Myers Industries, Inc. 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
Commission
File Number
001-08524
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
OHIO
|
|
34-0778636
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification
Number)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1293 S. Main Street,
Akron, Ohio
|
|
44301
|
|
(330) 253-5592
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
(Telephone Number)
|
|
|
|
Securities Registered Pursuant
to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
Name of Each Exchange
On which registered:
|
Common Stock, Without Par
Value
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
(Title of Class)
|
|
|
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for at least the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
common equity stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference
to the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange as of
June 30, 2006: $420,933,150.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of registrants
common stock as of March 9, 2007: 35,110,203 Shares of
Common Stock, without par value.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for
its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
|
|
(a)
|
General
Development of Business
|
Myers Industries, Inc. (the Company), an Ohio Corporation, was
founded in Akron, Ohio, in 1933. The Company grew from the
vision of two brothers, Louis and Meyer Myers, and a partnership
based on a $620 loan, tire repair merchandise, and a used truck.
The new venture was named Myers Tire Supply and
serviced tire dealers and retreaders through distribution of
tools and supplies needed to grow their businesses. The Company
expanded into manufacturing operations in the post-war
1940s and in 1963 was renamed Myers Industries, Inc. to
reflect its diversity. In 1971, the Company went public, and the
stock is traded today on the New York Stock Exchange under the
ticker symbol MYE.
Still headquartered in Akron, Ohio, Myers Industries has grown
from a small storefront into a premier, international
manufacturing and distribution business. Today, the Company
manufactures a diverse range of polymer products for industrial,
agricultural, automotive, commercial, and consumer markets.
Myers Industries is a leader in the manufacturing of plastic
reusable material handling containers and pallets and North
Americas leading producer of plastic horticultural pots,
trays, and flower planters. Other principal product lines
include plastic storage and organization containers, plastic and
rubber OEM parts, rubber tire repair products, and custom
plastic and rubber products.
The Company is also the largest wholesale distributor of tools,
equipment, and supplies for the tire, wheel, and undervehicle
service industry in the United States. The distribution products
range from tire balancers and alignment systems to valve caps,
tire repair tools, and other consumable service supplies.
As of March 9, 2007, the Company included: 23 manufacturing
facilities and 43 distribution branches located throughout
North, Central, and South America; approximately 12,000
manufactured products and 10,000 distributed products; and
nearly 5,000 employees.
Serving customers around the world, products and related
services from Myers Industries brands provide a wide range
of performance benefits to customers in diverse niche markets.
Some of these benefits include increasing productivity, lowering
material handling costs, improving product quality, reducing
labor costs, shortening assembly times, eliminating solid waste,
and increasing profitability. The Companys business
strategy the Strategic Business
Evolution is focused on sustainable,
profitable growth and is guided by five key operating
principles: 1) Business Growth, 2) Customer
Satisfaction, 3) Cost Control, 4) Organizational
Development, and 5) Positioning the Business for the
Future. Applying these within our Strategic Business Evolution,
the Company emphasizes:
|
|
|
|
|
Industry-leading innovation of niche, value added products;
|
|
|
|
Being the low-cost provider of certain commodity products where
our brands excel;
|
|
|
|
Achieving leadership in key product areas through breadth of
offering, consistent quality, and superior customer service;
|
|
|
|
Concentrating our efforts on niche markets where our
capabilities create profit opportunities for our customers and
ourselves;
|
|
|
|
Leveraging brand equity and capabilities to grow business with
existing customers and cultivate new ones, particularly in
emerging growth markets where we can deliver the greatest value
and achieve the best returns;
|
|
|
|
Investing in new technologies and processes to reinforce
customer satisfaction and market strength across our key
business segments;
|
|
|
|
Succession plans through our management teams at all levels in
the Company, ensuring the right people are in the right
positions to grow;
|
|
|
|
Selective acquisitions as opportunities arise to enhance our
leadership in key markets;
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Potential divestiture of businesses with non-strategic products
or markets, aligning our resources with the best avenues for
long-term, profitable growth potential; and
|
|
|
|
Consolidation and rationalization initiatives to reduce costs
and improve productivity within the Companys manufacturing
and distribution footprint.
|
The Companys segments and brands are under continuous
review for strategic fit and growth potential. The review
process is dedicated to strengthening innovation, enhancing
brand leadership in our markets, building strong customer
relationships, and positioning the Company to grow on a
sustainable basis.
|
|
(b)
|
Financial
Information About Segments
|
The response to this section of Item 1 is contained in the
Industry Segments footnote of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements under Item 8 of this report.
|
|
(c)
|
Description
of Business
|
The Company conducts its business activities in four distinct
business segments, including three in manufacturing and one in
distribution. The manufacturing segments consist of: North
American Material Handling, Lawn and Garden, and Automotive and
Custom. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the
Company also included one other manufacturing segment, European
Material Handling, which was announced for divestiture and moved
to discontinued operations status in the third quarter of 2006.
The businesses in that segment were subsequently sold in
February 2007 (see Subsequent Events footnote).
In our manufacturing segments, we design, manufacture, and
market a variety of plastic and rubber products. These range
from plastic reusable material handling containers and small
parts storage bins to plastic horticultural pots and hanging
baskets, decorative resin planters, plastic and rubber OEM
parts, tire repair materials, and custom plastic and rubber
products. The Distribution Segment is engaged in the
distribution of tools, equipment and supplies used for tire,
wheel and undervehicle service on passenger, heavy truck and
off-road vehicles.
2
The following table summarizes the key attributes of our
business segments in continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Continuing
|
|
North American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations(1)
|
|
Material Handling
|
|
Lawn & Garden
|
|
Automotive & Custom
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$240.1M
|
|
$160.2M
|
|
$204.7M
|
|
$197.3M
|
% of 2006 Total Net Sales(2)
|
|
31% of total net sales
|
|
21% of total net sales
|
|
26% of total net sales
|
|
25% of total net sales
|
Key Product Areas
|
|
Plastic Reusable
Containers & Pallets
Plastic Storage &
Organization Products
Plastic Carts
Metal Carts
Wooden Dollies
Custom Products
|
|
Plastic
Horticultural
Pots, Trays, Flats &
Hanging Baskets
Decorative Resin
Planters
Custom Products
|
|
Rubber &
Plastic
Original Equipment
Replacement Parts
Tire Repair &
Retreading Products
Highway Markings
Industrial Rubber
Custom Rubber &
Plastic Products
|
|
Tire Valves &
Accessories
Tire Changing &
Balancing Equipment
Lifts & Alignment
Equipment
Service Equipment
Hand Tools
Tire Repair & Retread
Equipment & Supplies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brake, Transmission
& Allied Service
Equipment & Supplies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Brands
|
|
Akro-Milstm
Buckhorn®
|
|
Dillen®
Listotm
Pro
Cal®
|
|
Ameri-Karttm
Buckhorn
Rubbertm
Michigan
Rubbertm
Patch
Rubbertm
WEK®
|
|
Myers Tire
Supply®
Myers do
Brasiltm
|
Key Capabilities
& Services
|
|
Product Design
Prototyping
Product Testing
Material Formulation
Injection Molding
Structural Foam
Molding
Metal Forming
Wood
Fabrication
Powder Coating
Material Regrind
& Recycling
|
|
Product Design
Prototyping
Testing
Material Formulation
Injection Molding
Thermoforming
Co-Extrusion
Thermoforming
Custom Printing &
Labeling
Material Regrind
& Recycling
|
|
Rubber Mixing Rubber
Compounding
Rubber Calendering
Rubber Extrusion
Rubber Injection
Molding
Rubber Compression
& Transfer Molding
Rubber & Plastic
Blow Molding
Co-Extrusion Blow
Molding
Rubber-to-Metal
Bonding
Rubber-to-Plastic
Bonding
Plastic Rotational
Molding
|
|
Broad Sales Coverage
Local Sales & Inventory
International
Distribution
Personalized Service
National Accounts
Product Training
Repair/Service Training
New Products
Speed to Market
|
Representative
Markets
|
|
Agriculture
Automotive
Commercial
Food Processing
Food Distribution
Healthcare
Industrial
Manufacturing
Retail Distribution
|
|
Horticulture: - Growers - Nurseries - Greenhouses - Retail Garden Centers Consumer - Retail Garden
Centers - Retail Home
Centers
|
|
Agricultural Vehicle
Automotive OEM
Construction Vehicle
Heavy Truck
Industrial
Mining
Recreational Marine
Recreational Vehicle
Road Construction
Sporting Goods
Telecommunications
Water Control
|
|
Retail Tire Dealers Truck Tire Dealers Auto Dealers Commercial Auto & Truck Fleets
General Repair & Services Facilities
Tire Retreaders Governmental Agencies
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company announced its
intention to divest the European Material Handling Segment,
which included the Allibert-Buckhorn and raaco International
businesses and six |
3
|
|
|
|
|
manufacturing facilities located in France, Spain, and the
United Kingdom (U.K.). The segment is reported as discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, and
represented net sales of $170.9 million. Sale of the
businesses in the European Segment was completed on
February 1, 2007. For more details, see Subsequent
Events footnote. |
Manufacturing
Segment Overview
In the Companys three manufacturing segments, we design,
manufacture, and market more than 12,000 plastic and rubber
products. Depending on the product brand, our manufactured
products are sold nationally and internationally by direct sales
forces, independent sales representatives, distributors, or a
mix of those sources.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Companys
manufacturing facilities in continuing operations included 20 in
the United States, one in Canada and one in Brazil. The
subsequent acquisition of ITML Horticultural Products Inc. on
January 9, 2007, added three manufacturing facilities in
the United States and five in Canada (see Lawn and Garden
Segment description that follows and Subsequent
Events footnote). In February 2007, the Company
consolidated operations from one facility to another in its
Automotive and Custom Segment as a move to improve productivity
and reduce costs. As of March 5, 2007, the Companys
manufacturing footprint included 29 facilities located in
North and South America.
North
American Material Handling Segment
The North American Material Handling Segment, the largest
segment in net sales dollars, includes plastic reusable material
handling containers and pallets for markets such as automotive,
appliance, general manufacturing, distribution, agriculture,
retail, and food processing. Myers Industries has a leadership
position across these markets through its strong
Buckhorn®
and
Akro-Milstm
brands. This leadership was built and is maintained through
constant innovation, diverse manufacturing processes, consistent
quality, and superior customer service, resulting in significant
productivity and cost-saving benefits for our customers.
Buckhorns reusable containers and pallets are used in
closed-loop supply chains to replace single-use cardboard boxes,
easily damaged wooden pallets, and high-cost steel containers to
help customers reduce material handling costs. Cost-reduction
benefits include: improving product protection, increasing
handling efficiencies, reducing freight costs, and eliminating
solid waste and disposal costs. Small parts bins, storage
systems, and transport products from Akro-Mils provide similar
benefits, along with storage and organization efficiency
throughout customers operations.
The Buckhorn brand in the North American Material Handling
Segment offers a product selection rich in both breadth and
depth, as well as a direct sales force with the packaging and
material handling expertise that makes Buckhorn a key solutions
partner for our customers. Buckhorns product line spans
injection-molded hand-held containers and totes; injection and
structural foam-molded collapsible and fixed wall bulk transport
containers; and injection, structural foam, thermoformed, and
blow-molded shipping pallets all in a wide range of
sizes and styles. Buckhorn also produces a wide range of custom
products and protective material handling packaging. Customers
count on Buckhorns single-source efficiency and the
productivity and profitability benefits delivered through
value-added innovation, broad product selection, quality, and
packaging services.
Buckhorn hand-held containers deliver significant cost-saving
benefits to customers. Our attached lid, detached lid, bi-color,
and specialty containers stack
and/or nest
for efficient space usage, thus lowering freight and storage
costs. In automotive plants across North America, our container
and pallet systems are reused hundreds of times to ship products
as small as fasteners or as large as sidewall components from
suppliers directly to assembly areas protecting
parts throughout the supply chain and reducing scrap rates. Our
attached lid containers and pallets are used by leading
retailers to receive their various products: the containers are
used in retailers regional distribution centers to
organize inventory, sort orders, and are then combined with
pallets to transport products directly to stores. In the food
processing and distribution industry, our specialty containers
provide superior protection to food products while in transit
and are more sanitary than cardboard boxes. For example, poultry
is delivered to restaurants and grocery stores across the
U.S. in a spill-proof container that we pioneered.
Case-ready, packaged meats are delivered from processors to
retailers in containers designed to accommodate specific cuts
and
4
package sizes, while maintaining optimal airflow for chilling.
Other specialty containers protect delicate fruits and
vegetables susceptible to costly damage while in transit from
harvesting to processing.
With its Buckhorn brand, Myers manufactures a comprehensive
selection of collapsible and fixed wall bulk transport
containers for the North American material handling industry.
Bulk containers perform both light- and heavy-duty tasks,
whether distributing seed products, carrying large automotive
components, or shipping liquids across long distances. These
containers range in size from footprints of 32 inches by
30 inches to 70 inches by 48 inches; heights up
to 65 inches; and weight capacities up to 3,000 pounds.
Bulk containers are compatible with forklifts and pallet jacks
for easy handling. Many of the containers collapse to a third of
their size for space-saving stacking, storage, and return
transport, thus helping to reduce freight and storage costs.
Examples of bulk container applications include our Center Flow
SeedBoxestm,
which are used by leading seed and feed distributors to
efficiently transport and dispense up to 2,500 lbs. of their
products. The unique SeedBox can be emptied in
approximately 30 seconds, then broken down for return shipping
and refilling, thus eliminating traditional seed bag packaging
and the related environmental impact of burning bags in the
fields. Automotive OEMs, manufacturers, and their
suppliers employ our
DunnageReadytm
Bulk Container to ship sensitive parts direct to assembly areas.
The DunnageReady Container accommodates custom-made, protective
inserts to separate parts and prevent scratches to Class A
painted surfaces or other costly damage. Manufacturers of tomato
paste employ our
Citadel®
bulk containers to move processed tomato products across country
in railcars. The smooth-sided, impact-resistant containers
replace wooden crates and steel containers that can cause
product damage and contamination. The Citadel and the new
Citadel-vtm,
which features a valve outlet and unique valve cover door, carry
up to 3,000 lbs. / 300 gallons of liquefied product, safely
stack when fully loaded, and are designed for long-term indoor
or outdoor storage of loads. This product line is applicable to
other food processing and ingredient niches such as
concentrates, oils, syrups, and similar products.
Buckhorns plastic pallets interwork with the hand-held
containers and totes to create a completely reusable system and
provide efficient space utilization in plants, warehouses, and
truck trailers helping customers to reduce storage
and freight costs. Buckhorn also produces a wide range of
specialty pallets for niche-type shipping applications, such as
drum pallets for chemical and liquid transport.
Our Akro-Mils brand provides customers with everything
needed to store, organize, and transport for greater
productivity and profitability. This related mix of
plastic, metal, and wooden material handling products serves
industrial and commercial end-users through leading industrial
supply catalogers and material handling distributors. Products
range from
AkroBins®
the industrys leading small parts bins to
Super-Size AkroBins, metal panel and bin hanging systems, metal
storage cabinet and bin systems, metal shelving systems, plastic
and metal transport carts, dollies, work benches, and a wide
variety of custom storage and transport products. Capabilities
used throughout the Akro-Mils product line include: injection
molding, metal forming, powder-coat painting/metal finishing,
and wood fabrication, as well as the additional capabilities
through synergies with Buckhorn.
Akro-Mils products deliver their storage and organization
solutions in a wide variety of applications, such as creating
assembly line workstations, organizing medical supplies, and
creating retail displays. Emphasis is placed on product bundling
and customizing systems to create specific storage and
organization configurations for customers operations. For
example, industrial manufacturers with specialized tool and
parts storage areas known as tool
cribs use a combination of Akro-Mils bins,
racking, locking cabinets, work tables, and transport carts to
speed assembly times, maintain accurate inventories, and reduce
loss. Metal carts and dollies are paired with custom-made
containers to create unique transport systems capable of
handling parts and components both small and large. Our powder
coating/painting capability allows for high-quality,
scratch-resistant finishing of metal products in a multitude of
colors and finish styles.
