The Fairchild Corporation Form 8-K/A Restatement
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K/A
Current
Report Pursuant to
Section
13 Or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
January
5, 2007
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
Commission
File Number 1-6560
THE
FAIRCHILD CORPORATION
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
of
incorporation or organization)
34-0728587
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
1750
Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1400, McLean, VA 22102
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(703)
478-5800
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)
AMENDMENT:
The
purpose of this amendment is to announce the following: our fiscal years ended
September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005 requires a restatement; to
specifically state when and who determined that we will restate our quarterly
financial statements contained in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006; and to enhance disclosure of the item deemed to
be
material for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS:
Certain
statements in this filing contain "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect
to
our financial condition, results of operation and business. These statements
relate to analyses and other information, which are based on forecasts of future
results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements also
relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies. These
forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases
such
as ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘intend,’’
‘‘may,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘predict,’’ ‘‘project,’’ ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and
phrases, including references to assumptions. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, including current trend information,
projections for deliveries, backlog and other trend estimates that may cause
our
actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different
from those suggested or described in this financial discussion and analysis
by
management. These risks include: our ability to finance and successfully operate
our retail businesses; our ability to accurately predict demand for our
products; our ability to receive timely deliveries from vendors; our ability
to
raise cash to meet seasonal demands; our dependence on the retail and aerospace
industries; our ability to maintain customer satisfaction and deliver products
of quality; our ability to properly assess our competition; our ability to
improve our operations to profitability status; our ability to liquidate
non-core assets to meet cash needs; our ability to attract and retain highly
qualified executive management; our ability to achieve and execute internal
business plans; weather conditions in Europe during peak business season and
on
weekends; labor disputes; competition; worldwide political instability and
economic growth; military conflicts, including terrorist activities; infectious
diseases; and the impact of any economic downturns and inflation.
If
one or
more of these and other risks or uncertainties materializes, or if underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those
expected, estimated or projected. Given these uncertainties, users of the
information included in this report, including investors and prospective
investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. We do not intend to update the forward-looking statements included
in this filing, even if new information, future events or other circumstances
have made them incorrect or misleading.
ITEM
4.02(a). Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or a related
Audit Report or Completed Interim Review
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2006
On
January 5, 2007, after consultation with our independent registered public
accounting firm, KPMG LLP, authorized officers of the Company determined that
we
will restate our quarterly financial statements contained in our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, to adjust our deferred
income taxes for the conversion of our subsidiary, PoloExpress, from a German
partnership to a German corporation. As a result, the previously issued
unaudited quarterly financial statements included in our Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006, should no longer be relied upon.
We
intend
to restate our financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, to
provide for deferred taxes of approximately $5.6 million that resulted from
the
conversion of our subsidiary into a German corporation. The restatement relates
to a non-cash adjustment from the conversion of PoloExpress into a German
corporation, in which we gave up the right to a €11.0 million step-up in the tax
basis of PoloExpress. The conversion of PoloExpress into a German corporation
was part of an overall tax planning strategy, in which PoloExpress and Hein
Gericke Deutschland will file a consolidated tax return in Germany to reduce
or
eliminate the trade tax liability at PoloExpress, with the opportunity of
utilizing approximately
€15 million of cumulative losses of Hein
Gericke Deutschland
that
existed at September 30, 2005, to offset against the fiscal 2006 and future
earnings of the consolidated entity.
We do
not believe this restatement will have a negative impact on our cash flows
or
financial condition.
Fiscal
Years Ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005
On
January 15, 2007, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, after
consultation with our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP,
determined that we will restate our September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005
annual financial statements previously contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. We intend to restate
our
financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2004, to increase our
net
deferred tax liabilities by approximately $5 million. The increase is related
to
the purchase accounting for our acquisition of Hein Gericke and PoloExpress
that
occurred in fiscal 2004, a change in tax law in Germany that occurred shortly
after our acquisition impacting our ability to recover a portion of our deferred
tax assets, and the utilization of previously unrecorded deferred tax assets
to
reduce taxable income in 2004. We are currently evaluating whether the increase
in the net deferred tax liability will be corrected through recognizing
additional tax expense, goodwill, or a combination of both. As a result, the
previously issued and audited financial statements included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the years ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005,
should no longer be relied upon.
2004
Change in Tax Law in Germany
- On
November 1, 2003, Fairchild purchased Hein Gericke and PoloExpress. As a result
of this purchase deferred tax assets and liabilities were established for
book/tax basis differences. Initially, the deferred tax assets were deemed
more
likely than not to be recoverable as they would either be recoverable in the
period in which they reverse, or would generate additional net operating loss
carryforwards which would be recoverable through reversal of the deferred tax
liabilities. This was true under the German net operating loss carryforward
rules in effect on the acquisition date, which had no limitation on the amount
or life to be utilized in any given year and, therefore, the deferred tax assets
could be recovered when the deferred tax liability related to indefinite lived
intangibles reversed. However, in December 2003 the German government enacted
a
change in the tax law, effective on January 1, 2004, imposing a limitation
of
60% for net operating loss carryforwards exceeding €1.0 million per year. Due to
the effect of the change in tax law, the Company should have established a
valuation allowance against a portion of the deferred tax assets recorded at
that date, and recognized a corresponding tax expense. The Company is finalizing
its analysis of the impact of this change in tax law. We do not believe
this
restatement will have a significant negative impact on our cash flows or
financial condition.
Purchase
Accounting Matters for 2004 Deferred Taxes - In
fiscal
2004, we acquired Hein Gericke and all but 7.5% of the interest owned by Mr.
Klaus Esser in PoloExpress. Mr. Esser retained a 7.5% ownership interest in
PoloExpress, but we have the right to call this interest at any time from March
2007 to October 2008, for a fixed purchase price of €12.3 million ($15.6 million
at September 30, 2006). Mr. Esser has the right to put such interest to us
at
any time during April 2008 for €12.0 million ($15.2 million at September 30,
2006). On January 2, 2004, we used available cash to pay Mr. Esser $18.8 million
(€15.0 million) and provided collateral of $15.0 million (€12.0 million) to a
German bank to issue a guarantee to Mr. Esser to secure the price for the put
Mr. Esser has a right to exercise in April 2008. Based on this transaction,
deferred tax assets and liabilities were established for PoloExpress trade
tax
due to the fact that these assets would be recoverable through taxable income
of
PoloExpress in the future. However, the deferred tax assets and liabilities
were
not recorded for German federal income tax and Hein Gericke Deutschland trade
tax, as it was assumed that the deferred tax assets and liabilities would offset
each other and any remaining deferred tax asset would be subject to a valuation
allowance. In addition, in 2004 Hein Gericke Deutschland and PoloExpress
utilized deferred tax assets with a full valuation allowance to offset taxable
income. The Company is finalizing its analysis of the impact of the previously
unrecorded deferred tax assets and liabilities. We do not believe this
restatement will have a significant negative impact on our cash flows or
financial condition.
2005
Adjustment for Deferred Taxes
- The
adjustments noted above for PoloExpress and Hein Gericke will also impact the
previously recorded deferred income taxes and related valuation allowance as
of
September 30, 2005. The Company is finalizing its analysis of the impact on
fiscal year 2005. We do not believe this
restatement will have a significant negative impact on our cash flows or
financial condition.
Effect
of the Adjustments on our Cash Flow and Financial
Condition
The
restatement for the third quarter ended June 30, 2006, should not have a
negative impact on our cash flows because the Company is establishing a deferred
tax liability for $5.6 million associated with the €11.0 million change in the
step-up in basis for book-to-tax differences. However, the deferred tax
liability would only have a negative cash flow impact if the Company ever sells
the assets of PoloExpress for a tax gain. The Company implemented a tax planning
strategy, in which PoloExpress and Hein Gericke Deutschland will file a
consolidated tax return in Germany to reduce or eliminate the trade tax
liability at PoloExpress, with the opportunity of utilizing approximately
€15 million of cumulative losses of Hein
Gericke Deutschland
that
existed at September 30, 2005, to offset against the fiscal 2006 and future
earnings of the consolidated entity.
Because
PoloExpress was a German Partnership, had the tax planning strategy not been
implemented, PoloExpress would have requirements to pay approximately €1.6
million in German trade taxes (effective tax rate of 19%) relating to its
taxable income in fiscal 2006. Accordingly, the Company’s immediate cash flows
benefited from this strategy.
Upon
the
conversion of PoloExpress into a German Corporation, we gave up the right to
€11.0 million of future deductions from a step up in basis in PoloExpress
(amount due to purchase remaining interest in PoloExpress from K. Esser). If
we
sell our interest in PoloExpress through an “asset transaction”, we would be
required to pay taxes at a rate of 40% on the gain recognized, and the step-up
amount given up would be approximately $5.6 million. However, if we sell our
interest in PoloExpress through a “stock transaction”, in accordance with
current German tax law, we only would be required to pay taxes on 5% of the
tax
gain recognized (effective tax rate of 2%), and the step-up amount given up
would be approximately $0.3 million. Should the Company ever decide to sell
PoloExpress, we would seek a stock sale transaction; however, there is no
guarantee that we could find a willing buyer to agree with these terms. In
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, we are
required to establish a tax liability presuming that a future transaction would
occur as an asset sale.
The
restatements for fiscal 2004 and 2005 will not have a negative impact on our
cash flows or financial condition. The net deferred tax liabilities arise from
indefinite life intangible assets which will not result in any cash impact
until
the Company disposes of the intangible assets related to Hein Gericke and
PoloExpress. Guidance provided by Generally Accepted Account Principles in
the
United States requires deferred tax liabilities to be established for book
to
tax differences associated with intangible assets that have indefinite
lives.
We do
not believe these restatements will have a negative impact on our cash flows
or
financial condition. Only if the Company ever sells its interest of PoloExpress
and/or Hein Gericke at a tax gain would we be required to pay taxes. The amount
of taxes we would be required to pay would depend on the type of a transaction
(“asset sale” or “stock sale”) and tax law in Germany at the time such a
transaction occurs, as discussed above.
Basis
for Conclusion to Restate our Financial Statements
We
elected to restate our financial statement for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
primarily because of the size of the adjustment and the fact that the adjustment
changes
a
net income period into a net loss period.
We
elected to restate our financial statements for the years ended September 30,
2004 and 2005, because of the expected magnitude of the adjustment in 2004,
as
compared to our net income.
Timing
on Filing our Annual Report on Form 10-K
Upon
the
adjustment of our financial statements for these matters, as well as any other
potential issues that may arise from additional reviews by us, we will review
our findings with KPMG LLP. Immediately upon the completion of the audit by
KPMG
LLP, we will file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 2006, in which the adjustments for the 2004 and 2005 fiscal years will
be
reflected in the financial statements and the adjustment for the third quarter
ended June 30, 2006, will be reflected in the quarterly footnote. At this time,
we cannot predict when this filing will occur.
SIGNATURES:
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
Dated:
January
16, 2007
By:
/s/
MICHAEL L. McDONALD
Name:
Michael L. McDonald
Title:
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer