UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

Commission file number: 000-19480

 

Per-Se Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

(770) 237-4300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer þ      Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate the number of shares of stock outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

FORM 10-Q

For the Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2006

 

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (interim financial statements) include the accounts of Per-Se Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Per-Se” or the “Company”). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements, and accounting policies consistent, in all material respects, with those applied in preparing the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2006 (“2005 Form 10-K”). These interim financial statements are unaudited but reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The information included in this report should be read in conjunction with the 2005 Form 10-K.

 

As discussed in Note 3, the Company completed the acquisition of NDCHealth Corporation (“NDCHealth”) on January 6, 2006, and has included the financial results of NDCHealth in its consolidated financial statements beginning January  6, 2006.

 

 

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”). SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB No. 25”), and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. The original effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) was for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005.

 

On April 14, 2005, the SEC announced the adoption of a rule that amended the compliance date for SFAS No. 123(R). The Company was required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) no later than January 1, 2006.

 

SFAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:

 

 

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method described above. The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

 

SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123. Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for stock options because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options granted to employees and directors equaled or exceeded the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. However, the Company previously disclosed the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to its stock-based compensation plans in its prior period financial statement footnotes.

 

As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience and management’s estimates. In the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS No. 123 for the periods prior to fiscal year 2006, the Company accounted for stock option forfeitures as they occurred.

 

The following table shows the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, on selected line items in the accompanying financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

Stock Option Plans

 

The Company has three stock option plans for employees: (i) the Second Amended and Restated Per-Se Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan, as amended; (ii) the Per-Se Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Executive Employees, as amended; and (iii) the Per-Se Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Employees of Acquired Companies, as amended. Options under all of these plans are granted at an exercise price equal to or in excess of the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Such options generally vest over a three-to-five year period and expire eleven years after the date of grant. The total number of options available for future grants under these stock option plans was approximately 2,493 at June 30, 2006 (excluding 339,286 shares under the Per-Se Technologies, Inc. Non- Qualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Executive Employees, as amended, from which the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has resolved no further grants shall be made).

 

The Company also has one stock option plan for non-employees who serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. This plan, the Amended and Restated Per-Se Technologies, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, provides for an initial grant of 10,000 stock options upon first election or appointment to the Board and an annual grant of 10,000 stock options for each year of service thereafter. Options under this plan are granted at an exercise price equal to the average of the fair market values of the Company’s Common Stock for the five trading days prior to the date of the grant. Such options are generally fully vested as of the date of grant but not exercisable until one year after the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had approximately 58,539 options available for future grants under this plan.

 

Activity related to all stock option plans as of June 30, 2006, and for the six months then ended is summarized as follows (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):

 

 

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, was $4.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The Company’s policy for issuing shares upon share option exercise is to issue new shares of Common Stock.

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of each option granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, was $9.50 and $6.64, respectively.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions for grants during the six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005:

 

 

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical information to estimate expected life and forfeitures within the valuation model. The expected term of awards represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve for issues with a remaining term approximating the expected term. Compensation cost is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or service period and is net of estimated forfeitures.

 

The compensation cost and related tax benefit associated with stock option grants was $1.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, and $2.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, there was approximately $7.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.

 

Long Term Incentive Plan

 

On May 25, 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved the Per-Se Technologies, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 LTIP”). A total of 1.5 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock are reserved and available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 LTIP. The 2006 LTIP authorizes the granting of awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted or deferred stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalents, performance-based cash awards, and other stock-based awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had approximately 1.1 million shares available for future grants under this plan.

 

On June 6, 2006, two types of restricted stock units were granted under the 2006 LTIP: performance-based restricted stock units and service-based restricted stock units. The performance-based restricted stock units represent the right to earn, on a one-for-one basis, a target number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, provided that the grantee remains continuously employed by the Company during the performance period. The performance-based restricted stock agreements contain a market-based condition that determines the number of shares earned. This market-based condition stipulates that the Company’s performance be measured against the attainment of specified targets for total shareholder return for the three year period ending December 31, 2008. Based on the result of this measurement, the number of shares earned can vary from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares. The service-based restricted stock units represent the right to receive, on a one-for-one basis, a fixed number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided that the grantee remains continuously employed by the Company during the vesting period.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

Performance-based restricted stock units.  The following is a summary of the activity relating to performance-based restricted stock units since the inception of the 2006 LTIP (units in thousands):

 

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of each performance-based restricted stock unit granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006, was estimated on the date of the grant using the Monte-Carlo simulation model based on the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve for issues with a remaining term approximating the expected term.

 

Compensation cost for performance-based restricted stock units is recognized using the straight-line method over the 31-month period from the date of grant through the end of the three-year performance period, or December 31, 2008, and is net of estimated forfeitures. Future adjustments to the amount of expense recognized relating to these awards will only result from changes in the Company’s forfeiture assumption. The Company uses historical information to estimate forfeitures.

 

The compensation cost and related tax benefit associated with performance-based restricted stock units during the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. At June 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation cost related to performance-based restricted stock units totaled $6.3 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

 

Service-based restricted stock units.  The following is a summary of the activity relating to service-based restricted stock units since the inception of the Plan (units in thousands):

 

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the service-based restricted stock units was based on the quoted fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of the grant.

 

Compensation cost for service-based restricted stock units is recognized using the straight-line method over the three-year vesting period and is net of estimated forfeitures. The Company uses historical information to estimate forfeitures.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

The compensation cost and related tax benefit associated with service-based restricted stock units during the three months ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $0.1 million and $31,000, respectively. At June 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation cost related to service-based restricted stock units totaled $2.9 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.

 

 

The Company completed the acquisition of NDCHealth on January 6, 2006.

 

Pursuant to the Company’s Agreement and Plan of Merger with NDCHealth, a Delaware corporation, dated August 26, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of NDCHealth for $19.50 per share ($14.05 in cash and $5.45 in stock) as of January 6, 2006 (“Acquisition Date”). The Company has included the financial results of NDCHealth in its consolidated financial statements beginning January 6, 2006.

 

The purchase of NDCHealth provided the Company with complementary technology solutions and services, an expanded customer base and entry into the Pharmacy market, which is a new market for Per-Se.

 

The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of January 6, 2006. The total purchase price was $727.8 million, and was comprised of:

 

 

In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued approximately 8.3 million shares of its common stock to NDCHealth stockholders. The fair value of Per-Se Common Stock was determined for accounting purposes using an average price of $23.95 per share, which represented the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock, over a four day period inclusive of the measurement date of the acquisition. The measurement date of the acquisition for accounting purposes was three days prior to the Acquisition Date.

 

Acquisition-related transaction costs include investment banking, legal and accounting fees, and other external costs directly related to the acquisition.

 

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

 

Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to NDCHealth’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of January 6, 2006, as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon a valuation. The Company’s estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation are subject to change. The primary areas of the purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to restructuring costs, certain legal matters, income and non-income based taxes, deferred income taxes and residual goodwill.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded certain adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation. These adjustments primarily related to accounts receivable and accrued expenses and resulted in a net increase in goodwill of $0.5 million.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

The following table details the purchase price allocation as of June 30, 2006, including all adjustments made during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

 

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Accounting for Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”), the Company was required to record acquired accounts receivable at fair value. The Company recorded approximately $37.2 million as the fair value of the acquired accounts receivable based on NDCHealth’s gross accounts receivable balance as of the acquisition date, less approximately $6.8 million, which represented the allowance for doubtful accounts on NDCHealth’s books at the date of acquisition.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately $84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The majority of this liability relates to the increase in the valuation of NDCHealth’s fixed assets and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the acquisition that were recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an acquisition of stock, NDCHealth’s tax basis of the assets carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the Company’s taxable income relating to this acquisition will be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed amortization for income tax purposes. Since management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset will be realized due to the recognition of a deferred tax liability, the Company released a portion of its valuation allowance against the asset.

 

The Company estimates that approximately 36% of goodwill acquired will be deductible for tax purposes. The deductible goodwill will be amortized for tax purposes over the next 11 years.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

Identifiable Intangible Assets

 

In performing the purchase price allocation, the Company considered, among other factors, the intention for future use of acquired assets, analyses of historical financial performance and estimates of future performance of NDCHealth’s products. The fair value of intangible assets was based, in part, on a valuation completed using an income approach. The rates utilized to discount net cash flows to their present values were based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and ranged from 15% to 20%. These discount rates were determined after consideration of the Company’s rate of return on debt and equity and the weighted average return on invested capital. The following table sets forth the components of intangible assets associated with the acquisition at June 30, 2006 (in thousands, except years):

 

 

Customer lists, software support agreements and related relationships represent the underlying relationships and agreements with NDCHealth’s existing customers. Developed technology represents the value assigned to the pharmacy clearinghouse infrastructure as well as to the ePremis, Lytec and Medisoft products. Trademarks represent the estimated fair value of the Lytec and Medisoft trade names and trademarks. Noncompete agreements represent the estimated fair value of agreements with NDCHealth’s former management team members. Intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method.

 

In-Process Research and Development

 

In-process research and development (“IPR&D”) represents NDCHealth’s research and development projects that had not reached a point where the product was available for general release and had no alternative future use as of the Acquisition Date. The value assigned to IPR&D was determined by considering the importance of each project to the Company’s overall development plan, estimating costs to develop the purchased IPR&D into commercially viable products and estimating and discounting the net cash flows resulting from the projects when completed. Purchased IPR&D relates primarily to projects associated with NDCHealth’s EnterpriseRx product ($8.6 million) and enhanced versions of ePremis ($2.8 million) and Medisoft ($1.9 million) products which had not yet reached general availability as of the Acquisition Date and had no alternative future use. IPR&D purchased in the acquisition of NDCHealth, which totaled $13.3 million, was expensed in the first quarter of 2006 in accordance with SFAS No. 141.

 

Deferred Revenue

 

In connection with the purchase price allocation, the Company has estimated the fair value of the support obligation assumed from NDCHealth in connection with the acquisition. The estimated fair value of the support obligation and other future services was determined utilizing a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related to fulfilling the obligation plus a normal profit margin. The sum of the costs and operating profit approximates the amount that the Company would be required to pay a third party to assume the support obligation. The estimated costs to fulfill the support obligation were based on the historical direct costs related to providing the support services. The Company did not include any costs associated with selling efforts or research and development or the related fulfillment margins on these costs. As a result, in allocating the acquisition purchase price, the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce the carrying value of NDCHealth’s

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

January 6, 2006, deferred revenue by approximately $9.8 million to an amount representing Per-Se’s estimate of the fair value of the support obligation assumed.

 

Accrued Restructuring and Merger Costs

 

As a part of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company formed a plan to restructure the NDCHealth duplicative functions with the Company’s existing business functions. Consequently, the Company included severance benefits of approximately $10.4 million in the purchase price.

 

In addition, NDCHealth sold its Canadian pharmacy transaction business in 2005. As part of this transaction, NDCHealth abandoned its facility lease, which expires in 2009. Therefore, the Company assumed a liability of $0.6 million in connection with the sale of the Canadian pharmacy transaction business, which represented the expected net cash outflows associated with this lease.

 

These two amounts and the related payments in the first six months of 2006 are set forth in the following table (in thousands):

 

 

Pre-Acquisition Contingencies

 

The Company has identified certain pre-acquisition contingencies, but the fair values for such contingencies are not yet determinable. If, during the purchase price allocation period, the Company is able to determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency, the Company will include that amount in the purchase price allocation. If, as of the end of the purchase price allocation period, the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency is not determinable, the Company will evaluate whether to include an amount in the purchase price allocation based on whether it is probable that a liability had been incurred and whether an amount can be reasonably estimated. After the end of the purchase price allocation period, any adjustment that results from a pre-acquisition contingency will be included in the Company’s operating results in the period in which the adjustment is determined. The purchase price allocation period ends when the Company has all of the information that it has arranged to obtain and that is known to be obtainable, but usually does not exceed one year from the date of acquisition.

 

Pro Forma Financial Information

 

The financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of Per-Se and NDCHealth, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the periods presented and assumes the disposition of NDCHealth’s information management business prior to such combination. Such pro forma financial information is based on the historical financial statements of Per-Se and NDCHealth. In determining such financial information, the combined historical results of Per-Se and NDCHealth were adjusted to eliminate sales and related costs of sales for NDCHealth’s information management business and for normal business transactions between Per-Se and NDCHealth. This pro forma financial information is based on estimates and assumptions, which have been made solely for purposes of developing such pro forma information, including, without limitation, purchase accounting adjustments. The pro forma financial information presented below also includes depreciation and amortization based on the valuation of NDCHealth’s tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the acquisition and interest expense related to the debt issued to

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

complete the acquisition. The pro forma financial information does not reflect any synergies or operating cost reductions that may be achieved from the combined operations.

 

The pro forma financial information for the three months ended June 30, 2005, combines the historical results for Per-Se’s three months ended June 30, 2005, and the historical results for NDCHealth for the period from February 25, 2005, to May 27, 2005. The pro forma financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2005, combines the historical results for Per-Se’s six months ended June 30, 2005, and the historical results for NDCHealth for the period from November 27, 2004, to May 27, 2005.

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and other equity-based awards. The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005:

 

 

The calculation of diluted EPS for the three months ended June 30, 2006, excluded 0.8 million shares of Common Stock issuable through stock options and other equity-based awards because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares, and therefore, the effect of excluding these options would have been antidilutive. The calculation of diluted EPS for the six months ended June 30, 2006, excluded 5.8 million shares of Common Stock issuable through stock options and other equity-based awards due to their antidilutive effect as a result of the Company’s net loss for the period.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

Options to purchase 0.2 million and 0.6 million shares of Common Stock during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares, and therefore, the effect of excluding these options would have been antidilutive.

 

 

The functional currency of the Company’s operations outside of the United States is the local country’s currency. Consequently, assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into dollars using exchange rates at the end of each reporting period. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Cumulative translation gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

 

The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, consists of the following components (in thousands):

 

 

See Note 7 — Long-Term Debt for further information on the Company’s cash flow hedging activities.

 

 

On April 7, 2004, a putative securities class-action, captioned Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against NDCHealth and two of its former executives, as defendants. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making material misrepresentations and omissions to the investing public regarding NDCHealth’s revenue recognition practices during the period from October 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and the recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 1, 2004, a second amended complaint was filed. The second amended complaint added other former NDCHealth executives, as well as Ernst & Young LLP, as defendants. The second amended complaint generally alleges, among other things, that members of a purported class of stockholders who purchased NDCHealth common stock between October 1, 2003, and August 9, 2004, were damaged as a result of (i) improper revenue recognition practices in NDCHealth’s physician business unit; (ii) the failure to timely writedown NDCHealth’s investment in MedUnite, Inc.; and (iii) the improper capitalization and amortization of costs associated with software development. It alleges that, as a result of such conduct, NDCHealth’s previously issued financial statements were

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

materially false and misleading, thereby causing the prices of NDCHealth’s common stock to be inflated artificially. It asserts violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief. On October 13, 2004, NDCHealth and the individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On July 27, 2005, the District Court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice. Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a third amended complaint by August 26, 2005. On August 26, 2005, plaintiffs filed a notice appealing the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. That appeal remains pending.

 

On May 10, 2005, a complaint captioned MMI Investments, L.P. v. NDCHealth Corporation, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against NDCHealth and certain of its former executives. The complaint generally alleges that plaintiff MMI Investments, L.P. (“MMI”) was damaged as a result of its purchases of NDCHealth common stock at artificially inflated prices from July 2003 through August 9, 2004. More specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b), 18 and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and committed common law fraud by materially overstating the reported financial condition of NDCHealth and issuing overly optimistic forecasts concerning NDCHealth’s financial prospects. It seeks unspecified monetary and other relief. On July 22, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss MMI’s Section 10(b), Section 20(a) and common law fraud claims and/or transfer the action to the Northern District of Georgia. The parties are currently engaged in discovery.

