def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only |
|
|
|
|
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Under Rule § 240.14a-12 |
|
|
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing proxy statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
333 West San Carlos Street
Suite 700
San Jose, CA 95110
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 26, 2005
On Thursday, May 26, 2005, PDF Solutions, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), will hold its Annual
Meeting of Stockholders at The Hilton Hotel-San Jose,
located at 300 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, California
95110. The Meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. local time.
Only record stockholders who owned stock at the close of
business on April 8, 2005 can vote at this Meeting or any
adjournment that may take place. At the Meeting we will:
|
|
|
|
|
Elect two Class I nominees to the Board of Directors to
serve for a three-year term expiring on the first Annual Meeting
of Stockholders that occurs after December 31, 2007, or
until such directors respective successors are duly
elected and qualified. |
|
|
|
Ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
Transact any other business properly brought before the Meeting. |
You can find more information about each of these items,
including the nominees for directors, in the attached Proxy
Statement.
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of each
of the two proposals outlined in this Proxy Statement.
We cordially invite all stockholders of record at the record
date or persons who hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting to
attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, whether or not you
expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please either
mark, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly
as possible in the postage-prepaid envelope provided or vote
your shares by telephone or via Internet to ensure your
representation and the presence of a quorum at the Annual
Meeting. If you send in your proxy card or vote via telephone or
Internet and then decide to attend the Annual Meeting to vote
your shares in person, you may still do so. Your proxy is
revocable in accordance with the procedures set forth in the
Proxy Statement.
At the Meeting, we will also report on our business results and
other matters of interest to stockholders.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
PETER COHN |
|
Secretary |
San Jose, California
April 22, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
|
|
|
C-1 |
|
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
333 West San Carlos Street
Suite 700
San Jose, CA 95110
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE
2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 26, 2005
Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for the 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. This Proxy Statement contains important
information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the
matters brought before the meeting. Please read it carefully.
The Board set April 8, 2005 as the record date for the
Meeting. Stockholders of record who owned our common stock on
that date are entitled to vote at and attend the Meeting, with
each share entitled to one vote. On the record date, there were
25,858,996 shares of our common stock outstanding.
Voting materials, which include this Proxy Statement, a proxy
card and the 2004 Annual Report, will be mailed to stockholders
on or about April 27, 2005.
In this Proxy Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
We, us, our and the
Company refer to PDF Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
|
Annual Meeting or Meeting means our 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
|
|
|
Board of Directors or Board means our
Board of Directors |
|
|
|
SEC means the Securities and Exchange Commission |
We have summarized below important information with respect to
the Annual Meeting.
Time and Place of the Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting is being held on Thursday, May 26, 2005
at 1:30 p.m. local time at The Hilton Hotel-San Jose,
located at 300 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, California
95110.
All stockholders of record who owned shares of our stock as of
April 8, 2005, the record date, may attend the Annual
Meeting.
Purpose of the Proxy Statement and Proxy Card
You are receiving a Proxy Statement and proxy card from us
because you owned shares of our common stock on April 8,
2005, the record date. This Proxy Statement describes issues on
which we would like you, as a stockholder, to vote. It also
gives you information on these issues so that you can make an
informed decision.
When you sign the proxy card, you appoint John K. Kibarian and
P. Steven Melman as your representatives at the Meeting.
Messrs. Kibarian and Melman will vote your shares, as you
have instructed them on the proxy card, at the Meeting. This
way, your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the
Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Meeting it is a
good idea to complete, sign and return your proxy card or vote
your shares by telephone or via Internet in advance of the
meeting just in case your plans change.
Proposals to be Voted on at This Years Annual
Meeting
You are being asked to vote on:
|
|
|
|
|
The election of two Class I directors to serve on our Board
of Directors. |
|
|
|
The ratification of the Audit Committees appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for
the current fiscal year. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each proposal.
Voting Procedure
To vote by mail, please sign your proxy card and return it in
the enclosed, prepaid and addressed envelope. If you mark your
voting instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted
as you instruct.
|
|
|
You may vote in person at the Meeting |
We will pass out written ballots to anyone who wants to vote at
the Meeting. Holding shares in street name means
your shares of stock are held in an account by your stockbroker,
bank or other nominee, and the stock certificates and record
ownership are not in your name. If your shares are held in
street name and you wish to attend the Annual
Meeting, you must notify your broker, bank or other nominee and
obtain the proper documentation to vote your shares at the
Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
You may vote by telephone or electronically |
If you live in the United States or Canada, you may submit your
proxy by following the Vote by Telephone instructions on the
proxy card. If you have Internet access, you may submit your
proxy from any location in the world by following the Vote by
Internet instructions on the proxy card.
|
|
|
You may change your mind after you have returned your
proxy card |
If you change your mind after you return your proxy card or
submit your proxy by telephone or Internet, you may revoke your
proxy at any time before the polls close at the Meeting. You may
do this by:
|
|
|
|
|
signing another proxy card with a later date, or |
|
|
|
voting in person at the Annual Meeting. |
Multiple Proxy Cards
If you received more than one proxy card, it means that you hold
shares in more than one account. Please sign and return all
proxy cards to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
Quorum Requirement
Shares are counted as present at the Meeting if the stockholder
either:
|
|
|
|
|
is present and votes in person at the Meeting, or |
|
|
|
has properly submitted a proxy card or voted by telephone or
Internet. |
A majority of our outstanding shares as of the record date must
be present at the Meeting (either in person or by proxy) in
order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is
called a quorum.
2
Consequences of Not Returning Your Proxy Card; Broker
Non-Votes
If your shares are held in your name, you must return your proxy
card or vote by telephone or Internet (or attend the Annual
Meeting in person) in order to vote on the proposals. If your
shares are held in street name and you do not return
your proxy card or vote by telephone or Internet, your
stockbroker may either:
|
|
|
|
|
vote your shares on routine matters, or |
|
|
|
leave your shares unvoted. |
Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of
shares that are held in street name for their
clients, brokers may vote such shares on behalf of their clients
with respect to routine matters (such as the
election of directors or the ratification of auditors), but not
with respect to non-routine matters (such as a proposal
submitted by a stockholder or a proposal related to a stock
incentive plan). If the proposals to be acted upon at the
Meeting include both routine and non-routine matters, the broker
may turn in a proxy card for uninstructed shares that
votes FOR the routine matters, but expressly states that
the broker is not voting on non-routine matters. This is called
a broker non-vote.
Broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining
the presence or absence of a quorum, but will not be counted for
the purpose of determining the number of votes cast.
We encourage you to provide instructions to your stockbroker by
returning your proxy card or voting by telephone or Internet.
This ensures that your shares will be voted at the Meeting.
Effect of Abstentions
Abstentions are counted as shares that are present and entitled
to vote for the purposes of determining the presence of a quorum
and as votes AGAINST a proposal for purposes of determining
the approval of any matter submitted to the stockholders for a
vote.
Required Vote
Assuming a quorum is present, the two nominees receiving the
highest number of affirmative votes will be elected as directors.
Vote Solicitation; Use of Outside Solicitors
PDF Solutions, Inc. is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares
at the Annual Meeting. In addition to this solicitation by mail,
our directors, officers and other employees may contact you by
telephone, Internet, in person or otherwise to obtain your
proxy. PDF Solutions, Inc. will bear the cost of this
solicitation, but our directors, officers and employees that
assist us in this solicitation will not receive any additional
compensation for doing so. We will also request brokerage firms,
nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials
to the beneficial owners. We will reimburse these entities and
our transfer agent for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
in forwarding proxy materials.
Voting Procedures
Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be
tabulated by a representative of EquiServe, our transfer agent,
and transmitted to P. Steven Melman, our Chief Financial
Officer, who will act as the Inspector of Election. The
Inspector will also determine whether a quorum is present at the
Annual Meeting.
The shares represented by the proxy cards received, properly
marked, dated, signed and represented by votes cast using the
telephone or Internet and not revoked, will be voted at the
Annual Meeting. If the proxy card specifies a choice with
respect to any matter to be acted on, the shares will be voted
in accordance with that specified choice. Any proxy card which
is returned but not marked will be voted FOR the director
nominee, FOR each of the other proposals discussed in this Proxy
Statement, and as the proxy holders deem
3
desirable for any other matters that may come before the
Meeting. Broker non-votes will not be considered as voting with
respect to any matter for which the broker does not have voting
authority.
We believe that the procedures to be used by the Inspector to
count the votes are consistent with Delaware law concerning
voting of shares and determination of a quorum.
Publication of Voting Results
We will announce preliminary voting results at the Meeting. We
will publish the final results in our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2005, which we
will file with the SEC. You may obtain a copy free of charge
from our Internet web site at www.pdf.com, by contacting our
Investor Relations Department at (408) 280-7900 or the SEC
at (800) 732-0330 for the location of the nearest public
reference room, or through the EDGAR system at www.sec.gov.