Cross-marketing and cross-selling are key synergies between the
North American Material Handling Segment brands. Equally
important are cross-manufacturing capabilities that allow each
brand to offer customers a wider range of value-added design and
molding benefits. In addition to standard material handling
products, we utilize the extensive design and manufacturing
capabilities between Buckhorn and Akro-Mils for turnkey
production of custom material handling products: container
inserts and protective dunnage, transport trays, modified or new
container and pallet combinations, and other packaging,
transport, or storage items tailored to customers applications.
5
Sustainable, profitable growth in this segment is fueled by a
strong focus on innovation with value-added new products,
concentrating sales efforts on niche markets and applications,
increasing awareness of plastic reusable material handling
products to drive conversions from cardboard and wood products,
and managing the balance of product pricing and raw material
costs.
Lawn and
Garden Segment
The Companys Lawn and Garden Segment brands include
Dillen®,
Pro
Cal®,
and
Listotm
serving the needs of the North American
floriculture/horticulture market. Our product selection,
manufacturing capabilities, quality, and customer service lead
the industry, which spans growers with 80-plus acre greenhouse
facilities and small regional operations to retail garden
centers and retail home centers.
Our Dillen and Pro Cal products for growers, available both
direct and through a network of horticultural distributors,
include the industrys most extensive range of
injection-molded and thermoformed pots, hanging baskets, flats
and carry trays, plug trays, nursery containers, propagation
sheets and flats, and specialty pots. Dillen is focused on the
broader range of products, while Pro Cal specializes in
injection molded and thermoformed nursery containers. Product
innovation for Dillen and Pro Cal is centered on the changing
needs of the professional grower, including increased automation
in growing operations, improving efficiency, and reducing costs.
For example, Dillen recently introduced lightweight co-extruded
(CoEx) thermoformed pots to provide growers with greater choice
in pot styles, from light to heavy-duty,
that meet their specific needs. CoEx pots have a thinner wall
construction compared to injection pots and combine a color
exterior with a black interior layer; that interior barrier
helps to protect plant roots against potential sunlight damage
in both grower and retailer operations.
In addition to working with growers on product innovation, we
support their needs for branding and retail merchandising
programs with services such as multi-color offset printing and
adhesive labeling on our round and square pots. Exclusive
products like our
picturePot®
graphic containers add to our leadership role in the branding
sector of marketplace. These custom-made pots are designed
specific to the grower
and/or plant
variety with vivid color photos, graphics, and care
instructions. Pot designs are then printed on flat,
polypropylene rolls, die-cut, and then formed into a variety of
sizes. Once filled with plant material by the grower and shipped
to retail, picturePots serve as packaging for plants and create
vibrant
point-of-sale
materials. To meet growers increased needs for branding
both their names and their plant varieties, our Dillen brand
expanded its printing and labeling operations with in-mold
labeling. This process also allows for stunning graphics and
colors to be printed on flat labels, which are then robotically
inserted into the mold before the container is formed. Once
molded, the label becomes part of the container. From offset
printing and adhesive labeling to picturePot and in-mold
labeling, we provide customers with the good,
better, and best options for branding
and merchandising their plant varieties.
In support of all of these printing and labeling programs, we
also offer customers graphic design services to create logos,
graphics, and marketing messages for their containers. This
service allows customers one-stop shop efficiency for unique
packaging for their plants.
Our Listo product line encompasses decorative resin planters
that feature intricate molding details and finishes in ceramic,
metallic, weathered stone, and textured styles. Sold into the
retail channel, the upscale look and feel of these decorative
planters capture the retailers attention and the
consumers imagination. Products include a diverse offering
of molded square and round planters, window boxes, urns, and
hanging baskets for indoor and outdoor usage. Consistent new
product development is key to success in the retail garden
center and mass merchandiser channels. Proprietary molding and
finishing processes, along with creative designs, deliver the
unique look in the decorative resin planter category that sets
our planters apart from the competition in leading retail stores
across North America.
Consistent with its operating strategy, Myers Industries seeks
to expand its industry leadership in the Lawn and Garden Segment
through product innovation and selection, diverse manufacturing
processes, customer satisfaction, and a wide variety of internal
and external strategic growth initiatives. One major transaction
for strategic growth occurred on January 9, 2007, when
Myers Industries completed its purchase of
ITML Horticultural Products
Inc.®
(ITML). The purchase solidified the Companys position as
the largest manufacturer of plastic horticultural containers and
related products in North America.
6
ITML, based in Ontario, Canada, designs, manufactures, and sells
plastic containers and related products for professional
floriculture / horticulture grower markets across North America.
ITML has more than 800 employees and eight facilities located in
Canada and the U.S., utilizing injection molding, blow molding,
and thermoforming processes, as well as extensive technology and
expertise for resin reprocessing and recycling for use in its
products. ITML is being integrated into Myers Industries
Lawn and Garden Segment. This acquisition increases Myers
grower and distributor market share in Canada and in the
southern and western United States. The addition of ITML to
Myers Lawn and Garden Segment represents a significant
growth opportunity through expanded product lines and
manufacturing capabilities, new sales channels and geographies,
and synergistic activities among the brands. These key areas
will allow the Company to align resources to meet the changing
needs of the grower industry and to deliver the best long-term
value for customers and other stakeholders.
Automotive
and Custom Segment
Myers Industries serves diverse niche markets and customers with
rubber and plastic products from the Automotive and Custom
Segment. Through our
Ameri-Karttm,
Buckhorn
Rubbertm,
Michigan
Rubbertm,
Patch
Rubbertm,
and
WEKtm
brands, we provide an array of engineered plastic and rubber
original equipment and replacement parts, tire repair materials,
and custom products. We offer a unique combination of product
design, molding, and finishing expertise to support our
customers needs for efficient, single sourcing of parts
and turnkey custom product development. In addition to our
plastics molding capabilities, we also offer a full range of
rubber molding processes that include: injection molding,
compression and transfer molding, compounding, calendering, and
extrusion, blow molding, rubber-to-metal bonding and
rubber-to-plastic bonding. Additional capabilities include
custom rubber formulation, mixing, and testing.
The Michigan Rubber and WEK brands support passenger car and
truck manufacturers to create rubber, plastic, and combination
components and assemblies for a wide variety of vehicle
platforms. Our proven track record and expertise affords us
guest engineering status with many of the
worlds leading automakers and suppliers both
transplants and domestics. Our molding and assembly capabilities
produce a diversified product mix, which includes: air induction
hoses, HVAC components, noise vibration dampers, grommets,
bushings, tubing assemblies, seals, and gaskets.
Manufacturers of recreational vehicles (RV) and watercraft
depend on our design expertise and production capabilities to
provide them an assortment of products. Through our Ameri-Kart
brand, rotationally-molded plastic water, waste handling, and
fuel tanks are created and assembled to fit the precise space
constraints within RV and marine vehicle designs. We utilize
thermoforming and rotational molding to manufacture plastic trim
and interior parts for RVs and helm consoles and seat
frames for watercraft.
Additionally, rubber seals from our Buckhorn Rubber brand are
used in several marine motor styles to protect transmission
compartments against water damage.
Our Buckhorn Rubber brand excels in engineering, quality, and
service to manufacturers of heavy trucks, trailers, construction
and agriculture equipment. These customers expect custom-molded
rubber air intake hoses, hood latches, boots, bellows, bushings,
and other products to perform under the harshest conditions,
whether
under-the-hood
or on the vehicles body. As one example of our market
strength, we provide air intake hoses in more than 200 standard
fittings for the majority of Class 6 and 8 trucks. Our
expertise in co-extrusion blow molding with three-dimensional
capabilities utilizing both rubber and
plastic allows us to create single-piece, complex
parts. These parts possess both rigid and flexible features and
extreme angles to meet the needs of changing vehicle design. As
heavy trucks and off-road vehicles are redesigned, engineering
and production synergies between our Buckhorn Rubber and
Michigan Rubber brands will keep Myers Industries in a strong
position to mold new components for our customers precise
needs.
Specialized manufacturing expertise, including
rubber-to-metal
and
rubber-to-plastic
bonding, enables us to create a range of specific performance
custom rubber products used in marine vehicles and lawn
maintenance equipment. We also employ our unique
rubber-to-metal
bonding process to manufacture parts for the water control
industry. These products include main valves for fire hydrants
and mechanical joint gaskets for water supply lines used in
residential and commercial construction.
7
Our manufacturing of rubber products began more than
60 years ago with our Patch Rubber brand, initially making
tire patches. Today, we manufacture the most comprehensive line
of tire repair and retreading products in the United States.
Service professionals depend on our product selection and
quality for safe, cost-effective repairs to passenger, truck,
and off-road tires. Products range from the plug that fills a
puncture, the cement that seats the plug, the tire innerliner
patch, and the final sealing compound. Patch brand repair
products maintain a strong position in the tire service markets
with exclusive sales through our Distribution Segments
branch network.
Also within the capabilities of Patch Rubber, we apply our
rubber calendering and compounding expertise to create a diverse
portfolio of products outside of the tire repair market, such as
reflective highway marking tapes. Our rubber-based tape and
symbols provide the durability and brightness that construction
professionals demand to replace paint for marking road repair,
intersections, and hazardous areas. Compared with traditional
highway paint, the tape stock is easier to apply, more
reflective, and longer lasting. It is available in both
temporary and permanent grades to meet the customers
specific requirements.
Other custom products represent a wide range of markets and
applications. These include: plastic elevated toilet seats and
tub rails for the healthcare market; plastic parts designed to
replace high-cost steel components in commercial cooling towers;
specialty tapes used for cable splicing in the
telecommunications industry; custom rubber linings for material
handling conveyors; and rubber sheet stock used as the base
material to produce the worlds top-selling line of golf
grips.
With diverse production capabilities, Myers Industries
Automotive and Custom Segment brands are positioned to grow in
niche markets with value-based plastic and rubber products.
Our
Distribution Segment
The Companys Distribution Segment includes the Myers Tire
Supply®,
Myers
International®,
and Myers do
Brasiltm
brands. With these, the Company is the largest
U.S. distributor and single source for tire, wheel, and
undervehicle service tools, equipment, and supplies. We buy and
sell nearly 10,000 different items everything that
professionals need to service passenger, truck, and off-road
tires and wheels. Independent tire dealers, mass merchandisers,
commercial auto and truck fleets, tire retreaders, and general
repair facilities rely on our broad product selection, rapid
availability, and personal service to be more productive and
profitably grow their business.
Within the continental United States, we provide widespread
distribution and sales coverage from 36 branches positioned in
major metropolitan areas. Each branch operates as a profit
center and is staffed by a branch manager, sales, office,
warehouse, and delivery personnel. Internationally, we have
three branches in Canada, three in Central America, and one
in Brazil. Sales personnel from our Akron, Ohio, headquarters
cover niche markets in the Far East, Middle East, South Pacific,
and South America.
We purchase products from trusted, industry-leading
manufacturers to ensure quality is delivered to our customers.
Each of the brand-name products we sell is associated with
superior performance in its respective area.
An essential element of the Companys success in the
Distribution Segment is our more than 190 sales representatives,
who deliver personalized service on a local level. Customers
rely on Myers sales representatives to introduce the
latest tools and technologies and to provide training in new
product features and applications. Representatives also teach
the proper use of diagnostic equipment and present
on-site
workshops demonstrating industry-approved techniques for tire
repair and undervehicle service.
While the needs and composition of our distribution markets
constantly change, we adapt and deliver the new products and
services that are important to our customers. The new product
pipeline is driven by innovations from auto and tire
manufacturers, which in turn prompts Myers and its suppliers to
develop new equipment, supplies, and service techniques to keep
cars and trucks moving down the road with confidence.
The Companys Distribution Segment is well positioned to
continue its steady growth through leading brands, product
selection and availability, and the personal service that is the
hallmark of the Companys success in this business. Myers
do Brasil will serve as our base of operations to grow the
Brazilian tire service market. This will be achieved by ongoing
productivity improvements in our distribution network, growing
within key domestic market sectors and emerging international
markets, delivering a continuous flow of new products with
first-to-market
8
speed, and improving efficiency and customer satisfaction
through implementation of innovative supply chain management
technologies. Strategic, bolt-on acquisitions are also a
potential growth avenue in this segment.
Raw
Materials & Suppliers Manufacturing and
Distribution Segments
For the Manufacturing Segment, the Company purchases
substantially all of its raw materials from a wide range of
third-party suppliers. These materials are primarily
polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene plastic resins, as
well as synthetic and natural rubber. Most raw materials are
commodity products and available from several domestic
suppliers. We believe that the loss of any one supplier or group
of suppliers would not have a materially adverse effect on our
business.
The Distribution Segment purchases substantially all of its
components from third-party suppliers and has multiple sources
for its products.
Competition
Competition in the manufacturing segments is substantial and
varied in form and size from manufacturers of similar products
and of other products which can be substituted for those
produced by the Company. In general, all direct competitors with
the Companys brands are private entities. Myers Industries
maintains strong brand presence and market positions in the
niche sectors of the markets it serves.
Competition in the Distribution Segment is generally from
private, smaller local and regional businesses. Within the
overall tire, wheel, and undervehicle service market, Myers is
the largest distributor of tools, equipment, and supplies.
Customer
Dependence
During the past three years, no single customer accounted for
more than five percent of the Companys total net sales.
Myers Industries serves thousands of customers who demand value
through product selection, innovation, quality, delivery and
responsive, personal service. Our brands foster satisfied, loyal
customers who have recognized our performance through numerous
supplier quality awards.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006 Myers Industries had a total of
3,689 full-time and part-time employees in its continuing
operations. Of these, 3,073 were employed in the Companys
manufacturing segments, including: 828 in the North American
Material Handling Segment, 1,563 in the Automotive and Custom
Segment, and 682 in the Lawn and Garden Segment. The
Distribution Segment employed 543 personnel. The Companys
corporate offices had 73 employees. In its discontinued
operations, the Company had 861 employees in the European
Material Handling Segment.
As of December 31, 2006 the Company had 144 employees in
the U.S. who were members of unions. In certain countries
in which the Company operates union membership is not known due
to confidentiality laws. The Company believes it has a good
relationship with its union employees.
|
|
(d)
|
Financial
Information About Geographic Areas
|
The response to this section of Item 1 is contained in the
Industry Segments footnote of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Item 8 of this report and
incorporated herein.
|
|
(e)
|
Available
Information
|
Filings with the SEC. As a public company, we regularly
file reports and proxy statements with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), such as:
* annual reports on
Form 10-K;
* quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q;
* current reports on
Form 8-K; and
* proxy statements on Schedule 14A.
9
Anyone may read and copy any of the materials we file with the
SEC at its Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580 , Washington, DC
20549. The SEC also maintains an internet website that contains
our reports, proxy and information statements, and our other SEC
filings; the address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
Also, we make our SEC filings available on our own internet site
as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed with the
SEC. Our internet address is http://www.myersind.com. The
content on the Companys website is available for
information purposes only, and is not incorporated by reference
into this
Form 10-K.
Corporate Governance. We have a Code of
Business Conduct for our employees and members of our Board of
Directors. A copy of the Code is posted on our website. We will
satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, any provision of the
Code with respect to our executive officers or directors by
disclosing the nature of that amendment or waiver.