 

The Company is subject to claims, litigation and official billing inquiries arising in the ordinary course of its business. These matters include, but are not limited to, lawsuits brought by former customers with respect to the operation of the Company’s business. The Company has also received written demands from customers and former customers that have not resulted in legal action. Within the Company’s industry, federal and state civil and criminal laws govern medical billing and collection activities. These laws provide for various fines, penalties, multiple damages, assessments and sanctions for violations, including possible exclusion from federal and state healthcare payer programs.

 

The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims and other issues asserted in pending legal matters; however, there can be no assurance that such matters or any future legal matters will not have an adverse effect on the Company. Amounts of awards or losses, if any, in pending legal matters have not been reflected in the financial statements unless probable and reasonably estimable.

 

 

On June 30, 2004, the Company issued $125 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2024 (the “Debentures”) to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As originally issued, the Debentures were convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an initial conversion rate of 56.0243 shares per $1,000 principal amount (a conversion price of approximately $17.85) once the Company’s Common Stock share price reaches 130% of the conversion price, or a share price of approximately $23.20. In November 2004, the Company exercised its irrevocable option to pay, when due, the principal of Debentures submitted for conversion in cash rather than shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company will satisfy any amount above the conversion trigger price of $17.85 through the issuance of Common Stock. The Debentures mature on June 30, 2024, and are unsecured. Interest on the Debentures is payable semiannually at the rate of 3.25% per annum on June 30 and December 30 of each year, beginning on December 30, 2004. The Company may redeem the Debentures either in whole or in part beginning July 6, 2009. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the Debentures on June 30, 2009, 2014, and 2019, or upon a fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture governing the Debentures. The Company used the proceeds from issuance of the Debentures, together with cash on hand, to retire $118.8 million outstanding under a term loan, as well as to repurchase, for approximately $25 million, an aggregate of approximately 2.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, at the market price of $12.57 per share, in negotiated transactions concurrently with the Debentures offering.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

On January 6, 2006, Per-Se acquired NDCHealth. In connection with the acquisition, the Company secured financing in the form of a new senior credit facility consisting of a $435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving credit facility (“Senior Credit Facility”), which replaced the Company’s prior $75 million revolving credit facility. The term loan matures in seven years and, at the Company’s election, bears interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 2.25% or Base Rate, as defined by the Senior Credit Facility, plus 1.25%. During the first six months of 2006, the Company elected to use LIBOR plus 2.25%. The revolving credit facility has an interest rate that varies between LIBOR plus 1.50% and LIBOR plus 2.50% or between Base Rate plus 0.5% and Base Rate plus 1.50%, based on performance, and matures in five years. The Company has the option of electing LIBOR or Base Rate. The Company has incurred no borrowings under the revolving credit facility. In conjunction with the financing transaction, the Company capitalized approximately $7.7 million in expenses, including legal and other professional fees, which are included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

The Company is required to pay an annual commitment fee ranging from 0.25% to 0.50%, based on performance, of the unused capacity related to the revolving credit facility. The commitment fee range is based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the facility agreement. The Company intends to use the revolving credit facility, as needed, for future investments in operations, including capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, to secure its letters of credit, as needed, and other general corporate purposes.

 

All obligations under the Senior Credit Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior secured basis, jointly and severally by all of the Company’s present and future domestic and material foreign subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). The financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors have not been presented, as all subsidiaries, except for certain minor foreign subsidiaries, have provided guarantees, and the parent company does not have any significant operations or assets separate from its investment in those subsidiaries. Any non-guarantor subsidiaries are minor individually and in the aggregate to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. There are no restrictions on the Subsidiary Guarantors that would prohibit the transfer of funds or assets to the parent company by dividend or loan.

 

The Senior Credit Facility contains financial and other restrictive covenants, including, without limitation, those restricting additional indebtedness, lien creation, dividend payments, asset sales and stock offerings, and those requiring a maximum leverage, maximum senior leverage, and minimum fixed charge coverage, each as defined in the Senior Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants as of June 30, 2006.

 

Also on January 6, 2006, the Company entered into a four-year interest rate swap agreement, in order to hedge against potential interest rate fluctuations resulting from the variable interest rate under the terms of the new Senior Credit Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company is obligated to periodically pay an amount based on a fixed interest rate, and the Company will receive an amount based on a variable rate. The variable rate is based on the three-month LIBOR rate available at the time. By entering into the interest rate swap, the Company has effectively fixed the maximum interest rate that the Company will pay on a portion of the outstanding balance under the Senior Credit Facility at 4.76% per annum plus the applicable spread, which is 2.25%. The amount of the Senior Credit Facility that is covered by the swap is $125 million in years one and two, decreasing to $100 million in year three and $75 million in year four. The interest rate swap will terminate on December 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated pursuant to its terms. SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”) requires that a company recognize derivatives as assets or liabilities on its balance sheet, and also requires that the gain or loss related to the effective portion of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges be recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. This interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge, was documented as fully effective, and was valued as an asset totaling approximately $2.5 million at June 30, 2006. The fair value of this swap arrangement is included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets, and the related gains or losses are recorded, net of income tax effects, as a component of other comprehensive income.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company retired approximately $10 million in term loan debt. On a year-to-date basis, the Company has retired approximately $50 million in term loan debt.

 

 

Income tax expense, which was primarily related to federal, state and local income taxes, was approximately $5.5 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, respectively and $6.3 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately $84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The majority of this liability relates to the increase in the valuation of NDCHealth’s fixed assets and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the acquisition that were recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an acquisition of stock, NDCHealth’s tax basis of the assets carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the Company’s taxable income relating to this acquisition will be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed depreciation and amortization for income tax purposes. Since management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset will be realized due to the reversal of the deferred tax liability recorded in connection with the acquisition, the Company released a portion of its valuation allowance against the asset.

 

The Company estimates that approximately 36% of goodwill acquired will be deductible for tax purposes. The deductible goodwill will be amortized for tax purposes over the next 11 years.

 

In the first quarter of 2006, the Company reassessed the remaining valuation allowance and determined that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would be realized in the foreseeable future. This determination was based upon the Company’s projection of taxable income for 2006 and 2007. Accordingly, $3.4 million of the valuation allowance was released during the first quarter of 2006, of which $1.9 million was recorded to equity as additional paid-in-capital and $1.5 million was recorded as a reduction in the income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This $3.4 million release of the valuation allowance results in a $33.7 million net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2006.

 

On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” The Company elected to adopt the alternative transition method, which is the simplified method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method was used to determine the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC pool”) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation. Due to the Company’s history of tax net operating losses, the Company had no beginning balance in the APIC pool at the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.

 

The Company uses the “with-and-without” or “incremental” approach for determining the order in which tax benefits derived from the share-based payment awards are utilized. Using the with-and-without approach, actual income taxes payable for the period are compared to the amount of income taxes that would have been payable if there had been no share-based compensation expense for tax purposes in excess of the compensation expense recognized for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this approach, tax net operating loss carryforwards not related to share-based compensation are utilized before the current period’s share-based compensation deduction. As a result of this accounting treatment, the Company has a fully reserved deferred tax asset of approximately $31.2 million related to tax net operating loss carryforwards for non-qualified stock option deductions as of June 30,

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

2006. The benefit of the valuation allowance release related to these deductions will be recorded directly to equity as additional paid-in-capital when such benefits are realized.

 

 

The amount of lease termination costs associated with a 1995 restructuring applied against the reserve in the six months ended June 30, 2006, is as follows:

 

 

 

The Company’s reportable segments are operating units that offer different services and products. Per-Se provides its services and products through its three operating divisions: Physician Solutions, Hospital Solutions, and Pharmacy Solutions.