Other Business
We do not know of any business to be considered at the 2005
Annual Meeting other than the proposals described in this Proxy
Statement. However, because we did not receive notice of any
other proposals to be brought before the Meeting, if any other
business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your
signed proxy card gives authority to John K. Kibarian and P.
Steven Melman to vote on such matters at their discretion.
Proposals for 2006 Annual Meeting
To have your proposal included in our proxy statement for the
2006 Annual Meeting, pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, you must submit
your proposal in writing by the date that is 120 calendar days
before the anniversary of the date this years proxy
statement is released to stockholders (i.e., the
mailing date) to the attention of our Secretary, PDF Solutions,
Inc., 333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 700,
San Jose, CA 95110.
In addition, our Bylaws provide that a proposal that the
stockholder delivers or mails to our principal executive offices
not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the
anniversary date of the prior years meeting shall be
timely received; provided, however, that if the date of the
annual meeting is more than 30 days prior to or more than
60 days after such anniversary date and less than
60 days notice of the date of the meeting is given to
stockholders, to be timely, the proposal must be received from
the stockholder not later than the close of business on the 10th
day following the date the notice of meeting was mailed.
If you submit a proposal for the 2006 Annual Meeting after the
date that is less than 90 days prior to April 26,
2006, or the anniversary date of the mailing of this years
Proxy Statement, management may or may not, at their discretion,
present the proposal at the meeting, and the proxies for the
2006 Annual Meeting will confer discretion on the management
proxy holders to vote against your proposal.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
Election of Directors
We have nominated two candidates for election to the Board this
year. Detailed information on each of the nominees is provided
below.
The Board is divided into three classes with each director
serving a three-year term and one class being elected at each
years Annual Meeting of stockholders. If any director is
unable to stand for re-election, the Board may reduce the size
of the Board, designate a substitute or leave a vacancy
unfilled. If a substitute is designated, proxies voting on the
original director candidate will be cast for the substitute
candidate. Each Class I nominee listed has consented to
serve as a director.
4
Vote Required
If a quorum is present, the nominees receiving the highest
number of affirmative votes of shares entitled to be voted for
them will be elected as Class I directors for the ensuing
three-year term. Unless marked otherwise, proxies received will
be voted FOR the election of each of the two nominees. If
additional people are nominated for election as directors, the
proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them in a
way that will ensure that as many as possible of the nominees
listed below are elected. If this happens, the specific nominees
to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders.
Nominees for the Board of Directors
The Companys Bylaws provide that the number of directors
shall be established by the Board or the stockholders of the
Company. The Companys Certificate of Incorporation
provides that the directors shall be divided into three classes,
with the classes serving for staggered, three-year terms.
Pursuant to the Companys Bylaws, the Board has set the
number of Directors at six, consisting of two Class I
directors, two Class II directors and two Class III
directors. Two Class I directors are to be elected at the
Annual Meeting. These Class I directors will hold office
until the Annual Meeting that occurs after the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007 or until their successors have
been duly elected and qualified. The terms of the Class II
and Class III directors will expire at the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders next following the fiscal years ending
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the
proxies received by them for the Companys nominees named
below. Mr. Lucas and Mr. Cassin are currently
directors of the Company. In the event that a nominee of the
Company becomes unable or declines to serve as a director at the
time of the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote the
proxies for any substitute nominee who is designated by the
current Board of Directors to fill such vacancy. It is not
expected that the nominees listed below will be unable or will
decline to serve as a director.
Set forth below are the names of, and certain information as of
April 21, 2005 about the business experience of, the
nominees for Class I directors and the current
Class II and Class III directors with unexpired terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
|
| |
|
|
Nominees for and Current Class I Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald L. Lucas
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Private Venture Capital Investor |
|
B. J. Cassin
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Private Venture Capital Investor |
Continuing Class II Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lucio L. Lanza
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Managing Director, Lanza techVentures |
|
Kimon Michaels, Ph.D.
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Co-Vice President, Client Services and Director of PDF
Solutions, Inc. |
Continuing Class III Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John K. Kibarian, Ph.D.
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of PDF
Solutions, Inc. |
|
Susan H. Billat
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Semiconductor Industry Consultant |
Business Experience of Nominees and Incumbent Directors
Except as indicated below, each nominee or incumbent director
has been engaged in the principal occupation set forth above
during the past five years. There are no family relationships
among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company.
Donald L. Lucas has served as a director since May 1999.
He has been a private venture capital investor since 1960. He
served as Chairman of the Board of Cadence Design Systems, Inc.,
an electronic design automation company, from 1988 until May
2004. Mr. Lucas also served as Chairman of the Board and a
5
director of SDA Systems, Inc., a predecessor of Cadence Design
Systems. Mr. Lucas presently serves as a director of
Macromedia, Inc., a software company, Oracle Corporation, an
information management software company and 51job, Inc., a
recruitment and human resource services company. Mr. Lucas
holds a B.A. in Economics and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.
B.J. Cassin has served as a director since November 1995.
Mr. Cassin has been a private venture capital investor
since 1979. Previously, he co-founded Xidex Corporation, a
manufacturer of data storage media in 1969. Mr. Cassin is
chairman of the board of directors of Cerus Corporation, a
medical device company and several private companies.
Mr. Cassin holds an A.B. in Economics from Holy Cross
College.
Lucio L. Lanza has served as the Chairman of the Board
since April 2004 and as a director since November 1995.
Mr. Lanza is the managing director of Lanza techVentures,
an early stage venture capital and investment firm, which he
founded in January 2001. From 1990 to December 2000,
Mr. Lanza served as partner of U.S. Venture Partners,
a venture capital firm. Mr. Lanza served as chairman of the
board of directors of Artisan Components, Inc., a semiconductor
intellectual property company, from November 1997 until December
2004 and as a director from March 1996 until December 2004.
Mr. Lanza has served as a director of ARM Holdings, PLC
since December 2004.
Kimon Michaels, Ph.D., one of our co-founders, has
served in vice presidential capacities since March 1993
including currently as Co-Vice President, Client Services, and
as a director since November 1995. He also served as Chief
Financial Officer from November 1995 to July 1998.
Mr. Michaels received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, a
M.S. E.C.E. and a Ph.D. E.C.E. from Carnegie Mellon University.
John K. Kibarian, Ph.D., one of our co-founders, has
served as President since November 1991 and has served as our
Chief Executive Officer since July 2000. Mr. Kibarian has
served as a director since December 1992. Mr. Kibarian
received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, a M.S. E.C.E. and a
Ph.D. E.C.E. from Carnegie Mellon University.
Susan H. Billat has served as a director since September
2003. Ms. Billat is a principal of Benchmark Strategies, a
consulting firm providing independent analysis of the
semiconductor equipment industry, which she founded in 1990.
From 1996 to 2002, Ms. Billat served with Robertson
Stephens, a former investment bank, most recently as a managing
director and senior semiconductor equipment research analyst.
Ms. Billat is a director and member of the audit committee
of Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc., a semiconductor equipment company.
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP
as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005. Deloitte & Touche LLP has
served as our independent auditors since September 18,
1998. In the event that ratification of this selection of
auditors is not approved by a majority of the shares of common
stock voting at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, the
Audit Committee will review its future selection of auditors.
A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected
to be present at the Annual Meeting. This representative will
have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to
respond to appropriate questions.
6
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by
Deloitte & Touche LLP for professional services
rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Category |
|
Fiscal 2004 Fees | |
|
Fiscal 2003 Fees | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
657,744 |
|
|
$ |
443,401 |
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
22,865 |
|
|
|
236,282 |
|
Tax Fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Compliance/ Preparation
|
|
|
54,913 |
|
|
|
44,688 |
|
|
Other Tax Fees
|
|
|
107,333 |
|
|
|
113,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax Fees
|
|
|
162,246 |
|
|
|
158,604 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
842,855 |
|
|
$ |
838,287 |
|
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed or expected to be
billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for professional
services rendered for the audits of the Companys annual
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the reviews
of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in
the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal years 2004 and 2003, the audit of managements
assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004 as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, Section 404 and consents totaled approximately
$657,744 and $443,401, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed or expected
to be billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for assurance and
related services for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2004 and December 31, 2003 totaled $22,865 and $236,282,
respectively. The audit-related fees for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 included fees
for financial accounting and reporting consultations. The
audit-related fees for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003 included fees for merger and acquisition services in
connection with the acquisition of IDS Software Systems, Inc.
Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte Tax
LLP for tax compliance/preparation services for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 totaled
$54,913 and $44,688, respectively. Tax compliance/preparation
services consisted of fees billed for assistance in preparation
of the Companys U.S. federal, state and local tax
returns. The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte Tax LLP for
other tax services for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2004 and December 31, 2003 totaled $107,333 and $113,916,
respectively. Other tax services consisted of fees billed for
tax advice related to international and domestic tax consulting
and planning.
All Other Fees. There were no fees billed or expected to
be billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for any other
services rendered to the Company during the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and
Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit
and permissable non-audit services provided by
Deloitte & Touche LLP. These services may include audit
services, audit-related services, tax services and other
services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year
and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or
category of services and is generally subject to an initial
estimated budget. Deloitte & Touche LLP and management
are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee
regarding the extent of services provided by Deloitte &
Touche LLP in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees
performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve
particular services on a case-by-case basis.
7
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
PROPOSAL NO. 2.
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
During the last fiscal year (the period from December 31,
2003 through December 31, 2004), the Board met eleven times
and took action by unanimous written consent five times during
the same period. Each director attended at least 75% of all
Board and applicable committee meetings during this time. The
Board has four standing committees: the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Special
Option Committee and the Audit Committee. Each of these
committees has a written charter approved by the Board (except
for the Special Option Committee). A copy of each charter can be
found on our website at www.pdf.com, and copies of the charters
of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are attached as
Appendices A, B and C, respectively, to this Proxy Statement.
The members of the committees are identified in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governance | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
Special Option | |
Director |
|
Committee | |
|
Committee | |
|
Audit Committee | |
|
Committee | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
John K. Kibarian, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Lucio L. Lanza
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kimon Michaels, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Cassin
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Donald L. Lucas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
Susan H. Billat
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee held one meeting during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004. The functions of the
Compensation Committee are to establish and administer our
policies regarding annual executive salaries and cash incentives
and long-term equity incentives and to assist with the
administration of our 2001 Stock Plan and 2001 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee
is an independent director as defined in
Rule 4200 of the Marketplace Rules of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., and an outside
director as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Board approved the formation of a Special Option Committee
in June of 2000 to assist the Compensation Committee by serving
as administrator for our stock plans for the purposes of
granting options to purchase up to 35,000 shares of common
stock to new, non-executive employees. In January of 2002, the
Board also authorized the Special Option Committee to approve
merit stock increases to existing employees by granting them
options to purchase up to 15,000 shares of common stock.
Mr. Kibarian comprises the Special Option Committee, with
Mr. Melman serving in a confirmatory role. The Special
Option Committee took action by unanimous written consent 15
times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
The Audit Committee held nine meetings and took action by
unanimous written consent twice during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. The functions of the Audit Committee are
to recommend the engagement of the independent public auditors,
to monitor the effectiveness of our internal and external audit
efforts, and to monitor and assess the effectiveness of our
financial and accounting organization and our system of internal
accounting controls. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules
adopted by the SEC require us to disclose whether the Audit
Committee includes at least one member who is an Audit
Committee Financial Expert within the meaning of such Act
and rules. The Board has determined that there is at least one
such financial expert on the Audit Committee and has designated
Donald L. Lucas as its Audit Committee Financial Expert. The
Board believes that Mr. Lucas qualifies as such an expert
in view of his extensive business background and experience,
including service at Oracle Corporation as a director since 1980
and as
8
Chairman of Oracle Corporations Audit and Finance
Committee since 1987; Cadence Design Systems, Inc. as Chairman
of the Board from 1988 until May 2004 and as a member of
Cadences Audit Committee since 1988; and Macromedia, Inc.
as a director since 1992 and as Chairman of Macromedias
Audit Committee since 2001 and a member since 1992.
Additionally, Mr. Lucas received a bachelors degree in
economics and a master of business administration from Stanford
University, and has been a private investor and venture
capitalist for more than 40 years. As a result of such
background and experience, the Board believes that
Mr. Lucas has acquired an understanding of generally
accepted accounting principles and financial statements, the
ability to assess the general application of such principles in
connection with accounting estimates, accruals and reserves,
experience analyzing and evaluating financial statements that
present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues
generally comparable to those of the Company, an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting and an
understanding of Audit Committee functions.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held three
meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
The functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee are to oversee all aspects of the Companys
corporate governance functions on behalf of the Board and make
recommendations on corporate governance issues, identify, review
and evaluate candidates to serve as directors and to make other
recommendations to the Board regarding affairs related to the
directors of the Company. Each of the members of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee is an independent
director as defined in Rule 4200 of the Marketplace
Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not set
specific criteria for directors but believes the Company is well
served when the Board is appropriately sized, the members of the
Board possess the requisite talents and experience with respect
to technology, business, finance, administration, and public
service, the members of the Board possess a variety of
backgrounds and demonstrated personal integrity, character and
acumen that complement the core components of the Board. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does, however,
believe it appropriate for at least one, and, preferably,
several, members of the Board to meet the criteria for an
audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC
rules, and that a majority of the members of the Board meet the
definition of independent director under Nasdaq
rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also
believes it appropriate for certain key members of the
Companys management to participate as members of the
Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
considers suggestions from many sources, including stockholders,
regarding possible candidates for director. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee considers properly submitted
stockholder nominees for director in the same manner as nominees
for director from other sources. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the
current members of the Board willing to continue in service.
Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are
relevant to the Companys business and who are willing to
continue in service are first considered for re-nomination. If
any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service,
the Board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election or
the Board decides to expand the size of the Board, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies the
desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the
guidelines set forth above. Current members of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee are polled for suggestions as
to individuals meeting the guidelines of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. Research may also be performed
to identify qualified individuals. To date, the Company has not
engaged third parties to identify, evaluate or assist in
identifying potential nominees, although the Company reserves
the right in the future to retain a third party search firm, if
necessary. Stockholders may send any recommendations for
director nominees or other communications to the Board of
Directors or any individual director at the following address:
Board of Directors (or Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee or name of individual director)
c/o Corporate Secretary
PDF Solutions, Inc.
333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 700
Santa Clara, California 95110
9
All director nominations received by the Secretary of the
Company in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements set
forth in Section 2.5 of the bylaws of the Company are
reported to the Board or the individual directors.
The Company strongly encourages all of the members of its Board
of Directors to attend its Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Five
members of the Board attended our Annual Meeting last year.
Director Compensation
Our non-employee directors received the following cash
compensation for serving on the Board of Directors during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, an annual cash
retainer fee in the amount of $15,000; per meeting fees of
$1,500 per board meeting ($500 for telephone
participation); and per meeting fees of $1,000 per
committee meeting ($500 for telephone participation) for
committee meetings held on days other than the same date as a
board meeting (in which case there is no additional per meeting
fee). The Chairman of the Board received additional fees
consisting of an annual cash retainer in the amount of $30,000
plus an option to purchase 30,000 shares a year.
Committee chairpersons received additional fees as follows:
Audit Committee Chair $10,000 plus an option to
purchase 5,000 shares per year; Compensation Committee
Chair $5,000 plus an option to purchase 5,000 shares
per year; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Chair $5,000 plus an option to purchase 5,000 shares
per year. Directors were reimbursed for reasonable travel
expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of
Directors and committee meetings. Our 2001 Stock Plan provides
for the automatic grant of nonstatutory options to non-employee
directors. Each new director subsequent to July 26, 2001,
the effective date of our initial public offering, will be
granted options to purchase 30,000 shares. In
addition, each non-employee director is currently granted
options to purchase 15,000 shares each year following
the conclusion of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for such
year. These grants each vest at the rate of 25% on the one-year
anniversary of the date of grant, and at the rate of 1/48 of the
total options granted in each month thereafter.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company provides information on its website about its
corporate governance policies, including the Companys Code
of Ethics, and charters for the committees of the Board. The
website can be found at www.pdf.com.
The Companys policies and practices reflect corporate
governance initiatives that are compliant with the listing
requirements of Nasdaq and the corporate governance requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including:
|
|
|
A majority of the board members are independent as defined in
Rule 4200 of the Marketplace Rules of the National
Association of Securities Dealers; |
|
|
All members of the key board committees the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nomination and
Corporate Governance Committee are independent as
the term is defined under the Nasdaq rules; |
|
|
The independent members of the Board meet at least twice per
year in execution sessions without the presence of management; |
|
|
The Company has an ethics hotline available to all employees,
and the Companys Audit Committee has procedures in place
for the anonymous submission of employee complaints on
accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters; and |
|
|
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of
its employees, including its principal executive officer and all
members of its finance department, including the principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer, as well as
the Board of Directors. |
Our Board welcomes communications from our stockholders.