Our website also contains additional information about our
corporate governance policies, including the charters of our
standing board committees. Any of these items are available in
print to any shareholder who requests them. Requests should be
sent to Corporate Secretary, Myers Industries, Inc.,
1293 S. Main Street, Akron, Ohio 44301.
|
|
ITEM 1A.
|
Risk
Factors; Forward Looking Statements
|
This
Form 10-K
and the information we are incorporating by reference contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal
securities laws, including information regarding the
Companys 2006 financial outlook, future plans, objectives,
business prospects and anticipated financial performance. You
can identify these statements by the fact that they include
words such as will, believe,
anticipate, expect,
estimate, intend, plan, or
variations of these words, or similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements are not statements of historical
facts and represent only our current expectations regarding such
matters. These statements inherently involve a wide range of
known and unknown uncertainties. The Companys actual
actions and results could differ materially from what is
expressed or implied by these statements. Specific factors that
could cause such a difference include, but are not limited to,
those set forth below and other important factors disclosed
previously and from time to time in our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these factors, as well
as other variables that may affect our operating results, you
should not rely on forward-looking statements, assume that past
financial performance will be a reliable indicator of future
performance, nor use historical trends to anticipate results or
trends in future periods. We expressly disclaim any obligation
or intention to provide updates to the forward-looking
statements and the estimates and assumptions associated with
them.
Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
applicable statements include, but are not limited to:
General
Economic, Business & Political Conditions
The Company operates in a wide range of geographies, primarily
North America, Central America, and South America.
Worldwide and regional economic, business, and political
conditions, including changes in the economic conditions of the
broader markets and in the Companys individual niche
markets, could have an adverse affect on one or more of the
Companys business segments.
Competition
Each of our segments participates in markets that are highly
competitive. Many of our competitors sell their products at
prices lower than ours, and we compete primarily on the basis of
product quality, product performance, value, supply chain
competency, and customer relationships. The Companys
competitive success also depends on its ability to maintain
strong brands / brand leadership within its markets so that
customers will need the Companys products and services to
meet their growth requirements. The development and maintenance
of such brands requires continuous investment in brand building,
marketing initiatives, and advertising. The competition that we
face in all of our markets which varies depending on
the Companys particular business segment, product line(s),
and
10
customers may prevent us from achieving sales,
product pricing, and income goals, which could affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Global
Economic Performance & Foreign Currency
Exposures
We currently operate manufacturing, sales and service facilities
outside of North America, particularly in Canada and Brazil. In
2006, international net sales accounted for approximately 12% of
our total net sales from continuing operations. Accordingly, we
are subject to risks associated with operations in foreign
countries, including:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
limitations on the remittance of dividends and other payments by
foreign subsidiaries;
|
|
|
limitations on foreign investment;
|
|
|
additional costs of compliance with local regulations; and
|
|
|
in certain countries, higher rates of inflation than in the
United States.
|
In addition, our operations outside the United States are
subject to the risk of new and different legal and regulatory
requirements in local jurisdictions, potential difficulties in
staffing and managing local operations and potentially adverse
tax consequences. The costs related to our international
operations could adversely affect our operations and financial
results in the future.
Raw
Material Cost Pressures
Our ability to manage our cost structure can be adversely
affected by movements in commodity and other raw material
prices. The Companys primary raw materials include plastic
resins, colorants, and natural and synthetic rubbers. The
Company attempts to reduce its exposure to increases in those
costs through a variety of programs and selling price
adjustments. Market conditions, however, may limit the
Companys ability to raise selling prices to offset
increases in our raw material input costs.
Raw
Material Availability
Changes in raw material availability may occur due to events
beyond our control. Our specific molding technologies
and/or
product specifications can limit our ability to locate
alternative supplies to produce certain products. The Company
believes, however, that its sources for its primary materials
will continue to be adequate to meet its requirements.
Manufacturing &
Distribution Activities
We are subject to the inherent risks in our diverse
manufacturing and distribution activities, including, but not
limited to: product quality, safety, licensing requirements and
other regulatory issues, environmental events, loss or
impairment of key manufacturing or distribution sites,
disruptions in logistics and transportation services, labor
disputes, and industrial accidents. In addition, the Company is
subject to natural disasters and other factors over which it has
no control.
Strategic
Growth Initiatives
The Company is undergoing a Strategic Business
Evolution process within its business segments to focus
resources on what it deems the best platforms for long-term,
sustainable growth including, but not limited to:
internal growth driven by strong brands and new product
innovation; development of new, high-growth markets and
expansion in existing niche markets; strengthening customer
relationships through value-added initiatives and key product
partnerships; investments in new technology and processes to
reinforce markets strength and capabilities in key business
groups; consolidation and rationalization activities to further
reduce costs and improve productivity within the Companys
manufacturing and distribution footprint; strategic, bolt-on
acquisitions to accelerate growth in the Companys market
positions; and potential divestiture of businesses with
non-strategic products or markets. Although the process is
underway, all of these activities and initiatives have inherent
risks, and there remain significant challenges and
uncertainties, including economic and general business
conditions, that could limit the
11
Companys ability to achieve anticipated benefits
associated with announced strategic initiatives and affect the
Companys financial results.
Future
Events
Future events may occur that would adversely affect the reported
value of the Companys assets. Such events may include, but
are not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to
changes in economic and competitive conditions, the impact of
the economic environment on the Companys customer base, or
a material adverse change in its relationship with significant
customers.
Equity
Ownership Concentration
Mary S. Myers, widow of the Companys co-founder Louis S.
Myers, and Stephen E. Myers, former Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, beneficially owned approximately 11.0% and 8.5%,
respectively, of the Companys outstanding common shares as
of February 14, 2007, and combined have sufficient voting
power to influence actions requiring the approval of our
shareholders.
Legal &
Regulatory Actions
Changes in laws and regulations and approvals and decisions of
courts, regulators, and governmental bodies on any legal claims
known or unknown, could have an adverse affect on the
Companys financial results.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
12
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to properties owned by us at December 31, 2006:
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor Space
|
|
|
Land Area
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
(Square Feet)
|
|
|
(Acres)
|
|
|
Use
|
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Executive offices and warehousing
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Warehousing
|
|
Akron, Ohio
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Warehousing
|
|
Pomona, California
|
|
|
17,700
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Englewood, Colorado
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
San Antonio, Texas
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
|
7,900
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
York, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Syracuse, New York
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Franklin Park, Illinois
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
Sandusky, Ohio
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Springfield, Missouri
|
|
|
227,000
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Dawson Springs, Kentucky
|
|
|
209,000
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Wadsworth, Ohio
|
|
|
197,000
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Hannibal, Missouri
|
|
|
196,000
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Sparks, Nevada
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Bluffton, Indiana
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Roanoke Rapids, N. Carolina
|
|
|
172,000
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Cadillac, Michigan
|
|
|
162,000
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Shelbyville, Kentucky
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Bristol, Indiana
|
|
|
166,000
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Jefferson, Ohio
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Fostoria, Ohio
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Surrey, B.C., Canada
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Mebane, North Carolina
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
13
The following table sets forth by segment certain information
with respect to facilities leased by us:
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor Space
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
(Square Feet)
|
|
|
of Lease
|
|
Use
|
|
|
Middlefield, Ohio
|
|
|
632,000
|
|
|
September 30, 2025
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Cassopolis, Michigan
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Reidsville, N. Carolina
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
South Gate, California
|
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
October 31, 2009
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Jaguariuna, Brazil
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
March 3, 2009
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Sales and distribution
|
|
Commerce, California
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
September 14, 2008
|
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Milford, Ohio
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
August 31, 2010
|
|
|
Administration and sales
|
|
We also lease distribution facilities in 28 locations throughout
the United States and Canada which, in the aggregate, amount to
approximately 167,000 square feet of warehouse and office
space. All of these locations are used by the distribution of
aftermarket repair products and services segment.
We believe that all of our properties and machinery and
equipment are well maintained and adequate for the purposes for
which they are used.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
On July 15, 2004, the Company announced that it had
reported to the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) certain international business practices that
were believed to be in violation of U.S. and, possibly, foreign
laws. The practices, which involved a limited number of
customers, related to the invoicing of certain sales to foreign
customers of the Companys distribution segment and sales
made by foreign subsidiaries to prohibited customers in certain
prohibited international jurisdictions. These business practices
were discontinued and an independent investigation, which has
been completed, was conducted by outside counsel under the
authority of the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of
Directors. The results of the investigation have been provided
to the DOJ, the SEC, the Office of Foreign Asset Control,
U.S. Department of the Treasury (OFAC) and the
Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of
Commerce (BIS).
The DOJ notified the Company that it determined not to proceed
against the Company or its employees for those matters described
in the Companys voluntary reporting and internal
investigation. The BIS notified the Company it had completed its
investigation and decided not to refer the matter for criminal
or administrative prosecution and closed the matter by issuing a
warning letter to the Company.
The Company is still voluntarily working with OFAC to complete
the investigation with them. If OFAC determined that these
incidents were unlawful, they could take action against the
Company
and/or some
of its employees. Based on informal discussions with the SEC, we
believe no further action will be taken against us by the SEC.
We will seek to settle any enforcement issues arising from these
matters, however, at this time we cannot reasonably estimate its
potential liability and, therefore, as of December 31,
2006, and the date of this filing, the Company has not recorded
any provision for any resulting settlements or potential fines
or penalties. Based in part upon the manner in which these
matters were resolved with the DOJ and BIS, management believes
that this liability, although possible, would not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. Further, the Company
believes that the practices in question have no effect on
previously filed financial statements, and that the final
findings from the investigation will not lead to any restatement
of reported financial results.
In addition to the proceedings discussed above, we have been, in
the ordinary course of business, a defendant in various lawsuits
and a party to various other legal proceedings, some of which
are covered in whole or in part by
14
insurance. We believe that the outcome of these lawsuits and
other proceedings will not individually or in the aggregate have
a future material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
Submission
Of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, there were no matters submitted to a
vote of security holders.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below is certain information concerning the executive
officers of the Registrant as of December 31, 2006.
Executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years as
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
Title
|
|
John C. Orr
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Donald A. Merril
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer and
Secretary
|
Each executive officer has not been principally employed in the
capacities shown or similar ones with the Registrant for over
the past five years. Mr. Orr, President and Chief Executive
Officer, was appointed to his current position on May 1,
2005. Mr. Orr had been President and Chief Operating
Officer since 2003. Prior to that Mr. Orr was General
Manager of Buckhorn Inc., one of the Companys material
handling subsidiaries. Before coming to Myers Industries,
Mr. Orr had been employed by The Goodyear Tire and Rubber
Company for 28 years. His last position at Goodyear was
Vice President North America.
Mr. Merril, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary, was appointed to his current position on
April 26, 2006. Mr. Merril joined the Company on
January 25, 2006, prior to that he was with Newell
Rubbermaid Inc. Rubbermaid Home Products Division,
where he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
since 2003. Mr. Merril joined Newell Rubbermaid in 2001
where he served as Chief Financial Officer of Newell
Rubbermaid Little Tikes prior to his position as
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Stock and Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
The Companys Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange (ticker symbol MYE). The approximate number of record
holders at December 31, 2006 was 1,532. High and low stock
prices and dividends for the last two years were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
18.39
|
|
|
|
14.63
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
17.66
|
|
|
|
15.13
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
18.77
|
|
|
|
15.32
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
14.84
|
|
|
|
11.98
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
14.51
|
|
|
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
13.70
|
|
|
|
11.38
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
14.84
|
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
15
Comparison
of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Myers Industries
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
99.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.01
|
|
|
|
$
|
134.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
154.32
|
|
|
|
$
|
167.82
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
77.89
|
|
|
|
$
|
100.23
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.13
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.46
|
|
|
|
$
|
132.54
|
|
S&P SmallCap 600
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
85.37
|
|
|
|
$
|
118.49
|
|
|
|
$
|
145.33
|
|
|
|
$
|
156.49
|
|
|
|
$
|
180.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth a summary of the securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2006.
Equity
Compensation Plan Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants or
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Securities Reflected in
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Warrants or Rights
|
|
|
Column (A))
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved by Security
Holders(1)
|
|
|
842,279
|
|
|
$
|
12.54
|
|
|
|
1,087,397
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not
Approved by Security Holders
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
842,279
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,087,397
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This information is as of December 31, 2006 and includes
the 1992, 1997 and 1999 Stock Plans, and the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. |
16
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Five-Year
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Operations for the
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
779,984,388
|
|
|
$
|
736,880,105
|
|
|
$
|
635,912,379
|
|
|
$
|
511,836,386
|
|
|
$
|
480,572,906
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
572,438,757
|
|
|
|
555,687,606
|
|
|
|
464,565,836
|
|
|
|
373,038,476
|
|
|
|
328,333,726
|
|
Selling
|
|
|
79,340,520
|
|
|
|
71,796,860
|
|
|
|
66,631,978
|
|
|
|
59,539,161
|
|
|
|
55,547,468
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
67,282,547
|
|
|
|
62,400,646
|
|
|
|
60,071,564
|
|
|
|
51,479.227
|
|
|
|
48,272,073
|
|
Gain on sale of plant
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
740,386
|
|
|
|
1,524,598
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Interest net
|
|
|
15,848,420
|
|
|
|
15,463,279
|
|
|
|
13,055,440
|
|
|
|
8,911,172
|
|
|
|
10,207,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
734,910,244
|
|
|
|
704,608,005
|
|
|
|
602,800,220
|
|
|
|
492,968,036
|
|
|
|
442,361,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
|
45,074,144
|
|
|
|
32,272,100
|
|
|
|
33,112,159
|
|
|
|
18,868,350
|
|
|
|
38,211,763
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16,363,613
|
|
|
|
12,907,205
|
|
|
|
12,925,464
|
|
|
|
7,885,588
|
|
|
|
16,153,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
28,710,531
|
|
|
|
19,364,895
|
|
|
|
20,186,695
|
|
|
|
10,982,762
|
|
|
|
22,057,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
per basic and diluted share*
|
|
$
|
.82
|
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
|
$
|
.33
|
|
|
$
|
.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Position
At Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
661,983,220
|
|
|
$
|
765,259,921
|
|
|
$
|
785,602,562
|
|
|
$
|
621,626,806
|
|
|
$
|
602,482,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
307,523,254
|
|
|
|
289,580,618
|
|
|
|
284,072,177
|
|
|
|
207,933,141
|
|
|
|
201,140,357
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
134,727,219
|
|
|
|
128,575,091
|
|
|
|
136,251,927
|
|
|
|
94,175,498
|
|
|
|
117,368,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
172,796,035
|
|
|
|
161,005,527
|
|
|
|
147,820,250
|
|
|
|
113,757,643
|
|
|
|
83,771,401
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
203,159,525
|
|
|
|
279,957,521
|
|
|
|
291,041,595
|
|
|
|
229,849,237
|
|
|
|
210,546,946
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
151,300,441
|
|
|
|
195,721,782
|
|
|
|
210,488,790
|
|
|
|
183,844,428
|
|
|
|
190,795,027
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
198,274,578
|
|
|
|
249,523,633
|
|
|
|
275,252,278
|
|
|
|
211,002,691
|
|
|
|
212,222,615
|
|
Other long term liabilities
|
|
|
12,922,285
|
|
|
|
12,667,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
35,400,520
|
|
|
|
35,092,826
|
|
|
|
28,094,321
|
|
|
|
21,924,269
|
|
|
|
17,201,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
|
$
|
280,658,618
|
|
|
$
|
339,401,371
|
|
|
$
|
346,004,036
|
|
|
$
|
294,524,348
|
|
|
$
|
255,689,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Shares Outstanding*
|
|
|
35,067,230
|
|
|
|
34,806,393
|
|
|
|
34,645,948
|
|
|
|
33,201,582
|
|
|
|
33,078,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value Per Common
Share*
|
|
$
|
8.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.75
|
|
|
$
|
9.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.87
|
|
|
$
|
7.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
$
|
7,173,706
|
|
|
$
|
6,946,838
|
|
|
$
|
6,478,502
|
|
|
$
|
6,026,349
|
|
|
$
|
5,878,169
|
|
Dividends paid per Common Share*
|
|
|
.205
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Common Shares Outstanding
during the year*
|
|
|
34,978,269
|
|
|
|
34,724,488
|
|
|
|
33,846,511
|
|
|
|
33,138,086
|
|
|
|
32,969,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Adjusted for the 10% stock dividend issued in August 2004. |
17
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
|
Executive
Overview
The Company conducts its business activities in four distinct
business segments, including three in manufacturing and one in
distribution. The manufacturing segments consist of: North
American Material Handling, Lawn and Garden, and Automotive and
Custom.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company also
included one other manufacturing segment, European Material
Handling, which was announced for divestiture and moved to
discontinued operations during the third quarter of 2006. In the
second quarter of 2006, the Company recorded a non-cash, non-tax
deductible goodwill impairment charge of $109.8 million
related to the European businesses. The businesses in that
segment were subsequently sold in February 2007 (see
Subsequent Events footnote).
In our manufacturing segments, the Company designs,
manufactures, and markets a variety of plastic and rubber
products. These products range from plastic reusable material
handling containers and small parts storage bins to plastic
horticultural pots and hanging baskets, decorative resin
planters, plastic and rubber OEM parts, tire repair materials,
and custom plastic and rubber products. The Distribution Segment
is engaged in the distribution of tools, equipment and supplies
used for tire, wheel and undervehicle service on passenger,
heavy truck and off-road vehicles.
2006 represented a year of growth and the start of
transformation for the Company. In addition to significant
internal improvements last year, the sale of the European
Material Handling segment businesses mentioned above and the
acquisition of ITML Horticultural Products, which occurred in
early 2007 (see Subsequent Events footnote), will
further strengthen the Companys competitive position in
the Lawn and Garden segment with its well-known brand. The
Company is currently focusing on aligning synergies with ITML to
meet the changing needs of customers and market.
Within the Companys remaining four business segments and
their respective brands, management is focusing on a variety of
growth catalysts. These range from ongoing new product
development; implementation of new technology platforms to speed
workflow and improve customer satisfaction; consolidation and
synergy initiatives across segments and brands to reduce costs
and improve productivity.
Results
of Operations: 2006 versus 2005
Net
Sales from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Segment
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
197.3
|
|
|
$
|
190.0
|
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Material Handling-
N.A
|
|
$
|
240.0
|
|
|
$
|
209.5
|
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Automotive &
Custom
|
|
$
|
204.7
|
|
|
$
|
195.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Lawn &
Garden
|
|
$
|
160.2
|
|
|
$
|
170.4
|
|
|
$
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Intra-segment
elimination
|
|
$
|
(22.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
780.0
|
|
|
$
|
736.9
|
|
|
$
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 30, 2006, net sales were
$780.0 million, an increase of 6 percent from the
$736.9 million reported in 2005 as the Company had strong
sales in most of its business segments. During the year, the
Company experienced increased sales in its Distribution,
Material Handling North America and Automotive and
Custom segments. Net sales in the Distribution segment increased
$7.4 million to $197.3 million in 2006; net sales for
the Material Handling North America segment
increased 15 percent or $30.6 million to
$240.1 million in the current year; Automotive and Custom
sales increased from $195.1 million to $204.7 million
in 2006, representing a five percent increase from 2005. The
sales increases referred to above, represent a combination of
increase in volumes and price increases which started to be
realized in the second half of 2005.
18
The increases in sales referred to above, were offset by
declining sales in the Lawn and Garden segment. Net sales in
this segment decreased $10.3 million to
$160.2 million, representing a six percent decrease from
2005. The reduction in sales was primarily volume driven as
weather conditions in the South and Midwest regions resulted in
low demand from growers for certain product lines throughout the
first half of the year. In the second half of the year, sales
volume continued to slow as major retailers changed the timing
of their spring garden programs which delayed forecasting and
buying patterns of growers pushed some sales into 2007.
Cost
of Sales & Gross Profit from Continuing
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
$
|
572.4
|
|
|
$
|
555.7
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
207.6
|
|
|
$
|
181.2
|
|
Gross profit
percentage
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Cost of sales increased $16.7 million in the year to
$572.4 million while gross profit increased from
$181.2 million to $207.6 million in 2006. These
increases were primarily the result of the $43.1 million
increase in sales from the prior year. Gross profit percentage
increased 2 percent in 2006 to 27 percent, compared to
25 percent in the prior year. Increased selling prices,
improved product mix and higher volumes resulted in higher gross
profit percentages in 2006. This was despite the fact that the
Company experienced higher raw material cost in the current
year, particularly for plastic resins. For the year, average
prices for raw material plastic resins were approximately
3 percent higher in 2006 compared to the prior year.
Selling,
General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses from
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A Expenses
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
146.6
|
|
|
$
|
133.5
|
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
SG&A percent
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Selling and administrative expenses for 2006 were
$146.6 million for an increase of $13.2 million
compared with the prior year. As a percentage of sales, selling
and administrative costs increased to 19 percent compared
to 18 percent in 2005. The increase is primarily related to
the impact of additional freight and variable selling expenses
associated with the increase in sales volume. Additionally, the
Company incurred additional costs in 2006 associated with
streamlining the organizational structure.
Interest
Expense from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Net Interest Expense
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Outstanding
borrowings
|
|
$
|
201.5
|
|
|
$
|
252.8
|
|
|
$
|
(51.3
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
Average borrowing
rate
|
|
|
6.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.69
|
%
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Net interest expense for 2006 was $15.9 million, an
increase of 2% compared to $15.5 million in the prior year.
The increase in current year expense reflects higher interest
rates which offset the impact of lower average borrowing levels.
19
Income
before taxes from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Segment
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
22.2
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Material Handling- North
America
|
|
$
|
34.9
|
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
114
|
%
|
Automotive &
Custom
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Lawn &
Garden
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)%
|
Corporate and
interest
|
|
$
|
(34.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes was $45.0 million in 2006 compared to
$32.3 million in 2005 for an increase of 40 percent.
The Company experienced increased income before tax in its
Distribution, Material Handling North America and
Automotive and Custom segments. Income before taxes for the
Distribution segment increased to $22.2 million or
8 percent from the prior year. The primary reasons for the
increase in Distribution segment was improvement in product mix,
cost controls and increased market penetration through tire
dealers, auto dealers and other tire service niches. Material
Handling- N.A. income before income taxes increased from
$16.3 million to $34.9 million in the current year.
The primary factors influencing this increase were strategic
pricing to help offset raw material price increases; mix
management, which focused on providing customers with
value-based material handling product solutions to improve their
business; internal productivity initiatives; and cost controls.
Income before taxes for the Automotive and Custom segment
increased to $14.0 million, representing an increase of
41 percent. The improvement realized in this segment was
related to a strong focus on customers needs for
value-added engineered products, mix management, continued
pricing improvements, cost controls and productivity gains.
The above mentioned increases were partially offset by a
decrease in Lawn and Garden segment. Income before taxes in this
segment decreased 51 percent from $16.4 million in
2005 to $8.1 million in 2006. This decrease was primarily
related to the fact that the slowness in recovery of unit
volumes to the grower market could not be offset by favorable
product pricing and robust decorative planter business to retail
markets.
Income
taxes from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Consolidated income taxes
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
Income tax expense increased from $12.9 million in 2005 to
$16.4 million in the current year. However, income taxes as
a percent of income before taxes for the year ended
December 31, 2006, decreased to 36.3 percent compared
to 40 percent in 2005. The lower effective rate in the
current year was the result of reduced state tax expense and the
impact of additional income tax expense in 2005, related to
repatriation of $4.4 million in dividends from foreign
subsidiaries pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
Discontinued
Operations: Material Handling- Europe
In the third quarter of 2006, the Companys Board of
Directors approved the plan of divestiture of the Companys
Material Handling Europe business segment, which was
ultimately divested in February, 2007. In accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the
operating results related to these businesses have been included
in discontinued operations in the Companys consolidated
statements of income for all periods presented.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company determined that
the Material Handling-Europe businesses were not core to the
Companys long term growth strategy and, accordingly, began
evaluating strategic options for
20
these businesses. Taking into consideration the economic factors
and business conditions in Europe it became necessary to perform
an interim goodwill impairment test in accordance with Statement
of Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. In performing this analysis, the fair
value of the reporting unit was based on estimated proceeds from
a potential sale and the implied fair value of goodwill was
estimated by deducting the fair value of all tangible and
intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value.
As a result of this analysis, all of the recorded goodwill of
the reporting unit was determined to be impaired and,
accordingly, the Company recorded a $109.8 million
impairment charge in the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Results
of Operations: 2005 versus 2004
(Amounts in millions)
Net
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Segment
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
190.0
|
|
|
$
|
171.6
|
|
|
$
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Material Handling-
N.A.
|
|
$
|
209.5
|
|
|
$
|
189.4
|
|
|
$
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Automotive &
Custom
|
|
$
|
195.1
|
|
|
$
|
171.1
|
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Lawn &
Garden
|
|
$
|
170.4
|
|
|
$
|
118.5
|
|
|
$
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Intra-segment
elimination
|
|
$
|
(28.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
736.9
|
|
|
$
|
635.9
|
|
|
$
|
101.0
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net sales were
$736.9 million, an increase of 16 percent from the
$635.9 million reported in 2004. Contributions from
acquisitions increased total net sales by $39.0 million.
Excluding the effect of acquisitions, net sales would have
increased $62.0 million or 10 percent as the Company
experienced strong demand and improved sales across all of its
business segments.
Sales in the Distribution Segment for 2005 were
$190.0 million, an increase of 11 percent compared to
the prior year. This increase was primarily due to increased
volume as sales of both equipment and consumable supplies
remained strong across the segments markets, particularly
to independent tire dealers. Sales in the Material
Handling North America Segment were
$209.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,
an increase of $20.1 million or 11 percent compared to
the $189.4 million reported in 2004. The increase was
primarily the result of higher selling prices realized through
most product lines and markets. In the Automotive and Custom
Segment, sales in 2005 were $195.1 million, an increase of
$24 million or 14 percent compared to 2004. Revenues
for 2005 include $10.1 million incremental sales from the
acquisition of Michigan Rubber Products and WEK Industries in
March 2004. Excluding the contribution from acquisitions, sales
in the segment increased 8 percent as strong demand in
automotive, RV and heavy truck markets resulted in higher sales
volumes. In the Lawn and Garden Segment, 2005 sales were
$170.4 million, an increase of $51.9 million or
44 percent compared to the prior year. 2005 sales include
$28.9 million incremental revenue from the acquisition of
Pro Cal which occurred in July 2004. Excluding the impact of the
acquisition of Pro Cal, sales in the segment increased
$23.0 million or 19 percent for the year reflecting
both unit volume gains and higher selling prices. The strong
sales performance was a result of new product introductions and
continued strong demand from all sectors of the horticultural
market, from grower to retail.
Cost
of Sales & Gross Profit from Continuing
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
555.7
|
|
|
$
|
464.6
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
181.2
|
|
|
$
|
171.4
|
|
Gross profit
percentage
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
21
Cost of sales increased $91.1 million in 2005 to
$555.7 million while gross profit increased from
$171.4 million to $181.2 million. These increases were
primarily the result of the $101.0 million increase in
sales from 2004. While sales increased, gross profit percentage
decreased 2 percent in 2005 to 25 percent, compared to
27 percent in the prior year. During 2005, the Company
experienced significantly higher costs for plastic raw
materials, causing the reduction in gross profit percentage.
This decline in gross profit margin affected the Companys
three manufacturing segments, as margins in the distribution
segment were essentially unchanged between years. For the year
ended December 31, 2005, plastic raw material costs were
approximately 30 percent higher on average compared to the
prior year. The Company was able to recover a significant
portion of the increased raw material costs through higher
selling prices, cost control initiatives and improved
manufacturing efficiencies, however, these measures could not
offset the total impact of higher raw material costs on gross
margins.
Operating
Expenses from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
133.5
|
|
|
$
|
125.2
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
Operating percent
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
In 2005, total SG&A expenses increased $8.3 million or
7 percent compared to 2004. 2005 operating expenses were
increased approximately $3.5 million due to the full year
impact of acquired companies. Excluding the impact of
acquisitions, operating expenses were up $4.8 million,
primarily due to increased freight and other selling expenses
related to higher sales. Operating expenses, excluding the gain
on sale of plants ($740,000 and $1.5 million in 2005 and
2004, respectively), expressed as a percent of sales decreased
to 18 percent in the current year compared with
20 percent in 2004, reflecting the benefit of cost control
programs and improved leverage from higher sales.
Interest
Expense from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Net Interest Expense
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Outstanding
borrowings
|
|
|
252.8
|
|
|
|
277.4
|
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
Average borrowing
rate
|
|
|
5.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Net interest expense for 2005 increased 16 percent to
$15.5 million compared to $13.1 million in the prior
year. The increase in current year expense reflects a higher
average interest rate of 5.69% compared to 2004 average interest
rate of 4.7%, which more than offset slightly lower average
borrowing levels.
Income
before taxes from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Segment
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Material Handling-
N.A.
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
19.7
|
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
Automotive &
Custom
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
Lawn &
Garden
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Corporate and
interest
|
|
$
|
(31.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes was $32.3 million in 2005 compared to
$33.1 million in 2004 representing a decrease of
2 percent. The Company experienced increased income before
tax in its Distribution and Lawn & Garden segments. In
the Distribution segment, income before taxes increased
19 percent to $20.6 million compared to last
years $17.3 million, a result of the increased sales
combined with ongoing cost controls which provided improved
leverage of operating expenses. In the Lawn & Garden
segment, income before taxes increased 37 percent to
$16.4 million compared to $12.0 million in 2004. The
strong performance was a result of an increase in sales prices
22
and improvement in operating costs which were offset by the
negative impact of higher costs for plastic raw materials.
Material Handling- N.A. income before income taxes decreased
from $19.7 million to $16.3 million in 2005. The
decline in income before taxes was due to substantially higher
raw material costs which were, on average, approximately
30 percent higher in 2005. The increased raw material costs
were partially offset by higher selling prices, improved
productivity and operating expense controls. Income before taxes
for the Automotive & Custom was $10.0 million, a
decrease of 24 percent compared to the $13.1 million
reported in 2004. Key factors affecting profitability in this
segment include higher rubber and plastic raw material costs and
the slower rate at which the Company was able to implement
higher selling prices to various automotive OEMs to offset the
increase in higher raw material costs.
Income
taxes from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Consolidated Income Taxes
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
Income tax expense remained consistent between 2004 and 2005.
Income taxes as a percent of income before taxes for the year
ended December 31, 2005, increased to 40 percent
compared to 39 percent in 2004. The higher effective rate
in 2005 was primarily the result of additional income taxes of
approximately $281,000, related to repatriation of
$4.4 million in dividends from foreign subsidiaries
pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. In both
years, the Companys effective tax rate was reduced as a
result of foreign tax rate differences including the realization
of net operating class carry forwards previously reserved.
Financial
Condition
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash provided from operating activities of continuing operations
was $67.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
compared with $54.0 million in the prior year. The increase
of $13.7 million in cash provided by operating activities
was primarily the result of a $9.3 million increase in
income from continuing operations. Depreciation and other non
cash expenses were $28.7 million in the current year
compared with $30.5 million in 2005 but cash provided by
working capital was $10.3 million in 2006 compared to
$4.2 million in the prior year. The increase in cash
provided by working capital resulted from initiatives which
successfully reduced accounts receivable and inventories by
$2.6 million and $9.2 million, respectively.
Offsetting the working capital provided by accounts receivable
and inventory was an increase of $1.9 million for prepaid
expenses, primarily costs incurred in connection with the
acquisition of ITML which was completed in 2007. Total debt at
December 31, 2006 was $201.5 million, a reduction of
$51.3 million from $252.8 million at December 31,
2005. At December 31, 2006, the Company had working capital
of $169.4 million and a current ratio of 2.25 compared with
working capital of $161.0 and a current ratio of 2.25 at
December 31, 2005.