 

The Physician Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare solutions that manage the revenue cycle for physician groups. The division provides a complete outsourcing service, therefore, allowing physician groups to avoid the infrastructure investment and administrative costs in their own in-house billing office. The division is the largest provider of business management outsourced services that supplant all or most of the administrative functions of a physician group. Its target market is primarily hospital-affiliated physician groups in the specialties of radiology, anesthesiology, emergency medicine and pathology as well as physician groups practicing in the academic setting and other large physician groups. Services include clinical data collection, data input, medical coding, billing, contract management, cash collections, accounts receivable management and extensive reporting of metrics related to the physician practice. These services help physician groups to be financially successful by improving cash flows and reducing administrative costs and burdens. Fees for these services are primarily based on a percentage of net collections on the clients’ accounts receivable. The division recognizes revenue and bills customers when the customers receive payment on those accounts receivable, which aligns the division’s interests with the interests of the physician groups it services. The division also generates revenue from one-time sales of physician practice management (“PPM”) software or monthly usage fees for software used via an Application Service Provider (“ASP”) model. The division’s revenue model is approximately 95% recurring in nature due to the transaction-based nature of its fee revenue in the outsourced services business and the monthly usage fee in the PPM business. The business of the Physician Solutions division is conducted by PST Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation, and NDCHealth Corporation, a Delaware corporation, both of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Both of these subsidiaries do business under the name “Per-Se Technologies.”

 

The Hospital Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare solutions that focus on revenue cycle and resource management to improve the financial health of hospitals and healthcare organizations. The division has one of the largest electronic clearinghouses in the medical industry, which provides an important infrastructure to support its revenue cycle management offerings. The clearinghouse delivers dedicated electronic and Internet-based business-to-business solutions that focus on electronic processing of medical transactions as well as complementary transactions, such as electronic remittance advices, real-time eligibility verification and high-speed print and mail services. Other revenue cycle management solutions provide insight into a hospital’s revenue cycle inefficiencies, such as denial management. Denial management allows hospitals to identify charges denied reimbursement by a payer and to facilitate corrective actions such that claims may be resubmitted for reimbursement. Hospitals may opt to outsource portions of their revenue cycle management process to the Company, such as secondary insurance billing, or outsource their entire central billing office. The division also provides resource management solutions that enable hospitals to efficiently manage resources to reduce costs and improve their bottom line. The division’s staff scheduling software efficiently plans nurse schedules, accommodating individual

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

preferences as well as environmental factors, such as acuity levels, and can schedule all the personnel across the hospital enterprise. The division’s patient scheduling software helps effectively manage a hospital’s most expensive and profitable area, the operating room, as well as schedules patients across the enterprise. The division primarily recognizes revenue on a per-transaction basis for its revenue cycle management solutions and primarily recognizes revenue on a percentage-of-completion basis or upon software shipment for sales of its resource management software solutions. Greater than 90% of the division’s revenue is recurring due to its transaction-based business and the maintenance revenue from its substantial installed base for the revenue cycle management solutions and resource management software. The business of the Hospital Solutions division is conducted by the following wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company: Per-Se Transaction Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation; Patient Account Management Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation; PST Products, LLC, a California limited liability company; Knowledgeable Healthcare Solutions, Inc., an Alabama corporation, and NDCHealth Corporation, a Delaware corporation. All of these subsidiaries do business under the name “Per-Se Technologies.”

 

The Pharmacy Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare solutions that focus on transaction clearinghouse services and point-of-service systems to improve administrative efficiencies and optimize the revenue and cash flow of retail and mail order pharmacies in the U.S. This division has a leading market position in pharmacy services and systems with connectivity to approximately 90% of the retail pharmacy stores, processing more than six billion total pharmacy transactions annually, and has systems installed in more than 20% of pharmacies in the U.S. The division’s electronic clearinghouse for pharmacy transactions provides real-time processing related to claims submission, eligibility verification, remittance advice, referral authorization, and drug formulary, as well as claim status and tracking. The division also provides value-added transaction services and claims edits that perform financial and administrative reviews on transactions to help pharmacies enhance the accuracy of submitted claims, decrease receivable days outstanding and improve labor efficiency. The division’s point-of-service systems offerings help retail and mail order pharmacies streamline workflow, improve cash flow and reduce costs while also serving as an additional source of transaction volume for the division’s electronic clearinghouse. The division’s revenue model is more than 90% recurring in nature due to the transaction-based or fixed-fee nature of its revenue in the services business and the maintenance-based nature of revenue in its systems business. The business of the Pharmacy Solutions division is conducted by NDCHealth Corporation, a Delaware Corporation d/b/a “Per-Se Technologies.”

 

The Company evaluates each segment’s performance based on its segment operating income. Segment operating income is revenue less cost of services, selling, general and administrative expenses and other expenses.

 

The Hospital Solutions segment revenue includes intersegment revenue for services provided to the Physician Solutions segment, which are shown as eliminations to reconcile to total consolidated revenue.

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

The Company’s segment information from continuing operations is as follows:

 

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

In connection with the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company assumed the NDCHealth noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”). The Pension Plan covered substantially all of the former NDCHealth employees who had met the eligibility provisions of the Plan as of May 31, 1998. The Pension Plan was closed to new participants beginning June 1, 1998, and benefit accruals for years of service ceased on July 31, 1998. Additionally, benefit accruals for compensation level increases ceased on June 30, 2003. Provisions of the Pension Plan meet the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Pension Plan is approximately 68% funded.

 

The liability relating to Pension Plan benefits totaled approximately $11.7 million, and is included in other obligations on the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2006. Net periodic pension cost for the Pension Plan during the period from January 6, 2006, (the date of the acquisition of NDCHealth) through June 30, 2006, and for the three months ended June 30, 2006, includes the following components:

 

 

The Company made contributions of $0.5 million and $0.6 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The Company anticipates making $1.5 million in additional contributions to fund the Pension Plan during the remainder of the 2006 fiscal year.

 

 

The Physician Solutions Division signed an agreement (the “Agreement”) in 2004 with a customer to provide business management outsourced services. Under the Agreement, Physician Solutions and the customer agreed to certain performance goals. The performance goals were measured on an interim basis. At each interim measurement period, Physician Solutions determined if the performance goals for that period had been achieved. However, the interim measurement periods specified in the contract did not coincide with the Company’s quarterly reporting

 

PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)

periods. As a result, a portion of the fees the Company received under this contract in any quarter were subject to a performance goal for an interim period ending after the Company’s quarterly reporting period, and consequently, were not considered fixed and determinable for revenue recognition purposes at the end of that period. This resulted in deferred revenue recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company signed an amendment to this contract. As a result, the Company no longer has performance goals or interim measurement periods as specified in the original contract. The deferral of revenue is no longer required. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized approximately $0.9 million of revenue that was previously deferred.

 

 

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). The Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FASB Statement No. 109 does not provide specific guidance on how uncertainties on tax positions should be reflected in a company’s financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a financial statement recognition threshold and measurement attribute for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The FASB’s objective in issuing this interpretation is to increase comparability in financial reporting of income taxes. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

 

The cumulative effect of applying Interpretation 48 will be recorded in opening retained earnings for the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financials. FIN 48 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2007.

 

Description of Business

 

Per-Se Technologies, Inc. (“Per-Se” or the “Company”), a corporation organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Delaware, is focused on providing solutions that improve the administrative functions of the healthcare industry. Specifically, Per-Se provides Connective Healthcare solutions that help physicians, hospitals and pharmacies achieve their income potential. Connective Healthcare solutions support and unite healthcare providers, payers and patients with innovative technology processes that improve and accelerate reimbursement and reduce the administrative cost of care.

 

The Company markets its products and services to constituents of the healthcare industry, primarily to hospital-affiliated physician practices, physician groups in academic and office-based settings, hospitals, healthcare organizations, integrated delivery networks (“IDN’s”) and retail and mail order pharmacies.

 

The Physician Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare solutions that manage the revenue cycle for physician groups. The division provides a complete outsourcing service, therefore, allowing physician groups to avoid the infrastructure investment and administrative costs in their own in-house billing office. The division is the largest provider of business management outsourced services that supplant all or most of the administrative functions of a physician group. The division’s target market is primarily hospital-affiliated physician groups in the specialties of radiology, anesthesiology, emergency medicine and pathology as well as physician groups practicing in the academic setting and other large physician groups. Services include clinical data collection, data input, medical coding, billing, contract management, cash collections, accounts receivable management and extensive reporting of metrics related to the physician practice. These services help physician groups to be financially successful by improving cash flows and reducing administrative costs and burdens. Fees for these services are primarily based on a percentage of net collections on the clients’ accounts receivable. The division recognizes revenue and bills customers when the customers receive payment on those accounts receivable, which aligns the division’s interests with the interests of the physician groups it services. The Company also generates revenue from one-time sales of physician practice management (“PPM”) software or monthly usage fees for software used via an Application Service Provider (“ASP”) model. The division’s revenue model is approximately 95% recurring in nature due to the transaction-based nature of its fee revenue in the outsourced services business and the monthly usage fee in the PPM business.