Stockholders may send communications to the Board, or any
director in particular, at the following address: Investor
Relations, c/o PDF Solutions, Inc.,
10
333 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 700, San Jose,
California 95110. Any correspondence addressed to the Board or
to any one of our directors care of our offices is reviewed by
our Investor Relations department and presented from time to
time to the Board at its regular meetings.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table shows how much common stock is owned by
owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock and by
the directors, the Named Executive Officers identified on
page 11, and all executive officers and directors as a
group, as of March 31, 2005. Except as otherwise indicated,
the address for each person listed as a director or officer is
c/o PDF Solutions, Inc., 333 West San Carlos Street,
Suite 700, San Jose, CA 95110. Unless otherwise
indicated in the footnotes, each person or entity has sole
voting and investment power, or shares such powers with his
spouse, with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and | |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Beneficial | |
|
Percentage of | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | |
|
Ownership(1) | |
|
Common Stock(1)(2) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
5% Stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
|
|
1,788,300 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
% |
114 West 47th Street, Suite 1926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10036 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Research and Management Company and SMALLCAP World Fund, Inc. |
|
|
1,520,000 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
333 South Hope Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90071 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John K. Kibarian(5) |
|
|
2,757,419 |
|
|
|
10.68 |
|
Kimon Michaels(6) |
|
|
1,684,530 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
|
Andre Hawit |
|
|
1,567,327 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
David Joseph(7) |
|
|
300,110 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
B. J. Cassin(8) |
|
|
277,289 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
P. Steven Melman(9) |
|
|
269,184 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
Cornelis D. Hartgring(10) |
|
|
139,878 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James Jensen(11) |
|
|
115,311 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lucio L. Lanza(12) |
|
|
113,339 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rebecca M. Baybrook(13) |
|
|
82,274 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald L. Lucas(14) |
|
|
57,380 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kevin MacLean(15) |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Zia Malik(16) |
|
|
17,707 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Susan H. Billat(17) |
|
|
16,249 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)(18) |
|
|
7,417,997 |
|
|
|
28.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules.
Beneficial ownership calculations for 5% stockholders are based
primarily on publicly-filed Schedule 13Ds or
13Gs, which 5% stockholders are required to file with the
SEC, and which generally set forth ownership interests as of
December 31, 2004. In computing the number of shares
beneficially owned by a person, we have included shares for
which the named person has sole or shared power over voting or
investment decisions. The number of shares beneficially owned
includes common stock which the named person has the right to
acquire, through conversion, option or warrant exercise, or
otherwise, within 60 days after March 31, 2005. |
11
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on
25,823,996 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2005.
For each named person, the percentage ownership includes stock,
which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days
after March 31, 2005, as described in Footnote 1.
However, such shares shall not be deemed outstanding with
respect to the calculation of ownership percentage for any other
person. |
|
|
(3) |
The Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2005 by T. Rowe
Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), an
Investment Adviser registered under Section 203 of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, indicates that Price Associates
has sole dispositive power of 1,788,300 shares and sole
voting power of 204,700 shares. |
|
|
(4) |
The Schedule 13G jointly filed on February 14, 2005 by
Capital Research and Management (Capital Research),
an Investment Adviser registered under Section 203 of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and SMALLCAP WorldFund, Inc.
(SMALLCAP), an investment company registered under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, indicates that Capital
Research has sole dispositive power of 1,520,000 shares and
that SMALLCAP has sole voting power of 1,100,000 shares.
Capital Research disclaims beneficial ownership of
1,520,000 shares pursuant to Rule 13d-4. |
|
|
(5) |
Includes 116,663 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
|
(6) |
Includes 126,454 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes 88,121 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes 11,666 shares held in the name of Cassin Family
Partners, A California Limited Partnership, 250,000 shares
held in the name of The Cassin Family Trust U/ D/ T dtd
1/31/96 and 15,623 shares issuable upon the exercise of
stock options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 80,831 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 133,331 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(11) |
Includes 110,622 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(12) |
Includes 1,042 unvested shares subject to our right to
repurchase upon termination from service and 23,123 shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options, each as of
March 31, 2005 or within 60 days thereafter. |
|
(13) |
Includes 80,831 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(14) |
Includes 20,382 shares held by the Donald L. Lucas
Remuneration Trust and 21,375 shares held by the Donald L.
Lucas & Lygia S. Lucas Trust U/ D/ T 12/3/84. Also
includes 15,623 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(15) |
Includes 10,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(16) |
Includes 17,707 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(17) |
Includes 16,249 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options as of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days
thereafter. |
|
(18) |
Includes an aggregate of 1,042 unvested shares, which are
subject to our right of repurchase upon termination of
employment or service and an aggregate of 835,178 shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options as of March 31,
2005 or within 60 days thereafter. |
12
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2004 about our Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise
of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity
compensation plans, including the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the
1997 Stock Plan, 2001 Stock Plan, the Stock Option/ Stock
Issuance Plan and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
Remaining Available for | |
|
|
to be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Future Issuance Under | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Equity Compensation Plans | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
(Excluding Securities | |
Plan Category |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Reflected in Column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders
|
|
|
4,466,126 |
|
|
$ |
9.991 |
|
|
|
3,363,055 |
(1)(2)(3) |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders
|
|
|
486,156 |
(4) |
|
$ |
7.221 |
|
|
|
323,428 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,952,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,686,483 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 2,332,319 shares available for issuance pursuant
to options, stock appreciation rights, stock purchase rights and
long-term performance awards under the 2001 Plan. The 2001 Plan
includes an evergreen feature, which provides for an
automatic annual increase in the number of shares available
under the plan on the first day of each of our fiscal years
through 2011, equal to the lesser of 3,000,000 shares, 5%
of our outstanding common stock on the last day of the
immediately preceding fiscal year or such amount as is
determined by our Board of Directors. |
|
(2) |
Includes 1,030,736 shares available for issuance under the
ESPP. The ESPP, designed to comply with Internal Revenue Code
Section 423, includes an evergreen feature,
which provides for an automatic annual increase in the number of
shares available under the plan on the first day of each of our
fiscal years through 2011, equal to the lesser of
675,000 shares, 5% of our outstanding common stock on the
last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or such amount
as is determined by our Board of Directors. |
|
(3) |
Other than in connection with outstanding awards, no shares
remain available for issuance pursuant to either of the 1996
Stock Option Plan or the 1997 Stock Plan. |
|
(4) |
The Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan was assumed by us upon the
acquisition of IDS Software Systems, Inc. |
13
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER MATTERS
The following table shows the compensation earned by
(a) the person who served as our Chief Executive Officer
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
(b) the four other most highly compensated individuals who
served as an executive officer during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Named Executive
Officers); and (c) the compensation received by each
of these people for the two preceding fiscal years.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation(3) | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
John K. Kibarian
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
and President
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
(2) |
Zia Malik
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
160,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,714 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
Vice President, Sales
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
7,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Joseph
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
Chief Strategy Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
216,250 |
|
|
|
72,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
James Jensen
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
184,950 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
Co-Vice President,
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
182,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,800 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
Client Services
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
143,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
P. Steven Melman
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
And Vice President,
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
179,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
Finance and Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts listed under All Other Compensation
represent the dollar value of premiums for term life insurance
paid by us on behalf of each Named Executive Officer during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. There is no cash
surrender value under these life insurance policies. |
|
(2) |
Includes $1,000 received by Mr. Kibarian in connection with
a PDF Solutions intellectual property patent award. |
|
(3) |
Includes non-recoverable advances and sales commissions paid to
Mr. Malik for sales made in 2003 and 2004, respectively. |
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table provides information with respect to stock
options granted to the Named Executive Officers during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, as
required by SEC rules, the table sets
14
forth the hypothetical gains that would exist for the options
based on assumed rates of annual compound stock price
appreciation during the option term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants(1) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Value at Assumed | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Annual Rates of Stock | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Per-share | |
|
|
|
Price Appreciation For | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Option Term(1) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
in Fiscal | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted(#) | |
|
Year(%)(2) | |
|
($/sh) | |
|
Date | |
|
5%($) | |
|
10%($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
John K. Kibarian
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zia Malik
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
|
|
|
9/02/2014 |
|
|
|
414,537 |
|
|
|
803,130 |
|
David A. Joseph
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Jensen
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Steven Melman
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
No stock appreciation rights were granted to the Named Executive
Officers in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
The Company granted stock options representing
1,047,400 shares to employees in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. |
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table provides certain information with respect to
stock options exercised by the Named Executive Officers during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The table also
provides the number of shares covered by stock options as of the
end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and the
value of in-the-money stock options, which
represents the positive difference between the exercise price of
a stock option and the market price of the shares subject to
such option at the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options at December 31, | |
|
In-the-Money Options | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
2004(1) | |
|
at December 31, 2004(2) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Exercise | |
|
Value Realized |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
John K. Kibarian
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
97,915 |
|
|
|
82,085 |
|
|
$ |
533,242.44 |
|
|
$ |
568,357.56 |
|
Zia Malik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
80,625.00 |
|
|
|
403,125.00 |
|
David Joseph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,622 |
|
|
|
44,377 |
|
|
|
472,410.90 |
|
|
|
324,885.46 |
|
James Jensen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,582 |
|
|
|
91,218 |
|
|
|
188,032.38 |
|
|
|
439,934.52 |
|
P. Steven Melman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,331 |
|
|
|
51,669 |
|
|
|
329,388.12 |
|
|
|
318,611.88 |
|
|
|
(1) |
No stock appreciation rights were outstanding during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Based on the $16.11 per share closing price of our common
stock on The Nasdaq National Stock Market on December 31,
2004, less the exercise price of the options. |
Change of Control Arrangements
On July 9, 1998, we entered into a letter agreement with
Mr. Melman to act as our Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer. This letter
agreement provides that in the event Mr. Melman is
terminated without cause any time after his one-year anniversary
with us and there is no change of control, Mr. Melman will
receive six months accelerated vesting of shares purchased
pursuant to an option or restricted stock purchase agreement. In
the event of a change of control, Mr. Melman will receive
24 months accelerated vesting, regardless of whether his
employment is terminated. Additionally, in the event
Mr. Melmans employment with the Company is terminated
by the Company at any time without cause, he
15
will be entitled to receive his monthly base salary and benefits
for a period of six months, paid on a monthly basis.
