Officer. The grant price was increased from $4.85 per share to
$8.25 per share by a committee of our Board of Directors. There
was no incremental cost of the modification. We estimated fair
value for the modified option grant as of the date of the
modification by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing
valuation model. The application of this model involves
assumptions that are judgmental and sensitive in the
determination of compensation expense. The key assumptions used
in determining the fair value of the options modified in the
first quarter of 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
54.5
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
F-83
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Significant assumptions required to estimate the fair value of
stock options include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expected term: The SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 Simplified method has
been used to determine a weighted average expected term of
options granted.
|
|
n
|
Expected volatility: We have estimated expected volatility based
on the historical stock price volatility of a group of similar
publicly traded companies. We believe that our historical
volatility is not indicative of future volatility.
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options modified
in the first quarter of 2009 was $1.97 per share.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, in accordance with the terms of
the option, the Compensation Committee approved an adjustment to
the exercise price of the Chief Executive Officers option
from $8.25 per share to $2.22 per share to account for the
payment of an extraordinary dividend of $1.33 per share in
September 2009 and $4.70 per share in October 2010 to our
shareholders. There was no incremental cost of the adjustment.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options modified
in the fourth quarter of 2010 was $7.28 per share.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
Range of
|
|
Number
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Exercise prices
|
|
of shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
of shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$ 2.22 - $10.00
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
$10.01 - $20.00
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.16
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
17.16
|
|
$20.01 - $30.00
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
26.29
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
26.29
|
|
$30.01 - $40.00
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
32.36
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
32.36
|
|
$40.01 - $70.00
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
44.21
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
44.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
19.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No options were granted or exercised in 2010 or 2009. There were
12 options exercised in 2008.
The total fair value of shares vested during 2010 and 2009 was
$193 and $193, respectively. The change in ownership which
occurred on August 6, 2008 was a change in control as
defined in the employment agreements for certain option holders.
This resulted in the immediate vesting of previously unvested
stock options. All previously unamortized stock option
compensation expense related to such stock options was
recognized as of August 6, 2008 resulting in a charge of
approximately $1,060. Also recorded in 2008 was stock option
compensation expense of $367, not related to the change in
control.
As of December 31, 2010, there were 994 additional options
available for grant under our stock option plans.
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, $194,
$193 and $937, respectively, was included as selling, general
and administrative expenses and $0, $0 and $402 was included in
research and development expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations related specifically to
these options granted to certain executive officers.
On August 27, 2009, our board of directors, upon the
recommendation of its compensation committee, approved the
MedQuist Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan is
designed to encourage and reward the creation
F-84
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
of long-term equity value by certain members of our senior
management team. The executives and key employees will be
selected by the Compensation Committee and will be eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. During the third quarter of
2010, the Compensation Committee awarded grants under the Long
Term Incentive Plan. In December 2010, the Compensation
Committee approved the terms and conditions of the plan. As of
December 2010 no amounts have been recorded as compensation
expense under the Long Term Incentive Plan as the amounts were
not material.
The sources of income (loss) before income taxes and the income
tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
30,278
|
|
|
$
|
24,314
|
|
|
$
|
(83,876
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
31,722
|
|
|
$
|
25,266
|
|
|
$
|
(85,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(660
|
)
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
(15,694
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
(2,379
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,677
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
(17,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
1,975
|
|
|
$
|
(16,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to
our effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Adjustments to tax reserves
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|
$
|
1,957
|
|
|
$
|
1,892
|
|
Domestic net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
|
38,336
|
|
|
|
48,397
|
|
|
|
47,694
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
11,308
|
|
|
|
12,784
|
|
|
|
20,976
|
|
Employee compensation and benefit plans
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Customer accommodation
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
|
4,668
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,107
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
68,273
|
|
|
|
77,813
|
|
|
|
85,711
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(63,268
|
)
|
|
|
(74,641
|
)
|
|
|
(81,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(5,731
|
)
|
|
|
(3,925
|
)
|
|
|
(2,907
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
(1,095
|
)
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(6,920
|
)
|
|
|
(5,020
|
)
|
|
|
(4,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(1,915
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had federal net operating loss
carry forwards of approximately $78 million which will
begin to expire in 2026 and 2028.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had state net
operating loss (NOL) carry forwards of approximately
$216 million and $225 million, respectively, which
will expire between 2011 and 2029. In addition, we have foreign
NOL carry forwards of approximately $10 million, which do
not expire. Utilization of the NOL carry forwards will be
subject to an annual limitation in future years as a result of
the change in ownership as defined by Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. We performed
an analysis on the annual limitation as a result of the
ownership change that occurred in 2008. As a result of this
analysis, the annual limitation in future years would not
prevent us from using the federal NOL carry forwards before
their respective expiration periods.
During 2010, we reduced a portion of our valuation allowance
against our deferred tax assets generated in foreign tax
jurisdictions based on managements assessment of future
earnings available to utilize these deferred tax assets. As a
result of the release of the valuation allowance, we recognized
a foreign deferred tax benefit of $1,310.
After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it was more likely than not that a
majority of the domestic deferred tax assets would not be
realized. As of December 31, 2010, this valuation allowance
has been decreased from $73.3 million to
$63.3 million. Although management currently believes that
a valuation allowance is required at December 31, 2010, it
is at least reasonably possible that this belief could change in
the near term, resulting in the release of all or a substantial
portion of the valuation allowance.
F-86
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Domestic net deferred tax assets were recognized to the extent
that objective positive evidence existed with respect to their
future utilization. The objective positive evidence included the
potential to carry back any losses generated by the deferred tax
assets in the future as well as income expected to be recognized
due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities as of
December 31, 2010. In analyzing deferred tax liabilities as
a source for potential income for purposes of recognizing
deferred tax assets, the deferred tax liabilities related to
excess book basis in goodwill over tax basis in goodwill were
considered a source of future income for benefiting deferred tax
assets with indefinite lives only due to the indefinite life and
uncertainty of reversal of these liabilities during the same
period as the non-indefinite life deferred tax assets.
Our consolidated income tax expense for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists
principally of an increase in deferred tax liabilities related
to goodwill amortization deductions for income tax purposes
during the applicable year as well as state and foreign income
taxes. Our consolidated income tax benefit for the year ended
December 31, 2008 consists primarily of the reversal of
$18.5 million of deferred tax liabilities associated with
indefinite life intangible assets related to goodwill which was
impaired in 2008, offset by state and foreign income tax expense.
We provide reserves for income taxes in accordance with the
guidance contained in ASC 740 for uncertainty in taxes.
ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attributes for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be
taken in a companys income tax return and utilizes a
two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Step
one, Recognition, requires a company to determine if the weight
of available evidence indicates that a tax position is more
likely than not to be sustained upon audit, including resolution
of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. Step two,
Measurement, is based on the largest amount of benefit, which is
more likely than not to be realized on settlement with the
taxing authority.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of
December 31, 2010 was $4,657 which includes $116 of accrued
interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits which we
recognize as a component of the provision for income taxes. Of
the $4,657 unrecognized tax benefits, $4,152 relates to tax
positions which if recognized would impact the effective tax
rate, not considering the impact of any valuation allowance. Of
the $4,152, $3,503 is attributable to uncertain tax positions
with respect to certain deferred tax assets which if recognized
would currently be offset by a full valuation allowance due to
the fact that at the current time it is more likely than not
that these assets would not be recognized due to a lack of
sufficient projected income in the future.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, all U.S. states which require income tax
returns, and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the nature of our
operations, no state or foreign jurisdiction is individually
significant. With limited exceptions we are no longer subject to
examination by U.S. federal or states jurisdictions for
years prior to 2007. The Internal Revenue Service concluded its
federal tax audit for years 2003 through 2006 with no material
adjustments. We are no longer subject to examination by the UK
federal jurisdiction for years prior to 2008. We do have various
state tax audits and appeals in process at any given time.
F-87
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following is a roll-forward of the changes in our
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,831
|
|
Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
575
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of
applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
4,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2010
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We anticipate decreases in unrecognized tax benefits of
approximately $118 related to state statutes of limitations
expiring during 2011. Our unrecognized tax benefits are expected
to change in 2011. However, we do not anticipate any significant
increases or decreases within the next twelve months.
|
|
13.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
401(k)
plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan named the MedQuist
401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan) that provides eligible employees with
an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis.
Our 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to contribute up to
25% of their annual eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis,
subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code limits. Elective
deferral contributions are allocated to each participants
individual account and are then invested in selected investment
alternatives according to the participants directives.
Employee elective deferrals are 100% vested at all times. Our
401(k) Plan provides that we may make a discretionary matching
contribution to the participants in the 401(k) Plan. We did not
match the employee contributions for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
14.
|
Related-party
transactions
|
MedQuist Holdings had an approximately 69.5% ownership interest
in us at December 31, 2010.
We have an agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of MedQuist
Holdings, CBay Systems & Services, Inc. (CBay
Services), under which we outsource medical transcription
services. We incurred expenses of $34,038, $6,798 and $283 for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. All
medical transcription expenses were recorded in Cost of revenues
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We
recorded other expense of $541 in 2010 recorded in research and
development.
We also have a subcontracting agreement (Subcontracting
Agreement) with CBay Services, pursuant to which CBay Services
subcontracts medical transcription, editing and related services
to us. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, we recorded revenue of $2,292, $1,483, and $0,
respectively.
F-88
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We have a Management Services Agreement with CBay Inc, pursuant
to which certain senior executives and directors of CBay Inc.
provide certain advisory and consulting services. The Management
Services Agreement provides that, in consideration of the
management services rendered by CBay Inc. to us since
July 1, 2009 we pay CBay Inc. a quarterly services fee
equal to $350, payable in arrears. For the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and 2008, we incurred
$1.4 million, $1.4 million, and $0 in services
expenses with CBay Inc. All Management Services Agreement costs
incurred have been recorded as selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
The Related party payable of $5.4 million and
$1.4 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, primarily represent amounts payable to MedQuist
Holdings for transcription and other services provided. We paid
MedQuist Holdings $4.6 million for a related party
liability assumed in the Spheris acquisition. MedQuist Holdings
provided guarantees related to our Senior Secured Credit
Facility.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, Accounts receivable in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets included $753 and
$710, respectively, for amounts due from MedQuist Holdings.
On May 4, 2010 we recorded a $1.5 million
success-based transaction fee, which was included in acquisition
related charges, to SAC Private Capital Group, LLC (SAC) for
work performed on the Spheris acquisition. SAC owns a majority
interest in MedQuist Holdings.
Prior to August 6, 2008, Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. (Philips) had approximately a 69.5% ownership interest in
us. There were no amounts due to or from Philips on our balance
sheets at December 31, 2010 or 2009. Prior to
August 6, 2008 we incurred $4,479 in expenses to Philips,
which were recorded primarily in cost of revenues.
|
|
15.
|
Cost of legal
proceedings and settlements
|
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we
recorded charges of $3,603, $14,843 and $19,738, respectively,
for costs associated with legal proceedings and settlements. The
following is a summary of the amounts recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
$
|
2,693
|
|
|
$
|
8,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,313
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,603
|
|
|
$
|
14,843
|
|
|
$
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts included in settlements for 2010 represent an
additional charge of $0.9 related to our settlement with Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and affiliates. The amounts
included in settlements for 2009 represent the settlement of a
patent litigation matter. The 2008 amount of $7,425 was for the
settlements of all claims related to the consolidated medical
transcriptionists putative class action and the Department of
Justice (DOJ) investigation.
|
|
16.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
2010
restructuring plan
Managements ongoing cost reduction initiatives, including
process improvement, combined with the acquisition of Spheris,
resulted in a restructuring plan involving staff reductions and
other actions designed to maximize operating efficiencies. The
affected employees are entitled to receive severance benefits
under existing established severance policies. The employees
affected were primarily in the operations and administrative
functions. Management approved the initial actions under the
plan during 2010.
F-89
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects that restructuring activities may continue
in 2011 as management identifies opportunities for synergies
resulting from the acquisition of Spheris including the
elimination of redundant functions and locations.
2009
restructuring plan
During the third and fourth quarters of 2009, as a result of
managements continued planned process improvement and
technology development investments we committed to an exit and
disposal plan which includes projected employee severance for
planned reduction in headcount. Because of plan development in
late 2009 and execution of the plan over multiple quarters in
2009 and 2010, not all personnel affected by the plan know of
the plan or its impact. The plan includes costs of
$2.5 million for employee severance and $0.3 million
for vacating operating leases. The table below reflects the
financial statement activity related to the 2009 restructuring
plan and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the twelve months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Charge (reversal)
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect the remaining balance to be paid in 2011.
17. Investment
in A-Life Medical, Inc. (A-Life)
We previously had an investment of $8,864 in A-Life, a privately
held entity which provides advanced natural language processing
technology for the medical industry that was recorded under the
equity method of accounting. In October 2010 we sold our shares
in A-Life for cash consideration of $23.6 million, of which
$4.1 million will be held in escrow until March 2012. We
recorded a pretax gain of $9.9 million. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, our investment increased by $2,015
related to our share of A-Lifes net income, primarily
related to a gain resulting from an acquisition, additional cash
investments in A-Life of $852 offset by $255 for a dilution,
which was recorded in shareholders equity in our
consolidated balance sheet. Our investment in A-Life had been
recorded in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. We will record the remaining gain, if any, in
2012 when escrow is released.
F-90
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Quarterly data
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
73,981
|
|
|
$
|
97,528
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
102,933
|
|
|
$
|
100,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
49,833
|
|
|
$
|
67,090
|
|
|
$
|
68,427
|
|
|
$
|
64,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,344
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
8,971
|
|
|
$
|
13,856
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
78,944
|
|
|
$
|
77,471
|
|
|
$
|
76,836
|
|
|
$
|
73,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
53,868
|
|
|
$
|
51,357
|
|
|
$
|
52,768
|
|
|
$
|
48,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,854
|
|
|
$
|
836
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
9,704
|
|
|
$
|
5,897
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,560
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes $5,750 recorded in cost of legal proceedings and
settlements, related to the settlement of all claims related a
patent litigation settlement.
|
(2)
|
Includes $500 recorded in cost of legal proceedings and
settlements, related to the settlement of all claims related to
a reseller arbitration settlement.
|
(3)
|
Includes $4.8 million of acquisition and related
integration charges, and $1.1 million in cost of legal
proceedings and settlements.
|
(4)
|
Includes the results of operations of Spheris from the date of
acquisition in April 2010.
|
(5)
|
In October 2010, we recorded a pre-tax gain of $9.9 million
on the sale of our investment in A-Life and we recorded a loss
on extinguishment of debt of $5.8 million.
|
F-91
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor company
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
For the six
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
99,562
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,528
|
|
|
$
|
154,588
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,048
|
|
|
$
|
171,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
64,648
|
|
|
|
|
67,090
|
|
|
|
99,840
|
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
116,923
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9,199
|
|
|
|
|
10,020
|
|
|
|
15,046
|
|
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
|
18,817
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
7,981
|
|
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
Cost (benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and
accommodations
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
(7,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
Acquisition and restructuring
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
85,962
|
|
|
|
|
92,967
|
|
|
|
127,859
|
|
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
159,605
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
26,729
|
|
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
11,904
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(6,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
(10,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
16,203
|
|
|
|
|
4,419
|
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
$
|
15,088
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
8,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,803
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,803
|
|
|
|
|
37,852
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-92
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor company
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,383
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,265
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,695 and $3,142,
respectively
|
|
|
69,600
|
|
|
|
|
76,155
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
15,060
|
|
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
109,043
|
|
|
|
|
127,200
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$62,267 and $57,544, respectively
|
|
|
13,432
|
|
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
89,370
|
|
|
|
|
88,982
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$73,026 and $63,534, respectively
|
|
|
100,608
|
|
|
|
|
79,860
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
14,126
|
|
|
|
|
10,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
329,737
|
|
|
|
$
|
323,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,984
|
|
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
17,039
|
|
|
|
|
27,106
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
6,331
|
|
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
Current portion of lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Related party payable
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
|
10,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
49,610
|
|
|
|
|
82,011
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
|
265,000
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,048
|
|
|
|
|
6,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized
60,000 shares; 37,556 and 37,556 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
2,992
|
|
|
|
|
238,042
|
|
Retained earnings and accumulated deficit
|
|
|
15,088
|
|
|
|
|
(271,316
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
18,524
|
|
|
|
|
(30,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
329,737
|
|
|
|
$
|
323,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-93
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
February 12
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
For the six months Ended
|
|
|
|
to June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
January 1 to February 11, 2011
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
11,057
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,587
|
|
|
$
|
12,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,294
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,466
|
)
|
|
|
(2,868
|
)
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(3,995
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
(2,613
|
)
|
Spheris acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(6,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
|
(104,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
|
83,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
|
(21,212
|
)
|
|
|
(7,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
20,053
|
|
|
|
|
41,265
|
|
|
|
25,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
24,383
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,053
|
|
|
$
|
17,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-94
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
Unaudited
The consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto are
unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations although we believe that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
MedQuist Inc. and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Company). All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that,
in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair
presentation of our results of operations, financial position
and cash flows. Interim results are not necessarily indicative
of results for a full year. The information in this
Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2010
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 (2010
Form 10-K)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on March 16, 2011.
On February 11, 2011, certain of the Companys
shareholders entered into an exchange agreement with MedQuist
Holdings Inc. (MedQuist Holdings) which increased
MedQuist Holdings ownership interest in the Company to
82.2% (the Private Exchange). Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC)
805-50-S99-1
Business Combinations-Related issues governs the
application of push down accounting in situations where
ownership is increased to 80% or more. The
post-February 11, 2011 consolidated financial statements
reflect the new basis of accounting as required by the
authoritative guidance under
ASC 805-50-S99-1,
and have applied the SEC rules and guidance regarding push
down accounting treatment. Accordingly, the Companys
consolidated financial statements prior to the closing of the
exchange agreement reflect the historical accounting basis in
our assets and liabilities and are labeled Predecessor Company,
while such consolidated financial statements subsequent to the
exchange agreement are labeled Successor Company and reflect the
push down basis of accounting for the fair values of assets and
liabilities acquired by MedQuist Holdings in August 2008, rolled
forward to February 11, 2011. This effect is presented in
the Companys consolidated financial statements by a
vertical black line division between the columns entitled
Predecessor Company and Successor Company on the statements and
relevant notes. The black line signifies that the amounts shown
for the periods prior to and subsequent to the exchange
agreement are not comparable. See Note 4, Change in
Ownership.
MedQuist Holdings announced, effective March 11, 2011, that
it had completed its public exchange offer under which it
acquired additional shares of MedQuist Inc. common stock
resulting in MedQuist Holdings now holding approximately 97% of
the issued and outstanding shares of MedQuist Inc. (the
Public Exchange Offer). In accordance with the terms
of a Stipulation of Settlement entered into in connection with
the settlement of MedQuist Inc. Shareholder Litigation (as
defined in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies), the
remaining approximately 3% issued and outstanding shares of
MedQuist Inc. are expected to be exchanged on the same terms as
the public exchange in a short-form merger by the end of 2011
(the Short Form Merger). Prior to the Short
Form Merger, MedQuist Holdings expects to conduct a second
public exchange offer on the same terms as the Public Exchange
Offer. In connection with this expected short-form merger and to
immediately reduce duplicate costs of being a public company,
MedQuist Inc. gave formal written notice to NASDAQ to delist its
shares traded under the ticker symbol, MEDQ. Shares of MedQuist
Inc. common stock have since ceased trading on NASDAQ and are
currently trading on OTCQB under the symbol MEDQ.
F-95
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Acquisition of
spheris
|
On April 22, 2010, we and our shareholder, CBay Inc.,
completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
Spheris Inc. (Spheris) and certain of its
affiliates, pursuant to the terms of the Stock and Asset
Purchase Agreement. This acquisition provided substantial
incremental volume growth and also provided opportunities for
operating efficiencies and operating margin expansion. Costs
incurred for the acquisition and direct integration costs are
included in acquisition and restructuring on the accompanying
statements of operations. The acquisition was funded from the
proceeds of credit facilities entered into in connection with
the acquisition.
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the
consolidated information of the Company as if the business
combination had occurred at the beginning of the first quarter
of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma three
|
|
|
Pro forma six
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
105,721
|
|
|
$
|
214,880
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,321
|
|
|
$
|
8,890
|
|
Net income per share (Basic)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Net income per share (Diluted)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying our accounting
policies and adjusting the results of Spheris to reflect the
additional amortization of intangibles that would have been
charged assuming the fair value adjustments to intangible assets
had been applied from the beginning of the annual period being
reported on, and the additional interest expense assuming the
acquisition-related debt had been incurred at the beginning of
the period being reported on, excluding the acquisition costs,
and including the related tax effects. Impacts of
integration-related charges have been excluded from the amounts
above, and per share amounts do not reflect the impacts of
ownership changes that occurred during the first quarter of
2011. Additionally, the pro forma revenue amounts reflect only
recognized revenues of the acquired business, but do not reflect
the impacts of known losses that impacted the actual results in
subsequent periods.
Debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
Less: Current maturities
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2011, we made an optional prepayment of
$20.0 million in addition to the $5.0 million due
under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. No additional
principal payments are required in 2011. In January 2011, as
required under our Credit Agreement, we entered into interest
rate cap contracts (for $60.0 million notional
F-96
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
amounts which will amortize over time) to limit the risk of
increase for fluctuation in interest rates. The interest rates
on the term loan and the Senior Subordinated Notes were 7.25%
and 13.0%, respectively, on June 30, 2011.
As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the
covenants of our debt.
On February 11, 2011, MedQuist Holdings acquired additional
shares of our common stock in a private exchange with certain of
our shareholders, which resulted in their ownership increasing
to over 80%. Effective February 11, 2011, we adopted the
provisions of push down accounting. Accordingly the purchase
accounting adjustments recorded at MedQuist Holdings related to
the purchase of a 69.5% interest in us on August 6, 2008,
as rolled forward to February 11, 2011, were recorded on
our books and records. The basis pushed down to us is the basis
recorded by MedQuist Holdings as of August 6, 2008, the
transaction date, adjusted for activities recorded by MedQuist
Holdings through February 11, 2011.
The following amounts were recorded on our financial records on
February 11, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
924
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property & equipment
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets other than goodwill
|
|
|
25,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
29,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
29,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact on our shareholders equity was adjusted to
reflect the new basis of accounting effective at the time that
ownership increased to more than 80%. Accordingly, the equity
accounts on Predecessor Company were not carried over to
Successor Company. Successor Companys beginning equity as
of February 11, 2011 represents the net assets of Successor
Company as valued with the impact of push down accounting.
Comprehensive income was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 12 to
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
For the six months
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
to February 11,
|
|
|
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
$
|
15,088
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
8,224
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
7,022
|
|
|
|
$
|
666
|
|
|
$
|
15,532
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,861
|
|
|
$
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each
period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted
for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, which
consist only of stock options, using the treasury stock method.
The following table reflects the weighted average shares
outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net income per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
For the six
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
$
|
15,088
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
8,224
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,803
|
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
37,803
|
|
|
|
|
37,852
|
|
|
|
37,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Customer accommodations
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,387
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
5,507
|
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
Restructure
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
Other (no item exceeds 5% of current liabilities)
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
17,039
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
restructuring plan
On March 31, 2011, our board of directors adopted a
restructuring plan (2011 Restructuring Plan) to
complete the integration of the acquired Spheris operations into
our operations. This integration resulted in termination costs
of approximately $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2011
from a related reduction in workforce and a charge of
$1.5 million in the first quarter of 2011 representing
future lease payments on the Companys former corporate
headquarters in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey and lease termination
costs for the former data center in Sterling, Virginia, net of
estimated sublease rentals. The future minimum lease payments on
the Mt. Laurel facility total $2.5 million. The 2011
Restructuring Plan will be implemented throughout 2011 and may
result in
F-98
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
additional charges incurred later in 2011. We expect the
majority of the remaining balance to be paid in 2011 and 2012.
We expect that acquisition and restructuring activities may
continue in 2011, as management identifies opportunities for
synergies including the elimination of redundant functions and
as the Company may complete other acquisitions.
The table below reflects the financial statement activity
related to the 2011 Restructuring Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
restructuring plan
Managements cost reduction initiatives, including process
improvement, combined with the acquisition of Spheris, resulted
in a restructuring plan (2010 Restructuring Plan)
involving staff reductions and other actions designed to
maximize operating efficiencies.
The table below reflects the financial statement activity
related to the 2010 Restructuring Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor company
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,889
|
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other restructuring plan has a material impact on our balance
sheets, results of operations or cash flows. We expect the
remaining balance to be paid in 2011.
F-99
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Cost (benefit) of
legal proceedings, settlements and accommodations
|
The following is a summary of the amounts recorded as cost
(benefit) of legal proceedings, settlements and accommodations
in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
company
|
|
|
|
Predecessor company
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
For the six
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
February 12, to
|
|
|
|
January 1, to
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2011
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Professional fees and settlements
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
2,134
|
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
Accommodation reversal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
(7,524
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts included in legal fees and settlements for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 include the settlement with our
former chief financial officer of indemnification claims with
the former chief financial officer, which will reduce legal fees
we would otherwise be required to pay pursuant to the
indemnification obligations under our bylaws, and the legal fees
incurred in connection with the Shareholder Litigation (as
defined in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).
In November 2003, one of our employees raised allegations that
we had engaged in improper billing practices. In response, our
board of directors undertook an independent review of these
allegations (Review). In response to our
customers concern over the public disclosure of certain
findings from the Review, we made the decision in the fourth
quarter of 2005 to take action to try to avoid litigation and
preserve and solidify our customer business relationships by
offering a financial accommodation to certain of our customers.
In connection with our decision to offer financial
accommodations to certain of our customers (Accommodation
Customers), we analyzed our historical billing information
and the available report-level data to develop individualized
accommodation offers to be made to Accommodation Customers
(Accommodation Analysis). Based on the Accommodation
Analysis, our board of directors authorized management to make
cash or credit accommodation offers to Accommodation Customers
in the aggregate amount of $75,818 (Customer Accommodation
Program). By accepting our accommodation offer, the
customer agreed, among other things, to release us from any and
all claims and liability regarding the billing-related issues.
On March 31, 2011, our board of directors terminated the
Customer Accommodation Program. As a result, any amounts that
had not been offered to customers were reversed.
Our consolidated income tax expense consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable period as well as state and foreign income taxes. We
recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax
assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized
in future years.
Effective with the completion of the Private Exchange on
February 11, 2011, we will file federal and certain states
short period tax returns for the period January 1, 2011 to
February 11, 2011. For periods after February 11,
2011, we will file our income tax returns as part of the
MedQuist Holdings consolidated tax return filings. We do not
expect these changes to materially impact our income tax
expense, cash payments, refunds or our ability to use net
operating losses during 2011.
F-100
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
We expect that our consolidated income tax expense for the year
ended December 31, 2011, similar to the year ended
December 31, 2010, will consist principally of an increase
in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill amortization
deductions for income tax purposes during the applicable year as
well as state and foreign income taxes. We regularly assess the
future realization of deferred taxes and whether the valuation
allowance against the majority of domestic deferred tax assets
is still warranted. To the extent sufficient positive evidence,
including past results and future projections, exists to benefit
all or part of these benefits, the valuation allowance will be
adjusted accordingly. It is reasonably possible that all or a
portion of the valuation allowance could be adjusted within the
next year.
|
|
10.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Shareholder
settlement
On February 8, 2011 and February 10, 2011, two of our
minority shareholders filed class action complaints in the
Superior Court of New Jersey, Burlington County, Chancery
Division, (Court) against us, the individual members
on our board of directors and MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Shareholder Litigation). Plaintiffs alleged that
the defendants breached certain fiduciary duties they owed to
our minority shareholders in connection with the structuring and
disclosure of the Public Exchange Offer.
On March 4, 2011, the parties to the Shareholder Litigation
entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU)
that outlined the material terms of a proposed settlement of the
Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of the MOU, MedQuist
Holdings Inc. agreed to extend the expiration of the Public
Exchange Offer and further agreed that if, as a result of the
Public Exchange Offer, it obtained ownership of at least 90% of
our outstanding common stock it would conduct a short-form
merger under applicable law to acquire the remaining shares of
our common stock that it does not currently own at the same
exchange ratio applicable under the Public Exchange Offer. We
agreed to make certain supplemental disclosures concerning the
Public Exchange Offer, which were contained in an amendment to
Schedule 14D-9
that we filed with the SEC on March 7, 2011. We also agreed
to use our best efforts to finalize a stipulation of settlement
(Stipulation of Settlement) and present it to the
Court for preliminary approval within thirty days of the date of
the MOU.
On April 1, 2011, the parties executed the Stipulation of
Settlement that memorialized the terms of the settlement
outlined in the MOU. On this same date, plaintiffs counsel
filed with the Clerk of the Court a Motion for Preliminary
Approval of the Proposed Stipulation of Settlement. The Motion
asked the Court to, among other things, (a) hold a hearing
to address preliminary approval of the Stipulation of
Settlement, (b) certify a class, for purposes of
effectuating the Stipulation of Settlement only, of all our
shareholders (except the named defendants and their families and
affiliates) as of and including the date of the closing of the
short-form merger contemplated under the Stipulation of
Settlement, and (c) schedule a final hearing within
60 days to determine whether the Stipulation of Settlement
is reasonable and fair and should receive final approval.
The Court held a preliminary approval hearing on April 19,
2011 and entered an Order preliminarily approving the settlement
and setting a final approval hearing for June 17, 2011
(Preliminary Approval Order). The Preliminary
Approval Order also required us to provide mail and publication
notice of the proposed settlement to all shareholders of
recorded and established deadlines for objections to the
settlement and for filing briefs in support and in opposition to
the settlement.
On June 17, 2011, following mail and publication notice to
our shareholders, the Court held a fairness hearing on the
settlement. On this date, the Court entered an Order and Final
Judgment (Final Judgment) that, among other things,
(a) certified the settlement class consisting of all our
shareholders (except the named defendants and their families and
affiliates) as of and including the date of the closing of the
short-form merger contemplated under the Stipulation of
Settlement (Settlement Class), (b) found the
terms set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement to be fair and
reasonable and in the best interests of the Settlement Class,
and (c) approved the application for attorneys fees
and costs and awarded plaintiffs counsel $400 which was
recorded in Cost
F-101
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(Benefit) of Legal Proceedings, Settlements and Accommodations
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and in Accrued
Expenses as of June 30, 2011. The final judgment also
dismissed the case with prejudice.
Agreement with
Nuance Communications, Inc.
On June 30, 2011, we and Nuance Communications, Inc.,
(Nuance), entered into an agreement whereby we
agreed to pay Nuance an agreed upon amount in full satisfaction
of our license fee obligations with respect to certain products
through June 30, 2015. We also agreed to pay Nuance for one
year of maintenance services to be provided by Nuance to us with
respect to the licensed products. The maintenance services will
automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless
canceled in writing by us prior to the annual renewal date or
the underlying agreement expires. The first installment due
under the agreement was paid on June 30, 2011, and is
classified in both other current assets and other assets in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We are obligated to
pay additional installments during the third quarter of 2011.
SEC
investigation of former officer
With respect to our historical billing practices, the SEC
pursued civil litigation against our former chief financial
officer, whose employment ended in July 2004. Pursuant to our
bylaws, we had been providing indemnification for the legal fees
for our former chief financial officer. In February 2011 we
reached a settlement under which our former chief financial
officer released us from our indemnification obligations to him
upon his settlement of the litigation with the SEC and our
payment to him of a negotiated amount. The former chief
financial officer settled the SEC litigation and we made our
settlement payment to him in May 2011. This settles the last
remaining contingency related to our billing practices.
|
|
11.
|
Related party
transactions
|
MedQuist Holdings (previously CBaySystems Holdings Limited) has
an approximately 97% ownership interest in us at June 30,
2011.
We have an agreement with CBay Systems & Services,
Inc., (CBay Systems), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
our majority shareholder, under which we outsource medical
transcription services to CBay Systems. We incurred expenses of
$11,601 and $8,349 for the three months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. We incurred expenses of $23,071 and
$9,621 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. All medical transcription expenses for both
periods were recorded in cost of revenues in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We also have a subcontracting agreement with CBay Systems,
pursuant to which CBay Systems subcontracts medical
transcription, editing and related services to us. For the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded revenue of
$607 and $564 respectively, under the terms of the
subcontracting agreement. For the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, we recorded revenue of $1,278 and $1,096
respectively, under the terms of the subcontracting agreement.
We have a Management Services Agreement with CBay Inc. pursuant
to which certain senior executives and directors of CBay Inc.
provide advisory and consulting services. The Management
Services Agreement provides that, in consideration of the
management services rendered by CBay Inc. to us since
July 1, 2009 we pay CBay Inc. a quarterly services fee
equal to $350, payable in arrears. For the three month periods
ending June 30, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $350 in services
expenses with CBay Inc. For the six month periods ending
June 30, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $700 in services
expenses with CBay Inc. All Management Services Agreement costs
incurred have been recorded as selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the related
party payable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets
included $0.7 million and $5.4 million respectively
for amounts due to CBay Inc. and CBay
F-102
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Systems. The June 30, 2011 amounts are net of
$5.2 million due from MedQuist Holdings Inc. for
transaction costs paid by us on their behalf. Additionally,
accounts receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
included $862 and $753, respectively, for amounts due from CBay
Systems.
