defa14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
þ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
CROWN CRAFT, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
July 16, 2007
Dear Fellow Crown Crafts Stockholder:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Crown Crafts, Inc., to be held on August 14, 2007, is an
important opportunity for you to cast your vote in support of your Board of Directors and their
role in the Companys successes that have contributed to the long-term value of your investment.
Your Board of Directors has nominated for re-election myself and two other highly qualified
candidates William T. Deyo, Jr. and Steven E. Fox and we each share a deep commitment to
serving your best interests.
As
you may be aware, a New York-based investment fund, Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P.,
and certain of its offshore and U.S. affiliates (together, Wynnefield or the Wynnefield
Group) have proposed a slate of two director nominees in opposition to two incumbent directors
nominated by your Board Messrs. Deyo and Fox. We firmly believe the Wynnefield Groups
initiation of this costly and disruptive proxy contest is not in your best interests.
Your Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares FOR the Companys nominees
by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card today. We urge you to
discard and not return any gold proxy card you may receive from the Wynnefield Group.
THE WYNNEFIELD GROUPS NOMINEES ARE WRONG FOR YOUR COMPANY
The Wynnefield Group has proposed a slate of director nominees consisting of Nelson Obus, a
Wynnefield principal, and his close business associate, Frederick G. Wasserman. We do not believe that either of these
individuals is right for Crown Crafts or possesses the necessary qualifications to effectively
serve on your Board of Directors.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) has charged Obus
and Wynnefield with having engaged in acts of fraud and deceit and seeks to bar Obus from
serving as an officer or director of any public company.
Obus, along with other members of the Wynnefield Group and another Wynnefield employee, is a
named defendant in an ongoing suit brought by the SEC in federal court for insider trading. In its
amended complaint, filed only last month, the SEC charges that Obus and the other defendants
knowingly or recklessly engaged in acts that violated the federal securities law, engaged in
acts, practices or courses of business that have operated . . . as a fraud and deceit upon other
persons and breached their fiduciary duties of trust and
confidence. The Wynnefield Groups proxy materials make only
passing reference to these charges, doing little more than
emphatically denying them. What they dont tell you,
however, is that the SEC is
demanding that Obus and the other defendants pay back their ill-gotten gains of more than $1.3
million and pay a civil money penalty and that Obus be barred from acting as an
officer or director of any public company.
Why would any company put Obus on its board? Does this sound like
someone who is fully committed, as is your Board, to the highest ethical standards, principles of
fair dealing and strict compliance with the law?
Wasserman takes his direction from Wynnefield and Obus.
In November 2005, at the request of Wynnefield, we agreed
to permit Wasserman to participate in all meetings of the Board as a non-voting observer. We
terminated this observer right at the end of last month when Wynnefield launched its proxy contest.
By that time, Wasserman had fully demonstrated that he was simply a mouthpiece for Wynnefield,
rather than someone who, as the Wynnefield Group suggests of its nominees, would bring fresh
thinking to the Board on behalf of the Companys stockholders. The Wynnefield Groups proxy
materials tout Wassermans service on the boards of other public companies. However, those
materials fail to state that Wynnefield is a substantial stockholder in each of those other
companies, that Wasserman is serving at the behest of Wynnefield or that Wasserman has not served
on any of these boards for more than nine months.
Wassermans nomination to your Board clearly reflects the Wynnefield Groups hand-picking of
an individual with established business relationships with Wynnefield. Again, given the storm of
SEC allegations that surrounds Obus and the Wynnefield Group today, it is inconceivable that any
company would want one of their close business associates on its board.
Wynnefield offers only a short-sighted, self-serving agenda.
The Wynnefield Groups short-sighted, self-serving agenda is reflected in its proxy materials
and past actions. While your Board is proud of its recent accomplishments and excited about the
future of the Company, the Wynnefield Group is demanding seats on your Board of Directors in order
to press for the hiring of an investment banker to pursue a sale of the Company without regard to
building long-term stockholder value. Unlike your independent Board, the Wynnefield Group is
responsible only to its unnamed and undisclosed backers and has neither allegiance nor
responsibility to you or your fellow Crown Crafts stockholders.
The Wynnefield Group has demanded similar action of the Company in the past. In 2004, at the
request of Wynnefield, the Company hired an investment banker to evaluate the repurchase of the
warrants previously held by the Companys lenders. Crown Crafts terminated that relationship when
it became clear that any transaction would cost the Company in excess of $4.5 million, including
investment banker fees. Ultimately, the Company, without hiring and paying an investment banker,
successfully negotiated a refinancing of the Companys debt in 2006 that resulted in the full
cancellation of the lender warrants.
In addition, if either of Wynnefields nominees is elected to
the Board, the Wynnefield Groups proxy materials state that Wynnefield intends to seek
reimbursement from the Company for its proxy solicitation expenses, which Wynnefield estimates will
be $325,000 (of which approximately $150,000 has already been spent) without submitting the question of
reimbursement of those expenses to a vote of the Companys stockholders. This action further underscores the
self-serving nature of Wynnefields agenda.
2
THE COMPANYS BOARD AND MANAGEMENT HAVE A PROVEN
TRACK RECORD AND THE RIGHT PLAN TO LEAD CROWN CRAFTS
AND CONTINUE INCREASING STOCKHOLDER VALUE
During fiscal year 2007 alone, with your current Board and management in place, Crown Crafts
achieved the following:
|
|
|
a more than 600% increase in the Companys stock price |
|
|
|
|
listing on The Nasdaq Stock Market |
|
|
|
|
favorable refinancing of debt facilities (after having reduced debt by more than
$35 million over a five-year period) |
|
|
|
|
extinguishment of outstanding lender warrants, exercisable at $0.11 per share,
that would have given the lenders control of the Company |
When current management took the Companys reins in 2001, Crown Crafts was burdened by
excessive debt and the overhang of warrants that, on exercise, would
have resulted in the Companys lenders
owning 65% of our outstanding shares. Although this severely hindered the Companys ability
to grow, management and your Board focused on other initiatives within its control, including
restructuring the Companys operations to cut costs and increase efficiencies. Under the
leadership of your Board, the Company has delivered six consecutive years of profitability.
Your Board and management also led the charge to aggressively pay down the Companys debt. In
July 2006, the Company refinanced its debt facilities, beginning
a new relationship with The CIT Group. This
refinancing represented a monumental success for Crown Crafts. What had been $48 million in debt
in July 2001 was reduced to $5.8 million as of
April 1, 2007, and the warrants held by the Companys
former lenders were fully extinguished, all without the extraordinary cost to the Company that
would have been commanded by an investment banker. Indeed, had we hired the investment banker
recommended to us by Wynnefield, we would have had to pay that banker a fee of more than $1.25
million in connection with the refinancing.
The July 2006 debt and capital restructuring has resulted in a Crown Crafts that is more
nimble and poised for growth. The Companys history is one of growth through successful
acquisitions, but the Companys past lender relationship and
debt position did not permit us to make any acquisitions. Now, with the support of CIT, the Board is actively pursuing strategic
acquisitions that will build long-term stockholder value.
Building on the successes of fiscal year 2007, our strategies to enhance future stockholder
value focus on the following key objectives:
|
|
|
completing key strategic acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
achieving organic growth and continuing to improve
profitability and increase efficiencies |
|
|
|
|
optimizing the Companys debt and capital structure |
In pursuing and achieving these strategic objectives, we believe that we will be better
positioned financially and competitively to capitalize on future opportunities and build long-term
value for our investors. We believe that our prospects are very promising and that our strategic
plan will provide excellent opportunities to enhance growth and profitability.
3
Quite simply, the Wynnefield Groups push for a sale of Crown Crafts now is ill-timed and
reflects Wynnefields lack of understanding of our Company. This is not the time to disrupt our
operations or distract our employees with concerns about their future and that of Crown Crafts.
This is the time to grow our Company with the leadership of an experienced Board and management
team.
THE COMPANYS NOMINEES ARE EXPERIENCED, INDEPENDENT AND FIRMLY
COMMITTED TO ENHANCING VALUE FOR ALL CROWN CRAFTS STOCKHOLDERS
Your Board is comprised of respected business leaders with extensive professional experience
and knowledge of our industry. This Board led an unprecedented turnaround at Crown Crafts that has
resulted in significant increases in stockholder value. In addition to their experience and
knowledge, the incumbent nominees have demonstrated a commitment to our stockholders that is vital
to the stability and success of Crown Crafts.
You are fortunate to have a Board who understands and is willing to shoulder the time
commitment necessary to effectively fulfill its responsibilities. Your Board has a sense of common
purpose and the energy, industry knowledge, business sense, character and integrity that you would
want in your leadership. Wynnefields suggestion that its nominees be added to the Board to build
stockholder value and that they alone not the Board are capable of doing this is an
unwarranted and misguided attack on the highly qualified, dedicated and experienced members of your
Board.
Further evidencing its commitment to the Companys stockholders, the Board has authorized a $6
million share repurchase program. Although the Wynnefield Group
suggests in its proxy
materials that this action may have been taken by the Board following the announcement of
Wynnefields nominees in an attempt by the Board to win your favor, the features of the repurchase program were all but finalized
prior to Wynnefields announcement, as Wynnefield must know from
Wasserman, who was actively involved in all Board deliberations
concerning the buyback.
We urge you to support the Companys nominees, putting your trust in those who have led Crown
Crafts successfully.
|
|
|
William T. Deyo, Jr. has been a principal of Goddard Investment Group, LLC, a real
estate investment group, since 1999. Mr. Deyo previously served as Executive Vice
President of Wachovia Bank, where he worked for over 20 years. He is a member of the audit committee. |
|
|
|
|
Steven E. Fox is a partner in the Atlanta-based law firm of Rogers & Hardin LLP, where
he has practiced since 1976 and serves on the firms management
committee. He has over 30 years of experience in corporate finance,
corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions and securities work for public and
privately-held companies in the U.S. and abroad. In addition, Mr. Fox was recently named
as one of the top 100 lawyers in Georgia by Atlanta magazine and is included in the
2007 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Mr. Fox has
also been selected in 2007 by Chambers
USA as one of the leading business lawyers in the country and is one of a
select group of lawyers to be included in two different corporate
practice areas in the first edition of Whos Who Legal: Georgia
2007, published by the official research partner of the International Bar Association. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fox currently serves on the Companys compensation committee. He has notified the
Company, however, that in response to Wynnefields concerns, he will resign from the
compensation committee immediately following the annual meeting if he is re-elected to the
Board. |
|
|
|
|
I joined Crown Crafts in January 1995 and have been President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Company since 2001. Prior to joining Crown Crafts, I served as
President of Beacon Manufacturing Company, a producer of adult and infant blankets, from
December 1988 |
4
|
|
|
to January 1995 and as Vice Chairman of Wiscassett Mills Company, a yarn manufacturer, from
1990 to 1994. |
Dont be misled by the self-serving rhetoric of the Wynnefield Group. One of its nominees is
a Wynnefield principal surrounded by a cloud of SEC litigation and the other is a close business
associate. In our experience, its nominees bring nothing to the table but their dedication to
Wynnefields agenda and the problematic balance they must strike between their fiduciary duties to
you, a Crown Crafts stockholder, and their loyalties and obligations to the Wynnefield Group, its
investors and its desire to see a quick sale of the Company.
This is not about Wynnefield having a voice. With its
designee Wasserman in the Board room the past 18 months, Wynnefield has had a voice. We remain committed to an ongoing
dialogue with Wynnefield and all other stockholders.
This is not about corporate governance practices. All members of your Board, other than
myself, are independent. And to further reinforce our commitment to best practices, at its next
meeting the Board intends to designate an independent lead director to aid the Board in assuring
effective corporate governance in managing the affairs of the Company.
In its proxy materials, the Wynnefield Group criticizes the Companys staggered
board structure, asserting that it diminishes a directors
accountability to Crown Crafts stockholders. This assertion is
unfounded. Board members are
subject to the same fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders without regard to the
length of their term of service or the frequency of their standing for re-election. Moreover, a
staggered board means that the majority of your Board at any given time will have experience in the
Companys business and affairs, promoting continuity and stability of the Companys business
strategies and policies.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US SUPPORT YOUR BOARDS NOMINEES
Your Board firmly believes that the best path to maximize value for all stockholders is the
continued execution of our strategic plan. We urge you to sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE
proxy card today.
VOTE FOR ME AND THE TEAM YOU CAN TRUST A VOTE FOR WYNNEFIELD IS A
VOTE AGAINST US
Your vote is very important to us, no matter the size of your holdings. To vote your shares,
please sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card by mailing it in the enclosed
pre-addressed, stamped envelope. You can also vote by internet or telephone by following the
instructions on the WHITE proxy card. Please do not sign or return any gold proxy card
sent to you by the Wynnefield Group. If you have any questions or need any assistance voting your
shares, do not hesitate to contact Georgeson Inc., who is assisting us in this matter, toll free at
1-888-605-7561.
We appreciate your continued support.
On behalf of your Board of Directors,
E. Randall Chestnut
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
5
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
|
1. |
|
To vote FOR your Companys nominees, you MUST execute a WHITE proxy card. |
|
|
2. |
|
The Board of Directors urges you to DISCARD any gold proxy cards that you may have
received from the Wynnefield Group. A WITHHOLD AUTHORITY vote on the Wynnefield Groups
gold proxy card is NOT a vote for the Companys nominees. |
|
|
3. |
|
If you have voted on a gold proxy card but wish to support your Companys nominees,
please sign, date and mail the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the postage-paid envelope
provided as soon as possible. You can also vote by internet or telephone by following the
instructions on the WHITE proxy card. |
|
|
4. |
|
Remember ONLY YOUR LATEST DATED PROXY WILL DETERMINE HOW YOUR SHARES ARE TO BE VOTED
AT THE MEETING. |
|
|
5. |
|
If any of your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, please
contact the party responsible for your account and direct them to vote your shares FOR your
Companys nominees on the WHITE proxy card. |
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please contact our proxy
solicitor.
17 State Street, 10
th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Banks and Brokers (212) 440-9800
Stockholders Call Toll Free (888) 605-7561
6