Change of control is defined as an event whereby a
party or group of parties, different from those in control of
PDF Solutions at the time of Mr. Melmans offer,
attains a majority voting right in PDF Solutions.
On August 29, 2002 we entered into a letter agreement with
Mr. Cornelis Hartgring to act as our Vice President, Sales.
This letter agreement provides that in the event of a change of
control of PDF Solutions during the first two years of
Mr. Hartgrings employment, he will be entitled to
receive twelve (12) months acceleration of vesting
regardless of whether his employment is terminated. For purposes
of Mr. Hartgrings agreement, a change of
control is defined as an event whereby a party or group of
parties, different from those maintaining control at the time of
Mr. Hartgrings agreement, attains a 55% voting right
in PDF.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of
the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that might incorporate
future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in
part, the Compensation Committee Report, the Audit Committee
Report and the Stock Performance Graph shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any such filings.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following is a report of the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors describing the compensation policies
applicable to the Companys executive officers during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The Compensation
Committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring our
general compensation policies and compensation plans, as well as
the specific compensation levels for executive officers.
Executive officers who are also directors have not participated
in deliberations or decisions involving their own compensation.
General Compensation Policy
Under the supervision of the Board of Directors, our
compensation policy is designed to attract and retain qualified
key executives critical to our growth and long-term success. It
is the objective of the Board of Directors to have a portion of
each executives compensation contingent upon our
performance as well as upon the individuals personal
performance. Accordingly, each executive officers
compensation package is comprised of three elements:
(i) base salary which reflects individual performance and
expertise, (ii) variable bonus awards payable in cash and
tied to the achievement of certain performance goals that the
Board of Directors establishes from time to time for the Company
and (iii) long-term stock-based incentive awards which are
designed to strengthen the mutuality of interests between the
executive officers and our stockholders.
The summary below describes in more detail the factors which the
Board of Directors considers in establishing each of the three
primary components of the compensation package provided to the
executive officers.
Base Salary
The level of base salary is established primarily on the basis
of the individuals qualifications and relevant experience,
the strategic goals for which he or she has responsibility, the
compensation levels at similar companies and the incentives
necessary to attract and retain qualified management. Base
salary may be adjusted each year to take into account the
individuals performance and to maintain a competitive
salary structure. Additionally, the Compensation Committee takes
into account general economic and business conditions. Company
performance does not play a significant role in the
determination of base salary.
Cash-Based Incentive Compensation
Cash bonuses are awarded on a discretionary basis to executive
officers on the basis of their success in achieving designated
individual goals and our success in achieving specific
company-wide goals, such as customer satisfaction, revenue
growth and earnings growth.
16
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We utilize our stock option plans to provide executives and
other key employees with incentives to maximize long-term
stockholder values. Awards under this plan by the Board of
Directors take the form of stock options designed to give the
recipient a significant equity stake and thereby closely align
his or her interests with those of our stockholders. Factors
considered in making such awards include the individuals
position, his or her performance and responsibilities, and
internal comparability considerations.
Each option grant allows the executive officer to acquire shares
of common stock at a fixed price per share (the fair market
value on the date of grant) over a specified period of time (up
to 10 years). The options typically vest over a four-year
period at the rate of 25% on the one year anniversary of the
vesting commencement date, and 1/48 of the total number of
shares subject to the option vest each month thereafter,
contingent upon the executive officers continued
employment with us. Accordingly, the option will provide a
return to the executive officer only if he or she remains in our
service, and then only if the market price of our common stock
appreciates over the option term.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
John K. Kibarian has served as our President since November 1991
and as our Chief Executive Officer since July 2001.
Mr. Kibarians base salary for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 was $250,000 and he did not receive a
cash bonus in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
The factors discussed above in Base Salaries,
Cash-Based Incentive Compensation, and
Long-Term Incentive Compensation were also applied
in establishing the amount of Mr. Kibarians salary.
In addition to the foregoing, other significant factors
considered in establishing Mr. Kibarians compensation
were competitive factors and Mr. Kibarians leadership
in achieving our long and short term strategic goals.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee has considered the impact of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code adopted under
the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, which section
disallows a deduction for any publicly held corporation for
individual compensation exceeding $1 million in any taxable
year for the CEO and four other most highly compensated
executive officers, respectively, unless such compensation meets
the requirements for the performance-based exception
to Section 162(m). As the cash compensation paid by the
Company to each of its executive officers is expected to be
below $1 million and the Committee believes that options
granted under the 2001 Stock Plan to such officers will meet the
requirements for qualifying as performance-based, the committee
believes that Section 162(m) will not affect the tax
deductions available to the Company with respect to the
compensation of its executive officers. It is the Compensation
Committees policy to qualify, to the extent reasonable,
its executive officers compensation for deductibility
under applicable tax law. However, the Company may from time to
time pay compensation to its executive officers that may not be
deductible.
|
|
|
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF |
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF |
|
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.: |
|
|
B.J. Cassin, Chair |
|
Lucio L. Lanza |
|
Donald L. Lucas |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors currently
consists of B. J. Cassin, Donald Lucas and Lucio L. Lanza. No
member of the Compensation Committee or executive officer of PDF
Solutions has a relationship that would constitute an
interlocking relationship with executive officers or directors
of another entity.
17
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is composed of
three independent directors and operates under a written charter
adopted by the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit
Committee are Ms. Billat, Mr. Lucas and
Mr. Cassin. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is
independent as defined by the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules presently
in place. In addition, our Board of Directors has determined
that Mr. Lucas qualifies as an audit committee financial
expert as defined by SEC rules.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the
Audit Committee which governs the Audit Committees
functions and responsibilities. This charter was amended and
restated on July 23, 2003 and again on January 26,
2004, in light of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and new SEC and
NASD rules. The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the
adequacy of this charter at least once per year and makes
recommendations to the Board regarding changes or amendments the
Audit Committee deems appropriate.
The Audit Committee, subject to stockholder ratification,
appoints the accounting firm to be engaged as the Companys
independent auditors. The independent auditors are responsible
for performing an independent audit of the Companys
consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America and
to issue a report thereon. Management is responsible for our
internal controls and the financial reporting process. The Audit
Committee is responsible for monitoring, overseeing and
assessing the effectiveness of these processes.
The Audit Committee held nine meetings and acted twice by
written consent during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004. The meetings were designed to facilitate and encourage
communication between the Audit Committee, management and our
independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP. Management
represented to the Audit Committee that our consolidated
financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 with management and the independent
auditors.
The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the
adequacy of the Companys internal control system,
financial reporting procedures and the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
Communication with Audit Committees, as amended.
The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written
disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors,
Deloitte & Touche LLP as required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees. Additionally, the Audit Committee has
discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the issue of its
independence from PDF Solutions, Inc.
Based on its review of the audited consolidated financial
statements and the various discussions noted above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF |
|
DIRECTORS OF PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.: |
|
|
Donald L. Lucas, Chair |
|
Susan H. Billat |
|
B. J. Cassin |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Loans to, and Other Arrangements with, Officers and
Directors
We had an early exercise provision under our 1996 Stock Option
Plan and 1997 Stock Plan, which allowed our optionholders and
holders of stock purchase rights to purchase shares of stock
underlying unvested options, subject to our own repurchase
right. In addition, we previously had an employee loan program,
which allowed employees to borrow the full exercise price of
their options or stock purchase rights from us by signing
18
a full recourse promissory note bearing interest at the
applicable federal rate in the month of purchase. The following
officers previously participated in the loan program and unless
otherwise indicated, currently have notes outstanding:
In connection with his purchase of 200,000 shares of common
stock on December 4, 1998 we loaned $75,000 to David A.
Joseph under a four-year, 4.46% promissory note. In connection
with his purchase of 33,333 shares on September 20,
1999 we loaned $12,500 to David Joseph under a four year, 4.46%
promissory note and in connection with his purchase of
53,333 shares of common stock on July 14, 2000, we
loaned $160,000 to Mr. Joseph under a four year, 6.62%
promissory note. Mr. Joseph paid off the December 4,
1998 note and the September 20, 1999 note in August 2003
and the July 14, 2000 note in June 2004. These notes were
full recourse notes secured by pledges of the shares of common
stock purchased.
