Neoprobe Corporation 424B3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-110858
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
Number 2
to
Fourth
Amended Prospectus dated May 16, 2008, and Prospectus Supplement
dated May 20, 2008,
of
NEOPROBE CORPORATION
21,817,257 Shares of Common Stock
This Prospectus Supplement relates to the sale of up to 21,817,257 shares of Neoprobe Corporation
common stock (the Shares). The Shares are being registered to permit public secondary trading
of the shares that are being offered by the selling stockholders named in the prospectus. We are
not selling any of the Shares in this offering and therefore will not receive any proceeds from
this offering.
This Prospectus Supplement No. 2 includes the attached Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form
10-Q) of Neoprobe Corporation (the Company), for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2008. The exhibits to the Form
10-Q are not included with this Prospectus Supplement No. 2 and are not incorporated by reference
herein. This Prospectus Supplement No. 2 should be read in conjunction with the prospectus
supplement dated May 20, 2008.
Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol NEOP.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED
OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The date of this Prospectus Supplement No. 2 is August 18, 2008.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
to
Commission
File Number: 0-26520
NEOPROBE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
31-1080091 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
425 Metro Place North, Suite 300, Dublin, Ohio
|
|
43017-1367 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12-b-2 of the Act.)
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 69,115,058 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (as of
the close of business on August 8, 2008).
NEOPROBE CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Neoprobe
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
3,476,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,540,220 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
195,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,130,507 |
|
|
|
1,621,910 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,048,589 |
|
|
|
1,237,403 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
126,237 |
|
|
|
247,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,977,103 |
|
|
|
4,646,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
2,039,327 |
|
|
|
1,918,343 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,704,624 |
|
|
|
1,630,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,703 |
|
|
|
287,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
|
3,025,763 |
|
|
|
3,016,783 |
|
Acquired technology |
|
|
237,271 |
|
|
|
237,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,263,034 |
|
|
|
3,254,054 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
1,767,551 |
|
|
|
1,652,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495,483 |
|
|
|
1,601,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
650,765 |
|
|
|
527,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,458,054 |
|
|
$ |
7,062,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued
3
Neoprobe Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
736,409 |
|
|
$ |
778,085 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
442,997 |
|
|
|
801,949 |
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion |
|
|
16,840 |
|
|
|
14,592 |
|
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
|
469,728 |
|
|
|
451,512 |
|
Notes payable to finance companies |
|
|
18,119 |
|
|
|
124,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,684,093 |
|
|
|
2,170,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
13,882 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion |
|
|
522,233 |
|
|
|
623,640 |
|
Notes payable to CEO, net of discounts of $86,357
and $95,786, respectively |
|
|
913,643 |
|
|
|
904,214 |
|
Notes payable to investors, net of discounts of $5,307,080
and $2,600,392, respectively |
|
|
4,692,920 |
|
|
|
4,399,608 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
686,638 |
|
|
|
2,853,476 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
49,632 |
|
|
|
52,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,563,041 |
|
|
|
11,006,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008;
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares
authorized; 69,115,058 and 67,240,030 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively |
|
|
69,115 |
|
|
|
67,240 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
142,647,735 |
|
|
|
136,765,697 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(142,821,381 |
) |
|
|
(140,776,531 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive losses |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit |
|
|
(104,987 |
) |
|
|
(3,943,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit |
|
$ |
8,458,054 |
|
|
$ |
7,062,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
Neoprobe
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,255,025 |
|
|
$ |
1,517,430 |
|
|
$ |
4,037,817 |
|
|
$ |
3,260,750 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
906,670 |
|
|
|
699,844 |
|
|
|
1,566,677 |
|
|
|
1,489,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,348,355 |
|
|
|
817,586 |
|
|
|
2,471,140 |
|
|
|
1,771,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
898,712 |
|
|
|
875,304 |
|
|
|
1,462,415 |
|
|
|
1,739,145 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
903,884 |
|
|
|
650,293 |
|
|
|
1,779,292 |
|
|
|
1,432,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,802,596 |
|
|
|
1,525,597 |
|
|
|
3,241,707 |
|
|
|
3,172,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(454,241 |
) |
|
|
(708,011 |
) |
|
|
(770,567 |
) |
|
|
(1,400,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
18,482 |
|
|
|
19,199 |
|
|
|
29,090 |
|
|
|
44,257 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(470,035 |
) |
|
|
(444,702 |
) |
|
|
(801,814 |
) |
|
|
(886,847 |
) |
Change in derivative liabilities |
|
|
(113,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses, net |
|
|
(564,618 |
) |
|
|
(426,631 |
) |
|
|
(1,274,283 |
) |
|
|
(844,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,018,859 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,134,642 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,044,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,245,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
68,526,573 |
|
|
|
61,608,782 |
|
|
|
67,905,581 |
|
|
|
60,635,448 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
68,526,573 |
|
|
|
61,608,782 |
|
|
|
67,905,581 |
|
|
|
60,635,448 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Neoprobe
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Deficit
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
67,240,030 |
|
|
$ |
67,240 |
|
|
$ |
136,765,697 |
|
|
$ |
(140,776,531 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,943,594 |
) |
|
Issued restricted stock |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
Issued stock to 401(k) plan
at $0.28 |
|
|
114,921 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
29,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,031 |
|
Issued stock upon exercise
of warrants |
|
|
1,310,107 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
112,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,750 |
|
Paid common stock
issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
Issued warrants to
purchase common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,178 |
|
Effect of beneficial
conversion feature of
convertible promissory
note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,845 |
|
Reclassified derivative
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,924,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,924,994 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,165 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,044,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,044,850 |
) |
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,045,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
69,115,058 |
|
|
$ |
69,115 |
|
|
$ |
142,647,735 |
|
|
$ |
(142,821,381 |
) |
|
$ |
(456 |
) |
|
$ |
(104,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Neoprobe
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,044,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,245,539 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
199,469 |
|
|
|
207,508 |
|
Amortization of debt discount and debt offering costs |
|
|
333,754 |
|
|
|
431,071 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
29,297 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
94,165 |
|
|
|
67,224 |
|
Change in derivative liabilities |
|
|
500,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
36,160 |
|
|
|
34,020 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
434,106 |
|
|
|
101,859 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
143,381 |
|
|
|
(28,544 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
147,461 |
|
|
|
123,349 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(41,676 |
) |
|
|
152,484 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities |
|
|
(361,593 |
) |
|
|
330,978 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(83,191 |
) |
|
|
(112,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(613,329 |
) |
|
|
(937,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(196,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(44,736 |
) |
|
|
(36,202 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patent and trademark costs |
|
|
(8,980 |
) |
|
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(249,596 |
) |
|
|
(38,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
114,200 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
Payment of stock offering costs |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(20,040 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(200,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of notes payable |
|
|
(106,651 |
) |
|
|
(942,078 |
) |
Payments under capital leases |
|
|
(7,964 |
) |
|
|
(7,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,798,931 |
|
|
|
(319,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
1,936,006 |
|
|
|
(1,295,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, beginning of period |
|
|
1,540,220 |
|
|
|
2,502,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period |
|
$ |
3,476,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
a. |
|
Basis of Presentation: The information presented as of June 30, 2008 and for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 is unaudited, but
includes all adjustments (which consist only of normal recurring adjustments) that the
management of Neoprobe Corporation (Neoprobe, the Company, or we) believes to be necessary
for the fair presentation of results for the periods presented. Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected for the year. The consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with Neoprobes audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007, which were included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Neoprobe, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Cardiosonix Ltd. (Cardiosonix), and our 90%-owned subsidiary, Cira Biosciences,
Inc. (Cira Bio). All significant inter-company accounts were eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
b. |
|
Financial Instruments and Fair Value: We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities as
of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest
priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are
described below: |
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for
which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair
value measurement and unobservable.
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level
of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining the
appropriate levels, we perform a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are
subject to SFAS No. 157. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the
fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which
trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as
Level 3. In estimating the fair value of our derivative liabilities, we used the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and, where necessary, other macroeconomic, industry and
Company-specific conditions.
8
The following tables set forth by level financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Description |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
195,544 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
195,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
195,544 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
195,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
related to warrants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative liabilities
related to conversion
and put options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,638 |
|
|
|
686,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
686,638 |
|
|
$ |
686,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Description |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
related to warrants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,254,404 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,254,404 |
|
Derivative liabilities
related to conversion
and put options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599,072 |
|
|
|
1,599,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,254,404 |
|
|
$ |
1,599,072 |
|
|
$ |
2,853,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our Level 3 liabilities
for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Transfers In |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
and |
|
|
and/or (Out) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Description |
|
2008 |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(See Note 9) |
|
|
2008 |
|
Derivative liabilities
related to conversion
and put options |
|
$ |
315,228 |
|
|
$ |
113,442 |
|
|
$ |
257,968 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
686,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
315,228 |
|
|
$ |
113,442 |
|
|
$ |
257,968 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
686,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our Level 2 and Level 3
liabilities for the sixmonth period ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Transfers In |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
and |
|
|
and/or (Out) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Description |
|
2007 |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(See Note 9) |
|
|
2008 |
|
Derivative liabilities
related to warrants |
|
$ |
1,254,404 |
|
|
$ |
270,654 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,525,058 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative liabilities
related to conversion
and put options |
|
|
1,599,072 |
|
|
|
229,534 |
|
|
|
257,968 |
|
|
|
(1,399,936 |
) |
|
|
686,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
2,853,476 |
|
|
$ |
500,188 |
|
|
$ |
257,968 |
|
|
$ |
(2,924,994 |
) |
|
$ |
686,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities Subject to FSP FAS 157-2 Deferral Provisions
We will apply the fair value measurement and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 157 effective
January 1, 2009 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis. We
measure the fair value of (1) long-lived assets and (2) intangible assets on a nonrecurring
basis.
3. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, we have three stock-based compensation plans. Under the Amended and Restated
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (the Amended Plan), the 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan (the 1996 Plan), and the Second Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2002
Plan), we may grant incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, and restricted stock
awards to full-time employees, and nonqualified stock options and restricted awards may be
granted to our consultants and agents. Total shares authorized under each plan are 2 million
shares, 1.5 million shares and 7 million shares, respectively. Although options are still
outstanding under the Amended Plan and the 1996 Plan, these plans are considered expired and no
new grants may be made from them. Under all three plans, the exercise price of each option is
greater than or equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the day prior to the
date of the grant. |
|
|
|
Options granted under the Amended Plan, the 1996 Plan and the 2002 Plan generally vest on an
annual basis over one to three years. Outstanding options under the plans, if not exercised,
generally expire ten years from their date of grant or 90 days from the date of an optionees
separation from employment with us. |
|
|
|
Compensation cost arising from stock-based awards is recognized as expense using the
straight-line method over the vesting period. As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately
$238,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards, which
we expect to recognize over remaining weighted average vesting terms of 0.8 years. For the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, our total stock-based compensation expense was
approximately $46,000 and $33,000, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, our total stock-based compensation expense was approximately $94,000 and $67,000,
respectively. We have not recorded any income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation
in any of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. |
10
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model to value share-based payments. Expected volatilities are based on the
Companys historical volatility, which management believes represents the most accurate basis
for estimating expected volatility under the current circumstances. Neoprobe uses historical
data to estimate forfeiture rates. The expected term of options granted is based on the vesting
period and the contractual life of the options. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant.
A summary of stock option activity under our stock option plans as of June 30, 2008, and changes
during the six-month period then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period |
|
|
5,495,473 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
506,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(17,200 |
) |
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
5,984,273 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
5.4 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
5,138,273 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
4.8 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the status of our restricted stock as of June 30, 2008, and changes during the
six-month period then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
We had no accumulated other comprehensive loss activity during the three-month and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2007. Due to our net operating loss position, there are no income tax
effects on comprehensive loss components for the three-month and six-month periods ended June
30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,018,859 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,044,850 |
) |
Unrealized losses on securities |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,019,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,045,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the periods, adjusted for unvested restricted stock. Diluted earnings (loss)
per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the periods, adjusted for the effects of convertible securities, restricted shares, options and
warrants determined using the treasury stock method, if dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
Outstanding shares |
|
|
69,115,058 |
|
|
|
69,115,058 |
|
|
|
62,739,731 |
|
|
|
62,739,731 |
|
Effect of weighting changes
in outstanding shares |
|
|
(138,485 |
) |
|
|
(138,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,130,949 |
) |
|
|
(1,130,949 |
) |
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
(450,000 |
) |
|
|
(450,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted shares |
|
|
68,526,573 |
|
|
|
68,526,573 |
|
|
|
61,608,782 |
|
|
|
61,608,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
Outstanding shares |
|
|
69,115,058 |
|
|
|
69,115,058 |
|
|
|
62,739,731 |
|
|
|
62,739,731 |
|
Effect of weighting changes
in outstanding shares |
|
|
(759,477 |
) |
|
|
(759,477 |
) |
|
|
(2,104,283 |
) |
|
|
(2,104,283 |
) |
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
(450,000 |
) |
|
|
(450,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted shares |
|
|
67,905,581 |
|
|
|
67,905,581 |
|
|
|
60,635,448 |
|
|
|
60,635,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no difference in basic and diluted loss per share related to the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. The net loss per common share for these periods
excludes the effects of 50,364,050 and 40,055,682 common share equivalents, respectively, since
such inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The excluded shares consist of restricted stock and
common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, or upon the conversion of
convertible debt.
12
6. |
|
Available-for-Sale Securities |
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses,
net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and
are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.
Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined on a
specific identification basis.
A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be
other than temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is
charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. Premiums and
discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related available-for-sale security as
an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Dividend and interest income are
recognized when earned.
Available-for-sale securities are classified as current based on our intent to use them to fund
short-term working capital needs.
We capitalize certain inventory costs associated with our Lymphoseek® product prior
to regulatory approval and product launch, based on managements judgment of probable future
commercial use and net realizable value of the inventory. We could be required to permanently
write down previously capitalized costs related to pre-approval or pre-launch inventory upon a
change in such judgment, due to a denial or delay of approval by regulatory bodies, a delay in
commercialization, or other potential factors. Conversely, our gross margins may be favorably
impacted if some or all of the inventory previously written down becomes available for
commercial use and is used for commercial sale. During the six-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, we capitalized $1,000 and $150,000, respectively, associated with our Lymphoseek
product.
The components of inventory are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Materials and component parts |
|
$ |
377,402 |
|
|
$ |
471,753 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
152,794 |
|
|
|
151,741 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
518,393 |
|
|
|
613,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,048,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,237,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The major classes of intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Wtd |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
8.3 yrs |
|
$ |
3,025,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,547,135 |
|
|
$ |
3,016,783 |
|
|
$ |
1,449,350 |
|
Acquired technology |
|
0.5 yrs |
|
|
237,271 |
|
|
|
220,416 |
|
|
|
237,271 |
|
|
|
203,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,263,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,767,551 |
|
|
$ |
3,254,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,652,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Expense |
For the year ended 12/31/2008 |
|
$ |
212,148 |
|
For the year ended 12/31/2009 |
|
|
170,136 |
|
For the year ended 12/31/2010 |
|
|
169,414 |
|
For the year ended 12/31/2011 |
|
|
168,310 |
|
For the year ended 12/31/2012 |
|
|
168,267 |
|
We warrant our products against defects in design, materials, and workmanship generally for a
period of one year from the date of sale to the end customer, except in cases where the product
has a limited use as designed. Our accrual for warranty expenses is adjusted periodically to
reflect actual experience and is included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheets. Our primary marketing partner, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. (EES), a Johnson & Johnson
company, also reimburses us for a portion of warranty expense incurred based on end customer
sales they make during a given fiscal year. Payments charged against the reserve are disclosed
net of EES estimated reimbursement.
The activity in the warranty reserve account for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Warranty reserve at
beginning of period |
|
$ |
81,513 |
|
|
$ |
67,401 |
|
|
$ |
115,395 |
|
|
$ |
44,858 |
|
Provision for warranty claims and
changes in reserve for warranties |
|
|
23,998 |
|
|
|
39,153 |
|
|
|
9,962 |
|
|
|
71,905 |
|
Payments charged against the
reserve |
|
|
(17,832 |
) |
|
|
(16,378 |
) |
|
|
(37,678 |
) |
|
|
(26,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
87,679 |
|
|
$ |
90,176 |
|
|
$ |
87,679 |
|
|
$ |
90,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, we completed a private placement of four-year convertible promissory notes in
an aggregate principal amount of $8.1 million under a Securities Purchase Agreement with
Biomedical Value Fund, L.P., Biomedical Offshore Value Fund, Ltd. and David C. Bupp, our
President and CEO. Biomedical Value Fund, L.P. and Biomedical Offshore Value Fund, Ltd. are
funds managed by Great Point Partners, LLC (collectively, the Great Point Funds). The notes
originally bore interest at 8% per annum and were due on December 13, 2008. As part of the
original transaction with the Great Point Funds, we issued the investors 10,125,000 Series T
warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.46 per share, expiring in
December 2009. The fair value of the warrants issued to the investors and the value of the
beneficial conversion feature were recorded as discounts on the note and were being amortized
over the term of the notes using the effective interest method. In November 2006, we amended
the Agreement and modified several of the key terms in the related notes, including the interest
rate which was increased to 12% per annum, and modified the maturity of the notes to provide for
a series of scheduled payments due on approximately six month intervals through January 7, 2009.
We were also required to make additional mandatory repayments of principal to the Great Point
Funds under certain circumstances. During 2007, we made scheduled principal payments and
mandatory repayments totaling $2.4 million.
14
In exchange for the increased interest rate and accelerated principal repayment schedule, the
note holders eliminated the financial covenants under the original notes and eliminated certain
conversion price adjustments from the original notes related to sales of equity securities by
Neoprobe. We treated the amendment to the Agreement as a modification for accounting purposes,
and the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs using the effective interest method was
revised accordingly. During the third quarter of 2007, management determined that we had, from
the date of the modification of the notes payable on November 30, 2006, through June 30, 2007,
incorrectly applied the effective interest method in calculating the amortization of the debt
discount and issuance costs related to the notes. As a result of the error in calculation, we
recorded a total adjustment of $286,000 in non-cash interest expense related to the seven months
ended June 30, 2007 in our results of operations for the third quarter of 2007. We determined
that the net effect of this adjustment was not material, either quantitatively or qualitatively,
to our results of operations and would not have resulted in changes to net loss per share, as
reported, for the year ended December 31, 2006 or for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June
30, 2007. Recording the adjustment did not require amendment of the previously filed reports
for the periods affected.