In October 2006, the Company entered into an amendment and
restatement of its revolving credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with a group of banks. The amended Credit Agreement
increased the maximum available borrowings from
$225 million to $250 million and has a five year term
which expires October 26, 2011. The Company is in
compliance with all of the covenants of the Credit Agreement at
December 31, 2006 and had approximately $156 million
available under this agreement.
Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2006
were $12.4 million and are expected to be in the range of
$15 million for each of the next 5 years. Cash flows
from operations and funds available under the Credit Agreement
will provide the Companys primary sources of future
financing. Management believes that cash flows from operations
and available credit facilities will be sufficient to meet
expected business requirements including capital expenditures,
dividends, working capital and debt service.
23
The following summarizes the Companys estimated future
cash outflows from financial contracts and commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
$
|
3,235
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
163,183
|
|
|
$
|
35,017
|
|
|
$
|
201,511
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
11,867
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
22,813
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
65,566
|
|
Lease payments
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
13,166
|
|
|
|
8,536
|
|
|
|
28,266
|
|
|
|
58,320
|
|
Pension and other retirement
payments
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
7,647
|
|
|
|
11,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,200
|
|
|
$
|
38,655
|
|
|
$
|
196,338
|
|
|
$
|
78,082
|
|
|
$
|
337,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
Risk and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company has financing arrangements that require interest
payments based on floating interest rates. As such, the
Companys financial results are subject to changes in the
market rate of interest. Our objective in managing the exposure
to interest rate changes is to limit the volatility and impact
of rate changes on earnings while maintaining the lowest overall
borrowing cost. At present, the Company has not entered into any
interest rate swaps or other derivative instruments to fix the
interest rate on any portion of its financing arrangements with
floating rates. Accordingly, based on current debt levels at
December 31, 2006, if market interest rates increase one
percent, the Companys interest expense would increase
approximately $940,000.
Some of the Companys subsidiaries operate in foreign
countries and, as such, their financial results are subject to
the variability that arises from exchange rate movements. The
Company believes that foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations do not represent a significant market risk due to
the nature of the foreign countries in which we operate,
primarily Canada, as well as the size of those operations
relative to the total Company.
The Company uses certain commodities, primarily plastic resins,
in its manufacturing processes. As such, the cost of operations
is subject to fluctuation as the market for these commodities
changes. The Company monitors this risk but currently has no
derivative contracts to hedge this risk; however, the Company
also has no significant purchase obligations to purchase fixed
quantities of such commodities in future periods.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of the Companys financial
condition and results of operations are based on the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, which are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. As indicated in the
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the notes
to the consolidated financial statements (included in
Item 8 of this report), the amount of assets, liabilities,
revenue and expenses reported are affected by estimates and
judgements that are necessary to comply with generally accepted
accounting principles. We base our estimates on prior experience
and other assumptions that we consider reasonable to our
circumstances. While estimates and judgements are applied in
arriving at reported amounts, we believe the following matters
may involve a high degree of judgement and complexity.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenues
from the sale of products, net of actual and estimated returns,
at the point of passage of title, which is at the time of
shipment.
Bad Debts The Company evaluates the collectability
of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In
circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific
customers inability to meet its financial obligations, a
specific allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded against
amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the
amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected.
Additionally, the Company also reviews historical trends for
collectability in determining an estimate for its allowance for
doubtful accounts. If economic circumstances change
substantially, estimates of the recoverability of amounts due
the Company could be reduced by a material amount.
24
Inventory Inventories are valued at the lower of
cost or market. Cost is determined by the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method for approximately 48 percent of the
Companys inventories and the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method for all other inventories. Where
appropriate, standard cost systems are utilized for purposes of
determining cost; the standards are adjusted as necessary to
ensure they approximate actual costs. Estimates of lower of cost
or market value of inventory are determined based upon current
economic conditions, historical sales quantities and patterns
and, in some cases, the specific risk of loss on specifically
identified inventories.
Goodwill As a result of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, recorded goodwill is subjected to
annual impairment testing, unless significant changes in
circumstances indicate a potential impairment may have occurred
sooner. Goodwill impairment testing requires, in part, that we
estimate the fair value of our business units which, in turn,
requires that we make judgments concerning future cash flows and
appropriate discount rates for those businesses. In evaluating
goodwill for impairment the Company uses a combination of
valuation techniques primarily using discounted cash flows to
determine the fair values of its business reporting units and
market based multiples as supporting evidence. The variables and
assumptions used, including the projections of future revenues
and expenses, working capital, terminal values, discount rates
and the market multiples observed in sale transactions are
determined separately for each reporting unit. The underlying
assumptions used are based on historical actual experience and
future expectations that are consistent with those used in the
Companys strategic plan. In addition we make certain
judgments about the selection of comparable companies used in
determining market multiples in valuing our business units, as
well as certain assumptions to allocate shared assets and
liabilities to calculate values for each of our business units.
Our estimate of the fair values of these business units and the
related goodwill, could change over time based on a variety of
factors, including the actual operating performance of the
underlying business or the impact of future events on the cost
of capital and the related discount rates used.
Contingencies In the ordinary course of business, we
are involved in various legal proceedings and contingencies. We
have recorded liabilities for these matters in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies (SFAS No. 5).
SFAS No. 5 requires a liability to be recorded based
on our estimate of the probable cost of the resolution of a
contingency. The actual resolution of these contingencies may
differ from our estimates. If a contingency were settled for an
amount greater than our estimates, a future charge to income
would result. Likewise, if a contingency were settled for an
amount that is less than our estimate, a future credit to income
would result.
Income Taxes Deferred income taxes are provided to
recognize the effect of temporary differences between financial
and tax reporting. Deferred income taxes are not provided for
undistributed earnings of foreign consolidated subsidiaries as
it is our intention to reinvest such earnings for an indefinite
period of time. The Company has operations outside the United
States and in jurisdictions with statutory tax rates both higher
and lower than in the United States. As a result, tax and
treasury planning and analysis of future operations are
necessary to determine the proper amounts of tax assets,
liabilities and expense to be recognized.
Recent
Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109. This Interpretation provides
accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return as well as additional disclosures related to these
tax positions. FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is
currently assessing the effect of FIN No. 48 on its
consolidated financial statements, however, we do not expect
adoption of the new standard to have a material effect on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements, rather it applies under existing accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. Myers Industries Inc. is currently
evaluating the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 157 on
the consolidated financial statements.
25
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Summarized
Quarterly Results of Operations
Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 2006
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sept. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
205,660
|
|
|
$
|
194,157
|
|
|
$
|
185,838
|
|
|
$
|
194,330
|
|
|
$
|
779,984
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
54,084
|
|
|
|
54,683
|
|
|
|
47,020
|
|
|
|
51,759
|
|
|
|
207,546
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,010
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
4,234
|
|
|
|
7,331
|
|
|
|
28,711
|
|
Per Basic and Diluted Share
|
|
|
.29
|
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
.21
|
|
|
|
.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 2005
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sept. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
191,892
|
|
|
$
|
179,978
|
|
|
$
|
174,000
|
|
|
$
|
191,010
|
|
|
$
|
736,880
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
47,301
|
|
|
|
40,772
|
|
|
|
43,552
|
|
|
|
49,567
|
|
|
|
181,192
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,838
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
5,883
|
|
|
|
19,365
|
|
Per Basic and Diluted Share
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.07
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
.17
|
|
|
|
.56
|
|
26
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Myers Industries, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statements of consolidated
financial position of Myers Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries
(Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
statements of consolidated income, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then
ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Myers Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
As discussed in the Stock Compensation note to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006. In
addition, as discussed in the Retirement Plans note to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment
of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),
effective December 31, 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 16, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
Cleveland, Ohio
March 16, 2007
27
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board
of Directors and Shareholders of Myers Industries,
Inc.
We have audited the accompanying statement of consolidated
income, shareholders equity and comprehensive income and
cash flows of Myers Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
results of operations and cash flows of Myers Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Akron, Ohio
March 15, 2005,
except for the effects of discontinued operations
described in the discontinued operations footnote, as to which
the date is
March 16, 2007
28
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements
of Consolidated Income
For The
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
779,984,388
|
|
|
$
|
736,880,105
|
|
|
$
|
635,912,379
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
572,438,757
|
|
|
|
555,687,606
|
|
|
|
464,565,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
207,545,631
|
|
|
|
181,192,499
|
|
|
|
171,346,543
|
|
Selling
|
|
|
79,340,520
|
|
|
|
71,796,860
|
|
|
|
66,631,978
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
67,282,548
|
|
|
|
62,400,646
|
|
|
|
60,071,564
|
|
Gain on sale of plants
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(740,386
|
)
|
|
|
(1,524,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,623,068
|
|
|
|
133,457,120
|
|
|
|
125,178,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
60,922,563
|
|
|
|
47,735,379
|
|
|
|
46,167,599
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(146,343
|
)
|
|
|
(340,173
|
)
|
|
|
(434,854
|
)
|
Expense
|
|
|
15,994,763
|
|
|
|
15,803,452
|
|
|
|
13,490,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,848,426
|
|
|
|
15,463,279
|
|
|
|
13,055,440
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
|
45,074,143
|
|
|
|
32,272,100
|
|
|
|
33,112,159
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16,363,613
|
|
|
|
12,907,205
|
|
|
|
12,925,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
28,710,531
|
|
|
|
19,364,895
|
|
|
|
20,186,695
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(97,734,686
|
)
|
|
|
7,190,611
|
|
|
|
5,523,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(69,024,155
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,555,506
|
|
|
$
|
25,709,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.82
|
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2.79
|
)
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
.76
|
|
|
$
|
.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.82
|
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2.79
|
)
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
.76
|
|
|
$
|
.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
29
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements
of Consolidated Financial Position
As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Assets
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
6,637,389
|
|
|
$
|
19,159,220
|
|
Accounts receivable
less allowances of $2,595,000 and $4,600,000 respectively
|
|
|
98,830,002
|
|
|
|
144,950,880
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished and in-process products
|
|
|
57,007,218
|
|
|
|
78,114,802
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
29,789,656
|
|
|
|
37,693,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,796,874
|
|
|
|
115,808,312
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,776,187
|
|
|
|
4,409,328
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,240,386
|
|
|
|
5,252,878
|
|
Current assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
105,242,416
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
307,523,254
|
|
|
|
289,580,618
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
162,214,948
|
|
|
|
263,883,274
|
|
Patents and other intangible assets
|
|
|
5,970,381
|
|
|
|
11,739,163
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,433,410
|
|
|
|
4,335,084
|
|
Long term assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
31,540,786
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,159,525
|
|
|
|
279,957,521
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment,
at Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
4,710,378
|
|
|
|
8,477,973
|
|
Buildings and leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
78,859,310
|
|
|
|
90,641,676
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
332,283,970
|
|
|
|
394,800,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,853,658
|
|
|
|
493,919,921
|
|
Less allowances for depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
264,553,217
|
|
|
|
298,198,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,300,441
|
|
|
|
195,721,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
661,983,220
|
|
|
$
|
765,259,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
30
Part I
Financial Information
Myers
Industries, Inc.
Statements
of Consolidated Financial Position
As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
48,111,122
|
|
|
$
|
67,838,604
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
18,535,357
|
|
|
|
28,979,004
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
2,326,865
|
|
|
|
2,558,217
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,632,619
|
|
|
|
2,594,191
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
420,355
|
|
|
|
1,175,193
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18,675,080
|
|
|
|
22,189,061
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
3,235,058
|
|
|
|
3,240,821
|
|
Current liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
41,790,763
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
134,727,219
|
|
|
|
128,575,091
|
|
Long-term Debt, less current
portion
|
|
|
198,274,578
|
|
|
|
249,523,633
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
4,447,222
|
|
|
|
12,667,000
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
35,400,520
|
|
|
|
35,092,826
|
|
Long term liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
8,475,063
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial Preferred Shares
(authorized 1,000,000 shares)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Common Shares, without par value
(authorized 60,000,000 shares; outstanding 35,067,230 and
34,806,393 shares, respectively)
|
|
|
21,347,941
|
|
|
|
21,188,831
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
270,836,471
|
|
|
|
267,562,138
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
12,497,362
|
|
|
|
(1,524,303
|
)
|
Retained (deficit) income
|
|
|
(24,023,156
|
)
|
|
|
52,174,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,658,618
|
|
|
|
339,401,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
661,983,220
|
|
|
$
|
765,259,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
31
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements
of Consolidated Shareholders Equity
and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For The
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2004
|
|
|
30,183,256
|
|
|
$
|
18,369,240
|
|
|
$
|
217,019,810
|
|
|
$
|
10,934,860
|
|
|
$
|
48,200,438
|
|
|
$
|
43,851,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
25,709,760
|
|
|
|
25,709,760
|
|
Sales under option plans
|
|
|
230,697
|
|
|
|
140,204
|
|
|
|
1,759,287
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees stock purchase plan
|
|
|
40,749
|
|
|
|
24,856
|
|
|
|
425,329
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
9,926
|
|
|
|
6,055
|
|
|
|
118,224
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
1,054,900
|
|
|
|
643,489
|
|
|
|
13,982,523
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
14,399,896
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
14,399,896
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
754,654
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
754,654
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends $.19 per
share
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(6,478,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
10% stock dividend
|
|
|
3,126,420
|
|
|
|
1,907,116
|
|
|
|
32,952,457
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(34,865,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2004
|
|
|
34,645,948
|
|
|
$
|
21,090,960
|
|
|
$
|
266,257,630
|
|
|
$
|
26,089,410
|
|
|
$
|
32,566,036
|
|
|
$
|
40,864,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
26,555,507
|
|
|
|
26,555,507
|
|
Sales under option plans
|
|
|
101,993
|
|
|
|
62,215
|
|
|
|
655,112
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees stock purchase plan
|
|
|
41,699
|
|
|
|
25,436
|
|
|
|
453,572
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
12,092
|
|
|
|
7,377
|
|
|
|
143,295
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
|
|
52,529
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(25,704,942
|
)
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(25,704,942
|
)
|
Dividends $.20 per
share
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(6,946,838
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(1,908,771
|
)
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(1,908,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
34,806,393
|
|
|
$
|
21,188,831
|
|
|
$
|
267,562,138
|
|
|
$
|
(1,524,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,174,705
|
|
|
$
|
(1,058,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(69,024,155
|
)
|
|
|
(69,024,155
|
)
|
Sales under option plans
|
|
|
220,864
|
|
|
|
134,726
|
|
|
|
1,595,853
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees stock purchase plan
|
|
|
31,408
|
|
|
|
19,159
|
|
|
|
437,148
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
132,238
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,314
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
16,952,010
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
16,952,010
|
|
Dividends
$.205 per share
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(7,173,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability, adoption of
SFAS 158
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(2,930,345
|
)
|
|
|
−0−
|
|
|
|
(2,930,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
35,067,230
|
|
|
$
|
21,347,941
|
|
|
$
|
270,836,471
|
|
|
$
|
12,497,362
|
|
|
$
|
(24,023,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55,002,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
32
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements
of Consolidated Cash Flows
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(69,024,155
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,555,507
|
|
|
$
|
25,709,760
|
|
Net loss (income) of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
97,734,686
|
|
|
|
(7,190,611
|
)
|
|
|
(5,523,065
|
)
|
Items not affecting use of cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
26,505,008
|
|
|
|
27,159,312
|
|
|
|
27,759,747
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
1,707,516
|
|
|
|
1,893,664
|
|
|
|
1,559,799
|
|
Non cash stock compensation
|
|
|
555,314
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(101,352
|
)
|
|
|
1,726,141
|
|
|
|
(71,426
|
)
|
Gain on sale of plant
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(740,386
|
)
|
|
|
(1,524,598
|
)
|
Cash flow provided by (used for)
working capital Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,614,403
|
|
|
|
(5,186,725
|
)
|
|
|
(9,130,751
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
9,212,812
|
|
|
|
1,286,076
|
|
|
|
(20,793,232
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(1,907,760
|
)
|
|
|
96,834
|
|
|
|
816,518
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
389,418
|
|
|
|
7,969,035
|
|
|
|
16,911,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
67,685,890
|
|
|
|
53,568,847
|
|
|
|
35,714,319
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
13,261,186
|
|
|
|
13,664,503
|
|
|
|
10,709,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
80,947,076
|
|
|
|
67,233,350
|
|
|
|
46,424,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of
cash
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(41,491,886
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of plant
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,277,760
|
|
|
|
2,522,179
|
|
Additions to property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(12,381,407
|
)
|
|
|
(24,559,724
|
)
|
|
|
(17,724,236
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
701,574
|
|
|
|
508,700
|
|
|
|
(352,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(11,679,833
|
)
|
|
|
(21,773,264
|
)
|
|
|
(57,046,940
|
)
|
Net cash used for investing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,656,735
|
)
|
|
|
(1,714,412
|
)
|
|
|
(8,596,169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing
activities
|
|
|
(13,336,568
|
)
|
|
|
(23,487,676
|
)
|
|
|
(65,643,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowing (repayment) of
credit facility
|
|
|
(49,887,562
|
)
|
|
|
(24,263,827
|
)
|
|
|
31,570,436
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(7,173,706
|
)
|
|
|
(6,946,838
|
)
|
|
|
(6,478,503
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
2,324,349
|
|
|
|
1,347,007
|
|
|
|
2,473,954
|
|
Tax benefit from options exercised
|
|
|
553,780
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(380,956
|
)
|
|
|
(262,500
|
)
|
|
|
(951,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(54,564,095
|
)
|
|
|
(30,126,158
|
)
|
|
|
26,614,381
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(249,062
|
)
|
|
|
(246,875
|
)
|
|
|
(5,852,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities
|
|
|
(54,813,157
|
)
|
|
|
(30,373,033
|
)
|
|
|
20,761,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Rate Effect on
Cash
|
|
|
1,767,129
|
|
|
|
(2,232,044
|
)
|
|
|
808,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
14,564,480
|
|
|
|
11,140,597
|
|
|
|
2,351,626
|
|
Cash at January 1
|
|
|
19,159,220
|
|
|
|
8,018,623
|
|
|
|
5,666,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at December 31
($27,086,311 included in discontinued operations in 2006)
|
|
$
|
33,723,700
|
|
|
$
|
19,159,220
|
|
|
$
|
8,018,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of
Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
16,225,095
|
|
|
$
|
15,826,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,763,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
20,096,118
|
|
|
$
|
12,316,811
|
|
|
$
|
12,810,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
33
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Myers Industries, Inc. and all wholly owned subsidiaries
(Company). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All
subsidiaries that are not wholly owned and are not included in
the consolidated results of the Company are immaterial
investments which have been accounted for under the cost method.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reported
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain items previously reported in specific financial
statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the 2006
presentation. During 2006, the Company reclassified its Material
Handling Europe businesses as discontinued operations and,
accordingly, amounts shown in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements relate only to the Companys
continuing operations.
Translation
of Foreign Currencies
All balance sheet accounts of consolidated foreign subsidiaries
are translated at the current exchange rate as of the end of the
accounting period and income statement items are translated
monthly at an average currency exchange rate for the period. The
resulting translation adjustment is recorded in other
comprehensive (loss) income as a separate component of
shareholders equity.
Financial
Instruments
Financial instruments, consisting of trade and notes receivable,
and certain long-term debt at variable interest rates, are
considered to have a fair value which approximates carrying
value at December 31, 2006. The Companys
$100 million senior notes have a fair value of
approximately $97.3 million at December 31, 2006.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk primarily consist of trade accounts
receivable. The concentration of accounts receivable credit risk
is generally limited based on the Companys diversified
operations, with customers spread across many industries and
countries. No single customer accounts for more than three
percent of total sales and no country, outside of the United
States, accounts for more than ten percent of total sales. In
addition, management has established certain requirements that
customers must meet before credit is extended. The financial
condition of customers is continually monitored and collateral
is usually not required. The Company evaluates the
collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of
factors. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a
specific customers inability to meet its financial
obligations, a specific allowance for doubtful accounts is
recorded against amounts due to reduce the net recognized
receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be
collected. Additionally, the Company also reviews historical
trends for collectability in determining an estimate for its
allowance for doubtful accounts. If economic circumstances
change substantially, estimates of the recoverability of amounts
due the Company could be reduced by a material amount. Expense
related to bad debts was approximately $1,164,289 $2,035,000 and
$1,864,000 for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. For
approximately 48 percent of its inventories, the Company
uses the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method of determining cost. All other
inventories are valued at the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method of determining cost.
34
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
If the FIFO method of inventory cost valuation had been used
exclusively by the Company, inventories would have been
$11,452,000, $9,710,000, and $8,459,000 higher than reported at
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Company provides
for depreciation and amortization on the basis of the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
20 to 30 years
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
7 to 10 years
|
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
|
3 to 12 years
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
1 to 3 years
|
|
Long-Lived
Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets and identifiable
intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Measurement of the
amount of impairment related to assets to be held and used is
based upon undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use
and ultimate disposition of the asset. For assets held for
disposal, this amount may be based upon appraisal of the asset,
market value of similar assets or cash flow from the disposition
of the asset. In 2006, the Company recorded expense of $299,000
in the Automotive and Custom segment to write off the net book
value of certain leasehold improvements no longer used in
production. In 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded expense of
approximately $151,000 and $317,000 in the Material
Handling North America segment to write off
unamortized intangible assets and net book value of equipment
related to product lines which the Company decided to
discontinue.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenues from the sale of products
including shipping and handling charges, net of actual and
estimated returns, at the point of passage of title, which is at
the time of shipment.
Shipping
and Handling
Shipping and handling expenses are classified as selling
expenses in the accompanying statements of consolidated income.
The Company incurred shipping and handling costs of
approximately $25.0 million, $22.4 million and
$21.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying accounts of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those differences are
expected to be received or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company is
required test for impairment on at least an annual basis. The
Company conducts its annual impairment assessment as of
October 1. In addition, the Company will test for
35
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that it is
more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is
below its carrying amount. Such events may include, but are not
limited to, significant changes in economic and competitive
conditions, the impact of the economic environment on the
Companys customer base or its businesses, or a material
negative change in its relationships with significant customers.
In evaluating goodwill for impairment the Company uses a
combination of valuation techniques primarily using discounted
cash flows to determine the fair values of its business
reporting units and market based multiples as supporting
evidence. The variables and assumptions used, including the
projections of future revenues and expenses, working capital,
terminal values, discount rates and the market multiples
observed in sale transactions are determined separately for each
reporting unit. The underlying assumptions used are based on
historical actual experience and future expectations that are
consistent with those used in the Companys strategic plan.
The Company compares the fair value of each of its reporting
units to their respective carrying values, including related
goodwill. The change in goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material Handling
|
|
|
Material Handling
|
|
|
Automotive and
|
|
|
Lawn and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amount in thousands)
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Custom
|
|
|
Garden
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
30,383
|
|
|
$
|
116,891
|
|
|
$
|
60,199
|
|
|
$
|
71,889
|
|
|
$
|
279,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(15,223
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(15,223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
30,383
|
|
|
|
101,668
|
|
|
|
60,074
|
|
|
|
71,544
|
|
|
|
263,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(109,823
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(109,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
30,383
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
60,074
|
|
|
$
|
71,544
|
|
|
$
|
162,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, a non-cash, non-tax
deductible goodwill impairment charge of $109.8 million was
recognized in the Companys Material Handling
Europe business segment. During the second quarter of 2006, the
Company determined that the European businesses in its Material
Handling Europe business segment were not core to
the Companys long term growth strategy and, accordingly,
began evaluating the strategic options of these businesses. As a
result of this evaluation and taking into consideration the
economic factors and evolution of business conditions in Europe,
it became necessary for the Company to perform an interim
goodwill impairment test in accordance with Statement of
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. In performing this analysis, the fair
value of the reporting unit was based on estimated proceeds from
a potential sale and the implied fair value of goodwill was
estimated by deducting the fair value of all tangible and
intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value.
As a result of this analysis, all of the recorded goodwill in
the reporting unit was determined to be impaired and,
accordingly, the Company recorded a $109.8 million
impairment which is included in the results of discontinued
operations in the accompanying statements of consolidated income.
The reductions in goodwill in 2005 of $125,000 in the automotive
and custom products segment and $345,000 in the lawn and garden
products segment resulted from finalization of purchase
accounting in connection with the 2004 acquisitions of ATP and
Pro Cal, respectively. Refer to Acquisition footnote.
Intangible assets other than goodwill and intangibles associated
with the Companys retirement plans, primarily consists of
customer relationship and technology assets established in
connection with purchase accounting or with patents held by the
Company. These intangible assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives, which for the customer relationship
intangibles is 7 to 10 years and for patents is the period
through their expiration date, not to exceed 17 years. The
accumulated amortization related to intangible assets was
$7,450,000 and $6,144,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Estimated annual amortization expense for the five
36
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
years ending December 31, 2011 are: $1,238,000 in 2007;
$1,085,000 in 2008; $1,085,000 in 2009, $1,085,000 in 2010 and
$755,000 in 2011.
Net
Income Per Share
Net income (loss) per share, as shown on the Statements of
Consolidated Income, is determined on the basis of the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the periods
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
34,978,269
|
|
|
|
34,724,488
|
|
|
|
33,846,511
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
65,889
|
|
|
|
162,476
|
|
|
|
185,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding diluted
|
|
|
35,044,158
|
|
|
|
34,886,964
|
|
|
|
34,031,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent
Events
On January 9, 2007, the Company acquired all of the shares
of ITML Horticultural Products Inc., an Ontario corporation and
Lone Star Plastics, Inc. a Nevada corporation (collectively
referred to as ITML). The purchase price was approximately
$110 million, which includes the assumption of
approximately $72 million of debt outstanding as of the
acquisition date. ITML is a leader in the design, manufacture,
and marketing of plastic containers and related products for the
horticultural grower markets in North America and had sales of
approximately $170 million in their fiscal year ended
October 31, 2006. The purchase price will be allocated to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their
fair values when appraisals, other studies and additional
information becomes available.
On March 8, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of
Schoeller Arca Systems, Inc. North America, a manufacturer of
reusable bulk containers for approximately $42 million. The
acquired assets include inventory, molds, equipment and
intellectual property related to certain product lines.
On February 1, 2007, the Company completed the sales of its
Material Handling Europe businesses. The selling price was
approximately 66 million euros with adjustments for the
value of cash, debt, and certain liabilities of the businesses
at the closing date. The Company anticipates recording a gain on
the sale in the quarter ending March 31, 2007.
Discontinued
Operations
In the third quarter of 2006, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a divestiture plan of the Companys
Material Handling Europe business segment. On
October 20, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to sell these businesses and the sale was completed on
February 1, 2007.
In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, the operating results related to these businesses
have been included in discontinued operations in the
Companys statements of consolidated income for all periods
presented, and the net assets related to these businesses have
been presented as discontinued operations in the statement of
consolidated financial position as of December 31, 2006.
These discontinued operations generated sales of
$170.9 million, $166.8 millions and
$167.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, these discontinued businesses had a net
loss of $97.7 million, which included a goodwill impairment
charge of $109.8 million, compared with net income of
$7.2 million and $5.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. Income tax expense for the
discontinued operations was $2.4 million, $944,000 and
$94,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
37
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
Net assets related to discontinued operations at
December 31, 2006 were $86.5 million and consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
27,086
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance of
$1,345
|
|
|
48,913
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
20,435
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
31,055
|
|
Intangible assets and other
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
136,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
23,775
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
Other long term liabilities
|
|
|
6,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
50,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
$
|
86,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
On March 10, 2004, the Company acquired all of the shares
of ATP Automotive, Inc. (ATP), a subsidiary of Applied Tech LLC.
ATP and its operating subsidiaries, Michigan Rubber Products,
Inc. (MRP) and WEK Industries, Inc. (WEK), are
manufacturers of molded rubber and plastic products for the
automotive industry with manufacturing facilities in Michigan
(MRP) and Ohio (WEK). The total purchase price was approximately
$61 million, which includes the assumption of
$26 million of ATP debt outstanding as of the acquisition
date. ATP compliments our existing product offering in our
plastic and rubber original equipment and replacements parts
market. The Company believes that the acquisition of ATP
resulted in the recognition of goodwill because of its industry
position and management strength along with providing the
Company a number of operational efficiency opportunities in
relation to other existing business units. The purchase price
has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based upon their fair values as determined by
appraisals, other studies and additional information as shown in
the table below. The allocation to intangible assets represents
customer relationship values with assigned lives ranging from 7
to 10 years.
On July 7, 2004, the Company acquired the operations and
assets of Productivity California, Inc. (Pro Cal), a leading
manufacturer of plastic nursery containers and specialty printed
containers for professional growers based in South Gate,
California. The total acquisition cost was approximately
$28.0 million including approximately
$3.8 million in cash, assumption of Pro Cal debt of
$9.5 million, and 1,153,847 shares of the
Companys common stock. As part of the purchase agreement,
for a one-year period ended July 7, 2005, the Company
agreed to issue additional shares of common stock in the event
that shares issued in connection with the Pro Cal acquisition
were sold at a price below the $12.73 per share value at
issuance or if the value of shares originally issued was below
$12.73 on the anniversary date. Pursuant to this agreement, the
Company issued 4,661 additional shares of common stock in the
quarter ended September 30, 2005. Pro Cal is a natural
expansion to the Companys plastic horticultural product
offering and its geographical location, unique manufacturing
capabilities and strong growth rate contributed to a purchase
price that exceeded the fair value of assets acquired resulting
in goodwill. The purchase price has
38
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based upon their fair values as determined by appraisals and
additional information, as shown below. The allocation to
intangible assets were primarily customer lists and technology
with estimated lives of 8 years.
On September 24, 2004, the Company acquired certain assets
of Premium Molding Inc. d/b/a Diakon Molding (Diakon), a
manufacturer of plastic refuse collection containers and other
blow molded products. Located in Reidsville, North Carolina,
Diakon had net sales of approximately $5.2 million for the
year ended June 30, 2004. Diakon enables Myers to better
serve certain customers in the Southeastern United States. The
assets acquired including cash, accounts receivable, inventory,
and machinery and equipment were purchased for
$4.4 million. In addition, the Company assumed certain
liabilities of Diakon including trade payables and certain
accrued liabilities related to the business operations.
The allocations of purchase price for ATP and Diakon, and Pro
Cal are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
ATP
|
|
|
Pro Cal
|
|
|
Diakon
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
1,549
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,996
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
3,878
|
|
|
|
4,535
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
17,179
|
|
|
|
12,736
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
22,410
|
|
|
|
5,560
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
(26,045
|
)
|
|
|
(9,519
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Accounts payable and accruals
|
|
|
(8,644
|
)
|
|
|
(4,820
|
)
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(4,041
|
)
|
|
|
(3,183
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,730
|
)
|
|
|
(17,522
|
)
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
5,867
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
34,601
|
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration in cash and
stock
|
|
$
|
35,045
|
|
|
$
|
18,544
|
|
|
$
|
4,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of ATPs, Pro Cals and Diakons
operations are included in the Companys consolidated
results of operations from the dates of acquisition and are
reported within the Companys Automotive and Custom, and
Lawn and Garden segments. The following unaudited proforma
information presents a summary of consolidated results of
operations for the Company including ATP, Pro Cal and Diakon as
if the acquisitions occurred January 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
667,881
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
Income from continuing operations
per share
|
|
|
.65
|
|
These unaudited proforma results have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and may not be indicative of results
of operations which actually would have occurred had the
acquisitions taken place on January 1, 2004 or future
results.
Stock
Compensation
In 1999, the Company and its shareholders adopted the 1999 Stock
Plan allowing the Board of Directors to grant key employees and
Directors options to purchase common stock of the Company at the
closing market price
39
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
on the date of grant. In April 2006, the shareholders approved
an amendment to the Plan which provides that, in addition to
stock options, grants of restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights and other forms of equity compensation consistent with
the Plan may be made. Annual grants may not exceed two percent
of the total shares of outstanding common stock. In general,
options granted and outstanding vest over three to five years
and expire ten years from the date of grant. At
December 31, 2006, there were 714,824 shares available
for future grant under the Plan.
Options granted during the past three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
382,800
|
|
|
$
|
15.11 to $17.21
|
|
2005
|
|
|
326,810
|
|
|
$
|
11.15 to $12.86
|
|
2004
|
|
|
19,250
|
|
|
|
11.51
|
|
Options exercised during the past three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
238,896
|
|
|
$
|
7.44 to $12.26
|
|
2005
|
|
|
93,110
|
|
|
$
|
7.60 to $11.15
|
|
2004
|
|
|
271,457
|
|
|
$
|
7.44 to $12.64
|
|
In addition, options totaling 47,321, 57,055 and 105,271 expired
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Options outstanding and exercisable at
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Year
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
781,219
|
|
|
$
|
8.00 to $17.21
|
|
|
|
210,882
|
|
|
$
|
13.52
|
|
2005
|
|
|
684,636
|
|
|
$
|
7.44 to $12.86
|
|
|
|
333,977
|
|
|
$
|
9.58
|
|
2004
|
|
|
507,991
|
|
|
$
|
7.44 to $12.29
|
|
|
|
276,962
|
|
|
$
|
8.20
|
|
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),
(SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, which
requires the Company to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and record the
related expense in the financial statements. The Company elected
to use the modified prospective transition method. The modified
prospective transition method requires that compensation cost be
recognized in the financial statements for all awards granted
after the date of adoption as well as for existing awards for
which the requisite service has not been rendered as of the date
of adoption and requires that prior periods not be restated. All
periods presented prior to January 1, 2006 were accounted
for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees.
The adoption of SFAS 123R reduced income before taxes
approximately $555,000 for the year ended December 31,
2006. These expenses are included in selling and administrative
expenses in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Income.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share
based compensation arrangements at December 31, 2006 was
approximately $3.7 million, which will be recognized over
the next four years.
40
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
The following table illustrates the effect on income and income
per share from continuing operations as if we had applied the
fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R to
stock-based employee compensation in prior periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
as reported
|
|
$
|
19,365
|
|
|
$
|
20,187
|
|
Stock option compensation as
reported, net of tax
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Fair value of stock option
compensation net of tax
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma income from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
19,185
|
|
|
$
|
20,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share from
continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
Basic and diluted proforma
|
|
|
.55
|
|
|
|
.59
|
|
The fair value of options granted is estimated using an option
pricing model based on assumptions set forth in the following
table. The Company uses historical data to estimate employee
exercise and departure behavior. The risk free interest rate is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant and through the expected term. The dividend yield
is based on the Companys historical dividend yield. The
expected volatility is derived from historical volatility of the
Companys shares and those of similar companies measured
against the market as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Black
|
|
|
Trinomial
|
|
|
Trinomial
|
|
Model
|
|
Scholes
|
|
|
Lattice
|
|
|
Lattice
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
Expected life of award (years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
31.58
|
%
|
|
|
37.50
|
%
|
|
|
35.70
|
%
|
Fair value per option share
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the
period ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
684,636
|
|
|
$
|
9.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
382,800
|
|
|
|
16.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
(238,896
|
)
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled or Forfeited
|
|
|
(47,321
|
)
|
|
|
9.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
781,219
|
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
|
|
8.55
|
|
|
$
|
1,671,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
210,882
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,822
|
|
The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the
market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price
of the option. The total intrinsic value of the options
exercised during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
and 2004 was approximately $1,789,000, $1,104,000 and $977,000
respectively. In addition, in September 2006, the Company issued
61,000 shares of restricted stock with a total compensation
value of $1,038,000 which is being recognized over the related
four year vesting period.
41
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
Contingencies
On July 15, 2004, the Company announced that it had
reported to the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) certain international business practices that
were believed to be in violation of U.S. and, possibly, foreign
laws. The practices, which involved a limited number of
customers, related to the invoicing of certain sales to foreign
customers of the Companys distribution segment and sales
made by foreign subsidiaries to prohibited customers in certain
prohibited international jurisdictions. These business practices
were discontinued and an independent investigation, which has
been completed, was conducted by outside counsel under the
authority of the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of
Directors. The results of the investigation have been provided
to the DOJ, the SEC, the Office of Foreign Asset Control,
U.S. Department of the Treasury (OFAC) and the
Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of
Commerce (BIS).
The DOJ notified the Company that it determined not to proceed
against the Company or its employees for those matters described
in the Companys voluntary reporting and internal
investigation. The BIS notified the Company it had completed its
investigation and decided not to refer the matter for criminal
or administrative prosecution and closed the matter by issuing a
warning letter to the Company.
The Company is still voluntarily working with OFAC to complete
the investigation with them. If OFAC determined that these
incidents were unlawful, they could take action against the
Company
and/or some
of its employees. Based on informal discussions with the SEC, we
believe no further action will be taken against us by the SEC.
We will seek to settle any enforcement issues arising from these
matters, however, at this time we cannot reasonably estimate its
potential liability and, therefore, as of December 31,
2006, and the date of this filing, the Company has not recorded
any provision for any resulting settlements or potential fines
or penalties. Based in part upon the manner in which these
matters were resolved with the DOJ and BIS, management believes
that this liability, although possible, would not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. Further, the Company
believes that the practices in question have no effect on
previously filed financial statements, and that the final
findings from the investigation will not lead to any restatement
of reported financial results.
In addition to the proceedings discussed above, we have been, in
the ordinary course of business, a defendant in various lawsuits
and a party to various other legal proceedings, some of which
are covered in whole or in part by insurance. We believe that
the outcome of these lawsuits and other proceedings will not
individually or in the aggregate have a future material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Long-Term
Debt and Credit Agreements
Long-term debt at December 31, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Credit agreement
|
|
$
|
94,148,992
|
|
|
$
|
144,509,700
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
Industrial revenue bonds
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,360,644
|
|
|
|
4,254,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,509,636
|
|
|
|
252,764,454
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
3,235,058
|
|
|
|
3,240,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
198,274,578
|
|
|
$
|
249,523,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 26, 2006, the Company entered into an amendment
and restatement of its loan agreement (the Credit Agreement)
with a group of banks. Under terms of the Credit Agreement, the
Company may borrow up to
42
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
$250 million, including up to $80 million in certain
foreign currencies, swing loans not to exceed $20 million
and letter of credit obligations up to $25 million.
Interest is based on the banks Prime rate or Euro dollar
rate plus an applicable margin that varies depending on the
Companys ratio of total debt to earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). The average
interest rate on borrowing under the Credit Agreement was
5.87 percent at December 31, 2006 and
5.36 percent at December 31,2005. In addition, the
Company pays a quarterly facility fee. The Credit Agreement
expires on October 26, 2011.
In December 2003, the Company issued $100 million in Senior
Unsecured Notes (the Notes) consisting of $65 million of
notes with an interest rate of 6.08 percent and a
7 year maturity and $35 million with an interest rate
of 6.81 percent and a 10 year maturity. Proceeds from
the issuance of the Notes were used to pay down term loan and
revolving credit facility borrowing outstanding at that time.
In addition, at December 31, 2006, the Company had
$7.4 million of other long-term debt consisting of
industrial revenue bonds, certain indebtedness of acquired
companies, and other credit facilities for the Companys
international operations. The weighted average interest rate on
these amounts outstanding was 4.91 percent at
December 31, 2006 and 3.70 percent at
December 31, 2005.
The Credit Facility and Notes contain customary covenants
including the maintenance of minimum consolidated net worth,
certain financial ratios regarding leverage and interest
coverage, and limitation on annual capital expenditures.
Maturities of long-term debt under the loan agreements in place
at December 31, 2006 for the five years ending
December 31, 2011 were approximately: $3,235,000 in 2007;
$59,000 in 2008; $17,000 in 2009; $69,017,000 in 2010;
$94,166,000 in 2011 and $35,017,000 thereafter.
Retirement
Plans
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have pension and
profit sharing plans covering substantially all of their
employees. Two plans are defined benefit plans with benefits
primarily based upon a fixed amount for each completed year of
service as defined.
For the Companys domestic defined benefit plans, both of
which were underfunded at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the
net periodic pension cost was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
28,570
|
|
|
$
|
110,055
|
|
|
$
|
191,272
|
|
|
$
|
240,314
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
168,416
|
|
|
|
155,897
|
|
|
|
350,501
|
|
|
|
333,201
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(226,915
|
)
|
|
|
(185,298
|
)
|
|
|
(396,485
|
)
|
|
|
(343,796
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9,629
|
|
|
|
25,894
|
|
|
|
42,776
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
35,109
|
|
|
|
83,545
|
|
|
|
67,536
|
|
Settlement/Curtailment
|
|
|
8,666
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
195,467
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension (income) cost
|
|
$
|
(20,036
|
)
|
|
$
|
125,392
|
|
|
$
|
450,194
|
|
|
$
|
340,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
The reconciliation of changes in projected benefit obligations
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
3,133,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,889,420
|
|
|
$
|
6,145,452
|
|
|
$
|
5,684,187
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
28,570
|
|
|
|
110,055
|
|
|
|
191,272
|
|
|
|
240,314
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
168,416
|
|
|
|
155,897
|
|
|
|
350,501
|
|
|
|
333,201
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(313,782
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(301,609
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(230,319
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
(65,119
|
)
|
|
|
(103,177
|
)
|
|
|
142,476
|
|
|
|
139,729
|
|
Expenses paid
|
|
|
(33,015
|
)
|
|
|
(25,441
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(182,984
|
)
|
|
|
(77,255
|
)
|
|
|
(262,880
|
)
|
|
|
(251,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,747,559
|
|
|
$
|
2,949,499
|
|
|
$
|
6,022,720
|
|
|
$
|
6,145,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost
and benefit obligations for both plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Discount rate for net periodic
pension cost
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Discount rate for benefit
obligations
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Expected long-term return of plan
assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Future benefit increases were not considered, as there is no
substantive commitment to increase benefits. The expected
long-term rate of return assumption is based on the actual
historical rate of return on assets adjusted to reflect recent
market conditions and future expectation consistent with the
Companys current asset allocation and investment policy.
The following table reflects the change in the fair value of the
plans assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,957,859
|
|
|
$
|
2,380,537
|
|
|
$
|
5,198,214
|
|
|
$
|
3,937,937
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
396,929
|
|
|
|
344,853
|
|
|
|
474,566
|
|
|
|
583,865
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(301,609
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(230,319
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
1,003,612
|
|
Expenses paid
|
|
|
(33,015
|
)
|
|
|
(25,441
|
)
|
|
|
(46,185
|
)
|
|
|
(75,221
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(182,984
|
)
|
|
|
(77,255
|
)
|
|
|
(262,880
|
)
|
|
|
(251,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end
of year
|
|
$
|
2,837,180
|
|
|
$
|
2,622,694
|
|
|
$
|
5,338,396
|
|
|
$
|
5,198,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average asset allocations for both of the
Companys defined benefit plans at December 31, 2006
and 2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Equities securities
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
The Companys investment policy related to the defined
benefit plans is to provide for aggressive capital growth with
moderate income production. Capital growth through equity
exposure is emphasized which is balanced with small to moderate
use of fixed income investments. Equity exposure is limited to a
maximum of 85 percent of the total portfolios.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the funded
status of the plans at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
2,747,559
|
|
|
$
|
2,949,499
|
|
Plan assets at fair value
|
|
|
2,837,180
|
|
|
|
2,622,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
89,621
|
|
|
$
|
(326,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 158, the funded status shown above is reflected in the
Companys statement of Financial Position at
December 31, 2006. Under the provisions of
SFAS No. 87, the Company had recorded an additional
minimum pension liability of $1,147,134 at December 31,
2005, of which $610,615 was recorded as a component of other
comprehensive income and $77,665 as an intangible pension asset.
At December 31, 2005, the accumulated benefit obligations
of the Plans, both of which were underfunded, was $6,022,720 and
the fair value of plan assets was $5,338,396. The Company has no
minimum required contribution for these plans in 2007 and does
not anticipate making any contributions during the next fiscal
year.
The table below illustrates the effect of applying
SFAS No. 158 on the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
SFAS 158
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
SFAS 158
|
|
Pension liability
|
|
$
|
(516,990
|
)
|
|
$
|
279,806
|
|
|
$
|
237,184
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
(448,954
|
)
|
|
|
(137,650
|
)
|
|
|
(586,604
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
68,036
|
|
|
|
(68,036
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
157,134
|
|
|
|
(74,120
|
)
|
|
|
83,014
|
|
In addition, the adoption of SFAS 158 to pension plans for
the Companys discontinued operations resulted in a loss of
$2.9 million in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Benefit payments projected for the plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
298,434
|
|
2008
|
|
|
309,649
|
|
2009
|
|
|
332,302
|
|
2010
|
|
|
357,326
|
|
2011
|
|
|
373,129
|
|
2012 - 2016
|
|
|
2,137,351
|
|
A profit sharing plan is maintained for the Companys
U.S. based employees, not covered under defined benefit
plans, who have met eligibility service requirements. The amount
to be contributed by the Company under the profit sharing plan
is determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Profit sharing plan expense was $1,668,000, $1,382,000 and
$1,510,000, for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In
addition, the Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (SERP) to provide participating senior executives with
retirement benefits in addition to amounts payable under the
profit sharing plan. Expense related to the SERP was ($193,000),
$1,022,000 and $1,175,000 for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The SERP is unfunded.
45
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
Leases
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are committed under
non-cancelable operating leases involving certain facilities and
equipment. Aggregate rental expense for all leased assets was
$9,713,000, $8,574,000 and $7,782,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively
Future minimum rental commitments for the next five years are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Commitment
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
8,352,000
|
|
2008
|
|
|
7,031,000
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,135,000
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,751,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,785,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
28,266,000
|
|
Income
Taxes
The effective tax rate was 36.3% in 2006, 40.0% in 2005 and
39.0% in 2004. A reconciliation of the Federal statutory income
tax rate to the Companys effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Pre-Tax Income
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Statutory Federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes net
of Federal tax benefit
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate for the year
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes was attributable to the following
sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollar in thousands)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
40,756
|
|
|
$
|
30,845
|
|
|
$
|
30,511
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
45,074
|
|
|
$
|
32,272
|
|
|
$
|
33,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
13,133
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
9,103
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
8,690
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,011
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
11,123
|
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
|
$
|
12,375
|
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
Significant components of the Companys deferred taxes as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
21,957
|
|
|
$
|
24,835
|
|
Tax deductible goodwill
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
|
|
8,678
|
|
State deferred taxes
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,117
|
|
|
|
38,465
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible
accounts
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Non-deductible accruals
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
Tax and capital loss carryforwards
|
|
|
15,273
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,230
|
|
|
|
7,997
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(15,273
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,957
|
|
|
|
7,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liability
|
|
$
|
31,160
|
|
|
$
|
30,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation
allowance, if based on all available evidence, it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Available evidence includes the reversal of existing taxable
temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of
temporary differences, taxable income in carryback years and tax
planning strategies. The change in the valuation allowance in
2006 was an increase of $373,000, primarily related to
additional foreign and state net operating losses due to the
uncertainty regarding future profitability in those
jurisdictions. The Company has tax loss carryforwards of
approximately $6.5 million with carryforward periods that
expire starting in 2019 and $14.4 million of capital loss
carryforwards expiring in 2012. The American Jobs Creation Act
of 2004 introduced a special one-time dividends received
deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a
U.S. taxpayer, provided certain provisions are met. Myers
Industries has an accounting policy to not record a provision
for unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries as it is the
Companys intention to indefinitely reinvest these earnings
of these subsidiaries. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
provided a special opportunity to review this policy and,
accordingly, in 2005 the Company made a repatriation of
approximately $4.4 million in dividends which resulted in
additional income taxes of approximately $281,000.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had not recorded a
deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to
investments in its foreign subsidiaries that are essentially
permanent in duration. The amount of such temporary differences
was estimated to be approximately $15.6 million. The amount
may become taxable upon a repatriation of assets or a sales or
liquidation of the subsidiaries. It is not practical to estimate
the related amount of unrecognized tax liability.
Industry
Segments
The Companys business units have separate management teams
and offer different products and services. Using the criteria of
SFAS No. 131, these business units have been
aggregated into four reportable segments. These include three
manufacturing segments encompassing a diverse mix of plastic and
rubber products: 1) Material Handling North
America, 2) Automotive and Custom, and 3) Lawn and
Garden. The fourth segment is
47
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
Distribution of tire, wheel, and undervehicle service products.
The aggregation of business units is based on management by the
chief operating decision-maker for the segment as well as
similarities of products, production processes, distribution
methods and economic characteristics (e.g. average gross margin
and the impact of economic conditions on long-term financial
performance).
In each of its manufacturing segments, the Company designs,
produces, and markets a wide range of polymer products for
diverse markets, customers, and applications. These products are
made through a variety of molding processes in facilities
located throughout North America and South America.
The Material Handling North America Segment includes
a broad selection of plastic reusable containers, pallets, small
parts bins, bulk shipping containers, and storage and
organization products. The product selection, manufacturing
processes, and markets served by each segment are similar. The
North American segment includes operations conducted in the
United States, Canada, and Mexico. The reusable container
products in both segments provide customers with cost-saving
material handling solutions for applications such as shipping
heavy automotive parts to assembly lines, transporting
perishable food products to retailers, organizing small parts,
and creating custom storage systems. Markets served encompass
various niches of industrial manufacturing, food processing,
retail/wholesale products distribution, agriculture, automotive,
healthcare, appliance, bakery, electronics, textiles, consumer,
and others. Products are sold both direct to end-users and
through distributors.
In the Automotive and Custom Segment, the Company engineers and
manufactures plastic and rubber original equipment and
replacement parts, rubber tire repair and retread products, and
a diverse array of custom plastic and rubber products.
Representative products include: plastic HVAC ducts, water/waste
storage tanks, and interior/exterior vehicle trim components;
rubber air intake hoses, vibration isolators, emissions tubing
assemblies, and trailer bushings; and custom products such as
plastic tool boxes and calendered rubber sheet stock. The
segment serves a diverse group of niche markets: automotive,
recreational vehicle, recreational marine, heavy truck,
construction and agriculture equipment, healthcare, and
transportation, to name a few.
Myers Industries Lawn and Garden Segment serves the North
American horticultural market with plastic products such as
seedling trays, nursery pots, hanging baskets, and custom
printed containers, as well as decorative resin planters.
Markets/customers include professional growers, greenhouses,
nurseries, retail garden centers, mass merchandisers, and
consumers.
The Companys Distribution Segment is engaged in the
distribution of equipment, tools, and supplies used for tire
servicing and automotive undervehicle repair. The product line
includes categories such as tire valves and accessories, tire
changing and balancing equipment, lifts and alignment equipment,
service equipment and tools, and tire repair/retread supplies.
The Distribution Segment operates domestically through 37
branches located in major cities throughout the United States
and in foreign countries through export sales. Markets served
include retail and truck tire dealers, commercial auto and truck
fleets, auto dealers, general service and repair centers, tire
retreaders, and government agencies.
Total sales from foreign business units and export were
approximately $92.4 million, $87.9 million and
$75.2 million for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. There are no individual foreign countries for
which sales are material. Long-lived assets in foreign
countries, consisting primarily of property, plant and equipment
and goodwill, were approximately $17.7 million at
December 31, 2006 and $15.4 million at
December 31, 2005.
48
MYERS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
197,329
|
|
|
$
|
189,950
|
|
|
$
|
171,626
|
|
Material Handling
North America
|
|
|
240,050
|
|
|
|
209,469
|
|
|
|
189,393
|
|
Automotive and Custom
|
|
|
204,659
|
|
|
|
195,125
|
|
|
|
171,089
|
|
Lawn and Garden
|
|
|
160,155
|
|
|
|
170,416
|
|
|
|
118,544
|
|
Intra-segment elimination
|
|
|
(22,209
|
)
|
|
|
(28,080
|
)
|
|
|
(14,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
779,984
|
|
|
$
|
736,880
|
|
|
$
|
635,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income
Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
22,241
|
|
|
$
|
20,566
|
|
|
$
|
17,289
|
|
Material Handling
North America
|
|
|
34,872
|
|
|
|
16,265
|
|
|
|
19,665
|
|
Automotive and Custom
|
|
|
14,041
|
|
|
|
9,967
|
|
|
|
13,093
|
|
Lawn and Garden
|
|
|
8,089
|
|
|
|
16,420
|
|
|
|
11,963
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(18,320
|
)
|
|
|
(15,483
|
)
|
|
|
(15,843
|
)
|
Interest
expense-net
|
|
|
(15,849
|
)
|
|
|
(15,463
|
)
|
|
|
(13,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,074
|
|
|
$
|
32,272
|
|
|
$
|
33,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
54,636
|
|
|
$
|
52,404
|
|
|
$
|
48,339
|
|
Material Handling
North America
|
|
|
149,114
|
|
|
|
149,709
|
|
|
|
152,110
|
|
Automotive and Custom
|
|
|
142,185
|
|
|
|
153,933
|
|
|
|
157,672
|
|
Lawn and Garden
|
|
|
163,434
|
|
|
|
176,826
|
|
|
|
173,909
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
11,671
|
|
|
|
12,228
|
|
Intra-segment elimination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(985
|
)
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
525,200
|
|
|
$
|
543,558
|
|
|
$
|
543,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Additions,
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Material Handling
North America
|
|
|
4,910
|
|
|
|
13,404
|
|
|
|
6,576
|
|
Automotive and Custom
|
|
|
1,773
|
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
Lawn and Garden
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
5,352
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,381
|
|
|
$
|
24,578
|
|
|
$
|
16,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
Material Handling
North America
|
|
|
10,378
|
|
|
|
11,419
|
|
|
|
12,820
|
|
Automotive and Custom
|
|
|
6,120
|
|
|
|
6,318
|
|
|
|
5,577
|
|
Lawn and Garden
|
|
|
9,215
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
8,358
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,505
|
|
|
$
|
27,160
|
|
|
$
|
27,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors selects the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm.
Effective on May 13, 2005, the Audit Committee appointed
KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm. On June 9, 2005, KPMG LLP accepted the
engagement, after completing its due diligence.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
and through June 9, 2005, the Company, nor anyone
acting on its behalf, consulted KPMG LLP with respect to the
application of accounting principles to a specified transaction,
either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that
might be rendered on the Companys financial statements, or
any other matters or reportable events listed in
Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of
Regulation S-K.
On May 10, 2005, upon the filing of the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, Ernst &
Young LLP (E&Y) completed all of its work for
the Company and was no longer the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm. Prior to the Company filing
the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, E&Y performed a
review of the Companys financial results for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 in accordance with the provisions of
SAS 100 (AU 722), Interim Financial Information.
On March 11, 2005, the Audit Committee determined that it
would request proposals from independent registered public
accounting firms for the Companys 2005 audit. E&Y, the
Companys then independent registered public accounting
firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, received
a request for proposal, but notified the Company on
April 13, 2005, that they declined to stand for
reappointment as the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm.
As disclosed in the Companys
Form 10-K/A
filed on May 2, 2005, management concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of December 31, 2004 due to material
weaknesses identified in the business segment reporting process,
the financial statement close process and the income tax
process. E&Y issued an adverse opinion on the effectiveness
of internal controls over financial reporting because of these
material weaknesses as of December 31, 2004.
E&Ys reports on the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse
opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or
modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles. In connection with the audits of the Companys
financial statements for each of the two fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and through June 9, 2005,
there were no disagreements with E&Y on any matters of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure or auditing scope and procedures which, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of E&Y would have caused
E&Y to make reference to the matter in their report.
|
|
ITEM 9.A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined under
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-a5(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the Companys reports under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, as appropriate, to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures.
The Company carries out a variety of on-going procedures, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, to evaluate the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and
50
procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of
the end of the period covered by this report.
Managements report of internal controls over financial
reporting, and the report of the independent registered public
accounting firm on internal control, are titled
Managements Annual Assessment of and Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting and are included herein.
Managements
Annual Assessment of and Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
The Companys internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Because of its inherent limitation, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary, the Company conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management has concluded that the internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2006.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report included herein.
|
|
|
John C. Orr
|
|
Donald A. Merril
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
|
51
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Board of
Directors and Shareholders
Myers Industries, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Assessment of and Report
On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Myers
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (Company) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
statements of consolidated financial position of Myers
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the related statements of consolidated income,
shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows for the years then ended, and our report dated
March 16, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 16, 2007
52
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
For information about the directors of the Registrant, see the
sections titled Nominees, Director
Independence, Committee Charters and Policies,
Shareholder Nominations of Director Candidates and
Corporate Governance Policies of Registrants
Proxy Statement dated March 20, 2007 (Proxy
Statement), which is incorporated herein by reference.
Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and
independent as defined under the Companys Independence
Criteria Policy and the independence standards set by the New
York Stock Exchange. The Board has identified Vincent C. Byrd as
Audit Committee financial expert.
Information about the Executive Officers appears in Part I
of this Report.
Disclosures by the Registrant with respect to compliance with
Section 16(a) appears under the section entitled
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated
herein by reference.
For information about our Code of Ethics, see the section titled
Corporate Governance Policies of our Proxy
Statement, incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
See the sections titled Executive Compensation and Related
Information of the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
See the sections titled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management, Employment Agreements Including Change of
Control, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation and the Compensation Committee Report of the Proxy
Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
See Item 5 of this
Form 10-K
for the Equity Compensation Plan Information Table, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
See the sections titled Policies and Procedures with
Respect to Related Party Transactions and Director
Independence of the Proxy Statement, which are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
Required information regarding fees paid to and services
provided by the Companys independent auditor during the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the pre-approval
policies and procedures of the Audit Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors is set forth under the section
titled Matters Relating to the Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm of the Proxy Statement, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
53
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
The following consolidated financial statements of the
Registrant appear in Part II of this Report:
|
|
|
|
15.
|
(A)(1) Financial Statements
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of Myers Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Statements of Consolidated Income For The Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Statements of Consolidated Shareholders Equity and
Comprehensive Income For The Years Ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows For The Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements For The Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
15.
|
(A)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
|
All other schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable,
not required, or because the information is included in the
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto which appear
in Part II of this Report.
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
3(a)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation. Reference is made to
Exhibit 3(a) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2005.
|
3(b)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated Code of Regulations. Reference is made to Exhibit(3)(b)
to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 26, 2003.
|
10(a)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(a) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001.
|
10(b)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
for Directors and Officers. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(b) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001.*
|
10(c)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(c) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001.*
|
10(d)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.
Reference is made to Exhibit 10(d) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 19, 2004.
|
10(e)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. 1997
Incentive Stock Plan. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form S-8
(Registration Statement
No. 333-90367)
filed with the Commission on November 5, 1999.*
|
10(f)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1999 Incentive Stock Plan. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(f) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on May 6, 2003.*
|
10(g)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Executive
Supplemental Retirement Plan. Reference is made to
Exhibit (10)(g) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 26, 2003.*
|
10(h)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Myers
Industries, Inc. and John C. Orr effective May 1, 2005.
Reference is made to Exhibit 10(h) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on August 10, 2005.*
|
10(i)
|
|
Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition
Agreement between Myers Industries, Inc. and John C. Orr dated
July 18, 2000. Reference is made to Exhibit 10(j) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on May 6, 2003.*
|
10(j)
|
|
Amendment to the Myers Industries,
Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (John C. Orr)
effective May 1, 2005.* Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(j) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
10(k)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Myers
Industries, Inc. and Donald A. Merril dated January 24,
2006.* Reference is made to Exhibit 10(k) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
10(l)
|
|
Amendment to the Myers Industries,
Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (Donald A. Merril)
dated January 24, 2006.* Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(l) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
10(m)
|
|
Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition
Agreement between Myers Industries, Inc. and Donald A. Merril
dated January 24, 2006.* Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(m) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
10(n)
|
|
Resignation and Retirement
Agreement between Myers Industries, Inc. and Gregory J. Stodnick
dated January 24, 2006.* Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(n) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
10(o)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Myers
Industries, Inc. and Kevin C. ONeil dated August 21,
2005. Reference is made to Exhibit 10(j) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on November 4, 2005.*
|
10(p)
|
|
Amendment to the Myers Industries,
Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (Kevin C.
ONeil) effective August 21, 2005.* Reference is made
to Exhibit 10(p) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
10(q)
|
|
Separation Agreement between Myers
Industries, Inc. and Kevin C. ONeil dated August 8,
2006. Reference is made to Exhibit 10(q) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on August 8, 2006.
|
10(r)
|
|
Retirement and Separation
Agreement between Myers Industries, Inc. and Stephen E. Myers
effective May 1, 2005. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(k) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on August 10, 2005.*
|
10(s)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant
Agreement. Reference is made to Exhibit 10(r) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2005.*
|
10(t)
|
|
Third Amendment to Amended and
Restate Loan Agreement between Myers Industries, Inc. and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Agent dated as of July 27, 2006.
Reference is made to Exhibit 10 to Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on July 27, 2006.
|
10(u)
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement
between Myers Industries, Inc. and the Note Purchasers,
dated December 12, 2003, regarding the issuance of
(i) $65,000,000 of 6.08%
Series 2003-A
Senior Notes due December 12, 2010, and
(ii) $35,000,000 of 6.81%
Series 2003-A
Senior Notes due December 12, 2013. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(o) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 15, 2004.
|
10(v)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc.
Non-Employee Board of Directors Compensation Arrangement.*
Reference is made to Exhibit 10(w) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006.
|
10(w)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1999 Incentive Stock Plan. Reference is made to
Exhibit 10(w) to
Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on August 9, 2006.
|
14(a)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics. Reference is made to
Exhibit 14(a) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2005.
|
14(b)
|
|
Myers Industries, Inc. Code of
Ethical Conduct for the Finance Officers and Finance Department
Personnel. Reference is made to Exhibit 14(b) to
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 16, 2005.
|
21
|
|
List of Direct and Indirect
Subsidiaries, and Operating Divisions, of Myers Industries, Inc.
|
23(a)
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)
|
23(b)
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)
|
31(a)
|
|
Certification of John C. Orr,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Myers Industries, Inc,
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.
|
31(b)
|
|
Certification of Donald A. Merril,
Vice President (Chief Financial Officer and Secretary) of Myers
Industries, Inc., pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.
|
32
|
|
Certifications of John C. Orr
Myers, President and Chief Executive Officer of Myers
Industries, Inc. and Donald A. Merril, Vice
President Finance (Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary), of Myers Industries, Inc. pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates executive compensation plan or arrangement. |
|
|
|
|
15.
|
(D) Financial Statements
|
See subparagraph 15(a)(1) above.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Myers Industries, Inc.
Donald A. Merril
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Donald
A. Merril
Donald
A. Merril
|
|
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Keith
A. Brown
Keith
A. Brown
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent
Byrd
Vincent
Byrd
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Karl
S. Hay
Karl
S. Hay
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
P. Johnston
Richard
P. Johnston
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
W. Kissel
Edward
W. Kissel
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen
E. Myers
Stephen
E. Myers
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
C. Orr
John
C. Orr
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
L. Osborne
Richard
L. Osborne
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jon
H. Outcalt
Jon
H. Outcalt
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
56