 

The Hospital Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare solutions that focus on revenue cycle and resource management to improve the financial health of hospitals and healthcare organizations. The division has one of the largest electronic clearinghouses in the medical industry, which provides an important infrastructure to support its revenue cycle management offerings. The clearinghouse delivers dedicated electronic and Internet-based business-to-business solutions that focus on electronic processing of medical transactions as well as complementary transactions, such as electronic remittance advices, real-time eligibility verification and high-speed print and mail services. Other revenue cycle management solutions provide insight into a hospital’s revenue cycle inefficiencies, such as denial management. Denial management allows hospitals to identify charges denied reimbursement by a payer and to facilitate corrective actions such as resubmitting for reimbursement. Hospitals may opt to outsource portions of their revenue cycle management process to the Company, such as secondary insurance billing, or outsource their entire central billing office. The division also provides resource management solutions that enable hospitals to efficiently manage resources to reduce costs and improve their bottom line. The division’s staff scheduling software efficiently plans nurse schedules, accommodating individual preferences as well as environmental factors, such as acuity levels, and can schedule all the personnel across the hospital enterprise. The division’s patient scheduling software helps effectively manage a hospital’s most expensive and profitable area, the operating room, as well as schedules patients across the enterprise. The division primarily recognizes revenue on a per-transaction basis for its revenue cycle management solutions and primarily recognizes revenue on a percentage-of-completion basis or upon software shipment for sales of its resource management software solutions. Greater than 90% of the division’s revenue is recurring due to its transaction-based business and the maintenance revenue from its substantial installed base for the revenue cycle management solutions and resource management software.

The Pharmacy Solutions division provides Connective Healthcare solutions that focus on transaction clearinghouse services and point-of-service systems to improve administrative efficiencies and optimize the revenue and cash flow of retail and mail order pharmacies in the U.S. This division has a leading market position in pharmacy services and systems with connectivity to approximately 90% of retail pharmacy stores, processing more than six billion total pharmacy transactions annually, and has systems installed in more than 20% of pharmacies in the U.S. The division’s electronic clearinghouse for pharmacy transactions provides real-time processing related to claims submission, eligibility verification, remittance advice, referral authorization, and drug formulary as well as claim status and tracking. The division also provides value-added transaction services and claims edits that perform financial and administrative reviews on transactions to help pharmacies enhance the accuracy of submitted claims, decrease receivable days outstanding and improve labor efficiency. The division’s point-of-service systems offerings help retail and mail order pharmacies streamline workflow, improve cash flow and reduce costs while also serving as an additional source of transaction volume for the division’s electronic clearinghouse. Historically, the division has generated pharmacy systems revenue through the sale of software licenses, upgrades and recurring maintenance and support fees. The Company’s new line of systems products is being sold to customers with varying pricing and revenue models that may include per-transaction fees, a license fee plus annual maintenance or a monthly per store fee, depending on the customer. The division’s revenue model is more than 90% recurring in nature due to the transaction-based or fixed-fee nature of its revenue in the services business and the maintenance-based nature of revenue in its systems business.

 

General Overview

 

Key Performance Indicators.  Management believes the key elements for assessing the Company’s performance are the ability to generate stable and improving operating profit margins on existing business, and to generate similar or better operating profit margins on new business. An additional element is the ability to generate positive cash flow from continuing operations. In assessing the Company’s performance, adjustments are made for items the Company considers to be atypical, such as those noted below, to help ensure the analysis is performed on a consistent, comparable basis from period to period.

 

NDCHealth Acquisition.  On August 29, 2005, Per-Se and NDCHealth Corporation (“NDCHealth”) announced that they had signed definitive agreements for the acquisition of NDCHealth, a leading provider of healthcare technology and information solutions by Per-Se. The transaction was completed on January 6, 2006. The Company now serves the healthcare industry through three divisions: Physician Solutions, Hospital Solutions and Pharmacy Solutions.

 

Overview of Operating Results.  Consolidated revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006, increased approximately 64% as compared to the same period of 2005 due to the acquisition of NDCHealth and organic growth in the outsourcing business in the physician segment. Consolidated margins increased from 9.5% in the second quarter of 2005 to 14.0% in the second quarter of 2006 due to improvements in profitability from organic growth and the acquisition of NDCHealth. Although profitability improved year over year, margins were negatively impacted by several atypical items related to the acquisition and its integration, as discussed below.

 

Atypical Items.  Results during the three months ended June 30, 2006, included atypical items that related to the Company’s acquisition and integration of NDCHealth. These atypical items totaled $2.6 million.

 

Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).  Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) using the modified prospective method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized is: (a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

The Company recorded non-cash expense of approximately $1.5 million and $2.4 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) for stock-based compensation in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.

 

Long Term Incentive Plan.  On May 25, 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved the Per-Se Technologies, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 LTIP”). A total of 1.5 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock are reserved and available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 LTIP. The 2006 LTIP authorizes the granting of awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted or deferred stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalents, performance-based cash awards, and other stock-based awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants.

 

On June 6, 2006, two types of restricted stock units were granted under the 2006 LTIP: performance-based restricted stock units and service-based restricted stock units. The performance-based restricted stock units represent the right to earn, on a one-for-one basis, a target number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, provided that the grantee remains continuously employed by the Company during the performance period. The performance-based restricted stock agreements contain a market-based condition that determines the number of shares earned. This market-based condition stipulates that the Company’s performance be measured against the attainment of specified targets for total shareholder return for the three year period ending December 31, 2008. Based on the result of this measurement, the number of shares earned can vary from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares. The service-based restricted stock units represent the right to receive, on a one-for-one basis, a fixed number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided that the grantee remains continuously employed by the Company during the vesting period.

 

The Company recorded non-cash expense of approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million related to the performance-based restricted stock units and service-based restricted stock units, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2006.

 

Cash Flow from Operations.  The Company generated $29.9 million in cash from continuing operations during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the first six months of 2005 of $22.6 million. During the first six months of 2006, the Company used cash of approximately $27.0 million related to the NDCHealth acquisition and integration. The Company incurred several expenses during the first six months of 2006 that negatively impacted profitability but had no impact on cash flow, including approximately $13.3 million of expenses related to the acquisition and integration of NDCHealth, as well as approximately $2.7 million of expenses related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP. Due to the increase in debt related to the NDCHealth acquisition, cash paid for interest in the current year period increased by approximately $13.8 million compared to the same period in 2005.

 

Capitalization.  The Company used a combination of both Common Stock and debt to fund its acquisition of NDCHealth. During January 2006, the Company issued approximately 8.3 million shares to the shareholders of NDCHealth. Additionally, the Company secured financing in the form of a new senior credit facility consisting of a $435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving credit facility. The Company has incurred no borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company retired approximately $10 million in term loan debt. On a year-to-date basis, the Company has retired approximately $50 million in term loan debt.

Results of Operations

 

Three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to three months ended June 30, 2005

 

Revenue.  Revenue classified by the Company’s reportable segments (“divisions”) is as follows:

 

 

Revenue for the Physician Solutions division increased approximately 16% in the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. The Company acquired and included within the Physician Solutions division the results of the physician business of NDCHealth effective January 6, 2006. Pricing for the division’s services and products was stable compared to the prior year period. Revenue in the division’s outsourced receivables management business, which represents approximately 90% of the division’s second quarter revenue and was not part of the NDCHealth acquisition, increased approximately 6% over the second quarter of 2005, primarily due to the implementation of the record net new business sold during 2005. Also contributing to the year-over-year increase was approximately $0.9 million in revenue recognized in the current year quarter, which was previously deferred, that related to a large contract signed in 2004. The contract was amended during the second quarter of 2006 to eliminate the quarterly measurement periods that resulted in the original revenue deferral. The remainder of the growth in the quarter was attributable to the NDCHealth acquisition.