In July 2007, David C. Bupp, our President and CEO, and certain members of his family (the Bupp
Investors) purchased a $1.0 million convertible note (the Bupp Note) and warrants. The note
bears interest at 10% per annum, had an original term of one year and is repayable in whole or
in part with no penalty. The note is convertible, at the option of the investors, into shares
of our common stock at a price of $0.31 per share, a 25% premium to the average closing market
price of our common stock for the 5 days preceding the closing of the transaction. As part of
this transaction, we issued the investors 500,000 Series V warrants to purchase our common stock
at an exercise price of $0.31 per share, expiring in July 2012. The fair value of the warrants
issued to the investors was approximately $80,000 on the date of issuance and was determined
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: an average
risk-free interest rate of 4.95%, volatility of 105% and no expected dividend rate. The value
of the beneficial conversion feature of the note was estimated at $86,000 based on the effective
conversion price at the date of issuance. The fair value of the warrants issued to the
investors and the value of the beneficial conversion feature were recorded as discounts on the
note. We incurred $43,000 of costs related to completing the Bupp financing, which were
recorded in other assets. The discounts and the deferred debt issuance costs were being
amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
In December 2007, we executed a Securities Purchase Agreement (the Montaur Purchase Agreement)
with Platinum Montaur Life Sciences, LLC (Montaur), pursuant to which we issued Montaur: (1) a
10% Series A Convertible Senior Secured Promissory Note in the principal amount of $7,000,000,
due December 26, 2011 (the Series A Note); and (2) 6,000,000 Series W warrants to purchase our
common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share, expiring in December 2012 (the Series W
warrants). Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Montaur Purchase Agreement: (1) upon
commencement of the Phase 3 clinical studies of Lymphoseek, we agreed to issue to Montaur a 10%
Series B Convertible Senior Secured Promissory Note, due December 26, 2011 (the Series B Note,
and hereinafter referred to collectively with the Series A Note as the Montaur Notes), and
five-year warrants to purchase an amount of common stock equal to the number of shares into
which Montaur may convert the Series B Note, at an exercise price of 115% of the conversion
price of the Series B Note (the Series X warrants), for an aggregate purchase price of
$3,000,000; and (2) upon completion of enrollment of 200 patients in the Phase 3 clinical
studies of Lymphoseek, we agreed to issue to Montaur 3,000 shares of our 8% Series A Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock) and five-year warrants to purchase an amount
of common stock equal to the number of shares into which Montaur may convert the Preferred
Stock, at an exercise price of 115% of the conversion price of the Preferred Stock (the Series Y
warrants, and hereinafter referred to collectively with the Series W warrants and Series X
warrants as the Montaur warrants), also for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000.
The Series A Note bears interest at 10% per annum and is partially convertible at the option of
Montaur into common stock at a price of $0.26 per share. Interest is payable monthly, in
arrears, beginning February 2008 until the earlier of the maturity date or the date of
conversion. At our
15
discretion, we may pay the monthly interest payments in cash, common stock, or a combination of
cash and common stock, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Series A Note. According
to the provisions of the Certificate of Designations, Voting Powers, Preferences, Limitations,
Restrictions, and Relative Rights of Series A 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the
Certificate of Designations), Montaur may convert all or any portion of the shares of Preferred
Stock into a number of shares of common stock equal to the quotient of: (1) the Liquidation
Preference Amount of the shares of Preferred Stock by (2) the Conversion Price then in effect
for the Preferred Stock. Per the Certificate of Designations, the Liquidation Preference Amount
is equal to $1,000 per share of Preferred Stock, and the Conversion Price is equal to the lesser
of $0.50 or the closing price of the common stock on the issuance date of the Preferred Stock,
subject to adjustment as described in the Certificate of Designations.
Under the terms of a Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, as amended by the
Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 7, 2008, and Second Amendment to
Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 16, 2008, and Third Amendment to Registration Rights
Agreement dated July 10, 2008 (the Rights Agreement), we agreed to file a registration statement
with the Securities and Exchange Commission providing for the resale of: (i) the shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Note; (ii) the shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of the Series X Warrant; and (iii) 3,500,000 shares of common stock which
the Company may elect to issue in payment of interest on the Montaur Notes, no later that 60
days following the closing, which deadline was subsequently extended to May 5, 2008. (See Note
15.) Additionally, in connection with the Montaur Purchase Agreement, we entered into: (1) a
Security Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, between Neoprobe and Montaur (the Montaur Security
Agreement); and (2) a Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Security Agreement, dated December 26,
2007, by and among Neoprobe, Cardiosonix Ltd., Cira Biosciences, Inc. and Montaur (the IP
Security Agreement), pursuant to which we have granted Montaur a security interest in all of our
property and assets and our subsidiaries to secure our obligations under the Montaur Notes and
all other transaction agreements. The Security Agreement and IP Security Agreement contain
covenants, remedies and other provisions as are customary for agreements of such type.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
the conversion option and two put options were considered derivative instruments and were
required to be bifurcated from the Series A Note and accounted for separately. In addition, in
accordance with SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics
of both Liabilities and Equity, the Series W warrants were accounted for as a liability due to
the existence of certain provisions in the instrument. As a result, we recorded a total
aggregate derivative liability of $2.6 million on the date of issuance of the Series A Note and
Series W warrants. The fair value of the bifurcated conversion option and put options was
approximately $1.45 million on the date of issuance. The fair value of the Series W warrants
was approximately $1.15 million on the date of issuance and was determined using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: an average risk-free
interest rate of 3.7%, volatility of 94% and no expected dividend rate. Changes in the fair
value of the derivative liabilities are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
As of December 31, 2007, the derivative liabilities had estimated fair values of $1.60 million
and $1.25 million for the conversion and put options and the warrants, respectively.
On March 14, 2008, Neoprobe and Montaur executed amendments to the Series A Note and the Series
W warrants. The amendments eliminated certain minor cash-based penalty provisions in the Series
A Note and Series W warrants which entitled the holders to different compensation than our
common shareholders under certain circumstances and qualifying Triggering Events. The
provisions that were eliminated and/or modified were the provisions that led to the derivative
accounting treatment for the embedded conversion option in the Series A Note and the Series W
warrants. Because the value of our stock increased between December 31, 2007, our year end, and
March 14, 2008, the effect of marking the conversion option and warrant liabilities to market
at March 14, 2008 resulted in an increase in the estimated fair value of the conversion option
and warrant liabilities of $381,000 which was recorded as non-cash expense during the first
quarter of 2008. The estimated fair value of the conversion option and warrant liabilities of
$2.9 million was reclassified to additional
16
paid-in capital during the first quarter of 2008 as a result of the amendments. The effect of
marking the put option liabilities related to the Series A Note to market at March 31, 2008
resulted in an increase in the estimated fair value of the put option liabilities of $5,000
which was recorded as non-cash expense during the first quarter of 2008. In addition, the
effect of marking the put option liabilities to market at June 30, 2008 resulted in an
increase in the estimated fair value of the put option liabilities of $75,000 which was recorded
as non-cash expense during the second quarter of 2008. The estimated fair value of the put
option liabilities related to the Series A Note of $390,000 remained classified as derivative
liabilities as of June 30, 2008.
The initial aggregate fair value of the conversion option and the put options related to the
Series A Note and the fair value of the Series W warrants of $2.6 million were recorded as a
discount on the note and are being amortized over the term of the note using the effective
interest method. During the first six months of 2008, we recorded interest expense of $265,000
related to the amortization of the debt discount. We incurred $510,000 of costs related to
completing the initial Montaur financing, which were recorded in other assets on the
consolidated balance sheet. The deferred financing costs are being amortized using the
effective interest method over the term of the note. During the first six months of 2008, we
recorded interest expense of $52,000 related to the amortization of the deferred financing
costs.
In April 2008, we completed the second closing under the December 2007 Montaur Purchase
Agreement, as amended, pursuant to which we issued Montaur a 10% Series B Convertible Senior
Secured Promissory Note in the principal amount of $3,000,000, due December 26, 2011; and
8,333,333 Series X warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.46 per
share, expiring in April 2013. The Series B Note bears interest at 10% per annum and is fully
convertible at the option of Montaur into common stock at a price of $0.36 per share. Interest
is payable monthly, in arrears, beginning in April 2008 until the earlier of the maturity date
or the date of conversion. At our discretion, we may pay the monthly interest payments in cash,
common stock, or a combination of cash and common stock, subject to certain limitations set
forth in the Series B Note.
The fair value of the Series X warrants was approximately $1.28 million on the date of issuance
and was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
an average risk-free interest rate of 2.6%, volatility of 95% and no expected dividend rate.
The value of the beneficial conversion feature of the Series B Note was estimated at $1.44
million based on the effective conversion price at the date of issuance. The fair value of the
warrants issued to the investors and the value of the beneficial conversion feature were
recorded as discounts on the notes and are being amortized over the term of the notes using the
effective interest method. The two put options were considered derivative instruments and were
required to be bifurcated from the Series B Note and accounted for separately. The fair value
of the bifurcated put options was approximately $258,000 on the date of issuance. Changes in
the fair value of the derivative liabilities are recorded in the consolidated statement of
operations. The effect of marking the put option liabilities related to the Series B Note to
market at June 30, 2008 resulted in an increase in the estimated fair value of the put option
liabilities of $38,000 which was recorded as non-cash expense during the second quarter of 2008.
The estimated fair value of the put option liabilities related to the Series B Note of $296,000
remained classified as derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2008.
The initial aggregate fair value of the beneficial conversion feature and put options related to
the Series B Note, and the fair value of the Series X warrants of $2.98 million were recorded as
a discount on the note and are being amortized over the term of the note using the effective
interest method. During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded interest expense of $7,000
related to the amortization of the debt discount. We incurred $188,000 of costs related to
completing the second Montaur financing, which were recorded in other assets on the consolidated
balance sheet. The deferred financing costs are being amortized using the effective interest
method over the term of the note. During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded interest
expense of $400 related to the amortization of the deferred financing costs.
17
In connection with the second closing, we also amended the Montaur Purchase Agreement with
respect to the milestone that would trigger the third closing for an additional $3 million
investment from Montaur. The milestone was revised from the accrual of 200 patients in a Phase
3 trial for Lymphoseek to obtaining 135 vital blue dye lymph nodes from patients with breast cancer or melanoma who have
completed surgery with the injection of the drug in a Phase 3 clinical trial of Lymphoseek.
In connection with the Montaur Purchase Agreement, Montaur requested that the term of the $1.0
million Bupp Note be extended until at least one day following the maturity date of the Montaur
Notes. In consideration for the Bupp Investors agreement to extend the term of the Bupp Note
pursuant to an Amendment to the Bupp Purchase Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, we agreed
to provide security for the obligations evidenced by the Amended 10% Convertible Note in the
principal amount of $1,000,000, due December 31, 2011, executed by Neoprobe in favor of the Bupp
Investors (the Amended Bupp Note), under the terms of a Security Agreement, dated December 26,
2007, by and between Neoprobe and the Bupp Investors (the Bupp Security Agreement). As further
consideration for extending the term of the Bupp Note, we issued the Bupp Investors 500,000
Series V warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share, expiring
in December 2012. The fair value of the warrants issued to the Bupp Investors was approximately
$96,000 on the date of issuance and was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following assumptions: an average risk-free interest rate of 3.72%, volatility of 94%
and no expected dividend rate. The fair value of the warrants was recorded as a discount on the
note and is being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method. We
treated the amendment to the Bupp Note as an extinguishment of debt for accounting purposes. As
such, the remaining discount resulting from the fair value of the warrants and the value of the
beneficial conversion feature and the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs associated
with the original note were written off as a loss on extinguishment of debt in December 2007.
We applied $5,725,000 from the proceeds of our issuance of the Series A Note and Series W
warrants to the complete and total satisfaction of our outstanding obligations under the
Replacement Series A Convertible Promissory Notes issued to the Great Point Funds and David C.
Bupp as of November 30, 2006, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of
December 13, 2004, by and among Neoprobe, the Great Point Funds and Mr. Bupp, as amended by the
Amendment dated as of November 30, 2006 (the Amended GPP Purchase Agreement). We treated the
early repayment of the notes as an extinguishment of debt for accounting purposes. As such, the
remaining discount resulting from the fair value of the warrants and the value of the beneficial
conversion feature associated with the original notes was written off as a loss on
extinguishment of debt in December 2007. We applied an additional $675,000 from the proceeds of
our issuance of the Series A Note and Series W warrants to the redemption of 10,000,000 Series T
warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.46 per share, issued to the
Great Point Funds pursuant to the Amended GPP Purchase Agreement. In connection with the
consummation of the Montaur Purchase Agreement and amendment of the Bupp Purchase Agreement,
Mr. Bupp agreed to the cancellation of 125,000 Series T warrants to purchase our common stock at
an exercise price of $0.46 per share, originally issued to Mr. Bupp pursuant to the Amended GPP
Purchase Agreement. The combined events retired all of the Series T warrants issued to the
Great Point Funds and Mr. Bupp.
During the first six months of 2008, David C. Bupp, our President and CEO, exercised 375,000
Series Q warrants in exchange for issuance of 375,000 shares of our common stock, resulting in
gross proceeds of $48,750. In addition, an outside investor exercised 500,000 Series Q warrants
in exchange for issuance of 500,000 shares of our common stock, resulting in gross proceeds of
$65,000. Also during the first six months of 2008, certain outside investors exercised a total
of 1,354,349 Series R warrants and 253,261 Series S warrants on a cashless basis in exchange for
issuance of 435,107 shares of our common stock.
18
At June 30, 2008, there are 19.8 million warrants outstanding to purchase our common stock. The
warrants are exercisable at prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.50 per share with a weighted average
exercise price of $0.39 per share.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements
in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement model for the financial statement recognition of a tax
position taken, or expected to be taken, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. No adjustment
was made to the beginning retained earnings balance as the ultimate deductibility of all tax
positions is highly certain, although there is uncertainty about the timing of such
deductibility. As a result, no liability for uncertain tax positions was recorded as of June
30, 2008. Should we need to accrue interest or penalties on uncertain tax positions, we would
recognize the interest as interest expense and the penalties as a selling, general and
administrative expense.
13. |
|
Segment and Subsidiary Information |
We report information about our operating segments using the management approach in accordance
with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This
information is based on the way management organizes and reports the segments within the
enterprise for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Our reportable segments
are identified based on differences in products, services and markets served. There were no
inter-segment sales. We own or have rights to intellectual property involving two primary types
of medical device products, including oncology instruments currently used primarily in the
application of sentinel lymph node biopsy, and blood flow measurement devices. We also own or
have rights to intellectual property related to several drug and therapy products.
19
The information in the following table is derived directly from each reportable segments
financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood |
|
Drug and |
|
|
|
|
($ amounts in thousands) |
|
Oncology |
|
Flow |
|
Therapy |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Devices |
|
Devices |
|
Products |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States1 |
|
$ |
2,151 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,154 |
|
International |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses, excluding depreciation
and amortization2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Income (loss) from operations3 |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
(454 |
) |
Other income (expenses)4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets, net of depreciation
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States operations |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
6,996 |
|
Israeli operations (Cardiosonix Ltd.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood |
|
Drug and |
|
|
|
|
($ amounts in thousands) |
|
Oncology |
|
Flow |
|
Therapy |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
Devices |
|
Devices |
|
Products |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States1 |
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
International |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses, excluding depreciation
and amortization2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Income (loss) from operations3 |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
(708 |
) |
Other income (expenses)4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets, net of depreciation
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States operations |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
Israeli operations (Cardiosonix Ltd.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood |
|
Drug and |
|
|
|
|
($ amounts in thousands) |
|
Oncology |
|
Flow |
|
Therapy |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Devices |
|
Devices |
|
Products |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States1 |
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
International |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses, excluding depreciation
and amortization2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Income (loss) from operations3 |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
(771 |
) |
Other income (expenses)4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets, net of depreciation
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States operations |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
6,996 |
|
Israeli operations (Cardiosonix Ltd.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood |
|
Drug and |
|
|
|
|
($ amounts in thousands) |
|
Oncology |
|
Flow |
|
Therapy |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
Devices |
|
Devices |
|
Products |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States1 |
|
$ |
2,890 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
International |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses, excluding depreciation
and amortization2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Income (loss) from operations3 |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,401 |
) |
Other income (expenses)4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
(845 |
) |
Total assets, net of depreciation
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States operations |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
Israeli operations (Cardiosonix Ltd.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
All sales to EES are made in the United States. EES distributes the product
globally through its international affiliates. |
|
2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and
amortization, represent expenses that relate to the general administration of the Company
and as such are not currently allocated to our individual reportable segments. |
|
3 |
|
Income (loss) from operations does not reflect the allocation of selling, general
and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, to the operating
segments. |
|
4 |
|
Amounts consist primarily of interest income and interest expense which are not
currently allocated to our individual reportable segments. |
14. |
|
Supplemental Disclosure for Statements of Cash Flows |
During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we paid interest aggregating $477,000
and $234,000, respectively. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we
transferred $45,000 and $44,000, respectively, of inventory to fixed assets related to the
creation and maintenance of a pool of service loaner equipment. During the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008, we purchased equipment under a capital
lease totaling $20,000. During the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, we issued 114,921 and 107,313 shares of
common stock, respectively, as matching contributions to our 401(k) plan.
21
Under the terms of the original Rights Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, we agreed to file a
registration statement with the Commission registering the shares of common stock underlying the
Notes, the Preferred Stock and the Warrants issued to Montaur pursuant to the Montaur Purchase
Agreement. On April 16, 2008, we entered into the Second Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement
(the Second Amendment), pursuant to which Montaur agreed to limit our registration obligations to
(a) the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Note; (b) the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series W and X Warrants; and (c) 3,500,000 shares of
common stock issuable as interest on the Montaur Notes. On July 10, 2008, we entered into a Third
Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement (the Third Amendment), pursuant to which Montaur agreed
to further limit our registration obligations to: (a) the shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series B Note; (b) the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the
Series X Warrants; and (c) 3,500,000 shares of common stock issuable as interest on the Montaur
Notes. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Rights Agreement, as amended by the Second
Amendment and Third Amendment, we agreed that: (a) within thirty-five (35) days following the Third
Closing Date (as that term is defined in the Montaur Purchase Agreement) we will prepare and file
with the Commission an additional resale registration statement providing for the resale of (in
the following order of priority): (i) the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of
the Preferred Shares; (ii) the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series Y
Warrant; and (iii) shares of common stock issuable as dividends on the Preferred Shares, for an
offering to be made on a continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415, and (b) within thirty-five (35)
days of a receipt by the written request of the Holder therefore, we will prepare and file with the
Commission an additional resale Registration Statement providing for the resale of the shares of
common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Note, and the shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of the Series W Warrant. (See Note 10.)
22
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) provides a safe harbor for
forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of our Company. From time to time, our
representatives and we may make written or verbal forward-looking statements, including statements
contained in this report and other Company filings with the SEC and in our reports to stockholders.
Statements that relate to other than strictly historical facts, such as statements about our plans
and strategies, expectations for future financial performance, new and existing products and
technologies, anticipated clinical and regulatory pathways, and markets for our products are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Generally, the words believe,
expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, will and other similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are and will be based on our
then-current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance, and speak
only as of their dates. Investors are cautioned that such statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated
results due to many factors including, but not limited to, our continuing operating losses,
uncertainty of market acceptance of our products, reliance on third party manufacturers,
accumulated deficit, future capital needs, uncertainty of capital funding, dependence on limited
product line and distribution channels, competition, limited marketing and manufacturing
experience, risks of development of new products, regulatory risks, and other risks detailed in our
most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other SEC filings. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.
The Company
Neoprobe Corporation is a biomedical technology company that provides innovative surgical and
diagnostic products that enhance patient care. We currently market two lines of medical devices;
our neo2000® and neoprobe GDS gamma detection systems and the
Quantix® line
of blood flow measurement devices of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardiosonix Ltd. (Cardiosonix).
In addition to our medical device products, we have two radiopharmaceutical products,
Lymphoseek® and
RIGScan® CR, in the advanced phases of clinical development.
We are also exploring the development of our activated cellular therapy (ACT) technology for
patient-specific disease treatment through our majority-owned subsidiary, Cira Biosciences, Inc.
(Cira Bio).
Product Line Overview
This Overview section contains a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on
current expectations. Actual results may differ materially. Our financial performance is highly
dependent on our ability to continue to generate income and cash flow from our gamma detection
device product line and on our ability to successfully commercialize the blood flow measurement
products of our subsidiary, Cardiosonix. We cannot assure you that we will achieve the volume of
sales anticipated, or if achieved, that the margin on such sales will be adequate to produce
positive operating cash flow.
We believe that the future prospects for Neoprobe continue to improve as we make progress in all of
our key growth areas. We expect revenue from our gamma device line to continue to provide a strong
revenue base during 2008 and to exceed 2007. Sales of our blood flow measurement devices continue
to fall short of our expectations but we believe some recent improvements in the device may provide
an entry into dialysis/vascular access applications. However, we expect blood flow-related revenue
for 2008 to be lower than 2007 levels as we complete our assessment of the dialysis/vascular access
market. Over the past few years, we have also made progress on our oncology drug development
initiatives. Most recently, we initiated patient enrollment in a Phase 3 clinical trial for
Lymphoseek in breast cancer and melanoma. We also continue to be optimistic about the longer-term
potential for our proprietary RIGS® (radioimmunoguided surgery) technology; however,
neither Lymphoseek nor RIGS are anticipated to generate any significant revenue for us during 2008.
23
Our operating expenses during the first six months of 2008 were focused primarily on support of
Lymphoseek product development. In addition, we continued to modestly invest in our gamma
detection device line related to product line expansion and innovation. We expect our drug-related
development expenses to increase significantly over the remainder of 2008 as we continue the multi-center Phase 3
clinical evaluations of Lymphoseek that were initiated during the second quarter of
2008 and support the other development activities related to the
potential marketing registration of Lymphoseek. We expect to continue to incur development
expenses to support our device product lines as well as we work with our marketing partners to
expand our product offerings in the gamma device arena. We expect to continue to limit our
financial support for our blood flow measurement products during the remainder of 2008 as we assess
the dialysis/vascular access opportunity.
Our efforts thus far in 2008 have resulted in the following research and development milestone
achievements:
|
|
|
Obtained clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to commence patient
enrollment in a Phase 3 clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of Lymphoseek in patients
with breast cancer or melanoma. |
|
|
|
|
Submitted a protocol design to FDA for a Phase 3 clinical study to evaluate the efficacy
of Lymphoseek in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. |
|
|
|
|
Completed a $3 million financing from Platinum-Montaur Life Sciences LLC (Montaur). The
closing represents the second tranche received from Montaur, bringing their to-date
investment to $10 million of the total $13 million commitment made in December 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Exercised the Companys option agreement with the University of California, San Diego
covering the potential use of Lymphoseek as an optical or ultrasound agent. |
|
|
|
|
Initiated the formalized scientific advice review process for Lymphoseek in the European
Union (EU). |
|
|
|
|
Completed a Phase 3 clinical trial design for RIGScan CR and held a pre-submission
meeting for a formalized scientific review process with regulatory authorities in the EU. |
|
|
|
|
Commenced patient enrollment in a Phase 3 multi-center clinical trial for Lymphoseek in
patients with breast cancer or melanoma. |
|
|
|
|
Introduced the neoprobe GDS enhanced gamma detection system. |
|
|
|
|
Signed a letter of intent with DRAXIMAGE for the sales and marketing distribution of
Lymphoseek in the EU, Scandinavia, Turkey, India and Canada. |
In April 2008, we received clearance from FDA to commence patient enrollment in the first Phase 3
study, which is being conducted in approximately 200 patients with either breast cancer or
melanoma. The trial design is similar to the successfully conducted Phase 2 study, except that we
will be monitoring the concordance of Lymphoseek uptake in lymph nodes with the uptake of vital
blue dye in the same lymph nodes. We initiated the first of the Phase 3 studies in June 2008. We
plan to have approximately 15 to 20 participating institutions in the trial, which should enable us
to enroll patients at a more rapid rate than we experienced with the Phase 2 study.
In addition, we have provided FDA and the centralized European Medicinal Evaluation Agency (EMEA)
with the full protocol and associated materials for a second Phase 3 study to be conducted in
patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. This second Phase 3 study is designed to
validate Lymphoseek as a sentinel lymph node targeting agent. Our discussions with FDA and EMEA
have also suggested that the Phase 3 trials will support an intended use of Lymphoseek in sentinel
lymph node biopsy procedures. We believe such an indication would be beneficial to the marketing
and commercial adoption of Lymphoseek in the U.S. and EU. Finally, we are harmonizing the second
Phase 3 protocol in head and neck tumors for Lymphoseek based upon input from both FDA and EMEA.
We expect this process to be concluded in the near future. We plan to have approximately 15 to 20
participating institutions in the trial, which we hope will enable us to enroll patients at a
fairly rapid rate. We have commenced some of the preliminary activities to initiate the study
after the appropriate regulatory clearances have been obtained.
24
Our goal is to file the new drug application for Lymphoseek in the first half of 2009, which will
be dependent upon our ability to commence and successfully conclude the Phase 3 clinical studies in
a timely fashion. Depending on the timing and outcome of the FDA regulatory review cycle, we
believe that Lymphoseek can be commercialized in early 2010. In addition, Neoprobe has had
advanced discussions regarding the drug approval and registration process under the centralized
European drug evaluation procedures with EMEA in London. We plan to use the safety and efficacy
results from the Phase 3 clinical evaluations of Lymphoseek, which will include sites in the EU, to
support the drug registration application process in the EU. We cannot assure you, however, that
this product will achieve regulatory approval, or if approved, that it will achieve market
acceptance.
Over the past few years, we have made progress in advancing our RIGScan CR development program
while incurring minimal research expenses. Our RIGS technology, which had been
essentially inactive since failing to gain approval following our original license application in
1997, has been the subject of renewed interest due primarily to the analysis of survival data
related to patients who participated in the original Phase 3 clinical studies that were completed
in 1996. After a successful pre-submission meeting with EMEA in July, we plan during the third
quarter of 2008 to submit a complete clinical development plan for RIGScan CR to EMEA and to
request meetings to review the development plan and clinical protocol. The clinical protocol we
envision would involve approximately 400 patients in a randomized trial of patients with colorectal
cancer. The participants in the trial would be randomized to either a control or RIGS treatment
arm. Patients randomized to the RIGS arm would have their disease status evaluated at the end of
their cancer surgery to determine the presence or absence of RIGS-positive tissue. Patients in
both randomized arms would be followed to determine if patients with RIGS-positive status have a
lower overall survival rate and/or a higher occurrence of disease recurrence. The hypothesis for
the trial is based upon the data from the earlier NEO2-13 and NEO2-14 trial results.
We continue to believe it will be necessary for us to identify a development partner or an
alternative funding source in order to prepare for and fund the pivotal clinical testing that will
be necessary to gain marketing clearance for RIGScan CR. In the past, we have engaged in
discussions with various parties regarding such a partnership. At the present time, we do not
believe these efforts will result in a partnership until further clarity can be added to the
RIGScan regulatory approval pathway, such as obtaining a positive protocol determination from
either EMEA or FDA. However, even if we are able to make such arrangements on satisfactory terms,
we believe that the time required for continued development, regulatory approval and
commercialization of a RIGS product would likely be a minimum of five years before we receive any
significant product-related royalties or revenues. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
complete definitive agreements with a development partner or obtain financing to fund development
of the RIGS technology and do not know if such arrangements could be obtained on a timely basis on
terms acceptable to us, or at all. We also cannot assure you that FDA or EMEA will clear our RIGS
products for marketing or that any such products will be successfully introduced or achieve market
acceptance.
In early 2005, we formed a new subsidiary, Cira Bio, to raise the capital necessary to further
explore the development of ACT. Neoprobe owns approximately 90% of the outstanding shares of Cira
Bio with the remaining shares being held by the principals of a private holding company, Cira LLC.
In conjunction with the formation of Cira Bio, an amended technology license agreement also was
executed with The Ohio State University, from whom both Neoprobe and Cira LLC had originally
licensed or optioned the various cellular therapy technologies. As a result of the cross-license
agreements, Cira Bio has the development and commercialization rights to three issued U.S. patents
that cover the oncology and autoimmune applications of its technology. In addition, Cira Bio has
licenses to several pending patent applications covering oncology and viral disease applications of
the ACT technology.
In August 2007 we entered into an option agreement whereby Neoprobe could purchase the remaining
10% interest in Cira Bio from Cira LLC for $250,000 in connection with the successful completion of
a financing transaction by Cira Bio. In the first quarter of 2008, we also entered into discussions
with an investment banking firm to help us gauge the interest of potential investment in the ACT
technology. We still hope to raise funds through Cira Bio to support the continued development of
ACT; however, our fundraising efforts have thus far not been successful and our option to purchase
the remaining 10%
25
interest in Cira Bio expired on June 30, 2008. If we are successful in identifying a funding
source, we expect that any funding would likely be accomplished by an investment directly into Cira
Bio, so that the funds raised would not dilute current Neoprobe shareholders. Obtaining this
funding would likely dilute Neoprobes ownership interest in Cira Bio; however, we believe that
moving forward such a promising technology will only yield positive results for the Neoprobe
stockholders and the patients who could benefit from these treatments. However, we do not know if
we will be successful in obtaining funding on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In the event we
fail to obtain financing for Cira Bio, the technology rights for the oncology applications of ACT
may revert back to Neoprobe and the technology rights for the viral and autoimmune applications may
revert back to Cira LLC upon notice by either party.
We anticipate generating a net profit from the sale of our gamma detection devices in 2008,
excluding the allocation of any corporate general and administrative costs; however, we expect to
show a loss for our blood flow measurement device product line for 2008 due to ongoing development
and marketing support that is required to expand market acceptance for the product line. However,
we have limited our investment in the blood flow line significantly over the past year and believe,
given some incremental amount of sales success, that we are not far from a breakeven point for the
blood flow line. We will continue to monitor the state of market development and success for our
blood flow measurement business and adjust our business plans accordingly. Our overall operating
results for 2008 will also be greatly affected by the amount of development of our
radiopharmaceutical products. If we are unsuccessful in achieving adequate commercial sales of the
Quantix products in 2008, or if we modify our business plan, our medical device profitability
estimates will be adversely affected and our business plan will likely need to be modified.
Primarily as a result of the significant development costs we expect to incur related to the
continued clinical development of Lymphoseek, we do not expect to achieve operating profit during
2008. In addition, our net loss and loss per share will likely be significantly impacted by the
non-cash interest expense we expect to record due to the accounting treatment for the derivative
liabilities related to the convertible debt we issued in December 2007 and the beneficial
conversion feature and warrants related to the convertible debt we issued in April 2008. We cannot
assure you that our current or potential new products will be successfully commercialized, that we
will achieve significant product revenues, or that we will achieve or be able to sustain
profitability in the future.
Results of Operations
Revenue for the first six months of 2008 increased to $4.0 million from $3.3 million for the same
period in 2007. Research and development expenses, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 36%
during the first six months of 2008 from 53% during the same period in 2007. Selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, remained steady at 44% during the first six
months of 2008 and 2007. Due to the ongoing development activities of the Company, research and
development expenses as a percentage of sales are expected to be higher in 2008 than they were in
2007. In addition, should we be successful in our ongoing commercialization activities related to
the Quantix product line, and in achieving increased sales of our wireless probes in 2008, selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales are expected to decrease in 2008
compared to 2007.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Net Sales and Margins. Net sales, comprised primarily of sales of our gamma detection systems,
increased $738,000, or 49%, to $2.3 million during the second quarter of 2008 from $1.5 million
during the same period in 2007. Gross margins on net sales increased to 60% of net sales for the
second quarter of 2008 compared to 54% of net sales for the same period in 2007.
The increase in net sales was the result of increased gamma detection device sales of $761,000 and
increased gamma detection device extended service contract revenue of $30,000, offset by decreases
of $56,000 in blood flow measurement device sales. Increased unit sales of our control units,
wireless probes and accessories were partially offset by decreased unit sales of corded probes.
The price at which we sell our gamma detection products to EES is based on a percentage of the
global average
26
selling price (ASP) received by EES on sales of Neoprobe products to end customers, subject to a
minimum floor price. Increased unit prices of our control units and corded probes were partially
offset by decreased unit prices of our wireless probes due to a decrease in the percentage of ASP
received by Neoprobe following a period of initial introduction offsetting an overall increase in
ASP for wireless probes.
The increase in gross margins on net product sales was due to a combination of factors including
increased unit sales and prices of gamma detection control units and increased unit sales and
prices of wireless probes offset by a decrease in the percentage of ASP for wireless probes
received by Neoprobe. The price increases we experienced in 2008 were
due in part to the current favorable impact on our sales prices to
EES of the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Gross margins in the second quarters of 2008 and 2007 were also adversely
affected by inventory impairments of $5,000 and $29,000, respectively, related to our Quantix
products.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses increased $23,000, or 3%, to
$899,000 during the second quarter of 2008 from $875,000 during the same period in 2007. Research
and development expenses in the second quarter of 2008 included approximately $561,000 in drug and
therapy product development costs, $286,000 in gamma detection device development costs, and
$52,000 in product design and support activities for the Quantix products. This compares to
expenses of $611,000, $163,000 and $101,000 in these segment categories during the same period in
2007. The changes in each category were primarily due to (i) decreased clinical activities related
to Lymphoseek due to costs of preparation for Phase 3 clinical trials in the second quarter of 2008
being lower than costs of conducting the Phase 2 clinical trials in the second quarter of 2007,
(ii) development of our Model 2300 control units in 2008, and (iii) decreased product refinement
activities related to our Quantix devices as we evaluate the dialysis/vascular access market,
respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $254,000, or 39%, to $904,000 during the second quarter of 2008 from $650,000 during the
same period in 2007. The net difference was due primarily to increases in professional services
and investor relations.
Other Income (Expenses). Other expenses, net increased $138,000 to $565,000 during the second
quarter of 2008 from $427,000 during the same period in 2007. Interest expense, primarily related
to the convertible debt agreements we completed in December 2004, July 2007, December 2007 and
April 2008, increased $25,000 to $470,000 during the second quarter of 2008 from $445,000 for the
same period in 2007. Of this interest expense, $195,000 and $221,000 in the second quarters of
2008 and 2007, respectively, was non-cash in nature related to the amortization of debt issuance
costs and discounts resulting from the warrants, beneficial conversion features and derivative
liabilities related to the convertible debt. In addition, we recorded a $113,000 increase in
derivative liabilities resulting from the accounting treatment for the convertible note agreements
we executed in December 2007 and April 2008.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Net Sales and Margins. Net sales, comprised primarily of sales of our gamma detection systems,
increased $777,000, or 24%, to $4.0 million during the first six months of 2008 from $3.3 million
during the same period in 2007. Gross margins on net sales increased to 61% of net sales for the
first six months of 2008 compared to 54% of net sales for the same period in 2007.
The increase in net sales was the result of increased gamma detection device sales of $840,000 and
increased gamma detection device extended service contract revenue of $58,000, offset by decreases
of $123,000 in blood flow measurement device sales. Increased unit sales of our control units and
wireless probes were partially offset by decreased unit sales of corded probes. Increased unit
prices of our control units and corded probes were partially offset by decreased unit prices of our
wireless probes due to a decrease in the percentage of ASP received by Neoprobe offsetting an
overall increase in ASP for wireless probes.
The increase in gross margins on net product sales was due to a combination of factors including
increased unit sales and prices of gamma detection control units and increased unit sales and
prices of wireless probes offset by a decrease in the percentage of ASP for wireless probes
received by Neoprobe. The price increases we experienced in 2008 were
due in part to the current favorable impact on our sales prices to
EES of the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange rate.
27
Gross margins in the first six months of 2008 and 2007 were also adversely affected by inventory
impairments of $5,000 and $46,000, respectively, related to our Quantix products.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased $277,000, or 16%,
to $1.5 million during the first six months of 2008 from $1.7 million during the same period in
2007. Research and development expenses in the first six months of 2008 included approximately
$892,000 in drug and therapy product development costs, $451,000 in gamma detection device
development costs, and $119,000 in product design and support activities for the Quantix products.
This compares to expenses of $1.2 million, $377,000 and $207,000 in these segment categories during
the same period in 2007. The changes in each category were primarily due to (i) decreased clinical
activities related to Lymphoseek due to costs of preparation for Phase 3 clinical trials in the
first six months of 2008 being lower than costs of conducting the Phase 2 clinical trials in the
first six months of 2007, as well as decreased activities related to RIGScan CR, (ii) development
of our wireless gamma detection probes being substantially complete in 2007, and (iii) decreased
product refinement activities related to our Quantix devices as we evaluate the dialysis/vascular
access market, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $346,000, or 24%, to $1.8 million during the first six months of 2008 from $1.4 million
during the same period in 2007. The net difference was due primarily to increases in professional
services and investor relations.
Other Income (Expenses). Other expenses, net increased $429,000 to $1.3 million during the first
six months of 2008 from $845,000 during the same period in 2007. Interest expense, primarily
related to the convertible debt agreements we completed in December 2004, July 2007, December 2007
and April 2008, decreased $85,000 to $802,000 during the first six months of 2008 from $887,000 for
the same period in 2007. Of this interest expense, $334,000 and $431,000 in the first six months
of 2008 and 2007, respectively, was non-cash in nature related to the amortization of debt issuance
costs and discounts resulting from the warrants, beneficial conversion features and derivative
liabilities related to the convertible debt. In addition, we recorded a $500,000 increase in
derivative liabilities resulting from the accounting treatment for the convertible note agreement
we executed in December 2007 and April 2008 and the related warrants to purchase our common stock,
which contained certain provisions that resulted in their being treated as derivative instruments.
We recorded a decrease of $15,000 in interest income related to lower interest rates partially
offset by higher balances of cash and investments during the first six months of 2008 compared to
the same period in 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash balances including short term available-for-sale securities increased to $3.7 million at June
30, 2008 from $1.5 million at December 31, 2007. The net increase resulted from proceeds from new
convertible notes issued in April 2008, offset by cash used to service our debt and to fund our
operations. The current ratio increased to 3.5:1 at June 30, 2008 from 2.1:1 at December 31, 2007.
The increase in the current ratio was primarily due to the receipt of cash from the notes issued
in April 2008.
Operating Activities. Cash used in operations decreased $325,000 to $613,000 during the first six
months of 2008 compared to $938,000 during the same period in 2007.
Accounts receivable decreased to $1.1 million at June 30, 2008 from $1.6 million at December 31,
2007. The decrease was primarily a result of normal fluctuations in timing of purchases and
payments by EES, including a return to normal levels of extended warranty contract sales after a
pronounced increase in such sales during the fourth quarter of 2007. We expect overall receivable
levels will continue to fluctuate during 2007 depending on the timing of purchases and payments by
EES.
Inventory levels decreased to $1.0 million at June 30, 2008 as compared to $1.2 million at December
31, 2007. Gamma detection device materials and finished device inventory decreased as materials
were converted into finished devices and sold. Blood flow measurement finished device inventories
also decreased as a result of sales. During the first six months of 2007, we also recorded
inventory impairment charges totaling $8,000, primarily related to our Quantix products. We expect inventory
levels to remain relatively steady during 2008.
28
Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities increased $212,000 to $250,000 during the
first six months of 2008 compared to $38,000 during the same period in 2007. We purchased $196,000
of available-for-sale securities during the first six months of 2008. Capital expenditures during
the first six months of 2008 were primarily for laboratory equipment, computers and software.
Capital expenditures during the first six months of 2007 were primarily for production tools and
equipment and software. We expect our overall capital expenditures for the remainder of 2008 will
be approximately the same as 2007.
Financing Activities. Financing activities provided $2.8 million during the first six months of
2008 versus $320,000 used during the first six months of 2007. Proceeds from notes payable were
$3.0 million during the first six months of 2008. Payments of debt issuance costs were $200,000
during the first six months of 2008. Proceeds from the issuance of common stock were $114,000 and
$650,000 during the first six months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Payments of common stock
offering costs were $20,000 during the first quarter of 2007. Payments of notes payable were
$107,000 and $942,000 during the first six months of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In December 2004, we completed a private placement of four-year convertible promissory notes in an
aggregate principal amount of $8.1 million under a Securities Purchase Agreement with Biomedical
Value Fund, L.P., Biomedical Offshore Value Fund, Ltd. and David C. Bupp, our President and CEO.
Biomedical Value Fund, L.P. and Biomedical Offshore Value Fund, Ltd. are funds managed by Great
Point Partners, LLC (collectively, the Great Point Funds). The notes originally bore interest at
8% per annum and were due on December 13, 2008. As part of the original transaction, we issued the
investors 10,125,000 Series T warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.46
per share, expiring in December 2009. In connection with this financing, we also issued 1,600,000
Series U warrants to purchase our common stock to the placement agents, containing substantially
the same terms as the warrants issued to the investors.
In November 2006, we amended the Securities Purchase Agreements with the Great Point Funds and Mr.
Bupp and modified several of the key terms in the related notes. The modified notes bore interest
at 12% per annum, payable quarterly. The maturity of the notes was modified as follows: $500,000
due January 8, 2007; $1,250,000 due July 9, 2007; $1,750,000 due January 7, 2008; $2,000,000 due
July 7, 2008 and the remaining $2,600,000 due January 7, 2009. We were also required to make
mandatory repayments of principal to the Great Point Funds under certain circumstances such as
asset dispositions, partnering transactions and sales of equity. During 2007, we made $625,000 of
such mandatory repayments that were applied against future scheduled principal payments. In
exchange for the increased interest rate and accelerated principal repayment schedule, the note
holders eliminated the financial covenants under the original notes and eliminated certain
conversion price adjustments from the original notes related to sales of equity securities by
Neoprobe. In addition, Neoprobe was allowed to make optional prepayments to the Great Point Funds
by giving them 10 business days notice during which time the note holders could decide to convert
the notes into our common stock. The new notes remained freely convertible into shares of our
common stock at a price of $0.40 per share. We could force conversion of the notes prior to their
stated maturity under certain circumstances. The convertible promissory note issued to Mr. Bupp in
connection with this transaction had an outstanding principal amount of $0 on June 30, 2008 as a
result of being refinanced on December 26, 2007. We made interest payments due under the note to
Mr. Bupp totaling $11,868 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
We applied $5,725,000 from the proceeds of our issuance of a Series A Convertible Senior Secured
Promissory Note and Series W warrants pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December
26, 2007, between the Company and Platinum-Montaur Life Sciences, LLC (Montaur), as described
below, to the complete repayment of our outstanding obligations under the Replacement Series A
Convertible Promissory Notes issued to the Great Point Funds and Mr. Bupp. We applied an
additional $675,000 from the proceeds of our issuance of the Series A Note and Series W warrants to
Montaur to the redemption of 10,000,000 Series T warrants to purchase our common stock at an
exercise price of
29
$0.46 per share, issued to the Great Point Funds. In connection with the consummation of the
Securities Purchase Agreement with Montaur and the Security Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, by
and between Neoprobe and Mr. Bupp and certain members of his family, as described below, Mr. Bupp
agreed to the cancellation of 125,000 Series T warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise
price of $0.46 per share, without additional consideration to Mr. Bupp other than that discussed
below. The combined events retired all of the Series T warrants issued to the Great Point Funds
and Mr. Bupp.
In December 2006, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital Fund II,
LLC (Fusion). We authorized up to 12,000,000 shares of our common stock for sale to Fusion under
the agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, in December 2006, we issued 720,000 shares of our
common stock as an initial commitment fee. We are also required to issue to Fusion up to an
additional 720,000 shares of our common stock as an additional commitment fee in connection with
future purchases made by Fusion. The additional 720,000 shares will be issued pro rata as we sell
our common stock to Fusion under the agreement, resulting in a total commitment fee of 1,440,000
shares of our common stock if the entire $6.0 million in value of stock is sold. The price of
shares sold to Fusion will generally be based on market prices for purchases that are not subject
to the floor price of $0.20 per share. We filed a registration statement covering sales to Fusion
and shares issued as additional commitment fees under the agreement, which became effective on
December 28, 2006. We have not sold any shares under the agreement during 2008 to date. During
2007, we sold a total of 7,360,338 shares of our common stock under the agreement, realized gross
proceeds of $1.9 million from such sales, and issued 228,000 shares of our common stock to Fusion
as additional commitment fees related to such sales. All of such sales and issuances were made
pursuant to the registration statement.
In July 2007, Mr. Bupp and certain members of his family (the Bupp Investors) purchased a $1.0
million convertible note (the Bupp Note) and warrants. The note bears interest at 10% per annum,
had an original term of one year and is repayable in whole or in part with no penalty. The note is
convertible into shares of our common stock at a price of $0.31 per share, a 25% premium to the
average closing market price of our common stock for the 5 days preceding the closing of the
transaction. As part of this transaction, we issued the Bupp Investors 500,000 Series V warrants
to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.31 per share, expiring in July 2012.
In connection with the consummation of the Securities Purchase Agreement with Montaur discussed
below, the term of the Bupp Note was extended to December 27, 2011 (one day following the maturity
date of the Series A and Series B Convertible Senior Secured Promissory Notes issued to Montaur).
In consideration for the Bupp Investors agreement to extend the term of the Bupp Note pursuant to
an Amendment to the Bupp Purchase Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, we agreed to provide security
for the obligations evidenced by the Amended 10% Convertible Note in the principal amount of
$1,000,000, due December 27, 2011, executed by Neoprobe in favor of the Bupp Investors (the Amended
Bupp Note), under the terms of a Security Agreement, dated December 26, 2007, by and between
Neoprobe and the Bupp Investors (the Bupp Security Agreement). This security interest is
subordinate to the security interest of Montaur. As further consideration for extending the term
of the Bupp Note, we issued the Bupp Investors an additional 500,000 Series V warrants to purchase
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share, expiring in December 2012. The Amended
Bupp Note had an outstanding principal amount of $1.0 million on June 30, 2008, and an outstanding
principal amount of $1.0 million as of August 8, 2008.
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement with Montaur, we issued Montaur a 10% Series A
Convertible Senior Secured Promissory Note in the principal amount of $7,000,000, due December 26,
2011 (the Series A Note) and a five-year Series W warrant to purchase 6,000,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share. In April 2008, upon clearance by FDA to
commence patient enrollment in the first of the Phase 3 clinical studies of Lymphoseek, we issued
Montaur a 10% Series B Convertible Senior Secured Promissory Note, due December 26, 2011 (the
Series B Note), and a five-year Series X warrant to purchase 8,333,333 shares of our common stock
at an exercise price of $0.46 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000.
Additionally, upon completion of enrollment of 200 patients in the Phase 3 clinical studies of
Lymphoseek, we will issue to Montaur 3,000 shares of our 8% Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock) and a five-year Series Y
30
warrant to purchase an amount of our common stock equal to the number of shares into which Montaur
may convert the Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of 115% of the conversion price of the
Preferred Stock, also for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000.
The Series A Note bears interest at a rate per annum equal to 10%, and Montaur may convert $3.5
million of the Series A Note into shares of our common stock at a price of $0.26 per share. The
Series B Note also bears interest at a rate per annum equal to 10%, and is fully convertible at the
option of Montaur into our common stock at a price of $0.36 per share. Pursuant to the provisions
of the Certificate of Designations, Voting Powers, Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions, and
Relative Rights of Series A 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the Certificate of
Designations), following issuance of the Preferred Stock Montaur may convert all or any portion of
the shares of Preferred Stock into a number of shares of common stock equal to the quotient of: (1)
the Liquidation Preference Amount of the shares of Preferred Stock by (2) the Conversion Price then
in effect for the Preferred Stock. Per the Certificate of Designations, the Liquidation
Preference Amount is equal to $1,000 per share of Preferred Stock, and the Conversion Price is
equal to the lesser of $0.50 and the closing price of the our common stock on the issuance date of
the Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment as described in the Certificate of Designations.
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including our
ability to expand market acceptance of our current products, our ability to complete the
commercialization of new products, our ability to monetize our investment in non-core technologies,
our ability to obtain milestone or development funds from potential development and distribution
partners, regulatory actions by FDA and international regulatory bodies, and intellectual property
protection. Our most significant near-term development priority is to complete patient enrollment
in the Phase 3 clinical trials for Lymphoseek. We believe our currently available capital
resources will be adequate to sustain our operations at planned levels for the foreseeable future.
The financing agreement with Montaur gives us access to an additional $3.0 million. In addition,
we may raise additional funds through our stock purchase agreement with Fusion to supplement our
capital needs until we are able to generate positive cash flow from Lymphoseek. However, the
extent to which we rely on Fusion as a source of funding will depend on a number of factors,
including the prevailing market price of our common stock and the extent to which we are able to
secure working capital from other sources. Specifically, Fusion does not have the right or the
obligation to purchase any shares of our common stock on any business day that the market price of
our common stock is less than $0.20 per share. Further, although we have successfully raised
capital in the past through our agreement with Fusion, under the terms of the Montaur financing we
are prohibited from accessing the Fusion line until certain conditions are satisfied. We cannot
assure you that we will be successful in raising additional capital through Fusion or any other
sources at terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. We also cannot assure you that we will be
able to successfully commercialize products, that we will achieve significant product revenues from
our current or potential new products or that we will achieve or sustain profitability in the
future.
Recent Accounting Developments
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under
other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having
previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement
attribute. Accordingly, SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No.
157 was initially effective for Neoprobe beginning January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB
approved the issuance of FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2. FSP FAS 157-2 allows entities to
electively defer the effective date of SFAS No. 157 until January 1, 2009 for nonfinancial assets
and nonfinancial liabilities except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on at least
an annual basis. We will apply the fair value measurement and disclosure provisions of SFAS No.
157 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2009. The application of such is
not expected to be material to our consolidated
results of operations or financial condition. See Note 1(b) and Note 2 for a discussion regarding
the January 1, 2008 implementation of SFAS No. 157 relating to our financial assets and
liabilities.
31
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No.
159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value at specified election dates. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 apply only to
entities that elect the fair value option. However, the amendment to FASB Statement No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities with
available-for-sale and trading securities. The fair value option established by SFAS No. 159
permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates.
A business entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may
be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted
for by the equity method, is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs), and is applied only
to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted SFAS No. 159 as required on January 1, 2008;
however, we did not elect to measure any of our currently outstanding financial instruments using
the fair value option outlined in SFAS No. 159. As such, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have
any impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements of the original pronouncement
requiring that the acquisition method (formerly called the purchase method) of accounting be used
for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses
in the business combination, establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer
achieves control and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets and liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest at their fair values as of the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141(R) requires,
among other things, that the acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the
acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and is required to be adopted by Neoprobe beginning January 1, 2009. The
effect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on us will depend on the nature and size of
acquisitions we complete after we adopt SFAS No. 141(R), if any.
Also in December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an Amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 amends ARB No. 51
to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also amends certain of ARB No. 51s consolidation
procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS
No. 160 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and is required to be adopted by Neoprobe beginning January 1, 2009.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of
the fiscal year in which it is adopted, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements.
The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods
presented. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on EITF Issue 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements. EITF 07-1 focuses on defining a collaborative
arrangement as well as the accounting for transactions between participants in a collaborative
arrangement and between the participants in the arrangement and third parties. The EITF concluded
that both types of transactions should be reported in each participants respective income
statement. EITF 07-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied
retrospectively to all prior periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of
the effective date. We do not expect EITF 07-1 to have a material effect on our consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
32
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 to provide a better understanding of how
and why and entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for, and their effect on an entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The following accounting policies are considered by us to be critical to our results of operations
and financial condition.
Revenue Recognition Related to Net Sales. We currently generate revenue primarily from sales of
our gamma detection products; however, sales of blood flow measurement products constituted
approximately 3% of total revenues for the first six months of 2008. Our standard shipping terms
are FOB shipping point, and title and risk of loss passes to the customer upon delivery to a common
carrier. We generally recognize sales revenue related to sales of our products when the products
are shipped and the earnings process has been completed. However, in cases where product is
shipped but the earnings process is not yet completed, revenue is deferred until it has been
determined that the earnings process has been completed. Our customers have no right to return
products purchased in the ordinary course of business.
The prices we charge our primary customer, EES, related to sales of products are subject to
retroactive annual adjustment based on a fixed percentage of the actual sales prices achieved by
EES on sales to end customers made during each fiscal year. To the extent that we can reasonably
estimate the end-customer prices received by EES, we record sales to EES based upon these
estimates. If we are unable to reasonably estimate end customer sales prices related to certain
products sold to EES, we record revenue related to these product sales at the minimum (i.e., floor)
price provided for under our distribution agreement with EES.
We also generate revenue from the service and repair of out-of-warranty products. Fees charged for
service and repair on products not covered by an extended service agreement are recognized on
completion of the service process when the serviced or repaired product has been returned to the
customer. Fees charged for service or repair of products covered by an extended warranty agreement
are deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the extended service agreement.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. We base these estimates and assumptions upon historical experience and
existing, known circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Specifically,
management may make significant estimates in the following areas:
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation. We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based
on their estimated fair values. Compensation cost arising from stock-based awards is
recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period. We use the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to value share-based payments. The valuation
assumptions used have not changed from those used under SFAS No. 123. |
33
|
|
|
Inventory Valuation. We value our inventory at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
method) or market. Our valuation reflects our estimates of excess, slow moving and
obsolete inventory as well as inventory with a carrying value in excess of its net
realizable value. Write-offs are recorded when product is removed from saleable inventory.
We review inventory on hand at least quarterly and record provisions for excess and
obsolete inventory based on several factors, including current assessment of future product
demand, anticipated release of new products into the market, historical experience and
product expiration. Our industry is characterized by rapid product development and
frequent new product introductions. Uncertain timing of product approvals, variability in
product launch strategies, product recalls and variation in product utilization all impact
the estimates related to excess and obsolete inventory. |
|
|
|
|
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We account for long-lived assets in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets. This Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The
recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying
amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of
the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell. As of June 30, 2008, the most significant long-lived assets
on our balance sheet relate to assets recorded in connection with the acquisition of
Cardiosonix. The recoverability of these assets is based on the financial projections and
models related to the future sales success of Cardiosonix products. As such, these assets
could be subject to significant adjustment should the Cardiosonix technology not be
successfully commercialized or the sales amounts in our current projections not be
realized. |
|
|
|
|
Product Warranty. We warrant our products against defects in design, materials, and
workmanship generally for a period of one year from the date of sale to the end customer.
Our accrual for warranty expenses is adjusted periodically to reflect actual experience.
EES also reimburses us for a portion of warranty expense incurred based on end customer
sales they make during a given fiscal year. |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities. We account for derivatives in accordance with
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which provides
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative
instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. Derivative
instruments embedded in contracts, to the extent not already a free-standing contract, are
required to be bifurcated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately. All
derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. In accordance
with SFAS No. 133, the conversion option and two put options embedded in the Series A Note
issued in December 2007 were considered derivative instruments and were required to be
bifurcated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately. In addition, in
accordance with SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, the Series W warrants issued in connection
with the Series A Note were accounted for as a liability due to the existence of certain
provisions in the instrument. As a result, we recorded a total aggregate derivative
liability of $2.6 million on the date of issuance of the note. The fair value of the
Series W warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Changes in
the fair value of the derivative liabilities are recorded in the consolidated statement of
operations. As of December 31, 2007, the derivative liabilities had a fair value of $1.60
million and $1.25 million for the conversion and put options and the warrants,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
On March 14, 2008, Neoprobe and Montaur executed amendments to the Series A Note and the
Series W warrants. The amendments eliminated certain minor cash-based penalty provisions in
the Series A Note and Series W warrants which entitled the holders to different compensation
than our common shareholders under certain circumstances and qualifying Triggering Events. |
34
|
|
|
The provisions that were eliminated and/or modified were the provisions that led to the
derivative accounting treatment for the embedded conversion option in the Series A Note and
the Series W warrants. Because the value of our stock increased between December 31, 2007,
our year end, and March 14, 2008, the effect of marking the conversion option and warrant
liabilities to market at March 14, 2008 resulted in an increase in the estimated fair
value of the conversion option and warrant liabilities of $381,000 which was recorded as
non-cash expense during the first quarter of 2008. The estimated fair value of the
conversion option and warrant liabilities of $2.9 million was reclassified to additional
paid-in capital during the first quarter of 2008. The effect of marking the put option
liabilities related to the Series A Note to market at March 31, 2008 resulted in an
increase in the estimated fair value of the put option liabilities of $5,000 which was
recorded as non-cash expense during the first quarter of 2008. In addition, the effect of
marking the put option liabilities to market at June 30, 2008 resulted in an increase in
the estimated fair value of the put option liabilities of $75,000 which was recorded as
non-cash expense during the second quarter of 2008. The estimated fair value of the put
option liabilities related to the Series A Note of $390,000 remained classified as
derivative liabilities as of
June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The two put options embedded in the Series B Note issued in April 2008 were also considered
derivative instruments and were required to be bifurcated from the debt instrument and
accounted for separately. The fair value of the bifurcated put options was approximately
$258,000 on the date of issuance. Changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilities
are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. The effect of marking the put
option liabilities related to the Series B Note to market at June 30, 2008 resulted in an
increase in the estimated fair value of the put option liabilities of $38,000 which was
recorded as non-cash expense during the second quarter of 2008. The estimated fair value of
the put option liabilities related to the Series B Note of $296,000 remained classified as
derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2008. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the specified time periods. As a part of
these controls, our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorization of management and directors of the Company; and |
35
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements. |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2008. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that (i) information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) the information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and
forms. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and
procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving those objectives and were
effective at that reasonable assurance level.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect
that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all improper conduct. A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute assurance that the objectives of the control systems are met. Further, a design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefit of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of improper conduct, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments and decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur
because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the
control. Further, the design of any system of controls is also based in part upon assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed
in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations of a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
Changes in Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) |
|
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, certain placement agents who received
warrants to purchase our common stock in connection with a November 2003 financing exercised a
total of 253,261 warrants on a cashless basis in exchange for issuance of 164,237 shares of
our common stock. The issuances of the shares and warrants to the placement agents were
exempt from registration under Sections 4(2) and 4(6) of the Securities Act and Regulation D. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) |
|
Neoprobe Corporation held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 26, 2008, to elect three
directors and to increase the number of shares of common stock issuable under the Amended and
Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
(b) |
|
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Carl J. Aschinger, Jr., Owen E. Johnson, M.D. and Fred
B. Miller were elected. The terms of office as director continued after the meeting for
Reuven Avital, Kirby I. Bland, M.D., David C. Bupp and J. Frank Whitley, Jr. |
|
(c) |
|
The following table shows the voting tabulation for the election of directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTION |
|
FOR |
|
WITHHELD |
Election of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl J. Aschinger, Jr. |
|
|
60,505,229 |
|
|
|
264,922 |
|
Owen E. Johnson, M.D. |
|
|
60,199,213 |
|
|
|
570,938 |
|
Fred B. Miller |
|
|
59,652,351 |
|
|
|
1,117,800 |
|
(d) |
|
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan was amended to increase
the number of shares of common stock issuable under the plan from 5,000,000 to 7,000,000
shares. |
|
(e) |
|
The following table shows the voting tabulation for the amendment of the 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTION |
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
Amend the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
11,032,043 |
|
|
|
3,360,215 |
|
|
|
419,515 |
|
37
Item 6. Exhibits
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.* |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.* |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.* |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.* |
Items 1, 3 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted. There are no material changes in Item
1A from the corresponding item reported in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, and has therefore been omitted.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEOPROBE CORPORATION
(the Company)
Dated: August 14, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ David C. Bupp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Bupp |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(duly authorized officer; principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Brent L. Larson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent L. Larson |
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
38