On August 18, 2011, we loaned $19,000,000 (the Loan)
to CBay Inc. (CBay). The Loan was documented by a
Subordinated Intercompany Note in favor of us by CBay (the
Note) and the proceeds of the Loan were used to
partially fund the acquisition of MultiModal Technologies, Inc.,
by MedQuist Holdings Inc. We believe the Loan was made on terms
no less favorable than what would be obtained by us in an
arms-length transaction.
The Note will mature on August 19, 2013 (the Maturity
Date), which date is the first business day after the
second anniversary of August 18, 2011. Interest will accrue on
any unpaid principal at an annual rate of 15.00% and interest
will be payable on the Maturity Date or, if sooner, the date of
any prepayment. Prepayment of the Note may occur at any time
prior to the Maturity Date with one business days notice,
provided that any prepayment must be for at least $100,000 (or
any whole multiple thereof) and accompanied by any accrued
interest on the amount of principal being paid.
The Loan and Note shall be subordinate and junior to all
obligations of CBay under (i) that certain Credit Agreement by
and among us, MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd.
(Transcriptions), MedQuist Holdings Inc., the other
Loan Parties signatory thereto, the Lenders signatory thereto,
and General Electric Capital Corporation as Agent for the
Lenders dated October 1, 2010 (as amended, restated, extended,
supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time)
and (ii) that certain Senior Subordinated Note Purchase
Agreement by and among us, CBay and Transcriptions as the
issuers, MedQuist Holdings Inc. and BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation, Pennantpark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A.
and THL Credit, Inc. as the purchasers dated September 30, 2010
(as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise
modified in writing from time to time).
|
|
12.
|
Fair value
measurements
|
Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific
measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be
determined based on the assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for
considering market participant assumptions in fair value
measurements, FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820) establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant
assumptions based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are
classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the
reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant
assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3
of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has
the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than
quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted
prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and
yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability, which are typically based on an entitys own
assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market
activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value
measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair
value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within
which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers
factors specific to the asset or liability.
F-103
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company uses interest rate caps to manage its interest rate
risk. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has interest rate
cap contracts for $60.0 million in notional amounts, which
amortize over time and expire in January 2013, to limit the risk
of increase in interest rates. The valuation of these
instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation
techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the
expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects
the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period
to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including
interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values
of interest rate caps are determined using the market standard
methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts
that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the
strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the
calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an
expectation of future interest rates derived from observable
market interest rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the
provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit
valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the
inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs,
such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the
likelihood of default by its counterparties. For counterparties
with publicly available credit information, the credit spreads
over LIBOR used in the calculations represent implied credit
default swap spreads obtained from a third party credit data
provider. However, as of June 30, 2011, the Company has
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions
and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not
significant to the overall valuation of the derivatives. As a
result, the Company has determined that its valuations for the
foreign currency exchange contracts in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
Interest rate agreements
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
The interest rate derivatives are classified in other assets,
with related gains and losses recorded in interest expense, net,
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Termination
of long term incentive plan
Our Long Term Incentive Plan was terminated on July 11,
2011.
Appointment
of executive chairman and chief executive
officer
On July 11, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors
appointed Roger L. Davenport to the position of Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (CEO), effective
July 11, 2011, and the MedQuist Holdings Board of Directors
appointed Mr. Davenport to the position of Chairman and CEO
of MedQuist Holdings, also effective July 11, 2011.
As previously announced, Peter Masanotti, the former President
and CEO of the Company and MedQuist Holdings, separated
employment with the Company and MedQuist Holdings, effective as
of the close of business on July 11, 2011. As previously
announced, Robert Aquilina, the former Executive Chairman of
MedQuist Holdings, separated employment with MedQuist Holdings
effective on the close of business on June 30, 2011.
Mr. Aquilina continues to serve as a member of the MedQuist
Holdings Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Aquilina, the
Companys
F-104
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
former Chairman of the Board of Directors, also resigned from
the Companys Board of Directors effective July 11,
2011.
Announcement
by Medquist Holdings merger
agreement
On August 18, 2011 (the Closing Date), MedQuist
Holdings completed the acquisition of Multimodal Technologies,
Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (MultiModal)
through a series of mergers between MultiModal and direct
wholly-owned subsidiaries of MedQuist Holdings (the
Merger). As a result of the Merger, MultiModal
became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of MedQuist Holdings. On
the Closing Date, MedQuist Holdings paid an aggregate of
approximately $48.4 million in cash to MultiModals
shareholders, optionholders and other third parties and issued
an aggregate of 4,134,896 shares of MedQuist Holdings
Inc.s common stock (the Shares) to
MultiModals shareholders who are accredited
investors within the meaning of Regulation D
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. MedQuist Holdings
is also obligated to pay up to approximately $28.8 million
of additional cash consideration in three installments of
approximately $16.3 million, $4.8 million and
$7.7 million, respectively, following the first, second and
third anniversaries of the Closing Date. To help fund the cash
portion of the purchase price, we loaned $19 million to
CBay Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MedQuist Holdings (the
Payor), on the Closing Date. The loan is evidenced
by the Note, which matures two years from the Closing Date and
bears a 15% interest rate per annum on the unpaid principal
amount thereof, all or a portion of which may be prepaid by the
Payor at any time upon one business days notice.
F-105
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of MedQuist Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MedQuist Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and other comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of MedQuist Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Notes 3 and 14 to the consolidated
financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, MedQuist
Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment.
As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2007, MedQuist Inc. and
subsidiaries adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of
SFAS No. 109.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 17, 2008
F-106
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
353,005
|
|
|
$
|
358,091
|
|
|
$
|
340,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
315,399
|
|
|
|
280,273
|
|
|
|
260,879
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
54,558
|
|
|
|
53,675
|
|
|
|
62,288
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
17,099
|
|
|
|
11,802
|
|
|
|
10,988
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,193
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
Cost of investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
|
|
34,127
|
|
|
|
13,001
|
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
Shareholder securities litigation settlement
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
450,315
|
|
|
|
381,241
|
|
|
|
362,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(97,310
|
)
|
|
|
(23,150
|
)
|
|
|
(21,858
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
|
|
7,628
|
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(90,870
|
)
|
|
|
(14,648
|
)
|
|
|
(12,867
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
20,762
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-107
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
175,412
|
|
|
$
|
161,582
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
54,778
|
|
|
|
48,725
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
|
|
219,042
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
20,969
|
|
|
|
21,366
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
124,826
|
|
|
|
125,505
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
45,448
|
|
|
|
42,262
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
441,139
|
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,779
|
|
|
$
|
12,754
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
28,812
|
|
|
|
18,989
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
15,558
|
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
24,777
|
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
Deferred income tax liability current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
|
|
16,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
95,128
|
|
|
|
85,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
18,034
|
|
|
|
15,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized
60,000 shares; 37,484 and 37,544 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
235,080
|
|
|
|
236,412
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
87,693
|
|
|
|
72,876
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
|
|
5,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
327,519
|
|
|
|
314,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
441,139
|
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-108
MedQuist Inc. and
subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash (used in) provided
by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,292
|
|
|
|
17,631
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
Write-off and impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
36,655
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
Stock based compensation Board Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
8,111
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
4,967
|
|
Asset writeoff charges
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
(1,359
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
(15,981
|
)
|
|
|
19,889
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,583
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
16,799
|
|
|
|
(9,366
|
)
|
|
|
(9,378
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
(5,537
|
)
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
37,176
|
|
|
|
(21,121
|
)
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(3,737
|
)
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
|
592
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(7,751
|
)
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(9,535
|
)
|
|
|
(8,191
|
)
|
|
|
(11,639
|
)
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(638
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(2,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(10,173
|
)
|
|
|
(8,249
|
)
|
|
|
(13,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(17,948
|
)
|
|
|
(2,859
|
)
|
|
|
(13,830
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
196,219
|
|
|
|
178,271
|
|
|
|
175,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$
|
178,271
|
|
|
$
|
175,412
|
|
|
$
|
161,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (recovered) paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
(22,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
$
|
232,926
|
|
|
$
|
216,267
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
4,425
|
|
|
$
|
453,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
232,963
|
|
|
|
104,635
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
341,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
235,080
|
|
|
|
87,693
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
4,414
|
|
|
|
327,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation-stock grants
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
$
|
236,412
|
|
|
$
|
72,876
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,356
|
|
|
$
|
314,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-110
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business
|
We are a provider of medical transcription technology and
services which are integral to the clinical documentation
workflow. We service health systems, hospitals and large group
medical practices throughout the U.S. In the clinical
documentation workflow, we provide, in addition to medical
transcription technology and services, digital dictation, speech
recognition and electronic signature services. We are a member
of the Philips Group of Companies and collaborate with Philips
Medical Systems in product development. On November 2,
2007, our majority shareholder, Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. (Philips), announced that it was going to proceed with the
sale of its ownership interest in us if a satisfactory price and
other acceptable terms can be realized. In addition, on
November 2, 2007 we announced, in light of Philips
announcement, that our board of directors, in connection with
its previously disclosed review of our strategic alternatives,
is evaluating whether a sale of us is in our best interests and
the best interests of our shareholders.
In November 2003, one of our employees raised allegations that
we had engaged in improper billing practices. In response, our
board of directors undertook an independent review of these
allegations and engaged the law firm of Debevoise and Plimpton
LLP, who in turn retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, to assist
in the review (Review). On March 16, 2004, we announced
that we had delayed the filing of our 2003 annual report on
Form 10-K
pending completion of the Review. Subsequently, on
March 25, 2004, we filed a
Form 8-K
detailing our determination that the Review would not be
completed by the March 30, 2004 filing deadline for our
2003
Form 10-K.
As a result of our noncompliance with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commissions (SEC) periodic disclosure
requirements, our common stock was delisted from the NASDAQ
National Market on June 16, 2004.
On July 30, 2004, we issued a press release entitled
MedQuist Announces Key Findings Of Independent Review Of
Client Billing, which announced certain findings in the
Review regarding our billing practices (July 2004 Press
Release). The Review found, among other things, that with
respect to our medical transcription services contracts that
called for billing based on the AAMT line billing
unit of measure, we used ratios and formulae to help calculate
the number of AAMT transcription lines for which our customers
(AAMT Customers) were billed rather than counting each of the
relevant characters to determine a billable line as provided for
in the contracts. With respect to these contracts, our use of
ratios and formulae to arrive at AAMT line counts was generally
not disclosed to our AAMT Customers.
The AAMT line unit of measure was developed in 1993 by three
medical transcription industry groups, including the American
Association for Medical Transcription (AAMT), in an attempt to
standardize industry billing practices for medical transcription
services. Following the development of the AAMT line unit of
measure, customers increasingly began to request AAMT line
billing. Accordingly, we, along with other vendors in the
medical transcription industry, began to incorporate the AAMT
line unit of measure into certain customer contracts. The AAMT
line definition provides that a line consists of 65
characters and defined the term character to include
such things as macros and function keys as well as other
information necessary for the final appearance and content of a
document. However, these definitions turned out to be inherently
ambiguous and difficult to apply in practice. As a result, the
AAMT line was applied inconsistently throughout the medical
transcription industry. In fact, no single set of AAMT
characters was ever defined or agreed upon for this unit of
measure, and it was eventually renounced by the groups
responsible for its development.
The Review concluded that our rationale for using ratios and
formulae to determine the number of AAMT transcription lines for
billing was premised on a good faith attempt to adopt a
consistent and commercially reasonable billing method given the
lack of common standards in the industry and ambiguities
inherent in the AAMT line definition. The Review concluded that
the use of ratios and formulae within the medical transcription
platform setups may have resulted in over billing and under
billing of some customers. In addition, in some instances,
customers ratios and formulae were adjusted without
disclosure to the AAMT Customers. However, the Review found no
evidence that the amounts we billed AAMT Customers were, in
general, commercially unfair or
F-111
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
inconsistent with what competitors would have charged. Moreover,
it was noted in the Review that we have been able to attract and
retain customers in a competitive market.
Following the issuance of the July 2004 Press Release, we began
an extensive review of our historical AAMT line billing
(Managements Billing Assessment) and in August 2004
informed our current and former customers that we would be
contacting them to discuss how they might have been impacted. In
response, several former and current customers, including some
of our largest customers, contacted us requesting, among other
things, (i) an explanation of the billing methods employed
by us for the customers account; (ii) an
individualized review of the customers past billings,
and/or
(iii) a meeting with a member of our management team to
discuss the July 2004 Press Release as it pertained to the
customers particular account. Some customers demanded an
immediate refund or credit to their account; others threatened
to withhold payment on invoices
and/or take
their business elsewhere unless we timely responded to their
information
and/or audit
requests.
In response to our customers concern over the July 2004
Press Release, we made the decision to take action to try to
avoid litigation and preserve and solidify our customer business
relationships by offering a financial accommodation to our AAMT
Customers. See Note 4.
Disclosure of the findings of the Review, along with the
delisting of our common stock, precipitated a number of
governmental investigations and civil lawsuits. See Note 13.
|
|
3.
|
Significant
accounting policies
|
Principles of
consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
MedQuist Inc. and its subsidiary companies. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
estimates and assumptions in the preparation of consolidated
financial statements
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Significant items subject to such
estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of
property and equipment, valuation of long-lived and intangible
assets and goodwill, valuation allowances for receivables,
inventories and deferred income taxes, revenue recognition,
stock-based compensation and commitments and contingencies.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
We follow revenue recognition criteria outlined in Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements, as amended by SAB 104. The
majority of our revenues are derived from providing medical
transcription services. Revenues for medical transcription
services are recognized when the services are rendered. These
services are based on contracted rates. The remainder of our
revenues are derived from the sale of voice-capture and document
management products including software, hardware and
implementation, training and maintenance service related to
these products.
We recognize software and software-related revenues pursuant to
the requirements of American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP)
97-2
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
as amended by
SOP 98-9,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions,
SOP 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-type and Certain
Production-type Contracts, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
00-03
Application of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on
Another Entitys Hardware,
EITF 03-05
Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing
More-Than-Incidental
Software and other authoritative accounting guidance.
F-112
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We recognize software-related revenues using the residual method
when vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value
exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement,
but does not exist for one or more delivered elements. We
allocate revenues to each undelivered element based on its
respective fair value determined by the price charged when that
element is sold separately or, for elements not yet sold
separately, the price established by management if it is
probable that the price will not change before the element is
sold separately. We defer revenues for the undelivered elements
and recognize the residual amount of the arrangement fee, if
any, when the basic criteria in
SOP 97-2
have been met.
Under
SOP 97-2,
provided that the arrangement does not involve significant
production, modification, or customization of the software,
revenues are recognized when all of the following four criteria
have been met; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectability is probable.
If at the outset of an arrangement, we determine that the
arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenues are
deferred until the arrangement fee becomes due and payable by
the customer. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine
that collectability is not probable, revenues are deferred until
payment is received. Our license agreements typically do not
provide for a right of return other than during the standard
warranty period. If an arrangement allows for customer
acceptance of the software or services, we defer revenues until
the earlier of customer acceptance or when the acceptance rights
lapse.
We separately market and sell hardware and software post
contract customer support (PCS). PCS covers phone support,
hardware parts and labor, software bug fixes and limited
upgrades, if and when available. We do not commit to specific
future software upgrades or releases. The contract period for
PCS is generally one year. We recognize both hardware and
software PCS on a straight line basis over the life of the
underlying PCS contract. In some of our PCS contracts, we bill
the customer prior to performing the services. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, deferred PCS revenues of
$12,235 and $11,494, respectively, are included in deferred
revenues and $450 and $221, respectively, are included in
non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Certain arrangements include multiple elements involving
software, hardware and implementation, training, or other
services that are not essential to the functionality of the
software. VSOE for services does not exist. Since the
undelivered elements are typically services, we recognize the
entire arrangement fee ratably over the period during which the
services are expected to be performed or the PCS period,
whichever is longer, beginning with delivery of the software,
provided that all other revenue recognition criteria in
SOP 97-2
are met. The services are typically completed before the PCS
term expires. As such, upon completion of the services, the
difference between the VSOE of fair value for the remaining PCS
period and the remaining unrecognized portion of the arrangement
fee is recognized as revenue (i.e. the residual method), and the
remaining deferred revenue is recognized ratably over the
remaining PCS period, provided that all other revenue
recognition criteria in
SOP 97-2
are met.
Sales
taxes
We present taxes assessed by a governmental authority including
sales, use, value added and excise taxes on a net basis and
therefore the presentation of these taxes is excluded from our
revenues and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets until such amounts are remitted to
the taxing authorities.
Accounting for
consideration given to a customer
As a result of the Accommodation Analysis (which is described in
Note 4), we offered financial accommodations to our
customers. Pursuant to EITF Issue
01-9,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products)
(EITF 01-9),
consideration given by a vendor to a customer is presumed to be
a reduction of the selling price of the vendors services
and, therefore, should be characterized as
F-113
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
a reduction of revenues when recognized in the vendors
income statement. For the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007, $57,678, $10,402 and $0, respectively, was
recorded as a reduction of revenues related to the Accommodation
Analysis.
Litigation and
settlement costs
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, claims,
contingencies and other legal matters. We record a charge equal
to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss
contingency when both of the following conditions are met:
(i) information available prior to issuance of the
financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset
had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date
of the financial statements and (ii) the range of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. We expense legal costs, including
those legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a
loss contingency, as incurred.
Services
provided by independent registered public
accountant
Services provided by our independent registered public
accounting firm are expensed as the services are provided and
were $1,254, $6,429, and $6,840 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Restructuring
costs
A liability for restructuring costs associated with an exit or
disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at fair
value when the liability is incurred. We record a liability for
severance costs when employees are notified that they are to be
terminated and for future, non-cancellable operating lease costs
when we vacate a facility.
Our estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to
record additional restructuring charges or reduce the amount of
liabilities recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we
evaluate the remaining accrued restructuring charges to ensure
their adequacy, that no excess accruals are retained and the
utilization of the provisions are for their intended purposes in
accordance with developed exit plans.
We periodically evaluate currently available information and
adjust our accrued restructuring charges as necessary. Changes
in estimates are accounted for as restructuring costs or credits
in the period identified.
Research and
development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements,
using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
our statements of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the
carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely
than not that such assets will be realized. Management considers
various sources of future taxable income including projected
book earnings, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the
need for a valuation allowance.
Stock-Based
compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
(Statement 123(R)), using the modified prospective transition
method which requires application of Statement 123(R) on the
date of adoption and,
F-114
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
therefore, we have not retroactively adjusted results from
periods prior to 2006. Under the modified prospective transition
method, compensation costs associated with share-based awards
recognized in 2006 include compensation costs for all
share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of
January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value
previously estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB
Statement 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(Statement 123). Had we granted options in 2006, the
compensation costs for those options would have been based on
the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 123(R). In March 2005, the SEC issued
SAB 107 (SAB 107) which provided supplemental
guidance related to Statement 123(R). We have applied the
provisions of SAB 107 in our adoption of Statement 123(R).
Statement 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value
of stock options on the date of grant using an option pricing
model. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
determine the fair value of our options. The determination of
the fair value of stock based awards using an option pricing
model is affected by a number of assumptions including expected
volatility of the common stock over the expected term, the
expected term, the risk free interest rate during the expected
term and the expected dividends to be paid. The value of the
portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is
recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service
periods.
Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock
options recognized under Statement 123(R) for 2006 and 2007 was
$2,117 and $565 which was charged to selling, general and
administrative expenses ($562 and $255), research and
development expenses ($240 and $91) and cost of revenues ($1,315
and $219). Included in the $2,117 and $565 is $194 and $120,
respectively, of expense related to options that were issued to
certain executive officers when we became current in our
periodic reporting obligations with the SEC in October 2007. As
of December 31, 2007, total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $1,371 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.7 years.
Prior to the adoption of Statement 123(R), we accounted for
stock-based awards to employees and directors using the
intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25), as allowed under Statement 123. Under
the intrinsic value method, no compensation expense for employee
stock options was recognized in our consolidated statements of
operations because the exercise price of the stock options
granted to employees was greater than or equal to the fair
market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net loss
and loss per share amounts for the year ended December 31,
2005 as if we had applied the fair-value recognition provisions
of Statement 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net loss
|
|
|
37
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair-value based method for all awards
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(115,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(3.07
|
)
|
Diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(3.07
|
)
|
We did not grant any options for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2006.
F-115
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Net loss per
share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during each
period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net
loss by the weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted for
the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, which consist
only of stock options, using the treasury stock method.
The table below reflects basic and diluted net loss per share
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(111,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted net loss per share does not assume
conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would have an
anti-dilutive effect on diluted net loss per share. During 2005,
2006 and 2007, we had a net loss. As a result, any assumed
conversions would result in reducing the net loss per share and,
therefore, are not included in the calculation. Shares having an
anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share and, therefore,
excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share,
totaled 3,432 shares, 2,150 shares and
2,298 shares for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007, respectively.
Advertising
costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $2,098, $1,903
and $1,674, respectively.
Cash and cash
equivalents
We consider all highly liquid instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our
cash management and investment policies dictate that cash
equivalents be limited to investment grade, highly liquid
securities. We place our temporary cash investments with
high-credit rated, quality financial institutions. Deposits held
with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such
deposits. Consequently, our cash equivalents are subject to
potential credit risk. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
cash equivalents consisted of money market investments. The
carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair
value.
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The carrying value of accounts receivable
approximates fair value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
our best estimate for losses inherent in our accounts receivable
portfolio. The sales return and allowance reserve is our best
estimate of sales credits that will be issued related to our
accounts receivable portfolio. These allowances are used to
state trade receivables at estimated net realizable value.
F-116
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We estimate uncollectible amounts based upon our historical
write-off experience, current customer receivable balances, age
of customer receivable balances, the customers financial
condition and current economic conditions. Historically, these
estimates have been adequate to cover our accounts receivable
exposure.
We enter into medical transcription service arrangements which
contain provisions for performance penalties in the event
certain service levels, primarily related to turn-around time on
transcribed reports, are not achieved. We reduce revenues for
any performance penalties incurred and have included an estimate
of such credits in our allowance for uncollectible accounts.
Product revenues for sales to end-user customers and resellers
is recognized upon passage of title if all other revenue
recognition criteria have been met. End-user customers generally
do not have a right of return. We provide certain of our
resellers and distributors with limited rights of return of our
products. We reduce revenues for rights to return our product
based upon our historical experience and have included an
estimate of such credits in our allowance for doubtful accounts.
Inventories
Inventories, which are primarily comprised of finished goods,
are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined
on a weighted-average basis. Inventories in excess of
anticipated future demand or for obsolete products are reserved.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the net inventory
balances were $2,608 and $2,011, respectively, and are included
in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range
from two to seven years for furniture, equipment and software,
and the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life for
leasehold improvements. Repairs and maintenance costs are
charged to expense as incurred while additions and betterments
are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposals are charged to
operations. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition, the
related cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from
the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price
over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a purchase
business combination. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment on
December 1 of each year.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step test. Under the first
step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its
carrying value (including goodwill). We consider three methods
when determining fair value; the discounted cash flow method,
the quoted price method and the public company method. Of these
three methods, we assign the most significant weighting to the
discounted cash flow method. If the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill
impairment exists for the reporting unit and the enterprise must
perform step two of the impairment test. Under step two, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying
amount of the reporting units goodwill over the implied
fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill
is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit
in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in
accordance with FASB Statement 141, Business
Combinations. The residual fair value after this allocation
is the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill.
Software
development
We capitalize software development costs pursuant to the
requirements of FASB Statement 86, Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed
(Statement 86), for our software developed
F-117
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
for sale and AICPA
SOP 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for internal Use
(SOP 98-1),
for our software developed for internal use.
Statement 86 specifies that costs incurred in creating a
computer software product shall be charged to expense when
incurred as research and development until technical feasibility
has been established. Technical feasibility is established upon
completion of a detail program design or, in its absence,
completion of a working model. Thereafter, all software
production costs shall be capitalized until the product is
available for release to customers.
SOP 98-1
specifies that software costs incurred in the preliminary
project stage should be expensed as incurred. Capitalization of
costs should begin when the preliminary project stage is
completed and management, with the relevant authority,
authorizes and commits funding of the project and it is probable
that the project will be completed and the software will be used
to perform the function intended. Capitalization should cease no
later than the point at which the project is substantially
complete and ready for its intended use.
Capitalized software is reported at the lower of unamortized
cost or net realizable value and is amortized over the
products estimated economic life which is generally three
years. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, $485 and $2,343,
respectively, of unamortized software development costs are
included in other intangible assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, software amortization
expense was $336, $262 and $360, respectively.
Long-Lived and
other intangible assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. To determine the recoverability of
long-lived assets, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by an asset is compared to the carrying
value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the
carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Annually we
evaluate the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
Intangible assets include certain assets (primarily customer
lists) obtained from business acquisitions and are being
amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives which range from three to 20 years.
Foreign
currency translation
Our operating subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada use
the local currency as their functional currency. We translate
the assets and liabilities of those entities into
U.S. dollars using the month-end exchange rate. We
translate revenues and expenses using the average exchange rates
prevailing during the reporting period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income within shareholders equity. Gains and
losses from foreign currency transactions are included in net
loss and were not material for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Business
enterprise segments
We operate in one reportable operating segment which is medical
transcription technology and services.
Concentration
of risk, geographic data and enterprise-wide
disclosures
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net
revenues in any period. There is no single geographic area of
significant concentration other than the United States.
F-118
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table summarizes the net revenues by the
categories of our products and services as a percentage of our
total net revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Medical transcription
|
|
|
79.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
Products and related services
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
PCS
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other includes medical coding, application service provider and
other miscellaneous revenues.
Fair value of
financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at carrying values which approximate
fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments and
the variability of the respective interest rates where
applicable.
Comprehensive
income/loss
Comprehensive income is comprised of Net income and Other
comprehensive income/loss.
Other comprehensive income/loss consists of foreign currency
translation adjustments. Other comprehensive income/loss and
comprehensive income are displayed separately in the
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Other
Comprehensive Income.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement 157, Fair Value
Measurements, (Statement 157) which defines fair value,
establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Statement 157
does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions
of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. On February 12, 2008, the FASB
delayed the effective date of Statement 157 for non-financial
assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of
Statement 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
including an amendment of FASB Statement 115 (Statement
159) which permits entities to choose to measure eligible
items at fair value at specified election dates. Unrealized
gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has
been elected will be reported in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date. The following balance sheet items are within the
scope of Statement 159:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Recognized financial assets and financial liabilities unless a
special exception applies;
|
|
n
|
Firm commitments that would otherwise not be recognized at
inception and that involve only financial instruments;
|
|
n
|
Non-financial insurance contracts; and
|
|
n
|
Host financial instruments resulting from separation of an
embedded non-financial derivative instrument from a
non-financial hybrid instrument
|
F-119
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Statement 159 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 2007 with early adoption possible but subject to
certain requirements. We do not expect the adoption of Statement
159 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement 141(R), Business
Combinations (Statement 141R). Statement 141R establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. Statement 141R also
provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill
acquired in the business combination and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. Statement 141R will become effective as of
the beginning of our fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(Statement 160). Statement 160 establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
Statement 160 will become effective as of the beginning of our
fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not
believe that Statement 160 will have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
4.
|
Customer
accommodation and quantification
|
As discussed in Note 2, in connection with our decision to
offer financial accommodations to our AAMT Customers, we
analyzed our historical billing information and the available
report-level data to develop individualized accommodation offers
to be made to our AAMT Customers (Accommodation Analysis). This
analysis took approximately one year to complete. The
methodology utilized to develop the individual accommodation
offers was designed to generate positive accommodation outcomes
for our AAMT Customers. As such, the methodology was not a
calculation of potential over billing nor was it intended as a
measure of damages or a reflection of any admission of liability
due and owed to our AAMT Customers. Instead, the Accommodation
Analysis was a methodology that was developed to arrive at
commercially reasonable and fair accommodation offers that would
be acceptable to our AAMT Customers without negotiation.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, based on the Accommodation
Analysis, our board of directors authorized management to make
cash accommodation offers to AAMT customers in the aggregate
amount of $65,413. In 2006, this amount was adjusted by a net
additional amount of $1,157 based on a refinement of the
Accommodation Analysis resulting in an aggregate amount of
$66,570. By accepting our accommodation offer, an AAMT Customer
must agree, among other things, to release us from any and all
claims and liability regarding AAMT line and other billing
related issues.
As part of this process, we also conducted an analysis in an
attempt to quantify the economic consequences of potentially
unauthorized adjustments to AAMT Customers ratios and
formulae within the transcription platform setups
(Quantification). This Quantification was calculated to be
$9,835.
Of the authorized cash accommodation amount of $66,570, $57,678
and $1,157 were treated as consideration given by a vendor to a
customer and accordingly recorded as a reduction in revenues in
2005 and 2006, respectively. The balance of $7,735 plus an
additional $2,100 has been accounted for as a billing error
associated with the Quantification resulting in a reduction of
revenues in various reporting periods from 1999 to 2005.
The goal of our customer accommodation was to reach a settlement
with our AAMT Customers. However, the Accommodation Analysis for
certain AAMT Customers did not result in positive accommodation
outcomes. For certain other customers, the Accommodation
Analysis resulted in calculated cash accommodation offers that
we believed were insufficient as a percentage of their
historical AAMT line billing to motivate such customers to
resolve their billing disputes with us. Therefore, in 2006 we
modified our customer accommodation to enable us to offer this
group of AAMT Customers credits for the purchase of future
products
and/or
services from us over a defined period of time. On July 21,
2006, our board of directors authorized management to make
credit
F-120
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
accommodation offers up to an additional $8,676 beyond amounts
previously authorized. During 2006, this amount was adjusted by
a net additional amount of $569 based on a refinement of the
Accommodation Analysis, resulting in an aggregate amount of
$9,245. In connection with the credit accommodation offers we
recorded a reduction in revenues and corresponding increase in
accrued expenses of $9,245 in 2006.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
related to the customer accommodation and the Quantification
which is included as a separate line item in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
46,878
|
|
|
$
|
24,777
|
|
Customer accommodation
|
|
|
10,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(31,523
|
)
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
24,777
|
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we
recorded a charge of $34,127, $13,001 and $6,083, respectively,
for costs associated with the Review, Managements Billing
Assessment as well as defense and other costs associated with
the SEC and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations
and civil litigation that we deemed to be unusual in nature.
These costs are net of insurance claim reimbursements. We record
insurance claims when the realization of the claim is probable.
The following is a summary of the amounts recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
$
|
20,858
|
|
|
$
|
14,427
|
|
|
$
|
18,678
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
9,789
|
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
Nightingale and Associates, LLC (Nightingale) services
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Insurance recoveries and claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,409
|
)
|
|
|
(15,386
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,127
|
|
|
$
|
13,001
|
|
|
$
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees represent accounting and dispute
analysis costs and document search and retrieval costs. In 2006,
insurance recoveries and claims represent insurance recoveries
($8,702) and insurance claims ($707). The insurance claims were
recorded in other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and
payment related to these claims was received in the first
quarter of 2007. During 2007 we recorded ($15,386) in additional
insurance recoveries and received payment of this entire amount
in 2007.
F-121
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2005
restructuring plan
During 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan (2005 Plan)
based on the implementation of a centralized national service
delivery model. The 2005 Plan involved the consolidation of
operating facilities and a related reduction in workforce. The
table below reflects the financial statement activity related to
the 2005 Plan which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cancelable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
$
|
1,693
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additional charge
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(4,780
|
)
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Charge
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(1,079
|
)
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments related to the 2005 Plan were made in 2007 for
severance and non-cancelable leases. The remainder of payments
related to the 2005 Plan will be made by 2009 for non-cancelable
leases.
2007
restructuring plans
During the third quarter of 2007, we implemented a restructuring
plan related to a reduction in workforce of 104 employees
as a result of the refinement of our centralized national
services delivery model. In addition, during the fourth quarter
of 2007 we implemented a restructuring plan related to an
additional reduction in workforce of 183 employees
attributable to our efforts to reduce costs. We recorded $2,263
in severance charges related to the 2007 restructuring plans.
The remaining restructuring costs are included in accrued
expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007. The table below reflects the financial
statement activity related to the 2007 restructuring plans for
the year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial charge
|
|
$
|
2,263
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of payments related to the 2007 restructuring
plans will be made in 2008.
F-122
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Accounts receivable consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
59,272
|
|
|
$
|
53,084
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(4,494
|
)
|
|
|
(4,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
54,778
|
|
|
$
|
48,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Property and
equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
28,541
|
|
|
$
|
27,610
|
|
Communication equipment
|
|
|
6,602
|
|
|
|
6,932
|
|
Software
|
|
|
18,002
|
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
58,807
|
|
|
|
60,138
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(37,838
|
)
|
|
|
(38,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
20,969
|
|
|
$
|
21,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, we recorded a write-off of $767 which was allocated
between cost of revenues ($425) and restructuring charges
related to the 2005 Plan ($342). In the fourth quarter of 2005,
based upon an inventory of fixed assets, we recorded a write-off
of $4,070 (original cost $29,116 less accumulated depreciation
$25,046). This expense was allocated between cost of revenues
($3,851) and restructuring charges related to the 2005 Plan
($219). In addition, during 2005 approximately $50,832 in fully
depreciated assets no longer in use were written off which had
no impact on net loss.
|
|
9.
|
Goodwill and
other intangible assets
|
Goodwill
The following table reflects the financial statement activity
related to the carrying amount of goodwill as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
123,849
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
124,826
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
125,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foreign currency adjustments reflect changes in the
period-end currency rates of our foreign subsidiaries.
F-123
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Other
intangible assets
As of December 31, other intangible asset balances were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
77,185
|
|
|
$
|
(32,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
44,531
|
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
(4,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
5,325
|
|
|
|
(4,893
|
)
|
|
|
432
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89,666
|
|
|
$
|
(44,218
|
)
|
|
$
|
45,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
$
|
77,331
|
|
|
$
|
(37,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,919
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
5,325
|
|
|
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
|
|
(2,472
|
)
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
87,471
|
|
|
$
|
(45,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated useful life and the weighted average remaining
lives of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
useful life
|
|
Remaining lives
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
10 - 20 years
|
|
10.7 years
|
Capitalized software
|
|
3 years
|
|
2.7 years
|
Estimated annual amortization expense for intangible assets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,479
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
17,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-124
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
Leases
Minimum rental payments under operating leases are recognized on
a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any
periods of free rent and landlord incentives. Rental expense for
operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007 was $5,710, $4,089 and $2,489, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one
year) as of December 31, 2007 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
4,650
|
|
|
$
|
4,571
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
15,732
|
|
|
$
|
15,612
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes our other contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
guaranteed payments
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
8,328
|
|
|
$
|
5,650
|
|
|
$
|
2,678
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,102
|
|
|
$
|
21,424
|
|
|
$
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations represent telecommunication contracts
($21,174), and other recurring purchase obligations ($250).
Severance and other guaranteed payments are comprised of
severance payments ($1,493), employee retention payments ($785)
and amounts owed to Nightingale ($400).
As of December 31, 2007, we had agreements with certain of
our senior management that provided for severance payments in
the event these individuals were terminated without cause. The
maximum cost exposure related to these agreements was $1,207 as
of December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, we had agreements with certain of
our senior management other than our President and Chief
Executive Officer that provided for payments to such individuals
in the event we are able to successfully complete a strategic
transaction and such individuals remained employed by us (or the
successor company as the case may be) for the
90-day
period immediately following the closing of the strategic
transaction or such individuals experience an involuntary
termination at any time during such
90-day
period. The maximum cost exposure related to these agreements
was $504 as of December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, we had an agreement with
Nightingale that provided for a payment to Nightingale in the
event we are able to successfully complete a strategic
transaction and Mr. Hoffmann continues to serve as our
F-125
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
President and Chief Executive Officer for the
90-day
period immediately following the closing of a strategic
transaction or Nightingales engagement with us (or any
successor to our business), including the retention of
Mr. Hoffmann as our President and Chief Executive Officer
(or any successor to our business), is terminated upon the
closing of a strategic transaction or during such
90-day
period. The maximum cost exposure related to this agreement was
$133 as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
11.
|
Investment in
A-Life Medical, Inc. (A-Life)
|
We have an investment in A-Life, a privately held entity which
provides advanced natural language processing technology for the
medical industry. Our investment is recorded under the equity
method of accounting since we owned 33.6% of A-Lifes
outstanding voting shares as of December 31, 2006 and 2007.
The table below reflects the financial statement activity
related to A-Life as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 that is
recorded in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
5,015
|
|
Share in income
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
Share in income
|
|
|
625
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investment in A-Life included a note receivable plus accrued
interest due from A-Life which matured on December 31,
2003. Prior to 2007, this note receivable and accrued interest
had been recorded in other assets. In January 2008, A-Life paid
us $1,250 to satisfy this note receivable and accrued interest
in full, as well as all other disputes and claims between A-Life
and us. Accordingly, we reclassified the note receivable and
accrued interest balances to other current assets in the
accompanying December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet.
Accrued expenses consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Professional services
|
|
$
|
4,938
|
|
|
$
|
4,959
|
|
Shareholder litigation settlement
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
14,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
28,812
|
|
|
$
|
18,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other individual accrued expense is in excess of 5% of total
current liabilities.
F-126
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Governmental
investigations
The SEC is currently conducting a formal investigation of us
relating to our billing practices. We have been fully
cooperating with the SEC since it opened its investigation in
2004. We have complied, and are continuing to comply, with
information and document requests by the SEC.
We also received an administrative HIPAA subpoena for documents
from the DOJ on December 17, 2004. The subpoena sought
information primarily about our provision of medical
transcription services to governmental and non-governmental
customers. The information was requested in connection with a
government investigation into whether we and others violated
federal laws in connection with the provision of medical
transcription services. We have complied, and are continuing to
comply, with information and document requests by the DOJ.
The DOL is currently conducting a formal investigation into the
administration of our 401(k) plan. We have been fully
cooperating with the DOL since it opened its investigation in
2004. We have complied, and are continuing to comply, with
information and document requests by the DOL.
Developments relating to the SEC, DOJ
and/or DOL
investigations will continue to create various risks and
uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our
business and our historical and future financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Shareholder
securities litigation
A shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against us
in the United States District Court District of New Jersey
on November 8, 2004. The action, entitled William
Steiner v. MedQuist, Inc., et al., Case
No. 1:04-cv-05487-FLW
(Shareholder Putative Action), was filed against us and certain
of our former officers, purportedly on behalf of an alleged
class of all persons who purchased our common stock during the
period from April 23, 2002 through November 2, 2004,
inclusive (Securities Class Period). The complaint
specifically alleged that defendants violated federal securities
laws by purportedly issuing a series of false and misleading
statements to the market throughout the Securities
Class Period, which statements allegedly had the effect of
artificially inflating the market price of our securities. The
complaint asserted claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5,
thereunder. Named as defendants, in addition to us, were our
former President and Chief Executive Officer and our former
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
On August 16, 2005, a First Amended Complaint in the
Shareholder Putative Class Action was filed against us in
the United States District Court District of New Jersey. The
First Amended Complaint named additional defendants, including
certain current and former directors, certain of our former
officers, our former and current external auditors and Philips.
Like the original complaint, the First Amended Complaint
asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder. The Securities Class Period of the original
complaint was expanded 20 months to include the period from
March 29, 2000 through June 14, 2004. Pursuant to an
October 17, 2005 consent order approved by the Court, lead
plaintiff Greater Pennsylvania Pension Fund filed a Second
Amended Complaint on November 15, 2005. The Second Amended
Complaint dropped Philips as a defendant, but alleged the same
claims and the same purported class period as the First Amended
Complaint. Plaintiffs sought unspecified damages. Pursuant to
the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act,
discovery in the action was stayed pending the filing and
resolution of the defendants motions to dismiss, which
were filed on January 17, 2006, and which were fully
briefed as of June 16, 2006. On September 29, 2006,
the Court denied our motions to dismiss and the motion to
dismiss of the individual defendants. In the same order, the
Court granted the motion to dismiss filed by our former and
current external auditors. On November 3, 2006, we filed
our Answer denying the material allegations contained in the
Second Amended Complaint. On March 23, 2007, we entered
into a memorandum of understanding and a stipulation of
settlement with the lead plaintiff in which we agreed to pay
$7,750 to settle all claims, throughout the class period,
against all defendants in the action. We accrued the
aforementioned $7,750 as of December 31, 2005.
F-127
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In April 2007, we paid the entire $7,750 into an escrow account
for the eventual distribution to the plaintiffs. On May 16,
2007, the Court issued an Order Preliminarily Approving
Settlement and Providing for Notice. The Court conducted a final
approval hearing and approved the settlement on August 15,
2007. Neither we nor any of the individuals named in the action
has admitted to liability or any wrongdoing in connection with
the settlement. On August, 17, 2007, the Court entered final
judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Customer
litigation
A putative class action was filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California. The action,
entitled South Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Memorial
Regional Hospital, et al. v. MedQuist, Inc. et al., Case
No. CV-04-7520-TJH-VBKx,
was filed on September 9, 2004 against us and certain of
our present and former officials, purportedly on behalf of an
alleged class of non-federal governmental hospitals and medical
centers that the complaint claims were wrongfully and
fraudulently overcharged for transcription services by
defendants based primarily on our use of the AAMT line billing
unit of measure. The complaint charged fraud, violation of the
California Business and Professions Code, unjust enrichment,
conversion, negligent supervision and violation of RICO.
Plaintiffs seek damages in an unspecified amount, plus costs and
interest, an injunction against alleged continuing illegal
activities, an accounting, punitive damages and attorneys
fees. Named as defendants, in addition to us, were one of our
senior vice presidents, our former executive vice president of
marketing and new business development, our former executive
vice president and chief legal officer, and our former executive
vice president and chief financial officer.
On December 20, 2004, we and the individual defendants
filed motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and
improper venue, or in the alternative, to transfer the putative
action to the United States District Court for the District of
New Jersey. On February 2, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Second
Amended Complaint both adding and deleting named plaintiffs in
an attempt to keep the putative action in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California. On
March 30, 2005, the United States District Court for the
Central District of California issued an order transferring the
putative action to the United States District Court District of
New Jersey and assigning Case
No. 05-CV-2206-JBS-AMD.
On August 1, 2005, we and the individual defendants filed
their respective Answers denying the material allegations
contained in the Second Amended Complaint. On August 31,
2005, we and the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss
the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim and a
motion to dismiss in favor of arbitration, or in the
alternative, to stay pending arbitration. On December 12,
2005, the plaintiffs filed an Amendment to the Second Amended
Complaint. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued an order
requiring plaintiffs to file a Third Amended Complaint.
Plaintiffs filed the Third Amended Complaint on January 4,
2006. The Third Amended Complaint expands the claims made beyond
issues arising from contracts based on AAMT line billing and
beyond customers billed based on an AAMT line, alleging that we
engaged in a scheme to inflate customers invoices without
regard to the terms of individual contracts and even in the
absence of any written contract. The Third Amended Complaint
also limits plaintiffs claim for fraud in the inducement
of the agreement to arbitrate to the three named plaintiffs
whose contracts contain an arbitration provision and a subclass
of similarly situated customers. On January 20, 2006 we and
the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third
Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim and a motion to
compel arbitration of all claims by the arbitration subclass and
to stay the case in its entirety pending arbitration. On
March 8, 2006 the Court held a hearing on these motions,
and took the matter under submission. On March 30, 2007,
the Court issued an order holding that plaintiffs could not make
out a claim that we had violated the federal RICO statute, thus
eliminating any claim against us for treble damages. The Court
also found that plaintiffs could not make out a claim that we
had engaged in any unfair or deceptive acts or practices in
violation of state law, or that we had made any negligent
misrepresentations to plaintiffs. In its ruling, the Court,
without reaching a decision of whether any wrongdoing had
occurred, allowed plaintiffs to proceed with their claims
against us for fraud, unjust enrichment and an accounting. In
its order, the Court denied our motion to compel arbitration
regarding those customers whose contracts contained an agreement
to arbitrate. We have appealed that decision to the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals, and we moved the District Court to
stay the matter
F-128
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
pending that appeal. The District Court heard oral argument on
our motion to stay on May 30, 2007 and took the motion
under submission.
On December 18, 2007, the Third Circuit entered judgment
denying our appeal and affirming the order of the District
Court. That same day, the District Court entered an order
denying our motion to stay pending appeal as moot and ordering
all Initial Disclosures, all
class-certification
related discovery, and all briefing upon
class-certification
motion practice completed within three months unless enlarged
for good cause. On February 21, 2008, the District Court
entered a scheduling order pursuant to which all fact discovery
related to class certification must be completed by
April 15, 2008 and plaintiffs motion for class
certification must be filed by April 30, 2008. All other
fact discovery must be completed by July 31, 2008, and all
expert discovery must be completed by October 31, 2008.
Dispositive motions must be filed by November 24, 2008. The
parties exchanged Initial Disclosures and commenced discovery.
The parties participated in court-ordered mediation in late
2007, but no settlement was reached. The parties continued to
explore the possibility of resolving the litigation before
trial, and have now reached agreement on settlement terms
resolving all claims by the named plaintiffs. Under the
parties agreement, we will make a lump sum payment of
$7,537 to resolve all claims by the individual named plaintiffs
and certain other additional putative class members represented
by plaintiffs counsel but not named in the action. We have
accrued the entire amount of this lump sum payment, $5,205 of
which was accrued during 2005, in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2007. Neither we, nor any
of the individual defendants, will admit to any liability or any
wrongdoing in connection with the settlement. The District Court
has entered a consent order staying the action through
April 18, 2008 to allow the parties to finalize the
settlement. We anticipate that the parties will execute a final
settlement agreement and the case will be dismissed with
prejudice in its entirety within the next four to eight weeks.
Because the settlement will not be on a
class-wide
basis, no class will be certified and thus there is no
requirement to give notice.
Medical
transcriptionist litigation
Hoffmann putative
class action
A putative class action lawsuit was filed against us in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia. The action, entitled Brigitte Hoffmann, et al. v.
MedQuist, Inc., et al., Case
No. 1:04-CV-3452,
was filed with the Court on November 29, 2004 against us
and certain current and former officials, purportedly on behalf
of an alleged class of current and former employees and
statutory workers, who are or were compensated on a per
line basis for medical transcription services
(Class Members) from January 1, 1998 to the time of
the filing of the complaint (Class Period). The complaint
specifically alleged that defendants systematically and
wrongfully underpaid the Class Members during the
Class Period. The complaint asserted the following causes
of action: fraud, breach of contract, demand for accounting,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, conversion, negligence,
negligent supervision, and RICO violations. Plaintiffs sought
unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages, disgorgement
and restitution. On December 1, 2005, the Hoffmann matter
was transferred to the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey. On January 12, 2006, the Court
ordered this case consolidated with the Myers Putative
Class Action discussed below. As set forth below, we
believe that the claims asserted in the consolidated Myers
Putative Class Action have no merit and intend to
vigorously defend that action.
Force putative
class action
A putative class action entitled Force v. MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-2608-WSD,
was filed against us on October 11, 2005, in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of current and
former employees who claim they are or were compensated on a
per line basis for medical transcription services
but were allegedly underpaid due to the actions of defendants.
The named plaintiff asserted claims for breach of contract,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and for an accounting. Upon
stipulation and consent of the parties, on February 17,
2006, the Force matter was ordered
F-129
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
transferred to the United States District Court for the District
of New Jersey. Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the parties
entered into a stipulation and consent order whereby the Force
matter was consolidated with the Myers Putative
Class Action discussed below, and the consolidated amended
complaint filed in the Myers action on January 31, 2006 was
deemed to supersede the original complaint filed in the Force
matter. As set forth below, we believe that the claims asserted
in the consolidated Myers Putative Class Action have no
merit and intend to vigorously defend that action.
Myers putative
class action
A putative class action entitled Myers, et al. v. MedQuist Inc.
and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-4608
(JBS), was filed against us on September 22, 2005 in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of our employee
and independent contractor transcriptionists who claim that they
contracted with us to be paid on a 65 character line, but were
allegedly underpaid due to intentional miscounting of the number
of characters and lines transcribed. The named plaintiffs
asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and
request an accounting.
The allegations contained in the Myers case are substantially
similar to those contained in the Hoffmann and Force putative
class actions and, as detailed above, the three actions have now
been consolidated. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on
January 31, 2006. In the consolidated amended complaint,
the named plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract,
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust
enrichment and demand an accounting. On March 7, 2006 we
filed a motion to dismiss all claims in the consolidated amended
complaint. The motion was fully briefed and argued on
August 7, 2006. The Court denied the motion on
December 21, 2006. On January 19, 2007, we filed our
answer denying the material allegations pleaded in the
consolidated amended complaint.
On May 17, 2007, the Court issued a Scheduling Order,
ordering all pretrial fact discovery completed by
October 30, 2007. The Court subsequently ordered plaintiffs
to file their motion for class certification by
December 14, 2007 and continued the date to complete fact
discovery to January 14, 2007. On October 18, 2007,
the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs motion to
compel further responses to written discovery regarding our
billing practices. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court
denied plaintiffs motion, finding plaintiffs had not
established that the billing discovery sought was relevant to
the claims or defenses regarding transcriptionist pay alleged in
their case. On December 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed their
motion for class certification, identifying a proposed class of
all our transcriptionists who were compensated on a per line
basis for work completed on MedRite, MTS or DEP transcription
platforms from November 29, 1998 to the present and
alleging that the proposed class was underpaid by more than
$80 million, not including interest.
On January 4, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order,
ordering our opposition to the motion for class certification to
be filed by March 14, 2008, plaintiffs reply brief to
be filed by May 14, 2008 and setting oral argument for
June 2, 2008. No date has been set for trial. On
January 9, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order
extending the deadline for the parties to complete depositions
of identified witnesses through February 15, 2008. We have
now deposed each of the named plaintiffs and all witnesses who
offered declarations in support of plaintiffs motion for
class certification, and plaintiffs have deposed numerous
MedQuist present and former employees. On February 8, 2008,
plaintiffs indicated that they will seek leave to file an
amended class certification brief to narrow their claims. On
February 19, 2008, the parties exchanged their Initial
Disclosures. Plaintiffs disclosures limit their damages
estimate to $41 million related to alleged underpayment on
the MedRite transcription platform; however, plaintiffs state
that they are continuing to analyze potential undercounting and
will supplement their damages claim. On March 10, 2008,
plaintiffs moved for leave to file an amended motion for
class certification dropping all allegations involving our DEP
transcription platform and narrowing the claims asserted
regarding the legacy MTS transcription platform. We did not
oppose plaintiffs motion for leave. On March 11,
2008, the Court granted plaintiffs motion, ordering us to
file our opposition to plaintiffs amended motion for class
certification by April 4, 2008 and ordering plaintiffs to
file their reply by May 23, 2008. The hearing date was not
changed and oral argument remains set for June 2, 2008. We
believe that the claims asserted in the consolidated actions
have no merit and intend to vigorously defend the suit.
F-130
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Shareholder
derivative litigation
On October 4, 2005, we announced the dismissal with
prejudice of a shareholder derivative action filed in
United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey. The suit, Rhoda Kanter (Plaintiff) v. Hans M.
Barella et al. (Defendants), was filed on November 12,
2004 against Philips and 10 current and former members of our
board of directors. We were named as a nominal defendant.
In a ruling dated September 21, 2005, the Court found
plaintiffs allegations that our board of directors
breached their fiduciary duties to us to be insufficient. The
plaintiff had alleged that for a period from 2001 through 2004,
the Defendants violated their fiduciary duties by permitting
artificial inflation of billing figures; failing to adequately
ensure accurate and lawful billing practices; and failing to
accurately report our true financial condition in our published
financial statements. On October 3, 2005, plaintiff filed a
motion for reconsideration of the Courts order dismissing
the action with prejudice. On November 16, 2005, the Court
denied plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. On
December 13, 2005, plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal with
the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Plaintiffs appeal was fully briefed as of May 2006, and
the Court of Appeals heard oral argument on the appeal on
March 1, 2007. Plaintiffs appeal was denied by the
Court of Appeals on May 25, 2007.
Shareholder
litigation
Costa Brava
partnership III, L.P. Shareholder Litigation
On October 9, 2007, a single count Complaint and an Order
to Show Cause were filed against us in the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County by one of our
shareholders. The action, entitled Costa Brava Partnership III,
L.P. v. MedQuist Inc. (Bur-C-0149-07), sought to compel us
to hold an annual meeting of shareholders (Annual Meeting Claim).
On October 30, 2007, plaintiff requested access under New
Jersey law to certain of our books and records. In response to
plaintiffs request, we voluntarily provided plaintiff with
those books and records that we believed we were required to
produce under New Jersey law. Thereafter, on November 9,
2007, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint to assert a second
claim to compel us to provide it with access to certain other
books and records (Books and Records Claim). The Annual Meeting
Claim and the Books and Records Claim sought equitable relief
only.
In December 2007, we agreed to hold our annual meeting of
shareholders on December 31, 2007. This resolved the Annual
Meeting Claim. Prior to the annual meeting, we voluntarily
produced to plaintiff certain additional books and records that
plaintiff requested in the Books and Records Claim. Thereafter,
on January 24, 2008, we filed an opposition to
plaintiffs Order to Show Cause to compel access to the
remaining books and records. On February 4, 2008, plaintiff
filed a reply brief. The Books and Records Claim has been
briefed and the parties are waiting for the Court to schedule a
hearing date to resolve the matter. We believe that the books
and records requests at issue in the Books and Records Claim are
burdensome and overbroad and intend to vigorously defend the
action.
Kahn putative
class action
A shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against us
in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division,
Burlington County. The action, entitled Alan R. Kahn v.
Stephen H. Rusckowski, et al., Docket
No. BUR-C-000007-08,
was filed with the Court on January 22, 2008 against us,
Philips and our four
non-independent
directors, Clement Revetti, Jr., Stephen H. Rusckowski,
Gregory M. Sebasky and Scott Weisenhoff. Plaintiff purports to
bring the action on his own behalf and on behalf of all current
holders of our common stock. The complaint alleges that
defendants breached their fiduciary duties of good faith, fair
dealing, loyalty, and due care by purportedly agreeing to and
initiating a process for our sale or a change of control
transaction which will allegedly cause harm to plaintiff and the
putative class. Plaintiff seeks damages in an unspecified
amount, plus costs and interest, a judgment declaring that
defendants breached their fiduciary duties and that any proposed
transactions regarding our sale or change of control are void,
an injunction preventing our
F-131
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
sale or any change of control transaction that is not entirely
fair to the class, an order directing us to appoint three
independent directors to our board of directors, and
attorneys fees and expenses. We have not yet been required
to file a responsive pleading. We believe that the claims
asserted have no merit and intend to defend the case vigorously.
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, we received from counsel to nine
current and former resellers of our products (Claimants), a copy
of an arbitration demand filed by the Claimants, initiating an
arbitration proceeding styled Diskriter, Inc., Electronic Office
Systems, Inc., Milner Voice & Data, Inc., Nelson
Systems, Inc., NEO Voice and Communications, Inc., Office
Business Systems, Inc., Roach-Reid Office Systems, Inc., Stiles
Office Systems, Inc., and Travis Voice and Data, Inc. v.
MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (filed on
September 27, 2007, AAA, Case Number Not Yet Assigned). The
arbitration demand purports to set forth claims for breach of
contract; breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing;
promissory estoppel; misrepresentation; and tortuous
interference with contractual relations. The Claimants allege
that we breached our written agreements with the Claimants by:
(i) failing to provide reasonable training, technical
support, and other services; (ii) using the Claimants
confidential information to compete against the Claimants;
(iii) directly competing with the Claimants
territories; and (iv) failing to make new products
available to the Claimants. In addition, the Claimants
allege that we made false oral representations that we:
(i) would provide new product, opportunities and support to
the Claimants; (ii) were committed to continuing to use
Claimants; (iii) did not intend to create our own sales
force with respect to the Claimants territory; and
(iv) would stay out of Claimants territories and
would not attempt to take over the Claimants business and
relationships with the Claimants customers and end-users.
The Claimants assert that they are seeking damages in excess of
$24.3 million. The arbitrator has not yet set a date for us
to formally respond to the arbitration demand. We deny all
wrongdoing and intend to defend ourselves vigorously including
asserting counterclaims against the Claimants as appropriate.
Anthurium
patent litigation
On November 6, 2007, Anthurium Solutions, Inc. filed an
action entitled Anthurium Solutions, Inc. v. MedQuist
Inc., et al., Civil Action
No. 2-07CV-484,
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas, alleging that we infringed and continue to infringe
United States Patent No. 7,031,998 through our DEP
transcription platform. The complaint also alleges patent
infringement claims against Spheris, Inc. and Arrendale
Associates, Inc. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and
unspecified damages, including enhanced damages and
attorneys fees. We filed our answer on January 15,
2008 and counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment of
non-infringement and invalidity. No scheduling order has been
issued, and no pretrial dates have been set. Our investigation
of the claims is ongoing, and we are awaiting plaintiffs
preliminary infringement contentions. We believe that the claims
asserted have no merit and intend to vigorously defend the suit.
Other
matters
From time to time, we have been involved in various claims and
legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our
opinion, the outcome of such actions will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
We provide certain indemnification provisions within our
standard agreement for the sale of software and hardware
(collectively, Products) to protect our customers from any
liabilities or damages resulting from a claim of
U.S. patent, copyright or trademark infringement by third
parties relating to our Products. We believe that the likelihood
of any future payout relating to these provisions is remote.
Accordingly, we have not recorded any liability in our
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006
or 2007 related to these indemnification provisions.
F-132
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We had insurance policies which provided coverage for certain of
the matters related to the legal actions described herein. We
received total insurance recoveries of $24,795 related to these
policies (See Note 5). We do not expect to receive any
additional insurance recoveries related to the legal actions
described above.
Our stock option plans provide for the granting of options to
purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees (including
officers) as well as to our non-employee directors. Options may
be issued with the exercise prices equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant or at a price
determined by a committee of our board of directors. Stock
options vest and are exercisable over periods determined by the
committee, generally five years, and expire no more than
10 years after the grant.
In July 2004, our board of directors affirmed our June 2004
decision to indefinitely suspend the exercise and future grant
of options under our stock option plans. Ten former executives
separated from us in 2004 and 2005. Notwithstanding the
suspension, to the extent such executives held options that were
vested as of their resignation date, such options remain
exercisable for the post-termination period, generally
90 days, commencing on the date that the suspension is
lifted for the exercise of options. This suspension was lifted
on October 4, 2007. There were 704 shares that
qualified for this post-termination exercise period. A summary
of these remaining post-termination options as of
December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$ 2.71-$10.00
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$10.01-$20.00
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
$20.01-$70.00
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extension of the life of the awards was recorded as a
modification of the grants. Under APB 25, the modification
created intrinsic value for vested stock if the market value of
the stock on the date of termination exceeded the exercise
price. Therefore, these grants required an immediate recognition
of the compensation expense with an offsetting credit to common
stock. We recorded a charge of $37, $0 and $0 for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
F-133
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Information with respect to our common stock options is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life in years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
4,211
|
|
|
$
|
29.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
$
|
34.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
$
|
27.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
$
|
28.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1,207
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
$
|
32.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
33.30
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
$
|
31.64
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of 2007
and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
options.
Under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, input assumptions
are determined at the time of option grant and are not adjusted
during the life of that grant. The following are assumptions
used in the 2007 option fair value calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
Significant assumptions required to estimate the fair value of
stock options include the following:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Expected term: The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No 107
Simplified method has been used to determine a
weighted average expected term of options granted.
|
|
n
|
Expected volatility: We have estimated expected volatility based
on the historical stock price volatility of a group of similar
publicly traded companies. We believe that our historical
volatility is not indicative of future volatility.
|
F-134
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The weighted average grant date fair value of options issued in
2007 was $7.03 per share.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$2.71-$10.00
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$10.01-$20.00
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.03
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
16.37
|
|
$20.01-$30.00
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
$30.01-$40.00
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.23
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
32.23
|
|
$40.01-$70.00
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
59.84
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
59.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
33.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 0 and 200 options granted during 2006 and 2007. There
were 0, 0 and 4 shares exercised in 2005, 2006 and 2007.
The total fair value of shares vested during 2007 was $396.
As of December 31, 2007, there were 962 additional options
available for grant under our stock option plans. When we became
up to date in our reporting to the SEC in October 2007, certain
executive officers, in accordance with their employment
agreements, received an aggregate of 200 options with an
exercise price equal to the then market value of our common
stock on the date of grant. In 2005, $78 is included in the pro
forma stock-based compensation amount depicted in Note 3
related to these options. In 2006 and 2007, $136 and $84,
respectively, is included as selling, general and administrative
expenses and $58 and $36 is included in research and development
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations related to these options with the total of $194 and
$120 included in common stock in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2006.
The sources of loss before income taxes and the income tax
provision for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(93,021
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,557
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(90,870
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision
|
|
$
|
(15,893
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,931
|
)
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
F-135
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
28,702
|
|
|
$
|
4,825
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
7,830
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
36,655
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
20,762
|
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to
our effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(62.5
|
)
|
|
|
(40.4
|
)
|
|
|
(53.0
|
)
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Adjustments to tax reserves
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Tax law changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
3,022
|
|
|
$
|
3,349
|
|
|
$
|
2,733
|
|
Domestic net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
18,492
|
|
|
|
36,295
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
24,192
|
|
|
|
22,285
|
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
Employee compensation and benefit plans
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
18,485
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
8,078
|
|
|
|
10,556
|
|
|
|
4,855
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
64,564
|
|
|
|
68,686
|
|
|
|
79,590
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(58,039
|
)
|
|
|
(64,601
|
)
|
|
|
(74,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
6,525
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
5,090
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(15,947
|
)
|
|
|
(18,704
|
)
|
|
|
(21,377
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(739
|
)
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(16,866
|
)
|
|
|
(19,443
|
)
|
|
|
(22,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(10,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,358
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-136
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, we had federal net operating loss
carry forwards of approximately $80,520 which will partially
expire in 2027 and 2028.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, we had state net
operating loss carry forwards of approximately $115,632 and
$167,750, respectively, which will expire between 2008 and 2027.
In addition, we have foreign net operating loss carry forwards
of approximately $15,492, which do not expire. Utilization of
the net operating loss carry forwards may be subject to an
annual limitation in the event of a change in ownership in
future years as defined by Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code and similar state provisions.
In assessing the future realization of deferred taxes, we
consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized based
on projections of our future taxable earnings. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible.
During 2007, we decreased our valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets generated in foreign tax jurisdictions from
$1,803 to $1,217 based on managements assessment of future
earnings available to utilize these deferred tax assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, a valuation allowance of $56,808
was established against various domestic deferred tax assets.
After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it was more likely than not that a
majority of the domestic deferred tax assets would not be
realized. In 2006 and 2007, we increased this valuation
allowance to $62,798 and $73,313, respectively.
Domestic deferred tax assets were recognized to the extent that
objective positive evidence existed with respect to their future
utilization. The objective positive evidence included the
potential to carry back any losses generated by the deferred tax
assets in the future as well as income expected to be recognized
due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities as of
December 31, 2007. In analyzing deferred tax liabilities as
a source for potential income for purposes of recognizing
deferred tax assets, the deferred tax liabilities related to
excess book basis in goodwill over tax basis in goodwill were
considered a source of future income for benefiting deferred tax
assets with indefinite lives only due to the indefinite life and
uncertainty of reversal of these liabilities during the same
period as the non-indefinite life deferred tax assets.
Our consolidated income tax expense for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable year as well as state and foreign income taxes.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 prescribes, among other things, a recognition
threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a companys income tax return.
FIN 48 utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating
uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with FASB
Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Step one,
Recognition, requires a company to determine if the
weight of available evidence indicates that a tax position is
more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
Step two, Measurement, is based on the largest amount of
benefit, which is more likely than not to be realized on
settlement with the taxing authority. We recorded a cumulative
effect increase to retained earnings of $389 upon adoption.
In accordance with FIN 48, the total amount of unrecognized
tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 was $5,614, which
includes $581 of accrued interest related to unrecognized income
tax benefits which we recognize as a component of the provision
for income taxes. Of the $5,614 unrecognized tax benefits,
$4,773 relates to tax positions which if recognized would impact
the effective tax rate, not considering the impact of any
valuation allowance. Of the $4,773, $2,859 is attributable to
uncertain tax positions with respect to certain deferred tax
assets
F-137
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
which if recognized would currently be offset by a full
valuation allowance due to the fact that at the current time it
is more likely than not that these assets would not be
recognized due to a lack of sufficient projected income in the
future.
The following is a roll-forward of the changes in our
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
5,002
|
|
Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the prior period
|
|
|
10
|
|
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
252
|
|
Amount of decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits relating to
settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of
applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective
tax rate if recognized
|
|
$
|
4,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, all U.S. states which require income tax
returns and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the nature of our
operations, no state or foreign jurisdiction is individually
significant. With limited exceptions we are no longer subject to
examination by the U.S. federal or states jurisdiction for
years beginning prior to 2003. We are currently under federal
tax audit for the tax years 2003 through 2006. We are no longer
subject to examination by the UK federal jurisdiction for years
beginning prior to 2005. We do have various state tax audits and
appeals in process at any given time.
We anticipate decreases in unrecognized tax benefits of
approximately $304 related to state statutes of limitations
expiring during 2008. Our unrecognized tax benefits are expected
to change in 2008. However, we do not anticipate any significant
increases or decreases within the next twelve months.
|
|
16.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
401(k)
plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan named the MedQuist
401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan) that provides eligible employees with
an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis.
Our 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to contribute up to
25% of their annual eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis,
subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code limits. Elective
deferral contributions are allocated to each participants
individual account and are then invested in selected investment
alternatives according to the participants directives.
Employee elective deferrals are 100% vested at all times. Our
401(k) Plan provides that we may make a discretionary matching
contribution to the participants in the 401(k) Plan. Our
discretionary matching contribution, if any, shall be in an
amount not to exceed 100% of the first 25% of a plan
participants compensation contributed as pre-tax
contributions to the 401(k) Plan. In our sole discretion, we may
make descretionary matching contributions on a quarterly or
annual basis. Historically we have matched 50% of each
participants contribution, up to a maximum of 5% of each
participants total annual compensation. Matching
contributions are 33% vested after one year of service, 67%
vested after two years of service and 100% vested after three
years of service. The charge to
F-138
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
operations for our matching contributions for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $1,380, $1,432 and
$1,547 respectively.
Executive
deferred compensation plan
We established the MedQuist Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (EDCP) in 2001. The EDCP, which is administered by the
compensation committee of our board of directors, allowed
certain members of management and highly compensated employees
to defer a certain percentage of their income. Participants were
permitted to defer compensation into an account in which
proceeds were available either during or after termination of
employment. The compensation committee authorized that certain
contributions made to a retirement distribution account be
matched with either shares of our common stock or cash.
Participants were not entitled to receive matching contributions
if they elected to make deferrals to an account into which
proceeds are available during employment. Participants were able
to defer up to 15% of their base salary (or such other maximum
percentage as may be approved by the compensation committee) and
90% of their bonus (or such other maximum percentage as may be
approved by the compensation committee). Distributions to a
participant made pursuant to a retirement distribution account
may be made to the participant upon the participants
termination or attainment of age 65, as elected by the
participant in their enrollment agreement. Distributions to a
participant made pursuant to an in-service distribution account
may be made at the election of the participant in their
enrollment agreement, subject to certain exceptions. The
balances in the EDCP are not funded, but are segregated, and
participants in the EDCP are our general creditors. All amounts
deferred in the EDCP increase or decrease based on hypothetical
investment results of the participants selected investment
alternatives. However, EDCP distributions are paid out of our
funds rather than from a dedicated investment portfolio. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the value of the assets held,
managed and invested pursuant to the EDCP was $1,120 and $1,118,
respectively, and is included in other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the corresponding deferred
compensation liability reflecting amounts due to employees was
$827 and $637, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Effective January 1, 2005, the EDCP was suspended and no
further contributions have been made.
Board of
directors deferred compensation plan
Commencing on January 1, 2005, a portion of the
compensation paid to our independent directors was deferred
compensation in the form of common stock having a fair market
value of $50 on the date of grant. Our board of directors
postponed the granting of the deferred compensation awards for
2006 and 2007 until October 2007 which is when we became up to
date with our periodic reporting obligations with the SEC. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, $332 and $0, respectively,
related to deferred compensation is included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of shareholders equity and other
comprehensive income. This plan was terminated in February 2008.
|
|
17.
|
Related-Party
transactions
|
From time to time, we enter into transactions in the normal
course of business with related parties. The audit committee of
our board of directors has been charged with the responsibility
of approving or satisfying all related party transactions other
than those between us and Philips. In any situation where the
audit committee sees fit to do so, any related party
transaction, other than those between us and Philips, may be
presented to disinterested members of our board of directors for
approval or ratification.
In connection with Philips investment in us, we have
entered into various agreements with Philips. All material
transactions between Philips and us are reviewed and approved by
the supervisory committee of our board of directors. The
supervisory committee is comprised of directors
independent from Philips. Listed below is a summary of our
material agreements with Philips.
F-139
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Licensing
agreement
In connection with Philips tender offer, we entered into a
Licensing Agreement with Philips Speech Processing GmbH, an
affiliate of Philips which is now known as Philips Speech
Recognition Systems GmbH (PSRS), on May 22, 2000 (Licensing
Agreement). The Licensing Agreement was subsequently amended by
the parties as of January 1, 2002, February 23, 2003,
August 10, 2003, September 1, 2004, December 30,
2005 and February 13, 2007.
Under the Licensing Agreement, we license from PSRS its
SpeechMagic speech recognition and processing software,
including any updated versions of the software developed by PSRS
during the term of the License Agreement (Licensed Product), for
use by us anywhere in the world. We pay a fee for use of this
license based upon a per line fee for each transcribed line of
text processed through the Licensed Product.
Upon the expiration of its initial term on June 28, 2005,
the Licensing Agreement was renewed for an additional five year
term.
In connection with the Licensing Agreement, we have a consulting
arrangement with PSRS whereby PSRS assists us with the
integration of its speech and transcription technologies.
OEM supply
agreement
On September 21, 2007, we entered into an Amended and
Restated OEM Supply Agreement (Amended OEM Agreement) with PSRS.
The Amended OEM Agreement amends and restates a previous OEM
Supply Agreement with PSRS dated September 23, 2004. In
connection with the Amended OEM Agreement certain amounts paid
to PSRS were capitalized in fixed assets and are being amortized
over a three-year period.
Pursuant to the Amended OEM Agreement, we purchased a
co-ownership interest in all rights and interests in and to
SpeechQ for Radiology together with its components, including
object and source code for the SpeechQ for Radiology application
and the SpeechQ for Radiology integration SDK (collectively, the
Product), but excluding the SpeechMagic speech recognition and
processing software, which we separately license from PSRS for a
fee under the Licensing Agreement. Additionally, the Amended OEM
Agreement provides that we shall receive, in exchange for a fee,
the exclusive right in the United States, Canada and certain
islands of the Caribbean (collectively the Exclusive Territory)
to sell, service and deliver the Product. In addition, PSRS has
agreed that for the term of the Amended OEM Agreement it will
not release a front-end multi-user reporting solution (including
one similar to the Product) in the medical market in the
Exclusive Territory nor will it directly authorize or assist any
of its affiliates to do so either; provided that the restriction
does not prevent PSRSs affiliates from integrating
SpeechMagic within their general medical application products.
The Amended OEM Agreement further provides that we shall make
payments to PSRS for PSRS development of an interim
version of the software included in the Product (Interim
Version). Except for the Interim Version which we and PSRS will
co-own, the Amended OEM Agreement provides that any
improvements, developments or other enhancements either we or
PSRS makes to the Product (collectively, Improvements) shall be
owned exclusively by the party that developed such Improvement.
Each party has the right to seek patent or other protection of
the Improvements it owns independent of the other party.
The term of the Amended OEM Agreement extends through
June 30, 2010 and will automatically renew for an
additional three year term provided that we are in material
compliance with the Amended OEM Agreement as of such date. If
PSRS decides to discontinue all business relating to the Product
in the Exclusive Territory on or after June 30, 2010, PSRS
can effect such discontinuation by terminating the Amended OEM
Agreement by providing us with six months prior written
notice of such discontinuation, provided the earliest such
notice can be delivered is June 30, 2010. Either party may
terminate the Amended OEM Agreement for cause immediately in the
event that a material breach by the other party remains uncured
for more than 30 days following delivery of written notice
or in the event that the other party becomes insolvent or files
for bankruptcy.
F-140
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Equipment
sales
We purchase dictation related equipment from Philips.
Insurance
coverage through Philips
We obtain all of our business insurance coverage (other than
workers compensation) through Philips.
Purchasing
agreements
For the three years ended December 31, 2007 we entered into
annual letter agreements with Philips Electronics North America
Corporation (PENAC), an affiliate of Philips, to purchase
products and services from certain suppliers under the terms of
the prevailing agreements between such suppliers and PENAC. As
of January 1, 2008, we are no longer a party to an
agreement with PENAC to purchase the aforementioned products and
services.
From time to time, we enter into other miscellaneous
transactions with Philips including Philips purchasing certain
products and implementation services from us. We recorded net
revenues from sales to Philips of $754, $26 and $0 for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and
2007 reflect other assets related to Philips of $0 and $1,002,
respectively, and accrued expenses related to Philips of $2,030
and $1,534, respectively.
Listed below is a summary of the expenses incurred by us in
connection with the various Philips agreements noted above for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Charges
related to these agreements are included in cost of revenues and
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
PSRS licensing
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
2,390
|
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
PSRS consulting
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
OEM agreement
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
Dictation equipment
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
PENAC
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
$
|
6,373
|
|
|
$
|
7,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 29, 2004, we entered into an agreement with
Nightingale under which Nightingale agreed to provide interim
chief executive services to us. On July 30, 2004, our board
of directors appointed Howard S. Hoffmann to serve as our
non-employee Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Mr. Hoffmann
serves as the Managing Partner of Nightingale. With the
departure of our former President in May 2007, our board of
directors appointed Mr. Hoffmann to the additional position
of President in June 2007. Mr. Hoffmann serves as our
President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the terms of
the agreement between us and Nightingale which was amended on
March 14, 2008 (Amendment). The Amendment, among other
things, extends the term of Mr. Hoffmanns role as our
President and Chief Executive Officer through August 1,
2008. Our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and
reviewing the performance of Mr. Hoffmann on an ongoing
basis. Our agreement with Nightingale also permits us to engage
additional personnel employed by Nightingale to provide
consulting services to us from time to time.
F-141
MedQuist Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we
incurred charges of $3,207, $3,005 and $2,914, respectively, for
Nightingale services. From February 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007, the Nightingale charges were recorded in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations due to Nightingales
focus on operational matters instead of the Review and
Managements Billing Assessment. Prior to February 1,
2007, charges related to Nightingale were recorded in cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net (see Note 5). As
of December 31, 2006 and 2007, accrued expenses included
$548 and $400, respectively, for amounts due to Nightingale for
services performed.
See Note 11 for a discussion of our agreements with A-Life.
|
|
18.
|
Quarterly data
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
96,014
|
|
|
$
|
93,359
|
|
|
$
|
82,096
|
|
|
$
|
86,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(8,471
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,951
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
89,066
|
|
|
$
|
88,692
|
|
|
$
|
82,518
|
|
|
$
|
80,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,886
|
|
|
$
|
(8,935
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,271
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,497
|
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
F-142
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
177,758
|
|
|
$
|
166,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
134,628
|
|
|
|
119,273
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
32,610
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
7,854
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
Cost of investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
|
|
(4,897
|
)
|
|
|
8,126
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
176,870
|
|
|
|
169,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
(3,586
|
)
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,499
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-143
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
161,582
|
|
|
$
|
151,095
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $4,359 and $4,417,
respectively
|
|
|
48,725
|
|
|
|
48,215
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
8,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
219,042
|
|
|
|
208,783
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$38,772 and $38,825, respectively
|
|
|
21,366
|
|
|
|
18,920
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
125,505
|
|
|
|
125,418
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$45,209 and $44,610, respectively
|
|
|
42,262
|
|
|
|
41,363
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
$
|
403,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
12,754
|
|
|
$
|
11,137
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
18,989
|
|
|
|
13,501
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
14,826
|
|
|
|
14,495
|
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
|
|
12,242
|
|
Deferred income tax liability current
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
16,023
|
|
|
|
16,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
85,834
|
|
|
|
72,438
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
15,151
|
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized
60,000 shares; 37,544 and 37,544 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
236,412
|
|
|
|
236,574
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
72,876
|
|
|
|
70,294
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
5,356
|
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
314,644
|
|
|
|
312,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
417,772
|
|
|
$
|
403,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-144
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided
by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,883
|
|
|
|
8,658
|
|
Equity in income of affiliated company
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects
of acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
Insurance receivable
|
|
|
(11,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(8,060
|
)
|
|
|
(5,405
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
Customer accommodation and quantification
|
|
|
(2,976
|
)
|
|
|
(5,593
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(9,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,137
|
)
|
|
|
(3,078
|
)
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(1,862
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,961
|
)
|
|
|
(4,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,131
|
)
|
|
|
(10,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
175,412
|
|
|
|
161,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
161,281
|
|
|
$
|
151,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodation payments paid with credits
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-145
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business
|
MedQuist is the largest Medical Transcription Service
Organization (MTSO) in the world, and a leader in technology
enabled clinical documentation workflow. We service health
systems, hospitals and large group medical practices throughout
the U.S., and we employ approximately 5,600 skilled medical
transcriptionists (MTs), making us the largest employer of MTs
in the U.S. We believe our services and enterprise
technology solutions including mobile voice capture
devices, speech recognition technologies, Web-based workflow
platforms, and global network of MTs and editors
enable healthcare facilities to improve patient care, increase
physician satisfaction, and lower operational costs.
Change in
majority owner
On August 6, 2008, CBaySystems Holdings Limited
(CBaySystems Holdings), a company that is publicly traded on the
AIM market of the London Stock Exchange with a portfolio of
investments in medical transcription, which includes a company
that competes in the medical transcription market, healthcare
technology, and healthcare financial services, acquired a 69.5%
ownership interest in MedQuist from Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V. (Philips) for $11.00 per share (CBaySystems
Holdings Purchase). Immediately prior to the closing of the
CBaySystems Holdings Purchase, four of our directors affiliated
with Philips resigned from our board of directors and four
individuals affiliated with CBaySystems Holdings were appointed
to our board of directors.
In November 2003, one of our employees raised allegations that
we had engaged in improper billing practices. In response, our
board of directors undertook an independent review of these
allegations (Review). On March 16, 2004, we announced that
we had delayed the filing of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 pending the completion
of the Review. As a result of our noncompliance with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC)
periodic disclosure requirements, our common stock was delisted
from the NASDAQ National Market on June 16, 2004.
In response to our customers concern over the public
disclosure of certain findings from the Review, we made the
decision in the fourth quarter of 2005 to take action to try to
avoid litigation and preserve and solidify our customer business
relationships by offering a financial accommodation to certain
of our customers. See Note 7.
Disclosure of the findings of the Review, along with the
delisting of our common stock, precipitated a number of
governmental investigations and civil lawsuits. See Note 11.
On July 5, 2007, we filed our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (2005
Form 10-K).
The 2005
Form 10-K
was our first periodic report covering the period after
September 30, 2003. On August 31, 2007, we filed our
Forms 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006
and September 30, 2006 as well as our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. On October 4,
2007, we filed our
Forms 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007. On November 9, 2007, we timely filed our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and we have timely
filed all periodic reports since that date.
Our common stock was relisted on the Global Market of The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC on July 17, 2008.
F-146
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The consolidated financial statements included herein are
unaudited and have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations although we believe that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The
consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the
accounts of all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
These statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that,
in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair
presentation of the information contained herein. These
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. As permitted under GAAP,
interim accounting for certain expenses is based upon full year
assumptions. Such amounts are expensed in full in the year
incurred. For interim financial reporting purposes, income taxes
are recorded based upon actual year to date income tax rates as
permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim
Periods.
Our accounting policies are set forth in detail in Note 3
to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on
March 17, 2008.
In September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines
fair value, creates a framework within GAAP for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In
defining fair value, SFAS 157 emphasizes a market-based
measurement approach that is based on the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements,
but does generally apply to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the
FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
which delays for one year the effective date of
SFAS 157 for most nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. Nonfinancial instruments affected by this deferral
include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured
at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted
SFAS 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities
recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The partial
adoption of SFAS 157 for these items did not have a
material impact on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows. The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value into three broad categories. Level 1:
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the company has the ability to access.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable
inputs that are corroborated by market data such as quoted
prices, interest rates and yield curves. Level 3: Inputs
are unobservable data points that are not corroborated by market
data. At June 30, 2008, we held two financial assets, cash
and cash equivalents (Level 1) and our Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP) included in other current
assets with a fair value of $975. We measure the fair value of
our EDCP on a recurring basis using Level 2 (significant
other observable) inputs as defined by SFAS 157. The
adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the
basis for measuring the fair value of these items.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, including interim periods within that
fiscal year. We did not elect the fair value option for any of
our existing financial instruments as of June 30, 2008 and
we have not determined whether or not we will elect this option
for financial instruments we may acquire in the future.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R defines a business combination
as a transaction or other event in which an acquirer obtains
control of one or more businesses. Under SFAS 141R, all
business combinations are accounted for by applying the
F-147
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase
method), under which the acquirer measures all identified assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in
the acquiree at their acquisition date fair values. Certain
forms of contingent consideration and certain acquired
contingencies are also recorded at their acquisition date fair
values. SFAS 141R also requires that most acquisition
related costs be expensed in the period incurred. SFAS 141R
is effective for us in January 2009. SFAS 141R will change
our accounting for business combinations on a prospective basis.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires a company to recognize
noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as
minority interests) as a separate component in the
equity section of the consolidated statement of financial
position. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income
specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be
identified in the consolidated statement of income.
SFAS 160 also requires changes in ownership interest to be
accounted for similarly, as equity transactions; and when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the
deconsolidation of the subsidiary be measured at fair value.
SFAS 160 is effective for us in January 2009. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS 160 will have
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires a
company with derivative instruments to disclose information that
should enable financial statement users to understand how and
why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect a companys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for us in January 2009.
The FASB recently issued a Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets, which amends the factors a company should
consider when developing renewal assumptions used to determine
the useful life of an intangible asset under SFAS 142.
Paragraph 11 of SFAS 142 requires companies to
consider whether renewal can be completed without substantial
cost or material modification of the existing terms and
conditions associated with the asset.
FSP 142-3
replaces the previous useful life criteria with a new
requirement that an entity consider its own
historical experience in renewing similar arrangements. If
historical experience does not exist then the company would
consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal
including 1) highest and best use of the asset by a market
participant, and 2) adjustments for other entity-specific
factors included in paragraph 11 of SFAS 142. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any,
SFAS 142-3
will have on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
|
4.
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation
expense related to employee stock options recognized under
SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment,
(SFAS 123R).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-148
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
As of June 30, 2008, total unamortized stock-based
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of
expected forfeitures, was $1,199 which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.3 years.
Our stock option plans provide for the granting of options to
purchase shares of common stock to eligible employees (including
officers) as well as to our non-employee directors. Options may
be issued with the exercise prices equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant or at a price
determined by a committee of our board of directors. Stock
options vest and are exercisable over periods determined by the
committee, generally five years, and generally expire no more
than 10 years after the grant.
In July 2004, our board of directors affirmed our June 2004
decision to indefinitely suspend the exercise and future grant
of options under our stock option plans. For 10 of our former
executives (who separated from us in 2004 and 2005) who
held options that were vested as of their resignation date, our
board of directors allowed their options to remain exercisable
for the post-termination period commencing on the date that the
suspension was lifted for the exercise of options. There were
704 options that qualified for this post-termination exercise
period. The suspension was lifted on October 4, 2007 and
all but 154 of these options terminated on February 1,
2008. A summary of these remaining options as of June 30,
2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.38
|
|
$
|
20.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Of the remaining 154 options, 12 were exercised in July 2008 and
the remaining 142 expire on October 3, 2009.
|
The extension of the life of the awards was recorded as a
modification of the grants in 2004 and 2005. Under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, (APB 25), the modification
created intrinsic value for vested stock if the market value of
the stock on the date of termination exceeded the exercise
price. Therefore, these grants required an immediate recognition
of the compensation expense with an offsetting credit to common
stock. No charges were incurred for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008.
Information with respect to our common stock options is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
subject to
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life in years
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
$
|
26.80
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
$
|
29.03
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
$
|
27.09
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-149
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference
between the closing stock price on the last trading day of the
quarter and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number
of
in-the-money
options.
There were no options granted or exercised during the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.
A summary of outstanding and exercisable common stock options as
of June 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
shares
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
14.80
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
16.75
|
|
$
|
20.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
26.41
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
26.41
|
|
$
|
30.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
32.89
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
32.89
|
|
$
|
40.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
58.88
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
58.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
26.80
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
29.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, there were 1,019 additional options
available for grant under our stock option plans. When we became
current in our reporting obligations with the SEC on
October 4, 2007, certain executive officers, in accordance
with their employment agreements, received a grant of an
aggregate of 200 options with an exercise price equal to the
grant date market value of our common stock on October 4,
2007.
|
|
5.
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,402
|
|
|
$
|
(2,621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-150
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Net income (loss)
per share
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per
share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average shares outstanding, as adjusted for the dilutive effect
of common stock equivalents, which consist only of stock
options, using the treasury stock method.
The following table reflects the weighted average shares
outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,484
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,499
|
|
|
|
37,544
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share does not
assume conversion, exercise or issuance of shares that would
have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net loss per share. For
the six months ended June 30, 2008 we had a net loss. As a
result, any assumed conversions would result in reducing the net
loss per share and, therefore, are not included in the
calculation. Shares having an anti-dilutive effect on net loss
per share and, therefore, excluded from the calculation of
diluted net loss per share, totaled 1,565 shares for the
six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
7.
|
Customer
accommodation and quantification
|
As noted in Note 2, in connection with our decision to
offer financial accommodations to certain of our customers
(Accommodation Customers), we analyzed our historical billing
information and the available report-level data
(Managements Billing Assessment) to develop individualized
accommodation offers to be made to Accommodation Customers
(Accommodation Analysis). The Accommodation Analysis took
approximately one year to complete. The methodology utilized to
develop the individual accommodation offers was designed to
generate positive accommodation outcomes for Accommodation
Customers. As such, the methodology was not a calculation of
potential over billing nor was it intended as a measure of
damages or a reflection of any admission of liability due and
owed to Accommodation Customers. Instead, the Accommodation
Analysis was a methodology that was developed to arrive at
commercially reasonable and fair accommodation offers that would
be acceptable to Accommodation Customers without negotiation.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, based on the Accommodation
Analysis, our board of directors authorized management to make
cash accommodation offers to Accommodation Customers in the
aggregate amount of $65,413. In 2006, this amount was adjusted
by a net additional amount of $1,157 based on a refinement of
the Accommodation Analysis resulting in an aggregate amount of
$66,570. By accepting our accommodation offer, an Accommodation
Customer must agree, among other things, to release us from any
and all claims and liability regarding certain billing related
issues.
As part of this process, we also conducted an analysis in an
attempt to quantify the economic consequences of potentially
unauthorized adjustments to Accommodation Customers ratios
and formulae within the transcription platform setups
(Quantification). This Quantification was calculated to be
$9,835.
F-151
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Of the authorized cash accommodation amount of $66,570, $57,678
and $1,157 were treated as consideration given by a vendor to a
customer and accordingly recorded as a reduction in revenues in
2005 and 2006, respectively. The balance of $7,735 plus an
additional $2,100 has been accounted for as a billing error
associated with the Quantification resulting in a reduction of
revenues in various reporting periods from 1999 to 2005.
The goal of our customer accommodation was to reach a settlement
with certain of our customers. However, the Accommodation
Analysis for certain customers did not result in positive
accommodation outcomes. For certain other Accommodation
Customers, the Accommodation Analysis resulted in calculated
cash accommodation offers that we believed were insufficient as
a percentage of their historical line billing to motivate such
customers to resolve their billing disputes with us. Therefore,
in 2006 we modified our customer accommodation to enable us to
offer this group of Accommodation Customers credits for the
purchase of future products
and/or
services from us over a defined period of time. On July 21,
2006, our board of directors authorized management to make
credit accommodation offers up to an additional $8,676 beyond
amounts previously authorized. During 2006, this amount was
adjusted by a net additional amount of $569 based on a
refinement of the Accommodation Analysis, resulting in an
aggregate amount of $9,245. In connection with the credit
accommodation offers we recorded a reduction in revenues and
corresponding increase in accrued expenses of $9,245 in 2006.
The following is a summary of the financial statement activity
for the periods indicated related to the customer accommodation
and the Quantification which is included as a separate line item
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
24,777
|
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
Payments and other adjustments
|
|
|
(3,723
|
)
|
|
|
(5,606
|
)
|
Credits
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
$
|
12,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, we
recorded a credit of ($4,897) and a charge of $8,126,
respectively for costs associated with the Review and
Managements Billing Assessment, as well as defense and
other costs associated with governmental investigations and
civil litigation, including, in 2007, $197 of consulting
services provided by Nightingale and Associates, LLC
(Nightingale), a management consulting company specializing in
turn-arounds and crisis management, that we deemed to be unusual
in nature. Howard Hoffmann, our former President and Chief
Executive Officer, provided services to us pursuant to the terms
of an agreement between us and Nightingale. Nightingale also
provided certain consulting services to us related to the Review
and Managements Billing Assessment. The agreement with
Nightingale was terminated consensually on June 10, 2008,
which was also the date that Mr. Hoffmann ceased being our
President and Chief Executive Officer. These costs are net of
insurance claim reimbursements. We record insurance claims when
the realization of the claim is
F-152
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
probable. The following is a summary of the amounts recorded as
Cost of investigation and legal proceedings, net, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
$
|
8,846
|
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Nightingale services
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries and claims
|
|
|
(15,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees represent accounting and dispute
analysis costs and document search and retrieval costs. In 2007,
insurance recoveries and claims represent insurance recoveries
($4,243) and insurance claims ($11,143). The insurance claims
were recorded in other current assets and payment related to
these claims was received in the third quarter of 2007. We do
not expect to receive any additional insurance recoveries in the
future. The 2008 Other amount of $1,500 is for the proposed
settlement of all claims related to the consolidated medical
transcriptionists putative class action.
2005
restructuring plan
During 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan (2005 Plan)
based on the implementation of a centralized national service
delivery model. The 2005 Plan involved the consolidation of
operating facilities and a related reduction in workforce. The
table below reflects the financial statement activity related to
the 2005 Plan which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total non-cancelable
|
|
|
Total non-cancelable
|
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
Additional charge
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of payments related to the 2005 Plan will be made
by 2009 for non-cancelable leases.
F-153
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2007
restructuring plans
During the third quarter of 2007, we implemented a restructuring
plan related to a reduction in workforce of 104 employees
as a result of the refinement of our centralized national
services delivery model. In addition, during the fourth quarter
of 2007, we implemented a restructuring plan related to an
additional reduction in workforce of 183 employees
attributable to our efforts to reduce costs. All of the
restructuring costs incurred are severance related. The table
below reflects the financial statement activity related to the
2007 Plan which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total severance
|
|
|
Total severance
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
Reversal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
(1,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2008, we reversed $45 related to the
2007 restructuring plan because certain employee severance
expenses will not be incurred. The remainder of payments related
to the 2007 restructuring plans will be made by the end of 2008.
Our consolidated income tax expense consists principally of an
increase in deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization deductions for income tax purposes during the
applicable period as well as state and foreign income taxes
offset by the reversal of certain state tax reserves due to the
expiration of the statutes of limitations. We have recorded a
valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to an
amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future
years.
Under FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48), we classify penalties and interest related to
uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense. There
were no material changes to our uncertain tax positions,
including penalties and interest for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Governmental
investigations
The SEC is currently conducting a formal investigation of us
relating to our billing practices. We have been fully
cooperating with the SEC since it opened its investigation in
2004 and we have complied with information and document requests
by the SEC.
We also received an administrative subpoena under Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) for
documents from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on
December 17, 2004. The subpoena sought information
primarily about our provision of medical transcription services
to governmental and non-governmental customers. The information
was requested in connection with a government investigation into
whether we and others violated federal laws in connection with
the provision of medical transcription services. We have
complied, and are continuing to comply, with information and
document requests by the DOJ.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) conducted a formal
investigation into the administration of our 401(k) plan. We
fully cooperated with the DOL from the inception of its
investigation in 2004 and we complied with
F-154
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
information and document requests by the DOL. In April 2008, we
made an additional contribution of approximately $41 to our
401(k) plan and certain current or former plan participants in
an attempt to resolve the DOL investigation. In July 2008, we
received written confirmation from the DOL that it has concluded
its investigation.
Developments relating to the SEC
and/or DOJ
investigations may continue to represent various risks and
uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our
business and our historical and future financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Customer
litigation
South broward
putative class action
A putative class action was filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California. The action,
entitled South Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Memorial
Regional Hospital, et al. v. MedQuist Inc. et al., Case
No. CV-04-7520-TJH-VBKx,
was filed on September 9, 2004 against us and certain of
our present and former officers, purportedly on behalf of an
alleged class of non-federal governmental hospitals and medical
centers that the complaint claims were wrongfully and
fraudulently overcharged for transcription services by
defendants based primarily on our use of the AAMT line billing
unit of measure. The complaint charged fraud, violation of the
California Business and Professions Code, unjust enrichment,
conversion, negligent supervision and violation of RICO. Named
as defendants, in addition to us, were one of our senior vice
presidents, our former executive vice president of marketing and
new business development, our former executive vice president
and chief legal officer, and our former executive vice president
and chief financial officer.
On March 10, 2008, the parties reached agreement on
settlement terms resolving all claims by the named plaintiffs.
The parties entered into a final settlement agreement on or
about May 21, 2008. Under the parties agreement, we
made a lump sum payment of $7,520 to resolve all claims by the
individual named plaintiffs and certain other additional
putative class members represented by plaintiffs counsel
but not named in the action. We have accrued the entire amount
of this lump sum payment, $5,205 of which was accrued during
2005, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007. Neither we, nor any of the individual
defendants, admitted to any liability or any wrongdoing in
connection with the settlement. On June 16, 2008, the
District Court dismissed the case with prejudice in its entirety
and without costs. Because the settlement is not be on a
class-wide
basis, no class will be certified and thus there is no
requirement to give notice.
Kaiser
litigation
On June 6, 2008, plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, The Permanente Medical Group,
Inc., Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States,
Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado
(collectively, Kaiser) filed suit against MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (collectively, MedQuist) in the
Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County
of Alameda. The action is entitled Foundation Health Plan Inc.,
et al v. MedQuist Inc. et al., Case
No. CV-078-03425
PJH. The complaint asserts five causes of action, for common law
fraud, breach of contract, violation of California Business and
Professions Code section 17200, unjust enrichment, and a
demand for an accounting. More specifically, Kaiser alleges that
MedQuist fraudulently inflated the payable units of measure in
medical transcription reports generated by MedQuist for Kaiser
pursuant to the contracts between the parties. The damages
alleged in the complaint include an estimated $7 million in
compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages,
attorneys fees and costs, and injunctive relief. MedQuist
contends that it did not breach the contracts with Kaiser, or
commit the fraud alleged, and it intends to defend the suit
vigorously. MedQuist removed the case to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California, and has
filed motions to dismiss Kaisers complaint and to transfer
venue of the case to the United Stated District Court for the
District of New Jersey. The parties participated in
mediation on July 24, 2008, but the case was not settled.
An initial case management conference has been set for
October 23, 2008.
F-155
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Medical
transcriptionist litigation
Hoffmann putative
class action
A putative class action lawsuit was filed against us in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia. The action, entitled Brigitte Hoffmann, et al. v.
MedQuist Inc., et al., Case
No. 1:04-CV-3452,
was filed with the Court on November 29, 2004 against us
and certain current and former officials, purportedly on behalf
of an alleged class of current and former employees and
statutory workers, who are or were compensated on a per
line basis for medical transcription services
(Class Members) from January 1, 1998 to the time of
the filing of the complaint (Class Period). The complaint
specifically alleged that defendants systematically and
wrongfully underpaid the Class Members during the
Class Period. The complaint asserted the following causes
of action: fraud, breach of contract, demand for accounting,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, conversion, negligence,
negligent supervision, and RICO violations. Plaintiffs sought
unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages, disgorgement
and restitution. On December 1, 2005, the Hoffmann matter
was transferred to the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey. On January 12, 2006, the Court
ordered this case consolidated with the Myers Putative
Class Action discussed below. As set forth below, the
parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle all
claims.
Force putative
class action
A putative class action entitled Force v. MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-2608-WSD,
was filed against us on October 11, 2005 in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of current and
former employees who claim they are or were compensated on a
per line basis for medical transcription services
but were allegedly underpaid due to the actions of defendants.
The named plaintiff asserted claims for breach of contract,
quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and for an accounting. Upon
stipulation and consent of the parties, on February 17,
2006, the Force matter was ordered transferred to the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the parties entered into a
stipulation and consent order whereby the Force matter was
consolidated with the Myers Putative Class Action discussed
below, and the consolidated amended complaint filed in the Myers
action on January 31, 2006 was deemed to supersede the
original complaint filed in the Force matter. As set forth
below, the parties have reached an agreement in principle to
settle all claims.
Myers putative
class action
A putative class action entitled Myers, et al. v. MedQuist Inc.
and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case
No. 05-cv-4608
(JBS), was filed against us on September 22, 2005 in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The
action was brought on behalf of a putative class of our employee
and independent contractor transcriptionists who claim that they
contracted with us to be paid on a 65 character line, but were
allegedly underpaid due to intentional miscounting of the number
of characters and lines transcribed. The named plaintiffs
asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and
requested an accounting.
The allegations contained in the Myers case are substantially
similar to those contained in the Hoffmann and Force putative
class actions and, as detailed above, the three actions have now
been consolidated. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on
January 31, 2006. In the consolidated amended complaint,
the named plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract,
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust
enrichment and demand an accounting. On March 7, 2006 we
filed a motion to dismiss all claims in the consolidated amended
complaint. The motion was fully briefed and argued on
August 7, 2006. The Court denied the motion on
December 21, 2006. On January 19, 2007, we filed our
answer denying the material allegations pleaded in the
consolidated amended complaint.
On May 17, 2007, the Court issued a Scheduling Order,
ordering all pretrial fact discovery completed by
October 30, 2007. The Court subsequently ordered plaintiffs
to file their motion for class certification by
December 14, 2007 and continued the date to complete fact
discovery to January 14, 2008. On October 18,
F-156
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2007, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs motion
to compel further responses to written discovery regarding our
billing practices. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court
denied plaintiffs motion, finding plaintiffs had not
established that the billing discovery sought was relevant to
the claims or defenses regarding transcriptionist pay alleged in
their case. On December 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed their
motion for class certification, identifying a proposed class of
all of our transcriptionists who were compensated on a per line
basis for work completed on MedRite, MTS or DEP transcription
platforms from November 29, 1998 to the present and
alleging that the proposed class was underpaid by more than
$80 million, not including interest.
On January 4, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order
ordering our opposition to the motion for class certification to
be filed by March 14, 2008, plaintiffs reply brief to
be filed by May 14, 2008 and setting oral argument for
June 2, 2008. No date has been set for trial. On
January 9, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order
extending the deadline for the parties to complete depositions
of identified witnesses through February 15, 2008. We have
now deposed each of the named plaintiffs and all witnesses who
offered declarations in support of plaintiffs motion for
class certification, and plaintiffs have deposed numerous
MedQuist present and former employees. On February 8, 2008,
plaintiffs indicated that they would seek leave to file an
amended class certification brief to narrow their claims. On
February 19, 2008, the parties exchanged their Initial
Disclosures. Plaintiffs disclosures limited their damages
estimate to $41.0 million related to alleged underpayment
on the MedRite transcription platform; however, plaintiffs
stated that they were continuing to analyze potential
undercounting and would supplement their damages claim. On
March 10, 2008, plaintiffs moved for leave to file an
amended motion for class certification dropping all allegations
involving our DEP transcription platform and narrowing the
claims asserted regarding the legacy MTS transcription platform.
We did not oppose plaintiffs motion for leave. On
March 11, 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs motion,
ordering us to file our opposition to plaintiffs amended
motion for class certification by April 4, 2008 and
ordering plaintiffs to file their reply by May 23, 2008. On
April 4, 2008, we filed our opposition to plaintiffs
amended motion for class certification.
On or about April 21, 2008, the parties reached a tentative
settlement of all claims in exchange for payment by MedQuist of
$1.5 million plus certain injunctive relief. The parties
are in the process of documenting their agreement. The court has
been notified of the tentative settlement and the lawsuit has
been stayed while the parties continue to negotiate the
settlement documentation. The tentative settlement contemplates
notice to a settlement class consisting of all medical
transcriptionists paid by the line for the period from
November 29, 1998 through execution of the stipulation of
settlement and is conditioned on final approval by the court.
Neither MedQuist, nor any other party, has admitted or will
admit liability or any wrongdoing in connection with the
proposed settlement.
Shareholder
litigation
Costa brava
partnership III, L.P. shareholder litigation
Annual meeting
and books and records claims
On October 9, 2007, a single count Complaint and an Order
to Show Cause were filed against us in the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County by one of our
shareholders. The action, entitled Costa Brava Partnership III,
L.P. v. MedQuist Inc. (Bur-C-0149-07), sought to compel us
to hold an annual meeting of shareholders (Annual Meeting Claim).
On October 30, 2007, plaintiff requested access under New
Jersey law to certain of our books and records. In response to
plaintiffs request, we voluntarily provided plaintiff with
those books and records that we believed we were required to
produce under New Jersey law. Thereafter, on November 9,
2007, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint to assert a second
claim to compel us to provide it with access to certain other
books and records (Books and Records Claim). The Annual Meeting
Claim and the Books and Records Claim sought equitable relief
only.
In December 2007, we agreed to hold our annual meeting of
shareholders on December 31, 2007. This resolved the Annual
Meeting Claim. Prior to the annual meeting, we produced to
plaintiff certain additional books and
F-157
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
records that plaintiff requested in the Books and Records Claim.
Thereafter, on January 24, 2008, we filed an opposition to
plaintiffs Order to Show Cause to compel access to the
remaining books and records. On February 4, 2008, plaintiff
filed a reply brief. In June 2008, we and the plaintiff settled
the Books and Records Claim on terms acceptable for all parties.
No monetary payments were made by either party and each party
was responsible for its own attorneys fees and costs
incurred in the litigation.
Claim for
preliminary and injunctive relief
On July 30, 2008, Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P. filed a
verified complaint and jury demand in the United States District
Court District of New Jersey against MedQuist Inc., Philips,
CBay Inc., CBaySystems Holdings, S.A.C. Capital Management, LLC,
S.A.C. Private Capital Group, LLC, S.A.C. PEI CB Investment,
L.P., and four of our former, non-independent directors, Clement
Revetti, Jr., Gregory M. Sebasky and Scott M. Weisenhoff
and Edward H. Siegel. It subsequently filed a first amended
complaint on August 1, 2008. The amended complaint alleges
that the defendants violated the Clayton Act, the New Jersey
Shareholder Protection Act, and federal securities laws, by
engaging in certain actions that were anti-competitive, harmful
to us and in furtherance of the CBaySystems Holdings purchase of
Philips stock in MedQuist. Certain of the claims are
purportedly asserted derivatively on our behalf. On
August 1, 2008, the plaintiff also sought an ex parte
temporary restraining order and entry of an order to show cause
requiring the defendants to appear and show cause why a
preliminary injunction should not be issued enjoining the
complained of actions. A hearing was held on the preliminary
injunction motion on August 5, 2008. At the conclusion of
the hearing, the Court denied the request for a temporary
restraining order and denied the request to enter an order to
show cause. The Court ruled that the plaintiff had not met the
standards for injunctive relief, including a showing of
likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm. The
Court allowed the plaintiff two weeks to file a further amended
complaint, and directed the parties to engage in discovery on an
expedited schedule. We deny any liability and intend to defend
this action vigorously.
Kahn putative
class action
A shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against us
in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division,
Burlington County. The action, entitled Alan R. Kahn v.
Stephen H. Rusckowski, et al., Docket
No. BUR-C-000007-08,
was filed with the Court on January 22, 2008 against us,
Philips and four of our former non-independent directors,
Clement Revetti, Jr., Stephen H. Rusckowski, Gregory M.
Sebasky and Scott Weisenhoff. Plaintiff purports to bring the
action on his own behalf and on behalf of all current holders of
our common stock. The complaint alleged that defendants breached
their fiduciary duties of good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, and
due care by purportedly agreeing to and initiating a process for
our sale or a change of control transaction which will allegedly
cause harm to plaintiff and the putative class. Plaintiff sought
damages in an unspecified amount, plus costs and interest, a
judgment declaring that defendants breached their fiduciary
duties and that any proposed transactions regarding our sale or
change of control are void, an injunction preventing our sale or
any change of control transaction that is not entirely fair to
the class, an order directing us to appoint three independent
directors to our board of directors, and attorneys fees
and expenses.
On June 12, 2008, plaintiff filed an amended class action
complaint against us, eight of our current and former directors,
and Philips in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery
Division. In the amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that our
current and former directors breached their fiduciary duties of
good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, and due care by not
permitting our public shareholders the opportunity to decide
whether they wanted to participate in a share purchase offer
with non-party CBaySystems Holdings that would have allowed the
public shareholders to sell their shares of our common stock for
an amount above market price. Plaintiff further alleges that
CBaySystems Holdings also made the share purchase offer to our
majority shareholder, Philips, and that Philips breached its
fiduciary duties by accepting CBaySystems Holdings offer.
Based on these allegations, plaintiff seeks declaratory,
injunctive, and monetary relief from all defendants.
On July 14, 2008, we moved to dismiss plaintiffs
amended class action complaint, arguing (1) that
plaintiffs amended class action complaint did not allege
that we engaged in any wrongdoing which supported a breach of
F-158
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
fiduciary duty claim and (2) that a breach of fiduciary
duty claim is not legally cognizable against a corporation.
Plaintiff filed an opposition to our motion to dismiss on
July 21, 2008. The Court will hold oral argument on our
motion some time in October 2008.
We deny any liability and intend to defend this action
vigorously.
Newcastle
shareholder litigation
On June 30, 2008, Newcastle Partners, L.P. (Newcastle), a
shareholder affiliated with one of our directors, derivatively
on our behalf, filed an action against Philips, CBaySystems
Holdings, CBay Inc., Stephen H. Rusckowski, Clement
Revetti, Jr., Greg Sebasky, Jr., Scott M. Weisenhoff
and Edward H. Siegel, each of whom is one of our former
non-independent directors, in the Superior Court of New Jersey,
Chancery Division, Burlington County. The complaint also named
us as a Nominal Defendant, meaning that no monetary
relief is being sought against us.
On July 9, 2008, Newcastle amended the complaint to add
Arklow Master Fund, Ltd. (Arklow), one of our shareholders and
affiliated with one of our directors, as an additional
plaintiff. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have taken steps to
sell Philips entire interest in MedQuist (i.e., 69.5% of
our outstanding shares) to CBaySystems Holdings and CBay Inc.
(collectively, CBay). Plaintiffs assert four counts in the
complaint. First, plaintiffs contend that Rusckowski, Revetti,
Sebasky, Weisenhoff and Siegel (collectively, the Philips
Directors), who are also senior officers of Philips, breached
their fiduciary duties, to the Company by taking steps to
consummate the proposed sale of Philips shares in MedQuist
to CBay Inc. that will adversely affect the Company. Second,
plaintiffs aver that all of the defendants, individually and
together, aided and abetted the Philips Directors breach
of their fiduciary duties. In light of the first two counts,
plaintiffs sought injunctive relief (including an order
enjoining the proposed sale of Philips shares in MedQuist
to CBay Inc.), declaratory relief and attorneys fees and
costs. Third, as an alternative form of relief, plaintiffs plead
that in the event that Philips sells its stake in MedQuist,
plaintiffs demand a declaration that a certain agreement related
to the governance of the Company remain in full force and
effect. Fourth, plaintiffs assert that CBay breached the
standstill provision contained in an April 2008 confidentiality
agreement between us and CBay and demand an injunction to
prevent CBay from violating that agreement.
On July 8, 2008, Newcastle filed an Application for an
Order to Show Cause (OSC) to (i) preliminarily enjoin
Philips and CBay from consummating the sale of Philips
MedQuist stock to CBay; (ii) preliminarily enjoin the
Philips Directors from taking any action to consummate the
proposed sale; and (iii) preliminarily enjoin CBay from
violating the Confidentiality Agreement. As part of the relief
requested in the OSC, plaintiffs sought a Temporary Restraining
Order (TRO) that would restrain all defendants from taking any
action in violation of the proposed OSC until a preliminary
injunction hearing could be held.
On July 9, 2008, counsel for MedQuist, Philips, the Philips
Directors, CBay, Newcastle and Arklow appeared before Judge
Michael Hogan of the Superior Court of New Jersey, for a hearing
on the TRO application. After entertaining argument from the
parties, Judge Hogan denied the TRO application. Judge Hogan
scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing for July 31,
2008 and ordered expedited discovery. The parties subsequently
agreed to an expedited discovery schedule, as well as a briefing
schedule on OSC for a preliminary injunction. The hearing was
held on July 31, 2008, and on August 1, 2008, the
Court issued an order denying plaintiffs motion seeking
preliminary injunctive relief. The Court found, among other
things, that the plaintiffs failed to establish by clear and
convincing evidence a reasonable probability of success on their
underlying claims, or that absent injunctive relief they would
suffer immediate irreparable harm.
F-159
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Reseller
arbitration demand
On October 1, 2007, we received from counsel to nine
current and former resellers of our products (Claimants), a copy
of an arbitration demand filed by the Claimants, initiating an
arbitration proceeding styled Diskriter, Inc., Electronic Office
Systems, Inc., Milner Voice & Data, Inc., Nelson
Systems, Inc., NEO Voice and Communications, Inc., Office
Business Systems, Inc., Roach-Reid Office Systems, Inc., Stiles
Office Systems, Inc., and Travis Voice and Data, Inc. v.
MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (collectively
MedQuist) (filed on September 27, 2007, AAA,
30-118-Y-00839-07).
The arbitration demand purports to set forth claims for breach
of contract; breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing;
promissory estoppel; misrepresentation; and tortious
interference with contractual relations. The Claimants allege
that we breached our written agreements with the Claimants by:
(i) failing to provide reasonable training, technical
support, and other services; (ii) using the Claimants
confidential information to compete against the Claimants;
(iii) directly competing with the Claimants
territories; and (iv) failing to make new products
available to the Claimants. In addition, the Claimants allege
that we made false oral representations that we: (i) would
provide new product, opportunities and support to the Claimants;
(ii) were committed to continuing to use Claimants;
(iii) did not intend to create our own sales force with
respect to the Claimants territory; and (iv) would
stay out of Claimants territories and would not attempt to
take over the Claimants business and relationships with the
Claimants customers and end-users. The Claimants assert
that they are seeking damages in excess of $24.3 million.
We also moved to dismiss MedQuist Inc. as a party to the
arbitration since MedQuist Inc. is not a party to the
Claimants agreements, and accordingly, has never agreed to
arbitration. The AAA initially agreed to rule on these matters,
but then decided to defer a ruling to the panel of arbitrators
selected pursuant to the parties agreements (Panel). In
response, we informed the Panel that a court, not the Panel,
should rule on these issues. When it appeared that the Panel
would rule on these issues, we initiated a lawsuit in the
Superior Court of DeKalb County (the Court) and requested an
injunction enjoining the Panel from deciding these issues. The
Court denied the request, and indicated that a new motion could
be filed if the Panels ruling was adverse to MedQuist Inc.
or MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. On May 6, 2008, the Panel
dismissed MedQuist Inc. as a party, but ruled against our
opposition to a consolidated arbitration. We asked the Court to
stay the arbitration in order to review that decision. The Court
initially granted the stay, but later lifted the stay. The Court
did not make any substantive rulings regarding consolidation,
and in fact, left that decision and others to the assigned
judge, who was unable to hear those motions. Accordingly, until
further order of the Court, the arbitration will proceed forward.
We filed an answer and counterclaim in the arbitration, which
generally denied liability. In the lawsuit, the defendants filed
a motion to dismiss alleging that the our complaint failed to
state an actionable claim for relief. On July 25, 2008, we
filed our response which opposed the motion to dismiss in all
respects. Discovery has now commenced in both the arbitration
and the lawsuit. We deny all wrongdoing and intend to defend
ourselves vigorously including asserting counterclaims against
the Claimants as appropriate.
Anthurium
patent litigation
On November 6, 2007, Anthurium Solutions, Inc. filed an
action entitled Anthurium Solutions, Inc. v. MedQuist Inc.,
et al., Civil Action
No. 2-07CV-484,
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas, alleging that we infringed and continue to infringe
United States Patent No. 7,031,998 through our DEP
transcription platform. The complaint also alleges patent
infringement claims against Spheris, Inc. and Arrendale
Associates, Inc. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and
unspecified damages, including enhanced damages and
attorneys fees. We filed our answer on January 15,
2008 and counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment of
non-infringement and invalidity. Plaintiff filed its preliminary
infringement contentions on May 2, 2008. Our investigation
of the claims is ongoing. We believe that the claims asserted
have no merit and intend to vigorously defend the suit.
F-160
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Other
matters
From time to time, we have been involved in various claims and
legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our
opinion, the outcome of such actions will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
We provide certain indemnification provisions within our
standard agreement for the sale of software and hardware
(collectively, Products) to protect our customers from any
liabilities or damages resulting from a claim of
U.S. patent, copyright or trademark infringement by third
parties relating to our Products. We believe that the likelihood
of any future payout relating to these provisions is remote.
Accordingly, we have not recorded any liability in our
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2007
or June 30, 2008 related to these indemnification
provisions.
We had insurance policies which provided coverage for certain of
the matters related to the legal actions described herein and
certain other legal actions that were previously settled or
dismissed. To date, we have received total insurance recoveries
of $24,795 related to these policies (See Note 8). We do
not expect to receive any additional insurance recoveries
related to these legal actions.
|
|
12.
|
Related party
transactions
|
From time to time, we enter into transactions in the normal
course of business with related parties. The audit committee of
our board of directors has been charged with the responsibility
of approving or ratifying all related party transactions other
than those between us and Philips. In any situation where the
audit committee sees fit to do so, any related party
transaction, other than those between us and Philips, may be
presented to disinterested members of our board of directors for
approval or ratification.
We are a party to various agreements with Philips, our former
majority shareholder. All material transactions between Philips
and us have been reviewed and approved by the supervisory
committee of our board of directors. The supervisory committee
is comprised of directors independent from Philips. Listed below
is a summary of our material agreements with Philips.
On August 6, 2008, the supervisory committee of our board
of directors was eliminated by our board of directors after the
consummation of the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase. We are not a
party to any material agreements with CBaySystems Holdings.
Licensing
agreement
We are a party to a Licensing Agreement with Philips Speech
Processing GmbH, an affiliate of Philips which is now known as
Philips Speech Recognition Systems GmbH (PSRS), on May 22,
2000 (Licensing Agreement). The Licensing Agreement was
subsequently amended by the parties as of January 1, 2002,
February 23, 2003, August 10, 2003, September 1,
2004, December 30, 2005 and February 13, 2007.
Under the Licensing Agreement, we license from PSRS its
SpeechMagic speech recognition and processing software,
including any updated versions of the software developed by PSRS
during the term of the License Agreement (Licensed Product), for
use by us anywhere in the world. We pay a fee for use of this
license based upon a per line fee for each transcribed line of
text processed through the Licensed Product.
Upon the expiration of its initial term on June 28, 2005,
the Licensing Agreement was renewed for an additional five year
term. As part of the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase, Philips
waived its ability to terminate the Licensing Agreement until
the expiration of the current renewal term, conditioned upon a
similar waiver from us.
In connection with the Licensing Agreement, we have a consulting
arrangement with PSRS whereby PSRS assists us with the
integration of its speech and transcription technologies.
F-161
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
OEM supply
agreement
On September 21, 2007, we entered into an Amended and
Restated OEM Supply Agreement (Amended OEM Agreement) with PSRS.
The Amended OEM Agreement amends and restates a previous OEM
Supply Agreement with PSRS dated September 23, 2004. In
connection with the Amended OEM Agreement certain amounts paid
to PSRS were capitalized in fixed assets and are being amortized
over a three-year period.
Pursuant to the Amended OEM Agreement, we purchased a
co-ownership interest in all rights and interests in and to
SpeechQ for Radiology together with its components, including
object and source code for the SpeechQ for Radiology application
and the SpeechQ for Radiology integration SDK (collectively, the
Product), but excluding the SpeechMagic speech recognition and
processing software, which we separately license from PSRS for a
fee under the Licensing Agreement. Additionally, the Amended OEM
Agreement provides that we shall receive, in exchange for a fee,
the exclusive right in the United States, Canada and certain
islands of the Caribbean (collectively the Exclusive Territory)
to sell, service and deliver the Product. In addition, PSRS has
agreed that for the term of the Amended OEM Agreement it will
not release a front-end multi-user reporting solution (including
one similar to the Product) in the medical market in the
Exclusive Territory nor will it directly authorize or assist any
of its affiliates to do so either; provided that the restriction
does not prevent PSRSs affiliates from integrating
SpeechMagic within their general medical application products.
The Amended OEM Agreement further provides that we shall make
payments to PSRS for PSRSs development of an interim
version of the software included in the Product (Interim
Version). Except for the Interim Version which we and PSRS will
co-own, the Amended OEM Agreement provides that any
improvements, developments or other enhancements either we or
PSRS makes to the Product (collectively, Improvements) shall be
owned exclusively by the party that developed such Improvement.
Each party has the right to seek patent or other protection of
the Improvements it owns independent of the other party.
The term of the Amended OEM Agreement extends through
June 30, 2010 and will automatically renew for an
additional three year term provided that we are in material
compliance with the Amended OEM Agreement as of such date. If
PSRS decides to discontinue all business relating to the Product
in the Exclusive Territory on or after June 30, 2010, PSRS
can effect such discontinuation by terminating the Amended OEM
Agreement by providing us with six months prior written
notice of such discontinuation, provided the earliest such
notice can be delivered is June 30, 2010. Either party may
terminate the Amended OEM Agreement for cause immediately in the
event that a material breach by the other party remains uncured
for more than 30 days following delivery of written notice
or in the event that the other party becomes insolvent or files
for bankruptcy.
Equipment
purchases
We purchase certain dictation related equipment from Philips.
Insurance
coverage
Prior to the closing of the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase on
August 6, 2008, we obtained all of our business insurance
coverage (other than workers compensation) through
Philips. As of August 7, 2008, we have insurance policies
through CBaySystems Holdings.
Purchasing
agreements
For each of the three years ended December 31, 2007 we
entered into annual letter agreements with Philips Electronics
North America Corporation (PENAC), an affiliate of Philips, to
purchase products and services from certain suppliers under the
terms of the prevailing agreements between such suppliers and
PENAC. As of January 1, 2008, we are no longer a party to
an agreement with PENAC to purchase the aforementioned products
and services.
F-162
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
CBaySystems
holdings purchase
Philips will reimburse us for certain incremental and direct
costs incurred by us in connection with the CBaySystems Holdings
Purchase. These costs totaled $0 for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and $119 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
From time to time prior to the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase, we
entered into other miscellaneous transactions with Philips
including Philips purchasing certain products and implementation
services from us. We recorded net revenues from sales to Philips
of $0 and $39 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
2008, respectively.
Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 reflect other assets related to Philips of
$1,003 and $955, respectively, and accrued expenses due to
Philips of $1,534 and $2,413, respectively.
Listed below is a summary of the expenses incurred by us in
connection with the various Philips agreements noted above for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.
Charges related to these agreements are included in cost of
revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Licensing agreement
|
|
$
|
1,102
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
OEM supply agreement
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Equipment purchases
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Insurance coverage
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Purchasing agreement
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBay Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,325
|
|
|
$
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 29, 2004, we entered into an agreement with
Nightingale under which Nightingale agreed to provide interim
chief executive officer services to us. On July 30, 2004,
our board of directors appointed Howard S. Hoffmann to serve as
our non-employee chief executive officer. Mr. Hoffmann
served as the Managing Partner of Nightingale. With the
departure of our former president in May 2007, our board of
directors appointed Mr. Hoffmann to the additional position
of president in June 2007. Mr. Hoffmann served as our
president and chief executive officer pursuant to the terms of
the agreement between us and Nightingale which was amended on
March 14, 2008 (Amendment). The Amendment, among other
things, extended the term of Mr. Hoffmanns role as
our president and chief executive officer through August 1,
2008. Our agreement with Nightingale also permitted us to engage
additional personnel employed by Nightingale to provide
consulting services to us from time to time.
Mr. Hoffmans service as president and chief executive
officer and the related engagement of Nightingale terminated
consensually on June 10, 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, we
incurred charges of $1,487 and $1,073, respectively for
Nightingale services. From February 1, 2007 through
June 10, 2008, the Nightingale charges were recorded in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations due to Nightingales
focus on operational matters instead of the Review and
Managements Billing Assessment. Prior to February 1,
2007, charges related to Nightingale were recorded in cost of
investigation and legal proceedings, net (see Note 8). As
of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, accrued
expenses included $400 and $40, respectively, for amounts due to
Nightingale for services performed.
F-163
MedQuist Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Investment in
A-Life Medical, Inc. (A-Life)
|
As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, we had an
investment of $6,016 and $6,056, respectively, in
A-Life, a
privately held entity which provides advanced natural language
processing technology for the medical industry. Our investment
is recorded under the equity method of accounting since we owned
33.6% of A-Lifes outstanding voting shares as of
December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008. Our investment in
A-Life is recorded in other assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
Our investment in A-Life included a note receivable plus accrued
interest due from A-Life which matured on December 31,
2003. Prior to 2007, this note receivable and accrued interest
had been recorded in other assets. In January 2008, A-Life paid
us $1,250 to satisfy this note receivable and accrued interest
in full, as well as all other disputes and claims between A-Life
and us. Accordingly, we reclassified the note receivable and
accrued interest balances to other current assets in the
accompanying December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet.
In January 2008, we recorded $438 of other income related to
this transaction.
On July 14, 2008, we announced that our board of directors
had declared a dividend of $2.75 per share of our common stock.
The dividend, aggregating $103,300, was paid on August 4,
2008 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
July 25, 2008.
On July 17, 2008, we announced that our common stock began
trading on the Global Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
under the ticker symbol MEDQ. The Company had been
trading on the pink sheets since 2004.
On August 6, 2008, the CBaySystems Holdings Purchase was
consummated.
F-164
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Spheris Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Spheris Inc. (the Company) as of December 31,
2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Spheris Inc. at December 31, 2008 and
2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared assuming that Spheris Inc. would continue as a going
concern. As more fully described in Notes 2 and 22 to the
consolidated financial statements, on February 3, 2010, the
100% owner of Spheris Inc., Spheris Holding II, Inc.,
voluntarily filed petitions on behalf of itself and each of its
direct and indirect subsidiaries (except for Spheris India
Private Limited) for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. This filing, along with debt covenant
violations as of the balance sheet date, caused the Company to
be in default with covenants under its loan agreements and
senior subordinated notes. These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. Managements plans in regard to these matters,
including the sale of substantially all of its assets, also are
described in Notes 2 and 22. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of
assets and the amounts, classification and satisfaction of
liabilities that resulted from the uncertainty regarding the
Companys ability to continue as a going concern and its
subsequent sale of assets.
Nashville, Tennessee
June 29, 2010
F-165
Spheris Inc.
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,332 and $632,
respectively
|
|
|
28,510
|
|
|
|
20,787
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
36,883
|
|
|
|
51,013
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,309
|
|
|
|
9,782
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
218,841
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
275,078
|
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
8,545
|
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
198,440
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
|
|
218,543
|
|
Long-term debt and lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
195,499
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
218,957
|
|
|
|
221,993
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized,
10 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effects of $0 and $1,500,
respectively
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
111,680
|
|
|
|
111,874
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(54,215
|
)
|
|
|
(242,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
56,121
|
|
|
|
(132,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders(deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
275,078
|
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-166
Spheris Inc.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
200,392
|
|
|
$
|
182,843
|
|
|
$
|
156,596
|
|
Direct cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization below)
|
|
|
144,255
|
|
|
|
131,039
|
|
|
|
109,059
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
4,782
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
19,730
|
|
|
|
20,845
|
|
|
|
16,592
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,273
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,872
|
|
Transaction charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
Costs of legal proceedings and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
193,040
|
|
|
|
177,196
|
|
|
|
343,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
|
|
(186,640
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
21,171
|
|
|
|
19,104
|
|
|
|
17,439
|
|
Loss on debt refinancing
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency (gain) loss
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(17,217
|
)
|
|
|
(15,309
|
)
|
|
|
(201,954
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-167
Spheris Inc.
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Contributed
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
equity (deficit)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,787
|
|
|
$
|
(474
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,675
|
)
|
|
$
|
86,638
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
|
(11,361
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
|
(10,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,158
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
(35,036
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
|
(19,179
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
|
(21,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,680
|
|
|
$
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,383
|
)
|
|
|
(187,383
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation, net of tax effects of $974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
Effects of change in tax position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(187,909
|
)
|
|
|
(188,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,874
|
|
|
$
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
(242,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(132,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-168
Spheris Inc.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187,383
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,273
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
Amortization of acquired technology
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,872
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(6,435
|
)
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
(15,287
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
Loss on sale or disposal of assets
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Loss on debt refinancing
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(4,674
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
(1,572
|
)
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
(10,069
|
)
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
10,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
|
|
(5,423
|
)
|
|
|
(3,766
|
)
|
Purchase and development of internal-use software
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
Purchase of Vianeta, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(8,447
|
)
|
|
|
(6,296
|
)
|
|
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
71,320
|
|
|
|
7,288
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Payments on the 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
Payments on the 2004 Senior Facility
|
|
|
(73,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(5,329
|
)
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
(3,933
|
)
|
|
|
5,555
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
7,195
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$
|
7,195
|
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
20,432
|
|
|
$
|
18,425
|
|
|
$
|
9,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment and internal-use software
through lease obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-169
Spheris Inc.
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business and summary of significant accounting
policies
|
Organization
and operations
Spheris Inc. (Spheris) is a Delaware corporation.
Subsequent to its acquisition by certain institutional investors
in November 2004 (the November 2004
Recapitalization), Spheris became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Spheris Holding II, Inc. (Spheris Holding
II), and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Spheris
Holding III, Inc. (Spheris Holding III), an entity
owned by affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC and TowerBrook Capital
Partners LLC, CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.
(CHS), and indirectly by certain members of
Spheris current and past management team.
Spheris and its direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Spheris Operations LLC (Operations), Spheris Leasing
LLC, Spheris Canada Inc., Spheris, India Private Limited
(SIPL) and Vianeta Communications
(Vianeta) (sometimes referred to collectively as the
Company), provide clinical documentation technology
and services to health systems, hospitals and group medical
practices located throughout the United States. The Company
receives medical dictation in digital format from subscribing
physicians, converts the dictation into text format, stores
specific data elements from the records, then transmits the
completed medical record to the originating physician in the
prescribed format. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
employed approximately 4,000 skilled medical language
specialists (MLS) in the United States and India.
Approximately 1,800 of these MLS work out of the Companys
facilities in India, making the Company one of the largest
global providers of clinical documentation technology and
services.
Basis of
presentation
For all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements and footnotes, Spheris is the reporting
unit. All dollar amounts shown in these consolidated financial
statements and tables in the notes are in thousands unless
otherwise noted. The consolidated financial statements include
the financial statements of Spheris, including its direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets
and the amounts, classification and satisfaction of liabilities
that resulted from the uncertainty regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern following its bankruptcy
filing and its subsequent sale of assets. See further discussion
in Note 2 and Note 22.
In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
the Company evaluated events and transactions that occurred
subsequent to December 31, 2009, through the date that the
accompanying consolidated financial statements were available to
be issued on June 29, 2010.
Revenue
recognition
The Companys customer contracts contain multiple elements
of services. The Company records service revenues as the
services are performed and defers one-time fees, which are
recognized as revenue over the life of the applicable contracts.
Software licensing revenues are recognized upon culmination of
the earnings process. Clinical documentation services are
provided at a contractual rate, and revenue is recognized when
the provision of services is complete including the satisfaction
of the following criteria: (1) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the
fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is
reasonably assured. The Company monitors actual performance
against contract standards and provides for credits against
billings as reductions to revenues.
F-170
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with
an original maturity of less than three months. At times, cash
balances in the Companys accounts may exceed Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. Consequently,
our cash equivalents are subject to potential credit risk. The
unrestricted cash amounts of SIPL, the Companys Indian
subsidiary, are included as a component of unrestricted cash.
Transfers of funds between the Companys domestic
operations and SIPL may be subject to certain foreign tax
effects.
Restricted
cash
The Companys cash balances include certain amounts that
are being held until the resolution of certain tax matters
related to the Vianeta acquisition, as well as amounts currently
available for distribution to former HealthScribe Inc.
(HealthScribe) and Vianeta shareholders. These
amounts are reflected as restricted cash in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Certain cash deposits made that are
being held as security under certain of the Companys lease
obligations are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Accounts
receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk
of a specific customer, historical trends and other information.
Accounts receivables are written off against the allowance for
doubtful accounts when accounts are deemed to be uncollectible
on a specific identification basis. The determination of the
amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to
judgment and estimation by management. Increases or decreases to
the allowance may be made if circumstances or economic
conditions change.
A summary of the activity in the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
$
|
1,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
Provisions and adjustments to expense
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
344
|
|
Write-offs and adjustments, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration
of credit risk
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of our
customers financial performance and generally requires no
collateral from customers. No individual customer accounted for
10% or more of the Companys net revenues during 2007, 2008
or 2009.
F-171
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a
straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally
two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the
estimated useful lives of the assets. Routine maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while betterments
and renewals are capitalized. Equipment under capital lease
obligations is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the
applicable assets.
Software
costs
The costs of obtaining or developing internal-use software are
capitalized. Capitalized software is reported at the lower of
unamortized cost or net realizable value and is amortized over
its estimated useful life, which is generally two to five years.
The Company charges the development costs of software intended
for sale to expense as incurred until technological feasibility
is attained. Technological feasibility is attained upon
completion of a detailed program design or, in its absence,
completion of a working model. The time between the attainment
of technological feasibility and completion of software
development by the Company historically has been short. The
Company capitalizes software acquired through business
combinations and technology purchases if the related software
under development has reached technological feasibility or if
there are alternative future uses for the software.
Goodwill,
intangibles and other long-lived assets
Goodwill represents the excess of costs over the fair value of
assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and
intangible assets acquired in a business combination with
indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are subject to
impairment tests at least annually.
The Company performs an analysis of potential impairment of its
goodwill assets annually, or whenever circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may be impaired. Goodwill impairment
testing requires a two step process. The first step is to
identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair
value of each reporting unit with its carrying value, including
goodwill. Regarding the Companys specific analysis, this
assessment is made at the consolidated Company level as it only
has one reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit
exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not considered to have a
potential impairment, and the second step is not necessary.
However, if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
the carrying value, the second step is performed to determine if
goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment
loss, if any.
Additionally, when events, circumstances or operating results
indicate that the carrying values of certain long-lived assets
and related identifiable intangible assets (excluding goodwill)
that are expected to be held and used might be impaired, the
Company prepares projections of the undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their
eventual disposition. If the projections indicate that the
recorded amounts are not expected to be recoverable, such
amounts are reduced to estimated fair value. Fair value may be
estimated based upon internal evaluations that include
quantitative analysis of revenues and cash flows, reviews of
recent sales of similar assets and independent appraisals. As
further discussed in Note 3, the Company performed an
analysis during 2009 as circumstances arose that indicated that
the carrying value of its goodwill might be significantly
impaired.
F-172
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Income
Taxes
The Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on differences between the financial reporting
and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using
the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income during the period that includes the enactment date. The
Company periodically assesses the likelihood that net deferred
tax assets will be recovered in future periods. To the extent
the Company believes that deferred tax assets may not be fully
realizable, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce such
assets to the carrying amounts that are more likely than not to
be realized. The Company accounts for income taxes associated
with SIPL in accordance with Indian tax guidelines and is
eligible for certain tax holiday programs pursuant to Indian law.
The Company exercises judgments regarding the recognition and
measurement of uncertain tax positions. The Company recognizes
interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax
benefits in income tax expense.
Advertising
costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
expenses of $1.7 million, $0.8 million, and
$0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively, were included as marketing and
selling expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. Advertising costs primarily consist of brand
advertising, recruiting for MLS and trade show participation.
Stock-based
compensation
Spheris Holding III has issued, at various times,
restricted stock and stock option grants to the Companys
employees and the Companys non-employee directors. These
restricted stock and stock option grants have been recorded as
compensation under general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations, due to
benefits received by the Company. These restricted stock and
stock option grants were valued at fair market value on the date
of grant using third-party valuations and typically vest over a
three or four-year period from the grant date. Accordingly,
compensation expense is currently being recognized ratably over
the applicable vesting periods.
The Company recognizes compensation expense, using a fair-value
based method, for costs related to share-based payments,
including stock options. The fair value of all share-based
payments received by the Companys employees, non-employee
directors and other designated persons providing substantial
services to the Company is based on the fair value assigned to
equity instruments issued by the Companys indirect parent,
Spheris Holding III.
In connection with an agreement for health information
processing services between Operations and Community Health
Systems Professional Services Corporation, an affiliate of CHS,
Spheris Holding III issued warrants to CHS to purchase
shares of common stock of Spheris Holding III upon the
attainment of certain revenue milestones set forth in the
warrants. Since the warrants were issued by Spheris
Holding III in order to induce sales by the Company, the
costs of the warrants subject to vesting are recognized over the
period in which the revenue is earned and are reflected as a
reduction of net revenues in the accompany consolidated
statements of operations.
Self-insurance
The Company is significantly self-insured for employee health
and workers compensation insurance claims. As such, the
Companys insurance expense is largely dependent on claims
experience and the Companys ability to control its claims.
The Company has consistently accrued the estimated liability for
these insurance claims based on its claims experience and the
time lag between the incident date and the date the cost is paid
by the Company, and based on third-party valuations of the
outstanding liabilities. These estimates could change in the
future. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company had
$2.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively, in
accrued liabilities for employee health and workers
compensation risks.
F-173
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In August 2009, the Company converted its self-insured
workers compensation policy to a premium based policy.
Comprehensive
income (loss) and foreign currency translation
The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional and
reporting currency. SIPL uses the Indian rupee as its functional
currency. The assets and liabilities of SIPL were translated
using the current exchange rate at the corresponding balance
sheet date. Operating statement amounts for SIPL were translated
at the average exchange rate in effect during the applicable
periods. The resulting translation gains and losses are
reflected as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in
the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders
equity. Exchange rate adjustments resulting from foreign
currency transactions are included in the determination of net
income or loss. The income tax effects of the foreign currency
translation amounts reflect a change in the tax position as a
result of the sale of SIPL stock in April 2010 as discussed in
Note 17 and Note 22.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) requires management of the Company to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets and
liabilities and contingency disclosures at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation in the financial statements and
notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. These
reclassifications primarily reflect transaction charges, costs
of proceedings and settlements and operational restructuring
charges. These expenses had previously been included in direct
costs of revenues, marketing and selling expenses and general
and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. These items are further discussed in
Notes 4, 5 and 21. These reclassifications had no effect on
the Companys previously reported results of operations or
financial position.
Recently
adopted accounting pronouncements
For the interim period ended September 30, 2009, the
Company adopted the FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(ASC), which the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) recognizes as the source of
authoritative accounting principles to be applied by
nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive
releases of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative
guidance issued by the FASB on fair value measurement for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or
permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted authoritative guidance
issued by the FASB on business combinations, which retains the
current purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but
requires a number of changes, including changes in the way
assets and liabilities are recognized in purchase accounting.
The guidance also requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs. The impact of this new
guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying
consolidated financial statements as we have not completed any
acquisitions subsequent to its adoption.
F-174
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted authoritative guidance
issued by the FASB that establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. As all of the
Companys subsidiaries are wholly-owned, adoption of the
new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative
guidance issued by the FASB relative to derivative instruments
and hedging activities, which requires entities that utilize
derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about
their objectives and strategies for using such instruments, as
well as any details of
credit-risk-related
contingent features contained within the derivative instruments.
The new guidance requires disclosure of the amounts and location
of derivative instruments included in an entitys financial
statements, as well as the accounting treatment of such
instruments and the impact that hedges have on an entitys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. See
Note 6 for the Companys disclosures about its
derivative financial instruments.
Beginning with the interim period ended June 30, 2009, the
Company adopted the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB
that establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. The new guidance requires entities to disclose the
date through which it has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for determining that date. See the Companys
disclosure relative to this new guidance above in this
Note 1.
In August 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance on
the measurement and disclosure of the fair value of liabilities
that clarifies the valuation methodologies that may be used when
a quoted market price in an active market for an identical
liability is not available. This guidance was effective for the
Company beginning October 1, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued
ASC 985-605,
Revenue Recognition Software, on revenue recognition
that will become effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. Under the
new guidance on arrangements that include software elements,
tangible products that have software components that are
essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no
longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition
guidance, and software-enabled products will now be subject to
other relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the
FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software
revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when
vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for
deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best
estimate of the selling price is required to separate
deliverables and allocate consideration received using the
relative selling price method. The new guidance includes new
disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative
selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue
recognition. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact
that this new guidance will have on its financial statements.
On September 23, 2009, the FASB ratified
ASC 605-25,
Revenue Recognition with Multiple Element
Arrangements (ASC
605-25).
ASC 605-25
requires the allocation of consideration among separately
identified deliverables contained within an arrangement, based
on their related selling prices. The Company utilizes current
accounting guidance, also titled Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables, in the recognition of revenue
associated with the Companys customer contracts that
contain multiple elements of services.
ASC 605-25
will become effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2011. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact that
this new guidance will have on its financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, an
amendment to earlier authoritative guidance concerning fair
value measurements and disclosures. This amendment requires an
entity to: (i) disclose separately the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 (as described in Note 6) fair value
measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and
(ii) present separate information for Level 3 (as
described in Note 6) activity pertaining to gross
purchases, sales, issuances, and
F-175
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
settlements. This guidance will become effective for the Company
beginning January 1, 2010. The Company has not yet fully
evaluated the impact that this new guidance will have on its
financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2009 were prepared under the assumption
that the Company would continue to operate as a going concern as
of December 31, 2009, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary
course of business. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
faced various uncertainties that raised substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.
On February 3, 2010, the Company, along with the other
Debtors (as defined in Note 22), filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United
States Code. On February 2, 2010, the Debtors entered into
an agreement, as amended April 15, 2010, under which the
Debtors agreed to sell substantially all of their assets to
MedQuist Inc. (MedQuist) and the stock of SIPL to
CBay Inc. (CBay and together with MedQuist, the
Purchasers), portfolio companies of CBaySystems
Holdings Ltd. and providers of medical transcription software
and services. In addition, the Purchasers agreed to assume
certain liabilities in connection with such sale. As further
discussed in Note 22, the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court)
approved the sale on April 15, 2010, and the sale was
consummated on April 22, 2010.
|
|
3.
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
The Company performed an interim analysis of its goodwill as
circumstances arose that indicated that the carrying value of
its goodwill may be impaired. The potential impairment was
primarily due to deteriorating economic conditions and lower
projected future cash flows as of September 30, 2009.
Regarding the Companys specific analysis, this assessment
was made at the consolidated Company level as the Company only
has one reporting unit. The Company compared the fair value of
its reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill,
and identified a potential impairment. The Company assigned the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its respective
assets and liabilities, including goodwill, to determine if an
impairment charge was required. Fair value of the reporting unit
was estimated based upon internal evaluations and through the
use of independent third-party valuation professionals. The
impairment test resulted in an impairment charge of
$198.9 million. The remaining balance of goodwill of
approximately $20 million is reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
The Company bases its estimates of fair value on various
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates,
which may require an additional impairment charge that could
have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial
position and results of operations.
During 2009, the Company evaluated multiple strategic
opportunities including a technology license agreement, a sale
of the Company or its assets, or a restructuring of its capital
structure. The Company, along with the other Debtors, ultimately
chose to pursue a sale of their assets pursuant to voluntary
filings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code as further described in Note 22. In connection with
evaluating and pursuing its options, the Company retained
financial and other advisors, including restructuring
professionals. These fees included (a) costs paid to
professionals and others in connection with evaluating,
preparing for, and pursuing filing for Chapter 11 relief,
(b) costs paid to professionals and others related to
evaluating, preparing for, and pursuing sales and licensing
options, (c) costs paid to creditors and creditor committee
advisors, including costs incurred to obtain interim financing
facilities, and (d) costs to retain key employees. Some of
the professionals engaged to assist the Company in these efforts
were utilized to perform multiple functions.
F-176
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The total of all of the related costs to the Company for
services performed through December 31, 2009, prior to the
Companys and the other Debtors filing for bankruptcy
in February 2010, were $7.0 million, and are reflected as
transaction charges in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations. There were $1.6 million of retainers
representing prepayments for services reflected as a component
of prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
Additionally, there were $0.3 million of prepaid retention
bonus amounts related to employee obligations reflected as a
component of prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2009.
|
|
5.
|
Costs of legal
proceedings and settlements
|
On November 6, 2007, the Company was sued for patent
infringement by Anthurium Solutions, Inc. in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging that
the Company had infringed and continues to infringe United
States Patent No. 7,031,998 through the Companys use
of its Clarity technology platform. The complaint also alleged
claims against MedQuist and Arrendale Associates, Inc., and
sought injunctive relief and damages. The Company entered into a
Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement with Anthurium on
August 19, 2009, the terms of which are confidential.
Defense costs, in addition to the confidential settlement paid
during 2009, were $0.4 million and $1.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
and were reflected as costs of legal proceedings and settlements
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
6.
|
Fair value of
financial instruments
|
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company holds certain derivative financial instruments that
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
These derivative financial instruments are utilized by the
Company to mitigate risks related to interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. The derivatives are measured at fair
value in accordance with the established fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into
the following three levels:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Level 1 observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets.
|
|
n
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
|
|
n
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which little or
no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop
its own assumptions.
|
The Company entered into certain interest rate management
agreements with a single counterparty to reduce its exposure to
fluctuations in market interest rates under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility (as defined in Note 13). An event of
default under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility would create an
event of default under these interest rate management
agreements, which may cause amounts due under these agreements
to become due and payable. The Companys accounting for
these derivative financial instruments did not meet hedge
accounting criteria. Accordingly, changes in fair value were
included as a component of other (income) expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of these interest rate management agreements was
determined using valuation techniques including discounted cash
flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis considered the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity, and used
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves
and implied volatilities. The interest rates used in the
calculation of projected cash flows were based on an expectation
of future interest rates derived from observable market interest
rate curves and volatilities. Additionally, the Company
incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately
reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
F-177
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its interest derivatives fell within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its interest derivatives utilized Level 3
inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate
the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The Company
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of its interest
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the interest derivatives in their entirety were
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This
contract expires during 2010. As a result, the full amount of
the liability at December 31, 2009 of $1.7 million is
reflected as a component of other current liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Payments to SIPL are denominated in United States dollars. In
order to hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates, SIPL
historically maintained a portfolio of forward currency exchange
contracts, which were transacted with a single counterparty. The
Companys accounting for these derivative financial
instruments, all of which expired during 2009, did not meet the
hedge accounting criteria. Accordingly, changes in fair value
were included as a component of other (income) expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Company determined the fair value of its foreign currency
exchange contracts utilizing inputs for similar or identical
assets or liabilities that were either readily available in
public markets, derived from information available in publicly
quoted markets or quoted by counterparties to these contracts.
The future value of each contract out to its maturity was
calculated using observable market data, such as the foreign
currency exchange rate forward curve. The present value of each
contract was then determined by using discount factors based on
the forward curve for the more liquid currency. Additionally,
the Company incorporated credit valuation adjustments to
appropriately reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its foreign currency exchange contracts fell
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilized
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The
Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit
valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of the
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the foreign currency exchange contracts in their
entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The Companys derivative financial instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and recorded in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification in the accompanying
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
consolidated balance sheets
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,466
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,016
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-178
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The (gains) losses from changes in fair value of the
Companys derivative financial instruments, as recorded in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Location of (gain) loss recognized
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
|
|
$
|
(779
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
(1,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,593
|
|
|
$
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
subordinated notes
The Companys Senior Subordinated Notes had a quoted market
value of $37.5 million and $63.8 million at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company determined that its valuation of its Senior
Subordinated Notes was classified in Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy as the fair value was determined through quoted
prices in active markets. The carrying value of the Senior
Subordinated Notes was $123.2 million at December 31,
2008, as included in current portion of long-term debt and lease
obligations, and was $123.6 million at December 31,
2009, as included in long-term debt and lease obligations, in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
7.
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
$
|
1,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,788
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Due from affiliate
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Prepaid professional fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
Prepaid payroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Other
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
4,430
|
|
|
$
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due from affiliate relate to expenses paid on behalf of
Spheris Holding III. Due to circumstances described in
Note 22, management has provided a reserve for the full
amount at December 31, 2009. Accordingly, a bad debt
expense was recorded for $0.8 million relating to the
write-off of this amount in the direct costs of revenues on the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Prepaid payroll for the year ended December 31, 2009 was a
result of the Companys decision to prefund payroll at
December 31, 2009.
The classification of debt issuance costs at December 31,
2009 was a result of the classification of the related debt
reflected in total current liabilities as discussed in
Note 13.
F-179
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
Property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2009
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
$
|
2,550
|
|
|
$
|
2,120
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
5,442
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
25,427
|
|
|
|
27,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,851
|
|
|
|
34,921
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(21,542
|
)
|
|
|
(25,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
12,309
|
|
|
$
|
9,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts above include assets acquired under financed lease
obligations of $0.5 million as of both December 31,
2008 and 2009. Depreciation expense, including amortization on
equipment under capital lease obligations, of $5.4 million,
$6.3 million, and $6.2 million was recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Capitalized interest on leasehold improvements of approximately
$0.01 million and $0.02 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, was recorded as a
reduction to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
9.
|
Internal-use
software, net of amortization
|
The Company capitalizes its costs to purchase and develop
internal-use software, which is utilized primarily to provide
clinical documentation technology and services to its customers.
Net purchased and developed software costs at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Software under development
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
Software placed in service
|
|
|
16,363
|
|
|
|
17,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,296
|
|
|
|
17,707
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(15,710
|
)
|
|
|
(16,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
$
|
1,586
|
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization on projects begins when the software is ready for
its intended use and is recognized over the expected useful
life, which is generally two to five years. Amortization expense
related to internal-use software costs was $2.9 million,
$1.4 million and $1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and was
included in depreciation and amortization in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Capitalized interest on internal-use software development
projects of approximately $23,000, $29,000 and $28,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
was recorded as a reduction to interest expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
F-180
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In connection with the November 2004 Recapitalization, the
Company assigned a value of $50.7 million as the fair value
of Spheris customer contracts existing as of the date of the
transaction. These contracts were amortized over an expected
life of four years and were fully amortized as of
December 31, 2008. In connection with the HealthScribe
acquisition in December 2004, the Company assigned a value of
$13.1 million to the acquired contracts. These contracts
were amortized over an estimated life of four years and were
fully amortized as of December 31, 2008. Additionally, the
Company assigned a value of $0.1 million for customer
contracts acquired in connection with the Vianeta acquisition
consummated on March 31, 2006. These contracts were
amortized over an expected life of three years and were fully
amortized as of December 31, 2009. Amortization expense for
customer contracts for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 was $16.0 million, $14.0 million, and
$9,000, respectively.
|
|
11.
|
Other noncurrent
assets
|
Other noncurrent assets of the Company at December 31, 2008
and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Lease deposits
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
Insurance security deposits
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
Other
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
5,459
|
|
|
$
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs are amortized to interest expense over the
life of the applicable credit facilities using the effective
interest method. These amounts were reflected in prepaid expense
and other current assets as discussed in Note 7 and
Note 13. Insurance security deposits include amounts
deposited to secure certain self-insurance obligations.
|
|
12.
|
Other current
liabilities
|
Other current liabilities of the Company at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accrued acquisition liabilities
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
7,448
|
|
Accrued fees for professional services
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Accrued group purchasing organization fees
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Reserve for sales credits and adjustments
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
Other
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-181
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The increase in accrued interest for the year-ended
December 31, 2009 was caused by the Companys decision
to not make its scheduled interest payment on its Senior
Subordinated Notes, as further described in Note 13.
Outstanding debt obligations of the Company at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007 Senior Credit Facility, net of discount, with principal due
at maturity on July 17, 2012; interest payable periodically
at variable rates. The weighted average interest rate was 5.75%
at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
72,290
|
|
|
$
|
74,552
|
|
11.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, net of discount, with
principal due at maturity in December 2012; interest payable
semi-annually in June and December
|
|
|
123,208
|
|
|
|
123,578
|
|
Financed lease obligations
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,182
|
|
|
|
198,520
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt and financed lease
obligations
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(198,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and financed lease obligations, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
195,499
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2007, the Company entered into a financing agreement
(the 2007 Senior Credit Facility), which consisted
of a term loan in the amount of $69.5 million and a
revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not
to exceed $25.0 million at any time outstanding. The
revolving loans and the term loan bore interest at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin or a reference banks base rate plus an
applicable margin, at the Companys option. Under the
revolving credit facility, the Company was permitted to borrow
up to the lesser of $25.0 million or a loan limiter amount,
as defined in the 2007 Senior Credit Facility, less amounts
outstanding under letters of credit. As of December 31,
2009, the Company had $5.7 million outstanding under the
revolver portion of the 2007 Senior Credit Facility.
Based on 2009 results of operations, the Company would not have
complied with the covenant requirements under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility. The Company elected not to report its financial
results pursuant to year-end covenant requirements under this
facility, and the Company, along with the other Debtors, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code in February 2010. As a
result, all amounts due under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility
are reflected as current obligations in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. All amounts due under this facility
were paid in full on April 22, 2010 in connection with the
Debtors sale of substantially all of their assets to
MedQuist and the stock of SIPL to CBay, as further described in
Note 22.
Under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility, Operations was the
borrower. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility was secured by
substantially all of Operations assets and is guaranteed
by Spheris, Spheris Holding II and all of Operations
subsidiaries, except SIPL. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility
contained certain covenants which, among other things, limited
the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments,
dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales,
acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances
and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The
2007 Senior Credit Facility also contained customary events of
default, including breach of financial covenants, the occurrence
of which could allow the collateral agent to declare any
outstanding amounts to be due and payable. The financial
covenants contained in the 2007 Senior Credit Facility included
(a) a maximum leverage test, (b) a minimum fixed
charge coverage test and (c) a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Consolidated EBITDA, as defined under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility) requirement, among others.
F-182
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In connection with the borrowings under the 2007 Senior Credit
Facility, the Company incurred $0.6 million and
$1.1 million in debt issuance costs and debt discounts,
respectively. These costs are being amortized as additional
interest expense over the term of the debt. The balance of the
issuance costs at December 31, 2009 of $0.3 million,
net of accumulated amortization, was reflected in prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. The debt discount at
December 31, 2009 of $0.7 million was reflected as a
reduction in the carrying amount of the debt under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility.
Senior
subordinated notes
In December 2004, the Company issued its Senior Subordinated
Notes, which mature on December 15, 2012 (the Senior
Subordinated Notes). The Senior Subordinated Notes bear
interest at a fixed rate of 11.0% per annum. Interest is payable
in semi-annual installments through maturity on
December 15, 2012. The Company did not file a
Form 10-Q
with the SEC for the third quarter of 2009 which violated
certain covenants in the Indenture. In addition, the Company
elected not to make its scheduled interest payment on
December 15, 2009. As a result, the Company received a
notice from the Indenture Trustee on December 16, 2009 that
an Event of Default had occurred, as defined in the Indenture.
As further described in Note 22, the Company, along with
the other Debtors, elected to file for bankruptcy protection
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on
February 3, 2010. Resolution of final payments due under
the Senior Subordinated Notes is subject to the Companys
ongoing bankruptcy case.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are junior to the obligations of
the 2007 Senior Credit Facility. The Senior Subordinated Notes
are guaranteed by the Companys domestic operating
subsidiaries. The Senior Subordinated Notes contain certain
restrictive covenants that place limitations on the Company
regarding incurrence of additional debt, payment of dividends
and other items as specified in the indenture governing the
Senior Subordinated Notes. An acceleration of outstanding
indebtedness under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility creates an
event of default under the Senior Subordinated Notes, which
would allow the trustee or requisite holders of Senior
Subordinated Notes to declare the Senior Subordinated Notes to
be due and payable. As a result of the default under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility, the Company has reflected all amounts
due under the Senior Subordinated Notes as a current obligation
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009.
The Company incurred $1.9 million and $2.9 million in
debt issuance costs and debt discounts, respectively, in
connection with the Senior Subordinated Notes. These costs are
being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of
the Senior Subordinated Notes. The remaining balance of the
issuance costs at December 31, 2009 of $0.9 million,
net of accumulated amortization, was reflected in prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. The remaining debt discount at
December 31, 2009 of $1.4 million was reflected as a
reduction in the carrying amount of the Senior Subordinated
Notes.
|
|
14.
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities
|
Other noncurrent liabilities of the Company at December 31,
2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
$
|
2,569
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued workers compensation
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Other
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,710
|
|
|
$
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-183
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The change in the derivative financial instruments reflects the
foreign currency exchange contracts which expired during 2009
and the reflection of the interest rate management agreements in
other current liabilities as described in Note 6 and
reflected in Note 12.
|
|
15.
|
Contractual
obligations
|
The following summarizes future minimum payments under the
Companys contractual obligations as of December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Financed lease
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
leases
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,576
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
$
|
21,328
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases certain equipment and office space under
noncancellable operating leases. The majority of the operating
leases contain annual escalation clauses. Rental expense for
these operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the term of the lease. Total rent expense for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was
$1.9 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, under these lease obligations. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had $1.3 million on
deposit as security for certain operating leases. The deposits
are included in other noncurrent assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.
The Company also leases certain hardware and software under
capital leases as defined in accordance with the provisions of
ASC 840 Leases. The related assets under
capital lease obligations are included in property and
equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Amortization expense related to assets under leases was
$0.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008
and 2009 and was included in depreciation and amortization in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Future
minimum payments under these capital leases include interest of
approximately $15,000. The present value of net minimum lease
payments is approximately $0.4 million, with
$0.3 million classified as current portion of long-term
debt and lease obligations and $0.1 million classified as
long-term debt and lease obligations, net of current portion in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2009.
Purchase obligations represent contractual commitments with
certain telecommunications vendors and technology providers that
include minimum purchase obligations.
As part of the sale agreement dated April 15, 2010 between
the Debtors and the Purchasers (as described in Note 22),
all of the non-cancellable operating leases, financed lease
obligations and purchase obligations were assigned to the
Purchasers as of April 22, 2010.
Subsequent to the November 2004 Recapitalization, Spheris
Holding III approved the establishment of the Spheris
Holding III, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (as amended to date, the
Plan) for issuance of common stock to employees,
non-employee directors and other designated persons providing
substantial services to the Company. As of December 31,
2009, 15.6 million shares have been authorized for issuance
under the Plan. Shares are subject to restricted stock and stock
option agreements and typically vest over a three or four-year
period. As of
F-184
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 12.1 million shares
of restricted stock and 1.9 million stock options were
issued and outstanding under the Plan. Additionally,
0.1 million shares of Series A convertible preferred
restricted stock have been issued by Spheris Holding III to
one of the Companys former board members for services
rendered. As these shares were issued for services to be
provided to the Company, compensation expense of
$0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million was
reflected in general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Under provisions of the Plan, all unvested shares and options
shall immediately vest and become exercisable upon an event of a
change in control. The sale of the Companys
assets as a result of the APA discussed in Note 22
constituted a change in control under these
provisions. Accordingly, all unvested options and shares were
immediately vested and exercisable on April 22, 2010.
During October 2008, Spheris Holding III issued warrants to
CHS to purchase 14.3 million shares of common stock of
Spheris Holding III upon the attainment of certain revenue
milestones set forth in the warrants. The costs of the warrants
subject to vesting are recognized over the period in which the
revenue is earned and are reflected as a reduction of revenue.
Accordingly, $23,000 of such costs was reflected as a reduction
to net revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 while none
was recognized during 2009.
Income tax benefit on income (loss) consisted of the following
for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
(12,712
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(2,629
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(6,158
|
)
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
(15,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,870
|
|
|
$
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-185
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the
effective rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Federal tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(5,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,206
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70,683
|
)
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
Permanent differences for goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,703
|
|
Permanent differences, other
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
Foreign tax / tax holiday
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
9,192
|
|
|
|
(8,294
|
)
|
Tax credits adjusted due to rate change
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,870
|
|
|
$
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the Companys deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
Net operating losses federal
|
|
|
35,539
|
|
|
|
37,753
|
|
Net operating losses state
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
Amortization expense goodwill and
start-up
costs
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
46,068
|
|
|
|
53,704
|
|
Valuation allowance federal
|
|
|
(40,116
|
)
|
|
|
(32,620
|
)
|
Valuation allowance state
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
|
|
(2,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
18,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense customer list and technology
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,035
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,592
|
)
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
16,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-186
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are
reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2008 and 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred taxes (current assets)
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
11,995
|
|
Deferred taxes (noncurrent assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities (noncurrent liabilities)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
16,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its net
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not
to be realized. The valuation allowance decreased by
$8.3 million during 2009 due to the sale of most of the
Companys assets on April 22, 2010 (see
Note 22) which will allow the realization of certain
of the Companys deferred tax assets, compared with an
increase of $9.2 million during 2008. Future changes in
valuation allowance amounts will be reflected as a component of
provision for (benefit from) income taxes in future periods.
In the United States, the Company benefitted from federal and
state net operating loss carryforwards. The Companys
consolidated federal net operating loss carryforwards available
to reduce future taxable income were $104.5 million and
$107.9 million at December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, which began to expire in 2007. State net operating
loss carryforwards at December 31, 2008 and 2009 were
$67.3 million and $71.5 million, respectively, and
began to expire in 2005. The majority of these federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards are restricted due to
limitations associated with ownership change, and as such, are
reserved to reduce the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. In addition, the Company has alternative minimum tax
credits which do not have an expiration date and certain other
federal tax credits that will begin to expire in 2014.
In connection with the HealthScribe acquisition, the Company
acquired a wholly-owned Indian subsidiary, SIPL. The Company
accounts for income taxes associated with SIPL in accordance
with ASC 740, Income Taxes, following Indian
tax guidelines. At December 31, 2008, the Company was
considered permanently reinvested in SIPL; accordingly, deferred
taxes were not provided on the outside basis differences. Due to
the subsequent event of the sale of SIPL stock in April 2010,
the Company was no longer deemed to be indefinitely reinvested
in SIPL. Accordingly deferred tax was provided on the outside
basis differences for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Prior to 2009, because the Company was considered permanently
reinvested in SIPL, no taxes were provided on accumulated
translation adjustments recorded in other comprehensive income.
Due to the subsequent event of the sale of SIPL stock, the net
income tax effect of the currency translation adjustments
related to SIPL is reflected in other comprehensive income for
the year ended 2009.
Spheris Holding III and related subsidiaries (the
filing group members) file their U.S. federal
and certain state income tax returns on a consolidated, unitary,
combined or similar basis. To accurately reflect each filing
group members share of consolidated tax liabilities on
separate company books and records, on November 5, 2004,
Spheris Holding III and each of its subsidiaries entered
into a tax sharing agreement. Under the terms of the tax sharing
agreement, each subsidiary of Spheris Holding III is
obligated to make payments on behalf of Spheris Holding III
equal to the amount of the federal and state income taxes that
its subsidiaries would have owed if such subsidiaries did not
file federal and state income tax returns on a consolidated,
unitary, combined or similar basis. Likewise, Spheris
Holding III may make payments to subsidiaries if it
benefits from the use of a subsidiary loss or other tax benefit.
The tax sharing agreement allows each subsidiary to bear its
respective tax burden (or enjoy use of a tax benefit, such as a
net operating loss) as if its return was prepared on a
stand-alone basis. To date, no amounts have been paid under this
agreement.
F-187
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Operations pays certain franchise tax obligations on behalf of
Spheris Holding III. Approximately $0.7 million of payments
by Operations related to these taxes were reflected by the
Company as a receivable due from affiliate and subsequently
written off as bad debt expense described in Note 7 in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
The Company analyzed filing positions for all federal, state and
international jurisdictions for all open tax years where it is
required to file income tax returns. Although the Company files
tax returns in every jurisdiction in which it has a legal
obligation to do so, it has identified the following as
major tax jurisdictions: Tennessee and Texas, as
well as India. Within these major jurisdictions, the Company has
tax examinations in progress related to transfer pricing rates
for its Indian facilities, as discussed in Note 19. Based
on the facts of these examinations, the Company believes that it
is more likely than not that it will be successful in supporting
its current positions related to the applicable filings. The
Company believes that all income tax filing positions and
deductions will be sustained upon audit and does not anticipate
any adjustments resulting in a material adverse impact on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flow. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax
positions have been recorded pursuant to
ASC 740-10,
Income Taxes Overall
(ASC 740-10).
In addition, the Company did not record a cumulative effect
adjustment related to the adoption of
ASC 740-10.
|
|
18.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
The Company sponsors an employee savings plan, the Spheris
Operations 401(k) Plan (the Spheris 401(k) Plan),
which permits participants to make contributions by salary
reduction pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code (IRC). Under the provisions of the
Spheris 401(k) Plan, participants may elect to contribute up to
75% of their compensation, up to the amount permitted under the
IRC. The Company also sponsored the Spheris Operations Amended
and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (the Deferred
Compensation Plan). Under the provisions of the Deferred
Compensation Plan, participants may elect to defer up to 50% of
base salary and up to 100% of incentive pay, as defined in the
plan. This plan was terminated on October 22, 2009.
At the Companys option, the Company may elect to match up
to 50% of the employees first 4% of wages deferred, in
aggregate, to the Spheris 401(k) Plan. In the event the Spheris
401(k) Plan participants contributions are limited under
provisions of the IRC and the participant is also deferring
amounts into the Deferred Compensation Plan, then such matching
amounts may be made to the Deferred Compensation Plan. The
Company recognizes the matching expense during the year the
discretionary match is awarded while the actual cash
contribution is made to the plan in the following year. The
Company made a cash contribution of $1.1 million in 2008
related to matches for the 2007 plan year. The Company elected
not to make any matching contributions in 2009 or 2008 related
to the 2008 and 2007 plan years.
The Company offers medical benefits to substantially all
full-time employees through the use of both Company and employee
contributions to third-party insurance providers. The Company is
significantly self-insured for certain losses related to medical
claims. The Companys expense for these benefits totaled
$4.1 million, $4.4 million and $4.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
F-188
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Litigation
In addition to the litigation described in Note 5, the
Company is also subject to various other claims and legal
actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the
opinion of management, any amounts for probable exposures are
adequately reserved for in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, and the ultimate resolution of such
matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
Employment
agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of
senior management that provide for the payment to these persons
of amounts equal to their applicable base salary, unpaid annual
bonus and health insurance premiums over the applicable periods
specified in their individual employment agreements in the event
the employees employment is terminated without cause or
certain other specified reasons. The maximum contingent
liabilities, excluding any earned but unpaid amounts accrued in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements, under these
agreements were $1.6 million and $1.0 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Tax
assessment
SIPL received notification of a tax assessment resulting from a
transfer pricing tax audit by Indian income tax authorities
amounting to 52.2 million Rupees (approximately
$1.1 million), including penalties and interest, for the
fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2004 (the 2004
Assessment). In January 2007, the Company filed a formal
appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax. Prior to
resolution of the Companys appeals process, the Indian
income tax authorities have required the Company to make advance
payments toward the 2004 Assessment amounting to
43.1 million Rupees (approximately $0.9 million). Any
amounts paid by the Company related to the 2004 Assessment are
subject to a claim by the Company for reimbursement against
escrow funds related to the Companys December 2004
acquisition of HealthScribe and its subsidiaries (the
HealthScribe Escrow). Accordingly, the Company has
recorded the advance payments as receivables from the escrow
funds, which are reflected as a component of prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, SIPL received notification of
a tax assessment from a transfer pricing tax audit by Indian
income tax authorities amounting to 40.6 million Rupees
(approximately $0.8 million), including penalties and
interest, for the fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2005
(the 2005 Assessment). In December 2008, the Company
filed a formal appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax.
Prior to resolution of the Companys appeals process, the
Company was required to provide a bank guarantee in January 2009
for the full amount of the 2005 Assessment. The guarantee amount
is included in restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2009. Approximately
$0.6 million of the 2005 Assessment is subject to a claim
for reimbursement against the HealthScribe Escrow.
In May, 2010 the Company was informed that the competent
authorities of India and the United States (the Competent
Authorities) had met regarding the assessments for the two
years above. The Company was informed that the Competent
Authorities had reached an agreement regarding the transfer
pricing that should have been used for transactions between SIPL
and its related U.S. entities for the two years mentioned
above. Based on this agreement, the tax assessment for the
fiscal tax periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31,
2005 would be reduced to approximately 36.6 million Rupees
(approximately $781,000) and 17.2 million Rupees
(approximately $366,000), respectively. An agreement reached by
the Competent Authorities under the U.S./India Income Tax Treaty
is not binding on the parties involved. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of the proposed settlement and has not
recorded a liability under the provision of
ASC 740-10
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ending
December 31, 2009.
F-189
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
If the assessments were brought forward from March 31, 2005
through December 31, 2009, a reasonable estimate of
additional liability could range from zero to $6.2 million,
contingent upon the final outcome of the claim. Payment of such
amounts would also result in potential credit adjustments to the
Companys U.S. federal tax returns. The Company
currently believes that it is more likely than not that it will
be successful in supporting its position relating to these
assessments. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any
accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the tax
assessments as of December 31, 2008 or December 31,
2009.
During the second quarter of 2009, SIPL received an assessment
order from Indian income tax authorities pertaining to an
inquiry regarding prior years usage of net operating
losses originating in 1999. The final assessment could
potentially amount to 5.6 million Rupees (approximately
$0.1 million).
|
|
20.
|
Related party
transactions
|
On October 3, 2008 (amended December 23, 2009),
Operations entered into an agreement for health information
processing services with Community Health Systems Professional
Services Corporation, an affiliate of Community Health Systems,
Inc. (CHS), to provide clinical documentation
technology and services to certain of its affiliated hospitals
(CHS Services Agreement). The Bankruptcy Court
approved the assumption of the CHS Services Agreement, as
amended, on March 17, 2010.
Contemporaneously with entering into the CHS Services Agreement,
CHS became a minority owner in Spheris Holding III, the
Companys indirect parent. The Company provided clinical
documentation technology and services to CHS in the ordinary
course of business at prices and on terms and conditions that
the Company believes are the same as those that would result
from arms length negotiations between unrelated parties.
The Company recognized net revenues from this customer of
$1.4 million and $4.0 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In March 2010, Spheris Holding III transferred
$9.2 million to the Debtors.
|
|
21.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
During October 2008, the Company commenced an operational
restructuring plan to effect changes in both the Companys
management structure and the nature and focus of its operations.
The Company initially recognized $0.5 million of
operational restructuring charges, including one-time
termination benefits and other restructuring related charges,
pursuant to this operational restructuring plan during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a continuation of the plan during
2009, the Company eliminated a significant portion of its
U.S. based administrative and corporate workforce,
recognizing an additional $0.8 million of operational
restructuring charges, including one-time termination benefits
and other operational restructuring related charges.
The following table sets forth the activity for accrued
operational restructuring charges, included in other current
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
775
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-190
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Bankruptcy
proceedings
Chapter 11
bankruptcy filings
On February 3, 2010 (the Petition Date), the
100% owner of Spheris Inc., Spheris Holding, II, Inc.,
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy
Code) in the Bankruptcy Court. Simultaneously, Spheris,
Operations, and its subsidiaries: Spheris Canada Inc., Spheris
Leasing LLC, and Vianeta (collectively, the Debtors)
also filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. SIPL did not
file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
As of the issuance date of these financial statements, the
Debtors are currently operating as
debtors-in-possession
under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance
with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In
general, the Debtors are authorized to continue to operate as
ongoing businesses, but may not engage in transactions outside
the ordinary course of business without the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
Stock and asset
purchase agreement
On February 2, 2010, the Debtors entered into a Stock and
Asset Purchase Agreement, as amended April 15, 2010 (the
APA), with the Purchasers. The APA outlines the
arrangement whereby the Debtors agreed to sell substantially all
of their assets to MedQuist, and the stock of SIPL to CBay. In
addition, the Purchasers agreed to assume certain liabilities in
connection with such sale, all subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
On April 15, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale
of substantially all of Spheris assets to the Purchasers,
and the related assumption of certain liabilities of the Debtors
by the Purchasers. The transaction was effected on
April 22, 2010. Under the terms of the sale, MedQuist
acquired significantly all of the Companys
U.S. assets and assumed certain liabilities and CBay
acquired the stock of SIPL. The purchase price was
$98.8 million in cash and an unsecured subordinated
promissory note issued by MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. in an
aggregate principal amount of $17.5 million. As a result of
the sale of substantially all of the Debtors assets, it is
likely that the Debtors Chapter 11 cases will result
in a liquidation of the Companys businesses and assets,
such that the Company will cease to operate as a going concern.
As a requirement of the APA, each of the Debtors changed their
names. Effective April 28, 2010, Spheris Holding II, Inc.
changed its name to SP Wind Down Holding II, Inc.; Spheris Inc.
became SP Wind Down Inc.; and Vianeta Communications, LLC became
VN Wind Down Communications. Effective April 30, 2010,
Spheris Operations LLC changed its name to SP Wind Down
Operations LLC; Spheris Leasing LLC became SP Wind Down Leasing
LLC; and Spheris Canada Inc. became SP Wind Down Canada Inc.
Debtor-in-possession
(DIP) financing
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed a motion with the
Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of their Senior Secured
Super-Priority
Debtor-In-Possession
Financing Agreement with certain lenders (as amended, the
DIP Credit Agreement). Interim approval of the DIP
Credit Agreement was granted by the Bankruptcy Court on
February 4, 2010. Final approval was granted on
February 23, 2010.
The DIP Credit Agreement provided post-petition loans and
advances consisting of a revolving credit facility up to an
aggregate principal amount of $15 million.
Under the DIP Credit Agreement, on February 3, 2010, the
Debtors borrowed $6.4 million. In accordance with the terms
of the DIP Credit Agreement, the Debtors used proceeds of
$6.4 million, net of lenders fees of approximately
$309,000, to pay past due principal and interest of
approximately $5.7 million on the revolver portion of the
2007 Senior Credit Facility and to pay other expenses of
approximately $381,000.
F-191
Spheris Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The outstanding principal amount of the loans under the DIP
Credit Agreement, plus interest accrued and unpaid, were due and
payable in full at the disposition of the APA, which was
April 22, 2010. All borrowings under the DIP Credit
Agreement were paid in full as of such date.
Reorganization
process
The Bankruptcy Court approved payment of certain of the
Debtors pre-petition obligations, including employee
wages, salaries and benefits, and the payment of vendors and
other providers for goods received and services and other
business-related payments necessary to maintain the operation of
the Debtors business. The Debtors retained legal and
financial professionals to advise them in connection with the
bankruptcy proceedings.
Immediately after filing for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors notified
known current or potential creditors of the bankruptcy filings.
Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, upon
the Petition Date, creditors were automatically enjoined, or
stayed, from continuing any judicial or administrative
proceedings or other actions against the Debtors or their
property to recover, collect or secure a claim arising prior to
the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to
obtain possession of property from the Debtors, or to create,
perfect or enforce any lien against their property, or to
collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise rights or remedies
with respect to pre-petition claims are enjoined unless and
until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay with respect
to such actions.
As contemplated by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States
Trustee for the District of Delaware (the
U.S. Trustee) appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors (the Creditors
Committee). The Creditors Committee and its legal
representatives have a right to be heard on matters that come
before the Bankruptcy Court with respect to the Debtors.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors generally must assume or
reject pre-petition executory contracts, including but not
limited to real property leases, subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Courts and certain other conditions. In this context,
assumption means that the Debtors agree to perform
their obligations and cure all existing defaults under the
contract or lease, and rejection means that they are
relieved from their obligations to perform further under the
contract or lease, but are subject to a pre-petition claim for
damages for the breach thereof subject to certain limitations.
In connection with the Debtors sale of substantially all
of their assets, numerous of the Debtors executory
contracts and unexpired leases were assumed and assigned to the
Purchasers. In addition, the Debtors have rejected certain
executory contracts and unexpired leases. Any damages resulting
from rejection of executory contracts that are permitted to be
recovered under the Bankruptcy Code will be treated as
liabilities subject to compromise unless such claims were
secured prior to the Petition Date.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors received approval from the
Bankruptcy Court to reject certain unexpired leases and
executory contracts of various types. Due to the uncertain
nature of many of the unresolved claims and rejection damages,
the Debtors cannot project the magnitude of such claims and
rejection damages with certainty.
On May 13, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order
establishing June 18, 2010, as the bar date for potential
creditors to file prepetition claims and postpetition claims
arising on or prior to April 30, 2010. The bar date is the
date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed
if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the
bankruptcy cases. Creditors were notified of the bar date and
the requirement to file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy
Court. Differences between liability amounts estimated by the
Debtors and claims filed by creditors are will be analyzed and,
if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final
determination of the allowable amount of a claim. The
determination of how liabilities will ultimately be treated
cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of
reorganization. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or treatment of
such liabilities is not determinable at this time.
F-192
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $632 and $646,
respectively
|
|
|
20,787
|
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
51,013
|
|
|
|
48,448
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
9,782
|
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
Liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
8,509
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
198,440
|
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
218,543
|
|
|
|
83,749
|
|
Long-term debt and lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
221,993
|
|
|
|
84,716
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
221,993
|
|
|
|
221,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized,
10 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $1,500 and $1,539
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,274
|
)
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
111,874
|
|
|
|
111,876
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(242,124
|
)
|
|
|
(245,624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(132,582
|
)
|
|
|
(136,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit
|
|
$
|
89,411
|
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-193
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
41,849
|
|
|
$
|
35,178
|
|
Direct costs of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization below)
|
|
|
28,574
|
|
|
|
25,600
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,628
|
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Transaction charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
Operational restructuring charges
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
37,274
|
|
|
|
34,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(1,056
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before reorganization items and income taxes
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
(5,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(2,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-194
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,014
|
)
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Purchase and development of internal-use software
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Payments on DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,400
|
)
|
Proceeds from 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
|
|
(7,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,929
|
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-195
Spheris Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
business and bankruptcy proceedings
|
Description of
business
Spheris Inc. (Spheris) is a Delaware corporation.
Subsequent to its acquisition by certain institutional investors
in November 2004 (the November 2004
Recapitalization), Spheris became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Spheris Holding II, Inc. (Spheris Holding
II), and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Spheris
Holding III, Inc. (Spheris Holding III), an entity
owned by affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC and TowerBrook Capital
Partners LLC, CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.
(CHS), and indirectly by certain members of
Spheris current and past management team.
Spheris and its direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Spheris Operations LLC (Operations), Spheris Leasing
LLC, Spheris Canada Inc., Spheris, India Private Limited
(SIPL) and Vianeta Communications
(Vianeta) (sometimes referred to collectively as the
Company), provide clinical documentation technology
and services to health systems, hospitals and group medical
practices located throughout the United States. The Company
receives medical dictation in digital format from subscribing
physicians, converts the dictation into text format, stores
specific data elements from the records, then transmits the
completed medical record to the originating physician in the
prescribed format.
Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceedings
On February 3, 2010, (the Petition Date), the
100% owner of Spheris Inc., Spheris Holding, II, Inc.,
filed a voluntary petition (Chapter 11
Petition) for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy
Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington,
Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). Simultaneously,
Spheris, Operations, and its subsidiaries: Spheris Canada Inc.,
Spheris Leasing LLC, and Vianeta (collectively, the
Debtors) also filed voluntary petitions for relief
under the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. SIPL did not
file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
During 2009, the Company did not comply with the covenant
requirements of its 2007 Senior Credit Facility and its Senior
Subordinated Notes (each as defined in Note 5). The
Companys failure to comply with these requirements and the
filing of the Chapter 11 Petition constituted an event of
default under the Companys debt obligations. Since the
Petition Date, the Company discontinued accruing interest
expense on its Senior Subordinated Notes.
The Company is currently operating as
debtor-in-possession
under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance
with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In
general, the Company is authorized to continue to operate as
ongoing businesses, but may not engage in transactions outside
the ordinary course of business without the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
Going concern
matters
The consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern as of March 31, 2010, although its bankruptcy
filings raised substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. Except as otherwise expressly stated herein,
the consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments related to the recoverability of assets and the
amounts, classification and satisfaction of liabilities that
resulted from the uncertainty regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern and its subsequent sale
of assets as described below.
F-196
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Stock and
asset purchase agreement
On February 2, 2010, the Debtors entered into a Stock and
Asset Purchase Agreement (the APA) as amended
April 15, 2010 with MedQuist Inc. (MedQuist)
and CBay Inc. (CBay and collectively referred to as
the Purchasers), portfolio companies of CBaySystems
Holdings Ltd.. The APA outlines the arrangement whereas the
Debtors agreed to sell substantially all of their assets to
MedQuist, and the stock of SIPL to CBay. In addition, the
Purchasers agreed to assume certain liabilities in connection
with such sale, all subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
On April 15, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale
of substantially all of Spheris assets to the Purchasers
and the related assumption of certain liabilities of the Debtors
by the Purchasers. The transaction was effected on
April 22, 2010. Under the terms of the sale, MedQuist
acquired significantly all of the Companys
U.S. assets and assumed certain liabilities. CBay acquired
the stock of SIPL. The purchase price was $98.8 million in
cash and an unsecured subordinated promissory note issued by
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. in an aggregate principal amount
of $17.5 million. As a result of the sale of substantially
all of the Debtors assets, it is likely that the
Debtors Chapter 11 cases will result in a liquidation
of the Companys businesses and assets, such that the
Company will cease to operate as a going concern.
As a requirement of the APA, each of the Debtors changed their
names. Effective April 28, 2010, Spheris Holding II, Inc.
changed its name to SP Wind Down Holding II, Inc.; Spheris
became SP Wind Down Inc.; and Vianeta became VN Wind Down
Communications. Effective April 30, 2010, Operations
changed its name to SP Wind Down Operations LLC; Spheris Leasing
LLC became SP Wind Down Leasing LLC; and Spheris Canada Inc.
became SP Wind Down Canada Inc.
Debtor-In-possession
(DIP) financing
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed a motion with the
Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to enter into a Senior Secured
Super-Priority
Debtor-In-Possession
Financing Agreement with certain lenders (as amended, the
DIP Credit Agreement). Interim approval of the DIP
Credit Agreement was granted by the Bankruptcy Court on
February 4, 2010. Final approval was granted on
February 23, 2010.
The DIP Credit Agreement provided post-petition loans and
advances consisting of a revolving credit facility up to an
aggregate principal amount of $15 million.
Under the DIP Credit Agreement, on February 3, 2010, the
Debtors borrowed $6.4 million. In accordance with the terms
of the DIP Credit Agreement, the Debtors used proceeds of
$6.4 million, net of lenders fees of approximately
$309,000, to pay past due principal and interest of
approximately $5.7 million on the revolver portion of the
2007 Senior Credit Facility and to pay other expenses of
approximately $381,000. There was no outstanding balance on the
DIP Credit Agreement at March 31, 2010.
The outstanding principal amount of the loans under the DIP
Credit Agreement, plus interest accrued and unpaid, were due and
payable in full at the disposition of the APA, which was
April 22, 2010. All borrowings under the DIP Credit
Agreement were paid in full as of this date.
Reorganization
process
The Bankruptcy Court approved payment of certain of the
Debtors pre-petition obligations, including employee
wages, salaries and benefits, and the payment of vendors and
other providers in the ordinary course for goods received and
services and other business-related payments necessary to
maintain the operation of the Debtors business. The
Debtors retained legal and financial professionals to advise
them on the bankruptcy proceedings.
Immediately after filing the Chapter 11 Petition, the
Debtors notified all known current or potential creditors of the
bankruptcy filings. Subject to certain exceptions under the
Bankruptcy Code, upon the Petition Date, creditors
F-197
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
were automatically enjoined, or stayed, from continuing any
judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions against
the Debtors or their property to recover, collect or secure a
claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example,
most creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the
Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against their
property, or to collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise
rights or remedies with respect to a pre-petition claim are
enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the
automatic stay.
As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee
for the District of Delaware (the U.S. Trustee)
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors (the
Creditors Committee). The Creditors
Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard
on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court with
respect to the Debtors.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors generally must assume or
reject pre-petition executory contracts, including but not
limited to real property leases, subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. In this context,
assumption means that the Debtors agree to perform
their obligations and cure all existing defaults under the
contract or lease, and rejection means that they are
relieved from their obligations to perform further under the
contract or lease, but is subject to a pre-petition claim for
damages for the breach thereof subject to certain limitations.
In connection with the Debtors sale of substantially all
of their assets, numerous of the Debtors executory
contracts and unexpired leases were assumed and assigned to the
Purchasers. In addition, the Debtors have rejected certain
executory contracts and unexpired leases. Any damages resulting
from rejection of executory contracts that are permitted to be
recovered under the Bankruptcy Code will be treated as
liabilities subject to compromise unless such claims were
secured prior to the Petition Date.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors received approval from the
Bankruptcy Court to reject unexpired leases and executory
contracts of various types. Liabilities subject to compromise
have been recorded related to the rejection of unexpired leases;
rejection of certain executory contracts; the claims related to
the outstanding unpaid Senior Subordinated Notes; and from the
determination of the Bankruptcy Court (or agreement by parties
in interest) of allowed claims for contingencies and other
disputed amounts. Due to the uncertain nature of many of the
unresolved claims and rejection damages, the Debtors cannot
project the magnitude of such claims and rejection damages with
certainty.
On May 13, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order
establishing June 18, 2010, as the bar date for potential
creditors to file prepetition claims and postpetition claims
arising on or prior to April 30, 2010. The bar date is the
date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed
if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the
bankruptcy cases. Creditors were notified of the bar date and
the requirement to file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy
Court. Differences between liability amounts estimated by the
Debtors and claims filed by creditors are being investigated
and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final
determination of the allowable amount of a claim. The
determination of how liabilities will ultimately be treated
cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of
reorganization. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or treatment of
such liabilities is not determinable at this time.
Proposed plan
of reorganization
In order to successfully emerge from or liquidate pursuant to
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Debtors must propose and obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy
Court of a plan of reorganization that satisfies the
requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors and the
official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases have jointly proposed the Joint
Liquidating Plan of SP Wind Down Inc., f/k/a Spheris Inc., and
its Affiliated Debtors (the Plan). The Plan was
filed on June 11, 2010. On such date, the Plan proponents
also filed the Disclosure Statement with Respect to the Joint
Liquidating Plan of SP Wind Down Inc., f/k/a Spheris Inc., and
its Affiliated Debtors (the Disclosure Statement). A
hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement is
scheduled for July 13, 2010, and the Debtors have requested
that a hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan be scheduled
for August 26, 2010.
F-198
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Under the priority scheme established by the Bankruptcy Code,
unless creditors agree otherwise, pre-petition liabilities and
post-petition liabilities must be satisfied in full before the
Debtors stockholders are entitled to receive any
distribution or retain any property under a plan of
reorganization on account of their equity interests. Given the
estimated liabilities of the Debtors, it is not anticipated that
the Debtors stockholders will receive any distribution
from the Debtors assets. The ultimate recovery to the
Debtors creditors, if any, will not be determined until
confirmation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance
can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed to each
of these constituencies or what types or amounts of
distributions, if any, they would receive. Because of such
possibilities, the value of the Debtors liabilities and
securities is highly speculative. Appropriate caution should be
exercised with respect to existing and future investments, if
any, of the Debtors liabilities and/or securities.
Section 1121(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides for an
initial period of 120 days after the commencement of a
Chapter 11 case to file a proposed plan of reorganization
(the Exclusive Filing Period) and an additional 180 days
after the commencement of the Chapter 11 case to solicit
acceptances of the plan of reorganization (the Exclusive
Solicitation Period). The Exclusive Filing Period and the
Exclusive Solicitation Period were set to expire on June 3,
2010 and August 2, 2010, respectively. Motions were filed
with the Bankruptcy Court to extend the Exclusive Filing Period
through and including September 1, 2010 and the Exclusive
Solicitation Period through and including November 1, 2010.
By order dated June 14, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved
such extensions of the Debtors exclusive periods to file a
plan of reorganization and to solicit votes with respect thereto.
Financial
reporting considerations
For periods subsequent to the bankruptcy filings, the Debtors
have applied the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 852, Reorganizations (ASC
852), in preparing the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that
the financial statements distinguish transactions and events
that are directly associated with the reorganization from the
ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain
expenses (including professional fees) that were incurred in the
Chapter 11 Petition have been recorded in reorganization
items in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations. In addition, pre-petition obligations that may have
been impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process have been
classified on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets in liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities
are reported at the amounts allowed or expected to be allowed by
the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser or
greater amounts.
Transaction costs
and reorganization items
During 2009, the Company evaluated multiple strategic
opportunities to continue as a going concern including a
technology license agreement, a sale of the Company or its
assets, or a restructuring of its capital structure. The Company
ultimately chose to pursue a sale of its assets pursuant to the
Chapter 11 Petition. In connection with evaluating and
pursuing its options, the Company retained financial and other
advisors, including restructuring professionals. These fees
included (a) costs paid to professionals and others in
connection with evaluating, preparing for, and pursuing filing
for Chapter 11 relief, (b) costs paid to professionals
and others related to evaluating, preparing for, and pursuing
sales and licensing options, (c) costs paid to creditors
and creditor committee advisors, including costs incurred to
obtain interim financing facilities, and (d) costs to
retain key employees. Some of the professionals engaged to
assist the Company in these efforts were utilized to perform
multiple functions.
The total of all of transaction costs to the Company for
services performed from January 1, 2010 through the
Petition Date, were $1.7 million, and are reflected as
transaction charges in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations. There were $1.6 million of
retainers representing prepayments for transactional services
reflected as a component of prepaid expenses and other current
assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2009. Additionally, there were
$0.3 million of prepaid
F-199
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
retention bonus amounts related to employee obligations
reflected as a component of prepaid expenses and other current
assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2009.
The Debtors reorganization items directly related to the
process of reorganizing the Debtors under Chapter 11 from
the Petition Date through March 31, 2010, are recorded in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
as reorganization items and consist of professional fees
totaling $3.4 million. Professional fees directly related
to the reorganization include fees associated with advisors to
the Debtors after the Petition Date. There were
$1.5 million of retainers representing prepayments for
reorganizational services reflected as a component of prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010.
Liabilities
subject to compromise
Liabilities subject to compromise at March 31, 2010 consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
11.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, net
|
|
|
122,799
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
8,670
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Other
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
$
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise represent pre-petition
unsecured obligations to be settled under a proposed plan of
reorganization. Generally, actions to enforce or otherwise
effect payments of pre-Chapter 11 liabilities are stayed.
Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise are
reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may
be settled for lesser or greater amounts. These liabilities
represent the amounts expected to be allowed on known or
potential claims to be resolved through the Chapter 11
process, and remain subject to future adjustments arising from
negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court,
rejection of executor contracts and leases, the determination as
to the value of collateral securing the claims, proof of claim,
or other events.
The Bankruptcy Court approved payment of certain pre-petition
obligations, including employee wages, salaries and benefits,
and the payment of vendors and other providers in the ordinary
course for goods and services received after the filing of the
Chapter 11 Petition and other business-related payments
necessary to maintain the operation of the Debtors
business. Obligations associated with these matters are not
classified as liabilities subject to compromise.
The Debtors rejected certain executory contracts and unexpired
leases with respect to the Debtors operations with
approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Damages resulting from
rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases are
generally treated as general unsecured claims and are classified
as liabilities subject to compromise.
Amounts subject to compromise include the Senior Subordinated
Notes. The Senior Subordinated Notes are shown net of discount
as described in Note 5. Debt issuance costs of
$0.9 million were also netted against this balance in
accordance with the fair value measurement requirements
described in ASC 852. Accrued interest related to these
Notes is also included in the liabilities subject to compromise.
F-200
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor
financial statements
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets,
statements of operations, and cash flows present the
consolidated financial position of the Company and consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods
presented. This information does not reflect the activity of
Spheris Holding II, Inc. which was included in the
Chapter 11 Petition.
The following schedules present the financial information for
the Debtors as of March 31, 2010 and the three months then
ended. In these schedules, the financial position and activity
of Spheris Holding II, Inc. (SH II, Inc.) is added
to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
of the Company. SH II, Inc. had no assets, liabilities, equity
or financial activity for all periods covered on these financial
statements.
As SIPL did not file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code,
SIPLs assets, liabilities, equity and financial activity
for the periods presented are subtracted from the accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the
Company. The subtraction of this activity from the accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements results in a
payable to SIPL of $8.7 million. In addition, all revenue
of SIPL is derived from subcontracting services provided to the
Company. Accordingly, $4.7 million in sales were eliminated
from the statements of operations. The addition of the payable
to SIPL and the elimination of the sales and related direct
costs reflect the operations and cash flows of the Debtors for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. These schedules are
presented as follows:
F-201
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet Schedule
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Reclassifications/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SH II, Inc.
|
|
|
SIPL
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
debtors
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
$
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,060
|
|
Restricted Cash
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,732
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,393
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
48,448
|
|
|
|
(13,628
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
43,552
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
|
|
(1,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,870
|
|
Internal-use software, net
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
$
|
(16,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,732
|
|
|
$
|
77,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,237
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
8,509
|
|
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
Intercompany payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
83,749
|
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
89,291
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
84,716
|
|
|
|
(3,577
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
89,871
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
221,184
|
|
|
|
(3,577
|
)
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
226,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,274
|
)
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed capital
|
|
|
111,876
|
|
|
|
(5,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,182
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(245,624
|
)
|
|
|
(9,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255,174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(136,022
|
)
|
|
|
(12,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit
|
|
$
|
85,162
|
|
|
$
|
(16,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,732
|
|
|
$
|
77,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-202
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations Schedule
For the Three Months ended March 31, 2010
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Reclassifications/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SH II, Inc.
|
|
|
SIPL
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
debtors
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
35,178
|
|
|
$
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,714
|
|
|
$
|
35,178
|
|
Direct costs of revenues
|
|
|
25,600
|
|
|
|
(3,963
|
)
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
|
|
26,351
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Transaction charges
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
Operational restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
34,420
|
|
|
|
(4,277
|
)
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
|
|
34,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Interest expense, net of income
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before reorganizational items and income taxes
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(5,840
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,257
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(2,340
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-203
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Debtor Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Schedule
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(Unaudited
and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Reclassifications/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SH II, Inc.
|
|
|
SIPL
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
debtors
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,900
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
|
|
(892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,378
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
Intercompany payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Purchase and development of internal-use software
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Payments on DIP Credit Agreement
|
|
|
(6,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,400
|
)
|
Proceeds from 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on 2007 Senior Credit Facility
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
Payments on lease obligations
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(7,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,576
|
)
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
$
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-204
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
significant accounting policies
|
Basis of
presentation
For all periods presented in the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and footnotes, Spheris is the
reporting unit. All dollar amounts shown in the accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements and tables
in the notes are in thousands unless otherwise noted. The
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
include the financial statements of Spheris, including its
direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by the Company without audit and,
in the opinion of management, reflect all normal recurring
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results for the
unaudited interim periods presented. Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in year-end financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. The
results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal
year.
For periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 Petition, the
Debtors have applied ASC 852, in preparing the accompanying
interim consolidated financial statements as further discussed
in Note 1.
Additionally, the accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis
which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability of assets and the amounts, classification, and
satisfaction of liabilities that resulted from uncertainty
regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern as of March 31, 2010, and its subsequent sale of
assets. See further discussion in Note 1.
In preparing the accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements, the Company evaluated events and
transactions that occurred subsequent to March 31, 2010,
through the date that the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued, June 29,
2010.
Recently
adopted accounting pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC
820-10)
as an amendment to earlier authoritative guidance concerning
fair value measurements and disclosures.
ASC 820-10
requires an entity to: (i) disclose separately the amounts
of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons
for the transfers and (ii) present separate information for
Level 3 activity pertaining to gross purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements.
ASC 820-10,
which became effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2010, did not have a material impact on its financial statements.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued
ASC 985-605,
Revenue Recognition Software (ASC
985-605)
that will become effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. Under
ASC 985-605
on arrangements that include software elements, tangible
products that have software components that are essential to the
functionality of the tangible product will no longer be within
the scope of
ASC 985-605,
and software-enabled products will now be subject to other
relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of
ASC 985-605.
Under
ASC 985-605,
when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence
for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best
estimate of the selling price is required to separate
deliverables and allocate consideration received using the
relative selling price method.
ASC 985-605
includes
F-205
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
new disclosure requirements on how the application of the
relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of
revenue recognition. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the
impact that
ASC 985-605
will have on its financial statements.
On September 23, 2009, the FASB ratified
ASC 605-25,
Revenue Recognition with Multiple Element
Arrangements (ASC
605-25).
ASC 605-25
requires the allocation of consideration among separately
identified deliverables contained within an arrangement, based
on their related selling prices. The Company utilizes current
accounting guidance, also titled Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables, in the recognition of revenue
associated with the Companys customer contracts that
contain multiple elements of services.
ASC 605-25
will become effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2011. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the impact that
ASC 605-25
will have on its financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Fair Value of
financial instruments
|
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company holds certain derivative financial instruments that
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
These derivative financial instruments are utilized by the
Company to mitigate risks related to interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. The derivatives are measured at fair
value in accordance with the established fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into
the following three levels:
|
|
|
|
n
|
Level 1 observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets.
|
|
n
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
|
|
n
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which little or
no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop
its own assumptions.
|
The Company entered into certain interest rate management
agreements with a single counterparty to reduce its exposure to
fluctuations in market interest rates under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility (as defined in Note 5). An event of default
under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility would create an event of
default under these interest rate management agreements, which
may cause amounts due under these agreements to become due and
payable. The Companys accounting for these derivative
financial instruments did not meet hedge accounting criteria.
Accordingly, changes in fair value were included as a component
of other expense (income) in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of these interest rate management agreements was
determined using valuation techniques including discounted cash
flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis considered the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity, and used
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves
and implied volatilities. The interest rates used in the
calculation of projected cash flows were based on an expectation
of future interest rates derived from observable market interest
rate curves and volatilities. Additionally, the Company
incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately
reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its interest derivatives fell within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its interest derivatives utilized Level 3
inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate
the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The Company
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of its interest
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the interest derivatives in their entirety were
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This
contract was scheduled to expire during 2010. During February
2010, the Company did not make payments due
F-206
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
on its interest derivatives and received notice of termination
from the counterparty to the agreements stating that all amounts
were currently due. As a result, the full amount of the
liability at December 31, 2009 of $1.7 million is
reflected as a component of other current liabilities in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As discussed
in Note 1, the full amount of this liability at
March 31, 2010 of $1.8 million is reflected in
liabilities subject to compromise at March 31, 2010.
Payments to SIPL are denominated in U.S. dollars. In order
to hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates, SIPL
historically maintained a portfolio of forward currency exchange
contracts, which were transacted with a single counterparty. The
Companys accounting for these derivative financial
instruments, all of which expired during the third quarter of
2009, did not meet the hedge accounting criteria. Accordingly,
changes in fair value were included as a component of other
expense (income) in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
The Company determined the fair value of its foreign currency
exchange contracts utilizing inputs for similar or identical
assets or liabilities that were either readily available in
public markets, derived from information available in publicly
quoted markets or quoted by counterparties to these contracts.
The future value of each contract out to its maturity was
calculated using observable market data, such as the foreign
currency exchange rate forward curve. The present value of each
contract was then determined by using discount factors based on
the forward curve for the more liquid currency. Additionally,
the Company incorporated credit valuation adjustments to
appropriately reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements.
Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs
used to value its foreign currency exchange contracts fell
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilized
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by its counterparties. The
Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit
valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative
positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments
were not significant to the overall valuation of the
derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its
valuations for the foreign currency exchange contracts in their
entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The Companys derivative financial instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and recorded in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification in the accompanying
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
condensed consolidated balance sheets
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The (gains) losses from changes in fair value of the
Companys derivative financial instruments, as recorded in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Location of (gain) loss recognized
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest rate management agreements
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(527
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-207
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Senior
subordinated notes
The Companys Senior Subordinated Notes had a quoted market
value of $63.8 million and $21.9 million at
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 respectively. The
Company determined that its valuation of its Senior Subordinated
Notes was classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy
as the fair value was determined through quoted prices in active
markets. The carrying value of the Senior Subordinated Notes
$123.6 million (net of discount) at December 31, 2009
was included in current portion of long-term debt and lease
obligations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
The carrying value of the Senior Subordinated Notes
$122.8 million (net of both discount and debt issuance
costs) at March 31, 2010 included debt issuance costs of
$0.9 million and is recorded in liabilities subject to
compromise as discussed in Note 1.
|
|
4.
|
Other
comprehensive loss
|
Other comprehensive loss was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
(3,500
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of tax of $0 and
$39, respectively
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding debt obligations of the Company at December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2007 Senior Credit Facility, net of discount, with principal due
at maturity on July 17, 2012; interest payable periodically
at variable rates. The weighted average interest rate was 5.75%
at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
74,552
|
|
|
$
|
66,883
|
|
11.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, net of discount, with
principal due at maturity in December 2012; interest payable
semi-annually in June and December
|
|
|
123,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financed lease obligations
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,520
|
|
|
|
67,198
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt and financed lease
obligations
|
|
|
(198,440
|
)
|
|
|
(67,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and financed lease obligations, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-208
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2007 senior
credit facility
The Companys senior secured credit facility consisted of a
term loan in the amount of $67.5 million and a revolving
credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$25.0 million at any time outstanding (the 2007
Senior Credit Facility). The revolving loans and the term
loan bore interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or a
reference banks base rate plus an applicable margin, at
the Companys option. Under the revolving credit facility,
the Company was permitted to borrow up to the lesser of
$25 million or a loan limiter amount, as defined in the
2007 Senior Credit Facility, less amounts outstanding under
letters of credit. On February 1, 2010, the Company paid
$2 million in principal and $0.5 million in interest
on the term loan and approximately $40,000 in accrued interest
on the revolving credit facility. A principal payment of
$5.7 million on the revolving credit facility was made on
February 3, 2010 as discussed in Note 1. As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had no amounts outstanding
under the revolver portion of the 2007 Senior Credit Facility.
Based on 2009 results of operations, the Company would not have
complied with the covenant requirements under the 2007 Senior
Credit Facility. The Company elected not to report its financial
results pursuant to year-end covenant requirements under the
2007 Senior Credit Facility, and filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code in February 2010. As a result, all amounts due under the
2007 Senior Credit Facility as of both December 31, 2009
and March 31, 2010 are reflected as current obligations in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. All
amounts due under this facility were paid in full on
April 22, 2010 in connection with the Companys sale
of substantially all of its assets to the Purchasers as further
described in Note 1.
Under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility, Operations was the
borrower. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility was secured by
substantially all of Operations assets and is guaranteed
by Spheris, Spheris Holding II and all of Operations
subsidiaries, except SIPL. The 2007 Senior Credit Facility
contained certain covenants which, among other things, limited
the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments,
dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales,
acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances
and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The
2007 Senior Credit Facility also contained customary events of
default, including breach of financial covenants, the occurrence
of which could allow the collateral agent to declare any
outstanding amounts to be due and payable. The financial
covenants contained in the 2007 Senior Credit Facility included
(a) a maximum leverage test, (b) a minimum fixed
charge coverage test and (c) a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Consolidated EBITDA, as defined under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility) requirement, among others.
In connection with the borrowings under the 2007 Senior Credit
Facility, the Company incurred $0.6 million and
$1.1 million in debt issuance costs and debt discounts,
respectively. These costs were being amortized as additional
interest expense over the term of the debt. The balance of the
issuance costs at March 31, 2010 of $0.3 million, net
of accumulated amortization, was reflected in prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet. The debt discount at March 31,
2010 of $0.6 million was reflected as a reduction in the
carrying amount of the debt under the 2007 Senior Credit
Facility.
Senior
subordinated notes
In December 2004, the Company issued its Senior Subordinated
Notes, which mature on December 15, 2012 (the Senior
Subordinated Notes). The Senior Subordinated Notes bear
interest at a fixed rate of 11.0% per annum. Interest is payable
in semi-annual installments through maturity on
December 15, 2012. The Company did not file a
Form 10-Q
with the SEC in the third quarter of 2009 which violated certain
covenants in the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated
Notes (the Indenture). In addition, the Company
elected not to make its scheduled payment on the Senior
Subordinated Notes on December 15, 2009. As a result, the
Company received a notice in from the trustee on
December 16, 2009 that an Event of Default had occurred, as
defined in the Indenture. As further described in Note 1,
the Company elected to file bankruptcy protection under
F-209
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on
February 3, 2010. Resolution of final payments due under
the Senior Subordinated Notes is pending outcome of these
matters.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are junior to the obligations of
the 2007 Senior Credit Facility. The Senior Subordinated Notes
are guaranteed by the Companys domestic operating
subsidiaries. The Senior Subordinated Notes contain certain
restrictive covenants that place limitations on the Company
regarding incurrence of additional debt, payment of dividends
and other items as specified in the indenture governing the
Senior Subordinated Notes. An acceleration of outstanding
indebtedness under the 2007 Senior Credit Facility would create
an event of default under the Senior Subordinated Notes, which
would allow the trustee or requisite holders of Senior
Subordinated Notes to declare the Senior Subordinated Notes to
be due and payable. As a result of the default under the 2007
Senior Credit Facility, the Company has reflected all amounts
due under the Senior Subordinated Notes as a current obligation
in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2009. The Company reflected all amounts due
under these notes as liabilities subject to compromise as of
March 31, 2010.
The Company incurred $1.9 million and $2.9 million in
debt issuance costs and debt discounts, respectively, in
connection with the Senior Subordinated Notes. These costs are
being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of
the Senior Subordinated Notes. The remaining balance of the
issuance costs at March 31, 2010 of $0.9 million, net
of accumulated amortization, was reflected as a part of the
amounts due under the Senior Subordinated Notes and included in
liabilities subject to compromise in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as discussed in Note 1. The
remaining debt discount at March 31, 2010 of
$1.4 million was reflected as a reduction in the carrying
amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes and is also included in
liabilities subject to compromise.
As stated above, the Company did not accrue interest of
$2.2 million in the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements related to the Senior
Subordinated Notes from the Petition Date (February 3,
2010) through March 31, 2010 in accordance with
ASC 852. Accrued interest as of the Petition Date is
recorded in liabilities subject to compromise in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Subsequent to the November 2004 Recapitalization, Spheris
Holding III approved the establishment of the Spheris
Holding III, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (as amended to date, the
Plan) for issuance of common stock to employees,
non-employee directors and other designated persons providing
substantial services to the Company. As of March 31, 2010,
15.6 million shares have been authorized for issuance under
the Plan. Shares are subject to restricted stock and stock
option agreements and typically vest over a three or four-year
period. As of March 31, 2010, an aggregate of
12.1 million shares of restricted stock and
1.8 million stock options were issued and outstanding under
the Plan. As these shares and stock options were issued for
services to be provided to the Company, compensation expense of
$0.1 million was reflected in general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. No
amounts were recorded as compensation expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
Under provisions of the Plan, all unvested shares and options
shall immediately vest and become exercisable upon an event of a
change in control. The sale of the Companys
assets as a result of the APA discussed in Note 1
constituted a change in control under these
provisions. Accordingly, all unvested options and shares were
immediately vested and exercisable on April 22, 2010.
During October 2008, Spheris Holding III issued warrants to
CHS to purchase 14.3 million shares of common stock of
Spheris Holding III upon the attainment of certain revenue
milestones set forth in the warrants. The costs of the warrants
subject to vesting are recognized over the period in which the
revenue is earned and are reflected as a reduction of revenue.
Accordingly, $8,000 and $2,000 of such costs are reflected as a
reduction to net
F-210
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2010, respectively.
The Company records deferred income taxes for the tax effect of
differences between book and tax bases of its assets and
liabilities. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce
its net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. The valuation allowance decreased by
approximately $0.2 million and $20,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. As of
March 31, 2010, the Companys valuation allowance that
is reflected as a reduction to the carrying value of its net
deferred tax balances was $35.1 million.
In the United States, the Company currently benefits from
federal and state net operating loss carryforwards. The
Companys consolidated federal net operating loss
carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income totaled
$107.9 million and $109.4 million at December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively, and began to expire
in 2007. State net operating loss carryforwards at
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 were
$71.5 million and $71.7 million, respectively, and
began to expire in 2005. The majority of these federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards is restricted due to
limitations associated with ownership change, and to the extent
these carryforwards are restricted, is reserved to reduce the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In addition,
the Company has alternative minimum tax credits which do not
have an expiration date and certain other federal tax credits
that will begin to expire in 2014.
The Company recognized income tax (benefit) expense of
$0.4 million and $(2.3) million during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The Company accounts for income taxes associated with SIPL in
accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, following
Indian tax guidelines. Prior to 2009, because the Company was
considered permanently reinvested in SIPL, no taxes were
provided on accumulated translation adjustments recorded in
other comprehensive loss. Due to the subsequent event of the
sale of SIPL stock (as discussed in Note 1), the net income
tax effect of the currency translation adjustments related to
SIPL is reflected in other comprehensive loss for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 (as provided in Note 4).
Spheris Holding III and related subsidiaries (the
filing group members) file their U.S. federal
and certain state income tax returns on a consolidated, unitary,
combined or similar basis. To accurately reflect each filing
group members share of consolidated tax liabilities on
separate company books and records, on November 5, 2004,
Spheris Holding III and each of its subsidiaries entered
into a tax sharing agreement. Under the terms of the tax sharing
agreement, each subsidiary of Spheris Holding III is
obligated to make payments to Spheris Holding III equal to
the amount of the federal and state income taxes that its
subsidiaries would have owed if such subsidiaries did not file
federal and state income tax returns on a consolidated, unitary,
combined or similar basis. Likewise, Spheris Holding III
may make payments to subsidiaries if it benefits from the use of
a subsidiary loss or other tax benefit. The tax sharing
agreement allows each subsidiary to bear its respective tax
burden (or enjoy use of a tax benefit, such as a net operating
loss) as if its return was prepared on a stand-alone basis. To
date, no amounts have been paid under this agreement.
The Company has analyzed filing positions for all federal, state
and international jurisdictions for all open tax years where it
is required to file income tax returns. Although the Company
files tax returns in every jurisdiction in which it has a legal
obligation to do so, it has identified the following as
major tax jurisdictions: Tennessee and Texas, as
well as India. Within these major jurisdictions, the Company has
tax examinations in progress related to transfer pricing rates
for its Indian facilities, as discussed in Note 8, as well
as significant federal and state net operating loss carryovers,
for which the earliest open tax year is 1997. Based on the facts
and circumstances of these examinations at March 31, 2010,
the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it
will be successful in supporting its current positions related
to the applicable filings. The Company believes that all
F-211
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained
upon audit and does not anticipate any adjustments resulting in
a material adverse impact on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flow. Therefore, no
reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.
|
|
8.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Litigation
The Company is subject to various other claims and legal actions
that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, any amounts for probable exposures are adequately
reserved for in the Companys interim condensed
consolidated financial statements, and the ultimate resolution
of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
Employment
agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of
senior management that provide for the payment to these persons
of amounts equal to the applicable base salary, unpaid annual
bonus and health insurance premiums over the applicable periods
specified in their individual employment agreements in the event
the employees employment is terminated without cause or
for certain other specified reasons. The maximum contingent
liabilities, excluding any earned but unpaid bonuses accrued in
the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements; under these agreements were $1.0 million at
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010.
These employment agreements were not included in the liabilities
assumed under the APA between the Purchasers and the Debtors.
Management anticipates that any amounts, if any, that may be
accrued in the future will be recorded as liabilities subject to
compromise in the condensed consolidated balance sheets of
subsequent periods.
Tax
assessment
SIPL received notification of a tax assessment resulting from a
transfer pricing tax audit by Indian income tax authorities
amounting to 52.2 million Rupees (approximately
$1.1 million), including penalties and interest, for the
fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2004 (the 2004
Assessment). In January 2007, the Company filed a formal
appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax. Prior to
resolution of the Companys appeals process, the Indian
income tax authorities have required the Company to make advance
payments toward the 2004 Assessment amounting to
43.1 million Rupees (approximately $0.9 million). Any
amounts paid by the Company related to the 2004 Assessment are
subject to a claim by the Company for reimbursement against
escrow funds related to the Companys December 2004
acquisition of HealthScribe, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
HealthScribe Escrow). Accordingly, the Company has
recorded the advance payments as receivables from the escrow
funds, which are reflected as a component of prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, SIPL received notification of
a tax assessment from a transfer pricing tax audit by Indian
income tax authorities amounting to 40.6 million Rupees
(approximately $0.8 million), including penalties and
interest, for the fiscal tax period ended March 31, 2005
(the 2005 Assessment). In December 2008, the Company
filed a formal appeal with the India Commissioner of Income Tax.
Prior to resolution of the Companys appeals process, the
Company was required to provide a bank guarantee in January 2009
for the full amount of the 2005 Assessment. The guarantee amount
is included in restricted cash in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2010. Approximately $0.6 million of the 2005
Assessment is subject to a claim for reimbursement against the
HealthScribe Escrow.
F-212
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In May 2010, the Company was informed that the competent
authorities of India and the United States (the Competent
Authorities) had met regarding the assessments for the two
years above. The Company was informed that the Competent
Authorities had reached an agreement regarding the transfer
pricing that should have been used for transactions between SIPL
and its related U.S. entities for the two years mentioned
above. Based on this agreement, the tax assessment for the
fiscal tax periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31,
2005 would be reduced to approximately 36.6 million Rupees
(approximately $813,000) and 17.2 million Rupees
(approximately $381,000), respectively. An agreement reached by
the Competent Authorities under the U.S./India Income Tax Treaty
is not binding on the parties involved. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of the proposed settlement and has not
recorded a liability under the provision of
ASC 740-10,
Income Taxes Other (ASC
740-10)
in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
ending December 31, 2009 or March 31, 2010.
If the assessments were brought forward from March 31, 2005
through March 31, 2010, a reasonable estimate of additional
liability could range from zero to $6.8 million, contingent
upon the final outcome of the claim. Payment of such amounts
would also result in potential credit adjustments to the
Companys U.S. federal tax returns. The Company
currently believes that it is more likely than not that it will
be successful in supporting its position relating to these
assessments. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any
accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the tax
assessments as of December 31, 2009 or March 31, 2010 .
During the second quarter of 2009, SIPL received an assessment
order from Indian income tax authorities pertaining to an
inquiry regarding prior years usage of net operating
losses originating in 1999. The final assessment could
potentially amount to 5.6 million Rupees (approximately
$0.1 million).
|
|
9.
|
Related party
transactions
|
On October 3, 2008 (amended December 23, 2009),
Operations entered into an agreement for health information
processing services with Community Health Systems Professional
Services Corporation, an affiliate of Community Health Systems,
Inc. (CHS), to provide clinical documentation
technology and services to certain of its affiliated hospitals
(CHS Services Agreement). The Bankruptcy Court
approved the assumption of the CHS Services Agreement, as
amended, on March 17, 2010.
Contemporaneously with entering into the CHS Services Agreement,
CHS became a minority owner in Spheris Holding III, the
Companys indirect parent. The Company provided clinical
documentation technology and services to CHS in the ordinary
course of business at prices and on terms and conditions that
the Company believes are the same as those that would result
from arms length negotiations between unrelated parties.
The Company recognized net revenues from this customer of
$1.4 million and $4.0 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In March 2010, Spheris Holding III transferred
$9.2 million to the Debtors.
|
|
10.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
During October 2008, the Company commenced an operational
restructuring plan to effect changes in both the Companys
management structure and the nature and focus of its operations.
The Company initially recognized $0.5 million of
operational restructuring charges, including one-time
termination benefits and other restructuring related charges,
pursuant to this operational restructuring plan during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a continuation of the plan during
2009, the Company eliminated a significant portion of its
U.S. based administrative and corporate workforce,
recognizing an additional $0.8 million of operational
restructuring charges, including one-time termination benefits
and other operational restructuring related charges. The Company
incurred $0.7 million in restructuring charges for the
three months ended March 31, 2009.
F-213
Spheris Inc. and
Subsidiaries
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Companys operational restructuring plan was
substantially complete as of December 31, 2009. No
additional amounts were incurred in 2010. No additional charges
are anticipated due to the Chapter 11 Petition filed on the
Petition Date.
On May 14, 2010, the Debtors received a letter from
MedQuist in which MedQuist asserted that the Debtors owe SIPL,
now a subsidiary of CBay, approximately $0.9 million for
the Debtors alleged failure to make certain payments to
SIPL prior to the closing of the APA (the SIPL
Claim). In addition, in an email dated April 30,
2010, representatives of MedQuist asserted that the Debtors are
required to reimburse MedQuist for the cost of providing COBRA
continuation coverage to terminated Spheris employees and their
dependents who are COBRA-eligible (the COBRA Claim
and, together with the SIPL Claim, the MedQuist
Claims). The Debtors dispute the MedQuist Claims.
F-214
The letter of transmittal and any other required documents
should be sent or delivered by each holder of MedQuist Inc.
common stock or such holders broker, dealer, commercial
bank, trust company or other nominee to the Exchange Agent at
its address or facsimile number set forth below.
Exchange
Agent:
|
|
|
If delivering by mail:
|
|
If delivering by hand or courier:
|
|
|
|
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
LLC
Operations Center
Attn: Reorganization Department
P.O. Box 2042
New York, New York
10272-2042
|
|
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
Operations Center
Attn: Reorganization Department
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, New York 11219
|
|
If delivering by fax (for Eligible Institutions
only):
|
|
Fax:
718-234-5001
|
PART II
Information not
required in the prospectus
Item 20. Indemnification
of directors and officers.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
authorizes a corporations board of directors to grant
indemnity to directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad
to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for
liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses incurred)
arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, our
by-laws include provisions that (i) eliminate, to the
fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law, the personal liability of our directors for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, and
(ii) require us to advance expenses, as incurred, to our
directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding to
the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law, subject to certain very limited exceptions.
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, our
by-laws provide that (i) we are required to indemnify our
directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the
Delaware General Corporation Law, (ii) we may indemnify any
other person as set forth in the Delaware General Corporation
Law, and (iii) the rights conferred in the bylaws are not
exclusive.
We have also obtained officers and directors
liability insurance that insures against liabilities that our
officers and directors, in such capacities, may incur.
We also have agreements with each director and officer to
provide indemnification to the extent permitted under Delaware
law.
We carry directors and officers liability insurance
covering acts and omissions of our directors and officers and
those of our controlled subsidiaries. The policy has a covering
limit of $25.0 million in each policy year.
II-1
Item 21. Exhibits
and financial statement schedules.
(a) Exhibits.
See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature
page hereto, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth herein.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
No financial statement schedules are provided because the
information called for is not required or is shown either in our
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(c) Reports, Opinions and Appraisals
None.
Item 22. Undertakings.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
|
|
(a) 1. |
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
That for purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)
(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be
deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time
it was declared effective.
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
That for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
|
|
|
(b) |
To respond to requests for information that is incorporated by
reference into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b),
11, or 13 of
Form S-4,
within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send
the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally
prompt means. This includes information contained in documents
filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration
statement through the date of responding to the request.
|
|
|
(c) |
To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning this Merger and MedQuist Inc. that was not the
subject of and included in the registration statement when it
became effective.
|
II-2
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the registrant has duly caused this registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized in the City of Franklin, State of
Tennessee, on October 4, 2011.
MEDQUIST HOLDINGS INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ ROGER
L. DAVENPORT
|
Name: Roger L. Davenport
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Power Of
Attorney
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this registration statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities indicated on October 4,
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROGER
L. DAVENPORT
Roger
L. Davenport
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
V.
Raman Kumar
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ RONALD
L. SCARBORO
Ronald
L. Scarboro
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Robert
Aquilina
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Frank
Baker
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Peter
Berger
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Merle
Gilmore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Jeffrey
Hendren
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Kenneth
John McLachlan
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
James
Patrick Nolan
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
* By:
|
|
/s/ ROGER
L. DAVENPORT
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
|
|
|
II-3
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1**
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of
July 11, 2011, by and among MedQuist Holdings Inc., Miami
Acquisition Corporation, Miami Acquisition LLC, MultiModal
Technologies, Inc. and Michael Finke. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
2
|
.2*
|
|
Form of Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among MedQuist
Holdings Inc., MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Merger Corporation.
|
|
3
|
.1**
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
March 16, 2011.)
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
By-Laws. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
March 16, 2011.)
|
|
4
|
.1**
|
|
Form of common stock certificate. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Amendment No. 5 to
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 28, 2011.)
|
|
4
|
.2**
|
|
Senior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of
September 30, 2010, among CBay Inc., MedQuist Inc. and
MedQuist Transcriptions Ltd., CBaySystems Holdings Limited,
BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation, PennantPark Investment
Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and THL Credit Inc. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to CBaySystems Holdings
Limited Amendment No. 1 to
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
4
|
.2.1**
|
|
Waiver and First Amendment to Senior Subordinated Note Purchase
Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2011, by and among CBay
Inc., MedQuist Inc., MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., MedQuist
Holdings Inc., BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation, PennantPark
Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and THL Credit, Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
4
|
.2.2**
|
|
Second Amendment to Senior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement,
dated as of July 11, 2011, by and among CBay Inc., MedQuist
Inc., MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation, PennantPark Investment
Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and THL Credit, Inc. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Form of 13% Senior Subordinated Note due 2016.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Exchange Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2010, by and
between CBaySystems Holdings Limited and the Investors
Signatories thereto. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
4
|
.4.1**
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Exchange Agreement, dated as of
December 30, 2010, by and between CBaySystems Holdings
Limited and the Investors signatories thereto. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4.1 to Amendment
No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Warrant issued to Oosterveld International BV on March 19,
2009. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Pepper Hamilton LLP.
|
|
9
|
.1**
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated September 30, 2010, by and between
CBaySystems Holdings Limited, S.A.C. PEI CB Investment, L.P.,
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC and International Equities
(S.A.C. Asia) Limited. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 9.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1**
|
|
Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 15, 2010,
between Spheris Holding II, Inc., Spheris Inc., Spheris
Operations LLC, Vianeta Communications, Spheris Leasing LLC,
Spheris Canada Inc., CBay Inc. and MedQuist Inc. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
10
|
.2**
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2010, among CBay
Inc., MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Transcriptions, Limited, as
Borrowers, CBaySystems Holdings Limited, as Holdings, the
Lenders and L/C Issuers party thereto, General Electric Capital
Corporation, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent,
SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent, and ING Capital LLC and
Regions Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents. (Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
10
|
.2.1**
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, Waiver and Consent, dated
as of July 11, 2011, by and among CBay Inc., MedQuist Inc.,
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., MedQuist Holdings Inc., the other
loan parties signatory thereto, the lenders signatory thereto,
and General Electric Capital Corporation, as agent for the
lenders. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.2.2**
|
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 14, 2011, by and among CBay Inc., MedQuist Inc.,
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., MedQuist Holdings Inc., the other
loan parties signatory thereto, the lenders signatory thereto,
and General Electric Capital Corporation, as agent for the
lenders (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on September 20, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.3**
|
|
Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of October 14,
2010, among CBay Inc., MedQuist Inc., MedQuist Transcriptions,
Limited, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Administrative
Agent and Collateral Agent, and Each Other Guarantor party
thereto. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
10
|
.4**
|
|
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2010, among
CBaySystems Holdings Limited, MedQuist IP LLC, MedQuist CM LLC,
MedQuist Delaware, Inc. and Each Other Guarantor From Time to
Time Party Hereto, BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation,
PennantPark Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and THL
Credit Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
10
|
.5**
|
|
Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated October 1,
2010, among BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation, PennantPark
Investment Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and THL Credit, Inc.,
CBay Inc., MedQuist Inc., MedQuist Transcriptions Ltd. and
General Electric Corporation. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on November 26, 2010.)
|
|
10
|
.6**
|
|
Agreement, dated August 19, 2008, between CBaySystems
Holdings Limited, S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC and Lehman
Brothers Commercial Corporation Asia Limited. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 2
to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.7**
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 4, 2011
among S.A.C. PEI CB Investment, L.P., S.A.C. PEI CB Investment
II, LLC and International Equities (S.A.C. Asia) Limited.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
March 16, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.7.1**
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement dated as
of August 18, 2011 by and among the Company and S.A.C. PEI
CB Investment L.P., S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC and
International Equities (S.A.C. Asia) Limited. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on August 24, 2011.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.8**
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2011,
among MedQuist Holdings Inc., S.A.C. PEI CB Investment, L.P.,
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment II, LLC, International Equities (S.A.C.
Asia) Limited and the other signatories party thereto.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
March 16, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.9**
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2011, among
MedQuist Holdings Inc., S.A.C. PEI CB Investment, L.P., S.A.C.
PEI CB Investment II, LLC and International Equities (S.A.C.
Asia) Limited. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
March 16, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.10**
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Management Stockholders
Agreement. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 5 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 28, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.11**
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of
June 12, 2007, as amended September 4, 2008.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.12**
|
|
Form of Share Option Agreement in connection with the 2007
Equity Incentive Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.13**
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment
No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.14**
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.15**
|
|
MedQuist Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.16**
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the MedQuist Inc. 2002
Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.17**
|
|
MedQuist Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan adopted on
August 27, 2009. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.18**
|
|
MedQuist Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.19**
|
|
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. 2010 Management Incentive Plan.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.20**
|
|
MedQuist Holdings Inc. 2010 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.1 to
Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 28, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.21**
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock Option Agreement by and between Peter
Masanotti and MedQuist Inc., dated March 2, 2009.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.22**
|
|
Amended and Restated agreement by and between CBaySystems
Holdings Limited, CBay Inc., CBay Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. and
V. Raman Kumar, dated as of December 6, 2010. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment
No. 5 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 28, 2011.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.23**
|
|
Employment agreement by and between CBaySystems Holdings
Limited, CBay Inc. and Robert Aquilina, dated as of August 2008.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.24**
|
|
Employment agreement by and between CBaySystems Holdings
Limited, CBay Inc. and Michael Seedman, dated as of
August 8, 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.25**
|
|
Employment agreement by and between CBaySystems Holdings
Limited, CBay Inc. and Clyde Swoger, dated as of August 2008.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011
|
|
10
|
.26**
|
|
Form of 2010 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
August 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.27**
|
|
Form of Letter of Appointment from CBaySystems Holdings Limited
to each non-executive director. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.28**
|
|
Form of Deed of Variation to Letter of Appointment between each
compensated non-executive director and CBaySystems Holdings
Limited. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27
to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.29**
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Peter Masanotti and MedQuist
Inc., dated September 3, 2008. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.30**
|
|
Employment Agreement between Anthony D. James and MedQuist Inc.
for the position of Co-Chief Operating Officer dated
June 24, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.31**
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between MedQuist Holdings Inc. and
Roger L. Davenport dated July 11, 2011. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.32**
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated as of July 11,
2011, by and between MedQuist Holdings Inc. and Roger L.
Davenport. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.33**
|
|
Separation Agreement by and among MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
MedQuist Inc. and Peter Masanotti dated July 11, 2011.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.34**
|
|
Offer of Employment letter between MedQuist Inc. and Michael
Clark dated April 21, 2005. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.29.1 to Amendment No. 6 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on February 4, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.35**
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between MedQuist Holdings Inc.
and certain Directors and Officers. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Amendment No. 5 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 28, 2011.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.36**
|
|
Form of Management Indemnification Agreement by and between
MedQuist Inc. and Certain Officers. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.30.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.36.2**
|
|
First Amendment to the Form of Management Indemnification
Agreement by and between MedQuist Inc. and Certain Officers.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31.2 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.37**
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated November 21, 2008 between
MedQuist Inc. and Peter Masanotti. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.38.1**
|
|
Office Lease, dated June 2006, between Ford Motor Land
Development Corporation and Spheris Operations Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32.1 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.38.2**
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease Agreement, dated March 27, 2009,
between Carothers Office Acquisition LLC and Spheris Operations,
Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32.2
to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.38.3**
|
|
Assignment, Assumption and Agreement to Relinquish Office Space
and Amendment to Office Lease Agreement, dated April 22,
2010 between Carothers Office Acquisition LLC and MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.32.3 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.39.1**
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated March 1, 2009, by
and between Atlanta Lakeside Real Estate, L.P. and MedQuist
Transcriptions, Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.33.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.39.2**
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, effective August 1,
2009, by and between Atlanta Lakeside Real Estate, L.P. and
MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.33.2 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.40#**
|
|
Licensing Agreement, as amended, dated as of November 10,
2009, between MedQuist Inc. and Nuance Communications, Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.41#**
|
|
Fee Agreement dated June 30, 2011, between MedQuist Inc.
and Nuance Communications, Inc. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed on
August 15, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.42#**
|
|
Third Amended and Restated OEM Supply Agreement dated
November 10, 2009, between MedQuist Inc. and Nuance
Communications, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.35 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.43#**
|
|
Licensing Agreement by and between Nuance Communications, Inc.
and MedQuist Inc., dated November 10, 2009. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Amendment
No. 5 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 28, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.44#**
|
|
Amended and Restated Clinical Documentation Solution Agreement
by and between Multimodal Technologies, Inc. and MedQuist Inc.,
dated March 25, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.37 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
for MedQuist Holdings Inc. (File
No. 333-169997)
filed on January 5, 2011.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.45**
|
|
Redemption Agreement among Lehman Brothers Commercial
Corporation Asia Limited, S.A.C. Private Equity Investors, L.P.,
S.A.C. PEI CB Investment, L.P. and S.A.C. PEI CB Investment GP,
Limited and the Liquidators named therein. (Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on
March 16, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.46**
|
|
Share Option Agreement, between CBaySystems Holdings Limited and
V. Raman Kumar, dated June 12, 2007. (Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our Registration Statement
on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-175474)
filed on July 11, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.47**
|
|
Agreement and Release, by and between MedQuist Holdings Inc.,
CBay Inc., MedQuist Inc. and Robert Aquilina, dated
August 2, 2011. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on August 16, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.48**
|
|
Separation Agreement and General Release by and between MedQuist
Holdings Inc. and Michael Seedman, dated August 2, 2011.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on August 16, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.49**
|
|
Subordinated Intercompany Note dated as of August 18, 2011
issued by CBay Inc. in favor of MedQuist Inc. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on August 24, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.50**
|
|
Amendment to Share Option Agreement, dated August 2, 2011,
by and between Robert Aquilina and MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on August 24, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.51**
|
|
Amendment to Share Option Agreement, effective August 2,
2011, by and between Michael Seedman and MedQuist Holdings Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on August 24, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.52**
|
|
Stockholders Agreement dated as of August 18, 2011 by
and among the Company and the other parties listed on the
signature pages Thereto.
|
|
10
|
.53**
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 15, 2011, by and between
the Company and Ronald L. Scarboro. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to MedQuist Holdings Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.54**
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated August 15, 2011, by
and between the Company and Ronald L. Scarboro. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to MedQuist Holdings
Inc.
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2011.)
|
|
10
|
.55*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by and between
the Company and Michael Finke.
|
|
10
|
.56*
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by
and between the Company and Michael Finke.
|
|
10
|
.57*
|
|
Restrictive Covenant Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by
and between the Company and Michael Finke.
|
|
10
|
.58*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by and between
the Company and Juergen Fritsch.
|
|
10
|
.59*
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by
and between the Company and Juergen Fritsch.
|
|
10
|
.60*
|
|
Restrictive Covenant Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by
and between the Company and Juergen Fritsch.
|
|
10
|
.61*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by and between
the Company and Detlef Koll.
|
|
10
|
.62*
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by
and between the Company and Detlef Koll.
|
|
10
|
.63*
|
|
Restrictive Covenant Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, by
and between the Company and Detlef Koll.
|
|
12
|
.1*
|
|
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
.1**
|
|
List of subsidiaries of MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Pepper Hamilton LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP as to the consolidated financial statements
for MedQuist Holdings Inc.
|
|
23
|
.3*
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP as to the consolidated financial statements
for MedQuist Inc. regarding its March 16, 2011 report.
|
|
23
|
.4*
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP as to the consolidated financial statements
for MedQuist Inc. regarding its March 17, 2008 report.
|
|
23
|
.5*
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP as to the financial
statements for Spheris Inc.
|
|
24
|
.1**
|
|
Powers of attorney (included on the signature page).
|
|
99
|
.1*
|
|
Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
Portions of this Exhibit were
omitted and filed separately with the Secretary of the SEC
pursuant to an order of the SEC granting our application for
confidential treatment filed pursuant to Rule 406 under the
Securities Act of 1933.
|