In connection with his purchase of 200,000 shares of common
stock on July 14, 2000, we loaned $600,000 to John K.
Kibarian under a four-year, 6.62% promissory note.
Mr. Kibarian paid this note in March 2004. This note was a
full recourse note secured by pledges of the shares of common
stock purchased.
In connection with his purchase of 50,000 shares of common
stock on July 24, 2001, we loaned approximately $550,000 to
Lucio L. Lanza under a four-year, 7.75% promissory note. This
note is a full recourse note secured by a pledge of the shares
of common stock purchased. At March 31, 2005, his
indebtedness plus accrued interest totaled approximately
$725,188.
Other Transactions
We have granted options to some of our officers and directors.
Please see Compensation of Executive Officers and Other
Matters Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year and
Meetings and Committees of the Board of
Directors Director Compensation.
|
|
|
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification Matters |
As permitted by the Delaware general corporation law, we have
included a provision in our certificate of incorporation to
eliminate the personal liability of our officers and directors
for monetary damages for breach or alleged breach of their
fiduciary duties as officers or directors, other than in cases
of fraud or other willful misconduct.
In addition, our Bylaws provide that we are required to
indemnify our officers and directors even when indemnification
would otherwise be discretionary, and we are required to advance
expenses to our officers and directors as incurred in connection
with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our
officers and directors containing provisions that are in some
respects broader than the specific indemnification provisions
contained in the Delaware general corporation law. The
indemnification agreements require us to indemnify our officers
and directors against liabilities that may arise by reason of
their status or service as officers and directors other than for
liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable
nature, to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any
proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified,
and to obtain our directors and officers insurance
if available on reasonable terms. We have obtained
directors and officers liability insurance in
amounts comparable to other companies of our size and in our
industry.
We believe that all related-party transactions described above
were made on terms no less favorable to us than could have been
otherwise obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
19
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder
return data for our stock since July 26, 2001 (the date on
which the Companys stock was first registered under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) to the cumulative return over such period of
(i) The Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.) Index and (ii) the
RDG Technology Composite Index. The graph assumes that $100 was
invested on July 27, 2001. The graph further assumes that
such amount was initially invested in the Common Stock of the
Company at a per share price of $12.00 (price at which such
stock was first offered to the public by the Company on the date
of its initial public offering) and reinvestment of any
dividends. The stock price performance on the following graph is
not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
COMPARISON OF 41 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG PDF SOLUTIONS, INC., THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S.)
INDEX
AND THE RDG TECHNOLOGY COMPOSITE INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Return | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
7/01 |
|
|
9/01 |
|
|
12/01 |
|
|
3/02 |
|
|
6/02 |
|
|
9/02 |
|
|
12/02 |
|
|
3/03 |
|
|
6/03 |
|
|
9/03 |
|
|
12/03 |
|
|
3/04 |
|
|
6/04 |
|
|
9/04 |
|
|
12/04 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
85.42 |
|
|
|
|
175.00 |
|
|
|
|
142.92 |
|
|
|
|
60.92 |
|
|
|
|
44.08 |
|
|
|
|
57.75 |
|
|
|
|
52.92 |
|
|
|
|
97.50 |
|
|
|
|
93.75 |
|
|
|
|
124.17 |
|
|
|
|
96.25 |
|
|
|
|
70.92 |
|
|
|
|
101.25 |
|
|
|
|
134.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S.)
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
68.85 |
|
|
|
|
88.30 |
|
|
|
|
81.77 |
|
|
|
|
66.66 |
|
|
|
|
54.46 |
|
|
|
|
51.18 |
|
|
|
|
46.27 |
|
|
|
|
58.05 |
|
|
|
|
71.04 |
|
|
|
|
77.77 |
|
|
|
|
84.50 |
|
|
|
|
82.69 |
|
|
|
|
76.81 |
|
|
|
|
82.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RDG TECHNOLOGY COMPOSITE
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
69.85 |
|
|
|
|
97.23 |
|
|
|
|
88.52 |
|
|
|
|
60.18 |
|
|
|
|
42.80 |
|
|
|
|
53.23 |
|
|
|
|
52.35 |
|
|
|
|
63.85 |
|
|
|
|
71.88 |
|
|
|
|
80.76 |
|
|
|
|
84.35 |
|
|
|
|
86.20 |
|
|
|
|
78.46 |
|
|
|
|
87.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 7/27/01 in stock or on 7/31/01 in
index-including investment of dividends. Fiscal year ending
December 31. |
Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors,
our executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of the
common stock (collectively, Reporting Persons) to
file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership of
our common stock. Reporting Persons are required by SEC
regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a)
reports they file. To our knowledge, based solely on our review
of the copies of such reports received or written
representations from certain Reporting Persons that no other
reports were required, we believe that during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, all Reporting Persons complied with
20
all applicable filing requirements, except for Mr. Malik,
who filed one report for the acquisition of an option to
purchase shares 4 days after the required filing date.
Other Matters
The Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be
presented to the Annual Meeting. If any other business is
properly brought before the Annual Meeting, proxies in the
enclosed form will be voted in respect thereof as the proxy
holders deem advisable.
It is important that the proxies be returned promptly and that
your shares be represented. Stockholders are urged to mark,
date, execute and promptly return the accompanying proxy card in
the enclosed envelope.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
PETER COHN |
|
Secretary |
San Jose, California
April 22, 2005
21
APPENDIX A
Audit Committee Charter
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
CHARTER OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose and Powers
The purpose of the Audit Committee established by this charter
will be to make such examinations as are necessary to monitor
the corporate financial reporting and the internal and external
audits of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the Company), to
provide to the Board of Directors (the Board) the
results of its examinations and recommendations derived
therefrom, to outline to the Board improvements made, or to be
made, in internal accounting controls, to appoint, compensate
and directly oversee the Companys independent accountants,
to supervise the finance function of the Company (which will
include, among other matters, the Companys investment
activities) to engage and compensate independent counsel and
other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties, to
the extent permitted under applicable laws, rules and
regulations, and the Companys bylaws and Certificate of
Incorporation, delegate to one or more members of the Audit
Committee the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit services
and non-audit services provided such decisions are presented to
the full Audit Committee at regularly scheduled meetings and to
provide the Board such additional information and materials as
it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant
financial matters which require Board attention.
The Audit Committee will undertake those specific duties and
responsibilities listed below, and such other duties as the
Board from time to time may prescribe.
Charter Review
The Audit Committee will review and reassess the adequacy of
this charter at least once per year. This review is initially
intended to be conducted at the first Audit Committee meeting
following the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but
may be conducted at any time the Audit Committee desires to do
so. Additionally, to the extent and in the manner that the
Company is legally required to do by the rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC), this charter (as
then constituted) shall be publicly filed.
Membership
The Audit Committee shall consist of at least three
(3) members of the Board. Such members will be elected and
serve at the pleasure of the Board. The members of the Audit
Committee will not be employees of the Company. Each member of
the Audit Committee shall meet the independence standards and
have the financial expertise as required by the Rules of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder
(collectively, the Exchange Act), the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and all other applicable rules and regulations. At
least one member of the Audit Committee must qualify as a
financial expert as defined in Section 407 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the SEC or in any other
applicable laws, rules or regulations.
Meetings
The Audit Committee will meet separately with the Chief
Executive Officer and separately with the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company at least quarterly to review the
financial affairs of the Company. The Audit Committee will meet
with the independent accountants of the Company at least once
quarterly, including upon the completion of the annual audit,
outside the presence of management, and at such other times as
it deems appropriate to review the independent accountants
examination and management report.
A-1
Responsibilities
To fulfill its responsibilities and duties, the Audit Committee
shall:
|
|
|
1. Appoint the independent accountants for ratification by
the stockholders and approve the compensation of and directly
oversee the independent accountants. |
|
|
2. Engage outside counsel and other advisors and approve
the compensation of and directly oversee such outside counsel
and other advisors. |
|
|
3. Review the plan for and the scope of the audit and
related services at least annually. Confirm that the independent
accountant complies with the Exchange Act and all other
applicable rules and regulations. |
|
|
4. Confirm that the lead audit partner, or the lead audit
partner responsible for reviewing the audit, for the
Companys independent accountants has not performed audit
services for the Company for each of the five previous fiscal
years. |
|
|
5. Pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit
services to be provided by the independent accountants as
required by the Exchange Act. |
|
|
6. Inquire of finance management of the Company and the
independent accountants about significant risks or exposures and
assess the steps management has taken to minimize such risk to
the Company. |
|
|
7. Review with finance management any significant changes
to GAAP, SEC and other accounting policies or standards that
will impact or could impact the financial reports under review. |
|
|
8. Discuss with the independent accountants the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Audit Standards
No. 61 relating to the conduct of the audit, including
reviewing with finance management and the independent
accountants at the completion of the annual audit: |
|
|
|
a. The Companys annual financial statements and
related footnotes; |
|
|
b. The independent accountants audit of the financial
statements; |
|
|
c. Any significant changes required in the independent
accountants audit plan; |
|
|
d. Any serious difficulties or disputes with management
encountered during the course of the audit; |
|
|
e. Any management letter(s) from the independent
accountants and managements response(s) thereto; and |
|
|
f. Other matters related to the conduct of the audit which
are to be communicated to the Committee under generally accepted
auditing standards. |
|
|
|
9. Ensure the receipt of, and review, a report from the
independent accountant required by Section 10A of the
Exchange Act. |
|
|
10. Review management and independent accountant procedures
established to prevent and uncover unlawful acts and violations
of the Companys Code of Ethics, including with respect to
unlawful political contributions, bribes, unexplained and
unaccounted for payments to intermediaries (foreign or US) and
their execution; ascertaining whether there are any unaccounted
for or off-book transactions; and identifying whether there have
been any payments made in violation of applicable laws and
standards of business which are intended to influence employees
of potential customers to purchase their products (commercial
bribes, kickbacks, etc.). |
|
|
11. Ensure the receipt of, and review, a written statement
from the Companys independent accountants delineating all
relationships between the accountants and the Company,
consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard 1. |
A-2
|
|
|
12. Review with the Companys independent accountants
any disclosed relationship or service that may impact the
objectivity and independence of the accountant. |
|
|
13. Take, or recommend that the Board take, appropriate
action to oversee the independence of the outside accountants,
including with respect to setting clear policies regarding
current or former employees of the independent accountants being
hired by the Company. |
|
|
14. Review with finance management and the independent
accountants at least annually (i) the Companys
application of critical accounting policies and its consistency
from period to period, and the compatibility of these accounting
policies with generally accepted accounting principles, and
(where appropriate) the Companys provisions for future
occurrences which may have a material impact on the financial
statements of the Company; (ii) all alternative treatments
of financial information within GAAP that have been discussed
with management, the ramifications of the use of such
alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment
preferred by the independent accountants; (iii) all other
material communications between the independent accountants; and
(iv) all other issues raised by the independent accountants
including but not limited to the adequacy of personnel, possible
weaknesses in the Companys internal controls, the attitude
and morale of the Companys finance employees, any concerns
expressed by finance or other Company personnel. |
|
|
15. Consider and approve, if appropriate, significant
changes to the Companys accounting principles and
financial disclosure practices as suggested by the independent
accountants, and finance management. Review with the independent
accountants and finance management, at appropriate intervals,
the extent to which any changes or improvements in accounting or
financial practices, as approved by the Committee, have been
implemented. |
|
|
16. Review and discuss with finance management all material
off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations
(including contingent obligations) and other relationships of
the Company with unconsolidated entities or other persons, that
may have a material current or future effect on financial
condition, changes in financial condition, results of
operations, liquidity, capital resources, capital reserves or
significant components of revenues or expenses. |
|
|
17. Oversee the adequacy of the Companys system of
internal accounting controls including computerized information
system controls and security. Obtain from the independent
accountants management letters or summaries on such internal
accounting controls. Review any related significant findings and
recommendations of the independent accountants together with
managements responses thereto. |
|
|
18. Oversee the effectiveness of the internal audit
function and obtain from the officers that certify the
Companys financial reports an assessment of the internal
controls, a report regarding any significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of those controls which could adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and any special steps adopted in light
of material control deficiencies and a report of any fraud in
connection with the preparation of reports and any other reports
required by applicable laws, rules or regulations. |
|
|
19. Oversee the Companys compliance with the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act. |
|
|
20. Oversee the Companys compliance with SEC
requirements for disclosure of accountants services and
Audit Committee members and activities. |
|
|
21. Oversee the Companys finance function, which may
include the adoption from time to time of a policy with regard
to the investment of the Companys assets. |
|
|
22. Review and approve all related party transactions other
than compensation transactions. |
|
|
23. Review the periodic reports of the Company with finance
management and the independent accountants prior to filing of
the reports with the SEC. |
A-3
|
|
|
24. In connection with each periodic report of the Company,
review: |
|
|
|
a. Managements disclosure to the Committee under
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; |
|
|
b. The contents of the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer certificates to be filed under
Sections 302 and 906 of the Act. |
|
|
|
25. Periodically discuss with the independent accountants,
without management being present, (i) their judgments about
the quality, appropriateness, and acceptability of the
Companys accounting principles and financial disclosure
practices, as applied in its financial reporting, and
(ii) the completeness and accuracy of the Companys
financial statements. |
|
|
26. Review and discuss with finance management the
Companys earnings press releases (including the use of
pro forma or adjusted non-GAAP
information) as well as financial information and earnings
guidance provided to analysts. |
|
|
27. Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and
treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. |
|
|
28. Establish procedures for the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
|
|
In addition to the above responsibilities, the Audit Committee
will undertake such other duties as the Board delegates to it or
that are required by applicable laws, rules and regulations. |
Finally, the Audit Committee shall ensure that the
Companys independent accountants understand both
(i) their ultimate accountability to the Board and the
Audit Committee, as representatives of the Companys
stockholders and (ii) the Boards and the Audit
Committees ultimate authority and responsibility to
select, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the
Companys independent accountants (or to nominate the
outside accountant to be proposed for stockholder approval in
any proxy statement).
Reports
The Audit Committee will to the extent deemed appropriate record
its summaries of recommendations to the Board in written form
that will be incorporated as a part of the minutes of the Board.
To the extent required, the Audit Committee will also prepare
and sign a Report of the Audit Committee for inclusion in the
Companys proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
A-4
APPENDIX B
Compensation Committee Charter
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
CHARTER OF
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose
The purpose of the Compensation Committee established pursuant
to this charter will be to make such examinations as are
necessary to create and to implement appropriate compensation
policies for the executive officers and such other employees of
the Company as the Board shall deem appropriate, including
performance-based and long-term compensation.
Membership and Power to Act
The Compensation Committee will be comprised of at least three
(3) members of the Board of Directors. Such members will be
elected by and serve at the pleasure of the Board. As long as
the Companys Common Stock remains publicly traded, no
member of the Committee will be an employee (including a current
officer) or a former officer of the Company or will have engaged
in any transaction or been involved in any business relationship
which would disqualify such Committee member as (i) a
Non-Employee Director under
Rule 16b-3(b)(3)(i) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), (ii) as an outside
director under the rules promulgated under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended or (iii) as an independent director as the term
independent is defined in Nasdaq
Rule 4200(a)(15).
In the event that one or more members of the Committee are
absent from a meeting of the Committee, the remaining members of
the Committee (provided there are at least two such members),
acting unanimously, shall have the power to take any action
necessary or convenient to the efficient discharge of the
foregoing. No action of the Committee shall be valid unless
taken pursuant to a resolution adopted and approved by at least
two members of the Committee. No employee-member of the
Committee, if any, shall participate in any discussions or
deliberations relating to such persons own compensation.
For the purposes of obtaining an exemption under
Rules 16b-3(d) and (e) promulgated under
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, any employee-member of the
Committee shall abstain or recuse themselves from deliberations
relating to such approvals.
Meetings
The Compensation Committee will meet at such times as it deems
appropriate to review the compensation of the executive officers
of the Company.
Responsibilities
1. To establish and review at least annually the
Companys general compensation policies applicable to the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and other executive
officers, including the relationship of the Companys
performance to executive compensation generally, and the Chief
Executive Officers compensation in particular, and the
bases for the Chief Executive Officers compensation. The
Committees power to establish and review annually the
Companys compensation policies applicable to the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and other executive
officers shall be subject to any modification or veto made by
the full Board in its discretion. The Companys Chief
Executive Officer shall not participate in any deliberations
concerning his or her compensation;
B-1
2. To review and approve the level of compensation,
including salaries, fees, benefits, executive incentive plans
and perquisites, of the Chief Executive Officer and the other
executive officers of the Company;
3. To review and advise the Board concerning the
performance of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and of
those other employees whose compensation is within the review
jurisdiction of the Committee;
4. To review (and, if deemed appropriate by the Committee,
retain consultants regarding) and advise the Board concerning
both regional and industry-wide compensation practices and
trends in order to assess the adequacy and competitiveness of
the Companys executive compensation programs among
comparable companies in the Companys industry;
5. To administer the stock compensation plans that may be
adopted by the Company from time to time, including the
determination of employees and the parties who are to receive
grants of stock or stock options and the terms of such grants;
6. To perform such other functions and have such other
powers as may be necessary or convenient to the efficient
discharge of the foregoing; and
7. To report to the Board of Directors regarding the
foregoing from time to time, or whenever it shall be called upon
to do so.
Reports
The Compensation Committee will record its summaries of
recommendations to the Board in written form which will be
incorporated as a part of the minutes of the Board of Directors.
B-2
APPENDIX C
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
CHARTER OF
THE NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Organization
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the
Committee) of the Board of Directors (the
Board) of PDF Solutions, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), shall consist of at least
three (3) members of the Board. No Committee member shall
be an employee of the Company and each member shall be free from
any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his
or her independent judgment, as determined by the Board of
Directors, in accordance with the applicable independence
requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The members of the Committee and the
Committee chairperson shall be appointed by the Board.
Statement of Policy
The purpose of the Committee shall be to (i) oversee all
aspects of the Companys corporate governance functions on
behalf of the Board; (ii) make recommendations to the Board
regarding corporate governance issues; (iii) identify,
review and evaluate candidates to serve as directors of the
Company; (iv) serve as a focal point for communication
between such candidates, non-committee directors and the
Companys management; (v) recommend such candidates to
the Board; and (vi) make such other recommendations to the
Board regarding affairs relating to the directors of the
Company, including director compensation.
Operating Principles and Processes
In fulfilling its function and responsibilities, the Committee
should give due consideration to the following operating
principles and processes:
|
|
|
|
|
Communication Regular and meaningful contact
throughout the year with the Chairman of the Board, other
committee chairpersons, members of senior management and
independent professional advisors to the Board and its various
committees, as applicable, is viewed as important for
strengthening the Committees knowledge of relevant current
and prospective corporate governance issues. |
|
|
|
Committee Education/ Orientation Developing
with management and participating in a process for systematic
review of important corporate governance issues and trends in
corporate governance practices that could potentially impact the
Company will enhance the effectiveness of the Committee. |
|
|
|
Resources The Committee shall be authorized
to access such internal and, in consultation with senior
management, external resources as the Committee deems necessary
or appropriate to fulfill its defined responsibilities,
including engagement of independent counsel, consultants and
other professional advisors, as well as executive search firms
to help identify director candidates. The Committee shall have
sole authority to approve fees, costs and other terms of
engagement of such outside resources. The Committee shall have
the authority to perform such other functions, and shall have
such powers, as may be necessary or appropriate in the efficient
and lawful discharge of its responsibilities hereunder. |
|
|
|
Reporting to the Board of Directors The
Committee, through the Committee chairperson, shall report all
material activities of the Committee to the Board from time to
time, or whenever so requested by the Board. |
C-1
Responsibilities
The operation of the Committee will be subject to the provisions
of the Bylaws of the Company and the Delaware General
Corporation Law, each as in effect from time to time. The
Committee will have the full power and authority to carry out
the following primary responsibilities or to delegate such power
and authority to one or more subcommittees of the Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Director Nominations The Committee, in
consultation with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has
the primary responsibility for establishing criteria for Board
membership and identifying, evaluating, reviewing and
recommending qualified candidates proposed by management and/or
shareholders to serve on the Board, including consideration of
any potential conflicts of interest as well as applicable
independence and experience requirements. No specific criteria
for directors has been set by the Committee, but the Committee
believes that the Company is well served when: |
|
|
|
the Board is appropriately sized; |
|
|
|
the members of the Board possess the requisite talents and
experience with respect to technology, business, finance,
administration, and public service; and |
|
|
|
the members of the Board possess a variety of backgrounds and
demonstrated personal integrity, character and acumen that
complement the core components of the Board. |
The Committee also believes it is appropriate for at least one,
and, preferably, several, members of the Board to meet the
criteria for an audit committee financial expert as
defined by SEC rules, and that a majority of the members of the
Board meet the definition of independent director
under NASDAQ rules. The Committee also believes it appropriate
for certain key members of the Companys management to
participate as members of the Board.
The Committee shall also have the primary responsibility for
evaluating, reviewing and considering the recommendation for
nomination of current directors for reelection to the Board. The
Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominees for
director in the same manner as nominees for director from other
sources.
The Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the
current members of the Board willing to continue in service.
Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are
relevant to the Companys business and who are willing to
continue in service are first considered for re-nomination. If
any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service,
the Board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election or
the Board decides to expand the size of the Board, the Committee
identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in
light of the guidelines set forth above. Current members of the
Committee are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting
the guidelines of the Committee. Research may also be performed
to identify qualified individuals including, to the extent
necessary or appropriate, the use of a search firm. The
selection of nominees for director to be presented to the
stockholders for election or reelection shall be made by the
Committee.
At the Boards option, nominations may also be made by a
majority of the independent members of the full Board based on
the recommendations of the Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
Board Committee Nominations The Committee, in
consultation with the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer,
and after due consideration of the wishes, independence and
experience of the individual directors and independence and
experience requirements in accordance with the Nasdaq Stock
Market, the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and applicable law, shall recommend to the entire
Board annually the chairmanship and membership of each committee. |
|
|
|
Continuing Education The Committee shall also
consider instituting a plan or program for the continuing
education of directors. |
|
|
|
Corporate Governance Principles The Committee
shall be responsible, in consultation with management and the
Board, as appropriate, for considering all matters of corporate
governance on behalf of |
C-2
|
|
|
|
|
the Company. The Committee shall develop a set of Corporate
Governance Principles to be applicable to the Company, shall
periodically review and assess these principles and their
application, and shall recommend any changes deemed appropriate
to the Board for its consideration. The Committee shall review
all issues pertaining to violations of the Corporate Governance
Principles and shall be responsible for working with the Board,
and management as appropriate, to address and resolve such
issues. Further, the Committee shall periodically review Company
policy statements to determine their adherence to the
Companys Code of Conduct. |
|
|
|
Code of Conduct The Committee shall, in
consultation with the Companys management, periodically
review the Companys Code of Conduct and shall recommend
any changes deemed appropriate to the Board for its
consideration. The Committee shall also work with the
Companys management, as appropriate, to review and address
violations of the Companys Code of Conduct and/or employee
complaints regarding the same; provided that any and all
accounting related complaints or violations will be addressed by
the Companys Audit Committee in accordance with the terms
of the Audit Committee Charter and those procedures established
by the Audit Committee to address such issues. |
|
|
|
Procedures for Information Dissemination The
Committee shall oversee and review the processes and procedures
used by the Company to provide information to the Board and its
committees. The Committee should consider, among other factors,
the reporting channels through which the Board and its
committees receive information and the level of access to
outside advisors where necessary or appropriate, as well as the
procedures for providing accurate, relevant and appropriately
detailed information to the Board and its committees on a timely
basis. |
Meetings
The Committee will hold at least one regular meeting per year
and additional meetings as the Committee deems appropriate. The
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Financial Officer may attend any meeting of the Committee,
except for portions of the meetings where his, her or their
presence would be inappropriate, as determined by the Committee.
Minutes and Reports
Minutes of each meeting will be kept and distributed to each
member of the Committee, members of the Board who are not
members of the Committee and the Secretary of the Company. The
Chairman of the Committee will report to the Board from time to
time, or whenever so requested by the Board.
C-3
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF PDF SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD MAY 26, 2005
The undersigned stockholder of PDF Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the Company)
hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement,
each dated April 22, 2005, and hereby appoints John K. Kibarian and P. Steven Melman or either of
them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the
name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PDF
Solutions, Inc. to be held on Thursday, May 26, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., (PDT) at The Hilton Hotel-San
Jose, 300 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, CA 95110, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof,
and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and
there personally present, on the matters set forth on the reverse side:
PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN
IMMEDIATELY
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08819-8694
Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.
Vote-by-Internet
Log on to the Internet and go to
http://www.eproxyvote.com/pdfs
Vote-by-Telephone
Call toll-free
1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-
877-779-8683)
If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.
DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL
|
|
|
ý
|
|
Please |
|
|
mark votes |
|
|
as in this |
|
|
example. |
|
|
|
1.
|
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, |
|
|
(01) Donald L. Lucas |
|
|
(02) B.J. Cassin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR all nominees
|
|
¨
|
|
¨
|
|
WITHHOLD authority to
|
|
MARK HERE
|
|
¨ |
listed above (except
|
|
|
|
|
|
vote for all nominees
|
|
IF YOU PLAN |
|
|
as indicated).
|
|
|
|
|
|
listed above
|
|
TO ATTEND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE MEETING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
|
|
|
MARK HERE FOR
|
|
¨ |
|
|
If you wish to withhold authority
to vote for any individual nominee, write that nominees name in the space provided above.
|
|
ADDRESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE BELOW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
APPOINTMENT BY THE AUDIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE
|
|
¨
|
|
¨
|
|
¨ |
|
|
LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, in their discretion, upon such other matter or matters that may properly come before the
meeting and any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO CONTRARY DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED AS
FOLLOWS: (1) FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; (2) FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT BY THE AUDIT
COMMITTEE OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2005; AND AS SAID PROXIES DEEM ADVISABLE ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY COME
BEFORE THE MEETING.
(This Proxy should be marked, dated, signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as his or her name
appears hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary
capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants or as community property, both
should sign.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature: |
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
Signature: |
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|