 

Net new business sold in the outsourced receivables management business during the second quarter of 2006 was approximately $6 million compared to $10 million during the second quarter of 2005. Net new business sold is defined as the annualized revenue value of new contracts signed in a period, less the annualized revenue value of terminated business in that same period.

 

Net backlog at June 30, 2006, was approximately $12 million, compared to the net backlog of approximately $12 million at December 31, 2005, and approximately $10 million at June 30, 2005. Net backlog represents the annualized revenue related to new contracts signed with the business still to be implemented, less the annualized revenue related to existing contracts where discontinuance notification has been received and the customer has yet to be phased out. The Company focuses on maintaining a positive net backlog and believes it is a useful indicator of future revenue growth.

 

Revenue for the Hospital Solutions division increased approximately 60% for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. Results for the second quarter of 2006 for the Hospital Solutions division included the results of the hospital business of NDCHealth, which was acquired on January 6, 2006, and the results of Integra Solutions, which was acquired on December 1, 2005. Revenue growth in the quarter was a result of these acquisitions. Pricing for the division’s services and products was stable compared to the prior year period. The division is continuing to penetrate both its existing customer base and reach new customers with its revenue cycle management products.

 

Revenue for the Pharmacy Solutions division was approximately $32.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. On January 2, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy business from NDCHealth. The network services business benefited from additional volume as well as from market acceptance of new, value-added network products. The pharmacy systems business has a recurring software maintenance revenue stream and benefited from implementations of new customers in the quarter.

 

The Hospital Solutions division revenue includes intersegment revenue for services provided to the Physician Solutions division, which is shown in Eliminations to reconcile to total consolidated revenue.

Segment Operating Income.  Segment operating income is revenue less cost of services, selling, general and administrative expenses and other expenses. Segment operating income, classified by the Company’s divisions, is as follows:

 

 

Physician Solutions’ segment operating income increased approximately 63% in the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in operating margins of approximately 15.2% in the three months ended June 30, 2006, versus approximately 10.8% in the same period in 2005. As compared to the second quarter of 2005, operating income increased by approximately $5 million in the quarter as a result of revenue growth and the acquisition of NDCHealth physician business, which historically operated at higher margins than the Company’s physician business. The positive impact of the approximately $0.9 million of deferred revenue the division recognized during the current year quarter related to a contract amendment was offset by approximately $1.0 million in bad debt expense recorded in the quarter for specific accounts receivable in the Company’s outsourcing business. The second quarter of 2006 included expenses of approximately $0.2 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.

 

Hospital Solutions’ segment operating income increased approximately 131% in the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in operating margins of approximately 27.3% compared to 18.9% in the prior year period. Operating income increased approximately $7 million in the quarter as a result of improvement in the business and the acquisition of the NDCHealth hospital business, which historically operated at higher margins than the Company’s revenue cycle management business for hospitals. The second quarter of 2006 included expenses of approximately $0.2 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.

 

Pharmacy Solutions’ segment operating income was $6.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006, resulting in operating margins of approximately 20.9%. On January 6, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy business from NDCHealth. The division’s services business had positive margins driven by volume and the introduction of new products. The division’s system business had negative margins due to the development and roll out of new products. The second quarter of 2006 also included expenses of approximately $0.2 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.

 

Corporate overhead expenses, which include certain executive and administrative functions, increased approximately $5.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005. The increase is attributable to the NDCHealth integration costs of approximately $2.6 million. Corporate also included approximately $1.2 million of expenses related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP. The remainder of the increase is primarily due to the acquisition of NDCHealth.

 

Interest.  Interest expense was approximately $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2005. The increase is attributable to the issuance of approximately $435 million in term loan debt related to the NDCHealth acquisition. Interest income was approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to approximately $0.3 million for the same period in 2005.

 

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense, which was primarily related to federal, state and local income taxes, was approximately $5.5 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, respectively. In 2005, the release of a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance reduced the Company’s

GAAP income tax expense to an amount that approximated the Company’s cash tax paying rate. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, there was not a similar release of the Company’s valuation allowance.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately $84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The majority of this liability relates to the increase in the valuation of NDCHealth’s fixed assets and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the transaction that were recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an acquisition of stock, NDCHealth’s tax basis of the assets carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the Company’s taxable income relating to this acquisition will be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed depreciation and amortization for income tax purposes. Since management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset will be realized due to the reversal of the deferred tax liability recorded in connection with the acquisition, the Company released a portion of its valuation allowance against the asset.

 

In addition to the intangibles discussed above, the Company has carryover tax basis of $125 million in the NDCHealth goodwill. This basis will continue to be amortized for tax purposes over the remaining life and will result in an additional tax benefit of approximately $47.5 million over the next 11 years. The benefit for the amortization of the goodwill is not reflected in the deferred tax asset recorded in accordance SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.

 

In the first quarter of 2006, the Company reassessed the remaining valuation allowance and determined that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would be realized in the foreseeable future. This determination was based upon the Company’s projection of taxable income for 2006 and 2007. Accordingly, $3.4 million of the valuation allowance was released during the first quarter of 2006, of which $1.9 million was recorded to equity as additional paid-in-capital and $1.5 million was recorded as a reduction in the income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This $3.4 million release of the valuation allowance results in a $33.7 million net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2006.

 

On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” The Company elected to adopt the alternative transition method, which is the simplified method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method was used to determine the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC pool”) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation. Due to the Company’s history of tax net operating losses, the Company had no beginning balance in the APIC pool at the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.

 

The Company uses the “with-and-without” or “incremental” approach for determining the order in which tax benefits derived from the share-based payment awards are utilized. Using the with-and-without approach, actual income taxes payable for the period are compared to the amount of income taxes that would have been payable if there had been no share-based compensation expense for tax purposes in excess of the compensation expense recognized for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this approach, tax net operating loss carryforwards not related to share-based compensation are utilized before the current period’s share-based compensation deduction. As a result of this accounting treatment, the Company has a fully reserved deferred tax asset of approximately $31.2 million related to tax net operating loss carryforwards for non-qualified stock option deductions as of June 30, 2006. The benefit of the valuation allowance release related to these deductions will be recorded directly to equity as additional paid-in-capital when such benefits are realized.

 

The Company expects to continue to have a cash tax-paying rate of between 5% and 6%. At December 31, 2005, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) for income tax purposes of approximately $375.4 million, which consists of $346.8 million of consolidated NOLs and $28.6 million of separate return limitation NOLs. The NOLs will expire at various dates from 2006 through 2024. The change in the Company’s

income tax rate has no impact on the Company’s ability to recognize NOLs and will have no impact on cash flow until the NOLs are utilized for tax purposes.

 

Six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to six months ended June 30, 2005

 

Revenue.  Revenue classified by the Company’s reportable segments (“divisions”) is as follows:

 

 

Revenue for the Physician Solutions division increased approximately 16% in the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. The Company acquired and included within the Physician Solutions division the results of the physician business of NDCHealth effective January 6, 2006. Pricing for the division’s services and products was stable compared to the prior year period. Revenue in the division’s outsourced receivables management business, which represents approximately 90% of the division’s revenue for the six months and was not part of the NDCHealth acquisition, increased approximately 5% due to the implementation of a record level of net new business sold during 2005. Also contributing to the year-over-year increase was approximately $0.9 million in revenue recognized in the second quarter which was previously deferred related to a large contract signed in 2004. The contract was amended during the second quarter to eliminate the quarterly measurement periods that resulted in the original revenue deferral. The remainder of the growth in the six months was attributable to the NDCHealth acquisition.

 

Net new business sold in the outsourced receivables management business during the first six months of 2006 was approximately $9 million compared to approximately $14 million during the first six months of 2005. Net new business sold is defined as the annualized revenue value of new contracts signed in a period, less the annualized revenue value of terminated business in that same period.

 

Net backlog at June 30, 2006, was approximately $12 million, compared to the net backlog of approximately $12 million at December 31, 2005, and approximately $10 million at June 30, 2005. Net backlog represents the annualized revenue related to new contracts signed with the business still to be implemented, less the annualized revenue related to existing contracts where discontinuance notification has been received and the customer has yet to be phased out. The Company focuses on maintaining a positive net backlog and believes it is a useful indicator of future revenue growth.

 

Revenue for the Hospital Solutions division increased approximately 57% for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. Results for the first six months of 2006 for the Hospital Solutions division includes the results of the hospital business of NDCHealth, which was acquired on January 6, 2006, and the results of Integra Solutions, which was acquired on December 1, 2005. Revenue growth in the current period was a result of these acquisitions. Pricing for the division’s services and products was stable compared to the prior year period. The division is continuing to penetrate both its existing customer base and reach new customers with its revenue cycle management products, particularly the conversion of the Premis customer base.

 

Revenue for the Pharmacy Solutions division was approximately $61.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. On January 6, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy business from NDCHealth. The network services business benefited from additional volume as well as from the implementation of Medicare Part D on January 1, 2006, and from market acceptance of new, value-added network products. The pharmacy systems business has a recurring software maintenance revenue stream and benefited from implementations of new customers in the period.

The Hospital Solutions division revenue includes intersegment revenue for services provided to the Physician Solutions division, which is shown in Eliminations to reconcile to total consolidated revenue.

 

Segment Operating Income.  Segment operating income is revenue less cost of services, selling, general and administrative expenses and other expenses. Segment operating income, classified by the Company’s divisions, is as follows:

 

 

Physician Solutions’ segment operating income increased approximately 27% in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in operating margins of approximately 12.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2006, versus approximately 11.8% in the same period in 2005. As compared to the first six months of 2005, operating income increased approximately $7 million in the current year period as a result of revenue growth and the acquisition of NDCHealth physician business, which historically operated at higher margins than the Company’s physician business. This increase was offset by expenses related to the acquisition of NDCHealth of approximately $0.1 million for severance and $1.9 million for the write-off of in-process research and development that was acquired in the purchase of NDCHealth. The first six months of 2006 also included expenses of approximately $0.4 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP. The positive impact of the approximately $0.9 million of deferred revenue the division recognized during the current year period related to a contract amendment was offset by approximately $1.0 million in bad debt expense recorded in the quarter for specific accounts receivable in the Company’s outsourcing business.

 

Hospital Solutions’ segment operating income increased approximately 68% in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, resulting in operating margins of 22.4% in the current year period versus 20.8% in the prior year. Operating income increased approximately $11 million in the current year period as a result of improvement in the business and the acquisition of the NDCHealth hospital business, which historically operated at higher margins than the Company’s revenue cycle management business for hospitals. This increase was offset by expenses related to the NDCHealth acquisition of approximately $0.1 million for severance and $2.8 million for the write-off of in-process research and development that was acquired in the purchase of NDCHealth. The first six months of 2006 also included expenses of approximately $0.3 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.

 

Pharmacy Solutions’ segment operating income was $2.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, resulting in operating margins of 3.6%. On January 6, 2006, the Company acquired the pharmacy business from NDCHealth. The division’s income for the first six months of 2006 was negatively impacted by expenses of approximately $8.6 million related to the write-off of in-process research and development purchased as part of the NDCHealth acquisition. The first six months of 2006 also included expenses of approximately $0.3 million related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP.

 

Corporate overhead expenses, which include certain executive and administrative functions, increased approximately $12.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005. The increase is attributable to the NDCHealth integration costs of approximately $6.6 million. Corporate also included approximately $1.7 million of expenses related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the 2006 LTIP. The remainder of the increase is due to the acquisition of NDCHealth.

 

Interest.  Interest expense was approximately $17.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2005. The increase is attributable to the issuance of approximately $435 million in term loan debt related to the NDCHealth acquisition. Interest income was approximately

$1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to approximately $0.6 million for the same period in 2005.

 

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense, which was primarily related to federal, state and local income taxes, was approximately $6.3 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, respectively. In 2005, the release of a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance reduced the Company’s GAAP income tax expense to an amount that approximated the Company’s cash tax paying rate. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, there was not a similar release of the Company’s valuation allowance.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset of $125.3 million due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to generate sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of its net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company released approximately $84 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance against the goodwill resulting from the transaction to offset a deferred tax liability recorded as part of the acquisition. The majority of this liability relates to the increase in the valuation of NDCHealth’s fixed assets and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the transaction that were recorded for GAAP. Since the NDCHealth acquisition was an acquisition of stock, NDCHealth’s tax basis of the assets carries over to the Company as its tax basis. Therefore, the Company will not receive a tax benefit from the additional intangible amortization recorded for GAAP purposes. As a result of this accounting treatment for the acquisition, the Company’s taxable income relating to this acquisition will be greater than its corresponding GAAP income, which will result in the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss carryforwards corresponding to the amount of the disallowed depreciation and amortization for income tax purposes. Since management believes it is more likely than not that a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset will be realized due to the reversal of the deferred tax liability recorded in connection with the acquisition, the Company released a portion of its valuation allowance against the asset.

 

In addition to the intangibles discussed above, the Company has carryover tax basis of $125 million in the NDCHealth goodwill. This basis will continue to be amortized for tax purposes over the remaining life and will result in an additional tax benefit of approximately $47.5 million over the next 11 years. The benefit for the amortization of the goodwill is not reflected in the deferred tax asset recorded in accordance with the guidelines of SFAS No. 109.

 

In the first quarter of 2006, the Company reassessed the remaining valuation allowance and determined that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would be realized in the foreseeable future. This determination was based upon the Company’s projection of taxable income for 2006 and 2007. Accordingly, $3.4 million of the valuation allowance was released during the first quarter of 2006, of which $1.9 million was recorded to equity as additional paid-in-capital and $1.5 million was recorded as a reduction in the income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This $3.4 million release of the valuation allowance results in a $33.7 million net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2006.

 

On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” The Company elected to adopt the alternative transition method, which is the simplified method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method was used to determine the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC pool”) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation. Due to the Company’s history of tax net operating losses, the Company had no beginning balance in the APIC pool at the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.

 

The Company uses the “with-and-without” or “incremental” approach for determining the order in which tax benefits derived from the share-based payment awards are utilized. Using the with-and-without approach, actual income taxes payable for the period are compared to the amount of income taxes that would have been payable if there had been no share-based compensation expense for tax purposes in excess of the compensation expense recognized for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this approach, tax net operating loss carryforwards not related to share-based compensation are utilized before the current period’s share-based compensation deduction. As a result of this accounting treatment, the Company has a fully reserved deferred tax asset of approximately $31.2 million related to tax net operating loss carryforwards for non-qualified stock option deductions as of June 30,

2006. The benefit of the valuation allowance release related to these deductions will be recorded directly to equity as additional paid-in-capital when such benefits are realized.

 

The Company expects to continue to have a cash tax-paying rate of between 5% and 6%. At December 31, 2005, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) for income tax purposes of approximately $375.4 million, which consists of $346.8 million of consolidated NOLs and $28.6 million of separate return limitation NOLs. The NOLs will expire at various dates from 2006 through 2024. The change in the Company’s income tax rate has no impact on the Company’s ability to recognize NOLs and will have no impact on cash flow until the NOLs are utilized for tax purposes.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The following table is a summary of the Company’s cash balances as of June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, and cash flows from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006, and 2005, (in thousands):

 

 

 

Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of no more than three months at the date of purchase.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company generated approximately $29.9 million in cash from continuing operations as a result of increased profitability from the business segments as well as from the acquisition of NDCHealth offset by approximately $27.0 million used for integration and other costs related to the NDCHealth acquisition.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company generated approximately $22.6 million in cash from continuing operations as a result of increased profitability and the timing of payment of certain accruals.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company used approximately $444.7 million in cash from investing activities from continuing operations, including $429.8 million used for the acquisition of NDCHealth, which is net of approximately $100 million of cash acquired. Approximately $14.9 million was used for capital expenditures and investment in software development costs.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company used approximately $8.1 million in cash from investing activities from continuing operations primarily for capital expenditures and investment in software development costs.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company generated approximately $380.6 million in cash from financing activities. The Company raised $435 million from a new senior credit facility in connection with the acquisition of NDCHealth and subsequently repaid approximately $50 million on this facility during the period. In conjunction with obtaining the new senior credit facility, the Company capitalized approximately $7.7 million in expenses, including legal and other professional fees, which are included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company also had proceeds from the exercise of stock options of approximately $2.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

 

On January 6, 2006, Per-Se acquired NDCHealth.  In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued approximately 8.3 million shares of Common Stock to NDCHealth stockholders and secured financing in the form of a new senior credit facility consisting of a $435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving credit facility

(“Senior Credit Facility”), which replaced the Company’s prior $75 million revolving credit facility. The term loan matures in seven years and, at the Company’s election, bears interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 2.25% or Base Rate, as defined by the Senior Credit Facility, plus 1.25%. During the first six months of 2006, the Company elected to use LIBOR plus 2.25%. The revolving credit facility has an interest rate that varies between LIBOR plus 1.50% and LIBOR plus 2.50% or between Base Rate plus 0.5% and Base Rate plus 1.50%, based on performance, and matures in five years. The Company has the option of electing LIBOR or Base Rate. The Company has incurred no borrowings under the revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company retired approximately $50 million in term loan debt.

 

For more information about the Company’s long-term debt, refer to “Note 7 — Long-Term Debt” in the Company’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company used approximately $10.8 million in cash from financing activities which included approximately $15.4 million used for the repurchase of the Company’s Common Stock which was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options of approximately $4.6 million.

 

On March 9, 2005, the Company announced that the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 1 million shares of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. Under the share repurchase program, the Company was able to repurchase shares from time to time at management’s discretion in the open market, by block purchase, in privately negotiated transactions or as otherwise allowed by securities laws and regulations. All shares repurchased were placed into treasury to be used for general corporate purposes. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company repurchased approximately one million shares of its outstanding Common Stock at a cost of approximately $15.4 million. The Company may establish new or additional share repurchase programs. The actual number and timing of shares to be repurchased will depend on market conditions and certain SEC rules. Repurchase programs may be discontinued at anytime.

 

The level of the Company’s indebtedness could adversely impact the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing. A substantial portion of the Company’s cash flow from operations could be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on its indebtedness.

 

The Company is subject to claims, litigation and official billing inquiries arising in the ordinary course of its business. These matters include pending lawsuits involving claims that are not required to be separately described in this report. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims and other issues asserted in such matters; however, there can be no assurance that such matters or any future legal matters will not have an adverse effect on the Company. Amounts of awards or losses, if any, in pending legal matters have not been reflected in the financial statements unless probable and reasonably estimable.

 

Other than the acquisition of NDCHealth, the Company has not experienced any material changes in the underlying components of cash generated by operating activities from continuing operations. The Company believes that the existing cash and the cash provided by operations will provide sufficient capital to fund its working capital requirements, contractual requirements, investing and financing needs.

 

Interest Rate Sensitivity

 

The Company invests excess cash in commercial paper, money market funds and other highly liquid short-term investments. Due to the limited amounts of these investments and their short-term nature, the Company does not expect any fluctuation in the prevailing interest rates to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

The Company has the option of entering into loans based on LIBOR or on Base Rates under the Senior Credit Facility. As such, the Company could experience fluctuations in interest rates under the Senior Credit Facility.

 

In connection with the acquisition of NDCHealth on January 6, 2006, the Company secured financing in the form of a new Senior Credit Facility consisting of a $435 million term loan and a $50 million revolving credit facility. Also on January 6, 2006, the Company entered into a four-year interest rate swap agreement, in order to hedge against potential interest rate fluctuations resulting from the variable interest rate under the terms of the new

senior credit facility. Pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company is obligated to periodically pay an amount based on a fixed interest rate, and the Company will receive an amount based on a variable rate. The variable rate is based on the three-month LIBOR rate available at the time. By entering into the interest rate swap, the Company has effectively fixed the maximum interest rate that the Company will pay on a portion of the outstanding balance under the Senior Credit Facility at 4.76% per annum plus the applicable spread, which is 225 basis points. The amount of the Senior Credit Facility that is covered by the swap is $125 million in years one and two, decreasing to $100 million in year three and $75 million in year four. The interest rate swap will terminate on December 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated pursuant to its terms.

 

The floating rate debt outstanding under the term loan, which is not subject to the above referenced interest rate swap agreement, subjects the Company to risk resulting from changes in short-term interest rates. The potential change in annual interest expense resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates applied to the Company’s floating rate debt at June 30, 2006 would be approximately $2.6 million.

 

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

 

The majority of the Company’s sales and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, the Company has not experienced any significant foreign exchange gains or losses to date. The Company conducts only limited transactions in foreign currencies and does not expect material foreign exchange gains or losses in the future. The Company does not engage in any foreign exchange hedging activities.

 

Conclusions Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

In connection with the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and (b) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Control System Limitations; NDCHealth Material Weaknesses

 

It should be noted, however, that a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues within the Company have been detected. Furthermore, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how unlikely. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements or omissions due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

It should be noted, further, that prior to the acquisition of NDCHealth by the Company, NDCHealth’s former management and its independent registered public accounting firm identified three “material weaknesses” in NDCHealth’s internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or

interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As of May 27, 2005, NDCHealth’s former management identified the following material weaknesses in NDCHealth’s internal control over financial reporting:

 

Revenue Recognition and Billing Processes

 

NDCHealth’s former management concluded that material weaknesses existed in documentation and procedures relating to its revenue recognition and billing processes that resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of its financial statements would not be prevented or detected.

 

Specific control deficiencies identified relating to revenue recognition and billing processes included:

 

 

Financial Statement Close Process

 

NDCHealth’s former management also concluded that material weaknesses existed in documentation and procedures relating to its financial statement close process that resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of its financial statements would not be prevented or detected.

 

Specific control deficiencies identified relating to the financial statement close process included:

 

 

Income Taxes

 

NDCHealth’s former management also concluded that a material weakness existed in accounting for income taxes that resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of its financial statements would not be prevented or detected.

 

Specifically, there was a lack of procedures and controls related to the preparation and review of the tax provision designed to ensure that the deferred tax provision and deferred tax asset and liability balances were accurate and determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Remediation Measures for Identified NDCHealth Material Weaknesses

 

Prior to the acquisition, NDCHealth’s former management undertook steps designed to remediate the weaknesses described above, including the following:

 

 

Further, a portion of the material weakness regarding revenue recognition and billing processes was attributable to the pharmaceutical information business which was sold to Wolters Kluwer Health prior to the Company’s acquisition of NDCHealth. In addition, the Company has implemented changes to the internal control structure of the acquired business operations as set forth below under the caption “Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

 

While the Company’s management believes that the material weaknesses previously identified with respect to the internal controls of the acquired business operations have been remediated sufficiently to make the conclusion set forth above regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, it should be noted that the Company has not fully tested the effectiveness of internal controls within the acquired business operations, and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the identified internal control weaknesses have been remediated or that additional weaknesses in such controls will not be found upon further testing.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

In connection with the evaluation of changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, management identified the following changes that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2006, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Management has devoted significant attention and resources during the quarter to integrating NDCHealth’s business practices and operations with those of the Company. The integration of the acquired business operations into the Company has also materially affected and is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. For example, certain NDCHealth legacy financial reporting processes and functions have been converted to or integrated with the Company’s financial reporting processes and functions, including purchasing, accounts payable, payroll, benefits, calculation of accruals, reserves and allowances, posting of journal entries for the former NDCHealth business units, and performing month-end reconciliation and close procedures for those business units.

 

The information required by this Item is included in “Note 6 — Legal Matters” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I.

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This report and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions with respect to the future and include, in particular, any statement relating to future revenues, income, earnings per share, capital expenditures, obligations, capital structure, prospects, plans and objectives. Statements in this report and the documents incorporated by reference herein that are not historical facts are hereby identified as “forward-looking statements” for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by the Reform Act. Words such as “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “would,” “should,” “could” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is suggested by forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including without limitation the risks described below under the caption “Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations, Financial Condition or Business,” and the following: